Combining population genetics and demographical approaches in evolutionary studies of plant mating systems

Save this PDF as:
 WORD  PNG  TXT  JPG

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Combining population genetics and demographical approaches in evolutionary studies of plant mating systems"

Transcription

1 Oikos 000: 19, 2006 doi: /j x, Copyright # Oikos 2006, ISSN Subject Editor: Pia Mutikainen, Accepted 5 September 2006 Combining population genetics and demographical approaches in evolutionary studies of plant mating systems Pierre-Olivier Cheptou and Daniel J. Schoen P.-O. Cheptou1 UMR 5175 CEFE-Centre d Ecologie Fonctionnelle et Evolutive (CNRS), 1919 Route de Mende, FR Montpellier Cedex 05, France. D. J. Schoen, Dept of Biology, McGill Univ., 1205, Dr. Penfield Avenue, Montreal, Quebec H3A 1B1, Canada. The striking amount of variation in the mating systems of higher plants has stimulated fruitful research by both ecologists and population geneticists. Historically, these two schools of thought have developed independent theoretical treatments and empirical approaches to account for the evolution of such diversity. We highlight the approach adopted by each field. Population geneticists have developed an approach centred on gene properties of individuals and their role on the evolution of self-fertilisation (transmission rules and the deleterious role of mutations), while ecologists have mostly focused on demographic properties of self-fertilisation (seed production, colonisation ability of selfers). As a result, the two approaches sometimes use conflicting notions of fitness. The recent empirical advances on inbreeding depression, a topic typically motivated by population genetic questions, have emphasized the need to adopt a demographical perspective for fitness. In this paper, we suggest generalizing this approach in mating system evolution and we expect further improvements by integrating demographic and genetics perspectives. For more than two centuries, the diversity of plant mating systems has captured the curiosity and imagination of biologists. Changes in the mating system are among the most frequent evolutionary transitions in plants. Not only is the mating system a central focus for the study of adaptation (e.g. adaptive changes in flower morphology related to plant pollinator interactions), but it also plays an important role in determining the distribution of genetic variation in populations (Baker 1955, Stebbins 1957, Holsinger 2000). The adaptive nature of plant mating systems has been studied intensively, especially in hermaphroditic species, which represent more than 70% of the plant kingdom (Yampolsky and Yampolsky 1922). One focus has been on the evolution of self-fertilisation. Interestingly and though their scientific approach differ, both ecologists and population geneticists have contributed to our current understanding of the evolution of plant mating systems (Barrett and Harder 1996). Their studies have led to extensive theoretical developments (especially a large body of population genetics theory for mating system evolution) along with many experimental tests of theoretical hypotheses. Over the years, an important body of data on variation in selfing rates in the Angiosperms has also been collected (Vogler and Kalisz 2001). As noted by several authors (Uyenoyama et al. 1993, Barrett and Harder 1996, Holsinger 1996), these two traditions have been developed along independent paths, and while a number of researchers have combined tools from ecology and population genetics in studies of mating system evolution. It would be interesting to go one step further, since to date, despite numerous models and hypotheses, neither ecological nor genetic theory have provided a completely adequate explanation for the selection and maintenance of the enormous range of selfing rates found in hermaphroditic plants (Barrett and Harder 1996). In this paper, our aim is to focus on the logic of the arguments developed in mating system theory and to clarify inconsistencies. We propose that adopting a demographical perspective for fitness components may be a way to unify the different factors affecting Online Early (OE): 1-OE

2 self-fertilisation and to consider its evolution under general ecological scenarios. (A) Fisher s argument Selfer Outcrosser Reviewing self-fertilisation theory As reviewed by Holsinger (1996), the selective advantage of selfing can be viewed as arising in one of two ways (Fig. 1): 1. selfing increases ovule success when seed production is limited by pollen transfer (reproductive assurance hypothesis or fertility advantage) 2. selfing exhibits an intrinsic advantage in pollen transmission (automatic selection or cost of outcrossing). The first principle was proposed by Darwin (1876) who focused on self-pollination as the means of ensuring seed set either when outcrossing partners are absent or when pollinators are scarce. This has been referred to as the reproductive assurance hypothesis (Jain 1976). The second principle, based on gene transmission mechanisms, was proposed by Ronald Fisher (Fisher 1941), who argued that genes favoring selfing (mating system modifiers) are automatically selected because they benefit from a 50% transmission advantage compared to outcrossing genes. On the other hand, the deleterious effect of inbreeding on progeny performance (or inbreeding depression) (Knight 1799), is considered to be the main factor selecting against selfing. These three general components: pollen limitation, the cost of outcrossing and inbreeding depression are the cornerstones of most theories for the evolution of selffertilisation (Lloyd 1979, 1980). Basing one s argument on the most influential papers (most highly cited) during the period 1985 to 2000, one of the most important theoretical developments in this field was the recognition of the importance of considering both the cost of outcrossing and inbreeding depression and of including aspects relevant to the genetic architecture of inbreeding depression (Lande and Schemske 1985, Holsinger 1988, Charlesworth and Charlesworth 1990, Charlesworth et al. 1990, 1991). This studies have led to the important notion that inbreeding depression is dynamically linked to selfing rate through purging of deleterious mutations (though see Byers and Waller 1999), as well as the potential importance of genetic associations between fitness loci and modifier loci (Holsinger 1991a). Also, there have been important theoretical insights about the cost of outcrossing. First, Uyenoyama (1986) pointed out that the cost of outcrossing is less than 50% when outcrossed partners are related (biparental inbreeding; Ronfort and Couvet 1995). When outcrossing occurs among relatives the automatic advantage of selfing is no longer 50% but W selfer > Woutcrosser (B) Reproductive assurance argument Selfer Pollen limitation Outcrosser W selfer > Woutcrosser Fig. 1. Two principles for the advantages of self-fertilization. (A) Mating system modifier genes are represented by dots; an allele coding for self-fertilization is shown as a black dot, while an allele coding for outcrossing is shown as an open dot. Transmission pathways from parent to offspring are shown as arrows; solid arrows represent gene transmission to progeny by the parent capable of self-fertilization, while dashed arrows represent transmission pathways for the outcrossing parent. The recognition that genes are transmitted by pollen and ovules leads to a definition of fitness expressed as the number of genes transmitted to the progeny (gene counting approach). Because the number of pollen grains produced is assumed to be large relative to the number of ovules (Bateman s principle), a selfing genotype enjoy a 50% advantage in gene transmission relative to a outcrossing genotype). This results in the cost of outcrossing (Fisher 1941). (B) Reproductive assurance advantage of selfing. The large circles represent individual parents and their progeny. The arrows represent the production of discrete offspring by parents, with solid arrows representing pollinator-independent offspring production, and dashed arrows representing pollinator-dependent offspring production. Selfing provides an advantage by ensuring offspring production when lack of cross-pollinators limits seed set. This results in reproductive assurance. less. Second, the cost of outcrossing may be reduced as a result of pollen discounting, i.e. when selfers contribute less to outcrossing as pollen donors than outcrosses do. Of interest, Holsinger (1991b) analysed the evolution of selfing when pollen export is dynamically linked to selfing rate (the mass action model ) and showed that partial self-fertilisation is evolutionarily stable whenever selfing can evolve, thus demonstrating the fundamental importance of pollination biology for a 2-OE

3 proper understanding of the cost of outcrossing. All these developments share a common viewpoint, that is, fitness components are analysed as a genetic property of individuals (number of genes transmitted and deleterious effects of genes). At the same time, this approach has often been free of the demographical structure linked to mating system evolution and its effect on fitness components, which imposes a number of limitations on the scenarios considered (below). An alternative tradition in mating system studies has focused on the importance of pollen limitation and, in particular, on the demographic impact of selfing. Specifically, Darwin s ideas (below) were largely popularized by Baker (1955) and Baker (1967) in an island biology context. Baker proposed that: With a selfcompatible individual a single propagule is sufficient to start a sexually reproducing colony (after long distance dispersal), making its establishment much more likely than if the chance of the two self-incompatible yet cross-compatible individuals sufficiently close together spatially and temporally is required. Though Baker did not explicitly mention demography, he implicitly focused on the problems posed by low population densities for ensuring outcrossing during colonisation. More recently, the theoretical formalisation of Baker s law by Pannell and Barrett (1998) explicitly analysed the demographic consequences of outcrossing and the importance of a minimum number of colonizers in a metapopulation to maintain outcrossing. Following this logic, the advantage of selfing in Pannell and Barrett s model is measured in terms of seed production per individual because they focused on the role of selfing in colonisation ability. In contrast to the population genetic tradition which focuses on the number of genes transmitted, ecological approaches have emphasized on demographical factors such as population density and the colonisation process as important selection pressures driving mating system evolution. If both fields have identified the major fitness components of selfing, it is fundamental to keep in mind that the automatic advantage of selfing and the fertility advantage do not apply to the same level of selection (see Lloyd 1977 and 1979 for a thoughtful discussion). On the one hand, automatic selection is linked to the number of genes transmitted by an individual (maternal and paternal contribution) and the evolutionary processes is considered as a change in gene frequency. This method is the relevant metrics for analysing individual selection and is classically used in population genetic models cited below. On the other hand, fertility advantage undeniably contributes to fitness but does not match individual gene number (maternal contribution only) and thus does not constitute the relevant metrics for analysing evolutionary processes (below). In particular, by emphasizing the fact that the rate of colonisation is favoured by selfing, Baker s law (Pannell and Barrett s 1998 metapopulation model) considers that selection is governed by group selection (Lloyd 1979). The way the fertility advantage of selfing is considered in ecological studies is particularly telling and may potentially lead to confusion. Indeed, it is often noted that an outcrosser will be at a disadvantage when pollinators are scarce because it produces few seeds (Klips and Snow 1997, Herrera et al. 2001, Anderson et al. 2003, Schueller 2004, Ward et al. 2005). This is true, but it must be reminded that when focusing on genes, each outcrossed seeds (maternal contribution) as well as each sired seeds in the population (paternal contributions) contain exactly one copy of the outcrossing individual. Yet ecological studies seldom note that the outcrosser will be at disadvantage because it also exports less pollen, We think that such an omission does not help to integrate the selective advantage of reproductive assurance in evolutionary models. If we take a look at the bibliographic for the last 60 years (Source ISI Research), it shows that the seminal work of Fisher (1941) (335 citations) is mostly cited in genetically-oriented journals, whereas Baker (1955) (366 citations) or Baker (1967) (131 citations) are mostly cited in plant science journals. Moreover, papers citing both Baker (1955) and Fisher (1941) are few (54 citations) and none of the major theoretical contributions (cited below) cite both.for the sake of simplicity, many models have considered situations where demography can be neglected. However, recent empirical results have demonstrated that demography cannot be neglected since classical mating system parameters have to be considered in the light of demographical interactions among individuals. That is what we develop in the next part. Inbreeding depression in wild hermaphroditic populations: the need for integrating population genetics and demography Some light can be shed on the necessity to include demographical components of fitness by considering the way in which inbreeding depression has been treated in studies of mating system evolution. First described by Thomas Knight (1799) more than 200 years ago, inbreeding depression is expressed at the individual level, and is interpreted as arising from increased homozygosity (Charlesworth and Charlesworth 1987). In hermaphrodites, inbreeding depression is classically defined as d1 W s ; where W s and W out W out are the performances of selfed and outcrossed progeny respectively; e.g. biomass, number of flowers, survival, etc.). 3-OE

4 Theory for the evolution of mating systems has stimulated many experimental measures of inbreeding depression (reviewed by Husband and Schemske 1996). The motivations for such studies include assessing how inbreeding depression acts to oppose the selection of selfing (Lloyd 1979) as well as understanding the genetic basis of inbreeding depression (Byers and Waller 1999). Unfortunately, other factors affecting inbreeding depression values (e.g. competition) have sometimes been considered as mere complications, things that should be avoided when studying inbreeding depression (reviewed by Barrett and Harder 1996). Indeed, the experimental measure of inbreeding depression raises a number of challenges. For instance, consider one example of the analysis of inbreeding depression of survival to flowering in annual plants, where the environment could, in theory, play an extreme role. If growth conditions are very good for growth and survival, both inbred and outbred plants may survive until the end of the life cycle, and one would conclude that there is no inbreeding depression for survivorship. On the other hand, with intermediate mortality rates (e.g. due to competition among individuals or environmental stress), experimental results would likely suggest a positive inbreeding depression value. And lastly, if all plants die before reproduction, (e.g. because of stressful environmental conditions), the experiment would give no information about inbreeding depression. Though these simple examples may seem extreme, they demonstrate that in addition to genetic architecture, the estimated magnitude of inbreeding depression must depend on the ecological conditions acting on individuals (physical stress or competition). To our knowledge, no theoretical models have included environmental effects on inbreeding depression when studying the genetic architecture of ID, though empirical results on this point are now clearly established (Armbruster and Reed 2005). We believe that taking into account this phenomenon is crucial for understanding the selective effect of inbreeding depression in natural populations. Indeed, it can modify the purging process (Bijlsma et al. 1999) as well as evolutionary predictions concerning selfing. In our own experimental work we have illustrated the importance of demographical feedbacks on inbreeding depression in the case when the environmental conditions experienced by individuals in a population are linked to the evolution of the reproductive system itself (Cheptou and Schoen 2003). In that study we measured inbreeding depression in competing stands and found that the relative composition of inbred and outbred plants (which in natural populations, is determined directly by population selfing rate) substantially influences the magnitude of inbreeding depression (Fig. 2). In this context, the classical balance between the cost of outcrossing and inbreeding depression ought to be reinterpreted in the light of feedback from intraspecific competition, itself a function of the population s rate of selfing (Cheptou and Dieckmann 2002). In other words, a gene favoring selfing may modify the competition environment in which its fitness is determined. We would like to emphasize that including demographical components of fitness into the population genetics framework may help to generalise the selection on self-fertilisation under general ecological scenarios. An example: the evolution of self-fertilisation under stochastic pollination environment In the first part, we emphasized the fact that, though reproductive assurance and the cost of outcrossing select for selfing, they do not operate on the same level of selection. As a consequence, their joint effect is not necessarily trivial. Adopting a demographical view of fitness may help to clarify selection processes and avoid oversimplistic (and intuitive) arguments for the selection of selfing. We illustrate this point by analysing the selection of self-fertilisation under stochastic pollination environment. When focusing on the role of reproductive assurance, people have often focused on the uncertainty of the pollination environment (temporal heterogeneity) (Baker 1967, Herlihy and Eckert 2002, Kalisz and Vogler 2003) and have considered selfing as a way to maximise seed production (Burd 1995). In population genetics models (Lande 1982, Charlesworth 1994), the classical assumption is the stability of environment, which rules out stochastic variations and density dependent effects-and so the exploration of evolutionary processes under those scenarios has been left out (Caswell 2001). The conclusions drawn from population genetics models built on stable environment assumptions are not valid under general demographic scenarios. Note that taking into account general ecological scenarios may be particularly relevant as regards the maintenance of mixed mating systems because it often leads to frequency- and densitydependant fitness (Heino et al. 1998), a necessary conditions for negative feedbacks to arise (Goodwillie et al. 2005). Here we define fitness components in a demographical context, including for instance density-dependence or stochastic environments and integrate them into a population genetics framework in order to derive evolutionary predictions (Metz et al. 1992, Brommer 2000). Let us consider a simple model including pollen limitation (reproductive assurance) inspired from Lloyd s (1979) work, and extending it to stochastic environments a variant of Morgan and Wilson s (2005) model. Thus, consider a hermaphroditic annual 4-OE

5 (a) Outbred populations Mixed populations Inbred populations Focal individual Outbred zygotes Inbred zygotes (b) Number of flowers (for focal plants) Inbreeding depression 0 0% 100% % (Inbred neighboors) 0% (Outbred neighboors) Fig. 2. Experimental evidence of ecological feedback on fitness driven by the mating system. Experiments on the partial selfer Amsinckia douglasiana (s/0.25). In partially selfing annual plant population, the population selfing rate in a large population is defined as the proportion of inbred and outbred individuals. Consider the focal individual shown in (A). Ecological interactions (competition) in a highly selfing population occur mainly among inbreds, whereas in a highly outcrossing population, they occur mainly among outbreds. Cheptou and Schoen (2003) measured the performances of focal plants (inbred and outbred) by varying the proportion of inbred and outbred plants (on the hexagon), thus simulating competition from complete outcrossing to complete selfing. (B) shows experimental results (fitted number of flowers produced by focal plants: mean, SE) as a function of the proportion of inbred neighboors in a competing stand (310 plants m 2 )inamsinckia douglasiana. Absolute fitness for inbred (dotted line) and oubred (solid line) as well as inbreeding depression (d1 W self W out :thin line) changes with the frequency of inbred plants, showing that the population selfing rate feedbacks on individual performances and on inbreeding depression as a result of ecological interactions in the population. Note: the possibility that inbreeding depression can be influenced by the composition of the stand, which was rediscovered by Schmitt and Ehrhardt (1990) was anticipated by Darwin (1876) who wrote: With Nicotiana the crossed were to the self-fertilized in height, when grown extremely crowded together in pots, as 100 to 54; when grown much less crowded in pots as 100 to 66, and when grown in the open ground, so as to be subjected to but little competition, as 100 to 72. plant population experiencing inbreeding depression and pollinator limitation. According to the classical population genetics model, the fitness of a rare mutant with a selfing rate r in a resident population with selfing rate R can be measured as the number of genes transmitted to the next generation, that is: Where d is the inbreeding depression parameter and e characterizes pollinator efficiency, the proportion of available ovules fertilized with the aid of an external agent (Lloyd 1979).From the perspective of reproductive assurance, we consider that e may fluctuate in time as the result of among-year variation in pollinator Gene transmission via Selfed ovules Out. ovules Pollen export 1 r 1 R W ( r, R, t) r ( 1 δ) e( t) 2 2 Fitness of inbred progeny Fitness of outbred progeny 5-OE

6 activity (Kalisz and Vogler 2003). As a particular case in point, when environmental conditions are constant, the evolution of selfing is favored if 1d e 0 (Lloyd ). Next, let s assume instead, that there is a stochastic pollination process resulting from amongyear variation in the pollinator population. Specifically, each year, pollination efficiency, e, is taken from a probability distribution (with mean /ē and variance s 2 ). If the population demography is assumed to be globally stable on an ecological timescale-- neither goes extinct nor grows exponentially-then, the direction of selection for self-fertilisation is given by the sign of (1de=2)f(R):s 2 (2) (see Box 1 for mathematical details). This characterizes the selection of selfing under stochastic pollination. Interestingly, f(r) embodies the feedback on selfing, modulating the spread of selfing genes in stochastic environments. f(r) is always positive and increases with R. So contrary to the environmentally stable situation, selection in this case depends on the population selfing rate R, and consequently the selection gradient may vanish for intermediate selfing rates in other words, stochastic pollination may create negative feedback on selfing, which in turn allows for the maintenance of mixed mating (Fig. 3). This result may be likened to bet-hedging theory, which states that a good strategy is the one that maximises the long-term fitness (geometric mean). Note that a qualitatively similar result may sometimes be found when inbreeding depression fluctuates in time (see Cheptou and Schoen 2002 for a theoretical model, and Dole and Ritland 1993 for an empirical example). From the point of view of reproductive assurance, it may be tempting to consider that a population adapted to a stochastic pollination environment is the one that maximises seed production over years; i.e. the best strategy is a mix of outcrossing for good years and selfing bad pollination years (bet hedging). As shown by Fig. 4, it is not the case. This model reveals that evolutionary stable strategies do not maximize seed production, as seen in other examples from evolutionary biology (Maynard Smith 1982). On this point, it is important to note that Darwin s and Baker s verbal interpretations are not accurate since they are implicitly based on the maximisation of seed production (Ashman et al. 2004, Burd 1995). Indeed, the selection of selfing is driven by gene transmission for which seed production is only one component of the fitness. The practical consequence is that mere observation of a population that appears to be employing selfing for optimising seed production in the face of an uncertain pollination does not constitute Box 1. The evolution of self-fertilisation under stochastic pollination environments. The fitness at time t of a mutant, with selfing rate r in a resident population with selfing rate R in stochastic pollination environment, is given by the following equation: 1 r W t (r; R)r(1d) 2 1 R e t (1) 2 The long-term exponential growth rate is given by: s(r; R) E[Lnw(r; R)] (2) We assume that the population is demographically stable i.e. s(r; R) E[Lnw(R; R)] and we approximate Var(w(r; R) s(r,r) using Jensen approximation E[Ln(w(r; R)]Ln[E(w(r; R)] : Then, the direction of 2E(w(r; R)) selection is given by the sign 1s 1r evaluated at r/r i.e. the sign of the quantity (where ē and s2 are mean and variance of the temporal pollination efficiency): D(R) 1 e=2 d 1 R 2 ( 1 d ) d R(1:5 1:5d) e(1 R) R(1 d) 2 s 2 [e(1 R) R(1 d)] 3 A(1e=2d)Bs 2 With A/0 and B/0 The evolutionary stable strategy R* is given by solving D(R) /0. The outcome of selection is summarised in Fig OE

7 0.2 Mixed selfing a proof of adaptation to its environment. As we have shown (Fig. 4), a population producing fewer seeds may actually be closer to the evolutionary stable selfing rate. In summary, this model reveals several interesting features. First, it combines a classical ecological scenario with basic population genetics models, which allows for the maintenance of mixed selfing rates. Second, it explicitly demonstrates that the criterion of seed maximisation under stochastic environment is not accurate from an evolutionary point of view. Though it is true that: (1) selfing increases ovule success when seed production is pollen-limited; and (2) selfing exhibits an intrinsic advantage in pollen transmission, we can see that the outcome is not trivial under general ecological scenarios Conclusions and perspectives σ Complete selfing Complete outcrossing µ Fig. 3. Selection of self-fertilisation in an environment with fluctuating pollination, as a function of mean and variance of pollination efficiency. In this example, inbreeding depression is fixed to d/0.6. Our aim has been to integrate concepts of population genetics and concepts of the ecological theory of mating system evolution. The demographical view of ecologists has often led to the use the optimization criteria applied on seed production, whereas population geneticists have based their evolutionary analysis on the spread of a gene increasing the selfing rate, with the focus on conditions for its spread and invasion. Ecologists have explored various ecological scenarios with little theoretical formalisation, whereas population geneticists have mostly formalised gene transmission process within populations. On the one hand, population genetics have developed an important theoretical framework, but on the other hand the demographical theory allows the extension of evolutionary predictions to complex ecological scenarios. According to us, since models that do not integrate environmental components may not be relevant in the light of recent studies, future models in the field of mating systems ought to take these components into account. Acknowledgements This article was initially entitled The interplay of genes and individuals in plant mating systems evolution (or can population genetics overlook ecology much longer?). Several reviewers have pointed out the provocative nature of the title. We thank them for their clear-sightedness. We are deeply indebted to Kent Holsinger for his encouragements and helpful comments. We thank Jeremiah Busch and numerous anonymous reviewers for improving the various versions of this manuscript. This article is part of the ACI project (P.-O. Cheptou) funded by the French Ministry of Research. Seed production (geometric mean) Selfing rate Fig. 4. Geometric mean of seed production (approximation for E[ln l]) as a function of selfing rate under stochastic pollination for various sets of parameters. For each set of parameters, the evolutionary stable selfing rate is represented by a black dot. 1-continuous thin line: d/0.7; mu/0.7; var/ dotted thin line: d/0.65; mu/0.85; var/ continuous thick line: d/0.6; mu/0.8; var/ dotted thick line: d/0.65; mu/0.8; var/0.08. References Anderson, B. et al Facilitated selfing offers reproductive assurance: a mutualistism between a hemipteran and carnivorous plant. Am. J. Bot. 90: Armbruster, P. and Reed, D Inbreeding depression in benign an stressfull environments. Heredity 95: Ashman, T. L. et al Pollen limitatio n of plant reproduction: ecological and evolutionary causes and consequences. Ecology 85: Baker, H. G Self-compatibility and establishment after long distance dispersal. Evolution 9: Baker, H. G Support for Baker s law as a rule. Evolution 21: OE

8 Barrett, S. C. H. and Harder, L. D Ecology and evolution of plant mating system. Trends Ecol. Evol. 11: Bijlsma, R. et al Environmental dependence of inbreeding depression and purging in Drosophila melanogaster. J. Evol. Biol. 12: Brommer, J. E The evolution of fitness in life-history theory. Biol. Rev. 75: Burd, M Ovule packaging in stochastic pollination and fertilization environments. Evolution 49: Byers, D. L. and Waller, D. M Do plant populations purge their genetic load? Effects of population size and mating system history on inbreeding depression. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 30: Caswell, H Matrix population models: construction, analysis and interpretation. Sinauer. Charlesworth B Evolution in age-structured populations (2nd ed.). Cambridge Univ. Press. Charlesworth, B. et al Multilocus models of inbreeding depression with synergistic selection and partial selffertilization. Genet. Res. Camb. 57: Charlesworth, D. and Charlesworth, B Inbreeding depression and its evolutionary consequences. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 18: Charlesworth, D. and Charlesworth, B Inbreeding depression with heterozygote advantage and its effect on selection for modifiers changing the outcrossing rate. Evolution 44: Charlesworth, D. et al Inbreeding depression, genetic load, and the evolution of outcrossing rates in a multilocus system with no linkage. Evolution 44: Cheptou, P. O. and Dieckmann, U The evolution of self-fertilization in density-regulated populations. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 269: Cheptou, P. O. and Schoen, D. J The cost of fluctuating inbreeding depression. Evolution 56: Cheptou, P. O. and Schoen, D. J Frequencydependent inbreeding depression in Amsinckia. Am. Nat. 162: Darwin, C. R The effects of cross and self fertilization in the vegetable kingdom. Murray, London. Dole, J. and Ritland, K Inbreeding depression in two Mimulus taxa measured by multigenerationnal changes in inbreeding coefficient. Evolution 47: Fisher, R. A Average excess and average effect of a gene substitution. Ann. Eugen. 11: Goodwillie, C. et al The evolutionary enigma of mixed mating systems in plants: occurrence, theoretical explanations, and empirical evidence. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 36: Heino, M. et al The enigma of frequency-dependent selection. Trends Ecol. Evol. 13: Herlihy, C. R. and Eckert, C. G Genetic cost of reproductive assurance in a self-fertilizing plants. Nature 416: Herrera, C. M. et al Geographical variation in autonomous self-pollination levels unrelated to pollinator service in Helleborus foetidus (Ranunculaceae). Am. J. Bot. 88: Holsinger, K. E Inbreeding doesn t matter: the genetic basis of mating system evolution. Evolution 42: Holsinger, K. E. 1991a. Inbreeding depression and the evolution of plant mating systems. Trends Ecol. Evol. 6: Holsinger, K. E. 1991b. Mass action models of plant mating systems: the evolutionnary stability of mixed mating systems. Am. Nat. 138: Holsinger, K. E Pollination biology and the evolution of mating systems in flowering plant. Evol. Biol. 29: Holsinger, K. E Reproductive systems and evolution in vascular plants. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97: Husband, B. and Schemske, D. W Evolution of the magnitude and timing of inbreeding depression in plants. Evolution 50: Jain, S. K The evolution of inbreeding in plants. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 7: Kalisz, S. and Vogler, D. W Benefits of autonomous selfing under unpredictable pollinator environments. Ecology 84: Klips, R. A. and Snow, A. A Delayed autonomous selfpollination in Hibiscus laevis (Malvaceae). Am. J. Bot. 84: Knight, T Experiments on the fecundation of vegetables. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. 89: Lande, R A quantitative genetic theory of life history evolution. Ecology 63: Lande, R. and Schemske, D. W The evolution of self fertilization and inbreeding depression in plants. I. Genetic models. Evolution 39: Lloyd, D. G Genetic and phenotypic models of natural selection. J. Theor. Biol. 69: Lloyd, D. G Some reproductive factors affecting the selection of self-fertilization in plants. Am. Nat. 113: Lloyd, D. G Demographic factors and mating patterns in Angiosperms. In: Solbrig, O. T. (ed.), Demography and evolution in plant populations. Univ. California Press, pp Maynard Smith, J Evolution and the theory of games. Cambridge Univ. Press. Metz, J. A. J. et al How should we define fitness for general ecological scenarios? Trends Ecol. Evol. 7: Morgan, M. T. and Wilson, W. G Self-fertilization and the escape from pollen limitation in variable pollination environments. Evolution 59: Pannell, J. R. and Barrett, C. H Bakers law: reproductive assurance in a metapopulation. Evolution 52: Ronfort, J. and Couvet, D A stochastic model of selection on the selfing rates in structured populations. Genet. Res. 65: Schmitt, J. and Ehrhardt, D. W Enhancement of inbreeding depression by dominance and suppression in Impatiens capensis. Evolution 44: OE

9 Schueller, S. K Self-pollination in island and mainland populations of the introduced hummingbird-pollinated plant, Nicotiana glauca (Solanaceae). Am. J. Bot 91: Stebbins, G. L Self-fertilization and population variability in higher plants. Am. Midl. Nat. 91: Uyenoyama, M. K Inbreeding and the cost of meiosis: the evolution of selfing in populations practcing biparental inbreeding. Evolution 40: Uyenoyama, M. K. et al Ecological and genetic factors directing the evolution of self fertilization. Oxford Survey Evol. Biol. 9: Vogler, D. W. and Kalisz, S Sex among the flowers: the distribution of plant mating systems. Evolution 55: Ward, M. et al To self, or not to self...a review of outcrossing and pollen-mediated gene flow in neotropical trees. Heredity 95: Yampolsky, C. and Yampolsky, H Distribution of sex forms in the phanerogamic flora. Bibl. Genet. 3: OE

Biology 1406 - Notes for exam 5 - Population genetics Ch 13, 14, 15

Biology 1406 - Notes for exam 5 - Population genetics Ch 13, 14, 15 Biology 1406 - Notes for exam 5 - Population genetics Ch 13, 14, 15 Species - group of individuals that are capable of interbreeding and producing fertile offspring; genetically similar 13.7, 14.2 Population

More information

CAMPBELL BIOLOGY. Chapter 13

CAMPBELL BIOLOGY. Chapter 13 Lecture 10 Population Genetics CAMPBELL BIOLOGY Chapter 13 Hox Genes Control development Hox genes need to be highly regulated to get expressed at the right time and correct level to orchestrate mammalian

More information

Microevolution: The mechanism of evolution

Microevolution: The mechanism of evolution Microevolution: The mechanism of evolution What is it that evolves? Not individual organisms Populations are the smallest units that evolve Population: members of a species (interbreeding individuals and

More information

How do populations evolve?... Are there any trends?...

How do populations evolve?... Are there any trends?... How do populations evolve?... Are there any trends?... Gene pool: all of the genes of a population Allele frequency: the percentage of any particular allele in a gene pool A population in which an allele

More information

Chapter 25: Population Genetics

Chapter 25: Population Genetics Chapter 25: Population Genetics Student Learning Objectives Upon completion of this chapter you should be able to: 1. Understand the concept of a population and polymorphism in populations. 2. Apply the

More information

Developed by William Beavis, Laura Merrick, Kendra Meade, Arden Campbell, and Deborah Muenchrath

Developed by William Beavis, Laura Merrick, Kendra Meade, Arden Campbell, and Deborah Muenchrath AGRONOMY 527 : LESSON 5 Population Genetics Introduction Developed by William Beavis, Laura Merrick, Kendra Meade, Arden Campbell, and Deborah Muenchrath Completion time: 1 week Readings Required reading:

More information

not to be republished NCERT Heredity and Evolution CHAPTER 9 Multiple Choice Questions

not to be republished NCERT Heredity and Evolution CHAPTER 9 Multiple Choice Questions CHAPTER 9 Heredity and Evolution Multiple Choice Questions 1. Exchange of genetic material takes place in (a) vegetative reproduction (b) asexual reproduction (c) sexual reproduction (d) budding 2. Two

More information

CHAPTER 23 THE EVOLUTIONS OF POPULATIONS. Section B: Causes of Microevolution

CHAPTER 23 THE EVOLUTIONS OF POPULATIONS. Section B: Causes of Microevolution CHAPTER 23 THE EVOLUTIONS OF POPULATIONS Section B: Causes of Microevolution 1. Microevolution is generation-to-generation change in a population s allele frequencies 2. The two main causes of microevolution

More information

Population Genetics: Changes in the Gene Pool and Gene Frequency

Population Genetics: Changes in the Gene Pool and Gene Frequency Biology 11 Name: Population Genetics: Changes in the Gene Pool and Gene Frequency Evolution through natural selection describes how populations change over time but it is not the only way that populations

More information

Seed color gene with two alleles: R = purple (or red) allele (dominant allele) r = yellow (or white) allele (recessive allele)

Seed color gene with two alleles: R = purple (or red) allele (dominant allele) r = yellow (or white) allele (recessive allele) Patterns of Inheritance in Maize written by J. D. Hendrix Learning Objectives Upon completing the exercise, each student should be able to define the following terms gene, allele, genotype, phenotype,

More information

The breeding system of the forest giant, Eucalyptus regnans

The breeding system of the forest giant, Eucalyptus regnans The breeding system of the forest giant, Eucalyptus regnans Rod Griffin 1, Craig Hardner 2, Peter Buxton 3, Charlie Bell 4 and Brad Potts 1 1 School of Plant Science and CRC for Forestry, University of

More information

Evolution (18%) 11 Items Sample Test Prep Questions

Evolution (18%) 11 Items Sample Test Prep Questions Evolution (18%) 11 Items Sample Test Prep Questions Grade 7 (Evolution) 3.a Students know both genetic variation and environmental factors are causes of evolution and diversity of organisms. (pg. 109 Science

More information

Lecture 6 Mendelian Genetics in Populations: Selection and Mutation

Lecture 6 Mendelian Genetics in Populations: Selection and Mutation Lecture 6 Mendelian Genetics in Populations: Selection and Mutation 1 Population: a group of interbreeding organisms and their offspring. Gene pool: the collection of alleles present within a population.

More information

C1. A gene pool is all of the genes present in a particular population. Each type of gene within a gene pool may exist in one or more alleles.

C1. A gene pool is all of the genes present in a particular population. Each type of gene within a gene pool may exist in one or more alleles. C1. A gene pool is all of the genes present in a particular population. Each type of gene within a gene pool may exist in one or more alleles. The prevalence of an allele within the gene pool is described

More information

Genetics and Evolution: An ios Application to Supplement Introductory Courses in. Transmission and Evolutionary Genetics

Genetics and Evolution: An ios Application to Supplement Introductory Courses in. Transmission and Evolutionary Genetics G3: Genes Genomes Genetics Early Online, published on April 11, 2014 as doi:10.1534/g3.114.010215 Genetics and Evolution: An ios Application to Supplement Introductory Courses in Transmission and Evolutionary

More information

Population and Community Dynamics

Population and Community Dynamics Population and Community Dynamics Part 1. Genetic Diversity in Populations Pages 676 to 701 Part 2. Population Growth and Interactions Pages 702 to 745 Review Evolution by Natural Selection new variants

More information

Lecture 10 Friday, March 20, 2009

Lecture 10 Friday, March 20, 2009 Lecture 10 Friday, March 20, 2009 Reproductive isolating mechanisms Prezygotic barriers: Anything that prevents mating and fertilization is a prezygotic mechanism. Habitat isolation, behavioral isolation,

More information

Chapter 23. (Mendelian) Population. Gene Pool. Genetic Variation. Population Genetics

Chapter 23. (Mendelian) Population. Gene Pool. Genetic Variation. Population Genetics 30 25 Chapter 23 Population Genetics Frequency 20 15 10 5 0 A B C D F Grade = 57 Avg = 79.5 % (Mendelian) Population A group of interbreeding, sexually reproducing organisms that share a common set of

More information

Supporting Online Material: Adaptive Dynamics of Continuous Games Adaptive Dynamics

Supporting Online Material: Adaptive Dynamics of Continuous Games Adaptive Dynamics Supporting Online Material: Adaptive Dynamics of Continuous Games Michael Doebeli 1, Christoph Hauert 1,2 & Timothy Killingback 3 1 Departments of Mathematics and Zoology, University of British Columbia,

More information

Genetics and Natural Selection

Genetics and Natural Selection Genetics and Natural Selection Darwin did not have an understanding of the mechanisms of inheritance and thus did not understand how natural selection would alter the patterns of inheritance in a population.

More information

Population Genetics (Outline)

Population Genetics (Outline) Population Genetics (Outline) Definition of terms of population genetics: population, species, gene, pool, gene flow Calculation of genotypic of homozygous dominant, recessive, or heterozygous individuals,

More information

The world s quarter of a million vascular plant species (1) Reproductive systems and evolution in vascular plants. Colloquium. Kent E.

The world s quarter of a million vascular plant species (1) Reproductive systems and evolution in vascular plants. Colloquium. Kent E. Colloquium Reproductive systems and evolution in vascular plants Kent E. Holsinger* Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, U-3043, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269-3043 Differences

More information

9.1: Mechanisms of Evolution and Their Effect on Populations pg. 350-359

9.1: Mechanisms of Evolution and Their Effect on Populations pg. 350-359 9.1: Mechanisms of Evolution and Their Effect on Populations pg. 350-359 Key Terms: gene flow, non-random mating, genetic drift, founder effect, bottleneck effect, stabilizing selection, directional selection

More information

PLANT EVOLUTION DISPLAY Handout

PLANT EVOLUTION DISPLAY Handout PLANT EVOLUTION DISPLAY Handout Name: TA and Section time Welcome to UCSC Greenhouses. This sheet explains a few botanical facts about plant reproduction that will help you through the display and handout.

More information

Lecture 20: Population and Community Ecology. I. Background

Lecture 20: Population and Community Ecology. I. Background Lecture 20: Population and Community Ecology I. Background A. Biological processes affecting populations 1. Population ecology is the study of populations in relation to environment a. Environment influences

More information

Summary. 16 1 Genes and Variation. 16 2 Evolution as Genetic Change. Name Class Date

Summary. 16 1 Genes and Variation. 16 2 Evolution as Genetic Change. Name Class Date Chapter 16 Summary Evolution of Populations 16 1 Genes and Variation Darwin s original ideas can now be understood in genetic terms. Beginning with variation, we now know that traits are controlled by

More information

Ch. 13 How Populations Evolve Period. 4. Describe Lamarck s proposed theory of evolution, The Theory of Acquired Traits.

Ch. 13 How Populations Evolve Period. 4. Describe Lamarck s proposed theory of evolution, The Theory of Acquired Traits. Ch. 13 How Populations Evolve Name Period California State Standards covered by this chapter: Evolution 7. The frequency of an allele in a gene pool of a population depends on many factors and may be stable

More information

Chapter 19 Populations & Communities

Chapter 19 Populations & Communities Chapter 19 Populations & Communities Ecology Population Dynamics Competition Shapes Communities Species Interactions/ Relationships Coevolution/symbiosis Predation/ animal defenses mimicry Levels of Ecological

More information

Evolution of Populations

Evolution of Populations Evolution of Populations Evolution Q: How can populations evolve to form new species? 17.1 How do genes make evolution possible? WHAT I KNOW SAMPLE ANSWER: There are different variations of the same gene.

More information

Chapter 21 Active Reading Guide The Evolution of Populations

Chapter 21 Active Reading Guide The Evolution of Populations Name: Roksana Korbi AP Biology Chapter 21 Active Reading Guide The Evolution of Populations This chapter begins with the idea that we focused on as we closed Chapter 19: Individuals do not evolve! Populations

More information

2. For example, tall plant, round seed, violet flower, etc. are dominant characters in a pea plant.

2. For example, tall plant, round seed, violet flower, etc. are dominant characters in a pea plant. Principles of Inheritance and Variation Class 12 Chapter 5 Principles of Inheritance and Variation Exercise Solutions Exercise : Solutions of Questions on Page Number : 93 Q1 : Mention the advantages of

More information

7A The Origin of Modern Genetics

7A The Origin of Modern Genetics Life Science Chapter 7 Genetics of Organisms 7A The Origin of Modern Genetics Genetics the study of inheritance (the study of how traits are inherited through the interactions of alleles) Heredity: the

More information

Chapter 9 Patterns of Inheritance

Chapter 9 Patterns of Inheritance Bio 100 Patterns of Inheritance 1 Chapter 9 Patterns of Inheritance Modern genetics began with Gregor Mendel s quantitative experiments with pea plants History of Heredity Blending theory of heredity -

More information

AP Biology Learning Objective Cards

AP Biology Learning Objective Cards 1.1 The student is able to convert a data set from a table of numbers that reflect a change in the genetic makeup of a population over time and to apply mathematical methods and conceptual understandings

More information

Exam 1. CSS/Hort 430. 2008 All questions worth 2 points

Exam 1. CSS/Hort 430. 2008 All questions worth 2 points Exam 1. CSS/Hort 430. 2008 All questions worth 2 points 1. A general definition of plants is they are eukaryotic, multi-cellular organisms and are usually photosynthetic. In this definition, eukaryotic

More information

NATURAL SELECTION FOR AN INTERMEDIATE OPTIMUM. [Manuscript received August 21, 1959] Summary

NATURAL SELECTION FOR AN INTERMEDIATE OPTIMUM. [Manuscript received August 21, 1959] Summary NATURAL SELECTION FOR AN INTERMEDIATE OPTIMUM By B. D. H. LATTER* [Manuscript received August 21, 1959] Summary Natural selection against extreme metric deviation is a process which is known to lead to

More information

AP Biology Essential Knowledge Student Diagnostic

AP Biology Essential Knowledge Student Diagnostic AP Biology Essential Knowledge Student Diagnostic Background The Essential Knowledge statements provided in the AP Biology Curriculum Framework are scientific claims describing phenomenon occurring in

More information

Pea Patch Pollination Game

Pea Patch Pollination Game Pea Patch Pollination Game Classroom Activity: 5-8 Time: One 45-60-minute class period Overview: In this activity, students play a simulation game modeling changes in a plant population (a Pea Patch) caused

More information

11.1 KEY CONCEPT A population shares a common gene pool.

11.1 KEY CONCEPT A population shares a common gene pool. 11.1 KEY CONCEPT A population shares a common gene pool. Why it s beneficial: Genetic variation leads to phenotypic variation. It increases the chance that some individuals will survive Phenotypic variation

More information

Basic Principles of Forensic Molecular Biology and Genetics. Population Genetics

Basic Principles of Forensic Molecular Biology and Genetics. Population Genetics Basic Principles of Forensic Molecular Biology and Genetics Population Genetics Significance of a Match What is the significance of: a fiber match? a hair match? a glass match? a DNA match? Meaning of

More information

The genetics of inbreeding depression

The genetics of inbreeding depression Fundamental ConCepts in GenetiCs The genetics of inbreeding depression Deborah Charlesworth* and John H. Willis Abstract Inbreeding depression the reduced survival and fertility of offspring of related

More information

Assessment Schedule 2014 Biology: Demonstrate understanding of genetic variation and change (91157) Evidence Statement

Assessment Schedule 2014 Biology: Demonstrate understanding of genetic variation and change (91157) Evidence Statement NCEA Level 2 Biology (91157) 2014 page 1 of 5 Assessment Schedule 2014 Biology: Demonstrate understanding of genetic variation and change (91157) Evidence Statement NCEA Level 2 Biology (91157) 2014 page

More information

Foundations of Genetics. Copyright The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display

Foundations of Genetics. Copyright The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display Foundations of Genetics 8.1 Mendel and the Garden Pea The tendency for traits to be passed from parent to offspring is called heredity Gregor Mendel (1822-1884) The first person to systematically study

More information

21. Heterosis, inbreeding depression, various theories of Heterosis

21. Heterosis, inbreeding depression, various theories of Heterosis 21. Heterosis, inbreeding depression, various theories of Heterosis Heterosis and Inbreeding Depression Cross pollinated species and species reproducing asexually are highly heterozygous. When these species

More information

AP Biology Unit I: Ecological Interactions

AP Biology Unit I: Ecological Interactions AP Biology Unit I: Ecological Interactions Essential knowledge 1.C.1: Speciation and extinction have occurred throughout the Earth s history. Species extinction rates are rapid at times of ecological stress.

More information

In developmental genomic regulatory interactions among genes, encoding transcription factors

In developmental genomic regulatory interactions among genes, encoding transcription factors JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY Volume 20, Number 6, 2013 # Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. Pp. 419 423 DOI: 10.1089/cmb.2012.0297 Research Articles A New Software Package for Predictive Gene Regulatory Network

More information

Practice Questions 1: Evolution

Practice Questions 1: Evolution Practice Questions 1: Evolution 1. Which concept is best illustrated in the flowchart below? A. natural selection B. genetic manipulation C. dynamic equilibrium D. material cycles 2. The diagram below

More information

3 5 6 5 7 7 3 6! 8, 90 /8 2/8 :66;

3 5 6 5 7 7 3 6! 8, 90 /8 2/8 :66; !! #! %!! & ( ))! +,../0 2 3 ) 4 3 3 3 5 6 5 7 7 3 6! 8, 90 /8 2/8 :66; /8 2 / < 3.. 9 ).. = > Received 2 July 2003 Accepted 30 September 2003 Published online 4 January 2004 Evolution of size-dependent

More information

Population Genetics. Outline. Key Concepts: How does a population evolve?

Population Genetics. Outline. Key Concepts: How does a population evolve? Population Genetics How does a population evolve? Outline 1. Key Concepts 2. Individuals Don t evolve, Populations Do 3. The Hardy-Weinberg Theorem 4. The Microevolution and Natural Selection 5. Genetic

More information

Workshop on Microevolution

Workshop on Microevolution Workshop on Microevolution by Dana Krempels I. Discuss the meaning of: a. species f. heritable traits (consider "nature vs. nurture") b. population g. lethal alleles c. gene pool h. adaptive, maladaptive,

More information

Okami Study Guide: Chapter 3 1

Okami Study Guide: Chapter 3 1 Okami Study Guide: Chapter 3 1 Chapter in Review 1. Heredity is the tendency of offspring to resemble their parents in various ways. Genes are units of heredity. They are functional strands of DNA grouped

More information

Assessment Schedule 2013 Biology: Demonstrate understanding of genetic variation and change (91157)

Assessment Schedule 2013 Biology: Demonstrate understanding of genetic variation and change (91157) NCEA Level 2 Biology (91157) 2013 page 1 of 5 Assessment Schedule 2013 Biology: Demonstrate understanding of genetic variation and change (91157) Assessment Criteria with with Excellence Demonstrate understanding

More information

Population Genetics -- Evolutionary Stasis and the Hardy-Weinberg Principles 1

Population Genetics -- Evolutionary Stasis and the Hardy-Weinberg Principles 1 Population Genetics -- Evolutionary Stasis and the Hardy-Weinberg Principles 1 Review and Introduction Mendel presented the first successful theory of the inheritance of biological variation. He viewed

More information

HLA data analysis in anthropology: basic theory and practice

HLA data analysis in anthropology: basic theory and practice HLA data analysis in anthropology: basic theory and practice Alicia Sanchez-Mazas and José Manuel Nunes Laboratory of Anthropology, Genetics and Peopling history (AGP), Department of Anthropology and Ecology,

More information

Ecology - scientific study of how individuals interact with their environment 34.1

Ecology - scientific study of how individuals interact with their environment 34.1 Biology 1407 Exam 4 Notes - Ecology Ch.35-36 Ecology - scientific study of how individuals interact with their environment 34.1 - organisms have adapted to - evolved in - a particular set of conditions;

More information

11.1 The Work of Gregor Mendel

11.1 The Work of Gregor Mendel 11.1 The Work of Gregor Mendel Lesson Objectives Describe Mendel s studies and conclusions about inheritance. Describe what happens during segregation. Lesson Summary The Experiments of Gregor Mendel The

More information

DATA QUALITY IN SAFETY ASSESSMENT OF GE CROPS: ISSUES AND CHALLENGES VIBHA AHUJA BIOTECH CONSORTIUM INDIA LIMITED

DATA QUALITY IN SAFETY ASSESSMENT OF GE CROPS: ISSUES AND CHALLENGES VIBHA AHUJA BIOTECH CONSORTIUM INDIA LIMITED DATA QUALITY IN SAFETY ASSESSMENT OF GE CROPS: ISSUES AND CHALLENGES VIBHA AHUJA BIOTECH CONSORTIUM INDIA LIMITED SAFETY ASSESSMENT OF GE CROPS Applications for the commercial approval of a GM crop are

More information

Genetics (20%) Sample Test Prep Questions

Genetics (20%) Sample Test Prep Questions Genetics (20%) Sample Test Prep Questions Grade 7 (2a Genetics) Students know the differences between the life cycles and reproduction methods of sexual and asexual organisms. (pg. 106 Science Framework)

More information

Ch.16-17 Review. Name: Class: Date: Multiple Choice Identify the choice that best completes the statement or answers the question.

Ch.16-17 Review. Name: Class: Date: Multiple Choice Identify the choice that best completes the statement or answers the question. Name: Class: Date: Ch.16-17 Review Multiple Choice Identify the choice that best completes the statement or answers the question. 1. Which of the following statements describe what all members of a population

More information

Modules 5: Behavior Genetics and Evolutionary Psychology

Modules 5: Behavior Genetics and Evolutionary Psychology Modules 5: Behavior Genetics and Evolutionary Psychology Source of similarities and differences Similarities with other people such as developing a languag, showing similar emotions, following similar

More information

Nature of Genetic Material. Nature of Genetic Material

Nature of Genetic Material. Nature of Genetic Material Core Category Nature of Genetic Material Nature of Genetic Material Core Concepts in Genetics (in bold)/example Learning Objectives How is DNA organized? Describe the types of DNA regions that do not encode

More information

Malthus, Darwin, and Natural selection: an historical introduction to evolution

Malthus, Darwin, and Natural selection: an historical introduction to evolution Malthus, Darwin, and Natural selection: an historical introduction to evolution Thomas Malthus Charles Darwin nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution Theodosius Dobzhansky, 1973

More information

Biology 32: Evolutionary Biology Computer simulations of evolutionary forces, 2010 KEY

Biology 32: Evolutionary Biology Computer simulations of evolutionary forces, 2010 KEY Biology 32: Evolutionary Biology Computer simulations of evolutionary forces, 2010 KEY 1. The default settings in Allele A 1 demonstrate Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. These settings include initial frequencies

More information

How Populations Evolve

How Populations Evolve How Populations Evolve Darwin and the Origin of the Species Charles Darwin published On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, November 24, 1859. Darwin presented two main concepts: Life

More information

THE CONSEQUENCES OF DIOECY FOR SEED DISPERSAL: MODELING THE SEED-SHADOW HANDICAP

THE CONSEQUENCES OF DIOECY FOR SEED DISPERSAL: MODELING THE SEED-SHADOW HANDICAP Evolution, 55(5), 2001, pp. 880 888 THE CONSEQUENCES OF DIOECY FOR SEED DISPERSAL: MODELING THE SEED-SHADOW HANDICAP JANA C. HEILBUTH, 1 KATRIINA L. ILVES, AND SARAH P. OTTO Department of Zoology, University

More information

Quiz #4 Ch. 4 Modern Evolutionary Theory

Quiz #4 Ch. 4 Modern Evolutionary Theory Physical Anthropology Summer 2014 Dr. Leanna Wolfe Quiz #4 Ch. 4 Modern Evolutionary Theory 1. T/F Evolution by natural selection works directly on individuals, transforming populations. 2. T/F A genotypic

More information

Saint Thomas the Apostle School. Grade 7 Life Science. Scope and Sequence. Jennifer Croze

Saint Thomas the Apostle School. Grade 7 Life Science. Scope and Sequence. Jennifer Croze Saint Thomas the Apostle School Grade 7 Life Science Scope and Sequence Jennifer Croze 2015-2016 Major Topic Description Standards Addressed Studying Life Living organisms are often MS-ETS1-1 described

More information

The Evolution of Sex: Diversity

The Evolution of Sex: Diversity The Evolution of Sex: Diversity Lukas Schärer Evolutionary Biology Zoological Institute University of Basel 25.10.2011 Evolution of Sex and its Consequences HS 11 1 Two-fold cost of sex? 2 Summary sex

More information

LAB 11 Natural Selection (version 2)

LAB 11 Natural Selection (version 2) LAB 11 Natural Selection (version 2) Overview In this laboratory you will demonstrate the process of evolution by natural selection by carrying out a predator/prey simulation. Through this exercise you

More information

NATURAL SELECTION AND GENE FREQUENCY

NATURAL SELECTION AND GENE FREQUENCY NATURAL SELECTION AND GENE FREQUENCY BY WOLFGANG RUBI CATALAN, MARNELLE MAC DULA, LIANNE UMALI, ERICA WILEY, & CHRIS YOUNG Student ID # s: WHAT IS THAT? Natural selection is a key mechanism of evolution.

More information

Name Period. 3. How many rounds of DNA replication and cell division occur during meiosis?

Name Period. 3. How many rounds of DNA replication and cell division occur during meiosis? Name Period GENERAL BIOLOGY Second Semester Study Guide Chapters 3, 4, 5, 6, 11, 14, 16, 17, 18 and 19. SEXUAL REPRODUCTION AND MEIOSIS 1. What is the purpose of meiosis? 2. Distinguish between diploid

More information

Anthropology 160: The Human Life Course NM HED Area III: Laboratory Science Competencies UNM Core Area 3: Physical and Natural Sciences

Anthropology 160: The Human Life Course NM HED Area III: Laboratory Science Competencies UNM Core Area 3: Physical and Natural Sciences Anthropology 160: The Human Life Course NM HED Area III: Laboratory Science Competencies UNM Core Area 3: Physical and Natural Sciences Student Learning Objectives: 1. Define basic concepts in evolutionary

More information

Chapter 16 How Populations Evolve

Chapter 16 How Populations Evolve Title Chapter 16 How Populations Evolve Copyright The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display. Population Genetics A population is all of the members of a single species

More information

Section Review 15-1 1.

Section Review 15-1 1. Section Review 15-1 1. Beagle 2. theory of evolution 3. varied 4. Darwin s curiosity might have led him to make many observations and ask questions about the natural world. His analytical nature may have

More information

A Hands-On Exercise To Demonstrate Evolution

A Hands-On Exercise To Demonstrate Evolution HOW-TO-DO-IT A Hands-On Exercise To Demonstrate Evolution by Natural Selection & Genetic Drift H ELEN J. YOUNG T RUMAN P. Y OUNG Although students learn (i.e., hear about) the components of evolution by

More information

Sexual and Asexual Reproduction

Sexual and Asexual Reproduction Program Support Notes by: Janine Haeusler M. Sc (Ed), B. Ed Produced by: VEA Pty Ltd Commissioning Editor: Sandra Frerichs B.Ed, M.Ed. Executive Producers: Edwina Baden-Powell B.A, CVP. Sandra Frerichs

More information

Animal Models of Human Behavioral and Social Processes: What is a Good Animal Model? Dario Maestripieri

Animal Models of Human Behavioral and Social Processes: What is a Good Animal Model? Dario Maestripieri Animal Models of Human Behavioral and Social Processes: What is a Good Animal Model? Dario Maestripieri Criteria for assessing the validity of animal models of human behavioral research Face validity:

More information

Curriculum Map: Life Sciences Grade 8. Month. Unit. Essential Questions (List 1-3 Essential Questions)

Curriculum Map: Life Sciences Grade 8. Month. Unit. Essential Questions (List 1-3 Essential Questions) Month Unit 2016-2017 Curriculum Map: Life Sciences Grade 8 September Scientific Inquiry October Origin of Life/Cellular Processes Essential Questions (List 1-3 Essential Questions) Learning Outcomes/Objectives

More information

Chromosomes, Mapping, and the Meiosis Inheritance Connection

Chromosomes, Mapping, and the Meiosis Inheritance Connection Chromosomes, Mapping, and the Meiosis Inheritance Connection Carl Correns 1900 Chapter 13 First suggests central role for chromosomes Rediscovery of Mendel s work Walter Sutton 1902 Chromosomal theory

More information

Chapter 11. Classical (Mendelian) Genetics

Chapter 11. Classical (Mendelian) Genetics Chapter 11 Classical (Mendelian) Genetics The study of how genes bring about characteristics, or traits, in living things and how those characteristics are inherited. Genetics Geneticist A scientist who

More information

Basics of Marker Assisted Selection

Basics of Marker Assisted Selection asics of Marker ssisted Selection Chapter 15 asics of Marker ssisted Selection Julius van der Werf, Department of nimal Science rian Kinghorn, Twynam Chair of nimal reeding Technologies University of New

More information

A Critique of Cosmological Natural Selection

A Critique of Cosmological Natural Selection A Critique of Cosmological Natural Selection Gordon McCabe March 7, 2004 Abstract Mathematical physicist Lee Smolin has proposed a theory of Cosmological natural selection which, he argues, explains the

More information

Conservation Genetics

Conservation Genetics Conservation Genetics The basis for an evolutionary conservation 2 Genetic consequences of small population size and extinction. Defining conservation and management units based on population genetics.

More information

Evolutionary Games and Evolutionarily Stable Strategies

Evolutionary Games and Evolutionarily Stable Strategies Evolutionary Games and Evolutionarily Stable Strategies Samuel Alizon and Daniel Cownden March 3, 2009 1 Introducing Evolutionary Games and ESS We now take all the theory we have been developing and extend

More information

10 Population Dynamics

10 Population Dynamics 10 Population Dynamics 10 Population Dynamics Time delays Demographic stochasticity Figure 10.8 A Population Cycle Patterns of Population Growth Different factors may drive population cycles in rodents.

More information

Gene flow and genetic drift Evolution Biology 4971/5974 D F Tomback

Gene flow and genetic drift Evolution Biology 4971/5974 D F Tomback Biology 4974/5974 Evolution Gene Flow, Genetic Drift, and the Shifting Balance Theory Figures from Hall and Hallgrimsson, 2014, Strickberger s Evolution Learning goals Understand how the following processes

More information

Fairfield Public Schools

Fairfield Public Schools Mathematics Fairfield Public Schools AP Statistics AP Statistics BOE Approved 04/08/2014 1 AP STATISTICS Critical Areas of Focus AP Statistics is a rigorous course that offers advanced students an opportunity

More information

Basic Premises of Population Genetics

Basic Premises of Population Genetics Population genetics is concerned with the origin, amount and distribution of genetic variation present in populations of organisms, and the fate of this variation through space and time. The fate of genetic

More information

MS.LS1.B: Growth and Development of Organisms

MS.LS1.B: Growth and Development of Organisms DCI: From Molecules to Organisms: Structures and Processes MS.LS1.B: Growth and Development of Organisms Organisms reproduce, either sexually or asexually, and transfer their genetic information to their

More information

Ecology Symbiotic Relationships

Ecology Symbiotic Relationships Ecology Symbiotic Relationships Overview of the Co-evolution and Relationships Exhibited Among Community Members What does Symbiosis mean? How do we define Symbiosis? Symbiosis in the broadest sense is

More information

Biology 160 Lab Module 12 Mendelian Genetics

Biology 160 Lab Module 12 Mendelian Genetics BIOL& 160 Clark College 1 Biology 160 Lab Module 12 Mendelian Genetics Name Learning Outcomes Upon successful completion of this lab, you should be able to: 1. Understand character inheritance, allelic

More information

Understanding by Design. Title: BIOLOGY/LAB. Established Goal(s) / Content Standard(s): Essential Question(s) Understanding(s):

Understanding by Design. Title: BIOLOGY/LAB. Established Goal(s) / Content Standard(s): Essential Question(s) Understanding(s): Understanding by Design Title: BIOLOGY/LAB Standard: EVOLUTION and BIODIVERSITY Grade(s):9/10/11/12 Established Goal(s) / Content Standard(s): 5. Evolution and Biodiversity Central Concepts: Evolution

More information

Breeding Value versus Genetic Value

Breeding Value versus Genetic Value Breeding Value versus Genetic Value Gene351 (not( Gene251) Lecture 6 Key terms Breeding value Genetic value Average effect of alleles Reading: Prescribed None Suggested Falconer & McKay, 1996 Revision

More information

Natural Selection. (1) variation in a trait between individuals (2) a relationship between the trait and reproductive success

Natural Selection. (1) variation in a trait between individuals (2) a relationship between the trait and reproductive success 1 Natural Selection Background Processes we've talked about so far (e.g.,, genetic sampling error, inbreeding, and gene flow) affect allele frequencies and/or genotype frequencies within a population,

More information

MOT00 KIMURAZ. Received January 29, 1962

MOT00 KIMURAZ. Received January 29, 1962 ON THE PROBABILITY OF FIXATION OF MUTANT GENES IN A POPULATION MOT00 KIMURAZ Uniuersity of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin Received January 29, 1962 HE success or failure of a mutant gene in a population

More information

Are the speeds of species invasions regulated? The importance of null models

Are the speeds of species invasions regulated? The importance of null models Oikos 117: 370375, 2008 doi: 10.1111/j.2007.0030-1299.16164.x, # 2007 The Authors. Journal compilation # Oikos 2007 Subject Editor: Beatrix Beisner, Accepted 18 October 2007 Are the speeds of species invasions

More information

Evolution by Natural Selection 1

Evolution by Natural Selection 1 Evolution by Natural Selection 1 I. Mice Living in a Desert These drawings show how a population of mice on a beach changed over time. 1. Describe how the population of mice is different in figure 3 compared

More information

Mendelian Genetics. I. Background

Mendelian Genetics. I. Background Mendelian Genetics Objectives 1. To understand the Principles of Segregation and Independent Assortment. 2. To understand how Mendel s principles can explain transmission of characters from one generation

More information

Deterministic computer simulations were performed to evaluate the effect of maternallytransmitted

Deterministic computer simulations were performed to evaluate the effect of maternallytransmitted Supporting Information 3. Host-parasite simulations Deterministic computer simulations were performed to evaluate the effect of maternallytransmitted parasites on the evolution of sex. Briefly, the simulations

More information

Next Generation Science Standards

Next Generation Science Standards The Next Generation Science Standards and the Life Sciences The important features of life science standards for elementary, middle, and high school levels Rodger W. Bybee Publication of the Next Generation

More information