# Section 1.3: Predicate Logic

Save this PDF as:

Size: px
Start display at page:

## Transcription

1 1 Section 1.3: Purpose of Section: To introduce predicate logic (or first-order logic) which the language of mathematics. We see how predicate logic extends the language of sentential calculus studied in Sections 1.1 and 1. by the inclusion of universal and existential quantifiers, logical functions and variables. Introduction The sentential calculus introduced in Lessons 1 and is not sufficient to represent the types of assertions normally found in mathematics, and thus in the late 1800s logicians created a richer, more expressive language, called predicate logic 1. Sentential logic as studied in Lessons 1 and involve the truth or falsity of simple sentences, whereas predicate logic is richer and allows one to express concepts about collections of objects (maybe real numbers, natural numbers, or functions). For instance, when we say for any real number x there exists a real number y that satisfies x < y we are making a claim about the validity of x < y over a collection of numbers x and y. A truth table for such a sentence is infeasible for statements of this type since it would require an infinite number of rows to enumerate all possible values of x and y. Nevertheless, sentences like this are the language of mathematics where information about the relevant variables are specified and propositions made about the variables. Whereas sentential calculus involves only simple sentences and their connectives, predicate logic includes quantifiers, logical functions and variables, allowing for a wider variety of ideas and concepts. Pick up your old calculus textbook and you will discover that theorems are stated in the language of predicate logic. Predicate logic might be interpreted as a formal language representation for sentences in natural languages, such as English. The quantifiers of predicate logic act are the subject of a sentences, and logical functions, called predicates, act as the verbs of the sentence. Historical Note: The development of predicate logic is generally attributed to the German logician Gottlob Frege ( ), considered to be the most important logician of the 19 th century. Predicate logic with its quantifiers and predicates is the logical basis for today s mathematics. It was Frege s belief (misguided as it turned out) that all mathematics could be derived from logic. Quantifiers Two phrases one hears again and again in any mathematical discussion are for all, and there exists. These expressions are called quantifiers in predicate logic and are necessary for the precise description of mathematical 1 Predicate logic is also called first-order logic in contrast to sentential calculus, which is sometimes called zero-order logic, studied in Lessons 1 and.

2 concepts. For example, the statement x < y is unclear, not having been explicitly told the meaning and extent of x and y. Do we mean for any real number x there exists a real number y satisfying x < y? Or do we mean there exists an x such that for all y we have x < y. Clearly, the statements are not the same (one is true the other isn t). The point we are trying to make is that in precise mathematical discourse one does not simply write down expressions and equations without exactly specifying the meaning and extend of the variables involved. This leads us to the two basic quantifiers of predicate logic. The phrase for all, is called the universal quantifier and is denoted by (upside down capital A), and there exists is called the existential quantifier and denoted by (backwards capital E). Inherent in the use of quantifies is the concept of a universe niverse. It makes no sense to say for all unless we know for all what? Sometimes the universal set is pointed out and sometimes it is understood from the context of the statement. In mathematics there are several sets that serve as universes. We have listed some important sets which will act as universal sets.. The reader should remember the symbols used to denote for each set such as increasing collection of set NZQRC,,,, since we will be referring to these sets in the remainder of the book.. N = { 1,,3,... } (natural numbers) { 0, 1,,... } (integers) { p q p q q } { real numbers} { complex numbers} Z = ± ± Q = / : and are integers with 0 (rational numbers) R = C = We have gotten ahead of ourselves and introduced a modicum of set notation, although we suspect most readers are well familiar with our mild use of sets and set notation.

3 3 Quantifiers of Let U be the universe under consideration. i i i Universal quantifier: ( x U ) P( x) Universal quantifier U, such that P( x ) is true Existential quantifier: ( x U ) P( x) Existential quantifier: U such that P( x ) is true Unique existential e quantifier: means For all (or any) x in the set means There existse an x in the set xistential quantifier: ( ) one x in the set U such that P( x ) is true! x U P( x) means There exists exactly Example 1 ( x R ) ( x < 0) ( x 0) For all real numbers x either x is less than zero or x is greater than or equal to zero. ( x R)( y R )( x < y) For all (or any) real numbers x there exists a real number y that satisfies x < y. ( y )(! x )( x + 3 = y) R R For any real number y there exists one and only one x that satisfies x + 3 = y. Margin Note: In books when one sees a statement like If x is an integer then x x x x Z x Q. x is a rational number, one means ( )( Z Q ) or ( )( ) In other words the universal quantifier is understood. Predicates: As discussed predicate logic might be interpreted as English language translated into the logic of mathematics, complete with a subject and verb. The quantifiers are the subject, as when we say for all real numbers x, and the predicate is proposition about the quantified variable. The predicate is a truth-valued function (of one or more variables) whose value is T or F. Typical predicates are P ( n ) : n is a prime number P ( x ) : x + 1 = 0 P ( x, y ) : x y P ( x, y, z ) : x + y + z = 1

4 4 Predicates can depend on one or more variables. P x, y : x y note that P (1, ) is true, P (5, 3) is false. ( ) For the predicate In sentences like ( x S ) P( x) or ( x S ) P( x) the variable x is called a bound variable 3, bound by the respective quantifier. A variable not bound is called a free variable, as in the phrase x is an even integer. In standard set x R : 0 x 1 the variable x is bound by the quantifier x R, notation { } which we understand to mean for all real numbers. In set notation the universal quantifier is generally omitted since it is understood. Example Translation of Below are English language interpretations of predicate logic sentences. Some sentences include more than one quantifier. Predicate Sentence ( x R ) ( x 0) ( x ) x is a prime number English Meaning For any real number, its square is nonnegative. Truth Value true N There exists a prime number true ( n ) N ( n ) ( n N ) ( n) ( x N) ( y N ) ( x = y + 1) ( x R) ( y R ) ( x < y) ( x R) ( y R ) ( x < y) ( x > 0)( y R )( y = x) There exists at least one odd natural number. There exists at least one even integer. For any natural number x there exists a natural number y satisfying x = y For any real number x there exist a real number y greater than x. There exists a real number x such that all real numbers y are greater than x.. For all positive real numbers x there exists a real number y such that the square of y is x. Predicate Sentences Table 1 true true false true false true 3 Students of integral calculus are well familiar with bound variables, sometimes called dummy variables.. b The variable x in the integral f ( x ) dx a is a bound (or dummy) variable.

5 5 Order of Quantifiers Counts Theorems in mathematics often begin with for all x there exists a y such that, or there exists an x such that for all y. The question arises does the order of the quantifiers make a difference in the meaning of the sentence? The answer is yes and Figure 1 below illustrates the difference between the orders,, and of the quantifiers and. To illustrate this difference, we present a simple scenario of a third grade class consisting of six students, 3 boys and 3 girls, where we denote the boys by the set B and the girls by the set G, where We now define the predicate B = G = { Abe, Bob, Carl} { Ann, Betty, Carol} ( ) P b, g = boy b likes girl g where b B represents one of the 3 boys and g G one of the 3 girls. The four drawings in Figure 1 (a), (b), (c), and (d) illustrate which boys like which girls, a dot at the intersection of a boy and girl indicates a preference. For example, in Figure 1 a) every boy likes every girl, while in Figure 1 c) Bob likes Ann and Betty, and Carl likes Carol. We will now argue the implications that ( b)( g ) P ( b, g ) ( b)( g ) P( b, g ) ( g )( b) P ( b, g ) ( b)( g ) P( b, g ) We analyze each of the drawings in Figure 1 one at a time:

6 6 Graphical Illustration Figure 1 Figure 1 (a) ( b)( g ) P( b, g ) In predicate logic this sentence reads For every boy b and every girl g, boy b likes girl g. In more conversational English, this sentence reads every boy likes every girl, which we represent by placing a dot at the intersection of every boy and girl in Figure 1 (a). This sentence says there exists a boy b such Figure 1 (b) ( b)( g ) P ( b, g ) that for any girl g, boy b likes girl g. In other words there exists a boy, Bob in our example, that likes every girl. Clearly, this sentence holds if the sentence in (a) holds, which states every boy likes every girl, not just Bob.

7 7 This sentence says for every girl g in the class, Figure 1 (c) ( g )( b) P ( b, g ) there exists a boy b such that boy b likes girl g. In other words, every girl in the class has at least one admirer, not necessarily the same boy as required in the more restrictive sentence in (b). In our example Ann and Betty are liked by Bob, and Carol is liked by Carl. This sentence is necessary for all the previous Figure 1 (d) ( b)( g ) P( b, g ) ones. It reads there exists a boy and there exists a girl such that the boy likes the girl. Simply put, there is at least one romance taking place in the third grade class. Clearly, this sentence holds if the previous statement in (c) holds. Our simple expedition into the third grade class demonstrates the general relationship ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) x y P( x, y) x y P( x, y) y x P( x, y) x y P( x, y) between the orders of the universal and existential quantifiers. Quantifiers in Calculus As mentioned earlier predicate logic is the language of mathematics. The following definition of continuity of a function at a point is one such example. Definition: A real-valued function f of a real variable x is continuous at a point x 0 if and only if 4 : ( 0)( 0 ) such that x x f ( x) f ( x ) ε > δ > < δ < ε 0 0 We add the phrase such that in English only for clarification. Sometimes the phrase such that is denoted by (backwards epsilon), although this symbol is not a formal character in the predicate logic, only a shorthand symbol such as a stenographer would use. Using the shorthand the above definition of 4 Note in the following predicate logic sentence we don t quantify the function f, the variable x, and the constant x 0 since they have been specified when we write A real-valued function f of a real variable x is continuous at a point x 0.

8 8 continuity of f at x 0 would be written ( 0)( 0 ) x x f ( x) f ( x ) ε > δ > < δ < ε 0 0 In English this statement would read: For all epsilon greater than 0, there exists a delta greater than 0, such that if x is closer to x 0 than delta, then f ( x ) is closer to f ( x 0 ) than eplison. Don t you agree the symbolic languate of predicate logic is preferable? Historical Note: Frege s 1879 seminal work Begriffsschrift ( Conceptial Notation ) marked the beginning of a new era in logic, which allowed for the quantification of mathematical variables, just in time for the more precise arithmetization of analysis of calculus, being carried out in the late 1800s by mathematicians like the German Karl Weierstrass ( ). Negation in In the next few sections when we introduce strategies for proving mathematical theorems, it is necessary to know how to negate quantified statements. The following table shows how a few statements in predicate logic are negated. We don t always state the universe if it is assumed given. Sentence x S P x Negation x S P( x) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( x S ) P( x) ( x S ) ( P( x) ) ( x)( y) P( x, y) ( x)( y) ( P( x, y) ) ( x)( y) P( x, y) ( x)( y) ( P( x, y) ) ( x)( y) P( x, y) ( x)( y)( P( x, y) ) ( x)( y) P( x, y) ( x)( y)( P( x, y) ) Negation in Table Table 3 gives some negations in common English. Sentence Every day it rains. There exists a number that is transcendental. All prime numbers are odd. At least one day I will go to class Negation There exists a day when it doesn t rain. Every number is not transcendental. There exists a prime number that is not odd. I will never go to class.

9 9 Common Predicate Sentences and Their Negatives Table 3 Example 3 (Negations) State the negation of the following quantified propositions. Solution a) ( x S )( x 0) b) ( n S )( n is a prime number) = (which we read for all x, there exists a y such c) ( x)( y)( xy 10) that xy = 10 ) (which we read there exists an x such that for d) ( x)( y)( xy 10) all y we have xy 10 ) a) ( x S )( x 0) ( x S )( x < 0) b) ( n S )( n is a prime number ) ( n S )( n is not a prime number) c) ( x)( y)( xy = 10) ( x)( y)( xy 10) d) ( x)( y)( xy 10) ( x)( y)( xy = 10) Historical Note: Although Frege is credited with the development of predicate logic, Aristotle anticipated quantifiers 000 years earlier in his development of syllogisms, the most famous being All people are mortal. Socrates is a person. Therefore Socrates is mortal. Also earlier In the 19 th century the English logician Augustus DeMorgan developed the notion of quantifiers. However, it was Frege who developed the complete theory of predicate logic as we know it today. Quantifiers and Conjunctions The universal quantifier( ) is related to the logical conjunction ( ) by ( x) P( x) Q( x) ( x) P( x) ( x) Q ( x) For example, suppose we have a universe of students x at a university where the predicates are taken to be

10 10 ( ) ( ) P x Q x = = student x likes peanuts student x likes qumquats ( ) means every student x likes both peanuts and Here ( x) P ( x) Q ( x) qumquats, which is true if and only if every student likes peanuts and every x P x x Q x student likes qumquats, which is represented by ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) On the other hand, for the existential quantifier ( ), we have ( x) P( x) Q( x) ( x) P( x) ( x) Q ( x) which in the context of students at our university, states if there exists a student who likes both peanuts and qumquats, then there exists a student who likes peanuts and there exists a student who likes qumquats which is clearly true since we simply take a student who likes both peanuts and qumquats. On the other hand, the converse ( x) P ( x) ( x) Q( x) ( x) P( x) Q( x) does not always hold since there might be a student who likes peanuts and a student who likes qumquats, but that doesn t mean there is a student who likes both peanuts and qumquats (every student likes exactly one of the selection of peanuts or qumquats). Quantifiers and Disjunctions have For the existential quantifier ( ) and the logical disjunction ( ) ( x) P( x) Q( x) ( x) P( x) ( x) Q( x) which states the logical equivalence of there is at least one x such that P ( x) or ( ) Q x is true, we with the sentence there exists an x such that P ( x ) is true or there exists an x such that Q ( x) is true.

11 11 However, the universal quantifier ( ) acting on the logical disjunction ( ) obeys the laws ( x) P ( x) ( x) Q( x) ( x) P ( x) Q( x) ( x) P( x) Q( x) ( x) P( x) ( x) Q ( x) Here ( x) P ( x) ( x) Q( x) means P ( x ) is true for all x or Q ( x ) is true for all x, which implies the weaker statement that for all x, either P ( x ) or ( ) denoted by ( x) P( x) Q ( x). [Clearly, if every student likes peanuts or if Q x, every student likes qumquats, then every student likes peanuts or qumquats.] On the other hand ( x) P( x) Q ( x) does not imply ( x ) P ( x ) ( x ) Q ( x ) ( ) For example ( x) P ( x) Q( x) but that does not imply ( x) P ( x) ( x) Q( x) means every student likes peanuts or qumquats,, which says there are three situations: 100% of the student body likes peanuts, 100% of the student body likes qumquats, or 100% of the student body likes both peanuts and qumquats. (In other words, we don t have 75% peanut lovers and 5% qumquat lovers.) We summarize the above relationships between quantifiers and connectives by Table. P Q P Q P Q P Q ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( P Q) P Q ( )( P Q) P Q Quantifiers and Conjunctions and Disjunctions Table Historical Note: The American logician Charles Saunders Pierce ( ) introduced second-order order logic, which in addition to quantifying variables like x, y,... also quantifies functions and entire sets of variables. However, for most mathematics, first-order logic is adequate. Pierce also developed first-order logic on his own, but Frege carried out his research earlier and is generally given credit its development. It was Pierce who coined the word first-order logic.

12 1 Problems 1. Write the following sentences in the symbolic language of predicate logic. The universe of each variable is given in paranthesis. a) If a b and b c, then a c, where a, b, c are integers. (Integers) b) 4 does not divide n + for any integer (Integers) c) x 3 + x + 1 = 0 for some real x (Real numbers) d) Only fools fall in love. (All people) e) Everybody loves mathematics. (All people) f) For every positive real number a there exists a real number x x that satisfies e = a. (Real numbers) g) For every positive real number ε > 0 there exists a real number δ > 0 such that x a < δ f ( x) f ( a) < ε. (Real numbers) h) Everyone always attends class. (All students) i) The equation x + 1 = 0 has no solution (Real numbers) j) The equation x = 0 has no solution (Rational numbers) k) In every mathematics class there is always one genius. (Students). (True or False?) Which of the following are true in the given universe? The universe is given in parenthesis. a) ( x)( x x) (Real numbers) b) ( x)( x ) = (Real numbers) c) ( x)( x ) = (Rational numbers)

13 13 d) ( x)( x x 1 0) + + = (Real numbers) e) ( x) x 1( mod5) f) (! x)( e x 1) (Integers) = (Real numbers) g) ( x)( x x) h) ( x)( x x) i) ( x)( x x) j) ( x)( x x) 4. (Expanding Universes) In which universe NZQRC,,,, are the following sentences true? a) For every x in the universe there exists a y = 1 x in the universe. b) For every x 0 in the universe there exists a 1/ x in the universe. c) For every x in the universe there exists a solution of x = 0 in the universe. d) For every x in the universe there exists a solution of x + 1 = 0 in the universe. (Not as Easy as It Looks) Tell if ( x)[ x is even 5 x 10] 5. (Not as Easy as It Looks) false for the given universe U. a) U = { 4} b) U = { 3} c) U = { 6,8,10} d) U = { 6,8,10,1} e) U = { 6, 7,8,10,1} is true or 6. (Small Universe) Which of the following statements are true for the

14 14 7. universe U = { 1,,3}. a) 1 < 0 ( x)( x < 0) b) ( x)( y)( x y) c) ( x)( y)( x y) d) ( x)( y)( y = x + 1) e) ( x)( y)( xy = yx) f) ( x)( y)( y x + 1) 8. (Well-Known Universe) Letting R( x) : x is a rational number I ( x) : x is an irrational number which of the following statements are true for the universe of real numbers. a) ( x)[ I ( x) R( x) ] b) ( x)[ I ( x) R( x) ] ( ) x I( x) c) ( x) R x ( ) x R( x) I ( x) x R( x) x I( x) d) ( )[ ] ( ) ( ) 9. State the following famous theorems in mathematics in the symbolic language of predicate calculus. a) (Bolzano s Intermediate Value Theorem) If f is a continuous function on an interval [ a, b ] and if f changes sign from negative to positive (or vice versa), then there exists a c between a and b such that f ( c ) = 0. b) (Fermat s Last Theorem) If n is an integer greater than, then there are n n n no nonzero integer values of a, b, c that satisfy a + b = c.

15 15 c) (Euler s Theorem) If P is any regular polyhedra, and v, e, f represent the number of vertices, edges, and faces, respectively of the polyhedra, then v e + f =. d) Binomial Theorem) If a, b are real numbers and n is a nonnegative integer, then n n! a + b = a b k! n k! ( ) n k n k k = 0 ( ) e) (Kepler Theorem 5 ) No packing of congruent spheres in threedimensional space has a density greater than π / (Negation) Negate the following sentences both in words and symbolically in the language of predicate logic. a) All women are moral. b) Every player on the basketball team was over six feet tall. c) For any real number y there exists a real number x that satisfies y = tan x. d) The exists a real number x such that 0 < x < 5 and 3 x 8 = 0. 5 This theorem was called the Kepler Conjecture until 1998 when the conjecture was proven in the affirmative by Thomas Hales of the University of Pittsburg. The proof, however, is 111 pages long and requires the use of a computer to verify 5000 specific cases of configurations of balls to prove the theorem.

16 16 n n n e) The equation a + b = c does not have nonzero integer solutions a, b, c for n a natural number n >. f) ( x)[ P( x) Q( x) ] x x > 0 y ( x = y) g) ( ) ( ) h) P ( Q R) i) ( ) P Q R 10. (An Old Friend) Write a statement in predate logic that defines the points in the plane (i.e. R ) whose distance from the origin (0,0) is (Graph to the Resc scue) Let the universe be the Cartesian plane with proposition P( x, y) : y x 1 x, y in the plane where the +. The points ( ) proposition is true is drawn in Figure 3. Truth Values of P( x, y ) Figure 3 Determine which of the following sentences are true? a) ( x)( y) P( x, y)

17 17 b) ( x)( y) P( x, y) c) ( x)( y) P( x, y) d) ( x)( y) P( x, y) e) ( y)( x) P( x, y) f) ( y)( x) P( x, y) 1. State the denial of the words of wisdom attributed to Abraham Lincoln: You can fool some of the people, all the time and all the people some of the time, but you can t fool all the people all of the time.

### DISCRETE MATHEMATICS W W L CHEN

DISCRETE MATHEMATICS W W L CHEN c W W L Chen, 1982, 2008. This chapter originates from material used by the author at Imperial College, University of London, between 1981 and 1990. It is available free

### Section 1. Statements and Truth Tables. Definition 1.1: A mathematical statement is a declarative sentence that is true or false, but not both.

M3210 Supplemental Notes: Basic Logic Concepts In this course we will examine statements about mathematical concepts and relationships between these concepts (definitions, theorems). We will also consider

### Section 3.3 Equivalence Relations

1 Section 3.3 Purpose of Section To introduce the concept of an equivalence relation and show how it subdivides or partitions a set into distinct categories. Introduction Classifying objects and placing

### Chapter I Logic and Proofs

MATH 1130 1 Discrete Structures Chapter I Logic and Proofs Propositions A proposition is a statement that is either true (T) or false (F), but or both. s Propositions: 1. I am a man.. I am taller than

### Handout #1: Mathematical Reasoning

Math 101 Rumbos Spring 2010 1 Handout #1: Mathematical Reasoning 1 Propositional Logic A proposition is a mathematical statement that it is either true or false; that is, a statement whose certainty or

### 31 is a prime number is a mathematical statement (which happens to be true).

Chapter 1 Mathematical Logic In its most basic form, Mathematics is the practice of assigning truth to welldefined statements. In this course, we will develop the skills to use known true statements to

### The Foundations: Logic and Proofs. Chapter 1, Part III: Proofs

The Foundations: Logic and Proofs Chapter 1, Part III: Proofs Rules of Inference Section 1.6 Section Summary Valid Arguments Inference Rules for Propositional Logic Using Rules of Inference to Build Arguments

### CHAPTER 3. Methods of Proofs. 1. Logical Arguments and Formal Proofs

CHAPTER 3 Methods of Proofs 1. Logical Arguments and Formal Proofs 1.1. Basic Terminology. An axiom is a statement that is given to be true. A rule of inference is a logical rule that is used to deduce

### Logic, Sets, and Proofs

Logic, Sets, and Proofs David A. Cox and Catherine C. McGeoch Amherst College 1 Logic Logical Statements. A logical statement is a mathematical statement that is either true or false. Here we denote logical

### 3. Predicates and Quantifiers

3. PREDICATES AND QUANTIFIERS 45 3. Predicates and Quantifiers 3.1. Predicates and Quantifiers. Definition 3.1.1. A predicate or propositional function is a description of the property (or properties)

### 2.1.1 Examples of Sets and their Elements

Chapter 2 Set Theory 2.1 Sets The most basic object in Mathematics is called a set. As rudimentary as it is, the exact, formal definition of a set is highly complex. For our purposes, we will simply define

### Even Number: An integer n is said to be even if it has the form n = 2k for some integer k. That is, n is even if and only if n divisible by 2.

MATH 337 Proofs Dr. Neal, WKU This entire course requires you to write proper mathematical proofs. All proofs should be written elegantly in a formal mathematical style. Complete sentences of explanation

### It is time to prove some theorems. There are various strategies for doing

CHAPTER 4 Direct Proof It is time to prove some theorems. There are various strategies for doing this; we now examine the most straightforward approach, a technique called direct proof. As we begin, it

### Predicate Logic. Lucia Moura. Winter Predicates and Quantifiers Nested Quantifiers Using Predicate Calculus

Predicate Logic Winter 2010 Predicates A Predicate is a declarative sentence whose true/false value depends on one or more variables. The statement x is greater than 3 has two parts: the subject: x is

### Oh Yeah? Well, Prove It.

Oh Yeah? Well, Prove It. MT 43A - Abstract Algebra Fall 009 A large part of mathematics consists of building up a theoretical framework that allows us to solve problems. This theoretical framework is built

### Students in their first advanced mathematics classes are often surprised

CHAPTER 8 Proofs Involving Sets Students in their first advanced mathematics classes are often surprised by the extensive role that sets play and by the fact that most of the proofs they encounter are

### WUCT121. Discrete Mathematics. Logic

WUCT121 Discrete Mathematics Logic 1. Logic 2. Predicate Logic 3. Proofs 4. Set Theory 5. Relations and Functions WUCT121 Logic 1 Section 1. Logic 1.1. Introduction. In developing a mathematical theory,

### Introduction to Proofs

Chapter 1 Introduction to Proofs 1.1 Preview of Proof This section previews many of the key ideas of proof and cites [in brackets] the sections where they are discussed thoroughly. All of these ideas are

### Introduction to mathematical arguments

Introduction to mathematical arguments (background handout for courses requiring proofs) by Michael Hutchings A mathematical proof is an argument which convinces other people that something is true. Math

### CS 2336 Discrete Mathematics

CS 2336 Discrete Mathematics Lecture 2 Logic: Predicate Calculus 1 Outline Predicates Quantifiers Binding Applications Logical Equivalences 2 Predicates In mathematics arguments, we will often see sentences

### 5 =5. Since 5 > 0 Since 4 7 < 0 Since 0 0

a p p e n d i x e ABSOLUTE VALUE ABSOLUTE VALUE E.1 definition. The absolute value or magnitude of a real number a is denoted by a and is defined by { a if a 0 a = a if a

### INTRODUCTION TO PROOFS: HOMEWORK SOLUTIONS

INTRODUCTION TO PROOFS: HOMEWORK SOLUTIONS STEVEN HEILMAN Contents 1. Homework 1 1 2. Homework 2 6 3. Homework 3 10 4. Homework 4 16 5. Homework 5 19 6. Homework 6 21 7. Homework 7 25 8. Homework 8 28

### 2. Propositional Equivalences

2. PROPOSITIONAL EQUIVALENCES 33 2. Propositional Equivalences 2.1. Tautology/Contradiction/Contingency. Definition 2.1.1. A tautology is a proposition that is always true. Example 2.1.1. p p Definition

### Logical Inference and Mathematical Proof

Logical Inference and Mathematical Proof CSE 191, Class Note 03: Logical Inference and Mathematical Proof Computer Sci & Eng Dept SUNY Buffalo c Xin He (University at Buffalo) CSE 191 Discrete Structures

### 2. Methods of Proof Types of Proofs. Suppose we wish to prove an implication p q. Here are some strategies we have available to try.

2. METHODS OF PROOF 69 2. Methods of Proof 2.1. Types of Proofs. Suppose we wish to prove an implication p q. Here are some strategies we have available to try. Trivial Proof: If we know q is true then

### Discrete Mathematics, Chapter : Predicate Logic

Discrete Mathematics, Chapter 1.4-1.5: Predicate Logic Richard Mayr University of Edinburgh, UK Richard Mayr (University of Edinburgh, UK) Discrete Mathematics. Chapter 1.4-1.5 1 / 23 Outline 1 Predicates

### Discrete Mathematics and Probability Theory Fall 2009 Satish Rao, David Tse Note 2

CS 70 Discrete Mathematics and Probability Theory Fall 2009 Satish Rao, David Tse Note 2 Proofs Intuitively, the concept of proof should already be familiar We all like to assert things, and few of us

### Introduction. Appendix D Mathematical Induction D1

Appendix D Mathematical Induction D D Mathematical Induction Use mathematical induction to prove a formula. Find a sum of powers of integers. Find a formula for a finite sum. Use finite differences to

### Quantifiers are used to describe variables in statements. - The universal quantifier means for all. - The existential quantifier means there exists.

11 Quantifiers are used to describe variables in statements. - The universal quantifier means for all. - The existential quantifier means there exists. The phrases, for all x in R if x is an arbitrary

### Chapter 1. Logic and Proof

Chapter 1. Logic and Proof 1.1 Remark: A little over 100 years ago, it was found that some mathematical proofs contained paradoxes, and these paradoxes could be used to prove statements that were known

### Math 3000 Running Glossary

Math 3000 Running Glossary Last Updated on: July 15, 2014 The definition of items marked with a must be known precisely. Chapter 1: 1. A set: A collection of objects called elements. 2. The empty set (

### Logic is a systematic way of thinking that allows us to deduce new information

CHAPTER 2 Logic Logic is a systematic way of thinking that allows us to deduce new information from old information and to parse the meanings of sentences. You use logic informally in everyday life and

### Appendix F: Mathematical Induction

Appendix F: Mathematical Induction Introduction In this appendix, you will study a form of mathematical proof called mathematical induction. To see the logical need for mathematical induction, take another

### CHAPTER 2. Inequalities

CHAPTER 2 Inequalities In this section we add the axioms describe the behavior of inequalities (the order axioms) to the list of axioms begun in Chapter 1. A thorough mastery of this section is essential

### Math 3000 Section 003 Intro to Abstract Math Homework 2

Math 3000 Section 003 Intro to Abstract Math Homework 2 Department of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences University of Colorado Denver, Spring 2012 Solutions (February 13, 2012) Please note that these

### Lecture 3. Mathematical Induction

Lecture 3 Mathematical Induction Induction is a fundamental reasoning process in which general conclusion is based on particular cases It contrasts with deduction, the reasoning process in which conclusion

### vertex, 369 disjoint pairwise, 395 disjoint sets, 236 disjunction, 33, 36 distributive laws

Index absolute value, 135 141 additive identity, 254 additive inverse, 254 aleph, 466 algebra of sets, 245, 278 antisymmetric relation, 387 arcsine function, 349 arithmetic sequence, 208 arrow diagram,

### Chapter 1 LOGIC AND PROOF

Chapter 1 LOGIC AND PROOF To be able to understand mathematics and mathematical arguments, it is necessary to have a solid understanding of logic and the way in which known facts can be combined to prove

### Lecture 16 : Relations and Functions DRAFT

CS/Math 240: Introduction to Discrete Mathematics 3/29/2011 Lecture 16 : Relations and Functions Instructor: Dieter van Melkebeek Scribe: Dalibor Zelený DRAFT In Lecture 3, we described a correspondence

### Proof: A logical argument establishing the truth of the theorem given the truth of the axioms and any previously proven theorems.

Math 232 - Discrete Math 2.1 Direct Proofs and Counterexamples Notes Axiom: Proposition that is assumed to be true. Proof: A logical argument establishing the truth of the theorem given the truth of the

### Discrete Mathematics Lecture 3 Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof. Harper Langston New York University

Discrete Mathematics Lecture 3 Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof Harper Langston New York University Proof and Counterexample Discovery and proof Even and odd numbers number n from Z is called

### 1 Proposition, Logical connectives and compound statements

Discrete Mathematics: Lecture 4 Introduction to Logic Instructor: Arijit Bishnu Date: July 27, 2009 1 Proposition, Logical connectives and compound statements Logic is the discipline that deals with the

### Sum of Rational and Irrational Is Irrational

About Illustrations: Illustrations of the Standards for Mathematical Practice (SMP) consist of several pieces, including a mathematics task, student dialogue, mathematical overview, teacher reflection

### Predicate in English. Predicates and Quantifiers. Propositional Functions: Prelude. Predicate in Logic. Propositional Function

Predicates and Quantifiers By Chuck Cusack Predicate in English In English, a sentence has 2 parts: the subject and the predicate. The predicate is the part of the sentence that states something about

### Inference Rules and Proof Methods

Inference Rules and Proof Methods Winter 2010 Introduction Rules of Inference and Formal Proofs Proofs in mathematics are valid arguments that establish the truth of mathematical statements. An argument

### CSE 191, Class Note 01 Propositional Logic Computer Sci & Eng Dept SUNY Buffalo

Propositional Logic CSE 191, Class Note 01 Propositional Logic Computer Sci & Eng Dept SUNY Buffalo c Xin He (University at Buffalo) CSE 191 Discrete Structures 1 / 37 Discrete Mathematics What is Discrete

### Review for Final Exam

Review for Final Exam Note: Warning, this is probably not exhaustive and probably does contain typos (which I d like to hear about), but represents a review of most of the material covered in Chapters

### Chapter 1, Part II: Predicate Logic. With Question/Answer Animations

Chapter 1, Part II: Predicate Logic With Question/Answer Animations Summary Predicate Logic (First-Order Logic (FOL) The Language of Quantifiers Logical Equivalences Nested Quantifiers Translation from

### Elementary Number Theory We begin with a bit of elementary number theory, which is concerned

CONSTRUCTION OF THE FINITE FIELDS Z p S. R. DOTY Elementary Number Theory We begin with a bit of elementary number theory, which is concerned solely with questions about the set of integers Z = {0, ±1,

### LOGICAL INFERENCE & PROOFs. Debdeep Mukhopadhyay Dept of CSE, IIT Madras

LOGICAL INFERENCE & PROOFs Debdeep Mukhopadhyay Dept of CSE, IIT Madras Defn A theorem is a mathematical assertion which can be shown to be true. A proof is an argument which establishes the truth of a

### What is logic? Propositional Logic. Negation. Propositions. This is a contentious question! We will play it safe, and stick to:

Propositional Logic This lecture marks the start of a new section of the course. In the last few lectures, we have had to reason formally about concepts. This lecture introduces the mathematical language

### MAT2400 Analysis I. A brief introduction to proofs, sets, and functions

MAT2400 Analysis I A brief introduction to proofs, sets, and functions In Analysis I there is a lot of manipulations with sets and functions. It is probably also the first course where you have to take

### Week 5: Quantifiers. Number Sets. Quantifier Symbols. Quantity has a quality all its own. attributed to Carl von Clausewitz

Week 5: Quantifiers Quantity has a quality all its own. attributed to Carl von Clausewitz Number Sets Many people would say that mathematics is the science of numbers. This is a common misconception among

### LESSON 1 PRIME NUMBERS AND FACTORISATION

LESSON 1 PRIME NUMBERS AND FACTORISATION 1.1 FACTORS: The natural numbers are the numbers 1,, 3, 4,. The integers are the naturals numbers together with 0 and the negative integers. That is the integers

### Mathematics for Computer Science/Software Engineering. Notes for the course MSM1F3 Dr. R. A. Wilson

Mathematics for Computer Science/Software Engineering Notes for the course MSM1F3 Dr. R. A. Wilson October 1996 Chapter 1 Logic Lecture no. 1. We introduce the concept of a proposition, which is a statement

### The Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic

MODULE 3 The Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic 1. Sieve of Eratosthenes Two is the only odd prime. Every even number > 2 is composite because it is divisible by 2. Similarly, all multiples of 3 6 are composite;

### Proof that an Infinite Number of Mersenne Prime Numbers Exit

Proof that an Infinite Number of Mersenne Prime Numbers Exit Stephen Marshall 29 Aug 2014 Abstract This paper presents a complete and exhaustive proof of the infinitude of Mersenne prime numbers. The approach

### Predicate Logic. Example: All men are mortal. Socrates is a man. Socrates is mortal.

Predicate Logic Example: All men are mortal. Socrates is a man. Socrates is mortal. Note: We need logic laws that work for statements involving quantities like some and all. In English, the predicate is

### 8 Primes and Modular Arithmetic

8 Primes and Modular Arithmetic 8.1 Primes and Factors Over two millennia ago already, people all over the world were considering the properties of numbers. One of the simplest concepts is prime numbers.

### Orders Modulo A Prime

Orders Modulo A Prime Evan Chen March 6, 2015 In this article I develop the notion of the order of an element modulo n, and use it to prove the famous n 2 + 1 lemma as well as a generalization to arbitrary

### Theorem 2. If x Q and y R \ Q, then. (a) x + y R \ Q, and. (b) xy Q.

Math 305 Fall 011 The Density of Q in R The following two theorems tell us what happens when we add and multiply by rational numbers. For the first one, we see that if we add or multiply two rational numbers

### Summer High School 2009 Aaron Bertram. 1. Prime Numbers. Let s start with some notation:

Summer High School 2009 Aaron Bertram 1. Prime Numbers. Let s start with some notation: N = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5,...} is the (infinite) set of natural numbers. Z = {..., 3, 2, 1, 0, 1, 2, 3,...} is the set of

### Undergraduate Notes in Mathematics. Arkansas Tech University Department of Mathematics. Introductory Notes in Discrete Mathematics

Undergraduate Notes in Mathematics Arkansas Tech University Department of Mathematics Introductory Notes in Discrete Mathematics Marcel B. Finan c All Rights Reserved Last Updated April 6, 2016 Preface

### Reading 7 : Program Correctness

CS/Math 240: Introduction to Discrete Mathematics Fall 2015 Instructors: Beck Hasti, Gautam Prakriya Reading 7 : Program Correctness 7.1 Program Correctness Showing that a program is correct means that

### A set is a Many that allows itself to be thought of as a One. (Georg Cantor)

Chapter 4 Set Theory A set is a Many that allows itself to be thought of as a One. (Georg Cantor) In the previous chapters, we have often encountered sets, for example, prime numbers form a set, domains

### 2.1 The Algebra of Sets

Chapter 2 Abstract Algebra 83 part of abstract algebra, sets are fundamental to all areas of mathematics and we need to establish a precise language for sets. We also explore operations on sets and relations

### Congruences. Robert Friedman

Congruences Robert Friedman Definition of congruence mod n Congruences are a very handy way to work with the information of divisibility and remainders, and their use permeates number theory. Definition

### So let us begin our quest to find the holy grail of real analysis.

1 Section 5.2 The Complete Ordered Field: Purpose of Section We present an axiomatic description of the real numbers as a complete ordered field. The axioms which describe the arithmetic of the real numbers

Mathematics 0N1 Solutions 1 1. Write the following sets in list form. 1(i) The set of letters in the word banana. {a, b, n}. 1(ii) {x : x 2 + 3x 10 = 0}. 3(iv) C A. True 3(v) B = {e, e, f, c}. True 3(vi)

### Basic Proof Techniques

Basic Proof Techniques David Ferry dsf43@truman.edu September 13, 010 1 Four Fundamental Proof Techniques When one wishes to prove the statement P Q there are four fundamental approaches. This document

### MAT Discrete Mathematics

RHODES UNIVERSITY Grahamstown 6140, South Africa Lecture Notes CCR MAT 102 - Discrete Mathematics Claudiu C. Remsing DEPT. of MATHEMATICS (Pure and Applied) 2005 Mathematics is not about calculations but

### We now explore a third method of proof: proof by contradiction.

CHAPTER 6 Proof by Contradiction We now explore a third method of proof: proof by contradiction. This method is not limited to proving just conditional statements it can be used to prove any kind of statement

### THE FUNDAMENTAL THEOREM OF ARITHMETIC

Introduction In mathematics, there are three theorems that are significant enough to be called fundamental. The first theorem, of which this essay expounds, concerns arithmetic, or more properly number

### PROBLEM SET 7: PIGEON HOLE PRINCIPLE

PROBLEM SET 7: PIGEON HOLE PRINCIPLE The pigeonhole principle is the following observation: Theorem. Suppose that > kn marbles are distributed over n jars, then one jar will contain at least k + marbles.

### Sets and functions. {x R : x > 0}.

Sets and functions 1 Sets The language of sets and functions pervades mathematics, and most of the important operations in mathematics turn out to be functions or to be expressible in terms of functions.

### SECTION 10-2 Mathematical Induction

73 0 Sequences and Series 6. Approximate e 0. using the first five terms of the series. Compare this approximation with your calculator evaluation of e 0.. 6. Approximate e 0.5 using the first five terms

### The set consisting of all natural numbers that are in A and are in B is the set f1; 3; 5g;

Chapter 5 Set Theory 5.1 Sets and Operations on Sets Preview Activity 1 (Set Operations) Before beginning this section, it would be a good idea to review sets and set notation, including the roster method

### 1.3 Induction and Other Proof Techniques

4CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTORY MATERIAL: SETS, FUNCTIONS AND MATHEMATICAL INDU 1.3 Induction and Other Proof Techniques The purpose of this section is to study the proof technique known as mathematical induction.

### 1.5 Methods of Proof INTRODUCTION

1.5 Methods of Proof INTRODUCTION Icon 0049 Two important questions that arise in the study of mathematics are: (1) When is a mathematical argument correct? (2) What methods can be used to construct mathematical

### Section 3.2 Partial Order

1 Section 3.2 Purpose of Section To introduce a partial order relation (or ordering) on a set. We also see how order relations can be illustrated graphically by means of Hasse diagrams and directed graphs.

### Calculus for Middle School Teachers. Problems and Notes for MTHT 466

Calculus for Middle School Teachers Problems and Notes for MTHT 466 Bonnie Saunders Fall 2010 1 I Infinity Week 1 How big is Infinity? Problem of the Week: The Chess Board Problem There once was a humble

### Math 223 Abstract Algebra Lecture Notes

Math 223 Abstract Algebra Lecture Notes Steven Tschantz Spring 2001 (Apr. 23 version) Preamble These notes are intended to supplement the lectures and make up for the lack of a textbook for the course

### STRAND B: Number Theory. UNIT B2 Number Classification and Bases: Text * * * * * Contents. Section. B2.1 Number Classification. B2.

STRAND B: Number Theory B2 Number Classification and Bases Text Contents * * * * * Section B2. Number Classification B2.2 Binary Numbers B2.3 Adding and Subtracting Binary Numbers B2.4 Multiplying Binary

### CHAPTER 3 Numbers and Numeral Systems

CHAPTER 3 Numbers and Numeral Systems Numbers play an important role in almost all areas of mathematics, not least in calculus. Virtually all calculus books contain a thorough description of the natural,

### p 2 1 (mod 6) Adding 2 to both sides gives p (mod 6)

.9. Problems P10 Try small prime numbers first. p p + 6 3 11 5 7 7 51 11 13 Among the primes in this table, only the prime 3 has the property that (p + ) is also a prime. We try to prove that no other

### Section 6-2 Mathematical Induction

6- Mathematical Induction 457 In calculus, it can be shown that e x k0 x k k! x x x3!! 3!... xn n! where the larger n is, the better the approximation. Problems 6 and 6 refer to this series. Note that

### INTRODUCTORY SET THEORY

M.Sc. program in mathematics INTRODUCTORY SET THEORY Katalin Károlyi Department of Applied Analysis, Eötvös Loránd University H-1088 Budapest, Múzeum krt. 6-8. CONTENTS 1. SETS Set, equal sets, subset,

### Pythagorean Triples. Chapter 2. a 2 + b 2 = c 2

Chapter Pythagorean Triples The Pythagorean Theorem, that beloved formula of all high school geometry students, says that the sum of the squares of the sides of a right triangle equals the square of the

### (Refer Slide Time: 1:41)

Discrete Mathematical Structures Dr. Kamala Krithivasan Department of Computer Science and Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Madras Lecture # 10 Sets Today we shall learn about sets. You must

### Real Numbers and Monotone Sequences

Real Numbers and Monotone Sequences. Introduction. Real numbers. Mathematical analysis depends on the properties of the set R of real numbers, so we should begin by saying something about it. There are

### 2 The Euclidean algorithm

2 The Euclidean algorithm Do you understand the number 5? 6? 7? At some point our level of comfort with individual numbers goes down as the numbers get large For some it may be at 43, for others, 4 In

### Spring As discussed at the end of the last section, we begin our construction of the rational

MATH 304: CONSTRUCTING THE REAL NUMBERS Peter Kahn Spring 2007 Contents 3 The Rational Numbers 1 3.1 The set Q................................. 1 3.2 Addition and multiplication of rational numbers............

3. QUADRATIC CONGRUENCES 3.1. Quadratics Over a Finite Field We re all familiar with the quadratic equation in the context of real or complex numbers. The formula for the solutions to ax + bx + c = 0 (where

### Predicates and Quantifiers. Niloufar Shafiei

Predicates and Quantifiers Niloufar Shafiei Review Proposition: 1. It is a sentence that declares a fact. 2. It is either true or false, but not both. Examples: 2 + 1 = 3. True Proposition Toronto is the

### Chapter 3. Proof. 3.1 The Nature of Proof

Chapter 3 Proof 3.1 The Nature of Proof We begin with a philosophical discussion on the nature of proof. When a person is arrested for a crime and brought to trial, it is assumed that the prosecution has

### If f is a 1-1 correspondence between A and B then it has an inverse, and f 1 isa 1-1 correspondence between B and A.

Chapter 5 Cardinality of sets 51 1-1 Correspondences A 1-1 correspondence between sets A and B is another name for a function f : A B that is 1-1 and onto If f is a 1-1 correspondence between A and B,

### 3 Some Integer Functions

3 Some Integer Functions A Pair of Fundamental Integer Functions The integer function that is the heart of this section is the modulo function. However, before getting to it, let us look at some very simple

### Propositional Logic. Definition: A proposition or statement is a sentence which is either true or false.

Propositional Logic Definition: A proposition or statement is a sentence which is either true or false. Definition:If a proposition is true, then we say its truth value is true, and if a proposition is