BARWINNERS CUT SHEET Torts 1 PLC High Voltage
|
|
- Merry Cobb
- 7 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 p. 1 SAMPLE A SIMULATED EXAM QUESTION TORTS QUESTION 1 PLC High Voltage Peter, a twelve-year old, was playing with his pet pigeon in a field near his home, which is adjacent to a high voltage electricity power substation. The substation is surrounded by a six-foot tall chain link fence topped with barbed wire. Attached to the fence are twelve 10 inch by 14 inch warning signs, which read Danger High Voltage. Peter s pigeon flew into the substation and landed on a piece of equipment. In an attempt to retrieve his pet, Peter climbed the surrounding fence, then scaled a steel support to a height of approximately ten feet from where the bird was stranded. When Peter grasped the bird, it fluttered from his hand, struck Peter inthe face, causing Peter to come into contact with a high voltage wire, which caused him severe burns. Peter s father is contemplating filing a lawsuit on Peter s behalf against the owner and operator of the substation, Power and Light Company (PLC), to recover damages arising from the accident. What causes of action might Peter s father reasonably assert against PLC; what defenses can PLC reasonably raise; and what is the likely outcome on each? Discuss SAMPLE OUR CUT SHEET BARWINNERS CUT SHEET BARWINNERS provides Cut Sheets for all of our Simulated Essay Exams. These are cut outs of all of the issues, sub rules and factual analysis tested in the essay. They also provide you a cut out of what to write and how to analyze each issue and sub issue. We give you the key facts that need to be quoted. The cut sheets are the boilerplate you need to use to prepare for the bar exam essays. The BARWINNERS CUT SHEETS mimic the bar examiners grading sheets on the actual bar exam. BARWINNERS CUT SHEET Torts 1 PLC High Voltage Here after reading the fact pattern you should identify that the subject is Torts and that this is asking you to analyze Strict Liability for an Inherently Dangerous Activity and Negligence. The best way to format and organize your answer is to follow the Barwinners Approach, breaking out, headnoting, and discussing each sub-issue, which is where you will get your points. Discussing the main points is most important here, not the content of your
2 p. 2 conclusions (you just have to have one) the two released bar answers have conflicting conclusions and sometimes just mention both possible outcomes. What causes of action might Peter s father reasonably assert against PLC, what defenses can PLC reasonably raise, and what is the likely outcome on each? Discuss. STRICT TORT LIABILTY: INHERENTLY DANGEROUS ACTIVITY Activities which involve a serious risk of harm to persons or property which cannot be avoided or eliminated by due care and the activity is not usually conducted in that area. ACTIVITY POSES SERIOUS RISK OF HARM TO PERSONS OR PROPERTY Activity must involve risk of serious harm to persons or property. FACTS: Here, running a high voltage electricity power substation is an activity that is inherently dangerous, however it is likely not abnormally dangerous. Therefore, the activity poses a risk of serious harm to persons or property. CANNOT BE PERFORMED WITH COMPLETE SAFETY Activity cannot be made safe by the exercise of due care. FACTS: Here, running a high voltage electricity power substation is an activity that most likely cannot be made safe, because the danger of electric shock was not eliminated by use of a six-foot tall chain link fence topped with barbed wire and he twelve 10 inch by 14 inch warning signs, which read Danger High Voltage. The only way to make the activity completely safe would be to stop electricity from running, but that is not likely to occur. However, PLC will claim that the substation is in a controlled, secure environment and that the danger only occurs when a third party comes into contact with the substation as Peter did when he came into contact with a high voltage wire but that the use of a six-foot tall chain link fence topped with barbed wire and he twelve 10 inch by 14 inch warning signs, which read Danger High Voltage intended to restrict free access to third parties was enough exercise of due care to allow PLC to perform the task with complete safety. In spite of this argument, the fact that Peter was injured will likely show that the fence and signs were not enough to make the activity safe. Therefore, it is likely this activity cannot be performed with complete safety. ACTIVITY NOT USUALLY CONDUCTED IN THAT AREA FACTS: Here, the high voltage electricity power substation was located in a field near (Peter s) home and electricity substations arguably are common near residential areas in order to supply them electricity. However, Peter s father will claim PLC should be sure the substation is as far as possible from residences, and possibly only operate low voltage substations near residences.
3 p. 3 Therefore, the activity will likely be considered usually conducted in that area. DAMAGES Plaintiff can recover all damages which are proximately caused by defendant s actions. FACTS: Here, Peter s father will be able to recover damages for Peter s severe burns unless a defense applies. ASSUMPTION OF THE RISK The test is whether plaintiff knew of the risk and voluntarily assumed it. FACTS: Here, PLC will claim that Peter, a twelve-year old could read the sign Danger High Voltage, so he knew of the risk and voluntarily assumed the risk when he climbed the surrounding fence then scaled a steel support. However, Peter s father will claim that a 12- year old cannot know of the risk to himself when he is preoccupied with retrieving his stranded bird. Therefore, the court may or may not find that Peter assumed the risk as a defense. CONTRIBUTORY NEGLIGENCE Plaintiff has a duty to act as a reasonable person would in like or similar circumstances to prevent an unreasonable risk of harm to himself. Contributory negligence does not apply to strict liability if the plaintiff failed to realize the danger or guard against its existence. FACTS: Here, Peter, a twelve-year old, had a duty to act as a reasonable twelve-year old to prevent an unreasonable risk of harm to himself, so if a reasonable 12-year old would have failed to realize the danger in climbing the surrounding fence then scaling a steel support and ignoring twelve warning signs to retrieve his stranded bird, contributory negligence will not be a defense to this strict liability action. Therefore, the court may or may not find that Peter was contributorily negligent as a defense. CONCLUSION ON STRICT LIABILITY Therefore, it is unlikely that the court will find PLC liable under a strict liability cause of action. However if the court finds that Peter did not assume the risk or was not contributorily negligent, then Father may recover damages for Peter s severe burns. NEGLIGENCE
4 p. 4 In order for plaintiff to recover in negligence he must plead and prove DUTY, BREACH OF DUTY, ACTUAL CAUSATION, PROXIMATE CAUSATION, AND DAMAGES. DUTY Defendant has a duty to act as a reasonable person would in like or similar circumstances to avoid causing unreasonable risk of harm to others. OWNERS AND OCCUPIERS OF LAND Liability rests on the status of the person coming into the land. FACTS: Here, Peter, a twelve-year old was the person who climbed the surrounding fence and came onto the land. Therefore, liability rests on the status of child trespassers the attractive nuisance theory. CHILD TRESPASSERS ATTRACTIVE NUISANCE THEORY Land occupier is liable to children only if: (1) POSSESSOR KNOWS OR HAS REASON TO KNOW THAT CHILDREN ARE LIKELY TO TRESPASS FACTS: Here, since the substation was near Peter s home would indicate that PLC had reason to know that, being located near a home or homes that children would be likely to trespass. However, PLC will claim and there are no facts to indicate that they actually knew that children were trespassing but this argument will likely fail since the standard is not actual knowledge. Therefore, the court will likely find that PLC knew or had reason to know that children were likely to trespass. (2) LAND OCCUPIER KNOWS OR HAS REASON TO KNOW CONDITION IS DANGEROUS TO CHILDREN FACTS: Here, PLC would have to know that a high voltage electricity power substation would be a condition dangerous to children. Therefore, the court will likely find that PLC knew or had reason to know that the condition is dangerous to children. (3) RISK TO THE CHILD OUTWEIGHS THE UTILITY OF MAINTAINING THE CONDITION AND THE BURDEN OF ELIMINATING THE DANGER FACTS: Here, the risk to Peter is very great -- severe burns, if not death. This will balance against PLC s burden of maintaining the condition and eliminating the danger which they already do by maintaining a six-foot tall chain link fence topped with barbed wire and having twelve 10 inch by 14 inch warning signs, which read Danger High Voltage which PLC will argue is sufficient maintenance of the condition. However, Peter s father may claim that PLC could do more to eliminate the danger, i.e. making a taller fence or even closing the substation. It is unlikely the court will find closing the substation a reasonable solution since the substation is placed to provide reliable
5 p. 5 power to the community, its residence, and businesses, on the other hand, making a taller fence would not probably be too costly of a solution. Therefore, the court will likely find that the risk to the child outweighs the utility of maintaining the condition and eliminating the danger. (4) CHILD IS TOO YOUNG TO APPRECIATE AND UNDERSTAND THE RISK FACTS: Here, Peter was twelve years old and the argument if whether twelve years old is too young to appreciate and understand the risk could go either way. PLC will claim that Peter, at 12-years old would likely be able to read and, therefore, should have read the signs that read Danger High Voltage all around the fence and understood the risk before climbing the fence or, alternatively, that the act of climbing the fence topped with barbed wire showed Peter s appreciation of the risk. Peter s father will claim that he was too young to appreciate and understand the risk since the sign only said Danger High Voltage and did not expand on the risks saying something like, i.e. High Risk of Serious Shock or Death and/or accompaniment of a picture for those who do not read that would get the point across, like a skull and crossbones, which may be clearer to a child. Alternatively, he may claim climbing a fence in and of itself is a common act for children and does not mean that they would understand a dangerous risk of shock resulting from doing so. Therefore, the court will likely find that the child is too young to appreciate and understand the risk. TO WHOM IS DUTY OWED? Under Cardozo, a duty is owed to foreseeable plaintiffs in defendant s physical zone of danger. Under Andrews, one owes a duty to the whole world to behave in a manner so as to not create unreasonable risk of harm. FACTS: Here, Peter came into contact with a high voltage wire, which caused him severe burns and under Cardozo, Peter s father will claim that as a person in a field near his home adjacent to a high voltage electricity substation he was a foreseeable plaintiff in the physical zone of danger. PLC may attempt to claim that it is unforeseeable a person would ignore the twelve warning signs and climb the six-foot tall chain link fence topped with barbed wire, however this claim will most likely fail. Under Andrews, since Peter was severely burned by the high voltage wire, he is owed a duty due to the unreasonable risk of harm that caused his burns. Therefore, under both the Cardozo and Andrews tests, Peter is a foreseeable plaintiff to whom PLC owed a duty of reasonable care. BREACH OF REASONABLE CARE FACTS: Here, PLC maintained a six-foot tall chain link fence topped with barbed wire and had twelve 10 inch by 14 inch warning signs, which read Danger High Voltage that surrounded the high voltage electricity power substation. However, it is foreseeable a person (particularly a child) could and would climb a chain link fence. PLC could have installed a taller fence or one made of a material that was less climbable and they could have labeled the results of the danger more clearly
6 p. 6 i.e. a sign reading High Risk of Serious Shock or Death and/or accompaniment of a picture for those who do not read that would get the point across, like a skull and crossbones. Therefore, it is likely PLC breached its duty of reasonable care to Peter. ACTUAL CAUSATION BUT-FOR TEST Defendant is the actual cause of plaintiff s injuries because but for operating the high voltage electricity power substation and presence of the high voltage wire the plaintiff, Peter was able to access, he would not have been injured, resulting in severe burns. Therefore, PLC is the actual cause of Peter s injuries. PROXIMATE CAUSATION Where something intervened between defendant s act and plaintiff s injuries, it must be determined whether the intervening force was dependent or independent. INDEPENDENT Superseding forces not arising from defendant s act which may relieve defendant of liability. FACTS: Here, Peter s pet pigeon flew into the substation and landed on a piece of equipment, then upon Peter s attempt to retrieve his pet (he) grasped the bird, it fluttered from his hand and the independent, superseding force here would be the bird striking Peter in the face, causing him to come into contact with the high voltage wire which, in turn, caused him severe burns. Therefore, the retrieval of the bird and the bird striking Peter was the independent, superseding force not arising from PLC s act and it may relieve PLC of liability. FORESEEABILITY If the intervening act was unforeseeable, then the chain of causation was broken. FACTS: Here, the question now is if the retrieval of the bird and the bird striking Peter was unforeseeable in which case the chain of causation would be broken. In this case, it is not unforeseeable that a pet of any kind would get into a substation located near a home or many homes, and so, any resulting effort of rescue of a pet, including Peter s attempt to retrieve his pet here, would be foreseeable. Therefore, foreseeability is present and does not break the chain of causation. Therefore, the independent superseding force was foreseeable PLC s operation of the substation was the proximate cause of Peter s injury.
7 p. 7 DAMAGES Plaintiff may recover for pain and suffering. Economic damages alone are insufficient. FACTS: Here, Peter suffered severe burns which likely incurred physical and emotional pain and suffering as well as medical and rehabilitation costs. Therefore, Peter s father may be able to recover damages for pain and suffering on Peter s behalf. DEFENSE CONTRIBUTORY NEGLIGENCE Plaintiff has a duty to act as a reasonable person would in like or similar circumstances to prevent an unreasonable risk of harm to himself. FACTS: Here, as stated above, Peter, a twelve-year old, had a duty to act as a reasonable twelveyear old to prevent an unreasonable risk of harm to himself, so if a reasonable 12-year old would have failed to realize the danger in climbing the surrounding fence then scaling a steel support and ignoring twelve warning signs to retrieve his stranded bird, contributory negligence will not be a defense to this strict liability action. Therefore, the court may or may not find that Peter was contributorily negligent as a defense. ASSUMPTION OF THE RISK The test is whether plaintiff knew of the risk and voluntarily assumed it. FACTS: Here, as stated above, PLC will claim that Peter, a twelve-year old could read the sign Danger High Voltage, so he knew of the risk and voluntarily assumed the risk when he climbed the surrounding fence then scaled a steel support. However, Peter s father will claim that a 12-year old cannot know of the risk to himself when he is preoccupied with retrieving his stranded bird. Therefore, the court may or may not find that Peter assumed the risk as a defense. CONCLUSION ON NEGLIGENCE Therefore, it is unlikely that the court will find PLC liable under a negligence cause of action. However if the court finds that Peter did not assume the risk or was not contributorily negligent, then Father may recover damages for Peter s severe burns.
Defendant has a duty to act as a reasonable person would in like or similar circumstances to avoid causing unreasonable risk of harm to others.
NEGLIGENCE (Heavily Tested) (Write On the Bar): In order for Plaintiff to recover in Negligence, she or he must plead and prove: DUTY, BREACH OF DUTY, ACTUAL CAUSATION, PROXIMATE CAUSATION, AND DAMAGES.
More informationChapter 7 Tort Law and Product Liability
Chapter 7 Tort Law and Product Liability Chapter Outline 1. Introduction 2. The Basis of Tort Law 3. Intentional Torts 4. Negligence 5. Cyber Torts: Defamation Online 6. Strict Liability 7. Product Liability
More informationNegligence: Element III: Proximate Cause. Chapter 15
Negligence: Element III: Proximate Cause Chapter 15 Introduction Proximate Cause. 1) the causation question (cause in fact): Did the defendant cause the plaintiff s injury? 2) The policy question ( a cut-off
More informationChapter 4 Crimes (Review)
Chapter 4 Crimes (Review) On a separate sheet of paper, write down the answer to the following Q s; if you do not know the answer, write down the Q. 1. What is a crime? 2. There are elements of a crime.
More informationMERCER COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE COURSE OUTLINE
MERCER COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE COURSE OUTLINE Course Number Course Title Credits LEG 130 Civil Litigation I 3 Hours: Lecture/Lab/ Others 3/0/0 Pre-Requisites: None Catalog Description (2011-2013 Catalog)
More informationDefenses in a Product Liability Claim
Defenses in a Product Liability Claim written by: Mark Schultz, Esq. COZEN O CONNOR Suite 400, 200 Four Falls Corporate Center West Conshohocken, PA 19428 (800) 379-0695 (610) 941-5400 mschultz@cozen.com
More informationLegal Liability in Recreation Site Management. Legal Climate. Classification of Legal Liability RRT 484. Professor Ed Krumpe
Legal Liability in Recreation Site Management RRT 484 Professor Ed Krumpe 1 Legal Climate Sovereign immunity is basically dead. Lawsuits are part of normal operations & we cannot prevent them. Injuries
More informationProfessional Practice 544
February 15, 2016 Professional Practice 544 Tort Law and Insurance Michael J. Hanahan Schiff Hardin LLP 233 S. Wacker, Ste. 6600 Chicago, IL 60606 312-258-5701 mhanahan@schiffhardin.com Schiff Hardin LLP.
More informationANSWER A TO QUESTION 8
ANSWER A TO QUESTION 8 Q-1 Torts Barb v. Adam Negligence Per Se - See under Breach. (defined intra) Crossing the double line - excusable NEGLIGENCE Negligence where a duty is owed and that duty is breached
More informationUnintentional Torts - Definitions
Unintentional Torts - Definitions Negligence The failure to exercise the degree of care that a reasonable person would exercise that results in the proximate cause of actual harm to an innocent person.
More informationNegligence & Tort Law
Negligence & Tort Law How to Prove Negligence The plaintiff needs to prove four elements by a preponderance of the evidence Duty Breach of Duty Causation (two parts) Damages Duty Defined: A legal obligation
More informationFIRE ON THE ICE: RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN THE LAW OF NEGLIGENCE REGARDING CAUSATION
Aaron L. Sherriff FIRE ON THE ICE: RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN THE LAW OF NEGLIGENCE REGARDING CAUSATION 2 Aaron L. Sherriff TABLE OF CONTENTS I. THE CGL POLICY... 3 II. NEGLIGENCE... 3 III. MR. HANKE... 4
More informationOutline: Ye Olde Sawmill Tort Class Midterm Call: Potential Claims and liabilities of the parties
Outline: Ye Olde Sawmill Tort Class Midterm Call: Potential Claims and liabilities of the parties 1. Waiver Release/assumption of Risk a. Unreasonable waiver for all 3 i. Wanton/willful ii. Unconscionable
More informationProfessional Negligence
1239272 - BCIT 1 Professional Negligence Jeremy T. Lovell Bull, Housser & Tupper LLP 1239272 - BCIT 2 Overview Professional negligence law in context Negligence law in general Duty of care Standard of
More informationLEGAL ISSUES. Why should I learn about legal issues? How am I liable? What are my responsibilities as a teacher?
LEGAL ISSUES Why should I learn about legal issues? School administrators are typically the only personnel to receive training in classroom liability issues, yet teachers have the most responsibility for
More informationChapter 11 Torts in the Business Environment
Chapter 11 Torts in the Business Environment Tort a civil wrong not arising from a breach of contract. A breach of a legal duty that proximately causes harm or injury to another. Two notions serve as the
More informationCanadian Law 12 Negligence and Other Torts
Canadian Law 12 Negligence and Other Torts What is Negligence? Someone who commits a careless act that creates harm to another person is negligent. Over the past several years, negligence has become the
More informationUNIT 2 TORT LAW. wrong committed by from the French word meaning. Someone has suffered an personal injury through 1) ; 2) ; 3).
UNIT 2 TORT LAW 1 OBJECTIVE: DIFFERENTIATE BETWEEN CRIMES AND TORTS AND DEVELOP A STUDENT UNDERSTANDING OF NEGLIGENCE. NBEA STANDARD I: DIFFERENTIATE BETWEEN CLASSIFICATIONS OF PROCEDURAL LAW, AND DIFFERENT
More informationTorts Copyright July, 2006 State Bar of California
Torts Copyright July, 2006 State Bar of California After paying for his gasoline at Delta Gas, Paul decided to buy two 75-cent candy bars. The Delta Gas store clerk, Clerk, was talking on the telephone,
More informationSession 30. Tort Law 2 Negligence and intent
Session 30 Tort Law 2 Negligence and intent Negligence and intent Negligence occurs when the following three conditions are satisfied The action is unintentional The action is unplanned An injury results
More informationIn order to establish a prima facie case of negligence, one must determine that the
In order to establish a prima facie case of negligence, one must determine that the following four elements are established: 1.) P must have suffered an injury and must demonstrate that the injury was
More informationAn act can be both a crime and a tort. Example reckless driving resulting in an accident
How Do Crimes and Torts Differ? A crime is an offense against society. It is a public wrong. A tort is a private or civil wrong. It is an offense against an individual. If someone commits a tort, the person
More informationFiling # 22009228 Electronically Filed 12/29/2014 03:48:06 PM
Filing # 22009228 Electronically Filed 12/29/2014 03:48:06 PM PENELOPE BELVOIR, as Executor de son Tort for the Pending Estate of Robert Belvoir, Deceased, vs. Plaintiff, ROPES COURSES, INC., FB ORLANDO
More informationFAULT INSTRUCTIONS Introduction
FAULT INSTRUCTIONS Introduction The format of the Fault section with basic liability instructions for any fault case is retained in RAJI (CIVIL) 5th Fault Instructions. Revisions to the RAJI (CIVIL) 4TH
More informationGENERAL CIVIL JURY CHARGES IN GENERAL NEGLIGENCE CASES. Although you, as jurors, are the sole judges of the facts, you are duty-bound to follow
GENERAL CIVIL JURY CHARGES IN GENERAL NEGLIGENCE CASES General Introduction Ladies and Gentlemen, now that you have heard the evidence and the argument of the attorneys, it is now time for me to instruct
More informationChapter IV INTRODUCTION
Chapter IV FACULTY LIABILITY I. Overview INTRODUCTION Faculty members are agents of their employers the college or university. In that capacity, the college is liable or responsible for their acts that
More informationAnglo-American Contract and Torts. Prof. Mark P. Gergen. 14. Strict liability abnormally dangerous activities and vicarious liability
Anglo-American Contract and Torts Prof. Mark P. Gergen 14. Strict liability abnormally dangerous activities and vicarious liability Vicarious liability respondeat superior An employer is strictly liable
More informationProducts Liability: Putting a Product on the U.S. Market. Natalia R. Medley Crowell & Moring LLP 14 November 2012
Products Liability: Putting a Product on the U.S. Market Natalia R. Medley Crowell & Moring LLP 14 November 2012 Overview Regulation of Products» Federal agencies» State laws Product Liability Lawsuits»
More informationBUSINESS LAW GUIDEBOOK
BUSINESS LAW GUIDEBOOK SECOND EDITION CHARLES YC CHEW CHAPTER 8: THE LAW OF NEGLIGENCE IN THE BUSINESS WORLD TEST YOUR KNOWLEDGE 1. Outline the elements of the tort of negligence. The elements of the tort
More informationLOUISIANA PERSONAL INJURY ACCIDENT BASICS
LOUISIANA PERSONAL INJURY ACCIDENT BASICS The Concept of Negligence If you have been injured, only an experienced Louisiana personal injury accident attorney can evaluate the unique facts and circumstances
More informationTORT LAW SUMMARY LAWSKOOL UK
TORT LAW SUMMARY LAWSKOOL UK TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 5 DEFENCES 6 Consent (Or Volenti Non Fit Injuria) 6 Illegtality (or Ex Trupi Causa) 7 Contributory Negiligence 8 NEGLIGENCE 11 Duty of Care 11
More informationNC General Statutes - Chapter 99B 1
Chapter 99B. Products Liability. 99B-1. Definitions. When used in this Chapter, unless the context otherwise requires: (1) "Claimant" means a person or other entity asserting a claim and, if said claim
More informationTorts II. False Imprisonment 6/28/13. Assault. Western Telegraph v. Hill (1933 AL) Wes
Torts II Assault Western Telegraph v. Hill (1933 AL) Wes False Imprisonment Defendant unlawfully acts to intendonally cause confinement or restraint of the vicdm within a bounded area. Accidental confinement
More informationNEGLIGENCE: ELEMENT I: DUTY CHAPTER 13
NEGLIGENCE: ELEMENT I: DUTY CHAPTER 13 General Rule on Duty What is a duty? A duty is an obligation or a requirement to conform to a standard of conduct prescribed by law. Consider the following questions.
More informationGRADER'S GUIDE *** QUESTION: ESSAY QUESTION NO. 3 *** SUBJECT: TORTS
GRADER'S GUIDE *** QUESTION: ESSAY QUESTION NO. 3 *** QUESTION NO. 1 (30 Points) Battery SUBJECT: TORTS John potentially has a battery claim against the guard. Battery is the intentional unlawful touching
More informationA PRACTITIONER S PERSPECTIVE ON SLIP AND FALL CASES Michael P. Taylor
A PRACTITIONER S PERSPECTIVE ON SLIP AND FALL CASES Michael P. Taylor LIABILITY TO THE PLAINTIFF Although the plaintiff s claim in a slip and fall case is in tort, any determination of the plaintiff s
More informationKey Concept 9: Understand the differences between compensatory and punitive damages 1. A. Torts. 1. Compensatory and Punitive Damages
Key Concept 9: Understand the differences between compensatory and punitive damages 1 A. Torts 1. Compensatory and Punitive Damages Tort law involves civil liability between private parties. A plaintiff
More informationKey Concept 2: Understanding the Differences Between 1) Intentional Tort Liability
Key Concept 2: Understanding the Differences Between 1) Intentional Tort Liability 1 (2) Negligence Liability, and 3) Strict Liability. I. Torts in General: A. Definition: A tort is a civil wrong that
More informationCONSTRUCTION ACCIDENTS: LANDOWNER AND CONSTRUCTION MANAGER LIABILITY REVISITED
CONSTRUCTION ACCIDENTS: LANDOWNER AND CONSTRUCTION MANAGER LIABILITY REVISITED In the recent case of Farabaugh v. Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission, 911 A.2d 1264 (Pa. 2006) the Pennsylvania Supreme Court
More informationCivil Law and Procedure
Chapter 5 Civil Law and Procedure Business Law Ms. Turner Crime Offense against society Tort Private or civil wrong; offense against an individual Can sue to receive money damages Can be both a crime and
More informationNEGLIGENCE. The elements of negligence: (Unintentional Torts) Pay attention the last slide is a three-question test!
NEGLIGENCE (Unintentional Torts) Pay attention the last slide is a three-question test! hahahahaha The elements of negligence: * Duty of Care * Breach of that Duty * Damage, Loss or Injury * Causation
More informationASPECTS OF CONTRACT AND NEGLIGENCE FOR BUSINESS. Lecturer: Judith Robb-Walters Lesson 8
ASPECTS OF CONTRACT AND NEGLIGENCE FOR BUSINESS Lecturer: Judith Robb-Walters Lesson 8 ASPECTS OF CONTRACT AND NEGLIGENCE FOR BUSINESS LO 2: Understand principles of liability in negligence in business
More informationAPPENDIX B: RECOMMENDATIONS TO BE IMPLEMENTED ON A NATIONALLY CONSISTENT BASIS
APPENDIX B: RECOMMENDATIONS TO BE IMPLEMENTED ON A NATIONALLY CONSISTENT BASIS Implementation of the Panel's Recommendations A national response Recommendation 1 The Panel's recommendations should be incorporated
More informationLIABILITY INSURANCE (with reference to Irish law and practice)
LIABILITY INSURANCE (with reference to Irish law and practice) Syllabus for the 756 THE IRISH LEGAL SYSTEM AND CIVIL PROCEDURE outline the nature and organisation of the Irish legal system, including function
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO
1 0 1 MARC D. ADELMAN Attorney at Law State Bar No. Liberty Station Historic Decatur Road, Suite 00 San Diego, CA - (1) -0 Phone (1) -0 Fax Email: AdelmanMD@aol.com Attorney for Plaintiff SUPERIOR COURT
More informationUNIMPROVED LAND IMMUNITY IN CLIFF FALL
UNIMPROVED LAND IMMUNITY IN CLIFF FALL James C. Kozlowski, J.D., Ph.D. 1987 James C. Kozlowski During recent months, the "NRPA Law Review" has presented decisions from various jurisdictions which discussed
More informationKey Concept 4: Understanding Product Liability Law
Key Concept 4: Understanding Product Liability Law Suppose that you are the president of a firm making products for sale to the public. One of your worries would be the company's exposure to civil liability
More informationILLINOIS LAW MANUAL CHAPTER VI OTHER CAUSES OF ACTION
If you have questions regarding Product Liability, please contact Bruce Schoumacher via bschoumacher@querrey.com www.querrey.com 2012 Querrey & Harrow, Ltd. All rights reserved. B. PRODUCT LIABILITY ILLINOIS
More information-3- 1. Manufacturing Defects
A SUMMARY OF PUERTO RICO PRODUCTS LIABILITY LAW Presented by: Manuel Moreda-Toldeo, Esq., McConnell Valdes While Puerto Rico is, in essence, a Civil Law jurisdiction, its legislature has never enacted
More informationCOMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL. Plaintiff, TARIN SAROKA, individually, and as the Personal Representative of the
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE 15 TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA TARIN SAROKA, individually and as the Personal Representative of the Estate of ALAN BAZINET, CIVIL DIVISION CASE
More informationSTATE OF OREGON TRANSPORTATION COMPENDIUM OF LAW
STATE OF OREGON TRANSPORTATION COMPENDIUM OF LAW Rodney L. Umberger, Jr. Marc M. Carlton Williams Kastner 888 SW Fifth Avenue, Suite 600 Portland, OR 97204 Phone: (503) 228 7967 Email: rumberger@williamskastner.com
More informationManufacturers versus Component Part and Raw Material Suppliers: How to Prevent Liability By Kenneth Ross *
Manufacturers versus Component Part and Raw Material Suppliers: How to Prevent Liability By Kenneth Ross * Introduction One of the more perplexing and potentially dangerous areas of product liability practice
More informationCivil Liability Amendment (Personal Responsibility) Bill 2002
Passed by both Houses New South Wales Civil Liability Amendment (Personal Responsibility) Bill 2002 Contents Page 1 Name of Act 2 2 Commencement 2 3 Amendment of Civil Liability Act 2002 No 22 2 4 Consequential
More informationvs. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Plaintiff JAMES SCHAIRER, by and through undersigned counsel, hereby sues
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE th 16 JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA GENERAL JURISDICTION DIVISION CASE NO. JAMES SCHAIRER, individually, Plaintiff, vs. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED PAUL KERCHER,
More informationCalifornia First-Year Law Students Examination. Essay Questions and Selected Answers
California First-Year Law Students Examination Essay Questions and Selected Answers October 2012 1 ESSAY QUESTIONS AND SELECTED ANSWERS OCTOBER 2012 FIRST-YEAR LAW STUDENTS EXAMINATION This publication
More information(1) A person to whom damage to another is legally attributed is liable to compensate that damage.
Principles of European Tort Law TITLE I. Basic Norm Chapter 1. Basic Norm Art. 1:101. Basic norm (1) A person to whom damage to another is legally attributed is liable to compensate that damage. (2) Damage
More informationPREMISES LIABILITY INSTRUCTIONS Introduction
PREMISES LIABILITY INSTRUCTIONS Introduction Premises Liability Instructions may be used in cases involving injuries resulting from the condition of property. The primary revision to the Premises Liability
More informationSIMULATED ESSAY EXAM CONSTITUTIONAL LAW
SIMULATED ESSAY EXAM CONSTITUTIONAL LAW SADS, a national college student organization, decided to conduct a campaign protesting government defense spending. SADS members at a university in City planned
More informationCommon Law: Trespass, Nuisance and Negligence
Common Law: Trespass, Nuisance and Negligence Fact Sheet 02 Updated December 2010 An Introduction to Common Law: Trespass, Nuisance and Negligence Mostly, the environmental law that we rely on to protect
More informationLITIGATION OF PRODUCTS LIABILITY CASES IN EXOTIC FORUMS - PUERTO RICO. Francisco J. Colón-Pagán 1
LITIGATION OF PRODUCTS LIABILITY CASES IN EXOTIC FORUMS - PUERTO RICO By Francisco J. Colón-Pagán 1 I. OVERVIEW OF PUERTO RICO LEGAL SYSTEM A. Three branches of government B. Judicial Branch 1. Supreme
More informationPremise/ Livestock Liability Issues
Premise/ Livestock Liability Issues Disclaimer This presentation is solely intended to provide legal information to the public. Nothing from this presentation is intended to provide legal advice. The legal
More informationCASE NO.: COMPLAINT. Plaintiff, [PLAINTIFF S NAME], by and through her parent and natural guardian
Form 2:150 Dog Bite Sample Complaint IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR COUNTY, FLORIDA [PLAINTIFF S NAME], by and through her parent and natural guardian, [PLAINTIFF S PARENT S
More information9-11 & AIRLINE CIVIL LIABILITY
9-11 & AIRLINE CIVIL LIABILITY Position Paper June 2002 2002 Perry Z. Binder, J.D. Assistant Professor of Legal Studies J. Mack Robinson College of Business Georgia State University Member, The Florida
More informationHow To Defend A Park District Slide From A Fall From An Asphalt Surface
FALL FROM PARK DISTRICT SLIDE ONTO ASPHALT FATAL TO HANDICAPPED YOUTH James C. Kozlowski, J.D., Ph.D. 1990 James C. Kozlowski Several years ago, during the so-called liability crisis of the late '80s,
More informationPRODUCT LIABILITY INSTRUCTIONS. Introduction
Introduction The RAJI (CIVIL) 5th Product Liability Instructions refer only to manufacturers and sellers. These instructions should be expanded when appropriate to include others in the business of placing
More informationThings You Should Know About Your Child s Personal Injury Case
Things You Should Know About Your Child s Personal Injury Case Virginia law treats often children differently than it treats adults for many reasons. Children are not considered mature enough to understand
More informationConstruction Negligence and Toxic Torts
Illinois Association of Defense Trial Counsel Springfield, Illinois www.iadtc.org 800-232-0169 IDC Quarterly Volume 18, Number 4 (18.4.56) Product Liability By: James W. Ozog and Staci A. Williamson Wiedner
More informationWaiver, Release of Liability and Assumption of Risk Agreement. Before any potential claims can be assessed, the Waiver,
Waiver, Release of Liability and Assumption of Risk Agreement Before any potential claims can be assessed, the Waiver, Release of Liability and Assumption of Risk Agreement must be addressed. In ND, contracts
More informationEmployer s Liability in a Practical Context
Contents Table of Statutes Table of Secondary Legislation Table of Cases Chapter 1: Employer s Liability in a Practical Context 1.1 Introduction 1.2 The parties to an employer s liability claim 1.3 An
More informationBetween Orest Strynatka, claimant, and Alison Forbes, defendant. [2002] B.C.J. No. 2589 2002 BCPC 481. North Vancouver Registry No.
Page 1 Case Name: Strynatka v. Forbes Between Orest Strynatka, claimant, and Alison Forbes, defendant [2002] B.C.J. No. 2589 2002 BCPC 481 North Vancouver Registry No. 0113258 British Columbia Provincial
More informationSTATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE. Strafford, Superior Court
Strafford, STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Superior Court SS. Robert and Dawn Brauel v. Gregory V. White, M.D. and Gastroenterology Professional Association Docket No. 96-C-0238 ORDER ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS
More informationv. Record No. 080751 OPINION BY JUSTICE BARBARA MILANO KEENAN June 4, 2009 LOUIS N. JOYNES, II, ET AL.
PRESENT: All the Justices LEO WILLIAMS v. Record No. 080751 OPINION BY JUSTICE BARBARA MILANO KEENAN June 4, 2009 LOUIS N. JOYNES, II, ET AL. FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF PORTSMOUTH Dean W. Sword,
More informationDuty of Care. Kung Fu Instructor in Training Program. Shaolin Guardian Network
Duty of Care Kung Fu Instructor in Training Program Shaolin Guardian Network Negligence This civil wrong is most importance to all professional groups, as far as being a source of potential legal action.
More informationClinical Negligence. by Janet C Kelly Midwifery Lecturer
Clinical Negligence by Janet C Kelly Midwifery Lecturer 1 Aim To give an insight into the concept of clinical negligence and its relation to children s nursing 2 Objectives 1. To explain the concept and
More informationNo. 1-10-0602 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT
SECOND DIVISION May 31, 2011 No. 1-10-0602 Notice: This order was filed under Illinois Supreme Court Rule 23 and may not be cited as precedent by any party except in the limited circumstances allowed under
More informationI. GOAL: To help students gain a better understanding of tort law and especially the concept of negligence.
NAME: LESSON: SOURCE: SUPPLIES: DURATION: Ieva Butkute Torts: The Elements of Negligence Original, with some references to the Streetlaw textbook The Simpsons DVD (Season 2, Episode 11), student handouts,
More informationThe Petrylaw Lawsuits Settlements and Injury Settlement Report
The Petrylaw Lawsuits Settlements and Injury Settlement Report ARM FRACTURE INJURIES How Minnesota Juries Decide the Value of Pain and Suffering in Arm Fracture/Humerus Injury Cases The Petrylaw Lawsuits
More informationTORTS SUMMARY LAWSKOOL SINGAPORE
TORTS SUMMARY LAWSKOOL SINGAPORE Table of Contents Sources Used...4 1. INTRODUCTION TO NEGLIGENCE...5 2. DUTY OF CARE...6 2.1 Introduction & Development of Duty of Care...6 3. DUTY OF CARE- Kinds of Harm...10
More information1. Introduction to Negligence
1. Introduction to Negligence You should be familiar with the following areas: l how to prove negligence l legislative reform to the law of negligence INTRODUCTION A tort exists to protect rights. The
More informationEverything you need...
TEXAS PREMISES LIABILITY Release No. 9 Everything you need... Important Updates: Discovery Issues Amusement Park Accidents Recreational Use Statute and Special Defects Trespassing Children Legal Duty Regarding
More informationCHAPTER 160 FATAL ACCIDENTS AND PERSONAL INJURIES LAWS OF BRUNEI ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS. Section PART I PRELIMINARY
Fatal Accidents and Personal Injuries CAP. 160 1 LAWS OF BRUNEI Section CHAPTER 160 FATAL ACCIDENTS AND PERSONAL INJURIES ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS PART I PRELIMINARY 1. Citation 2. Application PART II FATAL
More information2. Elements of the Product Liability Tort Claim
1. THE PRODUCT LIABILITY TORTS A. The Strict Product Liability Doctrine In the 1960 s, the American Law Institute drafted and adopted Restatement (2d) of Torts 402A. This section states: (1) One who sells
More informationSTATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE TRANSPORTATION COMPENDIUM OF LAW
STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE TRANSPORTATION COMPENDIUM OF LAW R. Matthew Cairns Samantha D. Elliott Gallagher, Callahan & Gartrell 214 North Main Street P.O. Box 1415 Concord, NH 03302 1415 Tel: (603) 228 1181
More informationCase 5:09-cv-00910-FB Document 35 Filed 10/20/10 Page 1 of 5
Case :09-cv-00910-FB Document Filed 10/0/10 Page 1 of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION CARL DWIGHT DAVIS, Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. SA-09-CA-910-FB
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN DANIELLE SOO YEE AND. JOHNNY SOONG (Trading as CLUB COCONUTS) AND
TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE HCA: No.416/2000 BETWEEN DANIELLE SOO YEE AND Plaintiff JOHNNY SOONG (Trading as CLUB COCONUTS) AND CASCADIA HOTEL LTD Defendants BEFORE THE HONOURABLE
More informationHow To Determine How Much Compensation A Victim Is Entitled To In Tennessee
COMPENSATION IN A TENNESSEE PERSONAL INJURY LAWSUIT If You Have Been Injured in a Personal Injury Accident and Someone Else s Negligence Caused, or Contributed to, the Accident, You May Be Entitled to
More informationKERN COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT CERRO COSO COLLEGE PARA C260 COURSE OUTLINE OF RECORD
KERN COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT CERRO COSO COLLEGE PARA C260 COURSE OUTLINE OF RECORD 1. DISCIPLINE AND COURSE NUMBER: PARA C260 2. COURSE TITLE: Personal Injury and Tort Litigation 3. SHORT BANWEB TITLE:
More informationHow To Understand The Law Of Germany
Contents Table of Statutes Table of Secondary Legislation Table of Cases Chapter 1: General Principles of Liability 1.1 Introduction 1.2 Interests protected 1.3 The mental element in tort 1.3.1 Malice
More informationInjury Law Attorney Clearwater - New Port Richey - Tampa Bay
Injury Law Attorney Clearwater - New Port Richey - Tampa Bay You need an aggressive injury lawyer to fight for your rights WHAT IS INJURY LAW? Injury Law is what an injury attorney would refer to as Tort
More informationProduct Liability Risks for Distributors: The Basics. Susan E. Burnett Bowman and Brooke LLP
Product Liability Risks for Distributors: The Basics Susan E. Burnett Bowman and Brooke LLP Whereas.... State laws vary widely and change frequently, Every case is different, I'm not your lawyer.. Disclaimer:
More informationUNIT 5 LAW OF TORT. Suggested Answers June 2009
UNIT 5 LAW OF TORT Suggested Answers June 2009 Note to Candidates and Tutors: The purpose of the suggested answers is to provide students and tutors with guidance as to the key points students should have
More informationWeiler, Maloney, Nelson
Forum North 2015 November 3, 2015 Supervisor Case Study: When Health & Safety is a Crime Weiler, Maloney, Nelson Brad Smith Bill C-45 Criminal Code amended easier to convict a corporation of criminal negligence
More informationSAFETY REVIEW NOT SPECIFIED IN CONTRACT
SAFETY REVIEW NOT SPECIFIED IN CONTRACT James C. Kozlowski, J.D., Ph.D. 2008 James C. Kozlowski In contracting for personal services, an architect's duty depends on the particular agreement entered into
More informationDeclarations. INSU 2500 Chapter 9 CHAPTER 9. Common Elements of Insurance Contracts. Insuring Agreement Example
Declarations INSU 2500 Chapter 9 October 10, 2006 Facts of Policy Usually first page of an insurance contract contains such things as: Identifies the insurance company Identifies the named insured Policy
More informationAPPORTIONMENT OF LIABILITY: UNIFORM APPORTIONMENT OF TORT RESPONSIBILITY ACT AS COMPARED TO RESTATEMENT THIRD, TORTS
APPORTIONMENT OF LIABILITY: UNIFORM APPORTIONMENT OF TORT RESPONSIBILITY ACT AS COMPARED TO RESTATEMENT THIRD, TORTS Presented by: Douglas G. Houser Bullivant Houser Bailey, P.C. Portland, Oregon -2- Where
More informationMEMORANDUM. Introduction. Public Golf Course Injury Fact Pattern. George would like to bring an action against the
MEMORANDUM TO: Betsy Candler FROM: Student RE: Public Golf Course Injury: George s Damages Claim DATE: July 12, 2015 Introduction This memorandum is based on the factual information contained in the document
More information"THE LAW OF DAMAGES" (Contract and Tort/Delict) Copyright Stewart Dunn except:
D EXTRACT FROM "THE LAW OF DAMAGES" (Contract and Tort/Delict) Copyright Stewart Dunn except: Extracts from cases reported in The Weekly Law Reports and The Law Reports are reproduced with the permission
More informationIndex. British Columbia Court of Appeal 80, 130, 164, 177 British Columbia Supreme Court 78 but for test 3, 5, 44. Canada Alberta Supreme Court 41, 79
Index abnormality. see normality; reasonableness test absence of tests 6 7, 259 accident insurance policies 143 4 accidental shootings dangerous chattels and substances 237 8 intervening conduct of children
More informationClackamas County 4- H Oregon City, Oregon. Oregon s Equine Inherent Risk Law: An Overview. February 12, 2014
An Overview Clackamas County 4-H Meeting Canby, Oregon February 12, 2014 ORS 30.687 30.698 Only applies to certain injuries/harm Only protects certain people/entities Each state s equine inherent risk
More information