Environmental Assessment of Surface Soils at Grace Campbell Reserve Hillsdale Grace Campbell Cres, Hillsdale, NSW

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Environmental Assessment of Surface Soils at Grace Campbell Reserve Hillsdale Grace Campbell Cres, Hillsdale, NSW"

Transcription

1 JBS July 2013 ATT: Jonathan Cawley Landscape Architect City of Botany Council 141 Coward St Mascot, NSW 2020 Via Environmental Assessment of Surface Soils at Grace Campbell Reserve Hillsdale Grace Campbell Cres, Hillsdale, NSW Dear Mr Cawley, 1. Introduction and Background JBS&G (NSW & WA) Pty Ltd trading as JBS&G was requested by City of Botany Council (Council) to undertake accessible surface soil investigations within Grace Campbell Reserve (the Park) located at Grace Campbell Cres Hillsdale. The investigations are understood to have been required following a request from the local community to assess accessible soils present on the Park for a range of potential environmental contaminants. 2. Objective The objective of the investigation was to identify if levels of soil contaminants as present within accessible surface soils on the Park pose a potential human health risk. 3. Site Identification Grace Campbell Reserve is located at Grace Campbell Cres Hillsdale. The Park is legally referred to as Lots 21 and 22 in Deposited Plan The Park is an irregularly shaped area, present over approximately 2750 m 2. The site location is shown on Figure 1 provided to Attachment 2 and the extent of the Park is shown on Figure 2 provided to Attachment 2. An inspection of the Park was completed by JBS&G Environmental Scientists on the 8 th July Features present on the Park included: A irregularly shaped delineated area present in the central and eastern portion of the site consisting of a bark / mulch ground cover and including items of play equipment (i.e. swings, slides etc) referred to as a playground throughout the remainder of this report; A paved area present at the western portion of the site which consist of a half basketball court and a smaller paved area adjoining a brick wall; Grassed level area over the remainder of the site with some large trees and park benches present throughout; and A small landscaped / garden area as present at the south-western corner of the site.

2 Surrounding land-uses have been identified as: North A Sydney Water controlled easement is present adjoining the northern boundary of the Park. This consists of a grassed area of varying elevation; East A residential unit / apartment block is present adjoining the eastern boundary of the Park; South Grace Campbell Cres is present adjoining the southern boundary of the Park. Further residential areas consisting of detached dwellings and apartment / unit block developments are located on the southern side of Grace Campbell Cres; and West A residential property consisting of a detached dwelling is located adjoining the western boundary of the Park. 4. Conceptual Site Model National Environment Protection (Assessment of Site Contamination) Measure, NEPC, 1999 (as amended 2013, NEPC 1999) identifies a conceptual site model (CSM) as a representation of site related information regarding contamination sources, receptors and exposure pathways between those sources and receptors. The development of a CSM is an essential part of all site assessments. NEPC (1999) identified the essential elements of a CSM as including: 2 Known and potential sources of contamination and contaminants of concern including the mechanism(s) of contamination; Potentially affected media (soil, sediment, groundwater, surface water, indoor and ambient air); Human and ecological receptors; Potential and complete exposure pathways; and Any potential preferential pathways for vapour migration (if potential for vapours identified). Each of these elements is discussed following. 4.1 Source of Contamination Potential sources of contamination on the Park site have been identified as: Potential lead impacts as associated with flaking lead paint as potentially used on historical structures on and in proximity of the Park; and/or Potential use of contaminated fill materials as associated with materials potentially generated by historical industrial activities located in proximity of the Park (i.e. Botany Industrial Area) and transported to the site for use as fill; and/or Potential historical uncontrolled dumping / waste discharge within the area of the Park; and/or Potential historical use of pesticides to control pests / weeds on the Park surface; and/or Potential migration of contaminants through groundwater onto the Park. A number of potential contaminants have been identified with these potential contamination sources including: Heavy metals; Volatile organic compounds including monocyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, halogenated aliphatic hydrocarbons and halogenated aromatic hydrocarbons; Semi-volatile organic compounds including chlorinated benzenes, phenols, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, organochlorine pesticide and organophosphorus pesticides; Polychlorinated biphenyls; and

3 Asbestos. 4.2 Potentially Affected Media Potentially affected media have been identified as: Surface soils as potentially impacted by flaking lead paint, uncontrolled historical waste disposal and/or fill materials as sourced from off-site contaminated locations used to form the Park profile; Groundwater where surface soils have been impacted by potential mobile contaminants and contaminant migration has occurred to the extent of groundwater; and Ambient air where substantial concentrations of volatile contaminants are present in soils and volatilise into the overlying atmosphere or occur as particulates by fugitive dust emissions or otherwise from surface soils. No structures are present on the site, and there is no potential for accumulation of potential vapours emitted from impacted soils. 4.3 Human and Ecological Receptors and Exposure Pathways Table 1 summarises potential human receptors and associated exposure pathways for the Park. Table 1: Summary of Potential Human Exposures Receptor Media Potential Exposure Pathways Recreational (adult and child) Surface soils Inhalation (vapours) Inhalation (particulates) Oral Dermal Groundwater Inhalation (vapours) Sub-Surface Maintenance / Excavation (short duration) Soils over depth of excavation Inhalation (vapours) Inhalation (particulates) Oral Dermal Groundwater Inhalation (vapours) By review of Table 1, direct exposure to groundwater is not considered a complete exposure pathway as groundwater is anticipated to be present at a depth of 5 m below ground surface (bgs), which is well below the maximum anticipated depth of any future excavation on the site. Potential inhalation of vapours from potentially impacted groundwater is not considered a potentially significant exposure pathway. There are no buildings present on the Park and vapour accumulation will not occur. No beneficial use of groundwater (i.e. extraction) occurs on the Park. Soils which are located under pavement within the western portion of the Park will not pose a potential oral or dermal risk to normal site users. The occurrence of the pavement prevents direct exposure to these soils. Ecological receptors are restricted to flora and fauna populations on the site, and potential ecological receptors of groundwater, where migration of contaminants to groundwater has occurred. JBS inspections of the Park have not identified any evidence of potential vegetation stress. The nearest potential ecological receptors of groundwater are associated with Botany Bay located an approximate distance of 2km form the Park. 4.4 Preferential Pathways No potential preferential pathways have been identified on the Park site. 3

4 5. Data Quality Objectives Data Quality Objectives (DQOs) were established for the assessment works, as described in the following sections. 5.1 State the Problem The Hillsdale Community has identified a potential for surface soils on the Park to pose a potential human health risk. 5.2 Identify the Decision The following specific decisions were required to be made as part of these investigations: Do accessible surface soils on the Park pose a potential human health risk? Is the environmental data collected by this assessment sufficiently reliable to be used to assess the environmental status of accessible surface soils on the Park? 5.3 Identify Inputs to the Decision Inputs to the decisions are: Observations of surface soils across the Park site with particular regard to indicators of contamination (foreign materials, inclusions, asbestos containing materials, aesthetic indicators of contamination etc); Soil analysis data from samples of surface soils; Soil assessment criteria as protective of potential recreational land-uses; and Assessment of quality assurance / quality control (QA/QC) for the purposes of assessing data reliability. 5.4 Define the Study Boundaries The investigations are required only to assess potential health risks associated with human exposure to near surface soils within the Park. The lateral study boundary is defined as The Park, as defined as Lots 21 and 22 DP and excluding the paved areas where direct contact to soils is prevented. The vertical investigation boundary has been restricted to soils to a depth of 0.1m below the ground surface. The mulch / bark materials in the playground area have been excluded, with soils immediately underlying these materials assessed. The report for these works has been required to be issued to Council on the 10 th July Develop a Decision Rule The decision rules are outlined as follows: Are contaminants present in surface soils and pose a potentially unacceptable health risk to human users of the site; and Is the data reliable? 4

5 5.6 Specify Limits on Decision Errors Guidance for acceptable limits on decision errors is provided in AS Guide to the investigation and sampling of sites with potentially contaminated soil. Part 1: Non-volatile and semi-volatile compounds. Two types of error are nominated in AS including: A. Deciding that the site is acceptable when it actually is not; and B. Deciding that the site is unacceptable when it is. It is nominated in AS that limits should be set on these, with a 5% probability set for A type errors and 20% probability set for B type errors. The number of samples required to be collected to allow these limits on decision errors to be met is calculated using the following relationship: where: n = 6.2 x σ 2 / (C s μ) 2 n number of sample needed 6.2 factor derived from 0.05 A risk and 0.2 B risk σ estimated standard deviation of contaminants concentration (mg/kg or mg/l where a soil validation data set is formed with leachate data) μ average concentration of contaminant (mg/kg or mg/l where a soil validation data set is formed with leachate data) C s acceptable limit (mg/kg or mg/l where a soil validation data set is formed with leachate data) The limits on decision error have been assessed for each constituent reporting above laboratory detection limits to verify that a sufficient number of sample locations have been undertaken to facilitate decisions in accordance with the adopted limits on decision error. 5.7 Optimise the Design for Obtaining Data The following sampling plan has been implemented: Collection of surface soil samples from the playground area at the central and eastern portion of the site on a 5 m grid basis, resulting in the collection of a total of 15 soil samples (sample IDs SS25 to SS39 as shown on Figure 2 provided to Attachment 2); and Collection of surface samples from the remaining accessible Park area on a 10 m grid basis, resulting in the collection of 24 soil samples (sample IDs SS1 to SS24 as shown on Figure 2 provided to Attachment 2). All soil samples have been analysed for heavy metals (Sb, As, Ba, Cd, Co, Cr, Pb, Mn, Hg, Ni, Sn, Ti and Zn), volatile organic compounds (VOCs), semi volatile organic compounds (SVOCs), polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and asbestos Soil Sampling Methodology Overlying bark and mulch was initially cleared in proximity of the sample locations prior to the collection of soil samples in the area of the playground. Soil samples were collected by the use of a sampling trowel by removal of surface soils to a typical depth of between 100 mm and 300 mm. During the collection of soil samples, features such as seepage, discolouration, staining, odours and other indications of contamination noted on field reporting sheets and are recorded on field notes provided as Attachment 5. Collected soil samples were immediately transferred to sample containers of appropriate composition (glass jars and plastic zip lock bags). Sample labels recorded JBS job number; sample identification number; and date and time of sampling. 5

6 Sample containers were transferred to a chilled ice box for sample preservation prior to and during shipment to the testing laboratory. A chain-of-custody form was completed and forwarded with the samples to the testing laboratory. Chain of custody forms are provided with laboratory documentation as Attachment 6. X-Ray Fluoresence (XRF) Spectrometer technology was also used to determine the composition of metals within soils during the collection of soil samples providing real time results. Results of XRF determinations are included in Table 4 provided to Attachment Laboratory Analyses NATA accredited laboratories were used for all laboratory analysis of all soil samples. 5.8 Assessment Criteria Assessment criteria have been derived for each constituent recorded above laboratory detection limits in the soils analysis data set as summarised in Table 2 following. Assessment criteria are provided for the protection of human health only. Table 2: Summary of Adopted Assessment Criteria for Constituents Measured above Detection Limits (mg/kg) Constituent Criteria Reference / Source Arsenic 300 NEPC (1999) Recreational C health based investigation levels Barium 160 Netherlands MHSP&E (2000) Circular on target values and intervention values for soil remediation. Target value adopted, equal to Dutch background concentrations of Barium. Cadmium 90 NEPC (1999) Recreational C health based investigation levels Chromium 300 NEPC (1999) Recreational C health based investigation levels, as based on Cr(VI) Cobalt 300 NEPC (1999) Recreational C health based investigation levels Copper NEPC (1999) Recreational C health based investigation levels Lead 600 NEPC (1999) Recreational C health based investigation levels Manganese NEPC (1999) Recreational C health based investigation levels Mercury 80 NEPC (1999) Recreational C health based investigation levels, as based on inorganic mercury Nickel 1200 NEPC (1999) Recreational C health based investigation levels Tin US EPA Region 9 (May 2013) Regional Screening Level (RSL) Summary Table. Residential soil value adopted. Target risk = 1 * 10-6, target hazard index = 1.0 Titanium US EPA Region 9 (May 2013) Regional Screening Level (RSL) Summary Table. Residential soil value adopted. Target risk = 1 * 10-6, target hazard index = 1.0. Value based on Titanium tetrachloride. Zinc NEPC (1999) Recreational C health based investigation levels 5.9 Quality Assurance / Quality Control An assessment of Quality Assurance / Quality Control (QA/QC) of the works has been undertaken in Attachment 3. The results of the field and laboratory QA/QC program indicates that the data obtained from the sampling and analysis can be considered appropriately accurate for the objectives of the assessment. However it should be noted that there is potential heterogeneity of contaminant distributions throughout fill based materials. 6. Results Observations during sampling have been recorded in field notes included in Attachment 5. Soil analysis data is summarised in Attachment 4. Sample locations are shown on Figure 2 in Attachment 2. Detailed laboratory reports and chain of custody documentation is presented in Attachment 6. An assessment of data quality has found that the data are of a suitable quality for the intended purposes (Attachment 3). 6.1 Field Observations Soils were found to consist of brown sandy soils, consistent with anticipated / typical top soil / upper soil characteristics for Botany / Hillsdale area. No potential indicators of contamination were identified apart from a small fragment of fibre cement sheet as identified as sample location SS23. Analysis of this fragment of sheet identified the presence of asbestos fibres. The fragment was removed from the site. No other potential asbestos containing materials were identified as present on the site surface. 6

7 6.2 Soil Results All soil results are summarised in soil data summary tables provided as Attachment 4. Heavy metals are the only constituents which have been recorded above laboratory detection limits. The maximum levels of each respective heavy metal constituent are well below the adopted site assessment criteria. Soil samples have been found to be free of asbestos fibres. 6.3 Compliance with Limits on Decision Error An assessment of the compliance of the environmental data sets with the limits on decision error has been undertaken for each of the constituents which have been recorded above detection limits. Sufficient samples have been collected, to allow decisions made with respect to the environmental data, that are within the adopted acceptable limits of decision error. 7. Conclusions Based on the findings of this investigation and subsequent to the limitations in Attachment 1, it has been found that surface soils as present on the Grace Campbell Reserve do not contain levels of environmental contaminants that would be considered to pose a potential health risk to Park users Should you have any queries or require further clarification, please feel free to contact the undersigned on or by msamuel@jbsg.com.au. Prepared by: Reviewed/Approved by: Matthew Parkinson Principal JBS&G (NSW & WA) Pty Ltd Michael Samuel Senior Environmental Consultant JBS&G (NSW & WA) Pty Ltd Attachments: (1) Limitations (2) Figures (3) Assessment of Quality Assurance/Quality Control (4) Soil Data Summary Tables (5) Field Notes (6) Laboratory Report and Chain of Custody Documentation 7

8 Attachment 1 Limitations This report has been prepared for use by the client who has commissioned the works in accordance with the project brief only, and has been based in part on information obtained from the client and other parties. The advice herein relates only to this project and all results conclusions and recommendations made should be reviewed by a competent person with experience in environmental investigations, before being used for any other purpose. JBS&G (NSW & WA) Pty Ltd accepts no liability for use or interpretation by any person or body other than the client who commissioned the works. This report should not be reproduced without prior approval by the client, or amended in any way without prior approval by JBS&G (NSW & WA) Pty Ltd, and should not be relied upon by other parties, who should make their own enquires. Sampling and chemical analysis of environmental media is based on appropriate guidance documents made and approved by the relevant regulatory authorities. Conclusions arising from the review and assessment of environmental data are based on the sampling and analysis considered appropriate based on the regulatory requirements. Limited sampling and laboratory analyses were undertaken as part of the investigations undertaken, as described herein. Ground conditions between sampling locations and media may vary, and this should be considered when extrapolating between sampling points. Chemical analytes are based on the information detailed in the site history. Further chemicals or categories of chemicals may exist at the site, which were not identified in the site history and which may not be expected at the site. Changes to the subsurface conditions may occur subsequent to the investigations described herein, through natural processes or through the intentional or accidental addition of contaminants. The conclusions and recommendations reached in this report are based on the information obtained at the time of the investigations. This report does not provide a complete assessment of the environmental status of the site, and it is limited to the scope defined herein. Should information become available regarding conditions at the site including previously unknown sources of contamination, JBS&G (NSW & WA) Pty Ltd reserves the right to review the report in the context of the additional information. 8

9 Attachment 2 Figures 9

10 SITE Source: Base Image - Google Maps accessed m Scale: Approximate Datum: MGA94 Zone 56 - AHD A4 A Original Issue - R01 LL Rev Description Drn. Date Legend: 2013 JBS&G Figure 1: Site Location Client: City of Botany Bay Council Project: Grace Campbell Reserve, Botany, NSW - DSI Job No: File Name: 42898_01

11 &> SS01 &> SS05 &> SS09 &> SS02 &> SS11 &> SS15 &> SS06 &> SS10 &> SS12 &> SS16 &> SS18 &> SS03 &> SS04 &> SS07 &> SS08 &> SS13 &> SS14 &> SS26 &> SS28 &> SS25 &> SS27 &> SS17 &> SS19 &> SS30 SS32 &> SS21 &> &> SS34 &>SS39 &> SS29 &> &> SS38 &> SS31 SS36 SS33 &> &> &> SS35 SS37 &> SS20 &> SS23 &> SS22 &> SS24 Grace Campbell Crescent A4 A Rev Source: Base Image - SIX Maps imagery date , accessed m Scale: 1:600 Datum: GDA 1994 MGA Zone 56 - AHD Original Issue - R01 Description SE Drn Date: Legend: &> Approximate Site Boundary Sample Location Client: City of Botany Bay Council Figure 2: Site Layout and Sample Locations Project: Grace Campbell Reserve, Botany, NSW - DSI Job No: File Name: 42898_ JBS&G

12 Attachment 3 Assessment of Quality Assurance/Quality Control The pre-determined data quality indicators (DQIs) established for the project are discussed below in relation to precision, accuracy, representativeness, comparability and completeness (Table A3.1). Precision - measures the reproducibility of measurements under a given set of conditions. The precision of the laboratory data and sampling techniques is assessed by calculating the Relative Percent Difference (RPD) of duplicate samples. Accuracy - measures the bias in a measurement system. The accuracy of the laboratory data that is generated during this study is a measure of the closeness of the analytical results obtained by a method to the true value. Accuracy is assessed by reference to the analytical results of laboratory control samples, laboratory spikes and analyses against reference standards. Representativeness expresses the degree which sample data accurately and precisely represents a characteristic of a population or an environmental condition. Representativeness is achieved by collecting samples on a representative basis across the site, and by using an adequate number of sample locations to characterise the site to the required accuracy. Comparability - expresses the confidence with which one data set can be compared with another. This is achieved through maintaining a level of consistency in techniques used to collect samples; ensuring analysing laboratories use consistent analysis techniques and reporting methods. Completeness is defined as the percentage of measurements made which are judged to be valid measurements. The completeness goal is set at there being sufficient valid data generated during the study. Table A3.1: Summary of Quality Assurance / Quality Control Program Data Quality Indicator Frequency DQI Target Precision Blind duplicates (soil intra-laboratory) 1/20 samples <50% RPD Split duplicates (soil inter-laboratory) 1/20 samples <50% RPD Laboratory duplicates 1/20 samples <50% RPD Trip blank 1/sampling event <LOR Rinsate blank 1/sampling event <LOR Trip spike 1/sampling event 70-30% recovery Accuracy Surrogate spikes All organic samples % recovery Matrix spikes 1 per lab batch or 20 samples % recovery Laboratory control samples 1 per lab batch or 20 samples % recovery Representativeness Sampling appropriate for media and analytes All samples - Laboratory blanks 1 per lab batch <LOR Samples extracted and analysed within holding times All samples - Comparability Standard operating procedures used for sample collection and All samples All samples handling Standard analytical methdos used for all analyses All samples All samples Consistent field conditions, field staff and laboratories All works All works Limits of reporting appropriate and consistent All samples All samples Completeness Soil description and COCs completed and appropriate All samples All samples Appropriate documentation completed All works All works Satisfactory frequency and result for QC samples All samples All samples Data from critical samples is considered valid - Critical samples valid (1) If the RPD between duplicates is greater than the pre-determined data quality indicator, a judgement will be made as to whether the excess is critical in relation to the validation of the data set or unacceptable sampling error is occurring in the field. (2) Lower recoveries may be recorded for some semi-volatile organic analyses particularly including phenols DQIs have been calculated as per Table A3.1 and are summarised in Table A3.2 and discussed below. 10

13 Table A3.2: Data Quality Indicators Data Quality Indicator Frequency DQI Target Precision Blind duplicates Soil 2/39 samples 0-195% RPD Split duplicates Soil 2/39 samples 0-195% RPD Laboratory duplicates % RPD Trip blank 1 <LOR Rinsate blank 1 <LOR Trip spike % Accuracy Surrogate spikes Soil batch, all samples % Matrix spikes % Laboratory control samples % recovery Representativeness Sampling appropriate for media and All samples All sampling appropriate analytes Laboratory blanks 1 per lab batch <LOR Samples extracted and analysed within holding times All samples All samples extracted and analysed within holding times Comparability Standard operating procedures used for All samples All samples sample collection and handling Standard analytical methods used for All samples All samples all analyses Consistent field conditions, field staff All works All works and laboratories Limits of reporting appropriate and All samples All samples consistent Completeness Soil description and COCs completed All samples All samples and appropriate Appropriate documentation completed All works All works Satisfactory frequency and result for QC All samples All samples samples Data from critical samples is considered valid - Critical samples valid Discussion of QA/QC Results Precision Blind Duplicates The rates of blind duplicate sampling and analysis met the DQI for the soil samples. RPDs where able to be calculated have been found to be generally acceptable, with a significant exceedance reported for lead in one duplicate pair and slightly elevated RPDs reported for barium. These RPD s are generally based on at least one analyte level close to detection limits. Further the soils are observed to be filled based and heterogeneous distribution of heavy metals can commonly occur in fill materials. Split Duplicates The rates of split duplicate sampling and analysis met the DQI for the soil samples. RPDs where able to be calculated have been found to be generally acceptable, with a significant exceedance reported for lead in one duplicate pair and slightly elevated RPDs reported for arsenic and barium. These RPD s are generally based on at least one analyte level close to detection limits. Further the soils are observed to be filled based and heterogeneous distribution of heavy metals can commonly occur in fill materials. Laboratory Duplicates Acceptable RPD s have been determined for laboratory duplicates apart from the RPD for mercury and barium in Sample SS11, nickel for sample SS31. RPDs for mercury and nickel were based on analyte levels very close to laboratory detection limits. RPD s can be elevated when base don low analyte levels due to 11

14 rounding of levels. The barium RPD is indicative of potential heterogeneous levels of heavy metals present in fill materials. Trip spike All trip spike results are found to be acceptable. Trip blank All trip blank results are found to be acceptable. Rinsate blank All rinsate blank results are found to be acceptable. Accuracy Surrogate Spikes Surrogate spikes have been reported for analysis of all constituents. Spikes have been found to be generally acceptable, apart from occurrences of under-recovery of surrogates in some semi-volatile analyses as base don phenolic surrogates. It is noted that under-recoveries of surrogates were within the laboratories NATA endorsed limits, and under-recovery of phenolic based surrogates is common in environmental samples. Noting compliance with laboratory NATA endorsed limits, surrogate recoveries are considered to have met the laboratories NATA endorsed limits and are considered acceptable. Matrix Spikes Noting the discussion of the laboratories NATA accredited limits, matrix spike analyses results have been found to be acceptable. Laboratory Control Samples Noting the discussion of the laboratories NATA accredited limits, laboratory control sample analyses results have been found to be acceptable. Representativeness Sampling appropriate for media and analytes Sampling has been undertaken by recovery of soil samples from SPT sampling tubes. These sampling methods are considered appropriate for the collection of undisturbed soil samples. The groundwater samples were all obtained using low flow peristaltic pump methods. Laboratory blanks All levels of analytes in laboratory blanks were below detection limits. Holding times All analyses have been undertaken within holding times. Comparability The laboratory (Envirolab Services) was NATA accredited for all methods. Experienced JBS personnel undertook all sampling in accordance with standard JBS sampling methods. Completeness Documentation All documentation is complete and correct. Frequency for QC Samples The frequency of analysis of all QC samples is considered appropriate. 12

15 Assessment of QA/QC The results of the field and laboratory QA/QC program indicates that the data obtained from the sampling and analysis can be considered appropriately accurate for the objectives of the assessment. However it should be noted that there is potential heterogeneity of contaminant distributions throughout fill based materials as present at surface depths on the site. 13

16 Attachment 4 Soil Data Summary Tables 14

17 Table 1: Soil Data Summary - VOCs Project Name: Grace Campbell Reserve DSI Project Number: VOCs Dichlorodifluoromethane Chloromethane Vinyl Chloride Bromomethane Chloroethane Trichlorofluoromethane 1,1-Dichloroethene trans-1,2-dichloroethene 1,1-dichloroethane mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg EQL cis-1,2-dichloroethene bromochloromethane chloroform 2,2-dichloropropane 1,2-dichloroethane 1,1,1-trichloroethane 1,1-dichloropropene Cyclohexane carbon tetrachloride Benzene dibromomethane 1,2-dichloropropane trichloroethene bromodichloromethane Field_ID Date Sample Code SS01 8/07/ <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <0.2 <1 <1 <1 <1 SS02 8/07/ <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <0.2 <1 <1 <1 <1 SS03 8/07/ <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <0.2 <1 <1 <1 <1 SS04 8/07/ <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <0.2 <1 <1 <1 <1 SS05 8/07/ <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <0.2 <1 <1 <1 <1 SS06 8/07/ <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <0.2 <1 <1 <1 <1 SS07 8/07/ <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <0.2 <1 <1 <1 <1 SS08 8/07/ <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <0.2 <1 <1 <1 <1 SS09 8/07/ <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <0.2 <1 <1 <1 <1 SS10 8/07/ <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <0.2 <1 <1 <1 <1 SS11 8/07/ <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <0.2 <1 <1 <1 <1 SS12 8/07/ <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <0.2 <1 <1 <1 <1 SS13 8/07/ <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <0.2 <1 <1 <1 <1 SS14 8/07/ <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <0.2 <1 <1 <1 <1 SS15 8/07/ <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <0.2 <1 <1 <1 <1 SS16 8/07/ <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <0.2 <1 <1 <1 <1 SS17 8/07/ <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <0.2 <1 <1 <1 <1 SS18 8/07/ <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <0.2 <1 <1 <1 <1 SS19 8/07/ <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <0.2 <1 <1 <1 <1 SS20 8/07/ <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <0.2 <1 <1 <1 <1 SS21 8/07/ <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <0.2 <1 <1 <1 <1 SS22 8/07/ <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <0.2 <1 <1 <1 <1 SS23 8/07/ <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <0.2 <1 <1 <1 <1 SS24 8/07/ <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <0.2 <1 <1 <1 <1 SS25 8/07/ <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <0.2 <1 <1 <1 <1 SS26 8/07/ <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <0.2 <1 <1 <1 <1 SS27 8/07/ <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <0.2 <1 <1 <1 <1 SS28 8/07/ <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <0.2 <1 <1 <1 <1 SS29 8/07/ <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <0.2 <1 <1 <1 <1 SS30 8/07/ <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <0.2 <1 <1 <1 <1 SS31 8/07/ <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <0.2 <1 <1 <1 <1 SS32 8/07/ <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <0.2 <1 <1 <1 <1 SS33 8/07/ <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <0.2 <1 <1 <1 <1 SS34 8/07/ <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <0.2 <1 <1 <1 <1 SS35 8/07/ <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <0.2 <1 <1 <1 <1 SS36 8/07/ <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <0.2 <1 <1 <1 <1 SS37 8/07/ <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <0.2 <1 <1 <1 <1 SS38 8/07/ <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <0.2 <1 <1 <1 <1 SS39 8/07/ <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <0.2 <1 <1 <1 <1 QC1 8/07/ <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <0.2 <1 <1 <1 <1 QC1A 8/07/2013 SE _QC1A <1 <1 <0.1 <1 <1 <1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 - <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 QC2 8/07/ <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <0.2 <1 <1 <1 <1 QC2A 8/07/2013 SE _QC2A <1 <1 <0.1 <1 <1 <1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 - <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1

18 Table 1: Soil Data Summary - VOCs Project Name: Grace Campbell Reserve DSI Project Number: VOCs EQL Field_ID Date Sample Code SS01 8/07/ SS02 8/07/ SS03 8/07/ SS04 8/07/ SS05 8/07/ SS06 8/07/ SS07 8/07/ SS08 8/07/ SS09 8/07/ SS10 8/07/ SS11 8/07/ SS12 8/07/ SS13 8/07/ SS14 8/07/ SS15 8/07/ SS16 8/07/ SS17 8/07/ SS18 8/07/ SS19 8/07/ SS20 8/07/ SS21 8/07/ SS22 8/07/ SS23 8/07/ SS24 8/07/ SS25 8/07/ SS26 8/07/ SS27 8/07/ SS28 8/07/ SS29 8/07/ SS30 8/07/ SS31 8/07/ SS32 8/07/ SS33 8/07/ SS34 8/07/ SS35 8/07/ SS36 8/07/ SS37 8/07/ SS38 8/07/ SS39 8/07/ QC1 8/07/ QC1A 8/07/2013 SE _QC1A QC2 8/07/ QC2A 8/07/2013 SE _QC2A trans-1,3-dichloropropene cis-1,3-dichloropropene 1,1,2-trichloroethane Toluene 1,3-dichloropropane dibromochloromethane 1,2-dibromoethane tetrachloroethene 1,1,1,2-tetrachloroethane chlorobenzene Ethylbenzene bromoform mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg <1 <1 <1 <0.5 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <2 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <0.5 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <2 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <0.5 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <2 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <0.5 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <2 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <0.5 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <2 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <0.5 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <2 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <0.5 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <2 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <0.5 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <2 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <0.5 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <2 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <0.5 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <2 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <0.5 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <2 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <0.5 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <2 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <0.5 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <2 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <0.5 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <2 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <0.5 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <2 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <0.5 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <2 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <0.5 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <2 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <0.5 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <2 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <0.5 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <2 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <0.5 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <2 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <0.5 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <2 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <0.5 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <2 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <0.5 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <2 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <0.5 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <2 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <0.5 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <2 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <0.5 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <2 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <0.5 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <2 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <0.5 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <2 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <0.5 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <2 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <0.5 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <2 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <0.5 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <2 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <0.5 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <2 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <0.5 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <2 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <0.5 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <2 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <0.5 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <2 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <0.5 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <2 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <0.5 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <2 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <0.5 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <2 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <0.5 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <2 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <0.5 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <2 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.2 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <1 <1 <1 <0.5 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <2 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.2 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 m+p-xylene styrene 1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane o-xylene 1,2,3-trichloropropane isopropylbenzene bromobenzene n-propyl benzene 2-chlorotoluene 4-chlorotoluene 1,3,5-trimethyl benzene

19 Table 1: Soil Data Summary - VOCs Project Name: Grace Campbell Reserve DSI Project Number: VOCs EQL Field_ID Date Sample Code SS01 8/07/ SS02 8/07/ SS03 8/07/ SS04 8/07/ SS05 8/07/ SS06 8/07/ SS07 8/07/ SS08 8/07/ SS09 8/07/ SS10 8/07/ SS11 8/07/ SS12 8/07/ SS13 8/07/ SS14 8/07/ SS15 8/07/ SS16 8/07/ SS17 8/07/ SS18 8/07/ SS19 8/07/ SS20 8/07/ SS21 8/07/ SS22 8/07/ SS23 8/07/ SS24 8/07/ SS25 8/07/ SS26 8/07/ SS27 8/07/ SS28 8/07/ SS29 8/07/ SS30 8/07/ SS31 8/07/ SS32 8/07/ SS33 8/07/ SS34 8/07/ SS35 8/07/ SS36 8/07/ SS37 8/07/ SS38 8/07/ SS39 8/07/ QC1 8/07/ QC1A 8/07/2013 SE _QC1A QC2 8/07/ QC2A 8/07/2013 SE _QC2A tert-butyl benzene 1,2,4-trimethyl benzene sec-butyl benzene 4-isopropyl toluene n-butyl benzene 1,2-dibromo-3-chloropropane 1,2,3-trichlorobenzene Acetone (2-propanone) Iodomethane Acrylonitrile Dichloromethane (Methylene chloride) Allyl chloride mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 < <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 < <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 < <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 < <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 < <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 < <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 < <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 < <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 < <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 < <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 < <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 < <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 < <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 < <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 < <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 < <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 < <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 < <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 < <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 < <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 < <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 < <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 < <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 < <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 < <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 < <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 < <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 < <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 < <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 < <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 < <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 < <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 < <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 < <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 < <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 < <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 < <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 < <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 < <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 < <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <10 <5 <0.1 <0.5 <0.1 <0.5 <0.1 <10 <10 <10 <1 <5 <1 <0.3 <1 <0.6 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 < <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <10 <5 <0.1 <0.5 <0.1 <0.5 <0.1 <10 <10 <10 <1 <5 <1 <0.3 <1 <0.6 Carbon disulfide MtBE (Methyl-tert-butyl ether) Vinyl acetate MEK (2-butanone) 2-nitropropane MIBK (4-methyl-2-pentanone) 2-hexanone (MBK) cis-1,4-dichloro-2-butene Total Xylenes trans-1,4-dichloro-2-butene Total BTEX

20 Table 2: Soil Data Summary - SVOCs Project Name: Grace Campbell Reserve DSI Project Number: Phenol Bis-(2-chloroethyl) ether 2-Chlorophenol 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 2-Methylphenol 1,2-Dichlorobenzene Bis (2-chloroisopropyl) ether 3/4-Methylphenol N-nitrosodi-n-propylamine mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg EQL Hexachloroethane Nitrobenzene Isophorone 2,4-Dimethylphenol 2-Nitrophenol Bis(2-chloroethoxy )methane 2,4-Dichlorophenol 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene Naphthalene 4-Chloroaniline Hexachlorobutadiene 2-Methylnaphthalene Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 2,4,6-trichlorophenol 2,4,5-trichlorophenol Field_ID Date SampleCode SS01 8/07/ <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <2 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 SS02 8/07/ <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <2 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 SS03 8/07/ <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <2 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 SS04 8/07/ <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <2 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 SS05 8/07/ <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <2 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 SS06 8/07/ <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <2 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 SS07 8/07/ <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <2 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 SS08 8/07/ <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <2 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 SS09 8/07/ <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <2 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 SS10 8/07/ <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <2 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 SS11 8/07/ <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <2 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 SS12 8/07/ <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <2 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 SS13 8/07/ <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <2 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 SS14 8/07/ <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <2 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 SS15 8/07/ <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <2 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 SS16 8/07/ <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <2 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 SS17 8/07/ <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <2 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 SS18 8/07/ <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <2 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 SS19 8/07/ <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <2 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 SS20 8/07/ <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <2 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 SS21 8/07/ <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <2 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 SS22 8/07/ <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <2 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 SS23 8/07/ <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <2 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 SS24 8/07/ <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <2 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 SS25 8/07/ <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <2 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 SS26 8/07/ <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <2 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 SS27 8/07/ <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <2 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 SS28 8/07/ <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <2 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 SS29 8/07/ <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <2 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 SS30 8/07/ <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <2 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 SS31 8/07/ <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <2 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 SS32 8/07/ <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <2 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 SS33 8/07/ <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <2 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 SS34 8/07/ <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <2 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 SS35 8/07/ <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <2 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 SS36 8/07/ <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <2 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 SS37 8/07/ <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <2 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 SS38 8/07/ <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <2 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 SS39 8/07/ <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <2 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 QC1 8/07/ <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <2 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 QC1A 8/07/2013 SE _QC1A <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.1 <0.1 <0.5 <0.1 <0.5 - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.1 <0.1 <1 <0.1 <0.1 <1 <0.5 <0.5 QC2 8/07/ <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <2 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 QC2A 8/07/2013 SE _QC2A <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.1 <0.1 <0.5 <0.1 <0.5 - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.1 <0.1 <1 <0.1 <0.1 <1 <0.5 <0.5

21 Table 2: Soil Data Summary - SVOCs Project Name: Grace Campbell Reserve DSI Project Number: EQL Field_ID Date SampleCode SS01 8/07/ SS02 8/07/ SS03 8/07/ SS04 8/07/ SS05 8/07/ SS06 8/07/ SS07 8/07/ SS08 8/07/ SS09 8/07/ SS10 8/07/ SS11 8/07/ SS12 8/07/ SS13 8/07/ SS14 8/07/ SS15 8/07/ SS16 8/07/ SS17 8/07/ SS18 8/07/ SS19 8/07/ SS20 8/07/ SS21 8/07/ SS22 8/07/ SS23 8/07/ SS24 8/07/ SS25 8/07/ SS26 8/07/ SS27 8/07/ SS28 8/07/ SS29 8/07/ SS30 8/07/ SS31 8/07/ SS32 8/07/ SS33 8/07/ SS34 8/07/ SS35 8/07/ SS36 8/07/ SS37 8/07/ SS38 8/07/ SS39 8/07/ QC1 8/07/ QC1A 8/07/2013 SE _QC1A QC2 8/07/ QC2A 8/07/2013 SE _QC2A 2-Chloronaphthalene 2-nitroaniline Dimethylphthalate 2,6-Dinitrotoluene Acenaphthylene 3-Nitroaniline Acenaphthene 2,4-dinitrophenol 4-nitrophenol Dibenzofuran diethylphthalate 4-chlorophenylphenylether 4-nitroaniline mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <10 <10 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <10 <1 <1 <1 <10 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <10 <10 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <10 <1 <1 <1 <10 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <10 <10 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <10 <1 <1 <1 <10 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <10 <10 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <10 <1 <1 <1 <10 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <10 <10 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <10 <1 <1 <1 <10 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <10 <10 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <10 <1 <1 <1 <10 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <10 <10 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <10 <1 <1 <1 <10 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <10 <10 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <10 <1 <1 <1 <10 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <10 <10 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <10 <1 <1 <1 <10 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <10 <10 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <10 <1 <1 <1 <10 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <10 <10 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <10 <1 <1 <1 <10 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <10 <10 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <10 <1 <1 <1 <10 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <10 <10 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <10 <1 <1 <1 <10 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <10 <10 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <10 <1 <1 <1 <10 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <10 <10 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <10 <1 <1 <1 <10 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <10 <10 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <10 <1 <1 <1 <10 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <10 <10 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <10 <1 <1 <1 <10 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <10 <10 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <10 <1 <1 <1 <10 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <10 <10 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <10 <1 <1 <1 <10 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <10 <10 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <10 <1 <1 <1 <10 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <10 <10 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <10 <1 <1 <1 <10 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <10 <10 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <10 <1 <1 <1 <10 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <10 <10 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <10 <1 <1 <1 <10 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <10 <10 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <10 <1 <1 <1 <10 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <10 <10 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <10 <1 <1 <1 <10 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <10 <10 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <10 <1 <1 <1 <10 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <10 <10 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <10 <1 <1 <1 <10 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <10 <10 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <10 <1 <1 <1 <10 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <10 <10 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <10 <1 <1 <1 <10 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <10 <10 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <10 <1 <1 <1 <10 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <10 <10 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <10 <1 <1 <1 <10 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <10 <10 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <10 <1 <1 <1 <10 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <10 <10 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <10 <1 <1 <1 <10 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <10 <10 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <10 <1 <1 <1 <10 <1 <1 <1 <1 1 1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <10 <10 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <10 <1 <1 <1 <10 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <10 <10 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <10 <1 <1 <1 <10 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <10 <10 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <10 <1 <1 <1 <10 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <10 <10 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <10 <1 <1 <1 <10 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <10 <10 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <10 <1 <1 <1 <10 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <10 <10 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <10 <1 <1 <1 <10 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 - <1 <0.5 <0.5 <0.1 <1 <0.1 - <1 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <1 < <0.5 <0.1 <0.5 <0.1 <0.1 - <0.5 <0.1 <0.1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <10 <10 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <10 <1 <1 <1 <10 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 - <1 <0.5 <0.5 <0.1 <1 <0.1 - <1 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <1 < <0.5 <0.1 <0.5 <0.1 <0.1 - <0.5 <0.1 <0.1 Fluorene 2-methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol azobenzene 4-bromophenylphenylether hexachlorobenzene pentachlorophenol Phenanthrene Anthracene carbazole di-n-butylphthalate Fluoranthene Pyrene

22 Table 2: Soil Data Summary - SVOCs Project Name: Grace Campbell Reserve DSI Project Number: EQL Field_ID Date SampleCode SS01 8/07/ SS02 8/07/ SS03 8/07/ SS04 8/07/ SS05 8/07/ SS06 8/07/ SS07 8/07/ SS08 8/07/ SS09 8/07/ SS10 8/07/ SS11 8/07/ SS12 8/07/ SS13 8/07/ SS14 8/07/ SS15 8/07/ SS16 8/07/ SS17 8/07/ SS18 8/07/ SS19 8/07/ SS20 8/07/ SS21 8/07/ SS22 8/07/ SS23 8/07/ SS24 8/07/ SS25 8/07/ SS26 8/07/ SS27 8/07/ SS28 8/07/ SS29 8/07/ SS30 8/07/ SS31 8/07/ SS32 8/07/ SS33 8/07/ SS34 8/07/ SS35 8/07/ SS36 8/07/ SS37 8/07/ SS38 8/07/ SS39 8/07/ QC1 8/07/ QC1A 8/07/2013 SE _QC1A QC2 8/07/ QC2A 8/07/2013 SE _QC2A butylbenzylphthalate bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate Benzo(a)anthracene Chrysene di-n-octylphthalate Benzo(b)fluoranthene Benzo(k)fluoranthene Benzo(a)pyrene Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene Benzo(g,h,i)perylene ethylmethanesulfonate aniline mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <0.5 <5 <0.1 <0.1 <0.5 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <1 <3 <0.5 <1 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 < <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <0.5 <5 <0.1 <0.1 <0.5 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <1 <3 <0.5 <1 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 < <1 pentachloroethane benzyl alcohol acetophenone N-nitrosomorpholine N-nitrosopiperidine 2,6-dichlorophenol hexachloropropene-1 N-nitroso-n-butylamine safrole 1,2,4,5-tetrachlorobenzene cis and trans iso-safrole 1,3-dinitrobenzene

23 Table 2: Soil Data Summary - SVOCs Project Name: Grace Campbell Reserve DSI Project Number: SVOCs EQL Field_ID Date SampleCode SS01 8/07/ SS02 8/07/ SS03 8/07/ SS04 8/07/ SS05 8/07/ SS06 8/07/ SS07 8/07/ SS08 8/07/ SS09 8/07/ SS10 8/07/ SS11 8/07/ SS12 8/07/ SS13 8/07/ SS14 8/07/ SS15 8/07/ SS16 8/07/ SS17 8/07/ SS18 8/07/ SS19 8/07/ SS20 8/07/ SS21 8/07/ SS22 8/07/ SS23 8/07/ SS24 8/07/ SS25 8/07/ SS26 8/07/ SS27 8/07/ SS28 8/07/ SS29 8/07/ SS30 8/07/ SS31 8/07/ SS32 8/07/ SS33 8/07/ SS34 8/07/ SS35 8/07/ SS36 8/07/ SS37 8/07/ SS38 8/07/ SS39 8/07/ QC1 8/07/ QC1A 8/07/2013 SE _QC1A QC2 8/07/ QC2A 8/07/2013 SE _QC2A pentachlorobenzene 1-naphthylamine 2,3,4,6-tetrachlorophenol 2-naphthylamine 5-nitro-o-toluidine diphenylamine phenacetin pentachloronitrobenzene dinoseb methapyrilene p-dimethylaminoazobenzene 2-acetylaminofluorene 7,12-dimethylbenz(a)anthracene mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <0.5 <1 - <1 <1 <0.5 <1 < <1 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.1 <0.5 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 < <0.2 <0.1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <0.5 <1 - <1 <1 <0.5 <1 < <1 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.1 <0.5 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 < <0.2 <0.1 3-methylcholanthrene a-bhc b-bhc g-bhc d-bhc Heptachlor Aldrin Heptachlor Epoxide g-chlordane a-chlordane Endosulfan I p,p'-dde

24 Table 2: Soil Data Summary - SVOCs Project Name: Grace Campbell Reserve DSI Project Number: EQL Field_ID Date SampleCode SS01 8/07/ SS02 8/07/ SS03 8/07/ SS04 8/07/ SS05 8/07/ SS06 8/07/ SS07 8/07/ SS08 8/07/ SS09 8/07/ SS10 8/07/ SS11 8/07/ SS12 8/07/ SS13 8/07/ SS14 8/07/ SS15 8/07/ SS16 8/07/ SS17 8/07/ SS18 8/07/ SS19 8/07/ SS20 8/07/ SS21 8/07/ SS22 8/07/ SS23 8/07/ SS24 8/07/ SS25 8/07/ SS26 8/07/ SS27 8/07/ SS28 8/07/ SS29 8/07/ SS30 8/07/ SS31 8/07/ SS32 8/07/ SS33 8/07/ SS34 8/07/ SS35 8/07/ SS36 8/07/ SS37 8/07/ SS38 8/07/ SS39 8/07/ QC1 8/07/ QC1A 8/07/2013 SE _QC1A QC2 8/07/ QC2A 8/07/2013 SE _QC2A Dieldrin Endrin p,p'-ddd Endosulfan II p,p'-ddt Endosulfan Sulphate Methoxychlor Benzo(b&k)fluoranthene 1-methylnaphthalene Isodrin Mirex Alpha-chlordane Gamma-chlordane mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 < <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 < <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 < <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 < <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 < <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 < <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 < <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 < <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 < <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 < <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 < <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 < <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 < <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 < <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 < <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 < <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 < <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 < <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 < <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 < <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 < <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 < <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 < <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 < <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 < <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 < <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 < <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 < <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 < <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 < <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 < <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 < <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 < <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 < <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 < <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 < <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 < <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 < <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 < <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 < <0.2 <0.2 <0.1 <0.2 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.2 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.2 <0.2 <0.5 <2 <0.5 <0.2 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 < <0.2 <0.2 <0.1 <0.2 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.2 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.2 <0.2 <0.5 <2 <0.5 <0.2 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 Endrin ketone Azinphos-methyl (Guthion) Bromophos ethyl Carbophenothion Chlorfenvinphos-cis (Chlofenvinp Chlorfenvinphos-trans (Chlofenvi Chlorpyrifos (Chlorpyrifos Ethyl) Chlorpyrifos-methyl Co-Ral (Coumaphos) Diazinon (Dimpylate) Dichlorvos Demeton-S-methyl

25 Table 2: Soil Data Summary - SVOCs Project Name: Grace Campbell Reserve DSI Project Number: EQL Field_ID Date SampleCode SS01 8/07/ SS02 8/07/ SS03 8/07/ SS04 8/07/ SS05 8/07/ SS06 8/07/ SS07 8/07/ SS08 8/07/ SS09 8/07/ SS10 8/07/ SS11 8/07/ SS12 8/07/ SS13 8/07/ SS14 8/07/ SS15 8/07/ SS16 8/07/ SS17 8/07/ SS18 8/07/ SS19 8/07/ SS20 8/07/ SS21 8/07/ SS22 8/07/ SS23 8/07/ SS24 8/07/ SS25 8/07/ SS26 8/07/ SS27 8/07/ SS28 8/07/ SS29 8/07/ SS30 8/07/ SS31 8/07/ SS32 8/07/ SS33 8/07/ SS34 8/07/ SS35 8/07/ SS36 8/07/ SS37 8/07/ SS38 8/07/ SS39 8/07/ QC1 8/07/ QC1A 8/07/2013 SE _QC1A QC2 8/07/ QC2A 8/07/2013 SE _QC2A Dimethoate Disulfoton (Di-syston) EPN Ethion Ethoprophos (ethoprop or proph Famphur (Famophos) Fenamiphos (Phenamiphos) Fenchlorophos (Ronnel) Fenitrothion Fenthion Malathion (Maldison) Methidathion Mevinphos-cis/trans mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.2 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.2 <0.5 <0.2 <0.5 <1 <0.5 <0.2 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.1 < <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.2 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.2 <0.5 <0.2 <0.5 <1 <0.5 <0.2 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.1 <0.1 o,o,o-triethyl phosphorothioate Parathion ethyl (Parathion) Parathion methyl Phorate Pirimiphos-ethyl Pirimiphos-methyl Profenofos Prothiophos (Tokuthion) Sulfotepp Tetrachlorvinphos (Stirophos) PCB Congener C28 PCB Congener C52

26 Table 2: Soil Data Summary - SVOCs Project Name: Grace Campbell Reserve DSI Project Number: EQL Field_ID Date SampleCode SS01 8/07/ SS02 8/07/ SS03 8/07/ SS04 8/07/ SS05 8/07/ SS06 8/07/ SS07 8/07/ SS08 8/07/ SS09 8/07/ SS10 8/07/ SS11 8/07/ SS12 8/07/ SS13 8/07/ SS14 8/07/ SS15 8/07/ SS16 8/07/ SS17 8/07/ SS18 8/07/ SS19 8/07/ SS20 8/07/ SS21 8/07/ SS22 8/07/ SS23 8/07/ SS24 8/07/ SS25 8/07/ SS26 8/07/ SS27 8/07/ SS28 8/07/ SS29 8/07/ SS30 8/07/ SS31 8/07/ SS32 8/07/ SS33 8/07/ SS34 8/07/ SS35 8/07/ SS36 8/07/ SS37 8/07/ SS38 8/07/ SS39 8/07/ QC1 8/07/ QC1A 8/07/2013 SE _QC1A QC2 8/07/ QC2A 8/07/2013 SE _QC2A PCB Congener C101 PCB Congener C118 PCB Congener C138 PCB Congener C153 PCB Congener C180 1,2,3,5 and 1,2,4,5 -tetrachlorobe 1,2,3,4-tetrachlorobenzene 1/2-Chloronaphthalene Bis(2-ethylhexyl)adipate Carbofuran Carbaryl N-nitroso-diethylamine (NDEA) Trifluralin mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <1 <0.5 <1 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <1 <0.5 <1 <1 <0.5 <1 <1 <1 <1 <0.5 <1 <1 <1 < <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <1 <0.5 <1 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <1 <0.5 <1 <1 <0.5 <1 <1 <1 <1 <0.5 <1 <1 <1 <2 N-nitroso-pyrrolidine (NPYR) 4-amino biphenyl 2,4-dinitrotoluene o-toluidine Methyl methanesulfonate Isosafrole Isomer 1 Isosafrole Isomer 2 1,4-naphthoquinone 3/4-methyl phenol (m/p-cresol) Thionazin 2,3,4,6 and 2,3,5,6-tetrachloroph 4-chloro-3-methylphenol

27 Table 3: Soil Data Summary - Metals / Metalloids, PCBs and Asbestos Project Name: Grace Campbell Reserve DSI Project Number: PCBs Metals & Metalloids Asbestos Arochlor 1016 Arochlor 1221 Arochlor 1232 Arochlor 1242 Arochlor 1248 Arochlor 1254 Arochlor 1260 Arochlor 1262 Arochlor 1268 Total PCBs (Arochlors) mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg - EQL Arsenic Cadmium Chromium Copper Lead Manganese Mercury Nickel Antimony Zinc Barium Cobalt Tin Titanium Asbestos ID in soil Field_ID Date SampleCode SS01 8/07/ <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 < <4 < <0.1 3 < < SS01 - Triplicate 8/07/ <4 < <0.1 3 < < SS02 8/07/ <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 < <4 < < < SS03 8/07/ <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 < <4 < < <1 < SS04 8/07/ <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 < <4 < < < SS05 8/07/ <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 < <4 < <0.1 2 <7 9 9 <1 < SS06 8/07/ <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 < <4 < < SS07 8/07/ <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 < <4 < < <1 < SS08 8/07/ <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 < < < SS09 8/07/ <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 < <4 < <0.1 1 < <1 < SS10 8/07/ <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 < <4 < < <1 < SS11 8/07/ <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 < <4 < < SS11 - Triplicate 8/07/ <4 < < SS12 8/07/ <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 < <4 < < SS13 8/07/ <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 < <4 < < SS14 8/07/ <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 < < < SS15 8/07/ <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 < <4 < < < SS16 8/07/ <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 < <4 < < SS17 8/07/ <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 < <4 < <0.1 1 < <1 < SS18 8/07/ <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 < <4 < < < SS19 8/07/ <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 < <4 < < SS20 8/07/ <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 < <4 < <0.1 1 < <1 < SS21 8/07/ <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 < <4 < < SS22 8/07/ <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 < <4 < < < SS23 8/07/ <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 < <4 < < <1 < SS24 8/07/ <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 < <4 < <0.1 3 < SS25 8/07/ <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 < <4 < <0.1 <1 <7 7 4 <1 < SS26 8/07/ <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 < <4 < <0.1 <1 <7 6 3 <1 < SS27 8/07/ <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 < <4 < <0.1 <1 < <1 < SS28 8/07/ <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 < <4 < <0.1 <1 <7 4 3 <1 < SS29 8/07/ <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 < <4 < < < SS30 8/07/ <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 < <4 < < < SS31 8/07/ <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 < <4 < < <1 < SS32 8/07/ <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 < <4 < < SS33 8/07/ <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 < <4 <0.4 1 <1 1 3 <0.1 <1 <7 3 2 <1 < SS34 8/07/ <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 < < < SS35 8/07/ <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 < <4 < <0.1 <1 <7 7 3 <1 < SS36 8/07/ <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 < <4 < <0.1 <1 < <1 < SS37 8/07/ <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 < <4 < < < SS38 8/07/ <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 < <4 < <0.1 <1 < <1 < SS39 8/07/ <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 < <4 < <0.1 <1 <7 4 3 <1 < QC1 8/07/ <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 < <4 < <0.1 3 < QC1A 8/07/2013 SE _QC1A <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <1 <3 < < < QC2 8/07/ <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 < <4 < <0.1 <1 <7 4 2 <1 < QC2A 8/07/2013 SE _QC2A <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <1 <3 < < < <0.5 <

28 Table 4 - Sample Register and XRF Determination Results SAMPLE ID SAMPLE DEPTH (metres below ground surface) Material Description SS Silty Sand, light brown, heterogeneous, dry, loosely packed, some river pebble inclusions, no odour SS Silty Sand, light brown, heterogeneous, dry, loosely packed, no odour SS Silty Sand, light brown, heterogeneous, dry, loosely packed, no odour SS Silty Sand, light brown, heterogeneous, dry, loosely packed, no odour SS05 SS06 SS07 SS Silty Sand, light brown, heterogeneous, dry, loosely packed, no odour Silty Sand, light brown, heterogeneous, dry, loosely packed, no odour Silty Sand, light brown, heterogeneous, dry, loosely packed, no odour Silty Sand, light brown, heterogeneous, dry, loosely packed, no odour XRF RESULTS (ppm) Au 22 Ni ND Cd ND Pb 21 Cu ND Sn ND Fe 2021 As ND Sb ND Zn 22 Se ND W ND Rb ND Mo ND Ir ND Sr 17 Ru ND Pt ND Zr 32 Rh ND Hg ND Cr ND Pd ND Bi ND Mn ND Pd ND Th ND Co ND Ag ND U ND Au 14 Ni ND Cd ND Pb ND Cu ND Sn ND Fe 2362 As ND Sb ND Zn 64 Se ND W ND Rb 12 Mo ND Ir ND Sr 11 Ru ND Pt ND Zr 59 Rh ND Hg ND Cr ND Pd ND Bi ND Mn ND Pd ND Th ND Co ND Ag ND U ND Au 26 Ni ND Cd ND Pb 24 Cu ND Sn ND Fe 3869 As ND Sb ND Zn 46 Se ND W ND Rb 20 Mo ND Ir ND Sr 26 Ru ND Pt ND Zr 79 Rh ND Hg ND Cr ND Pd ND Bi ND Mn ND Pd ND Th ND Co ND Ag ND U ND Au 19 Ni ND Cd ND Pb 57 Cu ND Sn ND Fe 1966 As ND Sb ND Zn 90 Se ND W ND Rb 9 Mo ND Ir ND Sr 19 Ru ND Pt ND Zr 26 Rh ND Hg ND Cr ND Pd ND Bi ND Mn ND Pd ND Th ND Co ND Ag ND U ND Au 24 Ni ND Cd ND Pb ND Cu ND Sn ND Fe 2133 As ND Sb ND Zn ND Se ND W ND Rb 8 Mo ND Ir ND Sr ND Ru ND Pt ND Zr 49 Rh ND Hg ND Cr ND Pd ND Bi ND Mn ND Pd ND Th ND Co ND Ag ND U ND Au 25 Ni ND Cd ND Pb 64 Cu 39 Sn ND Fe 2892 As ND Sb ND Zn 96 Se ND W ND Rb 11 Mo ND Ir ND Sr 14 Ru ND Pt ND Zr 49 Rh ND Hg ND Cr ND Pd ND Bi ND Mn ND Pd ND Th ND Co ND Ag ND U ND Au 25 Ni ND Cd ND Pb 22 Cu ND Sn ND Fe 2183 As ND Sb ND Zn 27 Se ND W ND Rb 15 Mo ND Ir ND Sr 12 Ru ND Pt ND Zr 45 Rh ND Hg ND Cr ND Pd ND Bi ND Mn ND Pd ND Th ND Co ND Ag ND U ND Au 20 Ni ND Cd ND Pb 23 Cu 47 Sn ND Fe 8885 As ND Sb ND Zn 94 Se ND W ND Rb 23 Mo ND Ir ND Sr 69 Ru ND Pt ND Zr 145 Rh ND Hg ND Cr ND Pd ND Bi ND Mn ND Pd ND Th ND Co ND Ag ND U ND

29 Table 4 - Sample Register and XRF Determination Results SAMPLE ID SS09 SS10 SS11 SS12 SS13 SS14 SS15 SS16 SAMPLE DEPTH (metres below ground surface) Material Description Silty Sand, light brown, heterogeneous, dry, loosely packed, no odour Silty Sand, dark brown, heterogeneous, slightly damp, loosely packed, no odour Silty Sand, dark brown, heterogeneous, slightly damp, loosely packed, no odour Silty Sand, dark brown, heterogeneous, slightly damp, loosely packed, no odour Sandy Silt, dark brown, heterogeneous, slightly damp, loosely packed, no odour Silty Sand, light brown, heterogeneous, dry, loosely packed, no odour Silty Sand, light brown, heterogeneous, dry, loosely packed, no odour Silty Sand, light grey-brown, heterogeneouse, dry, loosely packed, some asphalt and ironstone gravels observed, no odour XRF RESULTS (ppm) Au 17 Ni ND Cd ND Pb ND Cu ND Sn ND Fe 1103 As ND Sb ND Zn ND Se ND W ND Rb 10 Mo ND Ir ND Sr 11 Ru ND Pt ND Zr 26 Rh ND Hg ND Cr ND Pd ND Bi ND Mn ND Pd ND Th ND Co ND Ag ND U ND Au 25 Ni ND Cd ND Pb ND Cu ND Sn ND Fe 1323 As ND Sb ND Zn 29 Se ND W ND Rb 17 Mo ND Ir ND Sr 20 Ru ND Pt ND Zr 46 Rh ND Hg ND Cr ND Pd ND Bi ND Mn ND Pd ND Th ND Co ND Ag ND U ND Au 20 Ni ND Cd ND Pb 26 Cu ND Sn ND Fe 4155 As ND Sb ND Zn 105 Se ND W ND Rb 13 Mo ND Ir ND Sr 34 Ru ND Pt ND Zr 107 Rh ND Hg ND Cr ND Pd ND Bi ND Mn ND Pd ND Th ND Co ND Ag ND U ND Au 22 Ni ND Cd ND Pb 44 Cu ND Sn ND Fe 4556 As ND Sb ND Zn 87 Se ND W ND Rb 13 Mo ND Ir ND Sr 18 Ru ND Pt ND Zr 62 Rh ND Hg ND Cr ND Pd ND Bi ND Mn ND Pd ND Th ND Co ND Ag ND U ND Au 26 Ni ND Cd ND Pb 60 Cu ND Sn ND Fe 6800 As ND Sb ND Zn ND Se ND W ND Rb 34 Mo ND Ir ND Sr 37 Ru ND Pt ND Zr 104 Rh ND Hg ND Cr ND Pd ND Bi ND Mn 140 Pd ND Th ND Co ND Ag ND U ND Au 21 Ni ND Cd ND Pb 67 Cu ND Sn ND Fe 3664 As ND Sb ND Zn 43 Se ND W ND Rb 12 Mo ND Ir ND Sr 15 Ru ND Pt ND Zr 39 Rh ND Hg ND Cr ND Pd ND Bi ND Mn ND Pd ND Th ND Co ND Ag ND U ND Au 17 Ni ND Cd ND Pb 47 Cu ND Sn ND Fe 3689 As ND Sb ND Zn 81 Se ND W ND Rb 8 Mo ND Ir ND Sr 33 Ru ND Pt ND Zr 71 Rh ND Hg ND Cr ND Pd ND Bi ND Mn ND Pd ND Th ND Co ND Ag ND U ND Au 20 Ni ND Cd ND Pb 22 Cu ND Sn ND Fe 2606 As ND Sb ND Zn 56 Se ND W ND Rb 9 Mo ND Ir ND Sr 17 Ru ND Pt ND Zr 52 Rh ND Hg ND Cr ND Pd ND Bi ND Mn ND Pd ND Th ND Co ND Ag ND U ND

30 Table 4 - Sample Register and XRF Determination Results SAMPLE ID SS17 SS18 SS19 SS20 SS21 SS22 SS23 (duplicate QC1 and triplicate QC1A collected) SS24 SAMPLE DEPTH (metres below ground surface) Material Description Sand, light grey, heterogeneous, dry, loosely packed, some wood chips observed, no odour Sand, light grey, heterogeneous, dry, loosely packed, some wood chips observed, no odour Sandy Silt, dark brown, heterogeneous, slightly damp, loosely packed, no odour Sand, yellow brown, heterogeneous, damp, loosely packed, no odour Silty Sand, dark brown, heterogeneous, slightly damp, loosely packed, no odour Silty Sand, topsoil, dark brown, heterogeneous, dry, densely packed, some sandstone gravels observed, no odours Silty Sand, light grey-brown, heterogeneous, dry, ACM fragment (F01) observed on surface, no odours Silty Sand, light brown, heterogeneous, slightly damp, medium density, no odours XRF RESULTS (ppm) Au 22 Ni ND Cd ND Pb ND Cu ND Sn ND Fe 1155 As ND Sb ND Zn 32 Se ND W ND Rb ND Mo ND Ir ND Sr ND Ru ND Pt ND Zr 23 Rh ND Hg ND Cr ND Pd ND Bi ND Mn ND Pd ND Th ND Co ND Ag ND U ND Au 18 Ni ND Cd ND Pb 41 Cu ND Sn ND Fe 2350 As ND Sb ND Zn 45 Se ND W ND Rb 9 Mo ND Ir ND Sr 15 Ru ND Pt ND Zr 106 Rh ND Hg ND Cr ND Pd ND Bi ND Mn ND Pd ND Th ND Co ND Ag ND U ND Au 23 Ni ND Cd ND Pb 81 Cu ND Sn ND Fe 3874 As ND Sb ND Zn 69 Se ND W ND Rb 13 Mo ND Ir ND Sr 15 Ru ND Pt ND Zr 49 Rh ND Hg ND Cr ND Pd ND Bi ND Mn ND Pd ND Th ND Co ND Ag ND U ND Au 15 Ni ND Cd ND Pb 27 Cu ND Sn ND Fe 2495 As ND Sb ND Zn 36 Se ND W ND Rb 10 Mo ND Ir ND Sr 15 Ru ND Pt ND Zr 51 Rh ND Hg ND Cr ND Pd ND Bi ND Mn ND Pd ND Th ND Co ND Ag ND U ND Au 22 Ni ND Cd ND Pb ND Cu 35 Sn ND Fe 6255 As ND Sb ND Zn 54 Se ND W ND Rb 17 Mo ND Ir ND Sr 31 Ru ND Pt ND Zr 102 Rh ND Hg ND Cr ND Pd ND Bi ND Mn 123 Pd ND Th ND Co ND Ag ND U ND Au 18 Ni ND Cd ND Pb 21 Cu 177 Sn ND Fe As ND Sb ND Zn ND Se ND W ND Rb 18 Mo ND Ir ND Sr 58 Ru ND Pt ND Zr 163 Rh ND Hg ND Cr ND Pd ND Bi ND Mn 335 Pd ND Th ND Co ND Ag ND U ND Au 17 Ni ND Cd ND Pb ND Cu ND Sn ND Fe 1707 As ND Sb ND Zn 26 Se ND W ND Rb 9 Mo ND Ir ND Sr 10 Ru ND Pt ND Zr 49 Rh ND Hg ND Cr ND Pd ND Bi ND Mn ND Pd ND Th ND Co ND Ag ND U ND Au 22 Ni ND Cd ND Pb 33 Cu ND Sn ND Fe 1836 As ND Sb ND Zn 25 Se ND W ND Rb ND Mo ND Ir ND Sr 11 Ru ND Pt ND Zr 35 Rh ND Hg ND Cr ND Pd ND Bi ND Mn ND Pd ND Th ND Co ND Ag ND U ND

31 Table 4 - Sample Register and XRF Determination Results SAMPLE ID SS25 SS26 (duplicate QC2 and triplicate QC2A collected) SS27 SS28 SS29 SS30 SS31 SS32 SAMPLE DEPTH (metres below ground surface) Material Description Sand, grey and yellow mixed, heterogeneous, damp, no inclusions observed, no odours Sand, yellow, heterogeneous, damp, no inclusions observed, no odours Sand, yellow, heterogeneous, damp, no inclusions observed, no odours Sand, yellow, homogenous, wet, no inclusions observed, no odours Sand, yellow, homogenous, wet, no inclusions observed, no odours Sand, grey, homogenous, wet, no inclusions observed, no odours Sand, yellow-grey, homogenous, wet, no inclusions observed, no odours Sand, dark grey, homogenous, wet, no inclusions observed, no odours XRF RESULTS (ppm) Au 22 Ni ND Cd ND Pb ND Cu ND Sn ND Fe 496 As ND Sb ND Zn ND Se ND W ND Rb ND Mo ND Ir ND Sr 6 Ru ND Pt ND Zr 29 Rh ND Hg ND Cr ND Pd ND Bi ND Mn ND Pd ND Th ND Co ND Ag ND U ND Au 10 Ni ND Cd ND Pb ND Cu ND Sn ND Fe 754 As ND Sb ND Zn ND Se ND W ND Rb 9 Mo ND Ir ND Sr 9 Ru ND Pt ND Zr 47 Rh ND Hg ND Cr ND Pd ND Bi ND Mn ND Pd ND Th ND Co ND Ag ND U ND Au 18 Ni ND Cd 99 Pb ND Cu ND Sn ND Fe 633 As ND Sb ND Zn ND Se ND W ND Rb 9 Mo ND Ir ND Sr 8 Ru ND Pt ND Zr 40 Rh ND Hg ND Cr ND Pd ND Bi ND Mn ND Pd ND Th ND Co ND Ag ND U ND Au 22 Ni ND Cd ND Pb 55 Cu ND Sn ND Fe 1829 As ND Sb ND Zn 25 Se ND W ND Rb 17 Mo ND Ir ND Sr 20 Ru ND Pt ND Zr 54 Rh ND Hg ND Cr ND Pd ND Bi ND Mn ND Pd ND Th ND Co ND Ag ND U ND Au 16 Ni ND Cd ND Pb ND Cu ND Sn ND Fe 988 As ND Sb ND Zn ND Se ND W ND Rb 8 Mo ND Ir ND Sr 11 Ru ND Pt ND Zr 29 Rh ND Hg ND Cr ND Pd ND Bi ND Mn ND Pd ND Th ND Co ND Ag ND U ND Au 22 Ni ND Cd ND Pb 22 Cu ND Sn ND Fe 3134 As ND Sb ND Zn 34 Se ND W ND Rb 12 Mo ND Ir ND Sr 14 Ru ND Pt ND Zr 65 Rh ND Hg ND Cr ND Pd ND Bi ND Mn 105 Pd ND Th ND Co ND Ag ND U ND Au 27 Ni ND Cd ND Pb ND Cu ND Sn ND Fe 954 As ND Sb ND Zn ND Se ND W ND Rb 14 Mo ND Ir ND Sr 9 Ru ND Pt ND Zr 56 Rh ND Hg ND Cr ND Pd ND Bi ND Mn ND Pd ND Th ND Co ND Ag ND U ND Au 19 Ni ND Cd ND Pb 45 Cu ND Sn ND Fe 2267 As ND Sb ND Zn 65 Se ND W ND Rb ND Mo ND Ir ND Sr 17 Ru ND Pt ND Zr 75 Rh ND Hg ND Cr ND Pd ND Bi ND Mn ND Pd ND Th ND Co ND Ag ND U ND

32 Table 4 - Sample Register and XRF Determination Results SAMPLE ID SS33 SS34 SS35 SS36 SS37 SS38 SS39 SAMPLE DEPTH (metres below ground surface) Material Description Sand, yellow, homogenous, wet, no inclusions observed, no odours Sand, dark grey, homogenous, wet, no inclusions observed, no odours Sand, yellow, homogenous, wet, no inclusions observed, no odours Sand, yellow, homogenous, wet, no inclusions observed, no odours Sand, yellow, homogenous, wet, no inclusions observed, no odours Sand, yellow, homogenous, wet, no inclusions observed, no odours Sand, yellow, homogenous, wet, no inclusions observed, no odours XRF RESULTS (ppm) Au 24 Ni ND Cd ND Pb ND Cu ND Sn ND Fe 1856 As ND Sb ND Zn ND Se ND W ND Rb ND Mo ND Ir ND Sr ND Ru ND Pt ND Zr 21 Rh ND Hg ND Cr ND Pd ND Bi ND Mn ND Pd ND Th ND Co ND Ag ND U ND Au 20 Ni ND Cd ND Pb 115 Cu ND Sn ND Fe 2619 As ND Sb ND Zn 48 Se ND W ND Rb 12 Mo ND Ir ND Sr 20 Ru ND Pt ND Zr 47 Rh ND Hg ND Cr ND Pd ND Bi ND Mn ND Pd ND Th ND Co ND Ag ND U ND Au 13 Ni ND Cd ND Pb ND Cu ND Sn ND Fe 774 As ND Sb ND Zn ND Se ND W ND Rb 9 Mo ND Ir ND Sr ND Ru ND Pt ND Zr 15 Rh ND Hg ND Cr ND Pd ND Bi ND Mn ND Pd ND Th ND Co ND Ag ND U ND Au 18 Ni ND Cd ND Pb ND Cu ND Sn ND Fe 645 As ND Sb ND Zn ND Se ND W ND Rb ND Mo ND Ir ND Sr ND Ru ND Pt ND Zr 71 Rh ND Hg ND Cr ND Pd ND Bi ND Mn ND Pd ND Th ND Co ND Ag ND U ND Au 20 Ni ND Cd ND Pb ND Cu ND Sn ND Fe 768 As ND Sb ND Zn ND Se ND W ND Rb 11 Mo ND Ir ND Sr ND Ru ND Pt ND Zr 30 Rh ND Hg ND Cr ND Pd ND Bi ND Mn ND Pd ND Th ND Co ND Ag ND U ND Au 26 Ni ND Cd ND Pb ND Cu ND Sn ND Fe 689 As ND Sb ND Zn ND Se ND W ND Rb 7 Mo ND Ir ND Sr 6 Ru ND Pt ND Zr 34 Rh ND Hg ND Cr ND Pd ND Bi ND Mn ND Pd ND Th ND Co ND Ag ND U ND Au 16 Ni ND Cd ND Pb ND Cu ND Sn ND Fe 893 As ND Sb ND Zn ND Se ND W ND Rb 10 Mo ND Ir ND Sr 8 Ru ND Pt ND Zr 47 Rh ND Hg ND Cr ND Pd ND Bi ND Mn ND Pd ND Th ND Co ND Ag ND U ND

33 Attachment 5 Field Notes 15

34

35

36

37

38

39

40

41 Attachment 6 Laboratory Reports and Chain of Custody Documentation 16

42 CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS Client: JBS & G (NSW & WA) Pty Ltd Level 1, 50 Margaret St Sydney NSW 2000 Attention: Michael Samuel Sample log in details: Your Reference: 42898, Grace Campbell Reserve No. of samples: 41 Soils, 1 Material, 3 Waters Date samples received / completed instructions received 08/07/2013 / 08/07/2013 Analysis Details: Please refer to the following pages for results, methodology summary and quality control data. Samples were analysed as received from the client. Results relate specifically to the samples as received. Results are reported on a dry weight basis for solids and on an as received basis for other matrices. Please refer to the last page of this report for any comments relating to the results. Report Details: Date results requested by: / Issue Date: 9/07/13 / 9/07/13 Date of Preliminary Report: Not issued NATA accreditation number This document shall not be reproduced except in full. Accredited for compliance with ISO/IEC Tests not covered by NATA are denoted with *. Results Approved By: Page 1 of 101

Certifications: New York (EPA: NY00906, ELAP: 11078), New Jersey (NY026), Connecticut (PH-0337), Massachusetts (M-NY906), Virginia (1884)

Certifications: New York (EPA: NY00906, ELAP: 11078), New Jersey (NY026), Connecticut (PH-0337), Massachusetts (M-NY906), Virginia (1884) Pace Analytical e-report *Issuance of this report is prior to full data package. Report prepared for: ARCADIS 6723 TOWPATH RD SYRACUSE, NY 324 CONTACT: DON SAUDA ----------------------------------------------

More information

Methods 8260C and 8270D on a Single GCMS without Changing Columns

Methods 8260C and 8270D on a Single GCMS without Changing Columns Gas Chromatograph Mass Spectrometer No. GCMS-1302 Methods 8260C and 8270D on a Single GCMS without Changing Columns Introduction USEPA Methods 8260C (volatile) and 8270D (semi-volatile) typically require

More information

Soil, Ground Water and Sediment Standards for Use Under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act Ministry of the Environment April 15, 2011

Soil, Ground Water and Sediment Standards for Use Under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act Ministry of the Environment April 15, 2011 Soil, Ground Water and Sediment Standards for Use Under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act Ministry of the Environment April 15, 2011 PIBS # 7382e01 i TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS...ii

More information

South Dakota s Statewide Ground Water Quality Monitoring Network

South Dakota s Statewide Ground Water Quality Monitoring Network South Dakota s Statewide Ground Water Quality Monitoring Network Derric L. Iles State Geologist Geological Survey Program Department of Environment and Natural Resources 2014 Eastern South Dakota Water

More information

Draft Data Validation Plan Review Form Tier II

Draft Data Validation Plan Review Form Tier II Draft Data Validation Plan Review Form Tier II This Plan Review Form is # of forms completed in the review of this closure plan. Facility Name ID Number Date Review of Report is Completed Validator/DO

More information

Guidelines For Using and Generating Write-On Data Files

Guidelines For Using and Generating Write-On Data Files Guidelines For Using and Generating Write-On Data Files Drinking Water Program California Department of Health Services January 1999 The DHS Drinking Water Program (DWP) provides Write-On to public drinking

More information

The purpose of this bid is to procure a contract with a laboratory to provide analytical testing services on an as-needed basis.

The purpose of this bid is to procure a contract with a laboratory to provide analytical testing services on an as-needed basis. Page 1 of 11 1. GENERAL The purpose of this bid is to procure a contract with a laboratory to provide analytical testing services on an as-needed basis. Special consideration may be given to laboratories

More information

Texas Commission on Environmental Quality

Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Matrix: Biological Tissues Method EPA 245.6 Mercury TX 1095 10234001 Method EPA 6010 Arsenic TX 1010 10155609 Cadmium TX 1030 10155609 Chromium TX 1040 10155609 Copper TX 1055 10155609 Lead TX 1075 10155609

More information

INDUSTRIAL COMMERCIAL PERMIT APPLICATION CITY OF ANN ARBOR WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY INDUSTRIAL PRETREATMENT PROGRAM

INDUSTRIAL COMMERCIAL PERMIT APPLICATION CITY OF ANN ARBOR WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY INDUSTRIAL PRETREATMENT PROGRAM INDUSTRIAL COMMERCIAL PERMIT APPLICATION CITY OF ANN ARBOR WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY INDUSTRIAL PRETREATMENT PROGRAM City of Ann Arbor Wastewater Treatment Facility 49 Old Dixboro Road Ann Arbor, MI

More information

Appendix C Data Validation Report

Appendix C Data Validation Report Appendix C Data Validation Report INTRODUCTION Basis for the Data Validation This report summarizes the results of the summary (Level III) data validation performed on sediment, water, and quality control

More information

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY ACCREDITATION PROGRAM Accredited Fields of Testing

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY ACCREDITATION PROGRAM Accredited Fields of Testing CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY ACCREDITATION PROGRAM Accredited Fields of Testing Babcock Laboratories, Inc. 6100 Quail Valley Court Riverside, CA 92507 Phone: (951) 653-3351

More information

SEWAGE TREATMENT FACILITIES

SEWAGE TREATMENT FACILITIES SUBMIT ONE HARD COPY AND ONE ELECTRONIC COPY WYOMING POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO DISCHARGE FROM SEWAGE TREATMENT FACILITIES Revised February 2015 PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE

More information

New York State Brownfield Cleanup Program Development of Soil Cleanup Objectives. Technical Support Document

New York State Brownfield Cleanup Program Development of Soil Cleanup Objectives. Technical Support Document New York State Brownfield Cleanup Program Development of Soil Cleanup Objectives Technical Support Document Prepared By: New York State Department of Environmental Conservation and New York State Department

More information

ITS REWORK DATA VERIFICATION REPORT for samples collected from CAMP STANLEY STORAGE ACTIVITY BOERNE, TEXAS

ITS REWORK DATA VERIFICATION REPORT for samples collected from CAMP STANLEY STORAGE ACTIVITY BOERNE, TEXAS INTRODUCTION ITS REWORK DATA VERIFICATION REPORT for samples collected from CAMP STANLEY STORAGE ACTIVITY BOERNE, TEXAS Data Verifiers: Michelle Wolfe & Tammy Chang Parsons The following data validation

More information

Biofilter Treatment System at the East Kingston Septage Facility

Biofilter Treatment System at the East Kingston Septage Facility Biofilter Treatment System at the East Kingston Septage Facility Final Project Report of Water Quality Monitoring 1996 and 1997 New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services January 2001 NHDES-R-WD-01-2

More information

MEC X, LP 12269 East Vassar Drive Aurora, CO 80014 w w w. m e c x. n e t

MEC X, LP 12269 East Vassar Drive Aurora, CO 80014 w w w. m e c x. n e t SANTA SUSANA FIELD LABORATORY (SSFL) RCRA FACILITY INVESTIGATION March 2009, Revision 4 Prepared for: THE BOEING COMPANY, NATIONAL AERONAUTICS and SPACE ADMINISTRATION (NASA), and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

More information

Introduction. The following definitions may help you better understand the components of the data report.

Introduction. The following definitions may help you better understand the components of the data report. Introduction This document is designed to help our clients understand the quality control requirements and limitations of data reporting. There are three sections to this document. The first section will

More information

2013 Rhode Island Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Remediation General Permit

2013 Rhode Island Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Remediation General Permit 2013 Rhode Island Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Remediation General Permit Effective Date: October 1, 2013 Expiration Date: September 30, 2018 Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management

More information

TABLE 2. SOIL: RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL I PART 201 GENERIC CLEANUP CRITERIA AND SCREENING LEVELS

TABLE 2. SOIL: RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL I PART 201 GENERIC CLEANUP CRITERIA AND SCREENING LEVELS All criteria are expressed in units of parts per billion (ppb;ug/kg). Scientific notation is represented by E+ or E- a value; for example, 2 x 10 6 is reported as 2.0E+6. Analytical results must be expressed

More information

San Mateo County Environmental Health Characterization and Reuse of Petroleum Hydrocarbon Impacted Soil

San Mateo County Environmental Health Characterization and Reuse of Petroleum Hydrocarbon Impacted Soil INTRODUCTION San Mateo County Environmental Health Characterization and Reuse of Petroleum Hydrocarbon Impacted Soil This guidance relates to the on-site reuse of non-hazardous petroleum hydrocarbon impacted

More information

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES PAGE: 1 of 32 CONTENTS 1.0 SCOPE AND APPLICATION* 2.0 METHOD SUMMARY 3.0 SAMPLE PRESERVATION, CONTAINERS, HANDLING AND STORAGE 3.1 Sample Storage 3.2 Holding Times 4.0 INTERFERENCES AND POTENTIAL PROBLEMS

More information

March 8, 2013. Re: Site-Wide Characterization Work Plan Addendum No. 2 Former Duncan Refinery Duncan, Oklahoma. Dear Ms. Downard:

March 8, 2013. Re: Site-Wide Characterization Work Plan Addendum No. 2 Former Duncan Refinery Duncan, Oklahoma. Dear Ms. Downard: March 8, 2013 Ms. Sara Downard Environmental Programs Specialist Land Protection Division Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality 707 North Robinson Oklahoma City, OK 73101-1677 Project No. 0185151

More information

FUEL QUALITY REPORT BIOCNG GAS ANALYSIS NOVEMBER 2012

FUEL QUALITY REPORT BIOCNG GAS ANALYSIS NOVEMBER 2012 FUEL QUALITY REPORT BIOCNG GAS ANALYSIS NOVEMBER 2012 Prepared by: Mark J. Torresani, P.E. and Joseph J. Falle IV, P.E. 8413 Excelsior Drive, Suite 160 Madison, WI 53717 Rev. 0, 12/4/12 Project (enter

More information

SECTION 10 ANALYTICAL LABORATORY METHODS, METHOD DETECTION LIMITS, REPORTING LIMITS, QA/QC PROCEDURES, AND ELAP CERTIFICATIONS

SECTION 10 ANALYTICAL LABORATORY METHODS, METHOD DETECTION LIMITS, REPORTING LIMITS, QA/QC PROCEDURES, AND ELAP CERTIFICATIONS SECTION 10 ANALYTICAL LABORATORY METHODS, METHOD DETECTION LIMITS, REPORTING LIMITS, QA/QC PROCEDURES, AND ELAP CERTIFICATIONS APPENDIX I-1 TABLE SANTA SUSANA FIELD LABORATORY SURFACE WATER SAMPLING PROGRAM

More information

APPENDIX II TIER I CHECKLIST

APPENDIX II TIER I CHECKLIST APPENDIX II TIER I CHECKLIST Data Validation PRF - Tier I Page 1 Data Validation Plan Review Form Tier I This Plan Review Form is # 1 of 1 forms completed in the review of this closure plan. Facility Name

More information

LETTER FROM U S NAVY REGARDING RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, AND DEMONSTRATION PROJECT NCBC GULFPORT MS 8/12/1986 U S NAVY

LETTER FROM U S NAVY REGARDING RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, AND DEMONSTRATION PROJECT NCBC GULFPORT MS 8/12/1986 U S NAVY N62604.AR.000263 NCBC GULFPORT 5090.3a LETTER FROM U S NAVY REGARDING RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, AND DEMONSTRATION PROJECT NCBC GULFPORT MS 8/12/1986 U S NAVY ~.. 2.J- U" 'f7. 2/.' 1. 1 2 AUG 1986 trict t't..

More information

Guidelines on Resource Recovery Exemptions (Land Application of Waste Materials as Fill)

Guidelines on Resource Recovery Exemptions (Land Application of Waste Materials as Fill) Guidelines on Resource Recovery Exemptions (Land Application of Waste Materials as Fill) 2011 State of NSW and Department of Environment, Climate Change and Water NSW The State of NSW and the Department

More information

Air Monitoring Guide 3500/3510, 3520/3530, 3550/3551

Air Monitoring Guide 3500/3510, 3520/3530, 3550/3551 Air Monitoring Guide 3500/3510, 3520/3530, 3550/3551 1 Instructions for Use Important! You must read all instructions completely before proceeding with any monitoring. General Product Description The 3M

More information

Contract Laboratory Program (CLP)

Contract Laboratory Program (CLP) In 1980, Congress addressed the problem of cleaning up abandoned and inactive dump sites by enacting the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) and the Superfund

More information

Developing Quality Assurance Project Plans using Data Quality Objectives and other planning tools. Developing QAPPs 5/10/2012 1

Developing Quality Assurance Project Plans using Data Quality Objectives and other planning tools. Developing QAPPs 5/10/2012 1 Developing Quality Assurance Project Plans using Data Quality Objectives and other planning tools 1 Introductions 2 Agenda I. Developing a QAPP II. Systematic Planning using Data Quality Objectives III.

More information

Hazardous Waste Containers. Hazardous Waste Disposal. Examples of HW Containers. Typical Wastes in Chemistry

Hazardous Waste Containers. Hazardous Waste Disposal. Examples of HW Containers. Typical Wastes in Chemistry Hazardous Waste Initial Training Brian Smith, Hazardous Waste Coordinator Environmental Health and Safety Michigan State University THE Absolute Three Things you need to stay out of trouble: Words Hazardous

More information

XI (a). WASTE DISPOSAL -- CHEMICAL WASTE

XI (a). WASTE DISPOSAL -- CHEMICAL WASTE A. WHAT IS HAZARDOUS CHEMICAL WASTE? In order to determine proper handling procedures and disposal, a decision must be made regarding whether the chemical waste is hazardous. Federal (EPA 40 CFR 261) and

More information

Emission Testing February 2015 LMS Energy Pty Ltd - Jilliby Plant

Emission Testing February 2015 LMS Energy Pty Ltd - Jilliby Plant Page: 1 of 6 1/132 Ross Court Cleveland QLD 4163 Emission Testing February 2015 - Jilliby Plant Dear Nathan McClelland, Tests were performed 11 February 2015 to determine emissions to air from Unit 1 at

More information

How To Test For Volatile Organics

How To Test For Volatile Organics Memo Sent Via Email TO: Joseph Martella RIDEM GZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc. 530 Broadway Providence, Rhode Island 02909 Phone (40) 42440 Fax (40) 75863 FROM: CC: Meg Kilpatrick GZA Michele Leone NGRID James

More information

APPENDIX L META ENVIRONMENTAL FORENSIC REPORTS

APPENDIX L META ENVIRONMENTAL FORENSIC REPORTS APPENDIX L META ENVIRONMENTAL FORENSIC REPORTS N:\11173291.00000\WORD\Auburn RI (Final-June 2008).doc Environmental

More information

Health effects of particulate matter and implications for policy in Europe

Health effects of particulate matter and implications for policy in Europe Health effects of particulate matter and implications for policy in Europe Marie-Eve Héroux Technical Officer, Air Quality and Noise WHO European Centre for Environment and Health Bonn, Germany Presentation

More information

VOCs Ambient Air Monitoring Report

VOCs Ambient Air Monitoring Report VOCs Ambient Air Monitoring Report Pollution Control Department and Department of Environmental Quality Promotion Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment 2 List of abbreviations BKK ERTC GC/MS HAP

More information

Technical Guidance Manual for the Implementation of the Hawai`i State Contingency Plan. Interim Final SECTION 10

Technical Guidance Manual for the Implementation of the Hawai`i State Contingency Plan. Interim Final SECTION 10 Technical Guidance Manual for the Implementation of the Hawai`i State Contingency Plan SECTION 10 DATA QUALITY ASSURANCE AND QUALITY CONTROL (QA/QC) Hawai`i HEER TGM 10-1 December 31, 2008 CONTENTS Acronyms

More information

Talinga Water Treatment Facility Discharge Water Quality Report

Talinga Water Treatment Facility Discharge Water Quality Report Public Report Talinga Water Treatment Facility Contents 1. Summary 3 2. Introduction 3 3. Talinga Water Treatment Facility Scheme Description 5 3.1. Feed Pond 5 3.2. Filtration 6 3.3. Reverse Osmosis 6

More information

APPENDIX C. DATA VALIDATION REPORT

APPENDIX C. DATA VALIDATION REPORT APPENDIX C. DATA VALIDATION REPORT T-117 Upland Investigation Upland Investigation Data Report Appendices PROJECT NARRATIVE Basis for the Data Validation This report summarizes the results of the validation

More information

F002... The following spent

F002... The following spent 261.31 Hazardous wastes from non-specific sources. (a) The following solid wastes are listed hazardous wastes from non-specific sources unless they are excluded under 260.20 and 260.22 and listed in appendix

More information

Sampling Techniques to Ensure Quality Results. David Springer ACLCA Adelaide June 2013

Sampling Techniques to Ensure Quality Results. David Springer ACLCA Adelaide June 2013 Sampling Techniques to Ensure Quality Results David Springer ACLCA Adelaide June 2013 Tonight Measurement Uncertainty Poor Sampling Examples NEPM Preservations/Holding Times NEPM TRH v s TPH NEPM F1/F2

More information

Bottled Water Report

Bottled Water Report Bottled Water Report Sources of Water Our geologists discovered remote, protected locations with water of remarkable quality and purity... but that is only the first step. Other companies may truck their

More information

Frequently Asked Questions FAQ (click to follow link) How Does The Thermal Well System Work? How Much Does It Cost?

Frequently Asked Questions FAQ (click to follow link) How Does The Thermal Well System Work? How Much Does It Cost? Frequently Asked Questions FAQ (click to follow link) How Does The Thermal Well System Work? How Much Does It Cost? Isn't the Power Itself Excessively Expensive? What Are The Risks Of Using ISTD? Which

More information

Bottled Water Report

Bottled Water Report Bottled Water Report Sources of Water Our geologists discovered remote, protected locations with water of remarkable quality and purity but that is only the first step. Other companies may truck their

More information

Triad Characterization of Soil Contamination at Former Small Arms Training Ranges

Triad Characterization of Soil Contamination at Former Small Arms Training Ranges Triad Characterization of Soil Contamination at Former Small Arms Training Ranges Kira P Lynch, MS USACE, Seattle District National Site Assessment Symposium San Diego, CA, June 28, 2004 1 Site Background

More information

This study was performed in collaboration with CT Laboratories of Baraboo, WI, USA.

This study was performed in collaboration with CT Laboratories of Baraboo, WI, USA. Automated Gel Permeation Chromatography (GPC) Clean-up of Soil Extracts Prior to Analysis for Semivolatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS (USEPA Method 8270) Keywords: Automated GX-271 GPC Clean-up System,

More information

Pennsylvania Marcellus Shale Short- Term Ambient Air Sampling Project

Pennsylvania Marcellus Shale Short- Term Ambient Air Sampling Project Pennsylvania Marcellus Shale Short- Term Ambient Air Sampling Project Marcellus Shale Conference November 16, 2011 Nick Lazor Chief, Air Quality Monitoring Division Bureau of Air Quality PA Department

More information

Risk-Based Decision Making for Site Cleanup

Risk-Based Decision Making for Site Cleanup July 2013 Risk-Based Decision Making for Site Cleanup The Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) has adopted a risk based decision making process to provide a framework for determining cleanup

More information

Ch. 261a IDENTIFICATION AND LISTING 25 261a.1. CHAPTER 261a. IDENTIFICATION AND LISTING OF HAZARDOUS WASTE

Ch. 261a IDENTIFICATION AND LISTING 25 261a.1. CHAPTER 261a. IDENTIFICATION AND LISTING OF HAZARDOUS WASTE Ch. 261a IDENTIFICATION AND LISTING 25 261a.1 CHAPTER 261a. IDENTIFICATION AND LISTING OF HAZARDOUS WASTE Subchap. Sec. A. GENERAL... 261a.1 D. LISTS OF HAZARDOUS WASTES... 261a.32 Authority The provisions

More information

Waikato River and Treated Drinking Water Comprehensive Analysis Report 2013/14

Waikato River and Treated Drinking Water Comprehensive Analysis Report 2013/14 Hamilton City Council Private Bag 3010 Hamilton 3240 New Zealand +64 07 838 6699 Waikato River and Drinking Water Comprehensive Analysis Report 2013/14 Hamilton City Council undertakes the following water

More information

April 23, 2014. Ms. Lynn Dittmer Metropolitan Area Planning Agency 2222 Cuming Street Omaha, NE 68102

April 23, 2014. Ms. Lynn Dittmer Metropolitan Area Planning Agency 2222 Cuming Street Omaha, NE 68102 April 23, 2014 Ms. Lynn Dittmer Metropolitan Area Planning Agency 2222 Cuming Street Omaha, NE 68102 Re: South Omaha Brownfields Coalition Assessment Grant Phase II ESA Report Former Omaha Cold Storage

More information

Water Analysis Report Report Date: March 31, 2012 Testing Period: 1st - 4th Quarter 2011

Water Analysis Report Report Date: March 31, 2012 Testing Period: 1st - 4th Quarter 2011 Volatile Organic Compounds Benzene 0.0005 0.005 ND Carbon tetrachloride 0.0005 0.005 ND Chlorobenzene (Monochlorobenzene) 0.0005 0.100 ND 1,2-Dichlorobenzene (o-dcb) 0.0005 0.600 ND 1,4-Dichlorobenzene

More information

analytical Risk Analysis and Data Quality Evaluation

analytical Risk Analysis and Data Quality Evaluation STATE OF CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION LABORATORY QUALITY ASSURANCE AND QUALITY CONTROL DATA QUALITY ASSESSMENT AND DATA USABILITY EVALUATION GUIDANCE DOCUMENT May 2009 Revised December

More information

Health Consultation SUNOCO REFINERY CITY OF OREGON, LUCAS COUNTY, OHIO EPA FACILITY ID: OHD005046511 AUGUST 1, 2005

Health Consultation SUNOCO REFINERY CITY OF OREGON, LUCAS COUNTY, OHIO EPA FACILITY ID: OHD005046511 AUGUST 1, 2005 SUNOCO REFINERY CITY OF OREGON, LUCAS COUNTY, OHIO EPA FACILITY ID: OHD005046511 AUGUST 1, 2005 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Public Health Service Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease

More information

HAZARDOUS WASTE MANUAL For Faculty, Staff, and Students

HAZARDOUS WASTE MANUAL For Faculty, Staff, and Students Click Here to go to the Table of Contents Department of Chemical Engineering Michigan Technological University Houghton, MI HAZARDOUS WASTE MANUAL For Faculty, Staff, and Students Chemical Hygiene Officer:

More information

QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BROWNFIELDS/VOLUNTARY CLEANUP PROGRAM SITES

QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BROWNFIELDS/VOLUNTARY CLEANUP PROGRAM SITES QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BROWNFIELDS/VOLUNTARY CLEANUP PROGRAM SITES Prepared by the Missouri Department of Natural Resources Division of Environmental Quality Hazardous Waste Program Brownfields/Voluntary

More information

Fast Continuous Online Analysis of VOCs in Ambient Air using Agilent 5975T LTM GC/MSD and Markes TD

Fast Continuous Online Analysis of VOCs in Ambient Air using Agilent 5975T LTM GC/MSD and Markes TD Fast Continuous Online Analysis of VOCs in Ambient Air using Agilent 5975T LTM GC/MSD and Markes TD Application Note Environmental Author Xiaohua Li Agilent Technologies (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. 412 Ying Lun

More information

BOTTLED WATER QUALITY REPORT INTRODUCTION VOSS SOURCE SPECIFIC MINERAL ANALYSIS. VOSS Still. VOSS Sparkling. General Mineral Analysis

BOTTLED WATER QUALITY REPORT INTRODUCTION VOSS SOURCE SPECIFIC MINERAL ANALYSIS. VOSS Still. VOSS Sparkling. General Mineral Analysis BOTTLED WATER QUALITY REPORT Voss ion AS, N-4730 Vatnestrøm, Norway 1-877-525-VOSS INTRODUCTION At VOSS, we are proud of the quality of our products. VOSS Artesian Water from Norway meets all bottled water

More information

Environmental Forensics

Environmental Forensics Environmental Forensics N O T E S Volume 10 2011 CERCLA s Petroleum Exclusion and the Use of Chemical Forensic Methods Tarek Saba and Paul Boehm For more information on Exponent s environmental services,

More information

TORONTO MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 423, ENVIRONMENTAL REPORTING AND DISCLOSURE. Chapter 423 ENVIRONMENTAL REPORTING AND DISCLOSURE

TORONTO MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 423, ENVIRONMENTAL REPORTING AND DISCLOSURE. Chapter 423 ENVIRONMENTAL REPORTING AND DISCLOSURE 423-1. Definitions. TORONTO MUNICIPAL CODE 423-2. Duty to report. Chapter 423 ENVIRONMENTAL REPORTING AND DISCLOSURE ARTICLE I Interpretation ARTICLE II Duty to Report 423-3. Exemptions from reporting

More information

107-13-1 Acrylonitrile 1 53-96-3 2-Acetylaminofluorene 1 92-67-1 4-Aminodiphenyl 1 7440-38-2 Arsenic 1

107-13-1 Acrylonitrile 1 53-96-3 2-Acetylaminofluorene 1 92-67-1 4-Aminodiphenyl 1 7440-38-2 Arsenic 1 A hard copy of this document may not be the document currently in effect. The current version For concentrations less than 1 % (Wt.), the banned and restricted material requirements do not apply, except

More information

WASTE ACCEPTANCE PROTOCOLS FOR THE PROVINCES OF

WASTE ACCEPTANCE PROTOCOLS FOR THE PROVINCES OF WASTE ACCEPTANCE PROTOCOLS FOR THE PROVINCES OF BRITISH COLUMBIA ALBERTA SASKATCHEWAN BRITISH COLUMBIA BRITISH COLUMBIA SOLID WASTE ACCEPTANCE PROTOCOL BRITISH COLUMBIA This form will assist you in identifying

More information

A Comparison of EPA Methods 8260B and TO-14A/15 for the analysis of VOCs in Soil Gas: Application to Upward Vapor Intrusion Risk Studies

A Comparison of EPA Methods 8260B and TO-14A/15 for the analysis of VOCs in Soil Gas: Application to Upward Vapor Intrusion Risk Studies A Comparison of EPA Methods 8260B and TO-14A/15 for the analysis of VOCs in Soil Gas: Application to Upward Vapor Intrusion Risk Studies Paper #41 James E. Picker, Ph.D., H&P Mobile GeoChemistry 148 South

More information

APPENDIX L DATA VALIDATION REPORT

APPENDIX L DATA VALIDATION REPORT APPENDIX L DATA VALIDATION REPORT FIELD AND DATA REPORT DOWNTOWN PORTLAND SEDIMENT CHARACTERIZATION PHASE II WILLAMETTE RIVER PORTLAND, OREGON JUNE 2010 Data Validation Report Downtown Portland Sediment

More information

Purity of water is defined in part by the mineral level found in specific bottled waters and is referred to as

Purity of water is defined in part by the mineral level found in specific bottled waters and is referred to as BOTTLED WATER QUALITY REPORT Voss ion AS, N-4730 Vatnestrøm, Norway 1-877-525-VOSS INTRODUCTION At VOSS, we are proud of the quality of our products. VOSS Artesian Water from Norway meets all bottled water

More information

COST OF DRINKING WATER PROFICIENCY TESTING SAMPLES

COST OF DRINKING WATER PROFICIENCY TESTING SAMPLES Presence-Absence, Membrane Filter, Multiple Tube FermentatIon,ONPG- ASDW101 Microbiology Total Coliform MUG, Colisure, E-Colite, M-Coliblue Test, Readycult Coliforms Fecal Colifrom Presence-Absence, Membrane

More information

Quick Reference. Microbiological Testing. Proficiency Testing. Natural-Matrix CRMs. XRF Standards. Calibration Standards

Quick Reference. Microbiological Testing. Proficiency Testing. Natural-Matrix CRMs. XRF Standards. Calibration Standards Quick Reference Proficiency Testing DMRQA 31... 21 Solid Waste (RCRA)... 36 Under Ground Storage Tank (UST)... 36 Water Pollution (WP)... 8 Water Supply (WS)... 26 Microbiological Testing Microbiological

More information

Characterizing Beauty Salon Wastewater for the Purpose of Regulating Onsite Disposal Systems

Characterizing Beauty Salon Wastewater for the Purpose of Regulating Onsite Disposal Systems Characterizing Beauty Salon Wastewater for the Purpose of Regulating Onsite Disposal Systems Fred Bowers 1,2, Ph.D. New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection Division of Water Quality August 14,

More information

Generic Risk Assessment Methodology

Generic Risk Assessment Methodology Generic Risk Assessment Methodology Introduction As of March 2010, the Environment Agency have published a number of new Soil Guideline Values (SGVs) and have modified their TOX reports for these contaminants.

More information

Reference Materials for Environmental Performance Testing Dr Steve Wood Head of Regulatory and Legislative Services. ISPRA 25 June 2009

Reference Materials for Environmental Performance Testing Dr Steve Wood Head of Regulatory and Legislative Services. ISPRA 25 June 2009 Reference Materials for Environmental Performance Testing Dr Steve Wood Head of Regulatory and Legislative Services ISPRA 25 June 2009 Outline Background to LGC UK MCERTS scheme Reference materials production

More information

Guide to the Remediation Report & Fee Submission Form

Guide to the Remediation Report & Fee Submission Form Guide to the Remediation Report & Fee Submission Form May 1, 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 DEFINITIONS... 1 2 INTRODUCTION... 3 3 BACKGROUND... 3 3.1 EXISTING POLICY/GUIDELINES FRAMEWORK... 3 Domestic Fuel

More information

The 2015 Annual Report on Violations of the U.S. and Florida Safe Drinking Water Acts in the State of Florida

The 2015 Annual Report on Violations of the U.S. and Florida Safe Drinking Water Acts in the State of Florida The 2015 Annual Report on the U.S. and Florida Safe Drinking Water Acts in the State Florida Division Water Resource Management Florida Department Environmental Protection July 1, 2016 2600 Blair Stone

More information

Breast Cancer and Environmental Risk Factors

Breast Cancer and Environmental Risk Factors Breast Cancer and Environmental Risk Factors March 1998 Reducing Potential Cancer Risks from Drinking Water PART I: Contaminant Sources and Drinking Water Standards Many people are increasingly concerned

More information

New Jersey Private Well Water Test Reporting Form

New Jersey Private Well Water Test Reporting Form The New Jersey Private Well Water Test Reporting Form is a standardized form to be used exclusively by laboratories reporting well test results. In accordance with the Private Well Testing Act Regulations

More information

PROTOCOL NO. 5: Petroleum Hydrocarbon Analytical Methods and Standards

PROTOCOL NO. 5: Petroleum Hydrocarbon Analytical Methods and Standards PROTOCOL FOR THE CONTAMINATED SITES REGULATION UNDER THE ENVIRONMENT ACT PROTOCOL NO. 5: Petroleum Hydrocarbon Analytical Methods and Standards Prepared pursuant to Part 6 Administration, Section 21, Contaminated

More information

Defence College of Technical Training. Former RAF Lyneham Geo-Environmental Report 32655 Appendix D: Preliminary Qualitative Risk Assessment

Defence College of Technical Training. Former RAF Lyneham Geo-Environmental Report 32655 Appendix D: Preliminary Qualitative Risk Assessment Item No. Area/ Building Pathway to 1 Identified areas of / (redevelopment Ingestion Inhalation Severe Likely High SKM Enviros desk study highlights several known areas of significant historical. Areas

More information

FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT MASON COUNTY LANDFILL SUPERFUND SITE LUDINGTON, MICHIGAN FEBRUARY, 2001

FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT MASON COUNTY LANDFILL SUPERFUND SITE LUDINGTON, MICHIGAN FEBRUARY, 2001 FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT MASON COUNTY LANDFILL SUPERFUND SITE LUDINGTON, MICHIGAN FEBRUARY, 2001 I. INTRODUCTION Section 121(c) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act

More information

A Dynamic Site Investigation Adaptive Sampling and Analysis Program for Operable Unit 1 at Hanscom Air Force Base Bedford, Massachusetts

A Dynamic Site Investigation Adaptive Sampling and Analysis Program for Operable Unit 1 at Hanscom Air Force Base Bedford, Massachusetts A Dynamic Site Investigation Adaptive Sampling and Analysis Program for Operable Unit 1 at Hanscom Air Force Base Bedford, Massachusetts Prepared by Albert Robbat, Jr., Tufts University, Chemistry Department

More information

Prepared for: Jersey City Redevelopment Agency 30 Montgomery Street Jersey City, NJ 07302. Prepared by:

Prepared for: Jersey City Redevelopment Agency 30 Montgomery Street Jersey City, NJ 07302. Prepared by: REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION REPORT/REMEDIAL ACTION WORKPLAN AMENDMENT BLOCK 60, LOTS 19R AND 19H, JERSEY CITY, HUDSON COUNTY, NEW JERSEY SRP PI# G000004612 and EPA ID#: SUB070001 Prepared for: Jersey City Redevelopment

More information

BLUE ISLAND NORTHEAST MIXED-USE COMMERCIAL PARK 119TH STREET & VINCENNES AVENUE BLUE ISLAND, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS

BLUE ISLAND NORTHEAST MIXED-USE COMMERCIAL PARK 119TH STREET & VINCENNES AVENUE BLUE ISLAND, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS DRAFT ANALYSIS OF BROWNFIELDS CLEANUP ALTERNATIVES BLUE ISLAND NORTHEAST MIXED-USE COMMERCIAL PARK 119TH STREET & VINCENNES AVENUE BLUE ISLAND, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS PREPARED BY: Office of Sustainability

More information

Draeger-Tubes and accuro Pump

Draeger-Tubes and accuro Pump Draeger-Tubes and accuro Pump Trusted Technology that s ahead of its time Accurate Easy to read Flexible Fast Specific Easy to use Maintenance free Multi-Gas Detector accuro pump One handed operation What

More information

Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbon Fractions Using the ETPH Analytical Method and Criteria Development TECHNICAL SUPPORT DOCUMENT

Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbon Fractions Using the ETPH Analytical Method and Criteria Development TECHNICAL SUPPORT DOCUMENT Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbon Fractions Using the ETPH Analytical Method and Development TECHNICAL SUPPORT DOCUMENT Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection Connecticut Department

More information

Sample Management SOP 2v8 Page 1 STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE NO. 2 SAMPLE MANAGEMENT REVISION LOG. Revision Number Description Date

Sample Management SOP 2v8 Page 1 STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE NO. 2 SAMPLE MANAGEMENT REVISION LOG. Revision Number Description Date Sample Management SOP 2v8 Page 1 STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE NO. 2 SAMPLE MANAGEMENT REVISION LOG Revision Number Description Date 2.0 Original SOP 2.1 Revisions by McLemore after field testing 1/3/04

More information

Memorandum. Summary of Review. Government. Enquiries David Wainwright Queensland. Telephone

Memorandum. Summary of Review. Government. Enquiries David Wainwright Queensland. Telephone Memorandum Enquiries David Wainwright Queensland Government Telephone Phone Number Your reference Our reference Friday, 20 February 2015 Department of Science, nformation Technology, nnovation and the

More information

Evian Natural Spring Water - Annual Water Quality Report

Evian Natural Spring Water - Annual Water Quality Report Evian Natural Spring Water - Annual Water Quality Report At Evian we are proud of the quality of our products. Evian Natural Spring Water is distributed nationally and meets or exceeds all bottled water

More information

Street Address (number and street): City: County: ZIP Code: B. CURRENT SITE PRIORITY INFORMATION Was free product present this quarter?

Street Address (number and street): City: County: ZIP Code: B. CURRENT SITE PRIORITY INFORMATION Was free product present this quarter? QUARTERLY MONITORING REPORT (QMR) COVER SHEET AND REPORT FORMAT State Form 56087 (6-16) 329 IAC 9-5 Indiana Department of Environmental Management Office of Land Quality Leaking Underground Storage Tank

More information

QUALITY CONTROL AND QUALITY ASSURANCE PROCEDURES USED DURING THE INDOOR AIR QUALITY MONITORING PROGRAMME IN WESTON VILLAGE, RUNCORN

QUALITY CONTROL AND QUALITY ASSURANCE PROCEDURES USED DURING THE INDOOR AIR QUALITY MONITORING PROGRAMME IN WESTON VILLAGE, RUNCORN QUALITY CONTROL AND QUALITY ASSURANCE PROCEDURES USED DURING THE INDOOR AIR QUALITY MONITORING PROGRAMME IN WESTON VILLAGE, RUNCORN G Wilkinson 1, R Moss, D Crump 2, V Brown 2, J Rowley 2, T Hafkenscheid

More information

SOIL CONTAMINATION AND URBAN AGRICULTURE

SOIL CONTAMINATION AND URBAN AGRICULTURE SOIL CONTAMINATION AND URBAN AGRICULTURE A practical guide to soil contamination issues for individuals and groups Produced by Alexandra Heinegg Patricia Maragos Edmund Mason Jane Rabinowicz Gloria Straccini

More information

CHAPTER 62-713 SOIL TREATMENT FACILITIES

CHAPTER 62-713 SOIL TREATMENT FACILITIES CHAPTER 62-713 SOIL TREATMENT FACILITIES 62-713.100 Intent. 62-713.200 Definitions. 62-713.210 Documents Incorporated by Reference. 62-713.220 Approval of Alternate Procedures and Requirements. 62-713.300

More information

SAT Initiative: Young Scholars Academy (Houston, TX)

SAT Initiative: Young Scholars Academy (Houston, TX) SAT Initiative: Young Scholars Academy (Houston, TX) This document describes the analysis of air monitoring and other data collected under EPA s initiative to assess potentially elevated air toxics levels

More information

Managing Automotive Repair And Body Shop Wastes

Managing Automotive Repair And Body Shop Wastes Managing Automotive Repair And Body Shop Wastes For Assistance and More Information Your company may generate other hazardous wastes beyond the examples mentioned within this Booklet. It is your responsibility

More information

The laboratory fulfils the requirements for periodic emission measurement according to ČSN P CEN/TS 15675:2009

The laboratory fulfils the requirements for periodic emission measurement according to ČSN P CEN/TS 15675:2009 Page 1 of 8 Testing laboratory working site: Working place 1: Technické služby ochrany ovzduší Praha a.s. Testing Laboratory for Measuring Pollutants, Jenečská 146/44, 161 00 Praha Working place 3: Organizational

More information

SANTE ET HYGIENE INDUSTRIELLE Health Industrial hygiene Filtres, Peinture, Amiante, Silice Filters, Paint, Asbestos, Silica

SANTE ET HYGIENE INDUSTRIELLE Health Industrial hygiene Filtres, Peinture, Amiante, Silice Filters, Paint, Asbestos, Silica 4C la Tannerie BP 30 055 St Julien-lès-Metz F - 57072 METZ Cedex 3 : 03 87 75 54 29 : 03 87 36 23 90 E-MAIL : techlab@techlab.fr WEB : www.techlab.fr MATERIAUX DE REFERENCE CERTIFIES SANTE ET HYGIENE INDUSTRIELLE

More information

MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM (Accompanies the Van Nuys Fire Station 39 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration)

MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM (Accompanies the Van Nuys Fire Station 39 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration) MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM (Accompanies the Van Nuys Fire Station 39 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration) Van Nuys Fire Station 39 W.O. E170094B The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)

More information

METHOD 9075 TEST METHOD FOR TOTAL CHLORINE IN NEW AND USED PETROLEUM PRODUCTS BY X-RAY FLUORESCENCE SPECTROMETRY (XRF)

METHOD 9075 TEST METHOD FOR TOTAL CHLORINE IN NEW AND USED PETROLEUM PRODUCTS BY X-RAY FLUORESCENCE SPECTROMETRY (XRF) METHOD 9075 TEST METHOD FOR TOTAL CHLORINE IN NEW AND USED PETROLEUM PRODUCTS BY X-RAY FLUORESCENCE SPECTROMETRY (XRF) 1.0 SCOPE AND APPLICATION 1.1 This test method covers the determination of total chlorine

More information

STATEMENT OF BASIS HYPERGOL SUPPORT BUILDING SWMU 65 NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION KENNEDY SPACE CENTER BREVARD COUNTY, FLORIDA

STATEMENT OF BASIS HYPERGOL SUPPORT BUILDING SWMU 65 NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION KENNEDY SPACE CENTER BREVARD COUNTY, FLORIDA STATEMENT OF BASIS HYPERGOL SUPPORT BUILDING SWMU 65 NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION KENNEDY SPACE CENTER BREVARD COUNTY, FLORIDA PURPOSE OF STATEMENT OF BASIS This Statement of Basis (SB)

More information

2. determining that land is not contaminated land and is suitable for any use, and hence can be removed from the CLR or EMR, as relevant.

2. determining that land is not contaminated land and is suitable for any use, and hence can be removed from the CLR or EMR, as relevant. 1. Purpose The Environmental Protection Act 1994 (EP Act) enables listing of land on the environmental management register (EMR) if either a notifiable activity has been or is being conducted, or the land

More information

US EPA methods: standards and mixes

US EPA methods: standards and mixes US EPA methods: standards and mixes The United States Environmental Protection Agency 500, 600 and 8000 series test methods are approved protocols for measuring chemical pollutants in drinking water (series

More information

Quality Assurance Program Plan

Quality Assurance Program Plan Quality Assurance Program Plan Prepared by: Environment, Health and Safety Division Environmental Services Group Environmental Restoration Program September 2009 Revision 5 Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley

More information