Solutions to Tutorial 2 (Week 3)


 Thomas French
 10 months ago
 Views:
Transcription
1 THE UIVERSITY OF SYDEY SCHOOL OF MATHEMATICS AD STATISTICS Solutions to Tutorial 2 (Week 3) MATH3969: Measure Theory and Fourier Analysis (Advanced) Semester 2, 2016 Web Page: Lecturer: Daniel Daners Questions marked with * are more difficult questions. Material covered (1) Properties and constructions of outer measures (2) Construction of measures (3) Properties of the Lebesgue measure. Outcomes After completing this tutorial you should (1) be able to construct outer measures and measures (2) know the main invariance properties of the Lebesgue measure (3) be able to work with dyadic decomposition to prove properties of the Lebesgue measure. Summary of essential material The construction of measures from outer measures Let X by an arbitrary set. An outer measure on X is a set function μ (X) [0, ] with the following properties: (i) μ ( ) = 0 (ii) If A, A k X with A A k, then μ (A) μ (A k ) (countable subadditivity). The sets in are called measurable sets with respect to μ (or μ ). ote that an outer measure is always defined on the power set (X), that is, for all subsets of X. Even if the sets A k are disjoint, we only require countable subadditivity, not additivity. Carathéodory s theorem states that = {A X μ (S) = μ (S A) + μ (S A c ) for all S X} is a σalgebra, and that μ = μ [0, ] is a measure. We call μ the measure induced by the outer measure μ. The Lebesgue measure The most important application of Carathéodory s theorem for us is the construction of the Lebesgue measure. The Lebesgue measure representing dimensional volume in R is the measure induced by the Lebesgue outer measure given by { m (A) = inf vol (R k ) R k open rectangles, A R k }. The corresponding set of measurable sets is called the Lebesgue σalgebra. Copyright 2016 The University of Sydney 1
2 Properties of the Lebesgue measure: (i) The Lebesgue measure is a Borel measure. In particular, all open and closed sets are measurable, and all countable unions and intersections of open and closed sets are measurable. (ii) The Lebesgue measure is the only translation invariant Borel measure on R bounded sets have finite measure. such that all (iii) The Lebesgue measure is regular, that is: m (A) = inf{m (U) A U, U open} for every A R. m (A) = sup{m (K) A K, K compact} for every measurable A R. Dyadic decompositions Every nonempty open set in R can be written as a disjoint union of countably many dyadic cubes. A dyadic cube is a cube of the form { ( k Q n,k = 2 + 0, 1 ] } k Z. n 2 n Together with the regularity of the Lebesgue measure, dyadic decompositions are useful to prove many properties of the Lebesgue measure including uniqueness and invariance under rigid motion. Questions to complete during the tutorial 1. Consider an arbitrary subset A R. In lectures it was shown that m (A) = inf{m (U) A U, U open}. (1) For simplicity, we throughout assume that m (A) <. Show that for every A R there exist open sets U n so that ( m (A) = m U n ). In particular, the Borel set B = n U n is such that A B and m (A) = m (B). Solution: According to (1), for every n there exists an open set V n B such that m (A) m (V n ) m (A) + 1 n. Define U 1 = V 1, U n+1 = V n+1 U n. Then m (U n ) m (V n ) and A U n+1 U n for all n. Also n m (A) m (U n ) m (V n ) m (A) + 1 n for all n. We set B = U n=1 n. As A U n and m (U 1 ) <, the monotonicity properties of measures imply that ( m (A) lim m (U n ) = m ) U n = m (B) m (A). n Since countable intersections of Borel sets are Borel sets, B is a Borel set. In particular m (A) = m (B). Show that for every Lebesgue measurable set A R there exist open sets U n and a set S with m (S) = 0 so that A S = n U n. n=1 Solution: Let U n and B be as in part. We set S = B A c. If A is measurable, then S is measurable and hence 2
3 (c) Let A be a nonmeasurable set. Let B be as in part and define S = B A c. Show that S is not measurable and that m (S) > 0. Solution: If S is measurable, then A = B S c is measurable. Hence S is not measurable if A is not measurable. We know from lectures that every set of outer measure zero is measurable. Hence m (S) > 0 even though m (A) = m (B) = m (A S). 2. ote that this question has been changed slightly to resolve an issue with nonuniqueness of certain cases. Let Ω be the sample space obtained by doing an infinite sequence of coin tosses. Such coin tosses can be represented as infinite sequences of the form (a 1, a 2, ), where a k = 0 or 1. A zero means head and a one means tail for instance. Such sequences can be interpreted as binary expansions of the number α = a k [0, 1]. With that identification, the sample space is k=1 2k Ω = (0, 1]. There is one difficulty though: The association of a sequence (a 1, a 2, ) to the number α is not always injective. As 1 1 = 1 every sequence ending with all zeros gives the same α as 2 n k=1 2 k 2n a sequence ending in all ones. For instance, (1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, ) (1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, ) lead to the same α. For this reason we discard all sequences that only contain finitely many ones. What we discard is a set of probability zero since the probability of any single sequence occurring is zero, and there are only countably many sequences with finitely many ones. The set is countable since it can be written as the union of countably many finite sequences. In particular we discard the zero sequence (0, 0, 0, ). Set A k = {(a 1,, a k, ) Ω a k = 1}. Sketch A 1, A 2, A 3 as subsets of (0, 1] and then describe the sets A k for general k. What is the probability of A k, and how does it compare to the Lebesgue measure of A k? Solution: If a 1 = 1, then α = j=1 a j 2 j > 1 2, so A 1 = ( 1, 1]. There is a strict inequality since the sequence has to contain infinitely 2 many ones. If k = 2, then α = a a j 2 j so we have j=2 ( 1 A 2 = 4, 1 ( ] 3 2] 4, 1 since it is possible that a 1 = 0 or a 1 = 1. Again the left end is open because the sequence contains infinitely many ones by construction. Similarly, ( 1 A 3 = 8 4], 1 ( ( 5 2] 8 4], 3 ( 7 8, 1 ]. The Lebesgue measure of each of the sets is clearly 1 2. A sketch of A 1, A 2 and A 3 is as follows: 3
4 (c) Show that every dyadic interval I n,j = (j 2 n, (j + 1) 2 n ], j = 0,, 2 n 1, can be written as a finite intersection of the sets A k and A c k. Solution: First note that I n,j A k or I n,j A c for all k = 1,, n. Hence, for k k = 1,, n we let B j,k = A k if I n,j A k and B j,k = A c if I k n,j A c. Then k I n,j = n B k=1 j,k. Argue why the probability measure in the above situation coincides with the Lebesgue measure on (0, 1]. Solution: Every open subset U of (0, 1] can be written as a disjoint union of countably many intervals of the form (j 2 n, (j +1) 2 n ] (dyadic decomposition). Using the additivity of the measure, the probability measure of U is equal to the Lebesgue measure of U and thus coincides. It follows that the probability measure is the same as the Lebesgue measure on the Borel sets. (Technically, we should show the regularity of the probability measure, but we leave that here. One can show that any Borel measure on an interval that is translation invariant, normalised and finite for bounded intervals coincides with the Lebesgue measure.) 3. The purpose of this question is to give an example of a set that is not Lebesgue measurable. We define an equivalence relation on R by x y if x y Q. The equivalence class of x is then given by [x] = x + Q. Let now B R be the unit ball. Construct a set C as follows: For every equivalence class [x] with [x] B, choose precisely one y B [x] to be in C. Finally let I = 2B Q. (c) Show that the union (q + C) is disjoint. Solution: Let q 1, q 2 C and x (q 1 +C) (q 2 +C). Hence x q 1 C and x q 2 C. ow (x q 1 ) (x q 2 ) = q 2 q 1 Q which means that [x q 1 ] = [x q 2 ] by definition of the equivalence relation. By definition of C we have x q 1 = x q 2 since we have chosen precisely one element from any given equivalence class to belong to C. This means that q 1 = q 2. Hence if q 1 q 2, then (q 1 + C) (q 2 + C) =. Show that B (q + C) 3B Solution: If x B, then clearly B [x] and so by construction of C there exists y C with [x] = [y]. However, this means that x = q + y for some q Q. ow q = x y x + y < 2 since x, y B. Hence q I = 2B Q and so x q + C for some q I. For the second inclusion we let q I and x C, then by definition of I and C we have q + x q + x < = 3. Hence (q + C) 3B as claimed. Show that m (C) > 0 and deduce that C is not measurable. Solution: Lebesgue measure is translation invariant and subadditive. Hence, using that I is countable ( ) 0 < m (B) (q + C) m (q + C) = m (C) 4
5 and therefore m (C) > 0. As I is a countably infinite set m (q + C) =. If we assume that C is measurable, then q + C is also measurable and ( ) (q + C) = m (q + C) m (3B) < m because (q + C) is a disjoint union. As this is a contradiction we conclude that C is not measurable. 4. Let (X,, μ) be a measure space. for every A X we define { μ (A) = inf μ(a k ) A k, k, A k=1 } A k Show that μ (X) [0, ] is an outer measure. To do so proceed similarly as for the Lebesgue outer measure. Solution: The proof is very similar to the proof that the Lebesgue outer measure is an outer measure. If A = we choose A k = for all k. Then A k A k. By definition of μ 0 μ ( ) = μ( ) = = 0 k=1 Hence μ ( ) = 0. To prove the countable subadditivity let B, B k X so that B k B k. By definition of μ for every ε > 0 there exist sets A kj such that ε 2 k+1 + μ (B k ) > μ(a kj ). Moreover, B B k A kj. k k j By definition of μ we therefore find that ( ) ε μ (B) μ(a kj ) < 2 + k+1 μ (B k ) = ε + j=0 As the above arguments work for every choice of ε > 0 we get μ (B) ε + μ (B k ) as claimed. Prove that μ (A) μ(a) for all A. k=1 j=0 μ (B k ) Solution: If A, then we may choose A 0 = A and A k = for all k 1. By definition of μ we have μ (A) μ(a k ) = μ(a) + μ( ) + μ( ) + = μ(a) as claimed. 5
6 (c) Prove that μ (A) = μ(a) for all A. Solution: Taking into account the previous part we only need to show that μ (A) μ(a). Let A and consider an arbitrary sequence of sets A k with A A k. By the subadditivity of measures (see lectures) μ(a) μ(a k ) By definition of μ and properties of an infimum μ(a) μ (A). Extra questions for further practice 5. Consider a Lebesgue measurable set A R. Show that m(a) = sup{m(k) K A, K compact}. Hint: First assume that A is bounded and approximate S A c by open sets from outside for some compact set S A. Then look at unbounded A. Solution: Let A be a bounded Lebesgue measurable set. By the monotonicity of measures m(k) m(a) for all compact sets K A. Hence we need to show that for every ε > 0 there exists a compact set K A with m(k) > m(a) ε. Let S be a compact set such that A S. We know from lectures that there exists an open set U such that m(u) m(s A c ) + ε. We then set K = S U c. Then by the additivity of measures m(k) = m(s U c ) = m(s) m(u) > m(s) m(s A c ) ε = m(s) m(s) + m(a) ε = m(a) ε, so K is a compact set as required. ext we look at the case of unbounded A. We set A n = A B(0, n), where B(0, n) is the ball centred at zero with radius n. Then m(a n ) m(a) as n by the monotonicity of measures. Given ε > 0 we choose n such that m(a n ) m(a) ε 2. Then we choose a compact set K such that m(k) > m(a n ) ε 2. Hence m(k) > m(a n ) ε 2 m(a) ε 2 ε 2 = m(a) ε. This completes the proof. If A is Lebesgue measurable, show that there exists a Borel set C with C A and m(a) = m(c). Solution: According to, for every n there exist compact sets K n A such that m(k n ) m(a). We set C 1 = K 1 and C n+1 = C n K n+1. Then, C n C n+1 A for all n and m(a) m(c n ) m(k n ) m(a) for all n. Set C = C n=0 n. Since C n is compact C is a Borel set, and by the monotonicity of measures m(c n ) m(c). Hence by the squeeze law m(a) = m(c). 6. Show that the Lebesgue outer measure of an arbitrary set A R is given by { m (A) = inf m (Q k ) Q k disjoint dyadic cubes and A Q k }. k 6
7 For the proof use the outer regularity of the Lebesgue measure and the dyadic decomposition of open sets. Solution: Let Q k be disjoint dyadic cubes such that A k Q k. From the subadditivity of the outer measure m (A) m (Q k ) and hence m (A) inf { m (Q k ) Q k disjoint dyadic cubes and A k Q k }. of dyadic cubes Q kj. To prove the converse inequality we use the outer regularity of the measure, that is, m (A) = inf{m(u) A U, U open}. Given ε > 0 there exists an open set U such that A U and m(u) < m (A) + ε. In lectures we showed that the open set U can be written as a countable union of dyadic cubes Q k. Hence by the countable additivity of the Lebesgue measure m (A) + ε > m(u) = m(q k ). We also know that A U = k Q k. As the above argument works for every choice of ε > 0 we get as required. m (A) inf { m (Q k ) Q k disjoint dyadic cubes and A k Q k } 7
Math212a1010 Lebesgue measure.
Math212a1010 Lebesgue measure. October 19, 2010 Today s lecture will be devoted to Lebesgue measure, a creation of Henri Lebesgue, in his thesis, one of the most famous theses in the history of mathematics.
More informationCHAPTER 5. Product Measures
54 CHAPTER 5 Product Measures Given two measure spaces, we may construct a natural measure on their Cartesian product; the prototype is the construction of Lebesgue measure on R 2 as the product of Lebesgue
More informationREAL ANALYSIS LECTURE NOTES: 1.4 OUTER MEASURE
REAL ANALYSIS LECTURE NOTES: 1.4 OUTER MEASURE CHRISTOPHER HEIL 1.4.1 Introduction We will expand on Section 1.4 of Folland s text, which covers abstract outer measures also called exterior measures).
More informationOur goal first will be to define a product measure on A 1 A 2.
1. Tensor product of measures and Fubini theorem. Let (A j, Ω j, µ j ), j = 1, 2, be two measure spaces. Recall that the new σ algebra A 1 A 2 with the unit element is the σ algebra generated by the
More informationExtension of measure
1 Extension of measure Sayan Mukherjee Dynkin s π λ theorem We will soon need to define probability measures on infinite and possible uncountable sets, like the power set of the naturals. This is hard.
More informationSOLUTIONS TO ASSIGNMENT 1 MATH 576
SOLUTIONS TO ASSIGNMENT 1 MATH 576 SOLUTIONS BY OLIVIER MARTIN 13 #5. Let T be the topology generated by A on X. We want to show T = J B J where B is the set of all topologies J on X with A J. This amounts
More informationBasic Measure Theory
Basic Measure Theory Heinrich v. Weizsäcker Revised Translation 2004/2008 Fachbereich Mathematik Technische Universität Kaiserslautern 2 Measure Theory (October 20, 2008) Preface The aim of this text is
More informationRi and. i=1. S i N. and. R R i
The subset R of R n is a closed rectangle if there are n nonempty closed intervals {[a 1, b 1 ], [a 2, b 2 ],..., [a n, b n ]} so that R = [a 1, b 1 ] [a 2, b 2 ] [a n, b n ]. The subset R of R n is an
More informationMASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY 6.436J/15.085J Fall 2008 Lecture 5 9/17/2008 RANDOM VARIABLES
MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY 6.436J/15.085J Fall 2008 Lecture 5 9/17/2008 RANDOM VARIABLES Contents 1. Random variables and measurable functions 2. Cumulative distribution functions 3. Discrete
More information1 if 1 x 0 1 if 0 x 1
Chapter 3 Continuity In this chapter we begin by defining the fundamental notion of continuity for real valued functions of a single real variable. When trying to decide whether a given function is or
More informationThe Lebesgue Measure and Integral
The Lebesgue Measure and Integral Mike Klaas April 12, 2003 Introduction The Riemann integral, defined as the limit of upper and lower sums, is the first example of an integral, and still holds the honour
More information1. Prove that the empty set is a subset of every set.
1. Prove that the empty set is a subset of every set. Basic Topology Written by MenGen Tsai email: b89902089@ntu.edu.tw Proof: For any element x of the empty set, x is also an element of every set since
More informationLecture Notes on Measure Theory and Functional Analysis
Lecture Notes on Measure Theory and Functional Analysis P. Cannarsa & T. D Aprile Dipartimento di Matematica Università di Roma Tor Vergata cannarsa@mat.uniroma2.it daprile@mat.uniroma2.it aa 2006/07 Contents
More informationLebesgue Measure on R n
8 CHAPTER 2 Lebesgue Measure on R n Our goal is to construct a notion of the volume, or Lebesgue measure, of rather general subsets of R n that reduces to the usual volume of elementary geometrical sets
More informationAn example of a computable
An example of a computable absolutely normal number Verónica Becher Santiago Figueira Abstract The first example of an absolutely normal number was given by Sierpinski in 96, twenty years before the concept
More informationx if x 0, x if x < 0.
Chapter 3 Sequences In this chapter, we discuss sequences. We say what it means for a sequence to converge, and define the limit of a convergent sequence. We begin with some preliminary results about the
More informationMeasure Theory. Jesus FernandezVillaverde University of Pennsylvania
Measure Theory Jesus FernandezVillaverde University of Pennsylvania 1 Why Bother with Measure Theory? Kolmogorov (1933). Foundation of modern probability. Deals easily with: 1. Continuous versus discrete
More informationFUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS LECTURE NOTES: QUOTIENT SPACES
FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS LECTURE NOTES: QUOTIENT SPACES CHRISTOPHER HEIL 1. Cosets and the Quotient Space Any vector space is an abelian group under the operation of vector addition. So, if you are have studied
More informationNo: 10 04. Bilkent University. Monotonic Extension. Farhad Husseinov. Discussion Papers. Department of Economics
No: 10 04 Bilkent University Monotonic Extension Farhad Husseinov Discussion Papers Department of Economics The Discussion Papers of the Department of Economics are intended to make the initial results
More informationPART I. THE REAL NUMBERS
PART I. THE REAL NUMBERS This material assumes that you are already familiar with the real number system and the representation of the real numbers as points on the real line. I.1. THE NATURAL NUMBERS
More informationUndergraduate Notes in Mathematics. Arkansas Tech University Department of Mathematics
Undergraduate Notes in Mathematics Arkansas Tech University Department of Mathematics An Introductory Single Variable Real Analysis: A Learning Approach through Problem Solving Marcel B. Finan c All Rights
More informationINDISTINGUISHABILITY OF ABSOLUTELY CONTINUOUS AND SINGULAR DISTRIBUTIONS
INDISTINGUISHABILITY OF ABSOLUTELY CONTINUOUS AND SINGULAR DISTRIBUTIONS STEVEN P. LALLEY AND ANDREW NOBEL Abstract. It is shown that there are no consistent decision rules for the hypothesis testing problem
More informationMetric Spaces Joseph Muscat 2003 (Last revised May 2009)
1 Distance J Muscat 1 Metric Spaces Joseph Muscat 2003 (Last revised May 2009) (A revised and expanded version of these notes are now published by Springer.) 1 Distance A metric space can be thought of
More informationChapter 3. Cartesian Products and Relations. 3.1 Cartesian Products
Chapter 3 Cartesian Products and Relations The material in this chapter is the first real encounter with abstraction. Relations are very general thing they are a special type of subset. After introducing
More informationMathematical Methods of Engineering Analysis
Mathematical Methods of Engineering Analysis Erhan Çinlar Robert J. Vanderbei February 2, 2000 Contents Sets and Functions 1 1 Sets................................... 1 Subsets.............................
More informationMathematics for Econometrics, Fourth Edition
Mathematics for Econometrics, Fourth Edition Phoebus J. Dhrymes 1 July 2012 1 c Phoebus J. Dhrymes, 2012. Preliminary material; not to be cited or disseminated without the author s permission. 2 Contents
More informationCHAPTER II THE LIMIT OF A SEQUENCE OF NUMBERS DEFINITION OF THE NUMBER e.
CHAPTER II THE LIMIT OF A SEQUENCE OF NUMBERS DEFINITION OF THE NUMBER e. This chapter contains the beginnings of the most important, and probably the most subtle, notion in mathematical analysis, i.e.,
More informationTHE BANACH CONTRACTION PRINCIPLE. Contents
THE BANACH CONTRACTION PRINCIPLE ALEX PONIECKI Abstract. This paper will study contractions of metric spaces. To do this, we will mainly use tools from topology. We will give some examples of contractions,
More informationPROBABILITY THEORY  PART 1 MEASURE THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK CONTENTS
PROBABILITY THEORY  PART 1 MEASURE THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK MANJUNATH KRISHNAPUR CONTENTS 1. Discrete probability space 2 2. Uncountable probability spaces? 3 3. Sigma algebras and the axioms of probability
More informationContinued Fractions and the Euclidean Algorithm
Continued Fractions and the Euclidean Algorithm Lecture notes prepared for MATH 326, Spring 997 Department of Mathematics and Statistics University at Albany William F Hammond Table of Contents Introduction
More informationBasic Concepts of Point Set Topology Notes for OU course Math 4853 Spring 2011
Basic Concepts of Point Set Topology Notes for OU course Math 4853 Spring 2011 A. Miller 1. Introduction. The definitions of metric space and topological space were developed in the early 1900 s, largely
More informationand s n (x) f(x) for all x and s.t. s n is measurable if f is. REAL ANALYSIS Measures. A (positive) measure on a measurable space
RAL ANALYSIS A survey of MA 641643, UAB 19992000 M. Griesemer Throughout these notes m denotes Lebesgue measure. 1. Abstract Integration σalgebras. A σalgebra in X is a nonempty collection of subsets
More informationDeterminants, Areas and Volumes
Determinants, Areas and Volumes Theodore Voronov Part 2 Areas and Volumes The area of a twodimensional object such as a region of the plane and the volume of a threedimensional object such as a solid
More informationDiscrete Mathematics and Probability Theory Fall 2009 Satish Rao,David Tse Note 11
CS 70 Discrete Mathematics and Probability Theory Fall 2009 Satish Rao,David Tse Note Conditional Probability A pharmaceutical company is marketing a new test for a certain medical condition. According
More informationPOWER SETS AND RELATIONS
POWER SETS AND RELATIONS L. MARIZZA A. BAILEY 1. The Power Set Now that we have defined sets as best we can, we can consider a sets of sets. If we were to assume nothing, except the existence of the empty
More informationElements of probability theory
2 Elements of probability theory Probability theory provides mathematical models for random phenomena, that is, phenomena which under repeated observations yield di erent outcomes that cannot be predicted
More informationSOLUTIONS TO EXERCISES FOR. MATHEMATICS 205A Part 3. Spaces with special properties
SOLUTIONS TO EXERCISES FOR MATHEMATICS 205A Part 3 Fall 2008 III. Spaces with special properties III.1 : Compact spaces I Problems from Munkres, 26, pp. 170 172 3. Show that a finite union of compact subspaces
More informationNotes on metric spaces
Notes on metric spaces 1 Introduction The purpose of these notes is to quickly review some of the basic concepts from Real Analysis, Metric Spaces and some related results that will be used in this course.
More informationMA651 Topology. Lecture 6. Separation Axioms.
MA651 Topology. Lecture 6. Separation Axioms. This text is based on the following books: Fundamental concepts of topology by Peter O Neil Elements of Mathematics: General Topology by Nicolas Bourbaki Counterexamples
More informationMonotone maps of R n are quasiconformal
Monotone maps of R n are quasiconformal K. Astala, T. Iwaniec and G. Martin For Neil Trudinger Abstract We give a new and completely elementary proof showing that a δ monotone mapping of R n, n is K quasiconformal
More informationUniversity of Miskolc
University of Miskolc The Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Information Science The role of the maximum operator in the theory of measurability and some applications PhD Thesis by Nutefe Kwami Agbeko
More informationFollow links for Class Use and other Permissions. For more information send email to: permissions@pupress.princeton.edu
COPYRIGHT NOTICE: Ariel Rubinstein: Lecture Notes in Microeconomic Theory is published by Princeton University Press and copyrighted, c 2006, by Princeton University Press. All rights reserved. No part
More informationSeparation Properties for Locally Convex Cones
Journal of Convex Analysis Volume 9 (2002), No. 1, 301 307 Separation Properties for Locally Convex Cones Walter Roth Department of Mathematics, Universiti Brunei Darussalam, Gadong BE1410, Brunei Darussalam
More informationHandout #1: Mathematical Reasoning
Math 101 Rumbos Spring 2010 1 Handout #1: Mathematical Reasoning 1 Propositional Logic A proposition is a mathematical statement that it is either true or false; that is, a statement whose certainty or
More informationGod created the integers and the rest is the work of man. (Leopold Kronecker, in an afterdinner speech at a conference, Berlin, 1886)
Chapter 2 Numbers God created the integers and the rest is the work of man. (Leopold Kronecker, in an afterdinner speech at a conference, Berlin, 1886) God created the integers and the rest is the work
More informationPractice with Proofs
Practice with Proofs October 6, 2014 Recall the following Definition 0.1. A function f is increasing if for every x, y in the domain of f, x < y = f(x) < f(y) 1. Prove that h(x) = x 3 is increasing, using
More information6.4 The Infinitely Many Alleles Model
6.4. THE INFINITELY MANY ALLELES MODEL 93 NE µ [F (X N 1 ) F (µ)] = + 1 i
More informationHOMEWORK 5 SOLUTIONS. n!f n (1) lim. ln x n! + xn x. 1 = G n 1 (x). (2) k + 1 n. (n 1)!
Math 7 Fall 205 HOMEWORK 5 SOLUTIONS Problem. 2008 B2 Let F 0 x = ln x. For n 0 and x > 0, let F n+ x = 0 F ntdt. Evaluate n!f n lim n ln n. By directly computing F n x for small n s, we obtain the following
More information9 More on differentiation
Tel Aviv University, 2013 Measure and category 75 9 More on differentiation 9a Finite Taylor expansion............... 75 9b Continuous and nowhere differentiable..... 78 9c Differentiable and nowhere monotone......
More informationDuality of linear conic problems
Duality of linear conic problems Alexander Shapiro and Arkadi Nemirovski Abstract It is well known that the optimal values of a linear programming problem and its dual are equal to each other if at least
More informationBANACH AND HILBERT SPACE REVIEW
BANACH AND HILBET SPACE EVIEW CHISTOPHE HEIL These notes will briefly review some basic concepts related to the theory of Banach and Hilbert spaces. We are not trying to give a complete development, but
More informationMatrix Norms. Tom Lyche. September 28, Centre of Mathematics for Applications, Department of Informatics, University of Oslo
Matrix Norms Tom Lyche Centre of Mathematics for Applications, Department of Informatics, University of Oslo September 28, 2009 Matrix Norms We consider matrix norms on (C m,n, C). All results holds for
More informationMEASURE AND INTEGRATION. Dietmar A. Salamon ETH Zürich
MEASURE AND INTEGRATION Dietmar A. Salamon ETH Zürich 12 May 2016 ii Preface This book is based on notes for the lecture course Measure and Integration held at ETH Zürich in the spring semester 2014. Prerequisites
More informationMath 4310 Handout  Quotient Vector Spaces
Math 4310 Handout  Quotient Vector Spaces Dan Collins The textbook defines a subspace of a vector space in Chapter 4, but it avoids ever discussing the notion of a quotient space. This is understandable
More information3. Mathematical Induction
3. MATHEMATICAL INDUCTION 83 3. Mathematical Induction 3.1. First Principle of Mathematical Induction. Let P (n) be a predicate with domain of discourse (over) the natural numbers N = {0, 1,,...}. If (1)
More informationRecursion Theory in Set Theory
Contemporary Mathematics Recursion Theory in Set Theory Theodore A. Slaman 1. Introduction Our goal is to convince the reader that recursion theoretic knowledge and experience can be successfully applied
More informationProperties of BMO functions whose reciprocals are also BMO
Properties of BMO functions whose reciprocals are also BMO R. L. Johnson and C. J. Neugebauer The main result says that a nonnegative BMOfunction w, whose reciprocal is also in BMO, belongs to p> A p,and
More information1 Norms and Vector Spaces
008.10.07.01 1 Norms and Vector Spaces Suppose we have a complex vector space V. A norm is a function f : V R which satisfies (i) f(x) 0 for all x V (ii) f(x + y) f(x) + f(y) for all x,y V (iii) f(λx)
More informationSection 1.3 P 1 = 1 2. = 1 4 2 8. P n = 1 P 3 = Continuing in this fashion, it should seem reasonable that, for any n = 1, 2, 3,..., = 1 2 4.
Difference Equations to Differential Equations Section. The Sum of a Sequence This section considers the problem of adding together the terms of a sequence. Of course, this is a problem only if more than
More informationPROBLEM SET 7: PIGEON HOLE PRINCIPLE
PROBLEM SET 7: PIGEON HOLE PRINCIPLE The pigeonhole principle is the following observation: Theorem. Suppose that > kn marbles are distributed over n jars, then one jar will contain at least k + marbles.
More information2.3 Convex Constrained Optimization Problems
42 CHAPTER 2. FUNDAMENTAL CONCEPTS IN CONVEX OPTIMIZATION Theorem 15 Let f : R n R and h : R R. Consider g(x) = h(f(x)) for all x R n. The function g is convex if either of the following two conditions
More informationLecture 17 : Equivalence and Order Relations DRAFT
CS/Math 240: Introduction to Discrete Mathematics 3/31/2011 Lecture 17 : Equivalence and Order Relations Instructor: Dieter van Melkebeek Scribe: Dalibor Zelený DRAFT Last lecture we introduced the notion
More informationBasic Probability Concepts
page 1 Chapter 1 Basic Probability Concepts 1.1 Sample and Event Spaces 1.1.1 Sample Space A probabilistic (or statistical) experiment has the following characteristics: (a) the set of all possible outcomes
More informationChapter 1. Metric Spaces. Metric Spaces. Examples. Normed linear spaces
Chapter 1. Metric Spaces Metric Spaces MA222 David Preiss d.preiss@warwick.ac.uk Warwick University, Spring 2008/2009 Definitions. A metric on a set M is a function d : M M R such that for all x, y, z
More informationMetric Spaces. Chapter 7. 7.1. Metrics
Chapter 7 Metric Spaces A metric space is a set X that has a notion of the distance d(x, y) between every pair of points x, y X. The purpose of this chapter is to introduce metric spaces and give some
More informationIntroduction to Topology
Introduction to Topology Tomoo Matsumura November 30, 2010 Contents 1 Topological spaces 3 1.1 Basis of a Topology......................................... 3 1.2 Comparing Topologies.......................................
More informationOn strong fairness in UNITY
On strong fairness in UNITY H.P.Gumm, D.Zhukov Fachbereich Mathematik und Informatik Philipps Universität Marburg {gumm,shukov}@mathematik.unimarburg.de Abstract. In [6] Tsay and Bagrodia present a correct
More information16.3 Fredholm Operators
Lectures 16 and 17 16.3 Fredholm Operators A nice way to think about compact operators is to show that set of compact operators is the closure of the set of finite rank operator in operator norm. In this
More informationSo let us begin our quest to find the holy grail of real analysis.
1 Section 5.2 The Complete Ordered Field: Purpose of Section We present an axiomatic description of the real numbers as a complete ordered field. The axioms which describe the arithmetic of the real numbers
More informationNotes V General Equilibrium: Positive Theory. 1 Walrasian Equilibrium and Excess Demand
Notes V General Equilibrium: Positive Theory In this lecture we go on considering a general equilibrium model of a private ownership economy. In contrast to the Notes IV, we focus on positive issues such
More informationNotes on counting finite sets
Notes on counting finite sets Murray Eisenberg February 26, 2009 Contents 0 Introduction 2 1 What is a finite set? 2 2 Counting unions and cartesian products 4 2.1 Sum rules......................................
More informationE3: PROBABILITY AND STATISTICS lecture notes
E3: PROBABILITY AND STATISTICS lecture notes 2 Contents 1 PROBABILITY THEORY 7 1.1 Experiments and random events............................ 7 1.2 Certain event. Impossible event............................
More informationMetric Spaces. Chapter 1
Chapter 1 Metric Spaces Many of the arguments you have seen in several variable calculus are almost identical to the corresponding arguments in one variable calculus, especially arguments concerning convergence
More informationOn fractional parts of powers of real numbers close to 1
On fractional parts of powers of real numbers close to 1 Yann BUGEAUD and Niolay MOSHCHEVITIN Abstract We prove that there exist arbitrarily small positive real numbers ε such that every integral power
More informationChapter 1  σalgebras
Page 1 of 17 PROBABILITY 3  Lecture Notes Chapter 1  σalgebras Let Ω be a set of outcomes. We denote by P(Ω) its power set, i.e. the collection of all the subsets of Ω. If the cardinality Ω of Ω is
More informationMathematical Background
Appendix A Mathematical Background A.1 Joint, Marginal and Conditional Probability Let the n (discrete or continuous) random variables y 1,..., y n have a joint joint probability probability p(y 1,...,
More informationIEOR 6711: Stochastic Models I Fall 2012, Professor Whitt, Tuesday, September 11 Normal Approximations and the Central Limit Theorem
IEOR 6711: Stochastic Models I Fall 2012, Professor Whitt, Tuesday, September 11 Normal Approximations and the Central Limit Theorem Time on my hands: Coin tosses. Problem Formulation: Suppose that I have
More informationOpen and Closed Sets
Open and Closed Sets Definition: A subset S of a metric space (X, d) is open if it contains an open ball about each of its points i.e., if x S : ɛ > 0 : B(x, ɛ) S. (1) Theorem: (O1) and X are open sets.
More informationInformation Theory and Coding Prof. S. N. Merchant Department of Electrical Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay
Information Theory and Coding Prof. S. N. Merchant Department of Electrical Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay Lecture  17 ShannonFanoElias Coding and Introduction to Arithmetic Coding
More informationCombinatorics: The Fine Art of Counting
Combinatorics: The Fine Art of Counting Week 7 Lecture Notes Discrete Probability Continued Note Binomial coefficients are written horizontally. The symbol ~ is used to mean approximately equal. The Bernoulli
More informationThe Graphical Method: An Example
The Graphical Method: An Example Consider the following linear program: Maximize 4x 1 +3x 2 Subject to: 2x 1 +3x 2 6 (1) 3x 1 +2x 2 3 (2) 2x 2 5 (3) 2x 1 +x 2 4 (4) x 1, x 2 0, where, for ease of reference,
More informationDiscrete Mathematics: Solutions to Homework (12%) For each of the following sets, determine whether {2} is an element of that set.
Discrete Mathematics: Solutions to Homework 2 1. (12%) For each of the following sets, determine whether {2} is an element of that set. (a) {x R x is an integer greater than 1} (b) {x R x is the square
More informationThe fundamental group of the Hawaiian earring is not free (International Journal of Algebra and Computation Vol. 2, No. 1 (1992), 33 37) Bart de Smit
The fundamental group of the Hawaiian earring is not free Bart de Smit The fundamental group of the Hawaiian earring is not free (International Journal of Algebra and Computation Vol. 2, No. 1 (1992),
More informationMikołaj Krupski. Regularity properties of measures on compact spaces. Instytut Matematyczny PAN. Praca semestralna nr 1 (semestr zimowy 2010/11)
Mikołaj Krupski Instytut Matematyczny PAN Regularity properties of measures on compact spaces Praca semestralna nr 1 (semestr zimowy 2010/11) Opiekun pracy: Grzegorz Plebanek Regularity properties of measures
More informationMathematics for Computer Science/Software Engineering. Notes for the course MSM1F3 Dr. R. A. Wilson
Mathematics for Computer Science/Software Engineering Notes for the course MSM1F3 Dr. R. A. Wilson October 1996 Chapter 1 Logic Lecture no. 1. We introduce the concept of a proposition, which is a statement
More informationFundamentele Informatica II
Fundamentele Informatica II Answer to selected exercises 1 John C Martin: Introduction to Languages and the Theory of Computation M.M. Bonsangue (and J. Kleijn) Fall 2011 Let L be a language. It is clear
More information1. Let P be the space of all polynomials (of one real variable and with real coefficients) with the norm
Uppsala Universitet Matematiska Institutionen Andreas Strömbergsson Prov i matematik Funktionalanalys Kurs: F3B, F4Sy, NVP 0050615 Skrivtid: 9 14 Tillåtna hjälpmedel: Manuella skrivdon, Kreyszigs bok
More informationI. GROUPS: BASIC DEFINITIONS AND EXAMPLES
I GROUPS: BASIC DEFINITIONS AND EXAMPLES Definition 1: An operation on a set G is a function : G G G Definition 2: A group is a set G which is equipped with an operation and a special element e G, called
More information1 The Brownian bridge construction
The Brownian bridge construction The Brownian bridge construction is a way to build a Brownian motion path by successively adding finer scale detail. This construction leads to a relatively easy proof
More informationP (A) = lim P (A) = N(A)/N,
1.1 Probability, Relative Frequency and Classical Definition. Probability is the study of random or nondeterministic experiments. Suppose an experiment can be repeated any number of times, so that we
More informationAutomata and Rational Numbers
Automata and Rational Numbers Jeffrey Shallit School of Computer Science University of Waterloo Waterloo, Ontario N2L 3G1 Canada shallit@cs.uwaterloo.ca http://www.cs.uwaterloo.ca/~shallit 1/40 Representations
More informationLecture 8: Random Walk vs. Brownian Motion, Binomial Model vs. LogNormal Distribution
Lecture 8: Random Walk vs. Brownian Motion, Binomial Model vs. Logormal Distribution October 4, 200 Limiting Distribution of the Scaled Random Walk Recall that we defined a scaled simple random walk last
More informationWe give a basic overview of the mathematical background required for this course.
1 Background We give a basic overview of the mathematical background required for this course. 1.1 Set Theory We introduce some concepts from naive set theory (as opposed to axiomatic set theory). The
More informationLECTURE NOTES IN MEASURE THEORY. Christer Borell Matematik Chalmers och Göteborgs universitet 412 96 Göteborg (Version: January 12)
1 LECTURE NOTES IN MEASURE THEORY Christer Borell Matematik Chalmers och Göteborgs universitet 412 96 Göteborg (Version: January 12) 2 PREFACE These are lecture notes on integration theory for a eightweek
More informationINCIDENCEBETWEENNESS GEOMETRY
INCIDENCEBETWEENNESS GEOMETRY MATH 410, CSUSM. SPRING 2008. PROFESSOR AITKEN This document covers the geometry that can be developed with just the axioms related to incidence and betweenness. The full
More informationCHAPTER 1 BASIC TOPOLOGY
CHAPTER 1 BASIC TOPOLOGY Topology, sometimes referred to as the mathematics of continuity, or rubber sheet geometry, or the theory of abstract topological spaces, is all of these, but, above all, it is
More informationAN INTRODUCTION TO DIMENSION THEORY AND FRACTAL GEOMETRY: FRACTAL DIMENSIONS AND MEASURES
AN INTRODUCTION TO DIMENSION THEORY AND FRACTAL GEOMETRY: FRACTAL DIMENSIONS AND MEASURES ERIN PEARSE 1. Historical context and motivation Poincaré s topological reinterpretation of Euclid s initial concept
More informationMath/Stats 425 Introduction to Probability. 1. Uncertainty and the axioms of probability
Math/Stats 425 Introduction to Probability 1. Uncertainty and the axioms of probability Processes in the real world are random if outcomes cannot be predicted with certainty. Example: coin tossing, stock
More informationA Problem With The Rational Numbers
Solvability of Equations Solvability of Equations 1. In fields, linear equations ax + b = 0 are solvable. Solvability of Equations 1. In fields, linear equations ax + b = 0 are solvable. 2. Quadratic equations
More informationTuring Degrees and Definability of the Jump. Theodore A. Slaman. University of California, Berkeley. CJuly, 2005
Turing Degrees and Definability of the Jump Theodore A. Slaman University of California, Berkeley CJuly, 2005 Outline Lecture 1 Forcing in arithmetic Coding and decoding theorems Automorphisms of countable
More information