SOP22a: Standard Operating Procedure for Data Collection and Management
|
|
|
- Marjory McKenzie
- 9 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 SOP22a: Standard Operating Procedure for Data Collection and Management Authorship Team: Mel Storey and Stephen Allen for Joint SOP Group on Trial Techniques (viz Helen Snooks, Ian Russell, Bridget Wells, Frances Rapport, Julie Peconi, Moira Morgan, Simon Thompson, Sian Davies, Sinead Brophy, Steve Allen, Ceri Phillips) Approved by WWORTH JMG (Ian Russell in chair) Signature Date 07 May Version Record Version Number Effective Date Reason for Change 0 SOP approved by NWORTH Mar 2009 Adapted SOP discussed by JSOPG Apr 2009 Reviewed by JSOPG Jul 2009 Comments for review at JMG by KT Jul 2009 Amendment to SOP post-jmg review Aug 2009 Further amendments Sep 2009 Amendments to SOP following 2nd JMG review for final approval by KT Sept 2009 Approved in principle May 2010 Minor formatting amendments Apr 2012 Minor formatting amendments, addition of training section. Prepare SOP for JSOPG by MS. Egs in use CONSTRUCT, SAFER2, PRISMATIC, PROBAT May 2012 Minor amendments following JSOPG May 2012 Authorised for use by JMG Jun 2013 Update header and formatting amendments Jan 2014 Edits by MS. Inclusion of MACRO 4 software, May 2014 Remove training log post JSOPG discussion - MS & CS WWORTH-SOP22aDataCollectionManagementV Page 1 of 14 Not guaranteed if printed
2 1 Table of Contents 0 Version Record Table of Contents Glossary Introduction Purpose Roles and Responsibilities Procedures Procedural Flowchart Data Collection Data analysis plan Database design Data Management Data transfer Data storage Data security Post collection data validation Quality Assurance End of trial Training Plan References Related SOPs...14 WWORTH-SOP22aDataCollectionManagementV Page 2 of 14 Not guaranteed if printed
3 2 Glossary The full Glossary is in Swansea University H drive/documents/526- WWORTH/Development Group/Glossary. 3 Introduction Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) are succinct formal documents designed to achieve consistency in specified trial functions by specifying standard practice in performing those functions (GCP 1.55 & EMeA, 2002). While SOPs should cite relevant legislation & regulations, and key references & evidence, they need not expound theory. WWORTH SOPs should accord with all relevant regulations, including the European Union Clinical Trial Directive 1, ICH Good Clinical Practice (GCP) 2 and the current NHS Research Governance Framework 3. They will seek to distinguish between regulations for CTIMPs and for other research. This document describes the principles for collecting and managing data in trials. We are grateful to colleagues in the North Wales Organisation for Randomised Trials in Health for access to their SOP on Data Management (NWORTH, 2007). The overall aim of this SOP is to ensure that data management procedures: manage personal data from trial participants in a legally responsible manner result in error-free, high quality trial data for analysis are efficient and cost-effective All staff must comply with the Data Protection Act (1998) 4 and should comply with the MRC s code on Personal Information in Medical Research 5. All staff are required to have read these documents, agree to uphold their principles and sign a log after completion of training in this SOP. 4 Purpose The purpose of this SOP is to define the major processes in the collection and management of trial data held by each trial or on behalf of WWORTH and the responsibilities of individuals involved. It also aims to describe good practice in trial data collection and management techniques. This SOP should be used when any form of data is collected, accessed, transferred or stored by a trial. MACRO 4 is the single data management system that will centralise, automate, streamline and enhance the process of data collection whenever possible (WWORTH SOP 21 IT Databases). WWORTH-SOP22aDataCollectionManagementV Page 3 of 14 Not guaranteed if printed
4 It should inform protocol development (see WWORTH SOP13 Protocol Development) and trial methods. Types of data can include the following: 1. Pre-consent data (including basic, non-identifiable participant identification details held at trial sites but not by the Trial Office) 2. Post-consent data (interviews, questionnaires, laboratory results, etc.) Random allocation information (held at research sites and at WWORTH; see WWORTH SOP24 Randomisation). 5 Roles and Responsibilities The personnel responsible for using and implementing this SOP are listed below. Each trial should allocate the responsibilities linked to these roles. Chief Investigator (CI) - responsible for overall management of the trial, and delegating team responsibilities. Principal Investigator (PI) - responsible for the trial at a given site. Trial Data Manager (TDM) - responsible for all aspects of the trial data once it comes into existence. This includes checks on the accuracy and timeliness of data collection, production of accrual figures for reporting to the required authorities, provision of data to trial statisticians, health economists and outcomes specialists and overall security of the data including secure data storage in accordance with the Data Protection Act WWORTH Manager - responsible for overseeing and providing general guidance to the TDM of each trial, receiving regular updates on data management issues and ensuring that all staff adhere to the principles and practice outlined in this SOP. Senior Statistician Overall responsibility for the mathematical integrity of the data, the data checking algorithms and procedures and for the implementing of suitable fit for purpose" databases for all trials managed by WWORTH (in collaboration with the trial research team and the IT specialist) Database IT Specialist responsible for the writing, testing and implementation of the databases and IT systems, including the upgrade of all database software implemented. Also responsible for all aspects of electronic data security. WWORTH-SOP22aDataCollectionManagementV Page 4 of 14 Not guaranteed if printed
5 Trial Statistician delegated responsibility for the mathematical integrity of the data, the data checking algorithms and procedures and for the implementing of suitable fit for purpose" databases for the specific trial (in collaboration with the trial research team and the Database IT Specialist). The Trial Statistician should approve and sign-off all final CRFs and other data collection instruments. The Trial Statistician, in consultation with the TDM, will be responsible for locking the final version of the data for analysis in accordance with WWORTH SOP 28 Statistics. Trial Manager/Trial Coordinator (TM/TC) where a TDM has not been assigned on a trial, the TM / TC is responsible for overseeing data collection in accordance with the trial protocol and for coordinating the databases and paper based systems and developing, in consultation with the Trial Statistician and the Database IT Specialist, the details of the specification and testing. QA Officer is responsible for ensuring that all staff adhere to the principles and practice outlined in this SOP. WWORTH-SOP22aDataCollectionManagementV Page 5 of 14 Not guaranteed if printed
6 6 Procedures 6.1 Procedural Flowchart Analysis plan Case Report Forms (CRFs) Design data capture tools Treatment allocation forms Questionnaires Approval by TMG Logs and forms Storage Design databases Security aspects Confidentiality Approval by TMG Instruction manual Design data collection & storage process at sites Induction training Training log Data transfer process Paper flow Electronic data flow Data checking Missing data Suspect data Data handling Data cleaning Audit trail Quality assurance Validation Monitoring Cleaning End of trial Locking Dismounting Archiving WWORTH-SOP22aDataCollectionManagementV Page 6 of 14 Not guaranteed if printed
7 6.2 Data Collection Data analysis plan An analysis plan will be written and agreed by all investigators and the DMEC / advisory members at the beginning of the study and prior to any data analyses taking place (see WWORTH SOP 28 Statistics). All data sources e.g. health economics, routine data, questionnaires and qualitative data should be included in the analysis plan Case Report Form development and completion Case Report Forms (CRFs) and any other relevant data collection tool are completed for each trial participant who has consented and contain the data that will be used for trial analyses. CRF data entry must be verifiable using source documents e.g. patient notes, and stored safely and securely on site as these documents are confidential, although ownership lies with the trial Sponsor (see WWORTH SOP31 Sponsorship and Adoption). CRFs are developed at the beginning of a trial based on the funding bid and the protocol which will describe the data to be collected for analysis by the trial statistician. Typically, the CRF or any other data collection tool will contain patient demographical data, clinical data, details of medical and surgical histories, etc, as necessary depending on the design of the trial. Each page of the CRF/ source data should have the patient study ID and a space for the person completing the page to enter their name and the date it was completed. Subject to the provisions of the Data Protection Act, and Caldicott guidelines the CI and PI should agree who will be responsible for making data entries and amendments to the CRF and for storing them appropriately, and record them in the study delegation log. Anyone not authorised to collect / amend / file CRF data should not do so. The trial may ask the PI or other responsible person at the study site to do one of the following with Paper based CRFs/ source data: Fax the CRF/ source data to the Trial Office. A fax send report is filed with the CRF. /source data. Post a copy of the CRF /source data to the Trial Office, marked as confidential with the return address indicated and a copy of the covering letter is filed with the original CRF Scan and send the CRF /source data University FaxPress the CRF/ source data WWORTH-SOP22aDataCollectionManagementV Page 7 of 14 Not guaranteed if printed
8 The sponsor may come and collect the CRF after verification of source data Transfer of ecrfs to the trial office should be carried out following File Transfer Protocol (FTP) as outlined in WWORTH SOP 22b DataProtectionandConfidentiality. Completion of paper-based CRFs should be done clearly and any errors crossed through once, dated and signed off by the person making the amendment. Correction fluid is not permitted. Changes to ecrfs must be auditable so that any corrections can be traced back (see WWORTH SOP21 IT Databases). CRFs are subject to quality control checks during a monitoring visit by a member of the Trial Office, usually the TM or TDM. The contents of the CRF are compared with source documentation (see WWORTH SOP17 Monitoring and WWORTH SOP18a Quality Management). They may also be audited or inspected by an external regulatory body at any time. The procedures involved in this are described in WWORTH SOP18b Preparing Audit Inspection. All ecrfs must be saved in a password-protected electronic form to protect against loss and should be printed to create paper CRFs at the end of a trial. All forms of CRF should be archived at the end of the trial in accordance with WWORTH SOP08 Archiving. Other forms of data collection Treatment allocation forms, questionnaires, logs and any other forms to be completed for a trial on each participant or study site should be designed and completed in accordance with the relevant SOPs. Data must be anonymised and encrypted as soon as practicable. Trials using data from multiple sources, may have more than one value for the same variable. It may be necessary to design a variable list which will outline all the available data sources as well as a prioritisation log - which will outline how to use source data WWORTH SOP02 Training WWORTH SOP03 Master Site File WWORTH SOP04 Trial Supplies Labelling WWORTH SOP05 Participant Info Consent WWORTH SOP08 Archiving WWORTH SOP10 Project Management WWORTH SOP14a Ethics Approval WWORTH SOP14b Applying for NHS R&D approval WWORTH SOP17 Monitoring WWORTH-SOP22aDataCollectionManagementV Page 8 of 14 Not guaranteed if printed
9 WWORTH SOPs18a Quality Management WWORTH SOP21 IT Databases WWORTH SOP22b Data Protection Confidentiality WWORTH SOP23 Routine Data WWORTH SOP24 Randomisation WWORTH SOP25 Outcome Measures WWORTH SOP27Qualitative Methods WWORTH SOP31 Sponsorship and Adoption WWORTH SOP32 Detecting and Managing Misconduct, Serious Breaches and Deviations from GCP/Protocol and any other SOPs held by WWORTH that may be relevant). All types of data capture (paper and electronic) and management of data in all formats should be agreed by the TMG before being implemented by the trial Database design Data should be collected, with verification of entry, using standardised data collection tools. Wherever possible, data should be entered directly into the trial database. Data transfer should be as close as possible to the point of collection (e.g. using a hand-held computer or laptop). Each trial is guided by TMG responsible for ensuring the quality of data entry for example verification of data. Data transfer into databases is described in more detail in WWORTH SOP21 IT Databases. In situations where data from paper CRFs are scanned into databases, data capture schedules for scanned data should be designed by trained staff, and checked for accuracy on sample forms before use in the trial. They should incorporate suitable validity checks wherever possible, and either prevent or force operator verification of unexpectedly missing or suspect entries in accordance with WWORTH SOP18a Quality Management. Databases may be designed for direct electronic data entry. Where this occurs, suitable data validity checks should be incorporated at the point of data entry to prevent out of range, missing or other checkable data entry errors (see WWORTH SOPs 18aQualityManagement and WWORTH SOP21 IT Databases). Pre-trial testing of data management procedures should occur to ensure that they are appropriate for the purposes of the trial, are efficient, cost effective and result in high-quality, error-free data before the launch of the main trial. Pre-trial testing is likely to require initial feasibility testing, pre- WWORTH-SOP22aDataCollectionManagementV Page 9 of 14 Not guaranteed if printed
10 pilot testing (e.g. testing of specific data management procedures) and pilot testing of the final procedures (see WWORTH SOP16 Site Setup). 6.3 Data Management Data transfer This includes: Any means of electronic data flow including File Transfer Protocols, s, database to database transfers, portable devices and storage mechanisms. Paper flow, e.g. on forms, filled in by researchers, research participants or medical professionals and transferred by person to person or by fax or postal means or scanned CRFs sent by Paper to electronic flow including scanning and manual data entry. Data transfer is legitimate if it is auditable, secure and reliable. All methods of data transfer should be done in accordance with the principles of data confidentiality set out in the Data Protection Act and MRC s guidelines Personal Information in Medical Research 5, both of which are described in WWORTH SOP22b Data Protection Confidentiality Data storage This includes: Electronic data however stored (for example databases, computer hard drives, pen drives, remote server or other temporary and permanent media). All such data must be password protected. Paper documents which may include source data (for example CRFs and questionnaires) and all documentation relating to the management of the trial. Further information on documents stored in Trial Master and Site files can be found in WWORTH SOP03 Master Site File. Systems of record keeping and database management must prevent the loss, missing or unreadable information that compromises future data analysis. Interim and final archiving of documents should be done in accordance with WWORTH SOP08 Archiving. WWORTH-SOP22aDataCollectionManagementV Page 10 of 14 Not guaranteed if printed
11 6.3.3 Data security Data accessibility should be done in accordance with delegation log (see WWORTH SOP21 IT Databases and WWORTH SOP22b Data Protection Confidentiality). Data security protocols for trials should comply with the principles of data confidentiality set out in the Data Protection Act and MRC s guidelines Personal Information in Medical Research 5, both of which are described in WWORTH SOP22b Data Protection Confidentiality. GCP guidelines must be followed to ensure patient data is secure. Paper versions of data collection forms will not contain any patient identifiers and should not be held together with patient identifiers, i.e. should be stored in separate filing cabinets, not in different drawers of the same filing cabinet. Electronic data containing patient identifiers should be held on two password-protected databases with restricted access to both: one with only identifiers and a study ID ONLY and one with all relevant study data (clinical measures, patient-reported measures) and study ID only This will prevent patient data being identifiable Post collection data validation Routine statistical validity checks should identify missing or suspect entries at agreed defined intervals within the design of the trial so that correct data can be obtained from the research staff, participants or their records if needed. Thorough data cleaning should be performed before any data analysis (see WWORTH SOP18a Quality Management and WWORTH SOP28 Statistics). Manual data entry checking should be done when data is entered manually from a source document into a database MACRO 4. Where resources allow, this should be done separately by two independent data entry clerks and then validated to identify data punching errors. Where double entry of all data is not possible, a randomly-selected sample of at least 10% of the data should be double entered and validated. A decision can then be made regarding further validation and correction, depending on the number of errors identified in the quality sample (also see WWORTH SOP18a Quality Management). 6.4 Quality Assurance Database documentation should be clear and logical. A paper or electronic audit trail should be kept of all deletions, corrections/changes or recodes WWORTH-SOP22aDataCollectionManagementV Page 11 of 14 Not guaranteed if printed
12 that are performed after data capture, including version changes due to protocol amendments (see WWORTH SOP01b documentation control, WWORTH SOP18a Quality Management, WWORTH SOP18b Preparing Audit Inspection and WWORTH SOP21 IT Databases). The TDM should check the accuracy and reliability of the raw data (e.g. against original data sources such as hospital records) at pre-defined regular intervals throughout the study. Similarly, instruments used in the study (e.g. weighing scales, laboratory instruments) should be quality controlled at pre-defined intervals throughout the study, either during a monitoring visit or remotely by authorised site staff in accordance with WWORTH SOP17 Monitoring and WWORTH SOP18a Quality Management. Regular, frequent monitoring of data quality throughout the data collection phase of the trial is important (see WWORTH SOP17 Monitoring, WWORTH SOP18a Quality Management and WWORTH SOP28 Statistics). Trial documentation data and agreed amendments should be retained for audit purposes. A paper or electronic audit trail should be available with amendment dates of versions, & audits, as described in WWORTH SOP18a Quality Management and WWORTH SOP18b Preparing Audit Inspection. At the end of trial, the amendments will be archived in accordance with WWORTH SOP07 Site Closure and WWORTH SOP08 Archiving. 6.5 End of trial Once a trial has finished, the final, cleaned databases will be locked, dismounted and archived for audit and storage in accordance with WWORTH SOP07 Site Closure and WWORTH SOP08 Archiving. The study site data will be checked against the random allocation sequence (for WWORTH managed trials), discrepancies will be documented and resolved, so that they can be taken into account in intention to treat analyses. A copy of the random allocation information will be provided to the TM if requested (see WWORTH SOP24 Randomisation). These data will be maintained for the period agreed in the trial protocol and records will be archived in accordance with WWORTH SOP08 Archiving. The databases will be available for inspection by interested legitimate parties in accordance with WWORTH SOP18b Preparing Audit Inspection. 7 Training Plan All WWORTH staff involved with trials must undertake the appropriate generic and trial-specific training to ensure that they meet with the specific employers WWORTH-SOP22aDataCollectionManagementV Page 12 of 14 Not guaranteed if printed
13 mandatory training requirements and the specific requirements of the trial. For example, for SU staff, all new employees must attend induction, fire and safety training (as well as role-specific training courses, e.g. laboratory safety). For new staff, additional training requirements should be identified alongside the specific role requirements and the WWORTH Unit Manager should make provision for the new staff member to attend the necessary courses as soon after appointment as is practicably possible. It is the responsibility of the WWORTH Unit Manager (alongside the CI or TM) to identify all the SOPs that are relevant to a specific trial and in which the new member of staff should be trained. The WWORTH UM or the SOP author will provide group training for trial staff and/or one-to-one training, as required for new staff in relation to the specific SOPs identified. Training records should be filed both by the main employer and the staff member, in accordance with the specific employer requirements. Trial specific training should be filed in TMF or TSF as appropriate and every individual involved in a trial should have an individual training record (see WWORTH SOP02 Training). Where the tasks specified in the individual SOPs are delegated to WWORTH staff, CIs/PIs or TMs, these delegated staff must ensure that they have attended a training course on GCP and keep up-to-date through attending refresher courses. It is the responsibility of the CI/PI to ensure that all staff allocated duties on the study delegation log template of responsibilities are suitably trained in the activities linked to those duties (see WWORTH SOP16 Site Setup, Appendix 9 and Appendix 10). Each trial should maintain a central training log and ensure that WWORTH has access to that log, not least to integrate the logs of staff who work on more than one trial. Similarly trials should ensure that each site maintains a local training log, not least to integrate the logs of staff who work for more than one sponsor. 8 References 1. DIRECTIVE 2001/20/EC OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 4 April Official Journal of the European Communities. April-01.pdf 2. The European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products (EMEA). ICH Topic E 6 (R1) Guideline for Good Clinical Practice deline/2009/09/wc pdf WWORTH-SOP22aDataCollectionManagementV Page 13 of 14 Not guaranteed if printed
14 3. Department of Health. Research Governance Framework for Health and Social Care (2nd Edition) The Data Protection Act. Office of Public Sector Information (OPSI) Available at: 5. Personal Information in Medical Research Medical Research Council s Ethics Series. Available at 6. ICH-GCP booklet (circa 1996) incorporated into the EU CTD regulations - The Medicines for Human Use (Clinical Trials) Regulations, 2004, and Amendment Regulations, OPSI, and 9 Related SOPs WWORTH SOP01a on SOPs WWORTH SOP01b Document control WWORTH SOP02 Training WWORTH SOP03 Master Site File WWORTH SOP04 Trial Supplies Labelling WWORTH SOP05 Patient Info Consent WWORTH SOP07 Site Closure WWORTH SOP08 Archiving WWORTH SOP10 Project Management WWORTH SOP16 Site Setup WWORTH SOP17 Monitoring WWORTH SOP18a Quality Management WWORTH SOP18b Preparing Audit Inspection WWORTH SOP21 IT Databases WWORTH SOP22b Data Protection Confidentiality WWORTH SOP24 Randomisation WWORTH SOP25 Outcome Measures WWORTH SOP26 Health Economics WWORTH SOP27Qualitative data WWORTH SOP28 Statistics WWORTH SOP31 Sponsorship and adoption WWORTH SOP32 Detecting & Managing Misconduct, Serious Breaches & Deviations from GCP/Protocol WWORTH-SOP22aDataCollectionManagementV Page 14 of 14 Not guaranteed if printed
SOP10: Standard Operating Procedure for Project Management
SOP10: Standard Operating Procedure for Project Management Authorship team: John Williams & Anne Seagrove for Joint SOP Group on Trial Processes (viz Alex Nicholson, Leanne Quinn, Jemma Hughes, Ian Russell)
Managing & Validating Research Data
Research Management Standard Operating Procedure ISOP-H02 VERSION / REVISION: 2.0 EFFECTIVE DATE: 01 03 12 REVIEW DATE: 01 03 14 AUTHOR(S): CONTROLLER(S): APPROVED BY: Information Officer; NBT Clinical
SOP Number: SOP-QA-20 Version No: 1. Author: Date: 1-9-15 (Patricia Burns, Research Governance Manager, University of Aberdeen)
Standard Operating Procedure: SOP Number: SOP-QA-20 Version No: 1 Author: Date: 1-9-15 (Patricia Burns, Research Governance Manager, University of Aberdeen) Approved by: Date: 1-9-15 (Professor Julie Brittenden,
UNIVERSITY OF LEICESTER, UNIVERSITY OF LOUGHBOROUGH & UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS OF LEICESTER NHS TRUST JOINT RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT SUPPORT OFFICE
UNIVERSITY OF LEICESTER, UNIVERSITY OF LOUGHBOROUGH & UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS OF LEICESTER NHS TRUST JOINT RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT SUPPORT OFFICE STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES University of Leicester (UoL)
Standard Operating Procedure on Training Requirements for staff participating in CTIMPs Sponsored by UCL
Page 1 of 10 Standard Operating Procedure on Training Requirements for staff participating in CTIMPs Sponsored by UCL SOP ID Number: Effective Date:01/08/2012 Version Number & Date of Authorisation: V02,
CONTROLLED DOCUMENT. Uncontrolled Copy. RDS014 Research Related Archiving. University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust
University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust CONTROLLED DOCUMENT RDS014 Research Related Archiving CATEGORY: CLASSIFICATION: PURPOSE Controlled Document Number: Version Number: 1 Controlled Document
RD SOP17 Research data management and security
RD SOP17 Research data management and security Version Number: V2 Name of originator/author: Dr Andy Mee, R&I Manager Name of responsible committee: R&I Committee Name of executive lead: Medical Director
Archiving of Research Documentation
Suspension, Termination & Completion Standard Operating Procedure VERSION / REVISION: 2.0 EFFECTIVE DATE: 28 05 12 REVIEW DATE: 28 05 14 AUTHOR(S): CONTROLLER: APPROVED BY: Clinical Trials Manager; Recruitment
TRIAL MASTER FILE- SPONSORED
gsop-06-04 - Management of TMF for ENHT/ WHHT Sponsored CTIMPs Page 1 of 16 Hertfordshire Hospitals R&D Consortium Incorporating West Herts Hospitals NHS Trust and East & North Herts NHS Trust TRIAL MASTER
DATA MANAGEMENT IN CLINICAL TRIALS: GUIDELINES FOR RESEARCHERS
Reference Number: UHB 139 Version Number: 2 Date of Next Review: 14 Apr 2018 Previous Trust/LHB Reference Number: N/A DATA MANAGEMENT IN CLINICAL TRIALS: GUIDELINES FOR RESEARCHERS Introduction and Aim
This is a controlled document. The master document is posted on the JRCO website and any print-off of this document will be classed as uncontrolled.
This is a controlled document. The master document is posted on the JRCO website and any print-off of this document will be classed as uncontrolled. Researchers and their teams may print off this document
R&D Administration Manager. Research and Development. Research and Development
Document Title: Document Number: Patient Recruitment SOP031 Staff involved in development: Job titles only Document author/owner: Directorate: Department: For use by: RM&G Manager, R&D Administration Manager,
Marie-Claire Rickard, GCP & Governance Manager Rachel Fay, GCP & Governance Manager Elizabeth Clough, R&D Operations Manager
Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) for: Monitoring SOP 28 Version 7.0 Number: Number: Effective Date: 29 th November 2015 Review Date: 6 th January 2017 Author: Reviewer: Reviewer: Authorisation: Name
What is necessary to provide good clinical data for a clinical trial?
What is necessary to provide good clinical data for a clinical trial? Alain Barrois, Assistant Clinical Trials Operations Manager #EBMT2015 www.ebmt.org Is this a (typical) clinical trial? 2 Agenda Introduction
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE FOR RESEARCH. Management of Essential Documents and Trial Folders
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE FOR RESEARCH Management of Essential Documents and Trial Folders Author Linda Ward Author s Job Title QA Coordinator Division Department Version number 2 Ref SOP/CLN/001/2
Document Title: Project Management of Papworth Sponsored Studies
Document Title: Project Management of Papworth Sponsored Studies Document Number: SOP009 Staff involved in development: Job titles only Document author/owner: Directorate: Department: For use by: RM&G
Document Number: SOP/RAD/SEHSCT/007 Page 1 of 17 Version 2.0
Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) Research and Development Office Title of SOP: Computerised Systems for Clinical Trials SOP Number: 7 Version Number: 2.0 Supercedes: 1.0 Effective date: August 2013
TEMPLATE DATA MANAGEMENT PLAN
TEMPLATE DATA MANAGEMENT PLAN ICRIN (QM sub group) Version: XX Date: XXXXXXX Page 1 of 6 1.0 Document Ownership The Data Management Plan (DMP) will be initiated and subsequently owned by the Data Manager
ROLES, RESPONSIBILITIES AND DELEGATION OF DUTIES IN CLINICAL TRIALS OF MEDICINAL PRODUCTS
ROLES, RESPONSIBILITIES AND DELEGATION OF DUTIES IN CLINICAL TRIALS OF MEDICINAL PRODUCTS STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE NO SOP 09 DATE RATIFIED 4/7/13 NEXT REVIEW DATE 4/7/14 POLICY STATEMENT/KEY OBJECTIVES:
Trial Delivery SOP 05 Trial Archiving
Gloucestershire Research and Development Consortium Standard Operating Procedure R&D SOP TD 05Trial Archiving Trial Delivery SOP 05 Trial Archiving IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF ALL USERS OF THIS SOP TO
GCP INSPECTORS WORKING GROUP <DRAFT> REFLECTION PAPER ON EXPECTATIONS FOR ELECTRONIC SOURCE DOCUMENTS USED IN CLINICAL TRIALS
European Medicines Agency London, 17 October 2007 Doc. Ref. EMEA/505620/2007 GCP INSPECTORS WORKING GROUP REFLECTION PAPER ON EXPECTATIONS FOR ELECTRONIC SOURCE DOCUMENTS USED IN CLINICAL TRIALS
This SOP may also be used by staff from other NHS areas, or organisations, with prior agreement.
Standard Operating Procedure: SOP Number: SOP-QA-32 Version No: 1 Author: Date: (Gary Cooper, Named Sponsor Archivist, NHS Grampian and University of Aberdeen) 1-9-15 Approved by: Date: 1-9-15 (Professor
CONTROLLED DOCUMENT- DO NOT COPY STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE. STH Investigator
Research Department STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE STH Investigator Archiving of Essential Documentation Generated During Clinical Research SOP Number A127 Version Number V1.3 Effective Date Author Zoe Whiteley
Archiving of Clinical Trial Data and Essential Documentation JCTO/CT/SOP 4.0. Joint Clinical Trials Office. Stuart Hatcher, JCTO Archivist
Archiving of Clinical Trial Data and Essential Documentation Policy Details Document Type Standard Operating Procedure Document name Change History Date Version Number JCTO/CT/SOP 4.0 Version Final v 2.0-09/11/2010
Essential Documentation and the Creation and Maintenance of Trial Master Files
This is a controlled document. The master document is posted on the JRCO website and any print-off of this document will be classed as uncontrolled. Researchers and their teams may print off this document
Introduction 2. 1. The Role of Pharmacy Within a NHS Trust 3. 2. Pharmacy Staff 4. 3. Pharmacy Facilities 5. 4. Pharmacy and Resources 6
Index Index Section Page Introduction 2 1. The Role of Pharmacy Within a NHS Trust 3 2. Pharmacy Staff 4 3. Pharmacy Facilities 5 4. Pharmacy and Resources 6 5. Prescription Charges 7 6. Communication
RECOMMENDATION ON THE CONTENT OF THE TRIAL MASTER FILE AND ARCHIVING
RECOMMENDATION ON THE CONTENT OF THE TRIAL MASTER FILE AND ARCHIVING July 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1. Introduction 2 2. Scope 2 3. Documents to be archived 2 4. Quality of essential documents 10 5.
Document Title: Trust Approval and Research Governance
Document Title: Trust Approval and Research Governance Document Number: SOP034 Staff involved in development: Job titles only Document author/owner: Directorate: Department: For use by: RM&G Manager, R&D
NEWCASTLE CLINICAL TRIALS UNIT STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES
NEWCASTLE CLINICAL TRIALS UNIT STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES SOP details SOP title: SOP number: SOP category: Document Control GE-003 General SOP history Version number: 01 Version date: 1 March 2013 Effective
INTERIM SITE MONITORING PROCEDURE
INTERIM SITE MONITORING PROCEDURE 1. PURPOSE The purpose of this SOP is to describe the interim monitoring procedures conducted at Institution, according to GCP and other applicable local regulations.
JRO RMG RSS SOP 12. Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for Study Closedown and Archiving Royal Free site specific SOP
Office Location: 1 st Floor Maple House 149 Tottenham Court Road London W1T 7DN Joint Research Office Tel No. 0845 1555 000 Web-sites: www.uclh.nhs.uk; www.ucl.ac.uk/jro Postal Address: UCL, Gower Street
Working Instruction Template. Instructions for Archiving of Essential Trial Documents at Datatron Off Site Facility
Working Instruction Template WI number: WI full title: WI-JRO-001 Instructions for Archiving of Essential Trial Documents at Datatron Off Site Facility WI effective: 28 th October 2013 Review date: 28
1.0 Scope. 2.0 Abbreviations. 3.0 Responsibilities
1.0 Scope This Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) has been written in order to conduct clinical studies according to the International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT GAINING NHS RESEARCH PERMISSION FROM CARDIFF AND VALE UHB - GUIDANCE FOR RESEARCHERS. Research Governance Group
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT GAINING NHS RESEARCH PERMISSION FROM CARDIFF AND VALE UHB - GUIDANCE FOR RESEARCHERS Reference No: UHB 074 Version No: 5 Previous Trust / LHB Ref No: N/A Documents to read alongside
gsop-32-02 - Vendor Assessment SOP page 1 of 10
gsop-32-02 - Vendor Assessment SOP page 1 of 10 Hertfordshire Hospitals R&D Consortium Incorporating West Herts Hospitals NHS Trust and East & North Herts NHS Trust VENDOR ASSESSMENT Research & Development
Joint Research Office
Office Location: 1 st Floor Maple House 149 Tottenham Court Road London W1T 7DN Joint Research Office Postal Address: UCL, Gower Street London WC1E 6BT Email: [email protected] Tel No. 020
Effective Data Management Plans for Research Studies Patrick Murphy, Research Informatics, Family Health International
Effective Data Management Plans for Research Studies Patrick Murphy,, Family Health International 1 What is a Data Management Plan? A document that describes how data (clinical, behavioural, lab) will
Summary of the role and operation of NHS Research Management Offices in England
Summary of the role and operation of NHS Research Management Offices in England The purpose of this document is to clearly explain, at the operational level, the activities undertaken by NHS R&D Offices
Information Security Policy September 2009 Newman University IT Services. Information Security Policy
Contents 1. Statement 1.1 Introduction 1.2 Objectives 1.3 Scope and Policy Structure 1.4 Risk Assessment and Management 1.5 Responsibilities for Information Security 2. Compliance 3. HR Security 3.1 Terms
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE FOR RESEARCH. 2. Notification of Serious Breaches of Good Clinical Practice or Study Protocol
Basildon and Thurrock University Hospitals NHS FT Research & Development APPROVED STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE FOR RESEARCH 2. Notification of Serious Breaches of Good Clinical Practice or Study Protocol
The Study Site Master File and Essential Documents
The Study Site Master File and Essential Documents Standard Operating Procedure Office of Health and Medical Research Queensland Health SOP reference: 002 Version number: 1 Effective date: 01 June 2010
Standard Operating Procedure for Archiving Essential Documentation relating to Clinical Trials of Investigational Medicinal Products (CTIMPs)
archiving\spon_s21_sop_for_archiving V02.doc Page 1 of 13 Standard Operating Procedure for Archiving Essential Documentation relating to Clinical Trials of Investigational Medicinal Products (CTIMPs) SOP
Clinical Trial Oversight: Ensuring GCP Compliance, Patient Safety and Data Integrity
Clinical Trial Oversight: Ensuring GCP Compliance, Patient Safety and Data Integrity Michelle Quaye Regulatory Manager, Advanced Therapy Trials University College London Overview The Principles of Good
Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) Research and Development Office
Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) Research and Development Office Title of SOP: Undertaking Risk Assessment of a Research and Development Project SOP Number: 33 Version Number: 1.0 Supercedes: N/A Effective
Clinical Data Management (Process and practical guide) Dr Nguyen Thi My Huong WHO/RHR/RCP/SIS
Clinical Data Management (Process and practical guide) Dr Nguyen Thi My Huong WHO/RHR/RCP/SIS Training Course in Sexual and Reproductive Health Research Geneva 2012 OUTLINE Clinical Data Management CDM
Document Title: Research Database Application (ReDA)
Document Title: Research Database Application (ReDA) Document Number: SOP035 Staff involved in development: Job titles only Document author/owner: Directorate: Department: For use by: RM&G Manager, R&D
Clinical Data Management (Process and practical guide) Nguyen Thi My Huong, MD. PhD WHO/RHR/SIS
Clinical Data Management (Process and practical guide) Nguyen Thi My Huong, MD. PhD WHO/RHR/SIS Training Course in Sexual and Reproductive Health Research Geneva 2013 OUTLINE Overview of Clinical Data
EMA Clinical Laboratory Guidance - Key points and Clarifications PAUL STEWART
EMA Clinical Laboratory Guidance - Key points and Clarifications PAUL STEWART Framework Labs generate data that are used to make decisions on the safety and efficacy of medicinal products; consequently,
Barnett International and CHI's Inaugural Clinical Trial Oversight Summit June 4-7, 2012 Omni Parker House Boston, MA
Barnett International and CHI's Inaugural Clinical Trial Oversight Summit June 4-7, 2012 Omni Parker House Boston, MA This presentation is the property of DynPort Vaccine Company LLC, a CSC company, and
SOP Number: SOP-QA-34 Version No: 1. Version Description of Changes Date Effective. Change of number for Q-Pulse (Replaces UoA-NHSG-SOP-051 V1)
Standard Operating Procedure: SOP Number: SOP-QA-34 Version No: 1 Author: Date: 1-9-15 (Carole Edwards, Lead Research Nurse, NHS Grampian) Approved by: Date: 1-9-15 (Professor Julie Brittenden, R&D Director,
Information Governance Policy (incorporating IM&T Security)
(incorporating IM&T Security) ONCE PRINTED OFF, THIS IS AN UNCONTROLLED DOCUMENT. PLEASE CHECK THE INTRANET FOR THE MOST UP TO DATE COPY Target Audience: All staff employed or working on behalf of the
Information Security Policy
Information Security Policy Author: Responsible Lead Executive Director: Endorsing Body: Governance or Assurance Committee Alan Ashforth Alan Lawrie ehealth Strategy Group Implementation Date: September
Walton Centre. Document History Date Version Author Changes 01/10/2004 1.0 A Cobain L Wyatt. Monitoring & Audit
Page 1 Walton Centre Monitoring & Audit Document History Date Version Author Changes 01/10/2004 1.0 A Cobain L Wyatt Page 2 Table of Contents Section Contents 1 Introduction 2 Responsibilities Within This
PROCEDURE FOR PREPARING GCP INSPECTIONS REQUESTED BY THE EMEA. GCP Inspectors Working Group
European Medicines Agency Inspections London, 20 September 2007 EMEA/INS/GCP/197228/2005 Procedure no.: INS/GCP/2 PROCEDURE FOR PREPARING GCP INSPECTIONS REQUESTED BY THE EMEA GCP Inspectors Working Group
Data Management and Good Clinical Practice Patrick Murphy, Research Informatics, Family Health International
Data Management and Good Clinical Practice Patrick Murphy,, Family Health International 1 What is GCP? Good Clinical Practice is an international ethical and scientific quality standard for designing,
Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) for: Reporting of Serious Breaches of GCP or the Trial Protocol sponsored CTIMP s. Lisa Austin, Research Manager
Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) for: Reporting of Serious Breaches of GCP or the Trial Protocol sponsored CTIMP s Author: Lisa Austin, Research Manager Purpose and Objective: To identify and standardise
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE. Risk Assessment of STH sponsored CTIMPs
Research Department STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE of STH sponsored CTIMPs SOP History None SOP Number C118 Created STH Research Department (EW) Reviewed STH Research Department (EW) Superseded Version 1.0,
Research Governance Standard Operating Procedure
Research Governance Standard Operating Procedure The Management and Use of Research Participant Data for Secondary Research Purposes SOP Reference: Version Number: 01 Date: 28/02/2014 Effective Date: Review
Archiving Study Documents
This is a controlled document. The master document is posted on the JRCO website and any print-off of this document will be classed as uncontrolled. Researchers and their teams may print off this document
ACDM GUIDELINES TO FACILITATE PRODUCTION OF A DATA HANDLING PROTOCOL
ACDM GUIDELINES TO FACILITATE PRODUCTION OF A DATA HANDLING PROTOCOL BACKGROUND The need was identified by the Electronic Data Transfer Special Interest Group (SIG) for each company or organisation to
ROLE OF THE RESEARCH COORDINATOR
Clinical and Translational Science Institute / CTSI at the University of California, San Francisco Welcome to Online Training for Clinical Research Coordinators ROLE OF THE RESEARCH COORDINATOR Data Collection
Site visit inspection report on compliance with HTA minimum standards. London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine. HTA licensing number 12066
Site visit inspection report on compliance with HTA minimum standards London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine HTA licensing number 12066 Licensed under the Human Tissue Act 2004 for the storage of
MHRA GMP Data Integrity Definitions and Guidance for Industry January 2015
MHRA GMP Data Integrity Definitions and Guidance for Industry Introduction: Data integrity is fundamental in a pharmaceutical quality system which ensures that medicines are of the required quality. This
Standard Operating Procedures
Standard Operating Procedures 5.5.1 Electronic Data Handling History Version Date Author Reason 1.1 18 th July 2007 B Fazekas New procedure 1.2 18 th August B Fazekas Changes ratified by MAB 2007 1.3 16
MRC. Clinical Trials. Series MRC GUIDELINES FOR GOOD CLINICAL PRACTICE IN CLINICAL TRIALS. Medical Research Council
MRC Clinical Trials Series MRC GUIDELINES FOR GOOD CLINICAL PRACTICE IN CLINICAL TRIALS 1998 Medical Research Council MRC GUIDELINES FOR GOOD CLINICAL PRACTICE IN CLINICAL TRIALS 1998 MRC GUIDELINES FOR
Reflection paper on GCP compliance in relation to trial master files (paper and/or electronic) for management, audit and inspection of clinical trials
1 2 3 15 June 2015 EMA/INS/GCP/636736/2012 Good Clinical Practice Inspectors Working Group (GCP IWG) 4 5 6 7 Reflection paper on GCP compliance in relation to trial master files (paper and/or electronic)
Resources Based, Manufacturing and Consumer Goods Industries Chemicals Industry
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Directorate-General for Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs Resources Based, Manufacturing and Consumer Goods Industries Chemicals Industry Version March 2015 QUESTIONS
The Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust. Research & Development Department DATA PROTECTION IN RESEARCH GUIDANCE NOTES FOR RESEARCHERS
The Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust Research & Development Department DATA PROTECTION IN RESEARCH GUIDANCE NOTES FOR RESEARCHERS 1. Introduction The Research Governance Framework for Health & Social
Managing Risk in Clinical Research. Dr Martha J Wrigley R&D Manager Senior Visiting Fellow University of Surrey
Managing Risk in Clinical Research Dr Martha J Wrigley R&D Manager Senior Visiting Fellow University of Surrey Aim of the session To explore the risks associated with clinical research and understand how
Information Governance Strategy. Version No 2.1
Livewell Southwest Information Governance Strategy Version No 2.1 Notice to staff using a paper copy of this guidance. The policies and procedures page of LSW Intranet holds the most recent version of
MHRA GMP Data Integrity Definitions and Guidance for Industry March 2015
MHRA GMP Data Integrity Definitions and Guidance for Industry Introduction: Data integrity is fundamental in a pharmaceutical quality system which ensures that medicines are of the required quality. This
Supplement to the Guidance for Electronic Data Capture in Clinical Trials
Supplement to the Guidance for Electronic Data Capture in Clinical Trials January 10, 2012 Drug Evaluation Committee, Japan Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association Note: The original language of this
Information Governance Policy
Author: Susan Hall, Information Governance Manager Owner: Fiona Jamieson, Assistant Director of Healthcare Governance Publisher: Compliance Unit Date of first issue: February 2005 Version: 5 Date of version
CHILDREN AND ADULTS SERVICE RESEARCH APPROVAL GROUP
DURHAM COUNTY COUNCIL CHILDREN AND ADULTS SERVICE RESEARCH APPROVAL GROUP INFORMATION PACK Children and Adults Service Version 4 October 2015 Children and Adults Service Research Approval Group Page 1
Information Security Policies. Version 6.1
Information Security Policies Version 6.1 Information Security Policies Contents: 1. Information Security page 3 2. Business Continuity page 5 3. Compliance page 6 4. Outsourcing and Third Party Access
Information Governance Policy
Information Governance Policy Document Number 01 Version Number 2.0 Approved by / Date approved Effective Authority Customer Services & ICT Authorised by Assistant Director Customer Services & ICT Contact
Electronic Data Capture - MACRO. Anja Fischer, Thomas Müller
Electronic Data Capture - MACRO Anja Fischer, Thomas Müller Agenda Purpose of Electronic Data Capture (EDC) Regulatory Requirements EDC-System MACRO Clinical Trial Support for ELN by WP 3 (CICS) Costs
How To Protect Decd Information From Harm
Policy ICT Security Please note this policy is mandatory and staff are required to adhere to the content Summary DECD is committed to ensuring its information is appropriately managed according to the
UK Implementation of the EU Clinical Trial Directive 2001/20/EC:
UK Implementation of the EU Clinical Trial Directive 2001/20/EC: GCP Aspects. Dr. Colin Wilsher, FRQA. BARQA GCP Committee Chairman; & Pfizer Worldwide Development Quality Assurance. GIQAR, Roma, October
Research Study Close-down and Archiving Procedures
Title: Outcome Statement: Research Study Close-down and Archiving Procedures To inform researchers of the process for closing down research studies, retaining and storing research materials in the Trust.
The use of computer systems
Technology Update Computer Systems Validation, Part 1 Software Purchase and GCP Compliance Teri Stokes Teri Stokes, PhD, is senior consultant and director of GXP International, 131 Sudbury Road, Concord,
Research & Development Directorate
Research & Development Directorate Type of Document Standard Operating Procedure Name SOP10: Routine Audit Version 3.0 Author Miss Jennifer Boyle (Research Governance Co-ordinator) Version Superseded 2.4
CNE Disclosures. To change this title, go to Notes Master
CNE Disclosures Successful Completion: Participants must complete an evaluation form to receive a certificate of completion Contact Hours: 1 contact hour is available to those who meet the successful completion
Reflection paper on expectations for electronic source data and data transcribed to electronic data collection tools in clinical trials
09 June 2010 EMA/INS/GCP/454280/2010 GCP Inspectors Working Group (GCP IWG) Reflection paper on expectations for electronic source data and data transcribed to electronic data collection tools in clinical
VICTORIAN CARDIAC OUTCOMES REGISTRY. Data Management Policy
VICTORIAN CARDIAC OUTCOMES REGISTRY Data Management Policy Version 1.0 26 February 2014 Table of Contents 1. Document Version Control... 1 1. Preface... 2 2. Project Information... 2 2.1 Purpose of VCOR...
This interpretation of the revised Annex
Reprinted from PHARMACEUTICAL ENGINEERING The Official Magazine of ISPE July/August 2011, Vol. 31 No. 4 www.ispe.org Copyright ISPE 2011 The ISPE GAMP Community of Practice (COP) provides its interpretation
Version history Version number Version date Effective date 01 dd-mon-yyyy dd-mon-yyyy 02 dd-mon-yyyy dd-mon-yyyy 03 (current) dd-mon-yyyy dd-mon-yyyy
Trial name: HOVON xxx yyy Sponsor: HOVON Version history Version number Version date Effective date 01 dd-mon-yyyy dd-mon-yyyy 02 dd-mon-yyyy dd-mon-yyyy 03 (current) dd-mon-yyyy dd-mon-yyyy QRMP authors
Data Manager s Role in Data Quality
Data Manager s Role in Data Quality and KPI for Data Management Process May 17 th, 2011 Beijing, China Joyce Lai MSD (Shanghai) Pharmaceutical Consultancy Co, Ltd. Agenda Why is the Data Manager So Important
Personal data - Personal data identify an individual. For example, name, address, contact details, date of birth, NHS number.
Background The Data Protection Act 1998 i came into force in March 2000 and is followed by all NHS employed staff via their policies and procedures. The act applies to all personal, identifiable information
Subject: No. Page PROTOCOL AND CASE REPORT FORM DEVELOPMENT AND REVIEW Standard Operating Procedure
703 1 of 11 POLICY The Beaumont Research Coordinating Center (BRCC) will provide advice to clinical trial investigators on protocol development, content and format. Upon request, the BRCC will review a
Data Management Unit Research Institute for Health Sciences, Chiang Mai University
Data Management Unit Research Institute for Health Sciences, Chiang Mai University Clinical Data Management is the process of handling data from clinical trials. The inherent goal of any clinical data
CCG: IG06: Records Management Policy and Strategy
Corporate CCG: IG06: Records Management Policy and Strategy Version Number Date Issued Review Date V3 08/01/2016 01/01/2018 Prepared By: Consultation Process: Senior Governance Manager, NECS CCG Head of
QUALITY CONTROL AND QUALITY ASSURANCE IN CLINICAL RESEARCH
QUALITY CONTROL AND QUALITY ASSURANCE IN CLINICAL RESEARCH Martin Valania, Executive Director, Corporate QA and Compliance Introduction Pharmaceutical companies recognize the benefits of carefully managing
MONMOUTHSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL DATA PROTECTION POLICY
MONMOUTHSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL DATA PROTECTION POLICY Page 1 of 16 Contents Policy Information 3 Introduction 4 Responsibilities 7 Confidentiality 9 Data recording and storage 11 Subject Access 12 Transparency
INFORMATION GOVERNANCE POLICY & FRAMEWORK
INFORMATION GOVERNANCE POLICY & FRAMEWORK Version 1.2 Committee Approved by Audit Committee Date Approved 5 March 2015 Author: Responsible Lead: Associate IG Specialist, YHCS Corporate & Governance Manger
Reflection paper for laboratories that perform the analysis or evaluation of clinical trial samples
28 February 2012 EMA/INS/GCP/532137/2010 GCP Inspectors Working Group Reflection paper for laboratories that perform the analysis or evaluation of clinical trial Draft agreed by GCP Inspectors Working
Job Profile Clinical Research Associate III (CRA)
PART 1 - PROFILE You are an experienced CRA with a strong background in Clinical Research who is passionate about drug development and are seeking a challenging and rewarding career in a quality focussed
How To Inspect A Blood Bank
Site visit inspection report on compliance with HTA minimum standards Belfast Cord Blood Bank HTA licensing number 11077 Licensed for the procurement, processing, testing, storage, distribution and import/export
Corporate Information Security Policy
Corporate Information Security Policy. A guide to the Council s approach to safeguarding information resources. September 2015 Contents Page 1. Introduction 1 2. Information Security Framework 2 3. Objectives
