1 Assessment of Core Courses and Factors that Influence the Choice of a Major: A Major Bias? By Marc Siegall, Kenneth J. Chapman, and Raymond Boykin Peer reviewed Marc Siegall is a Professor in the Department of ; Raymond Boykin is a Professor in the Department of Accounting and MIS; and Kenneth J. Chapman is a Professor in the Department of Finance and Marketing at California State University, Chico.
2 ABSTRACT The authors of this paper conducted a survey to assess the influence of undergraduate students specialization within the business major on how they evaluated their satisfaction with; interest in; and usefulness of the core course in their area of specialization. The results of this study indicate that students evaluate courses in their major area as being more interesting, useful, and satisfying than other business core courses. Also investigated by the authors were environmental factors influencing students choice of a specialization within the business major. Differences were found between students that are associated with which specialization they chose. The authors conclude that, when analyzing current and former students evaluation of the business core courses they took in order to determine if they appropriately contribute to the business program, it is important that what they specialized in be taken into account. INTRODUCTION Many departments, colleges, and universities conduct surveys of their alumni to assess how different sets of courses are rated (e.g., general elective courses, required business courses). Alumni are often asked questions designed to determine how satisfied they were with the core courses they took and whether, in hindsight, the courses were useful and increased the likelihood they would be successful in their careers. More often than not, such data obtained from alumni is reported in aggregate form and discussed by faculty and administrators as they consider modifications to a program s required set of courses. In short, post hoc assessments of a course s value are often used for program improvement. A safe assumption is that students select majors based upon on interest in the subject matter of that major (e.g., Malgwi, Howe, and Burnaby, 2005). It would also logically follow that students would find courses in their major to be more interesting and useful than would students not in that major. However, it is less obvious how satisfied students might be with the introductory course in their major. The reasons for this could include the student s expectations of the class, having non-major students in the class, or the student s perception on the usefulness of an introductory class. More likely is that due to a natural affinity with the topic, a student would be more satisfied with a course in his/her area of interest (relative to other areas introductory courses), or that the student would pay particularly critical attention to the related required introductory course, due to its significance to the student s future
3 education and occupational prospects. Paying more critical attention to a course could lead to lower rated levels of satisfaction and usefulness simply because the student cares so much about this course relative to introductory (core) courses dealing with other areas within a business degree program. From an assessment point of view, if a student s field of study has a significant influence on his/her ratings of various introductory core courses, omnibus tests and aggregated data reporting may be a bit misleading when trying to understand the true value of the core set of introductory courses for the purpose of improving the curriculum. In this study, we investigated the following propositions: Proposition 1 - The highest ratings of Interest for a course would be associated with the course s affiliated major (e.g., marketing students would find the introduction to marketing course more interesting than the introductory courses for any other area). Proposition 2 - The highest ratings of Usefulness would be associated with the course s affiliated major (e.g., marketing majors will find introduction to marketing more useful than other courses, and they will rate the course higher than nonmarketing students would). Proposition 3 - The highest or lowest ratings of Satisfaction would be associated with the course s affiliated major. It is possible that students would report being more satisfied with introductory courses from their area of interest because they find it intrinsically more interesting or less satisfied because their expectations and demands for the introductory course in their specialization are seen as more critical than introductory courses in other areas of business. No research to date has examined the impact of the required introductory course in the student s major field. Our research examines the level of interest, usefulness, and satisfaction associated with the course s affiliated major. Students evaluation of these three factors likely influence an individual s choice of major. However, in all likelihood, numerous non-course related factors also have a significant influence on students choice of a major. There have been numerous studies whose objective was to determine why students select a specific business major. These studies reveal that everything from the parent s occupation to the instructor of a course in that major can affect a student s choice (Malgwi, et al., 2005; Kim, Markham, & Cangelosi, 2002; Pritchard, Potter, & Saccucci, 2004; DeMarie & Aloise-Young 2003). As has already been noted, one of the more recent studies by Malgwi, et al. (2005) examined the initial choice of major by freshman and transfer students and the reasons
4 influencing later change in major. The results of this study indicate that the most important factor is students interest in the subject matter. This study also examined gender differences. Results in this area showed narrowing differences as the students progressed through their degree programs. Indicated by these results is that there is almost no difference between male and female students at the senior level in terms of the five most important factors influencing their choice of a major. These factors are: (1) interest in the subject, (2) job opportunities, (3) compensation, (4) introductory course, and (5) discussion with other students. Another study on selection of a business major examines the effect of quantitative skills on a student s choice (Pritchard et al, 2004). This research used scores from the math portion of a basic college skills placement test and compared these scores by major. The results of this research indicate that accounting and finance students have higher quantitative skills test scores than do marketing and management majors. While this seems like a fairly obvious conclusion, it does indicate that in addition to interest factors, student skill levels may also influence their choice of major. Similarly, Cohen and Hanno (1993) found that students quantitative skills played a major role in determining the selection of accounting as an area of specialization. In addition, the research identified success or failure in the introductory accounting course and influence of the instructor as significant influences on whether or not students choose to specialize in accounting. Research into students interest in their major was done by DeMarie and Aloise- Young (2003). They surveyed 465 undergraduate students of which 155 were business majors. The survey focused on determining the students level of interest in their major. As might be expected, 99.4 percent of business students were either very interested (74.7 percent) or somewhat interested (24.7 percent) in their major. The survey also examined other reasons for selecting a major. For the business students, career was rated higher than interest in the area, with enjoyment of learning as the third highest factor. One of the factors that many studies include as a possible influence on the selection of a major is the students parents. Pearson and Dellman-Jenkins (1997) found that about 19 percent of incoming freshmen stated that parents were the most significant factor influencing which major to pursue. These students also indicated that teachers were the second most influential. The importance of siblings, friends, and the media combined was less than that of parents. Interestingly, the most common answer to Who or what most influenced your choice of a major? was other. In order to understand this factor better, Pearson and Dellman-Jenkins (1997) then conducted a follow-up survey, asking a subset of the original respondents to explain their other responses. The results of this survey showed that students selection of a major was most influenced by things such as: job, personal interest, or money. Still, about 25 percent of the students listed I don t know to the explanation of the response of other. This study did not differentiate between
5 majors selected by the students; thus, the authors were not able to determine whether responses differed according to students area of specialization. In short, research has shown that factors both internal (e.g., interest) and external (e.g., potential salary) to the student affects choice of major. Several of the previously referenced studies indicated that interest in the subject was the top or one of the top influencing factors in the section of a business major (Malgwi et al., 2005; Kim et al., 2002; DeMarie et al., 2003). Our study disaggregates the business major into areas of specialization (accounting, finance, marketing, etc.). Research Question: Are the factors students reported as having affected their choice of specialization within the business major different for students within each specialization? METHOD To assist in the development of the survey instrument and explore the topic, two focus groups were conducted. One focus group was held with a set of 12 senior business students while the other was with three freshman prebusiness students. The objective was to understand better the factors that influenced, or were perhaps going to influence, a student s desire to pursue a particular major in the College of Business. A survey was developed based upon information obtained in the focus group and the adaptation of questions from published research on this topic (e.g., Pappu, 2004; Strasser, Ozgur, & Schroeder, 2002). A small pilot study was conducted to ensure that the survey was easy to understand. Data were collected from 206 upper-division College of Business students using an online survey. The College of Business is an AACSB accredited college with 2,200 students at a public university that enrolls about 16,000 students. Students were entered into a drawing as incentive for participation. The sample was composed of 63 (31.3 percent) juniors and 138 (68.7 percent) seniors with gender being evenly split (50.7 percent male, 49.3 percent female). The sample included 89 (44.3 percent) students from marketing, 39 (19.4 percent), from management, 28 (13.9 percent) from accounting, 22 (10.9 percent) from finance, 15 (7.5 percent) from human resources management, 8 (4.0 percent) from management information systems (MIS), and 5 (2.4 percent) from production/operations management (POM). Due to the exceptionally small sample sizes, majors in MIS and POM were excluded from the analyses, leaving a usable sample size of 193 respondents. Results
6 Students were asked to rate how satisfied they were with the required business courses, how useful they felt the courses were, and the degree to which they viewed required business courses as interesting. These ratings were all analyzed by major to determine if students that pursued a particular major evaluated the required course in that field higher than majors from other fields. Tables 1, 2, and 3 (below) present the mean responses to the questions of satisfaction, interest, and usefulness of each core course. In Table 1, both of the introductory accounting courses were rated the highest by accounting students, the human resource management course was rated highest by human resource management students, and the finance course was rated highest by the finance students. A similar pattern was demonstrated in tables 2 and 3 in which all core courses were rated as most useful and interesting by students in the aligned major.
7 Table 1 Mean Satisfaction with Required Course Student s Major Field of Study Introductory Required Courses Accounting (n = 28) Finance (n = 22) Human Resource (n = 15) Marketing (n = 86) (n = 39) Overall (n = 193) Financial Accounting Managerial Accounting Human Resource Marketing Finance Note: Numbers represent mean ratings on an itemized scale anchored by 1= Very Dissatisfied and 5 = Very Satisfied. Shaded rows indicate that there are significant differences (p <.05) in responses among the majors.
8 Table 2 Mean Perceptions of Usefulness of Required Courses Student s Major Field of Study Required Courses Accounting (n = 28) Finance (n = 22) Human Resource (n = 15) Marketing (n = 86) (n = 39) Overall (n = 193) Financial Accounting Managerial Accounting Human Resource Marketing Finance Note: Numbers represent mean ratings on an itemized scale anchored by 1= Very Useless and 5 = Very Useful. Shaded rows indicate that there are significant differences (p <.05) in responses among the majors.
9 Table 3 Mean Rating of Degree to Which Required Course Content was Considered Interesting Student s Major Field of Study Required Courses Accounting (n = 28) Finance (n = 22) Human Resource (n = 15) Marketing (n = 86) (n = 39) Overall (n = 193) Financial Accounting Managerial Accounting Human Resource Marketing Finance Note: Numbers represent mean ratings on an itemized scale anchored by 1= Very Uninteresting and 5 = Very Interesting. Shaded rows indicate that there are significant differences (p <.05) in responses among the majors.
10 Proposition 1 stated that for each core course, the highest ratings of interest would be associated with the course s affiliated major. Proposition 2 stated that for each core course, the highest ratings of usefulness would be associated with the course s affiliated major. Proposition 3 stated that for each core course, the highest or lowest ratings of satisfaction would be associated with the course s affiliated major. While the ratings for each affiliated major were not necessarily statistically higher than the ratings for all other majors for each evaluative question, there were differences between majors within most cells, indicating significant variance in how different majors viewed these courses. The findings in Tables 1, 2, and 3 are summarized in Table 4 (below). As shown in Table 4, the directions of the means are consistent with the propositions in 16 of the 18 possible pairings between a major and its affiliated required course. In other words, there appears to be a revealing pattern of support for all three propositions, with the ratings of satisfaction being highest (not lowest) by students in the affiliated major. This pattern for Proposition 3 can be seen in Tables 1 and 4 in which course satisfaction ratings were highest when the introductory course was rated by a student in an affiliated major in four of the six pairings.
11 Table 4 Summary Results for Satisfaction (S), Usefulness (U), and Interest (I) Between Majors Student s Major Field of Study Required Courses Accounting Finance Human Resource Marketing Financial Accounting S, U, I Managerial Accounting S, U, I Finance S, U, I Human Resource S, U, I S U, I Marketing S U, I Notes: S = Mean satisfaction rating for this course was highest in this particular major. U = Mean usefulness rating for this course was highest in this particular major. I = Mean interest in content for this course was highest in this particular major. Shaded cells indicate that results are consistent with the propositions. The study also investigated the influence of environmental factors on choice of a business major. Table 5 (below) illustrates that a general sense of personal fit was the most influential factor overall, followed by the major sounding interesting or exciting, income potential and then desire to work with people. These results are consistent with statements from students in our focus groups. One student noted in the focus group that
12 The major found me. I didn t really find it. It just fit. Another student stated that he was looking for Personal fit and something that interests me. Analysis by major illustrates that the accounting and finance majors were most influenced by income potential and an innate sense of being good with numbers. This result is consistent with those of Cohen and Hanno (1993). Interestingly, the accounting and finance majors rated personal fit, job sounds interesting or exciting, and desire to work with people relatively low. In the focus groups, one student stated I m not into marketing. I like the idea of it, but trying to figure out people s minds isn t as fun to me as the numbers. A five is always a five. Overall, the accounting and finance majors seemed to be driven more by money, status, and job security, which are quite different from the factors noted by the other majors. The pattern of results in Table 5 (below) are consistent with the general premise of this research that researchers need to be careful with any omnibus analysis as ratings vary greatly by major, and answer the Research Question affirmatively.
13 Table 5 Influence Factors on Choice of Major Overall and by Major Influence Factor All Majors Overall Accounting Finance Marketing Human Resource A general sense of "personal fit" Sounds interesting/exciting Income potential Desire to work with people Personality/career/interest tests Interest in related fields (e.g law, computer science) Being your own boss Status of the job Desire to pursue more advanced coursework in area (e.g. MBA, JD) Being good with numbers Job availability/ease of finding employment Prior job experience (outside of family business) Job security Influence of parents Currently working in the field Media (TV, print, movies) Influence of students already in the option A particular faculty member Reputation of the option's faculty Influence of family members Influence of friends Working in family business Advising office Career planning office Desire to avoid working with people Note: Numbers represent percent of respondents who rated the influence factor a 6 or 7 on a degree of influence scale anchored by 1=Not at all and 7=Quite a lot. Shaded regions represent the top-two influence factors within each major. Shaded factors indicate that there are significant differences (p <.05) in responses among the majors.
14 DISCUSSION As far as we were able to determine, this is the first study to examine the relationship between satisfaction with required courses and the student s major. We found that, generally, students reported the most satisfaction with the core classes that were affiliated with their chosen course of study. Rather than being the most demanding and critical of their core courses, which could have led to lower satisfaction ratings, students reported being positively predisposed about their core classes at least in retrospect. It should not be too surprising that a student from a particular major would report that his/her affiliated core course was the most useful of all core courses. And, while some students might find that a class outside of their main course of study might be somewhat interesting, it makes sense that one would choose to major in the field that generally is more interesting than the alternatives. Given the strong trends, as reported in Tables 1, 2, and 3, it seems that influences such as quality of the instructor or received course grade were not major factors in students retrospective reports of the value of their core courses. If there were strong instructor or grade (bias) effects, we would expect to see certain courses uniformly being appraised as high or low. If all students generally shared the same value for a particular course instructor or easy classes, then we would expect those courses to be rated highly by students in all areas of business study. The same idea holds for unpopular instructors and courses where high grades are hard to come by. The most telling results are in the summary of findings in Table 4. These data provide strong inference that a student s major is associated with the rated satisfaction of, interest in, and perceived usefulness of the affiliated introductory core course. The main contribution of this study is finding that students from a major report more favorably about the introductory course in their major versus other introductory courses. Assessment programs that ask graduates post hoc how they view the value of their coursework need to consider the impact of this rating bias. So, for example, if an alumni survey indicates that overall the introductory marketing course was highly rated while the introductory management course was not, those acting upon those data need to consider the mix of alumni who responded. Were there a lot of marketing, and few management, majors in the respondent group? This finding potentially sheds new light on how previous studies that did not parse results according to area of specialization should be interpreted (e.g., DeMarie & Aloise-Young, 2003). The major limitation to this study was that we were not able to determine whether these results came from a general halo around courses dealing with the respondents major, or if these three evaluative criteria are in fact separate constructs for the students. Nor could we determine whether cognitive dissonance (e.g., I ve invested so much in a marketing education that it must mean that I really liked that first marketing
15 course ) played a strong role in the results. In addition, we did not directly measure whether one s career interest in a field of study led to greater focus on the initial course in that field, affecting perceptions and affective responses for that course. We acknowledge that the relatively small cell sizes and simple ways in which the three dependent variables were measured can affect the degree to which our findings can be generalized. However, the small cell sizes reduced analytical power (Cohen, 1988), meaning that there might be more support for our Propositions beyond the obvious trend patterns. It also is possible that the mechanism behind our findings is that, having found a core course that was particularly interesting and satisfying, the student then decided to choose the affiliated major. We currently are extending our research to address this question. Additional research in this area should move beyond cross-sectional analysis and pursue longitudinal studies. That is, do these influence factors and perceptions about classes change over time? It would be interesting to gather data on this topic from Freshman and examine whether the factors reported here change while one is in college and whether or not the changes continue as students become alumni. Do recollections about the quality and importance of critical courses continue to evolve when students are five, ten, or fifteen years beyond graduation? How consistent will ratings be over time? If ratings vary greatly, is it due to changes in life experiences and attitudes or is it due to retrieval biases (e.g., a tendency to remember the most salient events, or only recall the most polarizing aspects of an experience) and fading and reconstructed memories? In summary, we believe we found that a student s chosen course of study is positively associated with how they view the courses that began their career paths. In addition, we discovered significant differences based upon a student s major (or area of specialization within the major) in the factors that influence a student to pursue a field of study. These findings suggest it is imperative that when administrators are assessing a program and trying to figure out what influences students to pursue a particular major that results not be interpreted in aggregate. In fact, interpretation of the aggregated data could be quite misleading. It is critical that subgroup analysis based on major be conducted to understand if courses are appropriately contributing to a program.
16 REFERENCES Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Cohen, J., & Hanno, D. (1993). An analysis of underlying constructs affecting choice of accounting as a major. Issues in Accounting Education, 8, DeMarie, D., & Aloise-Young, P. (2003). College students interest in their major. College Student Journal, 37, Kim, D., Markham, F., & Cangelosi, J. (2002). Why students pursue the business degree: A comparison of business majors across universities. Journal of Education for Business, 78, Malgwi, C., Howe, M., & Burnaby, P. (2005). Influences on students choice of college major. Journal of Education for Business, 80, Pappu, Ravi (2004), Why do undergraduate marketing majors select marketing as a business major? Evidence from Australasia, Journal of Marketing Education, 26, Pearson, C., & Dellman-Jenkins, M. (1997). Parental influence on a student s selection of a college major. College Student Journal, 31, Pritchard, R., Potter, G., & Saccucci, M. (2004). The selection of a business major. Journal of Education for Business, 79, Strasser, Sandra E., Ozgur, Ceyhun, & Schroeder, David L. (2002), Selecting a business college major: An analysis of criteria and choice using the Analytical Hierarchy Process, Mid-American Journal of Business, 17 (2), 47-57
Abstract The perceptions of business students regarding management information systems (MIS) programs Patrick Hogan Turner College of Business and Computer Science Lei Li Turner College of Business and
Assessing Quantitative Reasoning in GE (Owens, Ladwig, and Mills) Introduction Many students at CSU, Chico, receive much of their college-level mathematics education from the one MATH course they complete
Transfer Intelligence: How Community College Transfer Students Work toward a Bachelor s in Criminal Justice Lisel Blash, Darla Cooper, Kelley Karandjeff, Nathan Pellegrin, Diane Rodriguez-Kiino, Eva Schiorring
A Review of Hospitality and Tourism Management Graduates Post Education Employment by Amanda Lee Adams Honors Thesis Appalachian State University Submitted to the College of Business and The Honors College
Peer Reviewed The three co-authors are members of the faculty at the University of South Carolina Upstate. William R. Word and Sarah P. Rook (email@example.com) are Professors of Economics. Lilly M.
GMAC Examining the Value Added by Graduate Management Education Brooks C. Holtom & Edward J. Inderrieden GMAC Research Reports RR-06-16 December 22, 2006 The value of getting an MBA degree has been the
Student Feedback on Online Summer Courses October 8, 2015 Santa Clara University Office of Assessment Report Introduction In the summer of 2015, approximately 700 undergraduate students were enrolled in
High School Counselors Influence Katey O Donnell and Katie Logan Undergraduate Students, Human Development and Family Studies Key Words: College freshmen, school counselors, high school, adequately prepared
STEM Perceptions: Student & Parent Study Parents and Students Weigh in on How to Inspire the Next Generation of Doctors, Scientists, Software Developers and Engineers Commissioned by Microsoft Corp. Introduction
Outcomes of Preservice Teacher s Technology Use William F. Morrison, Assistant Professor, Bowling Green State University Tara L. Jeffs, Assistant Professor, East Carolina University Abstract: At a time
SPECIALTY COURSE OFFERINGS IN IS EDUCATION: IS THERE A FAST TRACK FOR JOB PLACEMENT SUCCESS? Steven C. Ross, Western Washington University, firstname.lastname@example.org Craig K. Tyran, Western Washington University,
BEYOND ALBRECHT AND SACK: A COMPARISON OF ACCOUNTING PROFESSIONALS AND COLLEGE STUDENTS Bill Francisco is an assistant professor in the School of Accountancy at Georgia Southern University. He may be contacted
David F. Miller Center for Retailing Education and Research Developing Tomorrow s Retail Leaders BUSINESS SCHOOL STUDENTS CAREER PERCEPTIONS AND CHOICE DECISIONS About the David F. Miller Center for Retailing
Restructuring an MBA Program: What Becomes of the CIS Option? Doris G. Duncan California State University, East Bay email@example.com Abstract Leaders at California State University, East Bay,
Learning Equity between Online and On-Site Mathematics Courses Sherry J. Jones Professor Department of Business Glenville State College Glenville, WV 26351 USA firstname.lastname@example.org Vena M. Long Professor
An Introduction to Industrial- Organizational Psychology Master s Programs Presentation to the Psi Chi Club of Queens College Jinyan Fan March 9, 2009 What is Industrial-Organizational (I-O) Psychology?
Student Mood And Teaching Evaluation Ratings Mary C. LaForge, Clemson University Abstract When student ratings are used for summative evaluation purposes, there is a need to ensure that the information
Reviewing the Relevance of the Management Information Systems (MIS) Curriculum: Perspectives from Alumni Salvatore Ferraro, Montclair State University Richard Peterson, Montclair State University Abstract
Using Marketing Research To Develop Student Recruiting Strategies Camille P. Schuster and Paul Costantino Abstract Because of declining enrollments, the Associate Dean of the College of Agriculture and
BS in with a Concentration in (Effective Fall 2012) The undergraduate management concentration in provides students with both a theoretical and a practical knowledge of marketing. The curriculum achieves
Blended Learning vs. Traditional Classroom Settings: Assessing Effectiveness and Student Perceptions in an MBA Accounting Course Clement C. Chen, University of Michigan - Flint Keith T. Jones, Illinois
Review of the Master of Business Administration (M.B.A.) 52.0201 Overview of the program. The Master of Business Administration (M.B.A.) program within the College of Business is an interdisciplinary graduate
Graduate & Professional Schools Career Planning Allen House 610-606-4648 email@example.com Facebook.com/CareeratCCC Monday Friday: 8:30am 4:30pm So You Are Thinking About Graduate School... Graduate
A Graduate Real Estate Program Survey: Careers and Compensation Manuscript submitted to the Journal of Real Estate Practice and Education Submitted December 2012 Accepted May 2013 by Elaine Worzala College
Student Veterans in College: Do They Perform Differently from Their Civilian Peers? Young Kim, Nathan Durdella, and Caroline Durdella CAIR, San Diego, November 18, 2010 Context Recent and Ongoing Military
Instructional Strategies: What Do Online Students Prefer? Kristen Cuthrell Assistant Professor East Carolina University College of Education Curriculum and Instruction Greenville, NC USA firstname.lastname@example.org
Graduating Senior Survey Report Accounting, CCB Last Modified: 5/8/24 Filter By: Report Subgroup. What is MOST LIKELY to be your MAIN activity or activities upon graduation? (Select all that apply) Employment,
CPA Firms Hiring Preferences and the 150-Hour Requirement A. Bruce Caster, Wanda Causseaux, and Courtney Droms A. Bruce Caster is Associate Professor of Accounting, Utica College. Wanda Causseaux is Assistant
Business Administration and Accounting Program Review Year 2 Report Introduction Due to the sea change brought on by the launching of the Schneider School of Business and Economics and the establishment
IUMPST: The Journal. Vol 2 (Pedagogy), February 2011. [www.k-12prep.math.ttu.edu] Onsite Peer Tutoring in Mathematics Content Courses for Pre-Service Teachers Elaine Young Associate Professor of Mathematics
Annual Assessment Report to the College 2008-2009 DRAFT College: COBAE Department: Information Systems Program: B.S. in Information Systems Liaison: Leah Marcal 1. Overview of Annual Assessment Project(s)
MPA Program Assessment Report Summer 2015 Introduction: This was the second full year for doing learning outcomes assessment based on the 2009 NASPAA accreditation standards and conducting our exit interviews
Presented by: 1 Table of Contents Excutive Summary I. Introduction II. Methodology III. Results of the Graduate Impact Survey IV. Implications and Outlook V. Literature 2 Executive Summary The Graduate
1750 H Street NW, 2 nd Floor, Washington, DC 20006 P 202.756.2971 F 866.808.6585 www.hanoverresearch.com HIGHER EDUCATION PRACTICE RESEARCH ABSTRACTS June 2012 The following abstracts describe a sampling
An Application of the UTAUT Model for Understanding Student Perceptions Using Course Management Software Jack T. Marchewka Chang Liu Operations Management and Information Systems Department Northern Illinois
Satisfaction and Sequencing of the Communication A and B General Education Requirements Academic Planning and Analysis, Office of the Provost Abstract The Communication A and Communication B general education
THE MASTER OF ARTS PROGRAM IN INDUSTRIAL/ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF ARTS AND SCIENCE NEW YORK UNIVERSITY Information Booklet for Applicants Director: Barry H. Cohen, Ph.D Telephone: 212-998-7815
Department of Economics Cal State Univ., Hayward Phone 510 885 3275 OR 25800 Carlos Bee 510 885 3265 Hayward, CA 94542-3068 Fax 510 885 4796 DEPARTMENT AND PROGRAM MISSION, GOALS, AND ASSESSMENT A FOCUS
Introduction Policymakers and educators around the nation are wrestling with an important challenge how to raise expectations for high school achievement, while increasing relevance and engagement in learning
Department: Psychology MSU Departmental Assessment Plan 2007-2009 Department Head: Richard A. Block Assessment Coordinator: Richard A. Block Degrees/Majors/Options Offered by Department B.S. in Psychology
GMAC Understanding the Value of the MBA: A Program Type Comparison Grady D. Bruce GMAC Research Reports RR-06-01 February 6, 2006 Introduction Prior research conducted by the Graduate Management Admission
Psychology Dr. Spencer Thompson, Professor, is the Chair of Psychology and Coordinator of Child and Family Studies. After receiving his Ph.D. in Developmental Psychology at the University of California,
A TALE OF TWO COURSES: PLACEMENT OF MIS IN THE BUSINESS CORE Dr. Lynn R. Heinrichs, Elon University, email@example.com Dr. Herb Schuette, Elon University, firstname.lastname@example.org ABSTRACT How does the MIS
DIFFERING WORKPLACE PERCEPTIONS OF FEMALE GRADUATES Frederick J. DeCasperis, Ed.D Department of Marketing & Management Siena College email@example.com ABSTRACT Female students under the age of 25 when
s in Quantitative Methods (QMST) 2 Business Statistics. (-0) A basic introductory course covering descriptive and inferential statistical techniques for business and economic decision making. Topics include
Careers in Psychology Prepared by Greta Winograd, PhD Psychology Department, SUNY New Paltz A strong background in psychology is valuable for many types of occupations, and not just in the helping professions.
Conflicted: Faculty And Online Education, 2012 I. Elaine Allen and Jeff Seaman with Doug Lederman and Scott Jaschik AGREE DISAGREE YOUR PROGRAMS... EVERYWHERE. EXPAND YOUR REACH THROUGH A PARTNERSHIP WITH
As part of our ACBSP accreditation requirements, we routinely provide reliable information to the public on our performance, including student achievement such as assessment results. Portions of our report
Important Characteristics In An MBA Program: The Perceptions Of Online MBA Students Danielle N. Rydzewski, Georgia Southern University, USA Jacqueline K. Eastman, Georgia Southern University, USA Joseph
Business Week Full time What sources of data does Bloomberg Businessweek use to rank MBA programs? There are three main sources of data: a student survey, a survey of corporate recruiters, and an intellectual
Accounting students perceptions on employment opportunities ABSTRACT C. Shane Warrick Jackson State University Bobbie Daniels Jackson State University Cathy Scott Jackson State University Understanding
Teaching Engineering Students vs. Technology Students: Early Observations Robert Lipset, Ph.D., P.E. Ohio Northern University, Ada, OH 45810 Email: firstname.lastname@example.org Abstract As a former engineering faculty
2006-1195: EVOLUTION OF THE ELECTRICAL POWER TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM AT THE UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON Luces Faulkenberry, University of Houston Wajiha Shireen, University of Houston Dr. Faulkenberry is an Associate
Effective Practices at Community Colleges and Four- Year Institutions for Increasing Women in Information Technology (IT) Fields Project Results and Overview Problem Statement and Project Goals Colorado
International Journal of Economics and Management Sciences Vol. 2, No. 6, 2013, pp. 61-66 MANAGEMENT JOURNALS managementjournals.org Student Quality Perceptions and Preferences for MBA Delivery Formats:
THE PROS AND CONS OF ACCREDITATION: FACULTY AND STUDENT PERCEPTIONS Susan B. Shurden, M.P.A. College of Business and Public Affairs Lander University 321 Stanley Avenue Greenwood, SC 29649 Phone: 864 388-8224
Barriers to Enrollment: School Students Perceptions of What it Will Take to Go to College MiraCosta College Spring 2008 Prepared by: School Relations and Diversity Outreach Office & Institutional Research
Degree: BA Psychology For Calendar Year: 2012 (Date submitted to college committee:) 2-28-2013 (Date posted on college assessment website:) April 1, 2013 By: Roger Webb Overall Rating: Respond to all six
EARLY WARNING Impact of Participating in Early Warning on Course Performance Fall 2011 July 2012 Undergraduate Education Institutional Research Report Allison M. Cantwell Director of Evaluation, Assessment,
One Year Out Findings From A National Survey Among Members Of The High School Graduating Class Of 2010 Submitted To: The College Board By Hart Research Associates August 18, 2011 Hart Research Associates
Indiana University East - Self Study - 4/14/2016 Page 1 I - Institutional Information To complete this section, first click on the Edit/Checkout button. Then copy and paste the headings into the Institutional
Virginia s College and Career Readiness Initiative In 1995, Virginia began a broad educational reform program that resulted in revised, rigorous content standards, the Virginia Standards of Learning (SOL),
International Baccalaureate (IB) Programme Update Derick Kiger Director Research, Technology and Assessment Stephanie Leonard-Witte Director Curriculum and Instruction Joseph Moylan Principal Oconomowoc
UT MPH ALUMNI SURVEY (2013) 1 Master of Public Health Alumni Survey (2013): Major Findings The University of Tennessee An anonymous electronic survey of MPH alumni, graduated during calendar years 2011
Performance Management WORKSHOP HANDOUTS Facilitated by: Tara Kemes, Vantage Point Knowledge Philanthropist June 2013 Page 1 of 16 Handout 1 Performance Management System Overview What is performance management?
Contemporary Issues In Education Research January 2011 Volume 4, umber 1 Declining MIS Enrollment: The Death Of The MIS Degree? Gary Saunders, Marshall University, USA T Maurice Lockridge, Marshall University,
Administrative Residencies and Postgraduate Fellowships in Healthcare Administration SUMMARY REPORT 05/12/2010 Prepared by Strategic Communications for the American College of Healthcare Executives Residencies
Providence College Local Faculty Survey: Analytical Memo of Findings October 1, 2013 Overview The following memorandum provides an analytical narrative of the results of the 2013 Ithaka S+R Local Faculty
University of Miami Academic Bulletin 1 MASTER OF ACCOUNTING MASTER OF ACCOUNTING (MAcc) and MASTER OF SCIENCE IN TAXATION (MST) While the programs are similar in that they offer an opportunity to concentrate
CBA MBA Goals and Outcomes The MBA program of the College of Business 1. Business environment MBA students will acquire knowledge of political, technological, and social environments in which businesses
Where has the Time Gone? Faculty Activities and Time Commitments in the Online Classroom B. Jean Mandernach, Swinton Hudson, & Shanna Wise, Grand Canyon University USA Abstract While research has examined
1 Quinebaug Valley Community College Program Report Program: Computer Services Program Coordinator: John Hall Report Year: 2005-2006 Instructor: Janet Hall Program Description The mission of this program
Physics Performance Data Mining An Interactive Qualifying Project Report submitted to the Faculty of the Worcester Polytechnic Institute In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Bachelor
Continuous Improvement: It Takes More Than Test Scores Analyzing state assessment results is only the beginning of effective data-driven decision making. Victoria L. Bernhardt There is no question that
Alumni Perspectives: Evaluation of the Nonprofit Leadership and Management Masters Program June 2008 Linda Siefert, Ed.D. Director of Assessment Heather Carpenter, MMNA Viterbi Family Doctoral Fellow and
DEFINING, TEACHING AND ASSESSING LIFELONG LEARNING SKILLS Nikos J. Mourtos Abstract - Lifelong learning skills have always been important in any education and work setting. However, ABET EC recently put
GMAC Predicting Success in Graduate Management Doctoral Programs Kara O. Siegert GMAC Research Reports RR-07-10 July 12, 2007 Abstract An integral part of the test evaluation and improvement process involves
Determining Future Success of College Students PAUL OEHRLEIN I. Introduction The years that students spend in college are perhaps the most influential years on the rest of their lives. College students
An Analysis of how Proctoring Exams in Online Mathematics Offerings Affects Student Learning and Course Integrity Introduction Reliable assessment is central to education and educational institutions for
Attitudes Toward Science of Students Enrolled in Introductory Level Science Courses at UW-La Crosse Dana E. Craker Faculty Sponsor: Abdulaziz Elfessi, Department of Mathematics ABSTRACT Nearly fifty percent
GMAC School Brand Images and Brand Choices in MBA Programs Gregg Schoenfeld & Grady Bruce GMAC Research Reports RR-05-10 November 3, 2005 Introduction Intense competition in the world of higher education
Graduate School take your career to the next level Health Administration Buffalo New York Graduate Admissions Office 320 Porter Avenue Buffalo, NY 14201 D Youville Academic Center, Room 117 716.829.8400
2005 ABET Program Outcome and Assessment 3. Program Outcomes and Assessment Program Outcomes We define our program educational outcomes as statements that describe what students are expected to be able
Career Fair Reflection 10 CAREERS The BIG Idea What did I learn from participating in the career fair, and how did my presentation contribute to my classmates knowledge? AGENDA Approx. 45 minutes I. Warm
BEST COLLEGES 2015 ONLINE LEARNING SURVEY: ONLINE STUDENT NEEDS, PREFERENCES AND EXPECTATIONS EMAIL US: email@example.com Online Student Needs, Preferences and Expectations Online learning is still
Annual Report on Degree Program Assessment of Student Learning University Assessment Committee Office of Academic Assessment Purpose: The purpose of the Annual Report on Degree Program Assessment of Student