SUMMARY DECISION NO. 1162/97. Aggravation (preexisting condition) (osteoarthritis) (knee).

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "SUMMARY DECISION NO. 1162/97. Aggravation (preexisting condition) (osteoarthritis) (knee)."

Transcription

1 SUMMARY DECISION NO. 1162/97 Aggravation (preexisting condition) (osteoarthritis) (knee). The worker suffered left knee injuries in 1976, 1980 and The worker appealed a decision of the Appeals Officer denying a pension for left knee disability. The worker had generalized osteoarthritis. She was also diabetic and overweight, conditions which are secondary predisposing factors to development of osteoarthritis. The accidents aggravated the preexisting condition but did not affect the normal progression of the degenerative condition. The appeal was dismissed. [8 pages] PANEL: McIntosh-Janis; Jackson; Barbeau DATE: 22/10/97

2 WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 1162/97 [1] This appeal was considered in Toronto on October 16, 1997, by the Tribunal s Early Resolution Panel: F.W. McIntosh-Janis: Vice-Chair, P.A. Barbeau : Member representative of employers, F. Jackson : Member representative of workers. THE APPEAL PROCEEDINGS [2] This appeal was referred to this Panel as part of the Early Resolution Process described in Decision No. 276/97 (April 1997). The Appeals Resolution Officer s recommendation appears as an Appendix to this decision. [3] The worker has asked the Panel to have particular regard to certain facts outlined in the recommendation, especially the medical opinions outlined there. The worker and Appeals Resolution Officer recommend that we determine the issue of the worker s entitlement to a permanent disability assessment for her left knee on the basis of the written materials and the information and submissions noted in the recommendation appended to this decision. [4] We agree to this recommendation concerning the process to be followed in deciding this appeal. Accordingly, the balance of this decision will deal with the merits of the appeal. THE EVIDENCE [5] The Panel considered the material included in the Case Record prepared by the Tribunal Counsel Office (in three parts), two Addenda, and the recommendation of the worker and the Appeals Resolution Officer. THE ISSUES [6] The worker had compensable injuries involving her left knee in March 1976, February 1980 and December She claims that her current increased problems with her left knee, diagnosed as related to significant patello-femoral arthritis, are causally related to these compensable accidents and that she is accordingly entitled to a permanent disability assessment. THE PANEL S REASONS (i) The 1976 accident [7] In determining whether there is a connection between the worker s current problems and her 1976 compensable accident, we have considered especially the following: 1. The worker bruised both her left and right knees in March 1976 when she fell on concrete. The injury to her knees was diagnosed as a soft tissue injury that required conservative treatment. (There is no evidence of even x-rays being taken.) 2. The worker returned to her regular work approximately one month after this injury. Based on the medical information on file, it would appear that her March 1976 injury was completely resolved.

3 Page: 2 3. There is some reference to co-workers corroborating continuity of complaint from 1976 to 1979 (when the worker next laid off with knee complaints). However, the evidence appears to relate to complaints of problems with both knees, not just the left knee. Where there is reference to complaints of problems with only one knee, the co-workers cannot recall which knee. 4. The company First Aid nurse refers in 1980 to the worker being seen on several occasions in the medical office due to recurrent pain in her left knee. However, there is no evidence as to what the diagnosis was, how often these visits occurred, and what treatment was recommended. We do know, however, that the worker did not seek any other medical treatment for her left knee from 1976 to 1979/ The worker laid off for two months in The forms refer to osteoarthritis in the left knee. (There is also a reference to stomach problems.) This is the first reference to osteoarthritis as the diagnosis of the worker s left knee condition. However, there is no reference in any of the medical documentation which supported the worker s 1979 lay-off to any possible connection between this diagnosis and the 1976 compensable accident. In fact, the lay-off was clearly dealt with as a non-compensable problem which resulted in sickness and accident benefits. 6. Dr. Fink, an orthopaedic surgeon who saw the worker in 1988, stated that it was doubtful that the worker s osteoarthritis was precipitated by the 1976 fall. (ii) The 1980 accident [8] In determining whether there is a connection between the worker s current problems and her 1980 compensable accident, we have considered especially the following: 1. The diagnosis of the worker s left knee condition after the 1980 fall was aggravation of osteoarthritis. She laid off for approximately five months. 2. In July 1981 the worker laid off again, this time for two months, for an aggravation of her osteoarthritis. This lay-off was non-compensable and therefore covered by sickness and accident benefits. 3. In March 1987 the worker laid off again, again for two months, for an aggravation of her osteoarthritis. This lay-off was also considered non-compensable and therefore covered by sickness and accident benefits. 4. The worker advised Dr. Fink in February 1988 that after her lay-off in 1981 she had no difficulty in the ensuing six years and that she had some mild discomfort in the knee but she was able to continue performing her duties at work and her activities of daily living. 5. Dr. Pugen, the worker s family physician, referred in 1990 to the worker having continued to suffer with right shoulder and knee pain after However, he considered these complaints to be related to the worker s injury of January 1984, a compensable accident which we understand involved only the worker s right shoulder. His statement with respect to knee pain complaints is unfortunately so vague that we do not even know to which knee the doctor is referring. (iii) The 1987 accident [9] In determining whether there is a connection between the worker s current problems and her 1987 compensable accident, we have considered especially the following:

4 Page: 3 1. The worker s injury in 1987 resulted in the Board s award of approximately six months benefits, based upon the opinions of Drs. Urovitz, Fink and Weinstock, all orthopaedic specialists, that there would be an expected recovery time from the injury of two to four months. These opinions are all based upon the specialists examinations of the worker shortly after the 1987 accident. 2. There is no record of any medical treatment of the worker s left knee condition between April 16 and October 18, The worker s family physician, Dr. Pugen, wondered whether this might have been because the worker was unaware that anything further could be done for her and because of her limited English and poor education background. It would not appear, however, that Dr. Pugen was aware of the fact that the worker was in Italy for this period of time, attending to personal family matters. The worker undertook to supply the Board with doctors reports concerning her treatment in Italy during this period. However, the only reports on file from Italian doctors relate to physiotherapy treatments in 1989, not Dr. Pugen offered his opinion that the worker s knee condition had not returned to the preaccident level during the summer of However, this appears to be pure speculation on his part and not based upon any clinical examinations of the worker or upon objective medical information on file. Therefore, we cannot give any weight to this opinion as to the state of the worker s knee in the summer of It is not sufficient to cause us to doubt the accuracy of the three specialists opinions that the worker s aggravation of her underlying osteoarthritic condition would resolve by the late spring or early summer of The worker advised Dr. Weinstock in March 1988 that, prior to December 1987, her knee bothered her a little from time to time, but there was no restriction and she felt fully capable of working. (iv) Our conclusions [10] Given the nature of the 1976 injury, the quick recovery from the injury and return to regular work, the unclear evidence of continuing complaints, the lack of formal medical attention, and the lack of any medical opinion supporting a connection between the diagnosis of osteoarthritis and the 1976 injury, we are not satisfied that there is a connection between the worker s current problems and her 1976 compensable accident. [11] Given the diagnosis of the 1980 injury as an aggravation of a pre-existing underlying condition, the absence of any medical opinion to refute this characterization of the 1980 injury, the series of noncompensable aggravations which followed the 1980 injury and the worker s own reported ability to continue to work at her regular job without substantial difficulty, we are not satisfied that there is a connection between the worker s current problems and her 1980 compensable accident. [12] Given the medical evidence concerning the expected recovery time from the 1987 injury, the lack of any objective evidence to refute the three specialists opinions in this regard and the worker s concession that her knee condition prior to the 1987 accident did not interfere with her ability to do her regular work, we are not satisfied that there is a connection between the worker s current problems and her 1987 compensable accident. [13] In reaching these conclusions, we have also noted that the worker has generalized osteoarthritis, involving her right knee, her cervical spine and her right shoulder as well as her left knee. Her osteoarthritis is not limited to her left knee. We also note that the worker is diabetic and overweight. Both conditions are secondary pre-disposing factors to the development of osteoarthritis.

5 Page: 4 [14] In our view, the medical evidence establishes that the worker has suffered several compensable and non-compensable aggravations of this underlying condition. (It would appear that, in addition to the lay-offs noted above, after the worker retired she suffered another fall in July 1990 which caused yet another flare-up of her left knee condition.) However, there is no evidence to support the claim that any or all of the worker s compensable accidents to her knee have affected the normal progression of this degenerative condition. We are not satisfied that the evidence on this issue is approximately equal in weight; therefore, regard cannot be had to the benefit of doubt found in section 4(4) of the Act. THE DECISION [15] The appeal is denied. DATED: October 22, 1997 SIGNED: F.W. McIntosh-Janis, P.A. Barbeau, F. Jackson

6 APPENDIX RECOMMENDATION OF THE APPEALS RESOLUTION OFFICER THE APPEAL PROCEEDINGS [16] This appeal is from the decision of the Appeals Officer dated October 17, 1996, which denied the worker entitlement to a permanent disability assessment for her left knee. The worker was also denied ongoing entitlement to temporary total disability benefits for her left knee for a period subsequent to June 27, [17] The Appeals Resolution Officer met with the worker and her representative, E. Simonetto of the Office of the Worker Adviser, on August 29, Also present at the meeting were the worker s two daughters. C. Pisa interpreted in the Italian language. The accident employer is no longer in business. BACKGROUND TO THE RECOMMENDATION [18] The Appeals Resolution Officer notes the following facts, which are agreed to by the worker, as a basis for this recommendation: a) The worker was employed in an auto parts factory. Her job involved the assembly of brake shoes while standing at a table. She held the same job during the relevant period of these claims. b) On March 26, 1976, a power cable short-circuited near to the worker s job station. The resulting noise and flash caused the worker to fall to the concrete floor. As a result, she suffered bruises to her knees and hand. c) Temporary total disability benefits were paid to April 26, 1976, at which time the worker returned to work. d) In July 1979, the accident employer filed a claim on behalf of the worker for non-compensable sickness and accident benefits. The worker had osteoarthritis of the left knee. Benefits were paid by the company s insurer from July 17, 1979, to September 18, 1979, at which time the worker again returned to work. e) On February 22, 1980, the worker was coming from her car to work when she slipped and fell in the parking lot. As she attempted to get up, she slipped and fell, again hitting her knee. The worker s condition was diagnosed as a contusion of the knee, aggravation of left knee osteoarthritis and Baker s cyst of the left knee. A new workers compensation claim was established and lost time benefits were paid to July 21, f) In October 1980 and February 1981, the Board conducted investigations into the worker s claims. The Investigator interviewed the worker s foreman and a floorlady. The foreman told them he saw the worker rub one of her knees once in a while and that she complained that it was sore. The floorlady recalled to the Investigator that the worker frequently complained that both her knees were sore. This co-worker also saw the worker rubbing her knees in the company washroom.

7 Page: 6 g) An x-ray report dated April 18, 1980, indicates that the worker had minor degenerative change in her left knee. h) In a report dated May 7, 1980, Dr. S. Silverberg, Internal Medicine Specialist, diagnosed osteoarthritis of the left knee, with a Baker s cyst behind the left knee and left subacromial tendonitis. i) The worker again received non-compensable sickness and accident benefits from July 10, 1981, to September 21, She had osteoarthritis of the left knee and bursitis of the left shoulder. j) On December 23, 1987, the worker was going up a set of stairs to the lunchroom at work when she slipped and struck her left knee. She finished her shift and was off for the holiday season until January 4, On her day back, the worker had to stop due to pain and she did not return after January 5, As the worker was 66 years of age at that time, she retired from work. k) On March 2, 1988, Dr. M. Weinstock, reported that the worker had pre-existing osteoarthritis in her left knee before December 1987 and that, in his opinion, this was a legitimate recurrence of her previous left knee problem. l) A March 2, 1988, report from Dr. E. Fink, orthopaedic surgeon, indicates that it was doubtful that the worker s osteoarthritis was precipitated by her 1979 fall. m) Benefits were initially denied for the December 1987 accident. Entitlement was later allowed on an aggravation basis and total temporary disability benefits were paid from January 13, 1988, to June 27, n) The Board doctor, Dr. E.J. Macfarlane reviewed the file and in a memo dated May 2, 1989, gave the opinion that the worker s left patellofemoral arthritis has been present for many years. Dr. Macfarlane also stated that the accident of February 1980, probably aggravated the worker s underlying chondromalacia. It is noted, however, that Dr. Macfarlane s report makes no mention of the worker s earlier accident in o) In a report dated February 18, 1994, the worker s family doctor, Dr. G. Pugen, noted that the WCB injury caused the knee to worsen but it is difficult to say what percentage of her pain is still caused by the injury. p) Because of the variance in medical opinion, the worker agrees that the question of whether the worker is entitled to a permanent disability assessment, pursuant to section 45 of the pre-1990 Act, should be decided on the basis of section 4(4) of the Act, which states: In determining any claim under this Act, the decision shall be made in accordance with the real merits and justice of the case and where it is not practicable to determine an issue because the evidence for or against the issue is approximately equal in weight, the issue shall be resolved in favour of the claimant. q) The worker is not appealing the denial of temporary total disability benefits subsequent to June 27, 1988.

8 Page: 7 THE RECOMMENDATION [19] In accordance with the WCAT Decision Document dated November 20, 1996, the Appeals Resolution Officer therefore recommends, with the consent of the worker, and her representative, that the Panel dispose of this appeal as follows: a) That the Panel, based on the written material contained in the Case Record and the information in this Recommendation, determine whether the worker is entitled to a permanent disability assessment for her left knee condition. [20] The Appeals Resolution Officer is satisfied that the recommendation is consistent with law and policy and with findings of fact that a Hearing Panel might reasonably make. DATED: August 29, 1997 RECOMMENDED BY: M. Farago, Appeals Resolution Officer

SUMMARY DECISION NO. 143/97. Suitable employment.

SUMMARY DECISION NO. 143/97. Suitable employment. SUMMARY DECISION NO. 143/97 Suitable employment. The worker slipped and fell in January 1992, injuring her low back and hip. She was awarded a 28% NEL award for her low back condition. The worker appealed

More information

Workplace Health, Safety & Compensation Review Division

Workplace Health, Safety & Compensation Review Division Workplace Health, Safety & Compensation Review Division WHSCRD Case No: WHSCC Claim No: Decision Number: 15171 Gordon Murphy Review Commissioner The Review Proceedings 1. The hearing of the review application

More information

SUMMARY DECISION NO. 163/93. Recurrences (compensable injury); Second accident; Intervening causes; Apportionment (pensions).

SUMMARY DECISION NO. 163/93. Recurrences (compensable injury); Second accident; Intervening causes; Apportionment (pensions). SUMMARY DECISION NO. 163/93 Recurrences (compensable injury); Second accident; Intervening causes; Apportionment (pensions). The worker suffered a back injury in 1985. The employer appealed a decision

More information

WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 975/06

WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 975/06 WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 975/06 BEFORE: M. Crystal: Vice-Chair HEARING: February 28, 2007 at Toronto Written case DATE OF DECISION: March 1, 2007 NEUTRAL CITATION: 2007

More information

SUMMARY DECISION NO. 1194/97. Tear (meniscus); Tear (ligament).

SUMMARY DECISION NO. 1194/97. Tear (meniscus); Tear (ligament). SUMMARY DECISION NO. 1194/97 Tear (meniscus); Tear (ligament). The worker twisted his knee in 1991 and suffered a torn meniscus, for which he underwent arthroscopy. The worker appealed a decision of the

More information

WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL

WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL 2005 ONWSIAT 469 WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 1300/04 [1] This appeal was considered in Toronto on August 3, 2004, by Tribunal Vice-Chair M. Crystal. THE APPEAL PROCEEDINGS

More information

WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEAL TRIBUNAL. EMPLOYER CASE ID #[personal information] WORKERS COMPENSATION BOARD OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND WORKER DECISION #114

WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEAL TRIBUNAL. EMPLOYER CASE ID #[personal information] WORKERS COMPENSATION BOARD OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND WORKER DECISION #114 WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEAL TRIBUNAL BETWEEN: EMPLOYER CASE ID #[personal information] AND: APPELLANT WORKERS COMPENSATION BOARD OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND RESPONDENT AND: WORKER EMPLOYEE DECISION #114 Appellant

More information

WORKERS COMPENSATION BOARD APPEAL TRIBUNAL. [Personal information] CASE I.D. #[personal information]

WORKERS COMPENSATION BOARD APPEAL TRIBUNAL. [Personal information] CASE I.D. #[personal information] WORKERS COMPENSATION BOARD APPEAL TRIBUNAL BETWEEN: [personal information] CASE I.D. #[personal information] PLAINTIFF AND: WORKERS COMPENSATION BOARD OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND DEFENDANT DECISION #41 [Personal

More information

NOVA SCOTIA WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS TRIBUNAL

NOVA SCOTIA WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS TRIBUNAL NOVA SCOTIA WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS TRIBUNAL Appellant: [X] (Worker) Participants entitled to respond to this appeal: The Workers Compensation Board of Nova Scotia (Board) APPEAL DECISION Representatives:

More information

WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 2115/14

WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 2115/14 WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 2115/14 BEFORE: C. M. MacAdam : Vice-Chair S. T. Sahay : Member Representative of Employers K. Hoskin : Member Representative of Workers HEARING:

More information

WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 1708/15

WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 1708/15 WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 1708/15 BEFORE: E. Kosmidis : Vice-Chair E. Tracey : Member Representative of Employers C. Salama : Member Representative of Workers HEARING:

More information

WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS TRIBUNAL

WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS TRIBUNAL WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 1025/94 This appeal was heard in Toronto on December 5, 1994, by a Tribunal Panel consisting of: R.E. Hartman : Vice-Chair, G.M. Nipshagen: Member representative

More information

WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 1047/14

WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 1047/14 WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 1047/14 BEFORE: C. M. MacAdam: Vice-Chair HEARING: June 3, 2014 at Toronto Written DATE OF DECISION: June 18, 2014 NEUTRAL CITATION: 2014 ONWSIAT

More information

NOVA SCOTIA WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS TRIBUNAL

NOVA SCOTIA WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS TRIBUNAL NOVA SCOTIA WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS TRIBUNAL Appellant: [X] (Employer) Participants entitled to respond to this appeal: [X] (Worker) and The Workers Compensation Board of Nova Scotia (Board) APPEAL

More information

WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 376/08

WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 376/08 WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 376/08 BEFORE: A. Morris: Vice-Chair HEARING: February 7, 2008 at Toronto Oral DATE OF DECISION: June 9, 2008 NEUTRAL CITATION: 2008 ONWSIAT

More information

SUMMARY DECISION NO. 413/98. Fasciitis (plantar); Cashier.

SUMMARY DECISION NO. 413/98. Fasciitis (plantar); Cashier. SUMMARY DECISION NO. 413/98 Fasciitis (plantar); Cashier. A supermarket cashier appealed a decision of the Appeals Officer denying entitlement for plantar fasciitis. The causes of plantar fasciitis are

More information

DECISION NO. 1708/10

DECISION NO. 1708/10 B. Kalvin WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 1708/10 BEFORE: B. Kalvin : Vice-Chair HEARING: September 9, 2010 at Toronto Oral DATE OF DECISION: September 15, 2010 NEUTRAL CITATION:

More information

FD: ACN=1004 ACC=R FD: DT:D DN: 609/87 STY:PANEL: Thomas; Robillard; Jago DDATE:23/07/87 ACT: 40(3) [old 41(2)], 40(2)(b) [old 41(1)(b)] KEYW:

FD: ACN=1004 ACC=R FD: DT:D DN: 609/87 STY:PANEL: Thomas; Robillard; Jago DDATE:23/07/87 ACT: 40(3) [old 41(2)], 40(2)(b) [old 41(1)(b)] KEYW: FD: ACN=1004 ACC=R FD: DT:D DN: 609/87 STY:PANEL: Thomas; Robillard; Jago DDATE:23/07/87 ACT: 40(3) [old 41(2)], 40(2)(b) [old 41(1)(b)] KEYW: Temporary partial disability (level of benefits); Availability

More information

WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 1119/09

WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 1119/09 WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 1119/09 BEFORE: T. Mitchinson: Vice-Chair HEARING: June 3, 2009 at Sudbury Oral DATE OF DECISION: June 8, 2009 NEUTRAL CITATION: 2009 ONWSIAT

More information

SUMMARY DECISION NO. 70/98. Delay (treatment); Kienbock's disease.

SUMMARY DECISION NO. 70/98. Delay (treatment); Kienbock's disease. SUMMARY DECISION NO. 70/98 Delay (treatment); Kienbock's disease. A construction worker injured his wrist while moving a plank on September 25, 1991. He continued working and did not seek medical treatment

More information

SUMMARY DECISION NO. 248/97. Continuing entitlement.

SUMMARY DECISION NO. 248/97. Continuing entitlement. SUMMARY DECISION NO. 248/97 Continuing entitlement. The worker slipped and fell backwards in October 1991. The worker appealed a decision of the Hearings Officer denying entitlement for organic neck and

More information

Workplace Health, Safety & Compensation Review Division

Workplace Health, Safety & Compensation Review Division Workplace Health, Safety & Compensation Review Division WHSCRD Case No: 13252-11 WHSCC Claim No.(s): 604016, 611050, 672511 705910, 721783, 731715, 753775, 784014, 831110 Decision Number: 14189 Marlene

More information

WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 1602/11

WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 1602/11 WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 1602/11 BEFORE: M. M. Cohen: Vice-Chair HEARING: August 16, 2011 at Toronto Written DATE OF DECISION: August 23, 2011 NEUTRAL CITATION: 2011

More information

WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL

WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL 2001 ONWSIAT 2499 WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 398 01 [1] This appeal was heard in Toronto on February 16, 2001 by Tribunal Vice-Chair E.J. Sajtos. THE APPEAL PROCEEDINGS

More information

Noteworthy Decision Summary. Decision: WCAT-2003-01952 Panel: D. Dukelow Decision Date: August 11, 2003

Noteworthy Decision Summary. Decision: WCAT-2003-01952 Panel: D. Dukelow Decision Date: August 11, 2003 Noteworthy Decision Summary Decision: WCAT-2003-01952 Panel: D. Dukelow Decision Date: August 11, 2003 Re-opening Previous Decision Sections 96(2) and 240(2) of the Workers Compensation Act Item #102.01

More information

WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEAL TRIBUNAL [PERSONAL INFORMATION] CASE ID #[PERSONAL INFORMATION] WORKERS COMPENSATION BOARD OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND

WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEAL TRIBUNAL [PERSONAL INFORMATION] CASE ID #[PERSONAL INFORMATION] WORKERS COMPENSATION BOARD OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEAL TRIBUNAL BETWEEN: [PERSONAL INFORMATION] CASE ID #[PERSONAL INFORMATION] APPELLANT AND: WORKERS COMPENSATION BOARD OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND RESPONDENT DECISION #194 Appellant

More information

DECISION NUMBER 749 / 94 SUMMARY

DECISION NUMBER 749 / 94 SUMMARY DECISION NUMBER 749 / 94 SUMMARY The worker suffered a whiplash injury in a compensable motor vehicle accident in May 1991. The worker appealed a decision of the Hearings Officer denying entitlement when

More information

WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL

WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL 2004 ONWSIAT 737 WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 1960/03 [1] This written appeal was considered in Toronto on March 31, 2004, by Tribunal Vice-Chair E.J. Sajtos. THE APPEAL

More information

SUMMARY DECISION NO. 1007/99. Accident (occurrence).

SUMMARY DECISION NO. 1007/99. Accident (occurrence). SUMMARY DECISION NO. 1007/99 Accident (occurrence). The worker appealed a decision of the Appeals Resolution Officer denying entitlement for low back disability. The worker experienced the onset of back

More information

DECISION NO. 94/91. Exposure (asbestos).

DECISION NO. 94/91. Exposure (asbestos). DECISION NO. 94/91 Exposure (asbestos). The worker appealed a decision of the Hearings Officer denying entitlement for asbestosis which the worker related to exposure to asbestos when the building in which

More information

FD: FD: DT:D DN:81/87 STY: PANEL:O'Neil; Lankin; Jago DDATE:241287 TYPE:A ACT: DECON:81/87L CCON: SCON: BDG:Claims Adjudication Branch Procedures

FD: FD: DT:D DN:81/87 STY: PANEL:O'Neil; Lankin; Jago DDATE:241287 TYPE:A ACT: DECON:81/87L CCON: SCON: BDG:Claims Adjudication Branch Procedures FD: FD: DT:D DN:81/87 STY: PANEL:O'Neil; Lankin; Jago DDATE:241287 TYPE:A ACT: DECON:81/87L CCON: SCON: BDG:Claims Adjudication Branch Procedures Manual, document no. 33-13-09; Claims Services Division

More information

United States Department of Labor Employees Compensation Appeals Board DECISION AND ORDER

United States Department of Labor Employees Compensation Appeals Board DECISION AND ORDER United States Department of Labor J.S., Appellant and DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, Seattle, WA, Employer Appearances: Appellant, pro se Office of Solicitor, for the Director

More information

BEFORE THE APPEALS BOARD FOR THE KANSAS DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION

BEFORE THE APPEALS BOARD FOR THE KANSAS DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION BEFORE THE APPEALS BOARD FOR THE KANSAS DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION DONALD BRYAN SMITHHISLER Claimant VS. LIFE CARE CENTERS AMERICA, INC. Respondent Docket No. 1,014,349 AND OLD REPUBLIC INSURANCE

More information

NOVA SCOTIA WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS TRIBUNAL

NOVA SCOTIA WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS TRIBUNAL NOVA SCOTIA WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS TRIBUNAL Appellant: [X] (Worker) Participants entitled to respond to this appeal: [X] (Employer) and Workers Compensation Board of Nova Scotia (Board) APPEAL DECISION

More information

WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL

WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL 2001 ONWSIAT 1893 WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 193/00 [1] This appeal was heard in Toronto on September 22, 2000, by Tribunal Vice-Chair N. McCombie. THE APPEAL PROCEEDINGS

More information

WCB claims. WCB claim process. Worker suffers an injury/occupational disease. Report to first aid/supervisor.

WCB claims. WCB claim process. Worker suffers an injury/occupational disease. Report to first aid/supervisor. Section 4 WCB claims WCB claim process Worker suffers an injury/occupational disease. Worker reports to doctor. Physician s first report is sent to WCB. (Form 8). Report to first aid/supervisor. Injured

More information

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NO. F910691. TERRY FOSTER, Employee. TYSON SALES & DISTRIBUTION, Self-Insured Employer

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NO. F910691. TERRY FOSTER, Employee. TYSON SALES & DISTRIBUTION, Self-Insured Employer BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NO. F910691 TERRY FOSTER, Employee TYSON SALES & DISTRIBUTION, Self-Insured Employer CLAIMANT RESPONDENT OPINION FILED NOVEMBER 20, 2013 Hearing

More information

WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEAL TRIBUNAL

WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEAL TRIBUNAL WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEAL TRIBUNAL BETWEEN: [PERSONAL INFORMATION] CASE ID #[PERSONAL INFORMATION] APPELLANT AND: WORKERS COMPENSATION BOARD OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND RESPONDENT DECISION #199 Appellant

More information

WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 1985/14

WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 1985/14 WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 1985/14 BEFORE: A.G. Baker : Vice-Chair E. Tracey : Member Representative of Employers C. Salama : Member Representative of Workers HEARING:

More information

WHAT IS AN INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENT? WHAT SHOULD YOU DO IF IT HAPPENS TO YOU? WHAT ARE YOUR AVENUES OF RECOURSE?

WHAT IS AN INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENT? WHAT SHOULD YOU DO IF IT HAPPENS TO YOU? WHAT ARE YOUR AVENUES OF RECOURSE? APPLICATION GUIDE FOR SUPPORT STAFF MEMBERS WHAT IS AN INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENT? WHAT SHOULD YOU DO IF IT HAPPENS TO YOU? WHAT ARE YOUR AVENUES OF RECOURSE? When in doubt, contact your Union FPSES College sector

More information

WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 2437/15

WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 2437/15 WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 2437/15 BEFORE: S. Netten: Vice-Chair HEARING: November 10, 2015 at Toronto Written DATE OF DECISION: November 17, 2015 NEUTRAL CITATION: 2015

More information

WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 2395/13

WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 2395/13 WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 2395/13 BEFORE: A.G. Baker: Vice-Chair HEARING: December 27, 2013 at Toronto Written DATE OF DECISION: May 9, 2014 NEUTRAL CITATION: 2014 ONWSIAT

More information

Noteworthy Decision Summary. Decision: WCAT-2004-06682 Panel: Heather McDonald Decision Date: December 17, 2004

Noteworthy Decision Summary. Decision: WCAT-2004-06682 Panel: Heather McDonald Decision Date: December 17, 2004 Noteworthy Decision Summary Decision: WCAT-2004-06682 Panel: Heather McDonald Decision Date: December 17, 2004 Reopening of claim New diagnosis on reopening Back strain Disc herniation Radiculopathy CT

More information

WORKCOVER DIVISION Case No.C12401789 --- S GARNETT MELBOURNE REASONS FOR DECISION ---

WORKCOVER DIVISION Case No.C12401789 --- S GARNETT MELBOURNE REASONS FOR DECISION --- !Undefined Bookmark, I IN THE MAGISTRATES COURT OF VICTORIA AT MELBOURNE WORKCOVER DIVISION Case No.C12401789 ZIVKA SAPAZOVSKI Plaintiff v ONE FORCE GROUP AUSTRALIA PTY LTD Defendant --- MAGISTRATE: S

More information

Liability is admitted

Liability is admitted IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA Date 20080222 Docket M062030 Registry Vancouver Between Sakina Jah Plaintiff And Sik L Cheung Defendant Before The Honourable Madam Justice Bennett Oral Reasons

More information

WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 1617/14

WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 1617/14 WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 1617/14 BEFORE: T. Mitchinson: Vice-Chair HEARING: August 29, 2014 at Sudbury Oral DATE OF DECISION: September 4, 2014 NEUTRAL CITATION: 2014

More information

WORKERS COMPENSATION BOARD APPEAL TRIBUNAL. [Personal Information] WORKERS COMPENSATION BOARD OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND DECISION #42

WORKERS COMPENSATION BOARD APPEAL TRIBUNAL. [Personal Information] WORKERS COMPENSATION BOARD OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND DECISION #42 WORKERS COMPENSATION BOARD APPEAL TRIBUNAL CASE I.D. #[personal information] CASE I.D. #[personal information] BETWEEN: [Personal Information] PLAINTIFF AND: WORKERS COMPENSATION BOARD OF PRINCE EDWARD

More information

WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 2515/11

WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 2515/11 WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 2515/11 BEFORE: R. McClellan : Vice-Chair M. Christie : Member Representative of Employers A. Signoroni : Member Representative of Workers HEARING:

More information

NOVA SCOTIA WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS TRIBUNAL

NOVA SCOTIA WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS TRIBUNAL NOVA SCOTIA WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS TRIBUNAL Appellant: [*] (Worker) Participants entitled to respond to this appeal: J. W. Lindsay Enterprises Limited (Employer) and The Workers Compensation Board

More information

SUMMARY DECISION NO. 303/95R. Reconsideration (consideration of evidence).

SUMMARY DECISION NO. 303/95R. Reconsideration (consideration of evidence). SUMMARY DECISION NO. 303/95R Reconsideration (consideration of evidence). The worker's application to reconsider Decision No. 303/95 was denied. The hearing panel considered the evidence and reached its

More information

IN THE PENSION APPEALS BOARD IN RE THE CANADA PENSION PLAN JUDY MANCHUR. - and - MINISTER OF HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT

IN THE PENSION APPEALS BOARD IN RE THE CANADA PENSION PLAN JUDY MANCHUR. - and - MINISTER OF HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT IN THE PENSION APPEALS BOARD IN RE THE CANADA PENSION PLAN BETWEEN: JUDY MANCHUR Appellant - and - MINISTER OF HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT Respondent Appeal CP08485 heard in Regina, Saskatchewan October

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE SPECIAL WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS PANEL AT JACKSON March 26, 2012 Session

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE SPECIAL WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS PANEL AT JACKSON March 26, 2012 Session IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE SPECIAL WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS PANEL AT JACKSON March 26, 2012 Session GAIL FLY v. TRAVELERS INSURANCE ET AL. Appeal from the Chancery Court for Gibson County No.

More information

NOVA SCOTIA WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS TRIBUNAL. Participant entitled to Workers Compensation Board of Nova Scotia (Board)

NOVA SCOTIA WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS TRIBUNAL. Participant entitled to Workers Compensation Board of Nova Scotia (Board) WCAT # 2009-623-AD-RTH NOVA SCOTIA WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS TRIBUNAL Appellant: [X] (Worker) Participant entitled to respond to the appeal: Workers Compensation Board of Nova Scotia (Board) APPEAL

More information

FD: FD: DT:D DN: 675/93 STY: PANEL: Newman; M. Cook; Chapman DDATE:080494 ACT: KEYW: Delay (onset of symptoms); Heart condition (traumatic).

FD: FD: DT:D DN: 675/93 STY: PANEL: Newman; M. Cook; Chapman DDATE:080494 ACT: KEYW: Delay (onset of symptoms); Heart condition (traumatic). FD: FD: DT:D DN: 675/93 STY: PANEL: Newman; M. Cook; Chapman DDATE:080494 ACT: KEYW: Delay (onset of symptoms); Heart condition (traumatic). SUM: The worker's arm was caught in a conveyor belt and was

More information

BEFORE THE APPEALS BOARD FOR THE KANSAS DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION

BEFORE THE APPEALS BOARD FOR THE KANSAS DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION BEFORE THE APPEALS BOARD FOR THE KANSAS DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION SARAH DREILING ) Claimant ) VS. ) ) Docket No. 65,956 HAYS MEDICAL CENTER ) Respondent ) AND ) ) ROYAL & SUNALLIANCE ) Insurance

More information

The employee s files contained a post office box number instead of a street address.

The employee s files contained a post office box number instead of a street address. Worker s Compensation Fraud Preexisting Medical Condition The auditor was working on a worker s compensation (WC) audit at a Department of Defense agency. As part of the review, the auditor reviewed WC

More information

FD: ACN=235 ACC=R FD: DT:D DN: 1290/87 STY: PANEL: Bradbury; Beattie; Apsey DDATE: 180188 ACT: 40(2) KEYW: Temporary total disability; Temporary

FD: ACN=235 ACC=R FD: DT:D DN: 1290/87 STY: PANEL: Bradbury; Beattie; Apsey DDATE: 180188 ACT: 40(2) KEYW: Temporary total disability; Temporary FD: ACN=235 ACC=R FD: DT:D DN: 1290/87 STY: PANEL: Bradbury; Beattie; Apsey DDATE: 180188 ACT: 40(2) KEYW: Temporary total disability; Temporary partial disability. SUM: - Tribunal found that worker was

More information

NOVA SCOTIA WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS TRIBUNAL

NOVA SCOTIA WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS TRIBUNAL NOVA SCOTIA WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS TRIBUNAL Appellant: [*] (Worker) Participants entitled to respond to this appeal: The Workers Compensation Board of Nova Scotia (Board) APPEAL DECISION Representatives:

More information

Decision Number: WCAT-2015-02919

Decision Number: WCAT-2015-02919 WCAT Decision Number: WCAT-2015-02919 WCAT Decision Date: September 23, 2015 Panel: Joanne Kembel, Vice Chair Introduction [1] This is a referral to the chair of the (WCAT) under section 251 of the Workers

More information

2013 ANNUAL REPORT. An independent office working to ensure fair practices at the Workers Compensation Board of Manitoba

2013 ANNUAL REPORT. An independent office working to ensure fair practices at the Workers Compensation Board of Manitoba 2013 ANNUAL REPORT An independent office working to ensure fair practices at the Workers Compensation Board of Manitoba Table of Contents Message from the Fair Practices Advocate...3 Overview...4 Differences

More information

Noteworthy Decision Summary. Decision: WCAT 2003-04102 Panel: Randy Lane Decision Date: December 11, 2003

Noteworthy Decision Summary. Decision: WCAT 2003-04102 Panel: Randy Lane Decision Date: December 11, 2003 Noteworthy Decision Summary Decision: WCAT 2003-04102 Panel: Randy Lane Decision Date: December 11, 2003 Termination of wage-loss benefits When is a worker s condition stabilized Applying policy item #34.54

More information

Barbara Grimes v. City of Burlington (June 6, 2012) STATE OF VERMONT DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Barbara Grimes v. City of Burlington (June 6, 2012) STATE OF VERMONT DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Barbara Grimes v. City of Burlington (June 6, 2012) STATE OF VERMONT DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Barbara Grimes Opinion No. 17-12WC v. By: Jane Woodruff, Esq. Hearing Officer City of Burlington For: OPINION AND

More information

WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 845/15

WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 845/15 WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 845/15 BEFORE: S. Netten: Vice-Chair HEARING: April 28, 2015 at Toronto Written DATE OF DECISION: June 3, 2015 NEUTRAL CITATION: 2015 ONWSIAT

More information

WORKERS COMPENSATION AND REHABILITATION QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS

WORKERS COMPENSATION AND REHABILITATION QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS WORKERS COMPENSATION AND REHABILITATION QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS The Work Health & Safety Unit has responsibility for the management of workers compensation claims and the rehabilitation of injured employees.

More information

NOTEWORTHY DECISION SUMMARY. Decision: WCAT-2004-02435-RB Panel: Beatrice Anderson Decision Date: May 10, 2004

NOTEWORTHY DECISION SUMMARY. Decision: WCAT-2004-02435-RB Panel: Beatrice Anderson Decision Date: May 10, 2004 NOTEWORTHY DECISION SUMMARY Decision: WCAT-2004-02435-RB Panel: Beatrice Anderson Decision Date: May 10, 2004 Referrals to Board of Issue for Determination - Completion of Appeals after Referral - Section

More information

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND INDUSTRY SERVICES BUREAU OF HEARINGS. Agency No.

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND INDUSTRY SERVICES BUREAU OF HEARINGS. Agency No. STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND INDUSTRY SERVICES BUREAU OF HEARINGS In the matter of Vivian B. Nalu, Petitioner v Public School Employees Retirement System, Respondent / Docket No. 2000-1872

More information

Ontario ~ Commission des. Ontano OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF ARBITRATIONS PAULO PINTO. and

Ontario ~ Commission des. Ontano OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF ARBITRATIONS PAULO PINTO. and Ontario ~ Commission des Insurance assurances de Commission I Ontario Ontano OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF ARBITRATIONS Appeal P97-00031 PAULO PINTO Appellant/Respondent and GENERAL ACCIDENT ASSURANCE CO.

More information

WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEAL TRIBUNAL

WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEAL TRIBUNAL WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEAL TRIBUNAL BETWEEN: [PERSONAL INFORMATION] CASE ID #[PERSONAL INFORMATION] APPELLANT AND: WORKERS COMPENSATION BOARD OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND RESPONDENT DECISION #201 Appellant

More information

CASE ID # [personal information] WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEAL TRIBUNAL WORKERS COMPENSATION BOARD OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND DECISION #7

CASE ID # [personal information] WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEAL TRIBUNAL WORKERS COMPENSATION BOARD OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND DECISION #7 C A N A D A CASE ID # [personal information] PROVINCE OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEAL TRIBUNAL BETWEEN: WORKER APPELLANT AND: WORKERS COMPENSATION BOARD OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND RESPONDENT

More information

SOAH DOCKET NO. 453-04-4583.M2 TWCC MR NO. M2-04-0846-01 ' ' ' ' ' ' ' DECISION AND ORDER I. JURISDICTION, NOTICE, AND VENUE

SOAH DOCKET NO. 453-04-4583.M2 TWCC MR NO. M2-04-0846-01 ' ' ' ' ' ' ' DECISION AND ORDER I. JURISDICTION, NOTICE, AND VENUE SOAH DOCKET NO. 453-04-4583.M2 TWCC MR NO. M2-04-0846-01 FIRST RIO VALLEY MEDICAL, P.A., Petitioner V. AMERICAN HOME ASSURANCE CO., Respondent BEFORE THE STATE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS DECISION

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE SPECIAL WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEALS PANEL KNOXVILLE, MAY 1999 SESSION

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE SPECIAL WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEALS PANEL KNOXVILLE, MAY 1999 SESSION IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE SPECIAL WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEALS PANEL KNOXVILLE, MAY 1999 SESSION FILED August 27, 1999 Cecil Crowson, Jr. Appellate Court Clerk ROBERT JONES CUMBERLAND CIRCUIT

More information

WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 193/14

WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 193/14 WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 193/14 BEFORE: C. M. MacAdam : Vice-Chair J. Blogg : Member Representative of Employers A. Grande : Member Representative of Workers HEARING:

More information

NOVA SCOTIA WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS TRIBUNAL

NOVA SCOTIA WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS TRIBUNAL NOVA SCOTIA WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS TRIBUNAL Appellant: [X] (Worker) Participants entitled to respond to this appeal: [X] (Employer) and The Workers Compensation Board of Nova Scotia (Board) APPEAL

More information

DECISION 13080. Lloyd Piercey. Review Commissioner

DECISION 13080. Lloyd Piercey. Review Commissioner WORKPLACE HEALTH, SAFETY & COMPENSATION REVIEW DIVISION 6 Mt. Carson Ave., Dorset Building Mt. Pearl, NL A1N 3K4 DECISION 13080 Lloyd Piercey Review Commissioner May 2013 WORKPLACE HEALTH, SAFETY & COMPENSATION

More information

NOVA SCOTIA WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS TRIBUNAL

NOVA SCOTIA WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS TRIBUNAL NOVA SCOTIA WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS TRIBUNAL Appellant: [X] (Worker) Participant entitled to respond to this appeal: The Workers Compensation Board of Nova Scotia (Board) APPEAL DECISION Representative:

More information

Boutwell v. Hubbardton Forge (July 1, 2003) STATE OF VERMONT DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY ARBITRATION DECISION AND ORDER

Boutwell v. Hubbardton Forge (July 1, 2003) STATE OF VERMONT DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY ARBITRATION DECISION AND ORDER Boutwell v. Hubbardton Forge (July 1, 2003) STATE OF VERMONT DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY Michelle Boutwell ) ) State File No. P-07188 v. ) ) Hubbardton Forge ) Phyllis Severance, Esq. ) Arbitrator APPEARANCES:

More information

S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPELLATE COMMISSION

S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPELLATE COMMISSION 1997 OPINION # 219 S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPELLATE COMMISSION SUSAN BARTKIW, PLAINTIFF, V DOCKET # 94-0825 CITY OF DETROIT POLICE DEPARTMENT, SELF-INSURED, DEFENDANT. APPEAL

More information

GENERAL INFORMATION. What should I do if I m injured at work?

GENERAL INFORMATION. What should I do if I m injured at work? GENERL INFORMTION What should I do if I m injured at work? Ensure you report the accident immediately to your supervisor. Describe the event in detail, provide the names of any witnesses to the incident,

More information

STATE BOARD OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION Heritage Tower, Suite 200, 18 9th Street Columbus, Georgia 31901 (706) 649-7372 www.sbwc.georgia.

STATE BOARD OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION Heritage Tower, Suite 200, 18 9th Street Columbus, Georgia 31901 (706) 649-7372 www.sbwc.georgia. 2012003449 Trial Heritage Tower, Suite 200, 18 9th Street Columbus, Georgia 31901 (706) 649-7372 www.sbwc.georgia.gov STATEMENT OF CASE The employee requested a hearing in the above referenced claim for

More information

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA James Conace, : Petitioner : : v. : : Workers Compensation Appeal : Board (Armen Cadillac, Inc.), : Nos. 346 & 347 C.D. 2014 Respondent : Submitted: September

More information

DECISION NO. 4/92. Commutation (vehicle purchase).

DECISION NO. 4/92. Commutation (vehicle purchase). DECISION NO. 4/92 Commutation (vehicle purchase). The worker was awarded a 15% pension for an upper back condition resulting from his employment as a security guard. He had previously received a partial

More information

SUMMARY. White finger disease; Rheumatoid arthritis; Disablement (vibrations) (tools).

SUMMARY. White finger disease; Rheumatoid arthritis; Disablement (vibrations) (tools). SUMMARY DECISION NO. 1242/99 White finger disease; Rheumatoid arthritis; Disablement (vibrations) (tools). The worker was a jackleg driller until 1976 and then a hoist man until he retired in 1991. The

More information

.org. Shoulder Pain and Common Shoulder Problems. Anatomy. Cause

.org. Shoulder Pain and Common Shoulder Problems. Anatomy. Cause Shoulder Pain and Common Shoulder Problems Page ( 1 ) What most people call the shoulder is really several joints that combine with tendons and muscles to allow a wide range of motion in the arm from scratching

More information

WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 2289/08

WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 2289/08 WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 2289/08 BEFORE: M. Crystal: Vice-Chair HEARING: October 31, 2008 at Toronto Written case DATE OF DECISION: October 31, 2008 NEUTRAL CITATION:

More information

Decision No. 191/09. REASONS Introduction

Decision No. 191/09. REASONS Introduction WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 191/09 BEFORE: J. Parmar: Vice-Chair HEARING: January 27, 2009 at Toronto Oral hearing DATE OF DECISION: November 27, 2009 NEUTRAL CITATION:

More information

Special Report No. 26 February 2005 to the Legislative Assembly of British Columbia

Special Report No. 26 February 2005 to the Legislative Assembly of British Columbia Special Report No. 26 February 2005 to the Legislative Assembly of British Columbia Report on the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia s Minimal/No Damage- Low Velocity Impact Program Table of Contents

More information

The Worker sought compensation under the new Chronic Pain Regulations. This led to the following two decisions:

The Worker sought compensation under the new Chronic Pain Regulations. This led to the following two decisions: CLAIM HISTORY AND APPEAL PROCEEDINGS: On August 30, 1983, the Worker* injured his lower back while lifting an arch rail. The Board accepted his claim and provided him with 22 weeks of temporary benefits

More information

NOVA SCOTIA WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS TRIBUNAL

NOVA SCOTIA WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS TRIBUNAL NOVA SCOTIA WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS TRIBUNAL Appellant: [X] (Worker) Participants entitled to respond to this appeal: [X] (Employer) and The Workers Compensation Board of Nova Scotia (Board) APPEAL

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE SPECIAL WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS PANEL AT JACKSON August 31, 2000 Session

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE SPECIAL WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS PANEL AT JACKSON August 31, 2000 Session IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE SPECIAL WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS PANEL AT JACKSON August 31, 2000 Session STANLEY R. WILBANKS v. CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA Direct Appeal from the Circuit

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE SPECIAL WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS PANEL AT JACKSON July 1, 2004 Session

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE SPECIAL WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS PANEL AT JACKSON July 1, 2004 Session IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE SPECIAL WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS PANEL AT JACKSON July 1, 2004 Session WILLIAM G. NORVELL v. MENLO LOGISTICS, INC. Direct Appeal from the Chancery Court for Tipton

More information

United States Department of Labor Employees Compensation Appeals Board DECISION AND ORDER

United States Department of Labor Employees Compensation Appeals Board DECISION AND ORDER United States Department of Labor V.L., Appellant and DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, U.S. PROBATION DEPARTMENT, New York City, NY, Employer Appearances: Alan J. Shapiro, Esq., for the appellant Office of Solicitor,

More information

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F209084 EDDIE WEBB, EMPLOYEE LUTHERAN HIGH SCHOOL, INC., EMPLOYER

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F209084 EDDIE WEBB, EMPLOYEE LUTHERAN HIGH SCHOOL, INC., EMPLOYER BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F209084 EDDIE WEBB, EMPLOYEE LUTHERAN HIGH SCHOOL, INC., EMPLOYER CHURCH MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, INSURANCE CARRIER CLAIMANT RESPONDENT RESPONDENT

More information

CASE ID #[ personal information] WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEAL TRIBUNAL WORKERS COMPENSATION BOARD OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND DECISION #9

CASE ID #[ personal information] WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEAL TRIBUNAL WORKERS COMPENSATION BOARD OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND DECISION #9 C A N A D A CASE ID #[ personal information] PROVINCE OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND BETWEEN: WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEAL TRIBUNAL EMPLOYER AND: APPELLANT AND: WORKERS COMPENSATION BOARD OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND

More information

Workers Compensation: Making a claim

Workers Compensation: Making a claim Workers Compensation: Making a claim What are workers compensation benefits? Workers compensation benefits are payments for injuries or diseases that are related to the work you were doing. Workers compensation

More information

SUMMARY. Earnings basis (seasonal employment); Earnings basis (period of unemployment).

SUMMARY. Earnings basis (seasonal employment); Earnings basis (period of unemployment). SUMMARY DECISION NO. 1731/99 Earnings basis (seasonal employment); Earnings basis (period of unemployment). The worker appealed a decision of the Appeals Officer regarding the earnings basis for calculation

More information

BEFORE THE APPEALS BOARD FOR THE KANSAS DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION

BEFORE THE APPEALS BOARD FOR THE KANSAS DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION BEFORE THE APPEALS BOARD FOR THE KANSAS DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION MARY JANE WAGGONER ) Claimant ) VS. ) ) Docket No. 1,001,815 THE BOEING COMPANY ) Respondent ) AND ) ) INSURANCE COMPANY ) STATE

More information