# 3. Predicates and Quantifiers

Save this PDF as:

Size: px
Start display at page:

## Transcription

1 3. PREDICATES AND QUANTIFIERS Predicates and Quantifiers 3.1. Predicates and Quantifiers. Definition A predicate or propositional function is a description of the property (or properties) a variable or subject may have. A proposition may be created from a propositional function by either assigning a value to the variable or by quantification. Definition The independent variable of a propositional function must have a universe of discourse, which is a set from which the variable can take values. Recall from the introduction to logic that the sentence x + 2 = 2x is not a proposition, but if we assign a value for x then it becomes a proposition. The phrase x + 2 = 2x can be treated as a function for which the input is a value of x and the output is a proposition. Another way we could turn this sentence into a proposition is to quantify its variable. For example, for every real number x, x + 2 = 2x is a proposition (which is, in fact, false, since it fails to be true for the number x = 0). This is the idea behind propositional functions or predicates. As stated above a predicate is a property or attribute assigned to elements of a particular set, called the universe of discourse. For example, the predicate x + 2 = 2x, where the universe for the variable x is the set of all real numbers, is a property that some, but not all, real numbers possess. In general, the set of all x in the universe of discourse having the attribute P (x) is called the truth set of P. That is, the truth set of P is {x U P (x)} Example of a Propositional Function. Example The propositional function P (x) is given by x > 0 and the universe of discourse for x is the set of integers. To create a proposition from P, we may assign a value for x. For example, setting x = 3, we get P ( 3): 3 > 0, which is false. setting x = 2, we get P (2): 2 > 0, which is true.

2 3. PREDICATES AND QUANTIFIERS 46 In this example we created propositions by choosing particular values for x. Here are two more examples: Example Suppose P (x) is the sentence x has fur and the universe of discourse for x is the set of all animals. In this example P (x) is a true statement if x is a cat. It is false, though, if x is an alligator. Example Suppose Q(y) is the predicate y holds a world record, and the universe of discourse for y is the set of all competitive swimmers. Notice that the universe of discourse must be defined for predicates. This would be a different predicate if the universe of discourse is changed to the set of all competitive runners. Moral: Be very careful in your homework to specify the universe of discourse precisely! 3.3. Quantifiers. A quantifier turns a propositional function into a proposition without assigning specific values for the variable. There are primarily two quantifiers, the and the universal quantifier existential quantifier. Definition The universal quantification of P (x) is the proposition P (x) is true for all values x in the universe of discourse. Notation: For all x P (x) or For every x P (x) is written xp (x). Definition The existential quantification of P (x) is the proposition There exists an element x in the universe of discourse such that P (x) is true. Notation: There exists x such that P (x) or There is at least one x such that P (x) is written xp (x).

3 3. PREDICATES AND QUANTIFIERS 47 As an alternative to assigning particular values to the variable in a propositional function, we can turn it into a proposition by quantifying its variable. Here we see the two primary ways in which this can be done, the universal quantifier and the existential quantifier. In each instance we have created a proposition from a propositional function by binding its variable Example Example Suppose P (x) is the predicate x + 2 = 2x, and the universe of discourse for x is the set {1, 2, 3}. Then... xp (x) is the proposition For every x in {1, 2, 3} x + 2 = 2x. This proposition is false. xp (x) is the proposition There exists x in {1, 2, 3} such that x + 2 = 2x. This proposition is true. Exercise Let P (n, m) be the predicate mn > 0, where the domain for m and n is the set of integers. Which of the following statements are true? (1) P ( 3, 2) (2) mp (0, m) (3) np (n, 3) 3.5. Converting from English. Example Assume F (x): x is a fox. S(x): x is sly. T (x): x is trustworthy. and the universe of discourse for all three functions is the set of all animals. Everything is a fox: xf (x) All foxes are sly: x[f (x) S(x)] If any fox is sly, then it is not trustworthy: x[(f (x) S(x) T (x)] x[f (x) S(x) T (x)]

4 3. PREDICATES AND QUANTIFIERS 48 Notice that in this example the last proposition may be written symbolically in the two ways given. Think about the how you could show they are the same using the logical equivalences in Module Additional Definitions. An assertion involving predicates is valid if it is true for every element in the universe of discourse. An assertion involving predicates is satisfiable if there is a universe and an interpretation for which the assertion is true. Otherwise it is unsatisfiable. The scope of a quantifier is the part of an assertion in which the variable is bound by the quantifier. You would not be asked to state the definitions of the terminology given, but you would be expected to know what is meant if you are asked a question like Which of the following assertions are satisfiable? 3.7. Examples. Example If the universe of discourse is U = {1, 2, 3}, then (1) xp (x) P (1) P (2) P (3) (2) xp (x) P (1) P (2) P (3) Suppose the universe of discourse U is the set of real numbers. (1) If P (x) is the predicate x 2 > 0, then xp (x) is false, since P (0) is false. (2) If P (x) is the predicate x 2 3x 4 = 0, then xp (x) is true, since P ( 1) is true. (3) If P (x) is the predicate x 2 + x + 1 = 0, then xp (x) is false, since there are no real solutions to the equation x 2 + x + 1 = 0. (4) If P (x) is the predicate If x 0, then x 2 1, then xp (x) is false, since P (0.5) is false. Exercise In each of the cases above give the truth value for the statement if each of the and quantifiers are reversed.

5 3. PREDICATES AND QUANTIFIERS Multiple Quantifiers. Multiple quantifiers are read from left to right. Example Suppose P (x, y) is xy = 1, the universe of discourse for x is the set of positive integers, and the universe of discourse for y is the set of real numbers. (1) x yp (x, y) may be read For every positive integer x and for every real number y, xy = 1. This proposition is false. (2) x yp (x, y) may be read For every positive integer x there is a real number y such that xy = 1. This proposition is true. (3) y xp (x, y) may be read There exists a real number y such that, for every positive integer x, xy = 1. This proposition is false. Study the syntax used in these examples. It takes a little practice to make it come out right Ordering Quantifiers. The order of quantifiers is important; they may not commute. For example, (1) x yp (x, y) y xp (x, y), and (2) x yp (x, y) y xp (x, y), but (3) x yp (x, y) y xp (x, y). The lesson here is that you have to pay careful attention to the order of the quantifiers. The only cases in which commutativity holds are the cases in which both quantifiers are the same. In the one case in which equivalence does not hold, x yp (x, y) y xp (x, y), there is an implication in one direction. Notice that if y xp (x, y) is true, then there is an element c in the universe of discourse for y such that P (x, c) is true for all x in the universe of discourse for x. Thus, for all x there exists a y, namely c, such that P (x, y). That is, x yp (x, y). Thus, y xp (x, y) x yp (x, y). Notice predicates use function notation and recall that the variable in function notation is really a place holder. The statement x yp (x, y) means the same as

6 3. PREDICATES AND QUANTIFIERS 50 s tp (s, t). Now if this seems clear, go a step further and notice this will also mean the same as y xp (y, x). When the domain of discourse for a variable is defined it is in fact defining the domain for the place that variable is holding at that time. Here are some additional examples: Example P (x, y) is x is a citizen of y. Q(x, y) is x lives in y. The universe of discourse of x is the set of all people and the universe of discourse for y is the set of US states. (1) All people who live in Florida are citizens of Florida. x(q(x, F lorida) P (x, F lorida)) (2) Every state has a citizen that does not live in that state. y x(p (x, y) Q(x, y)) Example Suppose R(x, y) is the predicate x understands y, the universe of discourse for x is the set of students in your discrete class, and the universe of discourse for y is the set of examples in these lecture notes. Pay attention to the differences in the following propositions. (1) x yr(x, y) is the proposition There exists a student in this class who understands every example in these lecture notes. (2) y xr(x, y) is the proposition For every example in these lecture notes there is a student in the class who understands that example. (3) x yr(x, y) is the proposition Every student in this class understands at least one example in these notes. (4) y xr(x, y) is the proposition There is an example in these notes that every student in this class understands. Exercise Each of the propositions in Example has a slightly different meaning. To illustrate this, set up the following diagrams: Write the five letters A, B, C, D, E on one side of a page, and put the numbers 1 through 6 on the other side. The letters represent students in the class and the numbers represent examples. For each of the propositions above draw the minimal number of lines connecting people to examples so as to construct a diagram representing a scenario in which the given proposition is true. Notice that for any chosen pair of propositions above, you can draw diagrams that would represent situations where the two propositions have opposite truth values. Exercise Give a scenario where parts 1 and 2 in Example have opposite truth values.

7 3. PREDICATES AND QUANTIFIERS 51 Exercise Let P (x, y) be the predicate 2x + y = xy, where the domain of discourse for x is {u Z u 1} and for y is {u Z u 2}. Determine the truth value of each statement. Show work or briefly explain. (1) P ( 1, 1) (2) xp (x, 0) (3) yp (4, y) (4) yp (2, y) (5) x yp (x, y) (6) y xp (x, y) (7) x y[((p (x, y)) (x > 0)) (y > 1)] Unique Existential. Definition The unique existential quantification of P (x) is the proposition There exists a unique element x in the universe of discourse such that P (x) is true. Notation: There exists unique x such that P (x) or There is exactly one x P (x) is written!xp (x). Continuing with Example 3.9.2, the proposition x!yr(x, y) is the proposition Every student in this class understands exactly one example in these notes (but not necessarily the same example for all students). Exercise Let P (n, m) be the predicate mn 0, where the domain for m and n is the set of integers. Which of the following statements are true? (1)!n mp (n, m) (2) n!mp (n, m) (3)!mP (2, m) Exercise Repeat Exercise for the four propositions x!yr(x, y),!y xr(x, y),!x yr(x, y), and y!xr(x, y). Remember: A predicate is not a proposition until all variables have been bound either by quantification or by assignment of a value!

8 3. PREDICATES AND QUANTIFIERS De Morgan s Laws for Quantifiers. xp (x) x P (x) xp (x) x P (x) The negation of a quantified statement are obtained from the De Morgan s Laws in Module 2.1. So the negation of the proposition Every fish in the sea has gills, is the proposition there is at least one fish in the sea that does not have gills. If there is more than one quantifier, then the negation operator should be passed from left to right across one quantifier at a time, using the appropriate De Morgan s Law at each step. Continuing further with Example 3.9.2, suppose we wish to negate the proposition Every student in this class understands at least one example in these notes. Apply De Morgan s Laws to negate the symbolic form of the proposition: ( x yr(x, y)) x( yr(x, y)) x y R(x, y) The first proposition could be read It is not the case that every student in this class understands at least one example in these notes. The goal, however, is to find an expression for the negation in which the verb in each predicate in the scope of the quantifiers is negated, and this is the intent in any exercise, quiz, or test problem that asks you to negate the proposition.... Thus, a correct response to the instruction to negate the proposition Every student in this class understands at least one example in these notes is the proposition There is at least one student in this class that does not understand any of the examples in these notes. Exercise Negate the rest of the statements in Example It is easy to see why each of these rules of negation is just another form of De Morgan s Law, if you assume that the universe of discourse is finite: U = {x 1, x 2,..., x n }. For example, so that xp (x) P (x 1 ) P (x 2 ) P (x n )

9 3. PREDICATES AND QUANTIFIERS 53 xp (x) [P (x 1 ) P (x 2 ) P (x n )] [ P (x 1 ) P (x 1 ) P (x 1 )] x P (x) If U is an arbitrary universe of discouse, we must argue a little differently: Suppose xp (x) is true. Then xp (x) is false. This is true if and only if there is some c in U such that P (c) is false. This is true if and only if there is some c in U such that P (c) is true. But this is true if and only if x P (x). The argument for the other equivalence is similar. Exercise Suppose S(x, y) is the predicate x saw y, L(x, y) is the predicate x liked y, and C(y) is the predicate y is a comedy. The universe of discourse of x is the set of people and the universe of discourse for y is the set of movies. Write the following in proper English. Do not use variables in your answers. (1) y S(Margaret, y) (2) y xl(x, y) (3) x y[c(y) S(x, y)] (4) Give the negation for part 3 in symbolic form with the negation symbol to the right of all quantifiers. (5) state the negation of part 3 in English without using the phrase it is not the case. Exercise Suppose the universe of discourse for x is the set of all FSU students, the universe of discourse for y is the set of courses offered at FSU, A(y) is the predicate y is an advanced course, F (x) is x is a freshman, T (x, y) is x is taking y, and P (x, y) is x passed y. Use quantifiers to express the statements (1) No student is taking every advanced course. (2) Every freshman passed calculus. (3) Some advanced course(s) is(are) being taken by no students. (4) Some freshmen are only taking advanced courses. (5) No freshman has taken and passed linear algebra. Here is a formidable example from the calculus. Suppose a and L are fixed real numbers, and f is a real-valued function of the real variable x. Recall the rigorous definition of what it means to say the limit of f(x) as x tends to a is L : lim x a f(x) = L for every ɛ > 0 there exists δ > 0 such that, for every x,

10 3. PREDICATES AND QUANTIFIERS 54 if 0 < x a < δ, then f(x) L < ɛ. Here, the universe of discourse for the variables ɛ, δ, and x is understood to be the set of all real numbers. What does it mean to say that lim x a f(x) L? In order to figure this out, it is useful to convert this proposition into a symbolic proposition. So, let P (ɛ, δ, x) be the predicate 0 < x a < δ and let Q(ɛ, δ, x) be the predicate f(x) L < ɛ. (It is perfectly OK to list a variable in the argument of a predicate even though it doesn t actually appear!) We can simplify the proposition somewhat by restricting the universe of discourse for the variables ɛ and δ to be the set of positive real numbers. The definition then becomes Use De Morgan s Law to negate: ɛ δ x[p (ɛ, δ, x) Q(ɛ, δ, x)]. [ ɛ δ x[p (ɛ, δ, x) Q(ɛ, δ, x)]] ɛ δ x[p (ɛ, δ, x) Q(ɛ, δ, x)], and convert back into words: There exists ɛ > 0 such that, for every δ > 0 there exists x such that, 0 < x a < δ and f(x) L ɛ Distributing Quantifiers over Operators. (1) x[p (x) Q(x)] xp (x) xq(x), but (2) x[p (x) Q(x)] xp (x) xq(x). (3) x[p (x) Q(x)] xp (x) xq(x), but (4) x[p (x) Q(x)] xp (x) xq(x). Here we see that in only half of the four basic cases does a quantifier distribute over an operator, in the sense that doing so produces an equivalent proposition. Exercise In each of the two cases in which the statements are not equivalent, there is an implication in one direction. Which direction? In order to help you analyze these two cases, consider the predicates P (x) = [x 0] and Q(x) = [x < 0], where the universe of discourse is the set of all real numbers. Exercise Write using predicates and quantifiers. (1) For every m, n N there exists p N such that m < p and p < n. (2) For all nonnegative real numbers a, b, and c, if a 2 + b 2 = c 2, then a + b c.

11 3. PREDICATES AND QUANTIFIERS 55 (3) There does not exist a positive real number a such that a + 1 a < 2. (4) Every student in this class likes mathematics. (5) No student in this class likes mathematics. (6) All students in this class that are CS majors are going to take a 4000 level math course. Exercise Give the negation of each statement in example using predicates and quantifiers with the negation to the right of all quantifiers. Exercise Give the negation of each statement in example using an English sentence.

### Discrete Mathematics, Chapter : Predicate Logic

Discrete Mathematics, Chapter 1.4-1.5: Predicate Logic Richard Mayr University of Edinburgh, UK Richard Mayr (University of Edinburgh, UK) Discrete Mathematics. Chapter 1.4-1.5 1 / 23 Outline 1 Predicates

### CS 2336 Discrete Mathematics

CS 2336 Discrete Mathematics Lecture 2 Logic: Predicate Calculus 1 Outline Predicates Quantifiers Binding Applications Logical Equivalences 2 Predicates In mathematics arguments, we will often see sentences

### Predicate Logic. Example: All men are mortal. Socrates is a man. Socrates is mortal.

Predicate Logic Example: All men are mortal. Socrates is a man. Socrates is mortal. Note: We need logic laws that work for statements involving quantities like some and all. In English, the predicate is

### 1.4/1.5 Predicates and Quantifiers

1.4/1.5 Predicates and Quantifiers Can we express the following statement in propositional logic? Every computer has a CPU No Outline: Predicates Quantifiers Domain of Predicate Translation: Natural Languauge

### Predicate Logic. Lucia Moura. Winter Predicates and Quantifiers Nested Quantifiers Using Predicate Calculus

Predicate Logic Winter 2010 Predicates A Predicate is a declarative sentence whose true/false value depends on one or more variables. The statement x is greater than 3 has two parts: the subject: x is

### 1.4 Predicates and Quantifiers

Can we express the following statement in propositional logic? Every computer has a CPU No 1 Can we express the following statement in propositional logic? No Every computer has a CPU Let's see the new

### Predicate in English. Predicates and Quantifiers. Propositional Functions: Prelude. Predicate in Logic. Propositional Function

Predicates and Quantifiers By Chuck Cusack Predicate in English In English, a sentence has 2 parts: the subject and the predicate. The predicate is the part of the sentence that states something about

### MATH 55: HOMEWORK #2 SOLUTIONS

MATH 55: HOMEWORK # SOLUTIONS ERIC PETERSON * 1. SECTION 1.5: NESTED QUANTIFIERS 1.1. Problem 1.5.8. Determine the truth value of each of these statements if the domain of each variable consists of all

### Chapter 1, Part II: Predicate Logic. With Question/Answer Animations

Chapter 1, Part II: Predicate Logic With Question/Answer Animations Summary Predicate Logic (First-Order Logic (FOL) The Language of Quantifiers Logical Equivalences Nested Quantifiers Translation from

### Predicate Calculus. There are certain arguments that seem to be perfectly logical, yet they cannot be expressed by using propositional calculus.

Predicate Calculus (Alternative names: predicate logic, first order logic, elementary logic, restricted predicate calculus, restricted functional calculus, relational calculus, theory of quantification,

### DISCRETE MATH: LECTURE 4

DISCRETE MATH: LECTURE 4 DR. DANIEL FREEMAN 1. Chapter 3.1 Predicates and Quantified Statements I A predicate is a sentence that contains a finite number of variables and becomes a statement when specific

### Chapter 1, Part II: Predicate Logic. With Question/Answer Animations

Chapter 1, Part II: Predicate Logic With Question/Answer Animations Summary Predicate Logic (First Order Logic (FOL), Predicate Calculus (not covered)) The Language of Quantifiers Logical Equivalences

### Midterm Examination 1 with Solutions - Math 574, Frank Thorne Thursday, February 9, 2012

Midterm Examination 1 with Solutions - Math 574, Frank Thorne (thorne@math.sc.edu) Thursday, February 9, 2012 1. (3 points each) For each sentence below, say whether it is logically equivalent to the sentence

### Section 1. Statements and Truth Tables. Definition 1.1: A mathematical statement is a declarative sentence that is true or false, but not both.

M3210 Supplemental Notes: Basic Logic Concepts In this course we will examine statements about mathematical concepts and relationships between these concepts (definitions, theorems). We will also consider

### Sets and functions. {x R : x > 0}.

Sets and functions 1 Sets The language of sets and functions pervades mathematics, and most of the important operations in mathematics turn out to be functions or to be expressible in terms of functions.

Mathematics 0N1 Solutions 1 1. Write the following sets in list form. 1(i) The set of letters in the word banana. {a, b, n}. 1(ii) {x : x 2 + 3x 10 = 0}. 3(iv) C A. True 3(v) B = {e, e, f, c}. True 3(vi)

### 1 Proposition, Logical connectives and compound statements

Discrete Mathematics: Lecture 4 Introduction to Logic Instructor: Arijit Bishnu Date: July 27, 2009 1 Proposition, Logical connectives and compound statements Logic is the discipline that deals with the

### Predicates and Quantifiers. Niloufar Shafiei

Predicates and Quantifiers Niloufar Shafiei Review Proposition: 1. It is a sentence that declares a fact. 2. It is either true or false, but not both. Examples: 2 + 1 = 3. True Proposition Toronto is the

### Chapter 1. Logic and Proof

Chapter 1. Logic and Proof 1.1 Remark: A little over 100 years ago, it was found that some mathematical proofs contained paradoxes, and these paradoxes could be used to prove statements that were known

### 4. FIRST-ORDER LOGIC

4. FIRST-ORDER LOGIC Contents 4.1: Splitting the atom: names, predicates and relations 4.2: Structures 4.3: Quantification:, 4.4: Syntax 4.5: Semantics 4.6: De Morgan s laws for and 4.7: Truth trees for

### CSI 2101 Discrete Structures Winter 2012

CSI 2101 Discrete Structures Winter 2012 Prof. Lucia Moura University of Ottawa Homework Assignment #1 (100 points, weight 5%) Due: Thursday Feb 9, at 1:00 p.m. (in lecture); assignments with lateness

### Mathematics for Computer Science/Software Engineering. Notes for the course MSM1F3 Dr. R. A. Wilson

Mathematics for Computer Science/Software Engineering Notes for the course MSM1F3 Dr. R. A. Wilson October 1996 Chapter 1 Logic Lecture no. 1. We introduce the concept of a proposition, which is a statement

### Chapter 7. Functions and onto. 7.1 Functions

Chapter 7 Functions and onto This chapter covers functions, including function composition and what it means for a function to be onto. In the process, we ll see what happens when two dissimilar quantifiers

### CHAPTER 3. Methods of Proofs. 1. Logical Arguments and Formal Proofs

CHAPTER 3 Methods of Proofs 1. Logical Arguments and Formal Proofs 1.1. Basic Terminology. An axiom is a statement that is given to be true. A rule of inference is a logical rule that is used to deduce

### To formulate more complex mathematical statements, we use the quantifiers there exists, written, and for all, written. If P(x) is a predicate, then

Discrete Math in CS CS 280 Fall 2005 (Kleinberg) Quantifiers 1 Quantifiers To formulate more complex mathematical statements, we use the quantifiers there exists, written, and for all, written. If P(x)

### 2.3 Subtraction of Integers

2.3 Subtraction of Integers The key to subtraction of real numbers is to forget what you might have learned in elementary school about taking away. With positive numbers you can reasonably say take 3 away

### Inference Rules and Proof Methods

Inference Rules and Proof Methods Winter 2010 Introduction Rules of Inference and Formal Proofs Proofs in mathematics are valid arguments that establish the truth of mathematical statements. An argument

### Math 3000 Running Glossary

Math 3000 Running Glossary Last Updated on: July 15, 2014 The definition of items marked with a must be known precisely. Chapter 1: 1. A set: A collection of objects called elements. 2. The empty set (

### Quantifiers are used to describe variables in statements. - The universal quantifier means for all. - The existential quantifier means there exists.

11 Quantifiers are used to describe variables in statements. - The universal quantifier means for all. - The existential quantifier means there exists. The phrases, for all x in R if x is an arbitrary

### 2. Methods of Proof Types of Proofs. Suppose we wish to prove an implication p q. Here are some strategies we have available to try.

2. METHODS OF PROOF 69 2. Methods of Proof 2.1. Types of Proofs. Suppose we wish to prove an implication p q. Here are some strategies we have available to try. Trivial Proof: If we know q is true then

### Section 1.3: Predicate Logic

1 Section 1.3: Purpose of Section: To introduce predicate logic (or first-order logic) which the language of mathematics. We see how predicate logic extends the language of sentential calculus studied

### Logic, Sets, and Proofs

Logic, Sets, and Proofs David A. Cox and Catherine C. McGeoch Amherst College 1 Logic Logical Statements. A logical statement is a mathematical statement that is either true or false. Here we denote logical

### Math 55: Discrete Mathematics

Math 55: Discrete Mathematics UC Berkeley, Fall 2011 Homework # 1, due Wedneday, January 25 1.1.10 Let p and q be the propositions The election is decided and The votes have been counted, respectively.

### 31 is a prime number is a mathematical statement (which happens to be true).

Chapter 1 Mathematical Logic In its most basic form, Mathematics is the practice of assigning truth to welldefined statements. In this course, we will develop the skills to use known true statements to

### 3.3. INFERENCE 105. Table 3.5: Another look at implication. p q p q T T T T F F F T T F F T

3.3. INFERENCE 105 3.3 Inference Direct Inference (Modus Ponens) and Proofs We concluded our last section with a proof that the sum of two even numbers is even. That proof contained several crucial ingredients.

### 2. Propositional Equivalences

2. PROPOSITIONAL EQUIVALENCES 33 2. Propositional Equivalences 2.1. Tautology/Contradiction/Contingency. Definition 2.1.1. A tautology is a proposition that is always true. Example 2.1.1. p p Definition

### Propositional Logic. A proposition is a declarative sentence (a sentence that declares a fact) that is either true or false, but not both.

irst Order Logic Propositional Logic A proposition is a declarative sentence (a sentence that declares a fact) that is either true or false, but not both. Are the following sentences propositions? oronto

### 3. Recurrence Recursive Definitions. To construct a recursively defined function:

3. RECURRENCE 10 3. Recurrence 3.1. Recursive Definitions. To construct a recursively defined function: 1. Initial Condition(s) (or basis): Prescribe initial value(s) of the function.. Recursion: Use a

### All programs that passed test 1 were written in Java.

. Consider the following statements: (S) Programs that passed test also passed test. (S) Programs passed test unless they failed test. (S) Programs passed test only if they passed test. (a) Rewrite statements

### Section 7.1 First-Order Predicate Calculus predicate Existential Quantifier Universal Quantifier.

Section 7.1 First-Order Predicate Calculus Predicate calculus studies the internal structure of sentences where subjects are applied to predicates existentially or universally. A predicate describes a

### Chapter I Logic and Proofs

MATH 1130 1 Discrete Structures Chapter I Logic and Proofs Propositions A proposition is a statement that is either true (T) or false (F), but or both. s Propositions: 1. I am a man.. I am taller than

### 3.3 Proofs Involving Quantifiers

3.3 Proofs Involving Quantifiers 1. In exercise 6 of Section 2.2 you use logical equivalences to show that x(p (x) Q(x)) is equivalent to xp (x) xq(x). Now use the methods of this section to prove that

### Review Name Rule of Inference

CS311H: Discrete Mathematics Review Name Rule of Inference Modus ponens φ 2 φ 2 Modus tollens φ 2 φ 2 Inference Rules for Quantifiers Işıl Dillig Hypothetical syllogism Or introduction Or elimination And

### CSE 191, Class Note 01 Propositional Logic Computer Sci & Eng Dept SUNY Buffalo

Propositional Logic CSE 191, Class Note 01 Propositional Logic Computer Sci & Eng Dept SUNY Buffalo c Xin He (University at Buffalo) CSE 191 Discrete Structures 1 / 37 Discrete Mathematics What is Discrete

### Chapter 3. Cartesian Products and Relations. 3.1 Cartesian Products

Chapter 3 Cartesian Products and Relations The material in this chapter is the first real encounter with abstraction. Relations are very general thing they are a special type of subset. After introducing

### Predicate Logic Review

Predicate Logic Review UC Berkeley, Philosophy 142, Spring 2016 John MacFarlane 1 Grammar A term is an individual constant or a variable. An individual constant is a lowercase letter from the beginning

### Undergraduate Notes in Mathematics. Arkansas Tech University Department of Mathematics. Introductory Notes in Discrete Mathematics

Undergraduate Notes in Mathematics Arkansas Tech University Department of Mathematics Introductory Notes in Discrete Mathematics Marcel B. Finan c All Rights Reserved Last Updated April 6, 2016 Preface

### Introduction to Relations

CHAPTER 7 Introduction to Relations 1. Relations and Their Properties 1.1. Definition of a Relation. Definition: A binary relation from a set A to a set B is a subset R A B. If (a, b) R we say a is related

### Chapter 1. Use the following to answer questions 1-5: In the questions below determine whether the proposition is TRUE or FALSE

Use the following to answer questions 1-5: Chapter 1 In the questions below determine whether the proposition is TRUE or FALSE 1. 1 + 1 = 3 if and only if 2 + 2 = 3. 2. If it is raining, then it is raining.

### Logic and Proofs. Chapter 1

Section 1.0 1.0.1 Chapter 1 Logic and Proofs 1.1 Propositional Logic 1.2 Propositional Equivalences 1.3 Predicates and Quantifiers 1.4 Nested Quantifiers 1.5 Rules of Inference 1.6 Introduction to Proofs

### Problems on Discrete Mathematics 1

Problems on Discrete Mathematics 1 Chung-Chih Li 2 Kishan Mehrotra 3 L A TEX at July 18, 2007 1 No part of this book can be reproduced without permission from the authors 2 Illinois State University, Normal,

### Predicate Logic. M.A.Galán, TDBA64, VT-03

Predicate Logic 1 Introduction There are certain arguments that seem to be perfectly logical, yet they cannot be specified by using propositional logic. All cats have tails. Tom is a cat. From these two

### (Refer Slide Time: 1:41)

Discrete Mathematical Structures Dr. Kamala Krithivasan Department of Computer Science and Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Madras Lecture # 10 Sets Today we shall learn about sets. You must

### Handout #1: Mathematical Reasoning

Math 101 Rumbos Spring 2010 1 Handout #1: Mathematical Reasoning 1 Propositional Logic A proposition is a mathematical statement that it is either true or false; that is, a statement whose certainty or

### WUCT121. Discrete Mathematics. Logic

WUCT121 Discrete Mathematics Logic 1. Logic 2. Predicate Logic 3. Proofs 4. Set Theory 5. Relations and Functions WUCT121 Logic 1 Section 1. Logic 1.1. Introduction. In developing a mathematical theory,

### Math 2602 Finite and Linear Math Fall 14. Homework 9: Core solutions

Math 2602 Finite and Linear Math Fall 14 Homework 9: Core solutions Section 8.2 on page 264 problems 13b, 27a-27b. Section 8.3 on page 275 problems 1b, 8, 10a-10b, 14. Section 8.4 on page 279 problems

### Introduction to Predicate Calculus

Introduction to Predicate Calculus 1 Motivation Last time, we discuss the need for a representation language that was declarative, expressively adequate, unambiguous, context-independent, and compositional.

### It is time to prove some theorems. There are various strategies for doing

CHAPTER 4 Direct Proof It is time to prove some theorems. There are various strategies for doing this; we now examine the most straightforward approach, a technique called direct proof. As we begin, it

### Week 5: Quantifiers. Number Sets. Quantifier Symbols. Quantity has a quality all its own. attributed to Carl von Clausewitz

Week 5: Quantifiers Quantity has a quality all its own. attributed to Carl von Clausewitz Number Sets Many people would say that mathematics is the science of numbers. This is a common misconception among

### 3. Equivalence Relations. Discussion

3. EQUIVALENCE RELATIONS 33 3. Equivalence Relations 3.1. Definition of an Equivalence Relations. Definition 3.1.1. A relation R on a set A is an equivalence relation if and only if R is reflexive, symmetric,

### Announcements. CompSci 230 Discrete Math for Computer Science Sets. Introduction to Sets. Sets

CompSci 230 Discrete Math for Computer Science Sets September 12, 2013 Prof. Rodger Slides modified from Rosen 1 nnouncements Read for next time Chap. 2.3-2.6 Homework 2 due Tuesday Recitation 3 on Friday

### DISCRETE MATHEMATICS W W L CHEN

DISCRETE MATHEMATICS W W L CHEN c W W L Chen, 1982, 2008. This chapter originates from material used by the author at Imperial College, University of London, between 1981 and 1990. It is available free

### Valid formulas, games and network protocols

Valid formulas, games and network protocols Jean-Louis Krivine & Yves Legrandgérard Paris VII University, CNRS November 14, 2007 Introduction We describe a remarkable relation between a fundamental notion

### 2.4 Multiplication of Integers. Recall that multiplication is defined as repeated addition from elementary school. For example, 5 6 = 6 5 = 30, since:

2.4 Multiplication of Integers Recall that multiplication is defined as repeated addition from elementary school. For example, 5 6 = 6 5 = 30, since: 5 6=6+6+6+6+6=30 6 5=5+5+5+5+5+5=30 To develop a rule

### Problems on Discrete Mathematics 1

Problems on Discrete Mathematics 1 Chung-Chih Li 2 Kishan Mehrotra 3 Syracuse University, New York L A TEX at January 11, 2007 (Part I) 1 No part of this book can be reproduced without permission from

### What is logic? Propositional Logic. Negation. Propositions. This is a contentious question! We will play it safe, and stick to:

Propositional Logic This lecture marks the start of a new section of the course. In the last few lectures, we have had to reason formally about concepts. This lecture introduces the mathematical language

### Proof: A logical argument establishing the truth of the theorem given the truth of the axioms and any previously proven theorems.

Math 232 - Discrete Math 2.1 Direct Proofs and Counterexamples Notes Axiom: Proposition that is assumed to be true. Proof: A logical argument establishing the truth of the theorem given the truth of the

### Relational Query Languages

Relational Query Languages Universidad de Concepción, 2014 (Slides adapted from Loreto Bravo, who adapted from Werner Nutt who adapted them from Thomas Eiter and Leonid Libkin) Bases de Datos II 1 Queries

### First Order Predicate Logic. Lecture 4

First Order Predicate Logic Lecture 4 First Order Predicate Logic Limitation of Propositional Logic The facts: peter is a man, paul is a man, john is a man can be symbolized by P, Q and R respectively

### Finish Set Theory Nested Quantifiers

Finish Set Theory Nested Quantifiers Margaret M. Fleck 18 February 2009 This lecture does a final couple examples of set theory proofs. It then fills in material on quantifiers, especially nested ones,

### Subjects, Predicates and The Universal Quantifier

Introduction to Logic Week Sixteen: 14 Jan., 2008 Subjects, Predicates and The Universal Quantifier 000. Office Hours this term: Tuesdays and Wednesdays 1-2, or by appointment; 5B-120. 00. Results from

### Introduction to mathematical arguments

Introduction to mathematical arguments (background handout for courses requiring proofs) by Michael Hutchings A mathematical proof is an argument which convinces other people that something is true. Math

### Chapter Three. Functions. In this section, we study what is undoubtedly the most fundamental type of relation used in mathematics.

Chapter Three Functions 3.1 INTRODUCTION In this section, we study what is undoubtedly the most fundamental type of relation used in mathematics. Definition 3.1: Given sets X and Y, a function from X to

### 4 Domain Relational Calculus

4 Domain Relational Calculus We now present two relational calculi that we will compare to RA. First, what is the difference between an algebra and a calculus? The usual story is that the algebra RA is

### Exam 1 Answers: Logic and Proof

Q250 FALL 2012, INDIANA UNIVERSITY Exam 1 Answers: Logic and Proof September 17, 2012 Instructions: Please answer each question completely, and show all of your work. Partial credit will be awarded where

### Semantics for the Predicate Calculus: Part I

Semantics for the Predicate Calculus: Part I (Version 0.3, revised 6:15pm, April 14, 2005. Please report typos to hhalvors@princeton.edu.) The study of formal logic is based on the fact that the validity

### MAT Discrete Mathematics

RHODES UNIVERSITY Grahamstown 6140, South Africa Lecture Notes CCR MAT 102 - Discrete Mathematics Claudiu C. Remsing DEPT. of MATHEMATICS (Pure and Applied) 2005 Mathematics is not about calculations but

### The Foundations: Logic and Proofs. Chapter 1, Part III: Proofs

The Foundations: Logic and Proofs Chapter 1, Part III: Proofs Rules of Inference Section 1.6 Section Summary Valid Arguments Inference Rules for Propositional Logic Using Rules of Inference to Build Arguments

### Absolute Value of Reasoning

About Illustrations: Illustrations of the Standards for Mathematical Practice (SMP) consist of several pieces, including a mathematics task, student dialogue, mathematical overview, teacher reflection

### Example. Statements in Predicate Logic. Predicate Logic. Predicate Logic. (Rosen, Chapter ) P(x,y) TOPICS. Predicate Logic

Predicate Logic Predicate Logic (Rosen, Chapter 1.4-1.6) TOPICS Predicate Logic Quantifiers Logical Equivalence Predicate Proofs n Some statements cannot be expressed in propositional logic, such as: n

### Where are we? Introduction to Logic 1

Introduction to Logic 1 1. Preliminaries 2. Propositional Logic 3. Tree method for PL 4. First-order Predicate Logic 5. Tree Method for FOL 6. Expressiveness of FOL Where are we? Introduction to Logic

### CS 441 Discrete Mathematics for CS Lecture 4. Predicate logic. CS 441 Discrete mathematics for CS. Announcements

CS 441 Discrete Mathematics for CS Lecture 4 Predicate logic Milos Hauskrecht milos@cs.pitt.edu 5329 Sennott Square Announcements Homework assignment 1 due today Homework assignment 2: posted on the course

### Student Outcomes. Lesson Notes. Classwork. Discussion (10 minutes)

NYS COMMON CORE MATHEMATICS CURRICULUM Lesson 5 8 Student Outcomes Students know the definition of a number raised to a negative exponent. Students simplify and write equivalent expressions that contain

### Logic will get you from A to B. Imagination will take you everywhere.

Chapter 3 Predicate Logic Logic will get you from A to B. Imagination will take you everywhere. A. Einstein In the previous chapter, we studied propositional logic. This chapter is dedicated to another

### Outline. Database Theory. Perfect Query Optimization. Turing Machines. Question. Definition VU , SS Trakhtenbrot s Theorem

Database Theory Database Theory Outline Database Theory VU 181.140, SS 2016 4. Trakhtenbrot s Theorem Reinhard Pichler Institut für Informationssysteme Arbeitsbereich DBAI Technische Universität Wien 4.

### 3. Mathematical Induction

3. MATHEMATICAL INDUCTION 83 3. Mathematical Induction 3.1. First Principle of Mathematical Induction. Let P (n) be a predicate with domain of discourse (over) the natural numbers N = {0, 1,,...}. If (1)

### Artificial Intelligence. 5. First-Order Logic

Artificial Intelligence Artificial Intelligence 5. First-Order Logic Lars Schmidt-Thieme Information Systems and Machine Learning Lab (ISMLL) Institute of Economics and Information Systems & Institute

### Applications of Methods of Proof

CHAPTER 4 Applications of Methods of Proof 1. Set Operations 1.1. Set Operations. The set-theoretic operations, intersection, union, and complementation, defined in Chapter 1.1 Introduction to Sets are

### Discrete Mathematics and Probability Theory Fall 2009 Satish Rao, David Tse Note 2

CS 70 Discrete Mathematics and Probability Theory Fall 2009 Satish Rao, David Tse Note 2 Proofs Intuitively, the concept of proof should already be familiar We all like to assert things, and few of us

### LECTURE 10: FIRST-ORDER LOGIC. Software Engineering Mike Wooldridge

LECTURE 10: FIRST-ORDER LOGIC Mike Wooldridge 1 Why not Propositional Logic? Consider the following statements: all monitors are ready; X12 is a monitor. We saw in an earlier lecture that these statements

### Predicate Logic. For example, consider the following argument:

Predicate Logic The analysis of compound statements covers key aspects of human reasoning but does not capture many important, and common, instances of reasoning that are also logically valid. For example,

### Discrete Mathematics and Probability Theory Fall 2009 Satish Rao, David Tse Note 1

CS 70 Discrete Mathematics and Probability Theory Fall 2009 Satish Rao, David Tse Note 1 Course Outline CS70 is a course on Discrete Mathematics and Probability for EECS Students. The purpose of the course

### v 1. v n R n we have for each 1 j n that v j v n max 1 j n v j. i=1

1. Limits and Continuity It is often the case that a non-linear function of n-variables x = (x 1,..., x n ) is not really defined on all of R n. For instance f(x 1, x 2 ) = x 1x 2 is not defined when x

### Students in their first advanced mathematics classes are often surprised

CHAPTER 8 Proofs Involving Sets Students in their first advanced mathematics classes are often surprised by the extensive role that sets play and by the fact that most of the proofs they encounter are

### 3. Logical Reasoning in Mathematics

3. Logical Reasoning in Mathematics Many state standards emphasize the importance of reasoning. We agree disciplined mathematical reasoning is crucial to understanding and to properly using mathematics.

### Pre-Algebra Notes: , Absolute Value and Integers. Name: Block: Date: Z = {, -5, -4, -3, -2, -1, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, }

Name: Block: Date: Section 2.1: Integers and Absolute Value We remember from our previous lesson that the set Z of integers looks like: Z = {, -5, -4, -3, -2, -1, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, } Why do we care about

parent ROADMAP MATHEMATICS SUPPORTING YOUR CHILD IN HIGH SCHOOL HS America s schools are working to provide higher quality instruction than ever before. The way we taught students in the past simply does

### A set is an unordered collection of objects.

Section 2.1 Sets A set is an unordered collection of objects. the students in this class the chairs in this room The objects in a set are called the elements, or members of the set. A set is said to contain