An Examination of Resource Allocation at Stout
|
|
- Teresa Barber
- 7 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 An Examination of Resource Allocation at Stout In January of 2014, Chancellor Charles Sorensen requested that a committee be formed to examine resource allocation at the University of Wisconsin Stout. The impetus for this request was multifold. After years of increasing enrollments, the academic year was marked by a decline in enrollment. This was combined with the graduation of one of UW-Stout s largest classes. Enrollment growth funds had become a resource that was relied upon in several departments and colleges as base budget. These funds were generated when enrollment revenues exceeded the revenue estimates (tuition target). When the university falls below tuition target, enrollment growth funds are not available. For many years, UW-Stout exceeded our tuition target until The tuition revenue shortfall created a lack of enrollment growth dollars and a hole in several college budgets. To correct the situation, Chancellor Sorensen funded the shortfall; but only on a one time basis. He also requested a review of the college base budgets to determine if they were correctly proportional to their outputs and enrollments. Concurrently, the university was in the midst of one of the deepest budget reductions experienced by the UW System and by the University of Wisconsin-Stout. Every biennial budget for the past 20 years had been marked by budget reductions and budget lapses in the state of Wisconsin. The biennial budget cuts were dramatic. These budget reductions were not isolated to Wisconsin as the defunding of higher education is a national trend as public higher education has lost its standing in state budgetary priorities across the country. In Wisconsin alone, eighty-five colleges and universities are listed under the Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education. Those institutions enroll approximately 380,000 students. According to the 2010 US census, 386,552 Wisconsin residents were in the age range from Competition for students is high as the pool of traditional aged students has declined. State support of higher education has been on the decline across the nation. To counter the lost revenue, institutions have raised tuition to remain competitive. These tuition increases have not increased quality, they simply fill the voids created when of state funds are directed to other priorities. The result has been an outcry regarding the affordability of higher education. The problem is misunderstood when the cost of public higher education is benchmark against the Consumer Price Index or other inflationary indexes. This comparison does not take into consideration the revenue lost when state government defunds higher education. The result of this changing landscape is that institutions of higher learning will need to adapt to a changing landscape if they are to survive. 1
2 Financial Centralization/Incremental Budgeting During this transformation in the landscape of Higher Education, the University of Wisconsin- Stout became designated as Wisconsin s Polytechnic institution. Building on its tradition of career-focused education stressing applied learning and technical innovation. Stout embraced technology and became a laptop and wireless campus well before other institutions had considered such a move. Stout also entered the distance education market well ahead of its competitors. These moves grew student enrollments and helped offset annual budget lapses and cuts that had become a regular occurrence within Wisconsin s budgetary process. Achieving strategic planning goals was made possible in part by the UW-Stout s highly centralized budget model. Fiscal resources flowed centrally at the close of the fiscal year. Considerable resources were directed to university priorities such as technology projects, server upgrades, laptop rollouts and wireless connectivity that embodied the Polytechnic designation. That budgeting method relied upon the previous budget cycle that determined current and future resource allocations. UW-Stout utilized a base-plus approach to budgeting that mirrored the previous year s budget priorities. Additional base allocations to units were allocated by the Chancellor or through priorities identified in the strategic planning process. This funding method, which is characterized by central ownership of the unrestricted funding sources, is referred to as an incremental budget model. One benefit to a centralized (or incremental) budget model was the simplicity. Using the previous year s budget with additional base allocations as needed was simple to manage. On the revenue side, Stout s administration does not set tuition rates. Tuition is decided by the UW Board of Regents and the Wisconsin State Legislature. The largest source of revenue is largely determined outside university control. On the expense side, institutional pay plans are set within the legislative process. Therefore, the largest expense at UW-Stout (payroll) is decided by state legislators. Historically, when state support was strong, the need to make budgetary reallocations within the institution was less necessary. Emergency requests or new program initiatives were requested centrally. This budget model was simple and uncomplicated; thus creating stability across units and funded strategic priorities. This approach worked well when state support was high. This financial model did not adjust for enrollment fluctuations, did not create entrepreneurial activity, and did not incentivize units to grow or become more efficient. Important to note, in 1999, UW-Stout launched a program that turned the traditional method of resource allocation on its head. Customized Instruction (CI) was approved by the Wisconsin Board of Regents as a market based approach to deliver customized education to professionals. The budget model differed dramatically from the traditional method of resource 2
3 allocation at the university. The CI approach was established as a cost recovery method. The price of the tuition was set at at least 150% of tuition. Because it did not serve on campus students, segregated fees and laptop fees were waived. Overhead and indirect expenses are assessed to the tuition revenue at a rate of 36%. These taxes paid for university overhead, administrative support, institutional marketing and new program development. For years, excess revenue stayed in the program and was later swept centrally after large balances had begun to accumulate. Budget Model Committee The biennial budget was initially favorable for the University of Wisconsin System and for UW-Stout. When it was reported that the University of Wisconsin System collectively had reserves in excess of $1,000,000,000, the public and legislative action was swift. For the University of Wisconsin-Stout, it meant a permanent base budget reduction of $2,400,000 and a two-year tuition freeze. The two-year freeze then became a four-year freeze when the fund balances grew across the UW System instead of declined. At the time, UW-Stout s balances were second lowest in the UW-System. They stood at a paltry 10% of institutional budget compared to other UW institutions. The irony of the situation is that, by most standards, reserve balances of 20-30% are considered appropriate. In reaction to these cuts, Chancellor Charles Sorensen charged a committee in January of 2014 to explore the possibility of a different institutional budget model with a focus on incentivebased funding. He specified that any change to the budget model should provide greater transparency, establish incentives for revenue enhancements and judicious spending and maintain the ability to capture some funds centrally to support strategic planning. These items were included in the goals statement on the committee establishment form. The committee met numerous times as a whole in the spring of Through those months, the committee learned of the transition that the University of Wisconsin Colleges had made to a different budget model called responsibility centered management (RCM). The Budget Model Committee reviewed the 2013 UW-Madison White Paper on a potential transition of their budget model. The committee also developed a document that outlined institutional guiding principles that should guide any budgetary changes; principles that aligned well with Chancellor Sorensen s committee charge. The principles that the committee developed directed that a new budget model should: 3
4 Establish a sustainable funding model that advances UW-Stout s Polytechnic tenants of 1) career focused programming, 2) applied learning, and 3) collaboration with business, industry and other educational institutions. Prioritize student learning and maintain a comprehensive, competitive and unique undergraduate and graduate program array. Allocate resources to schools, colleges, and campus-level units but not allocate resources within those schools, colleges and campus units. Advance the University s strategic planning process through an alignment of financial resource allocation and UW-Stout s enduring goals, five-year goals, university priorities and action plans. Build incentives that can lead to entrepreneurship, innovation, and intelligent risk taking. Retain a centralized fund sufficient to ensure the achievement of our strategic goals, priorities, action plans, discretionary proposals and emergency needs. Ensure that the institution operates as a cohesive whole and rewards collaboration between units rather than fosters competition. Provide the information necessary to make data-driven decisions. Recognize the tradition of shared governance in the development and implementation of the budget model. Provide clear and concise communication and reasonable transition and bridging strategies. It was decided that one outcome of the Budget Model Review Committee would be to develop a document (similar to a UW-Madison Budget Allocation Model white paper) that established recommendations on achieving Chancellor Sorensen s charge. The document would serve as a communication tool to inform the greater university community. The audience for the document would be our new Chancellor, Dr. Robert Meyer, the Strategic Planning Group and ultimately the greater university community. An important recommendation that rose from committee deliberations involved the nonacademic and support service areas. Much of the conversation focused upon the historical budget allocations within the academic colleges. The comment was made that we should consider examining all areas including support areas such as the Physical Plant, Information Technology, Business & Financial Services and Student Services, to name a few. Committee Work From the onset the Budget Model Review Committee was a large group comprised of members of the administration, budget managers, governance representatives, the Academic Deans and 4
5 Directors of large non-academic areas. To better achieve that task at hand, it was decided to divide the larger group into four subcommittees that would work on focused goals. The subcommittees were charged to look at the base budgets of the academic colleges; measure the resource allocations of the non-academic areas, set timelines and milestones and organize the communication of the committee s work. The academic subcommittee would determine and recommend if institutional reallocation was needed to address enrollment fluctuations over the years. The second subcommittee was charged with examining institutional support services outside of the academic colleges. The committee would recommend metrics for measurement that would be benchmarked against state and national averages. Benchmarking would determine if those services were under or over allocated. The third subcommittee was charged with developing the narrative for why a change was needed from the current model to a future model. A final and fourth subcommittee was charged with focusing on the process of how a new budget model might be adopted. That subcommittee also attended the other subcommittees to understand their timelines. Costing Academic Programs and Administrative Services In order to manage resources effectively, it is important to understand how much it costs to educate students in any particular program. Instructional costs vary from program to program not only based upon class size but also faculty salaries, equipment and technology that is needed for classroom instruction. Outside of the cost of instruction, there is also the value in services that faculty offer through leadership positions (such as being a program director) or the value they return to the institution through research, product development, and grants. Faculty/student interaction has often been cited as the most important factor in retaining a student and moving them to graduation. In order to manage resources effectively, it is also very important to understand the value of administrative and student service functions. For instance, groundskeepers mow the grass. But, they can also impact recruitment by impacting the look of the campus. Athletic coaches work with student athletes, but they are also residually responsible for our highest retentions rates among traditional students on the Stout campus. It is not only an exercise in understanding the costs of things but also appreciating their full value. 5
6 Costing the Academic Program The Case for Change subcommittee discussed these concepts. Determining the true cost and true value included conversation regarding presenting financial data in its simplest format, including revenue and expenses by college and nothing else. That was a starting point for discussion. The conversation then brought forth the idea of other sources of revenue should be included as a part of a college s base budget. Those additional revenue streams include customized instruction funds, enrollment growth funds, access to learning funds, gift and grant revenue. Recommendations were presented that offered suggestions on how to measure faculty work load accurately. The recommendations were to subtract reassigned time for department chairs and program directors. Independent studies, co-ops, field experiences should be assigned back into the college so that the student credit hours can be counted for the college. These were among the recommendations on work load. The topic of class size was a focal point. Dramatic disparities in class size exist. It is widely recognized that some classes are better suited to larger sections. Social sciences and business courses are more easily taught in larger sections because there are no laboratory needs. But the comparisons are still dramatic when one college s academic staff are teaching average class sections of 27, while another college has an average class size of 13. The issue of class size is critical because of revenue generation, but it is also an issue of equity. Recently, the Bill and Melinda Gates foundation completed a study that showed that by simply consolidating sections within a single course (filling the empty seats in that classroom), an institution could save over $1,000,000. The study looked at seven regional public universities. The data allows academic administration to examine costs required to teach the average credit hour in a department. Taking a page from that book, UW-Stout ran an analysis that simply took budget divided by credit hour. The result was: Fall 2011 Fall 2012 Fall 2013 Credits CAHSS 33,574 32,077 31,964 CEHHS 24,990 24,810 24,165 COM 20,562 19,869 18,901 STEM 33,214 33,123 34,285 6
7 Budget CAHSS 7,392,339 7,711,810 7,823,974 CEHHS 10,041,711 11,566,819 10,309,548 COM 7,133,134 7,048,140 7,214,275 STEM 10,685,851 11,524,238 11,901,515 Budget/Cr CAHSS CEHHS COM STEM Average This illustrated that credit hour production between colleges is just one metric and does not take into account a number of other critical issues. Research productivity is not counted in credit generation and the revenue was not added to the bottom line of the college budgets. Credit hour generation does not take into account the higher cost for graduate programs as compared to undergraduate programs. Nor does this model identify that certain lab intensive programs are more costly to operate. To grapple with the different issues, the academic committee examined a weighting formula utilized by the Nevada System of Higher Education. The model takes into account the differing costs of instruction by discipline. This is an improvement over the Delaware Model of faculty workload that benchmarks workloads as an average, depending upon the institution. The first step in a new budget model would be to establish a new methodology compared to the historical college base budget allocation model. Once achieved, this new algorithm would allow the committee to discuss the ability for the colleges to carryover budget at fiscal yearend. This would eliminate some of the use or lose behavior. And, an important conversation by the budget model committee will involve the endorsement of running a model (Nevada Model?) annually to calculate the yearly budget. Colleges and academic units would benefit from enrollment increases that are reflected in budget. The converse would be that budget reductions by college or program would occur when enrollments declined. 7
8 Reallocating the Historical Base Budget Over the course of years we have increased the college budgets based mainly on building from the historical budget and then allocating new funds as they are received from UW-System. This method does not take into account the changing enrollments in the various colleges. This has led some of the colleges to need exceptional amounts of additional funding support that may not have been needed if the changing enrollment patterns had been taken into account in the past allocation periods. The Budget Model Review Committee has been looking at various formulaic approaches to both redistribute the current base allocations but also to distribute out future excess tuition dollars commonly called enrollment growth funds on our campus. We looked at using the Nevada Model which gives additional multipliers to areas based on discipline and level. The Nevada Model was developed by the Nevada Higher Educational System and was presented to the Nevada Legislature in While Wisconsin is not Nevada, the principles of the Nevada Model are important to highlight to understand the premise of the metric used for weighting resource allocation. Those principles included these guiding tenets: The primary driver of allocation of state resources to teaching institutions should be instruction as measured by student credit hours. With financial support based on this unit of student progression, each Chancellor can manage budgets to encourage excellence and student success. The differing cost of instruction by discipline and by level must be taken into account, and this can be accomplished through a matrix based on the cost studies and experience in other states. Courses are weighted based on discipline and course level. To recognize the research mission of the universities, an additional weighting to upper division and graduate courses is suggested. This additional state support for research reflects the state priorities for the role of research in innovation and economic development. Under this proposed model, the revenue from students tuition and fees remains at each institution. It is the student contribution to the cost of their education, just as the State supports its share of the cost through General Fund support. This methodology enables students (and their families) to see the direct link between their tuition and fees and the services provided to them at the institution they attend (Nevada Model, 2011). The results of using the model on the historical base budgets did not result in acceptable changes to the base budget reallocations. It is not possible to identify the exact reasons for this. Therefore, a different approach was used to redistribute the base. This resulted in conversations about the allocations of program directors/department chairs release times and how base budgets had further been impacted by System awarded DINS. The formula that was eventually used was based upon calculating what the colleges really needed in expenses. The Fiscal year of 2014 was an ideal year to use to adjust the historical budgets. During that year, the colleges used a maximum account of 102 funding and only as much 131 (excess tuition) funding as they needed. This was due the lack of excess tuition during that fiscal year. The usage for the two types of funding shows the inequity. It appears as such: 8
9 FY14 FY FY Combined use CAHSS 6,369, ,857 7,255,118 CEHHS 6,611, ,802 6,799,700 COM 4,557, ,173 4,724,478 STEM 8,954, ,800 9,353,866 26,492,530 1,640,633 28,133,163 The committee is proposing that we shift base dollars to take into account the changing enrollment patterns. By shifting 102 funds from one college to the other we would make the enrollment growth need identical in all colleges which would represent the changing enrollment patterns. New Base New 102 New 131 Combined use CAHSS 6,844, ,158 7,255,118 CEHHS 6,389, ,158 6,799,700 COM 4,314, ,158 4,724,478 STEM 8,943, ,158 9,353,866 26,492,530 1,640,633 28,133,163 The overall funding for each college remains the same by doing this, but the 102 funds are now in the appropriate portions for each college and their need for excess tuition is now identical. This does not take into account the use of the Nevada model for distributing out the excess tuition based on Student Credit Hour production. Using the Nevada model we took the prior 3 years of SCH production and modified them using the suggested Nevada Model multipliers based on discipline and level. The results were: Average CAHSS 91,492 87,535 86,689 88,572 CEHHS 108, ,035 92, ,836 COM 79,723 66,636 63,187 69,849 STEM 126, , , ,160 Total Cr 409, , , ,092 The excess tuition (enrollment growth) funding would then be allocated using a comparison of the current year s credit hour production to 90% of the 3 year average of credit hour production. This will give growing areas additional funding to provide instructional staff when needed. In order to achieve a 9
10 certain amount of fairness 90% of the average was used so all areas received at least some of the excess tuition the committee will need to decide on what percentage will be used in the future but 90% was used for this example. The result of shifting the excess tuition based on that premise is: Original FY14 New Prorated New FY14 Overall Combined Base 131 Combined Change CAHSS 7,255,118 6,844, ,350 7,387, ,192 CEHHS 6,799,700 6,389, ,275 6,577,817 (221,883) COM 4,724,478 4,314, ,691 4,427,011 (297,467) STEM 9,353,866 8,943, ,317 9,741, ,159 During the transition period we will be looking inside our colleges to look for efficiencies in many areas including cost of programs, support staff ratios, workload rules, sabbatical leave, department chair model, program chair model, travel rules, and many more areas. The State is expected to put more and more burden on the Universities in general to take on additional self-funding options and we plan on using our contacts in the private sector to partnership with as well. Creating Benchmarks and Cost Comparison for Academic Support and Service Units The benchmarking sub-committee was charged to examine the non-academic units and administrative/student service areas of the university. Their charge was to develop a method in determining if the allocation of resources to these units was an outlier in being under allocated or over allocated. A spreadsheet was developed by committee members that identified those units. They included: Marketing; Information Technology; Office of International Education; Administrative Office Professionals; Advisement; Career Services; Counseling; University Library; Research Services; Admissions; Registration and Records; Financial Aid; Business and Financial Services (and subunits); Planning, Assessment, Quality and Research; Human Resources; Physical Plant (and subunits); Health Services, Housing, Student Activities, Police, Parking and Risk Management. A proposal had been written by the Vice Chancellor s office for consideration by the benchmarking committee. That proposal suggested that we engage Huron Consulting to conduct a cursory review of all of the areas using recognized national benchmarks and comparing those benchmarks to our polytechnic peers and UW Comprehensive peers. The committee decided to not engage Huron due to the report that was released in the previous year that produced lingering concerns about their conclusions. The benchmarking proposal was sent to the Educational Advisory Board or EAB. EAB communicated that a cursory benchmarking study would not be something that they would 10
11 recommend because it would have a tendency to compare apples to oranges. For example, using a metric such as student advisees per academic counselor would not get at the underlying difference in the jobs of academic advisors. Some academic advisors only advise and register students while others have responsibilities in teaching, career counseling, orientation, study skills and special population advising such as athletics. EAB suggested in depth investigations of large areas. The full Budget Model Review Committee considered this recommendation from EAB, agreed to it and decided that the Physical Plant should undergo the first review. This was primarily based upon its FTE. The report has yet to be completed, but EAB has reported speaking with several UW institutions, and has collected an abundance of information on staffing and budgetary resources. They provided preliminary initial findings that included these comments: Physical Plant implements an altered chargeback model in which only revenuegenerating departments pay for facility services. All departments pay for services outside the standard scope of maintenance and operations. Decreases in state funding for central appropriations have reportedly forced facilities staff at some profiled institutions to increasingly rely on revenue generated for chargeback services. At UW Stevens Point, budget cuts forced administrators to eliminate several physical plant staff positions and consequently increased workload expectations for existing staff positions. UW Platteville administrators regretted that they must now perform more granular cost-analysis on chargeback services and cannot afford to waive any minor charges outside the scope of standard maintenance and operations. Decentralized facilities and residence life maintenance units can create tension between the departments due to duplicated positions and cost disagreements. The full EAB report should be completed at the beginning of November. The benchmarking committee will then make a recommendation on other areas to examine. Road Map Committee The final committee was the roadmap committee. The task of this committee was to develop a timeline, process and set of milestones for the Budget Model Review Committee. It was recognized that a task of this size needs a process and the recommendations that it develops need to be communicated widely across campus. The work of the road map committee produced this template. 11
12 Philosophy: There are needs for immediate, mid-term and long-term actions to address budget needs. The budget model committee needs to make separate recommendations for each of these timeframes within the context of their committee charge. There will be opportunities for campus-wide input, as described below. Long term roadmap for identifying a budget model for the future Early July, 2014 Early September September 22 Late October Late October November 3, 2015 (1 hour) Mid November Mid November November- December January, 2015 Late January February March/April April/May Each subcommittee presents updates to the budget committee. Phil takes the feedback from the budget committee and assembles a power point of the committee work to date. Chancellor invited to a budget committee meeting to review status, get feedback, and make modifications. Budget model committee meets to finalize initial draft of the white paper A draft of the white paper which describes the work done to date, guiding principles, and a process for obtaining input and finalizing the recommendations is ready for presentation to the Chancellor and SPG. White paper is reviewed with the SPG to obtain approval on the process and to discuss the current version of the white paper. If needed, the white paper is modified based on feedback from the SPG White paper is distributed campus wide for input. There is a link for feedback. Meetings occur with faculty senate, senate of academic staff, classified advisory development council, and college councils An open forum is held during professional development week to obtain additional input. All feedback is received and shared with the budget model committee. Budget model committee updates white paper based on feedback Budget model committee presents final recommendations to SPG for approval Recommendations forwarded on to the Chancellor for final approval Workload Metrics The workload metrics committee began by identifying a list of concerns with the way workload data is currently measured, and has been in the process of identifying solutions for those issues. The work of the group is ongoing, however, the initial recommendations include the following: 12
13 Change the activity code for program directors from 2 to 6, which would remove them from the workload metrics. Where appropriate, change the activity code for other types of reassigned time (excluding department chairs) to something other than activity 2, which would then remove them from the workload metrics. An example is to change technicians to activity 6. Ask the colleges to identify how they count each of the different types of instruction toward workload. For example, practices for counting field experiences, practicums, coops and internships vary across colleges. The following were identified as potential issues, but the group subsequently confirmed that the way they are currently being accounted for is correct: Dual level courses: the course is reported only once in the workload data and all student enrollments are counted. Late starting courses: any courses that have any student enrollments in them by the 6 th week of classes are included in the workload metrics. Issues yet to be resolved include the following: Department chairs are coded in activity 2, per Regent policy, and show up as part of the instructional workload metrics for all UW institutions, including UW-Stout. We are exploring whether we have any alternatives and what impact that would have on the ability to compare to other UW institutions. How to handle stacked courses. Currently, practices differ across colleges. How to handle differences between how colleges count credit hours vs. contact hours. How to handle instances where one person is listed as the instructor of record for accreditation purposes, but another person is teaching much of the course. How to handle courses that are team-taught. 13
University of Wisconsin-Stout UW-Stout-Online
University of Wisconsin-Stout UW-Stout-Online Decentralized to Centralized Support Services Experiences & Lessons Learned at UW-Stout UPCEA Seminar on the Management of Online Programs November 8, 2012-11:30
More informationBudget Model Redesign Initiative Stakeholder Discussions
Budget Model Redesign Initiative Stakeholder Discussions February 18, 2014 University of Memphis Budget Redesign Why should the University of Memphis Explore a budget model redesign? Financial Challenges
More informationDean s Response to B.S. Engineering Technology Program Planning and Review Committee Dean s Response. I. Degree: Engineering Technology
1 Dean s Response to B.S. Engineering Technology Program Planning and Review Committee Dean s Response I. Degree: Engineering Technology Date of Review: February 2011 Program Director: John Schultz PRC
More informationBUDGET in BRIEF. University of Wisconsin Madison Budget Report 2015 2016
BUDGET in BRIEF University of Wisconsin Madison Budget Report 2015 2016 This document is intended to provide an easy-to-understand glimpse of UW Madison s budget picture. Spending information included
More informationHow To Plan A University Budget
Annual Budget Plan Guidelines & Instructions 9/1/2010 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION...3 INTRODUCTION:...4 THE GOALS OF THE BUDGET PROCESS:...4 PRINCIPLES OF EFFECTIVE BUDGETING:...4 GUIDELINES FOR RESOURCE
More informationQuality STEMs from the Planning Process at the University of Wisconsin-Stout by Julie Furst-Bowe, University of Wisconsin-Stout
Quality STEMs from the Planning Process at the University of Wisconsin-Stout by Julie Furst-Bowe, University of Wisconsin-Stout The University of Wisconsin-Stout, a campus of more than 9,000 students in
More informationReport 13-17 November 2013 Level of Commitment for University of Wisconsin System Program Revenue Balances
Report 13-17 November 2013 Level of Commitment for University of Wisconsin System Program Revenue Balances Legislative Audit Bureau Report 13-17 November 2013 Level of Commitment for University of Wisconsin
More informationPlanning and Budget Process
Planning and Budget Process The University s planning framework, The Highest Order of Excellence II, is the framework for strategic planning at all levels of the institution. Oversight for the strategic
More informationUW-Stout Inclusive Excellence Action Plan
Goal 1: Increase the number of Wisconsin high school graduates from all segments who apply, are accepted, and enroll at UW System institutions Marketing materials: Produce DVD/video for parents, counselors
More informationOPERATING BUDGET POLICIES AND PROCEDURES 2013-2014. Table of Contents
Operating Budget Policies and Procedures FY2014 OPERATING BUDGET POLICIES AND PROCEDURES 2013-2014 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION... 2 STRUCTURE AND PRESENTATION... 2 RESOURCE ALLOCATION... 3 CARRYOVER
More informationRevised August 2013 Revised March 2006 Presented to Planning Council December 1993
1 Revised August 2013 Revised March 2006 Presented to Planning Council December 1993 Table of Content Mission, Vision, and Core Values... 3 Institutional Goals... 4 Historical Perspective and Current View...
More informationWORKING PAPER, V2 Revised December 2011
WORKING PAPER, V2 Revised December 2011 Incentive-Based Budget Model Undergraduate Tuition Allocation *New or revised material is indicated by an asterisk. The following information is intended to provide
More information2015 2016 PROPOSED BUDGET
BUDGET ADVISORY COMMITTEE FEBRUARY 13, 2015 THE FOLLOWING PROPOSED 2015-2016 BUDGET WAS APPROVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES AT THEIR FEBRUARY 6, 2015 MEETING 2015 2016 PROPOSED BUDGET BUDGET REVIEW COMMITTEE
More informationASSOCIATE DEAN, INSTRUCTION
ASSOCIATE DEAN, INSTRUCTION Board Approved May 27, 2015 FLSA: EXEMPT DEFINITION Under the direction of the Vice President of Instruction and the Executive Dean of Instruction, the Associate Dean of Instruction,
More informationLeadership & Professional Development Certificate Program Raina Clark University of Wisconsin-Stout
Leadership & Professional Development Certificate Program Raina Clark University of Wisconsin-Stout Abstract UW-Stout established a Leadership & Professional Development Certificate Program to meet employees
More informationSection B Standard Five T
Standard Five-T Information Technology Since 2004, the technology support landscape at Lane has undergone dramatic changes. Staff reductions and organizational changes have tested the ability of technology
More informationTechnology Master Plan 2010-2015 Irvine Valley College
Technology Master Plan 2010-2015 Irvine Valley College Adopted Fall Term 2010 V4.0 Created By: Irvine Valley College Page 1 6/21/2010 Table of Contents Introduction and Overview... 3 Background and Planning
More informationProvost Town Hall October 20, 2015
Provost Town Hall October 20, 2015 Facts and Figures 17,458 full-time undergraduate students, including 764 in the AA program; 764 parttime Full-time population is 39% Delaware residents and 61% nonresidents
More informationBOARD OF TRUSTEES MINNESOTA STATE COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES BOARD ACTION. Fiscal Years 2010-2011 Biennial Operating Budget
BOARD OF TRUSTEES MINNESOTA STATE COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES BOARD ACTION Fiscal Years 2010-2011 Biennial Operating Budget BACKGROUND Every other year, as part of the state s operating budget process, the
More informationThe University of Toledo Academic Affairs Committee Meeting Higher Learning Commission and Strategic Planning
The University of Toledo Academic Affairs Committee Meeting Higher Learning Commission and Strategic Planning David Cutri May 11, 2015 Higher Learning Commission Academic accrediting body for the University
More informationOHIO University OHIO Guarantee Testimony Ohio Senate Finance Higher Education Subcommittee May 19, 2015
OHIO University OHIO Guarantee Testimony Ohio Senate Finance Higher Education Subcommittee Introduction: Rethinking Ohio University; I would like to begin my testimony this morning by thanking the legislature
More informationTexas Two-year Colleges Briefing for State Policymakers
Texas Two-year Colleges Briefing for State Policymakers Increasing student performance is an urgent state and national priority for ensuring longterm economic growth and prosperity. To meet the goal for
More informationTRANSFORM CSCU 2020 PREAMBLE
TRANSFORM CSCU 2020 PREAMBLE A post-secondary education is not only critical for Connecticut residents to achieve personal success but also plays a key role in statewide economic expansion and stability.
More informationDRAFT. FY15 UW-Stout Institutional IT Plan
DRAFT FY15 UW-Stout Institutional IT Plan A. & University Strategic Objectives [1-2 pages] 1. How was the plan developed? The UW-Stout IT Planning is tightly integrated into the campus planning model.
More informationI. BACKGROUND INFORMATION
TO: FROM: Board of Trustees Kirsten M. Volpi Executive Vice President for Finance and Administration DATE: May 18, 2015 SUBJECT: FY 2016 Budget I. BACKGROUND INFORMATION As we approach fiscal year 2016
More informationGUIDELINES FOR ACADEMIC PROGRAM REVIEW For self-studies due to the Office of the Provost on October 1, 2015 GRADUATE PROGRAMS
GUIDELINES FOR ACADEMIC PROGRAM REVIEW For self-studies due to the Office of the Provost on October 1, 2015 GRADUATE PROGRAMS OVERVIEW OF PROGRAM REVIEW At Illinois State University, primary responsibility
More informationMINNESOTA STATE COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES BOARD OF TRUSTEES Agenda Item Summary Sheet
MINNESOTA STATE COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES BOARD OF TRUSTEES Agenda Item Summary Sheet Name: Finance and Facilities Committee Date: June 17, 2015 Title: FY2016 Operating Budget (Second Reading) Purpose
More informationWORKING PAPER, V3 Revised January 2012
WORKING PAPER, V3 Revised January 2012 Incentive-Based Budget Model Undergraduate Tuition Allocation *New or revised material is indicated by an asterisk. The following information is intended to provide
More informationON THE ROAD TO RCM. EACUBO Annual Meeting October 20, 2014
Rutgers Investor Update 12-18-13 2.ppt\16 DEC 2013\7:05 PM\1 ON THE ROAD TO RCM EACUBO Annual Meeting October 20, 2014 J. Michael Gower Senior Vice President for Finance & Treasurer Rutgers, The State
More information2014 Higher Education Accounting Forum
2014 Higher Education Accounting Forum The Accounting of RCM April 28, 2014 Conference Session Speakers Name Title Organization Andrew L. Laws Managing Director (session facilitator) Huron Consulting Group
More informationBoard of Regents Program Action Request University of Alaska Proposal to Add, Change, or Delete a Program of Study
Board of Regents Program Action Request University of Alaska Proposal to Add, Change, or Delete a Program of Study 1a. Major Academic Unit (choose one) UAA 1b. School or College Community and Technical
More informationBudget 101: RCM Budget Orientation
Budget 101: RCM Budget Orientation 1 Guiding Principles The following set of principles will guide the implementation and application of Responsibility Center Management (RCM) at Ohio University. These
More informationENROLLMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN
ENROLLMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN September, 2009 Vision A premier learning community recognized for supporting student success and enriching society. Mission Cypress College enriches students lives by providing
More informationDevelop and implement a systematic process that assesses, evaluates and supports open-access and equity with measurable outcome improvements
STRATEGIC GOAL 1: Promote Access and Equity Develop and implement a systematic process that assesses, evaluates and supports open-access and equity with measurable outcome improvements Increase pre-collegiate
More informationINTRODUCTION MEDICAL SCHOOL LANDSCAPE 5/13/2016. Introductions
Association of Chiefs and Leaders of General Internal Medicine 2016 Leon Hess Management Training and Leadership Institute Medical School Revenues and Budgeting Principles A discussion outlining the revenue
More informationConducting Market Analysis for New Programs
Academic Affairs Forum Conducting Market Analysis for New Programs Developing Financially Viable Programs and Meeting Market Demand Custom Research Brief eab.com Academic Affairs Forum Emily McKelvey Research
More informationEducational Master Plan 2010-2015 Goals WORKING DRAFT
Educational Master Plan 2010-2015 Goals WORKING DRAFT 1. PROVIDE SUPPORT TO ENSURE STUDENT RECRUITMENT, RETENTION AND SUCCESS. 1.1. Develop a policy to optimize student opportunity and access linked to
More informationAcademic Affairs Working Plan 2014-17
1 Division of Academic Affairs Academic Affairs Working Plan 2014-17 Strategic planning in Academic Affairs is guided by the five goals of the SJSU Strategic Plan: Vision 2017 and the planning previously
More informationEstablishing a Compensation Model in an Academic Pathology Department
Establishing a Compensation Model in an Academic Pathology Department William M. Hynes, MHSA, and Donna H. MacMillan, MT(ASCP), MBA Key Words: Academic pathology practice; Compensation; Salary model DOI:10.1309/WDYTWNWY31ACQE0X
More informationAcademic Health Center Six-Year Strategic Plan October 20, 2000
Goal 1: Create and Prepare the New Health Professionals for Minnesota Strategic Objectives 1.0 Develop and implement interdisciplinary health professional education opportunities that: Emphasize the core
More informationforum Forecasting Enrollment to Achieve Institutional Goals by Janet Ward Campus Viewpoint
forum Campus Viewpoint Forecasting Enrollment to Achieve Institutional Goals by Janet Ward As strategic and budget planning commences at community colleges, baccalaureate institutions, and comprehensive
More informationUniversity of Maine at Presque Isle 2020 Strategic Plan
University of Maine at Presque Isle 2020 Strategic Plan Table of Contents History and Planning Process.3 University Vision, Mission, & Institutional Values......4 Strategic Plan....5 2 History and Planning
More informationCost Drivers of Graduate Education
ACADEMIC AFFAIRS FORUM Cost Drivers of Graduate Education Custom Research Brief Research Associate Anna Krenkel Research Manager Lisa Geraci January 2013 2 of 10 3 of 10 Table of Contents I. Research Methodology...
More informationClass & Labor Implementation Committee Summarized Report of Action Steps & Ongoing Owners
Class & Labor Implementation Committee Summarized Report of Action Steps & Ongoing Owners The Class & Labor Implementation Committee has 17 members and began meeting in March 2013 to advice on the implementation
More informationSummary of the Funding Formula Recommended for Higher Education
Summary of the Funding Formula Recommended for Higher Education The Nevada System of Higher Education (NSHE) appreciates the hard work of the members of the Legislative Committee to Study the Funding of
More informationEastern Illinois University information technology services. strategic plan. January,
Eastern Illinois University information technology services strategic plan January, 2014 Introduction With the selection of emerging technologies as one of the six themes of the university s recent strategic
More informationCONSULTANT RECOMMENDATION REPORT Planning and Review Committee Consultant Recommendation
CONSULTANT RECOMMENDATION REPORT Planning and Review Committee Consultant Recommendation I. Degree: Master of Science in Vocational Rehabilitation (MSVR) Date of Review: 2013-2014 Program Directors: Michelle
More informationDoing More with Less Time: Project Management for Office Workflow
Doing More with Less Time: Project Management for Office Workflow Meridith Wentz, Director University of Wisconsin-Stout Susan Greene, Associate Institutional Planner University of Wisconsin-Stout Meridith
More informationDistance Delivery Confirmation Form Confirmation of Institutional Eligibility for Distance Delivery Approval
Appendix B1: UWSP Distance Delivery Confirmation of Eligibility Form Distance Delivery Confirmation Form Confirmation of Institutional Eligibility for Distance Delivery Approval In 2010, the Commission
More informationBuilding Bridges: The Link Between Strategic Planning and Budgeting
Building Bridges: The Link Between Strategic Planning and Budgeting Dr. Sona K. Andrews Vice Chancellor for Academic Strategies Oregon University System Stacy Pearson Vice President for Finance and Administration
More informationBUDGET APPROVED ON JULY 17, 2014 PROPOSED BUDGET
BUDGET APPROVED ON JULY 17, 2014 PROPOSED BUDGET FY2015 PROPOSED BUDGET FISCAL YEAR 2014-15 Budget Methodology: Temple University is implementing a decentralized budget model in fiscal year 2014-15. This
More informationNevada System of Higher Education. Evaluation of the NSHE Funding Formula. May 2011. submitted by:
Nevada System of Higher Education Evaluation of the NSHE Funding Formula May 2011 submitted by: Table of Contents Acknowledgements Executive Summary Chapter 1 Introduction 1.0 Background... 1-1 1.1 The
More informationAppendix D. Financial Modeling Tools. TWU Summary Budgets
Appendix D Financial Modeling Tools TWU Summary Budgets Revenue/Expense Examples Derived from Revenue-Estimating Spreadsheet developed during the Visioning Process 44 TWU Budget Fiscal Year 2013 BUDGETED
More informationFramework Focus Action Items Responsible Parties Goals/Metrics (Best estimates)* Timeline (Best estimates)*
Preface: The U. T. System Board of Regents unanimously adopted A Framework for Advancing Excellence throughout The University of Texas System (Framework) presented by Chancellor Francisco G. Cigarroa at
More informationBUDGET in BRIEF. University of Wisconsin Madison Budget Report 2014 2015
BUDGET in BRIEF University of Wisconsin Madison Budget Report 2014 2015 This document is intended to provide an easy-to-understand glimpse of UW Madison s budget picture. Spending information included
More informationInformation Technology Services
Information Technology Services 2015 Annual Report The 2015 Information Technology Services Annual Report Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) and Highlights of the 2014-2015 Academic Year Information Technology
More informationGrambling State University FIVE-YEAR STRATEGIC PLAN. FY 2017-2018 through FY 2021-2022
Grambling State University FIVE-YEAR STRATEGIC PLAN FY 2017-2018 through FY 2021-2022 July 1, 2016 GRAMBLING STATE UNIVERSITY Strategic Plan FY 2017-2018 through FY 2021-2022 Vision Statement: To be one
More informationEXECUTIVE SUMMARY. A. Planning Process
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Provide a narrative describing the program and concise summaries for Evaluation Criteria A-J of the proposal. Label section headings. (Limit 1200 words) Institution: Florida State College
More informationThe University of Wisconsin Flexible Option:
The University of Wisconsin Flexible Option: THE NEW MODEL: THE UW FLEXIBLE OPTION The UW Flexible Option is a student-centric approach to UW System degree and certificate programs designed to be more
More informationUniversity of Arizona Strategic Business Plan Arizona Board of Regents Presentation April 8, 2011. Board of Regents Meeting April 7-8, 2011 Item #25
University of Arizona Strategic Business Plan Arizona Board of Regents Presentation April 8, 2011 Board of Regents Meeting April 7-8, 2011 Item #25 Overview What are we doing Aligning our business plan
More informationPittsburg State University Distance Education Plan, 2013-15
Pittsburg State University Distance Education Plan, 2013-15 Pittsburg State University (PSU) continues to be successful in offering distance-delivered educational programs. Out of the various modes that
More informationStrategic Goals. 1. Information Technology Infrastructure in support of University Strategic Goals
Strategic Goals 1. Information Technology Infrastructure in support of University Strategic Goals a. Work toward building a modern data center and providing data services that support campus units and
More informationFINANCIAL PLANNING GUIDELINES FOR PROFESSIONAL DEGREE SUPPLEMENTAL TUITION SELF SUPPORTING PROGRAM FEES PROFESSIONAL SCHOOLS
FINANCIAL PLANNING GUIDELINES FOR PROFESSIONAL DEGREE SUPPLEMENTAL TUITION SELF SUPPORTING PROGRAM FEES PROFESSIONAL SCHOOLS INTRODUCTION This document describes the financial planning required for charging
More informationONE IT Organization, Staffing, and Planning
ONE IT Organization, Staffing, and Planning The first section of the 2005 core data survey included questions that can be clustered into three areas: campus information technology (IT) leadership and organization,
More informationChancellor s Workgroup: Fund the Vision
Chancellor s Workgroup: Fund the Vision Sharon Boyd AVC, Business Services Dr. Rob Burrus Dean, Cameron School of Business Dr. Carrie Clements Professor, Dept. of Psychology Dr. Jennifer Horan Associate
More informationKirsten Volpi Senior Vice President for Finance and Administration
TO: FROM: Board of Trustees Kirsten Volpi Senior Vice President for Finance and Administration DATE: May 23, 2011 SUBJECT: FY 2012 Budget I. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Fiscal Year 2012 Operating Budget Summary
More informationPart III. Self-Study Report Template
Part 3 Ministry Of Education And Higher Education Directorate General of Higher Education Part III Self-Study Report Template LABE SELF-STUDY QUESTIONNAIRE http://www.labe.org.lb General Instructions Introduction
More informationPlanning and Review Committee (PCR) AY 2013-14 Annual Report to the Faculty Senate and UW System
1 Results of Program Analysis and Recommendations: Planning and Review Committee (PCR) AY 2013-14 Annual Report to the Faculty Senate and UW System During the 2013-14 academic year, the Planning and Review
More informationHow Do You Stack Up?
How Do You Stack Up? Charles Tegen Associate Vice President for Finance Clemson University 2014 Managerial Analysis and Decision Support Charlotte, North Carolina November 13, 2014 Session Outline Benchmarking
More informationFaculty Workload Policies at Public Universities
ACADEMIC AFFAIRS FORUM Faculty Workload Policies at Public Universities Custom Research Brief Research Associate Ashley Greenberg Associate Research Director Sarah Moore February 2013 2 of 12 3 of 12 Table
More informationAnnual Report on the Virginia Plan for Higher Education. State Council of Higher Education for Virginia
0 Table of Contents Overview... 2 Objective: Be the Best-Educated State by 2030... 2 Goals in Support of The Virginia Plan... 3 2015 Activities to Support The Virginia Plan... 4 Measures and Targets: Baseline
More informationDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science (EECS) Bylaws for Program Structure
Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science (EECS) Bylaws for Program Structure I. Mission and Objectives: The mission of the University of Kansas Department of Electrical Engineering and
More informationNorthern Marianas College Fiscal Year 2013 Operations Budget and Financial Plan
Northern Marianas College Fiscal Year 2013 Operations Budget and Financial Plan General Information The Northern Marianas College (NMC) has been no stranger to financial struggles during the turbulent
More informationCreate an Accredited School to Advance and Accelerate Public Health Improvement
Create an Accredited School to Advance and Accelerate Improvement A B C D E Enhance Existing and Develop New Educational Offerings Generate and Translate to Promote Strengthen Community Engagement Secure
More informationUniversity Strategic Alignment Process Report
2015 University Strategic Alignment Process Report Indiana University Purdue University Fort Wayne Gerontology Part I 1. What does your unit do and how does it support the mission of the university? According
More informationAuthorization to Establish a Certificate in Medical Transcription; Flathead Valley Community College
July 8-9, 2004 ITEM 124-305-R0704 THAT: EXPLANATION: Authorization to Establish a Certificate in Medical Transcription; Flathead Valley Community College The Board of Regents of Higher Education authorizes
More informationChapter 2 Planning, Resource Allocation, and Institutional Renewal
Chapter 2 Planning, Resource Allocation, and Institutional Renewal An institution conducts ongoing planning and resource allocation based on its mission and utilizes the results of its assessment activities
More informationUniversity of Wisconsin System New Personnel Systems Work Group Recommendations
Work Group Name: Compensation Date: March 16, 2012 Work Group Lead(s): Karen Massetti-Moran, UW-Milwaukee Work Group Iddi Adam UW Colleges Members: Sasha Showsh UW-Eau Claire Jane Marquardt UW-Extension
More informationOffice of Academic and Student Services PROGRAMMING FOR THE NON-TRADITIONAL MARKET IN THE UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SYSTEM
The University of Wisconsin System Office of Academic and Student Services Academic Information Series 5.4 Rev (ACIS-5.4 Rev) PROGRAMMING FOR THE NON-TRADITIONAL MARKET IN THE UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SYSTEM
More informationUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SYSTEM INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SUMMARY FISCAL YEAR 2015
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SYSTEM INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SUMMARY FISCAL YEAR 2015 This page intentionally left blank. UW System IT Summary FY 2015 Page 2 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION... 5 GENERAL IT SERVICES...
More informationThe University of Akron Wayne College Administrative and Governance Models
The University of Akron Wayne College has created structures and procedures through which it pursues the achievement of its mission and vision. The ADMINISTRATIVE MODEL is designed to facilitate the day-to-day
More informationA Guide. to Assessment of Learning Outcomes. for ACEJMC Accreditation
A Guide to Assessment of Learning Outcomes for ACEJMC Accreditation Accrediting Council on Education in Journalism and Mass Communications, 2012 This guide explains ACEJMC s expectations of an assessment
More informationTaking Bold Steps. Taking Bold Steps.
Taking Bold Steps. Taking Bold Steps. Introduction Faculty, staff, and students at Indiana University Kokomo revisited the campus 2011-2015 strategic plan in response to a call for a university wide strategic
More informationCollege of Nursing and Health Sciences Strategic Goals and Objectives 2013-
Objective 1.1: Actively pursue VSU s Complete College Georgia Plan (CCG). See www.valdosta.edu/planning Strategy 1.1.1: Develop partnerships with K-12. 1 (USG Strategic Imperative 1a) Strategy 1.1.2: Improve
More informationPurdue University North Central Strategic Planning Document August 2001. Co-Chairs: James B. Dworkin and Silvia Lorente-Murphy
Purdue University North Central Strategic Planning Document August 2001 Co-Chairs: James B. Dworkin and Silvia Lorente-Murphy Strategic Planning Task Force Members Ken Andre (Chancellor s Advisory Board)
More informationFORMAL PROPOSAL FOR A NEW DEGREE PROGRAM and DISTANCE LEARNING DELIVERY (Program is New and Institution Currently Offers Distance Learning Programs)
FORMAL PROPOSAL FOR A NEW DEGREE PROGRAM and DISTANCE LEARNING DELIVERY (Program is New and Institution Currently Offers Distance Learning Programs) Form 3A Institution: Georgia Southwestern State University
More informationUNLV Differential Fee Proposal Business
UNLV Differential Fee Proposal Business (BOARD OF REGENTS' AGENDA 03/10/2011 & 03/11/2011) Ref. BOR-22, Page 3 of 24 UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA LAS VEGAS DIFFERENTIAL FEE PROPOSAL FOR UNLV COLLEGE OF BUSINESS
More information2015-2018 Human Resources Strategic Plan
2015-2018 Human Resources Strategic Plan Welcome to the 2015-2018 Human Resources Strategic Plan. The purpose of this plan is to stabilize and modernize the Human Resources system (people, processes, organization)
More informationStrategic Plan 2012-2014 2012-2014. San Luis Obispo County Community College District
Strategic Plan 2012-2014 2012-2014 S Strategic Plan 2012-2014 San Luis Obispo County Community College District San Luis Obispo County Community College District STRATEGIC PLAN 2012-2014 San Luis Obispo
More informationDepartment of Management and Budget
Director Debt Deputy Director and Budget FOCUS Business Support Group Budget Development & Production Revenue & Tax Analysis Customer & Information Technology Core Financial Processing Capital Projects/CIP
More informationE-Learning @ Pasco-Hernando Community College Operational Guidelines
E-Learning @ Pasco-Hernando Community College Operational Guidelines I. Operational Definition: E-Learning @ PHCC is a formal education process in which the majority of the instructional interaction occurs
More informationMaster of Science in Engineering Management University of Tennessee Chattanooga
NARRATIVE REPORT Master of Science in Engineering Management University of Tennessee Chattanooga Part 1 - Student Experience External Reviewer Report by Dr. Resit Unal, Old Dominion University Are admissions
More informationOFFICE FOR Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion. Unit Plan 2014 17
OFFICE FOR Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion Unit Plan 2014 17 Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion Built on collaboration and innovation, UC San Diego is a preeminent student-centered, research-focused, service-oriented
More informationThe Business School Strategy: Continuous Improvement by Implementing the Balanced Scorecard
The Business School Strategy: Continuous Improvement by Implementing the Balanced Scorecard Abstract Charles J. Pineno Shenandoah University cpineno@su.edu The strategic goal of accreditation by AACSB
More informationEncouraging Faculty Participation in Student Recruitment
Academic Affairs Forum Encouraging Faculty Participation in Student Recruitment Custom Research Brief eab.com Academic Affairs Forum Noorjahan Rahman Research Associate 202-266-6461 NRahman@eab.com Kevin
More informationA New Model for Funding Higher Education in Nevada
A New Model for Funding Higher Education in Nevada The Chancellor of the Nevada System of Higher Education presented to the Board of Regents and the Legislative Committee to Study the Funding of Higher
More informationGettysburg College. Co-Curricular Learning Assessment Plan. Subcommittee on Learning Outside the Classroom. June 15, 2003.
Gettysburg College Co-Curricular Learning Assessment Plan Subcommittee on Learning Outside the Classroom June 15, 2003 Submitted by: Julie Ramsey David Wright David Steinour Robin Wagner Thomas Mottola
More informationLord Fairfax Community College ACCOMPLISHMENT OF 2004-05 Goals in Support of Achieving Dateline 2009 Report Date: June 2005
Lord Fairfax Community College ACCOMPLISHMENT OF 2004-05 Goals in Support of Achieving Dateline 2009 Report Date: June 2005 Enrollment - The VCCS must serve at least 16,000 new students by 2009. 1. Conduct
More informationCONSULTANT RECOMMENDATION REPORT
CONSULTANT RECOMMENDATION REPORT Planning and Review Committee Consultant Recommendation Degree: Engineering Technology Date of Review: February 2011 Program Director: John Schultz PRC Consultant(s): Kimberly
More informationHuman Resources Department
Human Resources Department Mission Hire, develop and retain a competent, committed and diverse workforce to provide high quality and cost-effective services to Scottsdale citizens. Cultivate an environment
More information