Airline Pilots Perceptions of and Experiences in Crew Resource Management (CRM) Training
|
|
- Herbert Greer
- 8 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Copyright 2001 Society of Automotive Engineers, Inc Airline Pilots Perceptions of and Experiences in Crew Resource Management (CRM) Training J. Matthew Beaubien and David P. Baker American Institutes for Research ABSTRACT We surveyed over 30,000 airline pilots to assess their perceptions of and experiences in their professional training. In this paper, we describe their responses to a series of questions that focus on Crew Resource Management (CRM) training. The results suggest that most pilots are satisfied with their CRM training and find it useful. However, the respondents indicated that training programs which integrate CRM principles throughout the entire curriculum are substantially more useful than stand-alone CRM training courses. INTRODUCTION Over the years, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and the airline community have made tremendous strides in increasing flight safety through improved pilot training. For example, innovative training strategies such as Crew Resource Management (CRM) training have been incorporated into pilot training programs with noticeable payoffs. Unfortunately, few studies have compared the relative strengths and weaknesses of CRM training programs across multiple airlines. Therefore, we administered a survey to a large, representative sample of U.S. commercial airline pilots. The survey was designed to answer several questions: To what extent are pilots satisfied with their training (i.e., affective reactions)? To what extent do pilots find their training useful (i.e., utility reactions)? What are pilots opinions about various training issues? The survey was administered to over 30,000 airline pilots from 24 of the 30 largest U.S. passenger carriers, making it the largest training evaluation conducted to date. CREW RESOURCE MANAGEMENT TRAINING For over 20 years, Crew Resource Management (CRM) training has been used to reduce the impact and severity of human error on the flight deck. Unfortunately, few large-scale studies have examined the effectiveness of CRM training programs. THE NEED FOR CRM TRAINING Given the precision and reliability of modern aircraft technology, mechanical causes of accidents are extremely rare. A substantial proportion of aviationrelated accidents are due to pilot error (Boeing Commercial Airplane Group, 1994; National Transportation Safety Board, 1994). To reduce the incidence of pilot error, aviation professionals have traditionally focused on improving pilots technical skills and safety-related attitudes. However, the co-occurrence of several accidents during the late 1970 s caused aviation professionals to reexamine their selective emphasis on the skills and attitudes of individual pilots. For example, in 1978, United Air Lines flight 173 crashed near Portland as a result of total fuel exhaustion. Subsequent analyses of the cockpit voice recorder suggested that the crew were unable to effectively communicate with one another (National Transportation Safety Board, 1979). Given an alarming pattern of similar findings across several such accidents, the Federal Aviation Administration recommended that all carriers implement Crew Resource Management (CRM) training programs (Federal Aviation Administration, 1993). THE HISTORY OF CRM TRAINING The underlying purpose of CRM training is to provide trainees with the knowledge and skills to effectively manage all available resources, whether they are human-, hardware-, or information-based (Federal Aviation Administration, 1993). Over the years, CRM training has undergone a number of transformations (Helmreich, Merritt, & Wilhelm, 1999). The first generation of CRM training programs was designed to raise pilots awareness of human factors issues on the flight deck. For example, early CRM programs focused on how to recognize one s own leadership style, such as authoritarianism or lack of assertiveness (Helmreich, Merritt, & Wilhelm, 1999). These early programs focused on general CRM
2 principles, rather than providing training in specific CRM skills (e.g., situational monitoring, conflict management, decision-making). As a result, attempts to evaluate CRM performance have frequently met with resistance from line pilots who do not believe that CRM skills can be assessed with the same degree of precision as stickand-rudder skills. More recent CRM training programs routinely provide training in specific CRM skills, and integrate CRM principles throughout the entire training curriculum. Many have also included specific behavioral markers for assessing crewmembers CRM performance (Flin & Martin, 2001; Seamster, Boehm-Davis, Holt, & Schultz, 1998). These changes in CRM training are most clearly demonstrated in the Advanced Qualification Program (AQP; Federal Aviation Administration, 1998). AQP is a voluntary alternative to traditional pilot training under 14 CFR Part 121. Following an instructional systems development (ISD) approach, AQP development begins with a comprehensive task analysis of the technical and CRM requirements associated with each aircraft. The results of these task analyses are then used to develop AQP training programs from the ground up (Birnbach & Longridge, 1993). Several unique features of AQP training include: the integration of CRM concepts throughout the training curriculum; the requirement for pilots to demonstrate proficiency on technical and CRM skills in Line Operational Evaluation (LOE) scenarios prior to certification; the requirement that CRM evaluation focus on specific, observable behaviors that were derived from the task analysis, and; the requirement that check airmen receive special training in evaluating pilots CRM skills. THE EFFECTIVENESS OF CRM TRAINING Most attempts to validate the effectiveness of CRM training have focused on assessing the trainees reactions to their CRM training. A small number of studies have also assessed trainees learning (e.g., changes in attitudes towards CRM or knowledge about CRM principles) at the end of training. In general, CRM training has been found to produce positive reactions and enhanced learning. Unfortunately, many of these studies are based on extremely small samples, trainees from a single airline, anecdotal data, or weak evaluation designs (Salas, Burke, Bowers, & Wilson, 2001). Because AQP training is now being implemented at a large number of carriers, we felt that there was a unique opportunity to identify the strengths and weaknesses of different approaches to CRM training (Part 121, SVT, AQP), the results of which could be used to improve all CRM training programs. In the sections below, we describe the results of a largescale survey of pilots perceptions of and experiences in their training. In particular, we focus on their responses to a series of questions concerning Crew Resource Management (CRM) training. This project was a unique opportunity to conduct a scientifically rigorous, largescale comparison of CRM training programs across multiple airlines. Nevertheless, we recognize that participants reactions to training are only one measure of a training program s effectiveness. SURVEY DEVELOPMENT Survey development involved a number of critical steps, including: document review, focus groups, item development, and pre-testing. DOCUMENT REVIEW We extracted a list of preliminary variables from documents that describe AQP, SVT, and Part 121 pilot training (see, for example, Federal Aviation Administration, 1998). This information was supplemented by a review of the aviation psychology, training, and human factors research literatures, which yielded a number of relevant articles on aviation training (see, for example, Birnbach & Longridge, 1993) and training evaluation (see, for example, Alliger, et al., 1997; Kraiger, Ford, & Salas, 1993). We also reviewed a series of surveys that had been conducted among general aviation and commercial airline pilots. FOCUS GROUPS Focus groups were conducted with airline pilots to develop a better understanding of CRM training. Several important issues arose during the focus groups that directly contributed to finalizing the list of outcome and content variables. For example, because some airlines refer to their CRM training as Command/Leadership/Resource Management (C/L/R) training or Human Factors training, the participants felt it was important to include this terminology. We also established a Technical Advisory Board (TAB) to provide oversight for the project, to review and approve all deliverables, and to assist with coordinating important project activities. The TAB members included representatives from: the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), the Air Transport Association (ATA), the Air Line Pilots Association (ALPA), the Allied Pilots Association (APA), and the Independent Association of Continental Pilots (IACP). It was the general consensus of the TAB that pilots might not know which training program Part 121, SVT, or AQP they are currently trained under. Therefore, a procedure was established that involved identifying each pilot s airline and the fleet/series assignment. This information was later matched to FAA databases to determine the training program under which each pilot was trained. DRAFT SURVEY MATERIALS
3 Survey items were written to target each of the content variables included on the final variable list. The first draft was distributed to the TAB in early May 2000 for review and comment. Based on their feedback, a revised draft was submitted to TAB members in early June 2000, which was then formatted for pre-testing. Because the survey would be distributed to 24 different U.S. airlines and 3 distinct pilot unions, a decision was made to tailor the cover letter to each union. Therefore, comments from the TAB members were incorporated separately into their respective cover letters. Each cover letter appeared on union letterhead, was signed by the union president, and was personally addressed to the pilot receiving the survey. Each formatted cover letter was pre-tested with pilots from the appropriate union. We also decided to include a postcard follow-up. Previous research suggests that a follow-up postcard can significantly enhance response rates (Yammarino et al., 1991). Draft postcards were prepared and submitted to TAB members for review and comment. The postcards were pre-tested with the other survey materials. PRE-TESTS The best way to identify problems with a survey is to pre-test all of the survey questions and procedures prior to their actual administration in the field (Rea & Parker, 1997). This allows potential problems to be detected and avoided. Four separate pre-tests were conducted. In each pre-test, participants reviewed the cover letter, postcard, and survey instrument and were asked to independently complete the survey. A short focus group followed to identify any problems with the cover letter and the survey. Changes were made to the survey based on the focus group comments. These primarily involved minor editorial and formatting changes to the survey instrument. SAMPLE SELECTION For the purposes of this survey, we restricted the commercial airline pilot population to only those pilots who are currently employed by the 30 largest U.S. passenger carriers. These carriers were selected because they contain a substantial percentage of the best trained and most experienced air carrier pilots in the U.S. economy. Despite our efforts to contact the top 30 carriers and solicit their participation in the survey, we were unsuccessful at enlisting the participation of six airlines. Therefore, the final population for the survey consisted of 24 U.S. airlines, accounting for nearly 95% of the U.S. commercial market. SAMPLE SIZE We decided to use a very large sample 30,752 airline pilots for this survey. This figure represents 50% the airline pilots employed at the 24 largest U.S. carriers. Large samples have a number of advantages over smaller ones. For example, large samples are associated with small levels of sampling error and therefore produce more accurate statistical tests (Rea & Parker, 1997). SAMPLING STRATEGY After exploring a number of possible alternatives, we decided to use union membership lists as our sampling frame. These lists included the most up-to-date information on pilots names, mailing addresses, carrier affiliation, aircraft fleet and series, and seat position. We used stratified random sampling to select a sample of 50% of the pilots at 24 of the 30 largest air carriers. This technique produces a sample that is highly representative of the population (Fowler, 1993). To draw the sample, we sorted each database by carrier, fleet, series, and seat position. Next, we randomly chose a starting point in the database and then selected every other pilot. SURVEY ADMINISTRATION The survey was mailed during the last week of October When administering the survey, we utilized several strategies to bolster the probability of achieving as high of a response rate as possible. These included: publishing an article in each union s newsletter to pre-notify pilots of the upcoming survey; including a personalized cover letter in each participant s survey materials; ensuring the anonymity of all participants; limiting the survey to four pages in length; and mailing a follow-up postcard to all participants. SURVEY DISTRIBUTION Approximately 31,000 copies of the survey were printed for distribution. Personalized cover letters, postcards, and outgoing and return envelopes were also printed. Each outgoing envelope was clearly marked AIRLINE PILOT TRAINING SURVEY. Approximately one week after the survey was mailed, a postcard was sent to participants thanking them for their participation and reminding them, if they had not done so, to complete the survey and return it. As part of the survey distribution process, we established a toll-free telephone number for questions from pilots. SURVEY RETURNS Most of the surveys were returned between November 2000 through February In total, 11,709 surveys were completed and returned. DATA CLEANING Prior to conducting any statistical analyses, we performed a series of data screening and checking
4 procedures to ensure the quality of the data (Tabachnick & Fidell, 1996). training program. We found no meaningful differences between the two groups. GENERAL QUALITY CONTROL MEASURES Of the 30,732 surveys that were mailed, 11,709 were completed and returned. An additional 246 surveys were returned undeliverable. This yielded an effective response rate of 38.4%. To ensure that the survey results were not systematically biased, we first filtered out respondents who were either not currently employed as commercial airline pilots, or whose pattern of responding raised serious questions regarding the veracity of their responses. Four criteria were established: Age Federal regulations stipulate a mandatory retirement age for all commercial airline pilots. Therefore, we filtered the 96 respondents who exceeded the maximum age for their current seat position. Specifically, we filtered out Captains and First Officers who were over 60 years old and Flight Engineers who were over 65 years old. Year of Employment One of the survey questions asked the respondents to indicate the date that they began employment at their current airline. We then filtered the 17 respondents whose year of employment was either highly unlikely or which would make them too old for commercial licensure (e.g., 1956). Extensive Missing Data Certain response patterns tend to suggest general carelessness when responding which could bias the survey results. Therefore, we calculated the amount of missing data per respondent (items marked Not Applicable were not included in this calculation), and filtered the 36 respondents with greater than 10% missing data. Aberrant Response Patterns Other response patterns tend to suggest that certain respondents were not carefully reading the survey items. This could also bias the survey results. Therefore, we identified and filtered the 605 respondents who straightlined the entire survey (e.g., individuals who responded to all items as Strongly Agree ). A total of 738 respondents were filtered during this stage (16 respondents were filtered out for more than one reason). This represents approximately 6.3% of the total respondent pool. To check for possible bias, we compared the filtered respondents to the remaining respondents along a series of demographic variables: age, employing airline, number of flight hours, union affiliation, fleet and series assignment, seat position, and ADDITIONAL QUALITY CONTROL MEASURES During the second stage of the filtering process, we filtered out those respondents whose training program could not be accurately identified. Two criteria were established: Insufficient Information We filtered out the 504 respondents who failed to provide sufficient information that would allow us to accurately identify their training program. The necessary information typically included their employing airline, fleet and series assignment, training curriculum, and date of most recent training event. Transitions within s Even with all the necessary information, it was sometimes impossible to determine which type of training each respondent received. This typically occurred when the respondent s most recent training coincided with a change in the training program itself (e.g., when the training program formally transitioned from Part 121 to SVT). We then filtered out the 301 respondents whose training programs transitioned during the survey s administration. A total of 805 respondents were filtered during this stage. This represents an additional 6.9% of the total respondent pool. RESPONDENT REPRESENTATIVENESS In total, the filters resulted in a total of 10,166 usable responses for the remaining analyses. This represents approximately 86.8% of the total respondent pool. In order to assess the representativeness of the respondents vis-à-vis the intended population, we compared the sample proportion to the usable response proportion. If these two values are approximately equal, the usable respondents can be considered representative of the population of pilots. However, if large differences are observed, this would indicate that the results are biased and would require response weighting to offset this bias (Henry, 1990; Lee, Forthofer, & Lorimer, 1989). The differences between the sample and usable response proportions were generally less than 1 percent, and never exceeded four percent. These differences are extremely small and could easily have occurred by chance. As a result, it was not necessary to weight the survey results prior to conducting subsequent analyses (Henry, 1990; Lee et al., 1989). CREW POSITION
5 The surveys were completed by a roughly equal number of Captains (49.2%) and First Officers (45.6%). Substantially fewer were completed by Flight Engineers (5.2%). The relatively small number of responses from Flight Engineers is not unexpected, given that many carriers are phasing out their older, three-crewmember aircraft. NUMBER OF FLIGHT HOURS The respondents included both highly seasoned veterans and relative novices. A sizeable number reported that they had logged over 14,000 hours in all commercial and military aircraft (25.9%). However, most reported having logged between 2,000 and 14,000 hours (72.8%). A handful reported having flown fewer than 2,000 hours (1.3%). MOST RECENT TRAINING Because this survey was mailed to such a diverse population, we needed some type of anchor for pilots to use when responding to the survey items. We decided that the pilots most recent training event should serve as this anchor. Therefore, we asked the pilots to describe their most recent training event and to consider this event when responding to many of the survey questions. Roughly equal numbers of pilots were trained under AQP (42.0%) and Part 121 (41.8%). Substantially fewer pilots were trained under the SVT (16.3%). The majority of the respondents reported that they most recently received recurrent qualification training (66.5%). Substantially fewer received initial qualification (6.5%), re-qualification after losing their qualification (1.5%), transition training from one fleet to another (15.8%), or upgrade training to a different seat position (9.7%). When they responded to the survey, relatively few pilots were currently enrolled in training (3.3%). Many had received their most recent training between one to six months earlier (64.4%). Substantially fewer had received their training more than six months earlier (32.4%). During their most recent training event, a substantial majority of respondents participated in CRM training (95.2%). SURVEY RESULTS For ease of presentation, we collapsed the five-point response scale Strongly Agree, Agree,, Disagree, and Strongly Disagree into a three-point scale Agree,, Disagree. Differences between AQP and Part 121 that exceeded 5% for the new response category of Agree were considered practically meaningful. DESCRIPTIVE STATISTICS Survey items focused on the pilots personal experiences in CRM training. The respondents were instructed to answer these questions only if they received CRM training during their most recent training. As shown in Table 1, the majority of respondents indicated that their most recent training integrated CRM principles throughout the entire curriculum (55.8%). Substantially fewer indicated that they had received CRM training as a separate module (22.0%) or that their training involved both integrated CRM as well as a separate CRM course (12.1%). A small but sizeable percentage of pilots reported having received no formal CRM training (10.1%). Table 1. Item 2f, Please indicate what type of CRM training you received. Separate Course Integrated Throughout 32.7% 25.0% 11.1% 22.0% 46.5% 50.9% 65.8% 55.8% Both 9.3% 12.0% 11.5% 12.1% None other than LOFT 11.4% 12.1% 11.5% 10.1% was It is interesting to note that 11.5% of AQP trained pilots reported receiving no CRM training other than LOFT. These results are somewhat puzzling, because one of the tenets of AQP is that CRM should be integrated throughout the training curriculum. These results may suggest that a small but sizeable number of pilots are confused regarding what exactly the term CRM entails. Alternatively, the results may suggest that there is substantial variability among AQP programs regarding the extent to which CRM principles are integrated throughout training. DIFFERENCES BETWEEN AQP AND PART 121 Survey items all showed greater than a 5% difference between pilots trained under AQP compared to pilots trained under Part 121. For each item, these results favored AQP training. Item 50, which concerns the usefulness of performance feedback during CRM training, revealed the largest difference between pilots trained under AQP and Part 121. Item 52, which concerns the clarity of CRM training objectives, revealed the smallest difference. Tables 2-5 present the results for items 50-53, respectively.
6 Table 2. Item 50, CRM training provided useful feedback about my performance. Disagree 22.7% 18.5% 12.0% 17.5% 25.3% 23.6% 21.7% 23.5% Agree 52.1% 57.9% 66.3% 59.1% was 8,811. Table 3. Item 51, CRM training covered important issues in current line operations. Disagree 15.8% 12.8% 10.8% 13.2% 18.0% 18.2% 17.1% 17.7% Agree 66.2% 68.9% 72.1% 69.1% was 8,933. Table 4. Item 52, The objectives of CRM training were clear. Disagree 14.2% 11.9% 9.9% 12.0% 19.4% 18.4% 18.4% 18.8% Agree 66.4% 69.7% 71.8% 69.2% was 8,931. Table 5. Item 53, CRM training prepared me to fly the line. Disagree 20.6% 15.5% 14.0% 17.0% 27.1% 26.9% 24.3% 25.9% Agree 52.3% 57.6% 61.7% 57.1% was 8,901. Two additional items (items 70-71) focused on pilots opinions about various training issues. The respondents were instructed to answer these questions regardless of whether or not they received CRM training during their most recent training. Tables 6-7 present the results for items 70-71, respectively. Item 70 focused on the importance of CRM in the pilot training curriculum. This item is important because human error has been identified as a major cause of accidents (Boeing Commercial Airplane Group, 1998), and CRM training has been designed to address the role of human factors issues on the flight deck. A substantial majority of pilots recognize the value of CRM. Regardless of their training program, most pilots indicated that CRM is an important topic to include in training (86.2%). Few remained neutral on the topic (8.3%) or disagreed outright (5.5%). Table 6. Item 70, CRM is an important topic to include in training. Disagree 4.9% 7.7% 5.4% 5.5% 7.0% 11.0% 8.5% 8.3% Agree 88.1% 81.3% 86.2% 86.2% was 10,155. Item 71 focused on the extent to which CRM principles should be integrated throughout the training curriculum. Regardless of their training program, most pilots indicated that CRM should be integrated throughout the total training curriculum (82.6%). Again, few remained neutral on the topic (10.3%) or disagreed outright (7.1%).
7 Table 7. Item 71, CRM training should be integrated throughout the total training curriculum. Disagree 6.9% 9.3% 6.5% 7.1% 9.2% 14.1% 9.9% 10.3% Agree 83.8% 76.6% 83.6% 82.6% was 10,145. Survey items 50-53, which focused on pilots experiences in their training, clearly showed an advantage of CRM training conducted under AQP. By way of comparison, survey items 70-71, which focused on pilots opinions about CRM training, showed no discernable differences between AQP and Part 121 pilots. TESTS FOR GROUP DIFFERENCES In this section, we describe the procedures that we used to test for between-group differences on CRM Training. Specifically, we tested for differences between training programs (i.e., AQP, SVT, Part 121), training curricula (i.e., recurrent training vs. initial/other), seat positions (i.e., Captains vs. First Officers), and CRM training type (refer to Table 1). We started by conducting a factor analysis of survey items The results suggested that a single factor could explain approximately 75% of the total item variance. Moreover, all items loaded.84 or higher on this factor. We then conducted a reliability analysis of the 4 items. The results suggested that the reliability was high (α=.89). Combined, the results suggest that it was appropriate to average all 4 items to form a single scale. Tests for group differences yielded significant effects for training program and seat position, F (2,8959) =53.59, p. <.001 and F (1,8480) =65.02, p. <.001. The mean scores for Part 121, SVT, and AQP were 3.54, 3.63, and 3.76, respectively, while the mean scores for Captains and First Officers were 3.57 and 3.72, respectively. The results for training curricula were not statistically significant (F (1,8721) =.64, n.s.). The mean scores for Initial Qualification/Other and Recurrent Qualification were 3.64 and Although statistically significant effects for training program and seat position were identified, none of the mean differences exceeds our.5 scale point criterion for practical significance. Therefore, the extent to which the results for these analyses are meaningful is questionable. However, when taken in combination with the item-level percentages, it appears that pilots in AQP find their CRM training more useful than pilots in Part 121. This result may be a function of the fact that CRM training is more likely to be integrated throughout AQP training than in Part 121. Our analyses showed a significant effect for the type of CRM training that was offered (i.e., CRM taught as a separate course, CRM integrated throughout training, CRM taught both as a separate course and integrated throughout training), F (2,8639) =254.43, p. <.001. The mean scores for separate, integrated, and both separate/integrated were 3.28, 3.75, and 3.83, respectively. Although the mean differences between CRM taught as a separate course and the integrated and both options appear small (ranging between.47 and.53), the difference between taught as a separate course and both does exceed our.5 scale point criterion and the difference between taught as a separate course and integrated nearly meets our criterion. Therefore, we would consider these differences to have practical implications for how CRM training should be conducted. CONCLUSION The results suggest that most pilots regardless of whether they were trained under AQP, SVT, or Part 121 are satisfied with their CRM training and find it useful. However, AQP pilots did rate their CRM training as more useful that Part 121 pilots. Finally, the results suggest that training programs which integrate CRM principles throughout the entire curriculum are perceived more favorably than stand-alone CRM training courses. We remind the reader that in comparison to Part 121 training, AQP training programs are more likely to include: the integration of CRM concepts throughout the training curriculum; the requirement for pilots to demonstrate proficiency on technical and CRM skills in Line Operational Evaluation (LOE) scenarios prior to certification; the requirement that CRM evaluation focus on specific, observable behaviors that were derived from the task analysis, and; the requirement that check airmen receive special training in evaluating pilots CRM skills. We believe that these characteristics resulted in the higher ratings for AQP. However, because trainee reactions are only one measure of training s effectiveness, we refrain from making recommendations for practice. We feel that policy-related issues are best left to other groups that have more experience in this area. Nevertheless, we hope that these constituencies
8 will consider the survey results when updating their CRM training programs. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Funding for this research was provided through grant 99-G-048 from the FAA s Office of the Chief Scientific and Technical Advisor for Human Factors (AAR-100), Dr. David P. Baker, Principal Investigator. REFERENCES Alliger, G. M., Tannenbaum, S. I., Bennett, W. J., Traver, H., & Shotland, A. (1997). A meta-analysis of the relations among training criteria. Personnel Psychology, 50, Birnbach, R. A., & Longridge, T. M. (1993). The regulatory perspective. In E. L. Weiner, B. G. Kanki, & R. L. Helmreich (Eds.) Cockpit resource management (pp ). San Diego: Academic Press. Boeing Commercial Airplane Group. (1998). Statistical summary of commercial jet airplane accidents: Worldwide operations Seattle, WA: Author. Federal Aviation Administration. (1998). Advanced qualification program (Advisory Circular A). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. (1993). Crew resource management training. Advisory Circular A. Washington, DC: Author. Flin, R., & Martin, L. (2001). Behavioral markers for crew resource management: A review of current practice. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 11, Fowler, F. J. (1993). Newbury Park: Sage. Survey research methods. Helmreich, R. L., Merritt, A. C., & Wilhelm, J. A. (1999). The evolution of crew resource management training in commercial aviation. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 9(1), Kraiger, K., Ford, J. K., & Salas, E. (1993). Application of cognitive, skill-based, and affective theories of learning outcomes to new methods of training evaluation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, carriers, 1978 through Safety Study NTSB/SS- 94/01: Washington, DC: Author. National Transportation Safety Board. (1979). United Airlines, Inc., McDonnell-Douglas, DC-8-61, N8082U, Portland, Oregon. NTSB Report Number AAR Washington, DC: Author. Rea, L. M., & Parker, R. A. (1997). Designing and conducting survey research. San Francisco: Jossey- Bass. Salas, E., Burke, C. S., Bowers, C. A., & Wilson, K. A. (2001). Team training in the skies: Does resource management training really work? Human Factors, 43, Seamster, T. L., Boehm-Davis, D. A., Holt, R. W., & Schultz, K. (1998). Developing advanced crew resource management (ACRM) training: A training manual. Federal Aviation Administration, Office of the Chief Scientific and Technical Advisor for Human Factors, AAR-100. Washington, DC. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1996). Using multivariate statistics (3rd edition). New York: HarperCollins. Yammarino, F. J., Skinner, S. J., & Childers, T. L. (1991). Understanding mail survey response behavior: A meta-analysis. Public Opinion Quarterly, 55, CONTACT J. Matthew Beaubien, M.A. Research Scientist American Institutes for Research 1000 Thomas Jefferson Street, NW Washington, DC (phone) (fax) jbeaubien@air.org ( ) David P. Baker, Ph.D. Principal Research Scientist American Institutes for Research 1000 Thomas Jefferson Street, NW Washington, DC (phone) (fax) dbaker@air.org ( ) Lee, E. S., Forthofer, R. N., & Lorimer, R. J. (1989). Analyzing complex survey data. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. National Transportation Safety Board. (1994). A review of flightcrew-involved, major accidents of U.S. air
Provided by the author(s) and NUI Galway in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite the published version when available.
Provided by the author(s) and NUI Galway in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite the published version when available. Title Methods used to evaluate the effectiveness of CRM training: A survey
More informationA Framework for Understanding Crew Performance Assessment Issues
THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AVIATION PSYCHOLOGY, 12(3), 205 222 Copyright 2002, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. FORMAL PAPERS A Framework for Understanding Crew Performance Assessment Issues David P.
More informationMinistry of Civil Aviation Egyptian Advisory Circular Number 00-3 Egyptian Civil Aviation Authority. EAC No.00_3
Ministry of Civil Aviation Egyptian Advisory Circular Number 00-3 EAC No.00_3 Issue 5, Rev. 0 Dated May, 2012 Page 1 2B 1T11T Egyptian Advisory Circular Number 00-3 Ministry of Civil Aviation UTABLE of
More informationCrew Resource Management
Crew Resource Management DR TIMOTHY BRAKE, SENIOR MEDICAL OFFICER, UNITED CHRISTIAN HOSPITAL HONORARY SECRETARY HKSSIH Crew Resource Management 1 Crew Resource Management I am not an expert in CRM CRM
More informationBuilding Safety on the Three Cultures of Aviation
Building Safety on the Three Cultures of Aviation Robert L. Helmreich, Ph.D. Professor and Director University of Texas Aerospace Crew Research Project Austin, Texas, USA Effective efforts to achieve safety
More informationThe Life of Aviation Training
Chapter 1 The Life of Aviation Training Life is a culmination of the past, an awareness of the present, an indication of a future beyond knowledge, the quality that gives a touch of divinity to matter.
More informationCrew Resource Management (CRM)
King Schools Online Internet Learning Programs Crew Resource Management (CRM) Syllabus King Schools, Inc. 3840 Calle Fortunada San Diego, CA 92123 800-854-1001 (USA) 858-541-2200 (Worldwide) www.kingschoolsonline.com
More informationMODELS OF THREAT, ERROR, AND CRM IN FLIGHT OPERATIONS
MODELS OF THREAT, ERROR, AND CRM IN FLIGHT OPERATIONS Robert L. Helmreich 1, James R. Klinect, & John A. Wilhelm University of Texas Team Research Project The University of Texas at Austin Department of
More informationTitle & Image NATIONAL CIVIL AVIATION ADMINSTRATION. Advisory Circular
Title & Image NATIONAL CIVIL AVIATION ADMINSTRATION Advisory Circular Subject: CREW RESOURCE MANAGEMENT TRAINING PROGRAMME Issuing Office: [Identity of Office of NCAA issuing ] Document No.: [NCAA AC #]
More informationThe Development and Testing of NOTECHS: Non-Technical Skills for Airline Pilots
The Development and Testing of NOTECHS: Non-Technical Skills for Airline Pilots Rhona Flin Industrial Psychology Research Centre University of Aberdeen This paper provides back ground information on the
More informationSubject: CREW RESOURCE MANAGEMENT TRAINING PROGRAMME
ADVISORY CIRCULAR FOR AIR OPERATORS Subject: CREW RESOURCE MANAGEMENT TRAINING PROGRAMME Date: xx.xx.2013 Initiated By: Republic of Korea AC No: 1. PURPOSE This advisory circular (AC) presents guidelines
More informationNTSB Safety Forum on Professionalism in Aviation. Ab-Initio, University & Gateway Programs. Captain Gary Morrison. CAE Regulatory Affairs
NTSB Safety Forum on Professionalism in Aviation Ab-Initio, University & Gateway Programs Captain Gary Morrison CAE Regulatory Affairs Professionalism Professionalism can have a profound impact in only
More informationApril 28, 2012 IN SUPPORT WITH COMMENTS. To Whom it May Concern:
April 28, 2012 Docket Operations, M 30 U.S. Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE Room W12 140 West Building Ground Floor Washington, D.C. 20590 0001 Subject: ALPA Comments to Notice of
More informationDate: 6/23/06 Initiated by: AFS-230
Advisory Circular Subject: ADVANCED QUALIFICATION PROGRAM Date: 6/23/06 Initiated by: AFS-230 AC No: 120-54A 1. PURPOSE. This advisory circular (AC) provides the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) guidance
More informationTestimony of. Peter M. Bowler. President and CEO. American Eagle Airlines, Inc. Fort Worth, Texas
Testimony of Peter M. Bowler President and CEO American Eagle Airlines, Inc. Fort Worth, Texas Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation Subcommittee on Aviation Operations, Safety, and
More informationProvided by the author(s) and NUI Galway in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite the published version when available.
Provided by the author(s) and NUI Galway in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite the published version when available. Title Methods used to evaluate the effectiveness of CRM training: A literature
More informationCANADIAN AVIATION REGULATION ADVISORY COUNCIL (CARAC) NOTICE OF PROPOSED AMENDMENT (NPA) CREW RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CARAC ACTIVITY REPORTING NOTICE #: 2014-021 Contemporary Crew Resource Management (CRM) concepts and training programs have been proven by aviation human factors experts to be effective
More informationDeveloping Advanced Crew Resource Management (ACRM) Training: A Training Manual
Developing Advanced Crew Resource Management (ACRM) Training: A Training Manual BAGASOO August, 2009 COSCAP-BAG Office of the Technical Advisor for Human Factors, Abuja, Nigeria This Page Intentionally
More informationThe Evolution of Crew Resource Management Training in Commercial Aviation
The Evolution of Crew Resource Management Training in Commercial Aviation Robert L. Helmreich, Ashleigh C. Merritt & John A. Wilhelm Department of Psychology Aerospace Crew Research Project The University
More informationInternational Journal of Professional Aviation Training & Testing Research
International Journal of Professional Aviation Training & Testing Research Volume 1, Issue 1 2007 Article 3 CRM Vectors 2007 Theodore Beneigh Todd P. Hubbard Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Theodore.Beneigh@erau.edu
More informationMarch 21, 2011. Dear Ranking Member Costello:
U.S. Department of The Inspector General Office of Inspector General Transportation Washington, DC 20590 Office of the Secretary of Transportation March 21, 2011 The Honorable Jerry F. Costello Ranking
More information2. CANCELLATION. AC 120-51D, Crew Resource Management Training, dated 2/8/01, is cancelled.
Subject: CREW RESOURCE MANAGEMENT TRAINING Date: 1/22/04 Initiated By: AFS-210 AC No: 120-51E Change: 1. PURPOSE. This Advisory Circular (AC) presents guidelines for developing, implementing, reinforcing,
More informationIdea Search. The FAA seeks comments on proposals to enhance training and certification requirements for airline pilots. BY LINDA WERFELMAN
Idea Search The FAA seeks comments on proposals to enhance training and certification requirements for airline pilots. BY LINDA WERFELMAN In the aftermath of the fatal February 2009 crash of a Colgan Air
More informationDelivering the Promise to Healthcare: Improving Patient Safety and Quality of Care through aviation-related Crew Resource Management (CRM) Training
Delivering the Promise to Healthcare: Improving Patient Safety and Quality of Care through aviation-related Crew Resource Management (CRM) Training by Stephen M. Powell, Captain Delta Airlines Healthcare
More informationBehavioral Markers for Crew Resource Management: A Review of Current Practice
THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AVIATION PSYCHOLOGY, 11(1), 95 118 Copyright 2001, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. Behavioral Markers for Crew Resource Management: A Review of Current Practice Rhona Flin
More informationo Il'S~DU. Director, Flight Standards Service (AFS-l) SSISt t Chief Counsel for International Law, Legislation and Regulations (AG~ 0)
Memorandum Date: APR 29 2014 Federal Aviation Administration To: From: Prepared by: Subject: o Il'S~DU. Director, Flight Standards Service (AFS-l) ~ F 1/(~ ark."bury, ~ SSISt t Chief Counsel for International
More informationThe Evolution of Crew Resource Management Training in Commercial Aviation 1
The Evolution of Crew Resource Management Training in Commercial Aviation 1 Robert L. Helmreich, Ashleigh C. Merritt & John A. Wilhelm Department of Psychology Aerospace Crew Research Project The University
More informationCrew Resource Management in CRIOP from 2004
Crew Resource Management in CRIOP from 2004 Stig.O.Johnsen@sintef.no 1 Agenda Why CRM focus in CRIOP in 2004? Experiences of use Suggested use of CRM 1 Human Factors and CRM Human Factors (in short) a
More informationb) Describe the concept of ERROR CHAIN in aviation.
1. Crew Resource Management (CRM) was celebrated as the convergence ofa concept, an attitude and a practical approach to pilot training. a) What is the CRM all about and how this program could improve
More informationMauro Calvano. About Aviation Safety Management Systems
Mauro Calvano About Aviation Safety Management Systems January 2003 1 INTRODUCTION In order to be aware of the factors that are driving the accident rate during the last decade, we must identify the hazards
More informationMaryland State Firemen s Association Executive Committee Meeting December 5, 2009
Maryland State Firemen s Association Executive Committee Meeting December 5, 2009 Maryland State Police Aviation Command Update Presented by: Major Andrew J. (A. J.) McAndrew Hello, my name is Major A.
More informationfor teams in the offshore oil industry
for teams in the offshore oil industry Rhona H. Flin Professor of Industrial Psychology, Offshore Management Centre, Aberdeen Business School, The Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen, Scotland, UK 121 Introduction
More informationImportance of MRM Training
The pilot community has been aware of the importance of human factors for a long time. Since 1978 Cockpit Resource Management or Crew Resource Management (CRM) training has become a valuable asset to aviation
More informationDEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE COMMERCIAL AIR TRANSPORTATION QUALITY AND SAFETY REQUIREMENTS INTRODUCTION
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE COMMERCIAL AIR TRANSPORTATION QUALITY AND SAFETY REQUIREMENTS INTRODUCTION The Department of Defense (DOD), as a customer of airlift services, expects an air carrier or operator soliciting
More informationPolicy Regarding Datalink Communications Recording Requirements. AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of Transportation (DOT).
[4910-13] DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Parts 91, 121, 125, and 135 [Docket No. FAA 2015-0289] Policy Regarding Datalink Communications Recording Requirements AGENCY:
More informationFlight Operations Information Leaflet
State of Qatar Civil Aviation Authority Air Safety Department Flight Operations Information Leaflet FOIL No. 06/03 Issue No. 1 22 May 2003 CREW RESOURCE MANAGEMENT CABIN CREW 1 Introduction 1.1 In order
More informationTeam Training in the Skies: Does Crew Resource Management (CRM) Training Work? Dr. Eduardo Salas. C. Shawn Burke Clint A. Bowers Katherine A.
Team Training in the Skies: Does Crew Resource Management (CRM) Training Work? Eduardo Salas C. Shawn Burke Clint A. Bowers Katherine A. Wilson University of Central Florida Orlando, FL, USA Key Words:
More informationRunning Head: TAXONOMIES, REPORTING SYSTEMS, AND DATA COLLECTION TOOLS. A Review of Selected Aviation Human Factors Taxonomies,
Taxonomies, Reporting Systems, and Data Collection Tools 1 Running Head: TAXONOMIES, REPORTING SYSTEMS, AND DATA COLLECTION TOOLS A Review of Selected Aviation Human Factors Taxonomies, Accident/Incident
More informationSubject: Safety Management Systems for Date: 1/8/15 AC No: 120-92B Aviation Service Providers Initiated by: AFS-900 Change:
U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Advisory Circular Subject: Safety Management Systems for Date: 1/8/15 AC No: 120-92B Aviation Service Providers Initiated by: AFS-900 Change:
More informationAn Introduction to the Team Leadership Development Practice of Crew Resource Management
1 Running Head: CRM Leadership Development Practice: Developing a Model An Introduction to the Team Leadership Development Practice of Crew Resource Management in the Airline Industry and the Findings
More informationGaruda Indonesia Airlines CRM Training Program Overview. Capt. Prita Widjaja
Garuda Indonesia Airlines CRM Training Program Overview Capt. Prita Widjaja Aviation s Safety History & Human Factors Threats No defined recognition or training in human factors pre- 1980 Mishaps reach
More informationWhy assess operational behaviour? Seeing is Believing. Drift into Failure. The Problem with Learning. What to assess?
Why assess operational behaviour? Seeing is Believing Assessing CRM Competencies Dr. Nicklas Dahlstrom Human Factors Manager The Problem with Learning Drift into Failure Normal people doing normal work
More informationGAO. HUMAN FACTORS FAA s Guidance and Oversight of Pilot Crew Resource Management Training Can Be Improved. Report to Congressional Requesters
GAO United States General Accounting Office Report to Congressional Requesters November 1997 HUMAN FACTORS FAA s Guidance and Oversight of Pilot Crew Resource Management Training Can Be Improved GAO/RCED-98-7
More informationFederal Aviation Administration. Kathy Abbott and Robert Burke Federal Aviation Administration 4 February 2015
Operational Use of Flight Path Management Systems: Status of Recommendations of the Performance-Based Operations Aviation Rulemaking Committee (PARC)/ Commercial Aviation Safety Team (CAST) Flight Deck
More informationData Management Guide
Advanced Qualification Program Data Management Guide Produced by the Air Transport Association s Data Management Focus Group Second Release 5/12/98 TWA RPO This document supports the Advanced Qualification
More informationHuman variability: Two aspects (Reason, 2000)
Safe and Efficient Job Performance Non-Technical Skills in Industry and Medicine Rhona Flin Industrial Psychology Research Centre The Royal College of Pathologists, London, 28 November, 2013 Latent Conditions
More informationNational Transportation Safety Board Washington, D.C. 20594 Safety Recommendation
National Transportation Safety Board Washington, D.C. 20594 Safety Recommendation Honorable Donald D. Engen Administrator Federal Aviation Administration Washington, D.C. 20594 Date: March 4, 198G In reply
More informationCAUSES OF AIRCRAFT ACCIDENTS
CAUSES OF AIRCRAFT ACCIDENTS 10 th Week (9.00 am 10.30 am) 3 rd Oct 2009 (Friday) COURSE : DIPLOMA IN AVIATION MANAGEMENT MODULE : AVIATION SAFETY AND SECURITY (AVS 2104) 1 LEARNING OBJECTIVES Understand
More informationEMBARGOED UNTIL 1:00PM EST Monday, February 11, 2013
Executive Summary IPA Comments to FAA Docket on Interim Supplemental Regulatory Impact Analysis for Cargo Exclusion from Part 117 Duty and Rest Rules Summary: Due to intensive lobbying efforts by the air
More informationGeneral... 1. Applicability... 1 Cancellation... 1 References... 1 Effective Date... 1 Background...1. Components of CRM... 3
AC AOC-34( (0) 17 April 2014 Advisory Circular TRAINING PROGRAMME ON CREW RESOURCE MANAGEMENT General... 1 Purpose... 1 Applicability... 1 Cancellation... 1 References... 1 Effective Date... 1 Background....1
More informationThreat & Error Mgt Training at JetBlue Airways. Captain Chris Reed Manager, AQP
Threat & Error Mgt Training at JetBlue Airways Captain Chris Reed Manager, AQP Outline What s TEM at JetBlue? TEM versus CRM how we think about it Description of TEM courses to we teach Overview of our
More informationTraining. 2015 Pilot & Technician Outlook. 2015 Pilot & Technician Outlook 1
2015 Pilot & Technician Outlook 1 Pilot & Technician Outlook As global economies expand and airlines take delivery of tens of thousands of new commercial jetliners over the next 20 years, there is and
More informationNOTECHS: Non-technical skill evaluation in JAR-FCL
NOTECHS: Non-technical skill evaluation in JAR-FCL J.A.G. van Avermaete 07 - Evaluating CRM 25 NOTECHS: Non-technical skill evaluation in JAR-FCL J.A.G. van Avermaete This investigation has been carried
More informationMaritime Resource Management
Maritime Resource Management John Garner, Fleet Director Interferry Conference Vancouver 7 th October 2014 Key issues in the Human Element - Safety culture - Just culture - Learning culture driving continuous
More informationThe Development Process of a CRM Course with Computer Based Training Approach
Paper presented at Tenth International Symposium on Aviation Psychology, Columbus, Ohio, USA, May 3-6 1999. The Development Process of a CRM Course with Computer Based Training Approach A. Bellorini, M.
More informationGAO MILITARY AIRLIFT. DOD Should Take Steps to Strengthen Management of the Civil Reserve Air Fleet Program. Report to Congressional Committees
GAO United States Government Accountability Office Report to Congressional Committees September 2009 MILITARY AIRLIFT DOD Should Take Steps to Strengthen Management of the Civil Reserve Air Fleet Program
More informationGAO AVIATION SAFETY. FAA s Use of Emergency Orders to Revoke or Suspend Operating Certificates
GAO United States General Accounting Office Testimony Before the Subcommittee on Aviation, Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, House of Representatives For Release on Delivery Expected at 9:30
More informationTHE FLIGHT OPTIONS APPROACH TO SAFETY. Fractional Membership Jet Card
THE FLIGHT OPTIONS APPROACH TO SAFETY Fractional Membership Jet Card A s the premier provider of private jet travel, Flight Options number one priority is the safety of our customers and our employees.
More informationThe Effects of Joint Flight Attendant. and Flight Crew CRM Training. Programmes on Intergroup. Teamwork and Communication
The Effects of Joint Flight Attendant and Flight Crew CRM Training Programmes on Intergroup Teamwork and Communication Jane Rosemary Ford A thesis submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the
More informationDRAFT. Advisory Circular. AC 121A-09(0) December 2003 HUMAN FACTORS AND CREW RESOURCE MANAGEMENT TRAINING
Advisory Circular AC 121A-09(0) December 2003 HUMAN FACTORS AND CREW RESOURCE MANAGEMENT TRAINING CONTENTS 1. References 2. Purpose 3. Status of this AC 4. Introduction 5. Definitions 6. CRM Training Course
More informationSAFETY, SECURITY, AND OPERATIONAL EXCELLENCE
SAFETY, SECURITY, AND OPERATIONAL EXCELLENCE OUR COMMITMENT TO SAFETY INDUSTRY-LEADING SAFETY PROGRAMS Executive Jet Management (EJM) is committed to providing the highest level of safety and security
More informationCAE-APS Upset Prevention & Recovery Training
CAE-APS Upset Prevention & Recovery Training ENHANCING SAFETY & EFFICIENCY OF AIR TRANSPORTATION Together, CAE and Aviation Performance Solutions (APS) provide comprehensive Upset Prevention & Recovery
More informationThe Benefits of a Safety Studies Program to Proactively Promote Aviation Safety
The Benefits of a Safety Studies Program to Proactively Promote Aviation Safety By Joseph M. Kolly and Loren S. Groff National Transportation Safety Board Joseph M. Kolly is Director of NTSB s Office of
More informationSafety Risk. Aligning perception with reality
Safety Risk Aligning perception with reality Operating instructions Perception a person s recognition of the nature and degree of risk affecting an activity Reality accurate assessment of risk based on
More informationCompetency-Based. The time is now! ICAO NGAP March 2010. Global Head of MPL, Ab-Initio Initiatives Regulatory Affairs
Competency-Based Training Solutions The time is now! ICAO NGAP March 2010 Capt Gary Morrison Capt. Gary Morrison Global Head of MPL, Ab-Initio Initiatives Regulatory Affairs Topics Where are we today?
More informationHow To Write A Line Operation Safety Audit
LINE OPERATION SAFETY AUDITS (LOSA): DEFINITION AND OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS James Klinect, Patrick Murray, Ashleigh Merritt and Robert Helmreich The University of Texas Human Factors Research Project
More informationNote are at issue. 2 Standard parts, raw material and consumables
Delivered by email; read receipt requested to: John Duncan Director Flight Standards Service Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue SW Washington, DC 20591-0001 john.s.duncan@faa.gov Ricardo
More informationAirline Accident - A Case Study on the Sports Industry
303 THE IMPACT ON EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY OF A FATAL AIRLINE ACCIDENT: A CASE STUDY Tim Brady Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University United States of America Abstract This is a study of how a virtual technology
More informationAdvisory Circular. d. Special Federal Aviation Regulation 58 (SFAR 58), Advanced Qualification Program.
Q U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Advisory Circular Subject: LINE OPERATIONAL Date: 9/27/04 AC No: 120-35C SIMULATIONS: LINE ORIENTED Initiated By: AFS-230 Change: FLIGHT
More informationUNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION WASHINGTON, DC 20591
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION WASHINGTON, DC 20591 Exemption No. 10957 In the matter of the petition of EMBRY-RIDDLE AERONAUTICAL UNIVERSITY Regulatory
More informationPosition Classification Standard for Aviation Safety Series, GS-1825. Table of Contents
Position Classification Standard for Aviation Safety Series, GS-1825 Table of Contents SERIES DEFINITION... 2 OCCUPATIONAL INFORMATION... 2 EXCLUSIONS... 3 TITLES AND SPECIALIZATIONS... 4 CLASSIFICATION
More informationImproving the Construct Validity of. Line Operational Simulation (LOS) Ratings: Lessons Learned from the Assessment Center. J.
Construct Validity of LOS Ratings 1 Running Head: CONSTRUCT VALIDITY OF LOS RATINGS Improving the Construct Validity of Line Operational Simulation (LOS) Ratings: Lessons Learned from the Assessment Center
More information1. History of NASS Organizational Climate Surveys
ORGANIZATIONAL CLIMATE SURVEYS AT THE NATIONAL AGRICULTURAL STATISTICS SERVICE Daniel G. Beckler and Christina S. Messer, National Agricultural Statistics Service Daniel G. Beckler, USDA, NASS, 1400 Independence
More informationCRM Training. UK AltMOC. 3.1 Acceptable Means of Compliance (AMC) and Guidance Material (GM) (Draft EASA Decisions)
UK CAA Flight Operations CRM Training UK AltMOC 3.1 Acceptable Means of Compliance (AMC) and Guidance Material (GM) (Draft EASA Decisions) 3.1.2 Air operations Decision 2012/017/R (Part-ORO) SUBPART FC
More informationMPL. 15POS03 17 June 2014. Introduction. MPL Workshop Conclusions. Basic Flying Skills. Airmanship CRM
15POS03 17 June 2014 Introduction MPL Worldwide, in 2014, there are more than 22 certified MPL training programmes graduating new co-pilots who have earned the Multi-Crew Pilot License (MPL). These pilots
More informationADVISORY CIRCULAR AC-12-003
THE BAHAMAS CIVIL AVIATION DEPARTMENT ADVISORY CIRCULAR AC-12-003 GUIDANCE FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF AN INTEGRATED FLIGHT SAFETY DOCUMENTS SYSTEM SECTION 1 POLICY & GENERAL INFORMATION 1.1 PURPOSE This advisory
More informationFAA s Progress and Challenges in Integrating Unmanned Aircraft Systems into the National Airspace System
Before the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure Subcommittee on Aviation United States House of Representatives For Release on Delivery Expected at 10:00 a.m. EDT Wednesday Dec. 10, 2014 CC-2015-002
More informationComposition Senior Technical Fellows 61 Technical Fellows 522 Associate Technical Fellows 1,575
Fact Sheet Boeing Commercial Airplanes P.O. Box 3707 MC 03-XW Seattle, Washington 98124-2207 www.boeing.com One Boeing, One Team: Collaboration Drives Excellence, Results Boeing is the world s largest
More informationORGANISATIONAL DIAGNOSIS QUESTIONNAIRE (ODQ)
ORGANISATIONAL DIAGNOSIS QUESTIONNAIRE (ODQ) Robert C. Preziosi Both internal and external organization development (OD) consultants at some point in the consulting process must address the question of
More informationInstitute for Financial Literacy
Institute for Financial Literacy Financial Certification: A Study of the Impact on Professionals' Financial Literacy Levels and Competency A Report Published by the Institute for Financial Literacy, Inc.
More informationCommunity Colleges. Measuring Internationalization. AMERICAN COUNCIL ON EDUCATION The Unifying Voice for Higher Education
Measuring Internationalization at Community Colleges Funded by the Ford Foundation AMERICAN COUNCIL ON EDUCATION The Unifying Voice for Higher Education Center for Institutional and International Initiatives
More informationUpdate on Current Corporate Aviation Accidents. Robert L. Sumwalt NTSB Board Member April 20, 2011
Update on Current Corporate Aviation Accidents Robert L. Sumwalt NTSB Board Member April 20, 2011 The Board The investigators Corporate Aviation / Part 135 Fatal Accidents since last CASS Accident Date
More informationPHILIPPA GANDER, PH.D.
Comment on Mitigation Strategies PHILIPPA GANDER, PH.D. Massey University, New Zealand June 19, 2008: Discussion Groups Session Good morning, and thank you for still being awake to those of you who are.
More informationIf you look into the cockpit of. Part 3 The Future of FITS. by Thomas Glista
Mario Toscano photo Part 3 The Future of FITS by Thomas Glista This is the third and last in a series of articles introducing the FAA/Industry Training Standards (FITS) Program. The first article focused
More informationInFO Information for Operators
InFO Information for Operators U.S. Department InFO 07015 of Transportation DATE: 7/3/2007 Federal Aviation Administration Flight Standards Service Washington, DC http://www.faa.gov/other_visit/aviation_industry/airline_operators/airline_safety/info
More informationBENEFITS ADMINISTRATION THE IMPACT OF OUTSOURCING ON THE TOTAL COST OF OWNERSHIP
Helping Companies Optimize Their HR/Benefits/Payroll Service Partnerships WHITE PAPER BENEFITS ADMINISTRATION THE IMPACT OF OUTSOURCING ON THE TOTAL COST OF OWNERSHIP Sponsored by ADP Donald Glade December
More informationTRAINING GROUP EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PLANNED DELIVERABLES, TIMELINE AND OPEN ISSUES ICATEE, LONDON, JUNE 7-8 2010
TRAINING GROUP EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PLANNED DELIVERABLES, TIMELINE AND OPEN ISSUES ICATEE, LONDON, JUNE 7-8 2010 PURPOSE OF THIS DOCUMENT: This document is to supplement and assist ICATEE members in preparing
More informationTraining. 2014 Pilot & Technician Outlook. 2014 Pilot & Technician Outlook 1
2014 Pilot & Technician Outlook 2014 Pilot & Technician Outlook 1 Pilot & Technician Outlook As global economies expand and airlines take delivery of tens of thousands of new commercial jetliners over
More informationAviation Information Management
Aviation Information Management From Documents to Data Edited by Thomas L. Seamster & Barbara G. Kanki CONTENTS: Introduction: Context of aviation operational information, Thomas L. Seamster & Norman E.
More informationAviation Academy MAGNET PROGRAM Course Guide
DENBIGH HIGH SCHOOL & Aviation Academy MAGNET PROGRAM Course Guide Aviation Academy 902-B Bland Blvd. Newport News, VA 23602 757-886-2745 http://avi.nn.k12.va.us Dr. Aaron L. Smith Program Director aaron.smith@nn.k12.va.us
More informationCustomer Satisfaction Survey of Indian Tribal Governments. Office of Indian Tribal Governments Tax Exempt Government Entities Division
Customer Satisfaction Survey of Indian Tribal Governments Office of Indian Tribal Governments Tax Exempt Government Entities Division March 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS 2011 ITG CUSTOMER SATISFACTION SURVEY...
More informationNotice of Proposed Amendment 2014-17. Crew resource management (CRM) training
European Aviation Safety Agency Rulemaking Directorate Notice of Proposed Amendment 2014-17 Crew resource management (CRM) training RMT.0411 (OPS.094) 26.6.2014 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This Notice of Proposed
More informationYear 2 Evaluation of the Connecticut Clean Energy Climate Solutions Project
Year 2 Evaluation of the Connecticut Clean Energy Climate Solutions Project Submitted to Clean Air-Cool Planet Prepared by Rucha Londhe, Ph.D. Irene F. Goodman, Ed.D. Margaret Tiedemann, B.A. October 2008
More informationThe Art of Aeronautical Decision-Making Course Table of Contents
Federal Aviation Administration The Art of Aeronautical Decision-Making Course Table of Contents Introduction Chapter 1 Chapter 2 Chapter 3 Chapter 4 Chapter 5 Chapter 6 Chapter 7 What is ADM? 3-P Model
More informationDesigning & Conducting Survey Research
Designing & Conducting Survey Research Santa Monica College Fall 2011 Presented by: Hannah Alford, Director Office of Institutional Research 1 Workshop Overview Part I: Overview of Survey Method Paper/Pencil
More informationPutting Reliable Health Care Performance Measurement Systems into Practice
An NCQA Issue Brief 2000 L Street, NW Washington, DC 20036 888-275-7585 www.ncqa.org Putting Reliable Health Care Performance Measurement Systems into Practice By Joachim Roski, PhD MPH; Vice President,
More informationUsing Incident Investigation Tools Proactively for Incident Prevention.
Using Incident Investigation Tools Proactively for Incident Prevention. Joanne De Landre General Manager, Safety Wise Solutions ANZSASI 2006 - Melbourne Introduction Reducing Error Investigative Tools
More information[Docket No. FAA-2014-0428; Directorate Identifier 2014-NM-067-AD; Amendment 39-18205; AD 2015-14-07]
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 136 (Thursday, July 16, 2015)] [Rules and Regulations] [Pages 42014-42018] From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov] [FR Doc
More informationCapstone Suggestions for Survey Development for Research Purposes
Capstone Suggestions for Survey Development for Research Purposes 1. Begin by listing the questions you would like to answer with the survey. These questions will be relatively broad and should be based
More information