Pre-Employment Screening:
|
|
- Eustace Tate
- 7 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Pre-Employment Screening: How EEOC Guidance Affects Criminal Background Checks and Potentially Increases Employer Risks Tamika R. Nordstrom Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C. One Ninety One Peachtree Tower 191 Peachtree St. NE, Ste 4800 Atlanta, GA (404)
2 Tamika R. Nordstrom is a shareholder with Ogletree Deakins Nash Smoak & Stewart, P.C., in the firm s Atlanta office. Ms. Nordstrom is an experienced litigator whose legal practice focuses on management defense in the areas of labor and employment law. She specializes in all areas of employment litigation and also provides ongoing counseling for management on a full range of day-today employment issues. Ms. Nordstrom was consistently named a Rising Star by Minnesota Law & Politics during her 10 years of practice in Minneapolis and was selected as an Up and Coming attorney by Minnesota Lawyer Magazine in Since practicing in Georgia, she has been selected as one of Georgia Trend Magazine s Legal Elite and was selected for inclusion in Georgia Rising Stars. Ms. Nordstrom was recently selected as one of the Best Lawyers in America for 2013 in labor and employment litigation.
3 Pre-Employment Screening: How EEOC Guidance Affects Criminal Background Checks and Potentially Increases Employer Risks Table of Contents I. Introduction...93 II. EEOC s Guidance on Employers Consideration of Arrest and Conviction Records...93 A. The Decision...93 B. Title VII Concerns...93 C. Affirmative Defense of Job Relatedness...94 D. Criticism...95 E. Enforcement...96 III. State Laws Regulating Inquiries About and Use of Criminal Records...96 A. States Limiting Inquiries About Criminal Records...96 B. State Laws Regulating Use of Criminal Record Information...96 C. State Laws Requiring Criminal Background Checks...97 IV. Best Practices...97 V. Conclusion...98 Pre-Employment Screening: How EEOC Guidance Affects Criminal... Nordstrom 91
4
5 Pre-Employment Screening: How EEOC Guidance Affects Criminal Background Checks and Potentially Increases Employer Risks I. Introduction Hiring has never been harder. Traditional screening practices such as criminal record searches have come under increasing scrutiny by state and federal legislators. Many states have enacted or recently introduced laws limiting the practice and usage of criminal record information in order to protect the privacy of applicants and prevent potentially discriminatory hiring practices. The result is not only a patchwork of different laws that may trap an unwary employer, but also the loss of potentially valuable hiring tools. The first section of this paper will review recent EEOC Guidance on criminal background checks and required changes to employer practices. The second section of this paper will examine the various state laws preventing the request and usage of criminal records in hiring. The third section of this paper will review best practices and guidance in navigating hiring with the new guidelines. II. EEOC s Guidance on Employers Consideration of Arrest and Conviction Records A. The Decision On April 25, 2012, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) issued, after a vote of 4-1, an updated Enforcement Guidance on the Consideration of Arrest and Conviction Records in Employment Decisions under Title VII (the Guidance ). The Guidance, which took effect immediately, is a summary of the EEOC s long-held position that employers reliance on arrest and conviction records may have a disparate impact on individuals because of their race or national origin, with significant changes in certain areas that are important to most employers. Republican-appointee Commissioner Constance S. Barker dissented, while Republican-appointee Commissioner Victoria A. Lipnic voted with the majority, after reportedly securing some employer-friendly concessions in the Guidance. There was a push to get the Guidance approved before Democrat-appointee Commissioner Stuart J. Ishimaru steps down later this month. B. Title VII Concerns The Guidance is part of the EEOC s broader effort to crack down on the alleged misuse of arrest and conviction records. The EEOC s increased efforts in this area are due, in part, to the growing disparity in arrest and incarceration rates for Hispanics and African Americans compared to Caucasians. The Guidance notes that African Americans and Hispanics are arrested at a rate that is two to three times their proportion of the general population. Incarceration rates for male Hispanics (17.2 percent) and African Americans (32.2 percent) are also much higher than for Caucasian men (5.9 percent). The EEOC relies on these disparities in concluding national data supports a finding that criminal record exclusions have a disparate impact based on race and national origin. Pre-Employment Screening: How EEOC Guidance Affects Criminal... Nordstrom 93
6 The Guidance differentiates arrests from convictions, noting that because arrests are not proof of criminal conduct they cannot serve as a proper basis for excluding an individual from employment. The EEOC acknowledges, however, that while an arrest record standing alone may not be used to deny an employment opportunity, an employer may make an employment decision based on the conduct underlying the arrest if the conduct makes the individual unfit for the particular job position. According to the EEOC Guidance, Title VII violations may occur in two employment background check situations: 1. When employers treat criminal history differently for different applicants/employees, based on their race or national origin (disparate treatment) or 2. When an employer s neutral background check policy or practice disproportionately impacts protected individuals (disparate impact), unless the policy is job-related and consistent with business necessity. Not surprisingly, the majority of the Guidance discusses the second disparate impact type of Title VII race or national origin discrimination, although not before the Commission reminds employers that it may find disparate treatment when employers make distinctions between two applicants/employees of different races based on the employer s judgment as to the relative severity of past criminal convictions. The Guidance explains that, for a disparate impact claim, the EEOC first must identify the policy or practice causing the disparate impact and then confirm that there is a disparate impact. The commentary associated with the second confirmation step suggests employers may expect more EEOC requests for voluminous applicant and hiring data, in evaluating disparate impact. C. Affirmative Defense of Job Relatedness Once the EEOC has established disparate impact, the employer has the burden of proving the affirmative defense that its policy or practice is job-related and consistent with business necessity. In the Guidance, the Commission repeats its long-held position that an arrest, by itself, is never job-related and consistent with business necessity because an arrest does not establish that criminal conduct has occurred, individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty, and many arrests do not result in convictions. Although the EEOC identifies two circumstances allowing employers to establish the job-related and consistent with business necessity defense, only one is likely to be useful for most private-sector employers a targeted screening process that takes into account the following factors: 1. The nature and gravity of the offense or conduct; 2. The time that has passed since the offense, conduct, and/or completion of the sentence; and 3. The nature of the job held or sought. For any individuals screened out by this targeted screening process, the EEOC explains, the employer s policy should then provide an opportunity for an individualized assessment. While the EEOC stops just short of actually requiring employers to conduct individualized assessments as part of their targeted screening process, the Guidance repeatedly stresses that a screening process that does not include individualized assessments is more likely to violate Title VII. The between-the-lines message is that individualized assessments are now expected. The Guidance provides several factors for consideration during the individualized assessment, including some directly-relevant ones like a showing that the individual was incorrectly identified in the background check and less-relevant ones like employment or character references. 94 Employment and Labor Law May 2013
7 The second way an employer can satisfy the job-related and consistent with business necessity defense is complicated and costly for each position, the employer must validate the criminal conduct exclusion, by using the Uniform Guidelines on Employee Selection Procedures, including its statistical models, to validate that criminal conduct data relates to subsequent work performance. Even the Guidance seems to acknowledge that issues about the availability of criminal conduct data and the application of validation studies may be tough hurdles for employers to clear. D. Criticism Many in the business community have complained that the Guidance was rushed through with no public rulemaking or the associated process for public comment a refrain recently echoed by the Senate Appropriations Subcommittee responsible for EEOC funding and Commissioner Barker in her dissent. Although the EEOC did hold a hearing about the use of criminal background checks in employment, only nine witnesses were invited to testify, and of those nine, eight supported efforts to reduce the use of criminal background checks, whereas only one witness represented the interests of businesses that would be adversely affected by greater restrictions on the use of such checks. The U.S. Commission on Civil Rights held a hearing on December 7, 2012 regarding the new guidelines and concerns. Seventeen witnesses testified, including representatives of several national employer associations, major security firms, and victims advocacy groups, as well as ex-offenders advocacy groups. None of these employers or employer associations had been invited to testify before the EEOC. The witnesses cited numerous problems with the guidance, one particularly troubling problem being that the guidance provides no safe harbors for employers attempting to comply with conflicting state laws. Many states reasonably bar individuals convicted of certain crimes from working in particular jobs. Yet the EEOC specifically maintains that compliance with state law is not a defense to an EEOC charge under the guidance. The EEOC will honor a state-law exemption only if the EEOC determines that the state law complies with the EEOC guidance. So the decision becomes 1) determining whether a state law complies with the guidance, and if unsure, then 2) deciding whether it s better to be sued for violating state law or for discrimination under Title VII. The Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM) was one of the agencies that gave testimony regarding its concerns. Jonathan Segal, a partner at Duane Morris LLP in Philadelphia and the Pennsylvania legislative director for SHRM, testified on behalf of SHRM that clarification is needed on the EEOC s interpretation of disparate impact. Segal said, the guidance s interpretation of disparate impact appears to make employers vulnerable to an EEOC investigation any time they take an adverse employment action against individuals of certain races or national origins based on criminal background checks regardless of whether they have conducted a valid individualized assessment seemingly making criminal convictions a new protected status. Other witnesses before the Commission on Civil Rights included the National Small Business Association (NSBA) and the National Retail Federation (NRF), both of which urged the EEOC to clarify its guidance, so that expectations are made clear and so businesses can effectively meet those expectations. NSBA President, Todd McCracken, stated This is not a guidance at all. It provides no meaningful rules about how to proceed. It s really just a threat that the EEOC may proceed against employers if, in hindsight, it decides it wants to do so. NRF Vice President of Loss Prevention, Richard Mellor, said the guidelines are unclear and open to interpretation. Retailers who ask about criminal backgrounds run the risk of being charged with discrimination, but those who do not are not provided with any legal protection against lawsuits if an unscreened hire later commits a crime on the job, he said. Pre-Employment Screening: How EEOC Guidance Affects Criminal... Nordstrom 95
8 E. Enforcement While courts are required to defer to EEOC guidance like this to some extent, EEOC guidance is not controlling on courts interpretation of Title VII and is not entitled to the high level of deference given to federal regulations. Instead, courts and litigants may refer to the EEOC s interpretation for guidance, based on the guidance s thoroughness, the validity of its reasoning, and its consistency with earlier EEOC pronouncements. III. State Laws Regulating Inquiries About and Use of Criminal Records In addition to the federal considerations regarding the inquiries and usage of criminal records in the hiring process, employers must also arm themselves with knowledge regarding individual state laws and regulations. The federal rules and guidelines in many instances are more permissive than their state equivalents. The states have laws and rules ranging from prohibitions on asking any questions regarding arrest records to restricting the employer s use of conviction data in making an employment decision. In some states, while there is no restriction placed on the employer, there are protections provided to the applicant with regard to what information they are required to report. Also, as noted earlier, several states require criminal background checks for certain job functions and industries. Accordingly, this becomes an extremely tangled web of considerations. A. States Limiting Inquiries About Criminal Records A number of states (e.g. Massachusetts and Minnesota) and cities (e.g., Philadelphia) have recently enacted so called Ban the Box laws prohibiting employers from asking applicants about their criminal records during the initial phases of the hiring process. Several similar laws have been introduced in other states and at the federal level (e.g., HR 6220). The enacted and pending laws generally prohibit making inquiries about criminal convictions until after a conditional job offer has been made. In New Jersey, a bill was introduced in 2012 (A 2300) that would prohibit inquiries about convictions on an initial written application and would permit inquiries during a subsequent interview if a review of the initial written application indicates the applicant has preliminary eligibility for the position. B. State Laws Regulating Use of Criminal Record Information Several States have laws that prohibit employers from refusing to hire an applicant based on a criminal record, except under limited circumstances. New Jersey legislators have introduced several bills in recent years designed to restrict the use of applicants criminal histories, but none have progressed very far. New York has enacted one of the most restrictive laws An employer may not reject an applicant unless (1) there is a direct relationship between the criminal offense and the specific position sought or (2) employment of the person would involve or unreasonable risk to the safety or welfare of specific individuals or the general public. An employer must make an individualized assessment in each case considering 8 specified factors, such as the specific duties of position, the nature of these offense, the passage of time, and evidence of rehabilitation. A copy of the laws, known informally as Article 23-A, must be posted in a conspicuous location in the workplace. Also, if an employer conducts a background check (i.e., basic consumer report ) on an applicant using a third party company which reveals criminal conviction information, in additional to all other FCRA requirements, the employer must include a copy of Article 23-A with the pre-adverse action letter. Additionally, if an employer intends to conduct an investigative consumer report the employer must provide 96 Employment and Labor Law May 2013
9 the applicant with a copy of Article 23-A prior to procuring the report when the authorization is obtained. Finally, any person who has a criminal record who is denied employment (whether or not because of the prior record) must upon request be provided with a written statement setting forth the reasons for the rejection within 30 days. C. State Laws Requiring Criminal Background Checks Even some of the states perceived to be most employee friendly have mandatory criminal background checks for certain jobs and industries. For example, California requires that all private employers conduct criminal background checks on tow truck owners and operators (Cal Vehicle Code, Sec ). California also requires, as do most states, that individuals who will have direct contact with minors be checked for criminal background concerns. Similarly, all applicants to become toll enforcement officers in Florida must have their criminal history screened prior to hire (Fla. Admin. Code, r ). In Texas, all companies providing in-home services and/or residential deliveries must obtain criminal histories on their employees (Tex, Civ Prac & Rem. Code Ann., Section ). These are the kind of state law requirements that pose a distinct and direct problem to the EEOC s guidance. The situation will surely arise where there is a combination of the following facts: (1) a criminal background check was performed in accordance with state law requirements; (2) a member of a racial minority is not selected for a position based, in part, on this criminal background information; and (3) that individual proceeds with a claim for race discrimination pursuant to Title VII and the EEOC s stated guidance. If there also happens to be a disproportionate number of racially diverse employees working for that employer, this becomes a significant liability risk. IV. Best Practices The EEOC s guidance also provides an Employer Best Practices section with recommendations and suggestions on avoiding liability under Title VII. The EEOC recommends the following: (1) eliminating blanket policies or practices that automatically exclude individuals from employment based on any criminal record; (2) limiting inquiries into criminal convictions to those types of convictions that are potentially jobrelated for the position in question and consistent with business necessity; (3) developing a narrowly-tailored written policy and procedure for screening applicants and employees that provides for individualized consideration of criminal history; and (4) training managers, hiring officials and decision makers on how to implement the policy and procedures consistent with Title VII. Perhaps most significant is the EEOC s recommendation that employers not ask about convictions on job applications. Instead, the EEOC recommends that if and when employers make such inquiries, the inquiries be limited to convictions for which exclusion would be job-related for the position in question and consistent with business necessity. As we know, this is not always possible without violating certain state laws. Accordingly, it would be in all employers best interests to ensure that all applicable state laws are reviewed and considered prior to issuing any blanket determinations regarding prohibiting or limiting inquiries into the criminal background of its applicants. Individualized assessments and documentation supporting any jobrelated concerns are also extremely important. While no one has expressly stated it, the racial makeup of the workforce will undoubtedly come into play if an employer is ever put in the position of justifying the use of criminal histories with the EEOC or in Title VII litigation. Employers continuing to use criminal background checks should also be prepared to explain any disproportionate representations in the workforce racial demographics to the extent they exist. Pre-Employment Screening: How EEOC Guidance Affects Criminal... Nordstrom 97
10 V. Conclusion The old phrase the devil is in the details has never been more apt than with this new EEOC Guidance. Although the EEOC opines that this guidance is a natural evolution of its prior guidance, there are some huge changes, including the section on individualized assessment of applicants and employees. Employers would be wise to reexamine their background check policies and practices, in light of the new Guidance. Only time and, unfortunately, lawsuits are likely to determine whether courts think all or only some of the EEOC s new Guidance is correct. 98 Employment and Labor Law May 2013
Federal Employment Discrimination Law: Title VII Standards that Relate to People with Criminal Records
Federal Employment Discrimination Law: Title VII Standards that Relate to People with Criminal Records Updated November 30, 2009 Madeline Neighly Margaret (Peggy) Stevenson Oakland, California (510) 409-2427
More informationEmployers Guide to Best Practices. For Use of Background Checks in Employment Decisions. Copyright 2010 Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights Under Law
Employers Guide to Best Practices For Use of Background Checks in Employment Decisions A 2010 poll of the Society of Human Resource Management shows that approximately 60 percent of employers use credit
More informationEmployment Screening and Criminal Records: Pitfalls and Best Practices
Employment Screening and Criminal Records: Pitfalls and Best Practices Tanisha Wilburn Senior Attorney Advisor U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission December 4, 2013 2 BACKGROUND April 25, 2012
More informationUnderstanding Your Fair Credit Reporting Act Obligations
Understanding Your Fair Credit Reporting Act Obligations It is important to understand your obligations under the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) when you become an end user of background screening services.
More informationUsing Arrest, Conviction, and Misdemeanor Information in the Hiring Process
Summary It is a common belief that the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) prohibits the use of arrest and misdemeanor information in the hiring process. As is discussed below, this is not the
More informationEEOC-Denver Field Office
EEOC-Denver Field Office Laws EEOC enforces Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII) 15 employees or more Equal Pay Act of 1963 (EPA) At least one other employee of the opposite sex Age Discrimination
More informationTCL > December 2012 Issue > The EEOC s New Enforcement Guidance on the Use of Criminal Background Checks
TCL > December 2012 Issue > The EEOC s New Enforcement Guidance on the Use of Criminal Background Checks The Colorado Lawyer December 2012 Vol. 41, No. 12 [Page 45] 2012 The Colorado Lawyer and Colorado
More informationThird Thursday Crowell & Moring s Labor & Employment Update October 23, 2014
Third Thursday Crowell & Moring s Labor & Employment Update October 23, 2014 The webinar will begin shortly. Please stand by. Today s Presenters Trina Fairley Barlow Tom Gies Christine Hawes Ira Saxe 2
More informationGUIDE TO CRIMINAL BACKGROUND CHECKS IN EMPLOYMENT
GUIDE TO CRIMINAL BACKGROUND CHECKS IN EMPLOYMENT Philadelphia LawWorks, a project of Philadelphia VIP, contributes to Philadelphia s economic development by ensuring that homeowners, nonprofits and small
More informationMAY 2004. Legal Risks of Applicant Selection and Assessment
MAY 2004 Legal Risks of Applicant Selection and Assessment 2 Legal Risks of Applicant Selection and Assessment Effective personnel screening and selection processes are an important first step toward ensuring
More informationSo what do you really know about the candidates
44 PROFITABLE RESTAURATEURS ARE ALWAYS LEARNING IN-HOUSE COUNSEL Do Ask, Do Tell Vetting Employee Applicants Without Breaking the Law Questions on an employment application that could elicit information
More informationCollateral damage occurs in any war, including America s War on Crime.
12 Collateral damage occurs in any war, including America s War on Crime. Ironically, our zealous efforts to keep communities safe may have actually destabilized and divided them. The vast expansion of
More informationPre-Employment Screening Methods: How Much Do You Really Want to Know?
Ryan, Swanson & Cleveland, PLLC 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 3400 Seattle, WA 98101-3034 www.ryanswansonlaw.com Pre-Employment Screening Methods: How Much Do You Really Want to Know? Presented by: James M.
More informationU.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION
U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION Charlotte District Office 129 West Trade Street, Suite 400 Charlotte, NC 28202 Intake Information Group: 800-669-4000 Intake Information Group TTY: 800-669-6820
More informationUsing Criminal History Records to Make Personnel Decisions
Using Criminal History Records to Make Personnel Decisions TASPA/TAEE 2014 Winter Conference December 11, 2014 Amber K. King Thompson & Horton LLP 3200 Southwest Freeway, Suite 2000 Houston, Texas 77027
More informationJob Applicants with Criminal Records
Job Applicants with Criminal Records What Every Employer Needs to Know The Council on Crime and Justice, a Minnesota nonprofit organization, offers this guidebook to help employers better understand the
More informationState Laws and Their Impact on Use of Criminal Records for Employment Purposes
Laws and Their Impact on Use of Criminal Records for Employment Purposes While the FCRA and EEOC provide a legal framework under which consumer reporting agencies and employers report and use criminal
More information2014 Employment Law Update South Central Industrial Association. November 6, 2014 Houma, Louisiana
2014 Employment Law Update South Central Industrial Association November 6, 2014 Houma, Louisiana Which is Riskier? Hiring Criminals or Conducting Background Checks? Presented by: Timothy H. Scott Phone:
More informationEmployment Rights Under the Americans with Disabilities Act
DEVELOPED BY EQUIP FOR EQUALITY UNDER A GRANT PROVIDED BY THE ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT ON AGING DISCRIMINATION Employment Rights Under the Americans with Disabilities Act People with disabilities, including
More informationhistory on an employment application, and four states Hawaii, Massachusetts, Minnesota, and Rhode Island also ban such inquiries.
March 2014 Another One Bans the Box: San Francisco s Fair Chance Ordinance Prohibits Criminal History Inquiries on Employment and Affordable Housing Applications and Imposes Restrictions on the Use of
More informationFair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) Basics. A Primer for U.S. Employers from Littler Mendelson, the Nation s Largest Workforce Law Practice
Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) Basics A Primer for U.S. Employers from Littler Mendelson, the Nation s Largest Workforce Law Practice Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) Basics A Primer for U.S. Employers
More informationWhite Paper of Criminal Background Checks
White Paper of Criminal Background Checks Criminal Background Checks For Employment Purposes In recent years, criminal background checks have become a vital part of the employment process, both as a means
More informationCriminal Convictions and Employment Rights In New York State Robert D. Strassel
Policy Brief April 26, 2010 Criminal Convictions and Employment Rights In New York State Robert D. Strassel Executive Summary New York has a strong policy toward preventing discrimination based on prior
More informationPolicy Options: Limiting Employer Liability When Hiring Individuals Formerly Incarcerated
Policy Options: Limiting Employer Liability When Hiring Individuals Formerly Incarcerated Employers in Philadelphia require skilled and dedicated workers in order to be successful. Returning citizens (those
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE DIVISION. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) ) v. ) No. ) (Judge ) ) )
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) ) v. ) No. ) (Judge ) ) ) PETITION TO ENTER A PLEA OF GUILTY (Misdemeanor) I,, respectfully represent
More informationGUILTY PLEA and PLEA AGREEMENT United States Attorney Northern District of Georgia
Case 1:11-cr-00326-SCJ-JFK Document 119-1 Filed 01/20/12 Page 1 of 16 GUILTY PLEA and PLEA AGREEMENT United States Attorney Northern District of Georgia UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF
More informationQuestions and Answers from Webinar: Know Your Rights: Employment Discrimination Against People with Alcohol/Drug Histories
Questions and Answers from Webinar: Know Your Rights: Employment Discrimination Against People with Alcohol/Drug Histories NOTE: We answered a substantial number of the questions received; however, we
More informationA Guide to Employer Liability in Maryland: Principles of Agency and Negligent Hiring
A Guide to Employer Liability in Maryland: Principles of Agency and Negligent Hiring Prepared by the Job Opportunities Task Force and the Homeless Person s Representation Project For more information,
More informationNOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT
A FEDERAL COURT ORDERED THIS NOTICE. THIS IS NOT A SOLICITATION FROM A LAWYER. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Soutter v. Equifax Information Services, LLC Civil Action No. 3:10-cv-107
More informationEquality In The Workplace
All Things EEOC 2013 Update Melanie V. Pate Phone: 602.262.5318 Cell: 480.231.8586 FY12 Charge Statistics 99,412 total charges filed in FY 2012 Slight decrease from FY 2011 -- Race/Color: 36.4% -- Gender:
More informationCredit Checks: Best Practice. Mitigating Risk
Credit Checks: Best Practice Recommendations for Mitigating Risk Rod M. Fliegel Biography Rod M. Fliegel, Shareholder Littler Mendelson Mr. Fliegel has extensive experience defending national and local
More informationIntroductions. Overview. FCRA Litigation Is Powerful
HR attorneys have been buzzing that pre-employment screening litigation has become the new wage and hour, AKA the bread and butter for employment lawyers. The Background Checks: Best Practices for Compliance
More informationThe Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA): Background Screening and Compliance
The Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA): Background Screening and Compliance A white paper on how to be compliant with FCRA background screening requirements. The Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA): Background
More informationThe ABC's of the Hiring Process Applications, Background Checks, Credit Reports and Other Important Considerations in Selecting Employees
The ABC's of the Hiring Process Applications, Background Checks, Credit Reports and Other Important Considerations in Selecting Employees Phyllis G. Cancienne, Esq. Baker Donelson 450 Laurel Street, 20
More informationNew York State Labor Law Amendments Affecting Proof in Pay Discrimination Cases and Employer Policies Concerning Wage Disclosure
New York State Labor Law Amendments Affecting Proof in Pay Discrimination Cases and Employer Policies Concerning Wage Disclosure Amendments Alter Burden of Proof in Gender-Based Pay Cases and Bar Employer
More informationREVISITING DIRECTOR AND OFFICER INDEMNIFICATION: PROVISIONS IN THE NEW D.C. NONPROFIT ACT
Updated July 2015 REVISITING DIRECTOR AND OFFICER INDEMNIFICATION: PROVISIONS IN THE NEW D.C. NONPROFIT ACT 1. Initial Considerations The District of Columbia has recently modernized its statute dealing
More informationNew York Employment Law Update
Recent Legislative Developments in New York State Regarding Reductions in Force and Criminal Conviction Records SUMMARY A number of new New York State statutes of significance to employers will soon become
More informationTrends in Discrimination Law
Trends in Discrimination Law A. Martin Wickliff, Jr. April 2015 *Paper was adopted from a prior presentation by David L. Barron Agenda Latest EEOC Statistics EEOC Enforcement Guidance on Background Checks
More informationTHE GEORGIA NON-PROFIT AND LAWS PREVENTING DISCRIMINATION IN EMPLOYMENT
THE GEORGIA NON-PROFIT AND LAWS PREVENTING DISCRIMINATION IN EMPLOYMENT By: Benjamin D. Briggs Anna C. Curry TROUTMAN SANDERS LLP 600 Peachtree Street NE Bank of America Plaza, Suite 5200 Atlanta, Georgia
More informationAuthorization. First Middle ( none) Last. current from Mo/Yr to Mo/Yr Street City, State & Zip. from Mo/Yr to Mo/Yr Street City, State & Zip
Authorization Authorization: By signing below, you authorize: (a) General Information Services, Inc. ( GIS ) to request information about you from any public or private information source; (b) anyone to
More informationOFFICIAL COURT NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT
OFFICIAL COURT NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT KELLY MINICH AND DEBBIE MINICH, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Superior Court of California, County of San Diego v. Plaintiffs, Case No.
More informationTESTIMONY OF: Zoey Jones - Immigration Attorney BROOKLYN DEFENDER SERVICES
TESTIMONY OF: Zoey Jones - Immigration Attorney BROOKLYN DEFENDER SERVICES Presented before The New York Police Department (NYPD) Public Hearing on Police Department U Visa Certification Proposed Rule
More informationMANAGING WORK RELATED INJURIES: The Interaction of Workers Compensation, the ADA and Maximum Leave Policies
MANAGING WORK RELATED INJURIES: The Interaction of Workers Compensation, the ADA and Maximum Leave Policies Patrick J. Harvey harveyp@ballardspahr.com Ballard Spahr LLP 215.864.8240 Erin K. Clarke clarkee@ballardspahr.com
More informationI. Fair Credit Reporting Act and the Use of Background Checks.
I. Fair Credit Reporting Act and the Use of Background Checks. Note about this brief. This summary provides information about the law generally. It is designed as a public service, but it is not intended
More informationStrategy & Insights. Massachusetts CORI Reform: A Wave of New Obligations For Employers Conducting Criminal Background Checks.
Strategy & Insights Massachusetts CORI Reform: A Wave of New Obligations For Employers Conducting Criminal Background Checks As employers who do business in Massachusetts are aware, on August 6, 2010,
More informationFINDING EMPLOYMENT WITH A CRIMINAL HISTORY: DO APPLICANTS HAVE ANY RIGHTS?
FINDING EMPLOYMENT WITH A CRIMINAL HISTORY: DO APPLICANTS HAVE ANY RIGHTS? September 2015 A discussion among a diverse group of community stakeholders with the Atlanta District Office of the Equal Opportunity
More informationSeattle Job Assistance Legislation Regulating the use of criminal history in employment decisions. Frequently Asked Questions
Seattle Job Assistance Legislation Regulating the use of criminal history in employment decisions Frequently Asked Questions This Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) sheet addresses some of the most common
More informationBackground Checks. What Employers Need to Know. A joint publication of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and the Federal Trade Commission
Background Checks What Employers Need to Know A joint publication of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and the Federal Trade Commission When making personnel decisions including hiring, retention,
More informationGuns at the Workplace
Jonathan Hancock and Joann Coston-Holloway, Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, PC, with PLC Labor & Employment A Note describing state guns-at-work laws, sometimes known as parking lot laws.
More informationCORI S P E C I A L R E P O R T. Jackson Lewis LLP P A G E 0
P A G E 0 ABOUT JACKSON LEWIS SERVING THE DIVERSE NEEDS OF MANAGEMENT Founded in 1958, Jackson Lewis, dedicated to representing management exclusively in workplace law, is one of the fastest growing workplace
More informationDo You Have A Criminal Conviction History? A GUIDE TO YOUR EMPLOYMENT RIGHTS IN NEW YORK
Do You Have A Criminal Conviction History? A GUIDE TO YOUR EMPLOYMENT RIGHTS IN NEW YORK Introduction Searching for the right job can be difficult. It can be harder if you have a criminal conviction history,
More informationBass, Berry & Sims Presents An Employer s Guide to Navigating the EEOC s 2013 Initiatives
Bass, Berry & Sims Presents An Employer s Guide to Navigating the EEOC s 2013 Initiatives Table of Contents Introduction 1 Background: The EEOC s Strategic Enforcement Plan 2-3 What Can Employers Expect
More informationtogether Overview Conviction/Credit Check Issues Covered Topics EEOC Guidelines and Policies on Criminal Convictions
together Conviction/Credit Check Issues Presented at the ABA Section of Labor and Employment Law Annual Conference November 6, 2010 Robert Jon Hendricks www.morganlewis.com Overview Covered Topics EEOC
More informationReflections on Ethical Issues In the Tripartite Relationship
Reflections on Ethical Issues In the Tripartite Relationship [click] By Bruce A. Campbell 1 Introduction In most areas of the practice of law, there are a number of ethical issues that arise on a frequent
More informationElizabeth Grossman United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Regional Attorney, New York District Office
Elizabeth Grossman United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Regional Attorney, New York District Office Age Discrimination In Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA) Protects individuals who are 40
More informationChief Clerk of the Assembly. Secretary of the Senate. Private Secretary of the Governor
Assembly Bill No. 22 Passed the Assembly September 8, 2011 Chief Clerk of the Assembly Passed the Senate September 8, 2011 Secretary of the Senate This bill was received by the Governor this day of, 2011,
More informationGeneral District Courts
General District Courts To Understand Your Visit to Court You Should Know: It is the courts wish that you know your rights and duties. We want every person who comes here to receive fair treatment in accordance
More informationCITY OF LOS ANGELES SEXUAL ORIENTATION, GENDER IDENTITY, AND GENDER EXPRESSION DISCRIMINATION COMPLAINT PROCEDURE
CITY OF LOS ANGELES SEXUAL ORIENTATION, GENDER IDENTITY, AND GENDER EXPRESSION DISCRIMINATION COMPLAINT PROCEDURE The policy of the City of Los Angeles has been, and will continue to be, to promote and
More informationOVERVIEW OF STATE LAWS THAT BAN DISCRIMINATION BY EMPLOYERS
OVERVIEW OF STATE LAWS THAT BAN DISCRIMINATION BY EMPLOYERS As states consider passing laws that prohibit employment discrimination against people with criminal records, it may be helpful to examine how
More informationAPPLICANT TRACKING, SYSTEMIC DISCRIMINATION AND THE NEW, IMPROVED EEOC AND OFCCP
APPLICANT TRACKING, SYSTEMIC DISCRIMINATION AND THE NEW, IMPROVED EEOC AND OFCCP Speaker: Mickey Silberman, Esq. Jackson Lewis LLP Managing Partner, Denver Office silbermm@jacksonlewis.com (303) 225-2400
More informationImmigration Assistance Services
Immigration Assistance Services New York enacted A07137 into law in 2004. A07137 is reported to be the first to establish standards for immigration consultants. A press release from New York Governor Pataki
More informationKNOW YOUR VOTING RIGHTS
KNOW YOUR VOTING RIGHTS I. THE VOTING RIGHTS ACT The Voting Rights Act contains an arsenal of protections for minority voters. These include: A Nationwide Ban on Discrimination in Voting The Voting Rights
More informationSENATE BILL 1486 AN ACT
Senate Engrossed State of Arizona Senate Forty-fifth Legislature First Regular Session 0 SENATE BILL AN ACT AMENDING SECTION -, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES, AS AMENDED BY LAWS 00, CHAPTER, SECTION ; AMENDING
More informationHow To Get Your Criminal History From The Justice Department
Criminal Records & Employment 1. What exactly is a criminal record? YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS A criminal record, formally known as a summary criminal history, or more commonly known as a rap sheet, is a list of
More informationEEOC s New Guidelines on Workplace Bias: What Employers Need to Know EEOC FIGHT AGAINST SYSTEMIC DISCRIMINATION -- PRIORITY
EEOC FIGHT AGAINST SYSTEMIC DISCRIMINATION -- PRIORITY On April 4, 2006, the EEOC announced that it was making the fi ght against systemic discrimination a top priority. To that end, the Commission will
More informationTHE EQUALITY ACT 2010
THE EQUALITY ACT 2010 October 1st 2010 saw many of the provisions attained within the Equality Act, which gained Royal Assent on the 8th April 2010, come into force. The following summary has been put
More informationrequires the legal knowledge, skill, thoroughness and preparation reasonably necessary for the representation.
LEGAL ETHICS OPINION 1814 UNDISCLOSED RECORDING OF THIRD PARTIES IN CRIMINAL MATTERS In this hypothetical, a Criminal Defense Lawyer represents A who is charged with conspiracy to distribute controlled
More informationEmployee Relations. Waivers and Severance Arrangements: EEOC Announcement Offers Reminders for Employers. Anne E. Moran
VOL. 35, NO. 4 SPRING 2010 Employee Relations L A W J O U R N A L Employee Benefits Waivers and Severance Arrangements: EEOC Announcement Offers Reminders for Employers Anne E. Moran One common practice
More informationSubchapter 6.600 Criminal Procedure in District Court
Subchapter 6.600 Criminal Procedure in District Court Rule 6.610 Criminal Procedure Generally (A) Precedence. Criminal cases have precedence over civil actions. (B) Pretrial. The court, on its own initiative
More informationThis brochure provides general guidance on the legal rights of individuals with alcohol and drug problems. It is not intended to serve as legal
This brochure provides general guidance on the legal rights of individuals with alcohol and drug problems. It is not intended to serve as legal advice for any particular case involving or potentially involving
More informationSummary of End-Users Obligations. Federal Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) And California Investigative Consumer Reporting Agencies Act (CA ICRA)
Summary of End-Users Obligations And California Investigative Consumer Reporting Agencies Act (CA ICRA) INTRODUCTION - Description and purpose in background screening The following information provides
More information1. How many children do you have? This question is inappropriate for two reasons.
Interview Questions: Legal or Illegal? Can you ask if an employee has been arrested? If they have a high school diploma? What organizations they belong to? Employment application forms and pre-employment
More informationPre-Employment Background Checks. October 2, 2006
Date Effective October 2, 2006 City Manager Revision Date Effective Code Number HR19 Human Resources Responsible Key Business Purpose: The City of Charlotte seeks to ensure the safety and security of employees
More informationBan the Box. Betsey Lund, Attorney at Law Neils, Franz, Chirhart, P.A. www.nfclaw.com
Ban the Box 2013 Minnesota Employment Law Update Betsey Lund, Attorney at Law Neils, Franz, Chirhart, P.A. www.nfclaw.com Sponsored by Central MN Society of Human Resource Management (CMSHRM) November
More informationDiscrimination in the Workplace Against Individuals with Hearing Loss
Discrimination in the Workplace Against Individuals with Hearing Loss An applicant or employee may believe that his or her employment rights have been violated on the basis of a hearing disability. In
More informationBackground Checks Do they Minimize your Risk or Add to it?
Background Checks Do they Minimize your Risk or Add to it? Moderator: Dawn McCartney, Director CW Strategies and Research, Staffing Industry Analysts Panelists: Tom Shelley DP Procurement, DHL Clay Lewis
More informationBEST PRACTICE STANDARDS
BEST PRACTICE STANDARDS THE PROPER USE OF CRIMINAL RECORDS IN HIRING National Workrights Institute CONTRIBUTORS SPONSORING ORGANIZATION STAFF: Roberta Meyers has served as Director of the Legal Action
More informationWhat Every Employer Needs to Know in the Background Screening World
Jim Sweeney What Every Employer Needs to Know in the Background Screening World Today s Objectives Reminders compliance issues with the FCRA Identify the components of a solid background check. The EEOC
More informationJ.V. Industrial Companies, Ltd. Dispute Resolution Process. Introduction
J.V. Industrial Companies, Ltd. Dispute Resolution Process Companies proudly bearing the Zachry name have had the Dispute Resolution Process ( DR Process ) in place since April 15, 2002. It has proven
More informationGUIDE TO CRIMINAL RECORDS AND EMPLOYMENT IN WASHINGTON STATE
GUIDE TO CRIMINAL RECORDS AND EMPLOYMENT IN WASHINGTON STATE This guide provides general information about the rights and responsibilities of people with a criminal record who are looking for a job. It
More informationTODD S ON THE GO, LLC 260 13 th Street Marion, IA 52302 PHONE: (319) 892-0136
TODD S ON THE GO, LLC 260 13 th Street Marion, IA 52302 PHONE: (319) 892-0136 Position Applied for: Date: dd s On The Go, LLC considers all applicants for employment without regard to race, color, religion,
More informationAN ACT. The goals of the alcohol and drug treatment divisions created under this Chapter include the following:
ENROLLED Regular Session, 1997 HOUSE BILL NO. 2412 BY REPRESENTATIVE JACK SMITH AN ACT To enact Chapter 33 of Title 13 of the Louisiana Revised Statutes of 1950, comprised of R.S. 13:5301 through 5304,
More informationLAW ENFORCEMENT PHYSICAL FITNESS STANDARDS AND TITLE VII
LAW ENFORCEMENT PHYSICAL FITNESS STANDARDS AND TITLE VII by Michael E. Brooks, J.D. Supervisory Special Agent Office of the General Counsel Legal Instruction Unit FBI Academy Reprinted with Permission
More informationProfit and Purpose: Two New Types of California Corporation that Promote Social as well as Financial Benefits
April 3, 2012 Practice Group(s): Corporate Climate Change and Sustainability Profit and Purpose: Two New Types of California Corporation that Promote Social as well as Financial By Louise Adamson, Yusef
More informationInsurance Basics. WHITE PAPER Tough Issues Registered Sex Offenders in Ministry Activities
Insurance Basics WHITE PAPER Tough Issues Registered Sex Offenders in Ministry Activities 6400 Brotherhood Way, P.O. Box 2227, Fort Wayne IN 46801-2227 800 333 3735 fax.260 482 7709 brotherhoodmutual.com
More informationSUMMARY OF KEY PROVISIONS UNDER FEDERAL, STATE, and CITY EEO LAWS
SUMMARY OF KEY PROVISIONS UNDER FEDERAL, STATE, and CITY EEO LAWS I. PROTECTED CATEGORIES Protected Classes 42 USC 2000e-2(a)-(c) Prohibits discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex or national
More informationAdult Probation: Terms, Conditions and Revocation
Adult Probation: Terms, Conditions and Revocation Mandatory Conditions of Community Supervision Restitution Mandatory that it be pronounced at sentencing Sauceda v. State, 309 S.W. 3 rd 767 (Amarillo Ct
More informationFact sheet. New York State Department of Labor Wage Theft prevention act. What is New?
Fact sheet New York State Department of Labor Wage Theft prevention act A law passed in 2010 gives more protection to workers in New York State. This law, the Wage Theft Prevention Act (WTPA), took effect
More informationTestimony of Adrienne Poteat, Acting Director Court Services and Offender Supervision Agency for the District of Columbia
Testimony of Adrienne Poteat, Acting Director Court Services and Offender Supervision Agency for the District of Columbia Before the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Oversight And Government
More informationBattered Women's Legal Advocacy Project, Inc.
Battered Women's Legal Advocacy Project, Inc. Filing Complaints Against Judges This technical assistance packet addresses the problem of how and when to file a complaint against a judge. It is meant to
More informationThe NREMT Certification Eligibility, Discipline and Appeals Policy
The NREMT Certification Eligibility, Discipline and Appeals Policy A. Purpose of Certification/Registry The National Registry of Emergency Medical Technicians (NREMT) is the National EMS Certification
More informationTESTIMONY ROBERT M. A. JOHNSON ANOKA COUNTY ATTORNEY ANOKA, MINNESOTA JUNE 4, 2009 INDIGENT REPRESENTATION: A GROWING NATIONAL CRISIS
TESTIMONY OF ROBERT M. A. JOHNSON ANOKA COUNTY ATTORNEY ANOKA, MINNESOTA JUNE 4, 2009 ON INDIGENT REPRESENTATION: A GROWING NATIONAL CRISIS TESTIMONY OF ROBERT M.A. JOHNSON FOR THE HOUSE JUDICIARY SUBCOMMITTEE
More informationHIRING AND SELECTION Enforcement Priorities and Litigation Trends
HIRING AND SELECTION Enforcement Priorities and Litigation Trends (717) 237-5209 along@mwn.com ENFORCEMENT PRIORITIES AND LITIGATION TRENDS IN HIRING Recruitment, selection, and hiring decisions Claims
More informationNo. 147. An act relating to referral to court diversion for driving with a suspended license. (S.244)
No. 147. An act relating to referral to court diversion for driving with a suspended license. (S.244) It is hereby enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Vermont: Sec. 1. LEGISLATIVE PURPOSE (a)
More informationHOUSE BILL 1067. By Jernigan BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE STATE OF TENNESSEE:
HOUSE BILL 1067 By Jernigan AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 40, Chapter 17, relative to requiring reciprocal disclosure of witnesses prior to trial. BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY
More informationPOLICY NO. 3-80 LEGAL DEFENSE BENEFIT
FLORIDA POLICE BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION, INC. POLICY NO. 3-80 LEGAL DEFENSE BENEFIT BACKGROUND: In order to provide legal defense benefits to the members of Florida P.B.A., the Board of Directors hereby
More informationKnow Your Rights Under the San Francisco Fair Chance Ordinance
Know Your Rights Under the San Francisco Fair Chance Ordinance February 26, 2014 Michelle Natividad Rodriguez Staff Attorney mrodriguez@nelp.org About 1 in 4 U.S. Adults Has an Arrest or Conviction Record
More informationWhat you don t know can hurt you.
What you don t know can hurt you. Why you need a defense lawyer if you are charged with a misdemeanor. A misdemeanor conviction is SERIOUS A misdemeanor is not a minor crime. If you are convicted of a
More informationState FCRA Rulings. Abide by the Federal Trade Commission s Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA), 15 U. S. C. 1661 et seq. and the following state ruling:
State FCRA Rulings Alabama Alaska and the following state ruling: AS 12.62.160 (b) (8)Release and Use of Criminal Justice Information Subject to the requirements of this section, and except as otherwise
More informationPRESIDING JUSTICE WOLFSON delivered the opinion of the. Petitioner C.R.M. filed a charge of discrimination with the
SECOND DIVISION April 17, 2007 No. 1-06-2447 IN THE MATTER OF: ) Appeal from an order C.R.M., ) of the Chief Legal ) Counsel of the Petitioner-Appellant, ) Illinois Department ) of Human Rights. v. ) )
More information