FIRST SECTION. CASE OF ALEKSIĆ v. CROATIA. (Application no /10) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG. 5 December 2013

Save this PDF as:
 WORD  PNG  TXT  JPG

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "FIRST SECTION. CASE OF ALEKSIĆ v. CROATIA. (Application no /10) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG. 5 December 2013"

Transcription

1 FIRST SECTION CASE OF ALEKSIĆ v. CROATIA (Application no /10) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 5 December 2013 This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision.

2

3 ALEKSIĆ v. CROATIA JUDGMENT 1 In the case of Aleksić v. Croatia, The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Committee composed of: Elisabeth Steiner, President, Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska, Ksenija Turković, judges, and André Wampach, Deputy Section Registrar, Having deliberated in private on 12 November 2013, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: PROCEDURE 1. The case originated in an application (no /10) against the Republic of Croatia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms ( the Convention ) by two Serbian nationals, Mr Milan Aleksić and Ms Olga Aleksić ( the applicants ), on 8 January The applicants were represented by Mr N. Mamula, a lawyer practising in Karlovac. The Croatian Government ( the Government ) were represented by their Agent, Ms Š. Stažnik. 3. On 18 May 2011 the application was communicated to the Government. THE FACTS 4. The applicants were born in 1938 and 1944 respectively and live in Draginje, Serbia. 5. On 15 November 2001 the applicants applied to the Karlovac Municipal Court (Općinski sud u Karlovcu) for enforcement of a civil court judgment awarding him damages adopted on 28 August 1991 by the Šabac Municipal Court in Serbia. 6. On 4 March 2005 the case was forwarded to the Zagreb Municipal Court (Općinski sud u Zagrebu). 7. The applicants motion for enforcement was declared inadmissible on 24 October 2005 on the ground that the Šabac Municipal Court judgment had never been recognised in Croatia. 8. This decision was upheld by the Zagreb County Court (Županijski sud u Zagrebu) on 3 January 2006 and served its decision on the applicants representative on 17 February On 20 March 2006 the applicants lodged a constitutional complaint with the Constitutional Court (Ustavni sud Republike Hrvatske).

4 2 ALEKSIĆ v. CROATIA JUDGMENT 10. On 10 June 2009 the Constitutional Court dismissed the applicants constitutional complaint as ill-founded. 11. The decision of the Constitutional Court was served on the applicants representative on 10 July THE LAW I. ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 1 OF THE CONVENTION ON ACCOUNT OF THE LENGTH OF PROCEEDINGS 12. The applicants complained that the length of the proceedings before the Constitutional Court had been incompatible with the reasonable time requirement, laid down in Article 6 1 of the Convention, which reads as follows: In the determination of... any criminal charge against him everyone is entitled to a... hearing within a reasonable time by [a]... tribunal... A. Admissibility 13. The Government submitted that the applicants had failed to use the domestic length-of-proceedings remedies concerning the length of the enforcement proceedings in their part before the Karlovac Municipal Court and the Zagreb Municipal Court. They also considered that the six-month time-limit should be calculated from the decision of the Zagreb County Court of 3 January 2006 when the enforcement proceedings before the civil courts had ended. Thus, in the Government s view, since the applicants had lodged their application with the Court in January 2010, they had failed to comply with the six-month rule. 14. The Court first refers to its decision in the Slaviček case, where it held that since 15 March 2002 a constitutional complaint under section 63 of the Constitutional Court Act had represented an effective domestic remedy in respect of the length of court proceedings in Croatia (see Slaviček v. Croatia (dec.), no /02, ECHR 2002-VII). It further refers to its judgment in the Pavić case, where it held that as of 29 December 2005 a request for the protection of the right to a hearing within a reasonable time under sections 27 and 28 of the Courts Act has become an effective domestic remedy in respect of the length of court proceedings in Croatia (see Pavić v. Croatia, no /08, 36, 28 January 2010). It follows that in the period between 15 March 2002 and 28 December 2005 the applicants could have lodged a constitutional complaint to complain about the length of proceedings in their part before the first- and the second-instance court, and in the period between 29 December 2005 and 17 February 2006 (the

5 ALEKSIĆ v. CROATIA JUDGMENT 3 date when the second-instance decision was served on the applicants representative) to lodge a request for the protection of the right to a hearing within a reasonable time However, they did not do so. It follows that in so far as the applicants complaint concerns the proceedings in their part before the ordinary courts it is inadmissible under Article 35 1 of the Convention for non-exhaustion of domestic remedies and must be rejected pursuant to Article 35 4 thereof. In view of this conclusion it is not necessary to examine the Government s further inadmissibility objection based on noncompliance with the six-month rule. 15. On the other hand, to the extent that this complaint concerns the length of proceedings in their part before the Constitutional Court, the Court considers that it is not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 3 (a) of the Convention. It also notes that it is not inadmissible on any other grounds. It must therefore be declared admissible. B. Merits 1. Period to be taken into consideration 16. The period to be taken into consideration began on 20 March 2006 when the applicant lodged his constitutional complaint and ended on 10 July 2009 when the Constitutional Court s decision was served on the applicant s representative. It thus lasted almost three years and four months. 2. Reasonableness of the length of the proceedings 17. The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicants and the relevant authorities and what was at stake for the applicants in the dispute (see, among many other authorities, Frydlender v. France [GC], no /96, 43, ECHR 2000-VII). 18. The Court has frequently found violations of Article 6 1 of the Convention in cases raising issues similar to the one in the present case (see, for example, Pitra v. Croatia, no /02, 21, 16 June 2005; and Bečeheli v. Croatia, no. 8855/08, 17 and 20, 2 May 2013). 19. Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court considers that the Government have not put forward any fact or argument capable of persuading it to reach a different conclusion in the present case. Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant case the length of the proceedings was excessive and failed to meet the reasonable time requirement. 20. There has accordingly been a violation of Article 6 1.

6 4 ALEKSIĆ v. CROATIA JUDGMENT II. OTHER ALLEGED VIOLATIONS OF THE CONVENTION 21. The applicants also complained, under Article 6 1 of the Convention, that they could not enforce the Šabac Municipal Court in Croatia. 22. In the light of all the material in its possession, and in so far as the matters complained of are within its competence, the Court considers that this part of the application does not disclose any appearance of a violation of the Convention. It follows that it is inadmissible under Article 35 3 as manifestly ill-founded and must be rejected pursuant to Article 35 4 of the Convention. III. APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION 23. Article 41 of the Convention provides: If the Court finds that there has been a violation of the Convention or the Protocols thereto, and if the internal law of the High Contracting Party concerned allows only partial reparation to be made, the Court shall, if necessary, afford just satisfaction to the injured party. 24. The applicants did not submit a claim for just satisfaction. Accordingly, the Court considers that there is no call to award them any sum on that account. FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY, 1. Declares the complaint concerning the excessive length of proceedings before the Constitutional Court admissible and the remainder of the application inadmissible; 2. Holds that there has been a violation of Article 6 1 of the Convention; Done in English, and notified in writing on 5 December 2013, pursuant to Rule 77 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court. André Wampach Deputy Registrar Elisabeth Steiner President

SECOND SECTION. CASE OF ZICHY GALÉRIA v. HUNGARY. (Application no. 66019/01) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG. 5 April 2005

SECOND SECTION. CASE OF ZICHY GALÉRIA v. HUNGARY. (Application no. 66019/01) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG. 5 April 2005 SECOND SECTION CASE OF ZICHY GALÉRIA v. HUNGARY (Application no. 66019/01) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 5 April 2005 This judgment will become final in the circumstances set out in Article 44 2 of the Convention.

More information

COUR EUROPÉENNE DES DROITS DE L HOMME EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS

COUR EUROPÉENNE DES DROITS DE L HOMME EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS CONSEIL DE L EUROPE COUNCIL OF EUROPE COUR EUROPÉENNE DES DROITS DE L HOMME EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS THIRD SECTION DECISION AS TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF Application no. 53161/99 by Raimundas MEILUS

More information

COUR EUROPÉENNE DES DROITS DE L HOMME EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS

COUR EUROPÉENNE DES DROITS DE L HOMME EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS CONSEIL DE L EUROPE COUNCIL OF EUROPE COUR EUROPÉENNE DES DROITS DE L HOMME EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS FIRST SECTION PARTIAL DECISION AS TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF Application no. 10240/03 by Theodoros

More information

FIRST SECTION. CASE OF TARBUK v. CROATIA. (Application no /10) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG. 11 December 2012

FIRST SECTION. CASE OF TARBUK v. CROATIA. (Application no /10) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG. 11 December 2012 FIRST SECTION CASE OF TARBUK v. CROATIA (Application no. 31360/10) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 11 December 2012 This judgment will become final in the circumstances set out in Article 44 2 of the Convention. It

More information

COUR EUROPÉENNE DES DROITS DE L HOMME EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS

COUR EUROPÉENNE DES DROITS DE L HOMME EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS CONSEIL DE L EUROPE COUNCIL OF EUROPE COUR EUROPÉENNE DES DROITS DE L HOMME EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS SECOND SECTION CASE OF SWEDISH TRANSPORT WORKERS UNION v. SWEDEN (Application no. 53507/99) JUDGMENT

More information

European Court of Human Rights. Questions & Answers

European Court of Human Rights. Questions & Answers European Court of Human Rights Questions & Answers Questions & Answers What is the European Court of Human Rights? These questions and answers have been prepared by the Registry of the Court. The document

More information

COUR EUROPÉENNE DES DROITS DE L HOMME EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS

COUR EUROPÉENNE DES DROITS DE L HOMME EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS CONSEIL DE L EUROPE COUNCIL OF EUROPE COUR EUROPÉENNE DES DROITS DE L HOMME EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS THIRD SECTION DECISION AS TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF Application nos. 40766/06 and 40831/06 by Afram

More information

FIFTH SECTION. CASE OF BUSINESS SUPPORT CENTRE v. BULGARIA. (Application no. 6689/03) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG. 18 March 2010

FIFTH SECTION. CASE OF BUSINESS SUPPORT CENTRE v. BULGARIA. (Application no. 6689/03) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG. 18 March 2010 FIFTH SECTION CASE OF BUSINESS SUPPORT CENTRE v. BULGARIA (Application no. 6689/03) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 18 March 2010 This judgment will become final in the circumstances set out in Article 44 2 of the

More information

SECOND SECTION. CASE OF MUSTAFA AND ARMAĞAN AKIN v. TURKEY. (Application no. 4694/03) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG. 6 April 2010 FINAL 06/07/2010

SECOND SECTION. CASE OF MUSTAFA AND ARMAĞAN AKIN v. TURKEY. (Application no. 4694/03) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG. 6 April 2010 FINAL 06/07/2010 SECOND SECTION CASE OF MUSTAFA AND ARMAĞAN AKIN v. TURKEY (Application no. 4694/03) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 6 April 2010 FINAL 06/07/2010 This judgment has become final under Article 44 2 of the Convention.

More information

EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS : QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS

EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS : QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS : QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS REGISTRY OF THE COURT 2 WHAT IS THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS? T he European Court of Human Rights is an international court based in Strasbourg.

More information

COUR EUROPÉENNE DES DROITS DE L HOMME EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS

COUR EUROPÉENNE DES DROITS DE L HOMME EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS CONSEIL DE L EUROPE COUNCIL OF EUROPE COUR EUROPÉENNE DES DROITS DE L HOMME EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS SECOND SECTION CASE OF K. v. ITALY (Application no. 38805/97) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 20 July 2004

More information

FIRST SECTION. CASE OF VILBORG YRSA SIGURÐARDÓTTIR v. ICELAND. (Application no. 32451/96) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG

FIRST SECTION. CASE OF VILBORG YRSA SIGURÐARDÓTTIR v. ICELAND. (Application no. 32451/96) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG FIRST SECTION CASE OF VILBORG YRSA SIGURÐARDÓTTIR v. ICELAND (Application no. 32451/96) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 30 May 2000 In the case of Vilborg Yrsa SIGURÐARDÓTTIR v. Iceland, The European Court of Human

More information

FIFTH SECTION DECISION

FIFTH SECTION DECISION FIFTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 3145/16 J.M.N. and C.H. against Norway The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting on 11 October 2016 as a Chamber composed of: Angelika Nußberger,

More information

BASIC GUIDE FOR APPLICANTS TAKING THEIR CASE TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS

BASIC GUIDE FOR APPLICANTS TAKING THEIR CASE TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS BASIC GUIDE FOR APPLICANTS TAKING THEIR CASE TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS This document is a basic guide to the rights protected by the European Convention on Human Rights and the operation of

More information

SECOND SECTION. CASE OF DŽINIĆ v. CROATIA. (Application no /13) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG. 17 May 2016

SECOND SECTION. CASE OF DŽINIĆ v. CROATIA. (Application no /13) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG. 17 May 2016 SECOND SECTION CASE OF DŽINIĆ v. CROATIA (Application no. 38359/13) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 17 May 2016 This judgment will become final in the circumstances set out in Article 44 2 of the Convention. It may

More information

Protocol No. 14 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, amending the control system of the Convention

Protocol No. 14 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, amending the control system of the Convention Protocol No. 14 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, amending the control system of the Convention Strasbourg, 13.V.2004 Convention Protocol Protocols: No. 4 No.

More information

KOPF AND LIBERDA v. AUSTRIA JUDGMENT 1

KOPF AND LIBERDA v. AUSTRIA JUDGMENT 1 FIRST SECTION CASE OF KOPF AND LIBERDA v. AUSTRIA (Application no. 1598/06) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 17 January 2012 This judgment will become final in the circumstances set out in Article 44 2 of the Convention.

More information

DECISION. II. The repealed provisions shall cease to be valid on 31 December 2001.

DECISION. II. The repealed provisions shall cease to be valid on 31 December 2001. The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Croatia, composed of Smiljko Sokol, President of the Court, and Judges Marijan Hranjski, Petar Klarić, Jurica Malčić, Ivan Matija, Ivan Mrkonjić, Jasna Omejec,

More information

FIFTH SECTION. CASE OF DE SOUZA RIBEIRO v. FRANCE. (Application no /07) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG. 30 June 2011

FIFTH SECTION. CASE OF DE SOUZA RIBEIRO v. FRANCE. (Application no /07) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG. 30 June 2011 FIFTH SECTION CASE OF DE SOUZA RIBEIRO v. FRANCE (Application no. 22689/07) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 30 June 2011 Request for referral to the Grand Chamber pending This judgment will become final in the circumstances

More information

DECISIONS. Communication No. 393/1990. Date of communication : 16 March 1990 (initial submission)

DECISIONS. Communication No. 393/1990. Date of communication : 16 March 1990 (initial submission) Distr. RESTRICTED */ ENGLISH/FRENCH CCPR/C/45/D/393/1990 27 July 1992 ENGLISH Original: HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITTEE Forty-fifth session DECISIONS Communication No. 393/1990 Submitted by : A.C. Alleged victim

More information

FIRST SECTION. CASE OF YURIY RUDAKOV v. RUSSIA. (Application no. 48982/08) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG. 15 January 2015 FINAL 15/04/2015

FIRST SECTION. CASE OF YURIY RUDAKOV v. RUSSIA. (Application no. 48982/08) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG. 15 January 2015 FINAL 15/04/2015 FIRST SECTION CASE OF YURIY RUDAKOV v. RUSSIA (Application no. 48982/08) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 15 January 2015 FINAL 15/04/2015 This judgment has become final under Article 44 2 of the Convention. It may

More information

European. of Human QUESTIONS ENG?

European. of Human QUESTIONS ENG? European CourtTHE ECHR of Human RightsIN 50 QUESTIONS ENG? AN COURT OF HUM The ECHR in 50 questions This document has been prepared by the Public Relations Unit of the Court and does not bind the Court.

More information

COUR EUROPÉENNE DES DROITS DE L HOMME EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS

COUR EUROPÉENNE DES DROITS DE L HOMME EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS CONSEIL DE L EUROPE COUNCIL OF EUROPE COUR EUROPÉENNE DES DROITS DE L HOMME EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS SECOND SECTION DECISION AS TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF Application no. 23131/03 by Mark Anthony NORWOOD

More information

FOURTH SECTION. CASE OF MIKOLAJOVÁ v. SLOVAKIA. (Application no. 4479/03)

FOURTH SECTION. CASE OF MIKOLAJOVÁ v. SLOVAKIA. (Application no. 4479/03) FOURTH SECTION CASE OF MIKOLAJOVÁ v. SLOVAKIA (Application no. 4479/03) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 18 January 2011 FINAL 18/04/2011 This judgment has become final under Article 44 2 of the Convention. It may

More information

APP!JCATIONS N 23868/94 and 23869/94 (joined) Andre LOERSCH and NOUVELLE ASSOCIATION DU COURRIER v/switzerland

APP!JCATIONS N 23868/94 and 23869/94 (joined) Andre LOERSCH and NOUVELLE ASSOCIATION DU COURRIER v/switzerland APP!JCATIONS N 23868/94 and 23869/94 (joined) Andre LOERSCH and NOUVELLE ASSOCIATION DU COURRIER v/switzerland DECISION of 24 February 199'S on the admissibility of the applications Article 6, paragraph

More information

LAW ON THE PROTECTOR OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS

LAW ON THE PROTECTOR OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS LAW ON THE PROTECTOR OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS Podgorica, July 2003 LAW ON THE PROTECTOR OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS I BASIC PROVISIONS Article 1 Establishing the Protector of Human Rights and Freedoms

More information

Part 3: Arbitration Title 1: General Provisions

Part 3: Arbitration Title 1: General Provisions Civil Procedure Code 7 Part : Arbitration Title : General Provisions Art. 5 Scope of application The provisions of this Part apply to the proceedings before arbitral tribunals based in Switzerland, unless

More information

FIFTH SECTION. CASE OF SÝKORA v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC. (Application no. 23419/07) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG. 22 November 2012 FINAL 22/02/2013

FIFTH SECTION. CASE OF SÝKORA v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC. (Application no. 23419/07) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG. 22 November 2012 FINAL 22/02/2013 FIFTH SECTION CASE OF SÝKORA v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC (Application no. 23419/07) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 22 November 2012 FINAL 22/02/2013 This judgment has become final under Article 44 2 of the Convention.

More information

B. The Applicant did not receive from the Irish High Court a fair hearing.

B. The Applicant did not receive from the Irish High Court a fair hearing. III. EXPOSÉ DE LA OU DES VIOLATION(S) DE LA CONVENTION ET/OU DES PROTOCOLES ALLÉGUÉE(S), AINSI QUE DES ARGUMENTS À L APPUI STATEMENT OF ALLEGED VIOLATION(S) OF THE CONVENTION AND/OR PROTOCOLS AND OF RELEVANT

More information

Council of Europe: European Court of Human Rights and the Parot Doctrine

Council of Europe: European Court of Human Rights and the Parot Doctrine Council of Europe: European Court of Human Rights and the Parot Doctrine March 2014 The Law Library of Congress, Global Legal Research Center (202) 707-6462 (phone) (866) 550-0442 (fax) law@loc.gov http://www.law.gov

More information

COUR EUROPÉENNE DES DROITS DE L HOMME EUROPEAN COURTOFHUMAN RIGHTS

COUR EUROPÉENNE DES DROITS DE L HOMME EUROPEAN COURTOFHUMAN RIGHTS CONSEIL DE L EUROPE COUNCIL OF EUROPE COUR EUROPÉENNE DES DROITS DE L HOMME EUROPEAN COURTOFHUMAN RIGHTS FIRST SECTION DECISION AS TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF Application no. 45983/99 by Fadime and Mehmet

More information

Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms as amended by Protocols No. 11 and No. 14

Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms as amended by Protocols No. 11 and No. 14 Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms as amended by Protocols No. 11 and No. 14 Rome, 4.XI.1950 The governments signatory hereto, being members of the Council of Europe,

More information

FOURTH SECTION DECISION

FOURTH SECTION DECISION FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 39771/12 Hanna Riikka ALASIPPOLA against Finland The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 27 January 2015 as a Chamber composed of: Guido

More information

Relationship of the Charter to the ECHR and national human rights provisions

Relationship of the Charter to the ECHR and national human rights provisions Relationship of the Charter to the ECHR and national human rights provisions The Charter of Fundamental Rights ERA Training Seminar Dr Tobias Lock Lecturer School of Law t.lock@surrey.ac.uk Outline Introduction:

More information

Rules of Court. Registry of the Court. 1 June 2015. Strasbourg

Rules of Court. Registry of the Court. 1 June 2015. Strasbourg Rules of Court 1 June 2015 Registry of the Court Strasbourg Note by the Registry This new edition of the Rules of Court incorporates amendments made by the Plenary Court on 1 June 2015. The new edition

More information

European Convention. on Human Rights

European Convention. on Human Rights European Convention on Human Rights European Convention on Human Rights as amended by Protocols Nos. 11 and 14 supplemented by Protocols Nos. 1, 4, 6, 7, 12 and 13 The text of the Convention is presented

More information

THIRD SECTION. CASE OF LAVRIC v. ROMANIA. (Application no. 22231/05) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG. 14 January 2014 FINAL 14/04/2014

THIRD SECTION. CASE OF LAVRIC v. ROMANIA. (Application no. 22231/05) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG. 14 January 2014 FINAL 14/04/2014 THIRD SECTION CASE OF LAVRIC v. ROMANIA (Application no. 22231/05) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 14 January 2014 FINAL 14/04/2014 This judgment has become final under Article 44 2 of the Convention. It may be subject

More information

European Convention on Human Rights

European Convention on Human Rights European Convention on Human Rights European Convention on Human Rights as amended by Protocols Nos. 11 and 14 supplemented by Protocols Nos. 1, 4, 6, 7, 12 and 13 The text of the Convention is presented

More information

COUR EUROPÉENNE DES DROITS DE L HOMME EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS SECOND SECTION. CASE OF AGOUDIMOS AND CEFALLONIAN SKY SHIPPING CO. v.

COUR EUROPÉENNE DES DROITS DE L HOMME EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS SECOND SECTION. CASE OF AGOUDIMOS AND CEFALLONIAN SKY SHIPPING CO. v. CONSEIL DE L EUROPE COUNCIL OF EUROPE COUR EUROPÉENNE DES DROITS DE L HOMME EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS SECOND SECTION CASE OF AGOUDIMOS AND CEFALLONIAN SKY SHIPPING CO. v. GREECE (Application no. 38703/97)

More information

106th Session Judgment No. 2792

106th Session Judgment No. 2792 Organisation internationale du Travail Tribunal administratif International Labour Organization Administrative Tribunal 106th Session Judgment No. 2792 THE ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL, Considering the second

More information

108th Session Judgment No. 2862

108th Session Judgment No. 2862 Organisation internationale du Travail Tribunal administratif International Labour Organization Administrative Tribunal 108th Session Judgment No. 2862 THE ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL, Considering the complaint

More information

In the case of Guillemin v. France (1),

In the case of Guillemin v. France (1), In the case of Guillemin v. France (1), The European Court of Human Rights, sitting, in accordance with Article 43 (art. 43) of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms

More information

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Third Chamber) 2 April 2009 (*)

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Third Chamber) 2 April 2009 (*) JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Third Chamber) 2 April 2009 (*) (Judicial cooperation in civil matters Jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in matrimonial matters and the matters of parental

More information

Rules of Court. Registry of the Court. 1 January Strasbourg

Rules of Court. Registry of the Court. 1 January Strasbourg Rules of Court 1 January 2016 Registry of the Court Strasbourg Note by the Registry This new edition of the Rules of Court incorporates amendments made by the Plenary Court on 1 June and 5 October 2015.

More information

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Sixth Chamber) 8 December 1987*

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Sixth Chamber) 8 December 1987* JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Sixth Chamber) 8 December 1987* In Case 144/86 REFERENCE to the Court pursuant to the Protocol of 3 June 1971 on the interpretation by the Court of Justice of the Convention of 27

More information

PROTOCOL TO THE AFRICAN CHARTER ON HUMAN AND PEOPLES` RIGHTS ON THE ESTABLISHMENT OF AN AFRICAN COURT ON HUMAN AND PEOPLES` RIGHTS

PROTOCOL TO THE AFRICAN CHARTER ON HUMAN AND PEOPLES` RIGHTS ON THE ESTABLISHMENT OF AN AFRICAN COURT ON HUMAN AND PEOPLES` RIGHTS PROTOCOL TO THE AFRICAN CHARTER ON HUMAN AND PEOPLES` RIGHTS ON THE ESTABLISHMENT OF AN AFRICAN COURT ON HUMAN AND PEOPLES` RIGHTS The Member States of the Organization of African Unity hereinafter referred

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT THIRD JUDICIAL CIRCUIT MADISON COUNTY, ILLINOIS PART FIVE - LAW DIVISION AMENDED COURT RULES

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT THIRD JUDICIAL CIRCUIT MADISON COUNTY, ILLINOIS PART FIVE - LAW DIVISION AMENDED COURT RULES IN THE CIRCUIT COURT THIRD JUDICIAL CIRCUIT MADISON COUNTY, ILLINOIS PART FIVE - LAW DIVISION AMENDED COURT RULES RULE 1. MEDIATION IN MALPRACTICE CASES In order to alleviate the burden to the parties

More information

COUR EUROPÉENNE DES DROITS DE L HOMME EUROPEAN COURTOFHUMAN RIGHTS

COUR EUROPÉENNE DES DROITS DE L HOMME EUROPEAN COURTOFHUMAN RIGHTS CONSEIL DE L EUROPE COUNCIL OF EUROPE COUR EUROPÉENNE DES DROITS DE L HOMME EUROPEAN COURTOFHUMAN RIGHTS FIRST SECTION DECISION AS TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF Application no. 34082/02 by Cornelia RUSU against

More information

The European Commission of Human Rights (First Chamber) sitting in private on 23 October 1997, the following members being present:

The European Commission of Human Rights (First Chamber) sitting in private on 23 October 1997, the following members being present: Roetzheim v. Germany AS TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF Application No. 31177/96 by Theodor (Dora) ROETZHEIM against Germany The European Commission of Human Rights (First Chamber) sitting in private on 23 October

More information

THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS QUESTIONS & ANSWERS FOR LAWYERS

THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS QUESTIONS & ANSWERS FOR LAWYERS THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS QUESTIONS & ANSWERS FOR LAWYERS 0 14 1 2 3 This guide is directed at lawyers intending to bring a case before the European Court of Human Rights. It contains information

More information

CCPR/C/112/D/2070/2011

CCPR/C/112/D/2070/2011 United Nations International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights CCPR/C/112/D/2070/2011 Distr.: General 25 November 2014 Original: English Human Rights Committee Communication No. 2070/2011 Decision

More information

FRIENDLY SETTLEMENT AND STRIKE OUT (Articles 37-38) Textbox xi Example of Friendly Settlement Declaration

FRIENDLY SETTLEMENT AND STRIKE OUT (Articles 37-38) Textbox xi Example of Friendly Settlement Declaration FRIENDLY SETTLEMENT AND STRIKE OUT (Articles 37-38) 8.1 Friendly Settlement 8.1.1 Introduction 8.1.2 Friendly Settlement Declaration Textbox xi Example of Friendly Settlement Declaration 8.1.3 Enforcement

More information

OBTAINING COMPENSATION FOR HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS

OBTAINING COMPENSATION FOR HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS Presented by Blackstone Chambers in association with Liberty Focus on Public Law and Human Rights 18 th November 2005 OBTAINING COMPENSATION FOR HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS PUSHPINDER SAINI IVAN HARE Blackstone

More information

ORDER OF THE PRESIDENT 21 December 2012. (Intervention Representation by a lawyer - Interest in the result of case)

ORDER OF THE PRESIDENT 21 December 2012. (Intervention Representation by a lawyer - Interest in the result of case) ORDER OF THE PRESIDENT 21 December 2012 (Intervention Representation by a lawyer - Interest in the result of case) In Case E-7/12, Schenker North AB, established in Gothenburg (Sweden), Schenker Privpak

More information

Datum van inontvangstneming : 27/12/2012

Datum van inontvangstneming : 27/12/2012 Datum van inontvangstneming : 27/12/2012 Translation C-526/12-1 Case C-526/12 Reference for a preliminary ruling Date lodged: 20 November 2012 Referring court: Debreceni Munkaügyi Bíróság (Hungary) Date

More information

http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/hudoc1doc/hedec/sift/1898.txt

http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/hudoc1doc/hedec/sift/1898.txt Seite 1 von 7 AS TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF Application No. 25964/94 by Sharif Hussein AHMED against Austria The European Commission of Human Rights sitting in private on 2 March 1995, the following members

More information

SUBPOENA FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA REGISTRY:... ... Applicant. ... Respondent

SUBPOENA FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA REGISTRY:... ... Applicant. ... Respondent FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA REGISTRY:... File number:... COURT USE ONLY The last date for service of this subpoena is (refer to Notes 2, 3 &4 on page 4) / /.. Documents must be produced to registry

More information

Loan regulations (Adopted by the Administrative Council by Resolution 1562, on 14 November 2013)

Loan regulations (Adopted by the Administrative Council by Resolution 1562, on 14 November 2013) Loan regulations (Adopted by the Administrative Council by Resolution 1562, on 14 November 2013) Edition updated in November 2014 CHAPTER 1 Object of the Loan Regulations ARTICLE 1.1 Object of the Loan

More information

No. 2008/14 4 June Certain Questions of Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters (Djibouti v. France)

No. 2008/14 4 June Certain Questions of Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters (Djibouti v. France) INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE Peace Palace, Carnegieplein 2, 2517 KJ The Hague, Netherlands Tel.: +31 (0)70 302 2323 Fax: +31 (0)70 364 9928 Website: www.icj-cij.org Press Release Unofficial No. 2008/14

More information

USING LAWYERS IN HONG KONG

USING LAWYERS IN HONG KONG USING LAWYERS IN HONG KONG This Guide deals in general terms with using lawyers in Hong Kong. It aims to help a seafarer understand the legal profession in Hong Kong, and how to select, engage and if need

More information

Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms as amended by Protocol No. 11 with Protocol Nos. 1, 4, 6, 7, 12 and 13

Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms as amended by Protocol No. 11 with Protocol Nos. 1, 4, 6, 7, 12 and 13 Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms as amended by Protocol No. 11 with Protocol Nos. 1, 4, 6, 7, 12 and 13 The text of the Convention had been amended according to the

More information

Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms as amended by Protocol No. 11. with Protocol Nos. 1, 4, 6, 7, 12 and 13

Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms as amended by Protocol No. 11. with Protocol Nos. 1, 4, 6, 7, 12 and 13 Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms as amended by Protocol No. 11 with Protocol Nos. 1, 4, 6, 7, 12 and 13 The text of the Convention had been amended according to the

More information

Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, as amended by Protocol No. 11

Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, as amended by Protocol No. 11 European Treaty Series - No. 5 Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, as amended by Protocol No. 11 Rome, 4.XI.1950 The text of the Convention had been amended according

More information

Supreme Court, Appellate Division First Judicial Department 61 Broadway New York, New York 10006 (212) 401-0800 (212) 287-1045 FAX

Supreme Court, Appellate Division First Judicial Department 61 Broadway New York, New York 10006 (212) 401-0800 (212) 287-1045 FAX Departmental Disciplinary Committee Supreme Court, Appellate Division First Judicial Department 61 Broadway (212) 401-0800 (212) 287-1045 FAX HOW TO FILE A COMPLAINT INTRODUCTION When you hire a lawyer

More information

STATUTE OF THE COMMONWEALTH SECRETARIAT ARBITRAL TRIBUNAL

STATUTE OF THE COMMONWEALTH SECRETARIAT ARBITRAL TRIBUNAL STATUTE OF THE COMMONWEALTH SECRETARIAT ARBITRAL TRIBUNAL Adopted by Commonwealth Governments on 1 July 1995 and amended by them on 24 June 1999, 18 February 2004, 14 May 2005, 16 May 2007 and 28 May 2015.

More information

- 1 - THE ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL OF THE COUNCIL OF EUROPE

- 1 - THE ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL OF THE COUNCIL OF EUROPE - 1 - THE ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL OF THE COUNCIL OF EUROPE By Sergio Sansotta Registrar of the Administrative Tribunal of the Council of Europe I. INTRODUCTION 1. The Administrative Tribunal of the Council

More information

Legal Services Commissioner L.G. Yves Michel Melbourne Vice President Judge I J K Ross Hearing

Legal Services Commissioner L.G. Yves Michel Melbourne Vice President Judge I J K Ross Hearing VICTORIAN CIVIL AND ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL CIVIL DIVISION LEGAL PRACTICE LIST VCAT REFERENCE NO. J33 & J57 OF 2009 CATCHWORDS Legal Profession Act 2004 s 4.4.11(1)(b) failure to provide documents and

More information

FOURTH SECTION. CASE OF SZAFRAŃSKI v. POLAND. (Application no. 17249/12) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG. 15 December 2015

FOURTH SECTION. CASE OF SZAFRAŃSKI v. POLAND. (Application no. 17249/12) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG. 15 December 2015 FOURTH SECTION CASE OF SZAFRAŃSKI v. POLAND (Application no. 17249/12) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 15 December 2015 This judgment will become final in the circumstances set out in Article 44 2 of the Convention.

More information

WITNESSES AT TRIAL. Case: Doorson v Netherlands. ECHR Article: Article 6 The Right to a Fair Trial Project group: University of Glasgow

WITNESSES AT TRIAL. Case: Doorson v Netherlands. ECHR Article: Article 6 The Right to a Fair Trial Project group: University of Glasgow Case: Doorson v Netherlands WITNESSES AT TRIAL ECHR Article: Article 6 The Right to a Fair Trial Project group: University of Glasgow A LANDMARK DECISION A.0 RATIONALE: WHY THIS ARTICLE? WHY THIS JUDGMENT?

More information

SAVEZ CRKAVA RIJEČ ŽIVOTA AND OTHERS v. CROATIA JUDGMENT 1

SAVEZ CRKAVA RIJEČ ŽIVOTA AND OTHERS v. CROATIA JUDGMENT 1 FIRST SECTION CASE OF SAVEZ CRKAVA RIJEČ ŽIVOTA AND OTHERS v. CROATIA (Application no. 7798/08) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 9 December 2010 This judgment will become final in the circumstances set out in Article

More information

FIRST SECTION. Application no. 9500/09 Pavel Vasilyevich MUSIYENKO against Russia STATEMENT OF FACTS

FIRST SECTION. Application no. 9500/09 Pavel Vasilyevich MUSIYENKO against Russia STATEMENT OF FACTS FIRST SECTION Application no. 9500/09 Pavel Vasilyevich MUSIYENKO against Russia STATEMENT OF FACTS THE FACTS The applicant, Mr Pavel Vasilyevich Musiyenko, is a Russian national who was born in 1934 and

More information

Rules of Arbitration for the EHF Court of Arbitration (ECA) Statutes ECA STATUTES

Rules of Arbitration for the EHF Court of Arbitration (ECA) Statutes ECA STATUTES Statutes 1. Scope ECA STATUTES (1) The EHF Court of Arbitration shall have competence whenever disputes arise between the EHF and National Federations, between or among National Federations, between National

More information

Seite 1 von 7 AS TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF Application No. 20193/92 by Telesystem Tirol Kabeltelevision against Austria The European Commission of Human Rights (First Chamber) sitting in private on 6 April

More information

Rules for Admission to the Practice of Law in West Virginia

Rules for Admission to the Practice of Law in West Virginia STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA At a Regular Term of the Supreme Court of Appeals, continued and held at Charleston, Kanawha County, on September 29, 2014, the following order was made and entered: Re: Approval

More information

Council of the European Union Brussels, 12 September 2014 (OR. en)

Council of the European Union Brussels, 12 September 2014 (OR. en) Council of the European Union Brussels, 12 September 2014 (OR. en) Interinstitutional File: 2013/0409 (COD) 13132/14 NOTE From: To: Presidency DROIPEN 104 COPEN 218 CODEC 1799 Working Party on Substantive

More information

Submitted by: G. and L. Lindgren and L. Holm A. and B. Hjord, E. and I. Lundquist, L. Radko and E. Stahl [represented by counsel]

Submitted by: G. and L. Lindgren and L. Holm A. and B. Hjord, E. and I. Lundquist, L. Radko and E. Stahl [represented by counsel] HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITTEE Lindgren et al. and Lundquist et al. v. Sweden Communications Nos. 298/1988 and 299/1988 9 November 1990 CCPR/C/40/D/298-299/1988* DEAL JOINTLY AND VIEWS Submitted by: G. and L.

More information

No. 2012/7 3 February 2012. Jurisdictional Immunities of the State (Germany v. Italy: Greece intervening)

No. 2012/7 3 February 2012. Jurisdictional Immunities of the State (Germany v. Italy: Greece intervening) INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE Peace Palace, Carnegieplein 2, 2517 KJ The Hague, Netherlands Tel.: +31 (0)70 302 2323 Fax: +31 (0)70 364 9928 Website: www.icj-cij.org Press Release Unofficial No. 2012/7

More information

A D V O C A T E S A C T (12 December 1958/496)

A D V O C A T E S A C T (12 December 1958/496) 1 THE FINNISH BAR ASSOCIATION July 2005 A D V O C A T E S A C T (12 December 1958/496) Section 1 An advocate is a person who is registered in the Roll of Advocates as a member of the general Finnish Bar

More information

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT 13 January 2004*

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT 13 January 2004* JUDGMENT OF 13. 1. 2004 CASE C-453/00 JUDGMENT OF THE COURT 13 January 2004* In Case C-453/00, REFERENCE to the Court under Article 234 EC by the College van Beroep voor het bedrijfsleven (Netherlands)

More information

P R O T O C O L. The State Attorney's Office of the Republic of Croatia and the Prosecutor's Office of Bosnia and Herzegovina (hereinafter: Parties)

P R O T O C O L. The State Attorney's Office of the Republic of Croatia and the Prosecutor's Office of Bosnia and Herzegovina (hereinafter: Parties) P R O T O C O L of the State Attorney's Office of the Republic of Croatia and the Prosecutor s Office of Bosnia and Herzegovina on Cooperation in Prosecution of Perpetrators of War Crimes, Crimes against

More information

High Level Conference on the Future of the European Court of Human Rights

High Level Conference on the Future of the European Court of Human Rights High Level Conference on the Future of the European Court of Human Rights Interlaken Declaration 19. February 2010 The High Level Conference meeting at Interlaken on 18 and 19 February 2010 at the initiative

More information

FIRST SECTION. CASE OF BERNH LARSEN HOLDING AS AND OTHERS v. NORWAY. (Application no. 24117/08) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG. 14 March 2013

FIRST SECTION. CASE OF BERNH LARSEN HOLDING AS AND OTHERS v. NORWAY. (Application no. 24117/08) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG. 14 March 2013 FIRST SECTION CASE OF BERNH LARSEN HOLDING AS AND OTHERS v. NORWAY (Application no. 24117/08) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 14 March 2013 This judgment will become final in the circumstances set out in Article 44

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND. Misc. Docket AG. No. 13. September Term, 2005 ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND WILLIAM M.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND. Misc. Docket AG. No. 13. September Term, 2005 ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND WILLIAM M. IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND Misc. Docket AG No. 13 September Term, 2005 ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND v. WILLIAM M. LOGAN Bell, C.J. Raker Wilner Cathell Harrell Battaglia Greene JJ.

More information

LAW OF THE REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN About the order of consideration of judicial bodies and individuals petitions

LAW OF THE REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN About the order of consideration of judicial bodies and individuals petitions LAW OF THE REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN About the order of consideration of judicial bodies and individuals petitions Article 1. Basic concepts used in this Law Article 2. Legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan

More information

COUR EUROPÉENNE DES DROITS DE L HOMME EUROPEAN COURTOFHUMAN RIGHTS

COUR EUROPÉENNE DES DROITS DE L HOMME EUROPEAN COURTOFHUMAN RIGHTS CONSEIL DE L EUROPE COUNCIL OF EUROPE COUR EUROPÉENNE DES DROITS DE L HOMME EUROPEAN COURTOFHUMAN RIGHTS SECOND SECTION CASE OF STOCKHOLMS FÖRSÄKRINGS- OCH SKADESTÅNDSJURIDIK AB v. SWEDEN (Application

More information

HANDLING COMPLAINTS. The dissatisfaction may be based on the perception that the School has:

HANDLING COMPLAINTS. The dissatisfaction may be based on the perception that the School has: HANDLING COMPLAINTS PURPOSE It is recognised that, from time to time, complaints may be received by the School from parents (including guardians and any person with whom a student normally or regularly

More information

Rules of Procedure. of the Administrative Tribunal of the Bank for International Settlements. Article 1

Rules of Procedure. of the Administrative Tribunal of the Bank for International Settlements. Article 1 January 1, 2011 Chapter I: General provisions Scope of application Rules of Procedure of the Administrative Tribunal of the Bank for International Settlements Article 1 1. These rules (the Rules of Procedure)

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO 1 1 1 1 1 1 In the Matter of the Agreed Case: THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, and LYON FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC., doing business as U.S. BANCORP BUSINESS

More information

Procedures Manual for the Argentine National Contact Point. Title I National Contact Point

Procedures Manual for the Argentine National Contact Point. Title I National Contact Point 1 Procedures Manual for the Argentine National Contact Point Title I National Contact Point Article 1: THE ARGENTINE NATIONAL CONTACT POINT, hereinafter ANCP, will act in compliance with this Procedures

More information

On Effect of Constitution on Bankruptcy Law

On Effect of Constitution on Bankruptcy Law Professor of Civil Law, University of Tartu On Effect of Constitution on Bankruptcy Law Pursuant to 3 of the Constitution of the Republic of Estonia, the state authority is exercised solely pursuant to

More information

Intellectual Property Tribunal, Act [Chapter 26:08]

Intellectual Property Tribunal, Act [Chapter 26:08] Intellectual Property Tribunal, Act [Chapter 26:08] To provide for the establishment, functions and powers of the Intellectual Property Tribunal and to provide for matters connected therewith or incidental

More information

S.B. 88 126th General Assembly (As Introduced)

S.B. 88 126th General Assembly (As Introduced) Elizabeth Dominic Bill Analysis Legislative Service Commission S.B. 88 126th General Assembly (As Introduced) Sens. Coughlin, Goodman BILL SUMMARY Requires the Superintendent of Insurance to establish

More information

FINAL 24/07/2012 SECOND SECTION. CASE OF KALUCZA v. HUNGARY. (Application no /10) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG. 24 April 2012

FINAL 24/07/2012 SECOND SECTION. CASE OF KALUCZA v. HUNGARY. (Application no /10) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG. 24 April 2012 SECOND SECTION CASE OF KALUCZA v. HUNGARY (Application no. 57693/10) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 24 April 2012 FINAL 24/07/2012 This judgment has become final under Article 44 2 of the Convention. It may be subject

More information

MINORITY RIGHTS UNDER THE EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS

MINORITY RIGHTS UNDER THE EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS Pamphlet No. 7 MINORITY RIGHTS UNDER THE EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS Summary: The European Convention on Human Rights is an international treaty that sets out fundamental rights for the benefit

More information

SUPREME COURT, STATE OF COLORADO

SUPREME COURT, STATE OF COLORADO People v. Kocel, Report,No.02PDJ035,1-08-03. Attorney Regulation. Respondent, Michael S. Kocel, attorney registration number 16305 was suspended from the practice of law in the State of Colorado for a

More information

SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN

SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN 2012 WI 123 CASE NO.: COMPLETE TITLE: In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against Thomas E. Bielinski, Attorney at Law: Office of Lawyer Regulation, Complainant, v. Thomas

More information

http://curia.eu.int/jurisp/cgi-bin/gettext.pl?lang=en&num=79948890t19030275&doc...

http://curia.eu.int/jurisp/cgi-bin/gettext.pl?lang=en&num=79948890t19030275&doc... Page 1 of 7 IMPORTANT LEGAL NOTICE - The information on this site is subject to a disclaimer and a copyright notice. JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE (Third Chamber) 9 November 2005 (*) (Community

More information

The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting on 1 December 2009 as a Chamber composed of:

The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting on 1 December 2009 as a Chamber composed of: SECOND SECTION DECISION AS TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF Application no. 55779/08 by Regina RINKŪNIENĖ against Lithuania The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting on 1 December 2009 as a Chamber

More information

UNIFORM RAPID SUSPENSION SYSTEM ( URS ) 1 March 2013

UNIFORM RAPID SUSPENSION SYSTEM ( URS ) 1 March 2013 UNIFORM RAPID SUSPENSION SYSTEM ( URS ) 1 March 2013 1. Complaint 1.1 Filing the Complaint 1.1.1 Proceedings are initiated by electronically filing with a URS Provider a Complaint outlining the trademark

More information