STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PUNJAB, DAKSHIN MARG, SECTOR 37-A, CHANDIGARH. First Appeal No.359 of 2007
|
|
- Lambert Newton
- 7 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PUNJAB, DAKSHIN MARG, SECTOR 37-A, CHANDIGARH. First Appeal No.359 of 2007 Date of institution : Date of decision : The Ferozepur Primary Co-operative Agriculture Development Bank Ltd, Ferozepur through its Manager. Versus Appellants 1. Jugraj Singh son of Shri Maghar Singh, resident of Talwandi Bhai, Tehsil & District Ferozepur. 2. Gurjeet Engineering Works, Nava Bus Stand, Talwandi Bhai, District Ferozepur through Amarjeet Singh Proprietor. Before:- Present:- Respondents First Appeal against the order dated passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Ferozepur. Hon ble Mr.Justice S.N.Aggarwal, President. Sh.Baldev Singh Sekhon, Member For the appellants : Sh.D.K.Kaushal, Advocate. For respondent no.1 : Sh.N.K.Manchanda, Advocate. For respondent No.2 : Ex-parte. BALDEV SINGH SEKHON, MEMBER This order will dispose of two appeals namely FA No. 359 of 2007 (The Ferozepur Primary Co-operative Agriculture Development Bank Ltd. VS. Jugraj Singh and others) and FA No. 374 of 2007 (Surinder Kumar Vs. Jugraj Singh). These appeals are directed against the same impugned order dated passed by District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Ferozepur (in short District Forum ). 2. The facts have been taken from FA No. 359 of 2007 and parties have been referred to as per the status in this appeal. 3. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that Sh. Jugraj Singh complainant-respondent No. 1 (herein after called the respondent ) is a
2 First Appeal No. 359 of small Farmer having land measuring 37 kanals 16 marlas situated at Talwandi Bhai and was earning his livelihood through this land. The respondent No. 1 wanted to supplement his income. So he intended to buy a tube well boring machine for using with the help of his sons and for that purpose, he approached the appellant bank for raising loan for the boring machine. The appellants agreed to the proposal and the respondent obtained a quotation for Rs. 5,50,000/- from respondent No. 2 for the purchase of boring machine. He paid Rs. 50,000/- to the respondent No. 2 and applied for loan of Rs. 5 lacs to the appellants. 4. It was pleaded that the respondent was made to sign on number of papers by the appellants and it was assured by the appellant bank that the respondent can take the delivery of the machine in the month of April, 2005 and in the meantime the necessary loan would also be sanctioned. 5. It was further pleaded that in the month of April, 2005 the respondent approached the respondent No. 2 to take the delivery of the machine but he was told that since the machine of best quality was not ready, he was asked to come again after 15 days. The respondent enquired about the loan from the appellants but it was told that the loan would be sanctioned after the manufacturing of the machine, otherwise the respondent would be burdened with un-necessary interest. Thereafter, the respondent visited respondent No. 2 a number of times but in the month of May, 2005 it was told that the season of the boring machine had expired so the respondent can take delivery in the month of November, In the month of November, 2005 again respondent went to respondent No. 2 but the matter was again kept on lingering pleading that the best quality of machine was not ready. Ultimately, in the month of January, 2006 the respondent asked respondent No. 2 to return the amount of Rs. 50,000/- if he cannot manufacture the machine. The respondent No. 2 has neither returned the amount nor delivered the machine to the respondent.
3 First Appeal No. 359 of It was further pleaded that an undated notice was sent by appellants in which the respondent was asked to pay an amount of Rs.1.50 lacs on account of three un paid installments towards the loan sanctioned by the appellants. The respondent immediately approached the appellants and told that the respondent No. 2 had not delivered the machine till today and therefore, on what account the respondent was required to pay the installments. But the appellants informed the respondent that the loan to the tune of Rs. 5 lacs had already been sanctioned by mortgaging the land of respondent and the appellants had already sent a cheque No dated to the respondent No. 2. The respondent inquired how the appellants sanctioned the loan without verifying the delivery of the boring machine. It was further pleaded that the appellants and respondent No. 2 had joined hands with each other to cheat and defraud the respondent which amounted to unfair trade practice and deficiency in service. Hence the complaint before the District Forum for directing respondent to refund Rs.50,000/- with interest and compensation and further directing the appellants not to recover the loan amount. 7. Inspite of service of notice, the respondent No. 2 did not appear before the Ld. District Forum and therefore was proceeded against exparte. 8. The appellants filed a written statement in which it was pleaded that a cheque dated bearing No of Rs. 5,00,000/- lacs was given to the respondent NO. 2 and before issuing of the said cheque a bill of Rs. 5,00,000/- was submitted by the respondent to the appellant Bank on wherein it was agreed that boring machine will be delivered by respondent No.2 by It was further pleaded that on inspection of the file, it was found that respondent had already given an application intimating that he had not
4 First Appeal No. 359 of received the boring machine. A sum of Rs. 5 lacs as principal amount and Rs. 62,384/- as interest was payable by the respondent on It was further stated that the loan was advanced to the respondent when he mortgaged the land in favour of the appellant bank for the purpose of raising the loan. A quotation was submitted by the respondent No. 2 through the respondent whereby he agreed to deliver the machine by It was further pleaded that the amount was paid to the respondent No. 2 through cheque as per the instructions of the respondent to the appellants and therefore, the appellant bank is entitled to recover the amount advanced by it. Even the receipt of the cheque was signed / witnessed by respondent. 12. Parties filed their respective evidence by way of affidavits and documents. 13. Learned District Forum, after going through the pleadings of the parties and evidence on record, accepted the complaint of the complainant-respondent with Rs. 5000/- as cost against respondent No. 2, who was directed to refund Rs. 50,000/- to the complainant-respondent with 12% per annum from the date of its deposit till realization. A compensation of Rs. 25,000/- was also awarded. The complaint was also accepted against the appellants with Rs. 5,000/- as cost. The appellants were further directed not to recover any amount from the complainant-respondent as the payment of Rs. 5 lacs was not made by it to the respondent No. 2 under instruction of the complainant-respondent. The appellants were further directed to issue no due certificate to the complainant-respondent. 14. Hence the appeal by the appellants. 15. Learned counsel for the appellants submitted that the respondent applied for loan of Rs.5 lacs for purchase of tubewell boring machine and he produced a bill from respondent No.2 namely Gurjit Engineering
5 First Appeal No. 359 of Works, Nawa Bus Stand, Talwandi Bhai, District Ferozepur showing estimated value of machine and respondent introduced the said company to the appellant himself. The respondent also submitted a project report and mortgaged his land before the Sub Registrar in favour of the appellant bank and promised to repay the loan advanced by the bank within a period of ten years on installments. It was further submitted that the respondent Jugraj Singh duly signed the receipt of taking loan of Rs.5 lacs from the appellant bank. The said loan for the machinery had been duly paid to respondent No.2 at the instance of respondent No.1 and the third party receipt was duly signed by respondent. It was clear that the payment of Rs.5 lac made to respondent No.2 was at the specific instructions of respondent. It was further submitted that the learned District Forum has wrongly held that payment of Rs.5 lac was not made to respondent No.2 under instructions of complainant / respondent and that the amount should not be recovered from the respondent. Acceptance of the appeal was prayed. 16. Learned counsel for the respondent submitted that there is no merit in the appeal and same be dismissed. 17. Respondent No.2 did not appear before this Commission inspite of notice. Hence he was proceeded against ex-parte. 18. Submissions have been considered. Record has been perused. 19. The complainant / respondent has contended that respondent No.2 has not supplied boring machine to him for which the loan was applied by the respondent, but the appellants have strongly contended that the loan was advanced to the respondent against the specific bill / estimate submitted by the respondent himself. The appellants have placed on record the loan papers and estimate submitted by respondent No.2 and further placed on record the bill No.78 dated (page 53 of District Forum file) issued by respondent No.2, perusal of which shows that costs of boring machine has been mentioned as Rs.5,50,000/- and an amount of
6 First Appeal No. 359 of Rs.50,000/- has also been shown as advance money paid by respondent to respondent No.2. The promised date of supply of boring machine has been mentioned by respondent No.2 as The appellants have also placed on record receipt for Rs.5 lacs received by respondent No.2 on vide cheque No (page 51 of trial court file). This third party receipt has also been jointly signed by respondent No.2 and respondent No.1 and witnessed by one Sh.Gurdev Singh son of Udham Singh and Sh.Kuldeep Singh son of Sh.Kulwant Singh. The appellants have further placed on record mortgage deed executed by respondent in favour of appellant bank before availing the loan. They have also placed on record the affidavit submitted by respondent in which he has deposed that he had applied for loan of Rs.5 lacs and has undertaken to utilize the loan for the purpose for which it had been sanctioned and he has also undertaken to the repayment of loan in installment to the bank well in time. The appellants have also placed on record Form Authority Letter (Annexure Form A) dated submitted by the respondent authorizing appellants to make payment of loan amount to respondent No.2 on behalf of respondent, which bears signature of the respondent and same is also witnessed by Sh.Gurdev Singh and Sh.Kuldeep Singh. 20. The appellants have placed on record a letter (page 49 of the District Forum filed) by respondent informing the appellants about non delivery of machine, in which it has been admitted by him that the cheque for loan was delivered to M/s. Gurjit Engineering Works (respondent No.2) and therefore necessary legal action be initiated against him for non delivery of boring machine. 21. From the above documents, it is evident that the loan was advanced by the appellants to the complainant / respondent and payment of Rs.5 lacs was made to respondent No.2 on vide cheque No against third party receipt as per instructions of the respondent. It is also evident that the machinery was not delivered by
7 First Appeal No. 359 of respondent No.2 to respondent No.1, for which respondent No.2 is directly responsible. Since the payment of loan amount was made to respondent No.2 as per the specific instructions issued by respondent, the appellants are authorized to recover the loan amount as per terms and conditions of the loan agreement. Respondent No.2 is directly responsible for non delivery of machine inspite of receipt of Rs.5,50,000/-. He has deliberately not appeared before the District Forum or this Commission in spite of notice having been served to him. 22. Accordingly, the appeal of the appellant is accepted and order dated passed by the District Forum qua the appellants is set aside. The appellants are entitled to recover the loan amount from the respondent / complainant. 23. The appellants have deposited Rs.25,000/- in this Commission at the time of filing of appeal. This amount along with interest, if any, be refunded to the appellants after expiry of 45 days. F.A.No.374 of In view of above discussion and order passed in F.A.No.359 of 2007, this appeal is also accepted and impugned order dated qua the appellant is set aside. 25. The arguments in this case were heard on and the order was reserved. Now parties be communicated about the same. 26. The appeal could not be decided within the statutory period due to heavy pendency of court cases. (JUSTICE S.N. AGGARWAL) PRESIDENT April 02, 2012 Davinder (BALDEV SINGH SEKHON) MEMBER
2 nd Appeal First Appeal No. 295 of 2013
2 nd Additional Bench STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PUNJAB DAKSHIN MARG, SECTOR 37-A, CHANDIGARH First Appeal No. 54 of 2013 Date of institution: 17.1.2013 Date of Decision: 20.1.2015 National
More informationThis is an appeal filed by the appellant/complainant-avtar. Singh(hereinafter called the appellant ) against the order dated 2.4.
2 nd Bench STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PUNJAB, SECTOR 37-A, DAKSHIN MARG, CHANDIGARH First Appeal No. 735 of 2008 Date of institution : 17.7.2008 Date of Decision : 31.1.2013 Avtar Singh
More informationSTATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PUNJAB, S.C.O. NO. 3009-10, SECTOR 22-D, CHANDIGARH. First Appeal No.285 of 2003
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PUNJAB, S.C.O. NO. 3009-10, SECTOR 22-D, CHANDIGARH. First Appeal No.285 of 2003 1. Kasturi Lal Khurana, son of Ram Lal, Date of institution : 11.3.2003 Date
More informationConsumer Complaint No. 74 of 2009. Tajinder Kumar Taneja, S/o Late Sh. Ram Saran Dass, Opposite State
2 nd Additional Bench STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PUNJAB DAKSHIN MARG, SECTOR 37-A, CHANDIGARH Consumer Complaint No. 74 of 2009 Date of institution: 22.9.2009 Date of Decision: 1.11.2013
More informationH.P. STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, SHIMLA. First Appeal No: 256/2014. Date of Presentation: 17.07.2014. Date of Decision: 17.11.2014.
H.P. STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, SHIMLA. First Appeal No: 256/2014. Date of Presentation: 17.07.2014. Date of Decision: 17.11.2014. 1. Bajaj Allianz Life Insurance Company Limited, Regd.
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL NO. 10582 OF 2013 (arising out of SLP(C)No.27949 of 2012) VERSUS
-1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 10582 OF 2013 (arising out of SLP(C)No.27949 of 2012) SAROJ SUNDER SINGH & ORS. VERSUS APPELLANTS RESPONDENTS J
More informationIN THE COURT OF DISTRICT JUDGE, NAGAON.
IN THE COURT OF DISTRICT JUDGE, NAGAON. PRESENT : Smti. H. D. Bhuyan, District Judge, Nagaon. MONEY APPEAL NO. 1 OF 2011 This Money Appeal is directed against the Order & Judgment and decree dated 16-12-2010
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.9030 OF 2013 (@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO.
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.9030 OF 2013 (@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 18323 OF 2008) STATE OF HARYANA & OTHERS APPELLANTS VERSUS NAVIR
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REPORTABLE CIVIL APPEAL NO.8463 OF 2014 (Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.26308 of 2013) Narinder Singh Appellant (s) Versus New
More informationFIRST APPEAL NO. 88 / 2009. 1. Zonal Manager, Life Insurance Corporation of India Mall Road, Kanpur
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION UTTARAKHAND DEHRADUN FIRST APPEAL NO. 88 / 2009 1. Zonal Manager, Life Insurance Corporation of India Mall Road, Kanpur 2. Senior Divisional Manager, Life Insurance
More information2 nd Bench STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PUNJAB SCO NO.3009-12, SECTOR 22-D, CHANDIGARH.
2 nd Bench STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PUNJAB SCO NO.3009-12, SECTOR 22-D, CHANDIGARH. First Appeal No.326 of 2004. Date of Institution: 24.03.2004. Date of Decision: 29.09.2010. Charanjit
More informationN.I. case No. 15/09 U/S 138 of NI Act
1 IN THE COURT OF THE ADDL. CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, BARPETA. N.I. case No. 15/09 U/S 138 of NI Act Present : Md. Abdul Hakim, M.A.,LL.B., Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Barpeta. Narayan Nath --- Complainant
More informationappellant ) against the order dated 29.07.2003 of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Patiala (in short, the District Forum ), by
2 nd Bench STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PUNJAB SCO NO.3009-12, SECTOR 22-D, CHANDIGARH. First Appeal No.1206 of 2003 Date of Institution: 15.09.2003. Date of Decision: 19.08.2010. Sucheta
More informationHEADING OF JUDGMENT IN CONSUMER CASES : BEFORE THE PRESIDENT, DISTRICT CONSUMER FORUM, GOLAGHAT. Consumer Protection Case No. 2/2010.
HEADING OF JUDGMENT IN CONSUMER CASES : BEFORE THE PRESIDENT, DISTRICT CONSUMER FORUM, Consumer Protection Case No. 2/2010. Mrs. Manju Gohain.... Complainant. Vs. 1. The General Manager, Bajaj Allianz
More informationA. ARUL (Petitioner) vs. 1. STATE OF TAMIL NADU. rep. by its Secretary Public Works Department Secretariat Fort St. George Chennai
A. ARUL (Petitioner) vs. 1. STATE OF TAMIL NADU rep. by its Secretary Secretariat Fort St. George Chennai 2. THE CHIEF ENGINEER Chepauk Chennai-600 005 3. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER Building Construction and
More informationMONEY SUIT NO. 249/2000
HIGH COURT FORM NO. (J) 2. HEADING OF JUDGMENT IN ORIGINAL SUIT DISTRICT : KAMRUP. IN THE COURT OF CIVIL JUDGE NO. 3, KAMRUP, GUWAHATI. PRESENT : SHRI S.N. SARMA, LLM,, AJS, Civil Judge No. 3, Kamrup,
More informationCENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Appeal No. CIC/AT/A/2009/00422 dated 18-4-2009 Right to Information Act 2005 Section 19
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Appeal No. CIC/AT/A/2009/00422 dated 18-4-2009 Right to Information Act 2005 Section 19 Appellant: Respondent: Shri Suraj Prakash, United India Insurance Co. Decision Announced
More informationHIGH COURT FORM (J) 3 HEADING OF JUDGEMENT IN APPEAL. Dist. Cachar. In the Court of Addl. District Judge, Cachar, Silchar.
Page 1 HIGH COURT FORM (J) 3 HEADING OF JUDGEMENT IN APPEAL. Dist. Cachar. In the Court of Addl. District Judge, Cachar, Silchar. Present :- Shri T.K.Bhattacharjee, A.J.S. Addl. District Judge, Cachar,Silchar.
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. Crl.M.C.1682/2008 & Crl.M.A.Nos. 6167/2008 & 12878/2008. Date of reserve : 21.04.2009
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : Negotiable Instruments Act Crl.M.C.1682/2008 & Crl.M.A.Nos. 6167/2008 & 12878/2008 Date of reserve : 21.04.2009 Date of decision: 24.04.2009 M/s. Vijay
More informationDistrict : Lakhimpur. IN THE COURT OF DISTRICT JUDGE : LAKHIMPUR : AT NORTH LAKHIMPUR.
1 High Court Form No.(J)3. HEADING OF JUDGMENT IN THE APPEAL. District : Lakhimpur. IN THE COURT OF DISTRICT JUDGE : LAKHIMPUR : AT NORTH LAKHIMPUR. PRESENT : Sri A.K.Das, District Judge, Lakhimpur, North
More informationHIGH COURT FORM NO.(J) 2. HEADING OF JUDGMENT ON ORIGINAL APPEAL. IN THE COURT OF THE DISTRICT JUDGE, SONITPUR AT TEZPUR. MONEY APPEAL NO.
Page 1 of 9 District : Sonitpur. HIGH COURT FORM NO.(J) 2. HEADING OF JUDGMENT ON ORIGINAL APPEAL. IN THE COURT OF THE DISTRICT JUDGE, SONITPUR AT TEZPUR. Present : Sri M.K. Kalita, AJS, District Judge,
More informationFIRST ADDITIONAL BENCH STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PUNJAB SECTOR 37-A, DAKSHIN MARG, CHANDIGARH.
FIRST ADDITIONAL BENCH STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PUNJAB SECTOR 37-A, DAKSHIN MARG, CHANDIGARH. First Appeal No.16 of 2009. Date of Institution: 06.01.2009. Date of Decision: 26.03.2013.
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 3269-3270 OF 2007 UNITED INDIA INSURANCE & ANR. ETC...
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 3269-3270 OF 2007 MONTFORD BROTHERS OF ST. GABRIEL & ANR.... APPELLANTS VS. UNITED INDIA INSURANCE & ANR. ETC....
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc. M No. 53424 of 2007 (O&M) Date of Decision: August 12, 2013
Crl. Misc. M No. 53424 of 2007 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. M No. 53424 of 2007 (O&M) Date of Decision: August 12, 2013 Central Bank of India and others...petitioners
More informationRULES OF THE TAX APPEAL COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I
RULES OF THE TAX APPEAL COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I (SCRU-13-0005988) Adopted and Promulgated by the Supreme Court of the State of Hawai i As amended March 6, 1981 Effective March 6, 1981 With Further
More informationWhat is taxation of costs?
This leaflet is designed to provide you with a brief outline of the practice and procedure of the High Court and the District Court on taxation of costs in civil proceedings. You should read Order 62 of
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : RAILWAY CLAIMS TRIBUNAL ACT,1987 FAO No. 507/2011 DATE OF DECISION : 8th January, 2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : RAILWAY CLAIMS TRIBUNAL ACT,1987 FAO No. 507/2011 DATE OF DECISION : 8th January, 2014 GURCHARAN SINGH & ORS. Through: Mr. N.K. Gupta, Advocate versus
More informationCUSTOMER COMPENSATION POLICY
CUSTOMER COMPENSATION POLICY 1.1. 1.2. 1.3. 1.4. 1.4.1. 1.4.2. 1.4.3. 1.4.4. This Compensation Policy of the Bank is designed to cover all the incidences where the Bank is liable to make good any financial
More informationv/s. Western India Art Litho Works Pvt. Ltd.
1 cp1096.2000 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION COMPANY PETITION NO. 1096 of 2000 Solar Printing Inks v/s. Western India Art Litho Works Pvt. Ltd....Petitioner...Respondent
More information2 nd Bench STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PUNJAB SECTOR 37-A, DAKSHIN MARG, CHANDIGARH.
2 nd Bench STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PUNJAB SECTOR 37-A, DAKSHIN MARG, CHANDIGARH. First Appeal No.1585 of 2007. Date of Institution: 07.12.2007. Date of Decision: 19.09.2012. 1. Shri
More informationTDS not deductible on freight chargers shown separately in Goods Purchase Bill
TDS not deductible on freight chargers shown separately in Goods Purchase Bill CIT v. Bhagwati Steels - (Punjab & Haryana HC) - In the instant case, it was held that the payment of freight charges by the
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.8155 OF 2014
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.8155 OF 2014 Dhropadabai and Others Appellant(s) Versus M/s. Technocraft Toolings Respondent(s) J U D G M E N T Dipak
More informationOn behalf of the Respondents, the following were present in person:
Central Information Commission, New Delhi File No. File No. CIC/SH/A/2015/002332 File No. CIC/SH/C/2015/000462 Right to Information Act 2005 Under Section (18)/ (19) Date of hearing : 28th March 2016 Date
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No. 1940 of 2007 ------- Smt. Kavilash Devi, wife of late Lajit Mahto, resident of village Pipradih, P.O and P.S. Barkagaon, District Hazaribagh.... Petitioner
More informationIN THE COURT OF MEMBER, M.A.C.T. ::: MORIGAON. M.A.C Case No. 105/2008 U/S 166 M.V. Act
IN THE COURT OF MEMBER, M.A.C.T. ::: MORIGAON M.A.C Case No. 105/2008 U/S 166 M.V. Act Present :- Md. I. Hussain Member, M.A.C.T., Morigaon. Petitioner :- Md. Billal Ali, Vs Opp. Party :- 1. Md. Ashif
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. SUBJECT : Workmen's Compensation Act. Date of Decision : December 03, 2008. WP(C) No.6406 of 2007.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : Workmen's Compensation Act Date of Decision : December 03, 2008 WP(C) No.6406 of 2007 Sh. Jawahar Singh. Petitioner Through : Mr. Pradeep Kumar Arya, Advocate
More informationIN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AMRITSAR BENCH, AMRITSAR. [Coram: Pramod Kumar AM and A.D. Jain JM]
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AMRITSAR BENCH, AMRITSAR [Coram: Pramod Kumar AM and A.D. Jain JM] I.T.A. No.90 /Asr/2015 Page 1 of 7 I.T.A. No.90/Asr /2015 Assessment year: 2013-14 Sibia Healthcare
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (The High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Mizoram & Arunachal Pradesh)
1 IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (The High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Mizoram & Arunachal Pradesh) RSA 24/2004 MC 1482/04 1. Shri Manik Chakraborty Son of Late Bijoy Chakraborty, R/o Rangapara Town, Ward No.
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : COMPANIES ACT, 1956 Reserved on: 25th November, 2013 Date of Decision:21st January, 2014 CO. APPL. 1261/2007 IN CO. PET. 354/2001 REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL Judgment delivered on: 8th January, 2014 MAC.APP.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL Judgment delivered on: 8th January, 2014 MAC.APP. 819/2013 UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO LTD. Represented by: Mr. L.K. Tyagi,
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NARAYANA SWAMY MFA NO. 2293/2010 (MV)
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 28 TH DAY OF JUNE 2012 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NARAYANA SWAMY BETWEEN MFA NO. 2293/2010 (MV) NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED DO-3,
More informationProcedure for consumer complaint at a Glance
Procedure for consumer complaint at a Glance 1.0 One may send a notice to the opposite party mentioning a time limit to settle the grievance though it is not compulsory. 2.0 Prepare a complaint with the
More informationSECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA CORAM: T C NAIR, WHOLE TIME MEMBER
WTM/TCN/01 /CFD/ APRIL /08 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA CORAM: T C NAIR, WHOLE TIME MEMBER IN THE MATTER OF PUBLIC OFFER FOR ACQUISITION OF 103,88,445 OF THE EQUITY SHARE CAPITAL OF JAGATJIT
More informationBench: A Bhangale IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR, NAGPUR. CRIMINAL APPEAL NO: 467 /2009. Smt.Nanda w/o Dharam Nandanwar
Bench: A Bhangale 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR, NAGPUR. CRIMINAL APPEAL NO: 467 /2009 Smt.Nanda w/o Dharam Nandanwar Aged about 42 years, occu: Business Represented through
More informationIN THE COURT OF THE MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL, GOLAGHAT
IN THE COURT OF THE MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL, GOLAGHAT PRESENT: Smti. I. Barman, A.J.S. Member, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Golaghat, Assam MAC CASE NO. 48/2010 (Under Section 166of the MV Act)
More informationDISTRICT: DARRANG IN THE COURT OF THE MEMBER, MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL::DARRANG::MANGALDAI (CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION)
DISTRICT: DARRANG IN THE COURT OF THE MEMBER, MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL::DARRANG::MANGALDAI (CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION) Name of Parties: Ref: MAC Case No.74 of 2011 1. Mustt. Jamina Khatun----------------------------------------Claimant
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM: NAGALAND:: MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) CRL.PET. No.173/2010
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM: NAGALAND:: MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) CRL.PET. No.173/2010 1. TATA TELESERVICES LTD. A COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956 HAVING ITS
More informationCOURT OF MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL KARMUP :: GUWAHATI. MAC Case Nos. 2446/09 & 2447/09. 1 Sri Arun Das 2 Sri Bipul Das (2447/09) Claimants - VS -
1 COURT OF MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL KARMUP :: GUWAHATI Present :- Paran Kumar Phukan Member, MACT Kamrup, Guwahati MAC Case Nos. 2446/09 & 2447/09 1 Smti Jamini Das 2 Sri Ambika Kurmi @ Das (2446/09)
More informationPatna High Court. Shridhar Singh vs Manu Singh on 5 September, 2007. Author: S Hussain Bench: S Hussain JUDGMENT S.N. Hussain, J.
Patna High Court Shridhar Singh vs Manu Singh on 5 September, 2007 Author: S Hussain Bench: S Hussain JUDGMENT S.N. Hussain, J. 1. This Second Appeal has been filed by the plaintiff against the Judgment
More informationCR CASE NO: 346/ 2012 U/S 23/24 Contract Labour Act STATE VERSUS SRI A.MUNI SEKHAR...ACCUSED
DISTRICT: JORHAT IN THE COURT OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE (FIRST CLASS), JORHAT CR CASE NO: 346/ 2012 U/S 23/24 Contract Labour Act STATE VERSUS SRI A.MUNI SEKHAR...ACCUSED PRESENT : SMTI. B. GOGOI, JUDICIAL
More informationJUDGMENT IN M.A.C. CASE NO. 374 OF 2009
IN THE COURT OF THE MEMBER, MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL SONITPUR :: TEZPUR PRESENT : Sri A. Borthakur, Member, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal Sonitpur, Tezpur JUDGMENT IN M.A.C. CASE NO. 374 OF 2009
More informationIN THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE AT DIBRUGARH. Money Appeal Case No. 1/2011.
1 IN THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE AT DIBRUGARH Present : Sri A.B. Siddique, Addl. District Judge, Dibrugarh. Money Appeal Case No. 1/2011. Sri Bhupendra Singh,---------Appellant -Vs- Sri
More informationAnnexure 2. WHEREAS as per the G.O (R.t) No.1838/2012 dated.. 03/07/2012
Annexure 2 AGREEMENT Agreement executed on....day of........,two thousand twelve between Shri. M. PremKumar, General Manager,M/s KSEDC Limited, Vellayambalam, Thiruvananthapuram 695033 (hereinafter called
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. Date of order: 04th February, 2008. CRL. M.C. 2504 of 2006
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR DEFAMATION Date of order: 04th February, 2008. CRL. M.C. 2504 of 2006 NEMICHAND JAIN ALIAS CHANDRA SWAMI... Petitioner Through Mr. K.K. Sud, Sr.
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : COMPENSATION MATTER. Decided on: 02nd March, 2015 MAC.APP. 38/2014 MAC.APP.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : COMPENSATION MATTER Decided on: 02nd March, 2015 MAC.APP. 38/2014 THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD. Through: Mr.Pankaj Seth Gaur, Advocate.. Appellant versus
More informationCompensation Policy. 2.1 The policy is based on the principles of transparency and fairness in the treatment of our customers.
Compensation Policy 1. Objective of the Policy 1.1 The objective of the policy is to establish a system whereby the Bank compensates the customer for the financial loss he/she could incur due to deficiency
More informationSuits by or Against Persons in Military Service
Ch. 6 Part A] CHAPTER 6 Suits by or Against Persons in Military Service Part A AMENABILITY TO THE CIVIL COURTS OF PERSONS SUBJECT TO MILITARY LAW 1. Jurisdiction of Civil Courts All persons belonging to
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. IA No.991/2004, 6906/2005 & CS(OS)No.1710/2001 RESERVED ON : 07-07-2006
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE IA No.991/2004, 6906/2005 & CS(OS)No.1710/2001 RESERVED ON : 07-07-2006 DATE OF DECISION: 02-08-2006 Atul Anand... Plaintiff Through
More informationShri Inderjit Kaushik, Presiding Judicial Member. Shri Vinod Kumar Gupta, Member...
FIRST ADDITIONAL BENCH STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PUNJAB SECTOR 37-A, DAKSHIN MARG, CHANDIGARH. First Appeal No.1437 of 2008. Date of Institution: 12.12.2008. Date of Decision: 31.05.2013.
More informationTELECOM DISPUTES SETTLEMENT & APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI. Petition No. 669 of 2012. Loop Telecom Ltd. (Haryana) : Petitioner
TELECOM DISPUTES SETTLEMENT & APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI Dated 19 th October, 2012 Petition No. 669 of 2012 Loop Telecom Ltd. (Haryana) : Petitioner Vs. Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited : Respondent BEFORE:
More informationOriental Bank s Compensation Policy 2014-15
Oriental Bank s Compensation Policy 2014-15 Introduction Compensation Policy of Bank is designed to cover areas relating to unauthorized debiting of account, payment of interest to customers for delay
More informationBEFORE THE ADJUDICATING OFFICER SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA [ADJUDICATION ORDER NO. AO/SM-LS/ERO/10/2016]
BEFORE THE ADJUDICATING OFFICER SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA [ADJUDICATION ORDER NO. AO/SM-LS/ERO/10/2016] UNDER SECTION 15-I OF SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA ACT, 1992 READ WITH RULE
More information: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE K.N.KESHAVANARAYANA
: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 7 TH DAY OF JUNE 2012 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE K.N.KESHAVANARAYANA BETWEEN: MFA.No.122 OF 2009 (MV) C/w MFA.No.120 OF 2009 (MV) New
More informationMizuho Bank, Ltd. India. Deposit Policy. Revised on May 27, 2015
Mizuho Bank, Ltd. India Deposit Policy Revised on May 27, 2015 DISCLAIMER This Policy has been prepared on the basis of existing regulatory/statutory guidelines, existing risk management policies in the
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 4816-4817 OF 2013 (Arising out of SLP (C) Nos. 15531-15532 of 2007)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REPORTABLE CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 4816-4817 OF 2013 (Arising out of SLP (C) Nos. 15531-15532 of 2007) S. Manickam... Appellant (s) Versus Metropolitan
More informationLOAN AGREEMENT FOR PACKING CREDIT/ POST SHIPMENT FINANCE IN FOREIGN CURRENCY (PCFC / PSCFC)
IBD 10 LOAN AGREEMENT FOR PACKING CREDIT/ POST SHIPMENT FINANCE IN FOREIGN CURRENCY (PCFC / PSCFC) This agreement is made at on in between M/s hereinafter called the Borrower for the sake of brevity (which
More informationTHE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA JUDGMENT. KAREN HARRIET ELEY (formerly MEMMEL) MTHIYANE, LEWIS, PONNAN JJA, HURT AND KGOMO AJJA
THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA JUDGMENT REPORTABLE CASE NO: 614/2006 In the matter between KAREN HARRIET ELEY (formerly MEMMEL) APPELLANT and LYNN & MAIN INC RESPONDENT CORAM: MTHIYANE,
More informationBEFORE JUSTICE (Retd.) MAHMOOD ALI KHAN SOLE ARBITRATOR. A.M. No. D-061 of 2011
BEFORE JUSTICE (Retd.) MAHMOOD ALI KHAN SOLE ARBITRATOR A.M. No. D-061 of 2011 IN THE MATTER OF: Smt. Lalita Jain Constituent w/o Shri Vinod Kumar Jain 58, Krishna Marg Govind Nagar (East), Amer Road Jaipur
More informationTHE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO
THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE SUB REGISTRY SAN FERNANDO H.C.A. No. S 2161 of 1986 H..C.A. No. S 2162 of 1986 H.C.A. No. S 2163 of 1986 H.C.A. No. S 2164 of 1986 BETWEEN
More informationIN THE COURT OF THE MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL, GOLAGHAT. Smti. I. Barman, A.J.S. Member, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Golaghat, Assam
Page 1 IN THE COURT OF THE MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL, GOLAGHAT PRESENT: Smti. I. Barman, A.J.S. Member, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Golaghat, Assam MAC CASE NO. 53/2011 (Under Section 163-A of
More informationCLAIM SETTLEMENT (Deceased Depositor Claim Cases) SAVINGS BANK ACCOUNTS
CLAIM SETTLEMENT (Deceased Depositor Claim Cases) SAVINGS BANK ACCOUNTS When the depositor dies, the proceeds can be paid to the Nominee or legal heir, following the procedure for deceased depositor s
More informationAUTOMART LIMITED V. WAQA ROKOTUINASAU - ERCA NO. 9 OF 2012 JUDGMENT
IN THE EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS COURT AT SUVA APPELLATE JURISDICTION CASE NUMBER: ERCA NO. 09 OF 2012 BETWEEN: AUTOMART LIMITED APPELLANT AND: WAQA ROKOTUINASAU RESPONDENT Appearances: Ms. Drova for the Appellant.
More information2 nd Bench STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PUNJAB SCO NO.3009-12, SECTOR 22-D, CHANDIGARH.
2 nd Bench STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PUNJAB SCO NO.3009-12, SECTOR 22-D, CHANDIGARH. First Appeal No. 469 of 2005. Date of Institution: 23.03.2005. Date of Decision: 18.10.2010. Teja
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : EMPLOYEES COMPENSATION ACT, 1923 FAO 53/2012 Judgment delivered on: 14.03.2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : EMPLOYEES COMPENSATION ACT, 1923 FAO 53/2012 Judgment delivered on: 14.03.2012 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD... Appellant Through : Mr D.D. Singh with Mr
More informationMONEY SUIT NO.05 OF 2011
District : MORIGAON. High Court Form No. (J) 2. Heading of Judgment in Original Suit IN THE COURT OF MUNSIFF NO.1, MORIGAON. Present : N.C.BHUYAN, AJS, MUNSIFF NO.1, MORIGAON. Friday, the 5 th day of September,
More informationCENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Club Building (Near Post Office) Old JNU Campus, New Delhi-110067 Tel: +91-11-26105682. File No.CIC/DS/A/2011/001995/RM
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Club Building (Near Post Office) Old JNU Campus, New Delhi-110067 Tel: +91-11-26105682 File No.CIC/DS/A/2011/001995/RM Appellant: Mr. Rakesh Kumar Gupta, New Delhi Public
More informationMORTGAGE ACTIONS. FAQs. BANKRUPTCY PROCEEDINGS IN THE HIGH COURT Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) www.supremecourt.gov.sg
www.supremecourt.gov.sg MORTGAGE ACTIONS BANKRUPTCY PROCEEDINGS IN THE HIGH COURT Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) FAQs SUPREME COURT 1 Supreme Court Lane Singapore 178879 This pamphlet contains only
More informationFALSE CLAIMS ACT STATUTORY LANGUAGE
33 U.S.C. 3729-33 FALSE CLAIMS ACT STATUTORY LANGUAGE 31 U.S.C. 3729. False claims (a) LIABILITY FOR CERTAIN ACTS. (1) IN GENERAL. Subject to paragraph (2), any person who (A) knowingly presents, or causes
More information526 East Main Street P.O. Box 2385 Alliance, OH 44601 Akron, OH 44309
[Cite as Lehrer v. McClure, 2013-Ohio-4690.] COURT OF APPEALS STARK COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT RICHARD LEHRER, ET AL Plaintiffs-Appellees -vs- RALPH MCCLURE, ET AL Defendant-Appellant JUDGES
More informationDate of filing :27.04.2006 Date of order :06.04.2010 MAHARASHTRA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTE REDRESSAL COMMISSION,MUMBAI, CIRCUIT BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
1 Date of filing :27.04.2006 Date of order :06.04.2010 MAHARASHTRA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTE REDRESSAL COMMISSION,MUMBAI, CIRCUIT BENCH AT AURANGABAD. APPEAL NO. :839 OF 2006 IN COMPLAINT CASE NO.:256 OF
More informationBank Guarantees. What does Bank Guarantee mean?
Bank Guarantees. What does Bank Guarantee mean? A Contract of Guarantee is a contract to perform the promise or discharge of liability of a third person in case of his default. There are three parties
More informationA FORTNIGHTLY VAT/GST LAW REPORTER 2011 NTN 47)-272 [ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT]
2011 (Vol. 47)-272 [ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT] WRIT TAX No. - 1482 of 2010 Hon'ble Sunil Ambwani, and Hon'ble Kashi Nath Pandey,JJ. Hemkund Duplex & Board (Pvt.) Ltd. vs. Avasthapana Evam Audyogic Vikas Ayuqut/Adhyaksh
More informationIN THE COURT OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, FIRST CLASS,GOLAGHAT
IN THE COURT OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, FIRST CLASS,GOLAGHAT GR CASE NO: 1315/ 2012 U/S 380/457 IPC STATE -VERSUS- SRI NIGRU NAHAK...ACCUSED PERSON PRESENT : Smti Sorbani Bhattacharjee, AJS Judicial magistrate,
More informationCHAPTER VI AUDIT, ASSESSMENT, RECOVERY OF TAX AND REFUND
CHAPTER VI AUDIT, ASSESSMENT, RECOVERY OF TAX AND REFUND 41. Selection of dealers for tax audit. (1) The Commissioner shall, under the provision of section 41, select by the 31 st of January or by any
More informationThe payment of Wages (Procedure) Rules, 1937 1
The payment of Wages (Procedure) Rules, 1937 1 In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 26 of the Payment of Wages Act, 1936 (4 of 1936), read with section 22 of the General Clauses
More informationBEFORE THE MEMBER, MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL: CACHAR: SILCHAR: ASSAM
1 BEFORE THE MEMBER, MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL: CACHAR: SILCHAR: ASSAM Present: Shri B. Debnath, B.Com, LLM, AJS. Member, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Silchar. JUDGMENT IN MAC CASE NO 1471 of 2012
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Versus HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA
CRM-M-24864-2015 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. CRM-M-24864-2015 Date of decision: December 02, 2015 Satnam Dilbagh Singh...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab & others...respondents
More informationSUPREME COURT OF NOVA SCOTIA IN BANKRUPTCY AND INSOLVENCY Citation: Fines, (Re) 2015 NSSC 322
SUPREME COURT OF NOVA SCOTIA IN BANKRUPTCY AND INSOLVENCY Citation: Fines, (Re) 2015 NSSC 322 Date: November 17, 2015 Docket: Halifax, No. 38788 Registry: Halifax District of Nova Scotia Division No. 1
More informationOn behalf of the Respondents, Shri Sanjay Agarwal, CPIO was present at the NIC
Central Information Commission, New Delhi File No. Right to Information Act 2005 Under Section (19) Date of hearing : 29th June 2016 Date of decision : 29th June 2016 Name of the Appellant : Shri Ramchandra
More informationCivil Revision No.38/2007
Civil Revision No.38/2007 12.5.2015 Shri Navneet Dubey, counsel for the applicant. Heard on admission. Vide judgment and decree dated 31.8.2005, Second Civil Judge, Class-II, Panna in civil suit No.1-B/2005
More informationTHE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA IN THE HIGH COURT OF UGANDA AT KAMPALA (COMMERCIAL COURT DIVISION) HCT - 00 - CC - CS - 1-2007
THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA IN THE HIGH COURT OF UGANDA AT KAMPALA (COMMERCIAL COURT DIVISION) HCT - 00 - CC - CS - 1-2007 NOEL NUWE KYAPAKA ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: PLAINTIFF
More informationCopyright @ Ministry of Law, Justice and Parliamentary Affairs, Bangladesh.
360 (2) Every order made by a Competent Court under this Act shall be subject to appeal in accordance with the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, applicable to appeals. Appointment of Provincial
More informationBEFORE THE ADJUDICATING OFFICER SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA
BEFORE THE ADJUDICATING OFFICER SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA [ADJUDICATION ORDER NO. IVD-ID7/AL- RG/AO/DRK-AKS/EAD3-394/60-2013] UNDER SECTION 15 I OF SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA ACT,
More informationMUTHOOT VEHICLE & ASSET FINANCE LTD. LOAN POLICY
1 MUTHOOT VEHICLE & ASSET FINANCE LTD. LOAN POLICY Muthoot Vehicle & Asset Finance Ltd. (MVFL) is a Deposit taking Asset Finance Company licensed by the Reserve Bank of India for carrying out non banking
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 7373 OF 2005 STANTECH PROJECT ENGG. PVT. LTD.
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 7373 OF 2005 STANTECH PROJECT ENGG. PVT. LTD. APPELLANT NICCO CORPORATION LTD. VERSUS WITH RESPONDENT C.A.NO. 7374
More informationCANCELLATION AND INDEMNITY AGREEMENT CONCERNING LOST LETTER OF CREDIT
CANCELLATION AND INDEMNITY AGREEMENT CONCERNING LOST LETTER OF CREDIT This Cancellation and Indemnity Agreement Concerning Lost Letter of Credit (the Cancellation Agreement ) is made and entered into this
More informationNCDEX SPOT Exchange Limited Circular to all Trading and Clearing Members of NCDEX Spot Exchange Limited
NCDEX SPOT Exchange Limited Circular to all Trading and Clearing Members of NCDEX Spot Exchange Limited Circular No: NCDEX SPOT/TRADING/028/2012/036 Date : October 23, 2012 Subject : Contract Specifications
More informationRespondents : Shipping Corporation of India Limited ORDER. This appeal earlier came up for hearing on 05.06.2013 when the Commission
Central Information Commission Room No. 305, 2nd Floor, B Wing, August Kranti Bhavan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi 110066 Web: www.cic.gov.in Tel No: 26167931 Case No. November 12, 2013 Appellant : Shri
More informationCustomer Compensation Policy
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Mumbai Branch Customer Compensation Policy Version 4.0 1 Introduction This Compensation policy of the J.P. Morgan Chase Bank N.A., Mumbai Branch ( Bank ) is designed to cover
More informationDetermination of cost of power generation for Dongamahua captive power plant of Jindal Steel & Power Ltd. from FY 2011-12 till FY 2015-16.
Chhattisgarh State Electricity Regulatory Commission Irrigation Colony, Shanti Nagar, Raipur - 492 001 (C.G.) Ph.0771-4048788, Fax: 4073553 www.cserc.gov.in, e-mail: cserc.sec.cg@nic.in Petition No. 47
More information