Section Two Deprivation 2004

Transcription

1 Section Two Deprivation 2004 Page 59

2 2.1 District Level & County Summary of the Index of Multiple Deprivation 2004 Five district level summary measures were developed to compare each of the county council and unitary authorities (section 2.2) and district authorities (section 2.3). The ODPM suggests that there is no best way of describing or comparing England s 354 districts but provides the following 5 measures. Average Is the population weighted average of the combined scores for the Super Output Areas in a district or authority. Average Is the population weighted average of the combined ranks for the Super Output Areas in a district or authority. Extent Is the proportion of a districts population living in the most deprived Super Output Areas in the Country. The Average and Average measures in section 2.2 show that Essex compares favourably amongst other county councils and unitary authorities around England, ranking 121 out of 149 authorities. This places Essex within the 20% of the least deprived county councils and unitary authorities in England. Southend-on-Sea and Thurrock ranked 80 and 84 respectively out of 149 authorities, which places them just inside the top 50% of the least deprived authorities. The Average and Average measures in section 2.3 show that within Essex, it is only Uttlesford that is less deprived than Chelmsford Borough. This ranks Chelmsford within the 10% least deprived authorities in the England. Five of the nine Essex authorities are within the 25% least deprived authorities in England. Income Scale Is the number of people who are Income deprived. Employment Scale Is the number of people who are Employment deprived. 2.2 Summary County Name () Average of Average Average of Average Extent of Extent Income Scale of Income Scale Employment Scale of Employment Scale Peterborough , , Luton , , Southend-on-Sea , , , Thurrock , , , Norfolk , , , Suffolk , , , Essex , , , Bedfordshire , , , Cambridgeshire , , , Hertfordshire , , , Please Note: Essex County refers to the existing administrative boundaries of Essex. Page 60

3 Table 2.3. District Summary County Name () Average of Average Average of Average Extent of Extent Income Scale of Income Scale Employment Scale of Employment Scale Tendring , , , Harlow , , , Basildon , , , Colchester , , , Epping Forest , , , Braintree , , , Castle Point , , , Maldon , , , Brentwood , , , Rochford , , , Chelmsford , , , Uttlesford , , , , , Super Output Areas (SOA) Super Output Areas (SOA) are a new geography designed for small area statistical analysis. The SOA s have been designed to provide better statistical comparisons between SOA s as they are of a more consistent size and population. For example, currently in Chelmsford Borough the wards vary considerably from 2,695 people in Chelmsford Rural West to 8,999 in. The SOA s have been developed from the existing ward boundaries with each ward typically having between four and six SOA s within it. Each SOA has a minimum size of 1,000 residents and 400 households, but averages 1,500 residents. In total there are 104 SOA s in Chelmsford Borough and 1,065 in Essex. The SOA boundaries are built for statistical geography only and therefore, do not represent local communities The Index of Multiple Deprivation 2004 Domains The concept of multiple deprivation is based upon the idea of distinct dimensions of deprivation, which can be measured separately. The Index of Multiple Deprivation contains seven domains of deprivation with each domain containing very specific indicators for that purpose. The specific dimensions of deprivation (listed below) are weighted as an area level aggregation to provide the overall Index of Multiply Deprivation The Index of Mutiple Deprivation 2004 Domain Domain Income Deprivation Employment Deprivation Health Deprivation and Disability Education, Skills and Training Deprivation Barriers to Housing and Services Living Environment Deprivation Crime Domain Weight 22.5% 22.5% 13.5% 13.5% 9.3% 9.3% 9.3% Page 61

4 2.5.3 Income Deprivation Domain This domain aims to identify the proportion of the population experiencing income deprivation in an area. The following indices were used to derive a score. Adults and children in Income Support Households (2001) Adults and children in Income Based Job Seekers Allowance households (2001) Adults and children in Working Families Tax Credit households (excluding housing benefits) is below 60% of median before housing costs (2001) Adults and children in Disabled Person s Tax Credit household s whose equalised income (excluding housing benefits) is below 60% of median before housing costs (2001) National Asylum Support Service supported seekers in England in receipt of subsistence only and accommodation. (2002) Employment Deprivation Domain This domain captures employment deprivation conceptualised as involuntary exclusion of the working age population from the world of work. Unemployment claimant count (JUVOS) of women aged and men aged averaged 4 quarters (2001) Incapacity Benefit Claimants women aged and men aged (2001) Severe Disablement Allowance claimants women aged and men aged (2001) Participants in New Deal for the 18 24s who are not included in claimant count (2001) Participants in New Deal for 25+ who are not included in the claimant count (2001) Participants n New Deal for lone Parents aged 18 and over (2001) Health Deprivation and Disability Domain This domain identifies areas with relatively high rates of people who die prematurely or whose quality of life is impaired by poor health or who are disabled, across the whole population. Years of potential life lost ( ) Comparative Illness and Disability Ratio (2001) Measures of emergency admissions to hospital ( ) Adults under 60 suffering from mood or anxiety disorders ( ) Education, Skills and Training Deprivation Domain This domain measures deprivation of education, skills and training. The indicators fall within two sub-domains (i) relating to education deprivation for children and young people in and the other and (ii) lack of skills and qualifications among the working adult population. (i) Children/Young People Average points score of children at Key Stage 2 (2002) Average points score of children at Key Stage 3 (2002) Average points score of children at Key Stage 4 (2002) Proportion of young people not staying on in school or school level education above 16 (2001) (ii) Skills Proportion of working age adults (aged 25-54) in the area with no or low qualifications (2001) Page 62

5 2.5.7 Barriers to Housing and Services Domain This domain captures the barriers to housing and key local services. The indicators fall into two sub-domains (i) Geographical Barriers and (ii) Wider Barriers, which includes issues such as access to housing and affordability. (i) Geographical Barriers Road distance to GP premises (2003) Road distance to a supermarket or convenience store (2002) Road distance to primary school ( ) Road distance to a Post Office (2003) (ii) Wider Barriers Household overcrowding (2001) LA percentage of households for whom a decision on their application for assistance under the homeless provisions of housing legislation has been made, assigned to SOAs (2002) Difficulty of access to owner-occupation (2002) Crime Domain This domain measures the incidence of recorded crime for four major crime themes, representing the occurrence of personal and material victimisation at a small level. Burglary (4 recorded crime offence types, April 2002 March 2003) Theft (5 recorded crime offence types, April 2002 March 2003) Criminal damage (10 recorded crime offence types, April 2002 March 2003) Violence (14 recorded crime offence types April 2002 March 2003) The Living Environment Deprivation Domain The purpose of the domain is to illustrate deprivation in respect of the living environment. The indicators fall into two sub-domains (i) The Indoors Living Environment and (ii) The Outdoors Living Environment. (i) The Indoors Living Environment Social and private housing in poor condition (2001) Houses without central heating (2001) (ii) The Outdoors Living Environment Air quality (2001) Road traffic accidents involving injury to pedestrians and cyclists ( ) 2.6 Geographical Definitions The is the region in which Chelmsford is located. Essex Within the analysis, Chelmsford has been ranked by the deprivation results of other districts within Essex. Essex refers to the traditional County of Essex, that is, all districts within Essex and the unitary authorities of Southend-on-Sea and Thurrock. Page 63

6 Section Two: Deprivation Super Output Areas Key Map: Rural Chelmsford Please Note The Super Output Area number on the maps relate to the last three digits of the area code seen in full when in table form. The codes are ODPM designated Urban Chelmsford Inset South Woodham Ferrers Inset 595 Crown Copyright. All rights reserved. Chelmsford BC Licence Number Page

7 Section Two: Deprivation Super Output Areas Key Map: Urban Chelmsford Please Note The Super Output Area number on the maps relate to the last three digits of the area code seen in full when in table form. The codes are ODPM designated. Crown Copyright. All rights reserved. Chelmsford BC Licence Number Page 65

8 Super Output Areas Key Map: South Woodham Ferrers Please Note The Super Output Area number on the maps relate to the last three digits of the area code seen in full when in table form. The codes are ODPM designated Crown Copyright. All rights reserved. Chelmsford BC Licence Number Page 66

9 2.7 Chelmsford Borough: Index of Multiple Deprivation % most deprived SOAs in Essex 25-50% most deprived SOAs in Essex 25-50% least deprived SOAs in Essex 25% least deprived SOAs in Essex Index of Multiple Deprivation 2004: Summary The Index of Multiple Deprivation 2004 map above expresses how the Super Output Areas (SOA) in Chelmsford Borough rank against all SOAs in the traditional county of Essex. Chelmsford has very low levels of deprivation but there are pockets. There are just 5 SOAs out of a total of 104 Borough-wide that are ranked as being within the 25% most deprived SOAs in Essex. Furthermore, only 18 SOAs feature in the top 50% most deprived SOAs in Essex. This equates to just 17% of Chelmsford Borough s SOAs being present within Essex s top 50% most deprived SOAs. Of the five SOAs ranked in the 25% most deprived SOAs in Essex, three are located in north-west Chelmsford, creating a large pocket of deprivation. These SOAs are located in the wards of Marconi, and respectively. There are also pockets of deprivation in Great Baddow East and Waterhouse Farm. Please note that no ward has more than one SOA in the 25% most deprived in Essex. The worst ranked SOA in Chelmsford Borough is Marconi [E ] and incidentally the only SOA that ranks in the top 10% most deprived wards in Essex. In total there are 61 SOAs Borough-wide ranked as being in the 25% least deprived SOAs in Essex and 86 SOAs in the 50% least deprived SOAs in Essex. Thus, 83% of SOAs in Chelmsford Borough are ranked as being in the 50% least deprived SOAs in Essex. The highest ranked SOA in Chelmsford Borough is St Andrews [E ] which ranks in the top 0.5% least deprived SOAs in Essex. Notice that has the least deprived ward in the Borough and the second most deprived SOA in the Borough. Writtle [E ] is also ranked as being in the top 0.5% least deprived SOAs in Essex. Chelmsford Borough has 41 SOAs in the top 10% least deprived SOAs in England. This equates to two-fifths of the Boroughs SOAs being within in the top 10% least deprived SOAs in England. There are just 10 SOAs in top 50% most deprived SOAs in England and only 1 Chelmsford SOA (Marconi [E ]) features in the top 25% most deprived SOAs in England. About a third of the Borough s SOAs (34 SOAs) are in the s top 10% least deprived SOAs. Only 23 of Chelmsford Borough s SOAs are in the 50% most deprived SOAs in the. Page 67

10 2.7 Chelmsford Borough: Overall Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) Ward Name SOA IMD of IMD (where 1 is most deprived) % National % Essex % Essex Bicknacre and East and West Hanningfield E Bicknacre and East and West Hanningfield E Bicknacre and East and West Hanningfield E Boreham and The Leighs E Boreham and The Leighs E Boreham and The Leighs E Broomfield and The Walthams E Broomfield and The Walthams E Broomfield and The Walthams E Broomfield and The Walthams E Broomfield and The Walthams E E E E E E E Chelmsford Rural West E Chelmsford Rural West E Galleywood E Galleywood E Galleywood E Galleywood E Goat Hall E Goat Hall E Goat Hall E Goat Hall E Great Baddow East E Great Baddow East E Great Baddow East E Great Baddow East E Great Baddow East E Great Baddow West E Great Baddow West E Great Baddow West E Little Baddow, Danbury and Sandon E Little Baddow, Danbury and Sandon E Little Baddow, Danbury and Sandon E Little Baddow, Danbury and Sandon E Little Baddow, Danbury and Sandon E Marconi E Marconi E Marconi E Marconi E E E E E E E Moulsham Lodge E Moulsham Lodge E Moulsham Lodge E Moulsham Lodge E Page 68 Page 43

11 2.7 Chelmsford Borough: Overall Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) (continued) Ward Name SOA IMD of IMD (where 1 is most deprived) % National % East f England Essex % Essex E E E E E E Rettendon and Runwell E Rettendon and Runwell E Rettendon and Runwell E E E E E E E South Hanningfield, Stock and Margaretting E South Hanningfield, Stock and Margaretting E South Hanningfield, Stock and Margaretting E E E E E E E South Woodham-Elmwood and Woodville E South Woodham-Elmwood and Woodville E South Woodham-Elmwood and Woodville E South Woodham-Elmwood and Woodville E South Woodham-Elmwood and Woodville E E E E E E E The Lawns E The Lawns E The Lawns E The Lawns E Trinity E Trinity E Trinity E Trinity E Waterhouse Farm E Waterhouse Farm E Waterhouse Farm E Writtle E Writtle E Writtle E Writtle E Page 69

12 2.8 Income Deprivation Less 25% than Most 25 Income Deprived in Essex % Most Income Deprived in Essex % Least Icome Deprived in Essex 75 25% + Least Income Deprived in Essex Income Deprivation: Summary This domain aims to identify the proportion of the population experiencing income deprivation in an area. There are more pockets of Income Deprivation within Chelmsford than when compared to the overall the Index of Multiple Deprivation In total there are 9 Super Output Areas (SOA) ranked as being within the 25% most Income deprived SOAs in Essex and 29 SOAs ranked as being within 50% most Income deprived SOAs in Essex. Four of the nine SOAs ranked as being within in the 25% most Income deprived SOAs in Essex are located in northwest Chelmsford Borough and cross three ward boundaries, creating a large area of Income Deprivation. The wards of and Great Baddow East both have two SOAs that are within the 25% most Income deprived SOAs in Essex., Marconi, Waterhouse Farm, Writtle and Galleywood all have one SOA that is within the 25% most Income deprived SOAs in Essex. The worst ranked SOA in Chelmsford Borough is Marconi [E ] which ranks in the top 5% most Income Deprived SOA in Essex, top 2% most Income Deprived SOA in the and top 10% most Income Deprived SOA in England. There are 53 SOAs in Chelmsford Borough ranked as being within the 25% least Income deprived SOAs in Essex and 75 SOAs in the 50% least Income deprived SOAs in Essex. 72% of Chelmsford SOAs are thus ranked as being in the 50% least Income deprived SOAs in Essex. The highest ranked SOA in Chelmsford Borough is Little Baddow, Danbury and Sandon [E ] which ranks in the top 1% least Income Deprived SOAs in Essex and also is within the top 2% least Income Deprived SOAs in England. [E ] also ranks in the top 1% least Income Deprived SOAs in Essex. Notably though, the ward has the 2 nd least Income Deprived SOA in Chelmsford and the 4 th most Income Deprived SOA (see table 2.2). There are 24 Chelmsford Borough SOAs in the top 10% least Income Deprived SOAs in England and 81 SOAs in the top 50% least Income Deprived. Chelmsford Borough has just 23 SOAs in the 50% most deprived SOAs in England. At Regional level Chelmsford Borough fairs less well with just 13 SOAs in the 10% least Income Deprived SOAs in the and as many as 32 SOAs in 50% most Income Deprived SOAs for the region. Page 70

13 2.8 Income Deprivation Domain Ward Name SOA Income of Income (where 1 is most deprived) % National % Essex % Essex Bicknacre and East and West Hanningfield E Bicknacre and East and West Hanningfield E Bicknacre and East and West Hanningfield E Boreham and The Leighs E Boreham and The Leighs E Boreham and The Leighs E Broomfield and The Walthams E Broomfield and The Walthams E Broomfield and The Walthams E Broomfield and The Walthams E Broomfield and The Walthams E E E E E E E Chelmsford Rural West E Chelmsford Rural West E Galleywood E Galleywood E Galleywood E Galleywood E Goat Hall E Goat Hall E Goat Hall E Goat Hall E Great Baddow East E Great Baddow East E Great Baddow East E Great Baddow East E Great Baddow East E Great Baddow West E Great Baddow West E Great Baddow West E Little Baddow, Danbury and Sandon E Little Baddow, Danbury and Sandon E Little Baddow, Danbury and Sandon E Little Baddow, Danbury and Sandon E Little Baddow, Danbury and Sandon E Marconi E Marconi E Marconi E Marconi E E E E E E E Moulsham Lodge E Moulsham Lodge E Moulsham Lodge E Moulsham Lodge E Page 71

14 2.8 Income Deprivation Domain (continued) Ward Name SOA Income of Income (where 1 is most deprived) % National % Essex % Essex E E E E E E Rettendon and Runwell E Rettendon and Runwell E Rettendon and Runwell E E E E E E E South Hanningfield, Stock and Margaretting E South Hanningfield, Stock and Margaretting E South Hanningfield, Stock and Margaretting E E E E E E E South Woodham-Elmwood and Woodville E South Woodham-Elmwood and Woodville E South Woodham-Elmwood and Woodville E South Woodham-Elmwood and Woodville E South Woodham-Elmwood and Woodville E E E E E E E The Lawns E The Lawns E The Lawns E The Lawns E Trinity E Trinity E Trinity E Trinity E Waterhouse Farm E Waterhouse Farm E Waterhouse Farm E Writtle E Writtle E Writtle E Writtle E Page 72

15 2.9 Employment Deprivation Less 25% than Most 25 Deprived in Employment Terms in Essex % Most Deprived in Employment Terms in Essex % Least Deprived in Employment Terms in Essex 75 25% + Least Deprived Employment Terms in Essex Employment Deprivation: Summary This domain captures employment deprivation conceptualised as involuntary exclusion of the working age population from the world of work. The level of deprivation within this domain is more widespread than the overall Index of Multiple Deprivation. There are 8 Super Output Areas (SOA) that are ranked within the 25% most deprived SOAs in employment terms in Essex and 20 in the 50% most deprived SOAs in employment terms in Essex. Less than a fifth of Chelmsford Borough SOAs are ranked in 50% most deprived SOAs in employment terms in Essex. North-west Chelmsford contains five of the eight SOAs that are ranked 25% most deprived for employment in Essex. St Andrews and have 2 SOAs that are ranked 25 % most deprived for employment terms in Essex. The fifth SOA in north-west Chelmsford is Marconi [E ] and is the worst ranked SOA in Chelmsford. This SOA is ranked in the top 10% most deprived for employment in Essex and and is the only Chelmsford SOA ranked in 25% most deprived in employment terms in England. Waterhouse Farm, Great Baddow East and Rettendon and Runwell all have one SOA ranked in 25% most deprived in employment terms in Essex. 81% of Chelmsford SOAs are ranked within 50% least deprived in employment terms in Essex. There are four SOAs in Chelmsford Borough that are ranked within the top 1% least deprived for employment in Essex and top 2% in England. These are (in order) Little Baddow, Danbury and Sandon [E ]; Chelmer Village and Beaulieu Park [E ]; [E ]; and Writtle [E ]. There are 38 Chelmsford Borough SOAs in the top 10% least deprived SOAs in employment terms in England, which accounts for a third of the Borough s SOAs. There are 20 Borough-wide SOAs in the 50% most deprived SOAs in employment terms in England. Less than a fifth of Chelmsford SOAs are thus within the 50% most deprived SOAs in employment terms in England. In regional terms Chelmsford Borough fairs less well with just 19 SOAs in the 10% least deprived SOAs for employment in the. 22 Chelmsford Borough SOAs are ranked as being within 50% most deprived in employment terms in the East of England. In total there are 61 SOAs in Chelmsford Borough that are ranked as being within 25% least deprived SOAs in employment terms in Essex and 84 SOAs in the 50% least deprived SOAs for employment in Essex. Page 73

16 2.9 Employment Deprivation Domain Ward Name SOA Employment of Employment (where 1 is most deprived) % National % Essex % Essex Bicknacre and East and West Hanningfield Bicknacre and East and West Hanningfield Bicknacre and East and West Hanningfield E E E Boreham and The Leighs Boreham and The Leighs Boreham and The Leighs E E E Broomfield and The Walthams Broomfield and The Walthams Broomfield and The Walthams Broomfield and The Walthams Broomfield and The Walthams E E E E E E E E E E E Chelmsford Rural West Chelmsford Rural West E E Galleywood Galleywood Galleywood Galleywood E E E E Goat Hall Goat Hall Goat Hall Goat Hall E E E E Great Baddow East Great Baddow East Great Baddow East Great Baddow East Great Baddow East E E E E E Great Baddow West Great Baddow West Great Baddow West E E E Little Baddow, Danbury and Sandon Little Baddow, Danbury and Sandon Little Baddow, Danbury and Sandon Little Baddow, Danbury and Sandon Little Baddow, Danbury and Sandon E E E E E Marconi Marconi Marconi Marconi E E E E E E E E E E Moulsham Lodge Moulsham Lodge Moulsham Lodge Moulsham Lodge E E E E Page 74

17 2.9 Employment Deprivation Domain (continued) Ward Name SOA Employment of Employment (where 1 is most deprived) % National % Essex % Essex E E E E E E Rettendon and Runwell Rettendon and Runwell Rettendon and Runwell E E E E E E E E E South Hanningfield, Stock and Margaretting South Hanningfield, Stock and Margaretting South Hanningfield, Stock and Margaretting E E E E E E E E E South Woodham-Elmwood and Woodville South Woodham-Elmwood and Woodville South Woodham-Elmwood and Woodville South Woodham-Elmwood and Woodville South Woodham-Elmwood and Woodville E E E E E E E E E E E The Lawns The Lawns The Lawns The Lawns E E E E Trinity Trinity Trinity Trinity E E E E Waterhouse Farm Waterhouse Farm Waterhouse Farm E E E Writtle Writtle Writtle Writtle E E E E Page 75

18 2.10 Health Deprivation and Disability 25% Most health and disability deprived in Essex 25-50% Most health and disability deprived in Essex 25-50% Least health and disability deprived in Essex 25% Least health and disability deprived in Essex Health Deprivation and Disability: Summary This domain identifies areas with relatively high rates of people who die prematurely or whose quality of life is impaired by poor health or who are disabled, across the whole population. Generally, Chelmsford Borough fairs well with this domain but there is a large pocket of health deprivation within northwest Chelmsford. Borough-wide there are just 7 Super Output Areas (SOAs) in the 25% most deprived SOAs for health and disability in Essex and 16 in the 50% most deprived SOAs. Five of the seven SOAs ranked in the 25% most deprived SOAs for health and disability in Essex are located in northwest Chelmsford Borough. and Marconi wards both have two SOAs in the 25% most deprived for health and disability deprivation in Essex, whilst has one. Waterhouse Farm and Rettendon and Runwell also contain one SOA in the 25% most deprived SOAs for health and disability in Essex. There are as many as 65 SOAs for Chelmsford Borough that fall within the in the 25% least deprived SOAs in health and disability terms in Essex. In total 88 of Chelmsford Borough s 104 SOAs are ranked as being in the 50% least deprived SOAs in health and disability in Essex. This equates to 85% of Chelmsford SOAs being within the 25% least deprived SOAs for health and disability in Essex, suggesting a healthy population. At a national level, Chelmsford Borough performs very well with 42, that s two-fifths of SOAs in the Borough featuring in the 10% least deprived for health and disability in England. Three Chelmsford Borough SOAs for ranked with the top 1% least SOAs deprived for health and disability in England. These SOAs are Boreham and the Leighs [E ]; Little Baddow, Danbury and Sandon [E ]; and Writtle [E ]. There are just 7 SOAs in Chelmsford Borough that fall within the 50% most deprived SOAs in England for health and disability Regionally, Chelmsford Borough fairs less well with 21 SOAs ranked as being within the 50% most deprived SOAs for health and disability in the. More worryingly though is that four of those SOAs feature in the regions 15% most deprived SOAs for health and disability. These wards are (in ascending order) are [E ]; [E ]; Marconi [E ; and Waterhouse Farm [E ]. There are however, 25 Chelmsford Borough SOAs ranked as being within the 10% least deprived SOAs in the East of England for health and disability. Page 76

19 2.10 Health and Deprivation and Disability Domain Ward Name SOA Health and Disability of Health and Disability (where 1 is most deprived) % National % Essex % Essex Bicknacre and East and West Hanningfield E Bicknacre and East and West Hanningfield E Bicknacre and East and West Hanningfield E Boreham and The Leighs E Boreham and The Leighs E Boreham and The Leighs E Broomfield and The Walthams E Broomfield and The Walthams E Broomfield and The Walthams E Broomfield and The Walthams E Broomfield and The Walthams E E E E E E E Chelmsford Rural West E Chelmsford Rural West E Galleywood E Galleywood E Galleywood E Galleywood E Goat Hall E Goat Hall E Goat Hall E Goat Hall E Great Baddow East E Great Baddow East E Great Baddow East E Great Baddow East E Great Baddow East E Great Baddow West E Great Baddow West E Great Baddow West E Little Baddow, Danbury and Sandon E Little Baddow, Danbury and Sandon E Little Baddow, Danbury and Sandon E Little Baddow, Danbury and Sandon E Little Baddow, Danbury and Sandon E Marconi E Marconi E Marconi E Marconi E E E E E E E Moulsham Lodge E Moulsham Lodge E Moulsham Lodge E Moulsham Lodge E Page 77

20 2.10 Health and Deprivation and Disability Domain (continued) Ward Name SOA Health and Disability of Health and Disability (where 1 is most deprived) % National % Essex % Essex E E E E E E Rettendon and Runwell E Rettendon and Runwell E Rettendon and Runwell E E E E E E E South Hanningfield, Stock and Margaretting E South Hanningfield, Stock and Margaretting E South Hanningfield, Stock and Margaretting E E E E E E E South Woodham-Elmwood and Woodville E South Woodham-Elmwood and Woodville E South Woodham-Elmwood and Woodville E South Woodham-Elmwood and Woodville E South Woodham-Elmwood and Woodville E E E E E E E The Lawns E The Lawns E The Lawns E The Lawns E Trinity E Trinity E Trinity E Trinity E Waterhouse Farm E Waterhouse Farm E Waterhouse Farm E Writtle E Writtle E Writtle E Writtle E Page 78

21 2.11 Education, Skills and Training Deprivation 25% Most deprived for Education, Skills and Training in Essex 25-50% Most deprived for Education, Skills and Training in Essex 25-50% Least deprived for Education, Skills and Training in Essex 25% Least deprived for Education, Skills and Training in Essex Education, Skills and Training Deprivation: Summary This domain measures deprivation of education, skills and training with emphasis on education deprivation for children and young people and lack of skills and qualifications among the working adult population. This is a domain were Chelmsford Borough scored very well Borough-wide. There are just three SOAs in Chelmsford that are ranked in the 25% most deprived in Essex for education, skills and training and 15 SOAs in the 50% most deprived in Essex. North-west Chelmsford has a large pocket of education, skills and training deprivation with 7 SOAs in the 50% most deprived in Essex for education, skills and training. St Andrews was the worst performing ward with 1 SOA in the 25% most deprived in Essex for education, skills and training and a further three in the 25% to 50% most deprived SOAs for education, skills and training in Essex. Across the Borough there are 59 SOAs that are ranked as being within the 25% least deprived in Essex for education, skills and training and 89 in 50% least deprived. ward has the two best performing SOAs in the Borough with both being within the 1% least deprived in Essex for education, skills and training. Countywide only three other SOAs are less deprived than [E ] in terms of education, skills and training. [E ] is also in the top 10% least deprived SOAs countywide for education, skills and training. Chelmsford Borough has 14 SOAs ranked in England s 10% least deprived SOAs for education, skills and training. There are just 16 SOAs in Chelmsford Borough that are ranked in the 50% most deprived SOAs in England for education, skills and training. Of concern though is that Marconi [E ] and [E ] are both ranked within the 10% most deprived SOAs for education skills and training in England. At a regional level, Chelmsford Borough has 14 SOAs ranked in the 10% least deprived for education, skills and training. Only 16 of Chelmsford Borough s SOAs are ranked in the 50% most deprived SOAs for education, skills and training in the. Page 79

22 2.11 Education, Skills and Training Deprivation Ward Name SOA Education, Skills and Training of Education, Skills and Training (where 1 is most deprived) % National % Essex % Essex Bicknacre and East and West Hanningfield E Bicknacre and East and West Hanningfield E Bicknacre and East and West Hanningfield E Boreham and The Leighs E Boreham and The Leighs E Boreham and The Leighs E Broomfield and The Walthams E Broomfield and The Walthams E Broomfield and The Walthams E Broomfield and The Walthams E Broomfield and The Walthams E E E E E E E Chelmsford Rural West E Chelmsford Rural West E Galleywood E Galleywood E Galleywood E Galleywood E Goat Hall E Goat Hall E Goat Hall E Goat Hall E Great Baddow East E Great Baddow East E Great Baddow East E Great Baddow East E Great Baddow East E Great Baddow West E Great Baddow West E Great Baddow West E Little Baddow, Danbury and Sandon E Little Baddow, Danbury and Sandon E Little Baddow, Danbury and Sandon E Little Baddow, Danbury and Sandon E Little Baddow, Danbury and Sandon E Marconi E Marconi E Marconi E Marconi E E E E E E E Moulsham Lodge E Moulsham Lodge E Moulsham Lodge E Moulsham Lodge E Page 80