# Chapter 14: Production Possibility Frontiers

Save this PDF as:

Size: px
Start display at page:

## Transcription

1 Chapter 14: Production Possibility Frontiers 14.1: Introduction In chapter 8 we considered the allocation of a given amount of goods in society. We saw that the final allocation depends upon the initial allocation. The obvious next question then is the determination of this initial allocation. This obviously depends upon the choices open to society. It is to this question that we now turn: what determines the production possibilities open to a society? We consider two different scenarios. In the first the society consists of two individuals, each of whom can produce various combinations of two goods, using what we term a linear technology. We examine how the two individuals should divide up the work between them so that society (the two of them together) might produce the maximum output possible. In the second scenario, we have two firms, each producing one good, and with a fixed amount of inputs between them. We consider the optimal use of the two inputs so that, once again, output is maximised. In both scenarios we find the production possibility frontier available to society and discuss the factors which determine its shape. 14.2: Linear Technologies We start with a nice simple story. The society consists of two individuals, A and B, and two goods, 1 and 2, which both A and B can produce. We tell a very simple story about each of their production capabilities. For each of the goods there is a maximum amount that each individual can produce if they devote all their time to the production of that good say m 1 for good 1 and m 2 for good 2. (These maximum amounts can differ from individual to individual, as we shall see.) So if the individual works all day on good 1 he or she can produce m 1 of good 1 and nothing of good 2; if the individual works all day on good 2 he or she can produce m 2 of good 2 and nothing of good 1. Moreover let us assume that the working process is such that if he or she works half the day on good 1 and half on good 2 then he or she can produce m 1 /2 of good 1 and m 2 /2 of good 2. More generally if he or she spends a fraction a of the day working on good 1 and a fraction (1-a) of the day working on good 2, then he or she can produce a quantity am 1 of good 1 and a quantity (1-a)m 2 of good 2. This is called a linear technology. Let us now consider a specific example. Let us start with individual A and suppose that his or her maximum quantities are 120 units of good 1 and 60 units of good 2. Given what we have assumed above individual A s production possibility frontier is shown in the following figure, which has the quantity of good 1 produced along the horizontal axis and the quantity of good 2 along the vertical axis.

2 The line indicates the possibilities open to individual A assuming he or she works all day 1. So, for example, the midpoint represents what he or she would produce if half the day were spent on the production of each good. We make the same kinds of assumptions about individual B though we assume that he or she is less productive than A in the production of both of the goods. So, for individual B, we assume maximum quantities of good 1 and good 2 equal to 20 and 40 respectively. We thus get the following production possibility frontier for individual B. Working all day on good 1 he or she produces 20 of good 1 and none of good 2; working all day on good 2 he or she produces 40 of good 2 and none of good 1; working half the day on each, he or she produces 10 of good 1 and 20 of good 2. And so on. We note that B is absolutely worse than A in the production of both goods though we can say that B is relatively better than A at producing good 2 and A is relatively better than B at producing good 1. How can we say this? We note that for individual A, for every extra unit of good 1 that he or she produces he or she has to produce 0.5 units less of good 2, whereas for B, for every extra unit of good 1 that he or she produces he or she has to produce 2 units less of good 2. So, in terms of the cost of producing good 1 (as measured by the amount of good 2 that has to be given up to produce the extra amount of good 1) it is relatively low for A. In this sense then A is relatively better than B at producing good 1. We can do all this the other way around. We note that for individual B, for every extra unit of good 2 that he or she produces he or she has to produce 0.5 units less of good 1, whereas for A, for every extra unit of good 2 that he or she produces he or she has to produce 2 units less of good 1. So, in terms of the cost of producing good 2 (as measured by the amount of 1 From now on we shall simply take this as given. If he or she works less than all day then point within the triangle will the result.

3 good 1 that has to be given up to produce the extra amount of good 2) it is relatively low for B. In this sense then B is relatively better than A at producing good 2. The issue that we now discuss is that of the maximum output of the two individuals combined. We want to find the highest production possibility production of society. Well, the answer to this depends upon how they divide up the work between them. Actually the end points of the production possibility frontier for society are easy to find: if society wants the maximum amount of good 1 then both individuals have to work all day on good 1 this gives us a total output of good 1 of ( ) = 140; if society wants the maximum amount of good 2 then both individuals have to work all day on good 2 this gives us a total output of good 1 of ( ) = 100. It is in between these two extremes that difficulties lie. One possibility is that they simply divide up the work equally in the following sense: if A works half the day on good 1 then so does B; more generally, if A works a fraction a of the day on good 1 then so does B. This gives us the following production possibility frontier for society: The top line is society s production possibility frontier if A and B share the work equally. The second line is A s production possibility frontier and the bottom line B s. We have already discussed the extremes (140, 0) and (0, 100). Points in between are found by the sharing work equally rule. For example the point at the middle of society s frontier (70, 50) is reached by each working half the day on good 1 and half on good 2 so A produces 60 of good 1 and 30 of good 2 and B produces 10 of good 1 and 20 of good 2: jointly they produce 70 of good 1 and 50 of good 2. A further example is the point ¼ of the way along: (105, 25). This is reached by A working ¾ of the day on good 1 and ¼ on good 2 and producing 90 of good 1 and 15 of good 2, and by B working ¾ of the day on good 1 and ¼ on good 2 and producing 15 of good 1 and 10 of good 2. You might be asking yourself whether this is a particularly clever way for the two individuals to share the work. After all we have already realised that A is relatively good at producing good 1 and that B is relatively good at producing good 2. Might it not be better for each individual to specialise in the production of the good which they are relatively better at producing? We can easily see that the answer to this question must be yes by considering what happens at the point where each individual specialises in the good at which he or she is relatively good. If A works all day on good 1 he or she produces 120 of good 1 and 0 of good 2; if B works all day on good 1 then he or she produces 40 of good 2 and 0 of good 1. Between the two of them they produce 120 of good 1 and 40 of good 2 that is society reaches the point (120, 40). What do we notice about this point (120, 40)? Yes that it lies outside the production possibility frontier for society that we have drawn above.

4 If we apply this principle that each individual specialises in the production of the good in which he or she has a relative advantage, we get the society production possibility frontier shown below: We have already discussed the extremes and the point (120, 40) which is the point at the angle on society s frontier. This kink point divides up society s frontier into two regions the region above the kink and the region below the kink. We see that in the region above the kink, society is consuming more than 40 units of good 2 more than the amount of good 2 that can be produced by the expert in good 2, namely individual B. So in this region above the kink B spends all day on good 2 while A produces the rest. In the region below the kink, society is consuming more than 120 units of good 1, more than the amount of good 1 that can be produced by the expert in good 1, namely individual A. So in this region below the kink A spends all day on good 1 while B produces the rest. This way of dividing up the work between them is the most efficient possible in the sense that it leads to the highest possible production possibility frontier for society 2. It is instructive to look at this frontier and see where it comes from. There is a part which corresponds to the frontier for A shifted vertically upwards a distance 40 (corresponding to B specialising in good 2) and a part which corresponds to the frontier for B shifted horizontally rightwards a distance 120 (corresponding to A specialising in good 1). You will notice that the frontier is concave. Note that it must always be so if individuals specialise in what they are relatively good at producing. You might now be able to work out what happens if a third individual enters the society. His or her effect on society s production possibility frontier clearly depends upon his or her frontier. Let us suppose that he or she is between A and B in terms of productive ability both absolutely and relatively: his frontier going from (50, 0) to (0. 50) as in the figure Note that at all levels of production A is relatively better than B in the production of good 1 and B is relatively better than A in the production of good 2. So A should produce as much of good 1 as possible and B as much of good 2 as possible (though obviously this depends upon where one wants to be on society s frontier).

5 As before, society s frontier has a section corresponding to each individual and arranged in such a way that production is maximised. You should be able to verify the following: You will see that: (1) if society wants a lot of good 1 then both A and C specialise in its production; (2) if society wants a lot of good 2 then both B and C specialise in its production; (3) in between A specialises in good 1 and B specialises in good 2. We note that the frontier remains concave. Adding more individuals adds more segments (always one for individual) but keeps the frontier concave. Note that the slope of any segment measures the marginal rate of substitution between the two goods and in each segment this mrs is the mrs of some individual (which is constant for any one individual). 14.3: Non-Linear Technologies The interesting point about the material above is that although individual technologies are linear in the sense that I have described, the frontier for society is concave. It is concave because of the specialisation of the individuals. In this section we also derive (under certain assumptions) a concave frontier for society, but starting from a different perspective. Here we use the material of chapters 10 through 13. We assume that the society consists of two firms, firm 1 and firm 2, each producing a particular good: firm 1 produces output 1 and firm 2 produces output 2. They produce the goods using two inputs, input 1 and input 2, the total quantities of which are fixed and given in society. The problem that society faces then is the allocation of these two inputs in such a way that the output is as large as possible in some sense. To solve this problem it is useful to use an Edgeworth box. In the past we have used this to discuss the allocation of two goods between two individuals; here we use it to discuss the allocation of two inputs between two firms. We measure one firm from one origin and the other from the other. The

6 horizontal axis indicates the quantity of input 1 and the vertical axis the quantity of input 2. The width of the box is the total quantity of input 1 in the economy and the height of the box the total quantity of input 2 in the economy. A point in the box indicates an allocation of the two inputs between the two firms. This determines the outputs of the two firms. We have inserted into the box isoquants for the two firms those convex from the bottom left origin those for firm 1; those convex from the top right origin those for firm 2. Now we know that the efficient points are along the contract curve which is inserted into the above figure whatever society does it should choose a point on the contact curve. Once we are on the contract curve there is a trade-off: moving from the bottom left origin to the top right origin increases the output of firm 1 and decreases the output of firm 2. At each point along the contract curve we can calculate the output of firm 1 and the output of firm 2. An example is given in the figure. Here I am assuming a production function for firm 1 given by a Cobb-Douglas with parameters a = 0.56 and b = 0.24 and a production function for firm 2 that is also Cobb-Douglas but now with parameters a = 0.48 and b = Note that both firms have decreasing returns to scale. If we now plot the output of firm 2 against the output of firm 1 along the contract curve we get the production possibility frontier of the society 3. 3 This may all be very familiar. In fact, we did almost the same in chapter 9 when deriving the utility possibility frontier for society.

7 We see that the frontier is concave. The reason for this is that the technology of each firm has decreasing returns to scale: as we move up the contract curve the output of firm 1 rises, but at an increasingly slower rate, while the output of firm 2 falls, at an increasingly faster rate. Clearly the degree of the decreasing returns to scale will influence the concavity of the frontier: if we take, instead of a = 0.56 and b = 0.24 for firm 1 and a = 0.48 and b = 0.32 for firm 2, we take a = 0.49 and b = 0.21 for firm 1 and a = 0.42 and b = 0.24 for firm 2 (notice that the ratio of a to b for each firm has not changed so the isoquants look the same but their sum is smaller), we have for the frontier: This is considerably more concave. It might be obvious now that if both technologies display constant returns to scale we have a linear frontier: as we move along the contact curve from the bottom origin the output of firm 1 rises linearly from zero while the output of firm 2 falls linearly to zero. If we take the above example but instead of a = 0.56 and b = 0.24 for firm 1 and a = 0.48 and b = 0.32 for firm 2, we take a = 0.7 and b = 0.3 for firm 1 and a = 0.6 and b = 0.4 for firm 2 (notice that the ratio of a to b for each firm

8 has not changed so the isoquants look the same but their sum is now unity), we get the following frontier for society: (Note that in this example the total quantities of the two inputs are 100 and 100, so the total output with these technologies if all of both inputs is used is 100.) You can probably anticipate what will happen if both firms have increasing returns to scale. As we move up the contract curve from the bottom left origin then the output of firm 1 rises at an increasingly faster rate while the output of firm 2 falls at an increasingly slower rate. If we take the original example above but instead of a = 0.56 and b = 0.24 for firm 1 and a = 0.48 and b = 0.32 for firm 2, we have a = 0.7/0.9 and b = 0.3/0.9 for firm 1 and a = 0.6/0.9 and b = 0.4/0.9 for firm 2 (notice that the ratio of a to b for each firm has not changed so the isoquants look the same but their sum is now greater than unity), we get the following frontier for society: Finally let us consider a sort of hybrid case one in which firm 1 has increasing returns to scale while firm 2 has decreasing returns to scale. What do you think will happen?

9 Exactly the production possibility frontier for society has a convex section and a concave section. 14.4: Summary In this chapter we have constructed the production possibility frontier for society under different scenarios. The first scenario was when the production technology at the individual level is what we called linear. In this economy society's production possibility frontier is piecewise linear and concave. It is concave because everyone specialises in the production of the good in which they have a relative advantage. We then moved on to consider what might be termed a more normal society in which there are firms producing the output and they are competing for a fixed supply if inputs. On the assumption that the technology has convex isoquants we showed the following important result. In an economy with increasing, constant or decreasing returns to scale everywhere society's production possibility frontier is convex, linear or concave everywhere Should firms choose the same technology? If firms can choose their technology, should they choose the same as others or should they be different? The answer is that, if they are competing for scarce inputs, they should be different. We are going to show this here in the context of a simple example; this can be generalised. The example also illustrates some of the key concepts that emerge from this chapter. Consider a simple society in which there are two inputs into the production process, Input 1 and Input 2. Suppose the quantities of these two inputs are fixed. Suppose that there are two firms, Firm A and Firm B, who respectively produce Good A and Good B. Suppose the technology of Firm A is fixed it has a perfect 1-with-2 complements technology which displays constant returns to scale. Hence q units of Input 1 combined with 2q units of Input 2 produce q units of Good A. Firm B has a choice of technology. Both display constant returns to scale and both are perfect complements: one is perfect 1-with-2 complements (like Firm A); the other is perfect 2-with-1 complements. Which should it use? We shall answer this by looking at the production possibilities

10 open to the society under the two technologies. Intuitively it may be thought that, with limited input resources, that Firm B should use a different technology from that of Firm A, so that the competition for resources is less. We shall show this formally in a particular example in such a way that you should be able to generalise the result. Suppose Firm B uses the same technology as Firm A. We can illustrate the output possibilities in an Edgeworth Box which has Input 1 on the horizontal axis and Input 2 on the vertical axis. The width of the box is the total quantity of Input 1 that is available in the economy; the width of the box is the total quantity of Input 2 that is available in the economy. We assume that both of these are 100. We measure the quantities used by Firm A from the usual origin and the quantities used by Firm B from the upper right-hand corner. Any point in the box represents an allocation of the inputs to the two firms, and we can calculate the output of the two firms at any point in the box. Consider the following figure. The blue lines represent the isoquants of Firm A for outputs of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6. They have angles at the points (1,2), (2,4), (3,6), (4,8) (5,10) and (6,12). Clearly the output of Firm A around the bottom and the left-hand side of the box is zero. The line marked AA joins up the corners of these isoquants. The red lines represent the isoquants of Firm B for outputs of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6. (Do recall that we measure the inputs going to Firm B from the top right-hand corner.) They have angles at the points (11,10), (10,8), (9,6), (8,4) (7,2) and (6,0). Clearly the output of Firm B around the top and the right-hand side of the box is zero. The line marked BB joins up the corners of these isoquants.

11 Where is the contract curve in this society? The contract curve, remember, is the locus of efficient points in the sense that, on the contract curve, it is not possible to increase the output of one firm without decreasing the output of the other firm, while off the contract curve it is possible to increase the output of one firm without decreasing the output of the other. In this particularly economy, the contract curve is, in fact, an area the area coloured yellow in the above figure. This is a consequence of the technologies we have assumed. The simplest way to show this is to first state what the production possibility frontier is in this particular case and then relate it back to the figure above. We will show that the production possibility frontier has the form of the lower straight line in the following figure. The end points are easy to explain. The point on the production possibility frontier in which the output of Firm A is 6 and that of Firm B is 0 comes from the point (6,12) in the Edgeworth Box. The point on the production possibility frontier in which the output of Firm A is 0 and that of Firm B is 6 comes from the point (0,6) in the Edgeworth Box. Actually this is slightly misleading any point on the straight line between (6,12) and (12,12) in the Edgeworth Box gives outputs of 6 for Firm A and 0 for Firm B and any point on the straight line between (0,0) and (6,0) gives outputs of 0 for Firm A and 6 for Firm B. The crucial point is that, as we move along the straight line from (6,12) to (12,12), or along the straight line from (0,0) to (6,0), we are moving along both an isoquant of Firm A and along an isoquant of Firm B. That is why the outputs of both firms remain constant. This gives us a clue as to why the contract curve is the area shaded in the Edgeworth Box. Once inside the shaded area, moving horizontally does not change the output of either firm we are moving along their isoquants. However moving diagonally or vertically increases the output of one firm and decreases the output of the other firm. We cannot increase the output of both firms if we are inside the shaded area. Points inside the shaded area are efficient. If we are outside the shaded area, things are different. If we are to the left of it, moving rightwards increases the output of Firm A but does not change that of Firm B, while moving downwards increases the output of Firm B but does not change that of Firm A. If we are to the right of it, moving leftwards increases the output of Firm B but does not change that of Firm A, while moving upwards increases the output of Firm A but does not change that of Firm B. So points outside the shaded area are inefficient. The production possibility frontier comes from the contract curve. You should be able to verify that: at all points where the output of Firm A is 1 the output of Firm B is 5; at all points where the output of Firm A is 2 the output of Firm B is 4; at all points where the output of Firm A is 3 the output of Firm B is 3; and so on. This verifies the production possibility frontier that is illustrated above.

12 Now let us repeat the analysis with the alternative technique available to Firm 2: perfect 2-with-1 complements. The Edgeworth Box below shows the appropriate analysis. The line marked AA is again the line joining the corners of the isoqants of Firm A and the line BB that joining the corners of the isoquants of Firm B. Notice that this latter is different from the earlier case considered because of the different technology. Once again the blue lines are the isoquants of Firm A (0 output at the origin and then 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6) and the red lines those of Firm B (0 output at B s origin and then 1, 2, 3,,4, 5 and 6). The contract curve in this case is once again an area though a different area, that shaded in the figure above. You should go through the same reasoning as we went through above and convince yourself that the shaded area is indeed the contract curve. Let us now construct the production possibility frontier. The extremes are once again easy: at the bottom left-hand corner of the box (and indeed along the straight line from (0,0) to (0,6)) the output of Firm A is zero and that of Firm B is 6; at the top right-hand corner of the box (and indeed along the straight line from (6,12) to (12,12)) the output of Firm A is 6 and that of Firm B is 0. The middle point is also easy: at the point (4,8) where the lines AA and BB intersect, the output of both firms is 4. Other points you can verify: in the bottom triangle of the contract curve, whenever the output of Firm A is 2, the output of Firm B is 5, and so on; in the top triangle of the contract curve, whenever the output of Firm A is 5, the output of Firm B is 2, and so on. The production possibility frontier is the kinked frontier in the second figure above. What do we notice: that the production possibility frontier when Firm B uses a different technology from that of Firm A is everywhere further out than when both use the same technology. It is therefore unambiguously better for the society for the two firms to have different technologies. The

13 reason is simple but it is important that you understand it: the inputs in society are limited, and the less the competition for them, the better. Alternatively, the more efficiently they are used, the better. Clearly this is a special case, but the important messages generalises. You should try to do this yourself. However, other features of this special case do not generalise though they are of interest. Let us go back to the last graph above and ask ourselves: where would competitive trading of the two inputs take us? We know in general that it will take us to the point on the contract curve where the two price-offer curves intersect. In the context of this example, the price-offer curve of Firm A is the line AA and the price-offer curve of Firm B is the line BB. The competitive equilibrium is at the point (4,8). This is a rather special point in the contract curve. Why? Because at that point, and only at that point, in the contract curve, there is no waste of inputs. Everywhere else some of one of other inputs are unused because their employment does not increase output. So, at the competitive equilibrium, no input resources are being wasted. Do you think that this is always the case? Note there is no competitive equilibrium when the two firms have the same technology (see the first graph and ask yourself where the price-offer curves intersect). Why is that?

14

### Chapter 25: Exchange in Insurance Markets

Chapter 25: Exchange in Insurance Markets 25.1: Introduction In this chapter we use the techniques that we have been developing in the previous 2 chapters to discuss the trade of risk. Insurance markets

### Chapter 12: Cost Curves

Chapter 12: Cost Curves 12.1: Introduction In chapter 11 we found how to minimise the cost of producing any given level of output. This enables us to find the cheapest cost of producing any given level

### Chapter 27: Taxation. 27.1: Introduction. 27.2: The Two Prices with a Tax. 27.2: The Pre-Tax Position

Chapter 27: Taxation 27.1: Introduction We consider the effect of taxation on some good on the market for that good. We ask the questions: who pays the tax? what effect does it have on the equilibrium

### Review of Fundamental Mathematics

Review of Fundamental Mathematics As explained in the Preface and in Chapter 1 of your textbook, managerial economics applies microeconomic theory to business decision making. The decision-making tools

### Managerial Economics Prof. Trupti Mishra S.J.M. School of Management Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay. Lecture - 13 Consumer Behaviour (Contd )

(Refer Slide Time: 00:28) Managerial Economics Prof. Trupti Mishra S.J.M. School of Management Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay Lecture - 13 Consumer Behaviour (Contd ) We will continue our discussion

### 1. Briefly explain what an indifference curve is and how it can be graphically derived.

Chapter 2: Consumer Choice Short Answer Questions 1. Briefly explain what an indifference curve is and how it can be graphically derived. Answer: An indifference curve shows the set of consumption bundles

### An increase in the number of students attending college. shifts to the left. An increase in the wage rate of refinery workers.

1. Which of the following would shift the demand curve for new textbooks to the right? a. A fall in the price of paper used in publishing texts. b. A fall in the price of equivalent used text books. c.

### Linear Programming. Solving LP Models Using MS Excel, 18

SUPPLEMENT TO CHAPTER SIX Linear Programming SUPPLEMENT OUTLINE Introduction, 2 Linear Programming Models, 2 Model Formulation, 4 Graphical Linear Programming, 5 Outline of Graphical Procedure, 5 Plotting

### 13 Externalities. Microeconomics I - Lecture #13, May 12, 2009

Microeconomics I - Lecture #13, May 12, 2009 13 Externalities Up until now we have implicitly assumed that each agent could make consumption or production decisions without worrying about what other agents

### chapter >> Making Decisions Section 2: Making How Much Decisions: The Role of Marginal Analysis

chapter 7 >> Making Decisions Section : Making How Much Decisions: The Role of Marginal Analysis As the story of the two wars at the beginning of this chapter demonstrated, there are two types of decisions:

### Competitive Market Equilibrium

Chapter 14 Competitive Market Equilibrium We have spent the bulk of our time up to now developing relationships between economic variables and the behavior of agents such as consumers, workers and producers.

### Summary Chapter 12 Monopoly

Summary Chapter 12 Monopoly Defining Monopoly - A monopoly is a market structure in which a single seller of a product with no close substitutes serves the entire market - One practical measure for deciding

### c 2008 Je rey A. Miron We have described the constraints that a consumer faces, i.e., discussed the budget constraint.

Lecture 2b: Utility c 2008 Je rey A. Miron Outline: 1. Introduction 2. Utility: A De nition 3. Monotonic Transformations 4. Cardinal Utility 5. Constructing a Utility Function 6. Examples of Utility Functions

Section 5.4 The Quadratic Formula 481 5.4 The Quadratic Formula Consider the general quadratic function f(x) = ax + bx + c. In the previous section, we learned that we can find the zeros of this function

### 4 THE MARKET FORCES OF SUPPLY AND DEMAND

4 THE MARKET FORCES OF SUPPLY AND DEMAND IN THIS CHAPTER YOU WILL Learn what a competitive market is Examine what determines the demand for a good in a competitive market Chapter Overview Examine what

### The fundamental question in economics is 2. Consumer Preferences

A Theory of Consumer Behavior Preliminaries 1. Introduction The fundamental question in economics is 2. Consumer Preferences Given limited resources, how are goods and service allocated? 1 3. Indifference

### Elements of a graph. Click on the links below to jump directly to the relevant section

Click on the links below to jump directly to the relevant section Elements of a graph Linear equations and their graphs What is slope? Slope and y-intercept in the equation of a line Comparing lines on

### Tastes and Indifference Curves

C H A P T E R 4 Tastes and Indifference Curves This chapter begins a 2-chapter treatment of tastes or what we also call preferences. In the first of these chapters, we simply investigate the basic logic

### 2. Efficiency and Perfect Competition

General Equilibrium Theory 1 Overview 1. General Equilibrium Analysis I Partial Equilibrium Bias 2. Efficiency and Perfect Competition 3. General Equilibrium Analysis II The Efficiency if Competition The

### ECON 600 Lecture 3: Profit Maximization Π = TR TC

ECON 600 Lecture 3: Profit Maximization I. The Concept of Profit Maximization Profit is defined as total revenue minus total cost. Π = TR TC (We use Π to stand for profit because we use P for something

### DEMAND AND SUPPLY IN FACTOR MARKETS

Chapter 14 DEMAND AND SUPPLY IN FACTOR MARKETS Key Concepts Prices and Incomes in Competitive Factor Markets Factors of production (labor, capital, land, and entrepreneurship) are used to produce output.

### or, put slightly differently, the profit maximizing condition is for marginal revenue to equal marginal cost:

Chapter 9 Lecture Notes 1 Economics 35: Intermediate Microeconomics Notes and Sample Questions Chapter 9: Profit Maximization Profit Maximization The basic assumption here is that firms are profit maximizing.

### Chapter 21: The Discounted Utility Model

Chapter 21: The Discounted Utility Model 21.1: Introduction This is an important chapter in that it introduces, and explores the implications of, an empirically relevant utility function representing intertemporal

### MULTIPLE CHOICE. Choose the one alternative that best completes the statement or answers the question.

Chapter 11 Perfect Competition - Sample Questions MULTIPLE CHOICE. Choose the one alternative that best completes the statement or answers the question. 1) Perfect competition is an industry with A) a

### Microeconomics Topic 3: Understand how various factors shift supply or demand and understand the consequences for equilibrium price and quantity.

Microeconomics Topic 3: Understand how various factors shift supply or demand and understand the consequences for equilibrium price and quantity. Reference: Gregory Mankiw s rinciples of Microeconomics,

### Presentation of data

2 Presentation of data Using various types of graph and chart to illustrate data visually In this chapter we are going to investigate some basic elements of data presentation. We shall look at ways in

### The Central Idea CHAPTER 1 CHAPTER OVERVIEW CHAPTER REVIEW

CHAPTER 1 The Central Idea CHAPTER OVERVIEW Economic interactions involve scarcity and choice. Time and income are limited, and people choose among alternatives every day. In this chapter, we study the

### Problem Set 2 - Answers. Gains from Trade and the Ricardian Model

Page 1 of 11 Gains from Trade and the Ricardian Model 1. Use community indifference curves as your indicator of national welfare in order to evaluate the following claim: An improvement in the terms of

### CHAPTER 4 Consumer Choice

CHAPTER 4 Consumer Choice CHAPTER OUTLINE 4.1 Preferences Properties of Consumer Preferences Preference Maps 4.2 Utility Utility Function Ordinal Preference Utility and Indifference Curves Utility and

### CHAPTER 3 CONSUMER BEHAVIOR

CHAPTER 3 CONSUMER BEHAVIOR EXERCISES 2. Draw the indifference curves for the following individuals preferences for two goods: hamburgers and beer. a. Al likes beer but hates hamburgers. He always prefers

### Session 7 Bivariate Data and Analysis

Session 7 Bivariate Data and Analysis Key Terms for This Session Previously Introduced mean standard deviation New in This Session association bivariate analysis contingency table co-variation least squares

### Chapter 3 Consumer Behavior

Chapter 3 Consumer Behavior Read Pindyck and Rubinfeld (2013), Chapter 3 Microeconomics, 8 h Edition by R.S. Pindyck and D.L. Rubinfeld Adapted by Chairat Aemkulwat for Econ I: 2900111 1/29/2015 CHAPTER

### General Equilibrium Analysis and Economic Efficiency

CHAPTER 19 General Equilibrium Analysis and Economic Efficiency How is equilibrium determined in all markets simultaneously and to what extent do markets promote the well-being of the members of a society

### The Graphical Method: An Example

The Graphical Method: An Example Consider the following linear program: Maximize 4x 1 +3x 2 Subject to: 2x 1 +3x 2 6 (1) 3x 1 +2x 2 3 (2) 2x 2 5 (3) 2x 1 +x 2 4 (4) x 1, x 2 0, where, for ease of reference,

### Problem Set #5-Key. Economics 305-Intermediate Microeconomic Theory

Problem Set #5-Key Sonoma State University Economics 305-Intermediate Microeconomic Theory Dr Cuellar (1) Suppose that you are paying your for your own education and that your college tuition is \$200 per

### Labour is a factor of production, and labour, like other factors, such as capital (machinery, etc) are demanded by firms for production purposes.

Labour Demand Labour is a factor of production, and labour, like other factors, such as capital (machinery, etc) are demanded by firms for production purposes. The quantity of labour demanded depends on

### Chapter 6 Competitive Markets

Chapter 6 Competitive Markets After reading Chapter 6, COMPETITIVE MARKETS, you should be able to: List and explain the characteristics of Perfect Competition and Monopolistic Competition Explain why a

### Chapter. Perfect Competition CHAPTER IN PERSPECTIVE

Perfect Competition Chapter 10 CHAPTER IN PERSPECTIVE In Chapter 10 we study perfect competition, the market that arises when the demand for a product is large relative to the output of a single producer.

### Indifference Curves and the Marginal Rate of Substitution

Introduction Introduction to Microeconomics Indifference Curves and the Marginal Rate of Substitution In microeconomics we study the decisions and allocative outcomes of firms, consumers, households and

### Lab 17: Consumer and Producer Surplus

Lab 17: Consumer and Producer Surplus Who benefits from rent controls? Who loses with price controls? How do taxes and subsidies affect the economy? Some of these questions can be analyzed using the concepts

### Econ 101: Principles of Microeconomics Fall 2012

Problem 1: Use the following graph to answer the questions. a. From the graph, which good has the price change? Did the price go down or up? What is the fraction of the new price relative to the original

### Taylor Polynomials and Taylor Series Math 126

Taylor Polynomials and Taylor Series Math 26 In many problems in science and engineering we have a function f(x) which is too complicated to answer the questions we d like to ask. In this chapter, we will

### Chapter 23. Monopoly

Chapter 23 Monopoly We will now turn toward an analysis of the polar opposite of the extreme assumption of perfect competition that we have employed thus far. 1 Under perfect competition, we have assumed

### Graphical Presentation of Data

Graphical Presentation of Data Guidelines for Making Graphs Titles should tell the reader exactly what is graphed Remove stray lines, legends, points, and any other unintended additions by the computer

### Chapter 04 Firm Production, Cost, and Revenue

Chapter 04 Firm Production, Cost, and Revenue Multiple Choice Questions 1. A key assumption about the way firms behave is that they a. Minimize costs B. Maximize profit c. Maximize market share d. Maximize

ANSWERS TO END-OF-CHAPTER QUESTIONS 9-1 Explain what relationships are shown by (a) the consumption schedule, (b) the saving schedule, (c) the investment-demand curve, and (d) the investment schedule.

### chapter Perfect Competition and the >> Supply Curve Section 3: The Industry Supply Curve

chapter 9 The industry supply curve shows the relationship between the price of a good and the total output of the industry as a whole. Perfect Competition and the >> Supply Curve Section 3: The Industry

### Reflection and Refraction

Equipment Reflection and Refraction Acrylic block set, plane-concave-convex universal mirror, cork board, cork board stand, pins, flashlight, protractor, ruler, mirror worksheet, rectangular block worksheet,

### 8. Average product reaches a maximum when labor equals A) 100 B) 200 C) 300 D) 400

Ch. 6 1. The production function represents A) the quantity of inputs necessary to produce a given level of output. B) the various recipes for producing a given level of output. C) the minimum amounts

### Short-Run Production and Costs

Short-Run Production and Costs The purpose of this section is to discuss the underlying work of firms in the short-run the production of goods and services. Why is understanding production important to

### Some Notes on Taylor Polynomials and Taylor Series

Some Notes on Taylor Polynomials and Taylor Series Mark MacLean October 3, 27 UBC s courses MATH /8 and MATH introduce students to the ideas of Taylor polynomials and Taylor series in a fairly limited

### Economics 165 Winter 2002 Problem Set #2

Economics 165 Winter 2002 Problem Set #2 Problem 1: Consider the monopolistic competition model. Say we are looking at sailboat producers. Each producer has fixed costs of 10 million and marginal costs

### chapter >> Consumer and Producer Surplus Section 3: Consumer Surplus, Producer Surplus, and the Gains from Trade

chapter 6 >> Consumer and Producer Surplus Section 3: Consumer Surplus, Producer Surplus, and the Gains from Trade One of the nine core principles of economics we introduced in Chapter 1 is that markets

### Demand, Supply, and Market Equilibrium

3 Demand, Supply, and Market Equilibrium The price of vanilla is bouncing. A kilogram (2.2 pounds) of vanilla beans sold for \$50 in 2000, but by 2003 the price had risen to \$500 per kilogram. The price

9.3 Solving Quadratic Equations by Using the Quadratic Formula 9.3 OBJECTIVES 1. Solve a quadratic equation by using the quadratic formula 2. Determine the nature of the solutions of a quadratic equation

### 1 st Exam. 7. Cindy's cross-price elasticity of magazine demand with respect to the price of books is

1 st Exam 1. Marginal utility measures: A) the total utility of all your consumption B) the total utility divided by the price of the good C) the increase in utility from consuming one additional unit

### Managerial Economics Prof. Trupti Mishra S.J.M School of Management Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay. Lecture - 14 Elasticity of Supply

Managerial Economics Prof. Trupti Mishra S.J.M School of Management Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay Lecture - 14 Elasticity of Supply We will continue our discussion today, on few more concept of

### 2. THE x-y PLANE 7 C7

2. THE x-y PLANE 2.1. The Real Line When we plot quantities on a graph we can plot not only integer values like 1, 2 and 3 but also fractions, like 3½ or 4¾. In fact we can, in principle, plot any real

### THE SECOND DERIVATIVE

THE SECOND DERIVATIVE Summary 1. Curvature Concavity and convexity... 2 2. Determining the nature of a static point using the second derivative... 6 3. Absolute Optima... 8 The previous section allowed

### Elasticity. I. What is Elasticity?

Elasticity I. What is Elasticity? The purpose of this section is to develop some general rules about elasticity, which may them be applied to the four different specific types of elasticity discussed in

### Module 49 Consumer and Producer Surplus

What you will learn in this Module: The meaning of consumer surplus and its relationship to the demand curve The meaning of producer surplus and its relationship to the supply curve Module 49 Consumer

### MARKETS WITHOUT POWER Microeconomics in Context (Goodwin, et al.), 3 rd Edition

Chapter 16 MARKETS WITHOUT POWER Microeconomics in Context (Goodwin, et al.), 3 rd Edition Chapter Summary This chapter presents the traditional, idealized model of perfect competition. In it, you will

### MERSİN UNIVERSITY FACULTY OF ECONOMICS AND ADMINISTRATIVE SCİENCES DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS MICROECONOMICS MIDTERM EXAM DATE 18.11.

MERSİN UNIVERSITY FACULTY OF ECONOMICS AND ADMINISTRATIVE SCİENCES DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS MICROECONOMICS MIDTERM EXAM DATE 18.11.2011 TİIE 12:30 STUDENT NAME AND NUMBER MULTIPLE CHOICE. Choose the one

### Graphical Integration Exercises Part Four: Reverse Graphical Integration

D-4603 1 Graphical Integration Exercises Part Four: Reverse Graphical Integration Prepared for the MIT System Dynamics in Education Project Under the Supervision of Dr. Jay W. Forrester by Laughton Stanley

### 3.2. Solving quadratic equations. Introduction. Prerequisites. Learning Outcomes. Learning Style

Solving quadratic equations 3.2 Introduction A quadratic equation is one which can be written in the form ax 2 + bx + c = 0 where a, b and c are numbers and x is the unknown whose value(s) we wish to find.

### Horizontal Turns. Horizontal Crown Slope Angle = 90 - Crown Spring Angle

What is my rown Slope Angle? The crown slope angle is the angle measured from the back of the crown molding to the plane (horizontal, vertical or ceiling plane) in which you are making your turn. The rown

### When the price of a good rises (falls) and all other variables affecting the

ONLINE APPENDIX 1 Substitution and Income Effects of a Price Change When the price of a good rises (falls) and all other variables affecting the consumer remain the same, the law of demand tells us that

### Practice Questions Week 8 Day 1

Practice Questions Week 8 Day 1 Multiple Choice Identify the choice that best completes the statement or answers the question. 1. The characteristics of a market that influence the behavior of market participants

### REVIEW OF MICROECONOMICS

ECO 352 Spring 2010 Precepts Weeks 1, 2 Feb. 1, 8 REVIEW OF MICROECONOMICS Concepts to be reviewed Budget constraint: graphical and algebraic representation Preferences, indifference curves. Utility function

### Managerial Economics Prof. Trupti Mishra S.J.M School of Management Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay. Lecture - 10 Theory of Demand (Contd )

Managerial Economics Prof. Trupti Mishra S.J.M School of Management Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay Lecture - 10 Theory of Demand (Contd ) In continuation to our last session on theory of demand

### Chapter 4 Online Appendix: The Mathematics of Utility Functions

Chapter 4 Online Appendix: The Mathematics of Utility Functions We saw in the text that utility functions and indifference curves are different ways to represent a consumer s preferences. Calculus can

### Midterm Exam #1 - Answers

Page 1 of 9 Midterm Exam #1 Answers Instructions: Answer all questions directly on these sheets. Points for each part of each question are indicated, and there are 1 points total. Budget your time. 1.

### PLOTTING DATA AND INTERPRETING GRAPHS

PLOTTING DATA AND INTERPRETING GRAPHS Fundamentals of Graphing One of the most important sets of skills in science and mathematics is the ability to construct graphs and to interpret the information they

### Chapter 13 Perfect Competition

Chapter 13 Perfect Competition 13.1 A Firm's Profit-Maximizing Choices 1) What is the difference between perfect competition and monopolistic competition? A) Perfect competition has a large number of small

### Week 1: Functions and Equations

Week 1: Functions and Equations Goals: Review functions Introduce modeling using linear and quadratic functions Solving equations and systems Suggested Textbook Readings: Chapter 2: 2.1-2.2, and Chapter

### Sample Questions for ECN 302 Midterm 1

Sample Questions for ECN 302 Midterm 1 The correct answers are highlighted in yellow and the explanations for selected questions are provided in bold italics. Question (1): Which of the following will

### Digital Image Processing. Prof. P.K. Biswas. Department of Electronics & Electrical Communication Engineering

Digital Image Processing Prof. P.K. Biswas Department of Electronics & Electrical Communication Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur Lecture - 27 Colour Image Processing II Hello, welcome

### MICROECONOMICS AND POLICY ANALYSIS - U8213 Professor Rajeev H. Dehejia Class Notes - Spring 2001

MICROECONOMICS AND POLICY ANALYSIS - U8213 Professor Rajeev H. Dehejia Class Notes - Spring 2001 General Equilibrium and welfare with production Wednesday, January 24 th and Monday, January 29 th Reading:

### Chapter 8 Graphs and Functions:

Chapter 8 Graphs and Functions: Cartesian axes, coordinates and points 8.1 Pictorially we plot points and graphs in a plane (flat space) using a set of Cartesian axes traditionally called the x and y axes

### 7.7 Solving Rational Equations

Section 7.7 Solving Rational Equations 7 7.7 Solving Rational Equations When simplifying comple fractions in the previous section, we saw that multiplying both numerator and denominator by the appropriate

### MULTIPLE CHOICE. Choose the one alternative that best completes the statement or answers the question.

MBA 640 Survey of Microeconomics Fall 2006, Quiz 6 Name MULTIPLE CHOICE. Choose the one alternative that best completes the statement or answers the question. 1) A monopoly is best defined as a firm that

### UNIT 2: CONSUMER EQUILIBRIUM AND DEMAND

KEY CONCEPTS UNIT 2: CONSUMER EQUILIBRIUM AND DEMAND 1. UTILITY A) MARGINAL UTILITY B) LAW OF DIMINISHING MARGINAL UTILITY 2. CONDITIONS OF CONSUMER S EQUILIBRIUM 3. INDIFFERENCE CURVE ANALYSIS 4. THE

### Lines That Pass Through Regions

: Student Outcomes Given two points in the coordinate plane and a rectangular or triangular region, students determine whether the line through those points meets the region, and if it does, they describe

### Chapter 5: Working with contours

Introduction Contoured topographic maps contain a vast amount of information about the three-dimensional geometry of the land surface and the purpose of this chapter is to consider some of the ways in

### Unit 7. Firm behaviour and market structure: monopoly

Unit 7. Firm behaviour and market structure: monopoly Learning objectives: to identify and examine the sources of monopoly power; to understand the relationship between a monopolist s demand curve and

### U = x 1 2. 1 x 1 4. 2 x 1 4. What are the equilibrium relative prices of the three goods? traders has members who are best off?

Chapter 7 General Equilibrium Exercise 7. Suppose there are 00 traders in a market all of whom behave as price takers. Suppose there are three goods and the traders own initially the following quantities:

### 6. Which of the following is likely to be the price elasticity of demand for food? a. 5.2 b. 2.6 c. 1.8 d. 0.3

Exercise 2 Multiple Choice Questions. Choose the best answer. 1. If a change in the price of a good causes no change in total revenue a. the demand for the good must be elastic. b. the demand for the good

### Years after 2000. US Student to Teacher Ratio 0 16.048 1 15.893 2 15.900 3 15.900 4 15.800 5 15.657 6 15.540

To complete this technology assignment, you should already have created a scatter plot for your data on your calculator and/or in Excel. You could do this with any two columns of data, but for demonstration

### 13 EXPENDITURE MULTIPLIERS: THE KEYNESIAN MODEL* Chapter. Key Concepts

Chapter 3 EXPENDITURE MULTIPLIERS: THE KEYNESIAN MODEL* Key Concepts Fixed Prices and Expenditure Plans In the very short run, firms do not change their prices and they sell the amount that is demanded.

### TOPIC 4: DERIVATIVES

TOPIC 4: DERIVATIVES 1. The derivative of a function. Differentiation rules 1.1. The slope of a curve. The slope of a curve at a point P is a measure of the steepness of the curve. If Q is a point on the

### Study Questions for Chapter 9 (Answer Sheet)

DEREE COLLEGE DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS EC 1101 PRINCIPLES OF ECONOMICS II FALL SEMESTER 2002 M-W-F 13:00-13:50 Dr. Andreas Kontoleon Office hours: Contact: a.kontoleon@ucl.ac.uk Wednesdays 15:00-17:00 Study

### THE ECONOMY AT FULL EMPLOYMENT: THE CLASSICAL MODEL*

Chapter 8 THE ECONOMY AT FULL EMPLOYMENT: THE CLASSICAL MODEL* The Classical Model: A Preview Topic: Real Variables 1) Real variables A) are those that determine the cost of living. B) are those that determine

### I d ( r; MPK f, τ) Y < C d +I d +G

1. Use the IS-LM model to determine the effects of each of the following on the general equilibrium values of the real wage, employment, output, the real interest rate, consumption, investment, and the

### Econ 100B: Macroeconomic Analysis Fall Problem Set #3 ANSWERS (Due September 15-16, 2008)

Econ 100B: Macroeconomic Analysis Fall 2008 Problem Set #3 ANSWERS (Due September 15-16, 2008) A. On one side of a single sheet of paper: 1. Clearly and accurately draw and label a diagram of the Production

### Situation 23: Simultaneous Equations Prepared at the University of Georgia EMAT 6500 class Date last revised: July 22 nd, 2013 Nicolina Scarpelli

Situation 23: Simultaneous Equations Prepared at the University of Georgia EMAT 6500 class Date last revised: July 22 nd, 2013 Nicolina Scarpelli Prompt: A mentor teacher and student teacher are discussing

### Multiple Choice Questions for Self Study. (GZ der VWL / Introduction to Economics)

Multiple Choice Questions for Self Study (GZ der VWL / Introduction to Economics) ao. Prof. Dr. B. Yurtoglu) Economic Models 1) The purpose of making assumptions in economic model building is to (a) force

### Efficiency, Optimality, and Competitive Market Allocations

Efficiency, Optimality, and Competitive Market Allocations areto Efficient Allocations An allocation of resources is areto efficient if it is not possible to reallocate resources in economy to make one

### Probability and Statistics

CHAPTER 2: RANDOM VARIABLES AND ASSOCIATED FUNCTIONS 2b - 0 Probability and Statistics Kristel Van Steen, PhD 2 Montefiore Institute - Systems and Modeling GIGA - Bioinformatics ULg kristel.vansteen@ulg.ac.be