Cultural Heritage Assessment Report: Built Heritage Resources and Cultural Heritage Landscapes. Existing Conditions

Transcription

1 Cultural Heritage Assessment Report: Built Heritage Resources and Cultural Heritage Landscapes Existing Conditions Caledon East Additional Water Supply and Storage Class Environmental Assessment Regional Municipality of Peel, Ontario DRAFT Prepared for: Hatch Mott MacDonald 15 Allstate Parkway, Suite 300 Markham, ON L3R 5B4 Tel Fax ASI File 09EA-040 December 2009 (Revised March 2010)

2 Cultural Heritage Assessment Report: (Draft) Built Heritage Resources and Cultural Heritage Landscapes Existing Conditions Regional Municipality of Peel, Ontario EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Archaeological Services Inc. was contracted by Hatch Mott MacDonald (HMM), Markham, to provide special consulting services and conduct a cultural heritage assessment as part of the Caledon East Class Environmental Assessment for the Regional Municipality of Peel, Ontario. The Class EA study is being conducted to address additional water supply and water storage requirements for the Caledon East community. The results of background historic research and a review of secondary source material, including historic mapping and the Town of Caledon s Built Heritage Inventory, revealed a study area with a rural land use history dating back to the early-mid nineteenth century. The results of preliminary data collection indicate that there are 414 previously identified cultural heritage resource within the study area. Of these, 27 are designated under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act. The locations of five previously identified cultural heritage resources require confirmation upon field review. During evaluation of alternative design concepts for the preferred solution, a field review will be conducted to identify additional heritage resources, confirm the integrity of previously identified heritage properties and areas, and to obtain information to accurately map above ground cultural heritage resources. The potential impact of the proposed undertaking on identified cultural heritage resources will then be evaluated and appropriate mitigation measures recommended.

3 Regional Municipality of Peel, Ontario Page iii ARCHAEOLOGICAL SERVICES INC. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT DIVISION PROJECT PERSONNEL Senior Project Manager: Project Manager: Project Coordinator: Report Preparation: Robert Pihl, MA, CAHP Partner and Senior Archaeologist Manager, Environmental Assessment Division Rebecca Sciarra, MA, CAHP Heritage Planner Sarah Jagelewski, Hon. BA Research Archaeologist Sarah Jagelewski Graphics Preparation: Sarah Jagelewski Report Reviewer: Rebecca Sciarra

4 Regional Municipality of Peel, Ontario Page iv TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... ii PROJECT PERSONNEL... iii TABLE OF CONTENTS...iv 1.0 INTRODUCTION BUILT HERITAGE RESOURCE AND CULTURAL HERITAGE LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT CONTEXT Approach to Cultural Heritage Assessment Scope and Methodology of Cultural Heritage Assessment BUILT HERITAGE RESOURCE AND CULTURAL HERITAGE LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT Introduction Township Survey and Settlement Review of Historic Mapping Existing Conditions CONCLUSIONS AND FURTHER WORK REFERENCES...22 Appendix A: Mapping of Previously Identified Cultural Heritage Resources (CHRs) in the Caledon East Study Area...24 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location of the study area... 1 Figure 2: The study area overlaid on the map of Caledon Township in Figure 3: The study area overlaid on the map of Chinguacousy Township in Figure 4: The study area overlaid on the map of Albion Township in LIST OF TABLES Table 1: Previously Identified Cultural Heritage Resources (CHR) in the study area...11

5 Regional Municipality of Peel, Ontario Page INTRODUCTION Archaeological Services Inc. was contracted by Hatch Mott MacDonald (HMM), Markham, to provide special consulting services and conduct a cultural heritage assessment as part of the Caledon East Class Environmental Assessment for the Regional Municipality of Peel, Ontario. The Class EA study is being conducted to address additional water supply and water storage requirements for the Caledon East community. The study area is depicted on Figure 1 below. The purpose of this report is to present a built heritage and cultural landscape inventory of previously identified cultural heritage resources in the study area. This research was conducted under the project direction of Rebecca A. Sciarra, Heritage Planner. Figure 1: Location of the study area Base Map: NTS Sheet 30 M/13 (Bolton)

6 Regional Municipality of Peel, Ontario Page BUILT HERITAGE RESOURCE AND CULTURAL HERITAGE LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT CONTEXT 2.1 Approach to Cultural Heritage Assessment The cultural heritage assessment considers cultural heritage resources in the context of improvements to specified areas, pursuant to the Environmental Assessment Act. This assessment addresses above ground cultural heritage resources over 40 years old. Use of a 40 year old threshold is a guiding principle when conducting a preliminary identification of cultural heritage resources, as is indicated in such government documents as Cultural Heritage Built Heritage and Cultural Heritage Landscapes: Technical Requirements for Environmental Impact Study and Environmental Protection/Mitigation (Ministry of Transportation 2006), Environmental Guide for Built Heritage and Cultural Heritage Landscapes (Ministry of Transportation 2007), and Heritage Management Process Handbook (Ontario Realty Corporation 2007). While identification of a resource that is 40 years old or older does not confer outright heritage significance, this threshold provides a means to collect information about resources that may retain heritage value. Similarly, if a resource is slightly younger than 40 years old, this does not preclude the resource from retaining heritage value. The new high capacity well has the potential to affect cultural heritage resources in a variety of ways. These include the loss or displacement of resources through removal or demolition and the disruption of resources by introducing physical, visual, audible or atmospheric elements that are not in keeping with the resources and/or their setting. For the purposes of this assessment, the term cultural heritage resources was used to describe both cultural landscapes and built heritage features. A cultural landscape is perceived as a collection of individual built heritage features and other related features that together form farm complexes, roadscapes and nucleated settlements. Built heritage features are typically individual buildings or structures that may be associated with a variety of human activities, such as historical settlement and patterns of architectural development. The analysis throughout the study process addresses cultural heritage resources under various pieces of legislation and their supporting guidelines. Under the Environmental Assessment Act (1990) environment is defined in Subsection 1(c) to include: cultural conditions that influence the life of man or a community, and; any building, structure, machine, or other device or thing made by man. The Ministry of Culture (MCL) is charged under Section 2 of the Ontario Heritage Act with the responsibility to determine policies, priorities and programs for the conservation, protection and preservation of the heritage of Ontario and has published two guidelines to assist in assessing cultural heritage resources as part of an environmental assessment: Guideline for Preparing the Cultural Heritage Resource Component of Environmental Assessments (1992), and Guidelines on the Man-Made Heritage Component of Environmental Assessments (1981). Accordingly, both guidelines have been utilized in this assessment process. The Guidelines on the Man-Made Heritage Component of Environmental Assessments (Section 1.0) states the following:

7 Regional Municipality of Peel, Ontario Page 3 When speaking of man-made heritage we are concerned with the works of man and the effects of his activities in the environment rather than with movable human artifacts or those environments that are natural and completely undisturbed by man. In addition, environment may be interpreted to include the combination and interrelationships of human artifacts with all other aspects of the physical environment, as well as with the social, economic and cultural conditions that influence the life of the people and communities in Ontario. The Guidelines on the Man-Made Heritage Component of Environmental Assessments distinguish between two basic ways of visually experiencing this heritage in the environment, namely as cultural landscapes and as cultural features. Within this document, cultural landscapes are defined as the following (Section 1.0): The use and physical appearance of the land as we see it now is a result of man s activities over time in modifying pristine landscapes for his own purposes. A cultural landscape is perceived as a collection of individual man-made features into a whole. Urban cultural landscapes are sometimes given special names such as townscapes or streetscapes that describe various scales of perception from the general scene to the particular view. Cultural landscapes in the countryside are viewed in or adjacent to natural undisturbed landscapes, or waterscapes, and include such landuses as agriculture, mining, forestry, recreation, and transportation. Like urban cultural landscapes, they too may be perceived at various scales: as a large area of homogeneous character; or as an intermediate sized area of homogeneous character or a collection of settings such as a group of farms; or as a discrete example of specific landscape character such as a single farm, or an individual village or hamlet. A cultural feature is defined as the following (Section 1.0): an individual part of a cultural landscape that may be focused upon as part of a broader scene, or viewed independently. The term refers to any man-made or modified object in or on the land or underwater, such as buildings of various types, street furniture, engineering works, plantings and landscaping, archaeological sites, or a collection of such objects seen as a group because of close physical or social relationships. Additionally, the Planning Act (1990) and related Provincial Policy Statement (PPS) (2005) make a number of provisions relating to heritage conservation. One of the general purposes of the Planning Act is to integrate matters of provincial interest in provincial and municipal planning decisions. In order to inform all those involved in planning activities of the scope of these matters of provincial interest, Section 2 of the Planning Act provides an extensive listing. These matters of provincial interest shall be regarded when certain authorities, including the council of a municipality, carry out their responsibilities under the Act. One of these provincial interests is directly concerned with: 2.0 protecting cultural heritage and archaeological resources for their economic, environmental, and social benefits.

8 Regional Municipality of Peel, Ontario Page 4 Part 4.5 of the PPS states that: Comprehensive, integrated and long-term planning is best achieved through municipal official plans. Municipal official plans shall identify provincial interests and set out appropriate land use designations and policies. Municipal official plans should also coordinate cross-boundary matters to complement the actions of other planning authorities and promote mutually beneficial solutions. Municipal official plans shall provide clear, reasonable and attainable policies to protect provincial interests and direct development to suitable areas. In order to protect provincial interests, planning authorities shall keep their official plans up-to-date with this Provincial Policy Statement. The policies of this Provincial Policy Statement continue to apply after adoption and approval of a municipal official plan. The policies of particular relevance for the conservation of heritage features are contained in Section 2- Wise Use and Management of Resources, wherein Subsection Cultural Heritage and Archaeological Resources, makes the following provisions: Significant built heritage resources and cultural heritage landscapes shall be conserved. A number of definitions that have specific meanings for use in a policy context accompany the policy statement. These definitions include built heritage resources and cultural heritage landscapes. Built heritage resources mean one or more buildings, structures, monuments, installations or remains associated with architectural, cultural, social, political, economic, or military history, and identified as being important to a community. Cultural heritage landscapes mean a defined geographical area of heritage significance that has been modified by human activities. Such an area is valued by a community, and is of significance to the understanding of the history of a people or place. Examples include farmscapes, historic settlements, parks, gardens, battlefields, mainstreets and neighbourhoods, cemeteries, trailways, and industrial complexes of cultural heritage value (PPS 2005). In addition, significance is also more generally defined. It is assigned a specific meaning according to the subject matter or policy context, such as wetlands or ecologically important areas. With regard to cultural heritage and archaeology resources, resources of significance are those that are valued for the important contribution they make to our understanding of the history of a place, an event, or a people (PPS 2005). Criteria for determining significance for the resources are recommended by the Province, but municipal approaches that achieve or exceed the same objective may also be used. While some significant resources may already be identified and inventoried by official sources, the significance of others can only be determined after evaluation (PPS 2005). Accordingly, the foregoing guidelines and relevant policy statement were used to guide the scope and methodology of the cultural heritage assessment.

9 Regional Municipality of Peel, Ontario Page Scope and Methodology of Cultural Heritage Assessment In the course of the cultural heritage assessment, all potentially affected cultural heritage resources within the study area are subject to inventory. Short form names are usually applied to each resource type, (e.g. barn, residence). Generally, when conducting a preliminary identification of cultural heritage resources, three stages of research and data collection are undertaken to appropriately establish the potential for and existence of cultural heritage resources in a particular geographic area. Background historic research, which includes consultation of primary and secondary source research and historic mapping, is undertaken to identify early settlement patterns and broad agents or themes of change in a study area. This stage in the data collection process enables the researcher to determine the presence of sensitive heritage areas that correspond to 19th and 20th century settlement and development patterns. To augment data collected during this stage of the research process, federal, provincial, and municipal databases and/or agencies are consulted to obtain information about specific properties that have been previously identified and/or designated as retaining cultural heritage value. Typically, resources identified during these stages of the research process are reflective of particular architectural styles, associated with an important person, place, or event, and contribute to the contextual facets of a particular place, neighbourhood, or intersection. A field review is then undertaken to confirm the location and condition of previously identified cultural heritage resources. The field review is also utilized to identify cultural heritage resources that have not been previously identified on federal, provincial, or municipal databases. Several investigative criteria are utilized during the field review to appropriately identify new cultural heritage resources. These investigative criteria are derived from provincial guidelines, definitions, and past experience. A built structure or landscape is identified as a cultural heritage resource that should be considered during the course of the environmental assessment, if the resource meets a combination of the following criteria: It is 40 years or older; It is a rare, unique, representative or early example of a style, type, expression, material or construction method; It displays a high degree of craftsmanship or artistic merit; It demonstrates a high degree of technical or scientific achievement; The site and/or structure retains original stylistic features and has not been irreversibly altered so as to destroy its integrity; It has a direct association with a theme, event, belief, person, activity, organization, or institution that is significant to: the Town of Caledon; the Province of Ontario; Canada; or the world heritage list; It yields, or had the potential to yield, information that contributes to an understanding of: the Town of Caledon; the Province of Ontario; Canada; or the world heritage list; It demonstrates or reflects the work or ideas of an architect, artist builder, designer, or theorist who is significant to: the Town of Caledon; the Province of Ontario; Canada; or the world heritage list; It is important in defining, maintaining, or supporting the character of an area; It is physically, functionally, visually, or historically linked to its surroundings; It is a landmark;

10 Regional Municipality of Peel, Ontario Page 6 It illustrates a significant phase in the development of the community or a major change or turning point in the community s history; The landscape contains a structure other than a building (fencing, culvert, public art, statue, etc.) that is associated with the history or daily life of that area or region; or There is evidence of previous historic and/or existing agricultural practices (e.g. terracing, deforestation, complex water canalization, apple orchards, vineyards, etc.). If a resource satisfies an appropriate combination of these criteria, it will be identified as a cultural heritage resource and is subject to further research where appropriate and when feasible. Typically, further historical research and consultation is required to determine the specific significance of the identified cultural heritage resource. When identifying cultural heritage landscapes, the following categories are typically utilized for the purposes of the classification during the field review: Farm complexes: scapes: Waterscapes: Railscapes: Historical settlements: Streetscapes: Historical agricultural Landscapes: Cemeteries: comprise two or more buildings, one of which must be a farmhouse or barn, and may include a tree-lined drive, tree windbreaks, fences, domestic gardens and small orchards. generally two-lanes in width with absence of shoulders or narrow shoulders only, ditches, tree lines, bridges, culverts and other associated features. waterway features that contribute to the overall character of the cultural heritage landscape, usually in relation to their influence on historic development and settlement patterns. active or inactive railway lines or railway rights of way and associated features. groupings of two or more structures with a commonly applied name. generally consists of a paved road found in a more urban setting, and may include a series of houses that would have been built in the same time period. generally comprises a historically rooted settlement and farming pattern that reflects a recognizable arrangement of fields within a lot and may have associated agricultural outbuildings and structures land used for the burial of human remains. Results of data collection are contained in Section 3.0; while Section 4.0 contains preliminary conclusions and a description of further work to be conducted.

11 Regional Municipality of Peel, Ontario Page BUILT HERITAGE RESOURCE AND CULTURAL HERITAGE LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT 3.1 Introduction This section provides a brief summary of historic research and a description of previously identified above ground cultural heritage resources that may be affected by the new high capacity well. The study area is located in parts of the former Townships of Caledon, Chinguacousy, and Albion, in the County of Peel. Historical research revealed that the land which encompasses this part of the County of Peel contains a long and well-documented history extending to the early nineteenth century. 3.2 Township Survey and Settlement The land within Caledon Township was acquired by the British from the Mississaugas in The first township survey was undertaken in 1819, and the first legal settlers occupied their land holdings in the following year. The township was named after the Roman designation for Scotland. Caledon was initially settled by the children of Loyalists, soldiers who served during the War of 1812, and by immigrants from England, Scotland and Ireland. By the 1840s, the township was noted for its good farms (Smith 1846: 27; Armstrong 1985:142; Rayburn 1997:51). The land within Chinguacousy Township was acquired by the British from the Mississaugas in The first township survey was undertaken in 1818, and the first legal settlers occupied their land holdings in the same year. The township was first named after a Mississauga word meaning young pine, which may have been used to denote the Credit River. Chinguacousy was initially settled by the children of Loyalists, soldiers who had served during the War of 1812, and by immigrants from England, Scotland and Ireland. By the 1840s, the township was noted for its excellent land, many good farms and the excellent wheat grown there (Smith 1846:32; Armstrong 1985:142; Rayburn 1997:68). The Township of Albion was surveyed in and opened for European-American settlement in Eleven concessions comprised the township and were laid out west to east. Early settlement and development in the area is attributed to the emergence of water-power mill sites located near the Humber River, which ran through the whole length of the township. In 1821, the population of the entire township totalled 110 and by 1848, the population had increased to 3,567. The census of 1871 records that the population of the Township of Albion had reached 4,857 (Mika 1977:416; Rayburn 1997: 68). 3.3 Review of Historic Mapping The 1877 Illustrated Historical Atlas of the County of Peel, Ontario was reviewed to determine the potential for the presence of cultural heritage resources within the study area during the nineteenth century (Figures 2 to 4). Historically, the study area was situated on Lots 1-10, Concession V and VI, in the former Caledon Township (Figure 2), Lots 26 to 34, Concession V and VI, in the former Chinguacousy Township (Figure 3) and parts of Lots 6 to 26, Concession I to VII, in the former Township of Albion (Figure 4), Peel County. The atlas provides limited details regarding property owners and features within the study area. It should be noted, however, that not all features of interest were mapped systematically in the Ontario series of historical atlases, given that they were financed by subscription, and subscribers were given preference with regard to the level of detail provided on the maps. Moreover, not every feature of interest would have been within the scope of the atlases.

12 Regional Municipality of Peel, Ontario Page 8 The subject study area is located partially in the south-eastern most quadrant of the Caledon Township. A number of property owners and historic features are illustrated on the historic atlas, including homesteads, orchards, railways and a school house. The settlement of Caledon East/Paisley lies along the Hamilton and North Western Railway at the border to Albion Township in the east (Figure 2). The Hamilton and Northern Western Railway constructed in 1877, runs from the southwest to the northeast in the southern portion of the study area and served to connect Hamilton to Collingwood. The railway was taken over by the Grand Trunk Railway in 1888, and later absorbed by Canadian National Railways. The Toronto Gray and Bruce Railway also runs through the study area. It was constructed in 1870 to connect Toronto to Grey and Bruce Counties A portion of the study area also is also situated in the north-eastern quadrant of Chinguacousy Township. Within this area, a number of villages and hamlets developed at various cross roads in the township, often in close proximity to a waterway or railroad line. The historic settlement of Sand Hill is identified on historic mapping (Figure 3). A number of property owners and historic features are illustrated on the historic atlas, including homesteads, orchards, a church and a school house. The Sand Hill settlement centre is historically located on part Lot 10, Concession 1, in Albion Township, and on part Lots 27 and 28 Concession 6 East, in Chinguacousy Township. The settlement was first named Newton Hewitt after its earliest settler, John Hewitt. The name of the village was officially changed to Sand Hill when the post office was relocated there in It contained three churches (Presbyterian, Wesleyan Methodist and Anglican), two hotels one of which was known as the Sand Hill Commercial Hotel or Little Hotel, two stores, blacksmith shops, a saddlery, a shoe maker, tanners, carriage and wagon makers, a harness shop and a telegraph office. Other hotels in the immediate vicinity of Sand Hill included the Temperance Hotel or the Morning Stage Hotel, and also the Four Alls Hotel. A school stood to the south of Sand Hill on Airport which was known as the Kennedy School (SS19 Chinguacousy). Two other churches, known as the Hope/Grove Primitive Methodist Churches, stood south of Sand Hill near the intersection of Bramalea and Old School s. The population was about 200 in 1873 (Smith 1851:281; Crossby 1873:307; Heyes 1961: ; Charters 1967:231; Davies 2000:66, 87, 104, 110, , 117). A large section of the study area is located in the south central area of the Township of Albion. Within this area, a number of villages and historic settlements developed within proximity of waterways or railroad lines including Bolton, Sand Hill, and Caledon East/Paisley. Historic features as illustrated on the historic atlas include homesteads, orchards, churches, cemeteries, school houses, mills, and stone quarries. Bolton was the largest settlement centre in the Township of Albion. Originally, Bolton served as a post office village located on the Humber River on part Lots 8, 9 and 10, Concessions 6 and 7. The village was named after the family of James Bolton, an English settler who arrived in Albion Township in Bolton built the first mill here, which was known as Bolton Mills. The post office was known as Albion. Registered plans of subdivision for this village date from At this time it contained two telegraph offices, a printing office, several stores and mills, a distillery, a tannery, a blacksmith, a cooper, wagon and carriage makers, a shoemaker, a tailor, a hotel, churches and a school. Bolton was incorporated as a village in It was served by the Toronto, Grey and Bruce Railway. The population numbered about 1,000 (Crossby 1873:39; Heyes 1961: ; Charters 1967: ; Winearls 1991:618; Scott 1997:29; Rayburn 1997:37).

13 Regional Municipality of Peel, Ontario Page 9 Figure 2: The study area overlaid on the map of Caledon Township in 1877 Source: Illustrated Historical Atlas of County of Peel Figure 3: The study area overlaid on the map of Chinguacousy Township in 1877 Source: Illustrated Historical Atlas of County of Peel

14 Regional Municipality of Peel, Ontario Page 10 Figure 4: The study area overlaid on the map of Albion Township in 1877 Source: Illustrated Historical Atlas of County of Peel

15 Regional Municipality of Peel, Ontario Page Existing Conditions In order to make a preliminary identification of existing built heritage resources and cultural heritage landscapes within the study area, the Town of Caledon s Built Heritage Inventory was consulted. Within the limits of the study area, 414 properties have been previously identified as retaining cultural heritage value. Of these, 27 properties located within the study area limits have been designated under the Ontario Heritage Act. Table 1 lists the cultural heritage resource previously identified within the study area. Appendix A provides location mapping of these features, based on property parcel fabric data provided by the Regional Municipality of Peel. It is important to note that five of the total 414 cultural heritage resources previously identified within the study area do not have corresponding property parcel fabric data. These are identified by the asterisks placed next to their feature identifier in Table 1. These properties are listed on the heritage inventory, but could not be located on the mapping. Their locations will be confirmed upon field review. Table 1: Previously Identified Cultural Heritage Resources (CHR) in the study area Feature Location Estimated Feature Description Recognition Construction Type CHR 1* Mountainview Farmstead High Victorian Gothic farmhouse; Designated CHR Mountainview Farmstead Gothic Revival farmhouse; 2 barns CHR Mountainview Farmstead Italianate farmhouse; barn CHR Mountainview Undetermined House CHR Mountainview before 1850 Farmstead log farmhouse; barn; driveshed CHR Mountainview before 1850 House log farmhouse CHR Mountainview Farmstead Neoclassical farmhouse; barn CHR Mountainview before 1850 House log farmhouse Designated CHR Mountainview House Italianate farmhouse CHR Airport House Neoclassical house CHR Airport House Neoclassical house CHR Airport Commercia Colonial Revival commercial l Building building CHR Airport Farmstead Gothic Revival farmhouse; barn; CHR Airport Farmstead Italianate farmhouse; barn; silo CHR Airport Farmstead Neoclassical farmhouse; barn; silo CHR Airport Farmstead Neoclassical farmhouse; barn Designated CHR Airport ; Farmstead Neoclassical farmhouse & Edwardian Classical farmhouse; driveshed/carriage house/garage; silo CHR Airport Farmstead Neoclassical farmhouse; barn CHR Airport Farmstead Neoclassical farmhouse; ruins CHR Airport Farmstead Neoclassical farmhouse; barn CHR Airport Barn CHR Airport House Edwardian Classical house

16 Regional Municipality of Peel, Ontario Page 12 Table 1: Previously Identified Cultural Heritage Resources (CHR) in the study area Feature Location Estimated Feature Description Recognition Construction Type CHR Airport House Gothic Revival house CHR Airport House Late Neoclassical house CHR Airport undetermined House CHR Airport House Neoclassical house CHR Airport House Gothic Revival house CHR Airport House CHR Airport House Gothic Revival house CHR Airport House CHR Airport Commercia High Victorian Gothic commercial l Building building CHR Airport House Gothic Revival house CHR Airport Farmstead Gothic Revival house; CHR Airport House CHR Airport Farmstead Neoclassical farmhouse; 2 barns; CHR Airport House Gothic Revival farmhouse CHR Airport Farmstead Neoclassical farmhouse; barn; CHR Airport Farmstead Gothic Revival farmhouse; barn; silo CHR Airport House Edwardian house CHR Airport House Late Victorian Gothic house CHR Airport Farmstead Gothic Revival house; CHR Airport House Late Victorian Gothic house CHR Airport undetermined House log house (rear addition) CHR Airport Farmstead Late Victorian Gothic house; CHR Airport Farmstead Late Victorian Gothic house; CHR Airport Commercia Late Victorian Gothic commercial l Building building CHR Airport Commercia Late Victorian Gothic commercial l Building building CHR Airport Commercia Neoclassical commercial building l Building CHR Airport House Late Ontario Cottage house CHR Airport House Late Victorian Gothic commercial building CHR Airport Commercia Late Victorian Gothic commercial l Building building CHR Airport Farmstead High Victorian Gothic house; barn Designated CHR Airport House Late Victorian Gothic house CHR Airport Farmstead Gothic Revival house; CHR Airport House Late Ontario Cottage house CHR Airport undetermined House CHR Airport House Gothic Revival house CHR Airport House Edwardian Classical house CHR A Airport House Late Victorian Gothic house CHR Airport House High Victorian Gothic house CHR Airport House Edwardian Classical house CHR Airport House Neoclassical house CHR Airport House Edwardian Classical house

17 Regional Municipality of Peel, Ontario Page 13 Table 1: Previously Identified Cultural Heritage Resources (CHR) in the study area Feature Location Estimated Feature Description Recognition Construction Type CHR Airport undetermined House CHR Airport House High Victorian Gothic house CHR Airport Church Neoclassical church Designated CHR Airport House High Victorian Gothic house Designated CHR Airport House High Victorian Gothic house Designated CHR Airport House Edwardian Classical house CHR Airport Farmstead Neoclassical farmhouse; driveshed/carriage house/garage; ruins CHR Airport before 1850 Cemetery cemetery CHR Innis Lake Farmstead Neoclassical farmhouse; barn; CHR Innis Lake Barn CHR Innis Lake Farmstead Neoclassical farmhouse; barn CHR Innis Lake Farmstead Neoclassical farmhouse; barn; CHR Innis Lake before 1850 Chapel & mortuary chapel & cemetery Cemetery CHR Innis Lake Farmstead Neoclassical farmhouse; barn CHR Innis Lake House Edwardian Classical farmhouse; ruins CHR Innis Lake Farmstead Gothic Revival farmhouse; barn CHR Innis Lake Farmstead Neoclassical farmhouse; barn; CHR Innis Lake Farmstead Gothic Revival farmhouse; barn CHR Innis Lake Farmstead Neoclassical farmhouse; barn; CHR Innis Lake Farmstead Neoclassical farmhouse; ruins; other outbuilding CHR Innis Lake Farmstead Bungalow house; CHR 85* Innis Lake before 1850 Cemetery cemetery CHR Innis Lake Farmstead Neoclassical farmhouse; driveshed/carriage house/garage; silo; monument; ruins CHR Innis Lake Farmstead Edwardian Classical farmhouse; barn; driveshed/carriage house/garage CHR Innis Lake Farmstead Neoclassical farmhouse; barn; driveshed/carriage house/garage; silo CHR Innis Lake House Gothic Revival farmhouse CHR Centreville Creek Barn CHR Centreville Creek Farmstead Italianate farmhouse; barn CHR Centreville Creek House Edwardian Classical farmhouse CHR Centreville Creek Farmstead Edwardian Classical farmhouse; barn; outbuilding; silo CHR Centreville Creek House Italianate farmhouse

18 Regional Municipality of Peel, Ontario Page 14 Table 1: Previously Identified Cultural Heritage Resources (CHR) in the study area Feature Location Estimated Construction Feature Type Description CHR Centreville Creek before 1850 Farmstead plaster farmhouse; driveshed/carriage CHR 96 CHR 97 CHR 98 CHR 99 CHR Centreville Creek Centreville Creek Centreville Creek Centreville Creek Centreville Creek house/garage; other outbuilding Recognition before 1850 Farmstead Neoclassical farmhouse; driveshed/carriage house/garage; other outbuilding undetermined Industrial industrial structure Barn before 1850 House Georgian log farmhouse Designated Farmstead Neoclassical farmhouse; barn; driveshed/carriage house/garage; other outbuilding House Bungalow house CHR Centreville Creek CHR Bartley Drive Farmstead Octagonal farmhouse; CHR Cedar Mains Drive 1852 Church & Cemetery CHR The Grange before 1850? log farmhouses; church; other Sideroad outbuilding; CHR The Grange Farmstead Neoclassical farmhouse; barn; Sideroad driveshed/carriage CHR 106 CHR 107 CHR 108 CHR 109 CHR 110 CHR The Grange Sideroad 5534 The Grange Sideroad 6451 Patterson Sideroad 6500 Patterson Sideroad 6732 Patterson Sideroad 6916 Patterson Sideroad house/garage; 2 outbuildings Farmstead Neoclassical farmhouse; barn; driveshed/carriage house/garage; 2 outbuildings Designated Designated House log farmhouse Farmstead barn; driveshed/carriage house/garage; other outbuilding; silo 1900 School Farmstead Neoclassical farmhouse; barn Farmstead Edwardian Classical farmhouse; barn; driveshed/carriage house/garage; other outbuilding Barn CHR Patterson Sideroad CHR Patterson House Neoclassical log house Designated Sideroad CHR Bramalea Farmhouse Edwardian Classical farmhouse CHR Victoria Street House Late Victorian Gothic house CHR Victoria Street House Neoclassical house CHR Victoria Street House Late Victorian Gothic house CHR Hemlock Street House Gothic Revival house CHR Hemlock Street House Italianate house CHR Meadowvale Court House Gothic Revival farmhouse CHR Centennial Drive before 1850 Cemetery cemeteries; fence CHR Centennial Drive Cemetery cemetery; monument Designated CHR Plummer before 1850 Cemetery

19 Regional Municipality of Peel, Ontario Page 15 Table 1: Previously Identified Cultural Heritage Resources (CHR) in the study area Feature Location Estimated Feature Description Recognition Construction Type CHR Torbram Farmstead Neoclassical farmhouse; barn CHR Torbram Farmstead Edwardian Classical farmhouse; barn CHR Torbram Farmstead Neoclassical farmhouse; barn; CHR Torbram Farmstead Neoclassical farmhouse; barn CHR Torbram Farmstead Gothic Revival farmhouse; CHR Torbram Farmstead Neoclassical farmhouse; barn; CHR Torbram Farmhouse Italianate farmhouse CHR Torbram Farmstead Late Neoclassical farmhouse; barn CHR The Gore School Former schoolhouse House CHR The Gore Farmstead Barn; driveshed/carriage house/ garage; ruins CHR The Gore Farmstead Edwardian Classical farmhouse; barn CHR The Gore Farmstead Italianate farmhouse; barn; CHR The Gore Farmstead Queen Anne farmhouse; barn CHR The Gore Farmstead Neoclassical farmhouse; barn; CHR The Gore Farmstead Italianate farmhouse; barn CHR The Gore Farmhouse Edwardian Classical farmhouse CHR The Gore Farmhouse Edwardian Classical farmhouse CHR The Gore Farmstead Gothic Revival farmhouse; barn; CHR The Gore Farmstead Gothic Revival farmhouse; barn; silo; other outbuilding CHR The Gore Farmhouse Late Victorian Gothic farmhouse CHR The Gore Farmhouse Gothic Revival farmhouse CHR The Gore Farmhouse Neoclassical farmhouse CHR The Gore 1944 School Former school CHR The Gore 1906 Church / Late Victorian Gothic Church; House house CHR The Gore Farmhouse Neoclassical house CHR The Gore Farmhouse Gothic Revival farmhouse CHR The Gore Before 1850 Cemetery CHR The Gore Farmstead Gothic Revival farmhouse; CHR The Gore Farmstead Barn; driveshed/carriage house/ garage CHR The Gore Farmstead Neoclassical farmhouse; barn CHR The Gore Store Former store CHR The Gore Undetermined Farmstead House; driveshed/carriage house/garage CHR Humber Station Farmstead Edwardian Classical farmhouse; barn CHR Humber Station Farmhouse Late Neoclassical farmhouse CHR Humber Station Farmstead Edwardian Classical farmhouse; barn CHR Duffy s Lane Farmstead Neoclassical log farmhouse; barn Designated

20 Regional Municipality of Peel, Ontario Page 16 Table 1: Previously Identified Cultural Heritage Resources (CHR) in the study area Feature Location Estimated Feature Description Recognition Construction Type CHR Duffy s Lane Undetermined Ruins Ruins CHR Duffy s Lane Farmstead Neoclassical farmhouse; barn CHR Duffy s Lane Farmstead Edwardian Classical farmhouse; silo CHR Duffy s Lane Farmstead Edwardian Classical farmhouse; other outbuilding CHR Duffy s Lane Farmstead Neoclassical farmhouse; silo CHR Duffy s Lane Farmhouse Neoclassical farmhouse CHR Highway Farmstead Gothic Revival farmhouse; barn; CHR Highway Farmhouse Gothic Revival farmhouse CHR Highway Farmstead High Victorian Gothic farmhouse; 2 barns; driveshed/carriage house/garage; silo CHR Highway Farmhouse Edwardian Classical farmhouse CHR Highway Farmstead Edwardian Classical farmhouse; CHR Highway Farmstead Neoclassical farmhouse; barn CHR Highway Farmstead Neoclassical farmhouse; CHR Highway Farmstead Gothic Revival farmhouse; barn; CHR Highway Farmhouse Edwardian Classical farmhouse CHR Highway Barn Barn CHR King Street Farmhouse Edwardian Classical CHR King street Farmhouse Neoclassical farmhouse CHR King Street Farmhouse Neoclassical farmhouse CHR King Street Undetermined House House CHR King Street Church Church Designated CHR King Street Farmstead Edwardian Classical farmhouse; barn; driveshed/carriage house/ garage CHR King Street Farmhouse Neoclassical farmhouse CHR King Street Farmhouse Neoclassical farmhouse CHR King Street Undetermined Farmhouse Neoclassical farmhouse CHR King Street Undetermined Farmhouse Neoclassical farmhouse CHR King Street Farmhouse Italianate farmhouse CHR King Street Farmstead Edwardian Classical farmhouse; barn; driveshed/carriage house/ garage; other outbuilding CHR King Street Farmstead Regency farmhouse; barn; silo CHR Glasgow Farmstead Neoclassical farmhouse; CHR 190 Glasgow Bridge Steel truss bridge Designated CHR Boston Mills Barn Barn CHR Castlederg Before 1850 Farmstead Log farmhouse; barn; driveshed/ Sideroad carriage house/garage CHR Castlederg Farmhouse Gothic Revival farmhouse Sideroad CHR Castlederg Barn Barn Sideroad CHR Castlederg Farmhouse Gothic Revival farmhouse Sideroad CHR Castlederg Sideroad Barn Barn

21 Regional Municipality of Peel, Ontario Page 17 Table 1: Previously Identified Cultural Heritage Resources (CHR) in the study area Feature Location Estimated Feature Description Recognition Construction Type CHR Castlederg Undetermined Garage Driveshed/carriage Sideroad house/garage CHR Casltederg Farmhouse Neoclassical farmhouse Sideroad CHR Castlederg Farmstead Neoclassical farmhouse; barn; Sideroad CHR Castlederg Farmstead Edwardian Classical Farmhouse; Sideroad barn CHR Castlederg Farmstead Barn; driveshed/carriage house/ Sideroad garage CHR Olde Baseline Farmstead Gothic Revival farmhouse; barn; CHR Olde Baseline Farmhouse High Victorian Gothic house Designated CHR Olde Baseline Farmhouse Late Victorian Gothic house CHR Olde Baseline Farmhouse Late Neoclassical house CHR Olde Baseline Farmhouse Late Neoclassical house CHR Olde Baseline Farmhouse Late Victorian Gothic house CHR Olde Baseline Farmhouse Gothic Revival house CHR Olde Baseline Farmstead Late Victorian Gothic house; CHR Walker West Farmhouse Late Neoclassical house CHR Walker West Farmhouse Gothic Revival house CHR Walker West Farmhouse Neoclassical house CHR Walker West Farmstead Neoclassical farmhouse; barn; CHR 214* 6015 Old Church House Bungalow house CHR Old Church House Late Victorian Gothic house CHR Old Church Church Picturesque Gothic Church CHR Old Church House Late Neoclassical House CHR Old Church House House CHR Old Church Church Picturesque Gothic Church CHR Old Church House Late Neoclassical House CHR Old Church House Late Neoclassical house CHR Old Church House Gothic Revival House CHR Old Church House Late Neoclassical house CHR Old Church Farmstead Farmhouse; barn; driveshed/ carriage house/garage; other outbuilding CHR Old Church Farmstead Neoclassical farmhouse; barn; CHR Old Church House Concrete block house CHR Old Church Farmhouse Late Neoclassical farmhouse CHR Old Church Farmstead Edwardian Classical farmhouse; barn CHR Antrim Court Farmhouse Italianate farmhouse Designated CHR Emma Street Commercia Late Neoclassical commercial l building CHR Emma Street House High Victorian Gothic house Designated CHR Emma Street House Neoclassical log house

22 Regional Municipality of Peel, Ontario Page 18 Table 1: Previously Identified Cultural Heritage Resources (CHR) in the study area Feature Location Estimated Feature Description Recognition Construction Type CHR Emma Street House Late Neoclassical house CHR Emma Street House Edwardian Classical house CHR Cedar Street House High Victorian Gothic House CHR Cedar Street House Late Victorian Gothic House CHR Cedar Street House Colonial Revival House CHR Cedar Street House Late Neoclassical house; CHR Dufferin Street House Late Neoclassical house CHR Dufferin Street House Late Victorian Gothic house CHR Dufferin Street House Edwardian Classical house CHR Parsons Avenue House Bungalow house CHR Parsons Avenue House Ontario Cottage House CHR Parsons Avenue House Edwardian Classical house CHR Parsons Avenue House Ontario Cottage house CHR Parsons Avenue House Late Neoclassical house CHR Parsons Avenue House Edwardian Classical house CHR Parsons Avenue House Gothic Revival house CHR Parsons Avenue House Edwardian Classical house CHR Parsons Avenue House Late Neoclassical house CHR Parsons Avenue House Late Victorian Gothic house CHR Parsons Avenue House Late Neoclassical house CHR Parsons Avenue House Ontario Cottage house CHR Parsons Avenue House Ontario Cottage house CHR Greer Street Hall Neoclassical hall CHR John Street South House Neoclassical house CHR King Street West House High Victorian Gothic house CHR King Street West House Edwardian Classical house CHR King Street West House High Victorian Gothic house CHR King Street West Church Gothic Revival Church CHR King Street West House Edwardian Classical house CHR King Street West House Edwardian Classical house; CHR King Street West House Second Empire House CHR King Street West Undetermined House House CHR King Street West House Ontario Cottage house; other outbuilding CHR King Street West House Late Victorian Gothic House CHR King Street West House High Victorian Gothic house CHR King Street West House House CHR King Street West House Late Victorian Gothic house CHR King Street West House Edwardian Classical house CRH King Street West House Late Victorian Gothic house CHR King Street West House Edwardian Classical house CHR King Street West House Bungalow house CHR King Street West House Edwardian Classical house CHR King Street West House Late Italianate house CHR King Street West House Edwardian Classical house CHR King Street West House Edwardian Classical house CHR King Street West House Edwardian Classical house CHR King Street West House Edwardian Classical house CHR King Street West House Edwardian Classical house CHR King Street West House Bungalow House CHR King Street West House Edwardian Classical house CHR King Street West House Italianate house