Free and Open Source Software ( FOSS ) Licensing Overview. Gwyn Firth Murray Matau Legal Group February 11, 2015

Transcription

1 Free and Open Source Software ( FOSS ) Licensing Overview Gwyn Firth Murray Matau Legal Group February 11, 2015

2 Open Source Licenses: Three Main Categories A. Permissive/ Attribution Fewest requirements, unrestricted scope of use. Unrestricted development of derived works However, attribution is required Examples: Berkeley Software Distribution License (BSD) Apache License B. File-Based Copyleft Community fostering licenses Files derived from common files must be shared with the commons. Other derived works may be licensed in any manner. Examples: Mozilla Public License (MPL) Eclipse Public License (EPL) C. Strong Copyleft Competition-limiting Most Free but can be the most restrictive: seek to propagate open source. All work (including derived works) must be shared with the commons. Examples: GNU General Public License (GPL) Lesser GPL (LGPL) 2

3 Copyleft or Reciprocal Licenses Software must be redistributed under the original license terms Examples of strong copyleft are the AGPL, GPL and LGPL Examples of file-based copyleft are MPL and EPL Important note: copyleft is not the opposite of copyright. It means that licensees redistributing the software or modifications thereto must do so under the original inbound license. 3

4 The GPL Most widely-used free software license(s) Approximately ¾ of all free software packages are distributed under the GNU GPL Central GPL 2.0 Provision (Section 2): You must cause any work that you distribute or publish, that in whole or in part contains or is derived from the Program or any part thereof, to be licensed as a whole at no charge to all third parties under the terms of this License. GPLv3 and LGPLv3 released June 29,

5 The LGPL Library or Lesser GPL Designed to permit linking of LGPL libraries into non-free programs But legal analysis is the same as with GPL: Have you created a derivative work of the covered Program? And are you distributing that work? If yes to both, source code must be made available. Static vs. Dynamic Linking Debate 5

6 Permissive or Academic Licenses Examples are BSD, MIT, and Apache These Licenses Allow You to Impose Additional or Modified Terms on Modified Copies No Restriction on Charging Royalties for Modified Copies 6

7 The BSD License Central BSD Provision: Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without modification, are permitted... One of the Most Permissive Licenses Caveat: License Compliance Still Matters Atrribution and License Notice Terms 7

8 Permissive or Academic Licenses Examples are BSD, MIT, and Apache These Licenses Allow You to Impose Additional or Modified Terms on Modified Copies No Restriction on Charging Royalties for Modified Copies Some versions of these (BSD 3-clause and 4-clause, Apache 1.1) do have compatibility issues with GPL 2.0 and other licenses 8 March 2015

9 Unifying Theme in FOSS Licenses Give Credit Where Credit is Due Don t Claim You Wrote Something If You Didn t. License requirements are triggered upon distribution Note: Distribution can mean different things, depending upon the license. Modification matters, but distribution is the key 9

10 More on GPL/LGPL v 3.0 Pure Copyleft: GPL 2.0 and GPL 3.0: Is licensing GPL 2.0 only, or GPL 2.0 or later? GPL 3.0? GPL 2.0 or 3.0 with Classpath or other exception? Copyleft depending upon use: LGPL 2.1 LGPL 3.0. GPL and LGPL 3.0 have interesting terms Anti- Tivoization clause Patent license clauses 10

11 GPL 3.0, LGPL 3.0, AGPL 3.0 GPL 3.0 includes anti-drm and anti- Tivoization provisions These may be a big issue depending upon product. GPL 3.0 and LGPL 3.0 include explicit patent license terms that could jeopardize Licensee s patent portfolio AGPL 3.0 provides that operation of software as a service is a distribution, thus triggering source code availability requirements. 11 March 2015

12 Issues for Devices/ IoT All FOSS licenses require license notice and copyright attribution upon distribution What is a distribution? Use of contractors for code creation? Applications run from a central server? How to do this in a device? How to do this with a web service? 12

13 GPL/ AGPL 3.0 Section 3 ANTI DRM: 3. Protecting Users' Legal Rights From Anti-Circumvention Law. No covered work shall be deemed part of an effective technological measure under any applicable law fulfilling obligations under article 11 of the WIPO copyright treaty adopted on 20 December 1996, or similar laws prohibiting or restricting circumvention of such measures. 13

14 GPL/ AGPL 3.0 Section 3 ANTI DRM: 3. Protecting Users' Legal Rights From Anti- Circumvention Law (Con t) When you convey a covered work, you waive any legal power to forbid circumvention of technological measures to the extent such circumvention is effected by exercising rights under this License with respect to the covered work, and you disclaim any intention to limit operation or modification of the work as a means of enforcing, against the work's users, your or third parties' legal rights to forbid circumvention of technological measures. 14

15 GPL/AGPL 3.O Section 6 Anti-Tivoization Clause Section 6 If you convey an object code work under this section in, or with, or specifically for use in, a User Product, and the conveying occurs as part of a transaction in which the right of possession and use of the User Product is transferred to the recipient in perpetuity or for a fixed term (regardless of how the transaction is characterized), the Corresponding Source conveyed under this section must be accompanied by the Installation Information. But this requirement does not apply if neither you nor any third party retains the ability to install modified object code on the User Product (for example, the work has been installed in ROM). 15

16 GPL/AGPL 3.O Section 6 Anti-Tivoization Clause Section 6 A User Product is either (1) a consumer product, which means any tangible personal property which is normally used for personal, family, or household purposes, or (2) anything designed or sold for incorporation into a dwelling. In determining whether a product is a consumer product, doubtful cases shall be resolved in favor of coverage. For a particular product received by a particular user, normally used refers to a typical or common use of that class of product, regardless of the status of the particular user or of the way in which the particular user actually uses, or expects or is expected to use, the product. A product is a consumer product regardless of whether the product has substantial commercial, industrial or non-consumer uses, unless such uses represent the only significant mode of use of the product. 16

17 GPL/AGPL 3.O Section 6 Anti-Tivoization Clause Section 6 Installation Information for a User Product means any methods, procedures, authorization keys, or other information required to install and execute modified versions of a covered work in that User Product from a modified version of its Corresponding Source. The information must suffice to ensure that the continued functioning of the modified object code is in no case prevented or interfered with solely because modification has been made. 17

18 GPL/AGPL 3.O Section Patents If you convey a covered work, knowingly relying on a patent license, and the Corresponding Source of the work is not available for anyone to copy, free of charge and under the terms of this License, through a publicly available network server or other readily accessible means, then you must either (1) cause the Corresponding Source to be so available, or (2) arrange to deprive yourself of the benefit of the patent license for this particular work, or (3) arrange, in a manner consistent with the requirements of this License, to extend the patent license to downstream recipients. Knowingly relying means you have actual knowledge that, but for the patent license, your conveying the covered work in a country, or your recipient's use of the covered work in a country, would infringe one or more identifiable patents in that country that you have reason to believe are valid.

19 Thank You Gwyn Firth Murray Matau Legal Group (cell) 19