1. Description of the Assessment and Its Use in the Program
|
|
- Ambrose Douglas
- 7 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 1. Description of Assessment and Its Use in Program Key ISMM Assessment #3 Ability to Plan Instruction Intervention Specialist: Mild/Moderate (ISMM): EDUC 418, 465, and 466 Initial Teacher Preparation Program / Baccalaureate Level Educator Preparation Provider Muskingum University Key ISMM Assessment #3: Ability to Plan Instruction is an assignment that serves as an assessment of a candidate s ability to plan instruction. The candidate is charged with writing multiple-day individualized lessons for at least two students with identified disabilities for use during student teaching. The plan is n included as a component of Professional Portfolio that is required for Professional Practices course (EDUC 418/465/466). The Portfolio is submitted at conclusion of student teaching. A faculty member or practitioner whose certification/licensure and teaching experience are in special education is n responsible for assessing assignment. This key assessment is precursor to Key ISMM Assessment #5: Effect on Student Learning with data from Key ISMM Assessment #3 being used to complete Key ISMM Assessment #5. To exit licensure program, a candidate must complete Key ISMM Assessments #3 - #8 (Ability to Plan Instruction, Assessment of Student Teaching Performance, Effect on Student Learning, Individual Learning and Postsecondary Transition Plan, Communication and Collaboration Project, and Behavioral Support Plan) with at least 80% of standard elements of Council for Exceptional Children (CEC) Initial Level Special Educator Preparation Standards evaluated across six assessments rated at meets standard element and no standard element rated unacceptable. 2. Description of How Assessment Specifically Aligns with CEC Initial Level Special Educator Preparation s (2012) and How s are supported by Initial Special Education Individualized General Curriculum Specialty Set (2012) The following displays Initial Special Education Individualized General Curriculum Specialty Set used to support CEC Initial Level Special Educator Preparation s assessed through this key ISMM assessment. CEC STARD STARD ELEMENT SPECIALTY SET ELEMENT DESCRIPTION 1 LEARNER DEVELOPMENT INDIVIDUAL LEARNING DIFFERENCES 1.2 use understanding of development and individual differences to respond to needs of individuals with exceptionalities IGC 1 S1 Relate levels of support to needs of individual. 2 LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS 2.1 create safe, inclusive, culturally responsive learning environments to engage individuals with exceptionalities in meaningful learning activities and social interactions ISCI 2 S1 ISCI 2 S4 Create a safe, equitable, positive, and supportive learning environment in which diversities are valued. Design learning environments that encourage active participation in individual and group activities. Page 1 of 12
2 CEC STARD STARD ELEMENT SPECIALTY SET ELEMENT DESCRIPTION 3 CURRICULAR CONTENT KNOWLEDGE 3.1 understand central concepts, structures of discipline, and tools of inquiry of content areas y teach, and can organize this knowledge, integrate cross-disciplinary skills, and develop meaningful learning progressions for individuals with exceptionalities ISCI 3 K2 Scope and sequences of general and special curricula. ISCI 3 K3 National, state or provincial, and local curricula standards. 3.3 modify general and specialized curricula to make m accessible to individual with exceptionalities ISCI 3 S1 Identify and prioritize areas of general curriculum and accommodations for individuals with exceptionalities. 4 ASSESSMENT 4.1 select and use technically sound formal and informal assessments that minimize bias ISCI 4 S2 Administer non-biased formal and informal assessments. ISCI 4 S3 Use technology to conduct assessments. ISCI 4 S4 Develop or modify individualized assessment strategies. IGC 4 S3 Select, adapt, and modify assessments to accommodate unique abilities and needs of individuals with exceptionalities. 4.2 use knowledge of measurement principles and practices to interpret assessment results and guide educational decisions for individuals with exceptionalities ISCI 4 S5 Interpret information from formal and informal assessments. 4.3 use multiple types of assessment information in making decisions about individuals with exceptionalities ISCI 4 S1 Gar relevant background information. 5 INSTRUCTIONAL PLANNING STRATEGIES 5.1 consider an individual s abilities, interests, learning environments, and cultural and linguistic factors in selection, development, and adaptation of learning experiences for individual with exceptionalities ISCI 5 S6 Develop and select instructional content, resources, and strategies that respond to cultural, linguistic, and gender differences. ISCI 5 S15 Select, adapt, and use instructional strategies and materials according to characteristics of individual with exceptionalities. IGC 5 S23 Select and use specialized instructional strategies appropriate to abilities and needs of individual. IGC 5 S24 Plan and implement age and ability appropriate instruction for individuals with exceptionalities. 5.2 use technologies to support instructional assessment, planning, and delivery for individuals with exceptionalities IGC 5 S7 Use appropriate adaptations and technology for all individuals with exceptionalities. 5.3 are familiar with augmentative and alternative communication systems and a variety of assistive technologies to support communication and learning of individuals with exceptionalities ISCI 5 K3 Augmentative and assistive communication strategies. ISCI 5 S7 Incorporate and implement instructional and assistive technology into educational program. IGC 5 S21 Plan instruction on use of alternative and augmentative communication systems. Page 2 of 12
3 CEC STARD STARD ELEMENT SPECIALTY SET ELEMENT DESCRIPTION 5.6 teach to mastery and promote generalization of learning ISCI 5 S4 Use task analysis. ISCI 5 S5 Sequence, implement, and evaluate individualized learning objectives. ISCI 5 S6 Develop and select instructional content, resources, and strategies that respond to cultural, linguistic, and gender differences. ISCI 5 S11 Make responsive adjustments to instruction based on continual observations. ISCI 5 S21 Modify instructional practices in response to ongoing assessment data. IGC 5 S12 Use responses and errors to guide instructional decisions and provide feedback to learners. IGC 5 S13 Identify and teach essential concepts, vocabulary, and content across general curriculum. 3. Assessment Instrument Guidelines for Ability to Plan Instruction Assignment As you complete following, refer to Scoring Guide for Key ISMM Assessment #3 in Section 4 below to ensure that you carefully and completely address articulated for rating of meets standard element (2). Purpose of Assignment The purpose of Ability to Plan Instruction assignment is to demonstrate your knowledge, understanding, and ability to put into practice each of CEC Initial Level Special Educator Preparation Standard elements and specialty set elements articulated in Section 2 above. Assignment Tasks Task 1: Select at least two (2) students who vary in knowledge, skills, and abilities, each with an identified disability, to teach multiple-day individualized lessons (four days for instruction and one day for administration of a summative post-assessment), one set for each student, focused on appropriate and relevant learning targets in content areas of English Language Arts, Mamatics, Science, and/or Social Studies. Task 2: Identify learning targets for each set of multiple-day individualized lessons using Ohio s New Learning Standards ( Task 3: Develop and attach formative pre-assessments, aligned with selected learning targets (see Task 2 above), to be used as basis for writing designated lesson plans. The pre-assessments are to include observation and documentation of learning targets (5.6: ISCI 5 S11), use of assistive technology (5.3: ISCI 5 S7), and allow for identification of error patterns (5.6: IGC 5 S12). Task 4: Administer pre-assessments (4.1: ISCI 4 S2) to respective students. Task 5: Analyze pre-assessment data of each student, beginning with electronically charting, according to learning targets, achievement levels of each. After charting data, write a narrative that interprets your findings and that describes how what you learned from pre-assessment data will be used to write plans for each set of multiple-day lessons and for developing formative and post-assessment tools (4.1: ISCI 4 S4). Page 3 of 12
4 Task 6: Write five (5) inter-related lesson plans for each of students selected. Each set of plans is to address one or more of learning targets identified (see Task 2 above). Use Student Teaching Instructional Plan Template for ISMM Teacher Preparation Candidates (see page 4 of his document), responding to each component of Instructional Plan Template and labeling each component of instructional plan with respective CEC : Specialty Set Element(s). Task 7: Teach lessons using lesson plans developed. Task 8: Continue to Key ISMM Assessment #5: Effect on Student Learning. Submission of Assignment Upon completion, assignment is to become a component of your Professional Portfolio that is to be submitted as directed by course instructor of EDUC 418, 465, and 466: Professional Practices Muskingum University Student Teaching Instructional Plan Template for ISMM Teacher Preparation Candidates Student s Name Subject Grade Lesson Plan (circle one) I. Learning Standards and Targets: 1. Identify learning standard(s) for lesson as articulated in Ohio s New Learning Standards ( New-Learning-Standards) (3.1: ISCI 3 K3). 2. Conduct a task analysis of learning standards selected above and n identify specific learning target(s) for lesson specifically, what student will be expected to know and be able to do by conclusion of this lesson (5.6: ISCI 5 S4 and 5.6: IGC 5 S13). 3. Describe why selected learning target(s) are appropriate for each of respective students (3.3: ISCI 3 S1). II. Assessment 1. With exception of last lesson, develop and attach a formative assessment for each lesson that is aligned with learning target(s) for lesson, that includes observation and documentation of learning target(s) (5.6: ISCI 5 S11) and makes use of assistive technology (5.3: ISCI 5 S7). Each formative assessment needs to allow for error patterns to be identified (5.6: IGC 5 S12), current learning activities to be modified (5.6: ISCI 5 S21), and to determine wher student is ready to move to next learning target(s). 2. For last of five lessons, develop and attach a summative post-assessment for each student, aligned with learning targets for lessons, that makes use of assistive technology (5.3: ISCI 5 S7) and states expected levels of student performance. [Only include this component in last lesson plan for each student.] 3. Describe in specific terms what you expect to learn from results of formative assessment for lesson; that is, describe what you anticipate as goals, benefits, and uses of formative assessment you have developed for lesson (4.2: ISCI 4 S5). Page 4 of 12
5 4. Describe in specific terms how you will use what you learn from results of formative assessment for lesson; that is, describe how you will use results of assessment to furr identify appropriate learning targets, to modify plans, and to furr enhance curriculum and teaching strategies (5.6: ISCI 5 S21). 5. Describe in specific terms why you believe that formative assessment for lesson, including use of technology and assistive technology, will promote positive outcomes for student (5.6: ISCI 5 S21). 6. Develop and attach examples of technology you will use to collect assessment data and document assessment results (4.1: ISCI 4 S3). III. Student Backgrounds and Experiences 1. Describe characteristics and needs of each of students selected (4.3: ISCI 4 S1). Include with submission of se assessment materials, documentation from your cooperating teacher regarding accuracy of your description. 2. Describe various influences, including prior knowledge, skills, and experiences se students will need, that may impact this student being successful in reaching learning target(s) of this lesson (5.1: ISCI 5 S15, 5.1: IGC 5 S23, and 5.1: IGC 5 S24). 3. Describe how you will know if students have knowledge, skills, and experiences y need in order to be successful in reaching learning target(s) of this lesson (4.3: ISCI 4 S1). 4. Describe how you will use and/or accommodate for diverse backgrounds (gender, race/ethnicity, English language proficiency, economic status, exceptionalities, skill level, and/or learning preferences) that students bring to activities of this lesson (5.1: ISCI 5 S15, 5.1: IGC 5 S23, and 5.1: IGC 5 S24). IV. Content Knowledge 1. Outline content for each of respective learning targets identified for this lesson, including central concepts and structures of content (3.1: ISCI 3 K2). V. Learning Environment 1. Describe room arrangements for instructional activities designed to create a learning environment that is safe, healthy, respectful, supportive, challenging, and instructionally sound and n provide rationales for such arrangements (2.1: ISCI 2 S1 and 2.1: ISCI 2 S4). 2. Describe instructional activities designed to support student engagement in learning and that are instructionally sound and n provide rationales for such activities (2.1: ISCI 2 S4). VI. Learning Resources and Materials 1. Describe learning resources and materials, including technologies (5.2: IGC 5 S7), to be used in facilitating achievement of each learning target during lesson and provide rationales for use of each (5.3: ISCI 5 K3). 2. More specifically, describe inquiry tools to be used in promoting achievement of each learning target during lesson and provide rationales for use of each (5.3: ISCI 5 K3). Page 5 of 12
6 VII. Instructional Activities and Strategies Outline sequence of activities of instructional plan (5.6: ISCI 5 S5), including projected time allocations for each section of sequence (see below), making sure to articulate developmentally appropriate teaching and learning approaches (5.1: IGC 5 S23) and teaching strategies, including augmentative and alternative systems (5.3: ISCI 5 K3 and 5.3: IGC 5 S21), assistive technologies (5.3: ISCI 5 K3), and or technologies (5.2: IGC 5 S7) to be used across course of lesson. Provide a thorough description of each of following: 1. Opening Activities for Lesson: 2. Main Instructional Activities for each Learning Target, including Formative Assessment: 3. Closing Activities for Lesson: VIII. Differentiation of Instruction Modifications: changes that need to be made in student learning targets/objectives for lesson and/or in content taught to alter for a student (e.g. reduced number of questions to answer, questions at different levels of Bloom s taxonomy, and/or content extensions for advanced students) Accommodations: changes that need to be made in teaching methods, activities, and or materials to help students meet student learning targets/objectives for lesson (e.g. extended time, assistance of a scribe, assistance of a reader, spell checker, and/or guided notes) Describe how you will differentiate instruction/make adaptations for individual students during teaching of lesson. 1. Describe specific needs you will address for this student in writing lesson plan (1.2: IGC 1 S1). 2. Describe modifications you will make in what you expect this student to know and/or do (5.6: ISCI 5 S5). 3. Describe adaptations to instructional resources and materials you will make for this student during lesson (5.6: ISCI 5 S21). 4. Describe adaptations to instructional strategies you will make for this student during lesson (5.6: ISCI 5 S21). 5. Describe developmentally appropriate approaches you will use with this student during lesson (5.1: ISCI 5 S6 and 5.6: ISCI 5 S6). 6. Describe and attach adapted formative assessment tools you will use with this student during lesson (4.1: IGC 4 S3). 7. Describe and attach adapted summative post-assessment tools you will use with this student at conclusion of five lessons (4.1: IGC 4 S3). [Only include this component in last lesson plan.] Student Names (expand columns to number of students selected) Page 6 of 12
7 4. Scoring Guide for Assessment Statement [Assignment Tasks and/or Lesson Plan Template Components] and [ISCI and/or IGC alignment] 1.2: use understanding of development and individual differences to respond to needs of individuals with exceptionalities [VIII.1] [IGC 1 S1] 2.1: create safe, inclusive, culturally responsive learning environments to engage individuals with exceptionalities in meaningful learning activities and social interactions [V.1 and V.2] [ISCI 2 S1 and ISCI 2 S4] Meets (2) (1.5) Described at least three relevant ways in which specific needs of each respective student would be addressed in respective lessons [VIII.1]. (1) described room arrangements that would create safe, healthy, respectful, supportive, challenging, and instructionally sound environments and that were clearly appropriate for instructional activities planned [V.1]; (2) described instructional activities for lessons that were clearly appropriate for supporting student engagement and that were instructionally sound [V.2]; (3) provided logical rationales for room arrangements and for instructional activities intended to support student engagement [V.1 and V.2]. Developing (1) (0.5) Described one relevant way in which specific needs of each respective student would be addressed in respective lessons [VIII.1]. (1) described room arrangements that would create safe, healthy, respectful, supportive, challenging, and instructionally sound environments and that were clearly appropriate for instructional activities planned [V.1]; OR (2) described instructional activities for lessons that were clearly appropriate for supporting student engagement and that were instructionally sound [V.2]; of. of. Unacceptable (0) Failed to describe any relevant ways in which specific needs of each respective student would be addressed in respective lessons [VIII.1]. Failed to describe any room arrangements instructional activities for supporting student engagement that were instructionally sound [V.1 and V.2]. Page 7 of 12
8 Statement [Assignment Tasks and/or Lesson Plan Template Components] and [ISCI and/or IGC alignment] 3.1: understand central concepts, structures of discipline, and tools of inquiry of content areas y teach, and can organize this knowledge, integrate crossdisciplinary skills, and develop meaningful learning progressions for individuals with exceptionalities [I.1 and IV.1] Meets (2) (1.5) (1) identified from Ohio s New Learning Standards, standards that were appropriate for age-, grade-, and ability-levels of students engaged in lessons [I.1] and (2) accurately outlined [IV.1] content of each of learning targets taught across lessons of respective students. Developing (1) (0.5) (1) identified from Ohio s New Learning Standards, standards that were appropriate for age-, grade-, and ability-levels of students engaged in lessons [I.1], but (2) failed to accurately outline content of each of learning targets taught across lessons of respective students [IV.1]. of. Unacceptable (0) Failed to identify from Ohio s New Learning Standards, standards that were appropriate for age-, grade-, and ability-levels of students engaged in lessons [I.1]. [ISCI 3 K2 and ISCI 3 K3] 3.3: modify general and specialized curricula to make m accessible to individual with exceptionalities [I.3] [ISCI 3 S1] Logically described why learning targets articulated were appropriate for respective students engaged in lessons [I.3]. Described why learning targets articulated were appropriate for students engaged in lessons, but some of reasoning provided was contradictory [I.3]. of. Description as to why learning targets articulated were appropriate for students engaged in lessons was illogical [I.3]. Page 8 of 12
9 Statement [Assignment Tasks and/or Lesson Plan Template Components] and [ISCI and/or IGC alignment] 4.1: select and use technically sound formal and informal assessments that minimize bias [Tasks 4 and 5, II.6, VIII.6, and VIII.7] [ISCI 4 S2, ISCI 4 S3, ISCI 4 S4, and IGC 4 S3] 4.2: use knowledge of measurement principles and practices to interpret assessment results and guide educational decisions for individuals with exceptionalities [II.3] [ISCI 4 S5] Meets (2) (1.5) (1) provided evidence of administering pre-assessments [Task 4]; (2) logically interpreted preassessment data findings and provided an analytical description of how what s/he learned from pre-assessment data would be used to design plans for lessons and for developing additional assessment tools [Task 5]; (3) designed formative assessments that were accurately aligned with selected learning targets for respective lessons and appropriate for respective students [VIII.6]; (4) designed summative postassessments that were accurately aligned with selected learning targets for lessons and appropriate for respective students [VIII.7]; (5) provided examples of technology that would be effective for collecting assessment data and documenting assessment results [II.6]. Provided an analytical description of what s/he saw as goals, benefits, and uses of each of formative assessments s/he developed for respective lessons [II.3] Developing (1) (0.5) (1) provided evidence of administering pre-assessments [Task 4]; (2) logically interpreted preassessment data findings and provided an analytical description of how what s/he learned from pre-assessment data would be used to design plans for respective lessons and for developing additional assessment tools [Task 5]; (3) designed formative assessment summative post-assessment instruments that were accurately aligned with selected learning targets and appropriate for respective students [VIII.6 and VIII.7]. Provided a simplistic description of what s/he saw as goals, benefits, and uses of each of formative assessments s/he developed for respective lessons [II.3]. of. of. Unacceptable (0) Failed to design assessment instruments that were accurately aligned with selected learning targets and appropriate for respective students [Task 4, VIII.6, and VIII.7]. Failed to provide any description of what s/he saw as goals, benefits, and uses of each of formative assessments s/he developed for respective lessons [II.3]. Page 9 of 12
10 Statement [Assignment Tasks and/or Lesson Plan Template Components] and [ISCI and/or IGC alignment] 4.3: use multiple types of assessment information in making decisions about individuals with exceptionalities [III.1 and III.3] [ISCI 4 S1] Meets (2) (1.5) (1) accurately described, as documented by cooperating teacher, characteristics and needs of each respective student [III.1] (2) described at least three appropriate methods for knowing if students had knowledge and skills needed in order to be successful in reaching learning targets of lessons [III.3]. Developing (1) (0.5) (1) accurately described, as documented by cooperating teacher, characteristics and needs of majority of students [III.1] (2) described at least one appropriate method for knowing if students had knowledge and skills needed in order to be successful in reaching learning targets of lessons [III.3]. of. Unacceptable (0) (1) failed to accurately describe, as documented by cooperating teacher, characteristics and needs of any student [III.1] (2) failed to describe any appropriate method for knowing if students had knowledge and skills needed in order to be successful in reaching learning targets of lessons [III.3]. 5.1: consider an individual s abilities, interests, learning environments, and cultural and linguistic factors in selection, development, and adaptation of learning experiences for individual with exceptionalities [III.2, III.4, VII, and VIII.5] [ISCI 5 S6, ISCI 5 S15, IGC 5 S23, and IGC 5 S24] (1) described at least three credible influences that may impact students in being successful in reaching learning targets of lessons [III.2]; (2) described at least three appropriate strategies for using and/or accommodating for diverse experiences students may have brought to lessons [III.4]; (3) described developmentally appropriate teaching and learning approaches for age-group of students engaged in lessons developmentally appropriate teaching and learning approaches to address individual abilities of respective students [VII and VIII.5]. (1) described at least one credible influence that may impact students in being successful in reaching learning targets of lessons [III.2]; (2) described at least one appropriate strategy for using and/or accommodating for diverse experiences students may have brought to lessons [III.4]; (3) described developmentally appropriate teaching and learning approaches for age-group of students engaged in lessons [VII], but teaching and learning approaches described to address individual abilities of students were not consistently appropriate for respective students [VIII.5]. of. (1) failed to describe any credible influences that may impact students in being successful in reaching learning targets of lessons [III.2]; (2) failed to describe any appropriate strategies for using and/or accommodating for diverse experiences students may have brought to lessons [III.4]; (3) teaching and learning approaches described were not developmentally appropriate for eir age-group of students engaged in lessons [VII] nor were y suitable for addressing individual abilities of respective students [VIII.5]. Page 10 of 12
11 Statement [Assignment Tasks and/or Lesson Plan Template Components] and [ISCI and/or IGC alignment] 5.2: use technologies to support instructional assessment, planning, and delivery for individuals with exceptionalities [VI.1 and VII] [IGC 5 S7] 5.3: are familiar with augmentative and alternative communication systems and a variety of assistive technologies to support communication and learning of individuals with exceptionalities [Task 3, II.1, II.2, VI.1, VI.2, and VII] [ISCI 5 K3, ISCI 5 S7, and IGC 5 S21] Meets (2) (1.5) Accurately described and provided logical rationales for use of technologies which were identified for delivery of lessons [VI.1 and VII]. (1) designed formative assessment instruments that effectively incorporated use of appropriate assistive technology for respective students [Task 3 and II.1]; (2) designed summative postassessment instruments that effectively incorporated use of appropriate assistive technology for respective students [Task 3 and II.2]; (3) accurately described and provided logical rationales for use of learning resources, materials, strategies, including augmentative and alternative systems assistive technologies that were identified for delivery of lessons [VI.1 and VII]; (4) accurately described and provided logical rationales for inquiry tools to be used in promoting achievement of each learning target during lessons [VI.2]. Developing (1) (0.5) Accurately described use of technologies that were identified for delivery of lessons [VI.1 and VII]. (1) designed formative assessment instruments that incorporated use of assistive technology for respective students [Task 3 and II.1]; (2) designed summative postassessment instruments that incorporated use of assistive technology for respective students [Task 3 and II.2]; (3) described and provided rationales for learning resources, materials, strategies, identified for delivery of lesson [VI.1 and VII]; (4) described and provided rationales for inquiry tools to be used in promoting achievement of each learning target during lesson [VI.2]. of expectation s for a rating of 1. of expectation s for a rating of 1. Unacceptable (0) Failed to accurately describe and provide logical rationales for use of technologies that were identified for delivery of lessons [VI.1 and VII]. (1) failed to design any assessment instrument that incorporated use of appropriate assistive technology for respective students [Task 3, II.1, and II.2]; (2) failed to design formative assessment [II.1] summative post-assessment [II.2] instruments that were accurately aligned with selected learning targets for lessons; (3) failed to describe any strategies, tools, materials, technologies that were appropriate for students involved in lessons [VI.1 and VII]. Page 11 of 12
12 Statement [Assignment Tasks and/or Lesson Plan Template Components] and [ISCI and/or IGC alignment] 5.6: teach to mastery and promote generalization of learning [Task 3, I.2, II.1, II.4, II.5, VII, VIII.2, VIII.3, VIII.4, and VIII.5] [ISCI 5 S4, ISCI 5 S5, ISCI 5 S6, ISCI 5 S11, ISCI 5 S21, IIC 5 S5, and IIC 5 S7] Meets (2) (1.5) (1) designed pre-assessments that were accurately aligned with learning standards selected for respective students, that included observation and documentation of learning standards, and that allowed for error patterns to be identified [Task 3]; (2) provided evidence of conducting a task analysis of selected learning standards in order to identify learning targets for respective students [I.2]; (3) designed formative assessments that were accurately aligned with learning standards selected for respective students, that included observation and documentation of learning standards, that allowed for error patterns to be identified, and learning activities to be modified [II.1]; (4) provided logical descriptions of how results of formative assessments would be used to identify learning targets, modify plans, furr enhance curriculum and teaching strategies, and promote positive outcomes for respective students [II.4 and II.5]; (5) appropriately sequenced content of lesson [VII]; (6) provided logical descriptions for differentiating instruction for respective students [VIII.2- VIII.5]. Developing (1) (0.5) (1) designed pre-assessments that were accurately aligned with learning standards selected for respective students [Task 3]; (2) provided no evidence of conducting a task analysis of selected learning standards in order to identify learning targets for respective students [I.2]; (3) designed formative assessments that were accurately aligned with learning standards selected for respective students [II.1]; (4) provided simplistic descriptions of how results of formative assessments would be used to identify learning targets, modify plans, furr enhance curriculum and teaching strategies, and promote positive outcomes for respective students [II.4 and II.5]; (5) appropriately sequenced portions of lesson [VII]; (5) provided simplistic descriptions for differentiating instruction for respective students [VIII.2-VIII.5]. of expectation s for a rating of 1. Unacceptable (0) (1) designed assessments that were inaccurately aligned with learning standards and targets [Task 3 and II.1]; (2) provided no evidence of conducting a task analysis of selected learning standards in order to identify learning targets for respective students [I.2]; (3) provided disjointed descriptions of how results of formative assessments would be used to identify learning targets, modify plans, furr enhance curriculum and teaching strategies, and promote positive outcomes for respective students [II.4 and II.5]; (5) components of lesson were not connected [VII]; (4) provided disjointed descriptions for differentiating instruction for respective students [VIII.2- VIII.5]. Page 12 of 12
Indiana Wesleyan University Differentiated Lesson Plan Physical Education 2008 NASPE Standards
Indiana Wesleyan University Differentiated Lesson Plan Physical Education 2008 NASPE Standards Assignment Description The Indiana Wesleyan University differentiated lesson plan combines elements of the
More informationUCC/UGC/ECCC Proposal for Plan Change or Plan Deletion
UCC/UGC/ECCC Proposal for Plan Change or Plan Deletion FAST TRACK (Select if this will be a fast track item. Refer to Fast Track Policy for eligibility) If this proposal represents changes to the intent
More informationPre-service Performance Assessment Professional Standards for Teachers: See 603 CMR 7.08
Please use this assessment in conjunction with the for Teachers guidelines: the rating scale; evaluation questions relating to the standards; and the license-specific questions per standard (b)2c. Candidates
More informationGreenville City Schools. Teacher Evaluation Tool
Greenville City Schools Teacher Evaluation Tool Table of Contents Introduction to Teacher Evaluation 2 Glossary 3 Record of Teacher Evaluation Activities 5 Teacher Evaluation Rubric 6 Self-Assessment 11
More informationCURRICULUM MAP. Elementary and Early Childhood Program: Alignment of Student Learning Outcomes, Standards, and Assessments
CURRICULUM MAP Elementary and Early Childhood Program: Alignment of Student Learning Outcomes, Standards, and Assessments ACEI = Association for Childhood Education International Standards (see below for
More informationRequirements & Guidelines for the Preparation of the New Mexico Online Portfolio for Alternative Licensure
Requirements & Guidelines for the Preparation of the New Mexico Online Portfolio for Alternative Licensure Prepared for the New Mexico Public Education Department Educator Quality Division http://www.ped.state.nm.us/
More informationAutism Spectrum Disorder Performance Standards and Evaluation Criteria Rubric
Autism Spectrum Disorder Performance Standards and Evaluation Criteria Rubric 1. Professional Knowledge The teacher demonstrates an understanding of curriculum, subject content, and the developmental needs
More informationSection 3: Individual Professional Development Plan (IPDP) Resources Pages 14-18
Section 3: Individual Professional Development Plan (IPDP) Resources Pages 14-18 IPDP Resources page 1 of 5. Local Professional Development 14 Senior Professional Educator and Lead Professional Educator
More informationNEW YORK STATE TEACHER CERTIFICATION EXAMINATIONS
NEW YORK STATE TEACHER CERTIFICATION EXAMINATIONS TEST DESIGN AND FRAMEWORK September 2014 Authorized for Distribution by the New York State Education Department This test design and framework document
More informationTOOL KIT for RESIDENT EDUCATOR and MENT OR MOVES
Get to Know My RE Observe Collect Evidence Mentor Moments Reflect Review Respond Tailor Support Provide Provide specific feedback specific Feedback What does my RE need? Practice Habits Of Mind Share Data
More informationPittsburgh Public Schools. We Dream Big. We Work Hard. We Promise. Promise-Readiness Corps
Pittsburgh Public Schools We Dream Big. We Work Hard. We Promise. Promise-Readiness Corps 1 Promise-Readiness Corps (PRC) Salary Plan: Additional Compensation: Residency: FLSA Status: Work Day: Work Year:
More informationFINAL EVALUATION Professional Phase. Teacher Candidate s Name: ID# Date. Certification area: Special Education. Field Supervisor:
MOLLOY COLLEGE Division of Education SPECIAL EDUCATION FINAL EVALUATION Professional Phase Teacher Candidate s Name: ID# Date Certification area: Special Education Field Supervisor: Clinical Faculty [Cooperating
More informationJapanese International School. Assessment Recording and Reporting Policy
Japanese International School Assessment Recording and Reporting Policy 1.0 Philosophy and beliefs Through a positive learning environment, the Japanese International School respects the diversity of its
More information(i) The program shall prepare candidates who are familiar with the historical foundations of gifted and talented education;
Effective May 15, 2014 505-3-.90 GIFTED IN-FIELD EDUCATION ENDORSEMENT PROGRAM (1) Purpose. This rule states field-specific content standards for approving endorsement programs that prepare individuals
More informationReading Competencies
Reading Competencies The Third Grade Reading Guarantee legislation within Senate Bill 21 requires reading competencies to be adopted by the State Board no later than January 31, 2014. Reading competencies
More informationAdditional Qualification Course Guideline. Primary Education Specialist
Additional Qualification Course Guideline Primary Education Specialist Schedule D Regulation 184/97 Teachers Qualifications Standards of Practice and Education April 2003 Ce document est disponible en
More informationKey Assessments School Library Media Specialist
GACE Media Specialist Test I and Test II (Georgia Content Test) Web Folio (Content Knowledge, Planning, Clinical Practice, Effects on Student Learning, Dispositions) Graduate and Employer/Supervisor Surveys
More informationCritical Components of Lesson Design Guide
Critical Components of Lesson Design Guide There are a variety of lesson plan formats available as many districts have different ways to showcase each lesson plan component. In the 1980 s Madeline Hunter
More informationEXAMPLE FIELD EXPERIENCE PLANNING TEMPLATE CCSU MAT Program
EXAMPLE FIELD EXPERIENCE PLANNING TEMPLATE CCSU MAT Program Secondary Education (Math, History/Social Studies, Science, World Languages) and Special Education (K-12) Goal: The MAT program focuses on preparing
More informationTeaching MAT ADMISSION REQUIREMENTS APPLICATION PROCEDURES. Towson University 1
Towson University Teaching MAT Degree: Master of Arts in Teaching MAT Program Director: Judith Reber 40-704-495 jreber@towson.edu MAT Program Coordinator: Kim McGlaughlin 40-704-569 kmcglaughlin@towson.edu
More informationLITERACY: READING LANGUAGE ARTS
IMPORTANT NOTICE TO CANDIDATES: The assessment information in this document is aligned with NBPTS Literacy: Reading Language Arts Standards, Second Edition (for teachers of students ages 3 12). If you
More informationTeacher Education Portfolio Guidelines and Rubric
Teacher Education Portfolio Guidelines and Rubric The Teacher Education Portfolio is developed throughout a s program. Most Teacher Education courses have a capstone project designed to meet the InTASC
More informationCommission on Teacher Credentialing. Education Specialist Clear Program Standards
Commission on Teacher Credentialing Education Specialist Clear Program Standards Clear (Induction) Program Standards Adopted by the Commission, March 2009 1 Program Standards for the Clear (Induction)
More informationILLINOIS PROFESSIONAL TEACHING STANDARDS (2013)
ILLINOIS PROFESSIONAL TEACHING STANDARDS (2013) Standard 1 - Teaching Diverse Students The competent teacher understands the diverse characteristics and abilities of each student and how individuals develop
More informationBCSD EXCEL Program: Experiential Curriculum for the Enrichment of Learning
Gifted and Talented Education Service Delivery Plan BCSD EXCEL Program: Experiential Curriculum for the Enrichment of Learning BOONE COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICT 2015-16 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Mission and Vision..
More informationTESOL Standards for P-12 ESOL Teacher Education 2010. 1 = Unacceptable 2 = Acceptable 3 = Target
TESOL Standards for P-12 ESOL Teacher Education 2010 1 = Unacceptable 2 = Acceptable 3 = Target Standard 1. Language: Candidates know, understand, and use the major theories and research related to the
More informationCEC Special Education Specialist Advanced Preparation Standards 1
Page 1 of 8 CEC Special Education Specialist Advanced Preparation Standards 1 Among the sine qua non characteristics of mature professions are the identification of the specialized knowledge and skill
More informationNorth Carolina Professional Technology Facilitator Standards
North Carolina Professional Technology Facilitator Standards Every public school student will graduate from high school, globally competitive for work and postsecondary education and prepared for life
More informationComparing Sets of Data Grade Eight
Ohio Standards Connection: Data Analysis and Probability Benchmark C Compare the characteristics of the mean, median, and mode for a given set of data, and explain which measure of center best represents
More informationStudent Learning Objective (SLO) Template
Student Learning Objective (SLO) Template This template should be completed while referring to the SLO Template Checklist. Teacher Name: Content Area and Course(s): Science Grade Level(s): 6 th Grade Academic
More informationNorth Carolina TEACHER. evaluation process. Public Schools of North Carolina State Board of Education Department of Public Instruction
North Carolina TEACHER evaluation process Public Schools of North Carolina State Board of Education Department of Public Instruction Rubric for Evaluating North Carolina Teachers ( This form should be
More informationRUBRICS FOR READING SPECIALIST STANDARDS
RUBRICS FOR READING SPECIALIST STANDARDS SOE STANDARD 1 Disciplinary Foundations Disciplinary foundations: demonstrates interpretive, normative, critical understanding of educational phenomenon through
More informationTHE FRAMEWORK FOR SPECIAL EDUCATION GRADES PRE K- 8 & 7-12 PROGRAM GUIDELINES PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
THE FRAMEWORK FOR SPECIAL EDUCATION GRADES PRE K- 8 & 7-12 PROGRAM GUIDELINES PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION TABLE OF CONTENTS Why Quality Teacher Preparation Programs Are Important...3 Philosophy
More informationOglala Lakota College Teacher Preparation Program Instructional Unit Scoring Rubric
Oglala Lakota College Teacher Preparation Program Instructional Unit Scoring Rubric Student: Course: Date: Instructor: Center: Semester: Directions: Mark the descriptor that best describes candidate performance
More informationThe University of North Carolina at Pembroke 2015-2016 Academic Catalog
338 The University of North Carolina at Pembroke 2015-2016 Academic Catalog COURSES BIRTH TO KINDERGARTEN (ECE) ECE 2020. Foundations of Early Childhood (3 credits) This course is designed to introduce
More informationWhat s My Point? - Grade Six
Ohio Standards Connection Reading Applications: Informational, Technical and Persuasive Text Benchmark D Identify arguments and persuasive techniques used in persuasive writing. Indicators 6 Identify an
More informationGUIDELINES FOR ACADEMIC PROGRAM REVIEW For self-studies due to the Office of the Provost on October 1, 2015 GRADUATE PROGRAMS
GUIDELINES FOR ACADEMIC PROGRAM REVIEW For self-studies due to the Office of the Provost on October 1, 2015 GRADUATE PROGRAMS OVERVIEW OF PROGRAM REVIEW At Illinois State University, primary responsibility
More informationAPPENDIX A: Examples of Observations and Documentation
APPENDIX A: and Documentation 1. Centering instruction on high expectations for student achievement. Students communicate goals and objectives. Teacher communicates goals and objectives in lesson opening
More informationNW COLORADO BOCES ALTERNATIVE LICENSURE PROGRAM
NW COLORADO BOCES ALTERNATIVE LICENSURE PROGRAM 1 *For specific online course requirements, please refer to the attached course handout entitled Comprehensive Online Teacher Induction Program and Alternative
More informationEDTC Program Assessment Framework
EDTC Program Assessment Framework The University of Delaware s Master of Education in Educational Technology (EDTC) program aligns with both of the international standards bodies that inform the design
More informationNew Jersey Professional Standards for Teachers Alignment with InTASC NJAC 6A:9C-3.3 (effective May 5, 2014)
New Jersey Professional Standards for Teachers Alignment with InTASC NJAC 6A:9C-3.3 (effective May 5, 2014) Background On April 1, 2014, the State Board of Education adopted updated Professional Standards
More informationExhibit 3.3.f.2. Candidate s Score
Exhibit..f. Name Date: Teaching Process TWS Standard Contextual Factors Affecting The candidate teacher uses information about the learning- Student Learning teaching context and student individual differences
More informationPre-Requisites EDAM-5001 Early Literacy Guiding Principles and Language
. EDAM EDAM-5001. EARLY LITERACY: GUIDING PRINCIPLES AND LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT This course is the prerequisite for all other courses in the Early Childhood Literacy program. It outlines the philosophical
More informationGEORGIA STANDARDS FOR THE APPROVAL OF PROFESSIONAL EDUCATION UNITS AND EDUCATOR PREPARATION PROGRAMS
GEORGIA STANDARDS FOR THE APPROVAL OF PROFESSIONAL EDUCATION UNITS AND EDUCATOR PREPARATION PROGRAMS (Effective 9/01/08) Kelly Henson Executive Secretary Table of Contents Standard 1: Candidate Knowledge,
More informationILLINOIS CERTIFICATION TESTING SYSTEM
ILLINOIS CERTIFICATION TESTING SYSTEM FIELD 188: ASSESSMENT OF PROFESSIONAL TEACHING (PK 12) June 2011 ILLINOIS CERTIFICATION TESTING SYSTEM FIELD 188: ASSESSMENT OF PROFESSIONAL TEACHING (PK 12) June
More informationStandard 1. Foundational Knowledge Candidates have knowledge of the foundations of reading and writing processes and instruction.
Standard 1. Foundational Knowledge Candidates have knowledge of the foundations of reading and writing processes and instruction. 1.1 Demonstrate knowledge of psychological, sociological and linguistic
More informationProgram Report for the Preparation of Reading Education Professionals International Reading Association (IRA)
Program Report for the Preparation of Reading Education Professionals International Reading Association (IRA) NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR ACCREDITATION OF TEACHER EDUCATION 1: COVER SHEET 1. Institution Name
More informationCALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, HAYWARD DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH Assessment of Master s Programs in English
CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, HAYWARD DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH Assessment of Master s Programs in English [Note: Program descriptions are given at the end of this document.] Student Learning Outcomes (SLOs):
More informationConnects content, procedures, and activities to relevant life experiences of students and previously learned content.
Based on Kentucky Teacher Internship Program (KTIP) for use in the U of L Developmental Teacher Preparation (DTP) Model. This rubric will be used to assess Kentucky Teaching Standards #1, #3, #4, #5, and
More informationGifted Intervention Specialist
Gifted Intervention Specialist Endorsement Grades K-12 2008 Ohio Modified /CEC/NAGC Program Standards An endorsement of a teacher license, valid for teaching the subject or learners named, shall be issued
More informationRequirements EDAM-5002. WORD STUDY K-3: PRINT AWARENESS, LETTER KNOWLEDGE, PHONICS, AND HIGH FREQUENCY WORDS
LETTER OF ENDORSEMENT: TEACHER LEADERSHIP AND INSTRUCTIONAL COACHING Requirements Dr. Grace Surdovel, Director of Master's Programs/Faculty of Practice The Letter of Endorsement in Teacher Leadership and
More informationMasters Comprehensive Exam and Rubric (Rev. July 17, 2014)
1 Educational Leadership & Policy Studies Masters Comprehensive Exam and Rubric (Rev. July 17, 2014) The comprehensive exam is intended as a final assessment of a student s ability to integrate important
More informationMUSIC. Assessment at a Glance. Early and Middle Childhood. Choosing the Right Certificate. Reviewing the Standards
Early and Middle Childhood MUSIC Choosing the Right Certificate Reviewing the Standards Demonstrating Your Teaching Practice and Content Knowledge Understanding the National Board Scoring Process Beginning
More informationSection I: Introduction
Section I: Introduction Educators: In order to fulfill the requirements of Texas Education Code 21.045 and Texas Administration Code (TAC) Chapter 229, the Texas Education Agency is required to collect
More informationCompleted Formal Classroom Observation Form
Completed Formal Classroom Observation Form (Once participants have filled in and discussed the blank Formal Classroom Observation Form, facilitators should hand out copies of this completed form) August
More informationProgram Report for the Preparation of Special Education Professionals Council for Exceptional Children (CEC)
Program Report for the Preparation of Special Education Professionals Council for Exceptional Children (CEC) NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR ACCREDITATION OF TEACHER EDUCATION COVER SHEET 1. Institution Name Delaware
More informationSection Two: Ohio Standards for the Teaching Profession
12 Section Two: Ohio Standards for the Teaching Profession 1 Teachers understand student learning and development and respect the diversity of the students they teach. Teachers display knowledge of how
More informationNarrative Literature Response Letters Grade Three
Ohio Standards Connection Writing Applications Benchmark A Write narrative accounts that develop character, setting and plot. Indicator: 1 Write stories that sequence events and include descriptive details
More informationTHE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PALM BEACH COUNTY. Add on Certification Program English for Speakers of Other Languages (ESOL) Endorsement
THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PALM BEACH COUNTY Add on Certification Program English for Speakers of Other Languages (ESOL) Endorsement 2011 2016 William F. Malone, Acting Superintendent Constance Tuman Rugg,
More informationHow To Improve The Curriculum At Minnetonka School District
MINNETONKA PUBLIC SCHOOLS Policy #603: INSTRUCTIONAL AND CURRICULAR PROGRAM REVIEW AND IMPROVEMENT I. PURPOSE The purpose of this policy is to provide direction to parents, students, staff, and interested
More informationBTT1O/BTT2O. Peel Secondary Schools Course Outline 2011. Course Units with Learning Goals / Overall Expectations. Course Outline / Strands
LORNE PARK SECONDARY Grade 9/10 BUSINESS BTT1O/BTT2O Information and Communication Technology in Business, Grade 9 or 10, Open Course Outline / Strands This course introduces students to information and
More informationTask Requirements. Task 4 Implementing and Analyzing Instruction to Promote Student Learning
PPAT Assessment Task Requirements Task 4 Implementing and Analyzing Instruction to Promote Student Learning In this task, you will demonstrate your ability to plan and implement a lesson using standards-based
More informationTEAM PLANNING AND REPORTING
Chapter 10 TEAM PLANNING AND REPORTING TOOLS: Tool 10.1 Tool 10.2 Tool 10.3 Tool 10.4 Tool 10.5 Sample team plan. 3 pages Team planning template. 3 pages Alternative team planning template. 1 page Team
More informationRubrics for Evaluating Open Education Resource (OER) Objects
Rubrics for Evaluating Open Education Resource (OER) Objects The following rubrics represent an evaluation system for objects found within Open Education Resources. An object could include images, applets,
More informationSSED 7750 CURRENT TRENDS AND ISSUES IN SOCIAL STUDIES EDUCATION
SSED 77 CURRENT TRENDS AND ISSUES IN SOCIAL STUDIES EDUCATION Kennesaw State University Department of History and Philosophy in collaboration with Department of Middle Grades & Secondary Education Summer
More informationThe Ohio Resident Educator Program Standards Planning Tool. 1 9-1-11 Final
The Ohio Resident Educator Program Standards Planning Tool 1 The Resident Educator Program Standards Planning Tool The Resident Educator Program Standards Planning Tool is intended to assist district/schools
More informationAssessment That Drives Instruction
Improving Instruction Through Assessment Assessment That Drives Instruction Pokey Stanford Stacy Reeves TEACHING Exceptional Children, Vol. 37, No. 4, pp. 18-22. Copyright 2005 CEC. Two challenging aspects
More informationFacilitator: Dr. Mervin E. Chisholm h Manager/Coordinator, IDU
Developing Your Course Outline Facilitator: Dr. Mervin E. Chisholm h Manager/Coordinator, IDU What Will We Be Doing Today? Use instructional design models and to decide on appropriate it approaches to:
More informationSpecial Education Student Learning Outcomes
Special Education Student Learning Outcomes 1. Foundations. Special educators understand the field as an evolving and changing discipline based on philosophies, evidence-based principles and theories,
More informationCommittee On Public Secondary Schools. Standards for Accreditation
Committee On Public Secondary Schools Standards for Accreditation Effective 2011 New England Association of Schools & Colleges 3 Burlington Woods Drive, Suite 100 Burlington, MA 01803 Tel. 781-425-7700
More informationLocal Government and Leaders Grade Three
Ohio Standards Connection: Government Benchmark A Identify the responsibilities of the branches of the U.S. government and explain why they are necessary. Indicator 2 Explain the structure of local governments
More informationWAC 180-17-050 Release of a school district from designation as a. required action district. (1) The state board of education shall release
Exhibit C WAC 180-17-050 Release of a school district from designation as a required action district. (1) The state board of education shall release a school district from designation as a required action
More informationFRESNO ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT TEACHERS (FAST, V. 1.2) A MANUAL FOR T. FAST v.1.2. Manual
FRESNO ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT TEACHERS (FAST, V. 1.2) A MANUAL FOR T EACHER CANDIDATES Kremen School of Education and Human Development Office of the Dean 5005 N. Maple Ave. M/S ED1 Fresno, CA 93740-8025
More informationPennsylvania Core Knowledge Competencies for Early Childhood & School-Age Professionals
Pennsylvania Core Knowledge Competencies for Early Childhood & School-Age Professionals Office of Child Development and Early Learning Pennsylvania Department of Education and Department of Public Welfare
More informationREADING WITH. Reading with Pennsylvania Reading Specialist Certificate
READING WITH PENNSYLVANIA READING SPECIALIST CERTIFICATE Reading with Pennsylvania Reading Specialist Certificate Program Coordinator: Ms. Anne Butler The Master of Science degree in Education with a concentration
More information1. Department of Curriculum and Instruction ELE 499 Course Title: Supervised Student Teaching in Primary Through Fifth Grade Credit Hours: 12
1. Department of Curriculum and Instruction ELE 499 Course Title: Supervised Student Teaching in Primary Through Fifth Grade Credit Hours: 12 2. Course Description: Prerequisites: Admission to student
More informationReading Specialist (151)
Purpose Reading Specialist (151) The purpose of the Reading Specialist test is to measure the requisite knowledge and skills that an entry-level educator in this field in Texas public schools must possess.
More informationCALIFORNIA S TEACHING PERFORMANCE EXPECTATIONS (TPE)
CALIFORNIA S TEACHING PERFORMANCE EXPECTATIONS (TPE) The Teaching Performance Expectations describe the set of knowledge, skills, and abilities that California expects of each candidate for a Multiple
More informationLEVEL 1 LICENSURE PORTFOLIO
LEVEL 1 LICENSURE PORTFOLIO Part I Purpose Principles to Be Addressed Required Documentation Directions Entry 1: Analyzing the School Counseling Environment Candidates analyze the school counseling environment
More informationSelf-Assessment Duval County School System. Level 3. Level 3. Level 3. Level 4
Standard 1: Purpose and Direction 1.1 The system engages in a systematic, inclusive, and comprehensive process to review, revise, and communicate a system-wide propose for the student success. The system
More informationIllinois State Board of Education
Illinois State Board of Education August 2014 Guidance Document Guidance on Building Teacher Evaluation Systems for Teachers of Students With Disabilities, English Learners, and Early Childhood Students
More informationBachelors of Science in Education (BSED) Middle Childhood Education. School of Education CECH
Bachelors of Science in Education (BSED) Middle Childhood Education School of Education CECH 2014 Primary Faculty: Emilie M. Camp Emilie.Camp@uc.edu 513-556-0388 I. Program Overview The Middle Childhood
More informationMaster s Degree Portfolio Project
Master s Degree Portfolio Project Introduction The portfolio project serves as the capstone activity for the master s degree program in the Department of Secondary Education. The portfolio will provide
More informationHow To Pass A Queens College Course
Education Unit Assessment Analysis Guide...committed to promoting equity, excellence, and ethics in urban schools and communities 1 Unit Assessment Analysis Guide Introduction Form 1: Education Unit Core
More informationunderstanding of development and individual differences to respond to the needs of individuals with exceptionalities
UCC/UGC/ECCC Proposal for Plan Change or Plan Deletion FAST TRACK (Select if this will be a fast track item. Refer to Fast Track Policy for eligibility) If this proposal represents changes to the intent
More informationTeacher Work Sample (TWS) Special Education. Westminster College
1 Teacher Work Sample (TWS) Special Education Westminster College Revised Spring 2015 RESEARCH ON CONTEXT A. Interview and Summary B. Learning about the Context (CIA) C. Connections Research on Context
More informationICTICT403 Apply software development methodologies
ICTICT403 Apply software development Release: 1 ICTICT403 Apply software development Modification History Release Release 1 Comments This version first released with ICT Information and Communications
More informationEXCEPTIONAL NEEDS SPECIALIST
IMPORTANT NOTICE TO CANDIDATES: The assessment information in this document is aligned with NBPTS Exceptional Needs Standards, Second Edition (for teachers of students ages birth 21+). If you applied for
More information1. The teacher candidate sets learning targets that address the Essential Academic Learning Requirements and the state learning goals.
SCORING RUBRIC Candidate: Supervisor: Cooperating Teacher: School: School District: Grade Level(s): PAA Administration Dates: 1 st 2 nd 3 rd 4 th 1. The teacher candidate sets learning targets that address
More informationCHESHIRE PUBLIC SCHOOLS SUBJECT AREA SUMMARY SHEETS MUSIC
CHESHIRE PUBLIC SCHOOLS SUBJECT AREA SUMMARY SHEETS MUSIC Curriculum Review Cycle Schedule 14-15 Analyze/Plan-Presentation to CCC 15-16 Implement I 16-17 Implement II 17-18 Implement III 18-19 Evaluation
More informationCourse-Based Key Assessment #4 ESOL Teaching Portfolio and Reflective Summary of Field Experience Used in TESL 5040 Practicum in ESOL
Course-Based Key Assessment #4 ESOL Teaching Portfolio and Summary of Field Experience Used in TESL 5040 Practicum in ESOL Introduction Advanced teacher candidates work with an experienced, certified ESOL
More informationProgram Outcomes for B.S. in Secondary Education
Bachelors of Science: Secondary Education 5/10/07 1 Program Outcomes for B.S. in Secondary Education The successful undergraduate candidate in the 7-12 bachelors program is able to plan, teach, assess,
More informationCONTINUOUS ASSESSMENT PLAN. For. ADMINISTRATIVE CERTIFICATION and RANK I STATUS. Within the. M. Ed. and Ed. S. DEGREE PROGRAMS.
CONTINUOUS ASSESSMENT PLAN For ADMINISTRATIVE CERTIFICATION and RANK I STATUS Within the M. Ed. and Ed. S. DEGREE PROGRAMS In the DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION AND SUPERVISION Revised: September, 2000 This
More informationSaint Joseph s University Education Department
Saint Joseph s University Education Department Pre-Student Teaching Field Experiences Handbook for Secondary Education Certification A Guide for Graduate Education Students, University Instructors and
More informationPerimeter, Area and Volume What Do Units Tell You About What Is Being Measured? Overview
Perimeter, Area and Volume What Do Units Tell You About What Is Being Measured? Overview Summary of Lessons: This set of lessons was designed to develop conceptual understanding of the unique attributes
More informationInvestigating Quadrilaterals Grade Four
Ohio Standards Connection Geometry and Spatial Sense Benchmark A Provide rationale for groupings and comparisons of two-dimensional figures and three-dimensional objects. Indicator 3 Identify similarities
More informationFRAMEWORK OF SUPPORT: SCHOOL-LEVEL PRACTICE PROFILE
FRAMEWORK OF SUPPORT: SCHOOL-LEVEL PRACTICE PROFILE S The Framework of Supports are a set of Practice Profiles that serve as an implementation overview of Support for Personalized Learning (SPL). Practice
More informationCrosswalk of the New Colorado Principal Standards (proposed by State Council on Educator Effectiveness) with the
Crosswalk of the New Colorado Principal Standards (proposed by State Council on Educator Effectiveness) with the Equivalent in the Performance Based Principal Licensure Standards (current principal standards)
More informationColorado Professional Teaching Standards
Colorado Professional Teaching Standards Standard I: Teachers demonstrate knowledge of the content they teach a. Teachers provide instruction that is aligned with the Colorado Academic Standards and their
More informationTHE FRAMEWORK FOR A TEACHER INTERN CERTIFICATION PROGRAM: SPECIFIC PROGRAM GUIDELINES PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
THE FRAMEWORK FOR A TEACHER INTERN CERTIFICATION PROGRAM: SPECIFIC PROGRAM GUIDELINES PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION TABLE OF CONTENTS Why Quality Teacher Preparation Programs Are Important...3 Philosophy
More information