1 Additional Modalities That Further Enhance Direct Access, Including Through Funding Entities GCF/B.06/15 11 February 2014 Meeting of the Board February 2014 Bali, Indonesia Agenda item 15
2 Page b Recommended action by the Board It is recommended that the Board: (c) Takes note of the information presented in document GCF/B.06/15 Additional Modalities That Further Enhance Direct Access, Including Through Funding Entities; Provides guidance on policy matters regarding the Fund s direct access modalities; and Adopts the draft decision presented in Annex I to this document.
3 Page 1 Additional Modalities That Further Enhance Direct Access, Including Through Funding Entities I. Introduction 1. The Governing Instrument established the direct access modality for recipient countries to access the Fund At its June 2013 meeting, the Board decided to consider at its first meeting in 2014 additional modalities that further enhance direct access, including through funding entities, with a view to enhancing country ownership of projects and programmes Furthermore, at its October 2013 meeting, the Board requested a team of four Board members/alternate members to oversee the development by the Secretariat of the guiding framework for the Fund s accreditation process, for consideration by the Board no later than at its second meeting in The team is also expected to oversee the development by the Secretariat of, inter alia, additional modalities that further enhance direct access, including through funding entities, with a view to enhancing country ownership of projects and programmes, for consideration by the Board at its first meeting in The team of four Board members will also include four senior international experts to be nominated by the Executive Director Scope of the document 4. This document discusses an operational understanding of implementing entities (IEs) and intermediaries, from the perspective of both international and direct access, and how such understanding may allow for additional modalities that further enhance direct access, including through funding entities, with a view to enhancing country ownership of projects and programmes. 5. According to the approach taken, entities may be distinguished on the basis of the specialized institutional capacities they have accredited, or are interested in accrediting, with the Fund. The fundamental set of specialized institutional capacities refers to the management and oversight of project or programme implementation. Accreditation of additional sets of specialized institutional capacities will enable performance of additional functions. 6. On this basis, the document proposes that IEs be regarded as those entities that have been able to accredit, in addition to the basic fiduciary standards, the specialized fiduciary standards relating to the management and oversight of project or programme implementation. 7. Additional institutional capacities would enable the entity to be accredited also in relation to intermediation functions and thus, be classified as an intermediary. An intermediary would therefore be able to act as both an IE, in cases where it intends to perform management and oversight of the implementation process of a grant funded project or programme on behalf of the Fund; and as an intermediary, in cases where it intends to perform intermediation functions, such as allocation of grants within the criteria of an approved project or programme, and/or intermediation of reimbursable loans. 1 Governing Instrument, paragraph Decision B.04/06, paragraph (g). 3 Decision B.05/08, paragraph (d) (v).
4 Page 2 8. Funding entities are recognized as a special case of intermediaries, when these refer to accredited public sub national, national or regional entities with decision making authority over activities within the context of a project or programme in an approved funding proposal. 9. A particular case of funding entities is also suggested under direct access, in line with the understanding outlined above: the use of national budgets and public financial systems through ministries of finance or national treasuries for policy intervention programmes. 10. This document builds on relevant previous documents relating to access modalities and direct access, particularly documents GCF/B.04/05 and GCF/B.05/ An informal consultative discussion, convened by the Secretariat on 5 December 2013, engaged a number of relevant think tanks and technical experts with expertise in this field, including the representatives of the Center for Global Studies, Climate Policy Initiative, E3G, German Watch, Overseas Development Institute, Oxford Institute for Energy Studies, the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) secretariat and the World Resources Institute. This conversation provided a significant number of important inputs and insights to inform the development of this document, in addition to those obtained from the review of relevant literature. II. Linkages with other documents 12. This document has actual or potential linkages with the following documents: Guiding Framework and Procedures for Accrediting National, Regional and International Implementing Entities and Intermediaries, Including the Fund s Fiduciary Principles and Standards and Environmental and Social Safeguards (GCF/B.06/09). The decision on additional modalities that further enhance direct access, including through funding entities, will feed into the definition of the necessary specialized fiduciary standards to be required from each category and the overall development of the accreditation process; Initial Proposal Approval Process, Including the Criteria for Programme and Project Funding (GCF/B.06/08). The decision on additional modalities that further enhance direct access, including through funding entities, may feed into the final elaboration of the initial approval process. III. Operational understanding of the Fund s access modalities 3.1 Provisions of the Governing Instrument 13. The Governing Instrument states that access to Fund resources will be through national, regional and international IEs accredited by the Board. Each country is free to determine the mode of access and these options may be used simultaneously Direct access is presented in the Governing Instrument as access to Fund resources by recipient countries through competent sub national, national and regional IEs, which are accredited by the Fund for this purpose. Furthermore, the Governing Instrument also mandates the Board to consider additional modalities that further enhance direct access, including through funding entities, with a view to enhancing country ownership of projects and programmes 5. This provision in the Governing Instrument clearly points to enhancing country ownership of projects and programmes. 4 Governing Instrument, paragraph Governing Instrument, paragraph 47.
5 Page International access is set out in the Governing Instrument as access through accredited international entities, including United Nations agencies, multilateral development banks, international financial institutions and regional institutions The Governing Instrument also introduces the concept of financial intermediaries in the context of the Private Sector Facility (PSF), referring to local financial intermediaries that should participate in the Facility, among other private sector actors. 7 The reference is made to local and private financial intermediaries. 3.2 Further guidance by the Board on the understanding of access modalities 17. On the basis of these provisions of the Governing Instrument, subsequent decisions taken by the Board seem to distinguish between two categories of entities that may channel resources from the Fund to recipient countries: intermediaries and IEs. 18. It is proposed that the operational understanding of intermediaries refers to both international and direct access modalities, and beyond the context of the PSF, to include both public and private intermediaries. 19. The first time the term intermediaries was introduced by the Board was at its March 2013 meeting through decision B.01 13/06, in the context of the development of the business model framework of the Fund. In this decision, the Board noted convergence that the Fund should commence as a fund that operates through accredited national, regional and international intermediaries and IEs. 20. A number of other decisions were taken by the Board at its June 2013 meeting, also referring to intermediaries and IEs as two distinct categories of entities, and therefore modes of access for recipient countries. 21. Decision B.04/05 on country ownership, for instance, mentions that a national designated authority (NDA) or focal point will seek to ensure consistency of funding proposals from sub national, national, regional and international intermediaries and IEs with national plans and strategies. This decision clearly assumes that funding proposals may be submitted through two types of entities: intermediaries and IEs, under both access modalities (international and direct access). 22. The Governing Instrument and these subsequent Board decisions imply, therefore, that the fundamental criterion for determining the access modality is the type of entity used to access the Fund. It becomes important to understand, from an operational point of view, the institutional capacities that distinguish intermediaries from IEs, which will in turn provide a better understanding of the possibility of additional modalities, including through funding entities. 3.3 Implications for the operationalization of the Fund s access modalities 23. The provisions of the Governing Instrument, as well as the subsequent decisions taken by the Board, define the type of access modalities on the basis of the type of entity through which access is pursued. 24. At one level, the jurisdiction of the entity used for accessing resources determines whether it is international or direct access. Jurisdiction is understood as the geographic scope of 6 Governing Instrument, paragraph Governing Instrument, paragraph 43.
6 Page 4 the mandate for the entity to operate. If it is sub national, national or regional, it will correspond to direct access. If international, it will refer to international access. 25. At a next level, entities may be distinguished as intermediaries or IEs. Both categories of entities may relate to international or direct access modalities, depending on the geographic scope of their jurisdiction, as explained above. 26. Section 3.4 proposes an operational understanding of IEs and intermediaries based on the specialized institutional capacities that these entities have accredited with the Fund in addition to those required for project/programme management and oversight. 27. It is necessary to clarify that the accreditation process is intended to be applied to the institutional capacities that the entity is capable of, or interested in accrediting, and that this process may progress over time as the entity develops or decides to accredit additional capacities that will relate to the corresponding specialized fiduciary standards of the Fund. 3.4 Proposed operational understanding of implementing entities and intermediaries Implementing entities 28. By definition, the role of an IE relates to the management and oversight of the project implementation, which include the origination and preparation of a funding proposal and subsequent management of the necessary stages of the implementation process until its conclusion (project management) on behalf of the provider of funds (the Fund), with due reporting obligations. 29. Implementing entities typically perform this function by transferring funds from the funding source (the Fund), to all relevant and necessary executing entities. In some instances, this is also conceptualized as a devolution of the implementation function to the IE by the Fund Therefore, an IE can be understood, from an operational point of view, as a legal entity, public or private in nature, duly accredited with the Fund, whose accredited institutional capacities enable it to submit funding proposals in relation to specific projects or programmes to be funded by the Fund, with the explicit role of managing the approved project and programme cycle from preparation to conclusion. 31. Given the focus on project/programme implementation in their role, IEs are expected to channel only grants from the Fund and will be entitled to collect a fee for the services provided, in accordance with the terms and conditions to be applied by the Fund. 32. Implementing entities can only carry out their role within the jurisdiction for which they have been accredited: sub national, national and regional, or international, as applicable. 33. With regard to the role of project and programme implementation, the responsibilities of an IE will include management, financial, administrative, monitoring and evaluation and reporting duties necessary for a successful full implementation of the approved funding proposal and in accordance with relevant operational guidelines of the Fund. 8 See document GCF/B.04/05.
7 Page Intermediaries 34. The guidance provided by the Board, as discussed in Section 3.2, puts the concept of intermediaries in a broader context. Intermediaries, therefore, can be understood as referring to sub national, national, regional or international public and private entities with accredited capacities for intermediation. 35. Intermediaries are regarded as those accredited sub national, national, regional or international entities that have been able to accredit additional specialized capacities that enable them to intermediate grants and/or loans. These additional capacities for intermediation may be accredited at the outset or in a gradual manner as the institution evolves. 36. This effectively enables intermediaries to perform as both IEs and intermediaries. 37. According to this understanding, the scope of the role of intermediaries refers to a broader range of responsibilities than those of IEs, stemming from their capacities of intermediation, which may include one or more of the following: (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) Grant award mechanisms; On lending and capacity to undertake due diligence thereof; Financial blending; Financial structuring, including for guarantees; Insurance mechanisms relevant for climate change; Origination of financial structured products for financial engineering; and Other, to be defined as they become relevant and appropriate. 38. As in the case of IEs, intermediaries can only carry out their role within the jurisdiction for which they have been accredited: sub national, national, regional, or international, as applicable Key additional considerations 39. It is important to emphasize in this context the following key considerations for the operational understanding of intermediaries: (c) (d) (e) Intermediaries can perform also as IEs they are also accredited for project/programme management and oversight capacities, including those relating to monitoring and evaluation and reporting duties; Intermediaries can be both public or private entities this type of entity is not restricted to private entities working under the PSF; Intermediaries is a broad concept not limited to banking institutions a broad range of public or private entities may qualify, depending on their capacity to meet the required relevant fiduciary standards and accreditation criteria to perform as intermediaries; Intermediaries apply to both direct and international access modalities, depending on the geographic scope of their jurisdiction (sub national, national, regional or international); Intermediaries, both public and private, can submit funding proposals in relation to specific projects as well as programmes. 40. Under this operational understanding, funding proposals relating to programmes effectively devolve the decision making authority over individual funding decisions for projects or activities that are comprised within the approved programme to the accredited entity acting
8 Page 6 as an intermediary (sub national, national, regional or international). Such devolution of decision making authority should be understood as delegated responsibility with due provisions for accountability, in accordance with the Fund s fiduciary standards and terms and conditions, as, in fact, for any other accredited entity. 41. An operational understanding of an intermediary, consequently, will refer to the concept of a legal entity (sub national, national, regional or international) duly accredited with the Fund for the preparation, submission and implementation, upon approval, of funding proposals for financial intermediation relating to projects or programmes to achieve mitigation and/or adaptation results, which may include, among others, grant award mechanisms, on lending, financial blending, financial structuring (including guarantees), insurance mechanisms relevant for climate change and origination of structured financial products. 42. Intermediaries may be public or private sub national, national, regional or international entities able to channel grants and concessional loans from the Fund. 43. The following diagram attempts to facilitate understanding of the proposed approach from the perspective of the required institutional capacities. Figure 1: Intermediaries and implementing entities according to accredited capacities Institutional capacities / Specialized fiduciary standards (Other) Structuring Blending On lending Grant award mechanisms Intermediaries Project/programme implementation management and oversight Basic fiduciary standards Implementing entities IV. Further considerations on enhancing country ownership of projects and programmes under direct access 44. The proposed operational understanding of intermediaries and IEs allows for enhanced opportunities for country ownership of projects and programmes by recipient countries, particularly under the Fund s direct access modality.
9 Page This can be achieved especially in a scenario where a public intermediary takes responsibility of an approved programme, where the funding decisions on individual eligible projects or activities are delegated to the sub national, national or regional entity in question. 46. As this example illustrates, such modalities under direct access effectively enhance country ownership through decision making capacity over funding for specific projects or activities within the scope of an approved programme. 47. Key conditions for effectively enhancing country ownership under direct access require, therefore, an operational understanding of intermediaries that allows for: (c) Participation of sub national, national and regional public and private entities; Use of grants and/or concessional loans; Funding proposals that may relate to projects, but particularly to programmes. 48. Furthermore, programmes should have a broad operational understanding encompassing not only sets and/or bundles of projects, but also frameworks of activities and even policy intervention programmes that may take advantage of national public financial systems and budgets that meet the Fund s fiduciary requirements. 4.1 Additional modalities that further enhance direct access, including through funding entities 49. Based on the mandate given to the Board in the Governing Instrument, direct access may allow for additional modalities that enhance direct access with a view to enhancing country ownership of projects and programmes. This can be achieved through an expanded operational understanding of intermediaries, in particular when this category encompasses sub national, national or regional entities, including both public and private, with delegated authority over funding decisions on individual eligible projects or activities within an approved programme. 50. Funding entities may be regarded, in this context, as a special case of accredited sub national, national or regional intermediaries that are public in nature and intend to implement a project or programme where the decision making authority is delegated to the intermediary (the funding entity, in this special case), as per the preceding paragraph. 51. Further enhancement of country ownership may also be envisaged if, under this special case of intermediaries that can be categorized as funding entities, a funding proposal relating to a project or programme refers to the use of national financial systems and budgets through national treasuries or ministries of finance for the implementation of a policy intervention programme. 52. In this case, the funding entity (that would intrinsically be an intermediary) would be the ministry of finance or national treasury. It would have to be duly accredited with the Fund, and the funding proposal would have to refer to a project or programme for climate change policy intervention using the national public financial system and budget. V. Conclusions 53. The proposed operational understanding of IEs, intermediaries and funding entities would imply that: All accredited entities have capacities for project/programme implementation, which enable them to channel grants;
10 Page 8 (c) (d) Intermediaries have additional capacities relating to intermediation with regard to grants and/or loans from the Fund, and can be public or private, as well as sub national, national, regional or international entities; Funding entities are a special case of intermediaries where the sub national, national or regional entity is public in nature and related to an approved project or programme with decision making authority for funding decisions; Intermediaries (and thus, funding entities as well) may also perform as IEs. 54. Figure 2 describes the implications of this conclusion. Figure 2: Universe of accredited entities Implementing entities Intermediaries Funding entities VI. Next steps 55. Agreement on the operational understanding proposed in this document would allow for additional modalities focused on enhancing country ownership of projects and programmes under the direct access of the Fund. 56. This would also provide relevant guidance for the further elaboration of other related operational definitions necessary for the completion of the guiding framework for the Fund s accreditation process and the Fund s initial proposal approval process, including the criteria for programme and project funding.
11 Page 9 Annex I: Draft decision of the Board The Board, having considered document GCF/B.06/15 Additional Modalities That Further Enhance Direct Access, Including Through Funding Entities: Approves the operational understanding of the Fund s intermediaries and implementing entities, presented in document GCF/B.06/15, that allows for additional modalities that further enhance direct access, including through funding entities, with a view to enhancing country ownership of projects and programmes; Requests the Secretariat to incorporate this operational understanding in the final elaboration of the guiding framework for the Fund s accreditation process, the initial proposal approval process, including the criteria for programme and project funding, and other operational guidelines, as appropriate and necessary.
Decisions of the Board Seventh Meeting of the Board, 18-21 May 2014 GCF/B.07/11 19 June 2014 Meeting of the Board 18-21 May 2014 Songdo, Republic of Korea Agenda item 17 Page b Table of Contents Agenda
Status Report on the Operations Manual and Appraisal Toolkit GCF/BM-2015/Inf.06 5 May 2015 For information between meetings Page 1 I. Introduction Status Report on the Operations Manual and Appraisal Toolkit
Status Report on the Operations Manual and Appraisal Toolkit GCF/B.09/Inf.06 26 February 2015 Meeting of the Board 24-26 March 2015 Songdo, Republic of Korea Agenda item 17 Page 1 I. Introduction Status
Legal and Formal Arrangements with Accredited Entities GCF/B.09/03 25 February 2015 Meeting of the Board 24 26 March 2015 Songdo, Republic of Korea Agenda item 14 Page a Recommended action by the Board
Advance unedited version Green Climate Fund report of the Transitional Committee Draft decision -/CP.17 The Conference of the Parties, Recalling its decision 1/CP.16, 1. Welcomes the report of the Transitional
Business Model Framework: Terms and Criteria for Grants and Concessional Loans GCF/B.05/07 17 September 2013 Meeting of the Board 8-10 October 2013 Paris, France Agenda item 4 (f) Page b Recommended action
Decisions of the Board Eighth Meeting of the Board, 14-17 October 2014 GCF/B.08/45 3 December 2014 Meeting of the Board 14-17 October 2014 Bridgetown, Barbados Agenda item 36 Page b Table of Contents Agenda
Annex 2: Rules and Procedures for the Swiss-Polish Cooperation Programme Annex 2 is an integral part of the Framework Agreement between the Swiss Federal Council and the Government of the Republic of Poland
Page 84 Annex XIII: Gender policy for the Green Climate Fund I. Background 1. The Governing Instrument gives the Fund a clear mandate to enhance a gender sensitive approach in its processes and operations.
nicht amtliche Publikation Annex 2: Rules and Procedures for the Swiss- Estonian Cooperation Programme Annex 2 is an integral part of the Framework Agreement between the Swiss Federal Council and the Government
United Nations FCCC/CP/2013/10/Add.1 Distr.: General 31 January 2014 Original: English Conference of the Parties Contents Report of the Conference of the Parties on its nineteenth session, held in Warsaw
Page.1 DECISION B.11/06 * Agenda item 32: Other matters The Board: (f) (g) (h) (j) Decides on the need to undertake and conclude a review of the performance of the Executive Director by the first meeting
1818 H Street, NW MSN P4-400 Washington, DC 20433 USA Tel: 202.458.7347 Fax: 202.522.3240/3245 E-mail: email@example.com Ref: 2015/36 5 May 2015 To Parties Designated Authorities for the Adaptation
Diversity of Cultural Expressions 1.EXT.IGC Distribution limited CE/08/1.EXT.IGC/Dec. Rev. 2 Paris, 20 August 2008 Original: English / French INTERGOVERNMENTAL COMMITTEE FOR THE PROTECTION AND PROMOTION
United Nations FCCC/TP/2013/5 Distr.: General 22 October 2013 English only Technical synthesis on the framework for various approaches Technical paper Summary This technical synthesis draws on the information
ERASMUS+ MASTER LOAN GUARANTEE FACILITY OPEN CALL FOR EXPRESSION OF INTEREST TO SELECT FINANCIAL INTERMEDIARIES UNDER THE ERASMUS+ MASTER LOAN GUARANTEE FACILITY (Published on 13 February 2015) The objective
UNITED NATIONS UNEP/GC.23/6/Add.1 EP Governing Council of the United Nations Environment Programme Distr.: General 23 December 2004 Original: English Twenty-third session of the Governing Council/ Global
Meeting of the Board 8 10 March 2016 Songdo, Incheon, Republic of Korea Provisional Agenda Item 10 GCF/B.12/06 3 March 2016 Report on the development of the Draft Strategic Plan for the Green Climate Fund
Revised May 2007 Corporate Governance Guideline Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION 1 2. PURPOSES OF GUIDELINE 1 3. APPLICATION AND SCOPE 2 4. DEFINITIONS OF KEY TERMS 2 5. FRAMEWORK USED BY CENTRAL BANK
1 Call for Inputs on the Framework for Various Approaches September 2014 The Framework for Various Approaches (FVA): IETA s elaborations on a possible design framework. We have responded to each element
These terms of reference are prepared in English. In case of any inconsistency between the Chinese version and the English version, the English version shall prevail. JC GROUP HOLDINGS LIMITED (incorporated
8 May 2013 English only UNITED NATIONS FRAMEWORK CONVENTION ON CLIMATE CHANGE Subsidiary Body for Scientific and Technological Advice Thirty-eighth session Bonn, 3 14 June 2013 Item 5 of the provisional
Page 1 GREEN CLIMATE FUND PRIVATE SECTOR FACILITY Micro-, small- and medium-sized enterprise pilot programme Request for funding proposals from qualified financial institutions I. Introduction 1. At its
6 May 2016 Taking the Paris Agreement forward Reflections note by the President of the twenty-first session of the Conference of the Parties and the incoming President of the twenty-second session of the
UNITED NATIONS Distr. GENERAL FCCC/CP/2001/13/Add.1 21 January 2002 Original: ENGLISH CONFERENCE OF THE PARTIES REPORT OF THE CONFERENCE OF THE PARTIES ON ITS SEVENTH SESSION, HELD AT MARRAKESH FROM 29
15 June 2010 CEBS Guidelines for the Operational Functioning of Supervisory Colleges (GL 34) Table of contents Introductory statements... 3 Executive summary... 5 Chapter 1: Operational organisation of
CLEAN DEVELOPMENT MECHANISM CDM-EB61-A01-PROC Procedure Terms of reference of the support structure of the CDM Executive Board TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1. INTRODUCTION... 3 2. GENERAL GUIDELINES... 3 2.1.
RULES OF PROCEDURE OF THE CO-ORDINATING BODY OF THE CONVENTION ON MUTUAL ADMNISTRATIVE ASSISTANCE IN TAX MATTERS as of June 2015 I. MANDATE OF THE CO-ORDINATING BODY In accordance with Article 24(3) and
SD 0880/10 INSURANCE ACT 2008 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE CODE OF PRACTICE FOR REGULATED INSURANCE ENTITIES Laid before Tynwald 16 November 2010 Coming into operation 1 October 2010 The Supervisor, after consulting
Establishment and Terms of Reference of the Appointment Committee GCF/B.09/22 23 March 2015 Meeting of the Board 24 26 March 2015 Songdo, Republic of Korea Agenda item 29 Page a Recommended action by the
GREAT PLAINS ENERGY INCORPORATED BOARD OF DIRECTORS CORPORATE GOVERNANCE GUIDELINES Amended: December 9, 2014 Introduction The Board of Directors (the Board ) of Great Plains Energy Incorporated (the Company
United Nations A/RES/65/281 General Assembly Distr.: General 20 July 2011 Sixty-fifth session Agenda items 13 and 115 Resolution adopted by the General Assembly [without reference to a Main Committee (A/65/L.78)]
the European Economic Area (EEA) Financial Mechanism 2009-2014 adopted by the EEA Financial Mechanism Committee pursuant to Article 8.8 of Protocol 38b to the EEA Agreement on 13 January 2011 and confirmed
Purpose CHINA PIONEER PHARMA HOLDINGS LIMITED (Incorporated in the Cayman Islands with limited liability) (Stock Code: 01345) Terms of Reference for Audit Committee of the board of directors of the Company
VIEWS OF BRAZIL ON THE ELEMENTS OF THE NEW AGREEMENT UNDER THE CONVENTION APPLICABLE TO ALL PARTIES November 6 The Government of Brazil welcomes the opportunity to submit views regarding the elements for
Administrative Guidelines on the Internal Control Framework and Internal Audit Standards GCF/B.09/18 18 February 2015 Meeting of the Board 24 26 March 2015 Songdo, Republic of Korea Agenda item 24 Page
PART I - PRELIMINARY...1 Objective...1 Applicability...2 Legal and Regulatory Provision...2 PART II POLICY REQUIREMENTS...3 Investment and Risk Management Policy...3 Monitoring and Control...5 Roles of
Risk Management Strategy EEA & Norway Grants 2009-2014 Adopted by the Financial Mechanism Committee on 27 February 2013. Contents 1 Purpose of the strategy... 3 2 Risk management as part of managing for
United Nations General Assembly Distr.: General 12 April 2011 A/HRC/RES/16/21 Original: English Human Rights Council Sixteenth session Agenda item 1 Organizational and procedural matters Resolution adopted
Fisheries and Oceans Canada Species at Risk Act Listing Policy and Directive for Do Not List Advice DFO SARA Listing Policy Preamble The Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) Species at Risk Act (SARA) Listing
Mandatory Provident Fund Schemes Authority COMPLIANCE STANDARDS FOR MPF APPROVED TRUSTEES First Edition July 2005 Hong Kong Contents Glossary...2 Introduction to Standards...4 Interpretation Section...6
CHINA CITY INFRASTRUCTURE GROUP LIMITED 中 國 城 市 基 礎 設 施 集 團 有 限 公 司 (Incorporated in the Cayman Islands with limited liability) TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR THE AUDIT COMMITTEE - 1 - Definitions 1. For the purposed
UNITED NATIONS Framework Convention on Climate Change Distr. GENERAL FCCC/CP/1995/7/Add.1 6 June 1995 Original: ENGLISH CONFERENCE OF THE PARTIES First session Berlin, 28 March - 7 April 1995 REPORT OF
Mapping of outsourcing requirements Following comments received during the first round of consultation, CEBS and the Committee of European Securities Regulators (CESR) have worked closely together to ensure
Regulation on the implementation of the Norwegian Financial Mechanism 2009-2014 adopted by the Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs pursuant to Article 8.8 of the Agreement between the Kingdom of Norway
United Nations FCCC/SBSTA/2016/1 Distr.: General 7 March 2016 Original: English Subsidiary Body for Scientific and Technological Advice Forty-fourth session Bonn, 16 26 May 2016 Item 2 of the provisional
ATT Implementation Toolkit Module 4 Information exchange, International cooperation Arms Trade Treaty Implementation Toolkit Module 4 Information Exchange, International Cooperation and Assistance Available
United Nations FCCC/CP/2014/L.14 Distr.: Limited 13 December 2014 Original: English Conference of the Parties Twentieth session Lima, 1 12 December 2014 Agenda item 4 Report of the Ad Hoc Working Group
POLITICS & SOCIETY BRIEFING PAPER Report on the 23 rd meeting of the Adaption Fund Board Alpha Kaloga, Barbara Burkel & Lisa Junghans Brief Summary The Adaptation Fund (AF) was established under the Kyoto
The Conference of the Parties, Decision -/CP.13 Bali Action Plan Resolving to urgently enhance implementation of the Convention in order to achieve its ultimate objective in full accordance with its principles
Global Research Alliance Charter 1. Underlining the need for food security, and to promote synergies between adaptation and mitigation efforts, the Members set forth the following Charter for the Global
Call for Expression of Interest Ref: GCF/EOI/2016/002 Ad-Hoc Support: Funding Proposal development on an On Call Basis 1. Background 1.1 The Green Climate Fund (the Fund ) was established with the purpose
Mexan Limited Terms of Reference for Audit Committee Purpose 1. The purpose of the Audit Committee is to assist the board of directors (the Board ) of Mexan Limited (the Company ) in considering how the
1. ORGANIZATION E Lighting Group Holdings Limited 壹 照 明 集 團 控 股 有 限 公 司 (incorporated in the Cayman Islands with limited liability) Stock Code : 8222 TERMS OF REFERENCE OF AUDIT COMMITTEE The board (the
1 Membership i-control Holdings Limited 超 智 能 控 股 有 限 公 司 (incorporated in the Cayman Islands with limited liability) (the Company ) TERMS OF REFERENCE OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE (AMENDED AND ADOPTED BY THE
2015 Principles of Best Practice applicable to the distribution of Life Insurance Products on a Cross-border Basis within the EU or a Third Country 1 Principles of Best Practice applicable to the distribution
Appendix 14 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE CODE AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE REPORT The Code This Code sets out the principles of good corporate governance, and two levels of recommendations: code provisions; and recommended
CONTRACT MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK August 2010 Page 1 of 20 Table of contents 1 Introduction to the CMF... 3 1.1 Purpose and scope of the CMF... 3 1.2 Importance of contract management... 4 1.3 Managing contracts...
CHEUNG KONG INFRASTRUCTURE HOLDINGS LIMITED (Incorporated in Bermuda with limited liability) AUDIT COMMITTEE - TERMS OF REFERENCE Established on 11 th December, 1998 pursuant to the then Code on Corporate
PROCEDURES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL APPRAISAL AND MONITORING OF INVESTMENT PROJECTS Approved 10 July 2015 CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 1 2. OVERVIEW OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL APPRAISAL AND MONITORING
CEIOPS-DOC-29/09 CEIOPS Advice for Level 2 Implementing Measures on Solvency II: System of Governance (former Consultation Paper 33) October 2009 CEIOPS e.v. Westhafenplatz 1-60327 Frankfurt Germany Tel.
THE XVI GLOBAL CHILD NUTRITION FORUM ON SCHOOL FEEDING COMMUNIQUÉ Post 2015 Agenda: Role of Nutrition in Sustainable School Feeding Programmes linked to Local Agriculture South Africa from 29 September
UNITED NATIONS Distr. GENERAL FCCC/CP/2001/13/Add.2 21 January 2002 Original: ENGLISH CONFERENCE OF THE PARTIES REPORT OF THE CONFERENCE OF THE PARTIES ON ITS SEVENTH SESSION, HELD AT MARRAKESH FROM 29
United Nations FCCC/CP/2011/9/Add.1 Distr.: General 15 March 2012 Original: English Conference of the Parties Contents Report of the Conference of the Parties on its seventeenth session, held in Durban
United Nations FCCC/CP/2012/8/Add.2 Distr.: General 28 February 2013 Original: English Conference of the Parties Contents Report of the Conference of the Parties on its eighteenth session, held in Doha
Brief on Climate Change Finance Introduction Climate change is a complex policy issue with major implications in terms of finance. All actions to address climate change ultimately involve costs. Funding
Approach Paper: Guidelines for Climate Mitigation Evaluations Climate-Eval community of practice Draft as of February 8, 2012 1 I. Summary This paper presents the approach for crafting guidelines for evaluating
Page 22 Agenda item 22: Comprehensive Information Disclosure Policy of the Fund 46. The Ethics and Audit Committee presented to the Board on this matter. 47. The Board adopted the following decision: DECISION
MASTERMYNE GROUP LIMITED AUDIT AND RISK MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE CHARTER Purpose of Charter 1. The Audit and Risk Management Committee Charter (Charter) governs the operations of the Audit and Risk Management
FRAMEWORK AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF HUNGARY AND THE SWISS FEDERAL COUNCIL CONCERNING THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SWISS- HUNGARIAN COOPERATION PROGRAMME TO REDUCE ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL
Adaptation Fund Board Eleventh Meeting Bonn, September 16 17, 2010 AFB/B.11/Inf.6 September 9, 2010 INFORMATION SUBMITTED BY IMPLEMENTING ENTITIES ON THE REQUESTED FEES FOR PROJECT/PROGRAMME IMPLEMENTATION
L 132/32 COMMISSION IMPLEMTING REGULATION (EU) No 447/2014 of 2 May 2014 on the specific rules for implementing Regulation (EU) No 231/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing an
(Incorporated in Bermuda with limited liability) (Stock Code: 00618) TERMS OF REFERENCE OF AUDIT COMMITTEE (Amended and adopted by the Board on 5 February 2016) 1. Membership 1.1 The Audit Committee shall
Audit and Finance Committee Charter As of 2-3 December 2015 1. Purpose The Audit and Finance Committee ( Committee ) is established by the Board ( Board ) of the Gavi Alliance ( Gavi ) to assist the Board
Version No.: 2.0 Page 1 / 8 DOCUMENT ADMINISTRATION VERSION NUMBER APPROVAL PROCESS 1.0 Approved by: The Alliance & Fund Boards 26 June 2008 DATE Effective from: 01 January 2009 Review: On yearly basis
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE EEA FINANCIAL MECHANISM 2009-2014 between ICELAND, THE PRINCIPALITY OF LIECHTENSTEIN, THE KINGDOM OF NORWAY, hereinafter referred to as the Donor
EVERCHINA INT L HOLDINGS COMPANY LIMITED (the Company ) Audit Committee Terms of Reference (Amended & adopted by the Board on 8 January 2016) Constitution The board (the Board ) of directors (the Directors
Draft Comment Letter Comments should be submitted by 22 October 2015 to firstname.lastname@example.org International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street London EC4M 6XH United Kingdom [Date] Dear Sir/Madam,
EBA/RTS/2015/03 03 July 2015 EBA FINAL draft Regulatory Technical Standards on resolution colleges under Article 88(7) of Directive 2014/59/EU Contents 1. Executive summary 3 2. Background and rationale
Decision -/CP.20 Guidelines for the technical review of information reported under the Convention related to greenhouse gas inventories, biennial reports and national communications by Parties included
non-official publication FRAMEWORK AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE SWISS FEDERAL COUNCIL AND THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF ESTONIA CONCERNING THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SWISS- ESTONIAN COOPERATION PROGRAMME TO
Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting Chapter 1: The Objective of Financial Reporting INTRODUCTION OB1. The first chapter of the conceptual framework establishes the objective of general purpose
6 February 2015 The Director Financial and Accounting Policy Branch Fiscal and Economic Group NSW Treasury GPO Box 5469 Sydney NSW 2001 T +61 2 9223 5744 F +61 2 9232 7174 E email@example.com
DENTSPLY INTERNATIONAL INC. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE GUIDELINES/POLICIES TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Functions/Responsibilities of the Board of Directors...1 II. Selection/Service of Board Members...2 A. Identification...2
Date: 20 January 2015 Reference: CF/KS Page 1 of 6 MESSAGE TO PARTIES Communication of intended nationally determined contributions I would like to draw the attention of all Parties to the United Nations