Top Ambulatory Electronic Health Reports Vendors

Transcription

1 BLACK BOOK RANKINGS 0 SURVEY Top Ambulatory Electronic Health Reports Vendors Publication Date: February 0 Part One: Aggregate Black Book Survey Findings Part Two: Sample Data Set of Top EHR Vendors Two to Five ( - ) Physician Practices & Groups Top Electronic Medical Records/Electronic Health Records Vendors Published February 0 Black Book Rankings. This report is a licensed product. Page

2 Brown-Wilson Group annually evaluates leading healthcare/medical software and service providers across operational excellence key performance indicators completely from the perspective of the client experience. Independent and unbiased from vendors influence, Over 00,000 healthcare IT users are invited to contribute. Suppliers also encourage their clients to participate to produce current and objective customer service data for buyers, analysts, investors, consultants, competitive suppliers and the media. For more information or to order customized research results, please contact the Client Resource Center at +.. or 0, 0 Brown-Wilson Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of this publication in any form without prior written permission is forbidden. The information contained herein has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable. Brown-Wilson Group disclaims all warranties as to the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of such information. Brown-Wilson Group shall have no liability for errors, omissions or inadequacies in the information contained herein or for interpretations thereof. The reader assumes sole responsibility for the selection of these materials to achieve its intended results. The opinions expressed herein are subject to change without notice. Brown-Wilson Group's unrivaled objectivity and credibility is perhaps your greatest assurance. At a time when alliances between major consultancies and suppliers have clouded the landscape, Brown-Wilson Group remains resolutely independent. We have no incentive to recommend specific EMR software vendors. Our only allegiance is to help you achieve the results you want with the best possible solution. For more information, visit Top Electronic Medical Records/Electronic Health Records Vendors Published February 0 Black Book Rankings. This report is a licensed product. Page

3 Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS PART ONE: 0 BLACK BOOK EHR EMR E-PRESCRIBING USERS SURVEY RESULTS State of the EMR EHR Industry AGGREGATED RESPONSE FINDINGS Key findings - Survey Overview BLACK BOOK METHODOLOGY How the data sets are collected Understanding the statistical confidence of Black Book data Who participates in the Black Book ranking process PART TWO: TWO TO FIVE ( - ) PHYSICIAN PRACTICES & GROUPS TOP 0 ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD/HEALTH RECORD VENDORS Top # EHR Vendor Overall, Top # EHR Vendor by Four Functional Subsets 0 Top 0 Electronic Health and Medical Record Vendors, Ranked List through 0 STOP LIGHT SCORING KEY OVERALL KPI LEADERS Summary of criteria outcomes Top score per individual criteria INDIVIDUAL KEY PERFORMANCE - TABLE OF FIGURES Figure : Comprehensive EMR vendors defined Figure : Key to raw scores Figure : Color-coded stop light dashboard scoring key Figure : Raw score compilation and scale of reference Figure : Scoring key Top Electronic Medical Records/Electronic Health Records Vendors Published February 0 Black Book Rankings. This report is a licensed product. Page

4 Table of Contents TABLE OF AGGREGATED FINDINGS Figure : 00, 0, 0 Total Survey Response Rate Figure : 00, 00, 0 Implementation Rate of Basic EMR and Fully Functional EHR Figure : 0 Survey Response Rate by OrganizationType Figure : Implementation Rate by Practice Size Figure : Project IT Budget Spend Changes 0-0 Figure : Areas of Projected Largest Healthcare IT Spend by Project Type 0-0 Figure : EMR Implementation Rate by US State 0 Figure : Top Indicated EMR Selection Criteria Figure : Buyer Awareness of Vendors Figure 0: Buyer Awareness of Governement Meaningful Use Standards Q 0 Figure : EMR Adoption Rate by Specialty Figure : EHR Adoption by Practice Size, Setting, Location and Region 00 and 0 Figure : Meaningful User Achievement by Pracice Size, Setting, Location, Region 0-0 Figure : Estimated Meaningful Use Achievement with Current IT Strategy, Stage - Top Electronic Medical Records/Electronic Health Records Vendors Published February 0 Black Book Rankings. This report is a licensed product. Page

5 Table of Contents TABLE OF TABLES Table : Top 0 EMR EHR Vendors 0 Table : Summary of criteria outcomes Table : Top score per individual criteria Tables of Individual Key Performance Indicator, Top Ten Highest Mean by KPI 0- Table : Table : Table : Table : Table : Table : Vendor overall preference/vertical industry recommendations Innovation TrainingError! Bookmark not defined. Client relationships and cultural fiterror! Bookmark not defined. Trust, Accountability and TransparencyError! Bookmark not defined. Breadth of offerings, client types, delivery excellenceerror! Bookmark not defined. Table 0: Deployment and outsourcing implementationerror! Bookmark not defined. Table : CustomizationError! Bookmark not defined. Table : Integration and interfaceserror! Bookmark not defined. Table : Scalability, client adaptability, flexible pricingerror! Bookmark not defined. Table : Compensation and employee performanceerror! Bookmark not defined. Table : ReliabilityError! Bookmark not defined. Table : Brand image and marketing communicationserror! Bookmark not defined. Table : Marginal value addserror! Bookmark not defined. Table : ViabilityError! Bookmark not defined. Table : Data security and backup serviceserror! Bookmark not defined. Table 0: Support and customer careerror! Bookmark not defined. Table : Best of breed technology and process improvementerror! Bookmark not defined. Top Electronic Medical Records/Electronic Health Records Vendors Published February 0 Black Book Rankings. This report is a licensed product. Page

6 Part One: Aggregate Black Book EMR EHR Survey Findings 0 PART ONE: COMPREHENSIVE BLACK BOOK SURVEY FINDINGS, AGGREGATE RESPONSES STATE OF THE EMR EHR INDUSTRY 0 The U.S. is one of the most developed healthcare markets globally. The annual healthcare spending of the country reached around US$. Trillion in 0, which is expected to soar to US$. Trillion by 0. This growth was attributed to the increasing usage of patent drugs, high administrative costs, and expensive hospital care. The enormous healthcare costs, which are expected to increase in the future, will pressurize the government to cut budget funding from other important segments. To gradually reduce this massive economic burden and to revitalize the prompt healthcare services, a flurry of regulatory acts has been passed. e-health being the most prominent source of cost containment is being targeted by both public as well as private sector entities which help industry to grow manifold in last few years. The e-health market has evolved as one of the fastest growing U.S. industries and remained almost immune even in the tough postrecessionary scenarios. A number of federal policies and acts worked as catalysts for market growth and are expected to drive market developments also. The e-health adoption and its will open widespread market opportunities for the healthcare sector, which is poised to grow at a CAGR of around % during 0-0. The 00 economic stimulus set aside $. billion to jump-start the switch to electronic records. The law offers doctors up to $,0 over five years to help pay for the change if physicians can prove they re making meaningful use of the systems by scanning records and submitting prescriptions electronically. Through August, 0,000 of the roughly 0,000 eligible Medicare and Medicaid providers hospitals, clinics, and private practices had registered to participate in the government stimulus program, with about,000 receiving initial payments for demonstrating meaningful use of digital records, government figures show. Spending on electronic systems by health providers could grow percent to $ billion by 0 The EMR, EHR, Practice management, e-prescribing, and tele-healthcare sectors will witness strong growth due to technological advancements that will make treatment and diagnosis simpler. Additionally, individuals belonging to the young population are tech savvy and appreciate IT adoption in healthcare offerings. This population segment spends more on e-health and m-health applications and the trend is expected to remain applicable in the coming years also. Spending on electronic medical records may jump percent by 0, but adoption is being slowed by confusion over technologies. Many doctors who have made the shift to the new systems aren t tapping their full power. Only a fraction of physicians use their software to exchange information with other providers because of difficulties transmitting data. Tech investors and entrepreneurs are jumping into the saturated EMR marketplace. About 0 companies have started up, more than doubling the number of vendors in two years. That surge has many in the industry concerned that consolidation is inevitable. Some vendors may try to stay afloat without consolidating by selling doctors add-ons such as practice management, voice recognition and other services and products. National data for 0 indicates that 0% of office-based physicians were using some portion of e-health technology/ electronic medical record (EMR)/electronic health record (EHR) system. However, only.% of physicians are using a fully functional EHR system. Fully functional EHR System capabilities include electronic charts, test ordering and reports management, e-prescriptions, consultation referrals and reports, clinical decision support, disease management support and quality reports. Top Electronic Medical Records/Electronic Health Records Vendors Published February 0 Black Book Rankings. This report is a licensed product. Page

7 Part One: Aggregate Black Book EMR EHR Survey Findings 0 FINDING : TOTAL SURVEY RESPONSE RATE 0 Survey Conducted in Q of previous calendar year Validated Survey Responses by EMR EHR In Use or Under Implementation Validated Survey Responses by Physician Practices Not Yet Purchased EMR EHR 0,0, 0,0, 00, FINDING : IMPLEMENTATIONS OF BASIC EMR AND FULLY FUNCTIONAL EHR 00-0 IMPLEMENTED EMR 00 Basic EMR 00 Basic EMR 00 Fully Functional EHR 0 Basic EMR 0 Fully Functional EHR National.0%.%.% 0.%.% Office-Based Practices National.%.0%.%.%.% Hospital, Academic and Institutional Based Practices Top Electronic Medical Records/Electronic Health Records Vendors Published February 0 Black Book Rankings. This report is a licensed product. Page

8 Part One: Aggregate Black Book EMR EHR Survey Findings 0 A Basic EHR System is defined* as including all of the following functional components: patient demographics, patient problem lists, electronic medication lists, CLINICAL NOTES & DOCUMENTATION, order entry management of prescriptions, and viewing capability of laboratory and imaging results (reports). A Fully Functional EHR System is defined as including the basic system functionalities as CLINICAL NOTES & DOCUMENTATION of the medical history and follow-up, ordering of laboratory and radiology tests, electronic transmission of prescriptions and orders, and electronic return of images. Fully functional also includes clinical decision support with warnings of drug interactions or contraindications, highlighting of out-of-range test levels and reminders regarding guideline-based interventions or screening. FINDING : EMR EHR SURVEY RESPONSE RATES BY PRACTICE/ORGANIZATION TYPE, VALIDATED SYSTEM USERS SURVEY RESPONDENT IDENTIFICATION NUMBER OF RESPONSES VALIDATED PERCENT OF TOTAL RESPONSES Physician/Clinician Name.% Clinic/Practice Name.% Public Clinic 0.% Health System Clinic.0% Academic Hospital and Medical Centers over 0 Beds.% Community Hospitals 0.% Small Hospitals under 00 Beds.% Ambulatory Surgery Centers 0.% TOTAL % Top Electronic Medical Records/Electronic Health Records Vendors Published February 0 Black Book Rankings. This report is a licensed product. Page

9 Part One: Aggregate Black Book EMR EHR Survey Findings 0 FINDING : EMR ADOPTION RATE BY PRACTICE SIZE PRACTICE SIZE ADOPTION/IMPLEMENTATION RATE 0+ PHYSICIAN GROUPS 0.% 0-0.% 0-.% -.% (SOLO PRACTICES).% OVERALL.% FINDING : CHANGES IN IT ORGANIZATION SPEND ANTICIPATED IN NEXT MONTHS HEALTHCARE DELIVERY ORGANIZATIONS SPEND FOR IT 0 PROJECTING 0 SPEND INCREASING 0+% FOR ALL IT % % SPEND DECREASING 0+% FOR ALL IT % % FINDING : ANTICIPATED LARGEST BUDGET IT PROJECT INCREASES NEXT MONTHS SELECT THREE BIGGEST INCREASES FOR IT SPEND IN 0 CIO/CMO SELECTING IN THREE TOP PROJECTS ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS % CPOE % SECURITY PROGRAMS % NETWORKING % HEALTH INFORMATION EXCHANGE % E-PRESCRIBING 0% HARDWARE & INFRASTRUCTURE % WEB STORAGE & DIGITAL IMAGING % Top Electronic Medical Records/Electronic Health Records Vendors Published February 0 Black Book Rankings. This report is a licensed product. Page

10 Part One: Aggregate Black Book EMR EHR Survey Findings 0 FINDING : FULLY FUNCTIONAL EMR-EHR IMPLEMENTATION RATE BY STATE STATE Percent Utilizing Complex or Fully Functional EMR-EHR IOWA.% MASSACHUSETTS.% RHODE ISLAND.0% OREGON.% MINNESOTA.% DELAWARE 0.% MICHIGAN 0.% MISSOURI 0.% IDAHO.% PENNSYLVANIA.% MAINE.% SOUTH DAKOTA.% NEVADA.% NORTH CAROLINA.% ILLINOIS.% MISSISSIPPI.% KANSAS.0% INDIANA.0% WASHINGTON.% MONTANA.% OKLAHOMA.0% FLORIDA.% TENNESSEE.0% ARIZONA.% COLORADO.% ALABAMA.% VERMONT.0% ARIZONA.% GEORGIA.% OHIO.% KENTUCKY 0.% HAWAII 0.0% NEW JERSEY 0.0% LOUISIANA.% TEXAS.% VIRGINIA.% CONNECTICUT.% ALASKA.% WYOMING.% CALIFORNIA.% NEW HAMPSHIRE.% MARYLAND.% WISCONSIN.% NEBRASKA.% UTAH.% NEW YORK.% SOUTH CAROLINA.% NEW MEXICO.% WEST VIRGINIA.% NORTH DAKOTA.0% AVERAGE.% Top Electronic Medical Records/Electronic Health Records Vendors Published February 0 Black Book Rankings. This report is a licensed product. Page 0

11 Part One: Aggregate Black Book EMR EHR Survey Findings 0 FINDING : TOP SINGLE CRITERIA FOR SELECTING EHR TOP DECISION CRITERIA FOR SELECTION PENDING EMR EHR PERCENT SELECTING THIS CRITERIA SYSTEM & IMPLEMENTATION COSTS.% MEANINGFUL USE ACHIEVEMENT.% NO IDEA.% FINDING : AWARENESS OF DIFFERENT EHR VENDORS IN MARKETPLACE PHYSICIAN PRACTICE SETTING AWARENESS/KNOWLEDGE OF EMR EHR VENDORS BEFORE SELECTION PROCESS PERCENT AWARE OF VENDORS KNEW OF NO VENDORS.0% KNEW OF AT LEAST ONE VENDOR.% KNEW MORE THAN ONE VENODR.% FINDING 0: AWARENESS OF MEANINGUL USE KNOWLEDGE OF GOVERNMENT S EHR STANDARDS, STIMULUS AND REIMBURSEMENT RELATED PROCESSES, MEANINGFUL USE PERCENT UNDERTANDING OF GOVERNEMENT PROGRAMS VERY KNOWLEDGEABLE.% BASIC UNDERSTANDING..% VERY UNAWARE/NO UNDERSTANDING.% Top Electronic Medical Records/Electronic Health Records Vendors Published February 0 Black Book Rankings. This report is a licensed product. Page

12 Part One: Aggregate Black Book EMR EHR Survey Findings 0 FINDING : EMR ADOPTION/IMPLEMENTATION RATE BY SPECIALTY SPECIALTY TOTAL ACTIVE PHYSICIANS (NON RESEARCH/ NON TEACHING) PATIENT CARE PHYSICIANS EST IMPLEMENTING BASIC EMR PERCENT OF SAMPLE IMPLEMENTING EMR Radiology 00 0 % Emergency Medicine 0 0 % Pediatrics 0 0% Neurology % Family Medicine/General Practice 0 0 0% Plastic Surgery 0 % Gastroenterology 0 0 % Obstetrics & Gynecology % Ophthalmology 0 % Urology 0 % Otolaryngology 0 0% Physical Medicine & Rehab 0 0% Psychiatry % Neurosurgery 0 % Internal Medicine % Allergy & Immunology % Infectious Disease 0% Geriatric Medicine % General Surgery 0 % Hematology & Oncology 0 % Dermatology 00 % Nephrology 0 0 % Cardiovascular Disease % Rheumatology 0 % Orthopedic Surgery 0 % Child Adolescent Psychiatry % Vascular Surgery 0 % Endocrinology 0 % Pulmonary Medicine 0 % Thoracic Surgery 0 0 % ALL PHYSICIANS % Top Electronic Medical Records/Electronic Health Records Vendors Published February 0 Black Book Rankings. This report is a licensed product. Page

13 Part One: Aggregate Black Book EMR EHR Survey Findings 0 FINDING : MODULE ADOPTION RATES BY PRACTICE SIZE, LOCATION, REGION Basic EHR Basic EHR EHR+PM+ERX EHR+PM+ERX No EMR No EMR Primary Care % % % % 0% % SIZE Solo Practice % % % % % % - Physicians % % % 0% % % - Physicians - Physicians 00+ Physicians % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % SETTING Hospital and Academic Med Ctr Practices Office Practices % % % % % % % % % % % % LOCATION Urban % 0% % % 0% % Rural % % % % % % REGION Northeast % % % % % % Midwest % % % % % % South % % % % % 0% West % % % % % % Top Electronic Medical Records/Electronic Health Records Vendors Published February 0 Black Book Rankings. This report is a licensed product. Page

14 Part One: Aggregate Black Book EMR EHR Survey Findings 0 FINDING : ESTIMATING ACHIEVEMENT OF MEANINGFUL USE BY PRACTICE SIZE, LOCATION, SETTING Primary Care % % % % % SIZE Solo Practice % % 0% % % - Physicians % % % % % - Physicians - Physicians 00+ Physicians % % % % % % % % 0% % % % % % % SETTING Hospital and Academic Med Ctr Practices Office Practices 0% % 0% % % % % % % 0% LOCATION Urban % % % % % Rural % % % % % REGION Northeast % % % % % Midwest % % % 0% % South % % % % % West % 0% % % 0% Top Electronic Medical Records/Electronic Health Records Vendors Published February 0 Black Book Rankings. This report is a licensed product. Page

15 Part One: Aggregate Black Book EMR EHR Survey Findings 0 FINDING : ESTIMATING ACHIEVEMENT OF MEANINGFUL USE WITH CURRENT IT STRATEGY STAGE MU STAGE MU STAGE MU Primary Care % 0% % SIZE Solo Practice % % % - Physicians % 0% % - Physicians % % % - Physicians % % 0% 00+ Physicians % 0% % SETTING Hospital and Academic Med Ctr Practices % 0% % Office Practices % 0% % LOCATION Urban % % % Rural % 0% % REGION Northeast % % 0% Midwest % 0% 0% South % 0% 0% West % 0% 0% Top Electronic Medical Records/Electronic Health Records Vendors Published February 0 Black Book Rankings. This report is a licensed product. Page

16 Black Book Methodology SUMMARY Survey overview In Q through Q 0, the Black Book Rankings electronic medical record, electronic health record, e-prescribing, Practice Management and e-health client/user survey investcernerd over EMR vendors utilized by,0 validated EMR users nationwide for rankings and an additional, respondents in pre-use, implementation, system decisionmaking or purchased but not yet installed status. users of ambulatory EHR EMR systems participated in this subset of the 0 Black Book e-health IT surveys. Key satisfaction findings Key finding: most important customer satisfaction KPIs Customization, interfaces, reliability and deployment are the most important attributes influencing EMR client companies satisfaction with their EMR vendors. Key finding: EMR vendor satisfaction is highest among larger physician groups Clients with more than physicians in a single setting are significantly more satisfied with their EMR than are single and small group practice (-, - physician group) clients. Strong satisfaction in the larger practice segment surged to.% in 0, while small and single practices maintained a lesser overall EMR satisfaction in.% of users. Top Electronic Medical Records/Electronic Health Records Vendors Published February 0 Black Book Rankings. This report is a licensed product. Page

17 Black Book Methodology BLACK BOOK METHODOLOGY How the data sets are collected Black Book collects ballot results on performance areas of operational excellence to rank vendors by electronic medical and health record product lines. The gathered data are subjected immediately to an internal and external audit to verify completeness and accuracy and to make sure the respondent is valid while ensuring that the anonymity of the client company is maintained. During the audit, each data set is reviewed by a Brown-Wilson executive and at least two other people. In this way, Black Book's clients are able to clearly see how a vendor is truly performing. The criteria on operational excellence are subdivided by the client's industry, market size, geography and function outsourced and reported accordingly. Situational and market studies are conducted on areas of high interest such as e-prescribing, Health Information Exchange, Accountable Care organization, hospital software, services providers, educational providers in e-health, benchmarkers and advisors. These specific survey areas range from four to 0 questions or criteria each. Understanding the statistical confidence of Black Book data Statistical confidence for each performance rating is based upon the number of organizations scoring the electronic medical and health records service. Black Book identifies data confidence by one of several means: Top-0-ranked vendors must have a minimum of ten unique clients represented. Broad categories require a minimum of 0 unique client ballots. Data that are asterisked (*) represent a sample size below required limits and are intended to be used for tracking purposes only, not ranking purposes. Performance data for an asterisked vendor's services can vary widely until a larger sample size is achieved. The margin of error can be very large and the reader is responsible for considering the possible current and future variation (margin of error) in the Black Book performance score reported. Vendors with over 0 unique client votes are eligible for top 0 rankings and are assured to have highest confidence and lowest variation. Confidence increases as more organizations report on their outsourcing vendor. Data reported in this form are shown with a % confidence level (within a margin of 0., 0.0 or 0., respectively). Raw numbers include the quantity of completed surveys and the number of unique organizations contributing the data for the survey pool of interest. Top Electronic Medical Records/Electronic Health Records Vendors Published February 0 Black Book Rankings. This report is a licensed product. Page

18 Black Book Methodology Who participates in the Black Book Ranking process Over,000 practice management and physician leaders and other users ranking from hospital executives, clinicians, IT specialists and front-line implementation veterans are invited to participate in the 0 annual Black Book EMR EHR e- Health initiative satisfaction survey. Non-invitation receiving participants must complete a verifiable profile, utilize valid corporate address and are then included as well. The Black Book survey web instrument is open to respondents and new participants each year from July to October at and Only one ballot per corporate address is permitted and changes of ballots during the open polling period require a formal request process to ensure integrity. EMR vendor rankings and results 0,0 qualified users of systems with validated corporate/valid addresses ranked EMR-EHR suppliers offering individual or bundled arrangements as part of the Black Book annual survey, conducted via web survey instruments. Additionally,000 about-to-be users answered questions about budgeting, vendor familiarity and vendor selection processes but current non-user ballots are not counted in the vendor ranking process of client satisfaction. The four most highly utilized systems of EMR systems are included as subsets. Each year, the Brown-Wilson Group and BWG s Black Book EMR research division, Black Book Rankings, undertake an annual survey into organizations satisfaction with their outsourcing service providers. These research results are recognized as the most extensive and representative perception study of EMR vendors, validated by over,000 respondents from EMR users nationwide on EMR vendors. The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) provides strong incentives to encourage the adoption and meaningful use of electronic health records including health information exchange to improve the continuity and coordination of care and reporting of quality metrics. Medicare and Medicare incentive payments are critically dependent on the use of certified EHRs by eligible professionals to demonstrate meaningful use including e-prescribing, health information exchange, reporting of quality metrics and providing patiens with timely access to information Top Electronic Medical Records/Electronic Health Records Vendors Published February 0 Black Book Rankings. This report is a licensed product. Page

19 Part Two: Top 0 Ambulatory EHR Vendors TWO TO FIVE ( - ) PHYSICIAN PRACTICES Physicians & Groups PART TWO: 0 RESULTS ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS TWO TO FIVE ( - ) PHYSICIAN PRACTICES NOTE: This section forward provides the results for ambulatory TWO TO FIVE ( - ) physician practices and groups EMR balloted results of physicians and or groups networked together. The rankings and scores of vendors in Part Two are the responses represent EMR EHR users in this specialty only. Top Electronic Medical Records/Electronic Health Records Vendors Published February 0 Black Book Rankings. This report is a licensed product. Page

20 Part Two: Top 0 Ambulatory EHR Vendors TWO TO FIVE ( - ) PHYSICIAN PRACTICES Physicians & Groups TWO TO FIVE ( - ) PHYSICIAN PRACTICES TOP OVERALL EHR EMR VENDOR HONORS: TWO TO FIVE ( - ) PHYSICIAN PRACTICES ADP AdvancedMD FUNCTIONAL SUBSET HONORS: TOP VENDORS FOR TWO TO FIVE ( - ) PHYSICIAN PRACTICES PHYSICIANS TOP VENDOR: CLINICAL NOTES & DOCUMENTATION ADP AdvancedMD TOP VENDOR: E-PRESCRIBING ADP AdvancedMD TOP VENDOR: ORDER ENTRY ADP AdvancedMD TOP VENDOR: RESULTS REVIEW Care0 EHR (Quest Diagnostics) Top Electronic Medical Records/Electronic Health Records Vendors Published February 0 Black Book Rankings. This report is a licensed product. Page 0

21 Part Two: Top 0 Ambulatory EHR Vendors TWO TO FIVE ( - ) PHYSICIAN PRACTICES Physicians & Groups 0 TOP 0 EMR/EHR VENDORS Top Electronic Medical Records/Electronic Health Records Vendors Published February 0 Black Book Rankings. This report is a licensed product. Page

22 Part Two: Top 0 Ambulatory EHR Vendors TWO TO FIVE ( - ) PHYSICIAN PRACTICES Physicians & Groups Table : Top 0 Electronic Medical Record vendors, to Physician Practices and Groups 0 rank EMR/EHR vendor ADP ADVANCEDMD ALLSCRIPTS GREENWAY MEDICAL CARE0 QUEST NEXTGEN PRACTICEFUSION CERNER APRIMA ATHENAHEALTH 0 GE HEALTHCARE MCKESSON AMAZINGCHARTS E-MDS COMCHART HENRY SCHEIN MICROMD RAINTREE POLARIS NEXTECH ECLINICALWORKS 0 PRACTICEMAX Top Electronic Medical Records/Electronic Health Records Vendors Published February 0 Black Book Rankings. This report is a licensed product. Page

23 Stop Light Scoring Key STOP LIGHT SCORING KEY Figure : Comprehensive End-to-end EMR vendors are defined as being comprised of four surveyed functions CLINICAL NOTES & DOCUMENTATION E-PRESCRIBING ORDER ENTRY RESULTS REVIEW Top Electronic Medical Records/Electronic Health Records Vendors Published /0 Black Book Rankings. This report is a licensed product. Page

24 Stop Light Scoring Key Figure : Key to raw scores Deal breaking dissatisfaction Does not meet expectations Cannot recommend vendor Neutral Meets/does not meet expectations consistently Would not likely recommend vendor Satisfactory performance Meets expectations Recommends vendor Overwhelming satisfaction Exceeds expectations Highly recommended vendor Top Electronic Medical Records/Electronic Health Records Vendors Published /0 Black Book Rankings. This report is a licensed product. Page

25 Stop Light Scoring Key Figure : Color-coded stop light dashboard scoring key Green (top 0%) scores better than 0% of EMR vendors. Green coded vendors have received constantly highest client satisfaction scores.. + Clear (top %) scores better than % of EMR vendors. Well-scored vendor which have middle of the pack results.. to.0 Yellow scores better than half of EMR vendors. Cautionary performance scores, areas of improvement required..0 to. Red scores worse than % of EMR vendors. Poor performances reported potential cause for service and contractual cancellations. Less than. Top Electronic Medical Records/Electronic Health Records Vendors Published /0 Black Book Rankings. This report is a licensed product. Page

26 Stop Light Scoring Key Figure : Raw score compilation and scale of reference Black Book raw score scales 0 = Deal breaking dissatisfaction 0 = Exceeds all expectations Individual vendors can be examined by specific indicators on each of the main functions of EMR vendors as well as grouped and summarized subsets. Details of each subset are contained so that each vendor may be analyzed by function and end-to-end EMR services collectively. Top Electronic Medical Records/Electronic Health Records Vendors Published /0 Black Book Rankings. This report is a licensed product. Page

27 Stop Light Scoring Key Figure : Scoring key Overall rank Q criteria rank Company CLINICAL NOTES & DOCUMENTATION E-PRESCRIBING ORDER ENTRY RESULTS REVIEW Mean Doctors and Hospitals EMR Overall rank this rank references the final position of all criteria averaged by the mean score collectively. This vendor ranked fifth of the 0 competitors. Criteria rank refers to the number of the question or criteria surveyed. This is the sixth question of the criteria of which this vendor ranked first of the 0 vendors analyzed positioned only on this particular criteria or question. Each vendor required ten unique client ballots validated to be included in the top ten ranks. Company name of the EMR vendor. Subsections each subset comprises one-fourth of the total EMR vendor mean at the end of this row, and includes all buyers and users who indicate that they contract each respective EMR functional subsection with the supplier, specific to their physician enterprise. Mean congruent with the criteria rank, the mean is a calculation of all three subsets of EMR functions surveyed. As a final ranking reference, it includes all market sizes, specialties, delivery sites and geographies. Top Electronic Medical Records/Electronic Health Records Vendors Published /0 Black Book Rankings. This report is a licensed product. Page