CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION B- Wing, 2 nd Floor, August Kranti Bhavan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi

Save this PDF as:
 WORD  PNG  TXT  JPG

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION B- Wing, 2 nd Floor, August Kranti Bhavan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi"

Transcription

1 CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION B- Wing, 2 nd Floor, August Kranti Bhavan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi PARTIES TO THE CASE: Appeal No.CIC/SS/A/2011/ Appellant : Ms. Iqbal Kaur (represented through Shri Inderjeet Singh) Respondent : National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi (through Shri S. Hanumantha Rao, Deputy Registrar & CPIO and Shri Yatinder Kumar Sakkarwal, UDC & ACPIO) Date of Hearing : 12/12/2011 ORDER 1. The Appellant through her RTI Application dated 28/01/2011 had sought the copy of the complete case file including order sheets and judgment in Revision Petition No.914 of 2010 titled as Simran Co-operative Housing Society Limited vs. Naresh Sidramappa Upase & others which was decided on 17/03/2010 by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi ( NCDRC ). 2. The then ACPIO of the NCDRC had replied to the said RTI Application on 14/02/2011 and informed the Appellant that such information in the nature of judicial documents cannot be provided to third parties like the Appellant, 1

2 who was not involved in the said revision petition case. The ACPIO relied on an order dated 18/09/2007 passed by this Commission in Appeal No.CIC/AT/A/2006/00586 titled as Rakesh Kumar Gupta vs. ITAT. The ACPIO stated that as per the decision in Rakesh Kumar Gupta s case (supra), Section 4 (1) (d) of the RTI Act does not apply to judicial proceedings and therefore, the judicial records cannot be provided under the RTI Act. 3. When the Appellant preferred first appeal before the FAA of NCDRC, the said FAA through his Order dated 11/04/2011 upheld the reply given by the ACPIO. Though the FAA noted that the Appellant may inspect the judicial file of the said revision petition, yet he agreed with the CPIO to the extent that copy of judicial records cannot be supplied under the RTI Act. Aggrieved henceforth, the Appellant has preferred this second appeal. 4. The Commission has perused through the material placed on record and has heard both the parties at considerable length. 5. At the outset, the Commission would like to mention that as per Section 3 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, the word Court includes all Judges and Magistrates, and all persons, except arbitrators, legally authorized to take evidence. Clearly, as per the said provision, tribunals and commissions such 2

3 the NCDRC are covered within the ambit of the term Court. Now, the core issue which arises for consideration in the present appeal is whether the information related to court proceedings, as sought by the Appellant, can be processed under the RTI Act. 6. A similar issue of law, though framed slightly differently, arose before the Hon ble Delhi High Court in W.P.(C) 3530 / 2011 titled as Registrar, Supreme Court of India vs. RS Mishra & others. The Hon ble Delhi High Court vide its Order dated 23/05/2011 passed in the said petition had held as follows: 3. An important question that arises in the present writ petition is whether an application seeking information relating to court proceedings can be processed under the Right to Information Act, 2005 notwithstanding that there exist rules of procedure of the court concerning the disclosure of such information to the applicant. 4. Issue notice to Respondent No. 1, returnable on 24th August Dasti in addition. Respondents 2 and 3 are formal parties and no notice need to be issued to them. 5. Till the next date of hearing, there shall be a stay of the impugned order of the Central Information Commission ( CIC ). The CIC will also not proceed with petitions involving similar questions till a decision is rendered in the present writ petition. 7. The abovesaid order of the Hon ble Delhi High Court debars this Commission to proceed with cases involving any question of law similar to 3

4 the one been framed by the Hon ble Court, i.e. whether an application seeking information relating to court proceedings can be processed under the Right to Information Act, 2005 notwithstanding that there exist rules of procedure of the court concerning the disclosure of such information to the applicant (Emphasis Added). Therefore, the Commission is directed expressly not to proceed with such cases only where there are two channels of obtaining information related to court proceedings for an information seeker, i.e. one, through the procedure formulated by the court itself and the other, through the RTI Act. 8. It will not be wrong to say that if there is a situation where there are no procedures or rules established by any court for dissemination of information relating to its proceedings, then the order passed by the Hon ble Delhi High Court will not be attracted. Precisely, that is the case in the present appeal. 9. In the present case, the Consumer Protection Regulations, 2005 have been made by the NCDRC under Section 30A of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 and the relevant regulations pertaining to supply of court records are reproduced below: 4

5 21. Certified copy.- (l) A copy of the order is to be given to the parties free of cost as required under the Act and the rules made thereunder. (2) In case a party requires an extra copy, it shall be issued to him duly certified by the Registry on a payment of Rs.20/- irrespective of number of pages. (3) A certified copy of an order shall clearly specify the date when free copy was issued, date of application, date when the copy was made ready and the date when it was so delivered to him. (4) A fee of Rs.20/- shall be paid for obtaining another certified copy. (5) Any party desiring to get a certified copy of any document on the file of the Consumer Forum may get the same on payment of certification fee of twenty rupees per copy. Provided that if any such document of which certified copy is sought, is over and above 5 pages, an extra amount of one rupee per page shall be charged over and above the fee of twenty rupees. (6) Certified copy of any miscellaneous order passed by the Consumer Forum shall be supplied on payment of Rs.5 per copy. 5

6 22. Inspection of records.-parties or their agents can inspect the records of any matter by filing an application on payment often rupees as fee. 10. Perusal of the abovementioned regulations shows that there is nothing in the existing rules or regulations which lays any specific procedure or express mechanism for disclosure of information related to court proceedings of NCDRC to third-parties, i.e. to those persons who are not directly interested parties contesting the lis before the NCDRC. The regulations simply concern the disclosure of information related to court proceedings to parties but do not prohibit the disclosure of such information to third parties in an express manner. 11. It is in fact the submission on behalf of the NCDRC that as per law, anything which is not permitted is forbidden. Therefore, according to NCDRC, it is understood as implied that as per the Consumer Protection Regulations, 2005, any third party is prohibited from claiming information related to court proceedings of NCDRC. Reliance has been placed on Section 8 (1) (b) of the RTI Act which exempts the disclosure of such information which has been expressly forbidden to be published by any 6

7 Court of law or tribunal or disclosure of which may constitute contempt of court. 12. There is an inherent contradiction in the arguments advanced on behalf of the NCDRC. While on one hand, it is stated that absence of any provision in the Consumer Protection Regulations, 2005 for providing information related to court proceedings to any third party automatically implies prohibition from claiming such information; on the other hand, it is urged that as per Section 8 (1) (b) of the RTI Act, only that information is exempted from disclosure which is expressly forbidden to be published by any court. 13. There is nothing in the Consumer protection Regulations, 2005 which expressly prohibits or debars the disclosure of information related to court proceedings. It is in fact silent on the said issue. Such silence can be interpreted in two ways. 14. First, if such silence is interpreted in a harmonious manner with the RTI Act and it is assumed that the NCDRC may exercise discretion under the Consumer Protection Regulations, 2005 to provide information related to its proceedings to any third-party, then it will mean that the third-party has two channels of obtaining such information. One, through the Regulations 7

8 framed by the NCDRC and the other, through the RTI Act. In such case, this Commission will be hit by the interim order dated 23/05/2011 passed by the Hon ble Delhi Curt (supra), and by virtue of which, this Commission will not be in a position to proceed with the present appeal. 15. Second, if such silence is interpreted in the manner as suggested in the written submissions made on behalf of the NCDRC so as to mean that Consumer Protection Regulations, 2005 prohibit the disclosure of information related to its proceedings to third-parties, then that shall leave only one channel to the RTI Applicant for seeking such information, i.e. through the RTI Act. Therefore, the Commission will be entitled to proceed with the case since the issue framed by the Hon ble Delhi High Court (supra) will not arise at all and therefore, the order dated 23/05/2011 will not operate on this Commission. 16. In the present appeal, the NCDRC has preferred to take the second approach through its written submissions. By prohibiting or debarring the disclosure of information related to its proceedings to third-parties altogether, the NCDRC has virtually created an inconsistency with the object of the RTI Act. The purpose of the RTI Act is that disclosure of information shall be the norm while exemption shall be the exception. Therefore, in case of such inconsistency between the consumer Protection Regulations, 2005 and the 8

9 RTI Act, it is the latter which will prevail due to its overriding effect as per Section 22 of the RTI Act. Section 22 of the RTI Act reads as follows: 22. Act to have overriding effect - The provisions of this Act shall have effect notwithstanding anything inconsistent therewith contained in the Official Secrets Act, 1923, and any other law for the time being in force or in any instrument having effect by virtue of any law other than this Act. 17. Therefore, in the absence of any express bar on disclosure of information related to its proceedings to third-parties by the NCDRC, the matter has to be looked from the aspect of the RTI Act. 18. The Appellant is third-party seeking information relating to court proceedings which involved other individuals or persons who has personal interest in the said case. Section 8 (1) (j) of the RTI Act exempts the disclosure of such information which relates to personal information the disclosure of which has no relationship to any public activity or interest, or which would cause unwarranted invasion of the privacy of the individual. Unless the Central Public Information Officer or the State Public Information Officer or the appellate authority, as the case may be, is satisfied that the larger public interest justifies the disclosure of such information, the same cannot be provided under the RTI Act. 9

10 19. The Appellant, as a third-party to the case decided by the NCDRC, has failed to show how the information in the nature of entire case file of such decided case will yield larger public interest. The Appellant has also failed to show how the disclosure of such case records will have any relationship to any public activity or interest. In fact, it is the view of this Commission that disclosure of such case records to the Appellant will cause unwarranted invasion of the privacy of those parties who were directly involved as contesting parties in the said decided case before the NCDRC. 20. Therefore, the information sought by the Appellant is exempted from disclosure under section 8 (1) (j) of the RTI Act and thus, cannot be provided to her. 21. Before parting, the Commission would like to clarify that the Full-Bench decision of this Commission in Rakesh Kumar Gupta s case (supra) dealt with the following three issues: 22. ISSUES FOR DETERMINATION: I. Whether this Commission, under the Right to Information Act, can order the ITAT to disclose information which that Tribunal has decided not to disclose under the Income Tax Act, 1961 as amended from time to time and rules made thereunder? 10

11 II. Whether the RTI Act applies to a judicial proceeding and, if so, does it override the existing law concerning dissemination of information in respect of a judicial proceeding? III. Whether the information, which the respondents say are prohibited under the Income Tax Act can be given under the Right to Information Act? 22. The answers to the above stated three issues in the Rakesh Kumar Gupta s case (supra) do not apply to the present case for precisely two reasons. First, while in that case, ITAT had decided expressly and categorically not to disclose certain information related to its proceedings by virtue of the IT Act, 1961; in the present case, there is nothing in the consumer protection Regulations, 2005 which expressly debars the disclosure of information related to proceedings before NCDRC to third-parties. Second, that by virtue of the order dated 23/05/2011 passed by the Hon ble Delhi High Court (supra), the question whether RTI Act applies to judicial proceedings notwithstanding that there are rules of court for disclosure of information related to such judicial proceedings is presently subjudice and there is express direction of the Hon ble Delhi High Court to this Commission to not decide such matter till the Hon ble Court does so. Therefore, the decision in 11

12 the Rakesh Kumar Gupta s case (supra) does not hold an authoritative stand till the matter is disposed by the Hon ble Delhi Court. 23. Therefore, in light of the foregoing observations, the appeal is accordingly disposed of. Authenticated True Copy (Sushma Singh) Information Commissioner (DC Singh) Deputy Registrar Name & Address of Parties: Ms. Iqbal Kaur, 105 A, Sector IV DIZ Area, BKS Marg, New Delhi The CPIO/PIO, National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, 7 th Floor, B Wing, Janpath Bhawan, Janpath, New Delhi The First Appellate Authority, National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, 5 th Floor, B Wing, Janpath Bhawan, Janpath, New Delhi

Respondents : Shipping Corporation of India Limited ORDER. This appeal earlier came up for hearing on 05.06.2013 when the Commission

Respondents : Shipping Corporation of India Limited ORDER. This appeal earlier came up for hearing on 05.06.2013 when the Commission Central Information Commission Room No. 305, 2nd Floor, B Wing, August Kranti Bhavan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi 110066 Web: www.cic.gov.in Tel No: 26167931 Case No. November 12, 2013 Appellant : Shri

More information

Shri D. Sethi, GM, Ms. M. Kuttykrishnan, Asstt. Legal Adviser & Ms. Divya Sood Daur, General Manager at CIC. ADJUNCT ORDER

Shri D. Sethi, GM, Ms. M. Kuttykrishnan, Asstt. Legal Adviser & Ms. Divya Sood Daur, General Manager at CIC. ADJUNCT ORDER Central Information Commission Room No.307, II Floor, B Wing, August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi110066 websitecic. gov.in Appeal: No. CIC/VS/A/2013/002002/MP Appellant : Public Authority

More information

Central Information Commission. Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi 110 066. Website: www.cic.gov.in. : Heavy Water Plant, Kota ORDER

Central Information Commission. Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi 110 066. Website: www.cic.gov.in. : Heavy Water Plant, Kota ORDER Central Information Commission Room No.306, 2 nd Floor, August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi 110 066 Website: www.cic.gov.in CIC/SM/A/2013/000855/SS Dated: 14.2.2014 Appellant : Gaurav Garg,

More information

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION. Complainant : Shri R.K. Jain, 1512 B, Bhishm Pitamah Marg, Wazir Nagar, New Delhi 110 003.

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION. Complainant : Shri R.K. Jain, 1512 B, Bhishm Pitamah Marg, Wazir Nagar, New Delhi 110 003. CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION 2 nd Floor, August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi 110066 Decision No. CIC/DS/C/2013/000559/SB Dated 07.04.2016 Complainant : Shri R.K. Jain, 1512 B, Bhishm

More information

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION (Room No.315, B Wing, August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi 110 066) Prof. M. Sridhar Acharyulu (Madabhushi Sridhar) Information Commissioner CIC/SA/C/2015/000015

More information

Appeal: No. CIC/DS/A/2012/002663. Appellant /Complainant : Shri B.B. Das Adhikary, Bhubaneswar

Appeal: No. CIC/DS/A/2012/002663. Appellant /Complainant : Shri B.B. Das Adhikary, Bhubaneswar Central Information Commission Room No.307, II Floor, B Wing, August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi 110066 Telefax:011 26180532 & 011 26107254 website cic.gov.in Appellant /Complainant :

More information

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION (Room No.315, B Wing, August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi 110 066) Prof. M. Sridhar Acharyulu (Madabhushi Sridhar) Information Commissioner CIC/SA/A/2015/001951

More information

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Club Building (Near Post Office) Old JNU Campus, New Delhi-110067 Tel: +91-11-26105682. File No.CIC/DS/A/2011/001995/RM

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Club Building (Near Post Office) Old JNU Campus, New Delhi-110067 Tel: +91-11-26105682. File No.CIC/DS/A/2011/001995/RM CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Club Building (Near Post Office) Old JNU Campus, New Delhi-110067 Tel: +91-11-26105682 File No.CIC/DS/A/2011/001995/RM Appellant: Mr. Rakesh Kumar Gupta, New Delhi Public

More information

CIC/VS/A/2013/001063/SH

CIC/VS/A/2013/001063/SH Central Information Commission, New Delhi File No. CIC/VS/C/2013/000347/SH File No. CIC/VS/C/2013/000349/SH File No. CIC/VS/C/2013/000350/SH File No. CIC/VS/C/2013/000352/SH File No. CIC/VS/C/2013/000353/SH

More information

On behalf of the Respondents, the following were present in person:

On behalf of the Respondents, the following were present in person: Central Information Commission, New Delhi File No. File No. CIC/SH/A/2015/002332 File No. CIC/SH/C/2015/000462 Right to Information Act 2005 Under Section (18)/ (19) Date of hearing : 28th March 2016 Date

More information

On behalf of the Respondents, Shri Sanjay Agarwal, CPIO was present at the NIC

On behalf of the Respondents, Shri Sanjay Agarwal, CPIO was present at the NIC Central Information Commission, New Delhi File No. Right to Information Act 2005 Under Section (19) Date of hearing : 29th June 2016 Date of decision : 29th June 2016 Name of the Appellant : Shri Ramchandra

More information

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION 2nd Floor, 'B' Wing, August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi -110067 Tel : +91-11-26717355

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION 2nd Floor, 'B' Wing, August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi -110067 Tel : +91-11-26717355 CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION 2nd Floor, 'B' Wing, August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi -110067 Tel : +91-11-26717355 Appeal No.CIC/VS/A/2014/001672 Appellant: Subhash Sharma R/o Khera

More information

Appellant /Complainant : Sh. Madan Mohan Tiwari, New Delhi

Appellant /Complainant : Sh. Madan Mohan Tiwari, New Delhi 1 Central Information Commission Room No.296, II Floor, B Wing, August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi 110066 Telefax:011 26180532 & 011 26107254 website cic.gov.in Appellant /Complainant

More information

present at the NIC Studio, Ahmedabad and Ms. Charuta Joshi, Manager (Legal) was

present at the NIC Studio, Ahmedabad and Ms. Charuta Joshi, Manager (Legal) was Central Information Commission, New Delhi File No. File No. CIC/SH/A/2014/002051 Right to Information Act 2005 Under Section (19) Date of hearing : 7 th July 2015 Date of decision : 7 th July 2015 Name

More information

Central Information Commission, New Delhi File No. CIC/SH/A/2014/002481 Right to Information Act 2005 Under Section (19) 18th January 2016

Central Information Commission, New Delhi File No. CIC/SH/A/2014/002481 Right to Information Act 2005 Under Section (19) 18th January 2016 Central Information Commission, New Delhi File No. Right to Information Act 2005 Under Section (19) Date of first hearing : 18th January 2016 Date of first order : 18th January 2016 Date of second hearing

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. Special Leave Petition (Civil) No of 2012 CC 14781/2012)

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. Special Leave Petition (Civil) No of 2012 CC 14781/2012) 1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 27734 of 2012 (@ CC 14781/2012) Girish Ramchandra Deshpande.. Petitioner Versus Cen. Information

More information

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION (Room No.315, B Wing, August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi 110 066) File No.CIC/SA/A/2014/000669 Appellant : Sh. Anil Sood Respondent : Sub Divisional Magistrate

More information

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION (Room No.315, B Wing, August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi 110 066) File No.CIC/SS/A/2013/002209 SA Appellant : Mr. Subhash Chand Agrawal Respondent : Department

More information

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Club Building (Near Post Office) Old JNU Campus, New Delhi - 110067 Tel: +91-11-26161796

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Club Building (Near Post Office) Old JNU Campus, New Delhi - 110067 Tel: +91-11-26161796 CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Club Building (Near Post Office) Old JNU Campus, New Delhi - 110067 Tel: +91-11-26161796 Relevant Facts emerging from the Appeal: Appellant : Mr. Vinod K. Jose, E-3, Jhandewalan

More information

Appellant - Mohd. Yusuf Abbasee Respondent - Government of NCT of Delhi

Appellant - Mohd. Yusuf Abbasee Respondent - Government of NCT of Delhi CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Appeal No.CIC/WB/A/2006/00699 & 700 dated 21.9.2006 Right to Information Act 2005 Section 19 Appellant - Mohd. Yusuf Abbasee Respondent - Government of NCT of Delhi Facts:

More information

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi-110066 20.01.2016 20.01.2016. Bokaro. Kolkata

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi-110066 20.01.2016 20.01.2016. Bokaro. Kolkata CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi-110066 F.No.CIC/YA/A/2015/001700 Date of Hearing Date of Decision : : 20.01.2016 20.01.2016 Complainant/Appellant : Ms.

More information

104, Silverton Town, 1 st Floor, Golf Course Extension Road, Sec 50, Gurgaon 122001. File No. CIC/SH/A/2014/002741

104, Silverton Town, 1 st Floor, Golf Course Extension Road, Sec 50, Gurgaon 122001. File No. CIC/SH/A/2014/002741 Central Information Commission, New Delhi File No. File No. CIC/SH/A/2014/002740 Right to Information Act 2005 Under Section (19) Date of first hearing 5th January 2016 Date of first order 5th January

More information

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Appeal Nos. CIC/WB/A/2008/01019 & 1020 dated 3-6-2008 Right to Information Act 2005 Section 19

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Appeal Nos. CIC/WB/A/2008/01019 & 1020 dated 3-6-2008 Right to Information Act 2005 Section 19 CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Appeal Nos. CIC/WB/A/2008/01019 & 1020 dated 3-6-2008 Right to Information Act 2005 Section 19 Appellant: Respondent: Shri Sudhir Chopra Central Vigilance Commission (CVC)

More information

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION (Room No.315, B Wing, August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi 110 066) Prof. M. Sridhar Acharyulu (Madabhushi Sridhar) Information Commissioner CIC/SA/A/2015/001408

More information

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION August KrantiBhawan, BhikajiCama Place, New Delhi Appellant : Shri Madhusudhan Mukherjee

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION August KrantiBhawan, BhikajiCama Place, New Delhi Appellant : Shri Madhusudhan Mukherjee CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION August KrantiBhawan, BhikajiCama Place, New Delhi-110066 Date of Hearing : 02.07.2015 F.No.CIC/YA/A/2014/002131 F.No.CIC/YA/A/2014/002237 F.No.CIC/KY/C/2014/000329-YA F.No.CIC/YA/A/2014/003284

More information

THE CENTRAL EXCISE ACT 1944

THE CENTRAL EXCISE ACT 1944 THE CENTRAL EXCISE ACT 1944 35B. Appeals to the Appellate Tribunal.- (1) Any person aggrieved by any of the following orders may appeal to the Appellate Tribunal against such order (a) a decision or order

More information

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Appeal No. CIC/AT/A/2009/00422 dated 18-4-2009 Right to Information Act 2005 Section 19

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Appeal No. CIC/AT/A/2009/00422 dated 18-4-2009 Right to Information Act 2005 Section 19 CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Appeal No. CIC/AT/A/2009/00422 dated 18-4-2009 Right to Information Act 2005 Section 19 Appellant: Respondent: Shri Suraj Prakash, United India Insurance Co. Decision Announced

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : DELHI SCHOOL EDUCATION ACT, 1973 Date: 1st May, 2013 W.P.(C) 8060/2007

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : DELHI SCHOOL EDUCATION ACT, 1973 Date: 1st May, 2013 W.P.(C) 8060/2007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : DELHI SCHOOL EDUCATION ACT, 1973 Date: 1st May, 2013 W.P.(C) 8060/2007 SATBIR SINGH & ANR Through Mr. Akash Tyagi, Adv.... Petitioners versus DELHI SIKH

More information

Central Information Commission Room No.307, II Floor, B Wing, August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi website-cic.gov.

Central Information Commission Room No.307, II Floor, B Wing, August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi website-cic.gov. Central Information Commission Room No.307, II Floor, B Wing, August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi-110066 website-cic.gov.in Appeal No. CIC/MP/A/2014/002115 CIC/MP/A/2014/002153 Appellant

More information

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION (Room No.315, B Wing, August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi 110 066) File No.CIC/SA/A/2014/000494 Appellant : Dr.Dheeraj Kapoor Respondent : Directorate of

More information

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AMRITSAR BENCH, AMRITSAR. [Coram: Pramod Kumar AM and A.D. Jain JM]

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AMRITSAR BENCH, AMRITSAR. [Coram: Pramod Kumar AM and A.D. Jain JM] IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AMRITSAR BENCH, AMRITSAR [Coram: Pramod Kumar AM and A.D. Jain JM] I.T.A. No.90 /Asr/2015 Page 1 of 7 I.T.A. No.90/Asr /2015 Assessment year: 2013-14 Sibia Healthcare

More information

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION (Room No.315, B Wing, August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi 110 066) File No.CIC/SA/A/2014/000444 Subhash Chandra Agrawal v. Directorate of Health Services.

More information

14th January 2016. 14th January 2016

14th January 2016. 14th January 2016 Central Information Commission, New Delhi File No. File No. CIC/SH/A/2015/000773 File No. CIC/SH/A/2015/000838 File No. CIC/SH/A/2015/000841 File No. CIC/SH/A/2015/000843 File No. CIC/SH/A/2015/001111

More information

On behalf of the Respondents, the following were present:

On behalf of the Respondents, the following were present: Central Information Commission, New Delhi File No. File No. CIC/SH/A/2014/001245 File No. CIC/SH/A/2014/002761 File No. CIC/SH/A/2014/002763 File No. CIC/SH/A/2014/002760 File No. CIC/SH/A/2014/001797

More information

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION (Room No.315, B Wing, August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi 110 066) Prof. M. Sridhar Acharyulu (Madabhushi Sridhar) Information Commissioner CIC/SA/A/2014/000004

More information

ACTS & RULES : Food, Civil Supplies and Consumer Affairs Department, Himachal Pradesh

ACTS & RULES : Food, Civil Supplies and Consumer Affairs Department, Himachal Pradesh Acts & Rules Consumer Protection Rules, 1987 In exercise of the powers conferred by sub section(1) of section 30 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986(68 of 1986), Central Government hereby makes the following

More information

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION. Appellant : Shri Sanjiva Dayal, A-602, Twin Towers, Lakhanpur, Kanpur

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION. Appellant : Shri Sanjiva Dayal, A-602, Twin Towers, Lakhanpur, Kanpur CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION.. F.No.CIC/AT/A/2007/01058 Dated, the 20 th December, 2007. Appellant : Shri Sanjiva Dayal, A-602, Twin Towers, Lakhanpur, Kanpur-208024. Respondents : Shri Anand Deep, Director

More information

TELECOM DISPUTES SETTLEMENT & APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI. Dated 17 th July, Petition No. 273 of Reliance Telecom Ltd.

TELECOM DISPUTES SETTLEMENT & APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI. Dated 17 th July, Petition No. 273 of Reliance Telecom Ltd. TELECOM DISPUTES SETTLEMENT & APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI Dated 17 th July, 2014 Petition No. 273 of 2012 Reliance Telecom Ltd. Petitioner Vs. Union of India Respondent Petition No. 274 of 2012 Reliance

More information

APPEAL TO THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL

APPEAL TO THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL APPEAL TO THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL Introduction The Commissioner of Income-Tax (Appeals) is the first appellate authority and the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) is the second appellate authority.

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CENTRAL EXCISE ACT, 1944 DECIDED ON: CEAC 22/2010

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CENTRAL EXCISE ACT, 1944 DECIDED ON: CEAC 22/2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CENTRAL EXCISE ACT, 1944 DECIDED ON: 04.03.2015 CEAC 22/2010 MAHALAKSHMI CABLE INDUSTRIES... Appellant Through: Mr. Rajesh Mahna with Mr.ManuGiri, Advocates.

More information

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Club Building (Near Post Office) Old JNU Campus, New Delhi - 110067 Tel: +91-11-26101592

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Club Building (Near Post Office) Old JNU Campus, New Delhi - 110067 Tel: +91-11-26101592 CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Club Building (Near Post Office) Old JNU Campus, New Delhi - 110067 Tel: +91-11-26101592 File No. CIC/BS/A/2014/002043+002045+002046+002047+002048+002073+002116+002143+ 002434+002438+002451+002559+002636+000727+000863+000947+001004+

More information

ORDER (No.79 of 2015)

ORDER (No.79 of 2015) INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY APPELLATE BOARD Guna Complex, Annexe-I, 2 nd Floor, 443, Anna Salai, Teynampet, Chennai 600 018 CIRCUIT SITTING AT DELHI OA/10/2014/PT/DEL AND M.P. NOS.10/2014 & 114/2014 IN OA/10/2014/PT/DEL

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL NO OF 2015 (Arising out of S.L.P. (Civil) 2343 of 2014) Versus

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL NO OF 2015 (Arising out of S.L.P. (Civil) 2343 of 2014) Versus Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 3645 OF 2015 (Arising out of S.L.P. (Civil) 2343 of 2014) Central Bank of India Appellant Versus Jagbir Singh Respondent

More information

Jharkhand State Electricity Regulatory Commission Ranchi

Jharkhand State Electricity Regulatory Commission Ranchi Jharkhand State Electricity Regulatory Commission Ranchi FORM OF PROCEEDING Case No. 17 of 2012 M/s Usha Martin Limited... Petitioner Vrs. Jharkhand State Electricity Board & Ors...... Respondents Sl.No.

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. SUBJECT : Workmen's Compensation Act. Date of Decision : December 03, 2008. WP(C) No.6406 of 2007.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. SUBJECT : Workmen's Compensation Act. Date of Decision : December 03, 2008. WP(C) No.6406 of 2007. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : Workmen's Compensation Act Date of Decision : December 03, 2008 WP(C) No.6406 of 2007 Sh. Jawahar Singh. Petitioner Through : Mr. Pradeep Kumar Arya, Advocate

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O. O. C. J. INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.2714 OF 2009. The Commissioner of Income Tax 20 Vs.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O. O. C. J. INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.2714 OF 2009. The Commissioner of Income Tax 20 Vs. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O. O. C. J. INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.2714 OF 2009 The Commissioner of Income Tax 20..Appellant. Vs. M/s.B.N. Exports..Respondent.... Ms Suchitra Kamble for the Appellant.

More information

: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE K.N.KESHAVANARAYANA

: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE K.N.KESHAVANARAYANA : 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 7 TH DAY OF JUNE 2012 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE K.N.KESHAVANARAYANA BETWEEN: MFA.No.122 OF 2009 (MV) C/w MFA.No.120 OF 2009 (MV) New

More information

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Complaint No.CIC/WB/C/2009/ dated Right to Information Act 2005 Section 18

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Complaint No.CIC/WB/C/2009/ dated Right to Information Act 2005 Section 18 CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Complaint No.CIC/WB/C/2009/000006 dated 3.2.2009 Right to Information Act 2005 Section 18 Complainant - Ms Sudha Gupta Respondent - Dy. Commissioner of Police (DCP) New Delhi

More information

K O S T A L V S. R E G I S T R A R O F T R A D E M A R K S A N D O T H E R S

K O S T A L V S. R E G I S T R A R O F T R A D E M A R K S A N D O T H E R S K O S T A L V S. R E G I S T R A R O F T R A D E M A R K S A N D O T H E R S INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY APPELLATE BOARD Guna Complex Annexe-I, 2nd floor, 443, Anna Salai, Teynampet, Chennai 600 018 (Circuit

More information

CIVIL APPEAL NO. 10 OF 2016 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (CIVIL) NO.27243 OF 2015)

CIVIL APPEAL NO. 10 OF 2016 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (CIVIL) NO.27243 OF 2015) REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 10 OF 2016 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (CIVIL) NO.27243 OF 2015) MALATI SARDAR PETITIONER VERSUS NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY

More information

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Club Building (Near Post Office) Old JNU Campus,New Delhi 110067 Tel: +91 11 26106140/26179548

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Club Building (Near Post Office) Old JNU Campus,New Delhi 110067 Tel: +91 11 26106140/26179548 CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Club Building (Near Post Office) Old JNU Campus,New Delhi 110067 Tel +91 11 26106140/26179548 File No. CIC/CC/A/2014/001185/SD CIC/CC/A/2014/001186/SD Date of hearing 23/06/2016

More information

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) PRINCIPAL SEAT AT GUWAHATI (CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION) RSA No.146 of 2016 Sri Samir Kumar Chandra Appellant

More information

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH 1 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Single Bench: Hon ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS.10941-10942 OF 2013 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD...APPELLANT VERSUS WITH

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS.10941-10942 OF 2013 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD...APPELLANT VERSUS WITH 1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS.10941-10942 OF 2013 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD....APPELLANT VERSUS HILLI MULTIPURPOSE COLD STORAGE PVT. LTD...RESPONDENT

More information

CENTRAL EMPOWERED COMMITTEE

CENTRAL EMPOWERED COMMITTEE Order for closure of unlicensed plywood, veneer industries and sawmills in the country new licenses to be issued only after obtaining concurrence of the Court. Hon ble Supreme Court of India had passed

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURSIDCITION CIVIL APPEAL NO OF Versus

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURSIDCITION CIVIL APPEAL NO OF Versus Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURSIDCITION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 8427 OF 2014 Ramesh Chand (Dead) through L.Rs. Appellant Versus Asruddin (Dead) through LRs and another Respondents

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REPORTABLE CIVIL APPEAL NO.8463 OF 2014 (Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.26308 of 2013) Narinder Singh Appellant (s) Versus New

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION TRANSFER CASE (CIVIL) NO. 48 OF Manojbhai N. Shah & Ors. Petitioners.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION TRANSFER CASE (CIVIL) NO. 48 OF Manojbhai N. Shah & Ors. Petitioners. 1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION TRANSFER CASE (CIVIL) NO. 48 OF 2010 Manojbhai N. Shah & Ors. Petitioners Versus Union of India & Ors. Respondents WITH T.C.(C)No.7/2011,

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL Nos.823-854 OF 2016 (Arising out of SLP (C ) Nos. 15919-15950 of 2011)

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL Nos.823-854 OF 2016 (Arising out of SLP (C ) Nos. 15919-15950 of 2011) IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REPORTABLE CIVIL APPEAL Nos.823-854 OF 2016 (Arising out of SLP (C ) Nos. 15919-15950 of 2011) Kerala Public Service Commission & Ors...Appellants

More information

The Credit Information Companies (Regulation) Act, 2005 1

The Credit Information Companies (Regulation) Act, 2005 1 Disclaimer : Text of this Act/Bill/Rules is provided for information only. We undertake no responsibility for any errors/mistakes in the same. Please refer to the Gazette of India for the authentic text.

More information

INDIRECT TAXES Central Excise and Customs Case Law Update

INDIRECT TAXES Central Excise and Customs Case Law Update CA. Hasmukh Kamdar INDIRECT TAXES Central Excise and Customs Case Law Update CENVAT Credit Ajinkya Enterprises vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Pune III [2013 (288) E.L.T. 247 (Tri. Mumbai)] The facts

More information

CASE REFERENCE NUMBER: 67/12 MAURICE CAIRNS - APPELLANT AND COMMISSIONER OF VALUATION FOR NORTHERN IRELAND - RESPONDENT

CASE REFERENCE NUMBER: 67/12 MAURICE CAIRNS - APPELLANT AND COMMISSIONER OF VALUATION FOR NORTHERN IRELAND - RESPONDENT NORTHERN IRELAND VALUATION TRIBUNAL THE RATES (NORTHERN IRELAND) ORDER 1977 (AS AMENDED) AND THE VALUATION TRIBUNAL RULES (NORTHERN IRELAND) 2007 (AS AMENDED) CASE REFERENCE NUMBER: 67/12 MAURICE CAIRNS

More information

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: % Pronounced on: W.P.(C) 4208/2015 & CM No.

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: % Pronounced on: W.P.(C) 4208/2015 & CM No. $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: 02.12.2015 % Pronounced on: 08.02.2016 + W.P.(C) 4208/2015 & CM No.7613/2015 SHRI SHASHIKANT BAHL & ORS... Petitioners Through Mr. Ashim Vachher

More information

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PUNJAB, DAKSHIN MARG, SECTOR 37-A, CHANDIGARH. First Appeal No.359 of 2007

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PUNJAB, DAKSHIN MARG, SECTOR 37-A, CHANDIGARH. First Appeal No.359 of 2007 STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PUNJAB, DAKSHIN MARG, SECTOR 37-A, CHANDIGARH. First Appeal No.359 of 2007 Date of institution : 09.03.2007 Date of decision : 02.04.2012 The Ferozepur Primary

More information

AT ARUSHA. Taxation Cause No.2 of 2012. (Originating from Appeal No. 1 of 2012) (Appellate Division) PLAXEDA RUGUMBA..

AT ARUSHA. Taxation Cause No.2 of 2012. (Originating from Appeal No. 1 of 2012) (Appellate Division) PLAXEDA RUGUMBA.. IN THE EAST AFRICAN COURT OF JUSTICE AT ARUSHA Taxation Cause No.2 of 2012 (Originating from Appeal No. 1 of 2012) (Appellate Division) PLAXEDA RUGUMBA..APPLICANT VERSUS THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE REPUBLIC

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 754/2013. INDIAN AIRPORTS KAMGHAR UNION... Petitioner

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 754/2013. INDIAN AIRPORTS KAMGHAR UNION... Petitioner file:///c /Users/rakksingh/Desktop/754/W.P. (C)-754 OF 2013-08.02.2013.htm IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 754/2013 INDIAN AIRPORTS KAMGHAR UNION... Petitioner Through: Mr Colin Gonsalves,

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. Vs. CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 6620, 6621, 6622, 6623, 6624, 6627, 6628, 6629, 6630 & 6631 OF 2013

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. Vs. CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 6620, 6621, 6622, 6623, 6624, 6627, 6628, 6629, 6630 & 6631 OF 2013 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REPORTABLE CIVIL APPEAL NO.6619 OF 2013 (Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 33728 of 2011) M/s Tirupati Developers.Petitioner(s)

More information

Issue of Shares by Indian Subsidiary to Overseas Parent Company Transfer Pricing Implication

Issue of Shares by Indian Subsidiary to Overseas Parent Company Transfer Pricing Implication Issue of Shares by Indian Subsidiary to Overseas Parent Company Transfer Pricing Implication An international transaction in the context of Transfer Pricing Regulations, means a transaction between two

More information

Appellate Tribunal for Electricity (Appellate Jurisdiction) APPEAL No. 224 of 2014

Appellate Tribunal for Electricity (Appellate Jurisdiction) APPEAL No. 224 of 2014 APPEAL No. 244 of 2014 Dated: 27 th April, 2015 Appellate Tribunal for Electricity (Appellate Jurisdiction) APPEAL No. 224 of 2014 Present: Hon ble Mrs. Justice Ranjana P. Desai, Chairperson Hon ble Mr.

More information

CHAPTER XV. Applications under Article 226, 227 and 228 of the Constitution and Rules for the issue of writs under the said Articles

CHAPTER XV. Applications under Article 226, 227 and 228 of the Constitution and Rules for the issue of writs under the said Articles CHAPTER XV Applications under Article 226, 227 and 228 of the Constitution and Rules for the issue of writs under the said Articles (Except writ in the nature of Habeas Corpus) 1(a) An application for

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION KPPNair ---1--- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION COMPANY SCHEME PETITION NO. 434 OF 2014 CONNECTED WITH COMPANY SUMMONS FOR DIRECTION NO. 396 OF 2014. Capgemini

More information

Introduction: The orders prayed for

Introduction: The orders prayed for JUGNAUTH PRAVIND KUMAR (HON) v THE STATE OF MAURITIUS & ANOR 2015 SCJ 178 Record No. 108728 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MAURITIUS In the matter of: Hon. Pravind Kumar Jugnauth v. Plaintiff 1. The State of

More information

ORDER MO-2628 Appeal MA11-7 City of Waterloo

ORDER MO-2628 Appeal MA11-7 City of Waterloo ORDER MO-2628 Appeal MA11-7 City of Waterloo Tribunal Services Department Services de tribunal administratif 2 Bloor Street East 2, rue Bloor Est Suite 1400 Bureau 1400 Toronto, Ontario Toronto (Ontario)

More information

The Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013

The Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 The Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 (as subsequently amended up to 17 th February 2015) This document shows the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure contained in Schedule 1 of the Employment

More information

THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT CRL.M.C.1640/2011 Date of Decision: 27.04.2012

THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT CRL.M.C.1640/2011 Date of Decision: 27.04.2012 THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT CRL.M.C.1640/2011 Date of Decision: 27.04.2012 KAJAL SENGUPTA Petitioner Through: Mr.Viplav Sharma, Advocate with Ms.Nilanjana

More information

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Date of decision: 1 st December, W.P.(C) 8752/2009 & CM No.5984/2009 (for stay)

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Date of decision: 1 st December, W.P.(C) 8752/2009 & CM No.5984/2009 (for stay) *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision: 1 st December, 2015 + W.P.(C) 8752/2009 & CM No.5984/2009 (for stay) ISHWAR SINGH SHARMA... Petitioner Through: Mr. Prasoon Kumar & Mr. K. Kumar,

More information

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA CORAM: T C NAIR, WHOLE TIME MEMBER

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA CORAM: T C NAIR, WHOLE TIME MEMBER WTM/TCN/01 /CFD/ APRIL /08 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA CORAM: T C NAIR, WHOLE TIME MEMBER IN THE MATTER OF PUBLIC OFFER FOR ACQUISITION OF 103,88,445 OF THE EQUITY SHARE CAPITAL OF JAGATJIT

More information

Determination of cost of power generation for Dongamahua captive power plant of Jindal Steel & Power Ltd. from FY 2011-12 till FY 2015-16.

Determination of cost of power generation for Dongamahua captive power plant of Jindal Steel & Power Ltd. from FY 2011-12 till FY 2015-16. Chhattisgarh State Electricity Regulatory Commission Irrigation Colony, Shanti Nagar, Raipur - 492 001 (C.G.) Ph.0771-4048788, Fax: 4073553 www.cserc.gov.in, e-mail: cserc.sec.cg@nic.in Petition No. 47

More information

U;k;ky; eq[; vk;qdr fu% kdrtu

U;k;ky; eq[; vk;qdr fu% kdrtu U;k;ky; eq[; vk;qdr fu% kdrtu Court of Chief Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities Lkkekftd U;k;,oa vf/kdkfjrk ea=ky; Ministry of Social Justice & Empowerment fu% kdrrk dk;z fohkkx@department of Disability

More information

1. Common judgment and order of the High Court of Judicature at

1. Common judgment and order of the High Court of Judicature at REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.10554 OF 2010 M/s. Electro Optics (P) Ltd...Appellant Versus State of Tamil Nadu..Respondent W I T H C.A.Nos.10562

More information

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PUNJAB, S.C.O. NO. 3009-10, SECTOR 22-D, CHANDIGARH. First Appeal No.285 of 2003

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PUNJAB, S.C.O. NO. 3009-10, SECTOR 22-D, CHANDIGARH. First Appeal No.285 of 2003 STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PUNJAB, S.C.O. NO. 3009-10, SECTOR 22-D, CHANDIGARH. First Appeal No.285 of 2003 1. Kasturi Lal Khurana, son of Ram Lal, Date of institution : 11.3.2003 Date

More information

DISPUTES SETTLEMENT MECHANISM IN TELECOM SECTOR IN INDIA & CONSUMER RIGHTS UNDER THE TELECOM REGULATORY AUTHORITY OF INDIA ACT, 1997

DISPUTES SETTLEMENT MECHANISM IN TELECOM SECTOR IN INDIA & CONSUMER RIGHTS UNDER THE TELECOM REGULATORY AUTHORITY OF INDIA ACT, 1997 DISPUTES SETTLEMENT MECHANISM IN TELECOM SECTOR IN INDIA & CONSUMER RIGHTS UNDER THE TELECOM REGULATORY AUTHORITY OF INDIA ACT, 1997 BY RAMJI SRINIVASAN Advocate INTRODUCTION The protection of consumer

More information

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT. W. P.(C) No 6962 of Versus-

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT. W. P.(C) No 6962 of Versus- IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) PRINCIPAL SEAT AT GUWAHATI PETITIONER; W. P.(C) No 6962 of 2004 M/s Orang Tea Estate Represented by its Manager

More information

COMPETITION APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI. Appeal No. 44 OF 2013

COMPETITION APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI. Appeal No. 44 OF 2013 COMPETITION APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI Appeal No. 44 OF 2013 [Under Section 53-B of the Competition Act, 2002 against the Order dated 12.11.2013 passed by the Competition Commission of India in Combination

More information

HIGH COURT FORM (J) 3 HEADING OF JUDGEMENT IN APPEAL. Dist. Cachar. In the Court of Addl. District Judge, Cachar, Silchar.

HIGH COURT FORM (J) 3 HEADING OF JUDGEMENT IN APPEAL. Dist. Cachar. In the Court of Addl. District Judge, Cachar, Silchar. Page 1 HIGH COURT FORM (J) 3 HEADING OF JUDGEMENT IN APPEAL. Dist. Cachar. In the Court of Addl. District Judge, Cachar, Silchar. Present :- Shri T.K.Bhattacharjee, A.J.S. Addl. District Judge, Cachar,Silchar.

More information

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Club Building (Near Post Office) Old JNU Campus, New Delhi - 110067 Tel: +91-11-26161796

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Club Building (Near Post Office) Old JNU Campus, New Delhi - 110067 Tel: +91-11-26161796 CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Club Building (Near Post Office) Old JNU Campus, New Delhi - 110067 Tel: +91-11-26161796 Relevant Facts emerging from the Appeal: Decision No. CIC/SG/A/2010/002273/11349

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO OF 2004

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO OF 2004 'REPORTABLE' IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4494 OF 2004 M/S CHENNAI PROPERTIES & INVESTMENTS LTD., CHENNAI... Appellant VERSUS THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

More information

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL BANGALORE BENCH C : BANGALORE

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL BANGALORE BENCH C : BANGALORE IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL BANGALORE BENCH C : BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI N.V.VASUDEVAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER and SHRI JASON P.BOAZ, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No.1832/Bang/2013 (Assessment year: 2005-06) Shri

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 4816-4817 OF 2013 (Arising out of SLP (C) Nos. 15531-15532 of 2007)

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 4816-4817 OF 2013 (Arising out of SLP (C) Nos. 15531-15532 of 2007) IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REPORTABLE CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 4816-4817 OF 2013 (Arising out of SLP (C) Nos. 15531-15532 of 2007) S. Manickam... Appellant (s) Versus Metropolitan

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : ADMISSION MATTER W.P.(C) No. 3208/2012 & CM No. 6861/2012 DATE OF DECISION :

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : ADMISSION MATTER W.P.(C) No. 3208/2012 & CM No. 6861/2012 DATE OF DECISION : IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : ADMISSION MATTER W.P.(C) No. 3208/2012 & CM No. 6861/2012 DATE OF DECISION : 25.05.2012 Ujjwal Madan & Ors.... Petitioners Through: Mr.Jayant Bhushan,

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NARAYANA SWAMY MFA NO. 2293/2010 (MV)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NARAYANA SWAMY MFA NO. 2293/2010 (MV) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 28 TH DAY OF JUNE 2012 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NARAYANA SWAMY BETWEEN MFA NO. 2293/2010 (MV) NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED DO-3,

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT ; SERVICE MATTER. Judgment delivered on: 10.03.2014. W.P.(C) 2656/2013 and CM No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT ; SERVICE MATTER. Judgment delivered on: 10.03.2014. W.P.(C) 2656/2013 and CM No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT ; SERVICE MATTER Judgment delivered on: 10.03.2014 W.P.(C) 2656/2013 and CM No.5029/2013 (stay) ABHISHEK YADAV... PETITIONER VERSUS ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.8155 OF 2014

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.8155 OF 2014 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.8155 OF 2014 Dhropadabai and Others Appellant(s) Versus M/s. Technocraft Toolings Respondent(s) J U D G M E N T Dipak

More information

The Income Tax Ombudsman Guidelines 2010

The Income Tax Ombudsman Guidelines 2010 The Income Tax Ombudsman Guidelines 2010 The Guidelines are introduced with the objective of enabling the resolution of complaints relating to public grievances against the Income Tax Department and to

More information

By a notice of motion which was filed on 31/5/2013 under Rule 10 of. the Tanzania Court of Appeal Rules, 2009 (the Rules), Motor Vessel

By a notice of motion which was filed on 31/5/2013 under Rule 10 of. the Tanzania Court of Appeal Rules, 2009 (the Rules), Motor Vessel IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT ZANZIBAR CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 91 OF 2013 1. MOTOR VESSEL SEPIDEH 2. PEMBA ISLAND TOURS & SAFARIS...... APPLICANTS VERSUS 1. YUSUF MOH D YUSSUF 2. AHMAD ABDULLAH....

More information

$~23 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. Judgment delivered on: 18 th September, 2015. Versus

$~23 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. Judgment delivered on: 18 th September, 2015. Versus $~23 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A.No.460/2002 Judgment delivered on: 18 th September, 2015 BELA SHARDA Represented by: Versus... Appellant Mr.Samar Banal and Mr. Vinayak Mehrotra,

More information

2 nd Appeal First Appeal No. 295 of 2013

2 nd Appeal First Appeal No. 295 of 2013 2 nd Additional Bench STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PUNJAB DAKSHIN MARG, SECTOR 37-A, CHANDIGARH First Appeal No. 54 of 2013 Date of institution: 17.1.2013 Date of Decision: 20.1.2015 National

More information

2009 No (L. 20) TRIBUNALS AND INQUIRIES. The Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (General Regulatory Chamber) Rules 2009

2009 No (L. 20) TRIBUNALS AND INQUIRIES. The Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (General Regulatory Chamber) Rules 2009 STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS 2009 No. 1976 (L. 20) TRIBUNALS AND INQUIRIES The Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (General Regulatory Chamber) Rules 2009 Made - - - - 16th July 2009 Laid before Parliament

More information

NC General Statutes - Chapter 108A Article 4 1

NC General Statutes - Chapter 108A Article 4 1 Article 4. Public Assistance and Social Services Appeals and Access to Records. 108A-79. Appeals. (a) A public assistance applicant or recipient shall have a right to appeal the decision of the county

More information

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on October 19, 2015 Judgment delivered on November 17,2015 + W.P.(C) 6408/2014.

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on October 19, 2015 Judgment delivered on November 17,2015 + W.P.(C) 6408/2014. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on October 19, 2015 Judgment delivered on November 17,2015 + W.P.(C) 6408/2014 ARUN OSWAL... Petitioner Through: Mr. Siddharth Dias, Adv. versus

More information