County Court Rules Committee. Consultative Document on Scale Costs. Summary of Responses and Proposed Way Forward

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "County Court Rules Committee. Consultative Document on Scale Costs. Summary of Responses and Proposed Way Forward"

Transcription

1 County Court Rules Committee Consultative Document on Scale Costs Summary of Responses and Proposed Way Forward

2 Contents Page Section 1: Introduction 3 Section 2: Background and Proposals 5 Section 3: Summary of respondent s views and response from the County Court Rules Committee 9 Section 4: Conclusion and proposed way forward 27 2

3 1. Introduction 1.1 This is the County Court Rules Committee summary of responses on the consultative document on scale costs. 1.2 This report provides: a background to the consultation and proposals; a summary of the views expressed by respondents together with the County Court Rules Committee s response; and a conclusion and proposed way forward. 1.3 Further copies of this report and the consultation paper can be obtained by contacting: Consultation Co-ordinator Scale Costs, Civil Justice Policy and Legislation, Access to Justice Directorate, Massey House, Stormont Estate, Belfast BT4 3SX Phone: ; Textphone: atojconsultation@dojni.x.gov.uk 1.4 A copy of this report will be placed on the DOJ website at and the Northern Ireland Courts and Tribunals website at You may make additional copies of this report without seeking permission. If you require further printed copies of this report, we would invite you to access the document through our website and make 3

4 copies yourself. If you do not have access to the internet and require us to provide you with further copies, please contact the Consultation Coordinator at the address at paragraph 1.3 above with your specific request. 1.6 Comments in the summary of responses have not been attributed to any individual or organisation. 1.7 This document is available in alternative formats or languages on request. Please contact the Consultation Co-ordinator with your request. 4

5 2. Background and Proposals Background 2.1 In December 2010 the Minister of Justice indicated his intention to increase the financial jurisdiction of the county court (in accordance with Article 22 of the County Courts (Northern Ireland) Order 1980 ( the Order ). This followed a public consultation exercise conducted by the Northern Ireland Court Service (as it was then) earlier in The Minister proposed to increase the civil jurisdiction of the county court from 15,000 to 30,000 and the District Judges limit from 5,000 to 10,000. The Small Claims Court limit was increased by the Minister from 2,000 to 3,000 on 2 May It is in this context the County Court Rules Committee ( the Committee ) considered the amendments required to the County Court Rules (Northern Ireland) 1981 ( the 1981 Rules ) to facilitate the proposed increase in the jurisdiction of the court. Statutory Function of the Committee 2.3. Articles 47 and 48 of the Order provide for the establishment of the Committee and for that Committee to make rules in relation to the jurisdiction exercisable by county courts as referred to in section 21(1) and (2) of the Interpretation Act (Northern Ireland) 1954 ( the 1954 Act ). Section 21(1) of the 1954 Act provides for the making of rules to regulate the practice and procedures of a court including the regulation of costs. The Rules made by the Committee are submitted to the Department of Justice which, after consulting the Lord Chief Justice, may allow or disallow the Rules. 2.4 Appendix 2 to the 1981 Rules sets out in tables various scales for costs in respect of proceedings in the county courts. Scale costs have long 5

6 been regarded as a positive attribute of the county court system as they provide certainty for the benefit of all parties as to the cost of litigation. 2.5 On 23 March 2011, the Committee issued a targeted consultation on proposals to introduce new scale cost bands up to the proposed new county court limit of 30,000 and to provide for an inflationary uplift of existing scale costs. 14 responses were received to the consultation (nine from the legal profession, three from insurers and two from public bodies). On 7 July 2011 the Committee published an in-depth review of scale costs by way of public consultation and integrated impact assessment. The proposals recognised the merits of the existing system for the payment of costs for all involved in litigation. The Committee proposed to maintain that costs structure and build on existing scales by providing three additional bands to specify costs for matters up to the proposed new limit of 30,000. In adopting that approach, the Committee acknowledged that one of the benefits of the proposed increase in jurisdictional limits is enhanced access to the more straightforward procedures applicable in the county court. 2.6 The consultation ran for 12 weeks and closed on 30 September. 16 responses were received, nine were from the legal profession (two from individual solicitors and six from solicitors organisations and one from the Bar), three from insurers (one from an association of insurers and two from individual insurance companies), two from public bodies, one from a voluntary sector organisation and one from an individual. 2.7 The consultation document set out the Committees proposals, namely that:- a. there should be three new bands created up to the new limit of 30,000: 6

7 15,000-20,000 20,000-25,000 25,000-30,000. b. that the 2001 principles should be applied to the present review. c. an increase of the existing scale costs set out in Appendix 2 of the 1981 Rules by the rate of inflation as measured by the GDP deflator of 9.85% phased over two years. This should also be applied to other miscellaneous costs in Appendix 2. d. there should be a discretionary uplift of one-third for complex cases up to the new jurisdictional limit of 30,000. e. there should be an amendment to the existing rule for all county court claims to provide that solicitors costs for an additional day shall be 50% of the scale costs on the amount claimed/decreed (as appropriate) up to a ceiling of 600. Counsel s costs for an additional day will be 50% of counsel s scale costs. f. there should be a reduction in fee bands from eight to four and the addition of three new bands between 15,000 and the new limit of 30,000 in relation to costs where no notice of intention to defend is served and judgment is marked under Order 12 of the 1981 Rules (known as 21 days costs ). g. there should be an amendment to the 1981 Rules to provide that the judge has a discretion to award an uplift from 5% up to a ceiling of one-third of the relevant scale costs in circumstances where there is more than one separately represented defendant. 2.8 The consultation included a questionnaire seeking views on the following key issues: 7

8 should the guiding principles which informed the 2001 fundamental review of scale costs should continue to be applied; should the following bands be introduced- 15,000-20,000 20,000-25,000 and 25,000-30,000; should the proposed scales be applied to the new bands; should the present bands be increased in line with the rate of inflation; should there be a phased implementation of the inflationary increase; should a discretionary uplift of one-third for complex cases be applied to awards up to the new jurisdictional limit of 30,000; should there be new proposed costs for additional day hearings; should there be proposed costs for cases in which there is more than one defendant. 2.9 This report summarises the responses. 8

9 3. Summary of respondent s views and response from the County Court Rules Committee 3.1 The Committee received 16 responses to the consultation. Of these, nine were from the legal profession (two from individual solicitors and six from solicitors organisations and one from the Bar), three from insurers (one from an association of insurers and two from individual insurance companies), two from public bodies, one from a voluntary sector organisation and one from an individual. The responses to the consultation broadly reflect the comments received to the consultation undertaken in March Some respondents commented generally on the proposals in addition to or instead of answering the specific questions posed. The following summary of responses is grouped according to the specific questions set out in the consultation questionnaire. Where a reference is made below to the majority of respondents, it is to be read as a reference to the majority of respondents to that particular question, rather than to the majority of respondents to the consultation generally. Question 1 Do you agree that the guiding principles which formed the 2001 fundamental review of scale costs should continue to be applied? Responses 3.3 A majority of respondents (nine) agreed that the guiding principles of the 2001 fundamental review should continue to apply. Five respondents did not agree with the proposal and two respondents made no comment. 3.4 A respondent who agreed that the guiding principles which informed the 2001 review should be applied to the present review suggested that 9

10 those principles could be used as a starting point and that further work could be carried out particularly in relation to procedures. The respondent commented that as the jurisdictional limit of the county courts will increase to 30,000, the vast majority of personal injury cases will now be issued there and the requirements of county court work has changed somewhat since the last review in They went further to say that a costs drawer should be engaged in order for costs to be fixed at the appropriate level. Another respondent who agreed with the 2001 principles being followed agreed that the need to be remunerated on a fair and reasonable basis is paramount and that the need to ensure that litigation is conducted efficiently and economically is also considered. The same respondent commented that they would be less inclined to agree that Northern Ireland should follow similar scales prescribed in England and Wales and that Northern Ireland s own current economic situation should be considered when deciding an increase in court costs and that this should be tailored to any increases in jurisdiction. Another respondent who agreed with the continued application of the 2001 guiding principles also expressed concern about the applicability and comparability of the scales prescribed in England and Wales. 3.5 A respondent who agreed that the fundamental principles of the 2001 review should continue to be applied commented that requirements of county court work had changed since the last fundamental review in They stated that there was an increasing emphasis on efficiency and the speed of disposal cases. This in turn increases costs to the solicitor in having to devote more resources to the county court cases that they hold and reduces remuneration. Another respondent agreed with this comment and they suggested that further consideration be given to defendant behaviour and safeguards to protect the right of the injured party to bring and fully pursue a claim. 3.6 A respondent who disagreed with the 2001 principles being applied expressed concern that the Committee had decided not to undertake a 10

11 fundamental cost review at this time and rejected the suggestion that practice has not changed significantly since the last review in The respondent suggested that costs payable did not reflect the increasing requirement to attend at direction appointments and review hearings and also contended that additional requirements such as the preparation of indexed trial bundles for hearings were not accounted for. Referring to the Northern Ireland Courts and Tribunals Service policy of full cost recovery for civil business, the respondent also suggested the cost of financing civil litigation had increased since Although accepting that new fees represented only a relatively small increase in the cost of issuing a Civil Bill, the respondent suggested that the cost of ancillary proceedings had increased substantially. 3.7 A respondent who did not agree that the 2001 guiding principles should continue to be applied stated that costs have become disproportionate to complexity and that the swings and roundabouts principle has been eroded over time at the lower end of the scale. Another respondent agreed with this and suggested that further analysis was required as those guiding principles do not take account of increased complexities and procedural requirements of personal injury cases which will fall to the county court when the jurisdictional limit is increased to 30,000. Another respondent commented that since 2001 the landscape of civil litigation, its costs and impact on court users, consumers and taxpayers has significantly changed and that the 2001 principles are not current. Committee s comments 3.8 The Committee, in the fundamental review of county court costs in 2001, took the view that when conducting a review it should ensure that the scales are fair and reasonable. The essential guiding elements that informed the review carried out in 2001 were- a. professional services require a fair and reasonable return for work done. 11

12 b. whether any proposal which would constitute fair and reasonable remuneration should be assessed by considering what might be the result if cases were subject to taxation, using accepted principles. In that regard the assessment would include an appropriate hourly rate as well as information from the Taxing Master. c. whilst it was proper to have regard to any scale costs prescribed for England and Wales such work would require to be comparable, and in that regard there appeared to be agreement that fast track costs in England and Wales were, and remain, different from county court scale costs and operate on a different premise and for a different purpose. d. The Civil Justice Reform Group expected the advantage of the Northern Ireland civil justice system being less expensive than that in England and Wales to be maintained in the future, and that the Committee was to be alert to keeping the costs of litigation in Northern Ireland as economical as possible consistent with the need to ensure that professional services are properly remunerated. This reflected the comments of the Lord Chief Justice in Re C&H Jefferson when he observed that the county court should be a court in respect of whose proceedings the costs and fees should be both moderate and ascertainable [1998] NI at 409. e. The Committee should seek to maintain the principle that there should be a measure of proportionality between the amounts awarded and costs. 3.9 The Committee considered that those principles (largely derived from the 2001 Civil Justice Reform Group Final Report and jurisprudence) remained relevant and should remain the guiding principles in this 12

13 review. The Committee consider that the application of the 2001 principles ensures the proposals are fair and reasonable whilst allowing proper access to justice. The Committee considered comments from respondents that practice and procedure in the county court have changed since the 2001 review. The Committee agreed that in practice procedures both in terms of frequency and substance have not significantly changed since the last review As well as having regard to the 2001 principles the Committee also ensured that it was informed of all relevant factors it considered carefully the responses to the public consultation exercises, the Office of Fair Trading report on the cost of car insurance, comments made in the Northern Ireland Assembly, the current Northern Ireland economic climate and the effect on public funds. Whilst the Committee has adopted the underlying assumptions that have been identified in earlier fundamental reviews which it considers appropriate, the Committee also propose a fundamental review of the county court scale costs in 18 months time which will analyse the impact of the increase in jurisdiction of the county court and District Judges court in civil matters. Question 2 Are you content with the proposed bands of 15,000-20,000, 20,000-25,000 and 25,000-30,000? 3.11 A majority of respondents (10) agreed with the proposed new bands. One respondent who agreed with the proposed bands at intervals of 5,000 stated that this continued to provide certainty to parties who litigate in the county court. That respondent noted that unlike for applicants in England and Wales, the revised scales would allow the vast majority of civil litigants in Northern Ireland to assess with greater clarity the financial costs of going to court. 13

14 3.12 Four respondents did not agree with the proposed bands. Two of those respondents suggested the bands proposed were too wide and that a six band system of: 15,001 to 17,500 17,501 to 20,000 20,001 to 22,500 22,501 to 25,000 25,001 to 27,500 27,501 to 30,000 would provide fairer remuneration. Those respondents commented that a six band system would provide greater certainty at the top of the scale as to which costs applied in any given case which would be for the benefit of both the plaintiff and defendant. A respondent who agreed with the proposed three bands stated that a smaller more uniform gap would be preferable to avoid the potential difficulty when attempting to conclude settlement through negotiation Two respondents declined to comment. Committee s comments 3.14 When setting the new fee bands, the Committee recognises that the value of a claim can be used as a means of measuring its importance to the parties and consequently of the level of legal representation expected. The Committee also recognises, however, that one of the benefits of increasing the jurisdiction of the county court is to extend the more straightforward procedures applicable in that court The Committee are of the view that the bands represent a substantial saving on the present level of costs for cases of these values currently disposed of in the High Court, whether payable by taxation, the Insurance Industry or other scale costs. The Committee propose that 14

15 there should be three new bands created up to the new limit of 30,000: 15,000-20,000 20,000-25,000 25,000-30,000 Question 3 Do you agree with the proposed scales for the new bands? 3.16 A majority (nine) of respondents did not agree with the proposed scales within the suggested new bands. The majority of those respondents who did not agree were of the view that the proposed scales were not at an appropriate level which would allow for fair remuneration. One of these respondents noted that the Belfast Solicitor Association s Guide to High Court Costs recommends a fee of 7,595 for cases settling between 15,000 and 19,999 and that the proposed fee represents a figure just under half of that at 3,800. Whilst they acknowledged that removing cases from the High Court to the county court would generate cost savings, the respondent commented that the level of work and preparation involved is likely to be similar, whichever court the case is heard in and the proposed scales do not reflect that. Another respondent agreed with this view and commented that the procedures and burden of preparation for a county court case is certainly not half that of a High Court action in practice A respondent who disagreed with the proposed scales commented on the existing scales in relation to the difference in damages between 10,000 and 15,000 which equates to a difference in costs (for solicitors) of 460. They contended the proposed scales for year 1 of the new bands would introduce an increase of 905 for the step from 15,000 to 20,000. This would mean that a case potentially worth either 1 or even 5,000 more would result in an uplift of 50% in costs. They felt this potential of excessive costs would erode the principle of proportionality and may encourage claims to be inflated to fit within the upper band. 15

16 3.18 Five respondents agreed with the proposed new scales. One of those 5 respondents was of the view they represent fair remuneration in the current economic climate. They stated that it is a reasonable and proportionate approach and the proposed scale represents value for money for clients. That respondent went onto comment that it is important that the distinct roles played by both branches of the profession are recognised and remunerated appropriately Two respondents declined to comment. Committee s comments 3.20 The Committee concluded that the proposed new scales for the three bands should reflect the simpler procedures applicable in the county court. The Committee considered the Crown and Departmental Solicitors scales as well as the costs on taxation, Belfast Solicitors Association, Motor Insurers and Comerton scales. The Committee considered costs in England and Wales however a direct comparison was not possible as the fast track costs are very different to scale costs and work on a different premise. The Committee s approach to establishing fair and reasonable remuneration in respect of the three new bands was to take account of the mid-point on those existing scales for High Court proceedings, to establish an average then to reduce that figure to take account of the simpler procedures applicable in the county court. Some of the figures were then rounded off or adjusted. In setting counsel s costs, account was taken of the existing scales in High Court proceedings and the need to balance any reduction made to take account of simpler county court processes The Committee are of the view the proposed new scales safeguard against disproportionate costs and provide a civil justice system which is in line with the guiding principles established during the

17 fundamental review. The Committee propose the following scales for the new bands: Solicitors costs Counsels Costs 15,000-20,000 3, ,000-25,000 4, ,000-30,000 4,600 1,039 Question 4 Do you agree that bands should be increased in line with the rate of inflation? 3.22 A slight majority of respondents (seven) did not agree with the proposal to increase the present bands in line with inflation. Three of those respondents who were opposed to the increase held the view that the proposed new scales are set at too low a level in the first instance and that an inflationary rise was not enough to increase the scales to a level they thought they should be at. One respondent commented that the fees should reflect a realistic amount for the work involved and that there has been an increase in ancillary work in recent years and the scale costs have not been increased to take this into account. The additional increases of annual inflation increases would be minimal, by not increasing the costs yearly by inflation once a full scale review has taken place effectively means that the professionals suffer a drop in their income in real terms between the review years. For this reason the respondent commented that a purely inflationary increase in costs for the current bands is not appropriate. Another respondent commented there should be a full review of the current scale cost system by a costs drawer and that a yearly inflationary rise should be applied with further full reviews undertaken at five year intervals A respondent who did not agree with the proposed inflationary increase commented that the scales themselves self protect against inflation i.e. damages increase over time due to inflation thus pushing solicitor fees into the next bracket, which with the application of an inflationary rise to 17

18 scales, would effect a duplicated increase. Another respondent agreed with this approach and stated that the inflationary rise in damages offsets any notion of a pay-freeze for the legal profession. One respondent countered this argument by stating that whilst there may have been inflation in the economy as a whole this has not had any discernable impact on county court awards which have remained static for a number of years and that the vast majority of awards are still under A respondent noted consumers had experienced pay freezes, benefit reductions, reduced hours and increases in energy and food prices in recent years and expressed concern that the legal profession should consider raising its costs in line with inflation in that context Another respondent commented that if the existing scales are to be increased by reference to inflation or otherwise public funds do not have the financial resources to remunerate on this basis and will not be in position to continue to follow scale costs Six respondents favoured an increase of existing scales in line with inflation, although one respondent suggested that there should be an annual uplift which should be linked to the Retail Price Index rather than the GDP deflator. Another respondent stated that annual increases may be acceptable with detailed reviews every five years Three respondents declined to comment. Committee s comments 3.28 The Committee has had regard to the state of the Northern Ireland economy when determining what is fair and reasonable. In this consultation, the Committee originally proposed an inflationary increase of 9.85% to take effect over a two year period. This increase of 9.85% 18

19 reflected the measure of inflation (using the GDP deflator) between July 2007 and March Accordingly, having considered the responses to the consultations and the continuing difficult economic climate, the Committee have decided to reduce the proposed increase by 5.85% to 4% and for that increase to take effect over a two year period. Therefore there should be an increase of the existing costs set out in Appendix 2 of the 1981 Rules: a 2% increase for the first 12 months to be followed by a further increase of 2%, and a full review of all scale costs from 0-30,000 in 18 months time. The new bands between 15,000 and 30,000 would be increased only by 2% in year The Committee have taken into account the fact that since all cases between 15,000 and 30,000 will attract costs substantially less than would be payable through taxation in the High Court and also reduce the number of cases involving senior counsel, there is an efficiency and cost saving with the Committee s proposals. These proposals, whilst representing a saving, still provide a reasonable level of costs for the legal profession. The saving should mitigate against the impact of the proposed inflationary rise as, when viewed as a package rather than in isolation, proposals should provide value for money for courts users The Committee has been conscious that the scales reflect the amounts paid to businesses, not employees, and that those businesses have been faced with increases in overheads, as have most businesses in Northern Ireland. Scale costs have not increased since 2007 and in consequence the legal profession have effectively faced a pay freeze for work done in the intervening period and have subsumed increasing costs in respect of the cases issued and settled (as the vast majority have been). The Committee noted other pay freezes have engaged from 2009, particularly those in public bodies. However in some areas 19

20 there have been increases since then. The Committee also notes that going forward, public sector pay is planned to increase by 1% In relation to comments made by respondents that the scales self protect against inflation, the Committee undertook a review of the Guidelines for the Assessment of General Damages in Personal Injury Cases in Northern Ireland but did not easily identify this overlap (or double effect) and considered that this would only operate at the periphery of the bands. Furthermore, awards for personal injuries in Northern Ireland have largely remained stagnant over the past five years which is contrary to some respondent s comments. Judicial statistics show that in % of awards in the county court for personal injuries were for less than 5,000. In % of awards were for less than 5,000. Question 5 Do you agree with the phased implementation of the inflationary increase? 3.33 Four respondents agreed that if an inflationary rise was to be applied it should be implemented over a two year period. One of those respondents commented that they recognised and agreed with the need for the phased inflationary increase. Another respondent welcomed the Committee s proposal to phase in an increase in costs gradually over a two year period A majority of respondents (nine) disagreed with the proposal for a phased increase. The majority of those respondents (six) were of the view that the proposed inflationary increase being phased in would dilute the effect. One respondent commented that there had been an increase in ancillary work in recent years and the scale costs have not been increased for some time and did not therefore take such matters into account. Another respondent agreed with this view stating that the phased implementation was not acceptable, commenting that there had already been a delay in applying an inflationary rise and further delays 20

21 would perpetuate losses. Another respondent also noted that the proposal for phased implementation for an inflationary rise added a further year to losses already sustained by practitioners. The same respondent commented that in the five years since the last increase, the percentage increase which should have been paid annually since the 2007 Rules had been lost. A respondent commented that any benefit from the increase will be severely diluted by a phased implementation A respondent who opposed any increase for inflation also opposed an increase staged over two years commenting that it would place further unnecessary burden on consumers already struggling. Another respondent commented that if the existing scales are to be increased by reference to inflation, even on a phased implementation, public funds do not have the financial resources to remunerate on this basis Three respondents did not comment. Committee s comments 3.37 The reduction of a 5.85% increase to a 4% increase and the deferment over a two year period spreads the increase, whilst acknowledging that the profession should have some form of increase to allow for fair and reasonable remuneration The Committee was mindful of the potential impact of immediate full implementation on those responsible for paying costs and whilst it recognises that any delay in implementation will reduce the value of the increase, the Committee believes that phased implementation over a two year period balances those two legitimate but competing concerns. 21

Northern Ireland Courts and Tribunals Service County Court Rules Committee Consultative Document on Scale Costs

Northern Ireland Courts and Tribunals Service County Court Rules Committee Consultative Document on Scale Costs Northern Ireland Courts and Tribunals Service County Court Rules Committee Consultative Document on Scale Costs A response by the Association of Personal Injury Lawyers 30 September 2011 Page 1 of 13 The

More information

County Court Rules Committee Consultative Document on Scale Costs

County Court Rules Committee Consultative Document on Scale Costs County Court Rules Committee Consultative Document on Scale Costs serving the community through the administration of justice Document Details Date issued: 7 July 2011 Closing Date: 30 September 2011 Document

More information

This response is prepared on behalf of the Motor Accident Solicitors Society (MASS).

This response is prepared on behalf of the Motor Accident Solicitors Society (MASS). Introduction This response is prepared on behalf of the Motor Accident Solicitors Society (MASS). MASS is a society of solicitors acting for the victims of motor accidents, including those involving Personal

More information

This response is prepared on behalf of the Motor Accident Solicitors Society (MASS).

This response is prepared on behalf of the Motor Accident Solicitors Society (MASS). Introduction This response is prepared on behalf of the Motor Accident Solicitors Society (MASS). MASS is a Society of solicitors acting for the victims of motor accidents, including those involving Personal

More information

EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM TO THE CONDITIONAL FEE AGREEMENTS ORDER 2013. 2013 No. 689

EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM TO THE CONDITIONAL FEE AGREEMENTS ORDER 2013. 2013 No. 689 EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM TO THE CONDITIONAL FEE AGREEMENTS ORDER 2013 2013 No. 689 1. This explanatory memorandum has been prepared by the Ministry of Justice and is laid before Parliament by Command of

More information

ORAL STATEMENT ON ACCESS TO JUSTICE REVIEW FINAL REPORT: 13 SEPTEMBER 2011

ORAL STATEMENT ON ACCESS TO JUSTICE REVIEW FINAL REPORT: 13 SEPTEMBER 2011 ORAL STATEMENT ON ACCESS TO JUSTICE REVIEW FINAL REPORT: 13 SEPTEMBER 2011 Members will have heard me speak previously, in this chamber and elsewhere, of the opportunities that the devolution of justice

More information

LAW SOCIETY OF SCOTLAND REMUNERATION COMMITTEE SHORTFALL IN JUDICIAL EXPENSES THE COST OF LITIGATION AND ITS IMPACT UPON THE SUCCESSFUL PARTY

LAW SOCIETY OF SCOTLAND REMUNERATION COMMITTEE SHORTFALL IN JUDICIAL EXPENSES THE COST OF LITIGATION AND ITS IMPACT UPON THE SUCCESSFUL PARTY LAW SOCIETY OF SCOTLAND REMUNERATION COMMITTEE SHORTFALL IN JUDICIAL EXPENSES THE COST OF LITIGATION AND ITS IMPACT UPON THE SUCCESSFUL PARTY In the Society's Civil Justice Committee's Response to the

More information

Scottish Civil Justice Council Personal Injury Committee. Information Gathering Exercise on Pre Action Protocols

Scottish Civil Justice Council Personal Injury Committee. Information Gathering Exercise on Pre Action Protocols Scottish Civil Justice Council Personal Injury Committee Information Gathering Exercise on Pre Action Protocols Response from the Motor Accident Solicitors Society June 2014 Introduction This response

More information

Consultation Document Alternative Methods of Funding Money Damages Claims

Consultation Document Alternative Methods of Funding Money Damages Claims Consultation Document Alternative Methods of Funding Money Damages Claims March 2013 1 CONTENT 1. Introduction 3 2. Purpose of Consultation 4 3. How to Respond 4 4. Current Position 6 5 Access to Justice

More information

How To Compare Costs Between The Two Jurisdictions

How To Compare Costs Between The Two Jurisdictions Research and Information Service Research Paper January 2012 Fiona O Connell Justice Related Issues Regarding Car Insurance Costs NIAR 642-11 This paper proves information on the legal processes, legal

More information

ATTORNEY GENERAL'S DEPARTMENT OF NSW & THE DEPARTMENT OF PREMIER AND CABINET

ATTORNEY GENERAL'S DEPARTMENT OF NSW & THE DEPARTMENT OF PREMIER AND CABINET NSW GOVERNMENT REVIEW OF THE DUST DISEASES CLAIMS RESOLUTION PROCESS ISSUES PAPER DECEMBER 2008 ATTORNEY GENERAL'S DEPARTMENT OF NSW & THE DEPARTMENT OF PREMIER AND CABINET Issues Paper: Review of the

More information

Response of Browne Jacobson LLP (Solicitors) Civil Law Reform Bill - CP53/09

Response of Browne Jacobson LLP (Solicitors) Civil Law Reform Bill - CP53/09 Response of Browne Jacobson LLP (Solicitors) - CP53/09 February 2010 Contents Contents... 2 Introduction... 3 Browne Jacobson LLP... 3 Interest in the Consultation... 3 The Response... 3 Summary... 4 Response

More information

Department of Justice for Northern Ireland Alternative Methods of Funding Money Damages Claims

Department of Justice for Northern Ireland Alternative Methods of Funding Money Damages Claims Department of Justice for Northern Ireland Alternative Methods of Funding Money Damages Claims A response by the Association of Personal Injury Lawyers June 2013 Page 1 of 8 The Association of Personal

More information

EXTENSION OF THE RTA PI SCHEME: PROPOSALS ON FIXED RECOVERABLE COSTS RESPONSE BY THE LAW SOCIETY OF ENGLAND AND WALES

EXTENSION OF THE RTA PI SCHEME: PROPOSALS ON FIXED RECOVERABLE COSTS RESPONSE BY THE LAW SOCIETY OF ENGLAND AND WALES EXTENSION OF THE RTA PI SCHEME: PROPOSALS ON FIXED RECOVERABLE COSTS RESPONSE BY THE LAW SOCIETY OF ENGLAND AND WALES 4 th January 2013 INDEX 1 INTRODUCTION Page No. A Background 1 B Referral fees 2 C

More information

Track Limits and Personal Injury Claims Process Department Of Constitutional Affairs Consultation

Track Limits and Personal Injury Claims Process Department Of Constitutional Affairs Consultation Track Limits and Personal Injury Claims Process Department Of Constitutional Affairs Consultation With effect from 20 April 2007, the Department of Constitutional Affairs has entered into a period of consultation

More information

The Courts: small claims. Government Response to the Constitutional Affairs Select Committee s Report. Cm 6754

The Courts: small claims. Government Response to the Constitutional Affairs Select Committee s Report. Cm 6754 Government Response to the Constitutional Affairs Select Committee s Report Cm 6754 Government Response to the Constitutional Affairs Select Committee s Report Presented to Parliament by the Secretary

More information

Keoghs LLP response to the Legal Services Board consultation: Referral fees, referral arrangements and fee sharing.

Keoghs LLP response to the Legal Services Board consultation: Referral fees, referral arrangements and fee sharing. Introduction: response to the Legal Services Board consultation: Referral fees, referral arrangements and fee sharing. Keoghs is the only top 100 law firm to focus exclusively on the insurance sector and

More information

Information Gathering Exercise on Pre-Action Protocols

Information Gathering Exercise on Pre-Action Protocols Information Gathering Exercise on Pre-Action Protocols May 2014 INFORMATION GATHERING EXERCISE QUESTIONNAIRE 1. Are the stated aims and purposes of the current voluntary pre-action protocols adequate to

More information

ISSUES PAPER LEGAL REPRESENTATION AND JURISDICTIONAL LIMIT IN SMALL CLAIMS

ISSUES PAPER LEGAL REPRESENTATION AND JURISDICTIONAL LIMIT IN SMALL CLAIMS DEPARTMENT OF THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL AND JUSTICE ISSUES PAPER LEGAL REPRESENTATION AND JURISDICTIONAL LIMIT IN SMALL CLAIMS June 2013 Legal Policy Division Department of the Attorney-General and Justice

More information

Proposals for Reform of Civil Litigation Funding and Costs in England and Wales

Proposals for Reform of Civil Litigation Funding and Costs in England and Wales Proposals for Reform of Civil Litigation Funding and Costs in England and Wales Consultation Paper Response of JUSTICE February 2011 Q 1 Do you agree that CFA success fees should no longer be recoverable

More information

Taylor Review. UNISON Scotland response to Review of Expenses and Funding of Civil Litigation in Scotland

Taylor Review. UNISON Scotland response to Review of Expenses and Funding of Civil Litigation in Scotland Taylor Review UNISON Scotland response to Review of Expenses and Funding of Civil Litigation in Scotland March 2012 Taylor Review UNISON Scotland response to Review of Expenses and Funding of Civil Litigation

More information

PUTTING THINGS RIGHT GWEITHIO I WELLA. Legal Advice Group. Final Report October 2008

PUTTING THINGS RIGHT GWEITHIO I WELLA. Legal Advice Group. Final Report October 2008 PUTTING THINGS RIGHT GWEITHIO I WELLA Legal Advice Group Final Report October 2008 Background The Legal Advice Working Group has been set up as part of the Welsh Assembly s Putting Things Right Project

More information

How To Amend The Civil Procedure Rules

How To Amend The Civil Procedure Rules EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM TO THE CIVIL PROCEDURE (AMENDMENT No.8) RULES 2014 2014 No. 3299 (L. 36) 1. This explanatory memorandum has been prepared by the Ministry of Justice and is laid before Parliament

More information

MAKING A PERSONAL INJURIES CLAIM*

MAKING A PERSONAL INJURIES CLAIM* MAKING A PERSONAL INJURIES CLAIM* GETTING STARTED DO I HAVE A CASE? The first step is to contact one of our experienced personal injuries solicitors and arrange a no obligation consultation. At the initial

More information

Appendix I: Select Federal Legislative. Proposals Addressing Compensation for Asbestos-Related Harms or Death

Appendix I: Select Federal Legislative. Proposals Addressing Compensation for Asbestos-Related Harms or Death Appendix I: Select Legislative Appendix I: Select Federal Legislative is and Mesothelioma Benefits Act H.R. 6906, 93rd 1973). With respect to claims for benefits filed before December 31, 1974, would authorize

More information

FIXED COSTS PART 45. Contents of this Part

FIXED COSTS PART 45. Contents of this Part FIXED COSTS PART 45 PART 45 Contents of this Part I FIXED COSTS Rule 45.1 Scope of this Section Rule 45.2 Amount of fixed commencement costs in a claim for the recovery of money or goods Rule 45.2A Amount

More information

To: whiplashcondoc@justice.gsi.gov.uk

To: whiplashcondoc@justice.gsi.gov.uk To: whiplashcondoc@justice.gsi.gov.uk Unite the Union response to the MINISTRY OF JUSTICE consultation document: Whiplash reform programme: Consultation on independence in medical reporting and expert

More information

GADSBY WICKS SOLICITORS EXPLANATION OF LEGAL TERMS

GADSBY WICKS SOLICITORS EXPLANATION OF LEGAL TERMS EXPLANATION OF LEGAL TERMS Affidavit: After the event litigation insurance: Application notice: Bar Council: Barrister: Basic Charges: Before the Event Legal Expenses Insurance: Bill of costs: Bolam test:

More information

BABERGH DISTRICT COUNCIL. To: Strategy Committee Date of meeting: 6 October 2011

BABERGH DISTRICT COUNCIL. To: Strategy Committee Date of meeting: 6 October 2011 BABERGH DISTRICT COUNCIL From: Strategic and Financial Planning Task Group Report Number: L77 To: Strategy Committee Date of meeting: 6 October 2011 STRATEGIC AND FINANCIAL PLANNING PROCESS 1. Purpose

More information

Supreme Court Judgment in Coventry and Ors v Lawrence and another [2015] UKSC 50

Supreme Court Judgment in Coventry and Ors v Lawrence and another [2015] UKSC 50 Alerter 24 th July 2015 Supreme Court Judgment in Coventry and Ors v Lawrence and another [2015] UKSC 50 The Supreme Court has handed down its Judgment in Coventry v Lawrence in which it considered the

More information

Transport Accident Act Common Law Protocols 1 April 2005 (amended as from March 2010)

Transport Accident Act Common Law Protocols 1 April 2005 (amended as from March 2010) Transport Accident Act Common Law Protocols 1 April 2005 (amended as from March 2010) 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Consistent with its mission and vision statement, Client Service Charter and public commitment

More information

NSW COURT OF APPEAL DECISION SUPPORTS LITIGATION FUNDING MARKET

NSW COURT OF APPEAL DECISION SUPPORTS LITIGATION FUNDING MARKET NSW COURT OF APPEAL DECISION SUPPORTS LITIGATION FUNDING MARKET Introduction 1. The New South Wales Court of Appeal, in a unanimous Judgment on Thursday 31 March 2005, sent some clear messages to legal

More information

www.mcdermottqc.com Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill: Implications for Personal Injury Litigation

www.mcdermottqc.com Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill: Implications for Personal Injury Litigation www.mcdermottqc.com Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill: Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill: The Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill covers a wide

More information

CASE TRACK LIMITS AND THE CLAIMS PROCESS FOR PERSONAL INJURY CLAIMS

CASE TRACK LIMITS AND THE CLAIMS PROCESS FOR PERSONAL INJURY CLAIMS CASE TRACK LIMITS AND THE CLAIMS PROCESS FOR PERSONAL INJURY CLAIMS A consultation paper produced by the Department for Constitutional Affairs RESPONSE BY THE LAW SOCIETY OF ENGLAND AND WALES July 2007

More information

President s Guidance on Continuity and Deployment (Public Law)

President s Guidance on Continuity and Deployment (Public Law) Introduction President s Guidance on Continuity and Deployment (Public Law) 1. This Guidance is issued by the President of the Family Division under PD 12A (PLO 2014). 2. This Guidance applies to all care

More information

MASS agrees with the introduction of mandatory fixed fees for initial medical reports undertaken by the experts proposed.

MASS agrees with the introduction of mandatory fixed fees for initial medical reports undertaken by the experts proposed. Ministry of Justice Consultation: Whiplash Reform: Proposals on Fixed Costs For Medical Examinations / Reports and Related Issues Response from the Motor Accident Solicitors Society May 2014 Introduction

More information

Avant welcomes the opportunity to provide input into the Productivity Commission s draft report on Access to Justice Arrangements.

Avant welcomes the opportunity to provide input into the Productivity Commission s draft report on Access to Justice Arrangements. 21 May 2014 Access to Justice Productivity Commission GPO Box 1428 Canberra City ACT 2601 Access to Justice Arrangements Draft Report Avant welcomes the opportunity to provide input into the Productivity

More information

Expenses and Funding of Civil Litigation Bill Consultation Response by GCC

Expenses and Funding of Civil Litigation Bill Consultation Response by GCC Expenses and Funding of Civil Litigation Bill Consultation Response by GCC (A) Speculative Fee Agreements: Q1: Do you think that a lack of cap on speculative fee agreements prevents potential pursuers

More information

A response by the Association of Personal Injury Lawyers May 2014

A response by the Association of Personal Injury Lawyers May 2014 Scottish Civil Justice Council Information gathering exercise on pre-action protocols A response by the Association of Personal Injury Lawyers May 2014 Page 1 of 8 The Association of Personal Injury Lawyers

More information

Short Form CFA based on "APIL/PIBA 9" for personal injuries and clinical negligence claims from 1.10.2013

Short Form CFA based on APIL/PIBA 9 for personal injuries and clinical negligence claims from 1.10.2013 LAMB CHAMBERS SHORT FORM CFA for use BETWEEN SOLICITORS AND COUNSEL on or after 1 October 2013 in personal injuries and clinical negligence claims (This agreement is not suitable for claims for diffuse

More information

INFORMATION GATHERING EXERCISE QUESTIONNAIRE

INFORMATION GATHERING EXERCISE QUESTIONNAIRE ANNEX B INFORMATION GATHERING EXERCISE QUESTIONNAIRE 1. Are the stated aims and purposes of the current voluntary pre-action protocols adequate to comply with the recommendations of the Scottish Civil

More information

Response of the Association of Costs Lawyers to the consultation on the impact of the Jackson reforms on costs and case management

Response of the Association of Costs Lawyers to the consultation on the impact of the Jackson reforms on costs and case management Response of the Association of Costs Lawyers to the consultation on the impact of the Jackson reforms on costs and case management 1. Introduction The Association of Costs Lawyers (ACL) broadly welcomes

More information

Regulatory Impact Statement

Regulatory Impact Statement Regulatory Impact Statement Improving Case Management for Civil Cases in the High Court Agency Disclosure Statement This Regulatory Impact Statement (RIS) has been prepared by the Ministry of Justice.

More information

STUC Response to the Scottish Government s Making Justice Work - Courts Reform (Scotland) Bill May 2013

STUC Response to the Scottish Government s Making Justice Work - Courts Reform (Scotland) Bill May 2013 STUC Response to the Scottish Government s Making Justice Work - Courts Reform (Scotland) Bill May 2013 Introduction The STUC is Scotland s trade union centre. Its purpose is to co-ordinate, develop and

More information

Head 94 LEGAL AID DEPARTMENT

Head 94 LEGAL AID DEPARTMENT Controlling officer: the Director of Legal Aid will account for expenditure under this Head. Estimate... $826.9m Establishment ceiling (notional annual mid-point salary value) representing an estimated

More information

How To Manage Claims At The Trust

How To Manage Claims At The Trust GWASANAETHAU AMBIWLANS CYMRU YMDDIRIEDOLAETH GIG WELSH AMBULANCE SERVICES NHS TRUST CLAIMS MANAGEMENT POLICY Clinical Negligence, Personal Injury, Losses and Compensation Claims Approved by Date Review

More information

We believe that the financial aspects of the Bill merit consideration in a number of areas:

We believe that the financial aspects of the Bill merit consideration in a number of areas: COURTS REFORM (SCOTLAND) BILL WRITTEN EVIDENCE FINANCE COMMITTEE The Law Society of Scotland aims to lead and support a successful and respected Scottish legal profession. Not only do we act in the interests

More information

APIL/PIBA CFA version 9, for personal injuries and clinical negligence claims, from 1.4.13,

APIL/PIBA CFA version 9, for personal injuries and clinical negligence claims, from 1.4.13, SHORT FORM CFA for use BETWEEN SOLICITORS AND COUNSEL on or after 1 April 2013 in personal injuries and clinical negligence claims (This agreement is not suitable for claims for diffuse mesothelioma.)

More information

HER MAJESTY S COURTS SERVICE (HMCS) Part of the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) CIVIL COURT FEES A RESPONSE BY THE ASSOCIATION OF PERSONAL INJURY LAWYERS

HER MAJESTY S COURTS SERVICE (HMCS) Part of the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) CIVIL COURT FEES A RESPONSE BY THE ASSOCIATION OF PERSONAL INJURY LAWYERS HER MAJESTY S COURTS SERVICE (HMCS) Part of the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) CIVIL COURT FEES A RESPONSE BY THE ASSOCIATION OF PERSONAL INJURY LAWYERS June 2007 The Association of Personal Injury Lawyers

More information

Statutory Disclosure Guidance. Second edition August 2015

Statutory Disclosure Guidance. Second edition August 2015 Statutory Disclosure Guidance Second edition August 2015 Statutory guidance to chief officers of police on providing information for inclusion in enhanced criminal record certificates PURPOSE OF THIS GUIDANCE

More information

Review by Legal Costs Committee. Legal Profession (Family Court of Western Australia) Determination 2014

Review by Legal Costs Committee. Legal Profession (Family Court of Western Australia) Determination 2014 Review by Legal Costs Committee Legal Profession (Family Court of Western Australia) Determination 2014 Legal Profession (State Administrative Tribunal) Determination 2014 Legal Profession (Official Prosecutions)

More information

A MEMBERS GUIDE TO LIQUIDATORS FEES ENGLAND AND WALES

A MEMBERS GUIDE TO LIQUIDATORS FEES ENGLAND AND WALES A MEMBERS GUIDE TO LIQUIDATORS FEES ENGLAND AND WALES 1 Introduction 1.1 When a Company goes into members voluntary liquidation, the costs of the proceedings are paid out of its assets. A declaration of

More information

A MEMBERS GUIDE TO LIQUIDATORS FEES ENGLAND AND WALES

A MEMBERS GUIDE TO LIQUIDATORS FEES ENGLAND AND WALES A MEMBERS GUIDE TO LIQUIDATORS FEES ENGLAND AND WALES 1 Introduction 1.1 When a Company goes into members voluntary liquidation, the costs of the proceedings are paid out of its assets. A declaration of

More information

CONDITIONAL FEE AGREEMENTS GUIDANCE

CONDITIONAL FEE AGREEMENTS GUIDANCE Disclaimer In all cases solicitors must ensure that any agreement with a client is made in compliance with their professional duties, the requirements of the SRA and any statutory requirements depending

More information

ISSUES PAPER: FAMILY LAW RULES ALBERTA RULES OF COURT PROJECT

ISSUES PAPER: FAMILY LAW RULES ALBERTA RULES OF COURT PROJECT ISSUES PAPER: FAMILY LAW RULES ALBERTA RULES OF COURT PROJECT October 2002 INTRODUCTION The Rules Project [1] The Alberta Rules of Court (the Rules) govern practice and procedure in the Alberta Court of

More information

Advice Note. An overview of civil proceedings in England. Introduction

Advice Note. An overview of civil proceedings in England. Introduction Advice Note An overview of civil proceedings in England Introduction There is no civil code in England; English civil law comprises of essentially legislation by Parliament and decisions by the courts.

More information

Impact Assessment (IA)

Impact Assessment (IA) Title: Enhanced Court Fees IA No: MoJ222 Lead department or agency: Ministry of Justice Other departments or agencies: HM Courts and Tribunals Service Impact Assessment (IA) Date: 16/1/2015 Stage: Final

More information

Costs Payable in Personal Injury Claims under the Various Legislative Regimes by Paul Garrett

Costs Payable in Personal Injury Claims under the Various Legislative Regimes by Paul Garrett Costs Payable in Personal Injury Claims under the Various Legislative Regimes by Paul Garrett I was asked to deliver a paper in relation to costs which are payable under the various regimes where claimants

More information

CHAPTER 1 Moving civil business from the Court of Session to the sheriff courts

CHAPTER 1 Moving civil business from the Court of Session to the sheriff courts INTRODUCTION CONSULTATION QUESTIONS As a firm, Digby Brown continue to practice almost exclusively in the area of pursuer personal injury (including clinical negligence), and we therefore propose to concentrate

More information

Increasing the Magistrates Court fine limit Equality Impact Assessment

Increasing the Magistrates Court fine limit Equality Impact Assessment Increasing the Magistrates Court fine limit Equality Impact Assessment Introduction The Ministry of Justice tabled Government amendments at the Commons Report stage of the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment

More information

Legal Services Agency Mental Health Representation Project. Mental Health (Scotland) Bill

Legal Services Agency Mental Health Representation Project. Mental Health (Scotland) Bill Legal Services Agency Mental Health Representation Project Mental Health (Scotland) Bill 1. Do you agree with the general policy direction set by the Bill? We agree with the general policy direction set

More information

Briefing for the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill Committee. An interlocking package of reforms

Briefing for the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill Committee. An interlocking package of reforms Briefing for the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill Committee An interlocking package of reforms March 2012 Briefing for Members of the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders

More information

Introduction of a ban on the payment of referral fees in personal injury cases Equality Impact Assessment

Introduction of a ban on the payment of referral fees in personal injury cases Equality Impact Assessment Introduction of a ban on the payment of referral fees in personal injury cases Equality Impact Assessment Introduction This Equality Impact Assessment (EIA) relates to amendments to the Legal Aid, Sentencing

More information

Enhanced court fees - briefing for MPs and Peers

Enhanced court fees - briefing for MPs and Peers Enhanced court fees - briefing for MPs and Peers For further information please contact: Iana Vidal (Public Affairs Adviser, the Law Society) T: 020 7316 5581, E: iana.vidal@lawsociety.org.uk Key Points

More information

Scottish Government Removal of the 3 year limitation period from civil actions for damages for personal injury for in care survivors of historical

Scottish Government Removal of the 3 year limitation period from civil actions for damages for personal injury for in care survivors of historical Scottish Government Removal of the 3 year limitation period from civil actions for damages for personal injury for in care survivors of historical child abuse A response by the Association of Personal

More information

Guidance for case managers on the assessment of costs

Guidance for case managers on the assessment of costs Guidance for case managers on the assessment of costs The timetable Preparation by the parties 1 Where an MPT has made an order for costs, it will follow that the receiving party has a period of 28 days

More information

THE NATURE OF THE ROLE OF A MASTER

THE NATURE OF THE ROLE OF A MASTER THE NATURE OF THE ROLE OF A MASTER The primary jurisdiction of Masters in the Court of Judicature in Northern Ireland is derived from Order 32, rule 11 of the Rules of the Court of Judicature and the Judicature

More information

LEGAL GUIDE TO RECOVERING A TRADE DEBT

LEGAL GUIDE TO RECOVERING A TRADE DEBT LEGAL GUIDE TO RECOVERING A TRADE DEBT Howat Avraam Solicitors A: 154 160 FLEET STREET, LONDON, EC4A 2DQ T: 020 7884 9400 E: Matthew.Howat@hasolicitors.co.uk Unpaid invoicing is a fact of life for most

More information

Damages (Asbestos-related Conditions) Bill

Damages (Asbestos-related Conditions) Bill Research and Library Service 13 January 2010 Damages (Asbestos-related Conditions) Bill NIAR 644-10 This paper provides an overview and discussion of the Damages (Asbestos-related Conditions) Bill. Paper

More information

PRACTICE DIRECTION No. 8 of 2001 FAMILY PROVISION APPLICATIONS

PRACTICE DIRECTION No. 8 of 2001 FAMILY PROVISION APPLICATIONS PRACTICE DIRECTION No. 8 of 2001 FAMILY PROVISION APPLICATIONS 1. Practice Direction No. 2 of 1997 is repealed. 2. The objects of this Practice Direction are to reduce cost and delay by (a) making information

More information

Final Business and Regulatory Impact Assessment

Final Business and Regulatory Impact Assessment Title of Proposal Final Business and Regulatory Impact Assessment The Legal Aid and Advice and Assistance (Miscellaneous Amendments) (Scotland) Regulations 2015 Purpose and intended effect Background Legal

More information

Bar Council response to the Reducing Legal Costs in Clinical Negligence Claims pre-consultation paper

Bar Council response to the Reducing Legal Costs in Clinical Negligence Claims pre-consultation paper Bar Council response to the Reducing Legal Costs in Clinical Negligence Claims pre-consultation paper 1. This is the response of the General Council of the Bar of England and Wales (the Bar Council) to

More information

The industry is delivering on its commitment to pass on savings to customers

The industry is delivering on its commitment to pass on savings to customers TRANSPORT SELECT COMMITTEE INQUIRY COST OF MOTOR INSURANCE: WHIPLASH Evidence from the Association of British Insurers The Association of British Insurers (ABI) is the voice of the insurance and investment

More information

NORTHERN IRELAND OFFICE CONSULTATION CRIMINAL INJURIES COMPENSATION (NI) ORDER 2001 A RESPONSE BY THE ASSOCIATION OF PERSONAL INJURY LAWYERS

NORTHERN IRELAND OFFICE CONSULTATION CRIMINAL INJURIES COMPENSATION (NI) ORDER 2001 A RESPONSE BY THE ASSOCIATION OF PERSONAL INJURY LAWYERS NORTHERN IRELAND OFFICE CONSULTATION CRIMINAL INJURIES COMPENSATION (NI) ORDER 2001 A RESPONSE BY THE ASSOCIATION OF PERSONAL INJURY LAWYERS NOVEMBER 2001 The executive committee would like to acknowledge

More information

We agree that by not increasing small claims track hearing fees, the Government is ensuring access to justice is not compromised.

We agree that by not increasing small claims track hearing fees, the Government is ensuring access to justice is not compromised. Ministry of Justice Consultation Court Fees: Proposals for Reform Response from the Motor Accident Solicitors Society January 2014 Introduction This response is prepared on behalf of the Motor Accident

More information

The Jackson Reforms Jan Thompson, Director

The Jackson Reforms Jan Thompson, Director The Jackson Reforms Jan Thompson, Director In response to the perceived compensation culture in our civil justice system, the government has announced their intention to implement the majority of Lord

More information

LEGAL PROFESSION BILL REFERENCE GROUP FIRST MEETING 8 OCTOBER 2008 DEFINITION OF REGULATED LEGAL SERVICES

LEGAL PROFESSION BILL REFERENCE GROUP FIRST MEETING 8 OCTOBER 2008 DEFINITION OF REGULATED LEGAL SERVICES LEGAL PROFESSION BILL REFERENCE GROUP FIRST MEETING 8 OCTOBER 2008 DEFINITION OF REGULATED LEGAL SERVICES Aim The Group is asked to consider options for defining regulated legal services provided by alternative

More information

ACCESS TO JUSTICE. Final Consultation Paper issued by The Royal Court Rules Review Group

ACCESS TO JUSTICE. Final Consultation Paper issued by The Royal Court Rules Review Group ACCESS TO JUSTICE Final Consultation Paper issued by The Royal Court Rules Review Group Dated 5 th October 2015 1 FINAL CONSULTATION PAPER The Royal Court Rules Review Group ( the Group ) invites comments

More information

A CREDITORS' GUIDE TO LIQUIDATORS' FEES ENGLAND AND WALES

A CREDITORS' GUIDE TO LIQUIDATORS' FEES ENGLAND AND WALES A CREDITORS' GUIDE TO LIQUIDATORS' FEES ENGLAND AND WALES 1 Introduction 1.1 When a company goes into liquidation the costs of the proceedings are paid out of its assets. The creditors, who hope to recover

More information

NICS EQUAL PAY SETTLEMENT BRIEFING TO THE COMMITTEE FOR FINANCE AND PERSONNEL

NICS EQUAL PAY SETTLEMENT BRIEFING TO THE COMMITTEE FOR FINANCE AND PERSONNEL NICS EQUAL PAY SETTLEMENT BRIEFING TO THE COMMITTEE FOR FINANCE AND PERSONNEL PRODUCED BY NIPSA AUGUST 2011 COMMITTEE FOR FINANCE AND PERSONNEL UPDATE ON EQUAL PAY IN RESPECT OF DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE/FORMER

More information

Bar Council and the Personal Injuries Bar Association response to the Extension of the RTA Portal PA Scheme consultation paper

Bar Council and the Personal Injuries Bar Association response to the Extension of the RTA Portal PA Scheme consultation paper Bar Council and the Personal Injuries Bar Association response to the Extension of the RTA Portal PA Scheme consultation paper 1. This is the response of the General Council of the Bar of England and Wales

More information

Disease: solving disputes post 1 April 2013

Disease: solving disputes post 1 April 2013 Disease: solving disputes post 1 April 2013 This update examines the impact made by the Jackson reforms since their implementation on 1 April 2013 and looks forward to the extension of the RTA portal due

More information

Cafcass and Independent Reviewing Officer. Protocol for Public Law Work. Independent Reviewing Officer

Cafcass and Independent Reviewing Officer. Protocol for Public Law Work. Independent Reviewing Officer Cafcass and Independent Reviewing Officer Protocol for Public Law Work The Protocol has been developed in response to the need to agree a clear understanding of the statutory roles and interface between

More information

Response to sheriff court rules council consultation on proposals for procedural rules for personal injury actions in the sheriff court September

Response to sheriff court rules council consultation on proposals for procedural rules for personal injury actions in the sheriff court September Response to sheriff court rules council consultation on proposals for procedural rules for personal injury actions in the sheriff court September 2006 ^ÄçìííÜÉpÅçííáëÜ`çåëìãÉê`çìåÅáä qüé påçííáëü `çåëìãéê

More information

Cost of Preferred (or more likely) Option Net cost to business per year (EANCB on 2009 prices) 0m N/A N/A No N/A

Cost of Preferred (or more likely) Option Net cost to business per year (EANCB on 2009 prices) 0m N/A N/A No N/A Dismissal of personal injury claims involving fundamental dishonesty IA No: MoJ 021/2014 Lead department or agency: Ministry of Justice Other departments or agencies: Impact Assessment (IA) Date: 6 June

More information

EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM TO. The Adoption Agencies (Wales) (Amendment) Regulations 2012

EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM TO. The Adoption Agencies (Wales) (Amendment) Regulations 2012 EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM TO The Adoption Agencies (Wales) (Amendment) Regulations 2012 This Explanatory Memorandum has been prepared by the Department of Health, Children and Social Services and is laid

More information

CIVIL JUSTICE COUNCIL (CJC) RESPONSE REDUCING THE NUMBER & COSTS OF WHIPLASH CLAIMS

CIVIL JUSTICE COUNCIL (CJC) RESPONSE REDUCING THE NUMBER & COSTS OF WHIPLASH CLAIMS CIVIL JUSTICE COUNCIL (CJC) RESPONSE REDUCING THE NUMBER & COSTS OF WHIPLASH CLAIMS General The CJC welcomes the opportunity to respond to this consultation. It further welcomes the intention to improve

More information

Major UK Government Proposals on Reform of Litigation Costs and Funding

Major UK Government Proposals on Reform of Litigation Costs and Funding Major UK Government Proposals on Reform of Litigation Costs and Funding Dr Christopher Hodges Head of the CMS Research programme on Civil Justice Systems Centre for Socio-Legal Studies University of Oxford

More information

Expert Witnesses in the Federal Courts A Discussion Paper of the Federal Courts Rules Committee on Expert Witnesses

Expert Witnesses in the Federal Courts A Discussion Paper of the Federal Courts Rules Committee on Expert Witnesses Expert Witnesses in the Federal Courts A Discussion Paper of the Federal Courts Rules Committee on Expert Witnesses Background The role of the expert witness is to assist the court through the provision

More information

A BILL for AN ACT. Serial 137 Personal Injuries (Civil Claims) Bill 2003 Dr Toyne

A BILL for AN ACT. Serial 137 Personal Injuries (Civil Claims) Bill 2003 Dr Toyne Serial 137 Personal Injuries (Civil Claims) Bill 2003 Dr Toyne A BILL for AN ACT to provide for the economical and early resolution of claims for damages for personal injuries before proceedings are commenced,

More information

A CREDITORS GUIDE TO FEES CHARGED BY TRUSTEES IN BANKRUPTCY ENGLAND AND WALES

A CREDITORS GUIDE TO FEES CHARGED BY TRUSTEES IN BANKRUPTCY ENGLAND AND WALES A CREDITORS GUIDE TO FEES CHARGED BY TRUSTEES IN BANKRUPTCY 1 Introduction ENGLAND AND WALES 1.1 When an individual becomes bankrupt the costs of the bankruptcy proceedings are paid out of his or her assets.

More information

Consultation Document. Retained Firefighters pension settlement: A consultation to provide access to a modified pension scheme in Wales

Consultation Document. Retained Firefighters pension settlement: A consultation to provide access to a modified pension scheme in Wales Number: WG19518 Welsh Government Consultation Document Retained Firefighters pension settlement: A consultation to provide access to a modified pension scheme in Wales Date of issue: 23 August 2013 Action

More information

A SHAREHOLDERS GUIDE TO LIQUIDATORS FEES - ENGLAND AND WALES

A SHAREHOLDERS GUIDE TO LIQUIDATORS FEES - ENGLAND AND WALES A SHAREHOLDERS GUIDE TO LIQUIDATORS FEES - ENGLAND AND WALES 1 Introduction 1.1 When a company goes into liquidation the costs of the proceedings are paid out of its assets. The members (shareholders),

More information

BRACKNELL FOREST COUNCIL ADULT SOCIAL CARE & HEALTH DEBT RECOVERY POLICY & PROCEDURES

BRACKNELL FOREST COUNCIL ADULT SOCIAL CARE & HEALTH DEBT RECOVERY POLICY & PROCEDURES BRACKNELL FOREST COUNCIL ADULT SOCIAL CARE & HEALTH DEBT RECOVERY POLICY & PROCEDURES POLICY DOCUMENT Table of Contents 1. Definitions and Abbreviations... 3 2. Legal Status... 4 3. Principles for Debt

More information

The Police Pension Scheme 2015. Members Guide

The Police Pension Scheme 2015. Members Guide The Police Pension Scheme 2015 Members Guide 1 Contents 1. Introduction... 6 2. The Police Pension Scheme 2015 at a glance... 8 2.1 Key features... 8 2.2 Pension benefits for members... 8 2.3 Benefits

More information

FSB NI response to Consultation on Strategic Planning Policy Statement for Northern Ireland (Draft)

FSB NI response to Consultation on Strategic Planning Policy Statement for Northern Ireland (Draft) FSB NI response to Consultation on Strategic Planning Policy Statement for Northern Ireland (Draft) April 2014 FSB response to the Consultation on the Strategic Planning Policy Statement for Northern Ireland

More information

Law Society of Saskatchewan Queen s Bench Rules of Court webinars Part 1: Overview

Law Society of Saskatchewan Queen s Bench Rules of Court webinars Part 1: Overview Law Society of Saskatchewan Queen s Bench Rules of Court webinars Part 1: Overview Reché McKeague Director of Research, Law Reform Commission of Saskatchewan January 28, 2013 Table of Contents 1. Introduction...

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE IN NORTHERN IRELAND PROTOCOL FOR CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE LITIGATION

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE IN NORTHERN IRELAND PROTOCOL FOR CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE LITIGATION IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE IN NORTHERN IRELAND PROTOCOL FOR CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE LITIGATION 1. Practitioners are reminded of the need to bear in mind the overriding objective set out at Order 1 rule 1(a)

More information

Re: 15 & 15A Greenland Street, Belfast COSTS. Lands Tribunal - Mr M R Curry FRICS MCI.Arb Hon.Dip.Rating

Re: 15 & 15A Greenland Street, Belfast COSTS. Lands Tribunal - Mr M R Curry FRICS MCI.Arb Hon.Dip.Rating LANDS TRIBUNAL FOR NORTHERN IRELAND THE LAND COMPENSATION (NORTHERN IRELAND) ORDER 1982 PLANNING (NORTHERN IRELAND) ORDER 1991 LOCAL GOVERNMENT ACT (NORTHERN IRELAND) 1972 IN THE MATTER OF A REFERENCE

More information

A CREDITORS GUIDE TO LIQUIDATORS FEES - ENGLAND AND WALES

A CREDITORS GUIDE TO LIQUIDATORS FEES - ENGLAND AND WALES A CREDITORS GUIDE TO LIQUIDATORS FEES - ENGLAND AND WALES 1 Introduction 1.1 When a company goes into liquidation the costs of the proceedings are paid out of its assets. The creditors, who hope to recover

More information