# Panel Data Models. Chapter 5. Financial Econometrics. Michael Hauser WS15/16

Save this PDF as:

Size: px
Start display at page:

## Transcription

1 1 / 63 Panel Data Models Chapter 5 Financial Econometrics Michael Hauser WS15/16

2 2 / 63 Content Data structures: Times series, cross sectional, panel data, pooled data Static linear panel data models: fixed effects, random effects, estimation, testing Dynamic panel data models: estimation

3 Data structures 3 / 63

4 4 / 63 Data structures We distinguish the following data structures Time series data: {xt, t = 1,..., T }, univariate series, e.g. a price series: Its path over time is modeled. The path may also depend on third variables. Multivariate, e.g. several price series: Their individual as well as their common dynamics is modeled. Third variables may be included. Cross sectional data are observed at a single point of time for several individuals, countries, assets, etc., x i, i = 1,..., N. The interest lies in modeling the distinction of single individuals, the heterogeneity across individuals.

5 5 / 63 Data structures: Pooling Pooling data refers to two or more independent data sets of the same type. Pooled time series: We observe e.g. return series of several sectors, which are assumed to be independent of each other, together with explanatory variables. The number of sectors, N, is usually small. Observations are viewed as repeated measures at each point of time. So parameters can be estimated with higher precision due to an increased sample size.

6 6 / 63 Data structures: Pooling Pooled cross sections: Mostly these type of data arise in surveys, where people are asked about e.g. their attitudes to political parties. This survey is repeated, T times, before elections every week. T is usually small. So we have several cross sections, but the persons asked are chosen randomly. Hardly any person of one cross section is member of another one. The cross sections are independent. Only overall questions can be answered, like the attitudes within males or women, but no individual (even anonymous) paths can be identified.

7 7 / 63 Data structures: Panel data A panel data set (also longitudinal data) has both a cross-sectional and a time series dimension, where all cross section units are observed during the whole time period. x it, i = 1,..., N, t = 1,..., T. T is usually small. We can distinguish between balanced and unbalanced panels. Example for a balanced panel: The Mirkozensus in Austria is a household, hh, survey, with the same size of each quarter. Each hh has to record its consumption expenditures for 5 quarters. So each quarter 4500 members enter/leave the Mikrozensus. This is a balanced panel.

8 8 / 63 Data structures: Panel data A special case of a balance panel is a fixed panel. Here we require that all individuals are present in all periods. An unbalanced panel is one where individuals are observed a different number of times, e.g. because of missing values. We are concerned only with balanced panels. In general panel data models are more efficient than pooling cross-sections, since the observation of one individual for several periods reduces the variance compared to repeated random selections of individuals.

9 9 / 63 Pooling time series: estimation We consider T relatively large, N small. y it = α + β x it + u it In case of heteroscedastic errors, σi 2 σ 2 (= σu), 2 individuals with large errors will dominate the fit. A correction is necessary. It is similar to a GLS and can be performed in 2 steps. First estimate under assumption of const variance for each indiv i and calculate the individual residual variances, s 2 i. s 2 i = 1 T (y it a b x it ) 2 t

10 10 / 63 Pooling time series: estimation Secondly, normalize the data with s i and estimate (y it /s i ) = α (1/s i ) + β (x it /s i ) + ũ it ũ it = u it /s i has (possibly) the required constant variance, is homoscedastic. Remark: V(ũ it ) = V(u it /s i ) 1 Dummies may be used for different cross sectional intercepts.

11 Panel data modeling 11 / 63

12 12 / 63 Example Say, we observe the weekly returns of 1000 stocks in two consecutive weeks. The pooling model is appropriate, if the stocks are chosen randomly in each period. The panel model applies, if the same stocks are observed in both periods. We could ask the question, what are the characteristics of stocks with high/low returns in general. For panel models we could further analyze, whether a stock with high/low return in the first period also has a high/low return in the second.

13 13 / 63 Panel data model The standard static model with i = 1,..., N, t = 1,..., T is y it = β 0 + x it β + ϵ it x it is a K -dimensional vector of explanatory variables, without a const term. β 0, the intercept, is independent of i and t. β, a (K 1) vector, the slopes, is independent of i and t. ϵ it, the error, varies over i and t. Individual characteristics (which do not vary over time), z i, may be included y it = β 0 + x it β 1 + z i β 2 + ϵ it

14 14 / 63 Two problems: endogeneity and autocorr in the errors Consistency/exogeneity: Assuming iid errors and applying OLS we get consistent estimates, if E(ϵ it ) = 0 and E(x it ϵ it ) = 0, if the x it are weakly exogenous. Autocorrelation in the errors: Since individual i is repeatedly observed (contrary to pooled data) with s t is very likely. Then, Corr(ϵ i,s, ϵ i,t ) 0 standard errors are misleading (similar to autocorr residuals), OLS is inefficient (cp. GLS).

15 15 / 63 Common solution for individual unobserved heterogeneity Unobserved (const) individual factors, i.e. if not all z i variables are available, may be captured by α i. E.g. we decompose ϵ it in ϵ it = α i + u it with u it iid(0, σ 2 u) u it has mean 0, is homoscedastic and not serially correlated. In this decomposition all individual characteristics - including all observed, z i β 2, as well as all unobserved ones, which do not vary over time - are summarized in the α i s. We distinguish fixed effects (FE), and random effects (RE) models.

16 16 / 63 Fixed effects model, FE Fixed effects model, FE: α i are individual intercepts (fixed for given N). y it = α i + x it β + u it No overall intercept is (usually) included in the model. Under FE, consistency does not require, that the individual intercepts (whose coefficients are the α i s) and x it are uncorrelated. Only E(x it u it ) = 0 must hold. There are N 1 additional parameters for capturing the individual heteroscedasticity.

17 17 / 63 Random effects model, RE Random effects model, RE: α i iid(0, σ 2 α) y it = β 0 + x it β + α i + u it, u it iid(0, σ 2 u) The α i s are rvs with the same variance. The value α i is specific for individual i. The α s of different indivs are independent, have a mean of zero, and their distribution is assumed to be not too far away from normality. The overall mean is captured in β 0. α i is time invariant and homoscedastic across individuals. There is only one additional parameter σ 2 α. Only α i contributes to Corr(ϵ i,s, ϵ i,t ). α i determines both ϵ i,s and ϵ i,t.

18 18 / 63 RE some discussion Consistency: As long as E[x it ϵ it ] = E[x it (α i + u it )] = 0, i.e. x it are uncorrelated with α i and u it, the explanatory vars are exogenous, the estimates are consistent. There are relevant cases where this exogeneity assumption is likely to be violated: E.g. when modeling investment decisions the firm specific heteroscedasticity α i might correlate with (the explanatory variable of) the cost of capital of firm i. The resulting inconsistency can be avoided by considering a FE model instead. Estimation: The model can be estimated by (feasible) GLS which is in general more efficient than OLS.

19 19 / 63 The static linear model the fixed effects model 3 Estimators: Least square dummy variable estimator, LSDV Within estimator, FE First difference estimator, FD

20 20 / 63 [LSDV] Fixed effects model: LSDV estimator We can write the FE model using N dummy vars indicating the individuals. y it = N j=1 α j d j it + x it β + u it u it iid(0, σ 2 u) with dummies d j, where d j it = 1 if i = j, and 0 else. The parameters can be estimated by OLS. The implied estimator for β is called the LS dummy variable estimator, LSDV. Instead of exploding computer storage by increasing the number of dummy variables for large N the within estimator is used.

21 21 / 63 [LSDV] Testing the significance of the group effects Apart from t-tests for single α i (which are hardly used) we can test, whether the indivs have the same intercepts wrt some have different intercepts by an F -test. The pooled model (all intercepts are restricted to be the same), H 0, is y it = β 0 + x it β + u it the fixed effects model (intercepts may be different, are unrestricted), H A, y it = α i + x it β + u it i = 1,..., N The F ratio for comparing the pooled with the FE model is F N 1,N T N K = (R2 LSDV R2 Pooled )/(N 1) (1 RLSDV 2 )/(N T N K )

22 22 / 63 [FE] Within transformation, within estimator The FE estimator for β is obtained, if we use the deviations from the individual means as variables. The model in individual means is with ȳ i = t y it/t and ᾱ i = α i, ū i = 0 ȳ i = α i + x i β + ū i Subtraction from y it = α i + x it β + u it gives y it ȳ i = (x it x i ) β + (u it ū i ) where the intercepts vanish. Here the deviation of y it from ȳ i is explained (not the difference between different individuals, ȳ i and ȳ j ). The estimator for β is called the within or FE estimator. Within refers to the variability (over time) among observations of individual i.

23 23 / 63 [FE] Within/FE estimator ˆβ FE The within/fe estimator is ( ) 1 ˆβ FE = (x it x i )(x it x i ) (x it x i )(y it ȳ i ) i t This expression is identical to the well known formula ˆβ = (X X) 1 X y for N (demeaned wrt individual i) data with T repeated observations. i t

24 24 / 63 [FE] Finite samples properties of ˆβ FE Finite samples: Unbiasedness: if all x it are independent of all u js, strictly exogenous. Normality: if in addition u it is normal.

25 25 / 63 [FE] Asymptotic samples properties of ˆβ FE Asymptotically: Consistency wrt N, T fix: if E[(x it x i )u it ] = 0. I.e. both x it and x i are uncorrelated with the error, u it. This (as x i = x i,t /T ) implies that x it is strictly exogenous: E[x is u it ] = 0 for all s, t x it has not to depend on current, past or future values of the error term of individual i. This excludes lagged dependent vars any xit, which depends on the history of y Even large N do not mitigate these violations. Asymptotic normality: under consistency and weak conditions on u.

26 26 / 63 [FE] Properties of the N intercepts, ˆα i, and V( ˆβ FE ) Consistency of ˆα i wrt T : if E[(x it x i )u it ] = 0. There is no convergence wrt to N, even if N gets large. Cp. ȳ i = (1/T ) t y it. The estimates for the N intercepts, ˆα i, are simply ˆα i = ȳ i x i ˆβ FE Reliable estimates for V( ˆβ FE ) are obtained from the LSDV model. A consistent estimate for σu 2 is ˆσ u 2 1 = ûit 2 N T N K with û it = y it ˆα i x it ˆβ FE i t

27 27 / 63 [FD] The first difference, FD, estimator for the FE model An alternative way to eliminate the individual effects α i is to take first differences (wrt time) of the FE model. or y it y i,t 1 = (x it x i,t 1 ) β + (u it u i,t 1 ) y it = x it β + u it Here also, all variables, which are only indiv specific - they do not change with t - drop out. Estimation with OLS gives the first-difference estimator ˆβ FD = ( i T t=2 x it x it ) 1 i T x it y it t=2

28 28 / 63 [FD] Properties of the FD estimator Consistency for N : if E[ x it u it ] = 0. This is slightly less demanding than for the within estimator, which is based on strict exogeneity. FD allows e.g. correlation between x it and u i,t 2. The FD estimator is slightly less efficient than the FE, as u it exhibits serial correlation, even if u it are uncorrelated. FD looses one time dimension for each i. FE looses one degree of freedom for each i by using ȳ i, x i.

29 The static linear model estimation of the random effects model 29 / 63

30 30 / 63 Estimation of the random effects model y it = β 0 + x it β + α i + u it, u it iid(0, σ 2 u), α i iid(0, σ 2 α) where (α i + u it ) is an error consisting of 2 components: an individual specific component, which does not vary over time, α i. a remainder, which is uncorrelated wrt i and t, u it. α i and u it are mutually independent, and indep of all x js. As simple OLS does not take this special error structure into account, so GLS is used.

31 31 / 63 [RE] GLS estimation In the following we stack the errors of individual i, α i and u it. Ie, we put each of them into a column vector. (α i + u it ) reads then as α i ι T + u i α i is constant for individual i ι T = (1,..., 1) is a (T 1) vector of only ones. u i = (u i1,..., u it ) is a vector collecting all u it s for indiv i. I T is the T -dimensional identity matrix. Since the errors of different indiv s are independent, the covar-matrix consists of N identical blocks in the diagonal. Block i is V(α i ι T + u i ) = Ω = σ 2 α ι T ι T + σ2 u I T Remark: The inverse of a block-diag matrix is a block-diag matrix with the inverse blocks in the diag. So it is enough to consider indiv blocks.

32 32 / 63 [RE] GLS estimation GLS corresponds to premultiplying the vectors (y i1,..., y it ), etc. by Ω 1/2. Where [ ] Ω 1 = σu 2 I T ψ ι T ι T σ 2 α with ψ = σu 2 + T σα 2 and ψ = σ 2 u σ 2 u + T σ 2 α Remark: The GLS for the classical regression model is where u.(0, Ω) is heteroscedastic. ˆβ GLS = (X Ω 1 X) 1 X Ω 1 y

33 33 / 63 [RE] GLS estimator The GLS estimator can be written as ( ˆβ GLS = (x it x i )(x it x i ) + ψ i t i ( (x it x i )(y it ȳ i ) + ψ i t i T ( x i x)( x i x) ) 1 T ( x i x)(ȳ i ȳ) ) If ψ = 0, (σ 2 u = 0), the GLS estimator is equal to the FE estimator. As if N individual intercepts were included. If ψ = 1, (σ 2 α = 0). The GLS becomes the OLS estimator. Only 1 overall intercept is included, as in the pooled model. If T then ψ 0. I.e.: The FE and RE estimators for β are equivalent for large T. (But not for T fix and N.) Remark: ( i t + i T )/(N T ) is finite as N or T or both.

34 34 / 63 Interpretation of within and between, ψ = 1 Within refers to the variation within one individual (over time), between measures the variation between the individuals. The within and between components (y it ȳ) = (y it ȳ i ) + (ȳ i ȳ) are orthogonal. So (y it ȳ) 2 = i t i (y it ȳ i ) 2 + T t i (ȳ i ȳ) 2 The variance of y may be decomposed into the sum of variance within and the variance between. ȳ i = (1/T ) t y it and ȳ = (1/(N T ) i t y it

35 35 / 63 [RE] Properties of the GLS GLS is unbiased, if the x s are independent of all u it and α i. The GLS will be more efficient than OLS in general under the RE assumptions. Consistency for N (T fix, or T ): if E[(x it x i )u it ] = 0 and E[ x i α i ] = 0 holds. Under weak conditions (errors need not be normal) the feasible GLS is asymptotically normal.

36 Comparison and testing of FE and RE 36 / 63

37 37 / 63 Interpretation: FE and RE Fixed effects: The distribution of y it is seen conditional on x it and individual dummies d i. E[y it x it, d i ] = x it β + α i This is plausible if the individuals are not a random draw, like in samples of large companies, countries, sectors. Random effects: The distribution of y it is not conditional on single individual characteristics. Arbitrary indiv effects have a fixed variance. Conclusions wrt a population are drawn. E[y it x it, 1] = x it β + β 0 If the d i are expected to be correlated with the x s, FE is preferred. RE increases only efficiency, if exogeneity is guaranteed.

38 38 / 63 Interpretation: FE and RE (T fix) The FE estimator, ˆβ FE, is consistent (N ) and efficient under the FE model assumptions. consistent, but not efficient, under the RE model assumptions, as the correlation structure of the errors is not taken into account (replaced only by different intercepts). As the error variance is not estimated consistently, the t-values are not correct. The RE estimator is consistent (N ) and efficient under the assumptions of the RE model. not consistent under the FE assumptions, as the true explanatory vars (d i, x it ) are correlated with (α i + u it ) [with ˆψ 0 and x i x biased for fix T ].

39 39 / 63 Hausman test Hausman tests the H 0 that x it and α i are uncorrelated. We compare therefore two estimators one, that is consistent under both hypotheses, and one, that is consistent (and efficient) only under the null. A significant difference between both indicates that H 0 is unlikely to hold. H 0 is the RE model H A is the FE model y it = β 0 + x it β + α i + u it y it = α i + x it β + u it ˆβ RE is consistent (and efficient), under H 0, not under H A. ˆβFE is consistent, under H 0 and H A.

40 40 / 63 Test FE against RE: Hausman test We consider the difference of both estimators. If it is large, we reject the null. Since ˆβ RE is efficient under H 0, it holds The Hausman statistic under H 0 is ˆβ FE ˆβ RE V( ˆβ FE ˆβ RE ) = V( ˆβ FE ) V( ˆβ RE ) ( ˆβ FE ˆβ RE ) [ˆV( ˆβ FE ) ˆV( ˆβ RE )] 1 ( ˆβ FE ˆβ RE ) asy χ 2 (K ) If in finite samples [ˆV( ˆβ FE ) ˆV( ˆβ RE )] is not positive definite, testing is performed only for a subset of β.

41 41 / 63 Comparison via goodness-of-fit, R 2 wrt ˆβ We are often interested in a distinction between the within R 2 and the between R 2. The within R 2 for any arbitrary estimator is given by R 2 within ( ˆβ) = Corr 2 [ŷ it ŷ i, y it ȳ i ] and between R 2 by R 2 between ( ˆβ) = Corr 2 [ŷ i, ȳ i ] where ŷ it = x it ˆβ, ŷ i = x i ˆβ and ŷ it ŷ i = (x it x i ) ˆβ. The overall R 2 is R 2 overall ( ˆβ) = Corr 2 [ŷ it, y it ]

42 42 / 63 Goodness-of-fit, R 2 The usual R 2 is valid for comparison of the pooled model estimated by OLS and the FE model. The comparison of the FE and RE via R 2 is not valid as in the FE the α i s are considered as explanatory variables, while in the RE model they belong to the unexplained error. Comparison via R 2 should be done only within the same class of models and estimators.

43 43 / 63 Testing for autocorrelation A generalization of the Durbin-Watson statistic for autocorr of order 1 can be formulated T i t=2 DW p = (û it û i,t 1 ) 2 i t û2 it The critical values depend on T, N and K. For T [6, 10] and K [3, 9] the following approximate lower and upper bounds can be used. N = 100 N = 500 N = 1000 d L d U d L d U d L d U

44 44 / 63 Testing for heteroscedasticity A generalization of the Breusch-Pagan test is applicable. σ 2 u is tested whether it depends on a set of J third variables z. V(u it ) = σ 2 h(z it γ) where for the function h(.), h(0) = 1 and h(.) > 0 holds. The null hypothesis is γ = 0. The N(T 1) multiple of R 2 u of the auxiliary regression û 2 it = σ 2 h(z it γ) + v it is distributed under the H 0 asymptotically χ 2 (J) with J degrees of freedom. N(T 1)R 2 u a χ 2 (J)

45 Dynamic panel data models 45 / 63

46 46 / 63 Dynamic panel data models The dynamic model with one lagged dependent without exogenous variables, γ < 1, is y it = γ y i,t 1 + α i + u it, u it iid(0, σ 2 u)

47 47 / 63 Endogeneity problem Here, y i,t 1 depends positively on α i : This is simple to see, when inspecting the model for period (t 1) y i,t 1 = γ y i,t 2 + α i + u i,t 1 There is an endogeneity problem. OLS or GLS will be inconsistent for N and T fixed, both for FE and RE. (Easy to see for RE.) The finite sample bias can be substantial for small T. E.g. if γ = 0.5, T = 10, and N plim N ˆγ FE = 0.33 However, as in the univariate model, if in addition T, we obtain a consistent estimator. But T is i.g. small for panel data.

48 48 / 63 The first difference estimator (FD) Using the 1st difference estimator (FD), which eliminates the α i s y it = γ y i,t 1 + u it y it y i,t 1 = γ(y i,t 1 y i,t 2 ) + (u it u i,t 1 ) is no help, since y i,t 1 and u i,t 1 are correlated even when T. We stay with the FD model, as the exogeneity requirements are less restrictive, and use an IV estimator. For that purpose we look also at y i,t 1 y i,t 1 y i,t 2 = γ(y i,t 2 y i,t 3 ) + (u i,t 1 u i,t 2 )

49 49 / 63 [FD] IV estimation, Anderson-Hsiao Instrumental variable estimators, IV, have been proposed by Anderson-Hsiao, as they are consistent with N and finite T. Choice of the instruments for (y i,t 1 y i,t 2 ): Instrument y i,t 2 as proxy is correlated with (y i,t 1 y i,t 2 ), but not with u i,t 1 or u i,t, and so u i,t. Instrument (y i,t 2 y i,t 3 ) as proxy for (y i,t 1 y i,t 2 ) sacrifies one more sample period.

50 50 / 63 [FD] GMM estimation, Arellano-Bond The Arellano-Bond (also Arellano-Bover) method of moments estimator is consistent. The moment conditions use the properties of the instruments y i,t j, j 2 to be uncorrelated with the future errors u it and u i,t 1. We obtain an increasing number of moment conditions for t = 3, 4,..., T. t = 3 : E[(u i,3 u i,2 )y i,1 ] = 0 t = 4 : E[(u i,4 u i,3 )y i,2 ] = 0, E[(u i,4 u i,3 )y i,1 ] = 0 t = 5 : E[(u i,5 u i,4 )y i,3 ] = 0,..., E[(u i,5 u i,4 )y i,1 ] =

51 51 / 63 [FD] GMM estimation, Arellano-Bond We define the (T 2) 1 vector u i = [(u i,3 u i,2 ),..., (u i,t u i,t 1 )] and a (T 2) (T 2) matrix of instruments y i,1 y i,1... y i,1 Z i 0 y = i,2... y i, y i,t 2

52 [FD] GMM estimation, Arellano-Bond, without x s Ignoring exogenous variables, for y it = γ y i,t 1 + u it, E[Z i u i ] = E[Z i ( y i γ y i, 1 )] = 0 The number of moment conditions are (T 2). This number exceeds i.g. the number of unknown coefficients, so γ is estimated by minimizing the quadratic expression [ 1 min γ N i ] [ 1 Z i ( y i γ y i, 1 ) W N N i ] Z i ( y i γ y i, 1 ) with a weighting matrix W N. The optimal matrix W N yielding an asy efficient estimator is the inverse of the covariance matrix of the sample moments. 52 / 63

53 53 / 63 [FD] GMM estimation, Arellano-Bond, without x s The W N matrix can be estimated directly from the data after a first consistent estimation step. Under weak regularity conditions the GMM estimator is asy normal for N for fixed T, T > 2 using our instruments. It is also consistent for N and T, though the number of moment conditions as T. It is advisable to limit the number of moment conditions.

54 54 / 63 [FD] GMM estimation, Arellano-Bond, with x s The dynamic panel data model with exogenous variables is y it = x it β + γ y i,t 1 + α i + u it, u it iid(0, σ 2 u) As also exogenous x s are included in the model additional moment conditions can be formulated: For strictly exogenous vars, E[x is u it ] = 0 for all s, t, E[x is u it ] = 0 For predetermined (not strictly exogenous) vars, E[x is u it ] = 0 for s t E[x i,t j u it ] = 0 j = 1,..., t 1

55 55 / 63 GMM estimation, Arellano-Bond, with x s So there are a lot of possible moment restrictions both for differences as well as for levels, and so a variety of GMM estimators. GMM estimation may be combined with both FE and RE. Here also, the RE estimator is identical to the FE estimator with T.

56 Further topics 56 / 63

57 57 / 63 Further topics We augment the FE model with dummy variables indicating both individuals and time periods. y it = δ i d i + δ t d t + x it β + u it Common unit roots can be tested and modeled. which is transformed to y it = α i + γ i y i,t 1 + u it and tested wrt H 0 : π i = 0 for all i y it = α i + π i y i,t 1 + u it

58 58 / 63 Panel data models: further topics Cointegration tests. Limited dependent models, like binary choice, logit, probit models, etc.

59 Exercises and References 59 / 63

60 60 / 63 Exercises Choose one out of (1, 2), and 3 out of (3G, 4G, 5G, 6G). 7G is compulsory. 1 The fixed effects model with group and time effects is y it = α i d i + δ t d t + x it β + u it where d i are dummies for individuals, and d t dummies for time periods. Specify the model correctly when an overall intercept is included. 2 Show that holds. (y it ȳ) 2 = t i i (y it ȳ i ) 2 + T t i (ȳ i ȳ) 2

61 61 / 63 Exercises 3G Choose a subset of firms for the Grunfeld data and compare the pooling and the fixed effects model. Use Ex5_panel_data_R.txt. 4G Choose a subset of firms for the Grunfeld data and compare the fixed effects and the random effects model. Use Ex5_panel_data_R.txt. 5G Choose a subset of firms for the Grunfeld/EmplUK data and estimate a suitable dynamic panel data model. Use Ex5_panel_data_R.txt. 6G Compute the Durbin-Watson statistic for panel data in R. Test for serial correlation in the fixed effects model of a data set of your choice.

62 62 / 63 Exercises 7G (Compulsory) Prepare a short summary about the Illustration 10.5: Explaining capital structure, in Verbeek, p , covering the following issues: the empirical problem/question posed the model(s) under consideration/ the relations between the variables suggested by economic theory the formal model the data (source, coverage, proxies for the variables in the theoretical model) the estimation method(s), empirical specification of the model, comparison of models results/conclusions Delivery of an electronic version of 7G not later than 1 week after the final test.

63 63 / 63 References Verbeek 10

### Instrumental Variables (IV) Instrumental Variables (IV) is a method of estimation that is widely used

Instrumental Variables (IV) Instrumental Variables (IV) is a method of estimation that is widely used in many economic applications when correlation between the explanatory variables and the error term

### Econometrics of Panel Data

Econometrics of Panel Data 1. Basics and Examples 2. The generalized least squares estimator 3. Fixed effects model 4. Random Effects model 1 1 Basics and examples We observes variables for N units, called

### Econometric Methods for Panel Data

Based on the books by Baltagi: Econometric Analysis of Panel Data and by Hsiao: Analysis of Panel Data Robert M. Kunst robert.kunst@univie.ac.at University of Vienna and Institute for Advanced Studies

### Wooldridge, Introductory Econometrics, 4th ed. Chapter 15: Instrumental variables and two stage least squares

Wooldridge, Introductory Econometrics, 4th ed. Chapter 15: Instrumental variables and two stage least squares Many economic models involve endogeneity: that is, a theoretical relationship does not fit

### Testing for Serial Correlation in Fixed-Effects Panel Data Models

Testing for Serial Correlation in Fixed-Effects Panel Data Models Benjamin Born Jörg Breitung In this paper, we propose three new tests for serial correlation in the disturbances of fixed-effects panel

### What s New in Econometrics? Lecture 8 Cluster and Stratified Sampling

What s New in Econometrics? Lecture 8 Cluster and Stratified Sampling Jeff Wooldridge NBER Summer Institute, 2007 1. The Linear Model with Cluster Effects 2. Estimation with a Small Number of Groups and

### Instrumental Variables & 2SLS

Instrumental Variables & 2SLS y 1 = β 0 + β 1 y 2 + β 2 z 1 +... β k z k + u y 2 = π 0 + π 1 z k+1 + π 2 z 1 +... π k z k + v Economics 20 - Prof. Schuetze 1 Why Use Instrumental Variables? Instrumental

### SYSTEMS OF REGRESSION EQUATIONS

SYSTEMS OF REGRESSION EQUATIONS 1. MULTIPLE EQUATIONS y nt = x nt n + u nt, n = 1,...,N, t = 1,...,T, x nt is 1 k, and n is k 1. This is a version of the standard regression model where the observations

### Exam and Solution. Please discuss each problem on a separate sheet of paper, not just on a separate page!

Econometrics - Exam 1 Exam and Solution Please discuss each problem on a separate sheet of paper, not just on a separate page! Problem 1: (20 points A health economist plans to evaluate whether screening

### Simultaneous Equations

Simultaneous Equations 1 Motivation and Examples Now we relax the assumption that EX u 0 his wil require new techniques: 1 Instrumental variables 2 2- and 3-stage least squares 3 Limited LIML and full

### Econometric Methods fo Panel Data Part II

Econometric Methods fo Panel Data Part II Robert M. Kunst University of Vienna April 2009 1 Tests in panel models Whereas restriction tests within a specific panel model follow the usual principles, based

### . This specification assumes individual specific means with Ey ( ) = µ. We know from Nickell (1981) that OLS estimates of (1.1) are biased for S S

UNIT ROOT TESTS WITH PANEL DATA. Consider the AR model y = αy ( ), it it + α µ + ε i it i =,... N, t =,..., T. (.) where the ε 2 IN(0, σ ) it. This specification assumes individual specific means with

### Chapter 10: Basic Linear Unobserved Effects Panel Data. Models:

Chapter 10: Basic Linear Unobserved Effects Panel Data Models: Microeconomic Econometrics I Spring 2010 10.1 Motivation: The Omitted Variables Problem We are interested in the partial effects of the observable

### Chapter 2. Dynamic panel data models

Chapter 2. Dynamic panel data models Master of Science in Economics - University of Geneva Christophe Hurlin, Université d Orléans Université d Orléans April 2010 Introduction De nition We now consider

### OLS in Matrix Form. Let y be an n 1 vector of observations on the dependent variable.

OLS in Matrix Form 1 The True Model Let X be an n k matrix where we have observations on k independent variables for n observations Since our model will usually contain a constant term, one of the columns

### In this chapter, we aim to answer the following questions: 1. What is the nature of heteroskedasticity?

Lecture 9 Heteroskedasticity In this chapter, we aim to answer the following questions: 1. What is the nature of heteroskedasticity? 2. What are its consequences? 3. how does one detect it? 4. What are

### 2. Pooled Cross Sections and Panels. 2.1 Pooled Cross Sections versus Panel Data

2. Pooled Cross Sections and Panels 2.1 Pooled Cross Sections versus Panel Data Pooled Cross Sections are obtained by collecting random samples from a large polulation independently of each other at different

### Instrumental Variables & 2SLS

Instrumental Variables & 2SLS y 1 = β 0 + β 1 y 2 + β 2 z 1 +... β k z k + u y 2 = π 0 + π 1 z k+1 + π 2 z 1 +... π k z k + v Economics 20 - Prof. Schuetze 1 Why Use Instrumental Variables? Instrumental

### Econometrics Regression Analysis with Time Series Data

Econometrics Regression Analysis with Time Series Data João Valle e Azevedo Faculdade de Economia Universidade Nova de Lisboa Spring Semester João Valle e Azevedo (FEUNL) Econometrics Lisbon, May 2011

### 7. Autocorrelation (Violation of Assumption #B3)

7. Autocorrelation (Violation of Assumption #B3) Assumption #B3: The error term u i is not autocorrelated, i.e. Cov(u i, u j ) = 0 for all i = 1,..., N and j = 1,..., N where i j Where do we typically

### Linear combinations of parameters

Linear combinations of parameters Suppose we want to test the hypothesis that two regression coefficients are equal, e.g. β 1 = β 2. This is equivalent to testing the following linear constraint (null

### 6. Regression with panel data

6. Regression with panel data Key feature of this section: Up to now, analysis of data on n distinct entities at a given point of time (cross sectional data) Example: Student-performance data set Observations

### Estimation and Inference in Cointegration Models Economics 582

Estimation and Inference in Cointegration Models Economics 582 Eric Zivot May 17, 2012 Tests for Cointegration Let the ( 1) vector Y be (1). Recall, Y is cointegrated with 0 cointegrating vectors if there

### EC327: Advanced Econometrics, Spring 2007

EC327: Advanced Econometrics, Spring 2007 Wooldridge, Introductory Econometrics (3rd ed, 2006) Appendix D: Summary of matrix algebra Basic definitions A matrix is a rectangular array of numbers, with m

### 1 Logit & Probit Models for Binary Response

ECON 370: Limited Dependent Variable 1 Limited Dependent Variable Econometric Methods, ECON 370 We had previously discussed the possibility of running regressions even when the dependent variable is dichotomous

### Econometrics The Multiple Regression Model: Inference

Econometrics The Multiple Regression Model: João Valle e Azevedo Faculdade de Economia Universidade Nova de Lisboa Spring Semester João Valle e Azevedo (FEUNL) Econometrics Lisbon, March 2011 1 / 24 in

### Chapter 4: Vector Autoregressive Models

Chapter 4: Vector Autoregressive Models 1 Contents: Lehrstuhl für Department Empirische of Wirtschaftsforschung Empirical Research and und Econometrics Ökonometrie IV.1 Vector Autoregressive Models (VAR)...

### The Classical Linear Regression Model

The Classical Linear Regression Model 1 September 2004 A. A brief review of some basic concepts associated with vector random variables Let y denote an n x l vector of random variables, i.e., y = (y 1,

### Regression Analysis. Pekka Tolonen

Regression Analysis Pekka Tolonen Outline of Topics Simple linear regression: the form and estimation Hypothesis testing and statistical significance Empirical application: the capital asset pricing model

### 2. Linear regression with multiple regressors

2. Linear regression with multiple regressors Aim of this section: Introduction of the multiple regression model OLS estimation in multiple regression Measures-of-fit in multiple regression Assumptions

### Regression Analysis: Basic Concepts

The simple linear model Regression Analysis: Basic Concepts Allin Cottrell Represents the dependent variable, y i, as a linear function of one independent variable, x i, subject to a random disturbance

### The University of Chicago, Booth School of Business Business 41202, Spring Quarter 2013, Mr. Ruey S. Tsay Solutions to Final Exam

The University of Chicago, Booth School of Business Business 41202, Spring Quarter 2013, Mr. Ruey S. Tsay Solutions to Final Exam Problem A: (40 points) Answer briefly the following questions. 1. Describe

### Chapter 4: Constrained estimators and tests in the multiple linear regression model (Part II)

Chapter 4: Constrained estimators and tests in the multiple linear regression model (Part II) Florian Pelgrin HEC September-December 2010 Florian Pelgrin (HEC) Constrained estimators September-December

### Econometrics. Week 9. Fall Institute of Economic Studies Faculty of Social Sciences Charles University in Prague

Econometrics Week 9 Institute of Economic Studies Faculty of Social Sciences Charles University in Prague Fall 2012 1 / 21 Recommended Reading For the today Simultaneous Equations Models Chapter 16 (pp.

### Simple Linear Regression Chapter 11

Simple Linear Regression Chapter 11 Rationale Frequently decision-making situations require modeling of relationships among business variables. For instance, the amount of sale of a product may be related

### Overview of Violations of the Basic Assumptions in the Classical Normal Linear Regression Model

Overview of Violations of the Basic Assumptions in the Classical Normal Linear Regression Model 1 September 004 A. Introduction and assumptions The classical normal linear regression model can be written

### Chapter 6: Multivariate Cointegration Analysis

Chapter 6: Multivariate Cointegration Analysis 1 Contents: Lehrstuhl für Department Empirische of Wirtschaftsforschung Empirical Research and und Econometrics Ökonometrie VI. Multivariate Cointegration

### Heteroskedasticity and Weighted Least Squares

Econ 507. Econometric Analysis. Spring 2009 April 14, 2009 The Classical Linear Model: 1 Linearity: Y = Xβ + u. 2 Strict exogeneity: E(u) = 0 3 No Multicollinearity: ρ(x) = K. 4 No heteroskedasticity/

### CHAPTER 9: SERIAL CORRELATION

Serial correlation (or autocorrelation) is the violation of Assumption 4 (observations of the error term are uncorrelated with each other). Pure Serial Correlation This type of correlation tends to be

### Chapter 2 Principles of Linear Regression

Chapter 2 Principles of Linear Regression E tric Methods Winter Term 2012/13 Nikolaus Hautsch Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin 2.1 Basic Principles of Inference 2.1.1 Econometric Modelling 2 86 Outline I

### Vector autoregressions, VAR

1 / 45 Vector autoregressions, VAR Chapter 2 Financial Econometrics Michael Hauser WS15/16 2 / 45 Content Cross-correlations VAR model in standard/reduced form Properties of VAR(1), VAR(p) Structural VAR,

### Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data Second Edition. Jeffrey M. Wooldridge. The MIT Press Cambridge, Massachusetts London, England

Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data Second Edition Jeffrey M. Wooldridge The MIT Press Cambridge, Massachusetts London, England Preface Acknowledgments xxi xxix I INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND

### 1. The Classical Linear Regression Model: The Bivariate Case

Business School, Brunel University MSc. EC5501/5509 Modelling Financial Decisions and Markets/Introduction to Quantitative Methods Prof. Menelaos Karanasos (Room SS69, Tel. 018956584) Lecture Notes 3 1.

### Hypothesis Testing in the Classical Regression Model

LECTURE 5 Hypothesis Testing in the Classical Regression Model The Normal Distribution and the Sampling Distributions It is often appropriate to assume that the elements of the disturbance vector ε within

### Clustering in the Linear Model

Short Guides to Microeconometrics Fall 2014 Kurt Schmidheiny Universität Basel Clustering in the Linear Model 2 1 Introduction Clustering in the Linear Model This handout extends the handout on The Multiple

### Clustering in the Linear Model

Short Guides to Microeconometrics Fall 2013 Kurt Schmidheiny Universität Basel Clustering in the Linear Model 2 1 Introduction Clustering in the Linear Model This handout extends the handout on The Multiple

### Definition The covariance of X and Y, denoted by cov(x, Y ) is defined by. cov(x, Y ) = E(X µ 1 )(Y µ 2 ).

Correlation Regression Bivariate Normal Suppose that X and Y are r.v. s with joint density f(x y) and suppose that the means of X and Y are respectively µ 1 µ 2 and the variances are 1 2. Definition The

### A Symmetric Relationship Between Proxy and Instrumental Variables

A Symmetric Relationship Between Proxy and Instrumental Variables Damien Sheehan-Connor September 9, 2010 1 Introduction The basic problem encountered in much of applied econometrics is consistent estimation

### OLS is not only unbiased it is also the most precise (efficient) unbiased estimation technique - ie the estimator has the smallest variance

Lecture 5: Hypothesis Testing What we know now: OLS is not only unbiased it is also the most precise (efficient) unbiased estimation technique - ie the estimator has the smallest variance (if the Gauss-Markov

### Instrumental Variables Regression. Instrumental Variables (IV) estimation is used when the model has endogenous s.

Instrumental Variables Regression Instrumental Variables (IV) estimation is used when the model has endogenous s. IV can thus be used to address the following important threats to internal validity: Omitted

### p Values and Alternative Boundaries

p Values and Alternative Boundaries for CUSUM Tests Achim Zeileis Working Paper No. 78 December 2000 December 2000 SFB Adaptive Information Systems and Modelling in Economics and Management Science Vienna

### 1 OLS under Measurement Error

ECON 370: Measurement Error 1 Violations of Gauss Markov Assumptions: Measurement Error Econometric Methods, ECON 370 1 OLS under Measurement Error We have found out that another source of endogeneity

### Multivariate Analysis of Variance (MANOVA)

Multivariate Analysis of Variance (MANOVA) Example: (Spector, 987) describes a study of two drugs on human heart rate There are 24 subjects enrolled in the study which are assigned at random to one of

### My factorial research design yields panel data in which i vignettes (i = 1,, 10) are nested

1 SUPPLEENTAL ATERIAL Analytic Strategy: Studies 1ab y factorial research design yields panel data in which i vignettes (i = 1,, 10) are nested within individuals ( = 1,, J). As a result, I estimated two-level

### Ordinary Least Squares and Poisson Regression Models by Luc Anselin University of Illinois Champaign-Urbana, IL

Appendix C Ordinary Least Squares and Poisson Regression Models by Luc Anselin University of Illinois Champaign-Urbana, IL This note provides a brief description of the statistical background, estimators

### How to use Instrumental Variables

How to use Instrumental Variables Questions that can be answered with experiments: 1) If I give people aspirin, what happens to their body temperature? 2) If I use fertilizer on tomato plants, do I get

### Simultaneous Equations Models. Sanjaya DeSilva

Simultaneous Equations Models Sanjaya DeSilva 1 Reduced Form and Structural Models We will begin with definitions; 1. Exogenous variables are variables that are determined outside of the model. For the

### Panel Data: Linear Models

Panel Data: Linear Models Laura Magazzini University of Verona laura.magazzini@univr.it http://dse.univr.it/magazzini Laura Magazzini (@univr.it) Panel Data: Linear Models 1 / 45 Introduction Outline What

### Chapter 6. Econometrics. 6.1 Introduction. 6.2 Univariate techniques Transforming data

Chapter 6 Econometrics 6.1 Introduction We re going to use a few tools to characterize the time series properties of macro variables. Today, we will take a relatively atheoretical approach to this task,

### 2 Testing under Normality Assumption

1 Hypothesis testing A statistical test is a method of making a decision about one hypothesis (the null hypothesis in comparison with another one (the alternative using a sample of observations of known

### A Guide to Modern Econometrics / 2ed. Answers to selected exercises - Chapter 4. Exercise 4.1. Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-statistic Prob.

A Guide to Modern Econometrics / 2ed Answers to selected exercises - Chapter 4 Exercise 4.1 a. The OLS results (Eviews 5.0 output) are as follows: Dependent Variable: AIRQ Date: 12/02/05 Time: 14:04 C

### Linear and Piecewise Linear Regressions

Tarigan Statistical Consulting & Coaching statistical-coaching.ch Doctoral Program in Computer Science of the Universities of Fribourg, Geneva, Lausanne, Neuchâtel, Bern and the EPFL Hands-on Data Analysis

### Chapter 11: Two Variable Regression Analysis

Department of Mathematics Izmir University of Economics Week 14-15 2014-2015 In this chapter, we will focus on linear models and extend our analysis to relationships between variables, the definitions

### Statistics & Regression: Easier than SAS

ST003 Statistics & Regression: Easier than SAS Vincent Maffei, Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield, North Haven, CT Michael Davis, Bassett Consulting Services, Inc., North Haven, CT ABSTRACT In this paper

### Problems with OLS Considering :

Problems with OLS Considering : we assume Y i X i u i E u i 0 E u i or var u i E u i u j 0orcov u i,u j 0 We have seen that we have to make very specific assumptions about u i in order to get OLS estimates

### The Simple Linear Regression Model: Specification and Estimation

Chapter 3 The Simple Linear Regression Model: Specification and Estimation 3.1 An Economic Model Suppose that we are interested in studying the relationship between household income and expenditure on

### Econometrics Simple Linear Regression

Econometrics Simple Linear Regression Burcu Eke UC3M Linear equations with one variable Recall what a linear equation is: y = b 0 + b 1 x is a linear equation with one variable, or equivalently, a straight

### SELF-TEST: SIMPLE REGRESSION

ECO 22000 McRAE SELF-TEST: SIMPLE REGRESSION Note: Those questions indicated with an (N) are unlikely to appear in this form on an in-class examination, but you should be able to describe the procedures

### Economics 102C: Advanced Topics in Econometrics 2 - Tooling Up: The Basics

Economics 102C: Advanced Topics in Econometrics 2 - Tooling Up: The Basics Michael Best Spring 2015 Outline The Evaluation Problem Matrix Algebra Matrix Calculus OLS With Matrices The Evaluation Problem:

### Alastair Hall ECG 752: Econometrics Spring Serial Correlation

Alastair Hall ECG 752: Econometrics Spring 2005 SAS Handout # 5 Serial Correlation In this handout we consider methods for estimation and inference in regression models with serially correlated errors.

### AUTOCORRELATED RESIDUALS OF ROBUST REGRESSION

AUTOCORRELATED RESIDUALS OF ROBUST REGRESSION Jan Kalina Abstract The work is devoted to the Durbin-Watson test for robust linear regression methods. First we explain consequences of the autocorrelation

### ELEC-E8104 Stochastics models and estimation, Lecture 3b: Linear Estimation in Static Systems

Stochastics models and estimation, Lecture 3b: Linear Estimation in Static Systems Minimum Mean Square Error (MMSE) MMSE estimation of Gaussian random vectors Linear MMSE estimator for arbitrarily distributed

### Practical. I conometrics. data collection, analysis, and application. Christiana E. Hilmer. Michael J. Hilmer San Diego State University

Practical I conometrics data collection, analysis, and application Christiana E. Hilmer Michael J. Hilmer San Diego State University Mi Table of Contents PART ONE THE BASICS 1 Chapter 1 An Introduction

### Three-stage least squares

Three-stage least squares Econometric Methods Lecture 7, PhD Warsaw School of Economics Outline 1 Introduction 2 3 Outline 1 Introduction 2 3 3-Stage Least Squares: basic idea 1-stage (OLS): inconsistent

### 1 Teaching notes on GMM 1.

Bent E. Sørensen January 23, 2007 1 Teaching notes on GMM 1. Generalized Method of Moment (GMM) estimation is one of two developments in econometrics in the 80ies that revolutionized empirical work in

### The VAR models discussed so fare are appropriate for modeling I(0) data, like asset returns or growth rates of macroeconomic time series.

Cointegration The VAR models discussed so fare are appropriate for modeling I(0) data, like asset returns or growth rates of macroeconomic time series. Economic theory, however, often implies equilibrium

### If the model with two independent variables is the true model, the error term of the model with one independent variable can be expressed as follows:

Omitted Variable Bias Model with one independent variable: Model with two independent variables: If the model with two independent variables is the true model, the error term of the model with one independent

### MS&E 226: Small Data. Lecture 17: Additional topics in inference (v1) Ramesh Johari

MS&E 226: Small Data Lecture 17: Additional topics in inference (v1) Ramesh Johari ramesh.johari@stanford.edu 1 / 34 Warnings 2 / 34 Modeling assumptions: Regression Remember that most of the inference

### Linear Regression with One Regressor

Linear Regression with One Regressor Michael Ash Lecture 10 Analogy to the Mean True parameter µ Y β 0 and β 1 Meaning Central tendency Intercept and slope E(Y ) E(Y X ) = β 0 + β 1 X Data Y i (X i, Y

### Binary Response Models

Short Guides to Microeconometrics Fall 2016 Kurt Schmidheiny Unversität Basel Binary Response Models 2 2 The Econometric Model: Probit and Logit 1 Introduction Binary Response Models Many dependent variables

### 2. What are the theoretical and practical consequences of autocorrelation?

Lecture 10 Serial Correlation In this lecture, you will learn the following: 1. What is the nature of autocorrelation? 2. What are the theoretical and practical consequences of autocorrelation? 3. Since

### FULLY MODIFIED OLS FOR HETEROGENEOUS COINTEGRATED PANELS

FULLY MODIFIED OLS FOR HEEROGENEOUS COINEGRAED PANELS Peter Pedroni ABSRAC his chapter uses fully modified OLS principles to develop new methods for estimating and testing hypotheses for cointegrating

### C: LEVEL 800 {MASTERS OF ECONOMICS( ECONOMETRICS)}

C: LEVEL 800 {MASTERS OF ECONOMICS( ECONOMETRICS)} 1. EES 800: Econometrics I Simple linear regression and correlation analysis. Specification and estimation of a regression model. Interpretation of regression

### Introduction to Dynamic Panel Data: Autoregressive Models with Fixed Effects

Introduction to Dynamic Panel Data: Autoregressive Models with Fixed Effects Eric Zivot Winter, 2013 Dynamic Panel Data (without covariates) Typical assumptions = 1 + + = 1 (individuals) = 1 (time periods)

### What s New in Econometrics? Lecture 10 Difference-in-Differences Estimation

What s New in Econometrics? Lecture 10 Difference-in-Differences Estimation Jeff Wooldridge NBER Summer Institute, 2007 1. Review of the Basic Methodology 2. How Should We View Uncertainty in DD Settings?

### Two-Variable Regression: Interval Estimation and Hypothesis Testing

Two-Variable Regression: Interval Estimation and Hypothesis Testing Jamie Monogan University of Georgia Intermediate Political Methodology Jamie Monogan (UGA) Confidence Intervals & Hypothesis Testing

### Keynesian Theory of Consumption. Theoretical and Practical Aspects. Kirill Breido, Ilona V. Tregub

Keynesian Theory of Consumption. Theoretical and Practical Aspects Kirill Breido, Ilona V. Tregub The Finance University Under The Government Of The Russian Federation International Finance Faculty, Moscow,

### TESTING THE ONE-PART FRACTIONAL RESPONSE MODEL AGAINST AN ALTERNATIVE TWO-PART MODEL

TESTING THE ONE-PART FRACTIONAL RESPONSE MODEL AGAINST AN ALTERNATIVE TWO-PART MODEL HARALD OBERHOFER AND MICHAEL PFAFFERMAYR WORKING PAPER NO. 2011-01 Testing the One-Part Fractional Response Model against

### On Small Sample Properties of Permutation Tests: A Significance Test for Regression Models

On Small Sample Properties of Permutation Tests: A Significance Test for Regression Models Hisashi Tanizaki Graduate School of Economics Kobe University (tanizaki@kobe-u.ac.p) ABSTRACT In this paper we

### Dynamic panel estimation and homogeneity testing under cross section dependence

Econometrics Journal (23), volume 6, pp. 217 259. Dynamic panel estimation and homogeneity testing under cross section dependence PETER C. B. PHILLIPS AND DONGGYU SUL Cowles Foundation for Research in

### Which null hypothesis do overidentification restrictions actually test? Abstract

Which null hypothesis do overidentification restrictions actually test? Rembert De Blander EcRu, U.C.Louvain and CES, K.U.Leuven Abstract In this note I investigate which alternatives are detected by over-identifying

### Statistics II Final Exam - January Use the University stationery to give your answers to the following questions.

Statistics II Final Exam - January 2012 Use the University stationery to give your answers to the following questions. Do not forget to write down your name and class group in each page. Indicate clearly

### DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS. Unit ECON 12122 Introduction to Econometrics. Notes 4 2. R and F tests

DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS Unit ECON 11 Introduction to Econometrics Notes 4 R and F tests These notes provide a summary of the lectures. They are not a complete account of the unit material. You should also

### Statistiek (WISB361)

Statistiek (WISB361) Final exam June 29, 2015 Schrijf uw naam op elk in te leveren vel. Schrijf ook uw studentnummer op blad 1. The maximum number of points is 100. Points distribution: 23 20 20 20 17

### Regression analysis in practice with GRETL

Regression analysis in practice with GRETL Prerequisites You will need the GNU econometrics software GRETL installed on your computer (http://gretl.sourceforge.net/), together with the sample files that

### FIXED EFFECTS AND RELATED ESTIMATORS FOR CORRELATED RANDOM COEFFICIENT AND TREATMENT EFFECT PANEL DATA MODELS

FIXED EFFECTS AND RELATED ESTIMATORS FOR CORRELATED RANDOM COEFFICIENT AND TREATMENT EFFECT PANEL DATA MODELS Jeffrey M. Wooldridge Department of Economics Michigan State University East Lansing, MI 48824-1038

### Variance of OLS Estimators and Hypothesis Testing. Randomness in the model. GM assumptions. Notes. Notes. Notes. Charlie Gibbons ARE 212.

Variance of OLS Estimators and Hypothesis Testing Charlie Gibbons ARE 212 Spring 2011 Randomness in the model Considering the model what is random? Y = X β + ɛ, β is a parameter and not random, X may be