In the Spring 2002 issue of Management Accounting. Aligning the Balanced Scorecard and a Firm s Strategy Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process.
|
|
- Silvia Hardy
- 7 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 VOL.5 NO.4 Summer 2004 Aligning the Balanced Scorecard and a Firm s Strategy Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process B Y D E W AYNE L. SEARCY, CMA, CPA, CIA THE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS (AHP) IS USED TO PROVIDE INSIGHTS TO SIX COMPANIES TO DETERMINE IF EACH COMPANY S PERFORMANCE SYSTEM IS ALIGNED WITH ITS STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES OF IMPLEMENTING LEAN ENTERPRISE POLICIES. A STEP-BY-STEP PROCESS FOR USING EXCEL IN AHP APPLICATIONS IS DESCRIBED. In the Spring 2002 issue of Management Accounting Quarterly, B. Douglas Clinton, Sally A. Webber, and John M. Hassell illustrated the use of the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) in implementing a balanced scorecard. Their article demonstrated the power of the AHP in resolving multicriteria decisions such as developing a balanced scorecard. They mentioned that the first level of a balanced scorecard hierarchy contains the four balanced scorecard (performance) categories, while the second level of the hierarchy contains the metrics used within each category. The authors demonstrated how the AHP can be used to help select the metrics of a balanced scorecard as well as to help understand the relative importance of each metric for a firm s management. The purpose of this article is to investigate the use of the AHP at the first level of the balanced scorecard hierarchy with data from six firms. Using the AHP to determine the relative weight of the performance categories may give some insight into the alignment between the balanced scorecard and a company s strategic initiatives. In addition, the article will demonstrate the use of Excel in AHP applications. T HE COMPANIES The six companies involved were part of an overall assessment project aimed at measuring the extent that lean enterprise tools are implemented successfully. 1 MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING QUARTERLY 1 SUMMER 2004, VOL.5, NO.4
2 The common thread among all six companies was their involvement with implementing lean enterprise principles. In other words, lean was the strategic initiative undertaken across all six companies. Robert Kaplan and David Norton state, The scorecard should be the translation of the business unit s strategy into a linked set of measures that define both the long-term strategic objectives and the mechanisms for achieving those objectives. 2 For the companies under study, any scorecard developed should align with the strategic initiative of implementing lean. L EAN E NTERPRISES In their book Lean Thinking, James P. Womack and Daniel T. Jones state that lean thinking can be summarized in five principles: precisely specify value by specific product, identify the value stream for each product, make value flow without interruptions, let the customer pull value from the producer, and pursue perfection (italics theirs). 3 They also state that by clearly understanding these five principles and integrating them together, managers can make full use of lean tools and techniques to compete in the marketplace. Lean can be defined as the effective utilization of various tools and techniques in a systematic, customer-focused manner that increases the flexibility of the manufacturing/ logistical processes with the goal of producing the highest-quality product and/or service within an environment of continuous improvement through the absolute elimination of all forms of waste. The overarching values of lean are customer prosperity and the view that the workforce is the most important resource of an organization. As implied by the definition, lean is multidimensional. Two important characteristics of a lean enterprise are customer focus and employee empowerment. The customer is the driving force behind lean, which suggests that customer-focused measures should be an integral part of any performance system. In a similar vein, lean enterprises empower their employees to make operational decisions. The employees are trained to uncover and correct errors as well as find continuous Figure 1: The Balanced Scorecard for Lean Enterprises FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE: How should we appear to our shareholders? CUSTOMER FOCUS: How should we appear to our customers? PRODUCT QUALITY: Are we providing high-quality products? STRATEGY: Increase manufacturing efficiency and effectiveness OPERATING PERFORMANCE: What business processes must we excel at? SAFETY: Are we operating within a safe environment? EMPLOYEE SATISFACTION: Are our employees given opportunities to learn and grow? MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING QUARTERLY 2 SUMMER 2004, VOL. 5, NO. 4
3 improvement opportunities. 4 Measuring employee performance should also be a prominent aspect of any performance system in a lean enterprise. Firms attempting to implement lean need a performance system that collects, stores, aggregates, and reports on the many dimensions of lean. The structure of a balanced scorecard, with its four performance categories, is a good start for developing a performance system that meets the requirements of a lean enterprise. T HE BALANCED S CORECARD improve strategy is the focus of this article. The real question to ask is: Does the company s performance system support or hinder its strategic objectives? For example, if a company s strategic objective is to be the highest-rated customer service company in the industry, then it would be expected that customer-focused metrics would rank very high in the performance system for that company relative to other performance categories. If, however, customer-focused metrics are rated last or near the bottom in importance, a misalignment has occurred between the stated strategic objective and the The four performance perspectives of Kaplan and Norton s balanced scorecard are well documented. 5 While those perspectives provide a comprehensive picture of most companies, two additional perspectives were performance system. Not only can the AHP assist companies with developing a balanced scorecard, but the relative weighting of the performance categories can be used to provide insights into a company s strategy. added based on the lean initiatives under way at the companies being studied: quality and safety. T HE A NALYTIC H IERARCHY P ROCESS (AHP) Interviews with managers at some of the participating companies indicated that quality and safety were The AHP uses paired comparisons of objects with respect to a common goal or criteria. The end result of critical aspects worthy of separate categorization. Increase in quality is a direct benefit of successfully implementing lean and, therefore, Table 1: The Ratio Scale should be measured separately. In addition, safety was a major concern to the parties involved. Figure 1 displays the scorecard categories used. Basically, the four perspectives of Kaplan and Norton s balanced scorecard are retained, but the internal business processes For the 15 pairs of evaluation criteria to be compared, first indicate which category in the pair is more important for measuring and monitoring the performance of your site, then record your judgment as to the magnitude of its importance over the other item in the pair. There are no right or wrong answers. The response scale for magnitude of importance is as follows: perspective is subdivided into three subcategories: operating performance, safety, and product quality. The financial performance, customer focus, and employee satisfaction perspectives align with Kaplan and Norton s financial, customer, and learning and growth INTENSITY OF IMPORTANCE 1 2 DEFINITION Equal importance Weak importance EXPLANATION Two criteria contribute equally to the evaluation of performance Experience and judgment slightly of one item over favor one criterion over another perspectives. the other item Kaplan and Norton comment that a properly constructed balanced scorecard should tell 3 Strong importance Experience and judgment strongly favor one criterion over another the story of a company s strategy. 6 In their article, Clinton, Webber, and Hassell state, Dif- 4 Very strong A criterion is strongly favored, and importance its dominance is demonstrated ferent methods of employing a balanced in practice scorecard are used to clarify and update strategy, to communicate intentions, to align organi- importance over another is of the highest 5 Absolute The evidence favoring one criterion zation and individual goals, and to learn about possible order of affirmation and improve strategy. To learn about and MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING QUARTERLY 3 SUMMER 2004, VOL. 5, NO. 4
4 the AHP is a set of weights derived from the pair-wise comparisons. 7 See the Appendix for the AHP instrument completed by the management-level employees of the participating companies. Each manager made two decisions when completing the AHP instrument: 1. Selecting the more important performance category for measuring and monitoring the company s performance. 2. Recording the magnitude of importance the category selected has over the category not selected. Thomas Saaty, the developer of the AHP, recommends a one-to-nine ratio scale when deciding between the two alternatives. A one-to-five ratio scale (Table 1) was used in this study. Using a different scale does not violate the theoretical foundation of the AHP as long as the scale used is a bounded ratio scale and the alternatives are homogeneous with respect to the scale. 8 Both requirements are met in this study. U SING E XCEL IN AN AHP APPLICATION 9 Once the managers have completed the AHP instrument, five steps are necessary to develop the first hierarchical level of a balanced scorecard for each company: 1. Enter pair-wise responses in Excel. 2. Calculate a company-level matrix. 3. Normalize the comparisons. 4. Calculate the score. 5. Determine consistency. Step 1: Enter pair-wise responses in Excel Entering the pair-wise responses of each manager in Excel in a matrix format is the first step. The Performance Pair-Wise Comparisons section of Table 2 displays the matrix format for the performance AHP. The key to remember when entering the pair-wise comparisons is the assumption of reciprocity. For example, if the quality performance category is evaluated as three times more important than the operating performance category, the reciprocity axiom states that the operating performance category is 1 /3 times more important than the quality performance category. The AHP matrix shown in Table 2 is designed to account for reciprocity by entering the reciprocal formula in the lower half of the matrix. When entering data in the upper half of the matrix, one must enter the preference denoted by the respondent (i.e., P ij, where i = column and j = row) or its reciprocal (i.e., P ji = 1/P ij ). For example, a respondent indicates that safety is two times more important than quality. Notice that cell D11 represents the magnitude of quality over safety. Because the respondent indicates safety is more important than quality, the reciprocal (i.e., 1 2 = 0.50) is entered in cell D11, and Excel automatically places a 2 in cell C12, indicating safety is two times more important than quality. Likewise, cell E11 indicates the respondent thinks quality is two times more important than financial measures in measuring and monitoring the respondent s company performance. The reciprocal is calculated automatically and entered in cell C13. Once an AHP matrix is completed for each respondent, the company-level matrix is created. Step 2: Calculate a company-level matrix The objective of step two is to develop a single matrix for each company from the individual respondents. This step is accomplished by taking the geometric mean across the respondents for each company. 10 The geometric mean is calculated for each cell across all of the individual matrices. The result is a single, composite matrix. Table 3 displays the composite matrix for Company A. Step 3: Normalize the comparisons Normalizing the pair-wise comparisons is accomplished with two procedures. Calculating the sum of each column is the first procedure (i.e., the formula for cell C17 in Table 2: =SUM(C11:C16)). The formula for cell C17 is copied to cells D17 through H17. The next procedure involves dividing each entry in the matrix by its column sum (i.e., the formula for cell C21: =C11/C$17). The formula for cell C21 is copied to cells C21 through H26. Completing those two procedures creates the performance normalized comparison matrix found in Table 2. Step 4: Calculate the score The average of each row in the normalized matrix is used as the score for each alternative (i.e., the formula for cell C30 in Table 2: =AVERAGE(C21:H21)). That MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING QUARTERLY 4 SUMMER 2004, VOL. 5, NO. 4
5 Table 2: AHP Calculations A B C D E F G H 1 Performance Pair-Wise Comparisons 2 Quality Safety Financial Customer Operating Employee 3 Quality Safety =1/D Financial =1/E4 =1/E Customer =1/F4 =1/F5 =1/F Operating =1/G4 =1/G5 =1/G6 =1/G Employee =1/H4 =1/H5 =1/H6 =1/H7 =1/H Quality Safety Financial Customer Operating Employee 11 Quality Safety Financial Customer Operating Employee Sum Performance Normalized Comparisons 20 Quality Safety Financial Customer Operating Employee 21 Quality Safety Financial Customer Operating Employee Performance Consistency 29 Scores Measure 30 Quality Safety Financial Customer Operating Employee Consistency Ratio formula is copied to cells C31 through C35. The result is the score (relative importance weight) for each performance category for measuring and monitoring the company s performance. The performance scores in Table 2 indicate that the respondent ranks safety (0.28) as the most important performance category, followed by quality (0.252), financial (0.163), customer (0.138), operating (0.129), and employee (0.038). Step 5: Determine consistency The final step in applying the AHP is determining the consistency of the results. The respondents should be MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING QUARTERLY 5 SUMMER 2004, VOL. 5, NO. 4
6 Table 3: Composite AHP Matrix for Company A Quality Safety Financial Customer Operating Employee Quality Safety Financial Customer Operating Employee Sum consistent in their pair-wise comparisons. In other words, if the respondent considers quality two times more important than safety, and customer two times more important than quality, then the respondent should consider customer four times more important than safety. If the results are not consistent, the scores should not be used. Multiplying each alternative in the original matrix by the normalized scores and dividing the result by the respective normalized score calculates the consistency measure found in Table 2. In other words, you multiply each row in the performance pair-wise comparison matrix by the performance scores, then divide the result by the respective performance score (i.e., the formula for cell D30 in Table 2: =MMULT(C11:H11,$C$30: $C$35)/C30). The formula is copied to cells C31 through C35. If the respondent is perfectly consistent, the consistency measure will equal the number of alternatives (i.e., six). Table 2 indicates the respondent was not perfectly consistent. As long as the inconsistency is not excessive, however, the performance scores can be treated as reasonably accurate. A consistency ratio is calculated to determine reasonable consistency. The consistency ratio is calculated as follows: 11 Consistency ratio = CI / RI, where CI = Consistency Index = ( - n) / (n 1) = the average consistency measure for all alternatives n = the number of alternatives RI = the appropriate random index (1.24, when n = 6) The formula for cell F35 is: =(AVERAGE(D30:D35) -6)/(5*1.24). The consistency ratio calculated in Table 2 is A consistency ratio of 0.10 or less is considered acceptable, so the performance scores calculated in Table 2 appear reasonably consistent. BALANCED SCORECARD/STRATEGY ALIGNMENT Table 4 displays the performance scores for each company participating in the study. Are the scorecards balanced? With six performance categories, a perfectly balanced scorecard would weight each category equally at approximately 16.6%. None of the company s scorecards is perfectly balanced; however, Company E is the most balanced, with scores ranging from to Company C has the largest dispersion between the topranked performance category and the lowest-ranked performance category (0.197). While we would not expect any scorecard to be perfectly balanced, the analysis does give insight into the emphasis placed by management on particular performance categories. An examination of the ranking of the performance categories reveals a couple of interesting points. First, the employee performance category is ranked last across all companies. When compared to the other performance categories, employee performance is just not as important. In particular, Company C s scorecard ranks safety three and a half times more important than employee performance in measuring and monitoring the company s performance. The result is somewhat surprising because employee empowerment is a key principle in implementing lean. A higher focus on employees is expected as companies become more mature in implementing lean throughout their facilities. MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING QUARTERLY 6 SUMMER 2004, VOL. 5, NO. 4
7 Table 4: Performance Scores Company A 1 Quality Safety Operating Financial Customer Employee CR Company D 1 Quality Safety Operating Financial Customer Employee CR Company B 1 Safety Financial Quality Customer Operating Employee CR Company E 1 Quality Operating Financial Customer Safety Employee CR Company C 1 Safety Quality Customer Financial Operating Employee CR Company F 1 Operating Financial Quality Customer Safety Employee CR The second interesting point is the relative ranking of the customer performance category. A strong customer focus is at the heart of lean enterprises. Companies successful in implementing lean principles are in-tune with their customers. Two companies, however, have the customer performance category ranked next to last, while three companies ranked the customer performance category as second-to-last. For firms implementing lean, it would be expected that customer performance would be the highest-ranked performance category. Another point worth mentioning is the relative ranking of the financial performance category. None of the companies ranked financial performance as the top performance category, a refreshing development. With the dominance of financial measures in most companies, it was surprising to find the managers of the participating companies did not view financial performance as the most important performance category. While Kaplan and Norton do not rank financial performance as the most important performance category, they believe that the metrics used in the other performance categories MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING QUARTERLY 7 SUMMER 2004, VOL. 5, NO. 4
8 should be linked to financial performance. It is important that improvements in nonfinancial performance eventually translate into financial performance. Does the balanced scorecard perceived by the companies management support or hinder the strategic objective of implementing lean? Table 4 appears to suggest some misalignment between the performance system and strategy. The relative weighting of the performance categories does not reflect the importance of customers and employees to lean strategies. The operational performance categories dominate the higher-ranked categories. Presenting the results of the AHP to the management team to discuss the relative weights placed on the different performance categories may be useful. An open dialogue discussing the lean initiative and how the balanced scorecard affects the initiative also would be beneficial. Developing an understanding with a company s management on the importance of a properly structured balanced scorecard and its link with a company s strategic objectives is key. COMPLETING THE BALANCED S CORECARD The analysis conducted has only examined the performance category level of a balanced scorecard. The next step involves determining the specific metrics in each performance category to collect and measure. It is likely that the number of metrics within each performance category will vary. The steps outlined above can be used at the metric level. Once the metrics are defined and scored, a scoring system is developed. From that scoring system, an overall performance score can be calculated. 12 A single composite score allows for comparison across companies as well as comparisons across facilities within companies. The use of the Analytic Hierarchy Process in investigating the degree of alignment between management s ranking of balanced scorecard performance categories and the company s strategic initiatives was illustrated here using six lean enterprise companies. The use of Excel to perform AHP calculations also was demonstrated. Results of the process indicate two performance categories (customer and employee) were not highly ranked when compared to the other categories. Those two categories are the foundations of lean programs and were expected to be highly ranked. Armed with the results of the AHP, management can begin to realign the performance system to measure lean better. DeWayne L Searcy, PhD., CMA, CPA, CIA, is an assistant professor in the department of accounting at the University of Miami in Coral Gables, Fla. His research interests are supply chain management, lean enterprises, and continuous auditing. He can be reached at (305) or dsearcy@miami.edu. 1 The project refers to the companies participation in a Lean Enterprise Site Assessment conducted by Bradley Greene and DeWayne L. Searcy. The specifics detailed in this article are a small component of the overall assessment conducted with each company. 2 Robert S. Kaplan and David P. Norton, Why Does Business Need a Balanced Scorecard? Journal of Cost Management, May/June 1997, pp James P. Womack and Daniel T. Jones, Lean Thinking: Banish Waste and Create Wealth in Your Corporation, Simon & Schuster, New York, N.Y., Steven Spear and H. Kent Bowen, Decoding the DNA of the Toyota Production System, Harvard Business Review, September/October Robert S. Kaplan and David P. Norton, The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, Mass., Kaplan and Norton, 1997, pp Thomas L. Saaty, The Analytic Hierarchy Process, McGraw-Hill, New York, N.Y., Patrick T. Harker and Luis G. Vargas, The Theory of Ratio Scale Estimation: Saaty s Analytic Hierarchy Process, Management Science, November 1987 (vol. 33, no. 11), pp See also, Reply to Remarks on the Analytic Hierarchy Process by J. S. Dyer, Management Science, March 1990 (vol. 36, no. 3), pp , by the same authors. 9 See Cliff T. Ragsdale, Spreadsheet Modeling and Decision Analysis, 3rd ed., South-Western, Cincinnati, 2001, pp J. Aczel and Thomas L. Saaty, Procedures for Synthesizing Ratio Judgments, Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1983, vol. 27, pp The random index was generated through simulations conducted by Thomas L. Saaty. 12 See B. Douglas Clinton, Sally A. Webber, and John M. Hassell, Implementing the Balanced Scorecard Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process, Management Accounting Quarterly, Spring MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING QUARTERLY 8 SUMMER 2004, VOL. 5, NO. 4
9 Appendix Performance Categories AHP Instrument For the 15 pairs of evaluation criteria to be compared, first indicate which category in the pair is more important for measuring and monitoring the performance of your site, then record your judgment as to the magnitude of its importance over the other item in the pair. There are no right or wrong answers. The response scale for magnitude of importance is as follows: INTENSITY OF IMPORTANCE DEFINITION EXPLANATION 1 Equal importance Two criteria contribute equally to the evaluation of performance 2 Weak importance of one item over another Experience and judgment slightly favor one criterion over another 3 Strong importance Experience and judgment strongly favor one criterion over another 4 Very strong importance A criterion is strongly favored, and its dominance is demonstrated in practice 5 Absolute importance The evidence favoring one criterion over another is of the highest possible order of affirmation Example: Quality of a leader Communication Skills Technical Skills A B Communication skills are 4 times more important than technical skills of a leader. Product/Service Quality Safety A B Financial Performance Customer Focus A B Operating Performance Employee Satisfaction A B Safety Financial Performance A B Product/Service Quality Financial Performance A B Safety Employee Satisfaction A B Customer Focus Operating Performance A B MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING QUARTERLY 9 SUMMER 2004, VOL. 5, NO. 4
10 Appendix Performance Categories AHP Instrument (cont.) Employee Satisfaction Product/Service Quality A B Operating Performance Financial Performance A B Customer Focus Employee Satisfaction A B Product/Service Quality Operating Performance A B Customer Focus Safety A B Employee Satisfaction Financial Performance A B Customer Focus Product/Service Quality A B Operating Performance Safety A B MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING QUARTERLY 10 SUMMER 2004, VOL. 5, NO. 4
MULTIPLE-OBJECTIVE DECISION MAKING TECHNIQUE Analytical Hierarchy Process
MULTIPLE-OBJECTIVE DECISION MAKING TECHNIQUE Analytical Hierarchy Process Business Intelligence and Decision Making Professor Jason Chen The analytical hierarchy process (AHP) is a systematic procedure
More informationHow to do AHP analysis in Excel
How to do AHP analysis in Excel Khwanruthai BUNRUAMKAEW (D) Division of Spatial Information Science Graduate School of Life and Environmental Sciences University of Tsukuba ( March 1 st, 01) The Analytical
More informationPerformance Management for Inter-organization Information Systems Performance: Using the Balanced Scorecard and the Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process
Performance Management for Inter-organization Information Systems Performance: Using the Balanced Scorecard and the Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process Y. H. Liang Department of Information Management, I-SHOU
More informationCompanies using the balanced scorecard have
VOL.3 NO.3 Spring 2002 Implementing the Balanced Scorecard Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process B Y B. DOUGLAS C LINTON, PH.D., CPA; SALLY A. WEBBER, PH.D., CPA; AND J OHN M. HASSELL, PH.D., CPA THOMAS
More informationThe Analytic Hierarchy Process. Danny Hahn
The Analytic Hierarchy Process Danny Hahn The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) A Decision Support Tool developed in the 1970s by Thomas L. Saaty, an American mathematician, currently University Chair,
More informationInformation Security and Risk Management
Information Security and Risk Management by Lawrence D. Bodin Professor Emeritus of Decision and Information Technology Robert H. Smith School of Business University of Maryland College Park, MD 20742
More informationAn Evaluation Model for Determining Insurance Policy Using AHP and Fuzzy Logic: Case Studies of Life and Annuity Insurances
Proceedings of the 8th WSEAS International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, June 19-21, 2007 126 An Evaluation Model for Determining Insurance Policy Using AHP and Fuzzy
More informationUSING THE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS (AHP) TO SELECT AND PRIORITIZE PROJECTS IN A PORTFOLIO
USING THE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS (AHP) TO SELECT AND PRIORIZE PROJECTS IN A PORTFOLIO Ricardo Viana Vargas, MSc, IPMA-B, PMP Professor Fundação Getúlio Vargas (FGV) Brasil Professor Fundação Instituto
More informationANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS (AHP) TUTORIAL
Kardi Teknomo ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS (AHP) TUTORIAL Revoledu.com Table of Contents Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) Tutorial... 1 Multi Criteria Decision Making... 1 Cross Tabulation... 2 Evaluation
More informationVendor Evaluation and Rating Using Analytical Hierarchy Process
Vendor Evaluation and Rating Using Analytical Hierarchy Process Kurian John, Vinod Yeldho Baby, Georgekutty S.Mangalathu Abstract -Vendor evaluation is a system for recording and ranking the performance
More informationSupplier Performance Evaluation and Selection in the Herbal Industry
Supplier Performance Evaluation and Selection in the Herbal Industry Rashmi Kulshrestha Research Scholar Ranbaxy Research Laboratories Ltd. Gurgaon (Haryana), India E-mail : rashmi.kulshreshtha@ranbaxy.com
More informationChapter 4 SUPPLY CHAIN PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT USING ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS METHODOLOGY
Chapter 4 SUPPLY CHAIN PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT USING ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS METHODOLOGY This chapter highlights on supply chain performance measurement using one of the renowned modelling technique
More informationA Development of the Effectiveness Evaluation Model for Agile Software Development using the Balanced Scorecard
, March 13-15, 2013, Hong Kong A Development of the Effectiveness Evaluation Model for Agile Development using the Balanced Scorecard Sunisa Atiwithayaporn 1, Wanchai Rivepiboon 2 Abstract Most of standard
More informationTHE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS (AHP)
THE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS (AHP) INTRODUCTION The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is due to Saaty (1980) and is often referred to, eponymously, as the Saaty method. It is popular and widely used,
More informationUsing Analytic Hierarchy Process Method in ERP system selection process
Using Analytic Hierarchy Process Method in ERP system selection process Rima Tamošiūnienė 1, Anna Marcinkevič 2 Abstract. IT and business alignment has become of the strategic importance and the enterprise
More informationAnalytical Hierarchy Process for Higher Effectiveness of Buyer Decision Process
P a g e 2 Vol. 10 Issue 2 (Ver 1.0), April 2010 Global Journal of Management and Business Research Analytical Hierarchy Process for Higher Effectiveness of Buyer Decision Process Razia Sultana Sumi 1 Golam
More informationUSING THE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS FOR DECISION MAKING IN ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS: SOME CHALLENGES
Published in: Inter l Journal of Industrial Engineering: Applications and Practice, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 35-44, 1995. 1 USING THE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS FOR DECISION MAKING IN ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS:
More informationProject Management Software Selection Using Analytic Hierarchy Process Method
Project Management Software Selection Using Analytic Hierarchy Process Method ISSN - 35-055 Sweety Sen (B.tech: Information Technology) Dronacharya College of Engineering Gurgaon, India Phone no. : 00343
More informationDesign of Analytic Hierarchy Process Algorithm and Its Application for Vertical Handover in Cellular Communication
Design of Analytic Hierarchy Process Algorithm and Its Application for Vertical Handover in Cellular Communication Under the Guidance of Asso. Prof. Mr. Saurav Dhar Deptt. of Electronics and Communication
More informationProject Management Software Selection Using Analytic Hierarchy Process Method
International Journal of Applied Science and Technology Vol. 4, No. ; November 04 Project Management Software Selection Using Analytic Hierarchy Process Method Birgul Kutlu Professor Bogazici University
More informationKlaus D. Goepel No 10 Changi Business Park Central 2 Hansapoint@CBP #06-01/08 Singapore 486030 E-mail: drklaus@bpmsg.com ABSTRACT
IMPLEMENTING THE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS AS A STANDARD METHOD FOR MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING IN CORPORATE ENTERPRISES A NEW AHP EXCEL TEMPLATE WITH MULTIPLE INPUTS Klaus D. Goepel No 0 Changi Business
More informationMulti-Criteria Decision-Making Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process for Wicked Risk Problems
Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process for Wicked Risk Problems Introduction It has become more and more difficult to see the world around us in a uni-dimensional way and to
More informationAdopting an Analytic Hierarchy Process to Select Internet Advertising Networks
Adopting an Analytic Hierarchy Process to Select Internet Advertising Networks Chin-Tasi Lin 1), Pi-Fang Hsu 2) 1) Yuanpei Institute of Science and Technology, Department of Information Management, Taiwan
More informationInternational Association of Scientific Innovation and Research (IASIR) (An Association Unifying the Sciences, Engineering, and Applied Research)
International Association of Scientific Innovation and Research (IASIR) (An Association Unifying the Sciences, Engineering, and Applied Research) International Journal of Engineering, Business and Enterprise
More informationPERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT OF INSURANCE COMPANIES BY USING BALANCED SCORECARD AND ANP
PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT OF INSURANCE COMPANIES BY USING BALANCED SCORECARD AND ANP Ronay Ak * Istanbul Technical University, Faculty of Management Istanbul, Turkey Email: akr@itu.edu.tr Başar Öztayşi Istanbul
More informationEstimation of Unknown Comparisons in Incomplete AHP and It s Compensation
Estimation of Unknown Comparisons in Incomplete AHP and It s Compensation ISSN 0386-1678 Report of the Research Institute of Industrial Technology, Nihon University Number 77, 2005 Estimation of Unknown
More informationResearch on supply chain risk evaluation based on the core enterprise-take the pharmaceutical industry for example
Available online www.jocpr.com Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Research, 2014, 6(6):593-598 Research Article ISSN : 0975-7384 CODEN(USA) : JCPRC5 Research on supply chain risk evaluation based on
More informationDecision-making with the AHP: Why is the principal eigenvector necessary
European Journal of Operational Research 145 (2003) 85 91 Decision Aiding Decision-making with the AHP: Why is the principal eigenvector necessary Thomas L. Saaty * University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh,
More informationCHAPTER 14 ORDINAL MEASURES OF CORRELATION: SPEARMAN'S RHO AND GAMMA
CHAPTER 14 ORDINAL MEASURES OF CORRELATION: SPEARMAN'S RHO AND GAMMA Chapter 13 introduced the concept of correlation statistics and explained the use of Pearson's Correlation Coefficient when working
More informationTalk:Analytic Hierarchy Process/Example Leader
Talk:Analytic Hierarchy Process/Example Leader 1 Talk:Analytic Hierarchy Process/Example Leader This is an example showing the use of the AHP in a practical decision situation. Click HERE to return to
More informationApplying the Analytic Hierarchy Process to Health Decision Making: Deriving Priority Weights
Applying the to Health Decision Making: Deriving Priority Weights Tomás Aragón, MD, DrPH Principal Investigator, Cal PREPARE,. CIDER UC Berkeley School of Public Health Health Officer, City & County of
More informationApplication of the Multi Criteria Decision Making Methods for Project Selection
Universal Journal of Management 3(1): 15-20, 2015 DOI: 10.13189/ujm.2015.030103 http://www.hrpub.org Application of the Multi Criteria Decision Making Methods for Project Selection Prapawan Pangsri Faculty
More informationHow To Switch From A Traditional To An Activity Based Costing System
A Procedure for Smooth Implementation of Activity Based Costing in Small Companies Narcyz Roztocki State University of New York at New Paltz / Department of Business Administration 75 South Manheim Boulevard,
More informationANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS AS A TOOL FOR SELECTING AND EVALUATING PROJECTS
ISSN 1726-4529 Int j simul model 8 (2009) 1, 16-26 Original scientific paper ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS AS A TOOL FOR SELECTING AND EVALUATING PROJECTS Palcic, I. * & Lalic, B. ** * University of Maribor,
More informationUsing Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) Method to Prioritise Human Resources in Substitution Problem
Using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) Method to Raymond Ho-Leung TSOI Software Quality Institute Griffith University *Email:hltsoi@hotmail.com Abstract In general, software project development is often
More informationJournal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Research, 2014, 6(3):34-39. Research Article. Analysis of results of CET 4 & CET 6 Based on AHP
Available online www.jocpr.com Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Research, 2014, 6(3):34-39 Research Article ISSN : 0975-7384 CODEN(USA) : JCPRC5 Analysis of results of CET 4 & CET 6 Based on AHP
More information2. Under which perspective of the balanced scorecard would you classify each of the following measurements?
Amy Hissom Homework #6 Performance Measurement and Strategic Information Management TECH 50000 - Quality Standards Wednesday, February 16, 2011 Chapter 8 Review Questions 1. Define measurement. Measurement
More informationExamination of Thai Construction Safety Factors using the Analytic Hierarchy Process
, pp. 285-292 http://dx.doi.org/10.14257/ijsh.2015.9.7.29 Examination of Thai Construction Safety Factors using the Analytic Hierarchy Process Thanwadee Chinda School of Management Technology, Thammasat
More informationA Guide to the. Incorporating the Essential Elements of Strategy Within Your Organization. Empower
A Guide to the Balanced Scorecard Incorporating the Essential Elements of Strategy Within Your Organization This guide covers Create Keeping strategy creation practical, focused and agile Empower Empowering
More information1604 JOURNAL OF SOFTWARE, VOL. 9, NO. 6, JUNE 2014
1604 JOURNAL OF SOFTWARE, VOL. 9, NO. 6, JUNE 2014 Combining various trust factors for e-commerce platforms using Analytic Hierarchy Process Bo Li a, Yu Zhang b,, Haoxue Wang c, Haixia Xia d, Yanfei Liu
More informationA new Environmental Performance Index using analytic hierarchy process: A case of ASEAN countries
Article A new Environmental Performance Index using analytic hierarchy process: A case of ASEAN countries Wan Khadijah Wan Ismail, Lazim Abdullah Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science and Technology,
More information6 Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)
6 Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) 6.1 Introduction to Analytic Hierarchy Process The AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) was developed by Thomas L. Saaty (1980) and is the well-known and useful method to
More informationISAHP 2007, Viña Del Mar, Chile, August 3, 2007
ISAHP 2007, Viña Del Mar, Chile, August 3, 2007 Key Performance Indicators Measurement Model Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process and Trend-Comparative Dimension in Higher Education Institution Kadarsah
More informationSafety Metrics, The Big Picture -Terry L. Mathis President, ProAct Safety
Safety Metrics, The Big Picture -Terry L. Mathis President, ProAct Safety What is the best measure of safety performance? Is it the traditional recordable rate, severity rate, cost of accidents, near miss
More informationCHAPTER 3 IDENTIFICATION OF MOST PREFERRED KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR IN INDIAN CALL CENTRES
49 CHAPTER 3 IDENTIFICATION OF MOST PREFERRED KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR IN INDIAN CALL CENTRES 3.1 INTRODUCTION Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) is means for assessment of an organisations current position
More informationSubcontractor Selection Using Analytic Hierarchy Process
Volume 3 Number 3 2012 pp. 121-143 ISSN: 1309-2448 www.berjournal.com Subcontractor Selection Using Analytic Hierarchy Process Vesile Sinem Arıkan Kargı a Ahmet Öztürk b Abstract: Turkish textile firms
More informationCALCULATIONS & STATISTICS
CALCULATIONS & STATISTICS CALCULATION OF SCORES Conversion of 1-5 scale to 0-100 scores When you look at your report, you will notice that the scores are reported on a 0-100 scale, even though respondents
More informationTHE SELECTION OF BRIDGE MATERIALS UTILIZING THE ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS
THE SELECTION OF BRIDGE MATERIALS UTILIZING THE ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS Robert L. Smith Assistant Professor/Extension Specialist, Virginia Tech Robert J. Bush Associate Professor, Virginia Tech and
More informationFramework of Measuring Key Performance Indicators for Decision Support in Higher Education Institution
Journal of Applied Sciences Research, 3(12): 1689-1695, 2007 2007, INSInet Publication Framework of Measuring Key Performance Indicators for Decision Support in Higher Education Institution Kadarsah Suryadi
More informationDesigning a Metrics Dashboard for the Sales Organization By Mike Rose, Management Consultant.
Designing a Metrics Dashboard for the Sales Organization By Mike Rose, Management Consultant. Metrics can serve as critical measures of success for any organization and, in particular, the sales force
More informationThe Business Balanced Scorecard and Key Performance Indicators. The principles and approach to build
The Business Balanced Scorecard and Key Performance Indicators The principles and approach to build Some relevant quotes Business performance measurement is as necessary as the scorecard of sports What
More informationImplementing the Balanced Scorecard Checklist 154
Implementing the Balanced Scorecard Checklist 154 Introduction Traditionally, managers have used a series of indicators to measure how well their organisations are performing. These measures relate essentially
More informationENHANCEMENT OF FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT WITH THE AID OF ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS
ISAHP 2005, Honolulu, Hawaii, July 8-10, 2003 ENHANCEMENT OF FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT WITH THE AID OF ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS Jerzy Michnik a,b, 1, Mei-Chen Lo c a Kainan University, No.1, Kainan Rd.,
More information20 Best Practices for Customer Feedback Programs Building a Customer-Centric Company
Business growth through customer insight 20 Best Practices for Customer Feedback Programs Building a Customer-Centric Company The content of this paper is based on the book, Beyond the Ultimate Question,
More informationContent-Based Discovery of Twitter Influencers
Content-Based Discovery of Twitter Influencers Chiara Francalanci, Irma Metra Department of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering Polytechnic of Milan, Italy irma.metra@mail.polimi.it chiara.francalanci@polimi.it
More informationDevelopment of Virtual Lab System through Application of Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process
Development of Virtual Lab System through Application of Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process Chun Yong Chong, Sai Peck Lee, Teck Chaw Ling Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology, University
More informationAre Lean and Green Programs Synergistic?
Proceedings of the 2009 Industrial Engineering Research Conference Are Lean and Green Programs Synergistic? Gary G. Bergmiller, PhD Zero Waste Operations Research and Consulting Boulder, CO 80503, USA
More informationReproducing Calculations for the Analytical Hierarchy Process
Reproducing Calculations for the Analytical Hierarchy Process Booz Allen Hamilton International Infrastructure Team Introduction Booz Allen supports clients in the application of the Analytical Hierarchy
More informationAnalytic Hierarchy Process
MODULE 1 Analytic Hierarchy Process LEARNING OBJECTIVES After completing this module, students will be able to: 1. Use the multifactor evaluation process in making decisions that involve a number of factors,
More informationA Fuzzy AHP based Multi-criteria Decision-making Model to Select a Cloud Service
Vol.8, No.3 (2014), pp.175-180 http://dx.doi.org/10.14257/ijsh.2014.8.3.16 A Fuzzy AHP based Multi-criteria Decision-making Model to Select a Cloud Service Hong-Kyu Kwon 1 and Kwang-Kyu Seo 2* 1 Department
More informationOBJECT ORIENTED SOFTWARE SYSTEM BASED ON AHP
OBJECT ORIENTED SOFTWARE SYSTEM BASED ON AHP Soumi Ghosh Department of Computer Science & Engineering Amity School of Engineering and Technology Amity University, Sec-125, NOIDA, (U.P.), INDIA noni.soumi@gmail.com
More informationAnalytic Hierarchy Process for Design Selection of Laminated Bamboo Chair
Analytic Hierarchy Process for Design Selection of Laminated Bamboo Chair V. Laemlaksakul, S. Bangsarantrip Abstract This paper demonstrates the laminated bamboo chair design selection, the applicability
More informationINVOLVING STAKEHOLDERS IN THE SELECTION OF A PROJECT AND PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT TOOL
INVOLVING STAKEHOLDERS IN THE SELECTION OF A PROJECT AND PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT TOOL Vassilis C. Gerogiannis Department of Project Management, Technological Research Center of Thessaly, Technological Education
More informationApproaches to Qualitative Evaluation of the Software Quality Attributes: Overview
4th International Conference on Software Methodologies, Tools and Techniques Approaches to Qualitative Evaluation of the Software Quality Attributes: Overview Presented by: Denis Kozlov Department of Computer
More informationChapter 10. Key Ideas Correlation, Correlation Coefficient (r),
Chapter 0 Key Ideas Correlation, Correlation Coefficient (r), Section 0-: Overview We have already explored the basics of describing single variable data sets. However, when two quantitative variables
More informationExecuting Strategy with the Balanced Scorecard
Executing Strategy with the Balanced Scorecard Michael L. Werner (Corresponding author) School of Business Administration, University of Miami 5250 University Drive, Coral Gables, Florida 33146, United
More informationA Tool Selection Framework for Cross Platform Mobile App Development
A Tool Selection Framework for Cross Platform Mobile App Development Felix Appiah J. B. Hayfron-Acquah Joseph K. Panford Frimpong Twum PG Student, Department Of Computer Science PhD Department Of Computer
More informationPrize: an R package for prioritization estimation based on analytic hierarchy process
Prize: an R package for prioritization estimation based on analytic hierarchy process Daryanaz Dargahi October 14, 2015 daryanazdargahi@gmail.com Contents 1 Licensing 2 2 Overview 2 3 Relative AHP 3 3.1
More informationTOWARDS THE PATHWAYS VISION MODEL OF INTRODUCTORY ACCOUNTING. Michael S. Wilson, PhD, CPA, CGMA
TOWARDS THE PATHWAYS VISION MODEL OF INTRODUCTORY ACCOUNTING Michael S. Wilson, PhD, CPA, CGMA Associate Professor Metropolitan State University St Paul, MN 55106 Michael.wilson@metrostate.edu (612) 659-7279
More informationAnalytical hierarchy process for evaluation of general purpose lifters in the date palm service industry
Journal of Agricultural Technology 2011 Vol. 7(4): 923-930 Available online http://www.ijat-aatsea.com ISSN 1686-9141 Analytical hierarchy process for evaluation of general purpose lifters in the date
More informationReport on SELECTING THE BEST PROJECT DELIVERY METHOD USING THE ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS (AHP)
Report on SELECTING THE BEST PROJECT DELIVERY METHOD USING THE ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS (AHP) Prepared for Dr. Soliman Almohawis CEM 520 Construction Contracting & Administration By Abdullah S. Alzouri
More informationComparative Analysis of FAHP and FTOPSIS Method for Evaluation of Different Domains
International Journal of Research Studies in Computer Science and Engineering (IJRSCSE) August 2015, PP 58-62 ISSN 2349-4840 (Print) & ISSN 2349-4859 (Online) www.arcjournals.org Comparative Analysis of
More informationOPERATIONAL RISK EFFECT ON INSURANCE MARKET S ACTIVITY Darja Stepchenko, Irina Voronova, Gaida Pettere Riga Technical University, Latvia
OPERATIONAL RISK EFFECT ON INSURANCE MARKET S ACTIVITY Darja Stepchenko, Irina Voronova, Gaida Pettere Riga Technical University, Latvia Abstract. The main aim of Solvency II framework is to establish
More informationPackaging Scorecard a Packaging Performance Evaluation Method
PACKAGING TECHNOLOGY AND SCIENCE Packag. Technol. Sci. 2003; 16: 9 14 DOI:10.1002/pts.604 Packaging Scorecard a Packaging Performance Evaluation Method By Carl Olsmats* and Chris Dominic Packforsk The
More informationThe Balanced Scorecard. Background Discussion
The Balanced Scorecard Background Discussion Contents History and Evolution Important Business Drivers Key Concepts Case Studies & Success Stories 1 Business Intelligence (BI) and Knowledge Management
More informationMATERIAL PURCHASING MANAGEMENT IN DISTRIBUTION NETWORK BUSINESS
MATERIAL PURCHASING MANAGEMENT IN DISTRIBUTION NETWORK BUSINESS Turkka Kalliorinne Finland turkka.kalliorinne@elenia.fi ABSTRACT This paper is based on the Master of Science Thesis made in first half of
More informationManagement White Paper What is a modern Balanced Scorecard?
Management White Paper What is a modern Balanced Scorecard? For more information please visit: www.ap-institute.com What is a modern Balanced Scorecard? By Bernard Marr Abstract: The Balanced Scorecard
More informationEvaluation of educational open-source software using multicriteria decision analysis methods
1 Evaluation of educational open-source software using multicriteria decision analysis methods Georgia Paschalidou 1, Nikolaos Vesyropoulos 1, Vassilis Kostoglou 2, Emmanouil Stiakakis 1 and Christos K.
More informationProject Selection Guidelines
Selecting Projects Project Selection Guidelines Nominations can come from various sources, including associates and customers. To avoid sub-optimization, management has to evaluate and select the projects.
More informationDecision Making on Project Selection in High Education Sector Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process
Decision Making on Project Selection in High Education Sector Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process Nina Begičević University of Zagreb, Faculty of Organization and Informatics, Pavlinska 2, Varaždin nina.begicevic@foi.hr
More informationCOMMUNICATION UNIT: IV. Educational Technology-B.Ed Notes
UNIT: IV COMMUNICATION MEANING OF COMMUNICATION The word Communication has been derived from the latin word- communis means common. Hence communication is having common experiences with other people. Communication
More informationThe Strategic Management Maturity Model TM
The Strategic Management Maturity Model TM Many Institute clients ask a similar question as they work to improve their strategic management at their organizations: where do we stand compared with other
More informationAn Illustrated Guide to the ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS
An Illustrated Guide to the ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS Dr. Rainer Haas Dr. Oliver Meixner Institute of Marketing & Innovation University of Natural Resources and Applied Life Sciences, Vienna http://www.boku.ac.at/mi/
More informationMaking HR a Strategic Asset
Making HR a Strategic Asset By Brian E. Becker State University of New York at Buffalo Mark A. Huselid Rutgers University Dave Ulrich University of Michigan October 2001 (Please do not cite without permission)
More information2008 Jordan Journal of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering. All rights reserved - Volume 2, Number 2 (ISSN 1995-6665) Goal
JJMIE Jordan Journal of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering Volume 2, Number 2, Jun. 2008 ISSN 1995-6665 Pages 77-84 Evaluating and Benchmarking Non-Governmental Training Programs: An Analytic Hierarchy
More informationStrategic HR Partner Assessment (SHRPA) Feedback Results
Strategic HR Partner Assessment (SHRPA) Feedback Results January 04 Copyright 997-04 Assessment Plus, Inc. Introduction This report is divided into four sections: Part I, The SHRPA TM Model, explains how
More informationSUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT AND A STUDY ON SUPPLIER SELECTION in TURKEY
SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT AND A STUDY ON SUPPLIER SELECTION in TURKEY Pelin Alcan, Hüseyin Başlıgil, Melih Coşkun Yildiz Technical University, Besiktas, İstanbul, Turkey Abstract This study mainly focuses
More informationCONTRACTOR SELECTION WITH RISK ASSESSMENT BY
CONTRACTOR SELECTION WITH RISK ASSESSMENT BY USING AHP FUZZY METHOD Seyed Ali Tabatabaei Khodadadi 1, B. Dean Kumar 2 ¹Department of Civil Engineering, JNTUH CEH, Hyderabad -500085, India ²Associate Professor
More informationHow To Compare Six Sigma, Lean and the Theory of Constraints
P R O C E S S M P R O V E M E N T How To Compare Six Sigma, Lean and the Theory of Constraints A framework for choosing what s best for your organization WTHN THE AMERCAN business community a multitude
More informationStudy of data structure and algorithm design teaching reform based on CDIO model
Study of data structure and algorithm design teaching reform based on CDIO model Li tongyan, Fu lin (Chengdu University of Information Technology, 610225, China) ABSTRACT CDIO is a new and innovative engineering
More informationA BALANCED SCORECARD APPLICATION IN TURKISH FINANCIAL SECTOR USING BUSINESS INTELLIGENCE
A BALANCED SCORECARD APPLICATION IN TURKISH FINANCIAL SECTOR USING BUSINESS INTELLIGENCE Abdulkadir Hızıroğlu Yıldırım Beyazıt University, Turkey hiziroglu@ybusm.info Muazzez Pinar Yukay Bora Finansbank,
More informationDeveloping and Implementing a Balanced Scorecard: A Practical Approach
RL Consulting Developing and Implementing a Balanced Scorecard: A Practical Approach White Paper Prepared by: Rick Leopoldi March 31, 2004 Copyright 2004. All rights reserved. Duplication of this document
More informationConsulting Performance, Rewards & Talent. Measuring the Business Impact of Employee Selection Systems
Consulting Performance, Rewards & Talent Measuring the Business Impact of Employee Selection Systems Measuring the Business Impact of Employee Selection Systems Many, if not all, business leaders readily
More information5. SOCIAL PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT IN MICROFINANCE 1
5. SOCIAL PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT IN MICROFINANCE 1 INTRODUCTION TO SOCIAL PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Achieving Social and Financial Performance In the microfinance arena, performance has long been associated
More informationSince the 1990s, accountability in higher education has
The Balanced Scorecard Beyond Reports and Rankings More commonly used in the commercial sector, this approach to strategic assessment can be adapted to higher education. by Alice C. Stewart and Julie Carpenter-Hubin
More informationValue innovation and a cognitive map of stakeholder-oriented quality management
Value innovation and a cognitive map of stakeholder-oriented quality management Djoko Setijono Department of Quality Technology & Management Gotland University College, Sweden djoko.setijono@hgo.se Abstract
More informationLead Time Reduction in SME s; A Survey
Lead Time Reduction in SME s; A Survey - Research and experiences from the HAN LEAN-QRM Center - Wilfred Knol MSc http://www.han.nl/lectoraatlean Introduction Quantitative research on the relevance of
More informationA simplified implementation of the least squares solution for pairwise comparisons matrices
A simplified implementation of the least squares solution for pairwise comparisons matrices Marcin Anholcer Poznań University of Economics Al. Niepodleg lości 10, 61-875 Poznań, Poland V. Babiy McMaster
More informationEffective objective setting provides structure and direction to the University/Faculties/Schools/Departments and teams as well as people development.
Effective objective setting provides structure and direction to the University/Faculties/Schools/Departments and teams as well as people development. The main purpose of setting objectives is to reflect
More informationSelection of Database Management System with Fuzzy-AHP for Electronic Medical Record
I.J. Information Engineering and Electronic Business, 205, 5, -6 Published Online September 205 in MECS (http://www.mecs-press.org/) DOI: 0.585/ijieeb.205.05.0 Selection of Database Management System with
More information