1 Technology and the Problem of Change Michael Fullan Ontario Institute for Studies in Education University of Toronto Gerry Smith Founding Principal River Oaks Public School December 1999
2 1. Bringing Real-World Problems to the Classroom Children in a Tennessee middle-school math class have just seen a video adventure from the Jasper Woodbury series about how architects work to solve community problems, such as designing safe places for children to play. The video ends with this challenge to the class to design a neighborhood playground: Narrator: Trenton Sand and Lumber is donating 32 cubic feet of sand for the sandbox and is sending over the wood and fine gravel. Christina and Marcus just have to let them know exactly how much they ll need. Lee s Fence Company is donating 280 feet of fence. Rodriguez Hardware is contributing a sliding surface which they ll cut to any length, and swings for physically challenged children. The employees of Rodriguez want to get involved, so they re going to put up the fence and help build the playground equipment. And Christina and Marcus are getting their first jobs as architects, starting the same place Gloria did 20 years ago, designing a playground. Students in the classroom help Christina and Marcus by designing swingsets, slides, and sandboxes, and then building models of their playground. As they work through this problem, they confront various issues of arithmetic, geometry, measurement, and other subjects. How do you draw to scale? How do you measure angles? How much pea gravel to we need? What are the safety requirements? Assessments of students learning showed impressive gains in their understanding of these and other geometry concepts. In addition, students improved their abilities to work with one another and to communicate their design ideas to real audiences (often composed of interested adults). One year after engaging in these activities, students remembered them vividly and talked about them with pride. Bransford et al, 1999:196
3 2. The above example is one of countless radically new examples of the new technology at work (for many other examples see Bransford, et al, 1999, Chapter 9; Scardamalia and Bereiter, 1999; Wiggins and McTighe, 1998). While still in the minority, we now have enough on-the-ground examples to know what the new technology looks like and can do to embrace learning. At the same time we also are beginning to realize that the more powerful technology becomes, the more indispensable good teachers are. The more powerful technology becomes, the more indispensable good teachers are. This would not be the case if rote learning were the goal but it is especially the case when learners must construct knowledge and meaning in order to achieve deep understanding. In this paper we identify and connect two domains of knowledge within which great advances have been made in the past decade. One has to do with technology and learning itself; the other with knowledge of the process of change. By and large, the dramatic developments in the domain of technology and learning have not been informed by knowledge of the change process. Yet they used to be intimately related. We start with a brief portrayal of new developments on the pedagogy of technology and learning, and then we pursue the connection with what we know about how effective change takes place. Technology and Learning DVD, gigabyte, virtual learning space, RAM, ROM, digital video, digital cameras, ATM, PDF, graphing calculators, computer projection systems, video streaming all common terms to many people in the workplace and some
4 3. educators. Slide projectors, overhead projectors, Gestetner machines, dicta machines, record players and other traditional technology fond memories of the past or are they? A new language using technology vocabulary many of us are unfamiliar with today. Changing times, changing schools a phrase that challenges what we are currently doing in many classrooms. Are we still rooted in the curriculum of the 70 s or have we truly made the necessary changes to move forth and connect teaching and learning to a knowledge work society. There is actually an increasingly clear notion of the nature of the paradigm shift underway in radically altering the nature of learning through technology. What is the changing paradigm as we enter the year 2000? The technology will necessitate that teachers change their pedagogy for learning to become relevant and meaningful for students to acquire the necessary knowledge and skills to be productive citizens in a global economy. ISTE (International Society for Technology in Education) along with the Milken Exchange on Education Technology produced a document for the U.S. Department of Education titled National Education Technology Standards for Students. The following chart from this document is a good example of the shift in nature of the learning environment (U.S. Department of Education, 1998:2): Traditional Learning Environments New Learning Environments teacher centered instruction single sense stimulation single path progression single media student centered instruction multisensory stimulation multipath progression multimedia
5 4. Traditional Learning Environments New Learning Environments isolated work information delivery passive learning factual, knowledge-based reactive response isolated, artificial context collaborative work information exchange active/exploratory/inquiry based learning critical thinking and informed decisions proactive/planned action authentic, real-world context U.S. Department of Education, 1998 This same document notes that the resulting learning environments should prepare students to: Communicate using a variety of media and formats; Access and exchange information in a variety of ways; Compile, organize, analyze, and synthesize information; Draw conclusions and make generalizations based on information gathered; Use information and select appropriate tools to solve problems; Know content and be able to locate additional information as needed; Become self-directed learners; Collaborate and cooperate in team efforts; Interact with others in ethical and appropriate ways. Similarly, Dwyer, et al (1991) talk about classroom approaches of knowledge instruction and knowledge construction. Knowledge instruction is viewed as the transfer of thoughts from one who is knowledgeable to one who is not and teacher work is perceived as direct instruction. Knowledge construction
6 5. views learning as a personal, reflective, and transformative process where teacher work comprises facilitating students abilities to integrate ideas, experiences, and points of view into something new. The two approaches are not incompatible and simply position on a continuum of learning strategies. Technology plays a different role in the two approaches. In a knowledge instruction classroom, technology can be a patient tutor giving students the opportunity to repeat the learning of a concept until mastered. This is quite appropriate for some students. In a knowledge construction setting, technology becomes a tool to help students access information, communicate information and collaborate with others. In today s classrooms there is certainly the need for some knowledge instruction but a great deal of student activity might involve knowledge construction given the explosion of information. We do need to move away from students coming to school to watch teachers work. The following table summarizes the contrast of knowledge instruction and knowledge construction (Dwyer et al, 1991): Knowledge Instruction Knowledge Construction Classroom Activity Teacher centered (didactic) Learner centered (interactive) Teacher Role Fact teller (always expert) Collaborator (sometimes learner) Student Role Listener (always learner) Collaborator (sometimes expert) Instructional Emphasis Facts (memorization) Relationships (inquiry and invention) Concept of Knowledge Accumulation of facts Transformation of facts
7 6. Demonstration of Success Assessment Knowledge Instruction Quantity Norm referenced (multiple choice items) Knowledge Construction Quality of understanding Criterion referenced (portfolios and performances) Technology Use Drill and practice Communication (collaboration, information access, expression) Dwyer et al, 1991 In addition to the above directional analyses there are an increasing number of examples of these technologies-in-use in sophisticated learning environments. Bransford et al s (1999) chapter on Technology to Support Learning provides many examples of how new technologies work in practice and with what impact. Bransford and his colleagues explore how these technologies do five things by: New Technologies: Bring exciting curricula based on real-world problems into the classroom; Provide scaffolds and tools to enhance learning; Give students and teacher more opportunities for feedback, reflection, and revision; Build local and global communities that include teachers, administrators, students, parents, practising scientists, and other interested people; Expand opportunities for teacher learning. (Bransford, et al, 1999:195) Further, detailed descriptions of radical transformation of learning are contained in Scardamalia and Bereiter s (1999) work in which they have developed Computer Supported Intentional Learning Environments (CSILE) to support schools as knowledge-building organizations. Similarly, the establishment of a technology-based learning environment at River Oaks
8 7. contains many concrete examples of what these exciting ideas look like in practice (Smith, 1999). In many of the examples cited above there is evidence of impact on student learning (standardized tests as well as conceptual understanding and performance based assessment) see Bransford, et al (1999); Scardamalia and Bereiter, 1999; and Smith, 1999 for details. In essence, the role of technology envisaged is one where it helps transform learning by helping to answer the question, What kind of education will best prepare students for life in a knowledge society? (Scardamalia & Bereiter, 1999:275) Technology and the Problem of Change The problem, then, is not the absence of concrete examples of what these new learning ideas look like in practice (although this too is continually expanding). The more difficult problem is that teaching in a knowledgebuilding community represents a very sophisticated change for teachers and all those who work with them. Fortunately, knowledge about the change process has also been becoming more sophisticated (for this body of knowledge see Fullan, 1991; 1993; 1999; and Fullan and Hargreaves trilogy ( ). In this short paper we address three key aspects of this knowledge: the teacher as learner, organizational learning, and program coherence.
9 8. Teachers as Learners Many years ago we asked the question What kinds of changes would teachers experience if they were to implement a new learning approach? (Fullan, 1991) We suggested three aspects: New materials; New behaviors/practices; New beliefs/understandings. We observed that the (mere) use of new materials (curricular, technology, etc.) was important but was only the tip of the implementation iceberg. The more difficult parts related to whether teachers (a) developed new skills, behaviors, and practices associated with the change; and (b) acquired new beliefs and understandings about the change. In other words, change involved a process of redoing and rethinking. Given the dramatic distance from current to new practice represented by new technologies (or more accurately, new pedagogies) this change process, involving millions of teachers is obviously an enormous challenge. As we have studied the implementation process we have discovered that virtually all teachers go through an implementation dip during the first stages (of redoing and rethinking) even when there is good support. In any case, we know a fair amount about what to expect and how to support teachers during this period of change. It is also clear what kinds of professional development will be helpful. Clearly, one-shot workshops, no matter how good, will not (cannot) have much of a carryover effect. There needs to be continuous assistance during initial implementation. Good professional development provides follow-up. There are many examples
10 9. around of teacher development centers in which model examples of practice are demonstrated and in which teachers can learn from and receive network or hands-on support to apply the ideas. There is no doubt that the kinds of pedagogical changes generated by the partnering of cognitive science and technology have profound implications for the way teachers will teach and the way they need to think about and understand teaching and learning. Scardamalia and Bereiter (1999) capture this nicely: In our experience, the teachers who remain continually fascinated and involved are ones who have a dual interest. They are interested in advancing their understanding of history, geology, biology, cultural anthropology, and so forth; and each year they experience some advances themselves as they work with students on problems in those areas. But they are also interested in understanding the process of understanding itself. The students efforts (and their own as well) to explain phenomena, to grasp theories, and to overcome naïve conceptions are an endless source of insights into that distinctively human phenomenon, the pursuit of understanding. An interest in understanding how understanding grows does not seem to be a feature of most people s curiosity. It is an acquired interest, and one that teacher education programs ought to be passionately dedicated to developing. Without it, we find, teachers tend to remain detached from students knowledge-building efforts to reduce knowledgebuilding activities to merely another set of schoolwork routines. (p. 287)
11 10. Organizational Learning Unfortunately, good professional development by itself is not very effective. Studies of change have also enabled us to understand that the culture of the school makes a huge difference. Put one way, imagine one or two teachers who are involved in a highly motivating professional learning series involving technology. Picture the teachers returning to a negative work culture. In this situation, the culture wins every time. For this reason, a general aspect of supporting change involves developing collaborative work cultures within a school (or professional learning communities ). We, and others, have worked on this issue for some time and now have strong evidence that collaborative cultures make a difference in both teacher and student learning; we have also been working on how to develop professional learning communities through what we call reculturing (Fullan, 1999). In brief, research shows that schools that only restructure (change the curriculum, add new roles, reorganize) make no difference in teaching and learning. However, schools that reculture (as well as restructure) do make a difference if they (a) focus on student learning; (b) link knowledge of student learning to changes in instructional practices; and (c) work together to assess teachers and school leadership to make improvement. Out of this work we have concluded that teachers must become more assessment literate. Assessment literacy is the capacity to examine student work and student performance data and make critical sense of this information; and to develop instructional and school improvement plans to make the kinds of changes to get better results doing all of this on a continuous basis. Technology, of course, (as in the above examples) is absolutely crucial to this entire process.
12 11. Schools, in other words, must become learning organizations. We now know what these schools look like in practice (we return in the conclusion to the question of how to develop such schools). Incidentally, this finding also reveals the limitation of teacher networks. We, ourselves, value teacher networks (electronically supported) but their limitation is that they only stimulate individual learnings across the network. They do not connect the individual learnings to reculturing the whole school without the latter new ideas will falter and disappear (for a positive example see Smith s (1998) report on River Oaks). Program Coherence A third change learning is that teachers and schools are inundated with a continuous torrent of fragmented and unconnected policies, innovations and other demands. The natural tendency in our complex systems is toward nonlinearity and piecemeal reform (see Fullan, 1999). Innovations in technology so far have been part of the problem not the solution, that is, the vast majority of attempts to introduce technology have come in the form of new machines and software, one-shot workshops at best, and generally the episodic infusion of new monies for technology unconnected to the curriculum let alone to whole school improvement. The most effective schools are not the ones that take on the sheer most number of innovations (which actually adds to overload and non-linearity) but the ones that work on program coherence, connectedness, synergy and the like (Fullan, 1999; King & Newmann, 1999).
13 12. The good news is that not only can pedagogically driven technologies powerfully address the program coherence question, they are absolutely essential for this task. Although this has been an all too brief summary of change knowledge, two things should be clear. First, the combination of teacher learning through assisted professional development, organizational learning through the development of collaborative cultures, and program coherence are essential. No one or two of these will make an impact. Second, these changes in combination are exceedingly deep and complex to achieve. Still, The Problem of Change There are two additional perplexing problems about educational reform. The first problem is what we will call the pathways dilemma. Even if we have an idea of what the destination would look like, and even if we know the requirements of change (good professional development, organizational learning cultures, program coherence), this is not the same as knowing how to get there in one s own situation. Put differently, to know that organizational learning cultures are essential, and even to know what they look like, tells you very little about how to establish them. Research tells us the impact of learning cultures once they are up and running but does not say much, if anything, about the pathways of developing a learning culture if you don t have one. This is why we have said steer clear of false certainty (Hargreaves & Fullan, 1999). There is no substitute for working diligently on local strategies for change based on one s own context and informal (not determined by) visions of what the new order should be and what change knowledge one needs in setting out on the journey.
14 13. The second perplexing problem is how to go to scale. If we can point to a handful of successful examples, how do we propel them into 100 or more examples? We do not have space to address this issue in depth but we are gaining an appreciation of the problem of scale (see Fullan, in press). Essentially, if we do not improve the quality of the reform infrastructure (policies and agencies of pressure and support) it is not possible to achieve reform on a large scale. Even on a small scale, innovative examples which are established in given instances will not last if the infrastructure is not supporting them. Put another way, it is possible to create an innovative school which is highly successful for a few years; it is not possible to sustain innovations in the face of a neutral or non-supportive infrastructure. In addressing the infrastructure from a technology perspective, the Milken Exchange has developed a valuable framework of seven dimensions (along with indicators of implementation) including: learners, learning environments, professional competency, system capacity, community connections, technology capacity and community (Lemke, & Coughlin, 1998). There remains, of course, the very difficult task of implementing the framework itself, but the agenda is well established. These are exciting times in pursuing the new pedagogies and the new technologies. For the first time we can think of the education profession as engaged in the business of scientific breakthroughs about learning. What we have attempted to establish in this paper is that the phenomena about learning potential will not be realized unless we learn how to incorporate the knowledge of the change process, and the critical role of the teacher as learner and schools and networks as learning communities.
15 14. To achieve any significant breakthroughs it is going to require that we marry the professional new examples of technology-based pedagogies with grounded knowledge in the complexities of bringing about reform on a large scale. The content of reform in technology and learning, and knowledge of the change process must feed on each other if substantial impact is to be achieved.
16 15. References Bransford, J., Brown, A., & Cocking, R. (eds) (1999) How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School, Washington, DC, National Academy Press. Fullan, M. (1993) Change Forces: Probing the Depths of Educational Reform, London, Falmer Press; Levittown, PA, Falmer Press (Taylor and Francis Inc.) Fullan, M. (1997). What s Worth Fighting For in the Principalship?, 2 nd edn, Toronto, Elementary Teachers Federation of Ontario; New York, Teachers College Press; Buckingham, Open University Press. Fullan, M. (1999) Change Forces: The Sequel, London, Falmer Press; Levittown, PA, Falmer Press (Taylor and Francis Inc.) Fullan, M. (in press) The return of large scale reform, The Journal of Educational Change, 1, 1. Fullan, M., and Hargreaves, A. (1996) What s Worth Fighting For in Your School? Toronto, Elementary Teachers Federation of Ontario; New York, Teachers College Press; Buckingham, Open University Press. Fullan, M., with Steigelbauer, S. (1991) The New Meaning of Educational Change, New York, Teachers College Press. Hargreaves, A. and Fullan, M. (1998) What s Worth Fighting For Out There? Toronto, Elementary Teachers Federation of Ontario; New York, Teachers College Press; Buckingham, Open University Press. King, B. & Newmann, F. (1999) School Capacity as a Goal for Professional Development, Madison, University of Wisconsin. Lemke, C. & Coughlin, E. (1998) Technology in American Schools: Seven Dimensions for Gauging Progress, Santa Monica, Milken Exchange. Scardamalia, M. & Bereiter, C. (1999) Schools as knowledge-building communities, in D. Keating and C. Hertzman (eds), Developmental Health and the Wealth of Nations, New York, The Guilford Press. Smith, G. (1998) Lessons in school and classroom change, unpublished paper.
17 16. Smith, G. (1999) Teaching, learning, technology and effectiveness, unpublished paper. Wiggins, G. and McTighe, J. (1998) Understanding by Design, Alexandra, VA, ASCD.
BUILDING EVALUATIVE CAPABILITY IN SCHOOLING IMPROVEMENT POSITION PAPER 9 Learning for Leadership: Building Evaluative Capability through Professional Development for School Leaders D. Le Fevre Why a Focus
Curriculum and Instruction: A 21st Century Skills Implementation Guide Produced by To succeed in college, career and life in the 21st century, students must be supported in mastering both content and skills.
Arkansas Teaching Standards The Arkansas Department of Education has adopted the 2011 Model Core Teaching Standards developed by Interstate Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (InTASC) to replace
THE FUTURE OF PERSONALIZED LEARNING IN ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS Results from the Speak Up 2012 National Research Project and Project Tomorrow Presenters: Julie Evans CEO, Project Tomorrow Chief Researcher, Speak
A Common North Star: College Summit and the Common Core State Standards Overview The broad based adoption of the Common Core State Standards (Common Core) presents a challenge to any organization serving
Essays on Teaching Excellence Toward the Best in the Academy Volume 8, Number 2, 1996-97 A publication of The Professional & Organizational Development Network in Higher Education (www.podnetwork.org).
B E S T PRACTICES NEA RESEARCH BRIEF Learning and Teaching July 2006 This brief outlines nine leading research-based concepts that have served as a foundation for education reform. It compares existing
Supporting the Implementation of NGSS through Research: Curriculum Materials Janet Carlson, BSCS/Stanford University Elizabeth A. Davis, University of Michigan Cory Buxton, University of Georgia Curriculum
Department of Secondary Education Kutztown University of Pennsylvania Master s Degree Portfolio Project Introduction The portfolio project serves as the capstone activity for the master s degree program
Walden University Catalog 2005 2006 vii School of Education M.S. in Education The M.S. in Education program is designed to develop educators serving students in K 12 classrooms as scholar-practitioners
Leaders in Educational Thought Michael Fullan Title Duration Description Leadership: A Current View 2:47 Michael Fullan discusses the benefits and challenges of being a leader in education today. The Growth
May 2002 Volume 59 Number 8 Beyond Instructional Leadership Pages 61-63 The Changing Shape of Leadership The Annenberg Institute for School Reform's work with principals, superintendents, and other educators
The Thoughtful Classroom Program Becoming a Strategic Teacher: Better Instruction, Deeper, Higher Achievement One of the greatest challenges facing today s school leaders is the challenge of raising the
The ISTE National Educational Technology Standards (NETS S) and Performance Indicators for Students 1. Creativity and Innovation Students demonstrate creative thinking, construct knowledge, and develop
I.B. SPECIFIC TEACHING FIELDS Standards for Certification in Early Childhood Education [26.110-26.270] STANDARD 1 Curriculum The competent early childhood teacher understands and demonstrates the central
Concept-Mapping Software: How effective is the learning tool in an online learning environment? Online learning environments address the educational objectives by putting the learner at the center of the
John Tagg Conference on Teaching and Learning Oakland University May 14, 2014 THE LEARNING PARADIGM COLLEGE WHAT DO YOU WANT TO ACHIEVE? What is the single most important experience that you hope every
EDUCATIONAL SUPERVISION IN A "TRANSFORMED" SCHOOL ORGANIZATION Dennis L. Treslan* Faculty of Education Memorial University of Newfoundland Abstract This paper examines the learning organization dimension
A Primer on Writing Effective Learning-Centered Course Goals Robert K. Noyd (DFB) & The Staff of The Center for Educational Excellence (CEE) US Air Force Academy A Shift from a Topic-Centered to a Learning-Centered
Chapter 1 Educational Technology in the Science Classroom Glen Bull and Randy L. Bell Technology has transformed the way in which science is conducted. Almost every aspect of scientific exploration has
Authentic Intellectual Work in Social Studies: Putting Performance Before Pedagogy Geoffrey Scheurman and Fred M. Newmann Some critics of social studies education argue that U.S. students spend too much
Elementary MEd I. The Relationship of the Program with the Unit s Conceptual Framework Shaping Tomorrow: Ideas to Action The Early Elementary Education program for prospective elementary education candidates
ASU College of Education Course Syllabus ED 4972, ED 4973, ED 4974, ED 4975 or EDG 5660 Clinical Teaching Course: ED 4972, ED 4973, ED 4974, ED 4975 or EDG 5660 Credit: 9 Semester Credit Hours (Undergraduate),
K-12 Information Digital Literacy K-12 Information Digital Literacy It is the goal of the educators of the Burlington Public Schools to foster a dynamic learning environment that promotes engagement, relevant
Executive Summary Principles and Standards for School Mathematics Overview We live in a time of extraordinary and accelerating change. New knowledge, tools, and ways of doing and communicating mathematics
Evaluation Framework for Engineering Education Curriculum: a Review of Engineering is Elementary Meagan Ross 11/6/2010 HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE Ross, Meagan. (2010) Evaluation Framework for Engineering
TEXAS RISING STAR WEBINAR SERIES: CURRICULUM AND EARLY LEARNING GUIDELINES RECORDED OCTOBER 29, 2015 NOTES The topics that will be addressed during these webinars include: 1. The General Overview: Curriculum
Masters of Reading Information Booklet College of Education Department of Teaching and Learning Bloomsburg University's Masters in Reading/Reading Certification degree program provides theoretical, analytical
Get to Know My RE Observe Collect Evidence Mentor Moments Reflect Review Respond Tailor Support Provide Provide specific feedback specific Feedback What does my RE need? Practice Habits Of Mind Share Data
Scientific and Engineering Practices in K 12 Classrooms Understanding A Framework for K 12 Science Education by Rodger W. Bybee This morning I watched Sesame Street. During the show, characters acted like
p e d a g o g y s t r a t e g y MCEETYA A u s t r a l i a N e w Z e a l a n d Pedagogies that integrate information and communication technologies can engage students in ways not previously possible, enhance
Integrated STEM Education through Project-Based Learning by Diana Laboy-Rush, STEM Solutions Manager at Learning.com Table of Contents: Abstract...2 Math and Science Education Crisis...3 Integrated STEM
Text of article appearing in: Issues in Science and Technology, XIX(2), 48-52. Winter 2002-03. James Pellegrino Knowing What Students Know Recent advances in the cognitive and measurement sciences should
01-Bella.qxd 11/17/03 3:40 PM Page 1 What Are the Benefits of Analyzing Student Work? 1 W hat s in it for me? That s the question many educators secretly ask themselves when they are presented with a new
K 12 Paying Attention to LITERACY Six Foundational Principles for Improvement in Literacy, K 12 Focus on literacy. Build an understanding of effective literacy instruction. Design a responsive literacy
Jennifer Handley Book Review Sandholtz, J.H., Ringstaff, C., & Dwyer, D.C. (1997) Teaching with Technology: Creating Student-Centered Classrooms, Teachers College: New York, 211 pages. Teaching with Technology:
White Paper LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT The 11 Components of a Best-In-Class 360 Assessment Crucial elements for your 360 assessment 360-degree assessments are the backbone of most corporations leadership development
Preparing Teachers to Teach Mathematics With Technology Margaret L. Niess Oregon State University, USA firstname.lastname@example.org Abstract: The challenge for mathematics teacher educators is to identify
Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (in press). Knowledge Building. In Encyclopedia of Education, Second Edition. New York: Macmillan Reference, USA. Knowledge Building In what is coming to be called the knowledge
2010-2016 TECHNOLOGY PLAN Bland County Public Schools 361 Bears Trl. Bastian, VA 24315 www.bland.k12.va.us Six Year Technology Plan for Bland County Public Schools APPROVED BY SCHOOL BOARD MAY 23, 2011
Chariho Regional School District Technology Education Curriculum Grades K-8 March 13, 2012 Chariho Regional School District Technology Education Curriculum Grades K - 8 Table of Contents Page Section One
Ten Guiding Principles for the Use of Technology in Learning Introduction Ontario colleges, universities, secondary schools, the Ministry of Training, Colleges and Universities, the Ministry of Education,
Professional Standards for Teachers Guidelines for Professional Practice July 2005 Queensland the Smart State The State of Queensland (Department of Education) 2005 Copyright protects this publication.
Masters of Education Degree with a specialization in Elementary Mathematics Program Proposal School of Professional and Continuing Studies Northeastern University February 2008 Revised 2/18/2008 Revised
LEARNER-CENTERED PSYCHOLOGICAL PRINCIPLES: A Framework for School Reform & Redesign TABLE OF CONTENTS: Background Learner-Centered Principles Prepared by the Learner-Centered Principles Work Group of the
Integration of technology in our classrooms: A divisive issue Vahid Motamedi Assistant Professor Faculty of Psychology & Education Tarbiat Moallem University Mofateh Avenue Tehran, Iran 15614 email@example.com
The National Educational Standards (Upon which our local standards are based) Students demonstrate a sound understanding of the nature and operation of technology systems. Students are proficient in the
Session Title: Teaching Computational Thinking through Mobilize and the New Big Data Explosion MSP Project Name: MOBILIZE: Mobilizing for Innovative Computer Science Teaching and Learning Presenters: Jane
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT: A VISION FOR SAUDI SCIENCE TEACHERS Hiya Almazroa Pringcess Noura Bint Abdulrahman University, Saudi Arabia Abstract: Professional development is a significant mechanism for maintaining
SCHOOLS ATTUNED RESEARCH REPORT: ACADEMIC AND BEHAVIORAL CHANGES Evergreen Avenue Elementary School Woodbury, New Jersey Submitted by: Fran Carey, Principal July 2003 Background Evergreen Avenue School,
Early Childhood Program Guidance for Children Ages Birth through Eight Technology and Interactive Media in the Early Years Technology and interactive media are rapidly expanding the materials and experiences
Educational Technology Plan for Reynoldsburg City SD - 047001 School Years: 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 etech Ohio Certified on Jun 24, 2009 Certification Period: July 1, 2009 - Jun 30, 2012 *created using
P A R E N T G U I D E Prentice Hall World History Homeschool bundle includes: Student Edition Reading and Note-Taking Study Guide with Concept Connector Journal Teacher Edition Because You Know What Matters
What does the research say about teaching and learning mathematics? Structure teaching of mathematical concepts and skills around problems to be solved (Checkly, 1997; Wood & Sellars, 1996; Wood & Sellars,
Course Guide Masters of Education Program Note: 1 course = (3) credits Students need 12 credits (4 courses) to obtain Graduate Diploma Students need 30 credits (10 courses) to obtain M.Ed. or M.A Graduate
A STATISTICS COURSE FOR ELEMENTARY AND MIDDLE SCHOOL TEACHERS Gary Kader and Mike Perry Appalachian State University USA This paper will describe a content-pedagogy course designed to prepare elementary
SUCCESSFUL SCHOOL RESTRUCTURING A Report to the Public and Educators by the Center on Organization and Restructuring of Schools Fred M. Newmann and Gary G. Wehlage Distributed jointly by the American Federation
Principals as Leaders in a Culture of Change By Michael Fullan Ontario Institute for Studies in Education University of Toronto Paper prepared for Educational Leadership, Special Issue, May 2002 Revised
Curriculum and Instruction Core curriculum is the foundation of Tier 1 instruction and is the basis for building K-12 literacy in Arizona students. The curriculum at each level must be based upon the 2010
Teacher Education Portfolio Guidelines and Rubric The Teacher Education Portfolio is developed throughout a s program. Most Teacher Education courses have a capstone project designed to meet the InTASC
The Department of Education & Training Professional Learning in Effective Schools The Seven Principles of Highly Effective Professional Learning Professional Learning in Effective Schools: The Seven Principles
Capacity Building Series K 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Principals as Co-learners: Supporting the Promise of Collaborative Inquiry SPECIAL EDITION # 38 When schools were engaged in inquiry by...... re-focusing
ENHANCING THAI STUDENTS SCIENTIFIC LITERACY IN LEARNING ABOUT WORLD PHENOMENON AND SPACE TECHNOLOGY THROUGH YUENYONG (2006) SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY AND SOCIETY (STS) APPROACH Wanngam Marakrong Khon Kaen University,
Abstract 437 A Passionate Teacher: Teacher Commitment and Dedication to Student Learning Çağrı Tuğrul Mart Ishik University, Erbil, IRAQ E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org Passionate teachers are distinguished
Lindsay Unified School District Mission Statement ~Empowering and Motivating for Today and Tomorrow~ - Adopted by Lindsay Unified School Board: May 21, 2007 Mission: Empowering and Motivating for Today
COGNITIVE & K Critical and Creative Thinking: Students combine and apply artistic and reasoning skills to imagine, create, realize and refine artworks in conventional and innovative ways. The student will
Number and operations involves understanding whole numbers and realizing that numbers represent quantity. It includes learning number words and symbols, counting, comparing and ordering quantities, composing
Educational Technology in Introductory College Physics Teaching and Learning: The Importance of Students Perception and Performance Jean Chen, Assistant Director, Office of Institutional Research University
The Integration of Technology In Teacher Education Introduction It is a general expectation that new teachers entering today s classrooms routinely are expected to use, and apply technological tools in
Place Artwork Here CONNECTICUT PREKINDERGARTEN 2001 THROUGH GRADE 12 COMPUTER TECHNOLOGY COMPETENCY STANDARDS FOR STUDENTS Adopted by the Connecticut State Board of Education June 13, 2001 Office of Grant
Janet Russell CNDLS Workshop Goals: 1) Teaching vs. Learning goals Participants will be able to distinguish between teacher-centered and student-centered learning goals. 2) Articulate a set of learning
Instructional Framework What Do We Mean By Strong Instructional Programs and Supportive School Communities? Effective Instructional Programs Require a Focus Within and Across Classrooms In urban classrooms,
R e p o r t i n g S t u d e n t L e a r n i n g Guidelines for Effective Teacher-Parent-Student Communication 2 0 1 0 Contents ParT 1: The Importance of Effective Teacher-Parent-Student 2 Communication
research report What Does Good Math Instruction Look Like? Nancy Protheroe It involves good teachers, an effective math environment, and a curriculum that is more than a mile wide and an inch deep. Our
Addressing Technology Standards: An Analysis of STEM Lesson Plans Bettie HALL, M.Ed. Michelle L. DANIEL, M.Ed. College of Education, Criminal Justice, and Human Services, University of Cincinnati Cincinnati,
Capacity Building Series SECRETARIAT SPECIAL EDITION #14 Integrated Learning in the Classroom Why curriculum integration? Research has consistently shown that students in integrated programs demonstrate
Instructional Design& Technology Master of Science Degree Program Whether it s in a corporate training facility or high school classroom, the instructor s role is one of the most important in our society.
JOINT MASTER OF ARTS IN LEADERSHIP AND EDUCATION CHANGE COURSE DESCRIPTIONS A. CORE COURSES MALC 801 Perspectives in Educational Leadership Educational leadership is a complex concept, both in theory and
1 Title Enabling Students with Special Needs to Succeed in Target Audience This course is designed for teachers or specialists who serve classroom students with special needs, grades 4-8. Course Description
Book Study Prepared by the Kansas Multi Tier System of Supports (MTSS) Project Leadership & Sustainability: System Thinkers in Action Michael Fullan (Corwin Press, 2005) Book Description: In this book,
21 st Century Curriculum and Instruction The relationship between curriculum and instruction is obviously a very close one. Curriculum is essentially a design, or roadmap for learning, and as such focuses
LEARNING THEORIES Ausubel's Learning Theory David Paul Ausubel was an American psychologist whose most significant contribution to the fields of educational psychology, cognitive science, and science education.
The purpose of this brief is to provide Iowa educators with a clear understanding of what is meant by rigorous and relevant curriculum as a characteristic of effective instruction of the Iowa Core. A rigorous
Tech Training Through Tech Play: Hands-On Strategies to Supporting Parents and Educators Appropriately Use Tech Tools with Young Children Amanda Armstrong, M.S. TEC Center at Erikson Institute @AArmstrong_CD
Essays on Teaching Excellence Toward the Best in the Academy Volume 13, Number 1, 2001-02 A publication of The Professional & Organizational Development Network in Higher Education (www.podnetwork.org).
appendix 3 curriculum, instruction, and assessment: rigor and relevance The old adage of learning best by experience is really true. Research confirms that more learning occurs when students are immersed
Clarifying Misconceptions between Technology Education and Educational Technology Only you will assume the responsibility to educate others about the importance of technology education in schools today.
DOCTOR IN EDUCATION COURSE DESCRIPTIONS A. CORE COURSES NEDD 800 Professionalism, Ethics, and the Self This introductory core course will explore and interrogate ideas surrounding professionalism and professionalization.