conferencing feedback computer-mediated feedback CMF 10 Warschauer 2002

Transcription

1 CAFLE No. 146 Jul 櫗 櫗櫗櫗櫗櫗櫗櫗櫗櫗櫗櫗 * * H A Lee et al electronic feedback Tuzi teacher feedback peer feedback Ware 2011 conferencing feedback computer-mediated feedback CMF 10 Warschauer YJA JJW- YZCYB BWXZ01 11

2 DiGiovanni et al real-time synchronous communication Schultz Sotillo 2000 synchronous writing asyn- Tuzi chronous writing Warschauer 2002 CMC Lindblom-Ylanne et al Matsumura & Hann 2004 Braine 2001 Ware 2004 Liu & Sadler 2003 CMC 12

3 grammatical errors E-rater Kern et al E-rater ETS Criterion E-rater 98% Valenti et al Chodorow et al TOEFL E-rater 2 Benentt 2006 McCurry 2010 Kukich 2000 Vantage Learning MY Access Eliot & Mikulas 2004 E-rater Warden & Chen 1995 Burston 2001 MY Access E-rater online portfolios word banks spell checkers graphic charts MY Access 5 11 IELTS TOEFL ETS Criterion-E-rater Burstein et al syntactic variety topical content a writer s checklist E-rater lexical complexity 13

4 Todd 2001 Krishnamurthy 2005 Gaskell & Cobb 2004 Burstein et al Ware & Warschauer O'Sullivan et al Chang & Sun 2009 Google 4 Wordpilot 2000 Milton 1999 Check My Words Milton 2006 Word Neighbours Milton 2004 Milton 1999 Hyland 2003 Milton 2006 Mark My Words

5 4 13 Kukich K. Beyond automated essay scoring A. In Hearst K. eds.. The Debate on Automated Essay Scoring. IEEE Intelligent Systems C Lee Y-W. Gentile C. & Kantor R. Toward automated multi-trait scoring of essays Investigating links among holistic analytic and text features scores J. Applied Lin- guistics Bennett R. E. Technology and writing assessment lessons learned from the US national assessment of educational progress. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the International Association for Educational Assessment R. Singapore Braine G. A study of English as a foreign language EFL writers on a local-area network LAN and in traditional classes J. Computers and Composition Burstein J. & D. Marcu. Developing technology for automated evaluation of discourse structure in student essays A. In M. D. Shermis & J. C. Burstein eds.. Automated Essay Scoring A Cross-disciplinary Perspective C. Hillsdale NJ Lawrence Erlbaum Burston J. Computer-mediated feedback in composition correction J. CALICO Journal Chang W. Li. & Sun Y. C. Scaffolding and web concordancers as support for language learning J. Computer Assisted Language Learning Chodorow M. & Burnstein J. Beyond essay length evaluating e-rater' s performance on TOEFL essays OL /WE ftp / /ftp. ets. org /pub /toefl / pdf. May DiGiovanni E. & G. Nagaswami. Online peer review an alternative to face-to-face J. ELT Journal Eliot S. & Mikulas C. The impact of MY Access Use on student writing performance A technology overview and four studies. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research association R. San Diego CA Gaskell D. & T. Cobb. Can learners use concordance feedback for writing errors J. System Hyland K. Second Language Writing M. New York Cambridge University Press Kern R. & M. Warschauer. Introduction A. In M. Warschauer & R. Kern eds.. Network-based Language Teaching Concepts and Practice C. Cambridge Cambridge University Press Krishnamurthy S. A Demonstration of the Futility of Using Microsoft Word s Spelling and Grammar Check OL /WE. http / /faculty. washington. edu /sandeep /check /. December Lindblom-Ylanne S. & H. Pihlajamaki. Can a collaborative network environment enhance essay-writing processes J. British Journal of Educational Technology Liu J. & R. Sadler. The effect and affect of peer review in electronic versus traditional modes on L2 writing J. Journal of English for Academic Purposes Matsumura S. & G. Hann. Computer anxiety and students preferred feedback methods in EFL writing J. The Modern Language Journal McCurry D. Can machine scoring deal with broad and open writing tests as well as human readers J. Assessing Writing Milton J. Lexical thickets and electronic gateways Making text accessible by novice writers A. In C. Candlin & K. Hyland eds.. Writing Texts Processes and Practices C. London Longman Milton J. From parrots to puppet masters Fostering creative and authentic language use with online tools A. In B. Holmberg M. Shelly & C. White eds.. Distance Education and Language Evolution and Change C. Clevedon Multilingual Matters Milton J. Resource-rich web-based feedback Helping learners become independent writers A. In K. Hyland & F. Hyland eds.. Feedback in Second Language Writing Contexts and Issues C. New York Cambridge University Press O'Sullivan I. & Chambers A. Learners' writing skills in French Corpus consultation and learner evaluation J. Journal of Second Language Writing Schultz J. Computers and collaborative writing in the foreign language curriculum A. In M. Warschauer & R. Kern eds.. Network-based Language Learning Concepts and Practice C. Cambridge Cambridge University Press Sotillo Susana M. Discourse functions and syntactic complexity in synchronous and asynchronous communication J. Language Learning & Technology Todd R. Induction from self-selected concordances and self-correction J. System Tuzi F. The impact of e-feedback on the revisions of L2 15

6 writers in an academic writing course J. Computers and Composition Valenti S. F. Neri & A. Cucchiarelli. An overview of current research on Automated Essay Grading J. Journal of Information Technology Education Warden C. & J. Chen. Improving feedback while decreasing teacher burden in R. O. C. ESL business English writing classes A In P. Bruthiaux T. Boswood & B. Du-Babcock eds.. Explorations in English for Professional Communications C. Hong Kong City University of Hong Kong Press Ware P. Confidence and competition online ESL student perspectives on web-based discussions in the classroom J. Computers and Composition Ware P. Computer-generated feedback on student writing J. TESOL Quarterly Ware P. & M. Warschauer. Electronic feedback and second language writing A. In K. Hyland & F. Hyland eds.. Feedback in Second Language Writing Contexts and Issues C. New York Cambridge University Press Warschauer M. Networking into academic discourse J. Journal of English for Academic Purposes J J J J J J A Critical Review of Electronic Feedback in Second Language Writing WANG Ying LI Zhen-yang School of Foreign Languages and Literature Shandong University Jinan Shandong China Abstract With the rapid advancement of computer hardware and software the role of computer in both delivering and mediating feedback has become more important. Key areas of electronic feedback in second language writing are examined from three aspects computer-conferencing automated feedback and corpora-based feedback. The research shows that it is complicated to evaluate students' compositions and to provide feedback via computer. Future research into electronic feedback should seek to integrate feedback with writing development instruction and context. Key words Electronic Feedback Feedback Modes Second Language Writing 16