HELICAL FOUNDATIONS AND TIE BACKS. State of the Art. Richard W. Stephenson. Professor of Civil Engineering. University of MissouriRolla


 Alban Phillips
 9 months ago
 Views:
Transcription
1 ELICAL FOUNATIONS AN TIE BACKS State of the Art Richard W. Stephenson Professor of Civil Engineering University of MissouriRolla Rolla, Missouri 6509 June 6, 997 November, 003 (0:AM)
2 INTROUCTION...3 ISTORY...3 Modern Usage... ELICAL PILE ESIGN...7 Prototype...8 Theoretical...8 Semi empirical...8 Empirical...9 UPLIFT CAPACITY OF ELICAL PILES...9 General...9 SemiEmpirical elical Pile Capacity...0 Individual Plate Capacity Method...0 Kulhawy Method... Clemence Method...6 Uplift capacity of shallow anchors in sand...6 Uplift capacity of deep anchors in sand...5 Uplift capacity of helical anchors in clay...8 Empirical Method....3 BEARING CAPACITY OF ELICAL PILES...33 Bearing Capacity esign of elical Piles...3 LATERAL CAPACITY OF ELICAL PILES...36 Analysis Based on Limiting Equilibrium or Plasticity Theory...36 Analysis Based on Elastic Theory...37 Analysis Based on Nonlinear Theory...37 Simplified Method for Nonlinear Analysis of elical Piles in Clay...39 BIBLIOGRAPY...6 EXAMPLE PROBLEMS...8 Uplift Capacity...8 Shallow Anchor in Sand...8 eep Anchor in Sand...9 Shallow anchor in Clay...50 eep anchor in Clay...5 Anchor in Sand...5 Anchor in Clay...53 Lateral Capacity of a laterally Loaded elical Pile in Medium Clay...53 Lateral Capacity of a Laterally Loaded elical Pile in Soft Clay...5
3 ELICAL FOUNATIONS AN ANCORS STATE OF TE ART 6/6/997 R.W. Stephenson, P.E., Ph.. INTROUCTION elical piles (helical anchors) are finding increasingly widespread use in the geotechnical market. These foundations have the advantages of rapid installation and immediate loading capabilities that offer costsaving alternatives to reinforced concrete, grouted anchors and driven piles. The last years have seen the rapid development of rational geotechnical engineeringbased design and analysis procedures that can be used to provide helical pile design solutions ISTORY elical foundations have evolved from early foundations known as screw piles or screw The earliest reported screw pile was a timber fitted with an iron screw propeller that was twisted into the ground( ). The early screw mandrills were twisted into the ground by hand similar to a wood screw. They were then immediately withdrawn and the hole formed was filled with a crude form of concrete and served as foundations for small structures. Conventional screw piles have been in use since the 8th century for support of waterfront and in soft soil conditions for bridge structures as early as the 9th century. Power installed foundations were developed in England in the early 800's by Alexander Mitchell. In 833, Mitchell began constructing a series of lighthouses in the English tidal basin founded on his new screw ( The first commercially feasible helical anchor was developed in the early 900's to respond to a need for rapidly installed guy wire anchors. The anchors were installed and used primarily by the electrical power industry. The development of reliable truck mounted hydraulic torque drive devices revolutionized the anchor industry. These advances allowed the installation of helical anchors to greater depths and in a wider variety of soil conditions than ever before( ). Modern Usage Modern helical anchors are earth anchors constructed of helical shaped circular steel plates welded to a steel shaft (Figure ). The plates are constructed as a helix with a carefully controlled pitch. The anchors can have more than one helix located at appropriate spacing on the shaft. The central shaft is used to transmit torque during installation and to transfer axial loads to the helical plates. The central shaft also provides a major component of the resistance to lateral loading. A typical helical anchor installation is depicted in Figure. These anchors are turned into the ground using truck mounted augering equipment. The anchor is rotated into the ground with sufficient applied downward pressure (crowd) to advance the anchor one pitch distance per revolution. The anchor is advanced until the appropriate bearing stratum is reached or until the applied torque value attains a specified value. Extensions are added to the central shaft as needed. The applied loads may be tensile (uplift), compressive (bearing), shear (lateral), or some combination. elical anchors are rapidly installed in a wide variety of soil formations using a variety of readily available equipment. They are immediately ready for loading after installation. Large 3
4 Figure : Modern elical Pile
5 Figure : Installation of elical Pile multihelix anchors develop capacities of up to 00,000 lbs. (50 kn). In the past 0 years, the use of helical anchors has expanded beyond their traditional use in the electrical power industry. The advantages of rapid installation, immediate loading capability and resistance to both uplift and bearing loads have resulted in their being used more widely in traditional geotechnical engineering applications. Reported uses include tiebacks for soil retaining walls, foundations for lightly loaded structures such as transmission line towers, light poles, tie downs for manufactured housing, temporary structures, etc., and for underpinning lightly loaded structures such as single family dwellings. Because of these uses, there has been an increase in research into the behavior of helical anchors. Since about 975, a number of researchers have studied the geotechnical principals governing the behavior of helical piles. They have published reports of their studies of helical anchors under loading and proposed design procedures by which helical pile performance can be predicted. By far, the majority of this work has been in the anchoring (uplift) capacity of helical piles( ). owever, studies in the lateral and bearing (compression) load performance are reported as well. 5
6 ELICAL PILE ESIGN The methods available to design helical pile systems and to predict their performance under load can be divided into four broad categories: prototype (load test), theoretical, semiempirical and empirical. Prototype In the prototype design method, helical pile capacities are determined by testing a helical pile identical to the production pile in identical subsurface conditions (5). The results of the prototype test (load test) are then extrapolated to the rest of the helical piles used at the site. Advantages of this approach lie in the fact that actual piles are evaluated in their field use conditions. owever, this method requires the a priori selection of helix size and configurations as well as installation depth. The testing of several helical pile configurations to determine optimum size and spacing is usually too costly. Consequently, prototype testing is used primarily for proof testing semiempirical and empirical designs. Theoretical Theoretical methods utilize soil mechanics theories of the interaction behavior of foundations and earth materials. The theories use the basic properties of the foundation (strength and deformability) as well as the basic properties of the soil (strength and compressibility) to create design procedures that can be applied to different soil structures and different helical pile configurations. Ideally, the procedures are independent of particular installation equipment and can be applied to all realistic combinations of helical piles and soil stratigraphies. Semi empirical Unfortunately, because of the complexity of soil stratigraphy and the inability of current soil mechanics theories to fully describe the actual field performance of a soil, most geotechnical design procedures are theoretical procedures modified by experience (semiempirical). Empirical Empirical methods are most often developed and used by helical pile manufacturers who have access to vast quantities of pile behavior data. Empirical methods are based on statistical correlations of anchor uplift capacity with other, easily measured, parameters such as standard penetration test (N) values, installation torque, or other indices. The methodology for development of these correlations and the data on which they are based is usually considered proprietary by the manufacturers. Results obtained from these methods are highly variable ( )( )( )( ). By far the majority of the research has been directed toward the uplift behavior of helical piles (helical anchors). This is due primarily to their traditional use as guy line anchors and as tie downs for transmission towers and tiebacks for retaining structures. Considerably less work has been carried out on the performance of helical piles under lateral loading. owever, significant work is available on laterally loaded piles that could possibly be applied to helical piles. Even less data is reported on the performance of helical piles under bearing (compressive) loading. This is becoming more important since helical piles are gaining wide use for underpinning and supporting lightly loaded structures. The following sections will address each of the three design loading conditions. 6
7 UPLIFT CAPACITY OF ELICAL PILES General The behavior of any deep foundation is highly complex. Consequently, it is important to understand the the behavior of helical piles is influenced by the same factors that influence the behavior of drilled piers and driven piles: i.e., strength and deformation properties of soils, soil nonhomogeneities, groundwater levels, soil plasticity and volume change potential as well as installation procedures and equipment. SemiEmpirical elical Pile Capacity Individual Plate Capacity Method. One method of computing uplift capacities of helical piles is the individual plate capacity method. In this method, the uplift capacities are computing using: u n () U i i where n is the number of helices and ui is the ultimate uplift capacity of the individual helix. ui can be computed from bearing capacity theory as: where: q u i u i q i diameter of helix (3) i epth from ground surface to helix γ effective unit weight of soil above helix The first term of equation three is the contribution of soil cohesion to the uplift capacity. The second term is the contribution of soil friction to the capacity and the third term is the contribution of soil overburden to the capacity. N c *, N γ * and N q * are bearing capacity factors on cohesion, friction and surcharge respectively. For cohesive (clay) soils, N c * is normally taken as 9.0 for / > 3. For / 3, N c * is normally taken as 5.7. N γ * and N q * are taken as 0 and respectively. For helical foundations embedded in cohesionless (sand) soils, c is zero and N γ * and N q * vary as a function of the coefficient of friction (Φ) of the sand. Meyerhofs values of N γ * and N q * are often used and are presented as Table, below. Kulhawy Method. Kulhawy ( ) described a method of analysis of the uplift capacity of helical anchors by describing their behavior as intermediate between the grouted and spread anchors (Figure 3). In his model, the upper helix develops a cylindrical shear surface that controls its behavior. The soil between the helices becomes an effective cylinder if the helices are sufficiently close together. The shearing resistance along the interface is said to be controlled by the friction angle and state of stress in the disturbed cylinder of soil above the anchor. This disturbance effect can be approximated by relating the disturbed properties to the insitu properties in the following equations: u i xa * * cn c + iγ N γ + γ A area of helix 7 i N * q ()
8 u p+ f +W f () u Ultimate uplift capacity p Top plate (cone breakout) capacity f Cylinder friction capacity W f Weight of helical pile (often neglected) For cohesionless (sand) soils, Kulhawy recommended the following equations: Table Meyerhof s Bearing Capacity Factors Φ (deg) N c * N q * N γ *
9 where: ( max ) A f ( q N q ζ ζ ζ )+W f + (5) p p (max) Top plate capacity limit A f Area of top helix q effective surcharge γ W f Effective weight of helical pile alone tu Tip capacity in uplift (usually neglected) q qr qs qd tu Figure 3: Force model for helix 9
10 The N q term is a bearing capacity factor given by: π φ N e φ _ q tan 5 + (6) log I r 0 ζ qr exp (  3.8) tanφ +(3.07 sinφ ).0 + sinφ (7) G E I r (8) q tanφ (+ ν ) i qi tanφ The ζ terms are modification factors for soil rigidity (ζ qr ), anchor shape (ζ qs ), and anchor depth (ζ qd ) as given below. ζ + tanφ qs (9a) ζ qs + tanφ (9b)  ζ qd + tanφ( sinφ ) tan (9c) with the tan  term in radians. G soil shear modulus E soil elastic modulus The cylinder friction capacity, f, is computed from the following equation: where: f k k o P(z) σ v k P(z) σ v k u o (z)( tanδ )(z)dz δ (z) tan φ(z) φ P helix perimeter σ v effective vertical stress k coefficient of horizontal earth pressure δ effective interface friction angle k o Coefficient of earth pressure at rest φ Effective stress soil friction angle δ/ φ 0.9 k/k o 5/6 The friction capacity of the helical pile system is reduced due to disturbance caused by pile installation. Kulhawy accounted for this by using a reduced uplift capacity according to the following equation: β r f(reduced) () f β 0 0 (0)
11 δ β β β tan k 3 + o o o r () Clemence Method. A significant series of studies on helical anchor uplift capacity was done by Clemence ( ), and later summarized in Mitsch and Clemence ( ) and Mooney, Adamczak, and Clemence ( ). They extended the work of previous researchers with extensive full scale field tests, scale model laboratory tests, and theoretical analysis. These researchers suggested that helical pile uplift capacity could be divided into two broad categories: shallow anchors and deep anchors. They stated that the uplift capacity is provided by: + f p u (3) Uplift capacity of shallow anchors in sand (Figure ): +W 3 + k s 3 u u φ φ φ γ π tan cos tan () The weight of the soil, W s can be expressed as: + ) +( + )+ ( 3 W s φ φ π γ tan tan (5) as nondimensionalized these equations into: A F p q γ (6) ) ( k A F u p q φ φ φ γ tan cos tan (7) Similarly: A W F s q φ φ γ tan tan (8)
12 Figure : Idealized failure surface in sand for shallow anchor condition
13 Let Combining: F q p γ A R φ 0.5 φ R k u( tanφ ) cos tan R R φ φ tan +8R tan (9) (0) F q is called the breakout factor by as. To determine F q the value of k u must be determined. Mitsch and Clemence() showed that this value varies with the soil friction angle, Φ. Their values can be expressed as: ku 0.6 +m () The variation of m is given below. Table Variation of m Soil friction angle, Φ (degrees) m The magnitude of k u increases with / up to a maximum value and remains constant after that. This maximum value is attained at ( / ) cr R cr. The variation of k u with / and Φ are plotted in Figure 5. Substituting the appropriate value of k u and R into the previous equation, the variation of the breakout factor is shown in Figure 6 and Table 3. Now, 3
14 Figure 5: Variation of k u with / π p F qγ A F qγ () The frictional resistance that occurs at the interface of the cylinder is given as: π aγ ( n  )k utanφ (3) f a average helix diameter. Therefore the ultimate uplift capacity for a shallow anchor in sand is: π π + γ + n u F q ( γ )( n  )k u tanφ ()
15 Table 3: Variation of Breakout Factor F q for Shallow Anchor Condition F q R / Φ 5 Φ30 Φ35 Φ0 Φ
16 Φ 5 deg 00 Φ 0 deg Φ 35 deg F q Φ 30 deg Φ 5 deg / Figure 6: Variation of breakout factor with / for shallow condition Uplift capacity of deep anchors in sand: + + u p f s p f s bearing capacity of the top helix frictional resistance of the cone between the helices shaft friction resistance 0 where F * q π * p F q γ deep anchor breakout factor (5) (6) The magnitude of the F q F q * is determined by setting R R cr and k u k u(max) in equation 0. F q * has been plotted in Figure 8. The frictional resistance f is computed using: 6
17 π u a γ ( n  )k u max tanφ (7) + where n a The two equations can be combined to yield the net ultimate uplift capacity for deep anchors in sand: π * π + γ + n u F q γ ( n  )k u max tanφ (8) If the helices are placed too close to each other, the average net ultimate uplift capacity of each anchor may decrease due to the overlapping and interference of the individual failure zones It is recommended that the optimum spacing of the helices be about 3 apart. A factor of safety of.5 or more should be applied to the ultimate uplift capacity to determine the allowable or working uplift capacity. 7
18 Figure 7: Failure surface for deep helical pile in sand 8
19 eep Anchor Breakout Factor, F q * Soil Friction Angle (deg) Figure 8: Variation of deep anchor breakout factor with soil friction angle Uplift capacity of helical anchors in clay. Failure of helical piles in clay soils is normally analyzed using the Φ 0 condition. The soil shear strength is then characterized as: s u c u (9) Uplift capacity of shallow helical anchors in clay. For shallow anchors ( / ) ( / ) cr ), the failure surface at ultimate load extends from the top helix to the ground surface (Figure 9 ). If the / ratio is relatively large then the failure zone will not extend to the ground surface and the deep anchor situation controls. For shallow anchors: u p+ f (30) where: p bearing capacity of the top helix f bearing due to friction along enclosed cylinder between helices. p A c F c + W s A( cu F c + γ ) (3) Where A area of the top helix F c breakout factor 9
20 . u Φ/ W s Φ/ p n f Figure 9 Failure mode for shallow helical pile in clay γ unit weight of soil above top helix distance between the ground surface and the top helix F c is related to the bearing capacity factor N c in that it increases with depth of embedment up to a maximum of 9 at the critical R cr ( / ) cr value that depends on the undrained cohesion, c u (kn/m ) as in: R cr cr 0.07 cu+.5 7 (3) 0
21 F c ( / )/( / ) cr Figure 0: Variation of F c with ( / )/( / ) cr The variation of the breakout factor F c is plotted as a function of ( / )/( / ) cr in Figure 0. The frictional resistance of the cylinder of soil between the helices can be computed from: + n f π cu ( n ) (33) Combining: π + n u ( cu F c + γ )+ π ( n  )cu (3) Uplift capacity of deep helical anchors in clay. For the deep anchor condition ( / )> ( / ) cr deep anchor criteria holds (Figure ). The capacity for this case is given below. + + (35) u p f s Where s resistance due to adhesion at the interface of the clay and the anchor shaft located above the top helix. π p ( )(9cu+ γ ) (36) + n f π cu ( n ) (37) s π s ca (38)
22 Where c a is the adhesion and varies from about 0.3c u for stiff clays to about c u for soft clays and s is the shaft diameter. Combining: c + )c  ( + )+ + )(9 c ( a s u n n u u π π γ π (39) Figure : eep helical pile in clay
23 All ultimate uplift capacities should be divided by an appropriate factor of safety to set the allowable(working) factor of safety, i.e., u allow (0) FS Empirical Method Empirical methods are most often developed and used by anchor manufacturers who have access to vast quantities of anchor behavior data. These methods are based on statistical correlations of anchor uplift capacity with other, easily measured, parameters such as standard penetration test (N) values, installation torque, or other indices. The methodology for development of these correlations and the data on which they are based are usually considered proprietary by the manufacturers. Results obtained from these methods are highly variable. The most widely used correlation is with installation torque. In this method, the total anchor capacity is computed from the installation torque as: u K t xt () where: K t is the empirical factor relating installation torque and uplift capacity and T is the average installation torque. Currently, K t values are reported between 3 feet  for large (8 inch) extension shafts to around 0 feet  for all small (3 inch) shafts. 0 feet  is most widely used in the industry. BEARING CAPACITY OF ELICAL PILES Although helical piles have been used as tower foundations for many years, the design loading for these foundations is not bearing (compression) but uplift. It is only relatively recently that helical piles have been used in primarily bearing conditions. In particular, these foundations are being used in the retrofit or underpinning of distressed lightly loaded structures. There are several advantages of helical piles for foundation underpinning( ). Of particular importance is the general relationship between installation torque and helical pile capacity. It is possible to develop sitespecific K t values from preliminary field load testing and use the results as quality control values for the production piles. Other advantages include the ease of extending pile length by adding on extension shafts, the lack of influence of water table or caving soils, ability to install in lowoverhead, low noise or other restricted areas. elical anchor shafts are relatively small in diameter and by that develop low lateral stresses and low drag along their lengths. This makes them particularly applicable in expansive soil conditions. Bearing Capacity esign of elical Piles The bearing capacity of helical piles in compression is based upon the general bearing capacity equation: ' ' q cn + q(n  ) () ult Where: c soil cohesion q overburden pressure γ i γ effective unit weight i depth to helix c q 3
24 N c and N q are bearing capacity factors for circular plates at varying / values. Although there are some minor differences in these values depending upon the particular theory adopted, in general N c and N q are taken from Figure ( ). The bearing capacity of a multihelix system is the sum of the individual capacities of the individual helices if they are spaced appropriately far apart, i.e., three times the plate diameter or greater. n ult Ai ci N ' +q ( N ' ) (3) i [ i ] A i individual plate area c i cohesion of soil at and beneath helix I q i γ i i overburden pressure at helix i N ci Bearing capacity factor on cohesion for helix i (Figure ) N qi Bearing capacity factor on overburden for helix i (Figure ) c i q i 000 Nc* and Nq* 00 0 Nc / 7 7 Nq Soil Friction Angle (deg) Figure : N c * and N q * as a function of soil friction angle Φ
25 EXAMPLE PROBLEMS Uplift Capacity Shallow Anchor in Sand Given the situation shown in Figure EX. Using equation : π π γ + n u F q + ( γ )( n  )k u max tanφ 36 R Interpolating from Table 3, F q k u.3 (Figure 5). u π x05 π (05)( 8 x  3 ).3x tan 35 u 56+60,85 lbs FS.5 allow,85 7 lbs.5kips If the water surface were at the ground surface, then: γ γ γ γ sat water pcf
26 π 0 u 30.06x55. u 590 lbs FS.5 allow 590/.5 36 lbs. kips π (55.)(83 ).3x tan 35 x eep Anchor in Sand Given the situation shown in Figure EX. Using equation 8: k u max R (Figure 5) m cr For Φ 35, m 0.8 (Table ) cr cr 5 < R F * q 50 (Figure 8) π π + n u F qγ + ( γ )( n  )k umaxtanφ (equation 8 ) π 0 u 50x05 π (05)( x 6 ).5x tan 35
27 u lbs FS.5 allow 798/.5,67 lbs. kips If the water surface were at the ground surface, then: π 0 u 50x55. u 730 lbs FS.5 allow 730/ lbs 5.9 kips π (55.)( x 6 ).5x tan 35 Shallow anchor in Clay Figure EX3 Shallow anchor in clay Given the situation shown in Figure EX3. Using equation 30 A c F c +W s A( cu F c+ R p γ cr R R cr cr 0.07 cu+.5 7 cr 0.07(9) ) F c 9
28 in 30.5 cm π 30.5 p (9x9 +9.5) 33.6 kn 00 + n f π cu ( n ) (+0).5 f π 9.5 [(8x0.305) (3x0.305)] 66.3 kn x00 u kn
29 eep anchor in Clay u π ( )(9cu + γ Figure EX eep anchor in clay + )+ π n ( n  )cu + π s Assume c a 0.9c 0.9(8.0) 3. kn/m. π u [(x.305 ) )[9x x(6x.305)] (+0) π ( 6)(.305)8.0 xx00 x π 6x.305x kn FS 3.0 all u /FS 35.3/3 78 kn u c a (Equation39)
30 Bearing Capacity of a elical Pile in Compression Anchor in Sand (Figure EX5) Figure 5 EX 5 Bearing capacity of helical pile in sand c 0 γ 05 pcf Φ 35 deg q cn c + q( N q  ) (equation ) ult A n Ai c N + q ( N ult [ i c i i q i i (0/ ) π π )] 0.55 sf (0/ ) A π π 0.55 sf 3 (/ ) A3 π π 0.55 sf (0/ ) A π π sf
31 N q 77 N 7.6( max 7).8( max 7) q 90 q γ (05)(3) 35 psf q γ (05)(3+ 5/3) 90 psf q3 γ 3 3 (05)(3+0/3) 665 psf q γ (05)(3+5) 80 psf N N q 3 0 q 0 ult Ai [ ci N c i+qi N q i ] [(0.55)(35)(77)+(0.55)(90)(90)+(0.55)(665)(0)+(0.307)(80)](0) Anchor in Clay (Figure EX6) n i 3,9+,035+39,867 +8,367 05,87 lbs 05 kips allow ult FS kips Ai q i N qi Figure 6 EX6 Shallow anchor in clay
32 c 000 psf γ pcf Φ 0 deg N q (Figure ) * * q cn c + q( N q  ) (equation ) ult n ult Ai[ c i i N * ci + q ( N i * qi )] N c N c 6.3 N c ( max 7) N c 6 (/ ) A π π sf (/ ) A π π sf 3 (/ ) A3 π π sf (0/ ) A π π 0.55 sf (000)()+0.785(000)(5) ,990+, ,335 lbs allow ult 0.785(000)(0) +0.55(000)(6) ult FS 39.3 kips kips
33 BIBLIOGRAPY. Wilson, Guthlac, The Bearing Capacity of Screw Piles and Screwcrete Cylinders, J. Inst of Civil Engineers, London, Vol 3, pp 93, Stephenson, R.W., esign and Applications of elical Earth Anchors, (988), unpublished notes of a seminar for geotechnical engineering graduate students, University of Missouri Rolla, Oct. 0, Clemence, S.P., Thorsten, R.E., and Edwards, B., elical Anchors: Overview of Application and esign (990), Foundation rilling, ec./jan. 990, P.P as, Braja M. Earth Anchors, evelopments in Geotechnical Engineering, Series No. 50, Elsevier, NY Udwari, J.J., Rodgers, T.E., and Singh,., "A Rational Approach to the esign of igh Capacity ;Multihelix Screw Anchors," Proceedings, Seventh IEEE/PES Transmission and istribution Conference and Exposition, April 6, 979, pp Lutenegger, A.J., Smith, B.L., and Kabir, M.G., "Use of In Situ Tests to Predict Uplift Performance of Multihelix Anchors," Special Topics in Foundations, ASCE, pp A.B. Chance Co. Encyclopedia of Anchoring, The A.B. chance Co., oyt, R.M., and S.P. Clemence (989), "Uplift Capacity of elical Anchors in Sand," Proceedings of the XII International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Rio e Janeiro, Aug, 989, pp Kulhawy, F.., "Uplift Behavior of Shallow Soil Anchors  An Overview", Uplift Behavior of Anchor Foundations in Soil, ASCE, New York, pp. 5, Clemence, Samuel P., "The Uplift and Bearing Capacity of elix Anchors in Soil," Contract Report TT, 3 Volumes, Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation, Syracuse, New York (98).. Mitsch, M.P., and Clemence, S.P., The Uplift Capacity of elical Anchors in Sand, Uplift Behavior of Anchor Foundations in Soil, ASCE, New York, pp. 67 (985).. Mooney, J.S., Adamczak, S., and Clemence, S.P., "Uplift Capacity of elical Anchors in Clay and Silt," Uplift Behavior of Anchor Foundations in Soil, ASCE, pp. 87 (985).
34 3. Carville, Chester, A., P.E., and Walton, Robert W., Foundation Repair Using elical Screw Anchors, Foundation Upgrading and Repair for Infrastructure Geotechnical Special Publication, N. 50, American Society of Civil Engineering, New York, Meyerhof, G.G., Bearing Capacity and Settlement of Pile foundations, Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering ivision, American Society of Civil Engineers, Vol. 0, No. GT3, pp. 978, 976.
System. Stability. Security. Integrity. 150 Helical Anchor
Model 150 HELICAL ANCHOR System PN #MBHAT Stability. Security. Integrity. 150 Helical Anchor System About Foundation Supportworks is a network of the most experienced and knowledgeable foundation repair
More informationHow to Design Helical Piles per the 2009 International Building Code
ABSTRACT How to Design Helical Piles per the 2009 International Building Code by Darin Willis, P.E. 1 Helical piles and anchors have been used in construction applications for more than 150 years. The
More informationHelical Design Theory and Applications. By Darin Willis, P.E.
Helical Design Theory and Applications By Darin Willis, P.E. Solution Systems Ram Jack utilizes two unique underpinning & anchoring systems Hydraulically driven piles (pressed) Helical piles (torqued)
More informationDESIGN AND PERFORMANCE OF SCREW PILES AND HELICAL ANCHORS IN SOILS
DESIGN AND PERFORMANCE OF SCREW PILES AND HELICAL ANCHORS IN SOILS (A Bibliography of the Technical Literature) prepared by Alan J. Lutenegger Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering University
More informationComprehensive Design Example 2: Foundations for Bulk Storage Facility
Comprehensive Design Example 2: Foundations for Bulk Storage Facility Problem The project consists of building several dry product storage silos near an existing rail siding in an open field presently
More informationFOUNDATION DESIGN. Instructional Materials Complementing FEMA 451, Design Examples
FOUNDATION DESIGN Proportioning elements for: Transfer of seismic forces Strength and stiffness Shallow and deep foundations Elastic and plastic analysis Foundation Design 141 Load Path and Transfer to
More informationPILE FOUNDATIONS FM 5134
C H A P T E R 6 PILE FOUNDATIONS Section I. GROUP BEHAVIOR 61. Group action. Piles are most effective when combined in groups or clusters. Combining piles in a group complicates analysis since the characteristics
More informationALLOWABLE LOADS ON A SINGLE PILE
C H A P T E R 5 ALLOWABLE LOADS ON A SINGLE PILE Section I. BASICS 51. Considerations. For safe, economical pile foundations in military construction, it is necessary to determine the allowable load capacity
More informationFigure A1. Figure A2. continued on next page... HPM1. Grout Reservoir. Neat Cement Grout (Very Flowable) Extension Displacement Plate
Addendum HELICAL PULLDOWN Micropile (HPM) Introduction The HPM is a system for constructing a grout column around the shaft of a standard Helical Screw Foundation (see Figure A1). To begin the process,
More informationEvaluation Report CCMC 13102R Pieux Vissés Vistech / Postech Screw Piles
Evaluation Report CCMC 13102R Pieux Vissés Vistech / Postech Screw Piles 1. Opinion 1of 6 MASTERFORMAT: 31 62 16.01 Evaluation issued: 20030213 Reevaluated: 20150313 Reevaluation due: 20180213
More informationEVALUATING INSTALLATION DISTURBANCE OF HELICAL ANCHORS IN CLAY FROM FIELD VANE TESTS
EVALUATING INSTALLATION DISTURBANCE OF HELICAL ANCHORS IN CLAY FROM FIELD VANE TESTS Alan J. Lutenegger, John Erikson and Nicholas Williams, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, University
More informationHelical Piles. A Practical Guide to Design and Installation
Brochure More information from http://www.researchandmarkets.com/reports/2216946/ Helical Piles. A Practical Guide to Design and Installation Description: An unbiased, comprehensive review of helical pile
More informationPILE FOUNDATION. Pile
PILE FOUNDATION. One or more of the followings: (a)transfer load to stratum of adequate capacity (b)resist lateral loads. (c) Transfer loads through a scour zone to bearing stratum 1 (d)anchor structures
More informationStability. Security. Integrity.
Stability. Security. Integrity. PN #MBHPT Foundation Supportworks provides quality helical pile systems for both new construction and retrofit applications. 288 Helical Pile System About Foundation Supportworks
More informationStep 11 Static Load Testing
Step 11 Static Load Testing Test loading is the most definitive method of determining load capacity of a pile. Testing a pile to failure provides valuable information to the design engineer and is recommended
More informationDESIGN, INSTALLATION AND TESTING OF HELICAL PILES & ANCHORS. Presented by: Donald A. Deardorff, P.E. CHANCE Civil Construction Centralia, MO USA
DESIGN, INSTALLATION AND TESTING OF HELICAL PILES & ANCHORS Presented by: Donald A. Deardorff, P.E. CHANCE Civil Construction Centralia, MO USA Historical Perspective 1 st Recorded Screw Pile was by Alexander
More informationvulcanhammer.net This document downloaded from
This document downloaded from vulcanhammer.net since 1997, your source for engineering information for the deep foundation and marine construction industries, and the historical site for Vulcan Iron Works
More informationShallow Foundation Analysis on Heterogeneous Soil Formation in the Niger Delta of Nigeria
Shallow Foundation Analysis on Heterogeneous Soil Formation in the Niger Delta of Nigeria Akpila, S.B Department of Civil Engineering Rivers State University of Science & Technology, PortHarcourt. Eluozo,
More informationEXAMPLE 1 DESIGN OF CANTILEVERED WALL, GRANULAR SOIL
EXAMPLE DESIGN OF CANTILEVERED WALL, GRANULAR SOIL A sheet pile wall is required to support a 2 excavation. The soil is uniform as shown in the figure. To take into account the friction between the wall
More informationNew construction Repairing failed or old foundations Retrofit foundations Permanent battered piers Machinery/equipment foundations
from New construction foundations don t have to be a headache. The CHANCE Helical Pier Foundation System gives you the performance of concrete without the drawbacks and liabilities of driven piles and
More informationLEGACY REPORT ER5110. www.icces.org. ICC Evaluation Service, Inc. Reissued November 1, 2003. Legacy report on the 1997 Uniform Building Code
LEGACY REPORT Reissued November 1, 2003 ICC Evaluation Service, Inc. www.icces.org Business/Regional Office # 5360 Workman Mill Road, Whittier, California 90601 # (562) 6990543 Regional Office # 900
More informationTransmission Foundations. helical piles and guy anchors for transmission structures. www.hubbellpowersystems.com
Transmission Foundations helical piles and guy anchors for transmission structures www.hubbellpowersystems.com Grid locked on your transmission job? Instant Foundation helical piles go places concrete
More informationFinite Element Analysis of Elastic Settlement of Spreadfootings Founded in Soil
Finite Element Analysis of Elastic Settlement of Spreadfootings Founded in Soil Jae H. Chung, Ph.D. Bid Bridge Software Institute t University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA Content 1. Background 2.
More informationBEARING CAPACITY AND SETTLEMENT RESPONSE OF RAFT FOUNDATION ON SAND USING STANDARD PENETRATION TEST METHOD
SENRA Academic Publishers, British Columbia Vol., No. 1, pp. 272774, February 20 Online ISSN: 0353; Print ISSN: 177 BEARING CAPACITY AND SETTLEMENT RESPONSE OF RAFT FOUNDATION ON SAND USING STANDARD
More informationTerzaghi's Bearing Capacity Equations
Terzaghi's Bearing Capacity Equations Bearing capacity equation Bearing capacity factors Bearing capacity Chart Example 1: trip footing on cohesionless soil Example 2: quare footing on clay soil Example
More informationTYPES OF FOUNDATIONS
TYPES OF FOUNDATIONS 1 Foundation Systems Shallow Foundation Deep Foundation Pile Foundation Pier (Caisson) Foundation Isolated spread footings Wall footings Combined footings Cantilever or strap footings
More informationNumerical Simulation of CPT Tip Resistance in Layered Soil
Numerical Simulation of CPT Tip Resistance in Layered Soil M.M. Ahmadi, Assistant Professor, mmahmadi@sharif.edu Dept. of Civil Engineering, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran Abstract The paper
More informationHelical Pier Foundation System U.S. Patents 5,011,336; 5,120,163; 5,213,448
Helical Pier Foundation System U.S. Patents 5,011,336; 5,120,163; 5,213,448 Technical Manual Contents Helical Pier Foundation System History Research and Development Advantages Theory of Foundation Anchor
More informationENCE 4610 Foundation Analysis and Design
This image cannot currently be displayed. ENCE 4610 Foundation Analysis and Design Shallow Foundations Total and Differential Settlement Schmertmann s Method This image cannot currently be displayed. Strength
More informationEffect of shape on bearing capacity of embedded footings on reinforced foundation beds over soft nonhomogeneous ground
Japanese Geotechnical Society Special Publication The 15th Asian Regional Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering Effect of shape on bearing capacity of embedded footings on reinforced
More information13.1 SCOPE...131 13.2 DEFINITIONS...131 13.3 NOTATION...131 13.4 DETERMINATION OF SOIL PROPERTIES...132
SECTION 13: FOUNDATION DESIGN TABLE OF CONTENTS 13 13.1 SCOPE...131 13.2 DEFINITIONS...131 13.3 NOTATION...131 13.4 DETERMINATION OF SOIL PROPERTIES...132 13.5 FOUNDATION BEARING CAPACITY...132 13.5.1
More informationThe Islamic university  Gaza Faculty of Engineering Civil Engineering Department CHAPTER (2) SITE INVESTIGATION. Instructor : Dr.
The Islamic university  Gaza Faculty of Engineering Civil Engineering Department CHAPTER (2) SITE INVESTIGATION Instructor : Dr. Jehad Hamad Definition The process of determining the layers of natural
More informationAppendix A Sub surface displacements around excavations Data presented in Xdisp sample file
Appendix A Sub surface displacements around excavations Data presented in Xdisp sample file Notation B1 = lowest level of basement slab c = cohesion E = drained Young s Modulus Eu = undrained Young s Modulus
More informationHigh Capacity Helical Piles Limited Access Projects
High Capacity Helical Piles Limited Access Projects Tel 403 2281767 Canada, USA, Russia Brendan ODonoghue 519 8306113 Presentation Summary 1. Helical piles Background on large diameter shafts and helices
More informationNow That s IDEAL. Now That s IDEAL. LISTEN. RESEARCH. DESIGN. DELIVER.
The Leading Edge SM At IDEAL, we try not to complicate things. We discover needs and problems, then work out solutions. It takes real teamwork to accomplish truly great things. That s you and us, working
More informationHELICAL SCREW PILES (HSP) CAPACITY FOR AXIAL CYCLIC LOADINGS IN COHESIVE SOILS
4 th International Conference on Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering June 2528, 27 Paper No. 1567 HELICAL SCREW PILES (HSP) CAPACITY FOR AXIAL CYCLIC LOADINGS IN COHESIVE SOILS M. Hesham EL NAGGAR 1,
More informationNumerical Analysis of Texas Cone Penetration Test
International Journal of Applied Science and Technology Vol. 2 No. 3; March 2012 Numerical Analysis of Texas Cone Penetration Test Nutan Palla Project Engineer, TolunayWong Engineers, Inc. 10710 S Sam
More informationGeotechnical Measurements and Explorations Prof. Nihar Ranjan Patra Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur
Geotechnical Measurements and Explorations Prof. Nihar Ranjan Patra Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur Lecture No. # 13 (Refer Slide Time: 00:18) So last class, it was
More informationLymon C. Reese & Associates LCR&A Consulting Services Tests of Piles Under Axial Load
Lymon C. Reese & Associates LCR&A Consulting Services Tests of Piles Under Axial Load Nature of Services The company has a long history of performance of tests of piles and pile groups under a variety
More informationINSITU TESTS! Shear Vanes! Shear Vanes! Shear Vane Test! Sensitive Soils! Insitu testing is used for two reasons:!
Insitu Testing! Insitu Testing! Insitu testing is used for two reasons:! To allow the determination of shear strength or penetration resistance or permeability of soils that would be difficult or impossible
More informationMETHOD OF STATEMENT FOR STATIC LOADING TEST
Compression Test, METHOD OF STATEMENT FOR STATIC LOADING TEST Tension Test and Lateral Test According to the American Standards ASTM D1143 07, ASTM D3689 07, ASTM D3966 07 and Euro Codes EC7 Table of Contents
More informationPiezocone tests. Test standards and procedures. Seismic piezocone. June 2006
Piezocone tests Test standards and procedures Seismic piezocone June 2006 Av Érico Veríssimo, 901 / 302, 22621 180 Rio de Janeiro, Brasil P +55 21 2486 3386, F +55 21 2491 8974 www.terratek.com.br, terratek@terratek.com.br
More informationload on the soil. For this article s examples, load bearing values given by the following table will be assumed.
How Many Piers? By Gary Collins, P.E. A clearcut guide to helical pier spacing Introduction Helical pier spacing is not an exact science. How many does it take to support a structure adequately or repair
More informationc. Borehole Shear Test (BST): BST is performed according to the instructions published by Handy Geotechnical Instruments, Inc.
Design Manual Chapter 6  Geotechnical 6B  Subsurface Exploration Program 6B2 Testing A. General Information Several testing methods can be used to measure soil engineering properties. The advantages,
More informationSUGGESTION ABOUT DETERMINATION OF THE BEARING CAPACITY OF PILES ON THE BASIS OF CPT SOUNDING TESTS
SUGGESTION ABOUT DETERMINATION OF THE BEARING CAPACITY OF PILES ON THE BASIS OF CPT SOUNDING TESTS JóZSEF PUSZTAI About the authors Pusztai József Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Department
More informationDesign, Testing and Automated Monitoring of ACIP Piles in Residual Soils
Design, Testing and Automated Monitoring of ACIP Piles in Residual Soils Stephen W. Lacz 1, M. ASCE, P.E. and Richard C. Wells 2, F. ASCE, P.E. 1 Senior Professional, Trigon Kleinfelder, Inc., 313 Gallimore
More informationUSE OF CONE PENETRATION TEST IN PILE DESIGN
PERIODICA POLYTECHNICA SER. CIV. ENG. VOL. 47, NO. 2, PP. 189 197 (23) USE OF CONE PENETRATION TEST IN PILE DESIGN András MAHLER Department of Geotechnics Budapest University of Technology and Economics
More informationModule 7 (Lecture 24 to 28) RETAINING WALLS
Module 7 (Lecture 24 to 28) RETAINING WALLS Topics 24.1 INTRODUCTION 24.2 GRAVITY AND CANTILEVER WALLS 24.3 PROPORTIONING RETAINING WALLS 24.4 APPLICATION OF LATERAL EARTH PRESSURE THEORIES TO DESIGN 24.5
More informationDesign and Construction of Auger Cast Piles
Design and Construction of Auger Cast Piles 101 th Annual Road School 2015 3/11/2015 Malek Smadi, Ph.D., P.E. Principal Engineer  GEOTILL  Fishers, IN msmadi@geotill.com  www.geotill.com CONTENTS 1.
More informationINDIRECT METHODS SOUNDING OR PENETRATION TESTS. Dr. K. M. Kouzer, Associate Professor in Civil Engineering, GEC Kozhikode
INDIRECT METHODS SOUNDING OR PENETRATION TESTS STANDARD PENETRATION TEST (SPT) Reference can be made to IS 2131 1981 for details on SPT. It is a field edtest to estimate e the penetration e resistance
More informationBearing Capacity (Daya Dukung Tanah)
Bearing Capacity (Daya Dukung Tanah) Dr. Ir.H. Erizal, MAgr Definisi Daya dukung yang diizinkan (allowable bearing cap.) tekanan maksimum yang dapat diaplikasikan ke tanah dimana 2 kondisi diatas dipenuhi.
More informationModule 5 (Lectures 17 to 19) MAT FOUNDATIONS
Module 5 (Lectures 17 to 19) MAT FOUNDATIONS Topics 17.1 INTRODUCTION Rectangular Combined Footing: Trapezoidal Combined Footings: Cantilever Footing: Mat foundation: 17.2 COMMON TYPES OF MAT FOUNDATIONS
More informationOutline MICROPILES SUBJECT TO LATERAL LOADING. Dr. Jesús Gómez, P.E.
MICROPILES SUBJECT TO LATERAL LOADING Dr. Jesús Gómez, P.E. Micropile Design and Construction Seminar Las Vegas, NV April 34, 2008 Outline When are micropiles subject to lateral load? How do we analyze
More informationFoundation Installation
Appendix B Foundation Installation Guidelines SOUTHWEST WINDPOWER, INC.  1801 WEST ROUTE 66  FLAGSTAFF, ARIZONA 86001  PH: 928.779.9463  FAX: 928.779.1485 www.skystreamenergy.com October 2006 Southwest
More informationDesigned and Engineered to Perform
History EARTH CONTACT PRODUCTS, L.L.C., is a family owned company, based in Olathe, Kansas. This company was built upon Don May s U.S. Patented fourthgeneration Steel Piering System that has led to the
More informationMicropiles Reduce Costs and Schedule for Merchant RR Bridge Rehabilitation
Micropiles Reduce Costs and Schedule for Merchant RR Bridge Rehabilitation Jeff R. Hill, P.E. Hayward Baker Inc. 111 W. Port Plaza Drive Suite 600 St. Louis, MO 63146 3145423040 JRHill@HaywardBaker.com
More informationModule 1 : Site Exploration and Geotechnical Investigation. Lecture 4 : Insitu tests [ Section 4.1: Penetrometer Tests ] Objectives
Lecture 4 : Insitu tests [ Section 4.1: Penetrometer Tests ] Objectives In this section you will learn the following Penetrometer Tests Standard penetration test Static cone penetration test Dynamic cone
More informationNEGATIVE SKIN FRICTION AND SETTLEMENT OF PILES. Dr. Bengt H. Fellenius, P. Eng. University of Ottawa, Canada
Fellenius, B. H., 1984. Negative skin friction and settlement of piles. Second International Seminar, Pile Foundations, Nanyang Technological Institute, Singapore, November 2830, 12 p. NEGATIVE SKIN FRICTION
More informationReliability of Estimated Anchor Pullout Resistance. Yasser A. Hegazy, M. ASCE 1
Reliability of Estimated Anchor Pullout Resistance Yasser A. Hegazy, M. ASCE 1 Abstract In anchor pullout design, conservative soil and rock shear strength parameters are usually adopted. Presumptive values
More informationCE632 Foundation Analysis and Design
CE63 Foundation Analysis and Design Pile Foundations 1 Indian Standards on Piles IS 911 : Part 1 : Sec 1 : 1979 Driven cast insitu concrete piles IS 911 : Part 1 : Sec : 1979 Bored castinsitu piles
More informationStep 6 Buckling/Slenderness Considerations
Step 6 Buckling/Slenderness Considerations Introduction Buckling of slender foundation elements is a common concern among designers and structural engineers. The literature shows that several researchers
More informationAPPENDIX A PRESSUREMETER TEST INTERPRETATION
APPENDIX A PRESSUREMETER TEST INTERPRETATION PRESSUREMETER TEST INTERPRETATION Description of test The pressuremeter test, discussed in great detail by Martin (1977), Baguelin et al. (1978), Barksdale
More informationUSE OF MICROPILES IN TEXAS BRIDGES. by John G. Delphia, P.E. TxDOT Bridge Division Geotechnical Branch
USE OF MICROPILES IN TEXAS BRIDGES by John G. Delphia, P.E. TxDOT Bridge Division Geotechnical Branch DEFINITION OF A MICROPILE A micropile is a small diameter (typically less than 12 in.), drilled and
More informationSAMPLE GUIDE SPECIFICATIONS FOR OSTERBERG CELL LOAD TESTING OF DEEP FOUNDATIONS
Page 1 of 9 SAMPLE GUIDE SPECIFICATIONS FOR OSTERBERG CELL LOAD TESTING OF DEEP FOUNDATIONS 1. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 1. Description of Work: This work consists of furnishing all materials, equipment and
More informationPage B1 Hubbell Power Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved Copyright 2014 LOAD TESTS
Page B1 Hubbell Power Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved Copyright 2014 Appendix B CONTENTS STATIC (TIEBACKS)... B3 STATIC AXIAL (COMPRESSION/TENSION)... B6 STATIC (LATERAL)... B9 CAPACITY VERIFICATION
More informationDRIVEN PIPE PILES IN DENSE SAND
DRIVEN PIPE PILES IN DENSE SAND BYRON BYRNE GEOMECHANICS GROUP THE UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA ABSTRACT: Piles are often driven open ended into dense sand with the aim of increasing the ease of penetration
More informationOptimised Design for Soil Nailed Walls 1
Optimised Design for Soil Nailed Walls 1 J A R Ortigao 1 and E M Palmeira 2 1 Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil 2 University of Brasília, Brasília, Brazil INTRODUCTION The first
More informationB.TECH. (AEROSPACE ENGINEERING) PROGRAMME (BTAE) TermEnd Examination December, 2011 BAS010 : MACHINE DESIGN
No. of Printed Pages : 7 BAS01.0 B.TECH. (AEROSPACE ENGINEERING) PROGRAMME (BTAE) CV CA CV C:) O TermEnd Examination December, 2011 BAS010 : MACHINE DESIGN Time : 3 hours Maximum Marks : 70 Note : (1)
More informationCEEN 162  Geotechnical Engineering Laboratory Session 7  Direct Shear and Unconfined Compression Tests
PURPOSE: The parameters of the shear strength relationship provide a means of evaluating the load carrying capacity of soils, stability of slopes, and pile capacity. The direct shear test is one of the
More informationEarth Pressure and Retaining Wall Basics for NonGeotechnical Engineers
PDHonline Course C155 (2 PDH) Earth Pressure and Retaining Wall Basics for NonGeotechnical Engineers Instructor: Richard P. Weber, P.E. 2012 PDH Online PDH Center 5272 Meadow Estates Drive Fairfax, VA
More informationLoad and Resistance Factor Geotechnical Design Code Development in Canada. by Gordon A. Fenton Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada
Load and Resistance Factor Geotechnical Design Code Development in Canada by Gordon A. Fenton Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada 1 Overview 1. Past: Where we ve been allowable stress design partial
More informationDESIGN OF PILES AND PILE GROUPS CONSIDERING CAPACITY, SETTLEMENT, AND NEGATIVE SKIN FRICTION
DESIGN OF PILES AND PILE GROUPS CONSIDERING CAPACITY, SETTLEMENT, AND NEGATIVE SKIN FRICTION Introduction Bengt H. Fellenius, Dr.Tech., P.Eng. Background Notes for Demo Example for UniPile at www.unisoftltd.com
More informationSince the Steel Joist Institute
SELECTING and SPECIFYING Wesley B. Myers, P.E. An insider s guide to selecting and specifying Kseries, LH, DLHseries joists and joist girders Since the Steel Joist Institute adopted the first standard
More informationFigure 2.31. CPT Equipment
Soil tests (1) Insitu test In order to sound the strength of the soils in Las Colinas Mountain, portable cone penetration tests (Japan Geotechnical Society, 1995) were performed at three points C1C3
More informationDesign of pile foundations following Eurocode 7Section 7
Brussels, 1820 February 2008 Dissemination of information workshop 1 Workshop Eurocodes: background and applications Brussels, 1820 Februray 2008 Design of pile foundations following Eurocode 7Section
More informationMETHODS FOR ACHIEVEMENT UNIFORM STRESSES DISTRIBUTION UNDER THE FOUNDATION
International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology (IJCIET) Volume 7, Issue 2, MarchApril 2016, pp. 4566, Article ID: IJCIET_07_02_004 Available online at http://www.iaeme.com/ijciet/issues.asp?jtype=ijciet&vtype=7&itype=2
More informationIntroduction to Spread Footings and Mat Foundations
Introduction to Spread Footings and Mat Foundations Course No: G02008 Credit: 2 PDH J. Paul Guyer, P.E., R.A., Fellow ASCE, Fellow AEI Continuing Education and Development, Inc. 9 Greyridge Farm Court
More informationPTS HELICAL PIERS INSTALLATION SPECIFICATIONS NOTICE
FORM A PTS HELICAL PIERS INSTALLATION SPECIFICATIONS NOTICE The following suggested specifications are written as a guide to assist the specifier in writing his own specifications. Specific circumstances
More informationHUSH Screw Anchor. Technical data. Seismic design data. HUSH Carbon steel screw anchor. HUSH diameter 8, 10, 14. Seismic design data
Technical data HUSH Carbon steel screw anchor HUSH diameter 8, 10, 14 10 / 011 Version 01110 1 HUSH screw anchor seismic design data Anchor version Carbon steel screw Benefits  Quick and easy setting
More informationSoil Screw Design Manual Edition 2
Soil Screw Design Manual Edition 2 Page TOC1 Hubbell Power Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved Copyright 2015 CONTENTS CONTENTS TABLE of CONTENTS INTRODUCTION and APPLICATIONS Section 1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE...
More informationDIVISION: 31 00 00 EARTHWORK SECTION: 31 63 00 BORED PILES REPORT HOLDER: HUBBELL POWER SYSTEMS, INC.
0 ICC ES Report ICC ES (800) 4 6587 (56) 699 054 www.icc es.org 000 Most Widely Accepted and Trusted ESR 794 Reissued 05/05 This report is subject to renewal 05/06. DIVISION: 00 00 EARTHWORK SECTION: 6
More informationSTRUCTURES. 1.1. Excavation and backfill for structures should conform to the topic EXCAVATION AND BACKFILL.
STRUCTURES 1. General. Critical structures may impact the integrity of a flood control project in several manners such as the excavation for construction of the structure, the type of foundation, backfill
More informationDynamic Load Testing of Helical Piles
Dynamic Load Testing of Helical Piles ANNUAL KANSAS CITY SPECIALTY SEMINAR 2014 JANUARY 10, 2014 Jorge Beim JWB Consulting LLC Pile Dynamics, Inc. Main Topics Brief description of the Dynamic Load Test
More informationCIVL451. Soil Exploration and Characterization
CIVL451 Soil Exploration and Characterization 1 Definition The process of determining the layers of natural soil deposits that will underlie a proposed structure and their physical properties is generally
More informationNUMERICAL MODELLING OF PIEZOCONE PENETRATION IN CLAY
NUMERICAL MODELLING OF PIEZOCONE PENETRATION IN CLAY Ilaria Giusti University of Pisa ilaria.giusti@for.unipi.it Andrew J. Whittle Massachusetts Institute of Technology ajwhittl@mit.edu Abstract This paper
More informationPDHonline Course S151A (1 PDH) Steel Sheet Piling. Instructor: Matthew Stuart, PE, SE. PDH Online PDH Center
PDHonline Course S151A (1 PDH) Steel Sheet Piling Instructor: Matthew Stuart, PE, SE 2012 PDH Online PDH Center 5272 Meadow Estates Drive Fairfax, VA 220306658 Phone & Fax: 7039880088 www.pdhonline.org
More informationINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CIVIL AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING Volume 3, No 3, 2013
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CIVIL AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING Volume 3, No 3, 2013 Copyright by the authors  Licensee IPA Under Creative Commons license 3.0 Research article ISSN 0976 4399 Reliability of
More informationCopyright by W. Tom Witherspoon. All Rights Reserved. Soil Stabilzation of Oklahoma, Inc
Copyright by W. Tom Witherspoon All Rights Reserved LOAD CAPACITY TESTING AND ANALYSIS OF RESIDENTIAL UNDERPINNING SYSTEMS IN EXPANSIVE CLAY ENVIRONMENT by WILLIAM THOMAS WITHERSPOON Presented to the Faculty
More informationProLift Steel Pile Foundation Repair
ProLift Steel Pile Foundation Repair ProLift Steel Pile Foundation Repair System Prolift steel piles are designed for the stresses of Texas soils. They can have multiple steel walls, depending on the
More informationATLAS RESISTANCE Pier Foundation Systems
ATLAS RESISTANCE Pier Foundation Systems Foundation Repair Systems for Civil Construction Applications: Residential, Commercial, Industrial Atlas Resistance Piers have been used to restore and/or stabilize
More information5/1/2013. Topics. The challenge is to better maintain native characteristics of soils during and after construction
PIN Foundations Topics Applications Design and Construction Flow Control Credits www.pinfoundations.com Copyright 2008, Pin Foundations, Inc. Curtis Hinman WSU Extension Faculty, Watershed Ecologist chinman@wsu.edu
More informationLocal Authority Building Control Technical Information Note 3 Driven and Insitu Piled Foundations
Local Authority Building Control Technical Information Note 3 Driven and Insitu Piled Foundations Cambridge City Council  East Cambridgeshire District Council  Fenland District Council, Huntingdonshire
More informationDESIGNING STRUCTURES IN EXPANSIVE CLAY
DESIGNING STRUCTURES IN EXPANSIVE CLAY A GUIDE FOR A RCHITECTS AND E NGINEERS Table of Contents 1. Introduction Page 1 2. Common Foundation Systems Page 2 3. Drilled Piers Page 3 a. Skin Friction Piers
More informationGUIDELINE FOR HAND HELD SHEAR VANE TEST
GUIDELINE FOR HAND HELD SHEAR VANE TEST NZ GEOTECHNICAL SOCIETY INC August 2001 CONTENTS Page 1.0 Introduction 2 2.0 Background 2 3.0 Recommended Practice 3 4.0 Undrained Shear Strength 3 5.0 Particular
More informationSPECIFICATION FOR DYNAMIC CONSOLIDATION / DYNAMIC REPLACEMENT
SPECIFICATION FOR DYNAMIC CONSOLIDATION / DYNAMIC REPLACEMENT 1.0 SOIL IMPROVEMENT 1.1 General Soil Investigation Information are provided in Part B1 annex as a guide to the Contractor for his consideration
More informationNational Council of Examiners for Engineering and Surveying. Principles and Practice of Engineering Structural Examination
Structural Effective Beginning with the April 2011 The structural engineering exam is a breadth and exam examination offered in two components on successive days. The 8hour Vertical Forces (Gravity/Other)
More informationGeotechnical Investigation Test Report
Geotechnical Investigation Test Report Report No. htsc/rcd/ 3457 Dated:  20/03/2010 Asphalt Standard Penetration Test as per IS 2131  IS 6403 Soil Job Card No  1649 Cement Client/Department
More informationINTRODUCTION TO SOIL MODULI. JeanLouis BRIAUD 1
INTRODUCTION TO SOIL MODULI By JeanLouis BRIAUD 1 The modulus of a soil is one of the most difficult soil parameters to estimate because it depends on so many factors. Therefore when one says for example:
More informationStress and Deformation Analysis. Representing Stresses on a Stress Element. Representing Stresses on a Stress Element con t
Stress and Deformation Analysis Material in this lecture was taken from chapter 3 of Representing Stresses on a Stress Element One main goals of stress analysis is to determine the point within a loadcarrying
More informationCaltrans Geotechnical Manual
Cone Penetration Test The cone penetration test (CPT) is an insitu sounding that pushes an electronic penetrometer into soil and records multiple measurements continuously with depth. Compared with rotary
More information