UK and Japanese Banks Settle US Sanctions and Money Laundering Violations
|
|
- Natalie Hudson
- 7 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 December 21, Introduction On December 10, 2012, UK Banks HSBC and Standard Chartered Bank (SCB) entered into agreements with US enforcement authorities to settle civil and criminal charges relating to US economic sanctions, the Bank Secrecy Act, and the Foreign Narcotics Kingpin Sanctions Regulations. HSBC will forfeit a record $1.9 billion to US authorities, while SCB agreed to pay $327 million. Both have agreed to institute various compliance measures in their management and operations. On December 12, 2012, the Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd. (BTMU) agreed to pay $8,571,634 to settle potential civil liability for apparent violations of US economic sanctions. The coordinated US enforcement actions highlight the importance of economic sanctions compliance to US foreign policy and national security interests. The HSBC, SCB and BTMU settlement agreements are discussed in detail below. I. HSBC US enforcement authorities recently announced coordinated settlement agreements with HSBC Holdings Plc (HSBC Holdings), HSBC Bank USA N.A. (HSBC USA), and HSBC North America Holdings (HNAH) to resolve allegations that inadequate compliance measures led to widespread sanctions and money laundering violations involving Iranian banks, Mexican drug cartels, and other sanctioned entities for more than ten years. To resolve the claims, HSBC will pay $1.9 billion in penalties to US authorities. The bank agreed to pay $1.256 billion in disgorgement to the US Department of Justice (DOJ), $375 million in civil penalties to the Department of the Treasury, Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC), a $500 million civil penalty to the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), and a $165 million civil penalty to the Federal Reserve Board of Governors (Board of Governors). HSBC s OFAC penalty will be satisfied by payment to DOJ. The New York County District Attorney s Office (DANY) participated in the investigation and entered into a separate settlement. In addition, the UK Financial Services Authority has worked closely with US authorities on the investigation, but is pursuing a separate action. Money Laundering-Related Violations The DOJ criminal Information states that from 2006 to 2010, HSBC USA failed to dedicate adequate resources to its anti-money laundering compliance function and implement a compliance program capable of adequately monitoring suspicious transactions and activities among its affiliates. Under the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA), HSBC USA was required to establish and maintain an anti-money laundering compliance program that provided for: (1) internal policies, procedures, and controls to deter money laundering; (2) a compliance officer to coordinate and monitor BSA and AML compliance; (3) related training; (4) independent audit programs; and (5) due diligence policies, procedures, and controls reasonably designed to detect and report suspicious activity for correspondent accounts it maintained in the US for non-us persons.
2 Despite inherent money laundering risks associated with correspondent banking activities with affiliate HSBC Mexico, DOJ alleged that HSBC USA failed to conduct adequate due diligence on HSBC Mexico s operations as required by the BSA. Moreover, despite apparent awareness of narcotics-related money laundering risk associated with Mexican financial institutions, HSBC USA allegedly assigned HSBC Mexico its standard risk rating and neglected to monitor over $670 billion in wire transfers and $9.4 billion in US banknote purchases involving HSBC Mexico. In addition, it did not provide adequate staffing and other resources to maintain an effective AML program. As a result of these alleged compliance failures, HSBC USA laundered at least $881 million in Mexican drug cartel revenues through the Black Market Peso Exchange, a complex network designed to move cartel profits from drugs sold in the United States to foreign cartels. DOJ alleged that HSBC Mexico did not maintain sufficient Know Your Customer (KYC) information, including addresses, reasons for maintaining US dollar-denominated accounts, and source of US dollars. HSBC Mexico executives also overruled recommendations from its AML committee to close accounts with suspicious activity, and failed to act on US and Mexican law enforcement concerns that the volume of HSBC Mexico s US dollar exports was indicative of money laundering activity. Moreover, HSBC Mexico s CEO allegedly was told that Mexican law enforcement had obtained a recording of a Mexican drug lord saying that HSBC Mexico was a good bank to launder money. Iran-Related Transactions In addition to the money-laundering allegations described above, OFAC and DOJ claimed that certain of HSBC s Iranian transactions violated the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), the Trading with the Enemy Act (TWEA), and related Executive Orders and regulations. The settlement agreements state that beginning in the mid-1990s, employees of HSBC s non-us affiliates took deliberate action to withhold information that would have identified Bank Melli London, a US-sanctioned Iranian financial institution, in certain Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication (SWIFT) cover payments routed through an HSBC USA correspondent account. According to the allegations, if the transfer messages had accurately reflected the involvement of sanctioned entities, the US banks receiving the instructions could have rejected, blocked or stopped the transactions for investigation, per OFAC regulations. Therefore, to avoid denied transactions or costly delays, HSBC UK subsidiary HSBC Bank plc allegedly stripped information identifying sanctioned parties from the messages. This wire stripping allegedly caused US financial institutions unknowingly to provide banking services to sanctioned entities; prevented US regulatory and law enforcement authorities from detecting unlawful transactions; and resulted in false business record entries by New York financial institutions in violation of New York state law. OFAC acknowledged, however, that certain of HSBC Bank plc s Iranian transactions were permissible under authorizations and exemptions, including the U-turn exemption that was in place prior to November 10, Under the U-turn authorization, US financial institutions could process transactions for Iranian banks, individuals, and other entities if the transaction was initiated with a non-us, non-iranian bank, ended with a non-us, non-iranian bank, and was not barred by any other regulation. The OFAC settlement catalogs HSBC s alleged stripping of the Iranian parties identities from the transfer messages, despite HSBC group-wide compliance policies and management instructions prohibiting US dollar payments that were barred by OFAC regulations. OFAC regulations required US institutions to determine that the underlying transaction is not prohibited by this part before processing
3 the transaction under the U-turn license. HSBC s stripping activity prevented affiliated and unaffiliated US financial institutions from discharging their responsibility to investigate whether the U-turn exemption indeed applied when it was part of the law. As for the magnitude of the illegal conduct, the HSBC-OFAC settlement agreement claimed that from March 2004 to June 2010, HSBC Bank plc processed 203 electronic funds transfers (EFTs) worth $164.3 million for the benefit of the Government of Iran or persons in Iran. The HSBC-DOJ/DANY deferred prosecution agreement claimed that from 2000 through 2006, HSBC affiliates processed $183 million on behalf of sanctioned entities in Iran. Other Sanctioned Transactions According to DOJ and OFAC, HSBC also stripped wire transfers involving restricted transactions with the following countries: Burma: From March 2005 to May 2006, HSBC affiliates processed through US banks 1,031 EFTs worth $136.7 million in violation of prohibitions against exportation of financial services to Burma and/or dealing in property located in the US and belonging to Burmese specially-designated nationals (SDNs) Cuba: From March 2004 to December 2007, HSBC affiliates processed through US banks 40 electronic funds transfers in which Cuba or a Cuban national had an interest Libya: From March 2004 to August April 2004, HSBC affiliates processed through US banks 25 EFTs worth $1.2 million in violation of now-repealed prohibitions on the exportation of goods, technology, or services to the Government of Libya and/or persons in Libya Sudan: From March 2004 to August 2007, HSBC affiliates processed through US banks 1,036 EFTs worth $109 million for the benefit of the Government of Sudan and/or persons in Sudan and/or dealing in property located in the US and belonging to the Government of Sudan In addition, OFAC alleged separate and unrelated violations of Burmese, Iranian, Sudanese, and Zimbabwe sanctions regulations. Under the terms of its OFAC Settlement Agreement, HSBC Holdings agreed to a $375 million penalty. That penalty will be satisfied by HSBC s settlement with DOJ. Office of the Comptroller of the Currency Settlement HSBC USA agreed to an OCC Consent Order whereby it will pay a $500 million civil penalty the largest ever levied by OCC to settle allegations that its compliance program deficiencies violated the BSA, suspicious activity reporting obligations, and a related October 2010 consent order. The OCC penalty also satisfies a related $500 million Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) penalty. Like the DOJ DPA, the 2010 OCC Consent Order found that HSBC USA did not adequately monitor banknote transactions, collect or maintain customer due diligence information, process or file timely suspicious activity reports, or conduct adequate risk assessment on high-risk customers, even in instances where customers were associated with politically-exposed persons. As a result of these and other compliance weaknesses, the Consent Order required HSBC USA to institute certain compliance
4 program elements, including establishing a Compliance Committee of the Board and a comprehensive BSA/anti-money laundering action plan; hiring a Regional Compliance Officer and BSA Officer; and implementing appropriate due diligence procedures, training, audits, and review. In light of HSBC s recent compliance failures, OCC issued a separate Cease and Desist Order to address weaknesses in HSBC s enterprise-wide compliance program. Federal Reserve Board of Governors Settlement HSBC Holdings and HNAH will pay a $165 million civil penalty to the Board of Governors for maintaining inadequate BSA and anti-money laundering risk management procedures and internal controls as required by the Federal Deposit Insurance Act, and violation of a related October 2010 consent order. The Board of Governors also issued a Cease and Desist Order against HSBC Holdings, requiring it to institute a compliance program approved by the Board of Governors. II. Standard Chartered Bank London-based Standard Chartered Bank (SCB) entered into agreements with DOJ, DANY, OFAC, and the Federal Reserve Board of Governors in relation to the bank s financial activities implicating US sanctions relating to Iran, Burma, Libya, Sudan, and the Foreign Narcotics Kingpin Sanctions Regulations. SCB agreed to forfeit $327 million in total to US and NY authorities, and institute various compliance measures in its management and operations. The federal and DANY agreements follow the bank s August 14, 2012 settlement with the New York State Department of Financial Services (DFS), which addressed similar activity and resulted in SCB s forfeiture of $340 million and its agreement to engage in compliance measures, as described in Steptoe s prior advisory. SCB is alleged, from January 2001 through 2007, to have purposely falsified wire transfer messages to its New York branch in order to facilitate US dollar clearing activities involving entities subject to US sanctions. Like HSBC, SCB s Dubai and London offices allegedly avoided US sanctions and related delays by stripping information identifying any sanctioned parties from the messages. The allegations assert that senior corporate managers and the legal and compliance departments of SCB knew and approved of these practices. In addition, SCB is alleged to have made misleading statements to OFAC in 2003, and provided incomplete information to US bank regulators, the Federal Reserve Bank of New York (FRBNY) and the New York State Banking Department (NYSBD) in 2004, regarding its transactions involving sanctioned entities. SCB voluntarily disclosed the activities in question to the US authorities, and agreed to terminate such activities and take remedial action, including implementing compliance measures in its management and operations, such as reporting procedures and monitoring. Of its $327 million forfeiture, SCB will pay $227 million in the DOJ and DANY settlement, and $100 million to the Board of Governors. The bank s agreed forfeiture with OFAC of $132 million will be satisfied by SCB s settlement with DOJ/DANY. Iranian-Related Transactions SCB s Iranian-related transactions appear to have been the primary focus of the US authorities investigations, as those payments are alleged to have totaled over $240 billion from 2001 to SCB allegedly processed payments for the Iranian banks Markazi, Melli, Sepah, Persia International,
5 Saderat, and Mellat, as well as unspecified other Iranian banks and corporate customers. However, a carve-out to the OFAC restrictions, known as the U-turn payment provision, existed during the period of the transactions. As stated in the SCB agreements with DOJ and OFAC, because of the U-turn authorization, only a small portion of SCB s underlying Iranian-related banking transactions allegedly were themselves a substantive violation of OFAC sanctions: SCB-OFAC Settlement Agreement: From January 2001 to December 2007, SCB processed through US banks 488 EFTs worth $24,002,250 in apparent violation of the prohibition against exporting services to Iran or the Government of Iran SCB-DOJ/DANY Deferred Prosecution Agreement: From 2001 through 2007, SCB processed through US banks $23 million in Iranian-related transactions in violation of the IEEPA. SCB accepted and acknowledged responsibility for knowingly and willfully conspiring to engage in transactions involving sanctioned country entities, including Iran, in violation of US law Other Sanctioned Transactions According to the allegations, SCB used the same stripping practice to avoid alerting its US branch of certain sanctioned transactions involving Burma, Libya, Sudan, and the Foreign Narcotics Kingpin Sanctions. SCB allegedly processed the following prohibited transactions through financial institutions located in the United States: Burma: From August 2003 to May 2005, five EFTs worth $59,642 in violation of the prohibition against the exportation or reexportation of financial services to Burma Libya: From January 2001 to April 2004, 135 EFTs worth $12,349,361 in violation of the prohibition against the exportation of goods, technology or services to Libya Sudan: From January 2001 to November 2007, 283 EFTs worth $96,665,537 in violation of the prohibition against the exportation or re-exportation to Sudan of services FNKSR: From February 2011 to April 2011, SCB NY processed eight EFTs worth $243, in which an entity designated pursuant to the Foreign Narcotics Kingpin Sanctions Regulations (FNKSR) had an interest. OFAC alleges that these transactions were prohibited by Executive Orders and/or regulations promulgated pursuant to IEEPA and the Foreign Narcotics Kingpin Designation Act (FNKDA) Federal Reserve Board of Governors Settlement In a Consent Agreement among the Federal Reserve Board of Governors, SCB, and its indirect parent company, London-based Standard Chartered plc, SCB acknowledged that its policies and procedures prevented SCB s New York branch from determining whether financial transactions were carried out in a manner consistent with US law and from properly conduct[ing] the transaction review required under the 2004 Written Agreement based upon prior sanctions-related activities. In addition, the Consent Agreement noted the New York branch s failure to provide adequate and complete responses to examiners in sanctions-related inquiries, and deficiencies in the New York branch s risk management and compliance procedures.
6 SCB and its parent company did not admit wrongdoing, but settled the matter by instituting a compliance program and the payment of a joint civil money penalty totaling $100 million, with $65 million assessed in connection its alleged unsafe and unsound practices relating to OFAC regulations, and $35 million assessed in connection with its alleged deficient and misleading provision of information to examiners. III. BTMU Tokyo On December 12, 2012, the Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd. (BTMU) reached a settlement with OFAC regarding allegations of sanctions violations stemming from procedures similar to those alleged of SCB and HSBC. According to OFAC, between April 2006 and March 2007, BTMU s Tokyo operations willfully concealed the involvement of countries or persons subject to US sanctions relating to Iran, Burma, Sudan, Cuba, and the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, in transactions that it processed through financial institutions in the United States. BTMU allegedly systematically deleted or omitted from payment messages any information that would result in the funds being blocked or rejected because of links to US sanctions targets. OFAC estimates that BTMU processed at least 97 funds transfers, with an aggregate value of approximately $5,898,943, through BTMU s New York branch or other banks in the United States, in violation of US sanctions laws. BTMU s senior management voluntarily self-disclosed these activities to OFAC. IV. Conclusion The SCB and HSBC cases are notable for the number of federal and state agencies involved in the enforcement measures. The coordinated enforcement effort and relatively high penalties levied in these and prior cases indicate that US regulators intend to strictly enforce against entities that directly or indirectly interfere with US sanctions policies and related laws and regulations. The HSBC agreements are important not only for the record monetary penalty, but also for the layering of extensive money laundering charges on top of the sanctions charges. Further, like other recent enforcement activity against non-us financial institutions, the above cases are notable for US authorities focus on the applicability of US sanctions laws to non-us entities. The US agencies have clearly signaled their disapproval of wire stripping to obfuscate sanctioned party activity even where an underlying transaction may have been lawful. The language of the DOJ and OFAC agreements does not explicitly assert that the wire stripping was unlawful when used to process otherwise permissible transactions. Thus, while DOJ and OFAC did not clarify their own positions on wire stripping related to authorized transactions, the magnitude of the penalties and the coordinated enforcement effort shows that the agencies view the activity as impermissible and subject to enforcement, irrespective of whether the underlying transactions are lawful. Accordingly, non-us financial institutions, especially those that that process transactions through US branches involving US-sanctioned parties, should consider the adequacy of their AML and sanctions compliance programs and the transparency and accuracy with which they identify sanctioned parties to US financial institutions. The HSBC and SCB settlements have attracted substantial attention in the UK, mainly because of the economic importance of these banks and less (as would previously have been the case) because of a view that the US is unfairly targeting foreign entities. UK and EU sanctions and anti-money laundering law and enforcement have become much more aggressive in recent years, and as noted above HSBC
7 remains subject to investigation by the UK Financial Services Authority for conduct related to the US settlement. If you have any questions regarding economic sanctions or anti-money laundering enforcement, or any related issues, please contact Ed Krauland at or Meredith Rathbone at in our Washington office; or Maury Shenk at in our London office.
ISSUE 3. Enforcement Actions for U.S. Sanctions Violations Offer Lessons for Compliance
ISSUE 3 Enforcement Actions for U.S. Sanctions Violations Offer Lessons for Compliance Contents LEGAL BASIS FOR U.S. SANCTIONS ENFORCEMENT...3 SIGNIFICANT ENFORCEMENT CASES... 4 ABN AMRO, N.V./Royal Bank
More informationAnti-Money Laundering and Economic Sanctions
Anti-Money Laundering and Economic Sanctions 1 Meet Your Instructor Denise Whiting, CAMS Manager, Risk Advisory, Charlotte Uptown 14 years experience in the financial services industry Extensive knowledge
More informationCurrent Anti-Money Laundering Enforcement Trends
Current Anti-Money Laundering Enforcement Trends Michael Volkov, Shareholder 240.505.1992 michael.volkov@leclairryan.com Carlos Ortiz, Shareholder 973.491.3365 carlos.ortiz@leclairryan.com Today s presenters
More informationCase 1:12-cr-00763-ILG Document 3 Filed 12/11/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 5
Case 1:12-cr-00763-ILG Document 3 Filed 12/11/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 5 CBD:DSS/AAS U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney's Office Eastern District of New York 271 Cadman Plaza East F.#2009R02380
More informationOFAC Compliance Overview and Recent Trends
OFAC Compliance Overview and Recent Trends Frederick E. Curry III Deloitte Transactions and Business Analytics LLP December 2015 Institute of International Bankers & Conference of State Bank Supervisors
More informationSETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY WASHINGTON, D.C. 20220 MUL-60noo SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT This Settlement Agreement (the "Agreement") is made by and between the U.S. Department ofthe Treasury's Office offoreign
More informationThe New York State Department of Financial Services (the Department ), Commerzbank AG New York Branch ( New York Branch ), and Commerzbank AG
NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES In the Matter of COMMERZBANK AG, COMMERZBANK AG NEW YORK BRANCH CONSENT ORDER UNDER NEW YORK BANKING LAW 39 and 44 The New York State Department of Financial
More informationAnti-Money Laundering Issues for Securities Transfer Agents
Anti-Money Laundering Issues for Securities Transfer Agents Stanley V. Ragalevsky, Esq. Kirkpatrick & Lockhart LLP 75 State Street Boston, MA 02110 (617) 261-3100 Caveat This outline and the oral presentation
More informationThe Wolfsberg Group Anti-Money Laundering Questionnaire. Financial Institution Name. 8 Canada Square, London E14 5HQ
The Wolfsberg Group Anti-Money Laundering Questionnaire Financial Institution Name Location HSBC Group 8 Canada Square, London E14 5HQ This questionnaire acts as an aid to firms conducting due diligence
More informationPresented By Greg Baldwin
ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING COMPLIANCE OFFICER TRAINING Presented By Greg Baldwin THE ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING COMPLIANCE OFFICER We re going to cover: Basis for the requirement to have a Compliance Officer The
More informationRegulatory Compliance and Trade
Regulatory Compliance and Trade Global Transaction Services Cash Management Trade Services and Finance Securities Services Fund Services Regulatory Compliance and Trade 2007 These materials are provided
More informationMERCHANTS EXPRESS MONEY ORDER COMPANY, INC. (MEMO) AGENT ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING COMPLIANCE GUIDE
MERCHANTS EXPRESS MONEY ORDER COMPANY, INC. (MEMO) AGENT ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING COMPLIANCE GUIDE Table of Contents WHY YOU AND YOUR EMPLOYEES SHOULD READ AND UNDERSTAND THIS GUIDE...1 WHY THIS GUIDE IS
More informationControl Considerations For Auditing the OFAC Affidavit Program
Control Considerations For Auditing the OFAC Affidavit Program Cheryl Sincock, CAMS-Audit June 2014 Statement of Intent OFAC generally prohibits financial institutions from processing transactions involving
More informationDecember 2006 Report No. 07-001. FDIC s Supervision of Financial Institutions OFAC Compliance Programs AUDIT REPORT
December 2006 Report No. 07-001 FDIC s Supervision of Financial Institutions OFAC Compliance Programs AUDIT REPORT Report No. 07-001 December 2006 FDIC s Supervision of Financial Institutions OFAC Compliance
More informationOFAC Settlement Highlights Importance of Proactive Compliance Monitoring
June 2012 OFAC Settlement Highlights Importance of Proactive Compliance Monitoring BY SCOTT FLICKER, KEVIN PETRASIC AND AMANDA JABOUR The U.S. Department of the Treasury s Office of Foreign Assets Control
More informationU.S. Economic Sanctions Laws and How They Affect Insurance Brokers
U.S. Economic Sanctions Laws and How They Affect Insurance Brokers The United States Government imposes economic sanctions against several countries and a large number of individuals and entities, in response
More informationUNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM WASHINGTON, D C.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM WASHINGTON, D C. In the Matter of Docket Nos. 13-019-B-FB1. 13-019-B-FB2. THE ROYAL BANK OF SCOTLAND GROUP PLC. Edinburgh,
More informationJournal of Investment Compliance Emerald Article: OFAC compliance in the securities and investment sector
Journal of Investment Compliance Emerald Article: OFAC compliance in the securities and investment sector Article information: To cite this document: (2012),"OFAC compliance in the securities and investment
More informationDEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY WASHINGTON, D.C. 20220 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY WASHINGTON, D.C. 20220 MUL-473923 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT This Settlement Agreement (the "Agreement") is made by and between the U.S. Department ofthe Treasury's Office offoreign
More informationUNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY FINANCIAL CRIMES ENFORCEMENT NETWORK ASSESSMENT OF CIVIL MONEY PENALTY
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY FINANCIAL CRIMES ENFORCEMENT NETWORK IN THE MATTER OF: ) ) Number 2015-01 Oppenheimer & Co., Inc. ) New York, NY ) ASSESSMENT OF CIVIL MONEY PENALTY
More informationFEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION WASHINGTON, D.C. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION WASHINGTON, D.C. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA ) ) In the Matter of ) ) ORDER TO MIZRAHI TEFAHOT BANK, LTD. ) CEASE AND
More informationUNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY COMPTROLLER OF THE CURRENCY
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY COMPTROLLER OF THE CURRENCY #2014-001 In the Matter of: AA-EC-13-109 JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. Columbus, OH JPMorgan Bank and Trust Company, N.A. San
More informationNATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL
NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL OFFICE OF FOREIGN ASSET CONTROL COMPLIANCE REVIEW Report #OIG-06-09 December 18, 2006 William A. DeSarno Inspector General Released By:
More informationFCPA and OFAC Compliance Essentials
OFAC FCPA and OFAC Compliance Essentials By The FCPA Report The DOJ, SEC and OFAC continue to put resources into enforcement of trade regulations and the FCPA, pursuing new investigative techniques and
More informationAnti-Money Laundering Policy Manual Table of Contents [Sample Client] Table of Contents
Table of Contents [ Client] Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS... 1 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION... 3 1.1 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES... 3 1.2 REQUIRED REVIEW... 3 1.3 APPLICABILITY... 3 1.4 MONEY LAUNDERING DEFINED...
More informationFEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION WASHINGTON, D.C. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION WASHINGTON, D.C. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA ) ) In the Matter of ) ) CONSENT ORDER BANAMEX USA ) CENTURY CITY, CALIFORNIA
More informationTHE FORTY RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE FINANCIAL ACTION TASK FORCE ON MONEY LAUNDERING
THE FORTY RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE FINANCIAL ACTION TASK FORCE ON MONEY LAUNDERING 1990 A. GENERAL FRAMEWORK OF THE RECOMMENDATIONS 1. Each country should, without further delay, take steps to fully implement
More informationSETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY WASHINGTON, D.C. 20220 MUL~762365 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT This Settlement Agreement (the "Agreement") is made by and between the U.S. Department ofthe Treasury's Office of Foreign
More informationThe New York State Department of Financial Services ( the Department or DFS ) and
NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES X In the Matter of Standard Chartered Bank, New York Branch X CONSENT ORDER UNDER NEW YORK BANKING LAW 39 and 44 The New York State Department of Financial
More informationINSURANCE AGENT AND BROKER COMPLIANCE WITH THE PATRIOT ACT ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING REQUIREMENTS AND OFFICE OF FOREIGN ASSETS CONTROL REGULATIONS
INSURANCE AGENT AND BROKER COMPLIANCE WITH THE PATRIOT ACT ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING REQUIREMENTS AND OFFICE OF FOREIGN ASSETS CONTROL REGULATIONS This FAQ is not intended to provide specific advice about
More information8 Guiding Principles for Anti-Money Laundering Polciies and Procedures in
TCH Guiding Principles September 2014 Exposure Draft Guiding Principles for Anti-Money Laundering Policies and Procedures in Correspondent Banking Exposure Draft for Public Comment 2 Preamble to the Exposure
More informationBank Secrecy Act, Anti-Money Laundering, and Office of Foreign Assets Control
Bank Secrecy Act, Anti-Money Laundering, and Office of Foreign Assets Control Overview The Bank Secrecy Act (BSA) was created in 1970 to assist in criminal, tax, and regulatory investigations. The Financial
More informationFact Sheet for Financial Crimes Enforcement Network Geographic Targeting Orders for Manhattan, N.Y., and Miami-Dade County, Fla.
Fact Sheet for Financial Crimes Enforcement Network Geographic Targeting Orders for Manhattan, N.Y., and Miami-Dade County, Fla. On January 13, 2016, the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN),
More informationAML & Mortgage Fraud Compliance Program v. 08.2013 ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING & MORTGAGE FRAUD COMPLIANCE PROGRAM
ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING & MORTGAGE FRAUD COMPLIANCE PROGRAM Version: 2.0 dated 08.2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS AML & Mortgage Fraud Compliance Program 1.0 PURPOSE AND SCOPE... 3 2.0 APPLICABLE REGULATIONS AND
More informationTHE INSURANCE INDUSTRY AND OFAC ECONOMIC SANCTIONS
THE INSURANCE INDUSTRY AND OFAC ECONOMIC SANCTIONS Vincent J. Vitkowsky Partner, New York VVitkowsky@eapdlaw.com 212.912.2828 Stephen G. Huggard Partner, Boston SHuggard@eapdlaw.com 617.239.0769 Introduction
More informationAML and OFAC: Lessons from Recent Aggressive Enforcement Against Financial Institutions
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A AML and OFAC: Lessons from Recent Aggressive Enforcement Against Financial Institutions Strategies for Effective Defense, Remediation and BSA/AML/OFAC
More informationHow To Know If You Can Pay In Khanese Khan
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY WASHINGTON, D.C. ZOZZO SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT This Settlement Agreement (the "Agreement") is made by and between the U.S. Department of the Treasury's Office offoreign Assets Control
More informationUNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY OFFICE OF THE COMPTROLLER OF THE CURRENCY ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) STIPULATION AND CONSENT ORDER
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY OFFICE OF THE COMPTROLLER OF THE CURRENCY #2005-12 In the Matter of: Chicago Title Insurance Company Settlement Agent for: Whitney National Bank New
More informationWhat do I do if I inherited money in Iran? What do I do if I inherited property in Iran?
اطلاعات فارسی در ا خرين صفحه Although seemingly a difficult task, managing an inheritance in Iran can be done and done legally. With the right knowledge and a proactive approach you can successfully transfer
More informationBSA/AML & OFAC. Volunteer Compliance Training. Agenda
Ideas + Solutions = Success BSA/AML & OFAC Ideas + Solutions = Success Volunteer Compliance Training Presented by Dorie Fitchett HCUL Regulatory Officer April 25, 2013 Agenda 1. Bank Secrecy Act (BSA)
More informationTreasury Department Proposes Anti-Money Laundering Regulations for Investment Advisers
CLIENT MEMORANDUM Treasury Department Proposes Anti-Money Laundering Regulations for Investment Advisers August 28, 2015 AUTHORS Benjamin J. Haskin Russell L. Smith Barbara Block On August 25, 2015, the
More informationThe FDIC s Response to Bank Secrecy Act and Anti-Money Laundering Concerns Identified at FDIC-Supervised Institutions
Office of Audits and Evaluations Report No. AUD-14-009 The FDIC s Response to Bank Secrecy Act and Anti-Money Laundering Concerns Identified at FDIC-Supervised Institutions August 2014 Executive Summary
More informationBank Secrecy Act for Directors. Barb Boyd Content Manager CU Solutions Group
Bank Secrecy Act for Directors Barb Boyd Content Manager CU Solutions Group Agenda What is the Bank Secrecy Act? How to have a successful BSA Compliance Program OFAC responsibilities. Penalties for non-compliance.
More informationNOTICE TO BANKS MONETARY AUTHORITY OF SINGAPORE ACT, CAP. 186 PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING AND COUNTERING THE FINANCING OF TERRORISM - BANKS
MAS 626 2 July 2007 Last revised on 1 July 2014 (Refer to endnotes for history of amendments) NOTICE TO BANKS MONETARY AUTHORITY OF SINGAPORE ACT, CAP. 186 PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING AND COUNTERING
More informationSTEPTOE & JOHNSON LLP
STEPTOE & JOHNSON LLP The USA PATRIOT Act and Financial Institutions Who does it cover? What does it require? And what does it mean for your Company? On October 26, 2001, in the wake of the September 11
More informationFINAL NOTICE. (1) imposes on Bank of Beirut (UK) Ltd ( Bank of Beirut ) a financial penalty of 2,100,000; and
FINAL NOTICE To: Bank of Beirut (UK) Ltd Firm Reference Number: 219523 Address: 17a Curzon Street London UNITED KINGDOM W1J 5HS 4 March 2015 1. ACTION 1.1. For the reasons given in this notice, the Authority
More informationAnti-Money Laundering (AML) & Combating Financing Terrorism (CFT)
Anti-Money Laundering (AML) & Combating Financing Terrorism (CFT) Auditing the complex, unclear, and changing regulatory requirements and expectations Basics of Money Laundering Money laundering is the
More informationWhat You May Not Know About Sanctions (And How It Can Hurt You) by: Rajika Bhasin Counsel, Global Markets AIG
What You May Not Know About Sanctions (And How It Can Hurt You) by: Rajika Bhasin Counsel, Global Markets AIG What You May Not Know About Sanctions (And How It Can Hurt You) Introduction Companies navigating
More informationOFAC Office of Foreign Assets Control
OFAC Office of Foreign Assets Control What is it? The Office of Foreign Assets Control ( OFAC ) of the US Department of the Treasury is a law enforcement agency, not a regulatory agency. OFAC administers
More informationUNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY FINANCIAL CRIMES ENFORCEMENT NETWORK
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY FINANCIAL CRIMES ENFORCEMENT NETWORK IN THE MATTER OF: ) ) ) ) Number 2015-10 Desert Palace, Inc. d/b/a Caesars Palace ) Las Vegas, Nevada ) ASSESSMENT
More informationGuidance. FIN-2014-G001 Issued: February 14, 2014 Subject: BSA Expectations Regarding Marijuana-Related Businesses
Guidance FIN-2014-G001 Issued: February 14, 2014 Subject: BSA Expectations Regarding Marijuana-Related Businesses The Financial Crimes Enforcement Network ( FinCEN ) is issuing guidance to clarify Bank
More informationFEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION WASHINGTON, D.C. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION WASHINGTON, D.C. In the Matter of BURKE & HERBERT BANK & TRUST COMPANY ALEXANDRIA, VIRGINIA (Insured State Nonmember Bank CONSENT ORDER FDIC-14-0103b The Federal Deposit
More informationUNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY FINANCIAL CRIMES ENFORCEMENT NETWORK ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ASSESSMENT OF CIVIL MONEY PENALTY
-.- -- -.------ - --- --- UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY FINANCIAL CRIMES ENFORCEMENT NETWORK IN THE MATTER OF: THE FEDERAL BRANCH OF ARAB BANK PLC NEW YORK, NEW YORK Number 2005-2
More informationFEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION WASHINGTON, D.C. ) CONSENT ORDER. ) FDIC-13-0450b
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION WASHINGTON, D.C. In the Matter of THE BANK OF PRINCETON PRINCETON, NEW JERSEY (INSURED STATE NONMEMBER BANK) ) ) ) ) CONSENT ORDER ) ) ) FDIC-13-0450b ) The Federal
More informationUNITED STATES OF AMERICA Before the SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION II.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Before the SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 Release No. 75999 / September 28, 2015 ACCOUNTING AND AUDITING ENFORCEMENT Release No. 3708 / September
More informationUNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM WASHINGTON, D.C.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM WASHINGTON, D.C. In the Matter of Docket No. 15-008-B-HC 15-008-CMP-HC CITIGROUP INC. New York, New York Order to Cease
More informationRisk Factors for OFAC Compliance in the Securities Industry
Risk Factors for OFAC Compliance in the Securities Industry Updated November 5, 2008 Introduction The U.S. Department of the Treasury s Office of Foreign Assets Control ( OFAC ) is charged with administering
More informationOFAC Compliance- Internal Compliance Program
OFAC Compliance- Internal Compliance Program SCCE 6 th Annual Institute 10 September 2007 Who is OFAC? The Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) of the Department of the Treasury Administers U.S. economic
More informationCOMMERCIAL LENDERS MANDATED TO FIGHT WAR ON TERRORISM
COMMERCIAL LENDERS MANDATED TO FIGHT WAR ON TERRORISM By Gordon L. Gerson, Esq. It has not been business as usual in the lending industry since September 11, and commercial lenders have been conscripted
More informationUNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM WASHINGTON, D.C.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM WASHINGTON, D.C. In the Matter of BARCLAYS BANK PLC London, England and BARCLAYS BANK PLC NEW YORK BRANCH New York,
More informationDEVELOPING AN AML (ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING) PROGRAM:
DEVELOPING AN AML (ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING) PROGRAM: Although the Department of the Treasury has not issued specific rules for hedge funds and hedge fund managers, hedge fund managers should adopt and implement
More informationNavigating OFAC demands a map. Access valuable information and key details to stay informed.
White Paper Navigating OFAC demands a map. Access valuable information and key details to stay informed. February 2010 Risk Solutions Financial Services Introduction This white paper introduces the Office
More informationFALSE CLAIMS ACT STATUTORY LANGUAGE
33 U.S.C. 3729-33 FALSE CLAIMS ACT STATUTORY LANGUAGE 31 U.S.C. 3729. False claims (a) LIABILITY FOR CERTAIN ACTS. (1) IN GENERAL. Subject to paragraph (2), any person who (A) knowingly presents, or causes
More informationGOODMAN GLOBAL GROUP, INC. EXPORT CONTROL AND SANCTIONS COMPLIANCE POLICY
GOODMAN GLOBAL GROUP, INC. EXPORT CONTROL AND SANCTIONS COMPLIANCE POLICY Goodman Global Group, Inc. and our affiliates (collectively, the Company ) are committed to complying with all laws applicable
More informationSTATEMENT OF FACTS. The parties stipulate that the allegations in Count One of the Federal Information, the
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - x UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - v. - 14 Cr. BNP P ARIBAS, S.A., Defendant. - - - - -
More informationOPERATION CHOKE POINT AND THE BRAVE NEW WORLD OF CRIMINAL LIABILITY
OPERATION CHOKE POINT AND THE BRAVE NEW WORLD OF CRIMINAL LIABILITY Presented by: Jeffrey B. Coopersmith, Davis Wright Tremaine Jonny Frank, StoneTurn Group Discussion Points What is Operation Choke Point?
More informationMONEY LAUNDERING AND SANCTIONS COMPLIANCE A SURVEY OF GLOBAL TRENDS
MONEY LAUNDERING AND SANCTIONS COMPLIANCE A SURVEY OF GLOBAL TRENDS By Helen Parry Statement of intent This White Paper examines recent trends and developments in anti-money laundering (AML) and counter
More informationANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING FOR LENDERS
ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING FOR LENDERS Ari Karen Offit Kurman akaren@offitkurman.com 240.507.1740 Bill Heyman Offit Kurman wheyman@offitkurman.com 301.575.0393 THE RATIONALE FOR THE NEW REGULATIONS The Financial
More informationUNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY COMPTROLLER OF THE CURRENCY
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY COMPTROLLER OF THE CURRENCY #2013-002 ) In the Matter of: ) ) AA-EC-13-04 JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. ) Columbus, OH ) ) JPMorgan Bank and Trust Company,
More informationORDER PURSUANT TO BANKING LAW 39. Pursuant to the statutory powers vested in him by the People of the State of New York,
NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES In the Matter of STANDARD CHARTERED BANK, NEW YORK BRANCH, New York, New York ORDER PURSUANT TO BANKING LAW 39 Pursuant to the statutory powers vested in
More informationAML Rule Tuning: Applying Statistical and Risk-Based Approach to Achieve Higher Alert Efficiency
AML Rule Tuning: Applying Statistical and Risk-Based Approach to Achieve Higher Alert Efficiency By: Umberto Lucchetti Junior, CAMS-FCI Table of Contents 1. Executive Summary... 3 2. Introduction... 4
More information2012 Year-End OFAC Update
A Gibson Dunn National Security Presentation: 2012 Year-End OFAC Update January 17, 2013 Judith Alison Lee Marcellus McRae James Doody Andrea Farr MCLE Certificate Information Most participants should
More informationWolfsberg Frequently Asked Questions ("FAQs") on Correspondent Banking
Preamble Wolfsberg Frequently Asked Questions ("FAQs") on Correspondent Banking The Principles constitute global guidance on the establishment and maintenance of Foreign Correspondent Banking relationships,
More informationClient Update FinCEN Proposes Anti-Money Laundering Rules for Investment Advisers
1 Client Update FinCEN Proposes Anti-Money Laundering Rules for Investment Advisers WASHINGTON, D.C. Kenneth J. Berman kjberman@debevoise.com Satish M. Kini smkini@debevoise.com Robert T. Dura rdura@debevoise.com
More informationUNITED STATES OF AMERICA Before the SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION. INVESTMENT ADVISERS ACT OF 1940 Release No. 4219 / October 7, 2015
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Before the SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION INVESTMENT ADVISERS ACT OF 1940 Release No. 4219 / October 7, 2015 ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING File No. 3-16887 In the Matter of Blackstone
More informationOFAC's New Economic Sanctions Enforcement Guidelines
OFAC's New Economic Sanctions Enforcement Guidelines presents Compliance Strategies to Withstand Tougher Foreign Asset Control Oversight A Live 90-Minute Audio Conference with Interactive Q&A Today's panel
More informationMARYLAND FALSE CLAIMS ACT
MARYLAND FALSE CLAIMS ACT For the purpose of prohibiting certain actions constituting false claims against a governmental entity; providing certain penalties for making false claims; requiring the court
More informationOFAC Licensing: Exceptions to Economic Sanctions Prohibitions
A Presentation by Hal Eren SIFMA s OFAC Compliance Symposium AXA Conference Center New York, NY November 6, 2008 11/5/2008 1 OFAC licenses: - authorize transactions and activities that are otherwise prohibited
More informationThe ITAR and the FCPA: What You Disclose May Hurt You. October 7, 2014
The ITAR and the FCPA: What You Disclose May Hurt You October 7, 2014 Presenters Mark Srere Bryan Cave LLP Susan Kovarovics Bryan Cave LLP 2 Agenda Background on the FCPA Background on ITAR ITAR Part 129
More informationEnterprise Terrorist Financing & Money Laundering Policy
Policy Sponsor: Summary: CA and Compliance Sets out obligations under and suggestions for procedures to comply with antiterrorist financing, anti-money laundering and other laws implementing sanctions
More informationAetna Anti-Money Laundering and Financial Sanctions Compliance Policy
Aetna AML and Financial Sanctions Compliance Policy Aetna Anti-Money Laundering and Financial Sanctions Compliance Policy Originating Department: Aetna s AML Compliance Office Effective Date: January 1,
More informationHIGH-RISK COUNTRIES IN AML MONITORING
HIGH-RISK COUNTRIES IN AML MONITORING ALICIA CORTEZ TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction 3 II. High-Risk Countries 3 Customers 4 Products 7 Monitoring 8 Audit Considerations 8 III. Conclusion 10 IV. References
More informationAnti-Money Laundering Requirements for Residential Mortgage Originators and Brokers: What You Need to Know Now
Anti-Money Laundering Requirements for Residential Mortgage Originators and Brokers: What You Need to Know Now Frank A. Mayer, III, Audrey D. Wisotsky, Richard J. Zack, - March 29, 2012 We will be starting
More informationDOING BUSINESS IN IRAN
BRIEFING DOING BUSINESS IN IRAN THE LIFTING OF INTERNATIONAL SANCTIONS AND THE CHALLENGES AHEAD JANUARY 2016 U.S. SANCTIONS RELIEF LARGELY CONFINED TO "SECONDARY SANCTIONS". ON-GOING CONSIDERATIONS FOR
More informationOctober 2013. Avoiding the drift Optimizing and maintaining AML surveillance programs
October 2013 Avoiding the drift Optimizing and maintaining AML surveillance programs The heart of the matter Without regular updating, AML systems can drift into inadvertent noncompliance. Enacted in
More informationPersonal Liability Issues STOCK TTER SHU 6 ABA BANK COMPLIANCE MARCH APRIL 2016
Personal Liability 6 ABA BANK COMPLIANCE MARCH APRIL 2016 BY RALPH E. SHARPE, ESQUIRE ON DECEMBER 1, 2015, the New York Department of Financial Services ( DFS ) proposed a new anti-terrorism and anti-money
More informationBackground. FIN-2010-G001 Issued: March 5, 2010 Subject: Guidance on Obtaining and Retaining Beneficial Ownership Information
Joint Release Financial Crimes Enforcement Network Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation National Credit Union Administration Office of the Comptroller
More informationBank Secrecy Act Anti-Money Laundering Examination Manual
Bank Secrecy Act Anti-Money Laundering Examination Manual Core Overview - Customer Identification Program Assess the bank's compliance with the statutory and regulatory requirements for the Customer Identification
More informationRecent FCPA Enforcement Activities
November 2006 Recent FCPA Enforcement Activities By William F. Pendergast, Matthew R. Fowler and Jennifer D. Riddle This client alert provides a synopsis of recent Foreign Corrupt Practices Act ( FCPA
More informationCONSENT OF DEFENDANT PAUL W. JENNINGS
Case 1:11-cv-00144-RMC Document 1-1 Filed 01/24/11 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, 100 F. Street, NE Washington, D.C. 20549
More informationUNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM WASHINGTON, D.C.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM WASHINGTON, D.C. In the Matter of Docket No. 15-010-B-HC 15-010-CMP-HC BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION Charlotte, North
More informationCONSENT ORDER UNDER NEW YORK BANKING LAW 39 and 44. The New York State Department of Financial Services (the Department ), Deutsche
NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES In the Matter of DEUTSCHE BANK AG, DEUTSCHE BANK AG NEW YORK BRANCH CONSENT ORDER UNDER NEW YORK BANKING LAW 39 and 44 The New York State Department of Financial
More informationAppendix E: Know Your Client DUE DILIGENCE QUESTIONNAIRE
It is RBC policy to obtain information from all financial institutions doing business with RBC relative to their anti-money laundering, anti-terrorism controls. Your cooperation in completing this questionnaire
More informationCircular to Assureds (no 007 2010) Background
Subject: Sanctions Circular to Assureds (no 007 2010) Background Assureds will be aware that there are currently significant complications involved in trading with Iran or Iranian interests. From a charterers
More informationC2 Financial Corporation Anti Money Laundering Program and Suspicious Activity Reporting (AML Program)
C2 Financial Corporation Anti Money Laundering Program and Suspicious Activity Reporting (AML Program) Purpose: This program is being established and implemented by C2 Financial Corporation (C2) as an
More informationMetropolitan Jewish Health System and its Participating Agencies and Programs [MJHS]
Metropolitan Jewish Health System and its Participating Agencies and Programs [MJHS] POLICY PURSUANT TO THE FEDERAL DEFICIT REDUCTION ACT OF 2005: Detection and Prevention of Fraud, Waste, and Abuse and
More informationB roker-dealers often face a significant challenge
Securities Regulation & Law Report Reproduced with permission from Securities Regulation & Law Report, 44 SRLR 1410, 07/23/2012. Copyright 2012 by The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. (800-372-1033) http://www.bna.com
More informationValidating Third Party Software Erica M. Torres, CRCM
Validating Third Party Software Erica M. Torres, CRCM Michigan Bankers Association Risk Management & Compliance Institute September 29, 2014 MEMBER OF PKF NORTH AMERICA, AN ASSOCIATION OF LEGALLY INDEPENDENT
More informationCompliance Audit: Evaluating and Balancing Country Risk and Regulatory Risk
Compliance Audit: Evaluating and Balancing Country Risk and Regulatory Risk August 2013 Lisa Bowyer, CAMS CONTENTS Introduction... 3 Regulatory Risk... 4 Country Risk... 5 Obstacles to assessment and evaluation
More information(unofficial English translation)
REGULATION ON PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING AND FINANCING OF TERRORISM FOR MONEY TRANSFER BUSINESSES AND MONEY CHANGING BUSINESSES (unofficial English translation) REGULATION ON PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING
More information