1 Coral Reefs (2004) 23: DOI /s y REPORT K. E. Boyer Æ P. Fong Æ A. R. Armitage Æ R. A. Cohen Elevated nutrient content of tropical macroalgae increases rates of herbivory in coral, seagrass, and mangrove habitats Received: 1 August 2002 / Accepted: 3 October 2003 / Published online: 16 September 2004 Ó Springer-Verlag 2004 Abstract We explored the role of food quality in herbivore preference for macroalgae by comparing consumption of Acanthophora spicifera with and without elevated tissue nitrogen and phosphorus concentrations. Algal enrichment effects on herbivory were examined in coral, seagrass, and mangrove habitats along a sparsely populated Honduran island protected from fishing. Nutrient enrichment led to significantly increased grazing by herbivores across habitats. Consumption of enriched algae increased by 91% compared to controls among the mangrove roots, where herbivory rates were generally lowest. In the heavily grazed seagrass and coral habitats, nutrient enrichment increased consumption by 30 and 20%, respectively, with the effect more spatially variable than among the mangrove roots. We suggest that, at least on the local scale, intact herbivore populations may be able to compensate for effects of increased nutrient supply by locating and consuming nutrient-enriched algae, but that the importance of this mechanism varies both among and within habitats. Keywords Acanthophora Æ Herbivory Æ Honduras Æ Macroalgae Æ Nutrients Introduction Factors controlling growth and biomass accumulation of benthic algae are gaining considerable interest as Communicated by: R. C. Carpenter K. E. Boyer (&) Æ P. Fong Æ A. R. Armitage Æ R. A. Cohen Department of Organismic Biology, Ecology and Evolution, University of California Los Angeles, 621 Charles E. Young Drive South, Los Angeles, CA , USA Present address: K. E. Boyer Department of Biology and Romberg Tiburon Center for Environmental Studies, San Francisco State University, 3152 Paradise Drive, Tiburon, CA 94920, USA concern over the health of the world s coral reefs builds (e.g., Szmant 2001). A small body of direct experimental evidence documents negative effects of macroalgae on corals (reviewed by McCook et al. 2001) through overgrowth (Coyer et al. 1993; Hughes 1989), colonization of coral lesions (Meesters and Bak 1993; Meesters et al. 1994, 1997; van Woesik 1998), or abrasion through contact with algae (Coyer et al. 1993; Miller and Hay 1996). In addition, many experiments have indirectly revealed, and observational and correlative studies support, a negative relationship between measures of algal proliferation and coral decline (McCook et al. 2001). While it is often not clear whether algae caused coral declines or recruited after other damages occurred, phase shifts from coral- to algal-dominated reefs have been widely documented over the last two decades (Littler and Littler 1984; Lapointe 1989, 1997; Done 1992; Hughes 1996; Miller 1998; McCook 1999). Increases in human-derived nutrient supply to coastal areas in the tropics have been implicated in observed increases in cover or biomass of algal species in shallow habitats (Bell 1992; Lapointe 1997; Adey 1998). Increased nutrients (nitrogen, N and/or phosphorus, P) have been found to enhance productivity of many tropical algal species and assemblages (Hatcher and Larkum 1983; Lapointe 1987, 1989, 1997; Lapointe et al. 1987; Williams and Carpenter 1988; Larned and Stimson 1997; Schaffelke and Klumpp 1997, 1998a, 1998b; Larned 1998; Fong et al. 2003), although not all species/ assemblages responded to nutrient enrichment or not in all seasons (Hatcher and Larkum 1983; Degaldo et al. 1996; Miller et al. 1999; Koop et al. 2001). Despite experimental evidence for nutrient limitation of a number of tropical macroalgae, the extent and importance of nutrients to algal biomass accumulation in the field are unclear (e.g., Szmant 1997; McCook 1999). This is partly because herbivores, when abundant, exert strong control over macroalgae through biomass removal in nearshore tropical habitats (reviews by Hatcher 1983; Steneck 1988; Carpenter 1997) and are thought to counter the effects of ele-
2 531 vated nutrients on algal growth (Hughes et al. 1999; McCook 1999). Szmant (1997) hypothesized that as long as there is sufficient topographic complexity in a reef for herbivore refuge and no major losses of important herbivore species, reef communities should be able to incorporate relatively high levels of nutrients without a shift to algal dominance. While there is strong evidence that herbivores are important to community structure on reefs (e.g., Lewis 1986; Hay 1997), few manipulative experiments have tested the effects of nutrient enrichment on herbivore responses. In Australia, Hatcher and Larkum (1983) found inorganic nitrogen limited turf algal growth on an outer reef slope, but that grazing controlled standing crop. Recently, researchers at a low nutrient, fishery-managed reef in Hawaii found enhanced nutrients to promote fleshy macroalgal growth when large herbivores were excluded and growth of crustose coralline algae with herbivores present (Smith et al. 2001). Two other studies in which nutrient supply was manipulated in the field did not find a clear pattern of algal response, and thus were limited in their assessment of herbivore responses to increased nutrients (Miller et al. 1999; Thacker et al. 2001). Overall, these experiments have found strong top-down (e.g., herbivory) effects controlling algal biomass and community structure, but the relationship between nutrient enrichment and herbivory remains seldom tested and largely unresolved. Enhanced nutrient supply can influence not only the quantity, but also the quality of primary producers as food for herbivores. Elevated nutrient content of plant tissues can increase the efficiency with which a consumer converts food into biomass (e.g., Mattson 1980; Sterner and Hesson 1994). Faster grazing rates or overall greater consumption of N- and/or P-enriched algae suggest a preference for such high quality foods in temperate locations (Nicotri 1980; Yates and Peckol 1993; Hauxwell et al. 1998; Giannotti and McGlathery 2001; Plath and Boersma 2001). However, some grazers are more selective than others with regard to food quality (Cruz-Rivera and Hay 2000). We are aware of no studies in tropical waters that have explicitly tested the relationship between algal tissue nutrients and herbivory. Across adjacent coral reef, seagrass, and mangrove habitats, herbivore assemblage composition (Taylor et al. 1986; Marguiller et al. 1997), age and size structure (Chong et al. 1990; Laegdsgaard and Johnson 2001), and grazing rates (Hay 1984; Lewis and Wainwright 1985; Carpenter 1986; Lewis 1986) can differ greatly; hence, it is difficult to predict how elevated tissue nutrients might influence the response of a particular grazer assemblage. We conducted an experiment to examine the importance of increased algal tissue N and P on herbivore grazing along a remote and relatively pristine island off the coast of Honduras. The objectives of this study were to test if: (1) elevated nutrient content of a palatable algal species increased consumption by herbivores, (2) effects on herbivory varied among coral reef, seagrass, and mangrove habitats, and (3) effects on herbivory varied spatially within these habitats. Methods We performed a three-factor experiment, with nutrient enrichment of macroalgae (+/)), habitat (coral, seagrass, and mangrove), and station (three locations along an island) as factors. We compared consumption of the coarsely branched red macroalga, Acanthophora spicifera, cultured in ambient or enriched (N+P) seawater, then placed (along with a paired caged sample to account for growth) at three stations in each of the three habitats. This research was conducted at Cayos Cochinos Natural Monument, approximately 15 km from mainland Honduras, within the Bay Islands, in the Caribbean Sea (Fig. 1). The 460-km 2 marine reserve encompasses the Cayos Cochinos Archipelago, which includes two forested islands (Cochino Grande and Cochino Pequen o) and 12 sand cays. A field station operated by the Honduras Coral Reef Fund (HCRF) is located on the south end of Cochino Pequen o. One modest (10 rooms) commercial hotel/diving facility is located on the southwest side of Cochino Grande in addition to a few scattered vacation homes on the west and north coasts. Otherwise, the archipelago is inhabited only by three small villages of Garifuna, descendants of shipwrecked/ escaped slaves from Africa, who intermarried with native Arawak and Carib islanders beginning in the mid-1600s (Gonzalez 1988). The Garifuna practice subsistence fishing, but no other private or commercial fishing is permitted within the reserve (Adoni Cubas, HCRF, personal communication), a policy strictly enforced by park rangers based at the field station (personal observations). With its distance from the mainland, sparse population, and protection from fishing, the reserve presented a relatively pristine environment in which we could manipulate algal nutrient levels and study natural responses of herbivores. This research was conducted on the east side of Cochino Grande (Fig. 1) within three contiguous stands (>10 m long) of red mangrove (Rhizophora mangle), adjacent seagrass beds (Thalassia testudinum), and a fringing coral reef slope in which we deployed the experiment (stations 1, 2, and 3 from N to S; Fig. 2a). Station 3 was 20 m north of a Garifuna village of 80 people (Adoni Cubas, personal communication). On February 29, 2000, we collected Acanthophora spicifera from a backreef rubble/lagoonal area 100 m north of station 1 in 3-m-deep water. A. spicifera was chosen because it stores both N and P in response to enhanced nutrient supply (Fong et al. 2001, Fong et al. 2003) and is a preferred species for herbivorous fishes (Taylor et al. 1986), specifically for surgeonfishes and parrotfishes (Lewis 1985; Stimson et al. 2001). Algae were sorted in seawater to remove epiphytes, epizoa, and
3 532 Fig. 1 Study location in the Cayos Cochinos Archipeligo, Bay Islands, Honduras ( N, W). The Honduras Coral Reef Fund s field station is located on the south side of Cochino Pequen o. Darker coloring indicates islands, with lighter fringe demarcating shallow reef environments other debris and then placed in outdoor batch culture for 3 days, in ambient seawater either with or without added nutrients (20 lm N and 2 lm P). This level of nutrient enrichment was sufficient to increase tissue N and P content of A. spicifera in cultures from Puerto Rico (Fong et al. 2003). A second dose of N and P was added to the enriched tank after 24 h. After 3 days, tissues in enriched algae increased by 8% in both N ( % dry mass) and P ( % dry mass); methods of analysis are described below. Algae were spun (30 g at a time) for 1 min in a lettuce spinner to remove excess water, then divided into 5-g portions and bound together with a small cable tie (Fig. 2b). Half of the 5-g units from each nutrient treatment were attached to 15-cm segments of polypropylene rope while the other half were sewn into mesh bags (15 15 cm, flat) made from fiberglass window screening (cages) and then cable-tied to a 15-cm rope. All 180 experimental units were labeled and placed in coolers filled with ambient or nutrient-enhanced seawater for transport to the field. Within each habitat, at each station (Fig. 2a), we laid out 5-m polypropylene ropes attached at both ends to concrete blocks. Ropes were anchored to the substratum by covering them with rock and coral fragments found at the site. In the mangrove habitat, each rope was stationed beneath the aerial roots, 10 cm from the seaward edge in 1-m deep water. In the seagrass habitat, each rope was placed 5 m from the landward edge of the seagrass bed in 1-m deep water. In the coral habitat, each rope was placed among coral and coral rubble on the reef slope in 3-m deep water. Experimental units were attached to the long ropes so that the algae rested on the substratum (Fig. 2b, c), permitting access to both benthic and pelagic herbivores. Four experimental units (with or without cages, with or without nutrient enrichment) were grouped in haphazard order at five replicate positions along each long rope; each group of four was separated by 1 m of rope covered with rubble and coral to minimize visual cues. Within each group, 8 cm separated each of the four experimental units. While ropes and cages may have attracted or inhibited grazers, algae with or without nutrient-enriched tissues provided identical visual displays and thus were considered to provide a valid assessment of relative responses of grazers to our treatments. After 48 h, grazing in some locations had been high, but in no cases complete. Algae were removed from mesh bags and cable ties, rinsed gently in seawater, spun
4 533 Fig. 2 a Experimental arrays were deployed at three stations within each of the three habitats (mangrove, seagrass, coral) along the east side of Cochino Grande. Station 3 was nearest the Garifuna village. b Schematic of experimental units. Assembly with cable ties is shown loosely for clarity. c Each group of four units was repeated in haphazard order at five replicate positions along a rope anchored to the benthos for 1 min in nylon bags in a lettuce spinner, and then weighed. Values from caged samples were used to calculate percentage change from initial wet mass as a measure of algal growth when excluded from herbivores. We did not expect much growth due to the experimental conditions (bundled algae), but needed to account for any growth in calculating herbivory rates. Consumption of algae was quantified by subtracting the wet mass of the uncaged algae from the adjacent caged sample that had been subjected to the same nutrient treatment, and expressed as percent change from initial wet mass. While light reduction by cages (30%) could limit growth within them, our calculations generated a conservative estimate of consumption. Samples were rinsed in freshwater, placed in clean mesh bags, and air-dried outdoors at the field station. Samples were dried at 60 C to a constant weight upon return to UCLA. Since uncaged samples often lacked sufficient biomass, samples from within the cages only were analyzed for total N and P content (DANR Analytical Laboratory, University of California, Davis) after grinding with a mortar and pestle. Total N was determined by N gas analyzer, using an induction furnace and thermal conductivity (Sweeney 1989). The total P analysis used microwave acid digestion dissolution (Sah and Miller 1992) with determination by atomic emission spectroscopy. Percent change from initial nutrient concentration was calculated based on the mean initial N or P content. All data were analyzed using 3-factor ANOVA to test for differences by habitat (mangrove, seagrass, or coral), station (1, 2, or 3), nutrient treatment (enriched or not), and their interactions. A logarithmic transformation log (x+1) was used to achieve homogeneity of variances on the wet mass data. Following a significant ANOVA, multiple comparisons were made using the T- method on wet mass data (equal sample size) or the Tukey-Kramer method on nutrient data (unequal sample size due to a few samples that had insufficient mass for analysis; Sokal and Rohlf 1995). All errors presented are ±1SE. Results As expected, Acanthophora spicifera in cages changed little in wet mass during the experiment, but patterns emerged by both habitat and station (Table 1). Caged algae placed in the seagrass habitat had the highest average growth (2.4%), significantly greater than in the mangroves ()0.9%) but similar to the coral habitat (1.0%). Algal growth was greatest overall at station 2 (2%), significantly greater than at station 3 ()0.6%), and intermediate at station 1 (1%). There were no significant effects of algal nutrient treatment on growth, and no significant interactions. Consumption of Acanthophora spicifera differed by habitat, station, and nutrient treatment (Table 1, Fig. 3). Overall removal of algae was similar within the seagrass beds and coral reefs (means across stations = 31 and 33%, respectively); however, herbivory in both habitats was greater than in the mangrove habitat
5 534 Table 1 Statistical results of 3-factor ANOVA on % change in algal wet mass (Growthcaged only; Consumption uncaged corrected for paired caged sample) and tissue N and P concentration (caged only). Error df = 72 for wet mass, 70 for N, and 68 for P (see methods). Results of multiple comparison tests are indicated by letters below significant P values (alowest value); shared letters indicate no difference at = 0.05 Source of variation df % change in wet mass Nitrogen (total) Phosphorus (total) Growth Consumption Concentration % change Concentration % change F P F P F P F P F P F P Habitat Mangrove a a c c b b Seagrass b b a a a a Coral ab b b b a a Station ab a a a 2 b b ab ab 3 a ab b b Nutrients ) a b a + b a b Habitat x station Habitat x nutrients Station x nutrients Habitat x station x nutrients (15%). Algal consumption was highest overall at station 2 (33%), lowest at station 1 (22%), and intermediate at station 3 (24%). Enhanced algal tissue nutrient concentrations resulted in highly significant increases in consumption across habitats (Table 1, Fig. 3). In the mangrove habitat, where herbivory was generally lower than in other habitats, nutrient enrichment resulted in 91% greater consumption than on non-enriched algae. In the more heavily grazed seagrass and coral habitats, nutrient enrichment increased mean algal removal by 30 and 20%, respectively. The nutrient effect on herbivory was consistent across stations in the mangrove habitat, but less so in the seagrass and coral habitats. For example, Fig. 3 Percentage change in wet mass of uncaged algae (adjusted for growth using corresponding caged sample), indicating consumption of algae enriched/not enriched with nutrients, at the three stations within the a mangrove, b seagrass, and c coral habitats at station 2, where herbivory was the highest in both the seagrass and coral habitats, there was no effect of added nutrients on herbivory. The final N concentration of the caged algae depended on the habitat and station into which the experimental units were placed, but was not affected by initial algal tissue enrichment (Table 1, Fig. 4a, b, c). Overall, algal samples in the mangrove habitat ended with 12 or 16% greater tissue N (0.85% dry mass) than in the coral (0.76%) and seagrass (0.73%) habitats, respectively. Samples in the coral habitat were also significantly higher in tissue N than in the seagrass habitat. Overall, algal tissue N levels ended significantly higher at station 3 (0.80%) than at station 1 (0.76%), with station 2 levels intermediate (0.78%). Tissue N concentrations became similar among nutrient treatments during the 2-day period in the field. Samples placed in the mangrove habitat increased in N by 5 30% (mean = 12%), while those in the seagrass habitat decreased ()4%), and in the coral habitat
6 535 Fig. 4 Algal tissue total N (as % dry mass) and percentage change from initial mean N concentration after 2 days in the a and d mangrove, b and e seagrass, and c and f coral habitats changed little (0.5%; Fig. 4d, e, f). On average, algal N increased by 5% at station 3, significantly more than at station 1 (0.6%) but similar to station 2 (2.5%) (Table 1). Unlike final N concentration measures, percent change in N concentration differed by nutrient treatment with more positive changes for the nonenriched treatment; this resulted in convergence in final N concentrations among nutrient treatments. In the mangrove habitat, algae from the non-enriched treatment increased in N by 15% above initial levels; however, nutrient-treated algae, which started out 8% higher in N, only gained about 7%. In the seagrass habitat, algae from both nutrient treatments declined in N, but the nutrient-enriched treatment declined more on average. In the coral habitat, algal N levels across stations increased in the non-enriched treatment, and decreased or remained the same in the enriched treatment. Algal tissue P levels were influenced by the habitat, but not significantly by the station, into which experimental units were placed (Table 1, Fig. 5a, b, c). Final algal P in the mangrove habitat (0.05% dry mass) was 22 and 16% higher than in the seagrass (0.041%) and coral habitats (0.043%), respectively, which were similar to each other. There was a non-significant trend of higher tissue P at station 3 that was driven by high values in algae from the mangrove habitat, and it appears that the difference in pattern in the mangrove habitat versus the others caused the significant interaction between habitat and station. Unlike final tissue N measures, there was a significant effect of nutrient pre-treatment on final tissue P levels. P concentrations of macroalgae increased by 10 30% in the mangrove habitat in 2 days, significantly more so than in the seagrass or coral habitats (Table 1, Fig. 5d, e, f). Percent change in tissue P in the seagrass ()0.4%) and coral (4%) habitats was similarly low. As with P concentration, there were no significant effects of station on percent change in tissue P, but station 3 ranked highest due to relatively high values in the mangroves. Again, it was this pattern that resulted in a significant habitat x station interaction (Table 1). Nutrient treatment did not influence percent change in tissue P. Discussion We found that herbivores in mangrove root, seagrass, and coral habitats could differentiate between nutrientenhanced and untreated algae and concentrate grazing on nutrient-rich food. Through modification of algal nutrient content, we documented a linkage between bottom-up and top-down forces that may be important to community structure in shallow tropical habitats, at least on the local scale. Selection of nutrient-enriched and, potentially, faster-growing algae may be an
7 536 Fig. 5 Algal tissue total P and percentage change from mean initial P concentration, displayed as in Fig. 4. In panels e and f, missing bars indicate both mean and SE=0 important mechanism that contributes to herbivore control of algal biomass accumulation in areas subject to nutrient enrichment. Background differences in herbivory pressure among habitats and stations may have influenced responses of herbivores to nutrient-enhanced algae. There were higher rates of herbivory on Acanthophora spicifera in the coral and seagrass relative to the mangrove habitat, which may have resulted in reduced opportunity for grazers to be selective in their food choices. Similarly, in stations where herbivory rates were particularly high, the algal nutrient/herbivory relationship was less pronounced. Hence, the relationship between algal nutrient content and herbivory may be less coupled in habitats with higher herbivory pressure. We found the mangrove herbivore guild exhibited the greatest percent response to enhanced algal nutrient concentration of the three habitats studied, suggesting either resident grazers or transient fish passing by and remaining after sampling the algae, were more selective in response to variation in food quality. Other studies found juvenile parrotfishes are the most common grazing fishes in the mangroves, with adults present in the adjacent seagrass beds (Lewis and Wainright 1985; Taylor et al. 1986). The protection from predation afforded to small grazers by mangrove roots (Austin 1971; Phillips 1981) might allow relatively more time to be devoted to selecting high quality food than in other, more exposed habitats. Relative to coral and seagrass habitats, mangroves were a source of both N and P to the outplanted algal tissues across stations. Increased tissue nutrients in algae placed in the mangroves at station 3 suggest that the nearby Garifuna village contributes nutrients to nearshore waters. Sources probably include sewage (only 40% of the villagers utilize pit latrines; Adoni Cubas, personal communication) and livestock wastes; both may seep through soils or flow into aquatic habitats during storms. It is less likely that the Garifuna village influenced tissue nutrients at the more distant mangrove stations. Others have found that mangrove root habitats supply higher N and P to macroalgae (including Acanthophora spicifera) than coral habitats, even along uninhabited islands (Lapointe et al. 1987). It is notable that algae did not grow significantly while in mangrove stations in our experiment, unlike algae at the seagrass habitat, which grew and decreased in nutrient concentrations as the result of dilution in greater biomass. If a delay in growth is typical after nutrient uptake within mangrove habitats (perhaps due to light or other limitations), then the time available for herbivores to respond to increased food quality may also be extended. Our experiment simulated a short-term or pulsed nutrient input (3 days) over a small spatial scale and produced an immediate (within 2 days) increase in algal
8 537 consumption by herbivores. The herbivore guilds in all the habitats tested were capable of tracking and responding to changes in food quality that might result from pulsed or intermittent nutrient inputs. However, the effects of chronic and/or large-scale increases in nutrient supply are difficult to predict. Higher food quality should increase efficiency of transformation into herbivore biomass, such that less algal tissue needs to be consumed (e.g., Mattson 1980; Sterner and Hesson 1994). On the other hand, a sustained higher-quality food supply might lead to increases in herbivore abundance, such that continued control of algal biomass accumulation may be possible; however, such a scenario is possible only where fishing pressure is not strong enough to counter herbivore density increases. We tested algal nutrient/herbivory relationships using a highly palatable alga, but herbivores may not respond in the same manner to nutrient enrichment of less palatable (e.g., chemically or physically defended) algae. In a pristine Hawaiian reef, calcareous algae proliferated in the presence of herbivores, probably because palatable species were preferentially removed (Smith et al. 2001). Introduction of Acanthophora spicifera to Kaneohe Bay, Hawaii, is hypothesized to have led to the steady gain of the less palatable alga Dictyosphaeria cavernosa on coral reefs (Stimson et al. 2001). Thus, the importance of herbivore detection and consumption of nutrient-enriched algae in control of algal biomass in tropical waters will likely vary not only within and among habitats, but with the composition of both the algal and herbivore assemblages present at any one site. Acknowledgements We are grateful to Carlos Garcia-Saez and Adoni Cubas at the Honduras Coral Reef Fund for facilitating our research. We thank the staff at the HCRF field station, especially Alex Rubi and Elias Aguilar, for extensive support. This research was funded by grants from the Tinker Field Research program, the UCLA Latin American Center, and the US Environmental Protection Agency (#R to P. Fong) and fellowships (to K. Boyer) from the American Association of University Women and the UCLA Graduate Division. The comments of Rich Ambrose, Rick Vance, Phil Rundel, and anonymous reviewers improved earlier versions of the manuscript. References Adey WH (1998) Coral reefs: algal structured and mediated ecosystems in shallow, turbulent, alkaline waters. J Phycol 34: Austin HM (1971) A survey of the icthyofauna of the mangroves of western Puerto Rico during December 1967 August Carib J Sci 11:27 39 Bell PRF (1992) Eutrophication and coral reefs: some examples in the Great Barrier Reef Lagoon. Water Res 5: Carpenter RC (1986) Partitioning herbivory and its effects on coral reef algal communities. Ecol Monogr 56: Carpenter RC (1997) Invertebrate predators and grazers. In: Birkeland C (ed) Life and death of coral reefs. Chapman and Hall, New York, pp Chong VC, Sasekumar A, Leh MUC, Cruz RD (1990) The fish and prawn communities of a Malaysian coastal mangrove system, with comparisons to adjacent mudflats and inshore water. Est Coast Shelf Sci 31: Coyer JA, Ambrose RF, Engle JM, Carroll JC (1993) Interactions between corals and algae on a temperate zone rocky reef: mediation by sea urchins. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 167:21 37 Cruz-Rivera E, Hay ME (2000) Can quantity replace quality?: food choice, compensatory feeding and fitness of marine mesograzers. Ecology 81: Delgado O, Rodriguez-Prieto C, Gacia E, Ballesteros E (1996) Lack of severe nutrient limitation in Caulerpa taxifolia (Vahl) C. Agardh, an introduced seaweed spreading over the oligotrophic Northwestern Mediterranean. Bot Mar 39:61 67 Done TJ (1992) Phase shifts in coral reef communities and their ecological significance. Hydrobiologica 247: Fong P, Kamer K, Boyer KE, Boyle KA (2001) Nutrient content of macroalgae with differing morphologies may indicate sources of nutrients to tropical marine systems. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 220: Fong P, Boyer KE, Kamer K, Boyle KA (2003) Influence of initial tissue nutrient status of tropical marine algae on response to nitrogen and phosphorus additions. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 26: Giannotti AL, McGlathery KJ (2001) Consumption of Ulva lactuca (Chlorophyta) by the omnivorous mud snail Ilyanassa obsoleta (Say). J Phycol 37: Gonzalez NL (1988) Sojourners of the Caribbean: ethnogenesis and ethnohistory of the Garifuna. Univ of Ill Press, Chicago, 272 pp Hatcher BG (1983) Grazing in coral reef ecosystems. In: Barnes DJ (ed) Perspectives on coral reefs. Clouston, Canberra, pp Hatcher BG, Larkum AWD (1983) An experimental analysis of factors controlling the standing crop of the epilithic algal community on a coral reef. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 69:61 84 Hauxwell J, McClelland J, Behr PJ, Valiela I (1998) Relative importance of grazing and nutrient controls of macroalgal biomass in three temperate shallow estuaries. Estuaries 21: Hay ME (1984) Predictable spatial escapes from herbivory: how do these affect the evolution of herbivore resistance in tropical marine communities? Oecologia 64: Hay ME (1997) The ecology and evolution of seaweed-herbivore interactions on coral reefs. Coral Reefs 16: S67-S76 Hughes TP (1989) Community structure and diversity of coral reefs: the role of history. Ecology 70: Hughes TP (1996) Demographic approaches to community dynamics: a coral reef example. Ecology 77: Hughes TP, Szmant AM, Steneck R, Carpenter R, Miller S (1999) Algal blooms on coral reefs: what are the causes? Limnol Oceanogr 44: Koop K, Booth D, Broadbent A, Brodie J, Bucher D, Capone D, Coll J, Dennison W, Erdmann M, Harrison P, Hoegh-Guldberg O, Hutchings P, Jones GB, Larkum AWD, O Neil J, Steven A, Tentori E, Ward S, Williamson J, Yellowlees D (2001) ENCORE: the effect of nutrient enrichment on coral reefs. Mar Poll Bull 41: Laegdsgaard P, Johnson C (2001) Why do juvenile fish utilise mangrove habitats? J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 257: Lapointe BE (1987) Phosphorus- and nitrogen-limited photosynthesis and growth of Gracilaria tikvahiae (Rhodophyceae) in the Florida Keys: an experimental field study. Mar Biol 93: Lapointe BE (1989) Macroalgal production and nutrient relations in oligotrophic areas of Florida Bay. Bull Mar Sci 44: Lapointe BE (1997) Nutrient thresholds for bottom-up control of macroalgal blooms on coral reefs in Jamaica and southeast Florida. Limnol Oceanogr 42: Lapointe BE, Littler MM, Littler DS (1987) A comparison of nutrient-limited productivity in macroalgae from a Caribbean barrier reef and from a mangrove ecosystem. Aquat Bot 28: Larned ST (1998) Nitrogen- versus phosphorus-limited growth and sources of nutrients for coral reef macroalgae. Mar Biol 132:
9 538 Larned ST, Stimson J (1997) Nitrogen-limited growth in the coral reef chlorophyte Dictyosphaeria cavernosa, and the effect of exposure to sediment-derived nitrogen on growth. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 145: Lewis SM (1985) Herbivory on coral reefs: algal susceptibility to herbivorous fishes. Oecologia 65: Lewis SM (1986) The role of herbivorous fishes in the organization of a Caribbean reef community. Ecol Monogr 56: Lewis SM, Wainwright PC (1985) Herbivore abundance and grazing intensity on a Caribbean coral reef. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 87: Littler MM, Littler DS (1984) Models of tropical reef biogenesis: the contribution of algae. Prog Phycol Res 3: Marguillier S, van der Velde G, Dehairs F, Hemminga MA, Rajagopal S (1997) Trophic relationships in an interlinked mangrove-seagrass ecosystem as traced by d 13 C and d 15 N. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 151: Mattson WJ (1980) Herbivory in relation to plant nitrogen content. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 11: McCook LJ (1999) Macroalgae, nutrients and phase shifts on coral reefs: scientific issues and management consequences for the Great Barrier Reef. Coral Reefs 18: McCook LJ, Jompa J, Diaz-Pulido G (2001) Competition between corals and algae on coral reefs: a review of evidence and mechanisms. Coral Reefs 19: Meesters EH, Bak RPM (1993) Effects of coral bleaching on tissue regeneration potential and colony survival. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 96: Meesters EH, Noordeloos M, Bak RPM (1994) Damage and regeneration: links to growth in the reef-building coral Montastrea annularis. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 112: Meesters EH, Pauchli W, Bak RPM (1997) Predicting regeneration of physical damage on a reef-building coral by regeneration capacity and lesion shape. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 146:91 99 Miller MW (1998) Coral/seaweed competition and the control of reef community structure within and between latitudes. Oceanogr Mar Biol Ann Rev 36:65 96 Miller MW, Hay ME (1996) Coral-seaweed-grazer-nutrient interactions on temperate reefs. Ecol Monogr 663: Miller MW, Hay ME, Miller SL, Malone D, Sotka EE, Szmant MA (1999) Effects of nutrients vs. herbivores on reef algae: a new method for manipulating nutrients on coral reefs. Limnol Oceanogr 44: Nicotri ME (1980) Factors involved in herbivore food preference. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 42:13 26 Phillips PC (1981) Diversity and fish community structure in a Central American mangrove embayment. Rev Biol Trop 29: Plath K, Boersma M (2001) Mineral limitation of zooplankton: stoichiometric constraints and optimal foraging. Ecology 82: Sah RN, Miller RO (1992) Spontaneous reaction for acid dissolution of biological tissues in closed vessels. Anal Chem 64: Schaffelke B, Klumpp DW (1997) Growth of germlings of the macroalga Sargassum baccularia (Phaeophyta) is stimulated by enhanced nutrients. In: Proc 8th Int Coral Reef Symp, vol 2. June 1996, Panama City, pp Schaffelke B, Klumpp DW (1998a) Nutrient-limited growth of the coral reef macroalga Sargassum baccularia and experimental growth enhancement by nutrient addition in continuous flow culture. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 164: Schaffelke B, Klumpp DW (1998b) Short-term nutrient pulses enhance growth and photosynthesis of the coral reef macroalga Sargassum baccularia. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 170: Smith JE, Smith CM, Hunter CL (2001) An experimental analysis of the effects of herbivory and nutrient enrichment on benthic community dynamics on a Hawaiian reef. Coral Reefs 19: Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1995) Biometry: the principles and practice of statistics in biological research, 3rd edn. Freeman, New York Steneck RS (1988) Herbivory on coral reefs: a synthesis. In: Proc 6 th Int Coral Reef Symp, vol 1. August 1988, Townsville, pp Sterner RW, Hesson DO (1994) Algal nutrient limitation and the nutrition of aquatic herbivores. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 25:1-29 Stimson J, Larned ST, Conklin E (2001) Effects of herbivory, nutrient levels, and introduced algae on the distribution and abundance of the invasive macroalga Dictyosphaeria cavernosa in Kaneohe Bay, Hawaii. Coral Reefs 19: Sweeney RA (1989) Generic combustion method for determination of crude protein in feeds: collaborative study. J Assoc Off Anal Chem 72: Szmant AM (1997) Nutrient effects on coral reefs: a hypothesis on the importance of topographic and trophic complexity to reef nutrient dynamics. In: Proc 8 th Int Coral Reef Symp, vol 2. June 1996, Panama City pp Szmant AM (2001) Introduction to the special issue of Coral Reefs on Coral reef algal community dynamics. Coral Reefs 19: Taylor PR, Littler MM, Littler DS (1986) Escapes from herbivory in relation to the structure of mangrove island macroalgal communities. Oecologia 69: Thacker RW, Ginsburg DW, Paul VJ (2001) Effects of herbivore exclusion and nutrient enrichment on coral reef macroalgae and cyanobacteria. Coral Reefs 19: van Woesik R (1998) Lesion healing on massive Porites spp. corals. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 164: Williams SL, Carpenter RC (1988) Nitrogen-limited primary productivity of coral reef algal turfs: potential contribution of ammonium excreted by Diadema antillarum. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 47: Yates JL, Peckol P (1993) Effects of nutrient availability and herbivory on polyphenolics in the seaweed Fucus vesiculosus. Ecology 74:
Post Hurricane Ivan Damage Assessment of Seagrass Resources of Coastal Alabama Table of Contents: K.L. Heck, Jr. and D. Byron Dauphin Island Sea Lab 101 Bienville Boulevard Dauphin Island, AL 36528 (251/861-2141;
THE EFFECT OF GASTROPOD DIVERSITY AND DENSITY ON MACROALGAE DIVERSITY IN THE MASSACHUSETTS ROCKY INTERTIDAL Hillary Department of Biology,, Worcester, MA 01610 (email@example.com) Abstract Rocky intertidal
Hard Anemone An exoskeleton Even though it lies Beneath the animal Some scleractinian coral growth forms massive II. The Coral Host branching plate like foliaceous encrusting columnar Free-living Algae
Class 39 -- Food Webs MATTER AND ENERGY TRANSFER IN MARINE ECOSYSTEMS Ecosystems (Producers, Consumers, Decomposers) Food chains and food webs Efficiency of energy flow (Trophic( pyramid) FACTORS CONTROLLING
CORAL REEF ECOSYSTEMS: AN OVERVIEW OF THEIR STRUCTURE AND FUNCTION Chisholm J.R.M. Director of Research, Scientific Centre of Monaco, Monaco Keywords: Coral reef, ecosystem, photosynthesis, calcification,
Below are listed some Key Topics or terms to aid in focusing your study time. More topics then these may appear on the exam but these are a good place to start. Check each box as you review the concept
Michelle Dennis NRS 534 Term Paper Seascape ecology and coral reefs Seascape ecology is a relatively new study in the field of landscape ecology. Landscape ecology was developed over a half a century ago
GREAT BARRIER REEF Climate Change Action Plan 2007 2011 Climate change is now recognised as the greatest long-term threat to the Great Barrier Reef. The Great Barrier Reef is internationally renowned as
Chapter Concepts Chapter 18 PRIMARY PRODUCTION AND ENERGY FLOW Terrestrial Primary Production is generally limited by temperature and moisture Aquatic Primary Production is generally limited by nutrient
WEB OF LIFE Sea otters live in the shallow waters of the Pacific and in various types of habitats that include rocky shores, tidal estuaries, and kelp forests. Kelp forests are a key habitat often associated
BIOLOGICAL DYNAMICS OF CORAL REEFS Tung-Yung Fan National Museum of Marine Biology and Aquarium, Pingtung 944, Taiwan, R.O.C. Chang-Feng Dai Institute of Oceanography, National Taiwan University, Taipei
The Marine Protected Area Inventory New pictures Jordan Gass, Hugo Selbie and Charlie Wahle ESRI Ocean Forum November 6, 2013 Outline What is the MPA Inventory? Purpose Data How it s used Future directions
Introduction to Ecology Reading: Chapter 50 Introduction, today Chapter 52 Population ecology, today and W Chapter 54 Ecosystem ecology, W&F Outline of Lecture 1. Branches of ecology 2. Factors affecting
A Comparison of Brain Coral Bleaching And Water Quality at Champagne Bay and Rodney s Rock Lauren Divine, Carolyn Campbell, Ricci Loughridge, Travis Krause June 8, 20006 Texas A&M University Study Abroad
Appendix B: Estimates This appendix presents the estimated costs of the monitoring and supplemental research components presented in Section 3 of this document. A 20% quality assurance and quality control
Downloaded from UvA-DARE, the institutional repository of the University of Amsterdam (UvA) http://hdl.handle.net/11245/2.20101 File ID Filename Version uvapub:20101 Chapter 4 Inferring demographic processes
Biological Productivity and Coastal Habitats Why do we care? Fishing Water quality Wildlife Ecology and Ecosystems Ecology Natural systems Include interactions between living and non-living parts Ecosystem
Review Global disparity in the resilience of coral reefs George Roff and Peter J. Mumby Marine Spatial Ecology Lab and Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies, School of
7/24/11 Zones of the Ocean I. Physical Environment III. Patterns in the Biota III. Processes Only lines on the outline of the ocean; belies its importance to humankind as a key component of nearshore coastal
Policy & Management Applications of Blue Carbon fact SHEET Policy & Management Applications of Blue Carbon Coastal Blue Carbon - An Important Wetland Ecosystem Service Coastal Blue Carbon refers to the
Diver Impacts on coral reefs at Kealakekua Bay, Hawai i by Brian N. Tissot, Ph.D. Program in Environmental Science and Regional Planning Washington State University Vancouver, WA 98686 & Leon E. Hallacher,
2 1 SECTION 2 Monitoring water quality in estuaries The Waterwatch program includes testing of a number of water quality parameters to provide information about the health of the waterway under investigation.
AP Biology Unit I: Ecological Interactions Essential knowledge 1.C.1: Speciation and extinction have occurred throughout the Earth s history. Species extinction rates are rapid at times of ecological stress.
Marine Conservation Science and Policy Service learning Program Trophic Structure refers to the way in which organisms utilize food resources and hence where energy transfer occurs within an ecosystem.
Grass Shrimp Background When studying estuarine ecosystems, students can learn about the animals found in this environment including grass shrimp, some of which are in the genus Palaemonetes and include
STATUS REPORT FOR THE SUBMERGED REEF BALL TM ARTIFICIAL REEF SUBMERGED BREAKWATER BEACH STABILIZATION PROJECT FOR THE GRAND CAYMAN MARRIOTT HOTEL performed by Lee E. Harris, Ph.D., P.E. Consulting Coastal
Ch 54 Community Ecology A biological community is an assemblage of populations of various species living close enough for potential interaction Ecologists call relationships between species in a community
issue 84 Dec 2006 Great Barrier Reef Marine Park sedimentology revealed New research into inter-reefal environments will assist reef managers Emma Mathews and Andrew Heap Geoscience Australia has completed
Ecosystem Ecology Energy Flows and Nutrient Cycles Introduction to Ecosystems Some reflected Some converted to heat Some absorbed PSN Some absorbed by organisms, soils, water Introduction to Ecosystems
Aquatic Biomes, Continued Introduction Extent of Marine biomes Issues & challenges Factors influencing distribution Dynamics in time & space Depth Tour of marine biomes Issues (by biome) Freshwater biomes
Estuary monitoring by communities Mangrove habitats a case study Anne-Maree Schwarz NIWA Sharon Parker, Michael Grose Waikaraka Estuary Managers Introduction Flow chart of actions Example timetable These
AP Biology Chapter 54 notes Ecosystems Ecosystem ecology emphasizes energy flow and chemical recycling An ecosystem consists of all the organisms in a community and all the abiotic factors with which they
Chap. 8 Terrestrial Plant Nutrient Use Focus on the following sections: 1. Introduction and Overview (176-77) a. What are 2 reasons described that plant nutrient uptake is important? Can you think of any
The Importance of Coral Reefs 1 The Importance of Coral Reefs and Their Effects on the World Haley M. Smith East Kentwood High School The Importance of Coral Reefs 2 The Importance of Coral Reefs and Their
Period Date REVIEW UNIT 10: ECOLOGY SAMPLE QUESTIONS A. Sample Multiple Choice Questions Complete the multiple choice questions to review this unit. 1. All of the following are density-dependent factors
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX Response to Comments on the Goleta Sanitary District Draft NPDES Permit and 301(h) TDD A. Kamil S. Azoury of Goleta Sanitary District provided comments on
OCEAN FOOD WEBS AND TROPHIC DYNAMICS H. Stibor Department of Aquatic Ecology, University of Munich,Germany U.Sommer Institute for Marine Science, Kiel,Germany Keywords: Food web, food chain, trophic level,ecological
Water Quality of the Port River Estuary a community summary Government of South Australia INTRODUCTION In September 1995, the EPA began a long-term program to monitor water quality in the Port River estuary.
- Exchange of energy and matter You should be able to: (a) briefly describe the non-cyclical nature of energy flow (b) establish the relationship of the following in food webs: producer, consumer, herbivore,
Ecosystem Ecology 1. Overview of material and energy flows in ecosystems 2. Primary production 3. Secondary production and trophic efficiency 4. Ecological Pyramids Trophic levels energy flow through ecosystems
III. THE MICROBIAL BIOMASS Required Readings: Ley, R.E., D.A. Lipson and S.K. Schmidt. 2001. Microbial biomass levels in barren and vegetated high altitude talus soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 65:111 117.
7 Energy Flow Through an Ecosystem investigation 2 c l a s s se s s i o n s Overview Students create a food web of a kelp forest ecosystem with which they explore the flow of energy between ecosystem organisms.
Summary Report for Rookery Bay National Estuarine Research Reserve Contacts: Kevin Cunniff, Rookery Bay National Estuarine Research Reserve Katie Laakkonen, City of Naples Seagrass Integrated Mapping and
Sea Grant Extension Service School of Ocean and Earth Science and Technology University of Hawaii 1000 Pope Road, MSB 226 Honolulu, HI 96822 Phone: (808) 956-8191 Fax: (808) 956-2858 Fact Sheet No. 3 October
The effect of nitrogen fertilization on chlorophyll content and composition in the green algae Neochloris oleoabundans Jake Nelson Plant Nutrition Abstract Chlorophyll concentration was monitored under
Primary Production and Energy Flow Chapter 18 Sunlight to photosynthesizer to herbivore to carnivore to decomposer!!! 1 Copyright The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or
Experimental Design: Atmospheric CO 2 targets for ocean acidification perturbation experiments Jim Barry, Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute Atmospheric CO2 targets for perturbation experiments Why?
Published July 2008 Environmental Status: Macroalgae (Seaweeds) Commonwealth of Australia 2008 ISBN 1 876945 34 6 Published July 2008 by the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority This work is copyright.
SPATIAL VARIATION IN THE BIOCHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF SACCHARINA LATISSIMA Bruhn A, Nielsen MM, Manns D, Rasmussen MB, Petersen JK & Krause-Jensen D 4 TH NORDIC ALGAE CONFERENCE GRENÅ 2014 BIOCHEMICAL VARIATION
Biogeochemistry (2011) 106:281 302 DOI 10.1007/s10533-010-9542-2 Assessment of the eutrophication status of the Great Barrier Reef lagoon (Australia) J. E. Brodie M. Devlin D. Haynes J. Waterhouse Received:
1 st six weeks 1 Identify questions and problems that can be answered through scientific investigation. 2 Design and conduct scientific investigations to answer questions about the world by creating hypotheses;
NPS Inventory and Monitoring Program The National Park Service Inventory & Monitoring Program Student Opportunities Sara Stevens Program Manager NPS Inventory and Monitoring Program NPS Programs at URI
SPC Live Reef Fish Information Bulletin # December 997 to destructive fishing. But the chances of it happening are reduced when they are helped to become aware of the issues (see Smith, p. 7) and are the
Assessing risks to ecosystems - a new global standard IUCN Ecosystem Red List Working Group David Keith et al. Major scientific challenges I. What is an ecosystem? II. When is an ecosystem extinct? disappearance
Overview of Ocean Acidification Experimental Design Chris Langdon Major scientific issues Determine the calcification response to elevated CO 2 of planktonic (coccolithophorids, foraminifera, shelled pteropods)
BIOREGIONS OF THE GREAT BARRIER REEF WORLD HERITAGE AREA The Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority, through the classification phase of the Representative Areas Program, has mapped the biological and
EFFECTS OF VARYING IRRIGATION AND MEPIQUAT CHLORIDE APPLICATION ON COTTON HEIGHT, UNIFORMITY, YIELD, AND QUALITY Glen Ritchie 1, Lola Sexton 1, Trey Davis 1, Don Shurley 2, and Amanda Ziehl 2 1 University
Communities, Biomes, and Ecosystems Section 1: Community Ecology Section 2: Terrestrial Biomes Section 3: Aquatic Ecosystems Click on a lesson name to select. 3.1 Community Ecology Communities A biological
A User s Guide for the Ambient Water Quality Guidelines for Cadmium What is a Water Quality Guideline? The British Columbia Ministry of Environment develops ambient water quality guidelines (WQGs) to assess
Integrating Near Real-Time Data for Coral Reef Ecosystem Forecasting NOAA s Integrated Coral Observing Network (ICON) Atlantic Oceanographic and Meteorological Laboratory Laboratory Review, March 18, 2008
GIS Use in Mapping Coral Reefs Coral reefs rank among the most biologically productive and diverse of natural ecosystems and are undoubtedly one of the major biodiversity hot spots on the planet. Coral
THE KILL DATE AS A MANAGEMENT TOOL TO INCREASE COVER CROPS BENEFITS IN WATER QUALITY & NITROGEN RECYCLING María ALONSO-AYUSO José Luis GABRIEL Miguel QUEMADA Technical University of Madrid (Spain) INDEX
Sugarcane Production and the Environment Jason Clay, WWF-US Better Sugar Meeting, June 21 WWF and Agricultural Commodities The goal reduce measurably the most significant social and environment impacts
Ecological Roulette: The Global Transport of Nonindigenous Marine Organisms James T. Carlton 1 and Jonathan B. Geller 2 1 Maritime Studies Program, Williams College, Mystic Seaport, Mystic, CT 06355, and
S. Pillay 1;3, Dr. A. J. Smit 2, Dr D. Robertson-Andersson 1;3 1 UKZN 2 UWC 3 MACE Lab Objectives The specific objectives were: (1) To determine if each estuary chosen for this study is eutrophic and comparisons
Phosphorus Phosphorus Brochure Lake Whatcom Cooperative Management Reducing Phosphorus Website Washington State Department of Ecology www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/wq/nonpoint/phosphorus/phosphorusban.html Nutrients
The Biosphere Matter of Energy, Interdependence in Nature Q: How do Earth s living and nonliving parts interact and affect the survival of organisms? 3.1 How do we study life? WHAT I KNOW SAMPLE ANSWER:
BRIEF PREFACE XIV PRINCIPLES OF OCEANOGRAPHY AND MARINE ECOLOGY CHAPTER 1 Sounding the Deep 1 C H A P T E R 2 The Oceanic Environment 13 CHAPTER 3 Ecological and Evolutionary Principles of Marine Biology
CORAL REEF ACTIVITY PACKET ANSWER KEY FOR TEACHERS CORAL REEF WEBQUEST ANSWER KEY 1 What are coral and what is a coral reef? 3 What percentage of marine life live in coral reefs? Corals are animals related
A Comparison of Site Fidelity of the Invasive Crab Hemigrapsus sanguineus and the Native Crab Panopeus herbstii Dr. Diane Brousseau Dr. Laura McSweeney Taylor Anderson Katie Biardi Christina Elmore Jessica
DRAFT FINAL MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Pursuant to Section 21080(c) Public Resources Code To: Office of Planning & Research State Clearinghouse 1400 Tenth Street Sacramento, CA 95814 From: State Water
Coral Bleaching Alert System Technical Document Indian National Centre for Ocean Information Services (INCOIS) Hyderabad 2011 Contents Page No. 1. Introduction...1 1. Objective...2 2. Study Area...2 3.
Course Syllabus Marine Biology MARS 3450, Fall 2015 Updated 8/14/15 Photo by Dave Cowles, Goodman Creek, WA, July 2002 (http://www.wallawalla.edu/academics/departments/ biology/rosario/inverts/echinodermata/class%20asteroidea/pisaster_ochraceus.html).
No bull: Juvenile bull sharks may play diverse functional roles in coastal food webs Aaron J. Wirsing Introduction Predators may induce numerous direct and indirect effects in food webs Most studies of
How to Set-up a Halimeda Aquarium Heather Spalding, Gk-12 Program Setting up a salt-water aquarium for tropical fish requires a lot of time, energy and resources. The nutrient levels, salinity, water temperature,
There is a concerted effort in the regionto understand the sources, fate, transport and impacts of toxic to the Salish Sea with the intent of determining best management options to reduce toxic threats.
Development of the zooplankton community in the Srebarna Lake (North- Eastern Bulgaria) along the process of ecosystem rehabilitation Luchezar Pehlivanov, Vesselka Tsavkova, Vasil Vasilev 1 Keywords: zooplankton
2-1 Lab 2: Field sampling I. Introduction to ecological systems Ecologists frequently refer to their subject of study as a system that they investigate (O'Neill 2001). A group of potentially interbreeding
21st International Conference of The Coastal Society MARINE STEWARDSHIP AREA OFFERS A MODEL FOR INTEGRATING SCIENCE, MANAGEMENT, STEWARDSHIP AND ECOSYSTEM THINKING IN THE CONSERVATION OF COASTAL RESOURCES
CURTIN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY Department of Applied Geology Western Australia School of Mines Applied Sedimentology, Coastal and Marine Geoscience Group GERALDTON EMBAYMENTS COASTAL SEDIMENT BUDGET STUDY