Reforming the Federal Criminal Code Within the Context of White Collar Crime
|
|
- Alexia Atkinson
- 8 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Reforming the Federal Criminal Code Within the Context of White Collar Crime FRANK C. RAZZANO * INTRODUCTION In 2003, a Federalist Society study estimated that there were more than 4000 federal crimes scattered throughout the fifty titles of the U.S. Code. 1 That number jumps to 10,000 if criminal enforcement of federal regulations is included. 2 While the numbers are astounding, what is even more disturbing for members of a democratic society is the fact that the majority of these laws are vague and ambiguous. For example, there are more than 100 different types of mens rea in these statutes. 3 Even the commonly used term willfully has many meanings in federal criminal law. 4 This Article illustrates this fatal flaw of American criminal law by analyzing two of the Department of Justice s favorite tools for combatting white collar crime: the honest services fraud statute, 18 U.S.C. 1346, and the securities fraud statute, 15 U.S.C. 10(b). As shown below, these two statutes are so vague, ambiguous, and overly broad that even the U.S. Supreme Court has had difficulty figuring out what they mean ultimately engaging in judicial legislation to add some measure of specificity to these * Mr. Razzano is a partner in Pepper Hamilton LLP s Washington, D.C. office, and focuses his practice on all areas of civil, commercial, and criminal litigation, with an emphasis on U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission enforcement. He secured an acquittal in a criminal insider trading case for a tippee, despite the fact that the tipper was convicted. He is also an Adjunct Professor at the University of Maryland Law School, where he has taught courses on white-collar crime, international criminal law, securities litigation, broker-dealer regulation, and evidence. 1 Julie R. O Sullivan, The Federal Criminal Code is a Disgrace: Obstruction Statutes as Case Study, 96 J. CRIM. L. & CRIMINOLOGY 643, (2006). 2 Id. at 649 (stating that if all federal regulations in force as of 1998 were included, the number of criminal offenses would top 10,000). 3 William S. Laufer, Culpability and the Sentencing of Corporations, 71 NEB. L. REV. 1049, (1992). 4 See Spies v. United States, 317 U.S. 492, 497 (1943) ( *W+illful, as we have said, is a word of many meanings, its construction often being influenced by its context. ). 70
2 2012 Reforming th e Fed eral Criminal Code 71 hopelessly overbroad laws. As proud as we may be of our nine Supreme Court justices, they are not our elected representatives and should not be making up the law as they go along because that clearly is the task of Congress. I. Honest Services Fraud As the country industrialized after the Civil War, Congress passed the mail-fraud statute. Embodied in its current form at 18 U.S.C. 1341, the statute outlaws any scheme or artifice to defraud another of money or property. Around the time of World War II, courts began to develop a theory of mail fraud known as honest services fraud. Under that theory, one could violate the mail-fraud statute by engaging in a scheme or artifice to defraud another of the right to honest services. By the 1970s, federal prosecutors around the country had begun to use this theory to prosecute state and local officials who took bribes, arguing that the corrupt officials had deprived citizens of honest services. 5 Prosecutors also began to apply the theory of honest services fraud in the private sector, to employees who breached fiduciary duties owed to their employer. 6 Although the mail-fraud statute gave no textual indication that it encompassed breaches of fiduciary duty owed by state or local officials to their constituents or by private employees to their employer, courts nevertheless began to utilize the statute to prosecute such breaches of fiduciary duty as mail fraud. 7 In 1987, the Supreme Court attempted to put an end to the judicial development of honest services fraud in McNally v. United States. 8 In that case, Howard Hunt, who as chairman of the Kentucky Democratic Party, had de facto control over selecting insurance agencies for the state, entered into an agreement with an insurance agency to share commissions of more than $50,000 from the state with a company controlled by Hunt and operated by his business partner, Charles J. McNally. 9 The indictment alleged that McNally had entered into a scheme to obtain money by false pretenses and to defraud the citizens and government of Kentucky of the 5 See, e.g., United States v. Mandel, 862 F.2d 1067, 1074 (4th Cir. 1988) (discussing the government s theory of the case that the State of Maryland and its citizens were defrauded of the honest and faithful service of Mandel.... ). 6 See, e.g., United States v. George, 477 F.2d 508, 513 (7th Cir. 1973) ( Here the fraud consisted in Yonan s holding himself out to be a loyal employee, acting in Zenith s best interest, but actually not giving his honest and faithful services, to Zenith s real detriment. ). 7 See United States v. Siegel, 717 F.2d 9, (2d Cir. 1983) (Winter, J., dissenting in part & concurring in part) U.S. 350, 361 (1987). 9 Id. at
3 72 New England Law Review v right to have their governmental affairs conducted honestly. 10 The judge charged the jury that the defendants could be found guilty of fraud if the government proved that Hunt had directed commissions to his company without disclosing that fact to the public and the state government, whose actions could have been affected by such disclosure. 11 Although Hunt did not hold public office, the Sixth Circuit found that Hunt could make, and had made, decisions as a result of his special relationship with the government. 12 The court therefore concluded that Hunt was guilty of honest services fraud. On review, the Supreme Court reversed, holding that the mail fraud statute protects only property rights, not the intangible right to good government. This holding narrowed the mail-fraud statute to cover only schemes and artifices to defraud another of money or property by means of false or fraudulent pretense, representations, and promises. 13 In Carpenter v. United States, the Court elaborated on McNally s holding that the mail-fraud statute applies only to protected property rights, as opposed to the unprotected intangible right to honest and impartial government. 14 In Carpenter, a writer at the Wall Street Journal provided friends with advance copies of the Heard on the Street column, which was contrary to the newspaper s policy by depriving it of confidential business information. 15 The writer s friends then traded on the basis of the yet-to-be-published articles. 16 The Court made clear that the newspaper s right to maintaining the confidentiality of its business information was a tangible property right, unlike the intangible right to good government, which was not a property right per McNally. 17 The Court further held that the mailing element of the fraud statute had been satisfied based on the circulation of the Wall Street Journal through the mail, which was an essential part of the writer s scheme to defraud his employer of the right to protect its confidential business information before publication. 18 In the wake of McNally and Carpenter, Congress passed 18 U.S.C. 1346, which provides that the term scheme or artifice to defraud includes 10 Id. at Id. at Id. at In the wake of McNally, the Fourth Circuit granted former Maryland Governor Marvin Mandel, who had served a prison sentence in connection with his mail fraud racketeering conviction, a writ of coram nobis, available to remedy errors of the most fundamental character where a defendant is not in custody, but the conviction has some lingering effect beyond its mere stigma. United States v. Mandel, 862 F.2d 1067, 1070, 1075 (4th Cir. 1988) U.S. 19, 19, 25 (1987). 15 Id. at See United States v. Carpenter, 791 F.2d 1024, (2d Cir. 1986). 17 Carpenter, 484 U.S. at 25, Id. at 29.
4 2012 Reforming th e Fed eral Criminal Code 73 a scheme or artifice to deprive another of the intangible right of honest services. 19 The statute passed as part of the Omnibus Drug Bill with virtually no legislative history. 20 Its language was not the subject of any committee report or floor debate. 21 Indeed, Representative John Conyers stated that the statute was intended merely to overturn the McNally decision. 22 Following final passage, the Senate Judiciary Committee entered into the congressional record a report stating that 1346 overturns the decision in McNally v. United States. 23 By overturning McNally, Congress invited the courts to reenter the field of judicial legislation by grappling with what it means to deprive another of the intangible right of honest services. 24 In the ensuing years, when dealing with public officials, some courts held that the services owed by a public official must be due under state law. 25 Other courts required the public official to have breached a fiduciary duty established by state or federal law. 26 Yet other circuits rejected a state-law limiting principle and held that honest services were governed by a uniform federal standard. 27 In the private sector, the meaning of honest services fraud was even more confused. Some courts held that a fiduciary duty was required to establish honest services fraud. 28 Not all agreed, however. In United States v. Ervasti, the Eighth Circuit held that a breach of fiduciary duty is not a necessary element, because nothing in 1346 suggests that it is. 29 In United States v. Rybicki, the Second Circuit held that a personal injury lawyer violated 1346 by participating in a scheme involving payments made to insurance adjusters who, in turn, failed to report them to their employer in U.S.C (2006). 20 United States v. Brumley, 116 F.3d 728, 742 (5th Cir. 1997) (Jolly & DeMoss, JJ., dissenting). 21 Id CONG. REC. 33,297 (1988) CONG. REC. S17,360, S17376 (Daily Ed. Nov. 10, 1988) (statement of Sen. Joe Biden). 24 See 134 CONG. REC. 33,250 (1988). 25 See, e.g., Brumley, 116 F.3d at See, e.g., United States v. Murphy, 323 F.3d 102, (3d Cir. 2003) ( We thus endorse (and are supported by) the decisions of other Courts of Appeals that have interpreted 1346 more stringently and required a state law limiting principle for honest services fraud.... ). 27 See, e.g., United States v. Sorich, 523 F.3d 702, 712 (7th Cir. 2008); United States v. Urciuoli, 513 F.3d 290, (1st Cir. 2008); United States v. Walker, 490 F.3d 1282, 1299 (11th Cir. 2007); United States v. Sawyer, 239 F.3d 31, (1st Cir. 2001); United States v. Bryan, 58 F.3d 933, 942 (4th Cir. 1995). 28 See, e.g., United States v. Hausmann, 345 F.3d 952, 956 (7th Cir. 2003); United States v. Martin, 228 F.3d 1, 17 (1st Cir. 2000); United States v. Frost, 125 F.3d 346, 368 (6th Cir. 1997); United States v. Gray, 96 F.3d 769, 774 (5th Cir. 1996) F.3d 1029, 1036 (8th Cir. 2000).
5 74 New England Law Review v contravention of company policy. 30 Affirming the conviction, the court noted that, in a relationship that gives rise to a duty of loyalty comparable to that owed by employees to employers, honest services fraud could exist. 31 Some courts required a showing that a defendant s conduct resulted in reasonably foreseeable economic harm in order for the offense to fall within the honest services fraud statute. 32 The District of Columbia Circuit, on the other hand, required only that it be reasonably foreseeable that the economic harm could have resulted from a breach of fiduciary duty. 33 But the Tenth Circuit required no such showing of economic harm. 34 The Fifth Circuit, while requiring some detriment, believed that the detriment could be established by the breach of fiduciary duty itself. 35 In contrast, the Seventh Circuit rejected a reasonably-foreseeable-harm test, and required the breach of fiduciary duty be for personal gain at the expense of the party to whom the duty was owed. 36 The Second Circuit rejected any requirement of harm or gain and instead required only a showing of materiality (i.e., that the defendant s misrepresentation or omission naturally tended to influence or was capable of influencing a change in conduct). 37 Thus, the elements of honest services fraud differed in each circuit, as courts rather than Congress tried to define the crime. Finally, the Supreme Court entered the fray in Skilling v. United States. 38 The Court, however, simply engaged in further judicial legislation, ostensibly to save the statute from being declared unconstitutional. The Court acknowledged the statute s vagueness but chose to save the statute by limiting it to the core bribery and kickback offenses, which the majority asserted these offenses constituted the extent of the statute s application before McNally. 39 Skilling s judicial legislation does not truly resolve the matter. Now that honest services fraud has been interpreted to cover bribes and kickback F.3d 124, (2d Cir. 2003). 31 Id. 32 See, e.g., United States v. Serafino, 281 F.3d 327, 332 (1st Cir. 2002); United States v. Vinyard, 266 F.3d 320, (4th Cir. 2001); Martin, 228 F.3d at 17; United States v. Pennington, 168 F.3d 1060, 1065 (8th Cir. 1999); United States v. Devegter, 198 F.3d 1324, (11th Cir. 1999); Frost, 125 F.3d at See, e.g., United States v. Sun-Diamond Growers of Cal., 138 F.3d 961, (D.C. Cir. 1998); United States v. Lemire, 720 F.2d 1327, 1337 (D.C. Cir. 1983). 34 See, e.g., United States v. Welch, 327 F.3d 1081, 1104 (10th Cir. 2003). 35 See, e.g., United States v. Brown, 459 F.3d 509, 519 (5th Cir. 2006). 36 See, e.g., United States v. Hausmann, 345 F.3d 952, 956, 959 (7th Cir. 2003). 37 United States v. Rybicki, 354 F.3d 124, 145, 162 (2d. Cir. 2003) S. Ct (2010). 39 Id. at (discussing the court s decision to apply the statute only to bribery and kickbacks under a pre-mcnally rationale).
6 2012 Reforming th e Fed eral Criminal Code 75 cases, must the bribe or kickback violate a fiduciary duty? For example, if an employee favors a supplier that takes him golfing, is that a breach of fiduciary duty owed to his employer? And, if so, what is its source of the duty state law, federal law, or the employer s company ethics rules? In the wake of Skilling, the Third Circuit held that in order to prove honest services fraud, the government must establish an overt act in furtherance of a quid pro quo, such as mutual and contemporaneous benefits. 40 In other words, the government must prove that the payor provided a benefit to a public official intending that he will thereby take favorable [action] that he would not otherwise take and that the official accepted the benefit with the intent to take official [action] to benefit the payor. 41 This merely creates more judicial legislative gloss in an attempt to define what is a bribe or kickback in the absence of a congressional definition in 18 U.S.C While Skilling sought to confine honest services fraud to bribes and kickbacks, holding it does not apply to self-dealing or failure to disclose, there is an easy way around this. The government can avoid this limitation by merely alleging that a financial-disclosure form required by government or a private employer was mailed or sent over the wires via the Internet, and that such transmission was an act in furtherance of a bribe or a kickback scheme in violation of 18 U.S.C Thus, the Skilling decision, while potentially helpful in limiting an overly broad statute, creates as many issues in application as it resolves in theory. Public officials and employees will undoubtedly have to brave numerous future prosecutions until the Supreme Court further refines the meaning of the statute. II. Insider Trading Section 10(b) of the Securities and Exchange Act was first passed in But no one believed at that time that Section 10(b), which outlawed the use of manipulative or deceptive devices or contrivances in violation of SEC rules, covered insider trading. In fact, it was not until the 1940s that the SEC promulgated Rule 10b-5, which outlawed: employing any device, scheme or artifice to defraud; the making of an untrue statement of a material fact; or engaging in acts, practices or courses of business which would operate as a fraud or deceit upon any person. 42 It then took the SEC another twenty years to suggest in Cady, Roberts & Co., that Section 10(b) 40 United States v. Wright, 665 F.3d 560, 568 (3d Cir. 2012) ( In the honest services fraud context, the Government must prove overt acts in furtherance of a quid pro quo, such as mutual and contemporaneous benefits. ). 41 Id. at C.F.R b-5 (2011).
7 76 New England Law Review v covered insider trading. 43 Thereafter, it took the Supreme Court another thirty-six years and four separate opinions before it was able to define the parameters of insider trading. In 1968, the Second Circuit initially suggested that anyone who possesses information must either disclose that information to the investing public or be precluded from trading or recommending the stock while the information remains undisclosed. 44 But in 1980, in Chiarella v. United States, the Supreme Court rejected that interpretation and substituted what became known as the classical theory of insider trading. 45 Under that theory, the relationship between a corporate insider and a shareholder of the corporation gives rise to an obligation on the part of the insider either to disclose or refrain from trading. 46 If the trader is neither an insider nor a fiduciary, there simply is no obligation to disclose material nonpublic information. 47 Three years later, in Dirks v. SEC, the Supreme Court tackled the scenario of a tippee who receives material nonpublic information from an insider. 48 The Court concluded that a tippee has a duty to disclose or refrain from trading that derives from the insider s duty. This is not because the tippee merely received the information, but rather because the insider improperly made the information available to the tippee in breach of a fiduciary duty. 49 Whether improper disclosure breaches fiduciary duty depends upon the purpose of the disclosure. If the purpose was to benefit the person who provided the information to the tippee, then the disclosure constitutes a breach of fiduciary duty. 50 However, as the dissent correctly points out, this motivation requirement is blatant judicial activism with no basis in the law of fiduciary duty. 51 The Dirks majority s improper-purpose requirement never was an element of a breach of fiduciary duty until the Court judicially legislated it for insider trading cases. In Dirks, the Supreme Court left open the question whether an individual who does not derive nonpublic information from the corporation whose stock he trades may be held liable for insider trading 43 Order Suspending from National Securities Exchange, 1961 WL (Nov. 8, 1961). 44 SEC v. Tex. Gulf Sulphur, 401 F.2d 833, 848 (2d Cir. 1968) U.S. 222, 223 (1980); United States v. O Hagan, 521 U.S. 642, (1997) ( Under the traditional or classical theory of insider trading liability, 10(b) and Rule 10b-5 are violated when a corporate insider trades in the securities of his corporation on the basis of material, nonpublic information. ). 46 O Hagan, 521 U.S. at Chiarella, 445 U.S. at 232, U.S. 646, 658 (1983). 49 Id. at Id. at See id. at (Blackmun, J., dissenting).
8 2012 Reforming th e Fed eral Criminal Code 77 under Section 10(b). In Carpenter v. United States, the Court confronted the issue of whether a person engages in insider trading by misappropriating information in breach of fiduciary duty and trading on that information, where the duty breached was not owed to the corporation whose stock was traded. 52 However, the Court divided four to four on the issue, and it was not until 1997, in United States v. O Hagan, that the Supreme Court finally ruled that the so-called misappropriation theory was encompassed by Section 10(b) and Rule 10b Recently, there has been a great deal of controversy about whether members of Congress are exempt from the insider-trading laws. 54 While there is obviously no exemption in the text of Section 10(b), when a member of Congress utilizes material non-public information gained in a legislative capacity, it is unclear whether that member could be liable under the so-called misappropriation theory confirmed in O Hagan. 55 Under that theory, whenever someone misappropriates information in breach of a fiduciary duty and trades on the information, the individual has engaged in fraud in connection with the purchase or sale of a security in violation of Section 10(b). Do members of Congress owe a fiduciary duty to Congress or to their constituents? Before the Supreme Court s decision in Skilling, one would have thought that under the honest-services-fraud theory, members owe such a fiduciary duty, either to Congress or to the people of the United States. But the Supreme Court s judicial legislation in Skilling limited the honest-services-fraud theory to bribes and kickbacks. If, however, as Justice Ginsburg suggested in Skilling, and as Justice Scalia agreed, the honestservices-fraud theory is based fundamentally on a breach of fiduciary duty, and that breach arises out of a duty of loyalty owed by a state or local official to his constituency, it would seem inconceivable that members of Congress would not owe a similar duty of loyalty. 56 One great difficulty in sustaining such a prosecution, however, is the Speech or Debate Clause. Under the Speech or Debate Clause, members of Congress cannot be held U.S. 19, (1987) (describing the issue in terms of the defendant s duty to his employer, a journal which published information about certain stocks). 53 United States v. O Hagan, 521 U.S. 642, , 652 (1997) ( The misappropriation theory holds that a person commits fraud in connection with a securities transaction, and thereby violates 10(b) and 10b-5, when he misappropriates confidential information for trading purposes, in breach of a duty owed to the source of the information. ). 54 See, e.g., Andrew George, Public (Self)-Service: Illegal Trading on Confidential Congressional Information, 2 HARV. L. & POL Y REV., no. 1, Winter 2008, at 161, ; Donna M. Nagy, Insider Trading, Congressional Officials, and Duties of Entrustment, 91 B.U. L. REV. 1105, (2011). 55 See Bud W. Jerke, Comment, Cashing in on Capitol Hill: Insider Trading and the Use of Political Intelligence for Profit, 158 U. PA. L. REV. 1451, (2010). 56 See Skilling v. United States, 130 S. Ct. 2896, (2010).
9 78 New England Law Review v to answer for their legislative acts. 57 It would therefore be extremely difficult, if not impossible, to prosecute a member of Congress for insider trading. While it could be shown that the member had traded, the Speech or Debate Clause would make it essentially impossible to show that the member had derived the insider information motivating his trade from information obtained during the legislative process. CONCLUSION The mail-fraud and insider-trading statutes, which account for most of the ink devoted to white-collar crime in legal writing, plainly illustrate that much of American criminal law is vague and ambiguous. Because of its vagueness and ambiguity, criminal law does not inform prosecutors, defendants, or the courts what it is that Congress is outlawing. In a democratic society, laws should inform the public and the courts specifically what is outlawed. Yet in the case of these two foundation stones of white-collar criminal law, even the U.S. Supreme Court has struggled for decades to ascertain what the laws prohibit and what is allowed. And while courts were attempting to clarify these ambiguities, numerous people were prosecuted and jailed. In a democratic society, the existence of such ambiguity and its unjust results are intolerable. A wholesale reform of the federal criminal code is needed to eliminate these ambiguities so that the law clearly states what conduct is prohibited. Such reform is, unfortunately, unlikely. Indeed, the current Congress cannot even agree on a budget. Thus, it is unlikely that Congress will ever expend the intellectual capital necessary to bring greater specificity to the U.S. criminal code. We need a new Justinian or Napoleon to convene the greatest jurists and legal thinkers of our time to come together, think through, and accurately define the elements of our criminal statutes. Leaving the process to piecemeal decisions by our courts is inefficient and undemocratic. The people have a right to know the elements of a crime when a law is enacted, not thirty years later as a result of appealed convictions based on vague and ambiguous congressional laws. 57 United States v. Helstoski, 442 U.S. 477, (1979).
Case: 10-2878 Document: 39 Page: 1 06/07/2011 308084 6. August Term, 2010. Docket Nos. 10-2786-cr(L), 10-2878-cr(CON) Appellee,
Case: 10-2878 Document: 39 Page: 1 06/07/2011 308084 6 10-2786 (L) USA v. Wolfson UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term, 2010 (Argued: May 24, 2011 Decided: June 7, 2011) UNITED
More informationWHITE-COLLAR CRIME. Expert Analysis A Brave New World of Electronic Surveillance in White-Collar Investigations?
Westlaw Journal Formerly Andrews Litigation Reporter WHITE-COLLAR CRIME Litigation News and Analysis Legislation Regulation Expert Commentary VOLUME 25, ISSUE 9 / JUNE 2011 Expert Analysis A Brave New
More informationPeter Tom, Justice Presiding, Angela M. Mazzarelli Eugene Nardelli Luis A. Gonzalez Bernard J. Malone, Jr., Justices.
SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION FIRST JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT Peter Tom, Justice Presiding, Angela M. Mazzarelli Eugene Nardelli Luis A. Gonzalez Bernard J. Malone, Jr., Justices. ---------------------------------------x
More informationThe N.C. State Bar v. Wood NO. COA10-463. (Filed 1 February 2011) 1. Attorneys disciplinary action convicted of criminal offense
The N.C. State Bar v. Wood NO. COA10-463 (Filed 1 February 2011) 1. Attorneys disciplinary action convicted of criminal offense The North Carolina State Bar Disciplinary Hearing Commission did not err
More informationAnatomy of a Corruption Case
Anatomy of a Corruption Case presented by Patrick K. Hanly, Esq. The Law Office of Patrick K. Hanly 980 Ninth Street Sacramento, California 95814 I. Overview of Prosecuting Agencies U.S. Attorney Grand
More informationThe Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act: Standards of Conduct of Brokers, Dealers, and Investment Advisers
The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act: Standards of Conduct of Brokers, Dealers, and Investment Advisers Michael V. Seitzinger Legislative Attorney August 19, 2010 Congressional
More informationSupreme Court of the United States
No. 08-410 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States ROBERT SORICH, TIMOTHY MCCARTHY, and PATRICK SLATTERY Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to
More informationUSA v. Fabio Moreno Vargas
2015 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 11-18-2015 USA v. Fabio Moreno Vargas Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2015
More informationStewart violated Section 1001 by making a false statement on May 26, 2000, that she had not previously violated an alleged promise between May 16,
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -x UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, : : v. : 02 CR 395 (JGK) : AHMED ABDEL SATTAR,
More informationCourtesy of Tampa Criminal Defense Attorney 813-222-2220 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JULY TERM 2011
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JULY TERM 2011 STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellant, v. Case No. 5D10-1301 EDWARD DARRELL TRAYLOR and PERRY MICHAEL TRAYLOR, Appellees. / Opinion
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No. 15-12302 Non-Argument Calendar. D.C. Docket No. 2:14-cr-14008-JEM-1
Case: 15-12302 Date Filed: 02/10/2016 Page: 1 of 9 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 15-12302 Non-Argument Calendar D.C. Docket No. 2:14-cr-14008-JEM-1
More informationCommittee on Judicial Ethics Teleconference Thursday, January 15, 2015
Committee on Judicial Ethics Teleconference Thursday, January 15, 2015 Members present via teleconference: Judge Christine E. Keller, Chair, Judge Barbara M. Quinn, Professor Sarah F. Russell, Judge Angela
More informationPUBLISH UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS TENTH CIRCUIT
Filed 9/25/96 PUBLISH UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS TENTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. No. 95-3409 GERALD T. CECIL, Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT
More informationCASE COMMENTS Criminal Law
CASE COMMENTS Criminal Law First Circuit Deems Aggravated Identity Theft Statute Ambiguous and Applies Rule of Lenity United States v. Godin, 534 F.3d 51 (1st Cir. 2008) The prosecution usually must prove
More informationLeonard W. Vona, CPA, CFE
Leonard W. Vona, CPA, CFE Certified Public Accountant Certified Fraud Examiner 3331 Route 9 Valatie, NY 12184 Tel: (518) 784-2250 Fax: (518) 784-2251 e-mail: lwvcfe@aol.com Part of an auditor s job is
More informationBarry J. Pollack. Member bpollack@milchev.com 202-626-5830
Barry J. Pollack Member bpollack@milchev.com 202-626-5830 Practice Areas White Collar & Internal Investigations FCPA & International Anti-Corruption Cartel - Government Investigations & Litigation Congressional
More informationChapter 15 Criminal Law and Procedures
Chapter 15 Criminal Law and Procedures Chapter Outline 1. Introduction 2. What Is a Crime? 3. Elements of Criminal Liability 4. Types of Crimes 5. Cyber Crime 6. Constitutional Safeguards 7. Criminal Procedures
More informationGLOSSARY OF SELECTED LEGAL TERMS
GLOSSARY OF SELECTED LEGAL TERMS Sources: US Courts : http://www.uscourts.gov/library/glossary.html New York State Unified Court System: http://www.nycourts.gov/lawlibraries/glossary.shtml Acquittal A
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION. v. CASE NO. 8:15-CR-244-T-23AEP PLEA AGREEMENT
Case 8:15-cr-00244-SDM-AEP Document 3 Filed 07/08/15 Page 1 of 15 PageID 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CASE NO. 8:15-CR-244-T-23AEP
More informationCRIMES OF DISHONESTY AND BREACH OF TRUST: IS THEFT SUCH A CRIME UNDER 18 U.S.C. 1033(e)?
CRIMES OF DISHONESTY AND BREACH OF TRUST: IS THEFT SUCH A CRIME UNDER 18 U.S.C. 1033(e)? Zack Stamp, Esq. Steve W. Kinion, Esq. (217) 525-0700 The purpose of this article is to examine an ambiguity between
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO COLORADO CRIMINAL DEFENSE BAR, a Colorado non-profit corporation; COLORADO CRIMINAL JUSTICE REFORM COALITION, a Colorado
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit No. 13 2145 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff Appellee, v. GREGORY WALKER, Defendant Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court
More informationFEDERAL & NEW YORK STATUTES RELATING TO FILING FALSE CLAIMS. 1) Federal False Claims Act (31 USC 3729-3733)
FEDERAL & NEW YORK STATUTES RELATING TO FILING FALSE CLAIMS I. FEDERAL LAWS 1) Federal False Claims Act (31 USC 3729-3733) II. NEW YORK STATE LAWS A. CIVIL AND ADMINISTRATIVE LAWS 1) New York False Claims
More informationC O H E N, T O D D, K I T E & S T A N F O R D, L L C
C O H E N, T O D D, K I T E & S T A N F O R D, L L C John L. O Shea Member Direct: (513) 333-5227 Mobile: (513) 300-4012 Email: joshea@ctks.com visit superlawyers.com Top 50 Cincinnati Super Lawyer 2012,
More informationVNSNY CORPORATE. DRA Policy
VNSNY CORPORATE DRA Policy TITLE: FEDERAL DEFICIT REDUCTION ACT OF 2005: POLICY REGARDING THE DETECTION & PREVENTION OF FRAUD, WASTE AND ABUSE AND APPLICABLE FEDERAL AND STATE LAWS APPLIES TO: VNSNY ENTITIES
More informationPublic Integrity Criminal Law for the Municipal Attorney By Julia Davis
Public Integrity Criminal Law for the Municipal Attorney By Julia Davis You are an attorney with Municipal City s law department and your supervisor calls you with an urgent assignment: Joe Public Servant
More informationFEDERAL LAWS RELATING TO FRAUD, WASTE AND ABUSE
FEDERAL LAWS RELATING TO FRAUD, WASTE AND ABUSE FEDERAL CIVIL FALSE CLAIMS ACT The federal civil False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. 3729, et seq., ( FCA ) was originally enacted in 1863 to combat fraud perpetrated
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No. 12-13381 Non-Argument Calendar. D.C. Docket No. 3:11-cr-00281-RBD-JBT-1.
Case: 12-13381 Date Filed: 05/29/2013 Page: 1 of 12 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 12-13381 Non-Argument Calendar D.C. Docket No. 3:11-cr-00281-RBD-JBT-1
More informationHOUSE DOCKET, NO. 4128 FILED ON: 2/28/2014. HOUSE... No. 4077. The Commonwealth of Massachusetts PRESENTED BY: Paul R. Heroux
HOUSE DOCKET, NO. 4128 FILED ON: 2/28/2014 HOUSE............... No. 4077 The Commonwealth of Massachusetts PRESENTED BY: Paul R. Heroux To the Honorable Senate and House of Representatives of the Commonwealth
More informationTHE HOUSTON LAWYER March-April, 1988 Vol. 25 No. 5 THE CRIMINAL CLOUD OVER S.E.C. INVESTIGATIONS OF INSIDER TRADING
THE HOUSTON LAWYER March-April, 1988 Vol. 25 No. 5 THE CRIMINAL CLOUD OVER S.E.C. INVESTIGATIONS OF INSIDER TRADING By Joel M. Androphy Your client, a respected real estate attorney, receives a subpoena
More informationFederation of Law Societies of Canada. Ottawa, November 26, 2013
Submission to the Standing Senate Committee on Banking, Trade and Commerce in Respect of Bill C-4 (a second Act to implement certain provisions of the budget tabled in Parliament on March 21, 2013 and
More informationCommonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals
RENDERED: MARCH 14, 2008; 2:00 P.M. NOT TO BE PUBLISHED Commonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals NO. 2007-CA-001304-MR DONALD T. CHRISTY APPELLANT v. APPEAL FROM MASON CIRCUIT COURT HONORABLE STOCKTON
More informationFAIR DEBT COLLECTION PRACTICES ACT 15 U.S.C. 1692 et.seq.
FAIR DEBT COLLECTION PRACTICES ACT 15 U.S.C. 1692 et.seq. Lori E. Brown lbrown@gallaghersharp.com I. OVERVIEW OF THE FAIR DEBT COLLECTION PRACTICES ACT ( FDCPA ) A. Purpose of the FDCPA 1. The FDCPA is
More informationC O H E N, T O D D, K I T E & S T A N F O R D, L L C
C O H E N, T O D D, K I T E & S T A N F O R D, L L C John L. O Shea Member Direct: (513) 333-5227 Mobile: (513) 300-4012 Email: joshea@ctks.com visit superlawyers.com Top 50 Cincinnati Super Lawyer 2012,
More informationSarbanes-Oxley Whistleblower Provision
U.S. Supreme Court Significantly Expands Sarbanes-Oxley Whistleblower Provision to Include Employees of Non-Public Contractors and Subcontractors of Public Companies SUMMARY In Lawson v. FMR LLC, No. 12-3
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals
USCA Case #07-3021 Document #1160520 Filed: 01/23/2009 Page 1 of 14 United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued September 4, 2008 Decided January 23, 2009 No. 07-3021 UNITED
More informationWHITE-COLLAR CRIME. Expert Analysis Patently Unusual: How a Recent Supreme Court Patent Decision Alters the Landscape for Proving Criminal Knowledge
Westlaw Journal WHITE-COLLAR CRIME Litigation News and Analysis Legislation Regulation Expert Commentary VOLUME 25, ISSUE 12 / SEPTEMBER 2011 Expert Analysis Patently Unusual: How a Recent Supreme Court
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
[Cite as State v. Mobarak, 2015-Ohio-3007.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT State of Ohio, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 14AP-517 (C.P.C. No. 12CR-5582) v. : (REGULAR CALENDAR) Soleiman
More informationUsing Administrative Records to Report Federal Criminal Case Processing Statistics
Using Administrative Records to Report Federal Criminal Case Processing Statistics John Scalia, Jr. Statistician Bureau of Justice Statistics U.S. Department of Justice Federal criminal case processing
More informationScope of Criminal Insider Trading Liability for Remote Tippees
Scope of Criminal Insider Trading Liability for Remote Tippees United States v. Newman: Second Circuit Reverses Insider Trading Convictions; Requires That Tippee Know of Benefit Received by Insider; Strengthens
More informationIn The Supreme Court of the United States
No. 07-1281 ================================================================ In The Supreme Court of the United States --------------------------------- --------------------------------- DAVID KAY and
More informationMOLINA HEALTHCARE, INC. CODE OF BUSINESS CONDUCT AND ETHICS
MOLINA HEALTHCARE, INC. CODE OF BUSINESS CONDUCT AND ETHICS The Board of Directors of Molina Healthcare, Inc. has adopted this Code with respect to the business conduct and practices governing the affairs
More informationUNITED STATES OF AMERICA Before the SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Before the SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 Release No. 75319 / June 29, 2015 INVESTMENT ADVISERS ACT OF 1940 Release No. 4132 / June 29, 2015
More informationCase 4:14-cr-00171 Document 296 Filed in TXSD on 11/25/14 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION.
Case 4:14-cr-00171 Document 296 Filed in TXSD on 11/25/14 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CRIMINAL ACTION H-14-171S-12 DEBORAH
More informationCriminal Defense and Investigations
Fraud Enforcement and Recovery Act of 2009 SUMMARY On May 20, 2009, President Obama signed into law the Fraud Enforcement and Recovery Act of 2009 ( FERA ), a statute intended to strengthen the federal
More informationStatement of Introduction on the Nomination of John B. Owens to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Senator Dianne Feinstein
Statement of Introduction on the Nomination of John B. Owens to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Senator Dianne Feinstein Senate Judiciary Committee October 30, 2013 I will now introduce
More informationNorth Shore LIJ Health System, Inc.
North Shore LIJ Health System, Inc. POLICY TITLE: Detecting and Preventing Fraud, Waste, Abuse and Misconduct POLICY #: 800.09 System Approval Date: 6/23/14 Site Implementation Date: Prepared by: Office
More informationInternal Revenue Service
Internal Revenue Service Number: 201045005 Release Date: 11/12/2010 Index Number: 162.25-05 ----------------------- ------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------
More information[Cite as Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Nienaber (1997), 80 Ohio St.3d 534.] Attorneys at law Misconduct Indefinite suspension Making affirmative
CINCINNATI BAR ASSOCIATION v. NIENABER. [Cite as Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Nienaber (1997), 80 Ohio St.3d 534.] Attorneys at law Misconduct Indefinite suspension Making affirmative representations to courts
More informationFEDERAL & NEW YORK STATUTES RELATING TO FILING FALSE CLAIMS
FEDERAL & NEW YORK STATUTES RELATING TO FILING FALSE CLAIMS I. FEDERAL LAWS False Claims Act (31 USC 3729-3733) The False Claims Act ("FCA") provides, in pertinent part, that: (a) Any person who (1) knowingly
More informationHow To Defend Yourself In A Tax Court
Escape Conviction when Prosecuted for a Federal Tax Crime Court, DOJ, IRS no jurisdiction without specific Section of Title 26 quoted Why, in a "Federal District Court" when charged with a "tax crime"
More informationSupreme Court Clarifies Statute of Limitations Applicable to False Claims Act Whistleblower Suits Against Government Contractors
Supreme Court Clarifies Statute of Limitations Applicable to False Claims Act Whistleblower Suits Against Government Contractors In Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc., et al. v. United States ex rel.
More informationPUBLISH UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS TENTH CIRCUIT. Plaintiff-Appellee, v. No. 09-1570 CARLOS HUYOA-JIMENEZ, a.k.a. Uriel Ayala-Guzman,
FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit October 21, 2010 PUBLISH Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS TENTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
More informationETHICS IS EVERYBODY S BUSINESS. The Ohio Ethics Commission
ETHICS IS EVERYBODY S BUSINESS The Ohio Ethics Commission "No man is allowed to be a judge in his own cause, because his interest would certainly bias his judgment, and, not improbably, corrupt his integrity."
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA PARKERSBURG DIVISION. v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:02-0911
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA PARKERSBURG DIVISION BRIAN K. MARKS and JENNIFER D. MARKS, as individuals and on behalf of all others similarly situated,
More informationSEATTLE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AMERICAN INN OF COURT ETHICS MAY 21, 2015
SEATTLE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AMERICAN INN OF COURT ETHICS MAY 21, 2015 INTRODUCTION JONATHAN MCFARLAND 2 IN RE REINES - CASE OVERVIEW CHRISTIE MATTHAEI 3 APPLICABLE RULES THERESA WANG 4 APPLICABLE FEDERAL
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR TULSA COUNTY STATE OF OKLAHOMA STATE OF OKLAHOMA,
IN THE DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR TULSA COUNTY STATE OF OKLAHOMA STATE OF OKLAHOMA, Plaintiff, v. Case No. CF-2008-1601 Judge William Kellough RODNEY EUGENE DORSEY, Defendant. BRIEF CONCERNING REQUEST FOR
More informationSupreme Court Decision Affirming Judicial Right to Review EEOC Actions
Supreme Court Decision Affirming Judicial Right to Review EEOC Actions The Supreme Court Holds That EEOC s Conciliation Efforts Are Subject to Judicial Review, Albeit Narrow SUMMARY A unanimous Supreme
More informationHow To Get A City Hall Job
When Municipal Officials Are Prosecuted and Qui Tam Henry E. Hockeimer, Jr. Partner, Ballard Spahr LLP Abigail Elias Chief Assistant City Attorney, Ann Arbor 25 th Annual MAMA Advanced Institute April
More informationUNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff Appellee, v. Michael TURNER, Defendant Appellant.
Slip Copy, 2013 WL 510092 (C.A.11 (Ala.)) Judges and Attorneys Only the Westlaw citation is currently available. This case was not selected for publication in the Federal Reporter. Not for Publication
More information2015 IL App (3d) 140252-U. Order filed December 17, 2015 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS THIRD DISTRICT A.D., 2015
NOTICE: This order was filed under Supreme Court Rule 23 and may not be cited as precedent by any party except in the limited circumstances allowed under Rule 23(e(1. 2015 IL App (3d 140252-U Order filed
More informationTitle: Preventing and Reporting Fraud, Waste and Abuse in Federal Health Care Programs. Area Manual: Corporate Compliance Page: Page 1 of 10
Title: Preventing and Reporting Fraud, Waste and Abuse in Federal Health Care Programs Area Manual: Corporate Compliance Page: Page 1 of 10 Reference Number: I-70 Effective Date: 10/02 Contact Person:
More informationCHAMPAIGN COUNTY NURSING HOME SUMMARY OF ANTI-FRAUD AND ABUSE POLICIES
1. PURPOSE CHAMPAIGN COUNTY NURSING HOME SUMMARY OF ANTI-FRAUD AND ABUSE POLICIES Champaign County Nursing Home ( CCNH ) has established anti-fraud and abuse policies to prevent fraud, waste, and abuse
More informationFOREIGN CORRUPT PRACTICES ACT ANTIBRIBERY PROVISIONS
FOREIGN CORRUPT PRACTICES ACT ANTIBRIBERY PROVISIONS United States Department of Justice Fraud Section, Criminal Division 10th & Constitution Ave. NW (Bond 4th fl.) Washington, D.C. 20530 Phone: (202)
More informationEXECUTIVE SUMMARY Compliance Program and False Claims Recovery
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Compliance Program and False Claims Recovery INTRODUCTION: The Federal Deficit Reduction Act of 2005, also known as the DRA, requires that providers give their employees, medical staff,
More informationCase 2:04-cv-08026-LSC-JEO Document 5 Filed 03/18/05 Page 1 of 7
Case 2:04-cv-08026-LSC-JEO Document 5 Filed 03/18/05 Page 1 of 7 FILED 2005 Mar-18 PM 12:46 U.S. DISTRICT COURT N.D. OF ALABAMA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
More informationCOLORADO INDEPENDENT ETHICS COMMISSION S TRIAL BRIEF
DISTRICT COURT, CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, COLORADO 1437 Bannock Street Denver, CO 80202 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF COLORADO INDEPENDENT ETHICS COMMISSION AND COLORADO ETHICS WATCH Plaintiff v.
More informationPer Ramfjord Stoel Rives, LLP paramfjord@stoel.com CHALLENGING AMOUNT OF LOSS IN SECURITIES FRAUD CASES
Per Ramfjord Stoel Rives, LLP paramfjord@stoel.com CHALLENGING AMOUNT OF LOSS IN SECURITIES FRAUD CASES The Problem Securities fraud and insider trading defendants facing massive prison sentences: 25 years
More informationCOUNTY OF ORANGE. False Claims Act and Whistleblower Provisions Policy and Procedures
COUNTY OF ORANGE False Claims Act and Whistleblower Provisions Policy and Procedures COUNTY OF ORANGE FALSE CLAIMS ACT AND WHISTLEBLOWER PROVISIONS POLICY AND PROCEDURES I. Purpose. The County of Orange
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY DEAN SMITH, on behalf of himself and Others similarly situated, v. Michael Harrison, Esquire, Plaintiff, Defendant. OPINION Civ. No. 07-4255 (WHW) Walls,
More informationPAST CRIME, CRIME FRAUD, FUTURE CRIME: WHERE ARE WE? By Abraham A. Dash and Franklin A. Dash
PAST CRIME, CRIME FRAUD, FUTURE CRIME: WHERE ARE WE? By Abraham A. Dash and Franklin A. Dash Mr. Abraham Dash is a Professor Emeritus at the University of Maryland School of Law and Mr. Franklin Dash is
More informationHERITAGE FARM POLICY AND PROCEDURES. Policy: False Claims Act and Whistleblower Provisions
HERITAGE FARM POLICY AND PROCEDURES Policy: False Claims Act and Whistleblower Provisions Date: October 8, 2013 Rationale: It is Heritage Farm s intent to make sure all claims are submitted in a timely
More informationDisability Discrimination and
Disability Discrimination and Parker v. Metropolitan Life: Separate, but Equal? Barry W. Wall, MD In August 1997, the Sixth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals ruled that disability insurance obtained as an
More informationDodd-Frank Whistleblower Provision
Second Circuit, Disagreeing with Fifth Circuit, Defers to SEC s Interpretation of Dodd-Frank Whistleblower Definition and Holds That Internal Whistleblowers Are Entitled to Pursue Dodd-Frank Retaliation
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE THOMAS PARISI, No. 174, 2015 Defendant Below, Appellant, Court Below: Superior Court of the State of Delaware, v. in and for New Castle County STATE OF DELAWARE,
More informationPublic Act No. 15-162
Public Act No. 15-162 AN ACT CONCERNING A STUDENT LOAN BILL OF RIGHTS. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Assembly convened: Section 1. (NEW) (Effective October 1, 2015)
More informationFINANCIAL REFORM LEGISLATION OFFERS WHISTLEBLOWERS LUCRATIVE INCENTIVES AND ROBUST PROTECTION. Philip H. Hilder 1 Sunida A.
FINANCIAL REFORM LEGISLATION OFFERS WHISTLEBLOWERS LUCRATIVE INCENTIVES AND ROBUST PROTECTION Philip H. Hilder 1 Sunida A. Louangsichampa 2 The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act
More informationTENNESSEE ASSOCIATION OF CRIMINAL DEFENSE LAWYERS ANNUAL DUI TRAINING 2010 TUNICA, MISSISSIPPI - OCTOBER 21-22, 2010
TENNESSEE ASSOCIATION OF CRIMINAL DEFENSE LAWYERS ANNUAL DUI TRAINING 2010 TUNICA, MISSISSIPPI - OCTOBER 21-22, 2010 Glenn R. Funk 117 Union Street Nashville, TN 37201 (615) 255-9595 ETHICS IN DUI DEFENSE
More informationCompliance Plan False Claims Act & Whistleblower Provisions Purpose/Policy/Procedures
CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ROMAN CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF SYRACUSE, NY and TOOMEY RESIDENTIAL AND COMMUNITY SERVICES Compliance Plan False Claims Act & Whistleblower Provisions Purpose/Policy/Procedures Purpose:
More informationPROSECUTORS, KNOW YOUR CRIMINAL DEFENSE LAWYER *
PROSECUTORS, KNOW YOUR CRIMINAL DEFENSE LAWYER * George E. Tragos ** Prosecutors for the most part are dedicated and honest public servants. They certainly don't do what they do for the money. They do
More informationDEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES DIVISION OF DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES
DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES DIVISION OF DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES DIVISION CIRCULAR #54 N/A EFFECTIVE DATE: November 19, 2008 DATE ISSUED: November 19, 2008 (Rescinds Division Circular #54 issued on
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA DECLARATION OF MARY ELLEN SIGNORILLE
CASE 0:11-cv-02781-SRN-JSM Document 611 Filed 05/13/15 Page 1 of 7 ROGER KRUEGER, et al., IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA v. Plaintiffs, No. 11-CV-02781 (SRN/JSM) AMERIPRISE
More informationUNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No. 04-4684
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-4684 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, versus Plaintiff - Appellee, BERNARD JERIDORE, a/k/a Benny B, a/k/a Bernie, Defendant - Appellant.
More informationThe Lawyer as Gatekeeper The Backdrop
Lawyers as Gatekeepers The SEC s New Focus on Inside and Outside Counsel Julie M. Allen Frank Zarb National Conference of the Society of Corporate Secretaries and Governance Professionals June 28, 2014
More informationThe Need for Sneed: A Loophole in the Armed Career Criminal Act
Boston College Law Review Volume 52 Issue 6 Volume 52 E. Supp.: Annual Survey of Federal En Banc and Other Significant Cases Article 15 4-1-2011 The Need for Sneed: A Loophole in the Armed Career Criminal
More informationFraud, Waste and Abuse Prevention and Education Policy
Corporate Compliance Fraud, Waste and Abuse Prevention and Education Policy The Compliance Program at the Cortland Regional Medical Center (CRMC) demonstrates our commitment to uphold all federal and state
More informationCase 1:08-cv-06957 Document 45 Filed 10/19/2009 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION
Case 1:08-cv-06957 Document 45 Filed 10/19/2009 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ROBERT F. CAVOTO, ) ) Plaintiff, Counter-Defendant,
More informationMONTH IN REVIEW: JUNE 2006
MONTH IN REVIEW: JUNE 2006 Travis McDonough and Kyle Eiselstein, Miller & Martin PLLC Zedner v. United States No. 05-5992 (U.S. S. Ct. June 5, 2006) The Supreme Court unanimously ruled that defendants
More information2014 IL App (2d) 130390-U No. 2-13-0390 Order filed December 29, 20140 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS SECOND DISTRICT
No. 2-13-0390 Order filed December 29, 20140 NOTICE: This order was filed under Supreme Court Rule 23 and may not be cited as precedent by any party except in the limited circumstances allowed under Rule
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2002-KA-01124-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2002-KA-01124-COA JIMMY FORD APPELLANT v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE DATE OF TRIAL COURT JUDGMENT: 5/10/2002 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. MARCUS D. GORDON
More informationCase 3:09-cr-00856-JAP Document 84 Filed 11/30/11 Page 1 of 7 PageID: 376
Case 3:09-cr-00856-JAP Document 84 Filed 11/30/11 Page 1 of 7 PageID: 376 U.S. Department of Justij$ Paul Kemp, Esq.. Ethridge, Quinn, Kemp, McAuliffe, Rowan & 33 Wood Lane Rockville, Maryland 20850 Criminal
More informationRULES OF SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA PART THREE A CRIMINAL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE APPENDIX
RULES OF SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA PART THREE A CRIMINAL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE APPENDIX Form 6. Suggested Questions to Be Put by the Court to an Accused Who Has Pleaded Guilty (Rule 3A:8). Before accepting
More informationCase 1:05-cr-10037-GAO Document 459 Filed 09/24/14 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS CRIMINAL NO.
Case 1:05-cr-10037-GAO Document 459 Filed 09/24/14 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS CRIMINAL NO. 05-10037-GAO-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. GRANT BOYD, Defendant. O TOOLE,
More informationA summary of administrative remedies found in the Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act
BLACK HILLS SPECIAL SERVICES COOPERATIVE'S POLICY TO PROVIDE EDUCATION CONCERNING FALSE CLAIMS LIABILITY, ANTI-RETALIATION PROTECTIONS FOR REPORTING WRONGDOING AND DETECTING AND PREVENTING FRAUD, WASTE
More informationVILLAGECARE CORPORATE COMPLIANCE POLICY AND PROCEDURE MANUAL ORIGINAL EFFECTIVE DATE: JANUARY 1, 2007
VILLAGECARE CORPORATE COMPLIANCE POLICY AND PROCEDURE MANUAL SUBJECT: COMPLIANCE WITH FEDERAL AND STATE FALSE CLAIMS LAWS AND DETECTION AND PREVENTION OF FRAUD, WASTE AND ABUSE LAST POLICY REVISION EFFECTIVE
More informationWHITE-COLLAR CRIMES IN CALIFORNIA DOMENIC J. LOMBARDO
WHITE-COLLAR CRIMES IN CALIFORNIA Although White-Collar Crimes are Non-Violent Offenses They are Criminal Offenses Nonetheless and Can be Punished Just as Harshly as Other, More Well-Known, Crimes; a Basic
More informationForeign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA): Congressional Interest and Executive Enforcement
Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA): Congressional Interest and Executive Enforcement Michael V. Seitzinger Legislative Attorney October 21, 2010 Congressional Research Service CRS Report for Congress
More informationTITLE I REDUCTION OF ABUSIVE LITIGATION
109 STAT. 737 Public Law 104 67 104th Congress An Act To reform Federal securities litigation, and for other purposes. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America
More informationKBR Ruling Likely To Encourage More FCA Litigation
Portfolio Media. Inc. 860 Broadway, 6th Floor New York, NY 10003 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@law360.com KBR Ruling Likely To Encourage More FCA Litigation
More information