fw 163. com. r = % CI ~ r = % CI ~ Q = P < Q = P > 0.

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "fw 163. com. r = % CI ~ r = % CI ~ Q = P < Q = P > 0."

Dorcas Watkins
7 years ago
Views:

1 meta * fw -009@ 163. com meta CNKI 95% CI 26 meta r = % CI ~ r = % CI ~ Q = P < Q = P > meta B doi /j. issn A A meta-analysis of relationship between forgiveness and mental health FU Wei 1,ZHANG Shao-Bo 2,LI Xin 2,HAN Yi-Chu 2 1 College of Mental Hygiene,Qiqihar Medical University,Qiqihar ,Heilongjiang Province,China 2 Department of Psychology,Qiqihar University,Qiqihar ,Heilongjiang Province,China Corresponding author: ZHANG Shao-Bo,fw-009@ 163. com Abstract Objective: To explore the relation of forgiveness to the positive standards and negative standards of mental health. Methods: The studies on the association between forgiveness and mental health were collected through the database of China National Knowledge Infrastructure,Wang Fang,China Science and Technology Journal. Point estimate and 95% CI was calculated to analyze the association between forgiveness and mental health. Results: Totally 26 studies were met requirements of meta-analysis with the sample size of There was significant positive correlation between forgiveness and positive mental health ( r = 0. 29,95% CI: ) and negative correlation between forgiveness and negative mental health ( r = ,95% CI: ). The forgiveness quality measuring tool was able to adjust the relation of forgiveness and positive mental health ( Q = ,P < ) and forgiveness and negative mental health ( Q = ,P < ). The measurement index of forgiveness was not able to adjust the relation of forgiveness and positive mental health( Q = 0. 04,P > 0. 05) and forgiveness and negative mental health ( Q = 1. 73,P > 0. 05). Conclusion: The finding shows an accurate estimate of the relationship between mental health and forgiveness. Key words forgiveness; mental health; meta-analysis; moderate effect ( Chin Ment Health J,2016,30( 5) : ) *

2 396 Chinese Mental Health Journal Vol 30 No meta Hirsc ~ 1229 meta meta CMA2. 0 comprehensive meta-analysis 2. 0 meta Cochran Q Meta Q meta 13 I 2 I 2 I 2 25% 1 50% 75% 1. 1 Tau-squared CNKI 14

3 r 95% % confidence interval 95% CI meta Q / Q df Q I 2 % *** *** *** P < Tau

4 398 Chinese Mental Health Journal Vol 30 No / 95% CI r *** *** *** P < a Z a 3 Q df % CI / Z *** *** *** Hearland *** *** *** Hook * *** *** *** * Mullet *** * *** *** *** *** *** *** ** *** *** *** ** Hook ** *** ** Mullet *** *** *** Hearland *** *** * P < ** P < *** P < ***

5 meta 3 23 Burnette 24 [ 1] Pingleton JP. Why don't forgive: a Biblical and object relations theoretical model for understanding failures in the forgiveness progress meta [J]. J Psychol Theol,1997,25: [2],. : [J]. ( ),. 2010,31( 6) : [ 3] Fitzgibbons R. Anger and the healing power of forgiveness: a psychiatrist ' s view [M] Enright RD, North J. Exploring forgiveness. Madison. WI: University of Wisconsin Press,1998. [ 4] Temoshok LR,Wald RL. Forgiveness and health in persons living Macaskill with HIV /AIDS [M] Jr Worthington EL. Handbook of forgiveness. New York: Routledge,2005. Macaskill [ 5] Karremans JC,Van Lange PA,Ouwerkerk JW. When forgiving enhances psychological well-being: the role of inter personal commit- ment[j]. J Pers Soc Psyehol,2003,84 ( 5) : [ 6] Hirsch JK, Webb JR, Jeglic EL. Forgiveness, depression, and suicidal behavior among a diverse sample of college students [J]. J 25 Clin Psychol,2011,67( 9) : [ 7],. [J].,2011,19( 10) : [ 8]. [D]. :,2011. [ 9]. [D]. :,2011. [ 10]Enright RD,North JE. Exploring Forgiveness [M]. Madison: University of Wisconsin press,1998. [ 11] Enright RD,the Human Development Study Group. The moral development of forgiveness [M]. Kurtines W, Gerwitz J. Handbook of moral behavior and development. Erlbaum,1991. [ 12] Andrews M. Forgiveness in context [J]. J Moral Educ,2000,29 ( 1) : [ 13] Lispsey MW, Wilson DB. Practical meta analysis: applied social research method series 49[M]. Califrnia: SAGE Publications,Inc, [ 14]Borenstein M,Hedges LV,Higgins JP,et al. Introduction to meta-analysis[m]. New York: Wiley Press,2011. Hearland [ 15]. Mullet [D]. :,2011. [16] Hearland. [J].,2012,15( 1) : Mullet [ 17]. [D]. :,2012. [ 18]. [D]. :,2013. [ 19]. [J].,2009,24( 2) : [ 20]. [J].,2010,38( 14) : [ 21]. [D].

6 400 Chinese Mental Health Journal Vol 30 No :,2013. [ 26]Meneses CW, Greenberg LS. Interpersonal forgiveness in emotinfocused couple' s therapy: relating process to outcome[j]. J Mari- [ 22]. [D]. :,2005. [ 23]Enright RD, Santos MJ, Al-Mabuk R. The adolescent as forgiver [J]. J Adolesc,1989,12( 1) : [ 24]Tongeren DV,Hui CM,Hoyle RH,et al. Self-control and forgiveness: tal Fam Ther,2014,40( 1) : [ 27 ] Cairns E, Hewstone M, Tam T. Forgiveness in Northern Irelan [M]. Florence D,Deana C,Harold C,et al. Forgiveness: a sampling of research results. Washington, DC: American Psychology a meta-analytic review [J]. Soc Psychol Pers Sci,2014,5 Association,2006. ( 5) : [ 25]Macaskill A. Differentiating dispositional self-forgiveness from other-forgiveness: associations with mental health and life satisfaction [J]. J Soc Clin Psychol,2012,31( 1) : CT Ⅰ Ⅰ CCRT CCRT CCRT Ⅰ jk@ sina. com

The accuracy of emotional intelligence and forgiveness in predicting the degree of satisfaction in marital communications

The accuracy of emotional intelligence and forgiveness in predicting the degree of satisfaction in marital communications International Journal of Psychology and Counselling Vol. 3(6), pp. 106-110, September 2011 Available online at http://www.academicjournals.org/ijpc ISSN 2141-2499 2011 Academic Journals Full Length Research