Responding to a Complaint: Kansas

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Responding to a Complaint: Kansas"

Transcription

1 View the online version at Responding to a Complaint: Kansas AMY E. MORGAN, POLSINELLI PC, WITH PRACTICAL LAW LITIGATION A Q&A guide to responding to a complaint in a trial court of general jurisdiction in Kansas. This Q&A addresses the time to respond, extending the time to respond, pre-answer motions, answers, replies to the answer, counterclaims, crossclaims, third-party claims (also known as impleader) and defensive interpleader. In Kansas, a complaint is referred to as a petition (see Kan. Stat. Ann (a)). Responding to a petition is generally governed by the Kansas Rules of Civil Procedure and the Kansas Supreme Court Rules. However, each district court may impose additional requirements in its local rules, which are available on the Kansas Judicial Branch website. The Kansas Statutes Annotated establish three classes of civil proceedings: Lawsuits under Chapter 60. Limited actions under Chapter 61. Small claims under Chapter 61. To the extent there are differences in procedure, this Q&A only addresses the treatment of lawsuits under Chapter 60 of the Kansas Statutes Annotated. The petition's case caption should reflect whether the lawsuit is filed under Chapter 60 or whether it is a limited action filed under Chapter 61 (Kan. Stat. Ann (c)). Practitioners should refer to the appropriate statutory sections for limited actions and small claims for rules specific to those lawsuits. OVERVIEW OF RESPONDING TO A STATE COMPLAINT 1. When must a defendant respond to the complaint? In Kansas, a defendant must respond within 21 days after being served with the summons and petition. If the plaintiff served by publication, the defendant must respond within the time fixed in the notice, which must not be less than 41 days from the time the notice is first published. (Kan. Stat. Ann (a)(1)(A).) For those defendants served outside the state, no default may be entered until at least 30 days after service (Kan. Stat. Ann (a)(3)). This provision effectively gives the defendant an additional nine days to protect its interests after the expiration of the 21 days within which a defendant must answer (4 Kan. Law & Prac., Code of Civ. Proc. Anno (a) (5th ed.)). The additional time only applies to service of process outside of Kansas, so a foreign defendant served within Kansas (for example, by a registered agent) has only 21 days to serve its answer. Insurance companies receive service of process through the Kansas Insurance Commissioner and must respond within 40 days of service on the commissioner (Kan. Stat. Ann ). 2. How, if at all, can one obtain an extension of time to respond (for example, by stipulation, so-ordered stipulation, ex parte motion, motion on notice)? A defendant may unilaterally obtain a 14-day Clerk's Extension, which is a one-time, automatic extension from the clerk of the district court. The party seeking the extension must prepare an order for the clerk's signature, and serve copies of the signed order on all other parties. (Kan. Sup. Ct. R. 113.) Any other extension of time to plead must be by court order (Kan. Sup. Ct. R. 113). A party may obtain an order through a motion with notice to the other party. The motion should reflect the position of the other party to the requested extension and if the party agrees to the requested extension, the title of the motion can reflect that it is an "agreed motion." 3. What types of responses are permitted (for example, answer, motion, demurrer, special appearance)? The following types of responses to a petition are permitted: An answer. A motion. (Kan. Stat. Ann (a)(2) and )

2 Demurrers have been abolished in Kansas and the function of a general demurrer is served by a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted (4 Kan. Law & Prac., Code of Civ. Proc. Anno (a) (5th ed.)). The special appearance doctrine has also been made obsolete by Section (h) of the Kansas Statutes Annotated (4 Kan. Law & Prac., Code of Civ. Proc. Anno (a) (5th ed.)). Special appearances are not necessary to avoid submission to jurisdiction (4 Kan. Law & Prac., Code of Civ. Proc. Anno (b) (5th ed.)). PRE-ANSWER RESPONSES 4. If motions, demurrers or the like are permitted: Are there any preliminary requirements (for example, meet and confer with the plaintiff's counsel, have a conference with the court)? What grounds can be asserted (for example, subject matter jurisdiction, personal jurisdiction, failure to state a claim)? Are available grounds that are not asserted waived (either just for pre-answer litigation or for the whole case)? What papers are required (for example, notice of motion, motion, affidavit, memorandum of law)? Can the defendant offer evidence outside the complaint? When and how does the plaintiff respond? Can the defendant reply? If so, when and how? Does the court hear oral argument before deciding? Is discovery stayed until the court decides? If the court does not dismiss the complaint, how much time does the defendant have to serve an answer? A defendant served with a petition may file three types of pre-answer motions: Motion to dismiss. Motion for more definite statement. Motion to strike. Counsel making a motion should always check the local and judge's rules, as they may alter the general requirements discussed below. MOTION TO DISMISS Preliminary Requirements Court Rules specifically contemplates any preliminary requirements to filing a motion to dismiss. Grounds Asserted A defendant may base a pre-answer motion to dismiss on one or more of the following grounds: Lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Lack of personal jurisdiction. Improper venue. Insufficient process. Insufficient service of process. Failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Failure to join a party under Section of the Kansas Statutes Annotated. (Kan. Stat. Ann (b).) A motion asserting any of these defenses must be made before pleading if a responsive pleading is allowed (Kan. Stat. Ann (b)). If the court determines at any time that it lacks subject matter jurisdiction, the court must dismiss the action (Kan. Stat. Ann (h)(3)). Waiver A defendant waives the defenses of lack of personal jurisdiction, improper venue, insufficient process and insufficient service of process by: Omitting an available defense from a motion and attempting to raise it in a later motion. Failing to either: make it by motion under Section of the Kansas Statutes Annotated; or include it in a responsive pleading, or in an amendment allowed by Section (a)(1) of the Kansas Statutes Annotated, as a matter of course. (Kan. Stat. Ann (h)(1).) Required Papers Court Rules specifically contemplates mandatory papers to accompany a motion, other than a memorandum in support. Every written motion must include, either in the motion or in an accompanying memorandum: The reasons for the motion. The authorities, if any, the court should consider in ruling on the motion. (Kan. Sup. Ct. R. 133.) The motion must state with particularity the grounds for seeking the order and state the relief sought (Kan. Stat. Ann (b)). Outside Evidence If the motion to dismiss is based on the grounds of failure to state a claim, and matters outside the pleadings are presented to the court and not excluded, the court must treat the motion as one for summary judgment under Section of the Kansas Statutes Annotated. All parties must receive a reasonable opportunity to present all material pertinent to the motion. (Kan. Stat. Ann (d).) This rule does not apply to motions to dismiss based on other grounds. Response by Plaintiffs The plaintiff may file a memorandum in opposition to a motion stating: The reasons the motion should be denied. The authorities, if any, the court should consider in ruling on the motion. (Kan. Sup. Ct. R. 133(b).) 2

3 The plaintiff generally must file its response either: Not later than seven days after service of the motion. At any other time provided by the court (Kan. Sup. Ct. R. 133(b).) Reply by Defendants Court Rules specifically contemplates a reply in support of a motion to dismiss. However, attorneys typically file a reply brief unless local rules or the court provides otherwise. The defendant should serve its reply either: Not later than seven days after service of the plaintiff's response. Before the hearing on the motion, if the hearing is within seven days after service of the response. Oral Argument A party may request oral argument either in: The motion. A response filed by the adverse party. (Kan. Sup. Ct. R. 133(c)(1).) The court must grant a timely request for oral argument unless it states in the ruling or by separate communication that oral argument would not aid the court materially (Kan. Sup. Ct. R. 133(c)(1)). If no party requests oral argument, the court may either: Set the matter for hearing. Rule on the motion immediately and communicate that ruling to the parties. (Kan. Sup. Ct. R. 133(c)(2).) If a party moves for oral argument on any of the following defenses, the defense must be heard and decided before trial unless the court orders a deferral until trial: Lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Lack of personal jurisdiction. Improper venue. Insufficient process. Insufficient service of process. Failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Failure to join a party. (Kan. Stat. Ann (i).) Stay of Discovery Court Rules specifically contemplates a stay of discovery pending a motion. However, Kansas courts may impose appropriate limits on discovery by limiting the frequency or extent of discovery methods otherwise allowed by the rules of civil procedure (Kan. Stat. Ann (b)(2)). A stay of discovery may be appropriate if the court determines: That a ruling on a motion to dismiss will likely conclude the action. Discovery would not provide any information that could possibly affect the outcome of the ruling on the motion. Filing an Answer or Other Response If the court denies the motion to dismiss or postpones its disposition until trial, the defendant must serve its responsive pleading within 14 days after notice of the court's action (Kan. Stat. Ann (a)(2)(A)). MOTION FOR MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT Preliminary Requirements Court Rules specifically contemplates any preliminary requirements to filing a motion for more definite statement. Grounds Asserted A party may move for a more definite statement if the pleading is so vague or ambiguous that the party cannot reasonably prepare a response. The party must make the motion before filing a responsive pleading and must include: The defects complained of. The details desired. (Kan. Stat. Ann (e).) Waiver A defendant waives the right to file a motion for more definite statement by filing a responsive pleading before making the motion (Kan. Stat. Ann (e)). Required Papers Outside Evidence Kansas law does not expressly preclude a movant from presenting outside evidence in a motion for more definite statement. This type of motion, however, does not generally require outside evidence. Response by Plaintiffs Reply by Defendants Court Rules specifically contemplates a reply in support of a motion for more definite statement. However, attorneys typically file a reply brief unless local rules or the court provides otherwise. The defendant should serve its reply either: Not later than seven days after service of the plaintiff's response. Before the hearing on the motion, if the hearing is within seven days after service of the response. Oral Argument Stay of Discovery Court Rules specifically contemplates a stay of discovery pending a motion. However, Kansas courts may impose appropriate limits on discovery by limiting the frequency or extent of discovery methods otherwise allowed by the rules of civil procedure (Kan. Stat. Ann (b)(2)). 3

4 Filing an Answer or Other Response If the court grants a motion for more definite statement, the defendant must serve its responsive pleading within 14 days after the more definite statement is served (Kan. Stat. Ann (a)(2)(B)). If the court orders a more definite statement and the plaintiff does not comply within 14 days after notice of the order, or within the time the court sets, the court may: Strike the pleading. Issue any other appropriate order. (Kan. Stat. Ann (e)). If the court denies a motion for more definite statement or postpones its disposition until trial, the defendant must serve its responsive pleading within 14 days after notice of the court's action (Kan. Stat. Ann (a)(2)(A)). MOTION TO STRIKE Preliminary Requirements Court Rules specifically contemplates any preliminary requirements to filing a motion to strike. Grounds Asserted A party may move to strike: An insufficient defense. Any matter that is: 4 redundant; immaterial; impertinent; or scandalous. A motion to strike must be made either: Before responding to the pleading. Within 21 days after being served with the pleading, if a response is not allowed. (Kan. Stat. Ann (f).) The court may act on its own or on a motion made by a party (Kan. Stat. Ann (f)). Waiver A defendant waives the right to file a motion to strike by: Filing a responsive pleading before making the motion. Allowing more than 21 days to lapse after service of the pleading, if a response is not allowed. (Kan. Stat. Ann (f).) Required Papers Outside Evidence Kansas law does not expressly preclude a movant from presenting outside evidence in a motion to strike. This type of motion, however, does not generally require outside evidence. Response by Plaintiffs Reply by Defendants Court Rules specifically contemplates a reply in support of a motion to strike. However, attorneys typically file a reply brief unless local rules or the court provides otherwise. The defendant should serve its reply either: Not later than seven days after service of the plaintiff's response. Before the hearing on the motion, if the hearing is within seven days after service of the response. Oral Argument Stay of Discovery Court Rules specifically contemplates a stay of discovery pending a motion. However, Kansas courts may impose appropriate limits on discovery by limiting the frequency or extent of discovery methods otherwise allowed by the rules of civil procedure (Kan. Stat. Ann (b)(2)). Filing an Answer or Other Response If the court denies a motion to strike or postpones its disposition until trial, the defendant must serve its responsive pleading within 14 days after notice of the court's action (Kan. Stat. Ann (a)(2)(A)). ANSWERING THE COMPLAINT 5. What are the required and optional contents of an answer? REQUIRED CONTENTS Caption In Kansas, every pleading must have a caption listing the: Court's name. Title. File number. While the title of the petition must name all the parties, the title of the answer, after naming the first party on each side, may refer generally to the other parties. (Kan. Stat. Ann (a).) Denials or Admissions The answer must respond to each allegation in the petition with one of the following: A denial. Lack of knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief about its truth, which has the effect of a denial. An admission. (Kan. Stat. Ann (b)(1) and (5).) A denial must fairly respond to the substance of the allegation (Kan. Stat. Ann (b)(2)).

5 A party that intends in good faith to deny all the allegations of a pleading, including the jurisdictional grounds, may do so by a general denial. A party that does not intend to deny all the allegations must either specifically deny designated allegations or generally deny all except those specifically admitted. (Kan. Stat. Ann (b)(3).) Section (b) of the Kansas Statutes Annotated is intended to prevent the indiscriminate use of the general denial, particularly in cases where much of the plaintiff's petition is not in controversy. If the defendant's attorney makes a general denial, the denial must be genuine. Otherwise, the defendant must make specific denials of what can justifiably be denied, or else allege lack of knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief. (4 Kan. Law & Prac., Code of Civ. Proc. Anno (5th ed.).) A party that intends in good faith to deny only part of an allegation must admit the part that is true and deny the rest (Kan. Stat. Ann (b)(4)). An allegation is admitted if a responsive pleading is required and the allegation is not denied. The only exception concerns allegations relating to the amount of damages (Kan. Stat. Ann (b)(6)). Defenses Generally In responding to a petition, a party must state in short and plain terms its defenses to each claim asserted against it (Kan. Stat. Ann (b)(1)). A party may set out two or more statements of a defense alternately or hypothetically, either in a single defense or in separate ones. If a party makes alternative statements, the pleading is sufficient if any one of them is sufficient. (Kan. Stat. Ann (d)(2).) A party may state as many separate defenses as it has, regardless of consistency (Kan. Stat. Ann (d)(3)). Affirmative Defenses The answer must contain any affirmative defenses ( com/ ) that the defendant wants to raise (Kan. Stat. Ann (c)). If an affirmative defense is not pled, it is waived (Garden Nat'l Bank v. Cada, 738 P.2d 429, 432 (Kan. 1987)). An affirmative defense must be pled so that it provides an opponent with fair notice of the nature of the defense. A general denial does not provide notice. (In re Estate of Tracy, 140 P.3d 1045, 1048 (Kan. 2006).) Examples of affirmative defenses include: Accord and satisfaction. Arbitration and award. Assumption of risk. Contributory negligence or comparative fault. Duress. Estoppel. Failure of consideration. Fraud. Illegality. Injury by fellow servant. Laches. License. Payment. Release. Res judicata. Statute of frauds. Statute of limitations. Waiver. (Kan. Stat. Ann (c)(1).) It is not necessary to call the defenses "affirmative defenses" or use terms of art such as estoppel or waiver (see Truon State Bank v. Bozarth, 684 P.2d 419, 422 (Kan. 1984)). Each allegation must be simple, concise and direct. No technical form is required. (Kan. Stat. Ann (d)(1).) Each affirmative defense should be in a separately numbered paragraph (Kan. Stat. Ann (b)). An affirmative defense omitted from an initial answer to a petition may, in the court's discretion, be added in an answer to an amended petition (King v. Pimentel, 890 P.2d 1217, (Kan. 1995)). Signature and Attorney Contact Information Every pleading, written motion and other paper must be signed by at least one attorney of record or by a party personally if the party is unrepresented. The court must strike an unsigned paper unless the omission is promptly corrected after being called to the attorney's or party's attention. (Kan. Stat. Ann (a).) Pleadings must contain the filing attorney's: Name. Kansas registration number. Address. Telephone number. Fax number address. (Kan. Stat. Ann (a); Kan. Sup. Ct. R. 111.) Jury Demand A party may demand a jury trial by both: Serving the other parties with a written demand, which may be included in a pleading, no later than 14 days after the last pleading directed to the issue is served. Filing the demand according to Section of the Kansas Statutes Annotated. (Kan. Stat. Ann (b).) If a party wants a jury, however, it is much better practice to endorse the demand on the first pleading filed by the party. The defendant can endorse the demand for a jury on the answer, or can make the demand by separate writing within 14 days after the answer is served. (4 Kan. Law & Prac., Code of Civ. Proc. Anno (5th ed.).) 5

6 In its demand, a party may specify the issues that it wishes to have tried by a jury. Otherwise, the party is considered to have demanded a jury trial on all triable issues. If the party has demanded a jury trial on only some issues, any other party may serve a demand on any other triable issues within either: 14 days after being served with the demand. A shorter time ordered by the court. (Kan. Stat. Ann (c).) A party waives a jury trial unless its demand is properly served and filed, but the court may set aside a waiver: In the interest of justice. When the waiver inadvertently results. (Kan. Stat. Ann (d).) A demand for a jury, once made, cannot be withdrawn without the consent of all the parties involved (Kan. Stat. Ann (d); 4 Kan. Law & Prac., Code of Civ. Proc. Anno (5th ed.).) There is no general statute defining what issues are triable to a jury as a matter of right and which are not (4 Kan. Law & Prac., Code of Civ. Proc. Anno (5th ed.).) Claims for Relief A party may include in its answer counterclaims, crossclaims or third party claims (Kan. Stat. Ann and and see Question 9). Whenever a defense or counterclaim is based on a written instrument, a copy may be attached to the pleading as an exhibit (Kan. Stat. Ann (h)) Under what circumstances, if any, must a defendant verify its response? Unless a rule or statute specifically states otherwise, there is no requirement that a pleading be verified or accompanied by an affidavit or a declaration (Kan. Stat. Ann (a)). Neither the Kansas Rules of Civil Procedure nor the Kansas Supreme Court Rules specifically contemplates verification of a response. AMENDING AN ANSWER 7. Can a defendant amend its answer? If so: When? What grounds, if any, must be shown to justify an amendment? AMENDMENT AS OF RIGHT Time to Amend A defendant in Kansas may amend its answer once, without seeking leave of the plaintiff or the court, within either: 21 days after serving the answer. 21 days after service of a responsive pleading or motion. (Kan. Stat. Ann (a)(1).) Grounds for Amendment There are no grounds required for an amendment as of right. AMENDMENT BY STIPULATION Time to Amend A party may amend its pleading at any time with the opposing party's written consent (Kan. Stat. Ann (a)(2)). Grounds for Amendment The defendant may amend if the opposing party gives written consent. No particular grounds are required. AMENDMENT BY MOTION Time to Amend The court may grant a defendant leave to amend at any time (Kan. Stat. Ann (a)(2)). Grounds for Amendment The court should freely grant leave to amend (Williams v. Amoco Prod. Co., 734 P.2d 1113, 1119 (Kan. 1987); Kan. Stat. Ann (a)(2)). No particular grounds are required. Amendment is not an absolute right, however, and the court has discretion over whether to grant leave (Williams, 734 P.2d at 1119). Leave to amend should be freely given in the absence of any apparent or declared reason, including: Undue delay. Bad faith. Dilatory motive on the part of the movant. Repeated failure to cure deficiencies by amendments previously allowed. Undue prejudice to the opposing party. Futility of the amendment. (Johnson v. Bd. of Pratt Cnty. Comm'rs, 913 P.2d 119, 135 (Kan. 1995).) The Kansas Supreme Court has ruled that it was not an abuse of discretion when, four days before trial and again on the morning of trial, a trial court permitted the defendant to amend its answer to include the affirmative defenses of lack of consideration and misrepresentation (Commercial Credit Corp. v. Harris, 510 P.2d 1322, 1325 (1973)). REPLYING TO AN ANSWER 8. Can a plaintiff serve a reply pleading? If so: When is it due? What grounds, if any, must be shown to justify a reply? What are the optional and required contents? A reply to an answer is normally not allowed. A reply is required only if either: The court orders one. The answer contains a counterclaim. (Kan. Stat. Ann (a).)

7 A reply is not required to an answer that contains an affirmative defense but does not contain a counterclaim (Kan. Stat. Ann (a); 4 Kan. Law & Prac., Code of Civ. Proc. Anno (a) (5th ed.)). TIME TO REPLY A plaintiff must serve a reply to an answer within 21 days after being served with an order to reply, unless the order specifies a different time (Kan. Stat. Ann (a)(1)(C)). GROUNDS FOR REPLY Court Rules specifically contemplates what grounds exist for a reply to an answer. Because a reply is only permissible if ordered by the court, the court presumably will state its grounds upon which the reply is ordered. REPLY CONTENTS Court Rules specifies the contents for a reply to an answer. DEFENDANT'S AFFIRMATIVE CLAIMS 9. Can a defendant assert affirmative claims of its own? If so: What types of claims are available (for example, counterclaims, crossclaims, third-party claims) and what is the basic nature of each (for example, who is a proper defendant to it and what is a proper subject)? Are any claims by a defendant mandatory (for example, compulsory counterclaims, claims covered by an entire controversy rule)? When and how does the defendant assert its claims? When and how do other parties respond to a defendant's claims? AVAILABLE CLAIMS A defendant may assert a counterclaim or crossclaim under Section of the Kansas Statutes Annotated or a third-party petition under Section of the Kansas Statutes Annotated. Counterclaims An answer may state as a counterclaim any claim that the pleader has against an opposing party (Kan. Stat. Ann (a)-(b)). Some counterclaims are compulsory, meaning that the pleader must assert them in its answer or forfeit them (Kan. Stat. Ann (a)(1) and see Mandatory Claims for Defendant). A counterclaim need not diminish or defeat the recovery sought by the opposing party. It may request relief that: Exceeds the amount of relief sought by the opposing party. Differs in kind from the relief sought by the opposing party. (Kan. Stat. Ann (c).) Crossclaims Under Kansas law, the answer may contain crossclaims asserted against a co-party if the claim either: Arises out of the transaction or occurrence that is the subject matter of the original action or of a counterclaim. Relates to any property that is the subject matter of the original action. (Kan. Stat. Ann (g).) The crossclaim may include a claim that the co-party is or may be liable to the defendant for all or part of a claim asserted in the action against the defendant (Kan. Stat. Ann (g)). When a claim is governed by Section a of the Kansas Statutes Annotated relating to comparative negligence, the defendant must state as a crossclaim any claim the defendant has against any coparty, if the claim arises out of the same transaction or occurrence that is the subject matter of the negligence claim (Kan. Stat. Ann (f)). Third-party Petitions A defending party may, as a third-party plaintiff, serve a summons and petition on a nonparty who is or may be liable to the defendant for all or part of the plaintiff's claim against the defendant. The third-party plaintiff must, however, obtain the court's leave if it files the third-party complaint more than 14 days after serving its original answer. (Kan. Stat. Ann ) MANDATORY CLAIMS FOR DEFENDANT Under Kansas law, an answer must state as a counterclaim any claim that, at the time of its service, the pleader has against any opposing party if the claim: Arises out of the same transaction or occurrence. Does not require the presence of third parties over whom the court cannot acquire jurisdiction. (Kan. Stat. Ann (a)(1) and see Counterclaims.) The defendant need not state the claim, however, if, when the action was commenced, either: The claim was the subject of another pending action. The opposing party sued on its claim by attachment or other process that did not establish personal jurisdiction over the defendant on that claim and the defendant does not assert any counterclaim under Section of the Kansas Statutes Annotated. (Kan. Stat. Ann (a)(2).) When a claim is governed by Section a of the Kansas Statutes Annotated relating to comparative negligence, the defendant must state as a crossclaim any claim the defendant has against any co-party, if the claim arises out of the same transaction or occurrence that is the subject matter of the negligence claim (Kan. Stat. Ann (f) and see Crossclaims). WHEN AND HOW CLAIMS ARE ASSERTED Counterclaims, crossclaims and third-party petitions should be asserted in the initial answer or, if the court permits a later amendment, 7

8 in an amended answer. Whether denominated as a counterclaim, crossclaim or third-party petition, any pleading that states a claim for relief must contain: A short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief. A demand for the relief sought, which may include: relief in the alternative; or different types of relief. Except in contract actions, every pleading demanding relief for money damages in excess of $75,000, without demanding a specific amount of money, must state only that the amount sought as damages exceeds $75,000. Every pleading demanding relief for money damages in an amount of $75,000 or less must specify the amount sought as damages. (Kan. Stat. Ann (a).) A party may not plead a claim for punitive damages in a crossclaim, counterclaim or third-party petition unless the court enters an order allowing an amended pleading that includes a claim for punitive damages. To obtain an order of that kind, the party must show that there is a probability that it will prevail on its claim. A party must make this type of motion on or before the date of the final pretrial conference. (Kan. Stat. Ann ) If the court allows an amended pleading to include a claim for exemplary or punitive damages, the amended pleading must state only whether the amount sought as damages is or is not in excess of $75,000 (Kan. Stat. Ann (g)). Counterclaims and crossclaims asserted against existing parties to the lawsuit may be served on the attorney for that party by a service method listed in Section (b) of the Kansas Statutes Annotated. A third-party petition that brings a new party into the case must be formally served according to Sections and of the Kansas Statutes Annotated. The third-party defendant may assert any: Counterclaims against the third-party plaintiff under Section (b) of the Kansas Statutes Annotated. Crossclaims against another third-party defendant under Section (g) of the Kansas Statutes Annotated. Defenses that the third-party plaintiff has to the plaintiff's claim. Claims arising out of the transaction or occurrence that is the subject matter of the plaintiff's claim against the third-party plaintiff. (Kan. Stat. Ann (a)(2)(B).) The method of answering the third-party petition otherwise follows the same guidelines as answering a petition. For more information, see Questions 1 and 5. For the links to the documents referenced in this note, please visit our online version at RELATED CONTENT Topic Commencement and Pleadings General Litigation OTHER PARTIES' RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S CLAIMS Counterclaims and Crossclaims In Kansas, the responsive pleading to a counterclaim is called an "answer," rather than a "reply". A party must serve an answer to a counterclaim or crossclaim within 21 days after being served (Kan. Stat. Ann (a)(1)(B)). The method of answering the counterclaim or crossclaim follows the same guidelines as answering a petition. For more information, see Questions 1 and 5. Third-party Petitions In responding to third-party claims, the third-party defendant must assert any: Defenses against the third-party plaintiff's claim under Section of the Kansas Statutes Annotated. Counterclaims against the third-party plaintiff under Section (a) of the Kansas Statutes Annotated. Crossclaims against another third-party defendant under Section (f) of the Kansas Statutes Annotated. ABOUT PRACTICAL LAW Practical Law provides legal know-how that gives lawyers a better starting point. Our expert team of attorney editors creates and maintains thousands of up-to-date, practical resources across all major practice areas. We go beyond primary law and traditional legal research to give you the resources needed to practice more efficiently, improve client service and add more value. If you are not currently a subscriber, we invite you to take a trial of our online services at practicallaw.com. For more information or to schedule training, call or ustraining@practicallaw.com Use of Practical Law websites and services is subject to the Terms of Use ( and Privacy Policy ( 8

NC General Statutes - Chapter 1A Article 3 1

NC General Statutes - Chapter 1A Article 3 1 Article 3 Pleadings and Motions. Rule 7. Pleadings allowed; motions. (a) Pleadings. - There shall be a complaint and an answer; a reply to a counterclaim denominated as such; an answer to a crossclaim,

More information

Computing and Extending Time; Time. The following rules apply in

Computing and Extending Time; Time. The following rules apply in AMENDMENTS TO THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Rule 6. Computing and Extending Time; Time for Motion Papers (a) Computing Time. The following rules apply in computing any time period specified in these

More information

CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA. ANSWER ) Defendant. ) )

CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA. ANSWER ) Defendant. ) ) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ANS (NAME) (ADDRESS) (CITY, STATE, ZIP) (TELEPHONE) Defendant Pro Se DISTRICT COURT CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA ) ) Case No.: Plaintiff,

More information

HAWAI'I RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE

HAWAI'I RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE HAWAI'I RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE (SCRU-11-0000051) Adopted and Promulgated by the Supreme Court of the State of Hawai'i As amended April 7, 1980 Effective April 7, 1980 With Amendments as Noted The Judiciary

More information

I-2 FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE FOR THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTS

I-2 FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE FOR THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTS INTERNET RESOURCE Time Deadlines Federal Rules of Civil and Criminal Procedure Contents I-1 Introduction I-2 Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for the United States District Courts I-3 Federal Rules of

More information

Justice Court Rules of Civil Procedure: Table of Contents

Justice Court Rules of Civil Procedure: Table of Contents Justice Court Rules of Civil Procedure: Table of Contents Part I: General provisions. Rule 101: Application and interpretation. Rule 102: Duties of a party. Rule 103: Conducting a lawsuit. Part II: The

More information

Civil Suits: The Process

Civil Suits: The Process Jurisdictional Limits The justice courts have exclusive jurisdiction or the authority to hear all civil actions when the amount involved, exclusive of interest, costs and awarded attorney fees when authorized

More information

Case4:12-cv-03288-KAW Document2-1 Filed06/25/12 Page1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND DIVISION

Case4:12-cv-03288-KAW Document2-1 Filed06/25/12 Page1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND DIVISION Case4:12-cv-03288-KAW Document2-1 Filed06/25/12 Page1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND DIVISION STANDING ORDER FOR MAGISTRATE JUDGE KANDIS A. WESTMORE (Revised

More information

Any civil action exempt from arbitration by action of a presiding judge under ORS 36.405.

Any civil action exempt from arbitration by action of a presiding judge under ORS 36.405. CHAPTER 13 Arbitration 13.010 APPLICATION OF CHAPTER (1) This UTCR chapter applies to arbitration under ORS 36.400 to 36.425 and Acts amendatory thereof but, except as therein provided, does not apply

More information

NC General Statutes - Chapter 1A Article 7 1

NC General Statutes - Chapter 1A Article 7 1 Article 7. Judgment. Rule 54. Judgments. (a) Definition. A judgment is either interlocutory or the final determination of the rights of the parties. (b) Judgment upon multiple claims or involving multiple

More information

2014 IL App (1st) 130250-U. No. 1-13-0250 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT

2014 IL App (1st) 130250-U. No. 1-13-0250 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT 2014 IL App (1st) 130250-U FIFTH DIVISION September 12, 2014 No. 1-13-0250 NOTICE: This order was filed under Supreme Court Rule 23 and may not be cited as precedent by any party except in the limited

More information

Personal Injury Litigation

Personal Injury Litigation Personal Injury Litigation The Anatomy of a New York Personal Injury Lawsuit An ebook by Stuart DiMartini, Esq. 1325 Sixth Avenue, 27 th Floor New York, NY 10019 212-5181532 dimartinilaw.com Introduction

More information

Alabama Rules of Civil Procedure III. PLEADINGS AND MOTIONS. Rule 12.

Alabama Rules of Civil Procedure III. PLEADINGS AND MOTIONS. Rule 12. Alabama Rules of Civil Procedure III. PLEADINGS AND MOTIONS Rule 12. Defenses and objections When and how presented By pleading or motion Motion for judgment on the pleadings. (a) When presented. A defendant

More information

NC General Statutes - Chapter 1A 1

NC General Statutes - Chapter 1A 1 Chapter 1A. Rules of Civil Procedure. 1A-1. Rules of Civil Procedure. The Rules of Civil Procedure are as follows: Article 1. Scope of Rules-One Form of Action. Rule 1. Scope of rules. These rules shall

More information

Drafting and Issuing Subpoenas: New Jersey

Drafting and Issuing Subpoenas: New Jersey View the online version at http://us.practicallaw.com/6-569-5426 Drafting and Issuing Subpoenas: New Jersey EZRA ROSENBERG, MICHELLE HART YEARY AND THOMAS J. MILLER, DECHERT LLP, WITH PRACTICAL LAW LITIGATION

More information

Counsel must be fully familiar with the Uniform Civil Rules for the Supreme Court 22 NYCRR Part 202.

Counsel must be fully familiar with the Uniform Civil Rules for the Supreme Court 22 NYCRR Part 202. JUSTICE GERALD E. LOEHR, J.S.C. Rockland County Supreme Court 1 South Main Street New City, New York 10956 Courtroom 1 Tel: (845) 483-8343 Fax: (845) 708-7236 Staff Bruce J. Pearl, Principal Law Secretary

More information

CIVIL APPEALS DOCKETING STATEMENT INSTRUCTIONS

CIVIL APPEALS DOCKETING STATEMENT INSTRUCTIONS IN THE Court of Appeals STATE OF ARIZONA DIVISION ONE CIVIL APPEALS DOCKETING STATEMENT INSTRUCTIONS Arizona Rule of Civil Appellate Procedure 12(e) requires an appellant to file a civil appeals docketing

More information

MOHAVE COUNTY JUSTICE COURT. If you want to file a SMALL CLAIMS ANSWER

MOHAVE COUNTY JUSTICE COURT. If you want to file a SMALL CLAIMS ANSWER MOHAVE COUNTY JUSTICE COURT If you want to file a SMALL CLAIMS ANSWER MOHAVE COUNTY JUSTICE COURT You (the defendant) have TWENTY (20) calendar days to file an answer to the small claims complaint. The

More information

Handling Federal Litigation: Overview Marcellus McRae, Holly B. Biondo and Elizabeth Richardson-Royer, Gibson Dunn & Crutcher LLP

Handling Federal Litigation: Overview Marcellus McRae, Holly B. Biondo and Elizabeth Richardson-Royer, Gibson Dunn & Crutcher LLP Handling Federal Litigation: Overview Marcellus McRae, Holly B. Biondo and Elizabeth Richardson-Royer, Gibson Dunn & Crutcher LLP This Practice Note is published by Practical Law Company on its PLC Law

More information

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2011 HOUSE DRH11149-TG-5 (12/01) Short Title: Tort Reform Act of 2011. (Public)

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2011 HOUSE DRH11149-TG-5 (12/01) Short Title: Tort Reform Act of 2011. (Public) H GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION HOUSE DRH-TG- (/01) D Short Title: Tort Reform Act of. (Public) Sponsors: Referred to: Representatives Blust and Daughtry (Primary Sponsors). 1 A BILL TO BE

More information

Case 2:10-cv-02263-JAR Document 98 Filed 05/04/11 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

Case 2:10-cv-02263-JAR Document 98 Filed 05/04/11 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS Case 2:10-cv-02263-JAR Document 98 Filed 05/04/11 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS SANDRA H. DEYA and EDWIN DEYA, individually and as next friends and natural

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM IN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM RE: ) Supreme Court Case No. PRM 06-006 ) ) QMENDING PROMULGATION ORDER ) PROMULGATION ORDER NO. YO. 06-006-02 ON THE LOCAL RULES 06-006-10 DF THE SUPERIOR COURT OF GUAM )

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION EEOC versus BROWN & GROUP RETAIL, INC. CIVIL ACTION NO. H-06-3074 Memorandum and Order Regarding Discovery Motions,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA * * * ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA * * * ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case :-cv-000-pmp-pal Document Filed 0// Page of 0 DAVID LAWRENCE WILSON, v. WALMART, et al., Plaintiff, Defendants. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA * * * :-cv-000-pmp-pal ORDER Presently

More information

CIVIL TRIAL RULES. of the COURTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, TEXAS. Table of Contents GENERAL MATTERS. Rule 1.10 Time Standards for the Disposition of Cases...

CIVIL TRIAL RULES. of the COURTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, TEXAS. Table of Contents GENERAL MATTERS. Rule 1.10 Time Standards for the Disposition of Cases... CIVIL TRIAL RULES of the COURTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, TEXAS Table of Contents GENERAL MATTERS Addendum to Local Rules Rule 1.10 Time Standards for the Disposition of Cases...2 Rule 1.11 Annual Calendar...3

More information

HOW TO FILE AN ANSWER

HOW TO FILE AN ANSWER PRO SE OFFICE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DANIEL PATRICK MOYNIHAN UNITED STATES COURTHOUSE 500 PEARL STREET, ROOM 230 NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10007 Ruby J. Krajick CLERK OF COURT HOW TO FILE AN ANSWER An answer

More information

RULE 1. ASSIGNMENT OF CASES

RULE 1. ASSIGNMENT OF CASES LOCAL RULES FOR FOURTH CIRCUIT COURT DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI [Renumbered and codified by order of the Supreme Court effective May 18, 2006; amended effective April 23, 2009.] RULE 1. ASSIGNMENT OF CASES

More information

RULES OF THE TAX APPEAL COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I

RULES OF THE TAX APPEAL COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I RULES OF THE TAX APPEAL COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I (SCRU-13-0005988) Adopted and Promulgated by the Supreme Court of the State of Hawai i As amended March 6, 1981 Effective March 6, 1981 With Further

More information

Schedule of Forms SCHEDULE OF FORMS 3. Nil

Schedule of Forms SCHEDULE OF FORMS 3. Nil Queen s Bench Forms SCHEDULE OF FORMS 3 Schedule of Forms FORMS FOR PART 1 [Foundational Rules] Form R Nil rule No. Form No. Source FORMS FOR PART 2 [Parties to Litigation] Form R rule No. Form No. Source

More information

All About Motions To Dismiss

All About Motions To Dismiss All About Motions To Dismiss Edna Sussman Motions to dismiss can be big winners or big losers. IT CAN BE one of the most satisfying experiences for a litigator. You pinpointed the fatal flaw in your opponent

More information

JUDICIAL BRANCH MEMORANDUM. Re: New Hampshire Superior Court Civil Rules Effective October 1, 2013

JUDICIAL BRANCH MEMORANDUM. Re: New Hampshire Superior Court Civil Rules Effective October 1, 2013 JUDICIAL BRANCH MEMORANDUM To: Attorneys; Legal Assistants; Litigants From: Patricia A. Lenz, Superior Court Administrator Julie W. Howard, Strafford Superior Court Clerk Date: Updated December 16, 2013

More information

Supreme Court Rule 201. General Discovery Provisions. (a) Discovery Methods.

Supreme Court Rule 201. General Discovery Provisions. (a) Discovery Methods. Supreme Court Rule 201. General Discovery Provisions (a) Discovery Methods. Information is obtainable as provided in these rules through any of the following discovery methods: depositions upon oral examination

More information

Dos and Don ts of Summary Judgment Practice

Dos and Don ts of Summary Judgment Practice Dos and Don ts of Summary Judgment Practice DBA Presents 13 Building Blocks Title Here for Becoming a Great Trial Lawyer Why on earth?! But I m a trial lawyer! Why in the world would I need to know anything

More information

Commencing an Action: Texas

Commencing an Action: Texas View the online version at http://us.practicallaw.com/w-000-2524 Commencing an Action: Texas STEVEN WEISBURD, AMY RUDD AND LINDSEY COHAN, DECHERT, WITH PRACTICAL LAW LITIGATION A Q&A guide to commencing

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND JOAN FALLOWS KLUGE, Plaintiff, v. Civil No. L-10-00022 LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA Defendant. MEMORANDUM Plaintiff, Joan Fallows

More information

SMALL CLAIMS RULES. (d) Record of Proceedings. A record shall be made of all small claims court proceedings.

SMALL CLAIMS RULES. (d) Record of Proceedings. A record shall be made of all small claims court proceedings. SMALL CLAIMS RULES Rule 501. Scope and Purpose (a) How Known and Cited. These rules for the small claims division for the county court are additions to C.R.C.P. and shall be known and cited as the Colorado

More information

IN COURT OF APPEALS. DECISION DATED AND FILED December 9, 2004. Appeal No. 04-2182-FT DISTRICT IV ATLANTA CASUALTY COMPANIES, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

IN COURT OF APPEALS. DECISION DATED AND FILED December 9, 2004. Appeal No. 04-2182-FT DISTRICT IV ATLANTA CASUALTY COMPANIES, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 9, 2004 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of Appeals NOTICE This opinion is subject to further editing. If published, the official version will appear

More information

WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE, INC. CHRISTOPHER E. SPAULDING et al. [ 1] Christopher E. and Lorraine M. Spaulding appeal from a judgment

WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE, INC. CHRISTOPHER E. SPAULDING et al. [ 1] Christopher E. and Lorraine M. Spaulding appeal from a judgment MAINE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT Decision: 2007 ME 116 Docket: Cum-06-737 Submitted On Briefs: June 13, 2007 Decided: August 16, 2007 Reporter of Decisions Panel: SAUFLEY, C.J., and CLIFFORD, ALEXANDER, CALKINS,

More information

2013 Amendments to Local Rules and Invitation to Comment

2013 Amendments to Local Rules and Invitation to Comment 2013 Amendments to Local Rules and Invitation to Comment D.C.COLO.LCivR 1.1 D.C.COLO.LCivR 1.2 D.C.COLO.LCivR 3.1 D.C.COLO.LCivR 3.2 D.C.COLO.LCivR 3.3 D.C.COLO.LCivR 5.1 D.C.COLO.LCivR 5.2 D.C.COLO.LCivR

More information

CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA. ) ) Case No.: Plaintiff, ) Dept. No.: ) vs. ) )

CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA. ) ) Case No.: Plaintiff, ) Dept. No.: ) vs. ) ) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ANS (NAME) (ADDRESS) (CITY, STATE, ZIP) (TELEPHONE) Defendant Pro Se JUSTICE COURT CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA ) ) Case No.: Plaintiff,

More information

Case 2:11-cv-03070-WHW -MCA Document 17 Filed 09/26/11 Page 1 of 6 PageID: 199 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Case 2:11-cv-03070-WHW -MCA Document 17 Filed 09/26/11 Page 1 of 6 PageID: 199 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY Case 211-cv-03070-WHW -MCA Document 17 Filed 09/26/11 Page 1 of 6 PageID 199 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY KERRY FEDER, on behalf of herself and the putative class, Plaintiffs, WILLIAMS-SONOMA

More information

to add a number of affirmative defenses, including an allegation that Henry s claim was barred

to add a number of affirmative defenses, including an allegation that Henry s claim was barred REVERSE and REMAND; and Opinion Filed May 11, 2015. S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-14-00616-CV DOROTHY HENRY, Appellant V. BASSAM ZAHRA, Appellee On Appeal from the

More information

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF ALASKA THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT AT ANCHORAGE

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF ALASKA THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT AT ANCHORAGE IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF ALASKA THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT AT ANCHORAGE In the Matter of a ) Uniform Pretrial Order ) ) Administrative Order 3AO-03-04 (Amended) UNIFORM PRETRIAL ORDER In order

More information

HEARING EXAMINER RULES FOR WHISTLEBLOWER RETALIATION CASES

HEARING EXAMINER RULES FOR WHISTLEBLOWER RETALIATION CASES City of Seattle OFFICE OF HEARING EXAMINER HEARING EXAMINER RULES FOR WHISTLEBLOWER RETALIATION CASES Adopted May 8, 2014 Office of Hearing Examiner 700 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4000 Mailing: PO Box 94729 Seattle,

More information

Consensus of Judges on Multnomah County Court Foreclosure Panel

Consensus of Judges on Multnomah County Court Foreclosure Panel Consensus of Judges on Multnomah County Court Foreclosure Panel The judges who serve on the Multnomah County Court s Foreclosure Panel have been presented with the following recurring issues, which over

More information

ILLINOIS OFFICIAL REPORTS

ILLINOIS OFFICIAL REPORTS ILLINOIS OFFICIAL REPORTS Appellate Court Hart v. Kieu Le, 2013 IL App (2d) 121380 Appellate Court Caption LYNETTE Y. HART, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LOAN KIEU LE, Defendant-Appellee. District & No. Second

More information

Alabama Rules of Civil Procedure VIII. PROVISIONAL AND FINAL REMEDIES AND SPECIAL PROCEEDINGS. Rule 65. Injunctions.

Alabama Rules of Civil Procedure VIII. PROVISIONAL AND FINAL REMEDIES AND SPECIAL PROCEEDINGS. Rule 65. Injunctions. Alabama Rules of Civil Procedure VIII. PROVISIONAL AND FINAL REMEDIES AND SPECIAL PROCEEDINGS (a) Preliminary Injunction. Rule 65. Injunctions. (1) NOTICE. No preliminary injunction shall be issued without

More information

Frequently Asked Questions Foreclosure

Frequently Asked Questions Foreclosure Frequently Asked Questions Foreclosure What is a Foreclosure? How Can I Avoid A Foreclosure Once a Complaint Has Been Filed Against Me? Where is a Foreclosure Complaint Filed? What Should You Do if Served

More information

Information or instructions: Defendant s Cross-claims and counterclaims PREVIEW

Information or instructions: Defendant s Cross-claims and counterclaims PREVIEW Information or instructions: Defendant s Cross-claims and counterclaims 1. The purpose of counterclaims and cross-actions is to join persons and actions, as permitted by TRCP 39, 40, 41, 49, 50, and 51,

More information

New York Civil Practice

New York Civil Practice New York Civil Practice Test Bank Jeffrey A. Helewitz, JD., LLM, MBA ISBN: 0-929563-58-1 This Test Bank is designed to provide the instructor with questions and answers that may be used to test students

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA MEMORANDUM. Ludwig. J. July 9, 2010

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA MEMORANDUM. Ludwig. J. July 9, 2010 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA KATHLEEN M. KELLY : CIVIL ACTION : v. : : No. 09-1641 NATIONAL LIABILITY & FIRE : INSURANCE COMPANY : MEMORANDUM Ludwig. J.

More information

Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint

Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint Case 3:11-cv-00005-JPB Document 23 Filed 08/15/11 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 126 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA AT MARTINSBURG West Virginia Citizens Defense

More information

STEPHEN S. EDWARDS, individually and as Trustee of the Super Trust Fund, u/t/d June 15, 2001, Plaintiff/Appellant,

STEPHEN S. EDWARDS, individually and as Trustee of the Super Trust Fund, u/t/d June 15, 2001, Plaintiff/Appellant, NOTICE: NOT FOR PUBLICATION. UNDER ARIZ. R. SUP. CT. 111(c), THIS DECISION DOES NOT CREATE LEGAL PRECEDENT AND MAY NOT BE CITED EXCEPT AS AUTHORIZED. IN THE ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION ONE STEPHEN

More information

NC General Statutes - Chapter 7A Article 19 1

NC General Statutes - Chapter 7A Article 19 1 Article 19. Small Claim Actions in District Court. 7A-210. Small claim action defined. For purposes of this Article a small claim action is a civil action wherein: (1) The amount in controversy, computed

More information

No. 2007-310-Appeal. (PC 06-3123) Present: Goldberg, Acting C.J., Flaherty, Suttell, Robinson, JJ., and Williams, C.J. (ret.).

No. 2007-310-Appeal. (PC 06-3123) Present: Goldberg, Acting C.J., Flaherty, Suttell, Robinson, JJ., and Williams, C.J. (ret.). Supreme Court No. 2007-310-Appeal. (PC 06-3123) Cathy Lee Barrette : v. : Vincent John Yakavonis, M.D. : Present: Goldberg, Acting C.J., Flaherty, Suttell, Robinson, JJ., and Williams, C.J. (ret.). O P

More information

How to Litigate a Writ of Mandate Case

How to Litigate a Writ of Mandate Case How to Litigate a Writ of Mandate Case Manuela Albuquerque, Esq. Thomas B. Brown, Esq. Burke, Williams & Sorensen, LLP League of California Cities City Attorneys Conference May 4-7, 2011 Yosemite Introduction

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION SEVEN B255326

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION SEVEN B255326 Filed 1/21/15 Century Quality Management v. JMS Air Conditioning etc. CA2/7 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing

More information

STATE OF MICHIGAN MACOMB COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT. Case No. 2012-4691-CH OPINION AND ORDER

STATE OF MICHIGAN MACOMB COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT. Case No. 2012-4691-CH OPINION AND ORDER STATE OF MICHIGAN MACOMB COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT JOHN E. BUTERBAUGH and CARRIE BUTERBAUGH, Plaintiffs, vs. Case No. 2012-4691-CH SELENE FINANCIAL, LP, JPMORGAN MORTGAGE ACQUISITION CORP., AS TRUSTEE FOR THE

More information

A Practical Summary of the New Supreme Court Civil Rules for Clark Wilson LLP Insurance Clients

A Practical Summary of the New Supreme Court Civil Rules for Clark Wilson LLP Insurance Clients A Practical Summary of the New Supreme Court Civil Rules for Clark Wilson LLP Insurance Clients by: Jennifer Loeb Clark Wilson LLP tel. 604.891.7766 jrl@cwilson.com Edited by: Larry Munn Clark Wilson LLP

More information

ASSEMBLY BILL No. 597

ASSEMBLY BILL No. 597 AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY APRIL 14, 2015 california legislature 2015 16 regular session ASSEMBLY BILL No. 597 Introduced by Assembly Member Cooley February 24, 2015 An act to amend Sections 36 and 877 of, and

More information

In force as of 15 March 2005 based on decision by the President of NIB ARBITRATION REGULATIONS

In force as of 15 March 2005 based on decision by the President of NIB ARBITRATION REGULATIONS In force as of 15 March 2005 based on decision by the President of NIB ARBITRATION REGULATIONS Contents I. SCOPE OF APPLICATION... 4 1 Purpose of these Regulations... 4 2 Applicability to different staff

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE Filed 9/19/13 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE LAS VEGAS LAND AND DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants,

More information

Case: 4:13-cv-02652-SL Doc #: 32 Filed: 09/02/14 1 of 10. PageID #: <pageid> UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Case: 4:13-cv-02652-SL Doc #: 32 Filed: 09/02/14 1 of 10. PageID #: <pageid> UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION Case: 4:13-cv-02652-SL Doc #: 32 Filed: 09/02/14 1 of 10. PageID #: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION JERRY P. TAMARKIN, et al., ) CASE NO. 4:13cv2652 ) )

More information

Case 2:11-cv-02555-RDR-KGS Document 90 Filed 04/16/12 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS.

Case 2:11-cv-02555-RDR-KGS Document 90 Filed 04/16/12 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS. Case 2:11-cv-02555-RDR-KGS Document 90 Filed 04/16/12 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS PAULA M. MARS Executor of the estate of Mindy Knopf, Plaintiff, v. Case

More information

RULE 42 EVIDENCE AND PROCEDURE AT TRIAL

RULE 42 EVIDENCE AND PROCEDURE AT TRIAL RULE 42 EVIDENCE AND PROCEDURE AT TRIAL Application (1) This rule does not apply to summary trials under Rule 19, except as provided in that rule. Witness to testify orally (2) Subject to any Act, statute

More information

jurisdiction is DENIED and plaintiff s motion for leave to amend is DENIED. BACKGROUND

jurisdiction is DENIED and plaintiff s motion for leave to amend is DENIED. BACKGROUND IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 1 1 1 1 1 TRICIA LECKLER, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated v. Plaintiffs, CASHCALL, INC., Defendant. /

More information

How To File An Appeal In The United States

How To File An Appeal In The United States CHAPTER 7. APPELLATE RULES MICHIGAN COURT RULES OF 1985 Subchapter 7.100 Appeals to Circuit Court Rule 7.101 Scope of Rules (A) Scope of Rules. The rules in this subchapter govern appeals to the circuit

More information

ASSEMBLY BILL No. 597

ASSEMBLY BILL No. 597 california legislature 2015 16 regular session ASSEMBLY BILL No. 597 Introduced by Assembly Member Cooley February 24, 2015 An act to amend Sections 36 and 877 of, and to add Chapter 6 (commencing with

More information

Compulsory Arbitration

Compulsory Arbitration Local Rule 1301 Scope. Compulsory Arbitration Local Rule 1301 Scope. (1) The following civil actions shall first be submitted to and heard by a Board of Arbitrators: (a) (b) (c) (d) Civil actions, proceedings

More information

Chapter 153. Violations and Fines 2013 EDITION. Related Laws Page 571 (2013 Edition)

Chapter 153. Violations and Fines 2013 EDITION. Related Laws Page 571 (2013 Edition) Chapter 153 2013 EDITION Violations and Fines VIOLATIONS (Generally) 153.005 Definitions 153.008 Violations described 153.012 Violation categories 153.015 Unclassified and specific fine violations 153.018

More information

CASE 0:13-cv-01943-DSD-JSM Document 71 Filed 08/18/14 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA 13-1943(DSD/JSM)

CASE 0:13-cv-01943-DSD-JSM Document 71 Filed 08/18/14 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA 13-1943(DSD/JSM) CASE 0:13-cv-01943-DSD-JSM Document 71 Filed 08/18/14 Page 1 of 10 Angela N. Ikeri and Augustine C. Onuoha, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA 13-1943(DSD/JSM) Plaintiffs, v. ORDER Sallie

More information

INFORMATION FOR FILING AND DEFENDING A CIVIL CASE IN JUSTICE COURT

INFORMATION FOR FILING AND DEFENDING A CIVIL CASE IN JUSTICE COURT PINAL COUNTY Apache Junction Justice Court Eloy Justice Court Superior/Kearny Justice Court Maricopa/Stanfield Justice Court JUSTICE COURTS Casa Grande Justice Court Florence/Coolidge Justice Court Mammoth/San

More information

accounting, s. 122 addition, deletion, substitution of parties, 26.02 failure to serve affidavit of documents,

accounting, s. 122 addition, deletion, substitution of parties, 26.02 failure to serve affidavit of documents, All references in this Index are to the Rules of Civil Procedure and Forms, unless preceded by s. which indicates sections of the Courts of Justice Act. indicates sections of the text. ABANDONMENT. See

More information

Case 3:09-cv-01222-MMH-JRK Document 33 Filed 08/10/10 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JACKSONVILLE DIVISION

Case 3:09-cv-01222-MMH-JRK Document 33 Filed 08/10/10 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JACKSONVILLE DIVISION Case 3:09-cv-01222-MMH-JRK Document 33 Filed 08/10/10 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JACKSONVILLE DIVISION PHL VARIABLE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, vs. Case No. 3:09-cv-1222-J-34JRK

More information

Illinois Official Reports

Illinois Official Reports Illinois Official Reports Appellate Court CitiMortgage, Inc. v. Bukowski, 2015 IL App (1st) 140780 Appellate Court Caption CITIMORTGAGE, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ANNA BUKOWSKI and KATHERINE D. BUKOWSKI,

More information

2015 IL App (1st) 141985-U. No. 1-14-1985 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT

2015 IL App (1st) 141985-U. No. 1-14-1985 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT 2015 IL App (1st) 141985-U No. 1-14-1985 NOTICE: This order was filed under Supreme Court Rule 23 and may not be cited as precedent by any party except in the limited circumstances allowed under Rule 23(e)(1).

More information

MAINE REVENUE SERVICES PROPERTY TAX DIVISION PROPERTY TAX BULLETIN NO. 10

MAINE REVENUE SERVICES PROPERTY TAX DIVISION PROPERTY TAX BULLETIN NO. 10 MAINE REVENUE SERVICES PROPERTY TAX DIVISION PROPERTY TAX BULLETIN NO. 10 PROPERTY TAX ABATEMENT AND APPEALS PROCEDURES REFERENCE: Title 36 MRSA, Sections 583, 706, 841-849 and 1118 Issued July 2010; Replaces

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS Misc. Docket No. 93-0141L APPROVAL OF LOCAL RULES OF CIVIL TRIAL OF THE 241ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF SMITH COUNTY ORDERED: Pursuant to Rule 3a of the Texas Rules of Civil

More information

Case 1:10-cv-10170-NMG Document 38 Filed 06/15/11 Page 1 of 9. United States District Court District of Massachusetts MEMORANDUM & ORDER

Case 1:10-cv-10170-NMG Document 38 Filed 06/15/11 Page 1 of 9. United States District Court District of Massachusetts MEMORANDUM & ORDER Case 1:10-cv-10170-NMG Document 38 Filed 06/15/11 Page 1 of 9 WESTERN WORLD INSURANCE COMPANY, INC., Plaintiff, v. JAMES CZECH and WILLIAMS BUILDING COMPANY, INC., Defendants. United States District Court

More information

Prepared by: Hon. Duncan W. Keir, Judge U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Maryland. and. Richard L. Wasserman, Esq.

Prepared by: Hon. Duncan W. Keir, Judge U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Maryland. and. Richard L. Wasserman, Esq. Memorandum Summarizing Procedures With Respect To Removal Of Bankruptcy-Related State Court Actions To The United States District Court And United States Bankruptcy Court In Maryland Prepared by: Hon.

More information

F First Judicial District of Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County Trial Division Civil CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

F First Judicial District of Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County Trial Division Civil CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE F First Judicial District of Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County Trial Division Civil CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE ADVICE TO COUNSEL 1. Be sure to fully complete the Case Management

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS M.R. 3140 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS Order entered February 16, 2011. (Deleted material is struck through and new material is underscored.) Effective immediately, Supreme Court Rules

More information

ESTATE OF JOHN JENNINGS. WILLIAM CUMMING et al. entered in the Superior Court (Waldo County, R. Murray, J.) finding George liable

ESTATE OF JOHN JENNINGS. WILLIAM CUMMING et al. entered in the Superior Court (Waldo County, R. Murray, J.) finding George liable MAINE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT Decision: 2013 ME 103 Docket: Wal-13-175 Argued: October 7, 2013 Decided: November 26, 2013 Reporter of Decisions Panel: SAUFLEY, C.J., and ALEXANDER, LEVY, SILVER, MEAD, GORMAN

More information

Financial Pacific Leasing, LLC v Bloch Group, LLC 2014 NY Slip Op 30891(U) April 4, 2014 Sup Ct, New York County Docket Number: 652595/13 Judge:

Financial Pacific Leasing, LLC v Bloch Group, LLC 2014 NY Slip Op 30891(U) April 4, 2014 Sup Ct, New York County Docket Number: 652595/13 Judge: Financial Pacific Leasing, LLC v Bloch Group, LLC 2014 NY Slip Op 30891(U) April 4, 2014 Sup Ct, New York County Docket Number: 652595/13 Judge: Cynthia S. Kern Cases posted with a "30000" identifier,

More information

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-13-00125-CV CHRISTOPHER EDOMWANDE APPELLANT V. JULIO GAZA & SANDRA F. GAZA APPELLEES ---------- FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF TARRANT COUNTY

More information

2015 IL App (5th) 140554-U NO. 5-14-0554 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIFTH DISTRICT

2015 IL App (5th) 140554-U NO. 5-14-0554 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIFTH DISTRICT NOTICE Decision filed 08/13/15. The text of this decision may be changed or corrected prior to the filing of a Petition for Rehearing or the disposition of the same. 2015 IL App (5th 140554-U NO. 5-14-0554

More information

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE Filed 5/28/15 Lopez v. Fishel Co. CA4/3 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified

More information

The Enforceability of Mediated Settlement Agreements. By: Thomas J. Smith The Law Offices of Thomas J. Smith San Antonio, Texas

The Enforceability of Mediated Settlement Agreements. By: Thomas J. Smith The Law Offices of Thomas J. Smith San Antonio, Texas The Enforceability of Mediated Settlement Agreements By: Thomas J. Smith The Law Offices of Thomas J. Smith San Antonio, Texas NIGHTMARE ON MEDIATION STREET You mediate a case where the Plaintiff is suing

More information

The Truth About CPLR Article 16

The Truth About CPLR Article 16 The DelliCarpini Law Firm Melville Law Center 877.917.9560 225 Old Country Road fax 631.923.1079 Melville, NY 11747 www.dellicarpinilaw.com John M. DelliCarpini Christopher J. DelliCarpini (admitted in

More information

File a Written Response with the Court Answering Your Summons and Complaint

File a Written Response with the Court Answering Your Summons and Complaint Sacramento County Public Law Library & Civil Self Help Center 609 9 th Street Sacramento, CA 95814 (916) 874-6012 www.saclaw.org RESPONDING TO A LAWSUIT File a Written Response with the Court Answering

More information

Illinois Civil Practice Guide

Illinois Civil Practice Guide Practice Series Illinois Civil Practice Guide Andrew W. Vail Colleen G. DeRosa 2012 Jenner & Block LLP All Rights Reserved ABOUT JENNER & BLOCK www.jenner.com Founded in 1914, Jenner & Block is a national

More information

Real Estate Leasing: Kansas

Real Estate Leasing: Kansas View the online version at http://us.practicallaw.com/w-000-3667 Real Estate Leasing: Kansas BROOK M. BAILEY, POLSINELLI PC, WITH PRACTICAL LAW REAL ESTATE A Q&A guide to commercial real estate leasing

More information

VII. JUDGMENT RULE 54. JUDGMENTS; COSTS

VII. JUDGMENT RULE 54. JUDGMENTS; COSTS VII. JUDGMENT RULE 54. JUDGMENTS; COSTS (a) Definition; Form. Judgment as used in these rules includes a decree and any order from which an appeal lies. A judgment shall not contain a recital of pleadings

More information

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions. hb0087-00

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions. hb0087-00 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 A bill to be entitled An act relating to mortgage foreclosures; amending s. 95.11, F.S.; revising the limitations period for commencing

More information

Original FAQ Prepared July 30, 2013

Original FAQ Prepared July 30, 2013 2013-2014 COURT COSTS AND FEES - FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS Original FAQ Prepared July 30, 2013 Note: All of the answers to the following frequently asked questions (FAQ) reflect the interpretation of

More information

Dear Lead Judge Mitchell:

Dear Lead Judge Mitchell: VIA EMAIL: trialrules2015@uspto.gov Hon. Susan Mitchell Lead Judge, Patent Trial Proposed Rules Mail Stop Patent Board Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office P.O. Box 1450 Alexandria,

More information

TEXAS RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE

TEXAS RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE The Supreme Court must adopt rules by May 1, 2013 for Justice Court, as provided by HB 79. This set of proposed rules was submitted March 30, 2012 by a special Task Force to the Supreme Court Rules Committee,

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION EIGHT

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION EIGHT Filed 2/11/15 Estate of Thomson CA2/8 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified

More information

Motions After Judgment in Illinois and Federal Jury Trial Practice

Motions After Judgment in Illinois and Federal Jury Trial Practice By Judge Raymond W. Mitchell and Mary Patricia Benz Appellate Practice in Illinois Motions After Judgment in Illinois and Federal Jury Trial Practice 30 Post-trial (or postjudgment) motions are an important

More information