MAJOR FIELD TESTS Description of Test Reports


 Daniel McDowell
 1 years ago
 Views:
Transcription
1 MAJOR FIELD TESTS Description of Test Reports NOTE: Some of the tests do not include Assessment Indicators and some tests do not include Subscores. Departmental Roster Includes scale scores for all students tested, listed alphabetically by last name. Total scores are reported on a scale of ; subscores (if the test has subscores) are reported on a scale of For the MBA total scores are reported on a scale of Departmental Summary: Total Test and Subscores Includes frequency distributions for total scores and subscores (if the test has subscores) showing the percent of examinees scoring below each decile. The departmental mean scale score and standard deviation are also shown. A Departmental Summary does not include data from answer sheets on which fewer than 50% of the questions on one or both parts of the test are unanswered. Extremely small groups cannot yield meaningful data; therefore, the Departmental Summary Report requires a minimum of five answer sheets. Departmental Summary: Group Assessment Indicators Lists the mean (average) percent correct score and standard error of measurement for the group as a whole on each assessment indicator in the test. A graphic representation of each score relative to the possible range of scores on the test, with an error band of plus or minus two standard errors of measurement around the mean, is also provided. Assessment indicators are not reported for individual students. Extremely small groups cannot yield meaningful data; therefore, the Assessment Indicator report requires a minimum of five answer sheets. Departmental Demographic Summary Student demographic information taken from the answer sheets is summarized for the group as a whole. Additional Questions (Locally Written) Summary If locally written questions were used, a summary for the group as a whole is provided showing the number and percent responding to each option choice to each question. Responses are not reported for individual students. Individual Student Reports Includes total score and subscores (if the test contains subscores) for each student tested. A band of plus or minus two standard errors of measurement around the score is provided along with interpretive information. Subgroup Reports (roster and summary reports listed above for each subgroup, if requested)
2 GUIDE TO MFT COMPARATIVE DATA Background and Development The Major Field Tests are objective, endofprogram tests in many major disciplines. From their introduction in 1989, each of the tests is periodically reviewed for currency and each is completely revised at least once every five years. A note about the naming of the tests: during the first revisions of each original test, the Roman numeral II was added to the name distinguishes the new form from its predecessor. Beginning in 2000, that practice was discontinued. The name of the major field and the ETS "Form Code" of the test (printed on every test book) is now used to identify the tests. Scores on these tests provide useful information for institutions seeking outcomes measures for selfstudy and for faculty in measuring the progress of their students and evaluating their curriculum. The Major Field Tests provide reliable data for individual and group measurement by assessing student learning in major fields of study. The Undergraduate Major Field Tests Biology Criminal Justice Literature in English Political Science Business Economics Mathematics Psychology Chemistry Education Music Theory and History Sociology Computer Science History Physics The Graduate Major Field Test Masters of Business Administration Test Content The content specifications for the Major Field Tests reflect the basic knowledge and understanding gained in the curriculum. They have been designed to assess the mastery of concepts, principles, and knowledge expected of students at the conclusion of a major in specific subject areas. In addition to factual knowledge, the tests evaluate students' abilities to analyze and solve problems, understand relationships, and interpret material. They contain questions that call for information as well as questions that require interpretation of graphs, diagrams, and charts based on material related to the field. Go to for a brief outline of each test, showing the specific questions that contribute to each of the subscores and/or assessment indicators.
3 Test Construction The Major Field Tests are constructed according to specifications developed and reviewed by committees of experts in each subject area. Selected experts in appropriate ETS subject matter areas review the specifications, each question, and the completed tests before the tests are made available for use. The test development process includes an extensive review of each test question to eliminate language, symbols, or content considered to be potentially offensive, inappropriate for any subgroups of the testtaking population, or serving to perpetuate any negative attitudes that may be conveyed to these subgroups. After a new form of a test is introduced, and before score reports are released, each test undergoes a rigorous statistical analysis to see whether each question yields the expected result. Such an appraisal sometimes reveals that a question is not satisfactory. A question that proves to be ambiguous or otherwise unsuitable is not used in computing scores. Statistical properties of each question, such as difficulty level and correlation with the total score, are on record or are computed when new or revised test forms are first administered, to help ensure that each question contributes meaningfully to the test results. For each test, the aim is to provide an instrument that measures the subject matter and skills a student should gain from his or her major area of study. Scores Three types of scores are provided for the Major Field Tests: Individually Reliable Total Scores Each test yields an individually reliable total score for each student. An individually reliable score is one with statistical properties such that decisions about individual students can be made based on the scores. The length of the test and content coverage are factors in determining score reliability. Total scores are reported on a scale of for the undergraduate titles, and for the graduate titles. Individually Reliable Subscores * In addition to the total score, subscores represent achievement in broad areas within the field reflecting students strengths or weaknesses by area within their major. Subscores are reported on a scale of Group Reliable Scores * Assessment Indicator scores result from clustering test questions that pertain to a subfield within a major field of study. Assessment indicator scores are reported as mean (average) percent correct for a given group of students. By obtaining data on the performance of total groups of students, it is possible to report group scores by means of the reduced number of questions that constitute the assessment indicators. However, a minimum of five students is required for any test in order for assessment indicators to be reported. Assessment indicator scores cannot be reported for individual students. The assessment indicator approach to academic outcomes measurement increases an institution's ability to examine the performance of groups of students on various elements of the curriculum. In addition, a department receives a more precise interpretation of test results, including those areas that are covered by the test but are not part of the department s curriculum. * Note that not every test reports subscores AND assessment indicators. Check the subjectspecific test description at for a summary of reported scores.
4 INSTRUCTIONS FOR USING COMPARATIVE DATA TABLES Overview This Guide provides assistance in using the tables to interpret scores from the Major Field Tests. Tables are arranged alphabetically by test. The tables report data for seniors only, from institutions testing five or more seniors. Access the Comparative Data Tables for each test from our web site at The following tables are reported within each subject: Distributions for Individual Student Total Scores Means, and Standard Deviations Distributions for Individual Student Subscores (where appropriate), Means, and Standard Deviations Institutional Mean Score Distributions, Means, and Standard Deviations Institutional Mean Subscore (where appropriate) Distributions, Means, and Standard Deviations Institutional Summary Data for Assessment Indicators (where appropriate) In addition, the following tables are based on test administrations from recent testing years beginning when the current form of each test was introduced. Correlations among Subscores Reliability Coefficients and Standard Errors of Measurement of Subscores Mean Scaled Scores and Standard Errors of Measurement for Male and Female Examinees Mean Scaled Scores and Standard Errors of Measurement for African American and White Examinees Speededness Data Tables Distributions for Individual Students Total Scores and Subscores The distributions in these tables may be used to interpret individual student results by determining what percent of all those taking the test have scores below that of a particular student. Tables for total scale scores (and subscores where appropriate) for individual students are provided separately for each test. Each table shows scaled score intervals for total and subscores separately. By looking up the scaled score under the column labeled "Total Score" and reading across the row to the corresponding number in the column headed "% at or Below" the percent of individuals scoring at or below any interval can be determined. As discussed later in this Guide, distributions based on the students at your own institution may provide a better way to interpret individual results (see Local Comparative Data).
5 Distributions for Institutional Mean Scores and Mean Subscores The distributions in these tables present the number of institutions at each mean score level. These tables provide a way to compare the total score and subscore means for your institution with those of all other participating institutions. Institutions with fewer than five examinees are excluded. These tables show the mean of means (or the average of the mean scores for those departments in the database) as well as the standard deviations of those means. Institutional Summary Data for Assessment Indicators (where appropriate) The assessment indicator summary information in these tables includes the frequency distribution of departmental means for each assessment indicator. That is, for each assessment indicator, the score means (averages) falling into designated intervals of the score scale are tabulated for departments that tested five or more students in that subject area. These tables show the distribution of institutional rounded means as well as the average and standard deviations of those means. Since assessment indicators are reported for groups of students only, it is important to recognize that only mean or average scores are involved, both in the reports sent to a department and in the comparative data in the Comparative Data tables. Correlations among Subscores The correlations among the subscores are reported in Correlations Among Subscores. Both the observed correlations and the correlations adjusted for unreliability are provided. The corrected correlation adjusts for the unreliability of the two measures and can be interpreted as the expected correlation between true scores on the two measures. See the section on Measurement Considerations for an explanation of statistical terms. Reliability Coefficients and Standard Errors of Measurement Score reliabilities and standard errors of measurement are reported for each total score and subscore (where appropriate) in Reliability Coefficients and Standard Errors of Measurement. See the section on Measurement Considerations for an explanation of statistical terms. Mean Scaled Scores and Standard Errors of Measurement for Male/Female Examinees, and African American/White Examinees Scores and standard errors of measurement for male and female examinees are reported as well as African American and White examinees are reported in Table Mean Scaled Scores and Standard Errors of Measurement. For each test, a minimum of 200 students in a subgroup is required for these statistics to be reported. Speededness Data Speededness or rate of completion information is provided in Speededness Data. The data include the percent of examinees completing all items in the test, the percent of examinees completing at least 75 percent of the items in the test, the variance of index of speededness, and the number of items reached by 80 percent of the examinees. See the section on Measurement Considerations for explanations of statistical terms. Comparative Rather Than Normative Data It is important to remember that the data in this Guide should be considered comparative rather than normative because the institutions included in the data do not represent proportionally the various types of higher education institutions. A list of the participating institutions, by test, is included on this website at The gender and ethnic makeup of each comparative group, along with other demographic data, are given in the Summary of Demographic Information.
6 MEASUREMENT CONSIDERATIONS Accuracy of Test Scores The accuracy of a test score as a measure of a student's ability, achievement, or progress in the area being assessed is limited by numerous factors, such as the particular questions, the number of questions the test contains, and the amount of time allowed for answering them. Moreover, students perform at different levels on different occasions for reasons quite unrelated to the characteristics of the test itself. Therefore, a test can at best provide no more than an estimate of a person's achievement in a content area. The precision or accuracy of test scores is best described by two statistical terms: reliability and standard error of measurement (SEM). Reliability Reliability is an indicator of the consistency or stability of test scores. It refers to the extent to which scores obtained on a specific form of an assessment, administered under one set of conditions, can be generalized to scores obtained on other forms of the assessment, administered under other conditions. Reliability can also be viewed as an indicator of the extent to which differences in test scores reflect true differences in the knowledge or ability being tested rather than random variation caused by such factors as the form of an assessment, the time of administration, or the scoring method. The theoretical concepts of truth and error are important in the study of reliability. Theoretically, if a student takes an infinite number of equivalent editions of a test, the scores obtained would vary but would cluster around the student's true score. The "true score" would be the average score over the infinite number of replications. A true score is not necessarily a correct score. A consistent or systematic error that occurs in every sample would be counted as truth. Error is best thought of as the random fluctuations from sample to sample. Error can be thought of as differences between a person s "true score" and the obtained test scores (the sample scores). When a test is administered to a group, we assume that the variance in the distribution of scores is due partly to real differences in ability and partly to random errors (error variance). Reliability is the proportion of total variance attributed to true variance. That is, 2 total = 2 true + 2 error Reliability = 2 true / 2 total For example, if the reliability of a test is 0.95, then it can be interpreted to mean that 95% of the differences among the scores can be attributed to true differences in examinees' abilities rather than random fluctuations. Since we can never know a person s true score, we can never measure reliability directly. Instead, we can estimate reliability in various ways. It may be derived from comparisons of scores obtained by individuals on two parallel forms of a test (alternateform reliability), from comparisons of scores obtained by individuals on repeated administrations of the same test (testretest reliability), or from analysis of the consistency of the performance of individuals on items within a test (internalconsistency reliability). The numerical indices derived are called coefficients of reliability. The coefficients of reliability as reported in this Guide are measures of internalconsistency of the test. The internal consistency coefficients look at the measurement of test takers across the items in a single test form. They summarize the relationship between each item and performance on the total test. Various versions of the internal consistency reliability coefficients may be used, depending on the type of items and the structure of the test. The coefficients used here were computed using the KuderRichardson Formula (KR 20) Reliability = n n 1 2 t n i1 2 t p q i i,
7 Where n = number of items in the test, p i = proportion of correct responses to item i q i = 1 p i 2 t = variance of total scores on the test defined as Where X = total score for each individual examinee X = mean score N = number of examinees 2 ( X X ) / N For the reported total score, the desired level of reliability is 0.90 or higher. The reliability of a score is directly related to the number of items contributing to the score. Thus, the reliability coefficients for the subscores are usually not as high as that of total score. The internalconsistency reliability estimates include only one source of measurement error: sampling of items. They do not include instability of examinees performance over time as a source of measurement error. The more homogeneous a test is (the greater the extent to which all of the items measure the same thing), the higher the KR 20 reliability will be. Reliability coefficients for the Major Field Tests are given in Reliability Coefficients and Standard Error of Measurements. While scores on tests with reliabilities less than 0.90 should be interpreted more cautiously, the reliabilities of all the tests offered by the Major Field Tests program are sufficient to provide a sound basis for analysis of data based on groups of students as part of a planning or evaluation process. Standard Errors of Measurement (SEM) No test can be perfectly reliable because a test is only a sample from a larger population of possible questions and possible times and conditions of administration. There are differences between a "true score" and an obtained score. These differences are called errors of measurement. A way of characterizing the typical amount of error is called standard error of measurement (SEM). The SEM is a statistic that indicates the standard deviation of the differences between observed scores and their corresponding true scores. The interpretation of the SEM is usually made in terms of a statement of probability that the score obtained by an individual is within a certain distance of his or her true score. Theoretically, we can say that the obtained score for an individual will fall between +1 and 1 SEM of the true score 68% of the time, or between +2 and 2 SEM of the true score 95% of the time. The practical problem is that we never know an individual s true score. However, for large numbers of people with obtained score X, we can say that 68% of them are likely to have true scores between +1 and 1 SEM of X. That allows us to make practical use of the SEM. For example, the SEM of the SAT verbal test is about 30 points. We can say that 68% of the people who score at 500 have true scores no higher than 530 and no lower than 470. The crucial use of the SEM is to treat each score as a band rather than as a point when using scores to make decisions about people. It is common practice to extend the band one SEM above the obtained score and one SEM below the obtained score. The Standard Errors of Measurement (SEM) for the Major Field Tests are provided in Mean Scaled Scores and Standard Errors of Measurement. Standard Error of the Mean The accuracy of the mean scores reported for the assessment indicators can be interpreted in terms of the standard error of the mean. (In the following explanation it is assumed that the groups tested at each institution represent a sample and not the entire population at that institution.) If it were possible to choose an infinite number of samples of the same size from a given population and calculate the mean for each of these samples, a frequency distribution of means would result. The mean of this distribution would represent the true population mean. Its standard deviation is called the standard error of the mean. While the true population mean cannot be calculated based on a sample of examinees, it is possible to estimate the standard error of the mean from the observed data for a single group. The larger this single group, the smaller is the standard error of the mean. Continuing with the hypothetical infinite sampling scheme described above, if an interval is defined by two standard errors of the mean above and below the mean for each sample observed, then one can be confident that 95 percent of the intervals defined in this way would capture the population mean. Thus, the error bands reported on the institutional reports for the assessment indicators reflect a 95 percent level of confidence that the population mean is located within the interval indicated.
8 Speededness Data Information concerning the speededness or rate of completion of a test is provided in Speededness Data. Speededness data are based on the unanswered items after the last item answered by each student and do not take into account previous items that were omitted. Information in Speededness Data includes: Percent of examinees completing all items in the test Percent of examinees completing at least 75 percent of the items in the test Variance index of speededness (the ratio of the variance of notreached items to the variance of the number right items) Number of items reached by 80 percent of the examinees As a rule of thumb, a test is usually regarded as essentially unspeeded if at least 80 percent of the examinees reach the last question and if virtually everyone reaches at least threequarters of the items. A variance index less than 0.15 may be taken to indicate an unspeeded test, and an index greater than 0.25 usually means that the test is clearly speeded. Value between 0.16 and 0.25 generally indicate moderate speededness. However, these are only arbitrary indices, and judgments of speededness should be made in the context of additional data and in the light of the purpose of the individual testing program. Local Comparative Data One approach that a department may decide to pursue is to develop its own set of tables based on local data accumulated over several years. For institutional purposes, such as studying student performance, planning courses, and gauging the progress of individual students, local comparative data are often more useful than the national data presented in this publication. Not only do local data focus on the specific group of students with whom the faculty is concerned, they also represent student performance in an educational setting with which the faculty is familiar. In developing local comparative data, the total group can be separated into subgroups that differ from one another in important respects. For example, local comparative data by subarea of concentration, major field, and depth of course experience may provide significant distinctions. Comparisons between transfer and nontransfer students, or between students anticipating graduate study and those who are not planning to attend graduate school, may also be made. Departmental data can be extremely valuable for planning courses. In departments where annual enrollments are small, it probably would be necessary to accumulate data for several years to provide adequate reliability. However, some large departments may have enough students to develop local comparative data even within special fields by accumulating scores for only one or two years.
9 APPROPRIATE USE OF TESTS AND SCORES There are a number of ways an institution can judge whether these tests are appropriate for its purposes andif it requires students to take the examinationswhether it is using the scores properly. Some general guidelines related to use of the program's tests and services are discussed below. These guidelines summarize important considerations for appropriate use of the tests and provide examples of normally appropriate and inappropriate uses. Appropriateness of Test Content Tests that may be quite appropriate for one department in a specific discipline may be inappropriate for another. An important first step in evaluating a Major Field Test for use at your institution is a content review by appropriate faculty members to determine whether the content and coverage of the test are consistent with the content coverage expected of students majoring in that field at your institution. Departments can obtain a review copy of any of the tests by returning a signed copy of the Confidential Review Copy Request Form to ETS. The tests cannot measure every disciplinerelated skill necessary for academic work, nor do they measure other factors important to academic success. Moreover, programs requiring skills other than, or in addition to, academic skills (such as in the performing arts) cannot be fully served by written multiplechoice tests. For these reasons, each department is advised to conduct a careful review of the test's content, possibly in conjunction with empirical studies to determine the test's suitability. Group and Individual Assessment A key purpose of the Major Field Tests is to provide information for colleges and universities to use in curriculum evaluation, departmental selfstudy, and endofmajor outcomes assessment. Major Field Test summary data for a department's group of students can be an important part of the information available to a department or program in its selfevaluation. Test scores, however, should always be used in the context of other sources of information; test scores should never be the only criterion that is used when making decisions about programs or individuals. In particular, a Major Field Test score should not be used as a graduation requirement without careful study to ensure the validity of the test. As data accumulate on national and local populations, the data may also be useful for individual assessment. If they wish to use the Major Field Test results as part of an assessment of individual students, departments are advised to collect data and evaluate their experience using the test before making the decision to use individual scores. Criterion or passing scores for individual students should not be adopted unless a careful standard setting procedure has been employed. Decisions about individual students should never be based on Major Field Test scores alone. For guidance in setting local standards, the following publication is available: Passing Scores, A Manual for Setting Standards of Performance on Educational and Occupational Tests, by Samuel A. Livingston and Michael Zieky. Copies of this booklet may be obtained by contacting the Higher Education Assessment area at Students with Disabilities The Major Field Tests can be obtained in large print formats, on an audiocassette, or in Braille form for test takers with disabilities. Allow 6 weeks for preparation of a test in one of these formats. In addition, allowing additional time for test takers with certain disabilities is at the discretion of the test administrator. The scores of such test takers (if they are seniors) are included in MFT Comparative Data.
10 Appropriate Use of Scores Those using Major Field Test scores should be familiar with the statistical concepts of testing, such as percentile ranks, validity, and reliability. Use the following guidelines in interpreting your test scores and using the results. Scores are provided for groups as small as five students; however, care must be taken in interpreting the results from very small groups. For example, the reliability of the scores for small groups would be appropriate for evaluating curriculum but not appropriate for teacher evaluation or for grouptogroup comparisons. Consider factors that influence performance when comparing groups. Differences may occur if your group represents a different selection of students than the comparative group, for example. When the number of students is very small, keep in mind that the mean score can be affected greatly by one or two students with either very high or very low scores. In comparing your group to the comparative group, look at assessment indicator results as well as total scores to determine if significant differences in group performance might be due to curricular choices as well as student achievement. Administrators should periodically review the ways in which they are using the tests at their own institutions to confirm their continued appropriateness. ETS Higher Education Assessment program staff will be pleased to provide suggestions and advice regarding the use of the Major Field Tests. Background Information Questions Background information is collected on each answer sheet for the purpose of gathering data in group form about students' backgrounds, academic preparation, etc. Answers to these questions do not affect a student's test scores but can help to define comparative groups. Responses to these questions are summarized and reported as part of the scoring services. Confidentiality of Information All Major Field Test data are considered confidential and are reported only to the institution involved. Data aggregated across institutions are provided as comparative data; individually identifiable information is available only to the institution involved. Information about an institution gathered through the testing program will not be released in any form attributable to or identifiable with the institution unless ETS has received written authorization to do so. Answer sheets are kept for a period of twelve months and then destroyed. Score report data are kept on file at ETS for five years and then destroyed. ETS protects the confidentiality of all information about individuals as well as institutions. The confidentiality of student information and scores should be recognized and maintained. We suggest that institutions obtain a general written authorization from students to the effect that certain faculty members and others who are directly concerned with the students' education will have access to students' scores.
11 SUMMARIES OF DEMOGRAPHIC INFORMATION There is a demographic summary of the individuals taking the tests for the most recent fiveyear period. This table shows Gender, Ethnic Subgroup, Transfer Status, Enrollment Status, English as Best Language, Undergraduate GPA and Major GPA. The total number of tests taken in each subject area and the proportions of test takers in each subcategory are also presented. Because the Major Field Tests are revised on a fiveyear cycle, the sample of test takers included in the Comparative Data Guide will increase for several years and then sharply decline, as a revised test is included.
Interpreting and Using SAT Scores
Interpreting and Using SAT Scores Evaluating Student Performance Use the tables in this section to compare a student s performance on SAT Program tests with the performance of groups of students. These
More informationPRACTICE BOOK COMPUTER SCIENCE TEST. Graduate Record Examinations. This practice book contains. Become familiar with. Visit GRE Online at www.gre.
This book is provided FREE with test registration by the Graduate Record Examinations Board. Graduate Record Examinations This practice book contains one actual fulllength GRE Computer Science Test testtaking
More informationX = T + E. Reliability. Reliability. Classical Test Theory 7/18/2012. Refers to the consistency or stability of scores
Reliability It is the user who must take responsibility for determining whether or not scores are sufficiently trustworthy to justify anticipated uses and interpretations. (AERA et al., 1999) Reliability
More information9 Descriptive and Multivariate Statistics
9 Descriptive and Multivariate Statistics Jamie Price Donald W. Chamberlayne * S tatistics is the science of collecting and organizing data and then drawing conclusions based on data. There are essentially
More informationPRACTICE BOOK MATHEMATICS TEST (RESCALED) Graduate Record Examinations. This practice book contains. Become familiar with
This book is provided FREE with test registration by the Graduate Record Examinations Board. Graduate Record Examinations This practice book contains one actual fulllength GRE Mathematics Test (Rescaled)
More informationSession 7 Bivariate Data and Analysis
Session 7 Bivariate Data and Analysis Key Terms for This Session Previously Introduced mean standard deviation New in This Session association bivariate analysis contingency table covariation least squares
More informationIntroduction to Reliability
Introduction to Reliability What is reliability? Reliability is an index that estimates dependability (consistency) of scores Why is it important? Prerequisite to validity because if you are not measuring
More informationCurriculum Map Statistics and Probability Honors (348) Saugus High School Saugus Public Schools 20092010
Curriculum Map Statistics and Probability Honors (348) Saugus High School Saugus Public Schools 20092010 Week 1 Week 2 14.0 Students organize and describe distributions of data by using a number of different
More informationGlossary of Terms Ability Accommodation Adjusted validity/reliability coefficient Alternate forms Analysis of work Assessment Battery Bias
Glossary of Terms Ability A defined domain of cognitive, perceptual, psychomotor, or physical functioning. Accommodation A change in the content, format, and/or administration of a selection procedure
More informationOnline Score Reports: Samples and Tips
Online Score Reports: Samples and Tips Online Score Reports Authorized school administrators and AP Coordinators have access to the following reports for free at scores.collegeboard.org: AP Instructional
More informationThe test uses age norms (national) and grade norms (national) to calculate scores and compare students of the same age or grade.
Reading the CogAT Report for Parents The CogAT Test measures the level and pattern of cognitive development of a student compared to age mates and grade mates. These general reasoning abilities, which
More informationCollege Board Announces Scores for New SAT with Writing Section
Contact: Caren Scoropanos, Chiara Coletti 212 7138052 cscoropanos@collegeboard.org ccoletti@collegeboard.org Embargoed until 10:30 a.m. (Eastern Time) Tuesday, August 29, 2006 Immediately after the embargo,
More informationBackground and Technical Information for the GRE Comparison Tool for Business Schools
Background and Technical Information for the GRE Comparison Tool for Business Schools Background Business schools around the world accept Graduate Record Examinations (GRE ) General Test scores for admission
More informationPRELIMINARY ITEM STATISTICS USING POINTBISERIAL CORRELATION AND PVALUES
PRELIMINARY ITEM STATISTICS USING POINTBISERIAL CORRELATION AND PVALUES BY SEEMA VARMA, PH.D. EDUCATIONAL DATA SYSTEMS, INC. 15850 CONCORD CIRCLE, SUITE A MORGAN HILL CA 95037 WWW.EDDATA.COM Overview
More informationStatistics. Measurement. Scales of Measurement 7/18/2012
Statistics Measurement Measurement is defined as a set of rules for assigning numbers to represent objects, traits, attributes, or behaviors A variableis something that varies (eye color), a constant does
More informationII. DISTRIBUTIONS distribution normal distribution. standard scores
Appendix D Basic Measurement And Statistics The following information was developed by Steven Rothke, PhD, Department of Psychology, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago (RIC) and expanded by Mary F. Schmidt,
More informationDescriptive Statistics and Measurement Scales
Descriptive Statistics 1 Descriptive Statistics and Measurement Scales Descriptive statistics are used to describe the basic features of the data in a study. They provide simple summaries about the sample
More informationResearch Design Concepts. Independent and dependent variables Data types Sampling Validity and reliability
Research Design Concepts Independent and dependent variables Data types Sampling Validity and reliability Research Design Action plan for carrying out research How the research will be conducted to investigate
More informationData Analysis: Describing Data  Descriptive Statistics
WHAT IT IS Return to Table of ontents Descriptive statistics include the numbers, tables, charts, and graphs used to describe, organize, summarize, and present raw data. Descriptive statistics are most
More informationCALCULATIONS & STATISTICS
CALCULATIONS & STATISTICS CALCULATION OF SCORES Conversion of 15 scale to 0100 scores When you look at your report, you will notice that the scores are reported on a 0100 scale, even though respondents
More informationGuided Reading 9 th Edition. informed consent, protection from harm, deception, confidentiality, and anonymity.
Guided Reading Educational Research: Competencies for Analysis and Applications 9th Edition EDFS 635: Educational Research Chapter 1: Introduction to Educational Research 1. List and briefly describe the
More informationReport on the Scaling of the 2014 NSW Higher School Certificate. NSW ViceChancellors Committee Technical Committee on Scaling
Report on the Scaling of the 2014 NSW Higher School Certificate NSW ViceChancellors Committee Technical Committee on Scaling Contents Preface Acknowledgements Definitions iii iv v 1 The Higher School
More informationInferential Statistics
Inferential Statistics Sampling and the normal distribution Zscores Confidence levels and intervals Hypothesis testing Commonly used statistical methods Inferential Statistics Descriptive statistics are
More informationCRITICAL THINKING ASSESSMENT
CRITICAL THINKING ASSESSMENT REPORT Prepared by Byron Javier Assistant Dean of Research and Planning 1 P a g e Critical Thinking Assessment at MXC As part of its assessment plan, the Assessment Committee
More informationTesting Services. Association. Dental Report 3 Admission 2011 Testing Program. User s Manual 2009
American Dental Association Department of Testing Services Dental Report 3 Admission 2011 Testing Program User s Manual 2009 DENTAL ADMISSION TESTING PROGRAM USER'S MANUAL 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page History
More information6.4 Normal Distribution
Contents 6.4 Normal Distribution....................... 381 6.4.1 Characteristics of the Normal Distribution....... 381 6.4.2 The Standardized Normal Distribution......... 385 6.4.3 Meaning of Areas under
More informationDATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Quality Education for Minorities (QEM) Network HBCUUP Fundamentals of Education Research Workshop Gerunda B. Hughes, Ph.D. August 23, 2013 Objectives of the Discussion 2 Discuss
More informationACT Research Explains New ACT Test Writing Scores and Their Relationship to Other Test Scores
ACT Research Explains New ACT Test Writing Scores and Their Relationship to Other Test Scores Wayne J. Camara, Dongmei Li, Deborah J. Harris, Benjamin Andrews, Qing Yi, and Yong He ACT Research Explains
More informationStudy Guide for the Mathematics: Proofs, Models, and Problems, Part I, Test
Study Guide for the Mathematics: Proofs, Models, and Problems, Part I, Test A PUBLICATION OF ETS Table of Contents Study Guide for the Mathematics: Proofs, Models, and Problems, Part I, Test TABLE OF CONTENTS
More informationInterpretive Guide for the Achievement Levels Report (2003 Revision) ITBS/ITED Testing Program
Interpretive Guide for the Achievement Levels Report (2003 Revision) ITBS/ITED Testing Program The purpose of this Interpretive Guide is to provide information to individuals who will use the Achievement
More informationUse of Placement Tests in College Classes
By Andrew Morgan This paper was completed and submitted in partial fulfillment of the Master Teacher Program, a 2year faculty professional development program conducted by the Center for Teaching Excellence,
More informationReliability Overview
Calculating Reliability of Quantitative Measures Reliability Overview Reliability is defined as the consistency of results from a test. Theoretically, each test contains some error the portion of the score
More informationChapter 3: Data Description Numerical Methods
Chapter 3: Data Description Numerical Methods Learning Objectives Upon successful completion of Chapter 3, you will be able to: Summarize data using measures of central tendency, such as the mean, median,
More informationResearch Variables. Measurement. Scales of Measurement. Chapter 4: Data & the Nature of Measurement
Chapter 4: Data & the Nature of Graziano, Raulin. Research Methods, a Process of Inquiry Presented by Dustin Adams Research Variables Variable Any characteristic that can take more than one form or value.
More informationMAP Reports. Teacher Report (by Goal Descriptors) Displays teachers class data for current testing term sorted by RIT score.
Goal Performance: These columns summarize the students performance in the goal strands tested in this subject. Data will display in these columns only if a student took a Survey w/ Goals test. Goal performance
More informationUNDERSTANDING THE TWOWAY ANOVA
UNDERSTANDING THE e have seen how the oneway ANOVA can be used to compare two or more sample means in studies involving a single independent variable. This can be extended to two independent variables
More informationTechnical Information
Technical Information Trials The questions for Progress Test in English (PTE) were developed by English subject experts at the National Foundation for Educational Research. For each test level of the paper
More informationChanges in the Demographic Characteristics of Texas High School Graduates. Key Findings
Changes in the Demographic Characteristics of Texas High School Graduates 2003 2009 Key Findings The number of Texas high school graduates increased by 26,166 students, an 11 percent increase from 2003
More information(AA12) QUANTITATIVE METHODS FOR BUSINESS
All Rights Reserved ASSCIATIN F ACCUNTING TECHNICIANS F SRI LANKA AA EXAMINATIN  JULY 20 (AA2) QUANTITATIVE METHDS FR BUSINESS Instructions to candidates (Please Read Carefully): () Time: 02 hours. (2)
More informationAssociation Between Variables
Contents 11 Association Between Variables 767 11.1 Introduction............................ 767 11.1.1 Measure of Association................. 768 11.1.2 Chapter Summary.................... 769 11.2 Chi
More informationFocusing on LMU s Undergraduate Learning Outcomes: Creative and Critical Thinking
Focusing on LMU s Undergraduate Learning Outcomes: Creative and Critical Thinking www.lmu.edu/about/services/academicplanning/assessment/university_assessment_reports.htm Loyola Marymount University is
More informationThe Official Study Guide
The Praxis Series ebooks The Official Study Guide Middle School Mathematics Test Code: 5169 Study Topics Practice Questions Directly from the Test Makers TestTaking Strategies www.ets.org/praxis Study
More informationCHINHOYI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY
CHINHOYI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SCHOOL OF NATURAL SCIENCES AND MATHEMATICS DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS MEASURES OF CENTRAL TENDENCY AND DISPERSION INTRODUCTION From the previous unit, the Graphical displays
More informationAssessment Centres and Psychometric Testing. Procedure
Assessment Centres and Psychometric Testing Procedure INDEX INTRODUCTION 3 DEFINITION 3 Assessment & Development Centres 3 Psychometric Tests 3 SCOPE 4 RESPONSIBILITIES 5 WHEN SHOULD TESTS BE USED 5 CHOOSING
More informationElementary Statistics
Elementary Statistics Chapter 1 Dr. Ghamsary Page 1 Elementary Statistics M. Ghamsary, Ph.D. Chap 01 1 Elementary Statistics Chapter 1 Dr. Ghamsary Page 2 Statistics: Statistics is the science of collecting,
More informationIndicator 5.1 Brief Description of learning or data management systems that support the effective use of student assessment results.
Indicator 5.1 Brief Description of learning or data management systems that support the effective use of student assessment results. The effective use of student assessment results is facilitated by a
More informationAnnual Goals for Math & Computer Science
Annual Goals for Math & Computer Science 20102011 Gather student learning outcomes assessment data for the computer science major and begin to consider the implications of these data Goal  Gather student
More informationThe Personal Learning Insights Profile Research Report
The Personal Learning Insights Profile Research Report The Personal Learning Insights Profile Research Report Item Number: O22 995 by Inscape Publishing, Inc. All rights reserved. Copyright secured in
More informationContent Sheet 71: Overview of Quality Control for Quantitative Tests
Content Sheet 71: Overview of Quality Control for Quantitative Tests Role in quality management system Quality Control (QC) is a component of process control, and is a major element of the quality management
More informationBachelor's Degree in Business Administration and Master's Degree course description
Bachelor's Degree in Business Administration and Master's Degree course description Bachelor's Degree in Business Administration Department s Compulsory Requirements Course Description (402102) Principles
More informationStudy Guide for the Special Education: Core Knowledge Tests
Study Guide for the Special Education: Core Knowledge Tests A PUBLICATION OF ETS Table of Contents Study Guide for the Praxis Special Education: Core Knowledge Tests TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1 Introduction
More informationReport on the Scaling of the 2013 NSW Higher School Certificate. NSW ViceChancellors Committee Technical Committee on Scaling
Report on the Scaling of the 2013 NSW Higher School Certificate NSW ViceChancellors Committee Technical Committee on Scaling Universities Admissions Centre (NSW & ACT) Pty Ltd 2014 ACN 070 055 935 ABN
More informationGraphing Data Presentation of Data in Visual Forms
Graphing Data Presentation of Data in Visual Forms Purpose of Graphing Data Audience Appeal Provides a visually appealing and succinct representation of data and summary statistics Provides a visually
More informationTeacher Work Sample Rubrics To be completed as part of the Requirements during the Directed Teaching Semester
Teacher Work Sample Rubrics To be completed as part of the Requirements during the Directed Teaching Semester Middle Level Program Secondary Program The following assignments and rubrics have been developed
More informationTechnical Report. Overview. Revisions in this Edition. FourLevel Assessment Process
Technical Report Overview The Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals Fourth Edition (CELF 4) is an individually administered test for determining if a student (ages 5 through 21 years) has a language
More informationFairfield Public Schools
Mathematics Fairfield Public Schools AP Statistics AP Statistics BOE Approved 04/08/2014 1 AP STATISTICS Critical Areas of Focus AP Statistics is a rigorous course that offers advanced students an opportunity
More informationThe Detroit Tests of Learning Aptitude 4 (Hammill, 1998) are the most recent version of
Detroit Tests of Learning Aptitude 4 The Detroit Tests of Learning Aptitude 4 (Hammill, 1998) are the most recent version of Baker and Leland's test, originally published in 1935. To Hammill's credit,
More informationGMAC. Predicting Graduate Program Success for Undergraduate and Intended Graduate Accounting and BusinessRelated Concentrations
GMAC Predicting Graduate Program Success for Undergraduate and Intended Graduate Accounting and BusinessRelated Concentrations Kara M. Owens and Eileen TalentoMiller GMAC Research Reports RR0615 August
More informationChapter 1: The Nature of Probability and Statistics
Chapter 1: The Nature of Probability and Statistics Learning Objectives Upon successful completion of Chapter 1, you will have applicable knowledge of the following concepts: Statistics: An Overview and
More informationA s h o r t g u i d e t o s ta n d A r d i s e d t e s t s
A short guide to standardised tests Copyright 2013 GL Assessment Limited Published by GL Assessment Limited 389 Chiswick High Road, 9th Floor East, London W4 4AL www.glassessment.co.uk GL Assessment is
More informationThe Official Study Guide
The Praxis Series ebooks The Official Study Guide Interdisciplinary Early Childhood Education Test Code: 0023 Study Topics Practice Questions Directly from the Test Makers TestTaking Strategies www.ets.org/praxis
More informationReport on the Scaling of the 2012 NSW Higher School Certificate
Report on the Scaling of the 2012 NSW Higher School Certificate NSW ViceChancellors Committee Technical Committee on Scaling Universities Admissions Centre (NSW & ACT) Pty Ltd 2013 ACN 070 055 935 ABN
More informationThe Official Study Guide
The Praxis Series ebooks The Official Study Guide French: World Language Test Code: 5174 Study Topics Practice Questions Directly From the Test Makers TestTaking Strategies www.ets.org/praxis Study Guide
More informationNumerical Summarization of Data OPRE 6301
Numerical Summarization of Data OPRE 6301 Motivation... In the previous session, we used graphical techniques to describe data. For example: While this histogram provides useful insight, other interesting
More informationGMAC. Predicting Success in Graduate Management Doctoral Programs
GMAC Predicting Success in Graduate Management Doctoral Programs Kara O. Siegert GMAC Research Reports RR0710 July 12, 2007 Abstract An integral part of the test evaluation and improvement process involves
More information21st Century Community Learning Centers Grant Monitoring Support
21st Century Community Learning Centers Grant Monitoring Support Contract No. ED04CO0027 Task Order No. 0005 For the U.S. Department of Education, Office of Elementary and Secondary Education Evaluation
More informationGUIDELINES FOR TENURE AND PROMOTION. KenanFlagler Business School The University of North Carolina
GUIDELINES FOR TENURE AND PROMOTION KenanFlagler Business School The University of North Carolina Adopted April 24, 1985 and amended March 30, 2009, September 12, 2011 All procedures and policies relating
More informationGMAC. Executive Education: Predicting Student Success in 22 Executive MBA Programs
GMAC Executive Education: Predicting Student Success in 22 Executive MBA Programs Kara M. Owens GMAC Research Reports RR0702 February 1, 2007 Abstract This study examined common admission requirements
More informationSampling. COUN 695 Experimental Design
Sampling COUN 695 Experimental Design Principles of Sampling Procedures are different for quantitative and qualitative research Sampling in quantitative research focuses on representativeness Sampling
More informationInternal Quality Assurance Arrangements
National Commission for Academic Accreditation & Assessment Handbook for Quality Assurance and Accreditation in Saudi Arabia PART 2 Internal Quality Assurance Arrangements Version 2.0 Internal Quality
More informationTHE ACT INTEREST INVENTORY AND THE WORLDOFWORK MAP
THE ACT INTEREST INVENTORY AND THE WORLDOFWORK MAP Contents The ACT Interest Inventory........................................ 3 The WorldofWork Map......................................... 8 Summary.....................................................
More informationDevelopment and Validation of the National Home Inspector Examination
Development and Validation of the National Home Inspector Examination Examination Board of Professional Home Inspectors 800 E. Northwest Hwy. Suite 708 Palatine Illinois 60067 8472987750 info@homeinspectionexam.org
More informationStandard Deviation Estimator
CSS.com Chapter 905 Standard Deviation Estimator Introduction Even though it is not of primary interest, an estimate of the standard deviation (SD) is needed when calculating the power or sample size of
More informationBasic Concepts in Research and Data Analysis
Basic Concepts in Research and Data Analysis Introduction: A Common Language for Researchers...2 Steps to Follow When Conducting Research...3 The Research Question... 3 The Hypothesis... 4 Defining the
More informationFactors Affecting Performance. Job Analysis. Job Analysis Methods. Uses of Job Analysis. Some Job Analysis Procedures Worker Oriented
Factors Affecting Performance Motivation Technology Performance Environment Abilities Job Analysis A job analysis generates information about the job and the individuals performing the job. Job description:
More informationStudy Guide for the English Language, Literature, and Composition: Content Knowledge Test
Study Guide for the English Language, Literature, and Composition: Content Knowledge Test A PUBLICATION OF ETS Table of Contents Study Guide for the English Language, Literature, and Composition: Content
More informationDescriptive Statistics
Descriptive Statistics Primer Descriptive statistics Central tendency Variation Relative position Relationships Calculating descriptive statistics Descriptive Statistics Purpose to describe or summarize
More informationA. Terms and Definitions Used by ABET
AMERICAN BOARD OF ENGINEERING AND TEACHNOLOGY ABET http://www.abet.org/pevrefreshertrainingmodule4/# A. Terms and Definitions Used by ABET Unfortunately, there is no universally accepted set of terms
More informationAssessment METHODS What are assessment methods? Why is it important to use multiple methods? What are direct and indirect methods of assessment?
Assessment METHODS What are assessment methods? Assessment methods are the strategies, techniques, tools and instruments for collecting information to determine the extent to which students demonstrate
More information096 Professional Readiness Examination (Mathematics)
096 Professional Readiness Examination (Mathematics) Effective after October 1, 2013 MISGFLD096M02 TABLE OF CONTENTS PART 1: General Information About the MTTC Program and Test Preparation OVERVIEW
More informationChapter 8: Quantitative Sampling
Chapter 8: Quantitative Sampling I. Introduction to Sampling a. The primary goal of sampling is to get a representative sample, or a small collection of units or cases from a much larger collection or
More information2013 New Jersey Alternate Proficiency Assessment. Executive Summary
2013 New Jersey Alternate Proficiency Assessment Executive Summary The New Jersey Alternate Proficiency Assessment (APA) is a portfolio assessment designed to measure progress toward achieving New Jersey
More informationIBM SPSS Direct Marketing 23
IBM SPSS Direct Marketing 23 Note Before using this information and the product it supports, read the information in Notices on page 25. Product Information This edition applies to version 23, release
More informationResponsibilities of Users of Standardized Tests (RUST) (3rd Edition) Prepared by the Association for Assessment in Counseling (AAC)
Responsibilities of Users of Standardized Tests (RUST) (3rd Edition) Prepared by the Association for Assessment in Counseling (AAC) Many recent events have influenced the use of tests and assessment in
More informationBuilding a Better Teacher Appraisal and Development System: Draft Instructional Practice Rubric
Building a Better Teacher Appraisal and Development System: Draft Instructional Practice Rubric As a part of the design process for HISD s new teacher appraisal system, the Instructional Practice working
More informationCourse Text. Required Computing Software. Course Description. Course Objectives. StraighterLine. Business Statistics
Course Text Business Statistics Lind, Douglas A., Marchal, William A. and Samuel A. Wathen. Basic Statistics for Business and Economics, 7th edition, McGrawHill/Irwin, 2010, ISBN: 9780077384470 [This
More informationLean Six Sigma Training/Certification Book: Volume 1
Lean Six Sigma Training/Certification Book: Volume 1 Six Sigma Quality: Concepts & Cases Volume I (Statistical Tools in Six Sigma DMAIC process with MINITAB Applications Chapter 1 Introduction to Six Sigma,
More informationF. Farrokhyar, MPhil, PhD, PDoc
Learning objectives Descriptive Statistics F. Farrokhyar, MPhil, PhD, PDoc To recognize different types of variables To learn how to appropriately explore your data How to display data using graphs How
More informationStandard Deviation Calculator
CSS.com Chapter 35 Standard Deviation Calculator Introduction The is a tool to calculate the standard deviation from the data, the standard error, the range, percentiles, the COV, confidence limits, or
More informationIBM SPSS Direct Marketing 22
IBM SPSS Direct Marketing 22 Note Before using this information and the product it supports, read the information in Notices on page 25. Product Information This edition applies to version 22, release
More informationStudy Guide for the Physical Education: Content and Design Test
Study Guide for the Physical Education: Content and Design Test A PUBLICATION OF ETS Copyright 2011 by Educational Testing Service. All rights reserved. ETS, the ETS logo, GRE, and LISTENING. LEARNING.
More informationData Analysis, Statistics, and Probability
Chapter 6 Data Analysis, Statistics, and Probability Content Strand Description Questions in this content strand assessed students skills in collecting, organizing, reading, representing, and interpreting
More informationINTERNATIONAL FRAMEWORK FOR ASSURANCE ENGAGEMENTS CONTENTS
INTERNATIONAL FOR ASSURANCE ENGAGEMENTS (Effective for assurance reports issued on or after January 1, 2005) CONTENTS Paragraph Introduction... 1 6 Definition and Objective of an Assurance Engagement...
More informationStudent Evaluations and the Assessment of Teaching: What Can We Learn from the Data?
Student Evaluations and the Assessment of Teaching: What Can We Learn from the Data? Martin D. D. Evans and Paul D. McNelis Department of Economics, Georgetown University September 2000 This study was
More informationTHE STABILITY OF POINT BISERIAL CORRELATION COEFFICIENT ESTIMATES AGAINST DIFFERENTSAMPLING SCHEMES ABSTRACT
THE STABILITY OF POINT BISERIAL CORRELATION COEFFICIENT ESTIMATES AGAINST DIFFERENTSAMPLING SCHEMES by Jonny Pornel, Leonardo S. Sotaridona, Arianto Wibowo, and Irene Hendrawan ABSTRACT A point biserial
More informationChapter 4. Probability and Probability Distributions
Chapter 4. robability and robability Distributions Importance of Knowing robability To know whether a sample is not identical to the population from which it was selected, it is necessary to assess the
More informationThe Official Study Guide
The Praxis Series ebooks The Official Study Guide Pennsylvania Grades 4 8 Subject Concentration: Science Test Code: 5159 Study Topics Practice Questions Directly from the Test Makers TestTaking Strategies
More informationAssessment, Case Conceptualization, Diagnosis, and Treatment Planning Overview
Assessment, Case Conceptualization, Diagnosis, and Treatment Planning Overview The abilities to gather and interpret information, apply counseling and developmental theories, understand diagnostic frameworks,
More informationIntroduction to method validation
Introduction to method validation Introduction to method validation What is method validation? Method validation provides documented objective evidence that a method measures what it is intended to measure,
More informationMetaAnalytic Synthesis of Studies Conducted at Marzano Research Laboratory on Instructional Strategies
MetaAnalytic Synthesis of Studies Conducted at Marzano Research Laboratory on Instructional Strategies By Mark W. Haystead & Dr. Robert J. Marzano Marzano Research Laboratory Englewood, CO August, 2009
More information