# The RSA Algorithm. Evgeny Milanov. 3 June 2009

Save this PDF as:

Size: px
Start display at page:

## Transcription

1 The RSA Algorithm Evgeny Milanov 3 June 2009 In 1978, Ron Rivest, Adi Shamir, and Leonard Adleman introduced a cryptographic algorithm, which was essentially to replace the less secure National Bureau of Standards (NBS) algorithm. Most importantly, RSA implements a public-key cryptosystem, as well as digital signatures. RSA is motivated by the published works of Diffie and Hellman from several years before, who described the idea of such an algorithm, but never truly developed it. Introduced at the time when the era of electronic was expected to soon arise, RSA implemented two important ideas: 1. Public-key encryption. This idea omits the need for a courier to deliver keys to recipients over another secure channel before transmitting the originally-intended message. In RSA, encryption keys are public, while the decryption keys are not, so only the person with the correct decryption key can decipher an encrypted message. Everyone has their own encryption and decryption keys. The keys must be made in such a way that the decryption key may not be easily deduced from the public encryption key. 2. Digital signatures. The receiver may need to verify that a transmitted message actually originated from the sender (signature), and didn t just come from there (authentication). This is done using the sender s decryption key, and the signature can later be verified by anyone, using the corresponding public encryption key. Signatures therefore cannot be forged. Also, no signer can later deny having signed the message. This is not only useful for electronic mail, but for other electronic transactions and transmissions, such as fund transfers. The security of the RSA algorithm has so far been validated, since no known attempts to break it have yet been successful, mostly due to the difficulty of factoring large numbers n = pq, where p and q are large prime numbers. 1 Public-key cryptosystems. Each user has their own encryption and decryption procedures, E and D, with the former in the public file and the latter kept secret. These procedures are related to the keys, which, in RSA specifically, are sets of two special numbers. We of course start out with the message itself, symbolized by M, which is to be encrypted. There are four procedures that are specific and essential to a public-key cryptosystem: a) Deciphering an enciphered message gives you the original message, specifically D(E(M)) = M. (1)

2 b) Reversing the procedures still returns M: E(D(M)) = M. (2) c) E and D are easy to compute. d) The publicity of E does not compromise the secrecy of D, meaning you cannot easily figure out D from E. With a given E, we are still not given an efficient way of computing D. If C = E(M) is the ciphertext, then trying to figure out D by trying to satisfy an M in E(M) = C is unreasonably difficult: the number of messages to test would be impractically large. An E that satisfies (a), (c), and (d) is called a trap-door one-way function and is also a trap-door one-way permutation. It is a trap door because since it s inverse D is easy to compute if certain trapdoor information is available, but otherwise hard. It is one-way because it is easy to compute in one direction, but hard in the other. It is a permutation because it satisfies (b), meaning every ciphertext is a potential message, and every message is a ciphertext of some other message. Statement (b) is in fact just needed to provide signatures. Now we turn to specific keys, and imagine users A and B (Alice and Bob) on a two-user public-key cryptosystem, with their keys: E A, E B, D A, D B. 2 Privacy. Encryption, which is now a ubiquitous way of assuring a message is delivered privately, makes it so no intruder can bypass the ciphertext, which is essentially white noise. Without property (d), however, an encryption process is still not public-key, such as the NBS standard. It requires keys to be delivered privately through another secure courier, which is an extra process that would deem NBS, for example, as slow, inefficient, and possibly expensive. Thus, RSA is a great answer to this problem. The NBS standard could provide useful only if it was a faster algorithm than RSA, where RSA would only be used to securely transmit the keys only. Thus, an efficient computing method of D must be found, so as to make RSA completely stand-alone and reliable. For it to be reliable, it would have to use simple arithmetic, which is easier to compute (a requirement of property (c)) on a general-purpose computer than are bit manipulations, where better hardware is used, where perhaps NBS would be better. Now, Bob wants to send a private message to Alice. He will retrieve E A from the public file, encode M, getting C = E A (M), whereafter Alice decodes it with her own D A, which only she can do, due to property (d). She could also reply to Bob, using E B. So all that s needed is both user s agreement to be part of the cryptosystem by placing their encryption data into a public file. No beforehand communication is needed, private or not. Also, due to property (d), no eavesdropper can deduce D from listening in on E. 2

3 3 Signatures. For complete assurance that the message originated form a sender, and was not just sent through him by a third party who may have used the same encryption key (that of the receiver), we need a digital signature to come with the message. This has obvious implications of importance in real-life applications. Bob wants to send a private message to Alice. To sign the document, we pull a clever little trick, all assuming that the RSA algorithm is quick and reliable, mostly due to property (c). We decrypt a message with Bob s key, allowed by properties (a) and (b), which assert that every message is the ciphertext of another message, and that every ciphertext can be interpreted as a message. Formally, D B (M) = S. (3) Then we encrypt S with Alice s encryption key. E A (S) = E A (D B (M)) (4) This way, we can assure only she can decrypt the document. When she does, she gets the signature by D A (E A (D B (M)) = S. She now knows the message came from Bob, since only his decryption key could compute the signature. The message need not be sent separately, since Alice can deduce it from the signature itself by using Bob s publicly available encryption key, formally E B (S) = E B (D B (M)) = M. Since S depends on M, and the encrypted transmission Bob sent depends on S, we have a transmission that depends on both the message and the signature, so both can be deduced from the transmitted document. This brilliantly assures the message could not be modified (if needed to be presented to, say, a judge ), since a modified M in the form of M would have to generate a signature S = D B (M ) as well, which is impossible, since she does not known D B by property (d). So not only does Alice possess proof that Bob signed the message and indeed sent it, but she also cannot modify M nor forge a signature for any other message. Now, say an intruder attempted to lie and tell you he was from the public file? This is not a problem in RSA, since signatures are used. A signature just needs to assure it came form the public file (PF) itself. Every time a user joins a network, everybody gets a securely sent copy of the most recently updated PF, which is stored on their system, and they never have to look it up. Anyone trying to send a message pretending to be in the public file would not have the appropriate signature, and would be singled out as an intruder. He would also never receive the PF, since he never joined it. 4 Applications, predictions, hardware implementation. This has applications to electronic fund transmissions as well. Financial information needs to be secure, and checks can be electronically signed with RSA. Further measures would have to be taken, such as implementing unique check numbers that allow a check with this certain number transmittable/cashable 3

4 only once. In fact, such a system can be applied to any electronic system that needs to have a cryptosystem implemented. In their 1978 RSA paper, the authors of RSA predicted a secure world to evolve and for RSA to be used to encrypt a live telephone conversation. Now, these things are indeed a part of more than just daily life because of RSA. The encryption device must not be the direct buffer between a terminal and the communications channel. Instead, it should be a hardware subroutine that can be executed as needed, since it may need to be encrypted/decrypted with several different sequences of keys, so as to assure more privacy and/or more signatures. 5 The math of the method. So far, we expect to make E and D easy to compute through simple arithmetic. We must now represent the message numerically, so that we can perform these arithmetic algorithms on it. Now lets represent M by an integer between 0 and n 1. If the message is too long, sparse it up and encrypt separately. Let e, d, n be positive integers, with (e, n) as the encryption key, (d, n) the decryption key, n = pq. Now, we encrypt the message by raising it to the eth power modulo n to obtain C, the ciphertext. We then decrypt C by raising it to the dth power modulo n to obtain M again. Formally, we obtain these encryption and decryption algorithms for E and D: C E(M) M e (mod n) (5) M D(C) C d (mod n). Note that we are preserving the same information size, since M and C are integers between 0 and n 1, and because of the modular congruence. Also note the simplicity of the fact that the encryption/decryption keys are both just pairs of integers, (e, n) and (d, n). These are different for every user, and should generally be subscripted, but we ll consider just the general case here. Now comes the question of creating the encryption key itself. First, choosing two random large primes p and q, we multiply and produce n = pq. Although n is public, it will not reveal p and q since it is essentially impossible to factor them form n, and therefore will assure that d is practically impossible to derive from e. Now we want to obtain the appropriate e and d. We pick d to be a random large integer, which must be coprime to (p 1) (q 1), meaning the following equation has to be satisfied: gcd(d, (p 1) (q 1)) = 1. (6) gcd means greatest common divisor. The reason we want d to be coprime to (p 1) (q 1) is peculiar. I will not show the direct motivation behind it; rather, it will become clear why that statement is important when l show towards 4

5 the end of this section that it guarantees (1) and (2). We will want to compute e from d, p, and q, where e is the multiplicative inverse of d. That means we need to satisfy e d = 1 (mod φ(n)). (7) Here, we introduce the Euler totient function φ(n), whose output is the number of positive integers less than n which are coprime to n. For primes p, this clearly becomes φ(p) = p 1. For n, we obtain, by elementary properties of the totient function, that φ(n) = φ(p) φ(q) = (p 1) (q 1) (8) = n (p + q) + 1. From this equation, we can substitute φ(n) into equation (7) and obtain e d 1 (mod φ(n)) which is equivalent to e d = k φ(n) + 1 for some integer k. By the laws of modular arithmetic, the multiplicative inverse of a modulo m exists if and only if a and m are coprime. Indeed, since d and φ(n) are coprime, d has a multiplicative inverse e in the ring of integers modulo φ(n). So far, we can safely assured the following: D(E(M)) (E(M)) d (M e ) d (mod n) = M e d (mod n) E(D(M)) (D(M)) e (M d ) e (mod n) = M e d (mod n) Also, since e d = k φ(n) + 1, we can substitute into the above equations and obtain M e d M k φ(n)+1 (mod n). Clearly, we want that to equal M. To prove this, will need an important identity due to Euler and Fermat: for any integer M coprime to n, we have M φ(n) 1 (mod n). (9) Since we previously specified that 0 M < n, we know that M would not be coprime to n if and only if M was either p or q, of the integers in that interval. Therefore, the chances of M happening to be p or 5

6 q are on the same order of magnitude as 2/n. This means that M is almost definitely relatively prime to n, therefore equation (9) holds and, using it, we evaluate: M e d M k φ(n)+1 (M φ(n) ) k M 1 k M (mod n) = M. It turns out this works for all M, and in fact we see that (1) and (2) hold for all M, 0 M < n. Therefore E and D are inverse permutations. 6 Algorithms. 6.1 Efficient encryption and decryption operations. The authors of RSA claim that computing M e (mod n) requires at most 2 log 2 (e) multiplications and 2 log 2 (e) divisions if we use their procedure below. It is important for us to know the amount of steps it would take a computer to encrypt the message so we can see if a method is fast and efficient, or not. We now exponentiate by repeated squaring and multiplication : Step 1. Let e k e k 1...e 1 e 0 be the binary representation of e. Step 2. Set the variable C to 1. Step 3. Repeat steps 3a and 3b for i = k, k 1,..., 0: Step 3a. Set C to the remainder of C 2 when divided by n. Step 3b. If e i = 1 then set C to the remainder of C M when divided by n. Step 4. Halt. Now C is the encrypted form of M. There are more efficient procedures out there, but this one is good too. Also, since decryption follows the same identical procedure as encryption, we can implement the whole operation on a few integrated chips. According to the authors of RSA, the encryption time per block increases no faster than the cube of the number of digits in n. 6.2 Finding large prime numbers. Finding n is the first step to the entire process. The number n will be revealed in the encryption and decryption keys, but the numbers p and q, whose product make up n, will not be explicitly shown. They are essentially impossible to derive from n, in fact, especially if we pick, say, 100-digit primes p and q, which would make a 200-digit n. These figures were at least sufficient in However, today we must use far larger numbers. The scale of these numbers is mentioned in the last section of this article. Each user needs to privately choose his own two large prime numbers p and q. To do this, we need to generate, say, random odd 100-digit numbers until a prime is found. We will have to test each number, and according to the prime number theorem, there will be about (ln )/2 = 115 number to test. To test a large b for primality, we can use an algorithm due to Solovay and Strassen. First, we pick a random number a from a uniform distribution on 1,..., b 1 and test whether gcd(a, b) = 1 and J(a, b) = a (b 1) 2 (mod b), (10) 6

7 where J(a, b) is the Jacobi symbol, which can also be represented as ( ) ( ) a a α1 ( ) a α1 ( ) a αk =..., b p 1 p 2 where b = p α 1 1 pα 2 2 pα k k is the primal factorization of b, and the Legendre symbol is defined for all integers a and all odd primes p by ( ) a p ( ) a 1 = 0 if a 0 (mod p) +1 if a 0 (mod p) and for some integer x, a x 2 (mod p) 1 if there is no such a 0 (mod p) 1. The Jacobi symbol is only defined when a is an integer and b is a positive odd integer. Also, J(a, b) is 0 if gcd(a, b) 1 and ±1 if gcd(a, b) = 1. Equation (10) is always true if b is prime, otherwise (if b is composite), (10) will have a chance of being false of over 50%. If (10) is true 100 times for randomly chosen a s, then b is almost certainly prime, with a chance of being composite of 1 in If accidentally a composite were used for p or q in the process, the recipient would see junk and realize the decryption wasn t done correctly. I now present an efficient program for computing J(a, b) that the authors of RSA recommended in their original article: p k J(a, b) = if a = 1 then 1 else if is even then J(a 2, b) ( 1) (b2 1) 8 else J(b (mod a), a) ( 1) (a 1) (b 1) 4 To protect against sophisticated factoring algorithms, p and q should differ in length by a few digits, gcd(p 1, q 1) should be small, and both (p 1) and (q 1) should contain large prime factors. To assure the latter, we generate a large random prime number u and take the first prime in the sequence i u + 1, i = 2, 4, 6,.... This process would be very fast on a computer. When the authors of RSA published their article, on a high-speed computer, testing a 100-digit number for primality would take several seconds, while finding the next prime would take around a minute and a half. Imagine how quickly an average PC can do this today! Perhaps this is why the RSA algorithm has survived so long. We could also find large primes by taking a number whose factorization we know, add 1 to it, and test for primality. If we get a number we think is prime, we could potentially prove that it is prime by using the factorization of (p 1). 6.3 Finding d. This is very easy. We want to find a number d coprime to φ(n); any prime number greater than max(p, q) is fine. Since the set of primes P is large, it assures that a cryptanalyst cannot find d by a direct search. In fact, any method of finding d that picks d out of a big set would do. 7

8 6.4 Finding e form d and φ(n). Here, we use a variation of Euclid s algorithm for computing the greatest common divisor of φ(n) and d. First, we compute a series x 0, x 1, x 2,..., where x 0 φ(n), x 1 = d,..., x i+1 x i 1 (mod x i ), until an x k = 0 is found. Then gcd(x 0, x 1 ) = x k 1. Now we find numbers a i and b i such that x i = a i x 0 +b i x 1. If x k 1 = 1 then b k 1 is the multiplicative inverse of x 1 (mod n), and is precisely e. Since k < 2 log 2 (n), this can be computed quickly. Since the difficulty in computing complicated modular arithmetic in part contributes to the difficulty in cracking RSA, we need to use this to our advantage. Therefore, if e < log 2 (n), we find another e that s not too small so that the encrypted message undergoes reduction in modulo n ( wrap-around ). 7 An example. Let p = 37, q = 43, n = p q = 1591, d = 71. It follows that φ(1591) = = 1512 and now we compute e: x 0 = 1512, a 0 = 1, b 0 = 0, x 1 = 71, a 1 = 0, b 1 = 1, x 2 = 21, a 2 = 1, b 2 = 21, x 3 = 8, a 3 = 3, b 3 = 64, x 4 = 5, a 4 = 7, b 4 = 149, x 5 = 3, a 5 = 10, b 5 = 213, x 6 = 2, a 6 = 17, b 6 = 362, x 7 = 1, a 7 = 27, b 7 = 575. Thus e = 575 is the multiplicative inverse in modulo 1512 of d = 71. Using this and the rest of our values, we now begin to encrypt. We use a fairly standard numerical representation of the English alphabet: blank = 00, A = 01, B = 02,..., Z = 26. Each block of the message has to be less than n = In this case, we will break the message into two-letter blocks, because luckily no block will exceed 159. The bigger p and q are, the more information we can encrypt per block. We choose a short message for ease: NO ODD is encoded: is in binary. We now use the algorithm in section 6.1. We simplify it using modular arithmetic. We replace steps 3a and 3b by the following conditions: if e k = 1 then we square C and multiply by M, otherwise we just square C. After step 4, we put C into modulo n. Taking, for example, the first block and setting M = 1415 and encrypting we get: M 575 = (((((((((1 2 M) 2 ) 2 ) 2 ) 2 M) 2 M) 2 M) 2 M) 2 M) 2 M = 824 (mod 1591). The whole message becomes: Similarly, we can decrypt the message to check it deciphers properly: (mod 1591), etc. 8

9 8 How secure is RSA? The RSA algorithm is indeed among the strongest, but can it withstand anything? Certainly nothing can withstand the test of time. In fact, no encryption technique is even perfectly secure from an attack by a realistic cryptanalyst. Methods such as brute-force are simple but lengthy and may crack a message, but not likely an entire encryption scheme. We must also consider a probabilistic approach, meaning there s always a chance some one may get the one key out of a million. So far, we don t know how to prove whether an encryption scheme is unbreakable. If we cannot prove it, we will at least see if someone can break the code. This is how the NBS standard and RSA were essentially certified. Despite years of attempts, no one has been known to crack either algorithm. Such a resistance to attack makes RSA secure in practice. In section 8, we will see why breaking RSA is at least as hard as factoring n. Factoring large numbers is not provably hard, but no algorithms exists today to factor a 200-digit number in a reasonable amount of time. Fermat and Legendre have both contributed to this field by developing factoring algorithms, though factoring is still an age-old math problem. This is precisely what has partially certified RSA as secure. To show that RSA is secure, we will consider how a cryptanalyst may try to obtain the decryption key from the public encryption key, and not how an intruder may attempt to steal the decryption key. This should be taken care of as one would protect their money, through physical security methods. The authors of RSA provide an example: the encryption device (which could be, say, a set of integrated chips within a computer), would be separate from the rest of the system. It would generate encryption and decryption keys, but would not print out the decryption key, even for its owner. It would, in fact, erase the decryption key if it sensed an attempted intrusion. 8.1 Factoring n. Since knowing the factors of n would give away φ(n) and therefore d, a cryptanalyst would break the code if he factored n. However, factoring numbers has practically proven to be far harder than determining primality or compositeness. Nonetheless, many factoring algorithms are around. The authors of RSA referenced Knuth and Pollard as good sources for such algorithms. They also present an unpublished algorithm due to Richard Schroeppel, which factors n in approximately exp ln n ln ln n = n ln ln n ln n = (ln n) ln n ln ln n steps. The following table is the one the authors of RSA presented in They assume an operation in the Schroeppel factoring algorithm takes one microsecond to compute, and present the following data for various lengths of n: Digits Number of operations Time hours days years years years years The authors of RSA recommend that n be about 200 digits long. However, the length of n may be varied, based on the importance of speed of encryption versus security. RSA, in effect, allows the user 9

10 (administrator, etc.) to choose a key-length, and thus a level of security, a flexibility not found in many encryption schemes before 1978 (such as the NBS method). 8.2 Computing φ(n) without factoring n. This method would break the system because if one could compute φ(n), then he could compute d as the multiplicative inverse of the publicly revealed e modulo φ(n), using the method developed in section 6.4. This method is at least as difficult as factoring the publicly-revealed n since it would allow a cryptanalyst to easily factor n from φ(n). Since this approach to factoring n has not turned out practical, this method of computing φ(n) is also impractical, since it is more difficult, by the previous sentence. Indeed, factoring n as such is difficult because performing certain operations involving p, q, n, and even φ(n), all of immense sizes, would take too long. To factor n using φ(n), we first obtain (p + q) from n and φ(n) = n (p + q) + 1, then compute (p q) from this easily verifiable equation: (p q) 2 = (p + q) 2 4n. Finally, we obtain q from half the difference of (p q) and (p + q), and we get p from either p = n q or from half the sum of (p q) and (p + q). If n was prime, φ(n) = n 1 would be easy to compute, thus n must be composite, as originally stated. 8.3 Determining d without factoring n or computing φ(n). We use the same logic in the previous section. We have an approach to factoring n from a for-some-reason known d, described in the next paragraph, which has not proven practical. We argue that computing d is no easier than factoring n, since knowing d allows n to be factored easily. Knowing d allows us to calculate e d 1, which is a multiple of φ(n). Miller [6] shows that n can be factored using any such multiple, thus a cryptanalyst cannot determine d easier than he can factor n. Should one try to find a d which is equivalent to the secret d, and if such values d were common, then a brute-force attack could crack the code. However, all such values d differ by the least common multiple (lcm) of (p 1) and (q 1), and here is why. Since, by arithmetic modulo φ(n) we have e d = 1 (mod φ(n)), then indeed e kd = 1 (mod k φ(n)) for an integer k, and setting k = 1, we obtain the original equation. Seeing that since φ(n) = (p 1) (q 1) and k (p 1) (q 1) = lcm((p 1), (q 1)) when k = 1, then indeed φ(n) = lcm((p 1), (q 1)). Thus, finding such a d is as hard as factoring n. 8.4 Other ways of computing d. The authors of RSA argued that computing e-th roots modulo n without factoring n is practically impossible computationally. Thus, since the only other realistic option is to discover a way to break the code without factoring n, such a discovery would yield an efficient factoring algorithm. However, such a discovery, combined with ways of breaking the code by factoring n, would have to all be as hard as factoring n. The authors of RSA do not provide a proof for this conjecture. However, it seems that that were in fact correct, since there has been no known record of anyone breaking RSA in the 31 years since it has been published. 10

11 9 Avoiding reblocking for encryption of a signed message. Reblocking means having to break a signed message up into smaller blocks, since the signature n may be greater than the encryption n (both are different, since they are from different keys from two or more distinct users). The authors of RSA, however, have provided a way to avoid reblocking a message: choose a threshold value h (say h = ) for the public-key cryptosystem, and assure that every user maintains two public (e, n) pairs, one for enciphering and one for signature verification, where every signature n is less than h, and every enciphering n is greater than h. Thus, message blocking only depends on the transmitter s signature n. 10 Conclusions. RSA is a strong encryption algorithm that has stood a partial test of time. RSA implements a public-key cryptosystem that allows secure communications and digital signatures, and its security rests in part on the difficulty of factoring large numbers. The authors urged anyone to attempt to break their code, whether by factorization techniques or otherwise, and nobody to date seems to have succeeded. This has in effect certified RSA, and will continue to assure its security for as long as it stands the test of time against such break-ins. At the time, the RSA encryption function seemed to be the only known candidate for a trap-door one-way permutation, but now, others certainly exist, such as those described in [3] and [7]. The average size of n must increase with time as more efficient factoring algorithms are made and as computers are getting faster. In 1978, the authors of RSA suggested 200-digit long values for n. As of 2008, the largest (known) number factored by a general-purpose factoring algorithm was [200 digits (663 bits)] long [10]. Currently, RSA keys are typically between 1024 and 2048 bits long, which experts predict may be breakable in the near future. So far, no one sees 4096-bit keys to be broken anytime soon. Today, an n no longer than 300 bits can be factored on a PC in several hours, thus keys are typically 4-7 times longer today. RSA is slower than certain other symmetric cryptosystems. RSA is, in fact, commonly used to securely transmit the keys for another less secure, but faster algorithm. Several issues in fact exist that could potentially damage RSA s security, such as timing attacks and problems with key distribution. I will not go into detail about these issues here. They are described succinctly in [10]. In fact, these issues have solutions; the only downside is that any device implementing RSA would have to have much more hardware and software to counter certain types of attacks or attempts at eavesdropping. A very major threat to RSA would be a solution to the Riemann hypothesis. Thus a solution has neither been proven to exist nor to not exist. Development on the Riemann hypothesis is currently relatively stagnant. However, if a solution were found, prime numbers would be too easy to find, and RSA would fall apart. Undoubtedly, much more sophisticated algorithms than RSA will continue to be developed as mathematicians discover more in the fields of number theory and cryptanalysis. 11

### A Method for Obtaining Digital Signatures and Public-Key Cryptosystems

A Method for Obtaining Digital Signatures and Public-Key Cryptosystems R.L. Rivest, A. Shamir, and L. Adleman Abstract An encryption method is presented with the novel property that publicly revealing

### The Mathematics of the RSA Public-Key Cryptosystem

The Mathematics of the RSA Public-Key Cryptosystem Burt Kaliski RSA Laboratories ABOUT THE AUTHOR: Dr Burt Kaliski is a computer scientist whose involvement with the security industry has been through

### The RSA Algorithm: A Mathematical History of the Ubiquitous Cryptological Algorithm

The RSA Algorithm: A Mathematical History of the Ubiquitous Cryptological Algorithm Maria D. Kelly December 7, 2009 Abstract The RSA algorithm, developed in 1977 by Rivest, Shamir, and Adlemen, is an algorithm

### The science of encryption: prime numbers and mod n arithmetic

The science of encryption: prime numbers and mod n arithmetic Go check your e-mail. You ll notice that the webpage address starts with https://. The s at the end stands for secure meaning that a process

### U.C. Berkeley CS276: Cryptography Handout 0.1 Luca Trevisan January, 2009. Notes on Algebra

U.C. Berkeley CS276: Cryptography Handout 0.1 Luca Trevisan January, 2009 Notes on Algebra These notes contain as little theory as possible, and most results are stated without proof. Any introductory

### Public-Key Cryptography. Oregon State University

Public-Key Cryptography Çetin Kaya Koç Oregon State University 1 Sender M Receiver Adversary Objective: Secure communication over an insecure channel 2 Solution: Secret-key cryptography Exchange the key

### RSA Encryption. Tom Davis tomrdavis@earthlink.net http://www.geometer.org/mathcircles October 10, 2003

RSA Encryption Tom Davis tomrdavis@earthlink.net http://www.geometer.org/mathcircles October 10, 2003 1 Public Key Cryptography One of the biggest problems in cryptography is the distribution of keys.

### CRYPTOGRAPHY IN NETWORK SECURITY

ELE548 Research Essays CRYPTOGRAPHY IN NETWORK SECURITY AUTHOR: SHENGLI LI INSTRUCTOR: DR. JIEN-CHUNG LO Date: March 5, 1999 Computer network brings lots of great benefits and convenience to us. We can

### Number Theory. Proof. Suppose otherwise. Then there would be a finite number n of primes, which we may

Number Theory Divisibility and Primes Definition. If a and b are integers and there is some integer c such that a = b c, then we say that b divides a or is a factor or divisor of a and write b a. Definition

### Cryptography and Network Security Department of Computer Science and Engineering Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur

Cryptography and Network Security Department of Computer Science and Engineering Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur Module No. # 01 Lecture No. # 05 Classic Cryptosystems (Refer Slide Time: 00:42)

### PRIME NUMBERS & SECRET MESSAGES

PRIME NUMBERS & SECRET MESSAGES I. RSA CODEBREAKER GAME This is a game with two players or teams. The players take turns selecting either prime or composite numbers as outlined on the board below. The

### 7! Cryptographic Techniques! A Brief Introduction

7! Cryptographic Techniques! A Brief Introduction 7.1! Introduction to Cryptography! 7.2! Symmetric Encryption! 7.3! Asymmetric (Public-Key) Encryption! 7.4! Digital Signatures! 7.5! Public Key Infrastructures

### CSCE 465 Computer & Network Security

CSCE 465 Computer & Network Security Instructor: Dr. Guofei Gu http://courses.cse.tamu.edu/guofei/csce465/ Public Key Cryptogrophy 1 Roadmap Introduction RSA Diffie-Hellman Key Exchange Public key and

### Cryptography: Authentication, Blind Signatures, and Digital Cash

Cryptography: Authentication, Blind Signatures, and Digital Cash Rebecca Bellovin 1 Introduction One of the most exciting ideas in cryptography in the past few decades, with the widest array of applications,

### 1 Digital Signatures. 1.1 The RSA Function: The eth Power Map on Z n. Crypto: Primitives and Protocols Lecture 6.

1 Digital Signatures A digital signature is a fundamental cryptographic primitive, technologically equivalent to a handwritten signature. In many applications, digital signatures are used as building blocks

### Lecture Note 5 PUBLIC-KEY CRYPTOGRAPHY. Sourav Mukhopadhyay

Lecture Note 5 PUBLIC-KEY CRYPTOGRAPHY Sourav Mukhopadhyay Cryptography and Network Security - MA61027 Modern/Public-key cryptography started in 1976 with the publication of the following paper. W. Diffie

### Network Security. Computer Networking Lecture 08. March 19, 2012. HKU SPACE Community College. HKU SPACE CC CN Lecture 08 1/23

Network Security Computer Networking Lecture 08 HKU SPACE Community College March 19, 2012 HKU SPACE CC CN Lecture 08 1/23 Outline Introduction Cryptography Algorithms Secret Key Algorithm Message Digest

### 9 Modular Exponentiation and Cryptography

9 Modular Exponentiation and Cryptography 9.1 Modular Exponentiation Modular arithmetic is used in cryptography. In particular, modular exponentiation is the cornerstone of what is called the RSA system.

### Secure Network Communication Part II II Public Key Cryptography. Public Key Cryptography

Kommunikationssysteme (KSy) - Block 8 Secure Network Communication Part II II Public Key Cryptography Dr. Andreas Steffen 2000-2001 A. Steffen, 28.03.2001, KSy_RSA.ppt 1 Secure Key Distribution Problem

### RSA Attacks. By Abdulaziz Alrasheed and Fatima

RSA Attacks By Abdulaziz Alrasheed and Fatima 1 Introduction Invented by Ron Rivest, Adi Shamir, and Len Adleman [1], the RSA cryptosystem was first revealed in the August 1977 issue of Scientific American.

### Cryptography and Network Security Chapter 9

Cryptography and Network Security Chapter 9 Fifth Edition by William Stallings Lecture slides by Lawrie Brown (with edits by RHB) Chapter 9 Public Key Cryptography and RSA Every Egyptian received two names,

### Elements of Applied Cryptography Public key encryption

Network Security Elements of Applied Cryptography Public key encryption Public key cryptosystem RSA and the factorization problem RSA in practice Other asymmetric ciphers Asymmetric Encryption Scheme Let

### Software Tool for Implementing RSA Algorithm

Software Tool for Implementing RSA Algorithm Adriana Borodzhieva, Plamen Manoilov Rousse University Angel Kanchev, Rousse, Bulgaria Abstract: RSA is one of the most-common used algorithms for public-key

### Today ENCRYPTION. Cryptography example. Basic principles of cryptography

Today ENCRYPTION The last class described a number of problems in ensuring your security and privacy when using a computer on-line. This lecture discusses one of the main technological solutions. The use

### Symmetric Key cryptosystem

SFWR C03: Computer Networks and Computer Security Mar 8-11 200 Lecturer: Kartik Krishnan Lectures 22-2 Symmetric Key cryptosystem Symmetric encryption, also referred to as conventional encryption or single

### PUBLIC KEY ENCRYPTION

PUBLIC KEY ENCRYPTION http://www.tutorialspoint.com/cryptography/public_key_encryption.htm Copyright tutorialspoint.com Public Key Cryptography Unlike symmetric key cryptography, we do not find historical

### Overview of Public-Key Cryptography

CS 361S Overview of Public-Key Cryptography Vitaly Shmatikov slide 1 Reading Assignment Kaufman 6.1-6 slide 2 Public-Key Cryptography public key public key? private key Alice Bob Given: Everybody knows

### The Mathematics of RSA

The Mathematics of RSA Dimitri Papaioannou May 24, 2007 1 Introduction Cryptographic systems come in two flavors. Symmetric or Private key encryption and Asymmetric or Public key encryption. Strictly speaking,

### Data Encryption A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z. we would encrypt the string IDESOFMARCH as follows:

Data Encryption Encryption refers to the coding of information in order to keep it secret. Encryption is accomplished by transforming the string of characters comprising the information to produce a new

### The application of prime numbers to RSA encryption

The application of prime numbers to RSA encryption Prime number definition: Let us begin with the definition of a prime number p The number p, which is a member of the set of natural numbers N, is considered

### UOSEC Week 2: Asymmetric Cryptography. Frank IRC kee Adam IRC xe0 IRC: irc.freenode.net #0x4f

UOSEC Week 2: Asymmetric Cryptography Frank farana@uoregon.edu IRC kee Adam pond2@uoregon.edu IRC xe0 IRC: irc.freenode.net #0x4f Agenda HackIM CTF Results GITSC CTF this Saturday 10:00am Basics of Asymmetric

### CRYPTOGRAPHIC ALGORITHMS (AES, RSA)

CALIFORNIA STATE POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY, POMONA CRYPTOGRAPHIC ALGORITHMS (AES, RSA) A PAPER SUBMITTED TO PROFESSOR GILBERT S. YOUNG IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENT FOR THE COURSE CS530 : ADVANCED

### CIS 6930 Emerging Topics in Network Security. Topic 2. Network Security Primitives

CIS 6930 Emerging Topics in Network Security Topic 2. Network Security Primitives 1 Outline Absolute basics Encryption/Decryption; Digital signatures; D-H key exchange; Hash functions; Application of hash

### Cryptography: RSA and the discrete logarithm problem

Cryptography: and the discrete logarithm problem R. Hayden Advanced Maths Lectures Department of Computing Imperial College London February 2010 Public key cryptography Assymmetric cryptography two keys:

### Cryptography. Helmer Aslaksen Department of Mathematics National University of Singapore

Cryptography Helmer Aslaksen Department of Mathematics National University of Singapore aslaksen@math.nus.edu.sg www.math.nus.edu.sg/aslaksen/sfm/ 1 Basic Concepts There are many situations in life where

### Mathematics of Internet Security. Keeping Eve The Eavesdropper Away From Your Credit Card Information

The : Keeping Eve The Eavesdropper Away From Your Credit Card Information Department of Mathematics North Dakota State University 16 September 2010 Science Cafe Introduction Disclaimer: is not an internet

### Principles of Public Key Cryptography. Applications of Public Key Cryptography. Security in Public Key Algorithms

Principles of Public Key Cryptography Chapter : Security Techniques Background Secret Key Cryptography Public Key Cryptography Hash Functions Authentication Chapter : Security on Network and Transport

### Lecture 13: Factoring Integers

CS 880: Quantum Information Processing 0/4/0 Lecture 3: Factoring Integers Instructor: Dieter van Melkebeek Scribe: Mark Wellons In this lecture, we review order finding and use this to develop a method

### Outline. Computer Science 418. Digital Signatures: Observations. Digital Signatures: Definition. Definition 1 (Digital signature) Digital Signatures

Outline Computer Science 418 Digital Signatures Mike Jacobson Department of Computer Science University of Calgary Week 12 1 Digital Signatures 2 Signatures via Public Key Cryptosystems 3 Provable 4 Mike

### An Introduction to RSA Public-Key Cryptography

An Introduction to RSA Public-Key Cryptography David Boyhan August 5, 2008 According to the U.S. Census Bureau, in the 1st quarter of 2008, approximately \$33 billion worth of retail sales were conducted

### MA2C03 Mathematics School of Mathematics, Trinity College Hilary Term 2016 Lecture 59 (April 1, 2016) David R. Wilkins

MA2C03 Mathematics School of Mathematics, Trinity College Hilary Term 2016 Lecture 59 (April 1, 2016) David R. Wilkins The RSA encryption scheme works as follows. In order to establish the necessary public

### Asymmetric Cryptography. Mahalingam Ramkumar Department of CSE Mississippi State University

Asymmetric Cryptography Mahalingam Ramkumar Department of CSE Mississippi State University Mathematical Preliminaries CRT Chinese Remainder Theorem Euler Phi Function Fermat's Theorem Euler Fermat's Theorem

### Factoring & Primality

Factoring & Primality Lecturer: Dimitris Papadopoulos In this lecture we will discuss the problem of integer factorization and primality testing, two problems that have been the focus of a great amount

### Chapter 9 Public Key Cryptography and RSA

Chapter 9 Public Key Cryptography and RSA Cryptography and Network Security: Principles and Practices (3rd Ed.) 2004/1/15 1 9.1 Principles of Public Key Private-Key Cryptography traditional private/secret/single

### MATH 168: FINAL PROJECT Troels Eriksen. 1 Introduction

MATH 168: FINAL PROJECT Troels Eriksen 1 Introduction In the later years cryptosystems using elliptic curves have shown up and are claimed to be just as secure as a system like RSA with much smaller key

### ΕΠΛ 674: Εργαστήριο 3

ΕΠΛ 674: Εργαστήριο 3 Ο αλγόριθμος ασύμμετρης κρυπτογράφησης RSA Παύλος Αντωνίου Department of Computer Science Private-Key Cryptography traditional private/secret/single key cryptography uses one key

Family Name:... First Name:... Section:... Advanced Cryptography Final Exam July 18 th, 2006 Start at 9:15, End at 12:00 This document consists of 12 pages. Instructions Electronic devices are not allowed.

### Lecture 13 - Basic Number Theory.

Lecture 13 - Basic Number Theory. Boaz Barak March 22, 2010 Divisibility and primes Unless mentioned otherwise throughout this lecture all numbers are non-negative integers. We say that A divides B, denoted

### Public Key Cryptography and RSA. Review: Number Theory Basics

Public Key Cryptography and RSA Murat Kantarcioglu Based on Prof. Ninghui Li s Slides Review: Number Theory Basics Definition An integer n > 1 is called a prime number if its positive divisors are 1 and

### 1) A very simple example of RSA encryption

Solved Examples 1) A very simple example of RSA encryption This is an extremely simple example using numbers you can work out on a pocket calculator (those of you over the age of 35 45 can probably even

### Outline. Cryptography. Bret Benesh. Math 331

Outline 1 College of St. Benedict/St. John s University Department of Mathematics Math 331 2 3 The internet is a lawless place, and people have access to all sorts of information. What is keeping people

### Lukasz Pater CMMS Administrator and Developer

Lukasz Pater CMMS Administrator and Developer EDMS 1373428 Agenda Introduction Why do we need asymmetric ciphers? One-way functions RSA Cipher Message Integrity Examples Secure Socket Layer Single Sign

### Shor s algorithm and secret sharing

Shor s algorithm and secret sharing Libor Nentvich: QC 23 April 2007: Shor s algorithm and secret sharing 1/41 Goals: 1 To explain why the factoring is important. 2 To describe the oldest and most successful

### FAREY FRACTION BASED VECTOR PROCESSING FOR SECURE DATA TRANSMISSION

FAREY FRACTION BASED VECTOR PROCESSING FOR SECURE DATA TRANSMISSION INTRODUCTION GANESH ESWAR KUMAR. P Dr. M.G.R University, Maduravoyal, Chennai. Email: geswarkumar@gmail.com Every day, millions of people

### Cryptography and Network Security

Cryptography and Network Security Fifth Edition by William Stallings Chapter 9 Public Key Cryptography and RSA Private-Key Cryptography traditional private/secret/single key cryptography uses one key shared

### Factoring Algorithms

Factoring Algorithms The p 1 Method and Quadratic Sieve November 17, 2008 () Factoring Algorithms November 17, 2008 1 / 12 Fermat s factoring method Fermat made the observation that if n has two factors

### Introduction. Digital Signature

Introduction Electronic transactions and activities taken place over Internet need to be protected against all kinds of interference, accidental or malicious. The general task of the information technology

### 159.334 Computer Networks. Network Security 1. Professor Richard Harris School of Engineering and Advanced Technology

Network Security 1 Professor Richard Harris School of Engineering and Advanced Technology Presentation Outline Overview of Identification and Authentication The importance of identification and Authentication

### Cryptography and Network Security

Cryptography and Network Security Spring 2012 http://users.abo.fi/ipetre/crypto/ Lecture 7: Public-key cryptography and RSA Ion Petre Department of IT, Åbo Akademi University 1 Some unanswered questions

### Public Key Cryptography: RSA and Lots of Number Theory

Public Key Cryptography: RSA and Lots of Number Theory Public vs. Private-Key Cryptography We have just discussed traditional symmetric cryptography: Uses a single key shared between sender and receiver

### RSA Encryption. Grade Levels. Objectives and Topics. Introduction and Outline (54)(2)(2) (27)(2)(2)(2) (9)(3)(2)(2)(2) (3)(3)(3)(2)(2)(2)

RSA Encryption Grade Levels This activity is intended for high schools students, grades 10 12. Objectives and Topics One of the classical examples of applied mathematics is encryption. Through this activity,

### 1720 - Forward Secrecy: How to Secure SSL from Attacks by Government Agencies

1720 - Forward Secrecy: How to Secure SSL from Attacks by Government Agencies Dave Corbett Technical Product Manager Implementing Forward Secrecy 1 Agenda Part 1: Introduction Why is Forward Secrecy important?

### 3. Applications of Number Theory

3. APPLICATIONS OF NUMBER THEORY 163 3. Applications of Number Theory 3.1. Representation of Integers. Theorem 3.1.1. Given an integer b > 1, every positive integer n can be expresses uniquely as n = a

### Discrete Mathematics, Chapter 4: Number Theory and Cryptography

Discrete Mathematics, Chapter 4: Number Theory and Cryptography Richard Mayr University of Edinburgh, UK Richard Mayr (University of Edinburgh, UK) Discrete Mathematics. Chapter 4 1 / 35 Outline 1 Divisibility

### Number Theory and Cryptography using PARI/GP

Number Theory and Cryptography using Minh Van Nguyen nguyenminh2@gmail.com 25 November 2008 This article uses to study elementary number theory and the RSA public key cryptosystem. Various commands will

### Public Key (asymmetric) Cryptography

Public-Key Cryptography UNIVERSITA DEGLI STUDI DI PARMA Dipartimento di Ingegneria dell Informazione Public Key (asymmetric) Cryptography Luca Veltri (mail.to: luca.veltri@unipr.it) Course of Network Security,

### UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS Dept. of Electrical & Computer Engineering. Introduction to Cryptography ECE 597XX/697XX

UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS Dept. of Electrical & Computer Engineering Introduction to Cryptography ECE 597XX/697XX Part 6 Introduction to Public-Key Cryptography Israel Koren ECE597/697 Koren Part.6.1

### Mathematics of Cryptography

Number Theory Modular Arithmetic: Two numbers equivalent mod n if their difference is multiple of n example: 7 and 10 are equivalent mod 3 but not mod 4 7 mod 3 10 mod 3 = 1; 7 mod 4 = 3, 10 mod 4 = 2.

### Is this number prime? Berkeley Math Circle Kiran Kedlaya

Is this number prime? Berkeley Math Circle 2002 2003 Kiran Kedlaya Given a positive integer, how do you check whether it is prime (has itself and 1 as its only two positive divisors) or composite (not

### Chapter 10 Asymmetric-Key Cryptography

Chapter 10 Asymmetric-Key Cryptography Copyright The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display. 10.1 Chapter 10 Objectives Present asymmetric-key cryptography. Distinguish

### Announcements. CS243: Discrete Structures. More on Cryptography and Mathematical Induction. Agenda for Today. Cryptography

Announcements CS43: Discrete Structures More on Cryptography and Mathematical Induction Işıl Dillig Class canceled next Thursday I am out of town Homework 4 due Oct instead of next Thursday (Oct 18) Işıl

### Primality Testing and Factorization Methods

Primality Testing and Factorization Methods Eli Howey May 27, 2014 Abstract Since the days of Euclid and Eratosthenes, mathematicians have taken a keen interest in finding the nontrivial factors of integers,

### The mathematics of cryptology

The mathematics of cryptology Paul E. Gunnells Department of Mathematics and Statistics University of Massachusetts, Amherst Amherst, MA 01003 www.math.umass.edu/ gunnells April 27, 2004 What is Cryptology?

### Homework 5 Solutions

Homework 5 Solutions 4.2: 2: a. 321 = 256 + 64 + 1 = (01000001) 2 b. 1023 = 512 + 256 + 128 + 64 + 32 + 16 + 8 + 4 + 2 + 1 = (1111111111) 2. Note that this is 1 less than the next power of 2, 1024, which

### SFWR ENG 4C03 - Computer Networks & Computer Security

KEY MANAGEMENT SFWR ENG 4C03 - Computer Networks & Computer Security Researcher: Jayesh Patel Student No. 9909040 Revised: April 4, 2005 Introduction Key management deals with the secure generation, distribution,

### LUC: A New Public Key System

LUC: A New Public Key System Peter J. Smith a and Michael J. J. Lennon b a LUC Partners, Auckland UniServices Ltd, The University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand. b Department of

### RSA Cryptosystem. Yufei Tao. Department of Computer Science and Engineering Chinese University of Hong Kong. RSA Cryptosystem

Yufei Tao Department of Computer Science and Engineering Chinese University of Hong Kong In this lecture, we will discuss the RSA cryptosystem, which is widely adopted as a way to encrypt a message, or

### ACTA UNIVERSITATIS APULENSIS No 13/2007 MATHEMATICAL FOUNDATION OF DIGITAL SIGNATURES. Daniela Bojan and Sidonia Vultur

ACTA UNIVERSITATIS APULENSIS No 13/2007 MATHEMATICAL FOUNDATION OF DIGITAL SIGNATURES Daniela Bojan and Sidonia Vultur Abstract.The new services available on the Internet have born the necessity of a permanent

### Primality - Factorization

Primality - Factorization Christophe Ritzenthaler November 9, 2009 1 Prime and factorization Definition 1.1. An integer p > 1 is called a prime number (nombre premier) if it has only 1 and p as divisors.

### Practice Problems for First Test

Mathematicians have tried in vain to this day to discover some order in the sequence of prime numbers, and we have reason to believe that it is a mystery into which the human mind will never penetrate.-

### Notes for Recitation 5

6.042/18.062J Mathematics for Computer Science September 24, 2010 Tom Leighton and Marten van Dijk Notes for Recitation 5 1 Exponentiation and Modular Arithmetic Recall that RSA encryption and decryption

### FACTORING. n = 2 25 + 1. fall in the arithmetic sequence

FACTORING The claim that factorization is harder than primality testing (or primality certification) is not currently substantiated rigorously. As some sort of backward evidence that factoring is hard,

### 1. The RSA algorithm In this chapter, we ll learn how the RSA algorithm works.

MATH 13150: Freshman Seminar Unit 18 1. The RSA algorithm In this chapter, we ll learn how the RSA algorithm works. 1.1. Bob and Alice. Suppose that Alice wants to send a message to Bob over the internet

### Notes on Network Security Prof. Hemant K. Soni

Chapter 9 Public Key Cryptography and RSA Private-Key Cryptography traditional private/secret/single key cryptography uses one key shared by both sender and receiver if this key is disclosed communications

### Network Security. HIT Shimrit Tzur-David

Network Security HIT Shimrit Tzur-David 1 Goals: 2 Network Security Understand principles of network security: cryptography and its many uses beyond confidentiality authentication message integrity key

### Network Security. Chapter 2 Basics 2.2 Public Key Cryptography. Public Key Cryptography. Public Key Cryptography

Chair for Network Architectures and Services Department of Informatics TU München Prof. Carle Encryption/Decryption using Public Key Cryptography Network Security Chapter 2 Basics 2.2 Public Key Cryptography

### CIS 5371 Cryptography. 8. Encryption --

CIS 5371 Cryptography p y 8. Encryption -- Asymmetric Techniques Textbook encryption algorithms In this chapter, security (confidentiality) is considered in the following sense: All-or-nothing secrecy.

### Lecture 6 - Cryptography

Lecture 6 - Cryptography CSE497b - Spring 2007 Introduction Computer and Network Security Professor Jaeger www.cse.psu.edu/~tjaeger/cse497b-s07 Question 2 Setup: Assume you and I don t know anything about

### Computer and Network Security

MIT 6.857 Computer and Networ Security Class Notes 1 File: http://theory.lcs.mit.edu/ rivest/notes/notes.pdf Revision: December 2, 2002 Computer and Networ Security MIT 6.857 Class Notes by Ronald L. Rivest

### Number Theory and the RSA Public Key Cryptosystem

Number Theory and the RSA Public Key Cryptosystem Minh Van Nguyen nguyenminh2@gmail.com 05 November 2008 This tutorial uses to study elementary number theory and the RSA public key cryptosystem. A number

### RSA Encryption. Kurt Bryan ..., 2, 1, 0, 1, 2,...

1 Introduction Our starting point is the integers RSA Encryption Kurt Bryan..., 2, 1, 0, 1, 2,... and the basic operations on integers, +,,,. The basic material could hardly be more familiar. We denote

### Prime Numbers The generation of prime numbers is needed for many public key algorithms:

CA547: CRYPTOGRAPHY AND SECURITY PROTOCOLS 1 7 Number Theory 2 7.1 Prime Numbers Prime Numbers The generation of prime numbers is needed for many public key algorithms: RSA: Need to find p and q to compute

### NEW DIGITAL SIGNATURE PROTOCOL BASED ON ELLIPTIC CURVES

NEW DIGITAL SIGNATURE PROTOCOL BASED ON ELLIPTIC CURVES Ounasser Abid 1, Jaouad Ettanfouhi 2 and Omar Khadir 3 1,2,3 Laboratory of Mathematics, Cryptography and Mechanics, Department of Mathematics, Fstm,

### Network Security. Gaurav Naik Gus Anderson. College of Engineering. Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA. Drexel University. College of Engineering

Network Security Gaurav Naik Gus Anderson, Philadelphia, PA Lectures on Network Security Feb 12 (Today!): Public Key Crypto, Hash Functions, Digital Signatures, and the Public Key Infrastructure Feb 14:

### Elliptic Curve Cryptography

Elliptic Curve Cryptography Elaine Brow, December 2010 Math 189A: Algebraic Geometry 1. Introduction to Public Key Cryptography To understand the motivation for elliptic curve cryptography, we must first

### EULER S THEOREM. 1. Introduction Fermat s little theorem is an important property of integers to a prime modulus. a p 1 1 mod p.

EULER S THEOREM KEITH CONRAD. Introduction Fermat s little theorem is an important property of integers to a prime modulus. Theorem. (Fermat). For prime p and any a Z such that a 0 mod p, a p mod p. If

### SECURITY IN NETWORKS

SECURITY IN NETWORKS GOALS Understand principles of network security: Cryptography and its many uses beyond confidentiality Authentication Message integrity Security in practice: Security in application,

### Prime Numbers. Chapter Primes and Composites

Chapter 2 Prime Numbers The term factoring or factorization refers to the process of expressing an integer as the product of two or more integers in a nontrivial way, e.g., 42 = 6 7. Prime numbers are