1 Pegasus Guidelines for Applicants 1 These guidelines are valid for both Pegasus-long fellowships and Pegasus-short fellowships. 1 There are 6 calls in total, distributed over 3 years: Call deadline Category Available fellowships 01/02/2012 long + short 30 long + 10 short 01/05/2012 short 10 short 01/02/2013 short 10 short 01/05/2013 short 10 short 01/02/2014 short 10 short 01/05/2014 short 9 short Applicants are expected to read the guidelines before submitting their proposal. Application forms are available online through the FWO e-portal. All relevant information about the Pegasus programme can be found on the FWO website.
2 Table of content 1. What is Pegasus? 2. Who can apply? 3. How to apply for Pegasus funding? 4. Deadlines 5. Submission 6. Resubmissions 7. Financial and social issues 2 8. Funding decision and fellowship start 2 9. What are the selection criteria? 10. How are the Pegasus applications evaluated? 11. Part time research 12. Maternity leave 13. Applicants who are third country nationals 14. Misconduct 15. Dissemination of Research Results 16. Acknowledgement of Pegasus funding 17. Annual Pegasus meeting 18. Marie-Curie Cofunding 19. Grant writing 20. Useful links
3 3 To serve as a pilot initiative in bringing FWO procedures and regulations in line with the 3 European Charter and Code, and to raise awareness about researchers rights and obligations in general 1. What is Pegasus? Pegasus is a research funding scheme of the Research Foundation Flanders (FWO), destined for experienced researchers (at postdoctoral level) in all scientific areas. The programme goals are: To attract excellent postdoctoral researchers to Flanders in order to contribute to the advancement of Flemish science To provide the selected fellows with optimal conditions to further develop their research career in Flanders To raise the standards of the existing Visiting Postdoctoral Fellowship Scheme of FWO to the level of that of the regular postdocs, especially with respect to recruitment and selection procedures Two options are possible within the programme: Pegasus-long: Postdoctoral fellowships of 3 years, renewable once in open competition with the regular FWO postdoctoral fellows. 30 Pegasus-long fellowships are available, to be granted in a single call (expected launch in November 2011). Pegasus-short: Postdoctoral fellowships of 1 year, non renewable (although candidates can apply afterwards in the open competition for a regular postdoctoral fellowship), and available under the form of an employment contract (standard option) or a stipend (exceptional cases). 2. Who can apply? Nationality The Pegasus programme is open to all nationalities. PhD degree On the start date of the fellowship, the candidate must have obtained a PhD or a degree, in any scientific area, that is legally recognized as equivalent either in application of the guidelines of the European Union, or by virtue of a bilateral agreement with the European Union, in compliance with the provisions of the Decree concerning universities in the Flemish Community of 12 June 1991, Art. 60 (Belgian Law Gazette, 4/7/1991). The PhD must have been obtained by June 1 prior to the start of the fellowship (for those fellowships starting on October 1), or by November 1 prior to the start of the fellowship (for the short fellowships starting on January 1 of the next year). This means that candidates may apply prior to the actual defence of the PhD thesis.
4 4 Candidates cannot apply for a (incoming) fellowship of which they have previously, if only partially, been the beneficiary. Pegasus fellowships thereby count as regular postdoctoral fellowships 4 (Pegasus-long) or as Visiting Postdoctoral Fellowships (Pegasus-short); any researcher who has held one of these fellowships may not apply for the corresponding Pegasus fellowship. Seniority Applicants for a Pegasus-long fellowship can only apply within 6 years after obtaining their PhD. Applicants for a Pegasus-short fellowship can only apply within 10 years after obtaining their PhD. In both cases, the number of years is calculated at the planned starting date of the fellowship, and the time limit is extended by one year per pregnancy or parental leave, counted at the time of application. However, the rule does not apply to candidates who have not yet reached the age of 36 at the beginning of the fellowships. The Board can only make exceptions to this limit in cases where, for social and medical reasons, either there has been an interruption in previous career stages, or there has been a reduced capacity to work. Incoming Mobility Pegasus aims at incoming mobility and/or reintegration. Therefore, candidates should not have carried out their main activity (work, studies, etc.) in Belgium for more than 12 months in the 3 years immediately prior to the start of the fellowship. Host institution It is the responsibility of the applicants to identify a suitable host institution in Flanders, and a suitable research unit where they can carry out their research. In order to be eligible, applicants need the formal consent of the chosen host institution. The eligible host institutions are the Universities of the Flemish Community: Katholieke Universiteit Leuven (K.U.Leuven) Ghent University (UGent) University of Antwerp (UA) Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) Hasselt University (UHasselt) Katholieke Universiteit Brussel (KUBrussel) The research may also be carried out in close collaboration with Flemish or Federal research institutions, but always under the supervision of the Flemish University.
5 5 The HI declares to host the applicant and provide him/her with the working conditions and office 5 space, access to laboratories, libraries, and other premises necessary to carry out his/her research project successfully. When accepting an applicant for a Pegasus fellowship, the Host Institution will be asked to agree with the following declaration. The universities will be invited to deliver this declaration directly by FWO after the submission of the application. In completing this application, the Applicant and the Host Institution (HI) confirm that to the best of their knowledge and belief, the information in this application is complete and correct. Both the applicant and the HI will inform FWO immediately if the intended project cannot be carried out as foreseen or if a major change occurs that may hinder the planned implementation of the project. The applicant and the HI declare that they have read and agree with the Pegasus regulations that form an integral part of the application documents published on the FWO website and that form the legal basis of the future Pegasus contract. Furthermore, they take note that the FWO is committed to the principles of the European Charter for Researchers and the Code of Conduct for their Recruitment. The applicant and the HI agree that the data required for the research grant application and follow-up are electronically stored and used by the FWO. The FWO will use the data provided by the applicant and the HI according to the legal requirements of data protection in Belgium, including the use of the anonymized data for statistical purposes and reports. The applicant and the HI agree that the FWO will forward the full application form including their personal data to the members of the FWO expert panels and to experts involved in the evaluation of their proposal in Flanders and abroad (EU and outside EU). The panel members and experts must declare in advance that they will treat data confidentially and that they will not forward the data or the knowledge gained to anyone nor use it for their own purpose. Furthermore, the applicant and the HI agree that the following information may be included in lists published by the FWO: Full name of the beneficiary; nationality; address; name, birth date, host institution, degrees obtained; name of scientific contact and research group/department, title of research project; abstract; field of research and key words; start date and end date of the fellowship. 3. How to apply for Pegasus funding? The application form will be accessible online through the FWO e-portal; The application and all the accompanying documents can only be submitted in English; The application has to be accompanied by the approval of the host institution and a letter of recommendation by the supervisor (and co-supervisor(s), if applicable). Each letter of recommendation should attempt to give an impartial assessment of the qualities of the applicant, related to the selection criteria for the FWO fellowship. The host institution and supervisor(s) will be invited to deliver these documents directly by FWO after the submission of the application;
6 All documents of the application file are to be written in English; The contact person for questions or remarks concerning this programme is dr. Olivier Boehme 4. Deadlines Pegasus-long For the long fellowships, there will only be a single call, to be launched in November 2011 (call deadline February 1, 2012). The funding decision for these fellowships is expected by the end of June Start of the fellowships is on October 1, Pegasus-short 6 For the short fellowships, there are 6 calls, distributed over 3 years. 6 See also the timetable on the cover page of this guide. For the calls closing in February, the awarded fellowships will start on October 1 of the same year. For the calls closing in May, the awarded fellowships will start on January 1 of the next year. 5. Submission If applications are sent in too late or incomplete, they will be not be eligible; Applications for the short Pegasus fellowships handed in after the deadline can be submitted under the next call if the applicant wishes so; Prior approval of the application by the host institution is always required. It is the responsibility of the applicant to contact the chosen institution prior to the submission in order to get its approval for the proposal. 6. Resubmissions The applicant for a short postdoctoral fellowship whose proposal is not accepted for funding is allowed to resubmit once more in a later call. An application for a Pegasus-long fellowship is considered as equivalent to one for the regular FWO Postdoctoral Fellowship programme, for which a limit of 1 resubmission also holds; In a second application the applicant is expected to address specifically the critical comments on his first submission; This could take the form of the initial submission with the amendments, additions or argumentation, as a response to the comments, in a clearly marked way.
7 Finally, fellows can resort to their personal account manager at the FWO in case of problems related to working conditions. This is an indirect control mechanism to check working conditions 7 at the host institution and research unit Financial and social issues Employment conditions The research fellows are employed by the FWO, but work at a university or research performing institution. The host institution has to guarantee that it will provide the applicant with appropriate working conditions (e.g. office/lab space, access to appropriate equipment and material, etc.). The FWO limits the time its fellows can spend on tasks other than their research, and thus contributes to an optimal working environment. At the beginning of every academic year, fellows have to list their assignments other than research. Social Security Fellows of the FWO receive a salary with full social security coverage, comprising health and accident insurance and the accumulation of pension rights. The salary of the fellows takes into account the seniority of the researcher, as evidenced by certificates of former employers. The employment conditions are aligned with the European Charter and Code. Upon specific request of the researcher, a 1-year stipend fellowship (without income tax but with full social security coverage) can also be granted, provided that the legal conditions are met. The latter option is particularly useful for researchers holding an academic position abroad and wanting to spend 1 year in Flanders for research, without having to resign from their position at the home institution. Formal approval of both host and home institution will be needed in this case. The FWO will offer expertise to cope with various questions asked by (resident and international) researchers pertaining to social security regulations. Full support is given to fellowship holders, in order for them to focus maximally on their research. That includes the handling by FWO of problems concerning international researchers coming to Flanders, which is especially relevant for this programme (e.g. scientific visa, transfer of social security, etc.). Bench Fee and Grants Every fellow receives a bench fee of /year. This can be used for the purchase of research equipment, research travels and other issues related to the fellowship. Medium size and large infrastructure, however, are to be provided for by the host institution. Fellows have the opportunity to compete for an additional research grant up to 40,000 euro (covering research equipment and consumables), to the extent that they meet the criteria and regulations for FWO Research Grants.
8 8 Their own quality research capability and potential such as: 8 publications in peer review journals as well as other elements of the candidate s CV patents, teaching, advanced courses, etc., taking into account the level of experience research skills and methodology scientific independence (independent thinking, management experience and leadership qualities) scientific background of the candidate mobility of the applicant (previous transnational and/or intersectoral mobility experience) 8. Funding decision and fellowship start The evaluation of the proposals by the expert panels will be concluded at the latest 24 weeks after the deadline for submissions. Applicants will be informed about the funding decision no later than 8 weeks after the closure of the scientific evaluation. On request, the applicant will be offered feedback, also if the funding decision is negative. This request should be submitted within 3 months of the notification. Fellowships have to be started 8 weeks after the notification of the funding decision. 9. What are the selection criteria? Fellows will be selected on the basis of: The scientific quality of their project originality and innovative nature of the project (progress beyond the state of the art) feasibility of the project focus of the project relevance of the project coherence of the project The context of employment (especially relevant for incoming fellowships): quality of the research environment of the host group (researchers, infrastructure, etc.) quality of the supervision and training support of the host group potential to acquire new scientific (disciplinary and interdisciplinary) and non-scientific skills ( soft skills, e.g. project management, IPR, grant writing, communication, ethics, etc.) In no case is the strictly scientific performance of the candidate the only criterion. The panel aims at a holistic evaluation of each application, paying attention to non-scientific aspects such as career breaks (e.g. change of career or family reasons), employment in other contexts (intersectoral mobility) and other fruitful experiences of the candidate.
9 10. How are the Pegasus applications evaluated? The evaluation procedure is carried out in several steps, described hereafter: a. Formal eligibility check The administrative control is carried out taking into account the criteria mentioned above ( who can apply ) b. Peer Review stage I: external referees When applying, the applicant is asked to send in a list with the names of ten experts in the research field of the application, who might act as referee. Not eligible as referee are: - members of the Board of Directors of the FWO; 9 - members of an FWO Expert panel; 9 - persons appointed to a Belgian university, research institute or any other organization; or, in the case of calls for proposals in the framework of bilateral agreements, persons appointed to similar institutions or organisations in the country where the foreign project partner is professionally active; or, in the case of applications for mobility grants, persons appointed to a similar institution or organisation in the country the applicant intends to visit; - persons with a professional appointment to a foreign institute where the applicant(s) had been enrolled as a student or professional in the course of the past three years; - any co-authors with the applicants of a publication that was submitted or published in the three years preceding the final submission date for the applications; Co-authorship is to be understood as follows: - Co-authorship of a monography of which the applicant is co-author as well; - Co-authorship of an article or another type of contribution to a collection (book, journal issue, report, congress proceedings, ) of which the applicant is co-author as well; Editors are not regarded as co-authors insofar as they have not also acted as what is understood under co-author as described above. Co-editors of the applicant are not accepted as an external referee. - any partners of the applicant(s) in a research project that has been applied for or has been running within the three years preceding the final submission date of the applications. The applicants are responsible for the eligibility of the proposed referees. Whenever the proposed referees do not comply with the eligibility criteria, the application will be declared ineligible. When listing the external referees in the online application form, the applicant will be asked whether all proposed referees meet the eligibility criteria. If one or more of them do not, the ap-
10 plicant has the possibility to briefly motivate why those specific experts should nevertheless act as referees. In case the applicant doubts the eligibility of one or more of the proposed referees, he or she can also contact the FWO before submitting the application by sending an to Both the cases that were motivated in the online application form, and the questions concerning eligibility that reached the FWO before the application was submitted will be presented to the FWO referee commission of the appropriate scientific domain, consisting of all expert panels chairs of that domain. Five referee commissions are established, one for each domain: biological sciences, humanities, social sciences, medical sciences and science&technology; for applications submitted to the Interdisciplinary Panel the referee commissions of the respective scientific domains will be consulted. In case co-authorship is detected in publications with ten or more authors, the FWO administration will consult the referee commission as well. In all the above cases, the referee commission will decide on the alleged eligibility of the proposed referees. When the referee commission decides negatively on the eligibility of a proposed referee in an application that has already been submitted, this application will be disqualified. When the referee commission answers negatively to a question concerning the eligibility of a proposed referee that reached the FWO before the application was submitted, the applicant will be asked to propose a new referee that does meet the 10 eligibility criteria. 10 After the administrative check, the FWO will inform the applicant about the violations that were found. In case the alleged violations result from a factual error of the FWO administration, the FWO can be notified. For the integral regulations on internal and external peer review see: The applicants must see to it that any contact information of the reviewers is up-to-date. If this is not the case, then the FWO will take no further steps for tracking down the reviewer(s) in question. There should be no communication on the proposal between the applicant and the referee during the submission and evaluation process. From the list provided by the applicant, FWO will invite a number of referees and see to it that at least two of them deliver a written review on the application. The applicant will not be informed about the name of the referee nor about the content of the review. The members of the expert panel, however, will know the name of the referee who wrote the review that is presented to them. All scientific experts solicited by FWO, both external referees and panel members, are bound by rules of confidentiality. Both referees will evaluate the application and will give marks and comments on the basis of the selection criteria using the dedicated referee report form. The referee report forms are submitted to the FWO and attached to the application.
11 c. Peer Review stage II: Panel meeting After the external refereeing process, the applications are submitted to the expert panels of FWO. The FWO has 29 monodisciplinary Expert Panels and 1 interdisciplinary panel, each consisting of 16 experts, of which a majority are not affiliated to a Flemish institution. The list of current members of each panel, as well as its scientific scope, is freely accessible on the FWO website. Potential conflicts of interest may be communicated to FWO, and will be taken into account in the rest of the procedure. Each applicant is asked to choose a panel taking into account its specific scope. This choice must be motivated. Taking into account the specific evaluation criteria for Pegasus, the Expertpanel judges the applications in the following way: For each proposal, there are at least two preliminary assessors, who are asked to read the proposal thoroughly and provide substantial comments on it. To this end, they have a dedicated template at their disposal listing all the selection criteria with space for comments. An overall 11 score is also expected; 11 The chair and vice-chair of the panel decide who will assess which application(s), taking into account the specific expertise of each Panel member, and avoiding any conflict of interest (in principle, no expert from the current or future host institution of the applicant will be designated as a preliminary assessor for this application); On the basis of the preliminary assessments, the panel as a whole discusses the proposal and attributes an overall score on the basis of a consensus. The preliminary assessments are thus only an input to the discussion, and by no means a final conclusion; Finally, the expert panel establishes a ranking of all Pegasus applications submitted to it. These rankings of the different panels involved are endorsed on the next meeting of the Committee for International Cooperation, which then establishes an overall ranking. This ranking cannot overrule the earlier rankings established by the regular expert panels, and will contain three categories: Ranked in 1st order: to be funded with the highest priority Ranked in 2nd order: to be funded if the budget allows it (reserve list) Not ranked: not to be funded, even if budget were available Within the first two categories, a strict ranking of the candidates is mandatory. Ex aequo ranking is not allowed. The final funding decision is made by the Board of Trustees, and based on the advice given by the committee.
12 There are also flexible regulations for parental leave Part time research Pegasus fellowships are full-time employment contracts (or exceptionally stipends in the case of Pegasus-short). In exceptional cases, and depending on the formal agreement of the host institution, part-time fellowships may be granted for thoroughly motivated reasons. 12. Maternity leave Holders of a Pegasus-long fellowship are entitled to the legal maternity leave of 15 weeks. In this case, their fellowship is also extended with 9 full months, which brings the total duration to 4 years. This extension is limited to 1 child per fellowship term. For Pegasus-short fellowships, the fellowship is extended with 15 weeks, corresponding to the legal maternity leave. 13. Applicants who are third country nationals Applicants who are third country nationals may need a visa before entering the territory of Belgium. For procedures concerning the visa application, please refer to the Belgian embassy in the country of origin. IMPORTANT: The application for visa and related authorisations may take up to 4 months. In order not to lose precious time, Pegasus candidates should contact the local EURAXESS Service Centre as soon as possible after the submission of their Pegasus application. This enables them to receive the information about documents and procedures well in advance in order to submit their visa request immediately after the communication of the Pegasus funding decision. For researchers from third countries visiting Belgium in the context of scientific research for a period longer than 3 months, the procedure to obtain a residence permit has recently been simplified. On the basis of a host agreement, a scientific visa may be granted, which is considered as a valid permit, thus eliminating the need for a labour card or a work permit. Acknowledged institutions (among which FWO) may conclude an agreement with a foreign researcher. Researchers from third countries who are employed at a Flemish university or research institution with an employment contract, always pay full social security contributions, enabling them to build up pension and unemployment rights. However, for the time being, they can only enjoy these rights afterwards when moving to another EEA country (or Switzerland) or to a country which has a bi- or multilateral social security agreement with Belgium. Researchers returning to their country of origin lose these rights if the country concerned does not have such an agreement with Belgium.
13 14. Misconduct As stated in the general regulations, FWO adheres to the Code of Scientific Integrity developed by the Belgian Science Policy Office. Researchers funded by FWO should respect the principles laid down in this code. Moreover, FWO has signed the Charter for Researchers and the Code of Conduct for the Recruitment of Researchers, which also contains an item on research integrity. 15. Dissemination of Research Results The dissemination and transfer of knowledge is a key added-value of research. Results should be published actively in peer reviewed publications and presented in scientific conferences. The capacity to publish is an essential criterion to build up a future research career. The publication of research results should only be restricted in well justified cases by the host institutions. It is a 13 joint responsibility of the applicants and their scientific contacts to aim for publications in top scientific journals in their field, to improve career prospects after the Pegasus grant. 13 The FWO has subscribed to the Berlin Declaration; this implies that all publications resulting from FWO funding must be made available in Open Access, either through publishing in OA journals ( gold OA ) or by making them available in a repository, possibly with an embargo period ( green OA ). Furthermore, the FWO encourages applicants to make the results of their research known to a wider audience, and to valorize them where possible and relevant. 16. Acknowledgement of Pegasus funding Holders of a Pegasus fellowship may carry the title FWO Pegasus Marie Curie Fellow. Financial support from FWO must be acknowledged in all publications and other forms of media communication. 17. Annual Pegasus meeting The FWO will organise annually a meeting for all Pegasus beneficiaries and ex-grantees by way of information session, and to allow networking. 18. Marie-Curie Cofunding The Pegasus programme is co-funded by the European Commission under the Marie-Curie COFUND scheme. A link to funding opportunities and calls cofounded by the Marie Curie Actions of the European Commission is available on the EU Cordis Website.
14 19. Grant writing When writing a grant application, it may appear useful to consult websites on grant writing that can be found through standard website search tools. Applicants may also consult the research coordination department of their host institution, which may organize workshops dedicated to this topic. 20. Useful links
OUTGOING [PEGASUS]² MARIE SKŁODOWSKA-CURIE FELLOWSHIPS 1 Guidelines for Applicants These guidelines are valid for OUTGOING [PEGASUS]² Marie Skłodowska-Curie (MSCA) fellowships. Applicants must read these
INCOMING [PEGASUS]² MARIE SKŁODOWSKA-CURIE FELLOWSHIPS 1 Guidelines for Applicants These guidelines are valid for INCOMING [PEGASUS]² Marie Skłodowska-Curie (MSCA) fellowships. Applicants must read these
ACADEMIE UNIVERSITAIRE LOUVAIN FONDS SPECIAUX DE RECHERCHE Incoming post-doctoral Fellowships co-funded by the Marie Curie Actions of the European Commission 1. Aim of the action GUIDE FOR APPLICANTS 2013
Postdoctoral Researchers International Mobility Experience (P.R.I.M.E.) Objective With this new programme and funding from the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) and the European Union 1
Recommended Guidelines for the Doctor of Philosophy Degree (PhD) Recommended by the Board of the Norwegian Association of Higher Education Institutions on 29 April 2011. Updated and amended on 16 January
START PAGE MARIE SKŁODOWSKA-CURIE ACTIONS Innovative Training Networks (ITN) Call: H2020-MSCA-ITN-2015 PART B PROPOSAL ACRONYM This proposal is to be evaluated as: [ETN] [EID] [EJD] [delete as appropriate]
REGULATIONS FOR THE PHILOSOPHIAE DOCTOR DEGREE (PHD) AT THE NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (NTNU) 1 Passed by the Board of NTNU on 23 January 2012 under the provisions of the Act of 1 April
Postdoctoral Researchers International Mobility Experience (P.R.I.M.E.) 2015 Objective With this new programme and funding from the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) and the European Union
PISCOPIA Fellowship Programme co-funded by Marie Curie Actions Call for Proposals 2013 Deadline: 22/11/2013 OVERVIEW This call for proposal is issued by the University of Padova (UNIPD) within the Project
Aarhus Graduate School of Business and Social Sciences School of Business and Social Sciences, Aarhus University Rules and regulations for the PhD degree programme (April 2014) The following is an English
National Science Centre Council KR.0003.55.2015 POLONEZ 1 Call Text Resolution No. 55/ 2015 of 11 June 2015 of the NCN COUNCIL on the terms and conditions of the POLONEZ 1 call for proposals and the regulations
Starting Independent Researcher Grants Call Information Call Title: Call for proposals for ERC Starting Independent Researcher Grant Call identifier: ERC-2009-StG Date of publication: 24 July 2008 Electronic
RESEARCH DEGREE REGULATIONS These regulations apply to programmes of study leading to the award of Master of Philosophy and Doctor of Philosophy, including the Doctor of Philosophy awarded on the basis
Regulations for the Doctor of Philosophy degree (PhD) at University of Nordland Contents PART I INTRODUCTORY PROVISIONS... 2 Section 1 The applicability of the guidelines... 2 Section 2 The scope, content
AARHUS SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE Rules for PhD Programmes at the Aarhus School of Architecture 2013 Contents: Introduction... 3 1 Objectives, Structure, Etc.... 4 1.1 Objectives... 4 1.2 Structure... 4 1.3
National Science Centre POLONEZ funding scheme 1 1 POLONEZ Programme objectives: funding of research fellowships for incoming researchers who may apply for 12- or 24-month fellowships in host institutions,
Regulations to the Doctor of Philosophy Degree (PhD) at MF Norwegian School of Theology, Oslo Warrant: Stipulated by the Board of MF Norwegian School of Theology 5. June 2012, warranted by the Act 1. April
AFR PHD AND POSTDOC GRANTS INVESTIGATing future challenges FNR - Objectives, Strategy, Policy Since the year 1999, the National Research Fund (Fonds National de la Recherche, FNR) has fostered the creation
Regulations and Curriculum Doctoral School of the Humanities Aalborg University -February 2016 1 CONTENTS Introduction... 3 1. Purpose, structure etc.... 5 2. Admission etc. to the PhD programme... 6 3.
Regulation for Studentships and Fellowships of the Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, I. P. FCT Regulation for Studentships and Fellowships, approved by Regulation no. 234/2012, of 25 June, amended
FP7 PEOPLE PROGRAMME Marie Curie Actions ITN 2012: Multi-ITN, EID and IDP Kaisa HELLEVUO Head of Sector Research Executive Agency (REA) Unit P4, Marie Curie Host-Driven Actions 1 MC Actions FP7 overview
Aarhus Graduate School of Business and Social Sciences School of Business and Social Sciences, Aarhus University Rules and regulations for the PhD degree programme (December 2012) The following is an English
The European Research Council ERC Grant Funding Schemes in 2014 Dr. Kulcsár Ágnes Call Coordinator Scientific Department ERC Executive Agency Felkészülés a Horizont 2020-ra 2014. január 17, Budapest Outline
Regulations for the award of PhD and MPhil These Regulations apply to students registering in and after January 2011 1 1 Admission and Registration 1.1 The normal minimum entrance requirement for registration
Future Research Leaders call 2015/16 Guidance notes for non-academic reviewers Introduction... 1 Aims and objectives... 1 Procedure... 3 Peer Review form on Je-S... 3 The decision-making process... 3 Assessment
FACULTY OF ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS DOCTORAL REGULATIONS FACULTY OF ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS The doctoral regulations of the Faculty of Economics and Business cover the Doctoral Programmes in Economics and
Regulations governing the degree of Philosophiae Doctor (PhD) at Hedmark University College Approved by the University College Board on 16 December 2009 pursuant to Section 3-3 of the Norwegian Act relating
Rules for the PhD Programme at the Graduate School, Arts Table Of Contents 1. Purpose, structure, etc.... 1 1.1. Purpose... 1 1.2. Organisation... 1 2. Admission etc. to the PhD programme... 2 2.1. The
FP7 Marie Curie Initial Training Networks Mid-Term Review: A contractual obligation and a fruitful dialogue Guidelines for the Mid-Term Review 1 January 2014 2 1 These guidelines shall guide through the
PhD School at the Faculty of Business and Social Sciences Guidelines on the assessment and public defence of the PhD thesis at the Faculty of Business and Social Sciences, University of Southern Denmark
GUIDE FOR APPLICANTS Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions Individual Fellowships (IF) Call identifier: H2020-MSCA-IF-2015 Closing Date: 10 September 2015 at 17:00:00 (Brussels local time) Date of publication:
Regulations for the Philosophiae Doctor (Ph.D.) degree Adopted by the Executive Board of the Norwegian School of Economics and Business Administration on 26 April 2007. Changes adopted by the Executive
GUIDE FOR APPLICANTS Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions Individual Fellowships (IF) Call identifier: H2020-MSCA-IF-2015 Closing Date: 10 September 2015 at 17:00:00 (Brussels local time) Date of publication:
Regulation concerning the attainment of doctoral degrees at the KU Leuven Target group: students, KU Leuven personnel Contact: An Jansen In advance 1. Communication with potential legal significance must
Guidance notes for ESRC applicants October 2016 Entry The deadline for applications is noon (GMT) on Friday 19 th February 2016. It is important that you allow yourself sufficient time to read these Guidance
REGULATIONS FOR THE DEGREES OF MPHIL AND PHD These regulations are approved by Senate. They were most recently updated in July 2014. Effective date: July 2014 Institute of Education University of London
REGULATIONS RELATING TO OBTAINING THE ACADEMIC DEGREE OF DOCTOR AT HASSELT UNIVERSITY/TRANSNATIONAL UNIVERSITY LIMBURG Approved by the Board of the University on 12 December 2006 and revised by the Board
REGULATIONS FOR THE DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY DEGREE (PhD) AT THE UNIVERSITY OF STAVANGER Adapted by the Board of the University of Stavanger on 1 March 2012, pursuant to the Norwegian Act relating to universities
Legal Notice 293 of 2008 - Malta Government Gazette No. 18,342-18 November, 2008 Amended by: Legal Notice 117 of 2009 Malta Government Gazette No. 18,404 17 April, 2009 Legal Notice 388 of 2010 Malta Government
Regulations for the award of MPhil and PhD These Regulations apply to students registering before January 2011 1 1 Admission and Registration 1.1 The normal minimum entrance requirement for registration
Regulations governing the degree of Philosophiae Doctor (PhD) at Oslo University College Approved by the University College Board on 3 September 2005 pursuant to Section 3-3 of Act no. 15 of 1 April 2005
2016 POST-DOCTORAL PROGRAM Applicant Guide POST-DOCTORAL FELLOWSHIP PROGRAM 2016 Applicant guide The Initiative of Excellence of the University of Bordeaux (IdEx Bordeaux) is opening positions for postdoctoral
BIRKBECK, UNIVERSITY OF LONDON REGULATIONS FOR THE DEGREES OF MPhil AND PhD 1 Programme of Study 1. The length of a research degree is determined for each student individually by the authorities of the
THE GENERAL SECRETARIAT FOR RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY AS PROGRAMME OPERATOR OF THE GREEK-EEA RESEARCH PROGRAMME IMPLEMENTED UNDER THE GREEK FINANCIAL MECHANISM 2009-2014 PREANNOUNCES RESEARCH WITHIN PRIORITY
PUBLIC NOTICE FOR THE ADMISSION TO THE RESEARCH DOCTORATE IN MOLECULAR AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE XXXI Cycle - Academic year 2015/2016 Issued with Decree Nr. 063/2015 1 Summary Art. 1 Scope of the notice...
Extended call document: SNSF Consolidator Grants Excellent researchers who are currently unable to apply to the European Research Council for ERC Grants at Swiss research institutions because of the successful
GUIDE FOR APPLICANTS Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions Co-funding of Regional, National and International Programmes (COFUND) Call identifier: H2020-MSCA-COFUND-2014 Deadline: 02/10/2014 at 17:00:00 (Brussels
REGULATION OF THIRD CYCLE STUDIES IN ECONOMICS OF THE SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS, UNIVERSITY OF PORTO Article 1 Legal Framework This regulation seeks to develop and complement the legal framework introduced by
Curriculum of the Doctoral Programme and the PhD Programme in Life Sciences As of October 2012 University Gazette 2002 Universities Act as of 11 May 2009, 22nd edition, number 170 1st (minor) amendment:
Regulations of the Doctoral Education Programme and Doctorate of the Institute of Philosophy. Approved by the Doctoral Commission of 12.12.2007. With amendments approved by the Faculty Council of 14.05.2008.
Evaluation Guide 2013 FCT INVESTIGATOR GRANTS 01 August 2013 1. INTRODUCTION This document outlines the reviewing process of the call for FCT Investigator grants, inputs and outputs, and defines the responsibilities
Horizon 2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions Horizon 2020 new skills, knowledge and innovation 1. Fostering new skills through excellence in initial training of researchers 2. Nurturing excellence through
MAC1981 University of Wolverhampton Regulations for the Degree Awards of: Master of Philosophy Doctor of Philosophy PhD by Published Work and Postgraduate Diploma (by Research) Effective from 1 January
European Cooperation in the field of Scientific and Technical Research - COST - Secretariat ------- Brussels, 4 December 2009 COST 295/09 NOTE To : Subject : COST Committee of Senior Officials (CSO) COST
153 REGULATION 24: PROFESSIONAL DOCTORATES AND EXIT AWARDS General 1. This Regulation applies to the Doctor of Education and to the Doctor of Social Work. 2. In accordance with Article 10 of the Charter
Annex to Resolution No. 1/2015 of the Polish Accreditation Committee of 23 February 2015 STATUTE OF THE POLISH ACCREDITATION COMMITTEE 1. 1. The Polish Accreditation Committee, hereafter referred to as
STAFFORDSHIRE UNIVERSITY CODE OF PRACTICE FOR POSTGRADUATE RESEARCH DEGREES Introduction 1 The purpose of the Code of Practice is to demonstrate the University s commitment to excellence in postgraduate
European Projects Framework, grants for PhD graduates recruitment www.uib.cat Balbina Nogales Office for Support to Research 10/12/2014 1 The Scientific Century: securing our future prosperity The Royal
Guidelines for Industrial PhD In force as of 9 March 2015 Contents 1. What is an Industrial PhD?... 1 2. General conditions... 3 3. Entry requirements... 4 4. Application... 7 5. Decision on applications...
Attachment no 1 POLONEZ 1 Call Text POLONEZ 1 APPLICATION FORM DATA REQUIRED IN THE APPLICATION FOR FUNDING RESEARCH FELLOWSHIPS FOR INCOMING RESEARCHERS Information to be entered in the electronic application
Guide for Evaluators Table of Contents 1 General information about NanoTRAINforGrowth... 4 2 Evaluation process and criteria... 4 2.1 Introduction... 4 2.2 Evaluation process... 5 3 Procedure... 6 This
Article 1 Subject Matter and Definitions CALL FOR PROPOSAL 1. The SIR Programme (Scientific Independence of young Researchers) is designed to support young researchers in the early stage of their independent
la Caixa -Severo Ochoa International PhD Programme at the CNIO 2014 CALL During 2014, the Fundación la Caixa will provide support for four highly qualified graduate students, in order to carry out their
Regulation concerning the attainment of doctoral degrees at the KU Leuven Target group: students, KU Leuven personnel Contact: An Jansen In advance 1. Communication with potential legal significance must
General rules and guidelines for the PhD programme at the University of Copenhagen Adopted 3 November 2014 Contents 1. Introduction 2 1.1 General rules 2 1.2 Objective and scope 2 1.3 Organisation of the
UCL Academic Manual 2015-16 Chapter 8: Derogations and Variations UCL Institute of Education UCL IOE Doctor in Educational Psychology (DEdPsy) Regulations 2015-16 (New Students) Contact: Lizzie Vinton,
Pursuant to the Higher Education Act (Official Gazette of the RS, no. 67/1993 and amendments) and the Statute of the IEDC Bled School of Management, Postgraduate Studies, (Official Gazette of the RS, no.
Human Resources Strategy for Researchers Action Plan 2015-2017 July 2015 0 CONTENTS 1. CRM strategy for Researchers 2. Gap analysis Approach and applied methodology Creation of the working group Poll population
EUROPEAN ASYLUM SUPPORT OFFICE Vacancy for a post of a Human Resources Officer (Grade AD 5) in the European Asylum Support Office (EASO) REF.: EASO/2011/015 Publication Title of function Parent Directorate-General
Administration and Finances under H2020 in MSCA Helsinki 21/4/2015 Marcela Groholova Research Executive Agency Overview 1. EU contribution 2. Eligible costs 3. Cost categories 4. Parental and maternity
Important information! The information provided in this guide is subject to continuous revision and improvement. In order to ensure that you are up to date we recommend all candidates to regularly visit
GUIDANCE NOTES ON UNIVERSITY REGULATIONS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY (PhD) BY RESEARCH These notes provide guidance on the regulations for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Research which
PhD Degree Programme in Business, Economics and Statistics and Doctoral Degree Programme in Business, Economics and Statistics Faculty of Business, Economics and Statistics Brünner Straße 72 A-1210 Vienna
The Marie Curie Actions FP7 Financial Guidelines. These guidelines complement and should be considered in conjunction with the FP7 Guide on Financial Issues which is available for download at ftp://ftp.cordis.europa.eu/pub/fp7/docs/financialguide_en.pdf.
REGULATIONS FOR THE PHILOSOPHIAE DOCTOR DEGREE (PHD) AT THE NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (NTNU) Passed by the Board of NTNU on 23 January 2012 under the provisions of the Act of 1 April
HRB Guidelines for Host Institutions on Good Research Practice Background The HRB funds a wide range of health-related research in approved host institutions, after open calls and international peer review.
General Regulations Arenberg Doctoral School Science, Engineering and Technology Group, KU Leuven Approved by the Executive Committee 11 September 2013 Preliminary remarks... 2 Article 1. Definition...