1 BDO GOVERNMENT CONTRACTING PRACTICE GUIDANCE ON THE PROPOSED DOE BUSINESS SYSTEM RULE By Eric Sobota, Kelley Doran and Barron Avery Contractors that work for the Department of Energy (DOE) under agreements that are subject to DOE Acquisition Regulation (DEAR) may soon have to comply with rules proposed by DOE governing the adequacy of company business systems. This latest red tape requirement, if adopted as a final rule, will impose additional compliance burdens on affected companies and ultimately will increase operating costs. In this article, we introduce you to the proposed requirements and highlight the many ways in which this rule will impact your business. 1. Proposed rule On April 1, 2014, DOE proposed a new rule to address Contractor Business Systems in the DEAR. 1 The proposed rule outlines requirements that contractors business systems must meet, including accounting, cost estimating, purchasing, and property management systems, as well as earned value management systems (EVMS). The below provides a brief overview of the proposed DOE rule and outlines several recommendations for current and prospective DOE contractors to address the expected new requirements. CONTACT: Eric Sobota Managing Director with BDO Government Contracting Advisory Services Kelley Doran Partner, BakerHostetler Barron Avery Associate, BakerHostetler a. Background and Objectives According to the DOE, the primary goal of the proposed rule is to provide a standard for a contractor s business systems. 2 By strengthening internal control systems, DOE aims to improve its oversight of contractors business systems and to reduce waste, fraud, and abuse. 3 The DOE believes these requirements will help ensure potential increases in contract costs and/or schedules are assessed and addressed as they arise, not after the fact. The proposed rule would allow the DOE to withhold payments when inadequate business systems are identified. 4 The rule was modeled after the Department of Defense s (DOD) 2012 contractor management rules. 5 b. Contracts Covered The proposed rule will apply to contracts with the DOE, including the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), that meet certain thresholds. Specifically, the proposed rule s requirements generally will apply to: Prime contracts with a value in excess of $50 million (including options); or Prime contracts with a value in excess of $10 million (but less than $50 million), where it has been determined by the contracting officer to be in the government s interest to include the clause and when a contract is a fixed price contract awarded to a large business or a covered contract that also contains one of several business systems requirements. 6 1 Acquisition Regulation: Contractor Business Systems Definition and Administration, 79 Fed. Reg. 18,416 (proposed Apr. 1, 2014) (to be codified at 48 C.F.R. pts. 915, 934, 942, 944, 945, and 952). 2 Id. 3 Id. 4 Id. at 18,426 (to be codified at 48 C.F.R ). 5 Id. at 18, E.g., 79 Fed. Reg. 18, (to be codified at 48 C.F.R (b)(2)(i)-(ii)). Further, a host of other contracts may also be covered, as the rule also defines covered contract as any contract subject to the Cost Accounting Standards (CAS), but the rule does not elaborate on whether the contract must be subject to CAS in addition to the above criteria, or is independently subject to the proposed rule. This ambiguity in the proposed rule will likely be clarified through the rulemaking process. See id. BDO is a valued business advisor to government contractors. The Government Contracting practice works with a wide variety of clients, ranging from well-established contractors to small business owners, providing a myriad of accounting, tax, consulting and other financial services. Additionally, BDO s Center of Excellence for Government Contracting is committed to providing timely guidance and thought leadership on technical, regulatory and business matters important to government contractors nationwide.
2 2 c. Exceptions The DOE has proposed a number of exceptions to the proposed rule. Most prominently, Management and Operating (M&O) contracts are not covered by the proposed rule, although DOE indicated that such coverage may be included in the rule though a later rulemaking. 7 In addition, other exceptions to the rule have been proposed, including those for: Small businesses; Contracts for Energy savings performance as required by the Energy Policy Act of 1992; Advisory and assistance services as defined at 48 C.F.R 2.101, unless otherwise designated as applicable by the Senior Procurement Executive or the Head of the Contracting Activity; Security guards; Housekeeping; Education and training; Office of the Deputy Administrator for Naval Reactors; National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 Support; or Utilities; Interagency acquisitions in accordance with 48 C.F.R Subpart 17.5; and Orders against another federal agency contract, such as a Federal Supply Schedule. 8 d. Implementation Within Solicitations and Contracts The proposed rule includes solicitation provisions and contract clauses for inclusion in all covered procurements. The individual business system requirements are prescribed at , Cost Estimating System Requirements; , Earned Value Management System; , Accounting System Administration; , Contractor Purchasing System Administration; and , Contractor Property Management System Administration. 9 The attached Appendix I provides specific details of the requirements proposed for each of the applicable business systems under the above-referenced clauses. Covered contracts must also include an additional clause, , Contractor Business Systems, which prescribes standards and procedures for contracting officers to withhold payment for deficient business systems. 10 e. Review and Approval Process Contractors must submit required business systems for review within 60 days of contract award. 11 The contracting officer will review the contractor s business systems in consultation with an auditor to determine whether they are compliant by evaluating them against the system criteria. 12 Based on this review and consultation, the contracting officer must either approve the contractor s programs or else provide a written determination to the contractor describing the significant deficiencies and requesting corrective action. 13 Each business system is evaluated independently, so the contracting officer may approve certain systems while identifying deficiencies in others. The DOE may select some or all of the five business systems to audit over a period of time, and the government will issue a formal document to the contractor detailing the specific areas in which they wish to audit. During an audit, the DOE will evaluate internal controls to assess if there are any areas of risk. They will also perform an examination, on a test basis, of any evidence supporting the data and records evaluated. After this initial testing, the government will issue an Audit Report to identify any deficiencies. f. Deficiencies and Corrective Action The proposed DOE rule is similar to the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) business systems requirement final rule in that it references findings of significant deficiencies to be a cause for system inadequacy. The DOE considers these deficiencies to be shortcomings in the system that materially affect the ability of DOE to rely on information produced by the system. If deficiencies are identified in one of the business systems, the contracting officer will notify the contractor with initial findings, and the contractor will have up to 30 days to respond. 14 The contracting officer will assess the information received from the contractor and provide notification of a final determination within 30 days 7 79 Fed. Reg. 18, Fed. Reg. 18,426 (to be codified at 48 C.F.R ) Fed. Reg. 18, Fed. Reg. 18, E.g., 79 Fed. Reg. 18,423 (to be codified at 48 C.F.R (c)). 12 Id. In the case of EVMS systems, any required review will be conducted in consultation with the cognizant DOE Program Office as well. 79 Fed. Reg. 18,424 (to be codified at 48 C.F.R (a)(1)(ii)). The criteria for each system is detailed in Appendix I. 13 E.g., 79 Fed. Reg. 18,423 (to be codified at 48 C.F.R (d)). 14 E.g., id.
3 3 of the contractor s response. 15 The contractor is required to correct any deficiencies within 45 days or submit an acceptable corrective action plan showing milestones and actions to correct the findings. 16 The plan should, at a minimum Determine the root cause of the problem; Establish a corrective action plan; Outline a corrective action schedule; and Identify the person responsible for implementation of the corrective action plan. 17 g. Withholdings The DOE s proposed business system rule will allow contracting officers to withhold a percentage of payments from contractors with significant system deficiencies. The contract officer will be allowed to withhold no more than five percent of a payment for one or more significant deficiencies in any single contractor business system, and will be allowed to withhold no more than ten percent for significant deficiencies in multiple contractor business systems. 18 The contracting officer will request, in writing, that the contractor withhold these amounts from invoices until all system deficiencies have been corrected. Under the proposed rule, the DOE could withhold a percentage of: Interim payments under: Cost reimbursable contracts; Incentive type contracts; Time and material contracts; or Labor-hour contracts; Progress payments, including fixed-price contracts; and Performance-based payments, including fixed-price contracts. 19 As a practical matter, this ability to withhold payments, and the protracted effort required to implement a corrective action plan, means that contractors are well-advised to implement systems in advance of contract performance if possible and certainly prior to the commencement of any potential audit. 2. BDO s Recommendations BDO can provide current and potential DOE contractors with guidance regarding the impact of this proposed rule on their organization. In general, contractors must ensure current business systems are compliant with all applicable federal rules and staff can and should implement the enhanced business system requirements. BDO can also offer guidance for contractors wishing to prepare for potential federal audits. a. Enhance Current Business Systems Contractors should proactively review their practices and design enhancements to current business systems that will ensure compliance with applicable federal requirements. Contractors should require that consistent documentation be retained within each business system file appropriately detailing the internal control requirements of the identified system. As contractors review their federal business system practices, they should design effective controls to, at a minimum, include the following: Clearly defined process roles, responsibilities and authorities; Well-established, documented policies and procedures; Effective practices to mitigate conflicts of interest; Consistent file documentation; Assurance that applicable flowdown clauses and terms and conditions are included in sub-awards; Well-defined independent system monitoring practice; and Adequate training for applicable personnel. 15 E.g., id. 16 E.g., id. 17 E.g., id Fed. Reg. 18,436 (to be codified at 48 C.F.R (e)). 19 Id.
4 4 b. Monitor Internal Policies and Practices Contractors should also implement a process to independently monitor business system practices (e.g., internal audit function or compliance function), and to ensure that actual practices are consistent with documented processes and federal requirements. The process should include the review of established policies and procedures against applicable federal requirements and a mechanism to report potential noncompliance directly to stakeholders outside the business systems (e.g., finance or compliance department). The monitoring function should establish recommended corrective action plans, along with agreed upon milestones for implementation. Internal training programs should also be developed and conducted at least annually for applicable personnel to ensure that actual practices are consistent with design controls and with management s expectations. c. Prepare for an Audit Contractors should consider, as one of their first priorities in preparing for business systems audits, an assessment of their overall control environment. Contractors should be prepared to document to both their auditors and the federal contract officer the adequacy of their internal systems. It is recommended that contractors: Inventory and document the key internal controls of each major system, including those with both Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) and Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA) surveillance responsibility; Appropriately staff the compliance function and be prepared to demonstrate the effectiveness of internal control systems; Establish a robust record management system and communication process to be used in future audits; and Independently assess the adequacy of their systems in comparison to existing standards. In addition, to the extent that a contractor s system has not been audited and the lack of audit puts them at risk of losing a potential contract award, consideration should be given to engaging independent auditors to evaluate the adequacy of systems through an attestation engagement. This external audit can help identify key weaknesses and deficiencies that may arise during a contract bid or award process and can help alleviate the concerns of contracting officers. d. Address Increased Administrative Costs A key concern for this new rule is increased administrative costs to the contractor. It is critical that firms think through how they can recover these costs in order to avoid increasing general and administrative (G&A) costs overall. For instance, could this be a new function in the company allowing a new cost allocation to be created? If the company only has a few applicable contracts, could these be direct contract costs? 3. Final Thoughts DOE s proposed business systems rule represents yet another effort by the Government to police the perceived potential for waste, fraud and abuse through contractor compliance requirements. As with other payment withholding regimes, DOE s ability to withhold payment under its own business systems rule provides DOE with a big stick to force compliance, and contractors are well-advised to implement and/or update their systems in advance of the expected final rule. This advisement is particularly true as federal agencies continue to move toward proactive business system requirements and away from reactive post-award audits and reviews. In this environment, the design and implementation of a compliant federal business system practice is critical to a successful execution of federal awards.
5 5 APPENDIX I DOE Proposed Business System Rule Criteria: Accounting System Criteria, Clause A sound internal control environment, accounting framework, and organizational structure 2. Proper segregations of direct costs from indirect costs 3. Identification and accumulation of direct costs by contract 4. A logical and consistent method for the accumulation and allocation of indirect costs to intermediate and final cost objectives 5. Accumulation of costs under general ledger control 6. Reconciliation of subsidiary cost ledgers and cost objectives to general ledger 7. Approval and documentation of adjusting entries 8. Management reviews or internal audits of the system to ensure compliance with the contractor s established policies, procedures, and accounting practices 9. A timekeeping system that identifies employees labor by intermediate or final cost objectives 10. A labor distribution system that charges direct and indirect labor to the appropriate cost objectives 11. Interim (at least monthly) determination of costs charged to a contract through routine posting of books of account 12. Exclusion from costs charged to Government contracts of amounts which are not allowable in terms of 48 CFR part 31, Contract Cost Principles and Procedures, and other contract provisions 13. Identification of costs by contract line item and by units (as if each unit or line item were a separate contract), if required by the contract 14. Segregation of preproduction costs from production costs, as applicable 15. Cost accounting information, as requireda. By contract clauses concerning limitation of cost (48 CFR ), limitations of funds (48 CFR ), or allowable cost and payment (48 CFR ) b. To readily calculate indirect cost rates from the books of accounts 16. Billings that can be reconciled to the cost accounts for both current and cumulative amounts claimed and comply with contract terms 17. Adequate, reliable data for use in pricing follow-on acquisitions 18. Accounting practices in accordance with standards promulgated by the Cost Accounting Standards Board, if applicable, otherwise, Generally Accepted Accounting Principles
6 6 APPENDIX I DOE Proposed Business System Rule Criteria (continued) Cost Estimating System Criteria, Clause Acceptable estimating system means an estimating system that a. Is maintained, reliable, and consistently applied; b. Produces verifiable, supportable, documented, and timely cost estimates that are an acceptable basis for negotiation of fair and reasonable prices; c. Is consistent with and integrated with the contractor s related management systems; and d. Is subject to applicable financial control systems. 2. An estimating system disclosure is acceptable when the contractor has provided the contract officer with documentation no later than 60 days after contract award that a. Accurately describes those policies, procedures, and practices that the contractor currently uses in preparing cost proposals; and b. Provides sufficient detail for the Government to reasonably make an informed judgment regarding the acceptability of the contractor s estimating practices. 3. The contractor shall a. Comply with its disclosed estimating system; and b. Disclose significant changes to the cost estimating system to the Contracting Officer on a timely basis. 4. The contractor s estimating system shall provide for the use of appropriate source data, utilize sound estimating techniques and good judgment, maintain a consistent approach, and adhere to established policies and procedures. An acceptable estimating system shall accomplish the following functions: a. Establish clear responsibility for preparation, review, and approval of cost estimates and budgets. b. Provide a written description of the organization and duties of the personnel responsible for preparing, reviewing, and approving cost estimates and budgets. c. Ensure that relevant personnel have sufficient training, experience, and guidance to perform estimating and budgeting tasks in accordance with the contractor s established procedures. d. Identify and document the sources of data and the estimating methods and rationale used in developing cost estimates and budgets. e. Provide for adequate supervision throughout the estimating and budgeting process. f. Provide for consistent application of estimating and budgeting techniques. g. Provide for detection and timely correction of errors. h. Protect against cost duplication and omissions. i. Provide for the use of historical experience, including historical vendor pricing information, where appropriate. j. Require use of appropriate analytical methods. k. Integrate information available from other management systems. l. Require management review, including verification of compliance with the company s estimating and budgeting policies, procedures, and practices. m. Provide for internal review of, and accountability for, the acceptability of the estimating system, including the budgetary data supporting indirect cost estimates and comparisons of projected results to actual results, and an analysis of any differences. n. Provide procedures to update cost estimates and notify the contract officer in a timely manner. o. Provide procedures that ensure subcontract prices are reasonable based on a documented review and analysis provided with the prime proposal, when practicable. p. Provide estimating and budgeting practices that consistently generate sound proposals that are compliant with the provisions of the solicitation and are adequate to serve as a basis to reach a fair and reasonable price. q. Have an adequate system description, including policies, procedures, and estimating and budgeting practices, that comply with the Federal Acquisition Regulation (48 CFR chapter 1) and Department of Energy Acquisition Regulation (48 CFR chapter 9).
7 7 APPENDIX I DOE Proposed Business System Rule Criteria (continued) Contractor Purchasing System Criteria, Clause The Contractor s purchasing system shall a. Have an adequate system description including policies, procedures, and purchasing practices that comply with the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) (48 CFR Chapter 1) and the Department of Energy Acquisition Regulation (48 CFR Chapter 9); b. Ensure that all applicable purchase orders and subcontracts contain all flowdown clauses, including terms and conditions and any other clauses needed to carry out the requirements of the prime contract; c. Maintain an organization plan that establishes clear lines of authority and responsibility; d. Ensure all purchase orders are based on authorized requisitions and include a complete and accurate history of purchase transactions to support vendor selected, price paid, and document the subcontract/purchase order files which are subject to Government review; e. Establish and maintain adequate documentation to provide a complete and accurate history of purchase transactions to support vendors selected and prices paid; f. Apply a consistent make-or-buy policy that is in the best interest of the Government; g. Use competitive sourcing to the maximum extent practicable, and ensure debarred or suspended contractors are properly excluded from contract award; h. Evaluate price, quality, delivery, technical capabilities, and financial capabilities of competing vendors to ensure fair and reasonable prices; i. Require management level justification and adequate cost or price analysis, as applicable, for any sole or single source award j. Perform timely and adequate cost or price analysis and technical evaluation for each subcontractor and supplier proposal or quote to ensure fair and reasonable subcontract prices; k. Document negotiations in accordance with 48 CFR ; l. Seek, take, and document economically feasible purchase discounts, including cash discounts, trade discounts, quantity discounts, rebates, freight allowances, and company-wide volume discounts; m. Ensure proper type of contract selection and prohibit issuance of cost-plus-a-percentage-of-cost subcontracts; n. Maintain subcontract surveillance to ensure timely delivery of an acceptable product and procedures to notify the Government of potential subcontract problems that may impact delivery, quantity, or price; o. Document and justify reasons for subcontract changes that affect cost or price; p. Notify the Government of the award of all subcontracts that contain the 48 CFR Chapter 1 and 48 CFR Chapter 9 flowdown clauses that allow for Government audit of those subcontracts, and ensure the performance of audits of those subcontracts; q. Enforce adequate policies on conflict of interest, gifts, and gratuities, including the requirements of the 41 U.S.C. chapter 87, Kickbacks; r. Perform internal audits or management reviews, training, and maintain policies and procedures for the purchasing department to ensure the integrity of the purchasing system; s. Establish and maintain policies and procedures to ensure purchase orders and subcontracts contain mandatory and applicable flowdown clauses, as required by the 48 CFR chapter 1, including terms and conditions required by the prime contract and any clauses required to carry out the requirements of the prime contract; t. Provide for an organizational and administrative structure that ensures effective and efficient procurement of required quality materials and parts at the best value from responsible and reliable sources; u. Establish and maintain selection processes to ensure the most responsive and responsible sources for furnishing required quality parts and materials and to promote competitive sourcing among dependable suppliers so that purchases are reasonably priced and from sources that meet contractor quality requirements; v. Establish and maintain procedures to ensure performance of adequate price or cost analysis on purchasing actions; w. Establish and maintain procedures to ensure that proper types of subcontracts are selected, and that there are controls over subcontracting, including oversight and surveillance of subcontracted effort; and x. Establish and maintain procedures to timely notify the contract officer, in writing, if i. The Contractor changes the amount of subcontract effort after award such that it exceeds 70 percent of the total cost of the work to be performed under the contract, task order, or delivery order. The notification shall identify the revised cost of the subcontract effort and shall include verification that the Contractor will provide added value; or ii. Any subcontractor changes the amount of lower-tier subcontractor effort after award such that it exceeds 70 percent of the total cost of the work to be performed under its subcontract. The notification shall identify the revised cost of the subcontract effort and shall include verification that the subcontractor will provide added value as related to the work to be performed by the lower-tier subcontractor(s).
8 8 APPENDIX I DOE Proposed Business System Rule Criteria (continued) Contractor Property Management System Criteria, Clause Contractors shall establish and implement property management plans, systems, and procedures at the contract, program, site or entity level to enable the following outcomes: a. Acquisition of Property. The contractor shall document that all property was acquired consistent with its engineering, production planning, and property control operations. b. Receipt of Government Property. The contractor shall receive Government property and document the receipt, record the information necessary to meet the record requirements of paragraph (f)(1)(iii)(a)(1) through (5) of this clause, identify as Government owned in a manner appropriate to the type of property (e.g., stamp, tag, mark, or other identification), and manage any discrepancies incident to shipment. c. Government-furnished property. The contractor shall furnish a written statement to the Property Administrator containing all relevant facts, such as cause or condition and a recommended course(s) of action, if overages, shortages, or damages and/or other discrepancies are discovered upon receipt of Government-furnished property. d. Contractor-acquired property. The contractor shall take all actions necessary to adjust for overages, shortages, damage and/or other discrepancies discovered upon receipt, in shipment of contractor-acquired property from a vendor or supplier, so as to ensure the proper allocability and allowability of associated costs. e. Records of Government property. The contractor shall create and maintain records of all Government property accountable to the contract, including Government-furnished and contractor-acquired property. i. Property records shall enable a complete, current, auditable record of all transactions and shall, unless otherwise approved by the Property Administrator, contain the following: 1. The name, part number and description, National Stock Number (if needed for additional item identification tracking and/or disposition), and other data elements as necessary and required in accordance with the terms and conditions of the contract. 2. Quantity received (or fabricated), issued, and balance-on-hand. 3. Unit acquisition cost. 4. Unique-item identifier or equivalent (if available and necessary for individual item tracking). 5. Unit of measure. 6. Accountable contract number or equivalent code designation. 7. Location. 8. Disposition. 9. Posting reference and date of transaction. 10. Date placed in service (if required in accordance with the terms and conditions of the contract). ii. Use of a Receipt and Issue System for Government Material. When approved by the Property Administrator, the contractor may maintain, in lieu of formal property records, a file of appropriately cross-referenced documents evidencing receipt, issue, and use of material that is issued for immediate consumption. f. Physical inventory. The contractor shall periodically perform, record, and disclose physical inventory results. A final physical inventory shall be performed upon contract completion or termination. The Property Administrator may waive this final inventory requirement, depending on the circumstances (e.g., overall reliability of the contractor s system or the property is to be transferred to a follow-on contract). g. Subcontractor control. i. The contractor shall award subcontracts that clearly identify items to be provided and the extent of any restrictions or limitations on their use. The contractor shall ensure appropriate flowdown of contract terms and conditions (e.g., extent of liability for loss of Government property. ii. The contractor shall assure its subcontracts are properly administered and reviews are periodically performed to determine the adequacy of the subcontractor s property management system. h. Reports. The contractor shall have a process to create and provide reports of discrepancies, loss of Government property, physical inventory results, audits and self-assessments, corrective actions, and other property-related reports as directed by the contract officer. i. Relief of stewardship responsibility and liability. The contractor shall have a process to enable the prompt recognition, investigation, disclosure and reporting of loss of Government property, including losses that occur at subcontractor or alternate site locations.
9 9 APPENDIX I DOE Proposed Business System Rule Criteria (continued) Contractor Property Management System Criteria, Clause (continued) i. This process shall include the corrective actions necessary to prevent recurrence. ii. Unless otherwise directed by the Property Administrator, the contractor shall investigate and report to the Government all incidents of property loss as soon as the facts become known. Such reports shall, at a minimum, contain the following information: 1. Date of incident (if known). 2. The data elements required under (f)(1)(iii)(a). 3. Quantity. 4. Accountable contract number. 5. A statement indicating current or future need. 6. Unit acquisition cost, or if applicable, estimated sales proceeds, estimated repair or replacement costs. 7. All known interests in commingled material of which includes Government material. 8. Cause and corrective action taken or to be taken to prevent recurrence. 9. A statement that the Government will receive compensation covering the loss of Government property, in the event the contractor was or will be reimbursed or compensated. 10. Copies of all supporting documentation. 11. Last known location. 12. A statement that the property did or did not contain sensitive, export controlled, hazardous, or toxic material, and that the appropriate agencies and authorities were notified. iii. Unless the contract provides otherwise, the contractor shall be relieved of stewardship responsibility and liability for property when 1. Such property is consumed or expended, reasonably and properly, or otherwise accounted for, in the performance of the contract, including reasonable inventory adjustments of material as determined by the Property Administrator; 2. Property Administrator grants relief of responsibility and liability for loss of Government property; 3. Property is delivered or shipped from the contractor s plant, under Government instructions, except when shipment is to a subcontractor or other location of the contractor; or 4. Property is disposed of in accordance with paragraphs (j) and (k) of this clause. j. Utilizing Government property. i. The contractor shall utilize, consume, move, and store Government Property only as authorized under this contract. The contractor shall promptly disclose and report Government property in its possession that is excess to contract performance. ii. Unless otherwise authorized in this contract or by the Property Administrator the contractor shall not commingle Government material with material not owned by the Government. k. Maintenance. The contractor shall properly maintain Government property. The contractor s maintenance program shall enable the identification, disclosure, and performance of normal and routine preventative maintenance and repair. The contractor shall disclose and report to the Property Administrator the need for replacement and/or capital rehabilitation. l. Property closeout. The contractor shall promptly perform and report to the Property Administrator contract property closeout, to include reporting, investigating and securing closure of all loss of Government property cases; physically inventorying all property upon termination or completion of this contract; and disposing of items at the time they are determined to be excess to contractual needs. 2. The contractor shall establish and maintain Government accounting source data, as may be required by this contract, particularly in the areas of recognition of acquisitions, loss of Government property, and disposition of material and equipment.
10 10 APPENDIX I DOE Proposed Business System Rule Criteria (continued) Earned Value Management System Criteria, Clause In the performance of this contract, the contractor shall use a. An Earned Value Management System (EVMS) that complies with the EVMS guidelines in the American National Standards Institute/ Electronic Industries Alliance Standard 748, Earned Value Management Systems (ANSI/EIA 748) (current version at time of award) b. Management procedures. i. Management procedures provide for generation of timely, reliable, and verifiable information for the Department of Energy (DOE) Integrated Program Management Report (IPMR) data item of this contract. ii. The contractor shall use Department of Energy s (DOE) modified version of Department of Defense s Data Item Description (DID) Integrated Program Management Report (IPMR), DI MGMT 81861, (DOE version, current version at time of contract award) which contains data for measuring cost and schedule performance for this DOE contract. iii. The contractor shall submit the data electronically by uploading the data into the Project Assessment and Reporting System (PARS II) in accordance with the Contractor Project Performance Upload Requirements document maintained by the DOE Office of Acquisition and Project Management (OAPM). iv. All requested data shall be submitted timely and accurately, and shall be current as of the close of the previous month s accounting period. About BDO BDO is the brand name for BDO USA, LLP, a U.S. professional services firm providing assurance, tax, financial advisory and consulting services to a wide range of publicly traded and privately held companies. For more than 100 years, BDO has provided quality service through the active involvement of experienced and committed professionals. The firm serves clients through 52 offices and over 400 independent alliance firm locations nationwide. As an independent Member Firm of BDO International Limited, BDO serves multinational clients through a global network of 1,264 offices in 144 countries. BDO USA, LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership, is the U.S. member of BDO International Limited, a UK company limited by guarantee, and forms part of the international BDO network of independent member firms. BDO is the brand name for the BDO network and for each of the BDO Member Firms. For more information, please visit About BakerHostetler One of the nation s largest law firms, BakerHostetler helps clients around the world to address their most complex and critical business and regulatory issues. With five core national practice groups business, employment, intellectual property, litigation, and tax the firm has more than 900 lawyers located in 14 offices coast to coast. Material discussed in this article is meant to provide general information and should not be acted on without professional advice tailored to your firm s individual needs BDO USA, LLP. All rights reserved.
DOECAA Spring Conference Presentation Cost Reimbursement Contracting Issues - DOE Proposed Business System Rule Mary Karen Wills, CPA Director/Leader, BRG Government Contracts 2014 Berkeley Research Group
Strategic Implications of the New DFARS Business System Rule Co-presented by Venable LLP and Argy, Wiltse & Robinson June 12, 2012 1 Panelists Robert A. ( Rob ) Burton, Partner, Venable LLP A 30-year veteran
Property Management System (GPMS) Business System Overview Sep 20, 2013 Marcia D. Whitson, CPPM, CF NPMA National President DFARS 252.242-7005 Contractor Business Systems DoD Business Systems Rule - Clarifies
Activity Code 11070 Version 1.5, dated September 2015 B-01 Planning Considerations Accounting System Audit Audit Specific Independence Determination Members of the audit team and internal specialists consulting
GOVERNMENT CONTRACTING AND MICROSOFT DYNAMICS AX White paper on Government Contracting requirements and considerations in planning for a Dynamics AX implementation. 1 Government Contracting and Microsoft
DEFENSE CONTRACT AUDIT AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 8725 JOHN J. KINGMAN ROAD, SUITE 2135 FORT BELVOIR, VA 22060-6219 IN REPLY REFER TO PSP 730.8.B.1/2010-003 February 18, 2011 11-PSP-003(R) MEMORANDUM
Activity Code 17740 B-1 Planning Considerations Post Award Accounting System Audit at Nonmajor Contractors To provide general guidance for the audit of the adequacy and suitability of nonmajor contractor
Accounting System Requirements Further information is available in the Information for Contractors Manual under Enclosure 2 The views expressed in this presentation are DCAA's views and not necessarily
Metropolitan Area Corporate Counsel Association WMACCA Conference on Ethics and Compliance for Government Contractors The Devil is in the Details Compliance with the Business Systems Rule April 1, 2014
Activity Code 17741 Version 3.1, dated November 2015 B-01 Planning Considerations Post Award Accounting System Audit at Nonmajor Contractors Audit Specific Independence Determination Members of the audit
Government Contractor Business Systems and Overview of System Assessments Agenda Overview of business systems rules and environment today 3 rd party assessments Practical solutions Contractor perspective
DCAA Perspective: Key Subcontracting Practices for Maintaining Approved Business Systems Accounting System and Estimating System Breakout Session A Alfred J. Massey, Western Region, Special Programs Manager,
What Exactly is an Acceptable Accounting System? Kristen Soles, CPA Member Stephanie Widzinski, CPA Senior Manager September 27, 2012 Agenda Review DFARS Business System Rule What Agency is Responsible
Activity Code 17740 Version 6.11, dated November 2015 B-1 Planning Considerations Preaward Survey of Prospective Contractor Accounting System Audit Specific Independence Determination Members of the audit
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE (DOD) Contractor Purchasing System Review (CPSR) Guidebook November 02, 2015 DEFENSE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT AGENCY (DCMA) This revision supersedes all previous versions. Table of Contents
UNIT CERTIFICATION Statement of Completion has satisfactorily completed training in the duty of this Unit under the conditions described below and in accordance with the overall standard(s) for this Unit.
Federal Regulatory Compliance Best Practices Washington Technology Webcast September 27, 2012 Agenda Topic Minutes Regulatory compliance overview 5 Major areas of financial compliance risk 15 Best practices
Date Issued: June 12, 2009 Date Last Revised: September 28, 2015 CHAPTER 23. Contract Management and Administration Table of Contents CHAPTER 23. Contract Management and Administration... 23-1 23.1 Policy...
How to Pass an Estimating System Review February 27, 2013 ANNOUNCEMENTS Mr. James J. Gallagher Partner, McKenna Long & Aldridge LLP Ms. Jami Levy Pricing Manager, Northrop Grumman Corporation Mr. David
Activity Code 17740 B-1 Planning Considerations Preaward Survey of Prospective Contractor Accounting System Purpose and Scope The major objectives of this audit are to obtain an understanding of the accounting
CHAPTER 57 WORK IN PROCESS AND CONSTRUCTION IN PROCESS A. WORK IN PROCESS 1. Contents of Work In Process. Defense Working Capital Fund (DWCF) activities, primarily those involved in depot maintenance or
[ FEDERAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT STANDARDS 3-0127 ADMINISTRATION & FINANCE August 2010 1.01 The Director of Budget Operations through the Associate Vice President for Administration and Finance is designated
TC-UPDATE (11/10) The following updates reflect changes to various provisions and clauses of U.S. Government acquisition regulations, including the Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR) and the Department
Position Classification Standard for Industrial Property Management Series, GS-1103 Table of Contents SERIES DEFINITION... 2 EXCLUSIONS... 2 OCCUPATIONAL INFORMATION... 3 TITLES... 4 PART I - INDUSTRIAL
Attachment 32c FEDERAL PROVISIONS APPLICABLE WHEN SUBCONTRACTOR (COMMERCIAL ENTITY) IS IN POSSESSION OF GOVERNMENT PROPERTY GOVERNMENT SUBCONTRACT PROVISIONS INCORPORATED IN ALL SUBCONTRACTS/PURCHASE ORDERS
WELCOME Accounting Systems for DOD Contracts Moderator: Layli Pietri, Small Business Manager, Balfour Beatty Construction Speaker: Kay Papin, Government Compliance Manager, McCarthy Group Inc. Accounting
Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards AT 2 CFR 200 November 11, 2014 WHAT S CHANGING AND WHEN? Grants Reform Office of Management and Budget Circulars
February 3, 2016 12(1) CHAPTER 12 Table of Contents Paragraph Page 12-000 Auditing Contract Termination, Delay/Disruption, and Other Price Adjustment Proposals or Claims 12-001 Contract Terminations and
DCAA Guidelines How the SBIR firm can work effectively with the Defense Contract Audit Agency Today s Presenters OUTLINE Presenter Introduction DCAA & DCMA DCAA Overview Types of DCAA Audits What it takes
CHAPTER 2 2-000 Preaward Surveys of Prospective Contractor Accounting Systems 2-101 Preaward Survey Overview A preaward survey is an evaluation, usually made by the cognizant contract administration office,
THE DCAA AUDIT Created to oversee government spending on behalf of the American tax-payer, the Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) is responsible for supervising all Department of Defense (DoD) contracts.
Certificate of Accounting, Billing and Property System Adequacy This certifies that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, Contractor s Accounting, Billing and/or Property System and related internal
DOD's Business Systems Rule: The Challenge Measuring Government Contractor Compliance Against Subjective Criteria and Perceived Risks Breakout Session #: B04 Presented by: Michael E. Steen, CPA Date: July
General Terms and Conditions of Purchase Supplement 1 Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Government Contract Provisions 1. When the products or services furnished are for use in connection with a U.S.
Material Transfers and Material Management and Accounting System (MMAS) The Scenario Risk Assessment-Research and Planning: The auditor was assigned an audit of major contractor MIL s Material Management
Monitoring Subcontracts The views expressed in this presentation are DCAA's views and not necessarily the views of other DoD organizations Subcontracts What should a contractor know about subcontracting:
INTERNAL CONTROL MATRIX FOR AUDIT OF ESTIMATING SYSTEM CONTROLS Version No. 3.2 June 2006 Control Objectives Example Control Activities Audit Procedures 1. INTERNAL AUDITS Management should periodically
McKenna Government Contracts, continuing excellence at Dentons Government Contractor Business Systems Compliance Guide 2nd Edition Thomas A. Lemmer Steven M. Masiello Michael J. McGuinn Kelly P. Garehime
Warning: What you don't know will endanger you. A Government Contractor s survival guide to navigating complex rules and regulations imposed by the DCAA and FAR October 4, 2012 We will be starting shortly
PRE-AWARD SURVEY (SF 1408) OF PROSPECTIVE CONTRACTOR ACCOUNTING SYSTEM Date: XX/XX/201X Company Name, Contract Number, and Full Address: Commercial and Government Agency (CAGE) Code Number: (found at http://www.dlis.dla.mil/cage_welcome.asp)
Requirements Procurement under the New Requirements 1 1 Why This Session Is Needed New provisions in Uniform Guidance Changes to conflict of interest requirements in Uniform Guidance Distinctions between
Inspector General U.S. Department of Defense Report No. DODIG-2016-001 OCTOBER 1, 2015 Evaluation of Defense Contract Management Agency Actions on Reported DoD Contractor Business System Deficiencies INTEGRITY
85.36 Procurement. (a) States. When procuring property and services under a grant, a State will follow the same policies and procedures it uses for procurements from its non-federal funds. The State will
KPMG LLP Suite 12000 1801 K Street, NW Washington, DC 20006 Independent Auditors Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting and on Compliance and Other Matters Based on an Audit of Financial Statements
Activity Code 19404 Compliance Audit CAS 404 B-1 Planning Considerations Audit Specific Independence Determination Members of the audit team and internal specialists consulting on this audit must complete
COMMUNICATIONS & POWER INDUSTRIES ( CPI ) TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF PURCHASE Supplement 1 U.S. Government Contract Provisions from the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 1. When the materials or products
Contractor Purchasing System Review (CPSR) Presentation References FAR 44.3 and DFARS 244.3 -- Contractors Purchasing Systems Reviews Consent to Subcontract FAR 44.2 2 What is a CPSR Contractor purchasing
1201 Main Street, Suite 1600 Columbia, South Carolina 29201 Project Management Procedures Start Up The grant becomes effective upon return of one copy of the grant award executed by the Chief Executive
TREASURY INSPECTOR GENERAL FOR TAX ADMINISTRATION The Internal Revenue Service September 14, 2010 Reference Number: 2010-10-115 This report has cleared the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration
1. When the materials or products furnished are for use in connection with a U.S. Government contract or subcontract, in addition to the L-3 General Terms and Conditions (Corp Form CC008), the following
Federal Acquisition Regulation Subcontract Flowdown Provisions Clause Title Title Applicability 52.203-6, Alt 1 Restrictions on Subcontractor Sales to the (if subcontract over $150,000) Government (SEP
General Terms and Conditions of Purchase Supplement 1 Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Government Contract Provisions 1. When the materials or products furnished are for use in connection with a U.S.
JULY 26, 2012 AUDIT REPORT OFFICE OF AUDITS AUDIT OF NASA GRANTS AWARDED TO THE PHILADELPHIA COLLEGE OPPORTUNITY RESOURCES FOR EDUCATION OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL National Aeronautics and Space Administration
DHG 20 th Annual Government Contracting Update Current Initiatives May 2015 Mr. Ken Saccoccia Deputy Director Page 1 One Agency One Mission DCAA Overview Priorities and Better Buying Power Small Business
Financial Management Guide for Government Contractors Overview You are a Government Contractor or wish to be a Government Contractor. Congratulations. It is important you know that the challenges facing
Is Your Accounting System Making the Grade? Attributes of an Acceptable Accounting System April 26, 2012 2012 All Rights Reserved 805 King Farm Boulevard Suite 300 Rockville, Maryland 20850 301.231.6200
COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT BUSINESS Defense Acquisition Regulations System Mr. Mark Gomersall, OUSD (AT&L) DPAP (DARS) Crystal Square 4, Suite 200A 241 18th Street Arlington, VA 22202-3402 Subject: Comments
6 Chapter 6 Labor-Charging Systems and Other Considerations The purpose of this chapter is to provide interpretive guidance only. This chapter is not intended to be authoritative or to supersede the FAR.
Report No. DODIG-2014-109 Inspector General U.S. Department of Defense SEPTEMBER 8, 2014 Review of Audits Issued by the Defense Contract Audit Agency in FY 2012 and FY 2013 INTEGRITY EFFICIENCY ACCOUNTABILITY
KPMG LLP Suite 12000 1801 K Street, NW Washington, DC 20006 Independent Auditors Report Administrator and Acting Inspector General United States General Services Administration: Report on the Financial
Government Contracting and Earned Value Management (EVM) Ida Davis, EVP, PMP, MBA Earned Value Manager DynPort Vaccine Company LLC, A CSC Company Note: This presentation is the property of DynPort Vaccine
Curtis Matthews, Managing Partner Government Accounting, Estimating, and Billing Systems: Pitfalls and Answers Findley Gillespie, Senior Manager May 18, 2011 1 The material appearing in this presentation
Purchase Requisition & Purchase Order Policy Effective Date: July 9, 2012 Policy Statement The following provides policy guidance to faculty, staff, students and others with respect to the use of a Purchase
85.36 Procurement (a) States. When procuring property and services under a grant, a State will follow the same policies and procedures it uses for procurements from its non-federal funds. The State will
CONTRACT AUDIT GUIDE FRAMEWORK TOPIC 12 CONTRACT COST AND PRICE ANALYSIS Objective To determine whether the agency effectively conducts cost or price analysis to arrive at fair and reasonable prices for
Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) DCAA and the Small Business Innovative Research (SBIR) Program Judice Smith and Chang Ford DCAA/Financial Liaison Advisors NAVAIR 2010 Small Business Aviation Technology
Government Contract Accounting Are You DCAA Compliant? Procurement Technical Assistance Program (PTAP) NH Presentation October 20, 2010 Presented by: Fred Kline, MBA, CPA Tom Martin MBA, CPA Malcolm Young,
1 By now, most of you have had exposure to DoD s interim Business Systems Rule. The intent is to improve the effectiveness of the oversight of contractor business systems by DCMA & DCAA. To quote DoD Contractor
Contracting with Food Service Management Companies What the Law Requires 7CFR 210.16 Food service management companies a) Any school food authority may contract with a food service management company to
THE UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 3010 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC 20301 3010 ACQUlsmON, TECHNOLOGY AND LOG ISTICS AUG 1 0 2011 MEMORANDUM FOR SECRETARIES OF THE MILITARY DEPARTMENTS CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT
Page 1 of 18 A GUIDE TO BEST PRACTICES FOR CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF FEDERAL PROCUREMENT POLICY (OFPP) OCTOBER 1994 TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION OVERVIEW OF THE CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION
January 2004 5(1) Paragraph CHAPTER 5 Table of Contents 5-000 Audit of Policies, Procedures, and Internal Controls Relative to Accounting and Management Systems Page 5-001 Scope of Chapter... 501 5-100
CHAPTER 21 FINANCIAL CLOSEOUT 1. INTRODUCTION. a. Purpose. This chapter describes the financial policy for the closeout of contracts and other acquisition, assistance (e.g., grants and cooperative agreements),
Prepare for Self-Certification of the Government Property Management System By Jackie Luo, CEO, E-ISG Asset Intelligence Summary: Government Property Management is one of the 6 mandatory business systems
October 14, 2015 5(1) Paragraph CHAPTER 5 Table of Contents 5-000 Audit of Policies, Procedures, and Internal Controls Relative to Accounting and Management Systems Page 5-001 Scope of Chapter... 501 5-100
Federal Demonstration Partnership May 13, 2014 OMB Uniform Guidance Procurement Standards Pilot Worthy? Prepared by: Office of Naval Research Debbie Rafi, Director, University Business Affairs Abe Sabbag,
CHAPTER 9 RECORDS MANAGEMENT (Revised April 18, 2006) WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF RECORDS MANAGEMENT? 1. To implement a cost-effective Department-wide program that provides for adequate and proper documentation
Inspector General U.S. Department of Defense Report No. DODIG-2015-061 DECEMBER 23, 2014 Hotline Complaint Regarding the Defense Contract Audit Agency Examination of a Contractor s Subcontract Costs INTEGRITY
REPORT NO. 2014-020 OCTOBER 2013 DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES DIVISION OF RISK MANAGEMENT STATE EMPLOYEE WORKERS COMPENSATION Operational Audit CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER Pursuant to Article IV, Sections
Defense Contract Audit Agency: What Do They Do and How Does It Affect ME as a Resource Manager? (Breakout #63) Pat Fitzgerald Director Defense Contract Audit Agency The views expressed in this presentation
2014 OMB Uniform Guidance Assessing the OMB Uniform Guidance: Major Changes and Impacts The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) consolidated the federal government s guidance on Uniform Administrative
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING Between Defense Contract Audit Agency and Department of Homeland Security 1. PURPOSE This memorandum sets forth an understanding of contract audit coverage and related audit