SIGHT. line of. The Equity Imperative IMPROVING ACTIVE RISK BUDGETING
|
|
- Ronald Stone
- 7 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 line of SIGHT The Equity Imperative IMPROVING ACTIVE RISK BUDGETING Investors recently have begun to rethink how they take and manage risk in their portfolios, and many have reduced their allocations to managers that use high levels of active risk in favor of index strategies. Those investors taking this approach clearly do not believe they are being appropriately compensated for the risks their active managers are taking, leading them to limit or eliminate active risk from their portfolios. This approach is reflective of the misconception that overall portfolio risk can be managed best by allocating a significant portion of the portfolio to index strategies, while incorporating managers with a high level of active risk is the primary way to generate outperformance. In reality, taking a different approach will often better position investors to generate outperformance and target objectives that are not performance related. How? Using strategies that provide strong risk-adjusted returns by focusing on compensated risk factors, such as value, low volatility and momentum. In fact, strategies that take on high levels of active risk tend to be relatively inefficient and often result in low risk-adjusted performance. The following research reveals a better way to maximize risk-adjusted returns. May 2014 We hope you enjoy the latest presentation from Northern Trust s Line of Sight. By providing research, findings, analysis and insight on the effects and implications of our changing financial landscape, Line of Sight offers the clarity you need to make better informed decisions. The Equity Imperative research series provides new insights around the evolving equity landscape to help you navigate a better route to achieving your investment objectives. northerntrust.com Improving Active Risk Budgeting 1 of 12
2 The works of the greatest minds in finance reveal a common prescription: to achieve the best results, investors should maximize risk-adjusted returns 1. Harry Markowitz 2 led the way when he showed that a portfolio is only efficient if it has the highest possible return for a given level of risk. William Sharpe 3 formalized the relationship between equilibrium risk and return in the celebrated capital asset pricing model (CAPM), while Eugene Fama and Kenneth French 4 demonstrated ways to improve returns per unit of risk with style factors. The academics mantra: optimize risk-adjusted returns. Do investors actually take this advice? When asked, most investors we work with say they do. However, a quick review of their asset and risk allocations often suggests otherwise. The reality is that while investors may want an efficient portfolio and can obtain an efficient portfolio in principle, many obstacles stand in the way of achieving this goal. The reality is that while investors may want an efficient portfolio and can obtain an efficient portfolio in principle, many obstacles stand in the way of achieving this goal. THE BIAS TOWARD ISOLATING RISK Research suggests investors may have mental biases that prohibit them from behaving perfectly rationally when allocating risk across their portfolios. Of primary importance is a natural tendency to isolate risk in small pockets of the portfolio, while keeping the remainder for lower risk strategies. Behavioral economist Richard Thaler 5 suggests this cognitive bias is essentially a mental containment strategy that leads to the implicit but ultimately false notion that total risk is somehow reduced if it is concentrated. The problem is perhaps most acute with active risk, which often is characterized in portfolios by significant concentration. For example, most active investors maintain at least some passive exposure in their portfolios, suggesting a segregation of assets into high and low active risk. Those that don t, typically employ varied levels of active exposure across allocations also indicating heterogeneity and, thus, relative concentration in the total active risk budget. Indeed, risk isolation and concentration is so pervasive in the active space that it goes by several formal names, such as core-satellite, core-completion or barbell. No matter what it is called, following this type of strategy immediately causes something of a paradox. In a mental effort to control risk through concentration, investors allocate small portions of their portfolios to risky strategies. However, to meaningfully outperform a benchmark, the active risk taken by this fraction of total assets must be quite high. And managers with such high levels of active risk tend to have lower risk-adjusted returns. While active risk concentration may be intuitively appealing, the approach ultimately is inefficient and fails to achieve desired investment objectives. Most importantly, it fails to maximize risk-adjusted returns (i.e., information ratios) and, thus, is not consistent with established financial theory. Instead, an optimal active risk budget should: 1. Target managers with the highest risk-adjusted returns, and 2. Distribute risk relatively evenly throughout the portfolio without distinct concentration. The result is an investment allocation that meaningfully outperforms a stated benchmark while significantly reducing the probability of underperforming. 2 of 12 northerntrust.com Improving Active Risk Budgeting
3 DIMINISHING RISK-ADJUSTED RETURNS A phenomenon firmly established in the financial literature is that the information ratios of long-only managers tend to decrease as their active risk increases. This is the direct result of long-only managers limited ability to express negative views on stocks while their expression of positive views is generally unrestricted. This asymmetry becomes more pronounced as active risk increases and causes the managers excess return per unit of risk (tracking error) to decline. For example, active equity managers overweight and underweight stocks based on each stock s expected excess returns. Managers that have a long-only constraint and, hence, cannot short stocks, are limited in their ability to underweight a specific stock by the stock s allocation in the benchmark portfolio. At low tracking-error levels, this constraint may not be overly restrictive, and will still allow managers to express a full range of positive and negative views. However, as tracking error increases, the limitation on underweighting securities has a bigger impact and the managers active weights will begin to deviate from their forecast of expected excess returns. In other words, long-only managers can overweight their favorite names as much as they like, but can only fully underweight their least favorite names in a few cases where the benchmark weight is large enough to accommodate the desired underweight. Since the overweights and underweights must balance each other out, the no-short constraint effectively hinders a manager s ability to express a strong bullish or strong bearish view. This result was demonstrated empirically by Alford, Jones and Winkelmann 6. Using data on 1,052 large-cap U.S. equity managers over 13 years, they broke managers into two groups based on tracking error. The first group, which they called Structured Managers, contained managers with an annual tracking error between 100 basis points (bps) and 300 bps. The second group, known as Traditional Managers, was composed of managers with an annual tracking error between 500 bps and 1500 bps. The authors ignored managers whose tracking error fell between 300 bps and 500 bps because they felt these managers were too difficult to classify. (According to the authors, the results were not sensitive to the exclusion of these managers.) Their results are shown in Exhibit 1 (on page 4). DIMINISHING RISK-ADJUSTED RETURNS: THE FUNDAMENTAL LAW OF ACTIVE MANAGEMENT The concept of diminishing risk-adjusted returns was formally proven in the landmark paper by Clarke, de Silva and Thorley 7. Their expression for the information ratio is now widely known as the Fundamental Law of Active Management: IR = IC * TC * N (IR is the information ratio, IC is the information coefficient, TC is the transfer coefficient and N is the number of active bets taken.) For an active equity manager the information coefficient (IC) reflects the correlation between forecasted returns and realized returns. This is a measure of the investment manager s skill in predicting stock returns. More importantly, the transfer coefficient (TC) is the correlation between the portfolio s active weights and the forecasted returns. The information ratio is maximized when the transfer coefficient (which could be as high as 1 or as low as -1) is as large as possible. By limiting the manager s ability to express his or her views, the no-short constraint effectively limits the transfer coefficient. As tracking error increases, the correlation between active weights and expected returns is reduced. Thus, the transfer coefficient is reduced causing total information ratio to decline, all things being equal. (While it is beyond the scope of this paper, hedge funds do not have this no short constraint, so they are potentially in a better position to express their views within their long/short portfolios.) northerntrust.com Improving Active Risk Budgeting 3 of 12
4 EXHIBIT 1: TRACKING ERROR AND PERFORMANCE EMPIRICAL RESULTS Managers with higher tracking error tended to have lower information ratios. INFORMATION RATIO Average Median Top Quartile Bottom Quartile Structured Managers (Low Tracking Error) Traditional Managers (High Tracking Error) STRUCTURED MANAGERS (LOW TRACKING ERROR) AVERAGE MEDIAN TOP QUARTILE BOTTOM QUARTILE ACTIVE RETURN (bps) TRACKING ERROR (bps) INFORMATION RATIO TRADITIONAL MANAGERS (HIGH TRACKING ERROR) ACTIVE RETURN (bps) TRACKING ERROR (bps) INFORMATION RATIO Source: Northern Trust Quantitative Research using data from Alford, Jones and Winkelmann. Data is gross of fees. While high tracking-error managers have higher active returns, their risk-adjusted performance clearly lagged that of low tracking-error managers, just as predicted by the fundamental law of active management (see Diminishing Risk-Adjusted Returns: The Fundamental Law of Active Management, on page 3). The average information ratio of the low tracking-error group is 0.26 while that of the high tracking-error group is just The respective medians are 0.28 and Our analysis of data over the last 10 years reaffirms these findings, showing that lower tracking-error managers tend to have higher information ratios than higher tracking-error managers. Perhaps even more interesting is the dispersion in performance. The top-quartile structured managers had an active return of 92 bps while the bottom quartile had an active return of negative 4 bps. In contrast, the top quartile Traditional Manager outperformed by 201 bps but the bottom quartile underperformed by 120 bps. While these results are consistent with the tracking error classification, it does highlight that manager selection is much more important for high tracking-error Traditional Managers because the range of potential outcomes is much wider. Further, the severity of potential underperformance is clearly reduced with low tracking-error Structured Managers. 4 of 12 northerntrust.com Improving Active Risk Budgeting
5 It appears the natural tendency to concentrate risk may have led investors down the wrong path. Instead of enhancing the active risk budget, concentration has caused them to pursue investments that do not maximize risk-adjusted returns. IMPROVING RETURNS AND REDUCING RISK If risk concentration is synonymous with high tracking error and, therefore, lowinformation-ratio managers, can it possibly be part of an optimal risk budgeting structure? Borrowing from Markowitz s idea of the efficient frontier, we can look at an optimal risk budget using an efficient frontier of active risk. Each point on this frontier would represent the maximum excess return per unit of tracking error. This would show us the highest information ratio attainable for a given level of risk 8. Much like the Markowitz efficient frontier, the active efficient frontier (the grey line in Exhibit 2) is concave due to the Fundamental Law of Active Management and the diminishing information ratio phenomenon discussed previously. As you move up and to the right along the frontier, both expected excess returns and tracking error increase, but the information ratio declines because tracking error increases at a faster rate. For example, in Exhibit 2 the portfolio labeled A on the efficient frontier has a lower expected excess return and tracking error than the portfolio labeled B, but portfolio A (or any point to the left of portfolio B on the active efficient frontier) has a higher information ratio. EXHIBIT 2: EFFICIENT FRONTIER OF ACTIVE MANAGEMENT EXCESS RETURN A C B Levered Portfolio A Levered Portfolio B TRACKING ERROR Source: Northern Trust Quantitative Research One of Markowitz s great insights was that managers can use leverage to achieve higher portfolio returns without necessarily increasing risk or, conversely, a portfolio s risk may be reduced without affecting return. This concept applies equally to the active portfolio, as Exhibit 2 demonstrates. Applying leverage to any portfolio would generate a new linear frontier that connects the origin at the bottom left corner with the portfolio s point on the original frontier. For example, by applying leverage to portfolio A we obtain a new efficient frontier, as shown in portfolio C, that extends above the original frontier (the green line) as you move to the right of portfolio A. Similarly, portfolio B can be levered so that its new efficient frontier (red line) extends above the original frontier to the right of B. northerntrust.com Improving Active Risk Budgeting 5 of 12
6 Note that the new linear efficient frontier formed by leveraging portfolio A, with its high information ratio, always achieves a higher return per unit of risk than the linear frontier formed from the low-information-ratio portfolio B. For example, portfolio A could be levered to achieve portfolio C, which has the same tracking error as portfolio B, but with much higher expected excess returns. Markowitz concluded that if leverage is available, low information ratio portfolios should be expressly avoided because they are inefficient from a risk/return perspective. Of course, if the modern portfolio theory results are to be anything more than just academic, we must reconcile the use of leverage in its framework with an active risk budgeting approach. If investors cannot use or choose not to use leverage, can they still benefit from this concept? If the modern portfolio theory results are to be anything more than just academic, we must reconcile the use of leverage in its framework with an active risk budgeting approach. IMPLICIT LEVERAGE To illustrate the use of implicit leverage in a risk budgeting framework, consider a simple scenario in which we are deciding between two active managers. One has a high information ratio of 0.7, but a lower expected excess return of 2.0% (Manager A). The other has a higher expected excess return of 4.0% but a lower information ratio at 0.4 (Manager B). Which of these managers should we select? Exhibit 3 (on page 7) details the excess return and tracking error metrics for the two options. Tracking error is the expected tracking error of the total equity allocation relative to the benchmark index. A traditional risk concentration strategy might place 20% of the total equity allocation with the active manager and the remaining 80% in something with less active risk, such as indexing. Manager B s expected excess return is 0.80%, with an expected total equity allocation tracking error of 2.00%. These results are highlighted under the Low IR section. However, Manager A can achieve the same expected portfolio excess return with significantly less tracking error by simply increasing the active allocation from 20% to 40% and decreasing the index allocation from 80% to 60%. At this allocation Manager A also provides an expected total equity allocation excess return of 0.80%, but with an expected total equity allocation tracking error of just 1.14% which is 43% less risk than Manager B s tracking error of 2.00%. These results are highlighted in the High IR section, in Exhibit 3. Alternately, suppose we wanted to target the same 2.00% total equity allocation tracking error as Manager B in the first example. What level of excess return could we expect to achieve by using Manager A? As can be seen under the High IR section, a 2.00% total equity allocation tracking error would yield an expected excess return of 1.40%. To achieve this we simply must raise the active allocation from 20% to 70% as shown in the yellow highlight. This increase in excess return from 0.80% (Manager B) to 1.40% (Manager A) represents an increase of 75%. In short, our allocation decision acts as implicit leverage within our active risk budget. By increasing the active allocation we can effectively lever up managers with higher information ratios and lower expected excess returns to obtain higher total equity allocation excess returns and/or a lower tracking error. In this sense we can move up or down along the capital allocation line, achieving better risk adjusted results than with our lower information ratio/ higher alpha manager (Manager B). 6 of 12 northerntrust.com Improving Active Risk Budgeting
7 EXHIBIT 3: INCREASING THE USE OF MANAGERS WITH HIGH INFORMATION RATIOS TO IMPROVE EFFICIENCY Increasing the portion of the portfolio allocated to the high information ratio strategy and reducing the portion allocated to index strategies has the same effect as levering the high information ratio strategy portion of the portfolio without actually using leverage. HIGH IR (MANAGER A) LOW IR (MANAGER B) INDEX ASSET ALLOCATION ACTIVE EXCESS RETURN TRACKING ERROR EXCESS RETURN TRACKING ERROR 0% 100% 2.00% 2.86% 4.00% 10.00% 10% 90% 1.80% 2.57% 3.60% 9.00% 20% 80% 1.60% 2.29% 3.20% 8.00% 30% 70% 1.40% 2.00% 2.80% 7.00% 40% 60% 1.20% 1.71% 2.40% 6.00% 50% 50% 1.00% 1.43% 2.00% 5.00% 60% 40% 0.80% 1.14% 1.60% 4.00% 70% 30% 0.60% 0.86% 1.20% 3.00% 80% 20% 0.40% 0.57% 0.80% 2.00% 90% 10% 0.20% 0.29% 0.40% 1.00% 100% 0% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Source: Northern Trust Quantitative Research Note these results hold generally. If we assume our two active managers realize an information ratio of 0.4 and 0.7 for this example, then the higher information ratio manager will always be able to generate more efficient results using leverage, whether explicit or implicit. Exhibit 4 (on page 8) details the same total equity allocation spectrum except that we used the data from the Alford, Jones and Winkelmann 9 research. Keeping our 20% allocation to active, to Manager B would yield an expected total equity allocation excess return of 0.11% with 1.64% of tracking error. With leverage we could either hold expected total equity allocation excess return constant and reduce tracking error to 0.63% or hold the tracking error constant and increase the expected excess return to 0.34%. This represents a 62% reduction in risk or a 300% increase in expected excess return. Of course, adjusting the allocation between active and passive makes possible other combinations of risk reduction or increased excess return as well. northerntrust.com Improving Active Risk Budgeting 7 of 12
8 EXHIBIT 4: EMPIRICAL RESULTS: INCREASED ALLOCATION TO HIGH INFORMATION RATIO MANAGERS Using data from research by Alford, Jones and Winkelmann in 2003, we see that an increased allocation to the high information ratio manager can improve efficiency without sacrificing excess returns. HIGH IR (MANAGER A) LOW IR (MANAGER B) INDEX ASSET ALLOCATION ACTIVE EXCESS RETURN TRACKING ERROR EXCESS RETURN TRACKING ERROR 0% 100% 0.43% 2.09% 0.53% 8.21% 10% 90% 0.39% 1.88% 0.48% 7.39% 20% 80% 0.34% 1.67% 0.42% 6.57% 30% 70% 0.30% 1.46% 0.37% 5.75% 40% 60% 0.26% 1.25% 0.32% 4.93% 50% 50% 0.22% 1.05% 0.27% 4.11% 60% 40% 0.17% 0.84% 0.21% 3.28% 70% 30% 0.13% 0.63% 0.16% 2.46% 80% 20% 0.09% 0.42% 0.11% 1.64% 90% 10% 0.04% 0.21% 0.05% 0.82% 100% 0% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Source: Northern Trust Quantitative Research, using data from Alford, Jones and Winkelmann BENEFITS OF HIGH IR/LOW TRACKING ERROR MANAGERS Perhaps more importantly, moving toward higher IR managers increases the likelihood of beating the benchmark, which is, after all, most active investors stated objective. Using the data from original example of Managers A and B, Exhibit 5 details the probability of underperforming the benchmark across various periods. EXHIBIT 5: PROBABILITY OF UNDERPERFORMING A BENCHMARK Using a more efficient portfolio with a high information ratio manager reduces the probability of underperforming over various time periods. PROBABILITY OF UNDERPERFORMANCE 40% 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% 34.5% 24.2% 24.4% 11.3% 18.6% 1 YEAR 3 YEARS 5 YEARS Manager A (High IR) 5.9% Manager B (Low IR) 10.3% 1.3% 10 YEARS Source: Northern Trust Quantitative Research While this analysis does not include the impact of fees, a review of fees likely would only magnify these findings; typically low IR/high alpha managers have materially higher fees than high IR/lower alpha managers. 8 of 12 northerntrust.com Improving Active Risk Budgeting
9 Note that differences in portfolio tracking error lead to material differences in underperformance probabilities. The higher IR manager has a significantly lower probability of underperforming across all time horizons. For example, at the three-year horizon the period at which most managers performance is evaluated the lower IR manager has nearly a 25% chance of underperforming the benchmark while the higher IR manager has just a 10% chance. It should also be noted that the analysis above does not include the impact of fees. A review of fees would likely only magnify these findings. To better understand the dynamics of this underperformance, we prepared a Monte Carlo simulation study widely used in modeling phenomena with input uncertainty of both high IR and low IR managers. Using the tracking error, IR and alpha from Managers A (high IR) and B(low IR) in our scenario, we simulated 100,000 return paths spanning 10 years 10. A sample of these paths is shown in Exhibits 6 and 7. As you can see, a $1 investment at the begining of the period with Manager A (shown in Exhibit 6) yields a much narrower distribution of outcomes over any period relative to Manager B (shown in Exhibit 7). Most importantly, note that the frequency with which each manager falls below $1 is much lower with Manager A, the higher IR manager, than with Manager B. EXHIBIT 6: HIGHER INFORMATION RATIO MANAGERS (MANAGER A) HAVE A NARROWER RANGE OF PROBABLE RESULTS $3.00 VALUE OF $1 INVESTED $2.50 $2.00 $1.50 $1.00 $0.50 $ YEAR Source: Northern Trust Quantitative Research EXHIBIT 7: LOWER INFORMATION RATIO MANAGERS (MANAGER B) HAVE A WIDE DISPERSION OF PROBABLE RESULTS VALUE OF $1 INVESTED $3.00 $2.50 $2.00 $1.50 $1.00 $0.50 $ YEAR Source: Northern Trust Quantitative Research northerntrust.com Improving Active Risk Budgeting 9 of 12
10 Again, these results hold generally. Using the data from Alford, Jones and Winkelmann s research, we computed underperformance probabilities in Exhibit 8. Note that the differences between lower IR managers (Traditional Managers) and higher IR managers (Structured Managers) are even more extreme. At a three-year horizon, the lower IR managers still have more than a 45% probability of underperforming a benchmark while the higher IR managers have slightly more than an 11% likelihood. Note also that while underperformance probabilities decline steadily over time for higher IR managers, the reduction is significantly less extreme for lower IR managers. At the 10-year horizon, lower IR managers still have a 42% chance of underperforming; that probability is reduced to just above 1% for higher IR managers. EXHIBIT 8: EMPIRICAL RESULTS: PROBABILITY OF UNDERPERFORMING A BENCHMARK 50% PROBABILITY OF UNDERPERFORMING A BENCHMARK 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 47.4% 45.5% 44.3% 24.2% 11.3% 5.9% 1 YEAR 3 YEARS 5 YEARS 41.9% 10 YEARS 1.3% Low IR/High Alpha Traditional High IR/Low Alpha Structured Source: Northern Trust Quantitative Research using data from Alford, Jones and Winkelmann. So while many investors believe that risk concentration gives them the best of both worlds risk control and the opportunity for outperformance the reality is that it actually produces a portfolio with much higher risk and a significantly lower probability of outperformance than one focusing on higher IR/lower alpha managers. In this sense risk concentration is clearly inefficient and ultimately ineffective at delivering desired investment outcomes. PUTTING AN EFFICIENT RISK BUDGET INTO PRACTICE So ultimately, the evidence shows that the long-held belief that risk concentration is a viable component of an efficient active risk budget is actually counterproductive. A more effective strategy is for investors to maximize their risk-adjusted returns by creating an efficient active risk budget. By targeting high IR managers and using the natural leverage implicit in the active risk budgeting process, investors can still dial up or dial down alpha targets to meet their needs. 10 of 12 northerntrust.com Improving Active Risk Budgeting
11 If the key to achieving an efficient active risk budget is to target high IR managers, how can investors identify these managers? Northern Trust s research, detailed in the paper Understanding Factor Tilts shows that portfolios with tilts toward risk factors such as size, value and momentum, have outperformed their benchmarks in domestic, international and emerging markets, and do so with lower risk. This verifies the results of Carhart s 11 research, which showed that managers employing portfolio tilts toward compensated risk factors tend to have higher information ratios than other active managers. In particular, Carhart reveals that managers focused on fundamental stock picking (i.e., high active share/ high conviction strategies that are typical active candidates) commonly have negative alpha and, hence, negative information ratios, while compensated risk factor tilt strategies have consistently positive alpha and, thus, higher information ratios. THINK DIFFERENTLY, MAXIMIZE RISK-ADJUSTED RETURN While investors may have a natural bias toward strategies that isolate risk, this often leads to portfolios with higher levels of overall risk than many investors realize. At best, it is an inefficient strategy; at worst it can result in portfolios failing to meet their performance goals. Fortunately, research shows that there is a better approach: using an efficient active risk budget. By stepping outside the comfort zone of a traditional risk-concentration strategy and seeking an efficient active risk budget instead, investors will have a more even distribution of risk across the portfolio. This approach can increase returns, decrease risk and raise the likelihood of outperforming a benchmark the ultimate goals of any active risk strategy. LEARN MORE If you would like to learn more about how an efficient active risk budget might benefit your equity portfolio, please contact your local Northern Trust relationship manager or visit northerntrust.com. northerntrust.com Improving Active Risk Budgeting 11 of 12
12 Endnotes: 1. Specifically, returns per unit of risk (return/risk). 2. Harry Markowitz, Portfolio Selection, Journal of Finance, Vol. 7, No. 1, 77-91, March, William F. Sharpe, Capital Asset Prices A Theory of Market Equilibrium Under Conditions of Risk, The Journal of Finance, Vol. XIX, No. 3, , September Eugene F. Fama and Kenneth B. French, The Cross-Section of Expected Stock Returns, The Journal of Finance, Vol. 47, No. 2, June Richard Thaler, Mental Accounting Matters, Journal of Behavioural Decision Making, , Andrew Alford, Robert C. Jones, and Kurt Winkelmann, A Spectrum Approach to Active Risk Budgeting, Journal of Portfolio Management, Vol. 30, No. 1, 2003, Clarke, de Silva and Thorley, Portfolio Constraints and the Fundamental Law, Financial Analysts Journal, Vol. 61, No. 5, 70-83, September Note that for the total equity allocation to have zero tracking error there would be no active risk taken and, hence, the expected excess return relative to the benchmark would also be zero. 9. Alford, Jones and Winkelmann, Annual returns are assumed to be identically and independently normally distributed. 11. Mark M. Carhart. On Persistence in Mutual Fund Performance, Journal of Finance, Vol. 52: 57 82, IRS CIRCULAR 230 NOTICE: To the extent that this material concerns tax matters, it is not intended to be used and cannot be used by a taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed by law. For more information about this notice, see northerntrust.com/circular230. LEGAL, INVESTMENT AND TAX NOTICE. Information is not intended to be and should not be construed as an offer, solicitation or recommendation with respect to any transaction and should not be treated as legal advice, investment advice or tax advice. Clients should under no circumstances rely upon this information as a substitute for obtaining specific legal or tax advice from their own professional legal or tax advisors. All material has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but the accuracy, completeness and interpretation cannot be guaranteed. The views expressed are those of the authors as of the date noted and not necessarily of the Corporation and are subject to change based on market or other conditions without notice. There is no guarantee that the investment objectives of any fund or strategy will be met. Risk controls and models do not promise any level of performance or guarantee against loss of principal. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns of the indices also do not typically reflect the deduction of investment management fees, trading costs or other expenses. It is not possible to invest directly in an index. Indices are the property of their respective owners, all rights reserved Northern Trust Corporation. Head Office: 50 South La Salle Street, Chicago, Illinois U.S.A. Incorporated with limited liability in the U.S. Products and services provided by subsidiaries of Northern Trust Corporation may vary in different markets and are offered in accordance with local regulation. Northern Trust Asset Management comprises Northern Trust Investments, Inc., Northern Trust Global Investments Limited, Northern Trust Global Investments Japan, K.K., NT Global Advisors, Inc. and investment personnel of The Northern Trust Company of Hong Kong Limited and The Northern Trust Company. This material is directed to professional clients only and is not intended for retail clients. For Asia-Pacific markets, it is directed to institutional investors, expert investors and professional investors only and should not be relied upon by retail investors. For legal and regulatory information about our offices and legal entities, visit northerntrust.com/disclosures. The following information is provided to comply with local disclosure requirements: The Northern Trust Company, London Branch; Northern Trust Global Services Limited; Northern Trust Global Investments Limited. The following information is provided to comply with Article 9(a) of The Central Bank of the UAE s Board of Directors Resolution No 57/3/1996 Regarding the Regulation for Representative Offices: Northern Trust Global Services Limited, Abu Dhabi Representative Office. Northern Trust Global Services Limited Luxembourg Branch, 2 rue Albert Borschette, L-1246, Luxembourg, Succursale d une société de droit étranger RCS B Northern Trust Luxembourg Management Company S.A., 2 rue Albert Borschette, L-1246, Luxembourg, Société anonyme RCS B Northern Trust (Guernsey) Limited (2651)/Northern Trust Fiduciary Services (Guernsey) Limited (29806)/Northern Trust International Fund Administration Services (Guernsey) Limited (15532) Registered Office: Trafalgar Court Les Banques, St Peter Port, Guernsey GY1 3DA. Issued by Northern Trust Global Investments Limited. northerntrust.com Improving Active Risk Budgeting 12 of 12 Q (6/14)
G L O B A L F U N D S E R V I C E S. S e r v i c e s s u p p o r t i n g E u r o p e a n e x c h a n g e t r a d e d f u n d s
G L O B A L F U N D S E R V I C E S S e r v i c e s s u p p o r t i n g E u r o p e a n e x c h a n g e t r a d e d f u n d s Support physical, replicating and synthetic ETF models Experience across a
More informationNORTHERN TRUST. Private equity asset servicing solutions
NORTHERN TRUST Private equity asset servicing solutions AN ASSET SERVICING PROVIDER THAT UNDERSTANDS YOUR CHALLENGES Managing private equity funds in today s environment presents numerous challenges from
More informationPRIVATE EQUITY, HEDGE AND UNITIZED FUNDS. Report Guide
PRIVATE EQUITY, HEDGE AND UNITIZED FUNDS Report Guide PRIVATE EQUITY, HEDGE AND UNITIZED FUNDS Northern Trust s Private Equity, Hedge and Unitized Funds Report Guide is a series of specialized statements
More informationGlobal Low Volatility Anomaly
Insights on... Global Low Anomaly Global Low Anomaly: Benefiting from an Actively Designed Approach The low volatility anomaly suggests that low-volatility, low-beta securities outperform high-volatility
More informationAs an investment manager, you need. to efficiently run back- and middle-office. operations so you can concentrate on your
O P E R A T I O N A L A N D C O S T E F F I C I E N C I E S F O R A C O M P E T I T I V E E D G E I n v e s t m e n t O p e r a t i o n s O u t s o u r c i n g F O C U S O N Y O U R C O R E S T R E N G
More informationThe Merits of a Sector-Specialist, Sector-Neutral Investing Strategy
leadership series investment insights July 211 The Merits of a Sector-Specialist, Sector-Neutral Investing Strategy Perhaps the primary concern faced by asset managers, investors, and advisors is the need
More informationDoes the Number of Stocks in a Portfolio Influence Performance?
Investment Insights January 2015 Does the Number of Stocks in a Portfolio Influence Performance? Executive summary Many investors believe actively managed equity portfolios that hold a low number of stocks
More informationActive vs. Passive Money Management
Active vs. Passive Money Management Exploring the costs and benefits of two alternative investment approaches By Baird s Asset Manager Research Synopsis Proponents of active and passive investment management
More informationRethinking Fixed Income
Rethinking Fixed Income Challenging Conventional Wisdom May 2013 Risk. Reinsurance. Human Resources. Rethinking Fixed Income: Challenging Conventional Wisdom With US Treasury interest rates at, or near,
More informationEvolving beyond plain vanilla ETFs
SCHWAB CENTER FOR FINANCIAL RESEARCH Journal of Investment Research Evolving beyond plain vanilla ETFs Anthony B. Davidow, CIMA Vice President, Alternative Beta and Asset Allocation Strategist, Schwab
More informationan investor-centric approach nontraditional indexing evolves
FLEXIBLE INDEXING Shundrawn A. Thomas Executive Vice President Head of Funds and Managed Accounts Group The opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views
More informationWhat Level of Incentive Fees Are Hedge Fund Investors Actually Paying?
What Level of Incentive Fees Are Hedge Fund Investors Actually Paying? Abstract Long-only investors remove the effects of beta when analyzing performance. Why shouldn t long/short equity hedge fund investors
More informationWhen it comes to defined contribution (DC) investors and their equity portfolio allocations, the numbers tell an intriguing story.
line of SIGHT HOME COUNTRY BIAS WHY IT CAN UNDERMINE RETIREMENT PORTFOLIOS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY When it comes to defined contribution (DC) investors and their equity portfolio allocations, the numbers tell
More informationSingle Manager vs. Multi-Manager Alternative Investment Funds
September 2015 Single Manager vs. Multi-Manager Alternative Investment Funds John Dolfin, CFA Chief Investment Officer Steben & Company, Inc. Christopher Maxey, CAIA Senior Portfolio Manager Steben & Company,
More informationDefensive equity. A defensive strategy to Canadian equity investing
Defensive equity A defensive strategy to Canadian equity investing Adam Hornung, MBA, CFA, Institutional Investment Strategist EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Over the last several years, academic studies have shown
More informationUnder the Radar: the value of hedged equity in a diversified portfolio
Under the Radar: the value of hedged equity in a diversified portfolio By Emmett Maguire III, CFA Lake Street Advisors, LLC Investment Analyst As hedged equity strategies have underperformed their long
More informationActive vs. Passive Asset Management Investigation Of The Asset Class And Manager Selection Decisions
Active vs. Passive Asset Management Investigation Of The Asset Class And Manager Selection Decisions Jianan Du, Quantitative Research Analyst, Quantitative Research Group, Envestnet PMC Janis Zvingelis,
More informationLow Volatility Investing: A Consultant s Perspective
Daniel R. Dynan, CFA, CAIA ddynan@meketagroup.com M E K E T A I N V E S T M E N T G R O U P 100 LOWDER BROOK DRIVE SUITE 1100 WESTWOOD MA 02090 781 471 3500 fax 781 471 3411 www.meketagroup.com M:\MARKETING\Conferences
More informationUBS Global Asset Management has
IIJ-130-STAUB.qxp 4/17/08 4:45 PM Page 1 RENATO STAUB is a senior assest allocation and risk analyst at UBS Global Asset Management in Zurich. renato.staub@ubs.com Deploying Alpha: A Strategy to Capture
More informationUnderstanding Currency
Understanding Currency Overlay July 2010 PREPARED BY Gregory J. Leonberger, FSA Director of Research Abstract As portfolios have expanded to include international investments, investors must be aware of
More informationThe Evolution of Investing
Bringing the Best of Academic Research to Real-World Investment Strategies The Science of Investing from the Halls of Academia An enormous Industry has developed over the years that s very familiar to
More informationFinding outperforming managers. Randolph B. Cohen Harvard Business School
Finding outperforming managers Randolph B. Cohen Harvard Business School 1 Conventional wisdom holds that: Managers can t pick stocks and therefore don t beat the market It s impossible to pick winning
More informationLow Volatility Equity Strategies: New and improved?
Low Volatility Equity Strategies: New and improved? Jean Masson, Ph.D Managing Director, TD Asset Management January 2014 Low volatility equity strategies have been available to Canadian investors for
More informationBenchmarking Low-Volatility Strategies
Benchmarking Low-Volatility Strategies David Blitz* Head Quantitative Equity Research Robeco Asset Management Pim van Vliet, PhD** Portfolio Manager Quantitative Equity Robeco Asset Management forthcoming
More informationInvestment Portfolio Philosophy
Investment Portfolio Philosophy The performance of your investment portfolio and the way it contributes to your lifestyle goals is always our prime concern. Our portfolio construction process for all of
More informationCFA Examination PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT Page 1 of 6
PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT A. INTRODUCTION RETURN AS A RANDOM VARIABLE E(R) = the return around which the probability distribution is centered: the expected value or mean of the probability distribution of possible
More informationline of The Path Forward The Ideal DC Plan May Be Closer Than You Think
line of Sight The Path The Ideal DC Plan May Be Closer Than You Think The ideal DC plan may be closer than you think We hope you enjoy the latest presentation from Northern Trust s Line of Sight. By providing
More informationEQUITY OPTIMIZATION ISSUES IV: THE FUNDAMENTAL LAW OF MISMANAGEMENT* By Richard Michaud and Robert Michaud New Frontier Advisors, LLC July 2005
EQUITY OPTIMIZATION ISSUES IV: THE FUNDAMENTAL LAW OF MISMANAGEMENT* By Richard Michaud and Robert Michaud New Frontier Advisors, LLC July 2005 The Grinold Law of Active Management is one of the most widely
More informationSchool of Property, Construction and Project Management. Pacific Rim Real Estate Society Conference Paper
School of Property, Construction and Project Management Pacific Rim Real Estate Society Conference Paper Australian Securitised Property Funds: Tracking Error Analysis and Investment Styles January 2009
More informationU.S. Fixed Income: Potential Interest Rate Shock Scenario
U.S. Fixed Income: Potential Interest Rate Shock Scenario Executive Summary Income-oriented investors have become accustomed to an environment of consistently low interest rates. Yields on the benchmark
More informationMarket Efficiency and Behavioral Finance. Chapter 12
Market Efficiency and Behavioral Finance Chapter 12 Market Efficiency if stock prices reflect firm performance, should we be able to predict them? if prices were to be predictable, that would create the
More informationObligation-based Asset Allocation for Public Pension Plans
Obligation-based Asset Allocation for Public Pension Plans Market Commentary July 2015 PUBLIC PENSION PLANS HAVE a single objective to provide income for a secure retirement for their members. Once the
More informationThe problems of being passive
The problems of being passive Evaluating the merits of an index investment strategy In the investment management industry, indexing has received little attention from investors compared with active management.
More informationRussell Active Manager Report
MAY Surging commodities pose challenge for active managers in : Kathleen Wylie, CFA Head, Canadian Equity Research Russell Investments Canada Limited Kathleen Wylie, Head, Canadian Equity Research for
More informationNorthCoast Investment Advisory Team 203.532.7000 info@northcoastam.com
NorthCoast Investment Advisory Team 203.532.7000 info@northcoastam.com NORTHCOAST ASSET MANAGEMENT An established leader in the field of tactical investment management, specializing in quantitative research
More informationData as of 30/04/2010 Page 1 of 9. Risk Questionnaire and Adviser Select Results Risk Profile Score from Questionnaire
Data as of 30/04/2010 Page 1 of 9 Sample Plan Investment Policy Statement Introduction Your Investment Policy Statement is a summary of your current situation, your requirements and goals, and your recommended
More informationIN BRIEF. Active share has become a staple within the asset management lexicon, yet key lessons from the literature are often oversimplified.
Be Careful What You Wish For: High Perception Versus Reality The potential benefits of high active share may be offset by style inconsistency and overlapping exposures. IN BRIEF Active share has become
More informationQuantitative Asset Manager Analysis
Quantitative Asset Manager Analysis Performance Measurement Forum Dr. Stephan Skaanes, CFA, CAIA, FRM PPCmetrics AG Financial Consulting, Controlling & Research, Zurich, Switzerland www.ppcmetrics.ch Copenhagen,
More informationThe Case For Passive Investing!
The Case For Passive Investing! Aswath Damodaran Aswath Damodaran! 1! The Mechanics of Indexing! Fully indexed fund: An index fund attempts to replicate a market index. It is relatively simple to create,
More informationDiversified Alternatives Index
The Morningstar October 2014 SM Diversified Alternatives Index For Financial Professional Use Only 1 5 Learn More indexes@morningstar.com +1 12 84-75 Contents Executive Summary The Morningstar Diversified
More informationUnderstanding Investor Due Diligence
January 2013 Wells Fargo Prime Services Understanding Investor Due Diligence Executive Summary The investor due diligence process has evolved with the growth of the hedge fund industry. What was once a
More informationDaily vs. monthly rebalanced leveraged funds
Daily vs. monthly rebalanced leveraged funds William Trainor Jr. East Tennessee State University ABSTRACT Leveraged funds have become increasingly popular over the last 5 years. In the ETF market, there
More informationDeploying Multi-Factor Index Allocations in Institutional Portfolios
Deploying Multi-Factor Allocations in Institutional Jennifer Bender Remy Briand Dimitris Melas Raman Aylur Subramanian Madhu Subramanian Executive Summary This paper is the second in a three-paper series
More informationThe Use of Pooled Investment Vehicles for Ultra High Net Worth Investors. By Mark W. Castelin Director, Senior Investment Advisor
The Use of Pooled Investment Vehicles for Ultra High Net Worth Investors By Mark W. Castelin Director, Senior Investment Advisor A major challenge for a large segment of today s Ultra High Net Worth (UHNW)
More informationInvestment Statistics: Definitions & Formulas
Investment Statistics: Definitions & Formulas The following are brief descriptions and formulas for the various statistics and calculations available within the ease Analytics system. Unless stated otherwise,
More informationSolution: The optimal position for an investor with a coefficient of risk aversion A = 5 in the risky asset is y*:
Problem 1. Consider a risky asset. Suppose the expected rate of return on the risky asset is 15%, the standard deviation of the asset return is 22%, and the risk-free rate is 6%. What is your optimal position
More informationSophisticated investments. Simple to use.
Russell LifePoints INSTITUTIONAL TARGET DATE FUNDS Sophisticated investments. Simple to use. INVESTED. TOGETHER. Now your default option can be your best option. If your target date funds are projected
More informationThe UBS Core-Satellite investment approach Build wealth for the long term and make the most of your own investment ideas
The UBS Core-Satellite investment approach Build wealth for the long term and make the most of your own investment ideas StabiIity, opportunity and flexibility build the foundation for optimal results
More informationEmini Education - Managing Volatility in Equity Portfolios
PH&N Trustee Education Seminar 2012 Managing Volatility in Equity Portfolios Why Equities? Equities Offer: Participation in global economic growth Superior historical long-term returns compared to other
More informationCHAPTER 11: THE EFFICIENT MARKET HYPOTHESIS
CHAPTER 11: THE EFFICIENT MARKET HYPOTHESIS PROBLEM SETS 1. The correlation coefficient between stock returns for two non-overlapping periods should be zero. If not, one could use returns from one period
More informationETF Total Cost Analysis in Action
Morningstar ETF Research ETF Total Cost Analysis in Action Authors: Paul Justice, CFA, Director of ETF Research, North America Michael Rawson, CFA, ETF Analyst 2 ETF Total Cost Analysis in Action Exchange
More informationThe Tangent or Efficient Portfolio
The Tangent or Efficient Portfolio 1 2 Identifying the Tangent Portfolio Sharpe Ratio: Measures the ratio of reward-to-volatility provided by a portfolio Sharpe Ratio Portfolio Excess Return E[ RP ] r
More informationECON 422A: FINANCE AND INVESTMENTS
ECON 422A: FINANCE AND INVESTMENTS LECTURE 10: EXPECTATIONS AND THE INFORMATIONAL CONTENT OF SECURITY PRICES Mu-Jeung Yang Winter 2016 c 2016 Mu-Jeung Yang OUTLINE FOR TODAY I) Informational Efficiency:
More informationThe Cadence Approach to Strategic Beta Investing
Cadence Capital Management 265 Franklin Street, 4th Floor Boston, MA 02110 617-624-3500 cadencecapital.com The Cadence Approach to Strategic Beta Investing Contents An Introduction to Strategic Beta Specific
More informationEvolution of GTAA Investment Styles. In This Issue: June 2012
June 2012 ALPHA GROUP TOPIC The Alpha Group researches investment managers. In This Issue: n Evolution of GTAA Investment Styles n Risk-Parity vs. GTAA Managers n Implementation n Investing in a GTAA Strategy
More informationCompleting Emerging Market Equity Allocations with Small Caps
WisdomTree ETFs EMERGING MARKETS SMALLCAP DIVIDEND FUND DGS Completing Emerging Market Equity Allocations with Small Caps The world economy is increasingly powered by the evolution of the emerging market
More informationThe Case for Active Management in the Large Cap Growth Equity Universe
The Case for Active Management in the Large Cap Growth Equity Universe Pioneer US Concentrated Growth Strategy This case for active management examines risk-adjusted returns among large cap growth managers
More informationNavigating Rising Rates with Active, Multi-Sector Fixed Income Management
Navigating Rising Rates with Active, Multi-Sector Fixed Income Management With bond yields near 6-year lows and expected to rise, U.S. core bond investors are increasingly questioning how to mitigate interest
More informationInvestment Fiduciary Governance Commission Outcomes Under the Current Governance Model
As part of its role in assisting the Commission, Hewitt EnnisKnupp (HEK) was asked to provide to the Commission for its consideration as background, an independent evaluation of the outcomes under the
More informationExhibit 1: Hedge Fund Style Returns During Increasing and Decreasing Correlation Environments
ve Equity Derivatives Strategy CSFB Quantitati CSFB SFB Equity Derivatives Strategy Global Market Commentary October, 6, 24 Mika Toikka (212) 325-5798 Ed Tom (212) 325-3584 Martin Boldt-Christmas 44 2
More informationLong Term Investment Pool (LTIP) Investment Policy Statement Level 1
Long Term Investment Pool (LTIP) Level 1 CONTENTS I. OVERVIEW II. FINANCIAL GOALS OF THE LTIP III. INVESTMENT OBJECTIVES OF THE LTIP IV. INVESTMENT STRATEGIES OF THE LTIP V. PORTFOLIO REBALANCING VI. ASSET
More informationHow Much Should I Save for Retirement? By Massi De Santis, PhD and Marlena Lee, PhD Research
How Much Should I Save for Retirement? By Massi De Santis, PhD and Marlena Lee, PhD Research June 2013 Massi De Santis, a senior research associate at Dimensional, is a financial economist with more than
More information3Q14. Are Unconstrained Bond Funds a Substitute for Core Bonds? August 2014. Executive Summary. Introduction
3Q14 TOPICS OF INTEREST Are Unconstrained Bond Funds a Substitute for Core Bonds? August 2014 Executive Summary PETER WILAMOSKI, PH.D. Director of Economic Research Proponents of unconstrained bond funds
More informationNORTHERN TRUST HEDGE FUND SERVICES. Delivering Operational Alpha
NORTHERN TRUST HEDGE FUND SERVICES Delivering Operational Alpha Solutions that drive Operational Alpha Managing hedge funds and funds of hedge funds amidst the challenges of today s market environment
More informationCHAPTER 11: THE EFFICIENT MARKET HYPOTHESIS
CHAPTER 11: THE EFFICIENT MARKET HYPOTHESIS PROBLEM SETS 1. The correlation coefficient between stock returns for two non-overlapping periods should be zero. If not, one could use returns from one period
More informationTilted Portfolios, Hedge Funds, and Portable Alpha
MAY 2006 Tilted Portfolios, Hedge Funds, and Portable Alpha EUGENE F. FAMA AND KENNETH R. FRENCH Many of Dimensional Fund Advisors clients tilt their portfolios toward small and value stocks. Relative
More informationCHAPTER 16: MANAGING BOND PORTFOLIOS
CHAPTER 16: MANAGING BOND PORTFOLIOS PROBLEM SETS 1. While it is true that short-term rates are more volatile than long-term rates, the longer duration of the longer-term bonds makes their prices and their
More informationLow-volatility investing: a long-term perspective
ROCK note January 2012 Low-volatility investing: a long-term perspective For professional investors only Pim van Vliet Senior Portfolio Manager, Low-Volatility Equities Introduction Over the long-run,
More informationYour model to successful individual retirement investment plans
Your model to successful individual retirement investment plans Tim Noonan Managing Director, Capital Markets Insights Russell Investments WWW.RISYMPOSIUM.COM Presented by: Important Information Please
More informationStructured Products. Designing a modern portfolio
ab Structured Products Designing a modern portfolio Achieving your personal goals is the driving motivation for how and why you invest. Whether your goal is to grow and preserve wealth, save for your children
More informationAlpha Dynamics. Evaluating the Activeness of Equity Portfolios. Contributing Authors 1 Mustafa Sagun, Ph.D., CFA Scott Leiberton, CFA
RESEARCH RESOURCES RESULTS Alpha Dynamics Evaluating the Activeness of Equity Portfolios In assessing the relative attributes of active equity investment strategies, many market participants rely on an
More informationNavigator International Equity/ADR
CCM-16-06-637 As of 6/30/2016 Navigator International Navigate Global Equities with a Disciplined, Research-Backed Approach to Security Selection With heightened volatility and increased correlations across
More informationLow-Volatility Investing: Expect the Unexpected
WHITE PAPER October 2014 For professional investors Low-Volatility Investing: Expect the Unexpected David Blitz, PhD Pim van Vliet, PhD Low-Volatility Investing: Expect the Unexpected 1 Expect the unexpected
More informationHow To Understand The Theory Of Active Portfolio Management
Five Myths of Active Portfolio Management Most active managers are skilled. Jonathan B. Berk Proponents of efficient markets argue that it is impossible to beat the market consistently. In support of their
More informationInvestment manager research
Page 1 of 10 Investment manager research Due diligence and selection process Table of contents 2 Introduction 2 Disciplined search criteria 3 Comprehensive evaluation process 4 Firm and product 5 Investment
More informationPortfolio Management Consultants Perfecting the Portfolio
Portfolio Management Consultants Perfecting the Portfolio Envestnet PMC is the ultimate advisor to the advisor. Our goal is to help advisors strengthen relationships with their clients and improve outcomes
More informationMVO has Eaten my Alpha
Dear Investor: MVO has Eaten my Alpha Sebastian Ceria, CEO Axioma, Inc. January 28 th, 2013 Columbia University Copyright 2013 Axioma The Mean Variance Optimization Model Expected Return - Alpha Holdings
More informationJournal of Exclusive Management Science May 2015 -Vol 4 Issue 5 - ISSN 2277 5684
Journal of Exclusive Management Science May 2015 Vol 4 Issue 5 ISSN 2277 5684 A Study on the Emprical Testing Of Capital Asset Pricing Model on Selected Energy Sector Companies Listed In NSE Abstract *S.A.
More informationPERSPECTIVES. Reasonable Expectations for the Long-Run U.S.Equity Risk Premium. Roger G. Clarke, Ph.D and Harindra de Silva, Ph.D.
Risk Management PERSPECTIVES April 2003 Reasonable Expectations for the Long-Run U.S.Equity Risk Premium Expectations for the long-run equity risk premium play an important role in asset allocation decisions
More informationJ.P. Morgan Structured Investments
July 2012 J.P. Morgan Structured Investments The JPMorgan ETF Efficiente 5 Index Strategy Guide Important Information The information contained in this document is for discussion purposes only. Any information
More information(a) Apply generally accepted investment theories that take into account the historic returns of different asset classes over defined periods of time;
Yes. Since 1998, Financial Engines has provided online advice to individuals in defined contribution plans, and since 2001, we have provided advice on all tax-deferred and taxable account types (including
More informationRussell Low Volatility Indexes: Helping moderate life s ups and downs
Russell Indexes Russell Low Volatility Indexes: Helping moderate life s ups and downs By: David Koenig, CFA, FRM, Investment Strategist February 2013 Key benefits: Potential downside protection and upside
More informationBest Styles: Harvesting Risk Premium in Equity Investing
Strategy Best Styles: Harvesting Risk Premium in Equity Investing Harvesting risk premiums is a common investment strategy in fixed income or foreign exchange investing. In equity investing it is still
More informationA: SGEAX C: SGECX I: SGEIX
A: SGEAX C: SGECX I: SGEIX NOT FDIC INSURED MAY LOSE VALUE NO BANK GUARANTEE Salient Global Equity Fund The investment objective of the Salient Global Equity Fund (the Fund ) is to seek long term capital
More informationNavigating through flexible bond funds
For professional investors Navigating through flexible bond funds WHITE PAPER February 2015 Kommer van Trigt Winfried G. Hallerbach ROBECO GLOBAL TOTAL RETURN BOND FUND Contents Introduction 3 Flexible
More informationON THE RISK ADJUSTED DISCOUNT RATE FOR DETERMINING LIFE OFFICE APPRAISAL VALUES BY M. SHERRIS B.A., M.B.A., F.I.A., F.I.A.A. 1.
ON THE RISK ADJUSTED DISCOUNT RATE FOR DETERMINING LIFE OFFICE APPRAISAL VALUES BY M. SHERRIS B.A., M.B.A., F.I.A., F.I.A.A. 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 A number of papers have been written in recent years that
More informationDoes Past Performance Matter? The Persistence Scorecard
JUNE 2015 CONTRIBUTORS Aye M. Soe, CFA Senior Director Global Research & Design aye.soe@spdji.com Does Past Performance Matter? The Persistence Scorecard SUMMARY OF RESULTS When it comes to the active
More informationChapter 5. Conditional CAPM. 5.1 Conditional CAPM: Theory. 5.1.1 Risk According to the CAPM. The CAPM is not a perfect model of expected returns.
Chapter 5 Conditional CAPM 5.1 Conditional CAPM: Theory 5.1.1 Risk According to the CAPM The CAPM is not a perfect model of expected returns. In the 40+ years of its history, many systematic deviations
More informationThe Hidden Cost of Poor Advice: A Review of Investment Decision-Making and Governance in Local Government Pension Schemes ( LGPS ) Part 1
The Hidden Cost of Poor Advice: A Review of Investment Decision-Making and Governance in Local Government Pension Schemes ( LGPS ) Part 1 Universe and Data 99 Local Government Pension Schemes in England,
More informationGlide path ALM: A dynamic allocation approach to derisking
Glide path ALM: A dynamic allocation approach to derisking Authors: Kimberly A. Stockton and Anatoly Shtekhman, CFA Removing pension plan risk through derisking investment strategies has become a major
More informationANALYSIS AND MANAGEMENT
ANALYSIS AND MANAGEMENT T H 1RD CANADIAN EDITION W. SEAN CLEARY Queen's University CHARLES P. JONES North Carolina State University JOHN WILEY & SONS CANADA, LTD. CONTENTS PART ONE Background CHAPTER 1
More informationPerformance Evaluation on Mutual Funds
Performance Evaluation on Mutual Funds Dr.G.Brindha Associate Professor, Bharath School of Business, Bharath University, Chennai 600073, India Abstract: Mutual fund investment has lot of changes in the
More informationDavid C. Reilly, CFA President - Decision Critical Resources, Inc.
David C. Reilly, CFA President - Decision Critical Resources, Inc. Portfolio Construction and Asset Allocation Only - Do not distribute to public 2 Traditional asset classing has proved inadequate to the
More informationWhy Strategic Bond funds are failing investors
Why Strategic Bond funds are failing investors March 2016 For Professional Investors only The rise of Strategic Bonds The IA Sterling Strategic Bond sector was launched to much fanfare in 2008. The birth
More informationHedge-funds: How big is big?
Hedge-funds: How big is big? Marco Avellaneda Courant Institute, New York University Finance Concepts S.A.R.L. and Paul Besson ADI Gestion S.A., Paris A popular radio show by the American humorist Garrison
More informationEssential Beta: More Than Leveraged Bonds
Essential Beta: More Than Leveraged Bonds FQ Insight by Ed Peters Introduction isk parity is an asset allocation approach based upon risk rather than capital. In particular, it does not add a leverage
More informationSEI Japan Equity Fund As at 30th June, 2009
Benchmark TOPIX Base Currency JPY Currencies Available EUR, GBP Fund Complex SEI Global Assets Fund PLC SEI Japan Equity Fund As at 30th June, 2009 SEI MANAGER OF MANAGERS PHILOSOPHY SEI employs a sophisticated
More informationSmart Beta Theory and Practice
Smart Beta Theory and Practice Burton G Malkiel Chemical Bank of Chairman s Professor of Economics, emeritus Princeton University November 5, 2014 RCI Rogers Investment Innovations Conference 2014 1 What
More informationReal estate: The impact of rising interest rates
Fall 015 TIAA-CREF Asset Management Real estate: The impact of rising interest rates Overview TIAA-CREF Global Real Estate Strategy & Research Martha Peyton, Ph.D. Managing Director Edward F. Pierzak,
More informationStock Market -Trading and market participants
Stock Market -Trading and market participants Ruichang LU ( 卢 瑞 昌 ) Department of Finance Guanghua School of Management Peking University Overview Trading Stock Understand trading order Trading cost Margin
More information