How To Impeach A Witness In A Court Case
|
|
- Clyde Harrison
- 3 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 I need a memo, quick! : Using Short, Timed Memos To Motivate Student Learning Laurel Currie Oates Mimi Samuel Seattle University School of Law Western Regional Legal Writing Conference September 20, 2014
2 SAMPLE 1 Legal Writing I Spring 2014 Assignment Sheet: Memo 6 (In-Class Research and Writing Exam) Assignment: On Monday, April 14, 2014, you will take an in-class research and writing exam (Memo 6). The exam will consist of one question for you to research and answer during class. The exam is open book: You may bring any materials that you wish with you, and you may use feebased and free internet sites in your research. In particular, I suggest that you bring your Bluebook and Washington Style Sheet. You may not, however, contact any other person, electronically or otherwise, during the exam. Practice Questions: In class on Wednesday, April 9, we will walk through the research and analysis of two sample questions. I will provide sample answers for these questions. In addition, I will post one more question and sample answer for you to use as a practice test. The sample answers to the practice questions are representative of the length and depth of analysis that would receive an A on the in-class exam. Grading: The exam will be graded on (1) the thoroughness of the research, (2) the quality of the analysis, and (2) the presentation of the answer including writing style and citation. The grade on this memo constitutes 5% of your course grade. 2
3 SAMPLE 1 Legal Writing I Spring 2014 Name: Memo 6: In Class Research Exam Instructions: Research the questions set out below and send me an e-memo with the answers. You may use any resources that you wish; however, you may not contact any other person for assistance. me your e-memo (msamuel@seattleu.edu) no later than the end of class today. Please compose your e-memo as a Word document and send it as an attachment. In addition, please return this sheet to me after you have submitted your e-memo. Assignment: We are representing Olga Kleyner, a 16-year-old who has been charged with simple assault in juvenile court in Cowlitz County. Her trial is coming up next month. Her mother, who is not a witness in the case, is hearing impaired. She wants to attend the trial and is concerned that she will not be able to follow the proceedings without a sign language interpreter. Would you please check the RCW as well state and local court rules to determine whether we can have a sign language interpreter appointed for Ms. Kleyner s mother during the trial. If so, please determine (1) how far in advance we need to request the interpreter and if there are any special procedures we need to follow, and (2) whether she has to pay for the interpreter. 3
4 SAMPLE 1 SAMPLE ANSWER You have asked me to determine whether we can have a sign language interpreter appointed for Ms. Kleyner s mother during the trial. Specifically, you have asked me to determine (1) how far in advance we need to request the interpreter and if there are any special procedures we need to follow, and (2) whether she has to pay for the interpreter. A sign language interpreter may be appointed for Ms. Kleyner s mother pursuant to RCW , which provides that [i]f the parent of a juvenile brought before a court is hearing, the appointing authority shall appoint and pay for a qualified interpreter to interpret the proceedings. RCW (2). Although the state court rules provide for the use of interpreters for hearing impaired individuals, they do not provide any specific procedures. GR 11. Therefore, we must look to the Cowlitz County Local Rules. Moreover, the Juvenile Court State Rules state that the Superior Court rules will govern when they are not inconsistent with relevant statutes or the Juvenile Court Rules. JuCR 1.4. In order to request for an interpreter in Cowlitz County, we must submit a written request to the Interpreter Coordinator at least two weeks in advance. CCLAR 11(a). Alternatively, the request could be sent via . In our request, we must include the date, time, estimated length, and type of hearing. CCLAR 11(b). Moreover, Ms. Kleyner s mother would not have to pay for the interpreter. As mentioned above, the RCW provides that the appointing authority must pay for the interpreter. RCW (2). State and local rules do not vary this statute. If you have any further questions or would like me to do additional research, please let me know. 4
5 SAMPLE 2 Professor Laurel Currie Oates Legal Writing I Spring 2014 Samples from 2014 In-Class Research and Writing Assignment I am trying to whether we should call Amanda Nickerson as a witness is our upcoming products liability trial. Unfortunately, she has several prior convictions and, if I am remembering correctly, some but not all prior convictions can be used to impeach the credibility of a witness. Her prior convictions are as follows: 1999: Assault in the second degree under RCW 9A (Class B felony punishable by no more than 10 years in prison) 2006: DUI conviction under RCW (gross misdemeanor punishable by no more than 364 days in jail.) 2009: Possession of stolen property (third degree) conviction under RCW 9A (gross misdemeanor punishable by no more than 364 days in jail.) Ms. Nickerson was over the 18 when she committed the offenses. However, she has not been required to serve any jail time. Instead, she received suspended sentences and performed community service. Can you please check the Washington Rules of Evidence and determine whether any of these prior convictions can be used to impeach Ms. Nickerson s credibility as a witness. I need just a short memo. The instructions are on the back of this page.
6 SAMPLE 2 Instructions: 1. In researching this question, you can use free sources, Westlaw, WestlawNext, Lexis, or Lexis Advance. In writing the memo, you may refer to your Handbook, your Bluebook, and your Washington Style Sheet. However, you may not consult with any person, either face to face or through any media. Your work must be your own. 2. In grading your memo, I will be looking to see if you found the applicable rule, whether you read that rule correctly, whether you correctly applied the rule to the facts of your case, and whether you presented your analysis clearly and concisely using correct grammar and punctuation. You should also use the correct citation form for your citations. In citing to the evidence rules, use ER [rule number], and use the Washington rules in citing to cases and the RCW. 3. Use the typical format for an e-memo. Include an introductory paragraph followed by your analysis. Do not include a separate statement of facts. 4. There is no word limit. However, be concise. 5. me your memo no later than 3:50 p.m. on Thursday, March 7,
7 SAMPLE 2 Example 1: Student Examples You have asked me to determine whether Amanda Nickerson s prior convictions can be used to impeach her credibility as a witness under the Washington Rules of Evidence. After researching the relevant law, I have determined that Ms. Nickerson s third degree possession charge would likely be admissible. Her other two charges would likely be barred. The Washington Rules of Evidence allow for two ways in which evidence of a prior conviction may be used to impeach a witness: (1) if the crime was punishable by death or more than one year in prison and the court determines that the probative value of admitting this evidence outweighs the prejudice of the party against whom the evidence is offered; or (2) if the crime involved dishonesty or false statement, regardless of the punishment. ER 609(a). However, evidence of a conviction is not admissible if more than 10 years has passed since the conviction unless the court determines that the probative value of the conviction outweighs any prejudicial effects in the pursuit of justice. ER 609(b). Additionally, opposing counsel must give sufficient advance notice that it intends on using such evidence so that fair notice is given to contest the use of such evidence. Id. Accordingly, although Ms. Nickerson s assault conviction could be punishable by more than one year in prison, because it is well over 10 years old, it will be inadmissible. Courts have concluded that the older a conviction is, the less probative it is of the witness credibility. See e.g. State v. Gomez, 75 Wn. App. 648, 652, 880 P.2d 65 (1994). In order to admit this conviction, the court would balance the following six-factors to determine the probative value: (1) the length of the defendant's criminal record; (2) remoteness of the prior conviction; (3) nature of the prior crime; (4) the age and circumstances of the defendant; (5) centrality of the credibility issue; and (6) the impeachment value of the prior crime. State v. Ong, 153 Wn. App. 1016, pinpoint, add the parallel cite. (2009). As a result, it is likely that the assault will not be admissible because the conviction is 14 years old, it was Ms. Nickerson s only violent felony, and it is not central to her credibility as a witness. Second, although both the DUI and the possession convictions fall within the 10-year time limitation, it does not automatically follow that they are admissible. See Gomez, 75 Wn. App at 652. Instead, the court will generally exclude this evidence if the substance of the conviction has little bearing on the witness credibility. Id. As a result, because each of these convictions do not meet the requirement of ER 609(a)(1), the focus turns to whether the crime involved dishonesty or a false statement. Dishonesty is defined as the act or practice of telling a lie, or of cheating, deceiving, and stealing. State v. McKinsey, 116 Wn. 2d 911, 914, 810 P.2d 907 (1991). It is reasonable to conclude that the DUI conviction does not entail dishonesty as defined by the courts; however, a conviction for possession of stolen property does involve dishonesty and is admissible. Id. at 913. Although McKinsey dealt with a conviction of first-degree possession of stolen property, the court explicitly overruled a prior case that held third-degree possession as inadmissible. See State v. Zibell, 32 Wn. App. 158, 165, 646 P.2d 154 (1982), overruled by McKinsey, 116 Wn. 2d at
8 SAMPLE 2 As a result, it is likely that Ms. Nickerson s prior third degree possession charge could be admitted because the courts consider it to involve dishonesty and it is within the 10 year time period. Example 2: TO: Supervising Attorney FROM: RE: Nickerson witness credibility You have asked me to research the Washington Rules of Evidence to determine whether any of Amanda Nickerson s three prior convictions could be used to impeach her credibility as a witness. Neither of Ms. Nickerson s first two convictions could be used to impeach her credibility; however, her conviction for possession of stolen property could be used. Rule ER 609 Impeachment by Evidence of Conviction of Crime The rule that governs the impeachment of a witness credibility is ER 609, which states that evidence that a witness has committed a crime can be admitted: ER 609(a). if the crime (1) was punishable by death or imprisonment in excess of 1 year under the law under which the witness was convicted, and the court determines that the probative value of admitting this evidence outweighs the prejudice to the party against whom the evidence is offered, or (2) involved dishonesty or false statement, regardless of the punishment. However, evidence of a conviction is not admissible if more than 10 years has elapsed since the time of conviction or since release from imprisonment (whichever is longer). ER 609(b). Therefore, to be admissible, the conviction in question must have occurred within the last 10 years and must have been punishable by imprisonment in excess of 1 year, or the conviction must have involved dishonesty or false statement Assault in the second degree conviction Ms. Nickerson s conviction for second degree assault in 1999 is a conviction that is punishable by no more than 10 years in prison. RCW 9A This would meet the first requirement of ER 609(a); however, the conviction is more than ten years old. Because Ms. Nickerson had her sentence suspended, she was never released from confinement, so only the date of her conviction applies for the 10 year time limit. See ER 609(b). Therefore, the assault conviction would only be admissible if the court determines, in the interests of justice, that the probative value of the conviction supported by specific facts and circumstances substantially outweighs its prejudicial effect. Id. In State v. Gomez, the Court states that the factors that a trial court are required to balance before admitting prior convictions are (1) the length of the defendant's criminal record; (2) the remoteness of the prior conviction; (3) the nature of the prior crime(s); (4) the age and circumstances of the defendant; (5) the centrality of the credibility issue; and (6) the impeachment value of the prior crime(s). State v. Gomez, 75 Wn. App. 8
9 SAMPLE 2 648, , 880 P.2d 65, 67 (1994). Because Ms. Nickerson s criminal record is not long, her conviction for assault was over 10 years ago, and the fact that assault has little to do with a products liability trial, it is likely that Ms. Nickerson s assault conviction could not be used to impeach Ms. Nickerson s credibility DUI Conviction Ms. Nickerson s DUI conviction in 2006 is punishable by no more than 364 days in jail. RCW With a punishment of less than 1 year in jail, this conviction fails the first part of the ER 609(a) test. A DUI conviction also does not involve dishonesty or false statement; therefore, it would not meet the second part of the test, making it so that Ms. Nickerson s DUI conviction could not be used to impeach her credibility Possession of Stolen Property Conviction The punishment for a third degree possession of stolen property conviction is also less than one year. See RCW 9A However, in State v. McKinsey, the Court held that a possession of stolen property conviction (regardless of the degree) involves dishonesty. State v. McKinsey, 116 Wn.2d 911, 913, 810 P.2d 907, 909 (1991). This case specifically overruled another case where third degree possession of stolen property was found not to involve dishonesty. Id. at 914. Since her possession of stolen property conviction involves dishonesty, Ms. Nickerson s conviction in 2009 could be used to impeach her credibility as a witness. Conclusion Ms. Nickerson s 1999 assault conviction could not be used to impeach her credibility as a witness because it does not fall within the 10 year time limit. Ms. Nickerson s 2006 DUI conviction was not punishable by more than 1 year in jail, which made it inadmissible. However, because the 2009 conviction of possession of stolen property involves dishonesty, it will likely be admissible as evidence against Ms. Nickerson s credibility as a witness. If you have any additional question, or need me to do further research, please let me know. Example 3: TO: Supervising Attorney FROM: Intern RE: Amanda Nickerson, Admissibility of Prior Convictions for Purpose of Impeachment You have asked me to determine whether any of Ms. Nickerson s prior convictions can be used to impeach her credibility as a witness in our upcoming products liability trial. I have determined that Ms. Nickerson s conviction for the possession of stolen property is admissible for purposes of impeachment. The Washington Rules of Evidence state that, for the purpose of attacking the credibility of a witness in a civil case, evidence of a prior criminal conviction can be used to impeach the credibility of a witness if the information is elicited from the witness or established by public record during examination of the witness. ER 609(a). However, evidence of a prior conviction 9
10 SAMPLE 2 can only be used for the purpose of impeachment only if [T]he crime (1) was punishable by death or imprisonment in excess of 1 year under the law under which the witness was convicted, and the court determines that the probative value of admitting this evidence outweighs the prejudice to the party against whom the evidence is offered, or (2) involved dishonesty or false statement, regardless of the punishment. ER 609(a)(1) (2). The Washington Rules of Evidence have also imposed a time limit on the admissibility of criminal convictions for the purposes of impeachment of a witness. The Rules of Evidence declare: [E]vidence of a conviction under this rule is not admissible if a period of more than 10 years has elapsed since the date of the conviction or of the release of the witness from the confinement imposed for that conviction, whichever is the later date, unless the court determines, in the interests of justice, that the probative value of the conviction supported by specific facts and circumstances substantially outweighs its prejudicial effect. ER 609(b). 1. Assault Charge Ms. Nickerson s assault charge was an offense punishable by more than one year; assault in the second degree is punishable by no more than ten years in prison. RCW 9A Ms. Nickerson s assault conviction occurred more than ten years ago and she did not serve any jail time; therefore, evidence of the conviction is not admissible unless the court determines that the probative value of the conviction substantially outweighs the prejudicial effect of admitting the evidence. The court would most likely not admit evidence of Ms. Nickerson s prior assault conviction. The probative value of Ms. Nickerson s prior assault conviction is likely small for the purposes of a products liability trial; however, it could have a large prejudicial effect on Ms. Nickerson s case. 2. DUI Conviction Ms. Nickerson s DUI conviction is not admissible for the purposes of impeachment. The conviction was not punishable by more than one year and the conviction did not involve dishonesty or false statement. 3. Possession of Stolen Property Ms. Nickerson s conviction of stolen property in 2009 could be used to impeach her credibility. Although Ms. Nickerson s conviction for possession of stolen property was not punishable by 10
11 SAMPLE 2 more than one year in jail, it is considered a crime involving dishonesty or false statement. The court has held that the possession of stolen property is per se admissible for impeachment purposes under ER 609(a)(2) as it a crime of dishonesty. State v. McKinsey, 116 Wn.2d 911, 912, 801 P.2d 908 (1991). Finally, Ms. Nickerson s possession of stolen property conviction occurred within the last ten years, so it is not barred from admission under the Rules of Evidence. In conclusion, Ms. Nickerson s assault charge and DUI charge are likely not admissible in the upcoming products liability trial. However, Ms. Nickerson s possession of stolen property conviction is likely admissible. The rule states that information regarding a witness s prior conviction is admissible if it is elicited from the witness or established by public record during examination of the witness. If it is damaging to our case to have information regarding Ms. Nickerson s possession of stolen property charge revealed, it is possible that we could have Ms. Nickerson refrain from taking the stand during trial. Please let me know if you have any additional questions or concerns. 11
12 SAMPLE 3 TO: FROM: Extern Supervising Attorney, Public Defender s Office DATE: March 31, 2014 RE: Access devices We represent Ms. Carol Reem, who has been charged with three counts of Possession of Stolen Property in the Second Degree under RCW 9A Please assume the following facts. At 11:45 p.m. on March 21, 2014, Ms. Carol Reem was arrested on an outstanding warrant on an unrelated charge. During a valid search incident to the arrest, the police found the following items in Ms. Reem s coat pocket: Two Visa cards. One card had the name Courtney Lee on the front of the card, and the other card had the name Kerry Harrison. Both cards had an activation sticker on the front. Neither card was signed. A AAA membership card in Ms. Lee s name. The police contacted the credit card company and learned that the cards were replacement cards. According the credit card company, the cards could only have been activated via phone calls placed from Ms. Lee s and Ms. Harrison s home phone numbers. Neither of the cards had been activated. Both Ms. Lee and Ms. Harrison told the police that they had ordered replacement cards but had never received those cards. Neither Ms. Lee nor Ms. Harrison had reported the replacement cards as missing or stolen or de-activated or cancelled their accounts. There is no evidence that the AAA card had been used. The police believe that all three cards were stolen from unlocked mailboxes. Can you please determine whether the credit cards and the AAA card are access devices as that term is defined in 9A (1)? At this point, do not research or discuss any of the other elements of the crime or any other issues.
13 SAMPLE 3 To: Laurel Oates, Supervising Attorney From: Date: March 31, 2014 Re: Carol Reem Access Devices Defined per RCW 9A (1) You have asked me to determine whether credit cards that have not been activated and a AAA membership card belonging to others are access devices as defined by RCW 9A (1). It is likely that a court will find that these items are access devices. A person is guilty of Possession of Stolen Property in the Second Degree if [h]e or she is possess a stolen access device. RCW 9A (1)(c). An access device is defined in part as any card, plate, code, account number, or other means of account access that can be used alone or in conjunction with another access device to obtain money, goods, services, or anything else of value. RCW 9A (1). Non-Activated Credit Cards. While it may be a close call, a court will likely find that the two credit cards found in the possession of our client are access devices. The Washington Court of Appeals has held that the statutory definition of an access device only requires that the device can be used to access anything of value. State v. Clay, 144 Wn. App. 894, 898, 184 P.3d 674 (2008). A credit card is a device that can be used to obtain something of value. Additionally, the statute does not require that that the access device be activated. Id. In coming to this conclusion, the court stated that RCW 9A (1) focuses exclusively upon the capacity of the device to be used in the manner described and does not include within its definition of access device any reference to the status of that device with its issuer. Id. at
14 SAMPLE 3 On the other hand, there is Washington State Supreme Court case that could potentially aid our client. In that case, the court held that a non-activated credit card found in the possession of another individual was not an access device. State v. Rose, 175 Wn.2d 10, 18, 282 P.3d 1087 (2012). However, the court made clear that Rose could be distinguished from Clay in that the credit card in question in Rose was not tied to an active account, therefore, it could not be used to gain anything of value. Id. Our client was found to have two credit cards in her possession that were issued to other individuals. Unlike the credit card in Rose, the credit cards in our case are tied to existing accounts. While they may not have been activated, this fact does not preclude the court from determining that the cards are access devices. See Clay, 144 Wn. App at We may be able to distinguished fclay,because the cards in our case could only be activated from the home phone numbers of the true owners. This fact may make it highly improbable that our client would have been able to activate the cards. Thus she would have likely been unable to obtain anything of value. That being said, this would be a very difficult argument to win, and the court would likely consider that fact as irrelevant and the credit cards as access devices. The AAA Membership Card. The AAA membership card found in our client s possession would also likely be considered an access device. RCW 9A (1) states that an access device is any card that can be used to obtain anything of value. Individuals who are members of AAA use their membership cards to access roadside assistance services as well as other benefits such as merchant discounts. These facts would satisfy the anything else of value element of the statute. RCW 9A (1). The fact that there is no evidence that the card was used is irrelevant because the statute states that an access device is one that can be used and not actually used. Id. 14
15 SAMPLE 3 In conclusion, a court will likely find that the credit cards and the AAA membership card found in our client s possession are access devices as defined by RCW 9A (1). Please let me know if you have any other questions or would like me to do any additional research 15
16 Professor Laurel Currie Oates Legal Writing I Spring 2014 Practice Questions Question 1: Our client, Phronh Chan, reports that he found a summons and complaint in his private mailbox at Mailboxes R Us. Because Mr. Chan lives in Cambodia from September through March of each year, he uses the mailbox to receive mail when he is out of the country. Although Mr. Chan has a Seattle address on his Washington driver s license, that address is his sister s address. Under the Washington statutes governing service of process, is service valid when the documents are left at the defendant s private mailbox? Question 2: Our client operates a series of meatpacking plants around the state and is very interested in the outcome of a land-use case that was just filed in Division II of the Court of Appeals. The client would like us to file an amicus curiae brief on its behalf. Could you please check the court rules to determine whether we need permission from the court to file an amicus brief, and if so, how we obtain that permission, and when the brief is due? The hearing on the appeal is currently scheduled for May 7, Thanks very much. Question 3: We have a contested divorce proceeding coming up next month in Cowlitz County Superior Court. Our client, who was a mail order bride, is from Laos and speaks limited English, so we will need to have an interpreter for her. Would you please check the RCW and state and local court rules to determine (1) what procedures are necessary to ensure that the court appoints an interpreter for her and (2) whether we have pay for the interpreter? Thanks very much. 16
RULES OF SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA PART THREE A CRIMINAL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE APPENDIX
RULES OF SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA PART THREE A CRIMINAL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE APPENDIX Form 6. Suggested Questions to Be Put by the Court to an Accused Who Has Pleaded Guilty (Rule 3A:8). Before accepting
More informationBASIC CRIMINAL LAW. Joe Bodiford. Overview of a criminal case Presented by: Board Certified Criminal Trial Lawyer
BASIC CRIMINAL LAW Overview of a criminal case Presented by: Joe Bodiford Board Certified Criminal Trial Lawyer www.floridacriminaldefense.com www.blawgger.com THE FLORIDA CRIMINAL PROCESS Source: http://www.fsu.edu/~crimdo/cj-flowchart.html
More informationChapter 153. Violations and Fines 2013 EDITION. Related Laws Page 571 (2013 Edition)
Chapter 153 2013 EDITION Violations and Fines VIOLATIONS (Generally) 153.005 Definitions 153.008 Violations described 153.012 Violation categories 153.015 Unclassified and specific fine violations 153.018
More informationInformation for Crime Victims and Witnesses
Office of the Attorney General Information for Crime Victims and Witnesses MARCH 2009 LAWRENCE WASDEN Attorney General Criminal Law Division Special Prosecutions Unit Telephone: (208) 332-3096 Fax: (208)
More informationFLORIDA CRIMINAL OFFENSES AMANDA POWERS SELLERS AND JENNA C. FINKELSTEIN
If You Have Been Charged with a Crime in Florida, Familiarizing Yourself with Your Charges and the Potential Penalties If You are Convicted is the First Step to Making Yourself More Informed, Empowered
More informationPENNSYLVANIA IDENTITY THEFT RANKING BY STATE: Rank 14, 72.5 Complaints Per 100,000 Population, 9016 Complaints (2007) Updated January 29, 2009
PENNSYLVANIA IDENTITY THEFT RANKING BY STATE: Rank 14, 72.5 Complaints Per 100,000 Population, 9016 Complaints (2007) Updated January 29, 2009 Current Laws: A person commits the offense of identity theft
More informationNON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37
NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Appellee v. GARY LEE ROSE, Appellant No. 1335 MDA 2013 Appeal from the PCRA
More informationIN THE MUNICIPAL COURT OF THE CITY OF SEATTLE
IN THE MUNICIPAL COURT OF THE CITY OF SEATTLE THE CITY OF SEATTLE, PLAINTIFF vs, DEFENDANT Statement of Defendant on Plea of Guilty Case # 1. My true name is. 2. My age is. Date of Birth. 3. I went through
More informationGETTING TO KNOW THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM
Patricia A. DeAngelis District Attorney GETTING TO KNOW THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM AN OFFENSE IS COMMITTED There are three types of offenses that can be committed in New York State: VIOLATION MISDEMEANOR
More information18 Questions and Answers for Advising Potential PPOE Students
18 Questions and Answers for Advising Potential PPOE Students Question 1: Is a felony conviction always a bar to peace officer licensure in Minnesota? Answer: Yes. According to MN Rules a felony conviction
More informationFINAL ORDER REVERSING TRIAL COURT. Appellant, Joseph Pabon (herein Appellant ), appeals the Orange County Court s
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA APPELLATE CASE NO: 2011-AP-32 LOWER COURT CASE NO: 48-2010-MM-12557 JOSEPH PABON, vs. Appellant, STATE OF FLORIDA,
More informationDIVISION ONE. STATE OF ARIZONA, Appellee, JOHN F. MONFELI, Appellant. No. 1 CA-CR 13-0126
IN THE ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION ONE STATE OF ARIZONA, Appellee, v. JOHN F. MONFELI, Appellant. No. 1 CA-CR 13-0126 Appeal from the Superior Court in Maricopa County No. LC2012-000405-001 The Honorable
More informationMISSOURI IDENTITY THEFT RANKING BY STATE: Rank 21, 67.4 Complaints Per 100,000 Population, 3962 Complaints (2007) Updated January 11, 2009
MISSOURI IDENTITY THEFT RANKING BY STATE: Rank 21, 67.4 Complaints Per 100,000 Population, 3962 Complaints (2007) Updated January 11, 2009 Current Laws: A person commits the crime of identity theft if
More informationYour Guide to Illinois Traffic Courts
Consumer Legal Guide Your Guide to Illinois Traffic Courts Presented by the Illinois Judges Association and the Illinois State Bar Association Illinois Judges Association Traffic courts hear more cases
More informationPurpose of the Victim/Witness Unit
Purpose of the Victim/Witness Unit The Victim/Witness Assistance Division of the Lake County State s Attorney s Office was formed to serve the needs of people like you. The division is meant to ensure
More informationI just got arrested for a State of South Carolina DUI charge. What happens now?
I just got arrested for a State of South Carolina DUI charge. What happens now? ISSUE ONE: The South Carolina Implied Consent Proceeding: Under South Carolina's implied consent law, a person who drives
More informationCriminal Law. Month Content Skills August. Define the term jurisprudence. Introduction to law. What is law? Explain several reasons for having laws.
Criminal Law Month Content Skills August Introduction to law Define the term jurisprudence. What is law? Explain several reasons for having laws. Discuss the relationship between laws and values. Give
More informationThe Office of the State Appellate Defender
The Office of the State Appellate Defender http://www.illinois.gov/osad Last Updated: January 22, 2014 GENERAL INFORMATION - DO I QUALIFY? GUIDE TO EXPUNGE OR SEAL YOUR ILLINOIS JUVENILE RECORD Section
More informationAPPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Dane County: STEVEN D. EBERT, Judge. Affirmed.
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED August 28, 2008 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court of Appeals NOTICE This opinion is subject to further editing. If published, the official version will appear in
More informationTHE SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA MARICOPA COUNTY
THE SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA MARICOPA COUNTY STATE OF ARIZONA CASE NO: CR v. APPLICATION TO: DEFENDANT RESTORE CIVIL RIGHTS RESTORE GUN RIGHTS Complete and Date of Birth: Attach Request to Restore Right
More informationUNDERSTANDING THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM Anne Benson
UNDERSTANDING THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM Anne Benson What is the Criminal Justice System? The criminal justice system is the system we have in the United States for addressing situations where it is believed
More informationFirst Regular Session Sixty-ninth General Assembly STATE OF COLORADO INTRODUCED HOUSE SPONSORSHIP
First Regular Session Sixty-ninth General Assembly STATE OF COLORADO INTRODUCED LLS NO. 1-0.01 Michael Dohr x SENATE BILL 1-1 SENATE SPONSORSHIP Lambert, Lundberg (None), HOUSE SPONSORSHIP Senate Committees
More informationTitle 15 CRIMINAL PROCEDURE -Chapter 23 ALABAMA CRIME VICTIMS Article 3 Crime Victims' Rights
Section 15-23-60 Definitions. As used in this article, the following words shall have the following meanings: (1) ACCUSED. A person who has been arrested for committing a criminal offense and who is held
More informationGlossary of Court-related Terms
Glossary of Court-related Terms Acquittal Adjudication Appeal Arraignment Arrest Bail Bailiff Beyond a reasonable doubt Burden of proof Capital offense Certification Charge Circumstantial evidence Citation
More informationGlossary of Terms Acquittal Affidavit Allegation Appeal Arraignment Arrest Warrant Assistant District Attorney General Attachment Bail Bailiff Bench
Glossary of Terms The Glossary of Terms defines some of the most common legal terms in easy-tounderstand language. Terms are listed in alphabetical order. A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W
More informationIN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA William J. Bell : : No. 2034 C.D. 2012 v. : Submitted: April 19, 2013 : Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, : Department of Transportation, : Bureau of Driver Licensing,
More information42 4 1301. Driving under the influence driving while impaired driving with excessive alcoholic content definitions penalties.
42 4 1301. Driving under the influence driving while impaired driving with excessive alcoholic content definitions penalties. (1) (a) It is a misdemeanor for any person who is under the influence of alcohol
More informationAdult Plea Negotiation Guidelines
From the office of the Rice County Attorney: Adult Plea Negotiation Guidelines Revision June, 2004 1. These guidelines apply to any adult felony defendant case prosecuted by this office, which is not disposed
More informationSTATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A10-1884. State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Jolene Kay Coleman, Appellant.
STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A10-1884 State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Jolene Kay Coleman, Appellant. Filed January 3, 2012 Affirmed Kalitowski, Judge Hennepin County District Court File No.
More informationSUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN 2012 WI 123 CASE NO.: COMPLETE TITLE: In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against Thomas E. Bielinski, Attorney at Law: Office of Lawyer Regulation, Complainant, v. Thomas
More informationCRIMINAL LAW AND VICTIMS RIGHTS
Chapter Five CRIMINAL LAW AND VICTIMS RIGHTS In a criminal case, a prosecuting attorney (working for the city, state, or federal government) decides if charges should be brought against the perpetrator.
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA MARICOPA COUNTY LC2014-000424-001 DT 01/22/2015 THE HON. CRANE MCCLENNEN HIGHER COURT RULING / REMAND
Michael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Court *** Filed *** 01/26/2015 8:00 AM THE HON. CRANE MCCLENNEN STATE OF ARIZONA CLERK OF THE COURT J. Eaton Deputy GARY L SHUPE v. MONICA RENEE JONES (001) JEAN JACQUES CABOU
More informationChapter 813. Driving Under the Influence of Intoxicants 2013 EDITION. Title 59 Page 307 (2013 Edition)
Chapter 813 2013 EDITION Driving Under the Influence of Intoxicants GENERAL PROVISIONS 813.010 Driving under the influence of intoxicants; penalty 813.011 Felony driving under the influence of intoxicants;
More informationDESCRIPTION OF THE FEDERAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM FOR DEFENDANTS
DESCRIPTION OF THE FEDERAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM FOR DEFENDANTS DESCRIPTION OF THE FEDERAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM FOR DEFENDANTS This pamphlet has been provided to help you better understand the federal
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON. Respondent, ] Cox, J. When a trial court calculates an offender score, it must include
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON STATE OF WASHINGTON, No. 68115-0-1 Respondent, ] DIVISION ONE cz> zz.-z-. v. ] LARRY STEELE MOSLEY, UNPUBLISHED ~5 - "^ -r, 03.';"-:: Appellant. i FILED:
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA. No. 14-0420 Filed May 20, 2015. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Woodbury County, Jeffrey A.
CHARLES EDWARD DAVIS, Applicant-Appellant, vs. IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 14-0420 Filed May 20, 2015 STATE OF IOWA, Respondent-Appellee. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Woodbury County,
More informationThe Circuit Court. Judges and Clerks. Jurisdiction
The Circuit Court The circuit court is the trial court of general jurisdiction in Virginia, and the court has authority to try a full range of both civil and criminal cases. Civil cases involve disputes
More informationSubchapter 6.600 Criminal Procedure in District Court
Subchapter 6.600 Criminal Procedure in District Court Rule 6.610 Criminal Procedure Generally (A) Precedence. Criminal cases have precedence over civil actions. (B) Pretrial. The court, on its own initiative
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA
Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D, this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral
More informationCITY OF EDMONDS REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS FOR PUBLIC DEFENSE ATTORNEYS. The City of Edmonds ( City ), Washington, is requesting proposals from well
CITY OF EDMONDS REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS FOR PUBLIC DEFENSE ATTORNEYS The City of Edmonds ( City ), Washington, is requesting proposals from well qualified attorneys interested in providing legal representation
More informationSocial Security Disability How We Can Help You Get Benefits
Social Security Disability How We Can Help You Get Benefits Frequently Asked Questions No one likes to think that he or she may become disabled. Yet, the chances that you will become disabled are greater
More informationGETTING THROUGH THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM
GETTING THROUGH THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM ARREST An ARREST starts the criminal justice process. It is called an arrest whether the police officer hands you a summons or puts handcuffs on you and takes
More informationCriminal convictions and their lifelong impact....real or imagined?
Criminal convictions and their lifelong impact...real or imagined? How will this affect me? Short answer: It depends May depend on: Age of offender (at time of offence and conviction) Age Under 17 at time
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, FOR PUBLICATION September 13, 2012 9:00 a.m. v No. 304708 Oakland Circuit Court CONNIE LEE PENNEBAKER, LC No. 2011-235701-FH
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF ARIZONA DIVISION ONE
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF ARIZONA DIVISION ONE STATE OF ARIZONA ) ) Appellee, ) 1 CA-CR 13-0096 ) ) V. ) MOHAVE COUNTY ) David Chad Mahone, ) Superior Court ) No. CR 2012-00345 Appellant. ) ) )
More information20-28.3. Seizure, impoundment, forfeiture of motor vehicles for offenses involving impaired driving while license revoked or without license and insurance, and for felony speeding to elude arrest. (a)
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE
Filed 6/21/16 P. v. Archuleta CA2/3 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified
More informationSUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN 2015 WI 38 CASE NO.: COMPLETE TITLE: 2014AP2906-D In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against Jon Evenson, Attorney at Law: Office of Lawyer Regulation, Complainant, v.
More informationWhat you don t know can hurt you.
What you don t know can hurt you. Why you need a defense lawyer if you are charged with a misdemeanor. A misdemeanor conviction is SERIOUS A misdemeanor is not a minor crime. If you are convicted of a
More informationVIRGINIA DUI FACTSHEET
VIRGINIA DUI FACTSHEET BOSE LAW FIRM, PLLC Former Police & Investigators Springfield Offices: 6354 Rolling Mill Place, Suite 102 Springfield, Virginia 22152 Telephone: 703.926.3900 Facsimile: 800.927.6038
More information~ DJ.jC D N J TH CAROLINA STATE BAR,~\ ~ 09 DHC 5
-tiw~~ "'~ "" NORTH CAROLIN i;;" of. ~ BEFORE THE WAKE COUNTY 1:::::, c! P 201.@IS~'L1NARY HEARING COMMISSION ~ v~ji..s,=-= OF THE ~ DJ.jC D N J TH CAROLINA STATE BAR,~\ ~ 09 DHC 5 >?1/ 11 /?,., l C\ c:,,;/,
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE T. HENLEY GRAVES SUSSEX COUNTY COURTHOUSE RESIDENT JUDGE 1 THE CIRCLE, SUITE 2 GEORGETOWN, DE 19947 (302) 856-5257 December 16, 2014 Natalie S. Woloshin, Esquire
More informationOverview. Chapter 1: 1.1 Purpose of Manual 2
Chapter 1: Overview 1.1 Purpose of Manual 2 1.2 Role of Defense Counsel 2 A. Practice Standards and Cases Recognize Defense Counsel s Role B. More Noncitizen Clients May Face Adverse Immigration Consequences
More informationChapter 3. Justice Process at the County Level. Brooks County Courthouse
Chapter 3 Justice Process at the County Level Brooks County Courthouse Chapter Three: Judice Process at the County Level Developmental Assets: Life Skills: TEKS: Objectives: 10. Safety 30. Responsibility
More informationTHE BIANCHI LAW FIRM 2000 112 TH AVE NE BELLEVUE, WA 98004 WASHINGTON DRINKING & DRIVING PENALTIES AS OF JANUARY 1, 2014
THE BIANCHI LAW FIRM 2000 112 TH AVE NE BELLEVUE, WA 98004 WASHINGTON DRINKING & DRIVING PENALTIES AS OF JANUARY 1, 2014 I. CRIMINAL CONVICTIONS FOR DUI [RCW 46.61.502] OR PHYSICAL CONTROL [RCW 46.61.504]
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE DIVISION. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) ) v. ) No. ) (Judge ) ) )
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) ) v. ) No. ) (Judge ) ) ) PETITION TO ENTER A PLEA OF GUILTY (Misdemeanor) I,, respectfully represent
More informationIN THE MISSOURI COURT OF APPEALS WESTERN DISTRICT
IN THE MISSOURI COURT OF APPEALS WESTERN DISTRICT STATE OF MISSOURI, v. ROBERT E. WHEELER, Respondent, Appellant. WD76448 OPINION FILED: August 19, 2014 Appeal from the Circuit Court of Caldwell County,
More informationGUIDE TO WHAT TO EXPECT
D e l Si g n o r e L a w GUIDE TO WHAT TO EXPECT AT A CLERK MAGISTRATE HEARING What you need to know about your Massachusetts clerk magistrate hearing. Authored by Attorneys Michael DelSignore And Julie
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF IMPERIAL. People v. Case No. Advisement of Rights, Waiver, and Plea Form
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF IMPERIAL People v. Case No. Advisement of Rights, Waiver, and Plea Form Vehicle Code 23152 Fill out this form if you wish to plead guilty or no contest to the charges
More informationCalifornia Judges Association OPINION NO. 56. (Issued: August 29, 2006)
California Judges Association OPINION NO. 56 (Issued: August 29, 2006) ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS WHEN A JUDGE OR A MEMBER OF A JUDGE S FAMILY HAS BEEN ARRESTED OR IS BEING PROSECUTED FOR CRIMINAL ACTIVITY
More informationSENATE BILL 1486 AN ACT
Senate Engrossed State of Arizona Senate Forty-fifth Legislature First Regular Session 0 SENATE BILL AN ACT AMENDING SECTION -, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES, AS AMENDED BY LAWS 00, CHAPTER, SECTION ; AMENDING
More informationIAC 7/2/08 Parole Board[205] Ch 11, p.1. CHAPTER 11 PAROLE REVOCATION [Prior to 2/22/89, Parole, Board of[615] Ch 7]
IAC 7/2/08 Parole Board[205] Ch 11, p.1 CHAPTER 11 PAROLE REVOCATION [Prior to 2/22/89, Parole, Board of[615] Ch 7] 205 11.1(906) Voluntary termination of parole. Any voluntary termination of parole should
More informationInformation for Those Convicted of Minor Consuming or Possessing Alcohol (MCA)
Alaska District Court Information for Those Convicted of Minor Consuming or Possessing Alcohol (MCA) To those convicted of minor consuming or possessing alcohol and their parents or guardians -- Keep this
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND INDUSTRY SERVICES BUREAU OF HEARINGS
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND INDUSTRY SERVICES BUREAU OF HEARINGS In the matter of Bureau of Health Services, Petitioner v Marie L. Falquet, Respondent / Docket No. 2000-1297 Agency No.
More informationMASON COUNTY INDIGENT DEFENSE STANDARDS SUPERIOR AND JUVENILE COURT
MASON COUNTY INDIGENT DEFENSE STANDARDS SUPERIOR AND JUVENILE COURT Ordinance No. ~~q- 09:> WHEREAS, the Washington Legislature mated in RCW 10.101.030 that counties adopt stards for the delivery of public
More informationRestoration of Civil Rights. Helping People regain their Civil Liberties
Restoration of Civil Rights Helping People regain their Civil Liberties Consequences of a Felony Food Stamps and social security benefits: People convicted of a felony for possession or sell of controlled
More informationTHE BIANCHI LAW FIRM 605 Thomas Street Seattle, WA 98109 WASHINGTON DRINKING & DRIVING PENALTIES AS OF JANUARY 1, 2014
THE BIANCHI LAW FIRM 605 Thomas Street Seattle, WA 98109 WASHINGTON DRINKING & DRIVING PENALTIES AS OF JANUARY 1, 2014 I. CRIMINAL CONVICTIONS FOR DUI [RCW 46.61.502] OR PHYSICAL CONTROL [RCW 46.61.504]
More informationYou need legal help to protect your livelihood, which requires you to drive every day. Call Mr. Singh right away at 916-939-5151.
What is Driving Under the Influence (DUI)? Vehicle Code Sections 23151 and 23152 are the drunk driving laws. VC 23152(a) makes it unlawful to drive a vehicle while under the influence of alcohol or drugs.
More informationIMPERIAL COUNTY. Review police reports to determine if criminal complaints should be filed.
IMPERIAL COUNTY CLASS TITLE: DEPUTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY I BASIC FUNCTION: Under the direction of the Assistant District Attorney, prosecutes criminal cases in the municipal and superior courts; conducts
More informationLANCASTER COUNTY ADULT DRUG COURT
LANCASTER COUNTY ADULT DRUG COURT Administered by the Lancaster County Department of Community Corrections Judicial Oversight by the Lancaster County District Court www.lancaster.ne.gov keyword: drug court
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO WARREN COUNTY. : O P I N I O N - vs - 10/21/2013 :
[Cite as State v. McCoy, 2013-Ohio-4647.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO WARREN COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : CASE NO. CA2013-04-033 : O P I N I O N - vs - 10/21/2013
More informationGeneral District Courts
General District Courts To Understand Your Visit to Court You Should Know: It is the courts wish that you know your rights and duties. We want every person who comes here to receive fair treatment in accordance
More informationAs used in this chapter, the following words shall, unless the context clearly requires otherwise, have the following
Page 1 Massachusetts General Laws Annotated Currentness Part IV. Crimes, Punishments and Proceedings in Criminal Cases (Ch. 263-280) Title II. Proceedings in Criminal Cases (Ch. 275-280) Chapter 278A.
More informationTHE SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA MARICOPA COUNTY
THE SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA MARICOPA COUNTY STATE OF ARIZONA CASE NO: CR v. APPLICATION TO: DEFENDANT RESTORE CIVIL RIGHTS RESTORE GUN RIGHTS Complete and Date of Birth: Attach Request to Restore Right
More informationSUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN 2014 WI 48 CASE NO.: COMPLETE TITLE: In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against Geneva E. McKinley, Attorney at Law: Office of Lawyer Regulation, Complainant, v. Geneva
More informationOFFICE OF THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY Third Judicial District Of Kansas Chadwick J. Taylor, District Attorney
OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY Third Judicial District Of Kansas Chadwick J. Taylor, District Attorney Shawnee County Courthouse Fax: (785) 251-4909 200 SE 7th Street, Suite 214 Family Law Fax: (785)
More informationNo. 76. An act relating to civil penalties for possession of marijuana. (H.200) It is hereby enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Vermont:
No. 76. An act relating to civil penalties for possession of marijuana. (H.200) It is hereby enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Vermont: * * * Criminal Penalties and Civil Penalties for Marijuana
More informationMODEL CRIMINAL DEFENSE MENTORING PROGRAM Utah State Bar New Lawyer Training Program
MODEL CRIMINAL DEFENSE MENTORING PROGRAM Utah State Bar New Lawyer Training Program The following is submitted as a Model Mentoring Plan for the criminal defense practice field. It was prepared by an experienced
More informationUnderstanding the Criminal Bars to the Deferred Action Policy for Childhood Arrivals
Understanding the Criminal Bars to the Deferred Action Policy for Childhood Arrivals 1. What are the criminal bars for deferred action? In addition to a number of other requirements, to qualify for deferred
More informationMorgan County Prosecuting Attorney Debra MH McLaughlin
Morgan County Prosecuting Attorney Debra MH McLaughlin Directions: From Fairfax Street Entrance, Enter Main Door, turn Right through door, up the narrow staircase. Office is at top of steps. (Old Circuit
More informationMaricopa County Attorney s Office Adult Criminal Case Process
The following is a brief description of the process to prosecute an adult accused of committing a felony offense. Most misdemeanor offenses are handled by municipal prosecutors; cases involving minors
More informationINTRODUCTION DO YOU NEED A LAWYER?
INTRODUCTION The purpose of this handbook is to provide answers to some very basic questions that inmates or inmates families might have regarding the processes of the criminal justice system. In no way
More informationSenate Bill No. 86 Committee on Transportation and Homeland Security
Senate Bill No. 86 Committee on Transportation and Homeland Security CHAPTER... AN ACT relating to offenses; providing that counseling and evaluations required for certain offenses may be conducted in
More informationThe Legal System in the United States
The Legal System in the United States At the conclusion of this chapter, students will be able to: 1. Understand how the legal system works; 2. Explain why laws are necessary; 3. Discuss how cases proceed
More informationNo. 102,751 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, KRISTINA I. BISHOP, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT
No. 102,751 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. KRISTINA I. BISHOP, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. the State. A criminal diversion agreement is essentially
More informationSUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN 2013 WI 36 CASE NO.: COMPLETE TITLE: In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against Joseph M. Engl, Attorney at Law: Office of Lawyer Regulation, Complainant, v. Joseph M.
More informationACTION GUIDE November 2004
Here s How and When to Do It ACTION GUIDE November 2004 JUDGE S PERSPECTIVE Defending Your Client in a Misdemeanor Case (Including a DUI) Ron Albers The Honorable Fumiko Hachiya Wasserman Los Angeles County
More informationQuincy Police Department One Sea Street Quincy, MA 02169 (617) 479-1212 TTY: (617) 376-1375
PAUL KEENAN CHIEF OF POLICE Quincy Police Department One Sea Street Quincy, MA 02169 (617) 479-1212 TTY: (617) 376-1375 Please complete the attached Firearms Application. All questions must be answered
More informationOFFICE OF THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY Third Judicial District Of Kansas Chadwick J. Taylor, District Attorney
OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY Third Judicial District Of Kansas Chadwick J. Taylor, District Attorney Shawnee County Courthouse Fax: (785) 251-4909 200 SE 7th Street, Suite 214 Family Law Fax: (785)
More informationFILED December 8, 2015 Carla Bender 4 th District Appellate Court, IL
NOTICE This order was filed under Supreme Court Rule 23 and may not be cited as precedent by any party except in the limited circumstances allowed under Rule 23(e(1. 2015 IL App (4th 130903-U NO. 4-13-0903
More informationGLOSSARY OF SELECTED LEGAL TERMS
GLOSSARY OF SELECTED LEGAL TERMS Sources: US Courts : http://www.uscourts.gov/library/glossary.html New York State Unified Court System: http://www.nycourts.gov/lawlibraries/glossary.shtml Acquittal A
More informationHow To Get A Sentence In Florida
County Criminal Court: CRIMINAL LAW Probation - Trial court erred in denying motion to discharge. Trial court was without jurisdiction to sentence Appellant for violating his one year term of probation
More informationOrders of Protection
Orders of Protection Hotline: (212) 343-1122 www.liftonline.org This guide answers questions that you may have if an order of protection has been filed against you in Criminal Court or Family Court. The
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SANTA CRUZ STREET ADDRESS: MAILING ADDRESS: CITY AND ZIP CODE: BRANCH NAME:
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SANTA CRUZ STREET ADDRESS: MAILING ADDRESS: CITY AND ZIP CODE: BRANCH NAME: : PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA v. DUI ADVISEMENT OF RIGHTS, WAIVER, AND PLEA FORM
More informationChapter 15 Criminal Law and Procedures
Chapter 15 Criminal Law and Procedures Chapter Outline 1. Introduction 2. What Is a Crime? 3. Elements of Criminal Liability 4. Types of Crimes 5. Cyber Crime 6. Constitutional Safeguards 7. Criminal Procedures
More informationCOURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT. Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Kern County Superior Court
COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Plaintiff and Respondent, F065134 v. Kern County Superior Court ARMANDO ALVAREZQUINTERO, No. BF132212A
More informationDecades of Successful Sex Crimes Defense Contact the Innocence Legal Team Now
Criminal Court Felonies The U.S. has the highest rate of felony conviction and imprisonment of any industrialized nation. A felony crime is more serious than a misdemeanor, but the same offense can be
More informationCase 1:10-cr-00134-WSD-LTW Document 69 Filed 01/21/11 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION
Case 1:10-cr-00134-WSD-LTW Document 69 Filed 01/21/11 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, : : CRIMINAL INDICTMENT NO.:
More informationCRIMES OF DISHONESTY AND BREACH OF TRUST: IS THEFT SUCH A CRIME UNDER 18 U.S.C. 1033(e)?
CRIMES OF DISHONESTY AND BREACH OF TRUST: IS THEFT SUCH A CRIME UNDER 18 U.S.C. 1033(e)? Zack Stamp, Esq. Steve W. Kinion, Esq. (217) 525-0700 The purpose of this article is to examine an ambiguity between
More informationWhat can happen if a permanent resident is convicted of a crime
IMMIGRATION AND REFUGEE FACT SHEET What can happen if a permanent resident is convicted of a crime This fact sheet explains how being convicted of a crime in Canada can affect someone s status as a permanent
More information