Case 1:16-cv LTS Document 1 Filed 07/08/16 Page 1 of 14
|
|
- Angel O’Brien’
- 7 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Case 1:16-cv LTS Document 1 Filed 07/08/16 Page 1 of 14 DAVIS & GILBERT LLP Ina B. Scher ischer@dglaw.com Daniel A. Dingerson ddingerson@dglaw.com 1740 Broadway New York, NY (212) (212) fax Attorneys for Plaintiff J. Darius Bikoff UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK J. DARIUS BIKOFF, -against- Plaintiff, JAMES DOWLING and PASTIME, 16-cv-5478 COMPLAINT (ECF CASE) Defendants. Plaintiff J. Darius Bikoff ( Bikoff ), by and through his attorneys, Davis & Gilbert LLP, for his Complaint against Defendants James Dowling ( Dowling ) and Pastime (collectively, the Defendants ), alleges as follows: NATURE OF ACTION 1. This action arises out of intentional and fraudulent misrepresentations made by Dowling, a watch dealer known in the trade, to Bikoff regarding the purchase of certain watches from Pastime, Dowling s United Kingdom entity engaged in the resale of rare and collectible watches.
2 Case 1:16-cv LTS Document 1 Filed 07/08/16 Page 2 of In particular, with respect to at least two watches Pastime sold to Bikoff, Dowling made misrepresentations regarding the watches value, provenance, and authenticity which Dowling knew to be false at the time he made them. 3. With respect to three other watches Pastime sold to Bikoff, Dowling made misrepresentations about the value of the watches, based on his extensive experience in the trade, which he knew to be grossly inflated at the time he made the misrepresentations and at the time of the sale. 4. Dowling has refused to provide a full refund and to make Bikoff whole with respect to the five watches. 5. Further, Bikoff has reason to believe that Defendants are engaged in a broader scheme to defraud purchasers of rare and collectible watches. 6. Plaintiff is entitled to damages and punitive damages because of Defendants fraudulent conduct and refusals to make Plaintiff whole. PARTIES 7. Plaintiff J. Darius Bikoff is a citizen of the State of New York, domiciled in New York County, New York. 8. Defendant Pastime is an unincorporated United Kingdom entity with its principal place of business in London, England, and a mailing address of P.O. Box 874, London, U.K. NW3 5TT. 9. Defendant James Dowling is a citizen of the United Kingdom, domiciled in Greater London County, England. 2
3 Case 1:16-cv LTS Document 1 Filed 07/08/16 Page 3 of 14 JURISDICTION AND VENUE 10. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1332(a)(2) because Plaintiff is a citizen of New York, and Defendants are citizens of the United Kingdom, and the matter in controversy exceeds $75,000 exclusive of interests and costs. 11. This Court has personal jurisdiction over Defendants pursuant to N.Y. CPLR 302(a) because Defendants transact business within the state of New York and within this District and Plaintiff s claims arise from and are related to such transaction of business, and Defendants have committed tortious acts within the state of New York (or if they were committed without the state, they caused injury to Plaintiff within the state, and within the state Defendants engaged in a persistent course of conduct, derived substantial revenue from services rendered, should have reasonably expected their acts to have consequences in, and derived substantial revenue from interstate commerce). Plaintiff s claims arise from and are related to Defendants contacts with the state of New York. 12. Venue in this judicial district is proper pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1391(b)(2) because this civil action is founded on diversity jurisdiction and this is the district in which a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claims occurred, and pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1391(c)(3) because Defendants are not resident in the United States. Venue in this judicial district is also proper pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1391(a) because this civil action is founded on diversity jurisdiction and Defendants reside in this district due to their being subject to personal jurisdiction pursuant to their transaction of business in the district. 3
4 Case 1:16-cv LTS Document 1 Filed 07/08/16 Page 4 of 14 FACTS Background and Introduction of the Parties 13. Dowling is a collector and dealer of fine watches, and upon information and belief, maintains the website to promote himself and list watches Defendants have available for sale. 14. According to the website, Dowling first became interested in watches over a quarter century ago and began to buy and sell them about twenty years ago. 15. Dowling claims to have co-authored the book Best of Time: Rolex Wristwatches, now in its third edition and [to] have also written on watches for magazines in the US, the UK, Australia and Japan. 16. Dowling further states that he is one of the most respected authorities in the business of wristwatches, and provides on the website images of magazine articles written by or discussing him. 17. Dowling goes on to say that [w]hilst I buy and sell a lot of watches, it is important to realise that I am a collector at heart, which means that I tend only to buy watches which have something special about them, not run of the mill pieces and they tend to be between 15 and 90 years old. 18. Accordingly, Dowling has positioned himself as an authority on rare and collectible watches, who can supposedly be trusted to provide truthful and accurate information. 19. Currently, Dowling has approximately 46 watches listed on the website as being available for sale. 20. In 2011, Bikoff became interested in purchasing Rolex watches and asked his friend, an avid watch collector, to introduce him to someone who would have access to rare Rolex sport and military watches. 4
5 Case 1:16-cv LTS Document 1 Filed 07/08/16 Page 5 of Shortly thereafter, the friend brought Bikoff to a watch fair in New York City that was part of the International Watch Show, where he introduced Bikoff to Dowling. 22. Dowling claimed to have an extensive collection of rare and collectible watches, including watches that might be of interest to Bikoff. Dowling s Sales to Bikoff and New York Contacts 23. On April 24, 2011, Dowling met with Bikoff in New York City. 24. At the April 24, 2011 meeting in New York, Dowling showed Bikoff various watches, and made his first sale of watches to Bikoff. 25. Dowling s first sale was for four Rolex watches for a total sale price of 147,964 (to be paid by bank transfer of $240,000). (See Invoice attached as Exhibit A). 26. Included in the first sale was a Rolex 6538 Submariner (the Rolex Submariner Watch ), which was purchased by Bikoff for 56, (the list price of 65,000 less a discount applied to the entire sale, the representative share of which is 8,191.61, see Exhibit A). 27. Dowling represented, at the time of sale, that the Rolex Submariner Watch had a stunning Explorer style dial and the original gilt hour & minute hands. (See Rolex Submariner Watch Marketing Materials, attached as Exhibit B). 28. In August 2012, Dowling made another sale of watches to Bikoff, after again meeting with Bikoff in New York and showing him various watches. 29. The second sale involved three watches being delivered to Bikoff and the trade-in of one of the watches purchased in the first sale. (See Invoice attached as Exhibit C). 30. Included in the second sale was an IWC Ocean 2000 Bund (the IWC Bund Watch ), which was purchased by Bikoff for 49,500 (the list price of 55,000 less a discount applied to the entire sale, the representative share of which is 5,500, see Exhibit C). 5
6 Case 1:16-cv LTS Document 1 Filed 07/08/16 Page 6 of Dowling represented, at the time of the sale, that the IWC Bund Watch was worth at least $80, Dowling continued to deal in watches with Bikoff in On or about August 10, 2013 Dowling again met with Bikoff in New York City. 34. At the August 2013 meeting, Dowling made another sale of watches to Bikoff. 35. Dowling s August 2013 sale involved three watches being delivered to Bikoff and the trade-in of four of the watches previously purchased. (See Invoice attached as Exhibit D). 36. Included in the August 2013 sale was a Rolex Tektite GEV Sea Dweller (the Rolex Tektite GEV Watch ), which was purchased by Bikoff for $395,000. (Exhibit D). 37. Dowling represented, at the time of sale, that the Rolex Tektite GEV Watch was in excellent original condition. (See Rolex Tektite GEV Watch Marketing Materials, attached as Exhibit E). 38. Also included in the August 2013 sale was a Rolex COMEX Ludion Sea Dweller (the Rolex Ludion Watch ), which was purchased by Bikoff for $200,000. (Exhibit D). 39. Dowling represented, at the time of the sale, that the Rolex Ludion Watch was worth at least $200, Finally, the third watch included in the August 2013 sale was a Tudor Shayetet Submariner (the Tudor Shayetet Watch ), which was purchased by Bikoff for $70,000 (the list price of $71,500 less a discount of $1,500, see Exhibit D). 41. Dowling represented, at the time of the sale, that the Tudor Shayetet Watch was worth at least $70,000. 6
7 Case 1:16-cv LTS Document 1 Filed 07/08/16 Page 7 of Dowling made fraudulent misrepresentations regarding, and personally showed, each of the Rolex Tektite GEV Watch, the Rolex Submariner Watch, the IWC Bund Watch, the Rolex Ludion Watch, and the Tudor Shayetet Watch (collectively, the Subject Watches ) to Bikoff during their meetings in New York. Discovery of Dowling s Fraud 43. In the summer of 2015, Bikoff considered selling some of the watches purchased from Dowling, and contacted a well-known watch dealer in Miami, Florida, to determine their value. 44. The Miami watch dealer expressed concerns about the authenticity of certain of the watches, including the Rolex Tektite GEV Watch, the Rolex Submariner Watch, and the Rolex Ludion Watch, as well the generally inflated prices at which Dowling sold many of his watches to Bikoff. 45. The Miami watch dealer refused to assign a value to either of the Rolex Tektite GEV Watch or the Rolex Submariner Watch due to its concerns about the authenticity of those watches. 46. The Miami watch dealer valued each of the IWC Bund Watch, the Rolex Ludion Watch, and the Tudor Shayetet Watch at significantly less than the amounts paid by Bikoff to Dowling. 47. The Miami watch dealer valued the IWC Bund Watch at $15,000, compared to the 49,500 (approximately $77,000 as of the date of the sale, and approximately $72,000 at present) paid by Bikoff to Dowling. 48. The Miami watch dealer valued the Rolex Ludion Watch at $35,000, compared to the $200,000 paid by Bikoff to Dowling. 7
8 Case 1:16-cv LTS Document 1 Filed 07/08/16 Page 8 of The Miami watch dealer valued the Tudor Shayetet Watch at $10,000, compared to the $70,000 paid by Bikoff to Dowling. Attempts to Reconcile with Dowling 50. In light of the concerns raised by the Miami watch dealer, Bikoff s representatives attempted to have Dowling repurchase all the watches sold to Bikoff. 51. Dowling, in a further effort to deceive Bikoff, continued to insist that all of the watches Defendants sold to Bikoff were authentic (and had actually appreciated in value). 52. Even after being notified of Bikoff s concerns, Dowling was unrepentant and attempted to perpetuate his fraud by claiming that he could broker the sale of certain of the remaining watches or that Bikoff would be able to resell them at a profit. 53. However, despite his statements that the watches had appreciated in value, Dowling refused to provide Bikoff a full refund on the Subject Watches, and ultimately became unresponsive, going so far as to cut off contact with Bikoff for periods of time, even as Dowling continued to make regular visits to New York City. Further Evidence of Dowling s Fraud 54. In early 2016, Bikoff submitted the Rolex Tektite GEV Watch for inspection and potential auction scheduled to take place in May 2016 at Phillips Watch Auction ( Phillips ) in Geneva, Switzerland. 55. World-renowned watch expert Aurel Bacs inspected the Rolex Tektite GEV Watch on behalf of Phillips as part of the pre-auction inspection process. 56. Phillips, based upon Bacs inspection and expert opinion, rejected the Rolex Tektite GEV Watch for auction due to significant irregularities which called the watch s authenticity into question. 8
9 Case 1:16-cv LTS Document 1 Filed 07/08/16 Page 9 of Among other irregularities found by Bacs, the Rolex Tektite GEV Watch s inside case back serial number was not present, the outer engravings appeared to be crude, the thickness of the case did not match those of other Tektites from the same time period, and the dial of the watch (from which a watch derives much of its value) is believed [by Bacs] to be completely incorrect and possibly made much more recently than (See March 13, correspondence, attached as Exhibit F). 58. After learning that Dowling had fraudulently misrepresented the quality, value and authenticity of the Rolex Tektite GEV Watch, Bikoff engaged third-party Rolex expert Charles Tearle to inspect the Rolex Submariner Watch to assess its authenticity. 59. Tearle prepared a comprehensive report on the watch. (Tearle Report attached as Exhibit G). 60. In his report, Tearle concluded that he can confirm with certainty that the Submariner s dial is a counterfeit and not of original Rolex production and that it otherwise appears to have been artificially aged to appear older (a forgery). (Id.) 61. Tearle further concluded that the hour and minute hand are not genuine Rolex to the model and that they have been aged to appear older. (Id.) 62. Tearle also concluded that the bezel insert is later production and possibly not Rolex production. (Id.) 63. In sum, Tearle concluded that the watch is a clear and obvious counterfeit made to look original and that it was incorrectly advertised/sold as a very rare genuine Rolex product. (Id.) 9
10 Case 1:16-cv LTS Document 1 Filed 07/08/16 Page 10 of Tearle estimates the Rolex Submariner Watch s value to be no higher than $20,000, compared to the 56, (approximately $94,000 as of the date of the sale, and approximately $82,000 at present) paid by Bikoff to Dowling. (See id.) 65. In sum, Bikoff has been defrauded by Defendants in excess of $700,000 related to the Subject Watches. 66. Upon information and belief, Defendants have made the same or substantially similar fraudulent misrepresentations to other potential and actual purchasers of rare and collectible watches, both in and out of New York. FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION (Common Law Fraud as to the Rolex Submariner Watch) 67. Plaintiff repeats and realleges the allegations stated in paragraphs 1 through 66 of the Complaint as if set forth fully herein. 68. Defendants made representations regarding the Rolex Submariner Watch at or before the time of sale to Plaintiff. 69. Certain of Defendants representations regarding the Rolex Submariner Watch have proven to be false and were false at the time they were made. Watch. 70. Defendants intended to deceive Plaintiff with respect to the Rolex Submariner 71. Plaintiff reasonably relied on Defendants representations regarding the Rolex Submariner Watch, in part due to Defendants standing and reputation in the watch trade. 72. Plaintiff was injured as a result of his reliance upon Defendants representations regarding the Rolex Submariner Watch, in an amount to be determined. 10
11 Case 1:16-cv LTS Document 1 Filed 07/08/16 Page 11 of 14 SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION (Common Law Fraud as to the IWC Bund Watch) 73. Plaintiff repeats and realleges the allegations stated in paragraphs 1 through 66 of the Complaint as if set forth fully herein. 74. Defendants made representations regarding the IWC Bund Watch at or before the time of sale to Plaintiff. 75. Certain of Defendants representations regarding the IWC Bund Watch have proven to be false and were false at the time they were made. 76. Defendants intended to deceive Plaintiff with respect to the IWC Bund Watch. 77. Plaintiff reasonably relied on Defendants representations regarding the IWC Bund Watch, in part due to Defendants standing and reputation in the watch trade. 78. Plaintiff was injured as a result of his reliance upon Defendants representations regarding the IWC Bund Watch, in an amount to be determined. THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION (Common Law Fraud as to the Rolex Tektite GEV Watch) 79. Plaintiff repeats and realleges the allegations stated in paragraphs 1 through 66 of the Complaint as if set forth fully herein. 80. Defendants made representations regarding the Rolex Tektite GEV Watch at or before the time of sale to Plaintiff. 81. Certain of Defendants representations regarding the Rolex Tektite GEV Watch have proven to be false and were false at the time they were made. Watch. 82. Defendants intended to deceive Plaintiff with respect to the Rolex Tektite GEV 11
12 Case 1:16-cv LTS Document 1 Filed 07/08/16 Page 12 of Plaintiff reasonably relied on Defendants representations regarding the Rolex Tektite GEV Watch, in part due to Defendants standing and reputation in the watch trade. 84. Plaintiff was injured as a result of his reliance upon Defendants representations regarding the Rolex Tektite GEV Watch, in an amount to be determined. FOURTH CAUSE OF ACTION (Common Law Fraud as to the Rolex Ludion Watch) 85. Plaintiff repeats and realleges the allegations stated in paragraphs 1 through 66 of the Complaint as if set forth fully herein. 86. Defendants made representations regarding the Rolex Ludion Watch at or before the time of sale to Plaintiff. 87. Certain of Defendants representations regarding the Rolex Ludion Watch have proven to be false and were false at the time they were made. 88. Defendants intended to deceive Plaintiff with respect to the Rolex Ludion Watch. 89. Plaintiff reasonably relied on Defendants representations regarding the Rolex Ludion Watch, in part due to Defendants standing and reputation in the watch trade. 90. Plaintiff was injured as a result of his reliance upon Defendants representations regarding the Rolex Ludion Watch, in an amount to be determined. FIFTH CAUSE OF ACTION (Common Law Fraud as to the Tudor Shayetet Watch) 91. Plaintiff repeats and realleges the allegations stated in paragraphs 1 through 66 of the Complaint as if set forth fully herein. 92. Defendants made representations regarding the Tudor Shayetet Watch at or before the time of sale to Plaintiff. 12
13 Case 1:16-cv LTS Document 1 Filed 07/08/16 Page 13 of Certain of Defendants representations regarding the Tudor Shayetet Watch have proven to be false and were false at the time they were made. Watch. 94. Defendants intended to deceive Plaintiff with respect to the Tudor Shayetet 95. Plaintiff reasonably relied on Defendants representations regarding the Tudor Shayetet Watch, in part due to Defendants standing and reputation in the watch trade. 96. Plaintiff was injured as a result of his reliance upon Defendants representations regarding the Tudor Shayetet Watch, in an amount to be determined. SIXTH CAUSE OF ACTION (Violation of New York General Business Law 349) 97. Plaintiff repeats and realleges the allegations stated in paragraphs 1 through 66 of the Complaint as if set forth fully herein. 98. Defendants conduct of business and representations with respect to each of the Subject Watches was oriented towards consumers, including Plaintiff and other potential consumers in the State of New York. 99. Defendants actions and practices with respect to making misrepresentations about the provenance and authenticity of the Subject Watches were misleading in a material respect Plaintiff was injured as a result of Defendants deceptive actions and practices. 13
14 Case 1:16-cv LTS Document 1 Filed 07/08/16 Page 14 of 14 WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays for judgment to be entered in his favor and against Defendants as follows: A. An award of damages that Plaintiff has sustained due to Defendants fraudulent misrepresentations, with respect to each of the Subject Watches, in an amount to be determined at trial; B. An award of damages that Plaintiff has sustained due to Defendants deceptive acts and practices in violation of New York General Business Law 349, in an amount to be determined at trial, but no less than $700,000; C. An award of punitive damages due to Defendants intentional and egregious fraudulent misrepresentations, with respect to each of the Subject Watches, in an amount to be determined at trial, but no less than $1,000,000; D. An award of attorney s fees incurred by Plaintiff in attempts to recover damages from Defendants, in an amount to be determined; and, E. Such other and further relief as the Court deems just and proper. DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Plaintiff demands trial by jury on all claims and issues so triable. Dated: July 8, 2016 DAVIS & GILBERT LLP By: s/ina B. Scher Ina B. Scher ischer@dglaw.com Daniel A. Dingerson ddingerson@dglaw.com 1740 Broadway New York, NY (212) (212) fax Attorneys for Plaintiff J. Darius Bikoff 14
Case: 3:12-cv-00012-wmc Document #: 1 Filed: 01/05/12 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. Defendants.
Case: 3:12-cv-00012-wmc Document #: 1 Filed: 01/05/12 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN FATWALLET, INC., a Delaware corporation, v. ANDREW CHIU, an individual, and
More informationCase 7:15-cv-08630 Document 1 Filed 11/03/15 Page 1 of 11
Case 7:15-cv-08630 Document 1 Filed 11/03/15 Page 1 of 11 PREET BHARARA United States Attorney Southern District of New York By: ELLEN M. LONDON Assistant United States Attorney 86 Chambers Street, 3 rd
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. INFANT SWIMMING RESEARCH, INC., v. Plaintiff, FAEGRE & BENSON, LLP, MARK FISCHER, JUDY HEUMANN, NORMAN HEUMANN, BOULDER
More informationCase 2:12-cv-07481-SRC-CLW Document 1 Filed 12/06/12 Page 1 of 13 PageID: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Case 2:12-cv-07481-SRC-CLW Document 1 Filed 12/06/12 Page 1 of 13 PageID: 1 Michael D. Camarinos, Esq. Mavroudis, Rizzo & Guarino, LLC Attorneys at Law 690 Kinderkamack Road Oradell, New Jersey 07649 Telephone:
More informationCase 3:08-cv-00920-JAP-JJH Document 1 Filed 02/20/2008 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Case 3:08-cv-00920-JAP-JJH Document 1 Filed 02/20/2008 Page 1 of 13 Laurence M. Rosen, Esq. THE ROSEN LAW FIRM, P.A. 236 Tillou Road South Orange, NJ 07079 Telephone: (973 313-1887 Fax: (973 833-0399 lrosen@rosenlegal.com
More informationTrademark Infringement Complaint. No. Plaintiff, by and through its attorneys,, I. PARTIES
Trademark Infringement Complaint [Name/Address] Attorneys for Plaintiff UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON ALPHA, INC., a Washington corporation, v. Plaintiff, MR, DELTA
More informationCase 1:16-cv-10624 Document 1 Filed 03/31/16 Page 1 of 7
Case 1:16-cv-10624 Document 1 Filed 03/31/16 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, Case No. NATHANIAL D. PONN, Defendant, COMPLAINT
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. ) IATRIC SYSTEMS, INC., ) ) ) Civil Action No. 1:14-cv-13121 ) v. ) ) FAIRWARNING, INC.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS IATRIC SYSTEMS, INC., Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 1:14-cv-13121 v. FAIRWARNING, INC., JURY TRIAL DEMANDED Defendant. COMPLAINT Iatric Systems, Inc.
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SOMEWHERE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Harvey C. Berger (SBN POPE & BERGER 0 West "C" Street, Suite 100 San Diego, California 1 Telephone: (1-1 Facsimile: (1 - Attorneys for Plaintiff PLAINTIFF SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION. Plaintiff, Civil Action No. v. Defendants.
Case 1:13-cv-01817-WSD Document 1 Filed 05/30/13 Page 1 of 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, Civil Action No.
More informationPlaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission"), for its Complaint against PRELIMINARY STATEMENT
MARK K. SCHONFELD (MS-2798) REGIONAL DIRECTOR Attorney for Plaintiff SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Northeast Regional Office 3 World Financial Center New York, New York 1028 1 (212) 336-0077 (Gizzi)
More informationCase 1:05-cv-03493-JGK Document 1 Filed 04/04/05 Page 1 of 6. Plaintiff, : Civ. No. 05cv3493
Case 1:05-cv-03493-JGK Document 1 Filed 04/04/05 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - X ALEJANDRO
More informationCase 1:05-cv-01658-CCB Document 1-1 Filed 06/17/2005 Page 1 of 18
Case 1:05-cv-01658-CCB Document 1-1 Filed 06/17/2005 Page 1 of 18 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND (Northern Division SPRINGFIELD FINANCIAL COMPANY, L.L.C., d/b/a SFC, L.L.C.,
More informationCase 3:15-cv-00592-LAB-BLM Document 1 Filed 03/16/15 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case :-cv-00-lab-blm Document Filed 0// Page of 0 ERIC H. HOLDER, JR. Attorney General VANITA GUPTA Acting Assistant Attorney General STEVEN H. ROSENBAUM Chief, Housing and Civil Enforcement Section ELIZABETH
More informationCase4:15-cv-04219-DMR Document1 Filed09/16/15 Page1 of 11
Case:-cv-0-DMR Document Filed0// Page of MICHAEL G. RHODES () (rhodesmg@cooley.com) California Street, th Floor San Francisco, CA Telephone: Facsimile: BRENDAN J. HUGHES (pro hac vice to be filed) (bhughes@cooley.com)
More informationCase 1:14-cv-12193-WGY Document 1 Filed 05/16/14 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND
Case 1:14-cv-12193-WGY Document 1 Filed 05/16/14 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS PRIVATE BUSINESS JETS, L.L.C. Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. PRVT, Inc. Defendant. COMPLAINT
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE ELEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA. v. CASE NO. COMPLAINT
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE ELEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, and THE OFFICE OF THE STATE ATTORNEY
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION WAYNE WILLIAMS, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, v. Plaintiff, PROTECT SECURITY, LLC. Defendant.
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JEFFERSON COUNTY, ALABAMA BIRMINGHAM DIVISION
ELECTRONICALLY FILED 11/20/2014 2:59 PM 01-CV-2014-904803.00 CIRCUIT COURT OF JEFFERSON COUNTY, ALABAMA ANNE-MARIE ADAMS, CLERK IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JEFFERSON COUNTY, ALABAMA BIRMINGHAM DIVISION Genesis
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. Plaintiff, v. Civil File No. 2:13-cv-01151. Defendant.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. Civil File No. 2:13-cv-01151 MICHAEL R. ENEA, Defendant. COMPLAINT Plaintiff Securities
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case :-cv-00 Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Page ID #: 0 Robert S. Green (SBN ) James Robert Noblin (SBN ) GREEN & NOBLIN, P.C. -and- Telephone: Email: William B. Federman FEDERMAN & SHERWOOD Telephone: Email:
More informationFILED 15 JUL 27 AM 9:22
FILED JUL AM : KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CLERK E-FILED CASE NUMBER: --- KNT JUDITH JORGENSEN, vs. SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON KING COUNTY Plaintiff, JAMES WONG and TYRA WONG, husband and wife creating
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION
Case: 1:15-cv-06605 Document #: 1 Filed: 07/28/15 Page 1 of 17 PageID #:1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ) LINDA J. ROSSBACH, Individually and ) Case No. On
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.:
Case 0:12-cv-60137-XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/26/2012 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, v. Plaintiff, FIRST
More informationCase 3:15-cv-03620-D Document 1 Filed 11/10/15 Page 1 of 9 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Case 3:15-cv-03620-D Document 1 Filed 11/10/15 Page 1 of 9 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, v. Plaintiff, Case
More informationDefendant, by and through his attorneys LENOIR LAW FIRM, answering the complaint of plaintiff, upon information and belief,
CIVIL COURT OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF QUEENS -----------------------------------X Index No. CV-079576-10/QU LR CREDIT 21, LLC ANSWER Plaintiff, Kenneth Chow - against - Defendant. -----------------------------------X
More information4:10-cv-00701-TLW Date Filed 03/18/10 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 12
4:10-cv-00701-TLW Date Filed 03/18/10 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA FLORENCE DIVISION SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff,
More informationCase 3:15-cv-05082-JRC Document 1 Filed 02/09/15 Page 1 of 10
Case :-cv-00-jrc Document Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 0 TEFERI BIKILA, an individual, v. Plaintiff, VIBRAM USA INC., a Delaware corporation, Defendant. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
More informationCase 2:10-cv-01224-JCM-LRL Document 1 Filed 07/22/10 Page 1 of 8
Case :0-cv-0-JCM-LRL Document Filed 0//0 Page of Reno, NV ( -00 Fax ( 0-0 0 Mark R. Thierman, NV# laborlawyer@pacbell.net THIERMAN LAW FIRM, P.C. Reno, Nevada Tel: ( -00 Fax: ( 0-0 David R. Markham, CAL#
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Case 4:10-cv-00706 Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 03/04/10 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION U.S. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION, v. Plaintiff,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY DEFENDANT S ANSWER
Case 1:14-cv-05919-JEI-KMW Document 19 Filed 02/13/15 Page 1 of 11 PageID: 84 Frank L. Corrado, Esquire Attorney ID No. 022221983 BARRY, CORRADO & GRASSI, PC 2700 Pacific Avenue Wildwood, NJ 08260 (609)
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA AMENDED COMPLAINT I. INTRODUCTION
Case 3:08-cv-01939-JMM Document 12 Filed 03/18/2009 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA v. Plaintiff, Docket 3:08-cv-01939-JMM (JUDGE JAMES M. MUNLEY)
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. Bryana Bible, SECOND AMENDED CLASS Plaintiff, Court File No. 12-cv-01236-RHK-JSM INTRODUCTION
CASE 0:12-cv-01236-RHK-JSM Document 50 Filed 04/01/13 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Bryana Bible, SECOND AMENDED CLASS Plaintiff, ACTION COMPLAINT v. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
More informationFraud - Trading Commodity Futures
Case 2:06-cv-00132-KJD-LRL Document 1 Filed 02/03/2006 Page 1 of 10 Louis V. Traeger California State Bar No. 38714 ltraeger@cftc.gov William P. Janulis IL ARDC No. 1326449 Rosemary Hollinger IL ARDC No.
More informationCase 1:11-cv-00273-CMA -CBS Document 1 Filed 02/02/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Case 1:11-cv-00273-CMA -CBS Document 1 Filed 02/02/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. MIKHAIL MATS, Plaintiff, v. DAVID MAZIN;
More informationCase 1:15-cv-04941-LAK Document 1 Filed 06/24/15 Page 1 of 6
Case 1:15-cv-04941-LAK Document 1 Filed 06/24/15 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK OFFICE SPACE SOLUTIONS, INC., Plaintiff, VERIFIED COMPLAINT JASON KNEEN, -against-
More informationCase 1:16-cv-00437-UNA Document 1 Filed 06/14/16 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1
Case 1:16-cv-00437-UNA Document 1 Filed 06/14/16 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, v. ANDREW K. PROCTOR, and
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 9 th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 9 th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA DEAN KUMANCHIK, vs. Plaintiff, Case No.: UNIVERSAL CITY DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS, LTD d/b/a UNIVERSAL STUDIOS, a Florida
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION DEFENDANT S COUNTERCLAIM
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE ) COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) Case No. 3:10-cv-00743 ) Judge Campbell v. ) Magistrate
More informationNo. Plaintiff Kelvin Bledsoe ( Plaintiff ), by his undersigned counsel, brings claims
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK KELVIN BLEDSOE, Plaintiff, v. SAAQIN, INC., No. COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATION OF FAIR LABOR STANDARDS ACT JURY TRIAL DEMANDED Defendant. Plaintiff Kelvin
More informationCase 1:10-cv-00168-JBS -KMW Document 1 Filed 01/12/10 Page 1 of 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Case 1:10-cv-00168-JBS -KMW Document 1 Filed 01/12/10 Page 1 of 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY SMART VENT INC., : : Plaintiff, : CIVIL ACTION NO.: : : : USA FLOODAIR VENTS,
More information-- - ~- --- ---- - IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE SIXTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CARIBOU ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
10/01/99 FRI 11: 25 FAX 208 3328099 14J 003 J,. : l :: < - '- ' I J ~. ~ i_ -- - ~- --- ---- - -- - ---~-- l -- ' 1_, 1 \ 5 ' I f r- ~,! ',! i ; ~- _, ALAN G. LANCE ATIORNEY GENERAL STA TE OF IDAHO MARYE.
More information1. This case involves widespread fraudulent conduct orchestrated by Shkreli from at
Andrew M. Calamari Sanjay Wadhwa Gerald A. Gross Paul G. Gizzi Eric M. Schmidt Attorneys for Plaintiff SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION New York Regional Office 200 Vesey Street, Suite 400 New York,
More informationSTATE OF COLORADO, ex rel. JOHN W. SUTHERS, ATTORNEY GENERAL, Plaintiff,
DISTRICT COURT, DENVER CITY AND COUNTY, COLORADO 1437 Bannock Street Denver, Colorado 80202 STATE OF COLORADO, ex rel. JOHN W. SUTHERS, ATTORNEY GENERAL, Plaintiff, v. LEGAL AID d/b/a LEGAL AID US, a Colorado
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON
ROBERT L. MITCHELL (Admitted in California) MitchellR@sec.gov LLOYD A. FARNHAM (Admitted in California) FarnhamL@sec.gov HELANE L. MORRISON (Admitted in California) 44 Montgomery Street, Suite 2600 San
More informationTHE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION
Case :-cv-0000 Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Page ID #: 0 James H. Holl, III,, CA Bar # jholl@cftc.gov Thomas J. Kelly, pro hac vice pending tkelly@cftc.gov U.S. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION st Street,
More informationSILVERLAW.COM 954-755-4799
Filing # 19686414 Electronically Filed 10/22/2014 02:30:10 PM IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA GENERAL JURISDICTION DIVISION Case No: SKYE BONOW,
More informationHow to Write a Complaint
Federal Pro Se Clinic CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA How to Write a Complaint Step : Pleading Paper Complaints must be written on pleading paper. Pleading paper is letter-sized (8. x paper that has the
More information------------------------------)
/!.'. '"1" ii;,i;;' UNITED STATES DISTRIdi',cb1:1RT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK BRIAN 1. BEATTY, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, vs. Plaintiff, JPMORGAN CHASE & CO., J.P. MORGAN
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY COMPLAINT SUMMARY. 1. Commencing in at least September 2004 and continuing
James H. Holl, III Gretchen L. Lowe Alan I. Edelman U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission 1155 21st St, NW Washington, DC 20581 Attorneys for PLAINTIFF UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW
More informationCase 0:11-cv-60673-XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/30/2011 Page 1 of 13
Case 0:11-cv-60673-XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/30/2011 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, ~ JAMES
More information4:15-cv-00432-RBH Date Filed 01/29/15 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 10
4:15-cv-00432-RBH Date Filed 01/29/15 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA FLORENCE DIVISION Ryan Michael Stinnett, on behalf of himself CASE
More informationCase 3:15-cv-05076 Document 1 Filed 11/05/15 Page 1 of 7
Case :-cv-00 Document Filed /0/ Page of 0 JINA L. CHOI (NY State Bar No. ) choij@sec.gov JOHN S. YUN (State Bar No. 0) yunj@sec.gov STEVEN D. BUCHHOLZ (State Bar No. 0) buchholzs@sec.gov ELENA RO (State
More informationMARK K. SCHONFELD (MS-2798) REGIONAL DIRECTOR
MARK K. SCHONFELD (MS-2798) REGIONAL DIRECTOR Attorney for Plaintiff SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Northeast Regional Office 233 Broadway New York, N.Y. 10279 (646) 428-1650 UNITED STATES DISTRICT
More informationCase: 1:15-cv-00608 Document #: 1 Filed: 01/21/15 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:1
Case: 1:15-cv-00608 Document #: 1 Filed: 01/21/15 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY
More informationCase 3:14-cv-01824-M Document 1 Filed 05/19/14 Page 1 of 9 PageID 1
Case 3:14-cv-01824-M Document 1 Filed 05/19/14 Page 1 of 9 PageID 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION BEST LITTLE PROMOHOUSE IN TEXAS LLC, Plaintiffs,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, 100 F. Street, N.E. Washington, DC 20549 Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. MICHAEL R. DROGIN, CPA 8 Hunt Court,
More informationCase 2:13-cv-00753-DS Document 1 Filed 08/08/13 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION
Case 2:13-cv-00753-DS Document 1 Filed 08/08/13 Page 1 of 13 Thomas M. Melton ( 4999) meltont@sec.gov Daniel J. Wadley (10358) wadleyd@sec.gov Attorneys for Plaintiff Securities & Exchange Commission 15
More informationCase 3:10-cv-02236-DRD Document 31 Filed 05/05/11 Page 1 of 9
Case 3:10-cv-02236-DRD Document 31 Filed 05/05/11 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO DAVID ASHE Plaintiff, CIVIL NO. 10-2236 ( DRD ) vs. DISTRIBUIDORA NORMA,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION PLAINTIFF MCAFEE, INC. S THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION McAFEE, INC. v. Plaintiff, WILMER, CUTLER, PICKERING, HALE AND DORR, L.L.P JURY REQUESTED No. 4:08-cv-160 MHS-DDB Defendant.
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION SMILEBOND SYSTEMS LLC, a Michigan Limited Liability Company, v. Plaintiff, GC AMERICA INC. an Illinois Corporation,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE MOBILE TRANSFORMATION LLC, Plaintiff, v. Civil Case No. A&E TELEVISION NETWORKS, LLC JURY TRIAL DEMANDED Defendant. COMPLAINT Plaintiff
More informationCase 3:11-cv-01252-P Document 1 Filed 06/10/11 Page 1 of 7 PageID 1
Case 3:11-cv-01252-P Document 1 Filed 06/10/11 Page 1 of 7 PageID 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff,
More informationHow To Get A Court Order To Stop A Fraudster From Selling Securities In Idaho
ALAN G. LANCE ATIORNEY GENERAL STATE OF IDAHO MARY E. HUGHES Deputy Attorney General State of Idaho Department of Finance P.O. Box 83720 Boise, Idaho 83720-0031 Telephone: (208) 332-8092 Facsimile: (208)
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR DISABILITY INSURANCE BENEFITS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION FREDERICK FREEMAN, Plaintiff, CASE NO. v. MONARCH LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY; A foreign corporation. Defendant. / COMPLAINT FOR DISABILITY
More informationCase 1:15-cv-23425-MGC Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/10/2015 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.
Case 1:15-cv-23425-MGC Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/10/2015 Page 1 of 11 LESLIE REILLY, an individual, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, v. Plaintiff, CHIPOTLE MEXICAN GRILL,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION, v. Plaintiff, ULRICH GARBE, a/k/a ULI GARBE and SUNSTATE FX INC., a Florida corporation, Defendants.
More informationCase: 1:12-cv-01612 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/06/12 Page 1 of 6 PageID #:1
Case: 1:12-cv-01612 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/06/12 Page 1 of 6 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION GARY HANLEY on behalf of himself and
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 10-60 REAL WEALTH, INC., a corporation, also d/b/a American Financial
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA COMPLAINT
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. No. AMERICAN-AMICABLE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF TEXAS, PIONEER AMERICAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY,
More informationCOMPLAINT. Plaintiff [PLAINTIFF] hereby sues the Defendants, [DEFENDANT #1], [DEFENDANT INTRODUCTION
Form 2:40-2 Complaint Negligence, Motor Vehicle IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE ## JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR [COUNTY], FLORIDA [PLAINTIFF], Plaintiff, CASE NO.: ##-##### ## ## GENERAL JURISDICTION vs. [DEFENDANT
More informationCase 1:10-cv-10494-WGY Document 1 Filed 03/23/10 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
Case 1:10-cv-10494-WGY Document 1 Filed 03/23/10 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS ELECTRONICS N.V. AND PHILIPS SOLID-STATE LIGHTING SOLUTIONS,
More informationCase 3:14-cv-00671-HU Document 1 Filed 04/23/14 Page 1 of 12 Page ID#: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Case 3:14-cv-00671-HU Document 1 Filed 04/23/14 Page 1 of 12 Page ID#: 1 OSB#013943 sean.riddell@live.com Attorney At Law 4411 NE Tillamook St Portland, OR 97140 971-219-8453 Attorney for Plaintiff IN
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE
Case :-cv-00-tsz Document Filed 0// Page of 0 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 0 EVAN CONKLIN PLUMBING AND HEATING INC., a Washington corporation d/b/a SEATTLE PLUMBING
More informationPlaintiff, : X. Nature of the Action. 1. This is an action for breach of a settlement agreement, retaliation
Case 1:06-cv-03834-JGK-THK Document 17 Filed 12/20/2006 Page 1 of 16 Thomas J. Luz (TL-4665) PEARCE & LUZ LLP Attorneys for Plaintiff Peter Lindner 1500 Broadway, 21 st Floor New York, New York 10036 (212)
More informationCase No.: CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT FOR BREACH OF IMPLIED WARRANTY OF WORKMANSHIP AND HABITABILITY. Plaintiffs,
1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 Stephen L. Weber, Esq. (AZ SBN 01) Michael J. White, Esq. (AZ SBN 01) James W. Fleming, Esq. (AZ SBN 0) KASDAN SIMONDS WEBER & VAUGHAN LLP 00 N. Central Ave., Suite 0 Phoenix, AZ 0 E-Mail:
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DMSION. Defendant. COMPLAINT FOR CIVIL PENALTY
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DMSION ldrle SEP 2 8 1: 3 =&&: b - 4 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, v. Plaintiff, Civil Action File No. GIOACCHINO DE CHIRICO,
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF BALDWIN COUNTY, ALABAMA * *
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF BALDWIN COUNTY, ALABAMA vs. Plaintiffs, CIVIL ACTION NUMBER CV-99-792 Defendants. COMPLAINT 1. Plaintiffs, Bryan K. Bunten and Lisa Bunten, are over the age of nineteen (19) years
More informationCase 2:15-cv-01429 Document 1 Filed 09/04/15 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 8 SEATTLE DIVISION
Case :-cv-0 Document Filed 0/0/ Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON SEATTLE DIVISION SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Case No. Plaintiff, COMPLAINT v. SUMMIT ASSET STRATEGIES
More informationCase 2:13-cv-04245-JS-AKT Document 1 Filed 07/26/13 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Case No.
Case 2:13-cv-04245-JS-AKT Document 1 Filed 07/26/13 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ANA MARLEN MEMBRENO JIMENEZ, Plaintiff, - versus - WILLIAM DEGEL and
More informationCOMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND. of police reports in bad faith. Plaintiff claims that Defendants acted willfully, wantonly and in
Weld County, Colorado, District Court, 901 9 th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 970.351.7300 Plaintiff: vs. Defendants: JENNIFER BELL, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, BRADLEY PETROLEUM,
More informationPlaintiff, by and through its attorneys, The Law Firm of Michael Levine, P.C.,
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - X RxUSA WHOLESALE, INC., Plaintiff, : Docket No. 06 CV
More informationCase 2:15-cv-03432-DDP-AGR Document 1 Filed 05/07/15 Page 1 of 15 Page ID #:1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case :-cv-0-ddp-agr Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Page ID #: 0 Matthew T. Walsh, Esq. (Bar No. ) CARROLL, McNULTY & KULL LLC 00 North Riverside Plaza, Suite 00 Chicago, Illinois 00 Telephone: () 00-000 Facsimile:
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT THE PARTIES
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE AEROSCOUT, LTD. and AEROSCOUT, INC., v. CENTRAK INC., Plaintiffs, Defendant. C.A. No. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED COMPLAINT Plaintiffs AeroScout,
More informationCOURT USE ONLY COMPLAINT
DISTRICT COURT, CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, COLORADO 1437 Bannock Street, Room 256 Denver, Colorado 80202 STATE OF COLORADO ex rel. John W. Suthers, Attorney General, Plaintiff, v. Jennifer Proffitt-Payne,
More informationAttorney for Plaintiff SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES COUNTY CENTRAL DISTRICT STANLEY MOSK COURTHOUSE
VACHON LAW FIRM Michael R. Vachon, Esq. (SBN ) 0 Via Del Campo, Suite San Diego, California Tel.: () -0 Fax: () - Attorney for Plaintiff SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES COUNTY CENTRAL
More informationCase 1:16-cv-00320-CBA-PK Document 1 Filed 01/21/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Case 116-cv-00320-CBA-PK Document 1 Filed 01/21/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID # 1 Frank J. Martinez (FJM-2149) THE MARTINEZ GROUP PLLC 55 Washington Street, Suite 253-C Brooklyn, New York 11201 718.797.2341 Telephone
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION. In Re: Bankruptcy No. 09-26549. (Chapter 11) Filed Electronically
Document Page 1 of 16 Steven C. Tycksen, #3300 Chad Shattuck, #9345 TYCKSEN & SHATTUCK, L.C. 12401 South 450 East, Unit E1 Draper, Utah 84020 Telephone: 801-748-4081 Facsimile: 801-748-4087 steve@tyshlaw.com
More informationORDER. Objections of Defendants Laurence A. Mester ( Mester ) and Villa Development, LLC
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL TRIAL DIVISION : VILLAR MANAGEMENT, LLC, : OCTOBER TERM 2007 Plaintiff, : : No. 1319 v. : : VILLA DEVELOPMENT,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) Civil No. CONTROLSCAN, INC., ) a corporation, ) ) Defendant. ) ) COMPLAINT
More information9:10-cv-01756-MBS Date Filed 07/06/10 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA INTRODUCTION
9:10-cv-01756-MBS Date Filed 07/06/10 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA CHARLESTON xxxxxxxxxxxdivision BEAUFORT ) Jonathon Rowles, individually
More informationCase 1:15-cv-05107 Document 1 Filed 06/30/15 Page 1 of 21
Case 1:15-cv-05107 Document 1 Filed 06/30/15 Page 1 of 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -----------------------------------------------------------------------x PEGGY CABRERA,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) Civil Action No. Ex rel. ) ) FILED IN CAMERA AND Plaintiff, ) UNDER SEAL ) vs. ) FALSE CLAIMS ACT ) MEDICAID FRAUD, ), and ) JURY
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION JPM NETWORKS, LLC, ) d/b/a KWIKBOOST ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. ) 3:14-cv-1507 JCM FIRST VENTURE, LLC )
More information- "'. --, ,-~ ') " UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA. Federal Trade Commission,
- "'. --, -.:li ') " :::; ),-~ --' DA VlD SHONKA Acting General Counsel 2 BARBARA Y.K. CHUN, Cal. BarNo. 0 3 JOHN D. JACOBS, Cal. Bar No. 1344 Federal Trade Commission 4 Wilshire Blvd., Ste. 00 Los Angeles,
More informationCase 1:15-cv-00179-RDB Document 1 Filed 01/22/15 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE DIVISION
Case 1:15-cv-00179-RDB Document 1 Filed 01/22/15 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE DIVISION CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU 1700 G Street NW Washington,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE ) SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ) COMMISSION, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. Civil-04-475 ) MAURICE L. AREL, ) ) Defendant. ) ) COMPLAINT Plaintiff Securities
More informationCase 8:13-cv-00868-SDM-AEP Document 1 Filed 04/05/13 Page 1 of 19 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.
Case 8:13-cv-00868-SDM-AEP Document 1 Filed 04/05/13 Page 1 of 19 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. )
More informationCAUSE NO. PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL PETITION. Greg Abbott, and complains of OLD UNITED LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY ( Defendant ), and I.
CAUSE NO. STATE OF TEXAS, Plaintiff, v. OLD UNITED LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, TEXAS JUDICIAL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL PETITION TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE
More informationCase 6:14-cv-01521-AA Document 14 Filed 01/19/15 Page 1 of 5
Case 6:14-cv-01521-AA Document 14 Filed 01/19/15 Page 1 of 5 Portland, OR 97210-3408 Telephone: (503 299-6116 Facsimile: (503 299-6106 E-mail: rsw@miller-wagner.com sml@miller-wagner.com Of Attorneys for
More information