# Dedekind s forgotten axiom and why we should teach it (and why we shouldn t teach mathematical induction in our calculus classes)

Save this PDF as:

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Dedekind s forgotten axiom and why we should teach it (and why we shouldn t teach mathematical induction in our calculus classes)"

## Transcription

1 Dedekind s forgotten axiom and why we should teach it (and why we shouldn t teach mathematical induction in our calculus classes) by Jim Propp (UMass Lowell) March 14, / 29

2 Completeness Three common axioms of completeness, and one not-so-common: convergence of all Cauchy sequences nested interval property what people call Dedekind completeness what people should call Dedekind completeness 2 / 29

3 What people usually call Dedekind completeness: Every bounded non-empty set S of real numbers has a least upper bound. It s a good completeness axiom, but it s not in Dedekind! Question: Who deserves the credit for this axiom? 3 / 29

4 What Dedekind did in his 1872 pamphlet Continuity and irrational numbers (section V, subsection IV, in Beman s translation, taken from the Dover paperback Essays on the Theory of Numbers): (a) stated completeness of line (more on this below) (b) defined Dedekind cuts to build a model of R from Q (c) derived completeness of R (more on this below) 4 / 29

5 (a) If all points of the straight line fall into two classes such that every point of the first class lies to the left of every point of the second class, then there exists one and only one point which produces this division of all points into two classes, this severing of the straight line into two portions.... The assumption of this property of the line is nothing else than an axiom by which we attribute to the line its continuity. Note that Dedekind used the word continuity (Stetigkeit) where we nowadays would say completeness. (b) [Details well-known and hence omitted.] 5 / 29

6 (c) The following theorem is true: If the system R of all real numbers breaks up into two classes A 1, A 2 such that every number α 1 of the class A 1 is less than every number α 2 of the class A 2 then there exists one and only one number α by which this separation is produced. (Earlier he explains how, given a number α, one can produce sets A 1, A 2 satisfying this condition, and indeed can do so in two ways for each α, according to whether α belongs to A 1 or A 2.) Note that for Dedekind, set means nonempty set. 6 / 29

7 I ll call (c) the cut property of R: The cut property: If A, B are non-empty subsets of R such that A B = R, A B =, and a < b for all a A and b B, then there exists c in R such that a c for all a A and c b for all b B. More compactly: Every cut of R is associated with an element of R. 7 / 29

8 The cut property is a second-order property, like the least upper bound property (though the collection of sets we re quantifying over is easier to visualize, and in fact turns out to have smaller cardinality). Main theme: We could bypass the introduction of Dedekind cuts and just take the cut property of R as an axiom. 8 / 29

9 The cut property implies the least upper bound property, and vice versa: : Every non-empty set S that s bounded above cuts R into two pieces: the set B of numbers that are upper bounds of S and the set A of numbers that aren t. The cut-point c given by the cut property can be shown to be the least upper bound of S. : Take c to be the least upper bound of A. 9 / 29

10 The cut property is simple and compelling. It is also satisfyingly symmetrical (unlike the least upper bound property, whose twin, the greatest lower bound property, is logically equivalent but semantically different). Why don t we call the cut property an axiom of real analysis? 10 / 29

11 The cut property is easier for students to grasp than the least upper bound property. (It s easier for students to visualize a cut of R than an arbitrary non-empty bounded-above subset of R.) The cut property is teachable Socratically. (Ask your students to come up with a set B R such that every non-element of B is less than every element of B. Then ask them to find another such set. And then another. Then challenge them to find all such sets. When they ve come up with all the sets B = [c, ) and B = (c, ) and can t think of any more, they ll be ready to conjecture the cut property on their own.) Why don t we teach it? 11 / 29

12 Forgotten? The geometrical version was never forgotten by workers in the foundations of geometry: see e.g. Marvin Jay Greenberg s Old and New Results in the Foundations of Elementary Plane Euclidean and Non-Euclidean Geometry, American Mathematical Monthly 117, Number 3, March 2010, pages / 29

13 Logicians didn t forget: Tarski s continuity axiom (If A, B are subsets of R such that a < b for all a A and b B, then there exists c R such that that a c for all a A and c b for all b B) is a variant of Dedekind s (logically equivalent but semantically stronger since its hypotheses are weaker). 13 / 29

14 Historians didn t forget: see Steven Krantz s on-line book sk/books/newhist.pdf, An Episodic History of Mathematics, page / 29

15 Some analysts remember: Dedekind s cut property appears as Theorem 1.32 in Walter Rudin s Principles of Mathematical Analysis. But I ve found only one intro textbook on real analysis that takes this property of R as a starting point: Real and Complex Analysis by C. Apelian and S. Surace. Why doesn t everyone base real analysis on the cut property? I have a couple of ideas about this: 15 / 29

16 How ideas are originally labelled and packaged makes a difference: Dedekind treated the property as a theorem, so it takes intellectual effort for readers of Dedekind to recognized it as a good axiom Dedekind didn t give the property a name Dedekind didn t state the property in a succinct self-contained way (and it s somewhat resistant to being stated in such a fashion) 16 / 29

17 How ideas lend themselves to use makes a difference: There s nothing that the cut axiom can do that the least upper bound axiom can t do better There isn t time in the semester to teach a principle you ll only use once 17 / 29

18 From completeness to induction The usual approach to proving formulas like n k 2 = n(n + 1)(2n + 1)/6 k=1 is via the axiom of induction: If a proposition is true for 1, and if whenever the proposition is true for n it s true for n + 1, then the proposition is true for all positive integers. 18 / 29

19 When we teach our students to prove such formulas in this way, we re missing a huge opportunity to convey a perspective that unifies the discrete and continuous realms. The first hint of this comes from the observation that the axiom of induction for N can be derived as a consequence of the completeness of R by way of the ordered field axioms for R, and the ordered ring axioms for Z, and one extra axiom: the axiom that 1 is the smallest positive integer. 19 / 29

20 This implication may seem less bizarre if one considers some parallels between various statements equivalent to completeness and various statements equivalent to induction. Greatest lower bound property Least element principle Topological connectedness of R Graph-theoretic connectedness of Z Cut axiom for R Cut axiom for Z 20 / 29

21 Greatest lower bound property: A non-empty subset of R that s bounded below has a greatest lower bound. Least element principle: A non-empty subset of Z that s bounded below has a least element. 21 / 29

22 Topological connectedness of R: R cannot be expressed as the disjoint union of two topologically closed non-empty subsets. Graph-theoretic connectedness of Z: Z cannot be expressed as the disjoint union of two graph-theoretically closed non-empty subsets. (A subset S of the vertex set V of a graph is closed iff there exist no edge of the graph joining a vertex of S to a vertex of V \ S.) 22 / 29

23 Cut axiom for R: If A, B are disjoint non-empty subsets of R with every element of A less than every element of B, then A has a greatest element or B has a least element. (This is equivalent to what I called the cut axiom before, as long as you re not an intuitionist.) Cut axiom for Z: If A, B are disjoint non-empty subsets of Z with every element of A less than every element of B, then A has a greatest element and B has a least element. (Equivalently:... then there exist a A, b B with b = a + 1.) Question: Can one derive the cut axiom for R from the cut axiom for Z via non-standard analysis? 23 / 29

24 But the best pair (of a completeness principle for R and an induction principle for N with a strong thematic link between them) best conceptually and best pedagogically is Discrete no-change- implies-constancy principle Continuous no-changeimplies-constancy principle 24 / 29

25 Instead of teaching the axiom of induction, I propose we teach calculus students the following axiom: The discrete no-change-implies-constancy principle: If f : N R has the property that f (n + 1) f (n) = 0 for all n in N, then f is constant on N. This is indeed how computers generate proofs of identities nowadays, thanks to the work of Herb Wilf and Doron Zeilberger. Their method involves a number of tricks, but the basic trick is: to prove that a(n) = b(n) for all n 1, first show that a(n) b(n) is constant (by showing that it doesn t change if you replace n by n + 1), and then evaluate the constant. Easy exercise: Apply this to a(n) = n 2 and b(n) = n(n + 1)(2n + 1)/6. 25 / 29

26 The discrete no-change-implies-constancy principle implies the axiom of induction, and vice versa. : [Omitted.] : Given propositions P(1), P(2),... such that P(1) is true and such that (for all n) P(n) implies P(n + 1), let { 1 if P(1) through P(n) are true, f (n) = 0 otherwise. It is easy to show that f (n) = f (n + 1) for all n, so f is constant. And since f (1) = 1, that constant is 1, so f (n) = 1 for all n, so P(n) is true for all n. 26 / 29

27 The continuous no-change-implies-constancy principle: If f : R R is differentiable and satisfies f (x) = 0 for all x R, then f is constant on R. The continuous no-change-implies-constancy principle implies the axiom of completeness, and vice versa. : Completeness implies the Extreme Value Theorem, which implies the Mean Value Theorem, which implies the continuous no-change-implies-constancy principle. : We prove the contrapositive. Suppose completeness were false. There would exist a cut of R into two non-empty sets A and B, with every element of A less than every element of B, where A has no greatest element and B has no least element. Then the indicator function of A would be a non-constant function whose derivative is everywhere zero. So the continuous no-change-implies-constancy principle would be false. 27 / 29

28 Note that I am not suggesting that we should take the continuous no-change-implies-constancy principle as an axiom. For one thing, we can t even state it until we ve defined the derivative. But most calculus texts already mention the principle. We can emphasize it more. Then, in the second semester, when we need formulas like n k=1 k2 = n(n + 1)(2n + 1)/6, we can bring in the discrete no-change-implies-constancy principle, and it ll make sense because it s analogous to something the students have already seen. 28 / 29

29 Slides for this talk are at An early version of this talk (after I d reinvented Dedekind s cut property but before I learned it was Dedekind s) is at I m thinking of writing this up for publication; comments are welcome! 29 / 29

### MAT2400 Analysis I. A brief introduction to proofs, sets, and functions

MAT2400 Analysis I A brief introduction to proofs, sets, and functions In Analysis I there is a lot of manipulations with sets and functions. It is probably also the first course where you have to take

### 1.3 Induction and Other Proof Techniques

4CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTORY MATERIAL: SETS, FUNCTIONS AND MATHEMATICAL INDU 1.3 Induction and Other Proof Techniques The purpose of this section is to study the proof technique known as mathematical induction.

### Discrete Mathematics, Chapter 5: Induction and Recursion

Discrete Mathematics, Chapter 5: Induction and Recursion Richard Mayr University of Edinburgh, UK Richard Mayr (University of Edinburgh, UK) Discrete Mathematics. Chapter 5 1 / 20 Outline 1 Well-founded

### WRITING PROOFS. Christopher Heil Georgia Institute of Technology

WRITING PROOFS Christopher Heil Georgia Institute of Technology A theorem is just a statement of fact A proof of the theorem is a logical explanation of why the theorem is true Many theorems have this

### MA651 Topology. Lecture 6. Separation Axioms.

MA651 Topology. Lecture 6. Separation Axioms. This text is based on the following books: Fundamental concepts of topology by Peter O Neil Elements of Mathematics: General Topology by Nicolas Bourbaki Counterexamples

### Induction. Margaret M. Fleck. 10 October These notes cover mathematical induction and recursive definition

Induction Margaret M. Fleck 10 October 011 These notes cover mathematical induction and recursive definition 1 Introduction to induction At the start of the term, we saw the following formula for computing

### Basic Concepts of Point Set Topology Notes for OU course Math 4853 Spring 2011

Basic Concepts of Point Set Topology Notes for OU course Math 4853 Spring 2011 A. Miller 1. Introduction. The definitions of metric space and topological space were developed in the early 1900 s, largely

### Chapter 6 Finite sets and infinite sets. Copyright 2013, 2005, 2001 Pearson Education, Inc. Section 3.1, Slide 1

Chapter 6 Finite sets and infinite sets Copyright 013, 005, 001 Pearson Education, Inc. Section 3.1, Slide 1 Section 6. PROPERTIES OF THE NATURE NUMBERS 013 Pearson Education, Inc.1 Slide Recall that denotes

### More Mathematical Induction. October 27, 2016

More Mathematical Induction October 7, 016 In these slides... Review of ordinary induction. Remark about exponential and polynomial growth. Example a second proof that P(A) = A. Strong induction. Least

### Mathematics for Computer Science/Software Engineering. Notes for the course MSM1F3 Dr. R. A. Wilson

Mathematics for Computer Science/Software Engineering Notes for the course MSM1F3 Dr. R. A. Wilson October 1996 Chapter 1 Logic Lecture no. 1. We introduce the concept of a proposition, which is a statement

### 3. Mathematical Induction

3. MATHEMATICAL INDUCTION 83 3. Mathematical Induction 3.1. First Principle of Mathematical Induction. Let P (n) be a predicate with domain of discourse (over) the natural numbers N = {0, 1,,...}. If (1)

### Math 317 HW #7 Solutions

Math 17 HW #7 Solutions 1. Exercise..5. Decide which of the following sets are compact. For those that are not compact, show how Definition..1 breaks down. In other words, give an example of a sequence

### 1 if 1 x 0 1 if 0 x 1

Chapter 3 Continuity In this chapter we begin by defining the fundamental notion of continuity for real valued functions of a single real variable. When trying to decide whether a given function is or

### New Zealand Mathematical Olympiad Committee. Induction

New Zealand Mathematical Olympiad Committee Induction Chris Tuffley 1 Proof by dominoes Mathematical induction is a useful tool for proving statements like P is true for all natural numbers n, for example

### Section 3 Sequences and Limits

Section 3 Sequences and Limits Definition A sequence of real numbers is an infinite ordered list a, a 2, a 3, a 4,... where, for each n N, a n is a real number. We call a n the n-th term of the sequence.

### Assignment 7; Due Friday, November 11

Assignment 7; Due Friday, November 9.8 a The set Q is not connected because we can write it as a union of two nonempty disjoint open sets, for instance U = (, 2) and V = ( 2, ). The connected subsets are

### Climbing an Infinite Ladder

Section 5.1 Climbing an Infinite Ladder Suppose we have an infinite ladder and the following capabilities: 1. We can reach the first rung of the ladder. 2. If we can reach a particular rung of the ladder,

### CHAPTER II THE LIMIT OF A SEQUENCE OF NUMBERS DEFINITION OF THE NUMBER e.

CHAPTER II THE LIMIT OF A SEQUENCE OF NUMBERS DEFINITION OF THE NUMBER e. This chapter contains the beginnings of the most important, and probably the most subtle, notion in mathematical analysis, i.e.,

### Problem Set I: Preferences, W.A.R.P., consumer choice

Problem Set I: Preferences, W.A.R.P., consumer choice Paolo Crosetto paolo.crosetto@unimi.it Exercises solved in class on 18th January 2009 Recap:,, Definition 1. The strict preference relation is x y

### Mathematical Induction

Mathematical Induction Victor Adamchik Fall of 2005 Lecture 2 (out of three) Plan 1. Strong Induction 2. Faulty Inductions 3. Induction and the Least Element Principal Strong Induction Fibonacci Numbers

### CARDINALITY, COUNTABLE AND UNCOUNTABLE SETS PART ONE

CARDINALITY, COUNTABLE AND UNCOUNTABLE SETS PART ONE With the notion of bijection at hand, it is easy to formalize the idea that two finite sets have the same number of elements: we just need to verify

### WHAT ARE MATHEMATICAL PROOFS AND WHY THEY ARE IMPORTANT?

WHAT ARE MATHEMATICAL PROOFS AND WHY THEY ARE IMPORTANT? introduction Many students seem to have trouble with the notion of a mathematical proof. People that come to a course like Math 216, who certainly

### Lecture 17 : Equivalence and Order Relations DRAFT

CS/Math 240: Introduction to Discrete Mathematics 3/31/2011 Lecture 17 : Equivalence and Order Relations Instructor: Dieter van Melkebeek Scribe: Dalibor Zelený DRAFT Last lecture we introduced the notion

### Proof: A logical argument establishing the truth of the theorem given the truth of the axioms and any previously proven theorems.

Math 232 - Discrete Math 2.1 Direct Proofs and Counterexamples Notes Axiom: Proposition that is assumed to be true. Proof: A logical argument establishing the truth of the theorem given the truth of the

### An Innocent Investigation

An Innocent Investigation D. Joyce, Clark University January 2006 The beginning. Have you ever wondered why every number is either even or odd? I don t mean to ask if you ever wondered whether every number

### Chapter 2 Limits Functions and Sequences sequence sequence Example

Chapter Limits In the net few chapters we shall investigate several concepts from calculus, all of which are based on the notion of a limit. In the normal sequence of mathematics courses that students

### Analysis MA131. University of Warwick. Term

Analysis MA131 University of Warwick Term 1 01 13 September 8, 01 Contents 1 Inequalities 5 1.1 What are Inequalities?........................ 5 1. Using Graphs............................. 6 1.3 Case

### The Foundations: Logic and Proofs. Chapter 1, Part III: Proofs

The Foundations: Logic and Proofs Chapter 1, Part III: Proofs Rules of Inference Section 1.6 Section Summary Valid Arguments Inference Rules for Propositional Logic Using Rules of Inference to Build Arguments

### Mathematical Induction. Mary Barnes Sue Gordon

Mathematics Learning Centre Mathematical Induction Mary Barnes Sue Gordon c 1987 University of Sydney Contents 1 Mathematical Induction 1 1.1 Why do we need proof by induction?.... 1 1. What is proof by

### CHAPTER 3. Sequences. 1. Basic Properties

CHAPTER 3 Sequences We begin our study of analysis with sequences. There are several reasons for starting here. First, sequences are the simplest way to introduce limits, the central idea of calculus.

### x if x 0, x if x < 0.

Chapter 3 Sequences In this chapter, we discuss sequences. We say what it means for a sequence to converge, and define the limit of a convergent sequence. We begin with some preliminary results about the

### For the purposes of this course, the natural numbers are the positive integers. We denote by N, the set of natural numbers.

Lecture 1: Induction and the Natural numbers Math 1a is a somewhat unusual course. It is a proof-based treatment of Calculus, for all of you who have already demonstrated a strong grounding in Calculus

### God created the integers and the rest is the work of man. (Leopold Kronecker, in an after-dinner speech at a conference, Berlin, 1886)

Chapter 2 Numbers God created the integers and the rest is the work of man. (Leopold Kronecker, in an after-dinner speech at a conference, Berlin, 1886) God created the integers and the rest is the work

### TOPOLOGY: THE JOURNEY INTO SEPARATION AXIOMS

TOPOLOGY: THE JOURNEY INTO SEPARATION AXIOMS VIPUL NAIK Abstract. In this journey, we are going to explore the so called separation axioms in greater detail. We shall try to understand how these axioms

### SOLUTIONS TO EXERCISES FOR. MATHEMATICS 205A Part 3. Spaces with special properties

SOLUTIONS TO EXERCISES FOR MATHEMATICS 205A Part 3 Fall 2008 III. Spaces with special properties III.1 : Compact spaces I Problems from Munkres, 26, pp. 170 172 3. Show that a finite union of compact subspaces

### INTRODUCTION TO PROOFS: HOMEWORK SOLUTIONS

INTRODUCTION TO PROOFS: HOMEWORK SOLUTIONS STEVEN HEILMAN Contents 1. Homework 1 1 2. Homework 2 6 3. Homework 3 10 4. Homework 4 16 5. Homework 5 19 6. Homework 6 21 7. Homework 7 25 8. Homework 8 28

### vertex, 369 disjoint pairwise, 395 disjoint sets, 236 disjunction, 33, 36 distributive laws

Index absolute value, 135 141 additive identity, 254 additive inverse, 254 aleph, 466 algebra of sets, 245, 278 antisymmetric relation, 387 arcsine function, 349 arithmetic sequence, 208 arrow diagram,

### 136 CHAPTER 4. INDUCTION, GRAPHS AND TREES

136 TER 4. INDUCTION, GRHS ND TREES 4.3 Graphs In this chapter we introduce a fundamental structural idea of discrete mathematics, that of a graph. Many situations in the applications of discrete mathematics

### Induction. Mathematical Induction. Induction. Induction. Induction. Induction. 29 Sept 2015

Mathematical If we have a propositional function P(n), and we want to prove that P(n) is true for any natural number n, we do the following: Show that P(0) is true. (basis step) We could also start at

### Notes on Richard Dedekind s Was sind und was sollen die Zahlen?

Notes on Richard Dedekind s Was sind und was sollen die Zahlen? David E. Joyce, Clark University December 2005 Contents Introduction 2 I. Sets and their elements. 2 II. Functions on a set. 5 III. One-to-one

### 1. R In this and the next section we are going to study the properties of sequences of real numbers.

+a 1. R In this and the next section we are going to study the properties of sequences of real numbers. Definition 1.1. (Sequence) A sequence is a function with domain N. Example 1.2. A sequence of real

### Mathematical Induction

Mathematical Induction MAT30 Discrete Mathematics Fall 016 MAT30 (Discrete Math) Mathematical Induction Fall 016 1 / 19 Outline 1 Mathematical Induction Strong Mathematical Induction MAT30 (Discrete Math)

### Introduction to Topology

Introduction to Topology Tomoo Matsumura November 30, 2010 Contents 1 Topological spaces 3 1.1 Basis of a Topology......................................... 3 1.2 Comparing Topologies.......................................

### Mathematical induction & Recursion

CS 441 Discrete Mathematics for CS Lecture 15 Mathematical induction & Recursion Milos Hauskrecht milos@cs.pitt.edu 5329 Sennott Square Proofs Basic proof methods: Direct, Indirect, Contradiction, By Cases,

### Math212a1010 Lebesgue measure.

Math212a1010 Lebesgue measure. October 19, 2010 Today s lecture will be devoted to Lebesgue measure, a creation of Henri Lebesgue, in his thesis, one of the most famous theses in the history of mathematics.

### Undergraduate Notes in Mathematics. Arkansas Tech University Department of Mathematics

Undergraduate Notes in Mathematics Arkansas Tech University Department of Mathematics An Introductory Single Variable Real Analysis: A Learning Approach through Problem Solving Marcel B. Finan c All Rights

### Mathematical Induction

MCS-236: Graph Theory Handout #A5 San Skulrattanakulchai Gustavus Adolphus College Sep 15, 2010 Mathematical Induction The following three principles governing N are equivalent. Ordinary Induction Principle.

### Applications of Methods of Proof

CHAPTER 4 Applications of Methods of Proof 1. Set Operations 1.1. Set Operations. The set-theoretic operations, intersection, union, and complementation, defined in Chapter 1.1 Introduction to Sets are

### Chapter I Logic and Proofs

MATH 1130 1 Discrete Structures Chapter I Logic and Proofs Propositions A proposition is a statement that is either true (T) or false (F), but or both. s Propositions: 1. I am a man.. I am taller than

### PRINCIPLE OF MATHEMATICAL INDUCTION

Chapter 4 PRINCIPLE OF MATHEMATICAL INDUCTION Analysis and natural philosophy owe their most important discoveries to this fruitful means, which is called induction Newton was indebted to it for his theorem

### POWER SETS AND RELATIONS

POWER SETS AND RELATIONS L. MARIZZA A. BAILEY 1. The Power Set Now that we have defined sets as best we can, we can consider a sets of sets. If we were to assume nothing, except the existence of the empty

### Sets, Relations and Functions

Sets, Relations and Functions Eric Pacuit Department of Philosophy University of Maryland, College Park pacuit.org epacuit@umd.edu ugust 26, 2014 These notes provide a very brief background in discrete

### 2.1.1 Examples of Sets and their Elements

Chapter 2 Set Theory 2.1 Sets The most basic object in Mathematics is called a set. As rudimentary as it is, the exact, formal definition of a set is highly complex. For our purposes, we will simply define

### Lecture 3. Mathematical Induction

Lecture 3 Mathematical Induction Induction is a fundamental reasoning process in which general conclusion is based on particular cases It contrasts with deduction, the reasoning process in which conclusion

### 1. Prove that the empty set is a subset of every set.

1. Prove that the empty set is a subset of every set. Basic Topology Written by Men-Gen Tsai email: b89902089@ntu.edu.tw Proof: For any element x of the empty set, x is also an element of every set since

### Lecture 16 : Relations and Functions DRAFT

CS/Math 240: Introduction to Discrete Mathematics 3/29/2011 Lecture 16 : Relations and Functions Instructor: Dieter van Melkebeek Scribe: Dalibor Zelený DRAFT In Lecture 3, we described a correspondence

### Axiom A.1. Lines, planes and space are sets of points. Space contains all points.

73 Appendix A.1 Basic Notions We take the terms point, line, plane, and space as undefined. We also use the concept of a set and a subset, belongs to or is an element of a set. In a formal axiomatic approach

### 5. GRAPHS ON SURFACES

. GRPHS ON SURCS.. Graphs graph, by itself, is a combinatorial object rather than a topological one. But when we relate a graph to a surface through the process of embedding we move into the realm of topology.

### Introduction to mathematical arguments

Introduction to mathematical arguments (background handout for courses requiring proofs) by Michael Hutchings A mathematical proof is an argument which convinces other people that something is true. Math

### Sample Problems in Discrete Mathematics

Sample Problems in Discrete Mathematics This handout lists some sample problems that you should be able to solve as a pre-requisite to Computer Algorithms Try to solve all of them You should also read

### Logic and Incidence Geometry

Logic and Incidence Geometry February 27, 2013 1 Informal Logic Logic Rule 0. No unstated assumption may be used in a proof. 2 Theorems and Proofs If [hypothesis] then [conclusion]. LOGIC RULE 1. The following

### FIRST YEAR CALCULUS. Chapter 7 CONTINUITY. It is a parabola, and we can draw this parabola without lifting our pencil from the paper.

FIRST YEAR CALCULUS WWLCHENW L c WWWL W L Chen, 1982, 2008. 2006. This chapter originates from material used by the author at Imperial College, University of London, between 1981 and 1990. It It is is

### Chapter 3. Cartesian Products and Relations. 3.1 Cartesian Products

Chapter 3 Cartesian Products and Relations The material in this chapter is the first real encounter with abstraction. Relations are very general thing they are a special type of subset. After introducing

### k=1 k2, and therefore f(m + 1) = f(m) + (m + 1) 2 =

Math 104: Introduction to Analysis SOLUTIONS Alexander Givental HOMEWORK 1 1.1. Prove that 1 2 +2 2 + +n 2 = 1 n(n+1)(2n+1) for all n N. 6 Put f(n) = n(n + 1)(2n + 1)/6. Then f(1) = 1, i.e the theorem

### Section 2.6 Cantor s Theorem and the ZFC Axioms

1 Section 2.6 and the ZFC Axioms Purpose of Section: To state and prove Cantor theorem, which guarantees the existence of infinities larger than the cardinality of the continuum. We also state and discuss

### Metric Spaces Joseph Muscat 2003 (Last revised May 2009)

1 Distance J Muscat 1 Metric Spaces Joseph Muscat 2003 (Last revised May 2009) (A revised and expanded version of these notes are now published by Springer.) 1 Distance A metric space can be thought of

### Mathematical Induction. Lecture 10-11

Mathematical Induction Lecture 10-11 Menu Mathematical Induction Strong Induction Recursive Definitions Structural Induction Climbing an Infinite Ladder Suppose we have an infinite ladder: 1. We can reach

### Euclidean Geometry. We start with the idea of an axiomatic system. An axiomatic system has four parts:

Euclidean Geometry Students are often so challenged by the details of Euclidean geometry that they miss the rich structure of the subject. We give an overview of a piece of this structure below. We start

### Mathematical induction. Niloufar Shafiei

Mathematical induction Niloufar Shafiei Mathematical induction Mathematical induction is an extremely important proof technique. Mathematical induction can be used to prove results about complexity of

### Course Notes for Math 320: Fundamentals of Mathematics Chapter 3: Induction.

Course Notes for Math 320: Fundamentals of Mathematics Chapter 3: Induction. February 21, 2006 1 Proof by Induction Definition 1.1. A subset S of the natural numbers is said to be inductive if n S we have

### Math 3000 Running Glossary

Math 3000 Running Glossary Last Updated on: July 15, 2014 The definition of items marked with a must be known precisely. Chapter 1: 1. A set: A collection of objects called elements. 2. The empty set (

### The Union-Find Problem Kruskal s algorithm for finding an MST presented us with a problem in data-structure design. As we looked at each edge,

The Union-Find Problem Kruskal s algorithm for finding an MST presented us with a problem in data-structure design. As we looked at each edge, cheapest first, we had to determine whether its two endpoints

### PROBLEM SET 7: PIGEON HOLE PRINCIPLE

PROBLEM SET 7: PIGEON HOLE PRINCIPLE The pigeonhole principle is the following observation: Theorem. Suppose that > kn marbles are distributed over n jars, then one jar will contain at least k + marbles.

### Introduction Russell s Paradox Basic Set Theory Operations on Sets. 6. Sets. Terence Sim

6. Sets Terence Sim 6.1. Introduction A set is a Many that allows itself to be thought of as a One. Georg Cantor Reading Section 6.1 6.3 of Epp. Section 3.1 3.4 of Campbell. Familiar concepts Sets can

### SEQUENCES, MATHEMATICAL INDUCTION, AND RECURSION

CHAPTER 5 SEQUENCES, MATHEMATICAL INDUCTION, AND RECURSION Alessandro Artale UniBZ - http://www.inf.unibz.it/ artale/ SECTION 5.2 Mathematical Induction I Copyright Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

### MATH 289 PROBLEM SET 1: INDUCTION. 1. The induction Principle The following property of the natural numbers is intuitively clear:

MATH 89 PROBLEM SET : INDUCTION The induction Principle The following property of the natural numbers is intuitively clear: Axiom Every nonempty subset of the set of nonnegative integers Z 0 = {0,,, 3,

### Math 421, Homework #5 Solutions

Math 421, Homework #5 Solutions (1) (8.3.6) Suppose that E R n and C is a subset of E. (a) Prove that if E is closed, then C is relatively closed in E if and only if C is a closed set (as defined in Definition

### Measure Theory. 1 Measurable Spaces

1 Measurable Spaces Measure Theory A measurable space is a set S, together with a nonempty collection, S, of subsets of S, satisfying the following two conditions: 1. For any A, B in the collection S,

### Induction Problems. Tom Davis November 7, 2005

Induction Problems Tom Davis tomrdavis@earthlin.net http://www.geometer.org/mathcircles November 7, 2005 All of the following problems should be proved by mathematical induction. The problems are not necessarily

### CS 173: Discrete Structures, Fall 2010 Homework 6 Solutions

CS 173: Discrete Structures, Fall 010 Homework 6 Solutions This homework was worth a total of 5 points. 1. Recursive definition [13 points] Give a simple closed-form definition for each of the following

### Math 563 Measure Theory Project 1 (Funky Functions Group) Luis Zerón, Sergey Dyachenko

Math 563 Measure Theory Project (Funky Functions Group) Luis Zerón, Sergey Dyachenko 34 Let C and C be any two Cantor sets (constructed in Exercise 3) Show that there exists a function F: [,] [,] with

### CS 441 Discrete Mathematics for CS Lecture 5. Predicate logic. CS 441 Discrete mathematics for CS. Negation of quantifiers

CS 441 Discrete Mathematics for CS Lecture 5 Predicate logic Milos Hauskrecht milos@cs.pitt.edu 5329 Sennott Square Negation of quantifiers English statement: Nothing is perfect. Translation: x Perfect(x)

### 3. INNER PRODUCT SPACES

. INNER PRODUCT SPACES.. Definition So far we have studied abstract vector spaces. These are a generalisation of the geometric spaces R and R. But these have more structure than just that of a vector space.

### MATHEMATICAL INDUCTION. Mathematical Induction. This is a powerful method to prove properties of positive integers.

MATHEMATICAL INDUCTION MIGUEL A LERMA (Last updated: February 8, 003) Mathematical Induction This is a powerful method to prove properties of positive integers Principle of Mathematical Induction Let P

### CHAPTER 7 GENERAL PROOF SYSTEMS

CHAPTER 7 GENERAL PROOF SYSTEMS 1 Introduction Proof systems are built to prove statements. They can be thought as an inference machine with special statements, called provable statements, or sometimes

### Mathematics for Economics (Part I) Note 5: Convex Sets and Concave Functions

Natalia Lazzati Mathematics for Economics (Part I) Note 5: Convex Sets and Concave Functions Note 5 is based on Madden (1986, Ch. 1, 2, 4 and 7) and Simon and Blume (1994, Ch. 13 and 21). Concave functions

### DISCRETE MATHEMATICS W W L CHEN

DISCRETE MATHEMATICS W W L CHEN c W W L Chen, 1982, 2008. This chapter originates from material used by the author at Imperial College, University of London, between 1981 and 1990. It is available free

### Metric Spaces. Chapter 1

Chapter 1 Metric Spaces Many of the arguments you have seen in several variable calculus are almost identical to the corresponding arguments in one variable calculus, especially arguments concerning convergence

### 2 The Euclidean algorithm

2 The Euclidean algorithm Do you understand the number 5? 6? 7? At some point our level of comfort with individual numbers goes down as the numbers get large For some it may be at 43, for others, 4 In

### INTRODUCTORY SET THEORY

M.Sc. program in mathematics INTRODUCTORY SET THEORY Katalin Károlyi Department of Applied Analysis, Eötvös Loránd University H-1088 Budapest, Múzeum krt. 6-8. CONTENTS 1. SETS Set, equal sets, subset,

### Section 4.3 Image and Inverse Image of a Set

Section 43 Image and Inverse Image of a Set Purpose of Section: To introduce the concept of the image and inverse image of a set We show that unions of sets are preserved under a mapping whereas only one-to-one

### The Banach-Tarski Paradox

University of Oslo MAT2 Project The Banach-Tarski Paradox Author: Fredrik Meyer Supervisor: Nadia S. Larsen Abstract In its weak form, the Banach-Tarski paradox states that for any ball in R, it is possible

### CS 2336 Discrete Mathematics

CS 2336 Discrete Mathematics Lecture 5 Proofs: Mathematical Induction 1 Outline What is a Mathematical Induction? Strong Induction Common Mistakes 2 Introduction What is the formula of the sum of the first

### PART I. THE REAL NUMBERS

PART I. THE REAL NUMBERS This material assumes that you are already familiar with the real number system and the representation of the real numbers as points on the real line. I.1. THE NATURAL NUMBERS

### Chapter 1 LOGIC AND PROOF

Chapter 1 LOGIC AND PROOF To be able to understand mathematics and mathematical arguments, it is necessary to have a solid understanding of logic and the way in which known facts can be combined to prove

### Rolle s Theorem. q( x) = 1

Lecture 1 :The Mean Value Theorem We know that constant functions have derivative zero. Is it possible for a more complicated function to have derivative zero? In this section we will answer this question

### Theorem (The division theorem) Suppose that a and b are integers with b > 0. There exist unique integers q and r so that. a = bq + r and 0 r < b.

Theorem (The division theorem) Suppose that a and b are integers with b > 0. There exist unique integers q and r so that a = bq + r and 0 r < b. We re dividing a by b: q is the quotient and r is the remainder,

### Mathematical induction: variants and subtleties

Mathematical induction: variants and subtleties October 29, 2010 Mathematical induction is one of the most useful techniques for solving problems in mathematics. I m assuming you re familiar with the basic