COA Process. Requirements. Federal Aviation Administration. Presented to: By: Henry Rigol Date: June 18, 2015
|
|
|
- Geoffrey Eaton
- 7 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 COA Process Requirements Presented to: By: Henry Rigol Date:
2 Agenda Types of COA s COA Process COA On-line COA Template (FAA Form ) 2
3 Types of COA s 3
4 Certificate of Authorization or Waiver (COA) Public Federal Memorandum of Agreement (DoD, DHS, NOAA, NASA, DOI) Other Federal Non-Federal (State & municipal governments, state colleges and universities) Must be for a governmental purpose Civil Special Airworthiness Certificate (SAC) Experimental Restricted Category Section 333 (Small UAS) 4
5 COA Process 5
6 Certificate of Authorization or Waiver (COA) Types of Operations Public Aircraft Public Operation Civil Operation Civil Aircraft Special Airworthiness Certificate Section 333 Authorization Type Certificate 6
7 Current COA Process Public SAC Civil 333 Type Cert Phase I Phase II ATO Service Area ATO Flight Standards Phase III ATO Service Area Phase IV ATO Phase V ATO Phase I ATO Phase II Service Area Phase III ATO 7
8 Certificate of Authorization or Waiver (COA) Public Operation New Non-DoD 5 Phases 60 Business Days Renewal Non DoD 4 Phases 30 Business Days No changes to original COA Other Public COA s 3 Phases 8
9 Public COA Phase Processing (Business) Days Other State/Federal Federal MOA New Renewal 1- Admin ATC Feasibility N/A 3-Flight Standards Review N/A 4-ATC Coordination 20 N/A 20 5-Signature Good for 2 years 9
10 COA Phases Phase 1 Administrative Review Review for proper attachments and basic compliance (Transponder, night operations, Class of Airspace, etc) When complete, update COA on-line that the Administrative Review is complete. Phase 2 ATC Feasibility Review of operating location, altitudes, routes, etc. When complete, add any provisions requested by the Service Area to the draft COA. Update COA on-line that the Feasibility Review is complete. 10
11 COA Phases Phase 3 Flight Standards Review Phase 4 ATC Review Add mitigations from the Program Letter to the Flight Standards Special Provisions section of the draft COA. Send the draft COA to the appropriate service area with any Special Provisions provided in Phase 2 and Phase 3. This is called the 95%. Include any attachments necessary (ie operating area, Lost Link). The Service Area will return the 95% back with any additional Special Provisions required in red. This is called the 99%. Phase 5 Signature Finalized and sent for signature. 11
12 Streamlined COA s Emergency COA Existing COA Manned flight is not possible due to a hazard, or, the operation cannot be conducted safely with manned flight A situation exists that is defined as a condition of distress or urgency where there is, or has the extreme possibility of loss of life. 12
13 Streamlined COA s Disaster COA Combined Forces Air Component Commander (CFACC) COA Defense Support to Civil Authorities (DSCA) 13
14 Other COA s Class G Notification (DoD, NASA, NOAA, DOI) DoD UAS that weighs 55/20 pounds or less. Operating in Class G airspace below 1200' AGL (not applicable to airspace identified by 14 CFR (b)(2)) (Mode C Veil) over military bases, reservations or land protected by purchase, lease or other restriction. No closer than 5nm miles from any civil use airport or heliport. The UAS remains within clear visual range of the pilot, or a certified observer in ready contact with the pilot, to ensure separation from other aircraft. No COA is issued. An is generated when the proponent commits the application in COA On-line s DoD Notifications section. 14
15 Other COA s Class D All categories of DoD UAS operations conducted wholly within Class D airspace that has an associated DoD-controlled, nonjoint-use airfield Issued to the air traffic control tower rather than an individual proponent Must comply with the DoD/ (FAA) Memorandum of Agreement (MOA), dated September 16, 2013, and the ATC Procedures for DoD Non Joint Use Airfield with Associated Class D Airspace," dated January 23, 2009 Stays within ATO 15
16 Section 333 Civil COA Requires an exemption Blanket COA Under 200 feet Distance from public use airport 5 nautical miles (NM) from an airport having an operational control tower; or 3 NM from an airport having a published instrument flight procedure, but not having an operational control tower; or 2 NM from an airport not having a published instrument flight procedure or an operational control tower; or 2 NM from a heliport Specific COA if not qualified above 16
17 COA Online 17
18 COA Online 18
19 COA Online 19
20 COA Online 20
21 COA Online 21
22 FAA Form (COA Template) 22
23 COA Template 3 Primary Sections Standard Provisions Flight Standards Special Provisions Air Traffic Control Special Provisions 23
24 COA Template Standard Provisions A. General B. Airworthiness C. Operations D. Air Traffic Control (ATC) Communications E. Safety of Flight F. Crewmember Requirements G. Notice to Airman (NOTAM) H. Data Reporting I. Incident/ Accident/ Mishap Reporting 24
25 COA Template Flight Standards Special Provisions A. Contingency Planning B. Night Operations Air Traffic Control Special Provisions A. Coordination Requirements B. Communications Requirements C. Flight Planning Requirements D. Procedural Requirements E. Emergency/ Contingency Procedures F. Operations Area (or as an attachment) 25
26 Questions? 26
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION Air Traffic Organization Policy
NOTICE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION Air Traffic Organization Policy N JO 7110.495 Effective Date: January 15, 2009 Cancellation Date: January 14, 2010 SUBJ: Unmanned
For the purpose of see-and-avoid, visual observers must be utilized at all times
2009-WSA-92 WARNING: This correspondence may contain Sensitive Security Information and attachments that are controlled under 49 CFR 15 and 1520. No part of this correspondence may be disclosed to persons
FACT SHEET UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS (UAS)
FAA News Federal Aviation Administration, Washington, DC 20591 Updated February 2015 Contact: Les Dorr or Alison Duquette Phone: (202) 267-3883 FACT SHEET UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS (UAS) Unmanned aircraft
Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS)
Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) UAS 101 Presented to: Airports Consultant Council Technical Workshop Presented by: Victoria Wei, Deputy Director Airport Planning and Programming Date: July 16, 2015 FAA
FAA s Progress and Challenges in Integrating Unmanned Aircraft Systems into the National Airspace System
Before the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure Subcommittee on Aviation United States House of Representatives For Release on Delivery Expected at 10:00 a.m. EDT Wednesday Dec. 10, 2014 CC-2015-002
See Appendix A for the petition submitted to the FAA describing the proposed operations and the regulations that the petitioner seeks an exemption.
October 30, 2015 Exemption No. 13453 Regulatory Docket No. FAA 2015 2819 Ms. Joanne Williamson Hawaiian Electric Companies 820 Ward Avenue Honolulu, HI 96814 Dear Ms. Williamson: This letter is to inform
October 16, 2015. Exemption No. 11175A Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2014-0846
October 16, 2015 Mr. Todd Binion Innovation Manager State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company 1 State Farm Plaza Bloomington, IL 61710 Dear Mr. Binion: Exemption No. 11175A Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2014-0846
SAFETY ADVISOR UAS IN THE USA MANNED & UNMANNED AIRCRAFT FLYING TOGETHER SAFELY
AIR SAFETY INSTITUTE 421 AVIATION WAY, FREDERICK, MD 21701 800.638.3103 AIRSAFETYINSTITUTE.ORG SAFETY ADVISOR A DIVISION OF THE AOPA FOUNDATION UAS IN THE USA MANNED & UNMANNED AIRCRAFT FLYING TOGETHER
Thank you for the opportunity to appear before you today to discuss the status of the safe
STATEMENT OF MARGARET GILLIGAN, ASSOCIATE ADMINISTRATOR FOR AVIATION SAFETY, FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION (FAA), BEFORE THE SENATE COMMITTEE ON COMMERCE, SCIENCE & TRANSPORTATION, SUBCOMMITTEE ON AVIATION
October 6, 2015. Exemption No. 13100 Regulatory Docket No. FAA 2015 2920
October 6, 2015 Exemption No. 13100 Regulatory Docket No. FAA 2015 2920 Ms. Denise Martin President and Owner Night Hawk Security and Consulting, LLC 3901 Barrett Drive, Suite 100 Raleigh, NC 27622 Dear
See Appendix A for the petition submitted to the FAA describing the proposed operations and the regulations that the petitioner seeks an exemption.
August 25, 2015 Exemption No. 12599 Regulatory Docket No. FAA 2015 0959 Mr. Donald Lee 22705 Northeast Mountain View Court Ridgefield, WA 98642 Dear Mr. Lee: This letter is to inform you that we have granted
CHAPTER 7. AIRSPACE 7.1 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT
CHAPTER 7. AIRSPACE 7.1 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT 7.1.1 Definition of Resource Airspace management is defined as directing, controlling, and handling flight operations in the volume of air that overlies the
Bridging integration THOMPSON WIMMER THE. Unmanned aircraft SyStem test Site/airport GUide STRENGTH INNOVATION
THOMPSON WIMMER THE STRENGTH OF INNOVATION Bridging integration Bridging integration Unmanned aircraft SyStem test Site/airport GUide Distribution Restriction: Proprietary Information Release Statement
February 4, 2016. Exemption No. 14672 Regulatory Docket No. FAA 2015 3613
February 4, 2016 Exemption No. 14672 Regulatory Docket No. FAA 2015 3613 Mr. Phil Case Public Surveyor Gourdie-Fraser, Inc. 123 West Front Street Traverse City, MI 49684 Dear Mr. Case: This letter is to
Southwest Texas Regional Advisory Council Air Medical Provider Advisory Group (AMPAG)
Southwest Texas Regional Advisory Council Air Medical Provider Advisory Group (AMPAG) MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING FOR HELICOPTER AIR AMBULANCE (HAA) AIR-TO-AIR COMMUNICATION AND COORDINATION PLAN JULY
6. Consensus Opinion. Note: 7. Discussion. 8. Applicability and Approval Process Criteria.
NOTICE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION National Policy N 8900.227 Effective Date: 7/30/13 Cancellation Date: 7/30/14 SUBJ: Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) Operational
Airspace. Chapter 14. Introduction
Chapter 14 Airspace Introduction The two categories of airspace are: regulatory and nonregulatory. Within these two categories there are four types: controlled, uncontrolled, special use, and other airspace.
See Appendix A for the petition submitted to the FAA describing the proposed operations and the regulations that the petitioner seeks an exemption.
September 22, 2015 Exemption No. 12959 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2015-2721 Mr. Matt Riggs London Offshore Consultants 16800 Imperial Valley Drive, Suite 280 Houston, TX 77060 Dear Mr. Riggs: This letter
Office of Inspector General Audit Report
Office of Inspector General Audit Report FAA FACES SIGNIFICANT BARRIERS TO SAFELY INTEGRATE UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS INTO THE NATIONAL AIRSPACE SYSTEM Federal Aviation Administration Report Number: AV-2014-061
Exemption No. 11188 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION WASHINGTON, DC 20591
Exemption No. 11188 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION WASHINGTON, DC 20591 In the matter of the petition of STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
Exemption No. 11109 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION WASHINGTON, DC 20591
Exemption No. 11109 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION WASHINGTON, DC 20591 In the matter of the petition of CLAYCO, INC. Regulatory Docket No. FAA 2014
See Appendix A for the petition submitted to the FAA describing the proposed operations and the regulations that the petitioner seeks an exemption.
March 26, 2015 Exemption No. 11238 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2014-0719 Mr. Dallas Cormier San Diego Gas & Electric Company 101 Ash Street San Diego, CA 92101 Dear Mr. Cormier: This letter is to inform
See Appendix A for the petition submitted to the FAA describing the proposed operations and the regulations that the petitioner seeks an exemption.
September 10, 2015 Exemption No. 12810 Regulatory Docket No. FAA 2015 2346 Mr. Jorge Sosa JOSA Industries, LLC 163 Rue du Belier, Apartment 104 Lafayette, LA 70506 Dear Mr. Sosa: This letter is to inform
The 7 th International Scientific Conference DEFENSE RESOURCES MANAGEMENT IN THE 21st CENTURY Braşov, November 15 th 2012
The 7 th International Scientific Conference DEFENSE RESOURCES MANAGEMENT IN THE 21st CENTURY Braşov, November 15 th 2012 COMMUNICATION ISSUES OF UAV 1 INTEGRATION INTO NON 1 st. Lt. Gábor Pongrácz, ATM
See Appendix A for the petition submitted to the FAA describing the proposed operations and the regulations that the petitioner seeks an exemption.
September 1, 2015 Exemption No. 12690 Regulatory Docket No. FAA 2015 1352 Ms. Kristen Brumbaugh Blackhound Creative Werks 328 Bluestem Drive Elgin, SC 29045 Dear Ms. Brumbaugh: This letter is to inform
See Appendix A for the petition submitted to the FAA describing the proposed operations and the regulations that the petitioner seeks an exemption.
June 25, 2015 Exemption No. 11909 Regulatory Docket No. FAA 2015 1253 Mr. Andrew Bernstein GraVoc Associates, Inc. 81 Main Street Peabody, MA 01960 Dear Mr. Bernstein: This letter is to inform you that
See Appendix A for the petition submitted to the FAA describing the proposed operations and the regulations that the petitioner seeks an exemption.
September 14, 2015 Exemption No. 12839 Regulatory Docket No. FAA 2015 2003 Mr. Ryan Wellvang 723 South Wisconsin Avenue Rice Lake, WI 54868 Dear Mr. Wellvang: This letter is to inform you that we have
Safety Considerations When Performing aerial Imaging Site inspections
September 16, 2015 Exemption No. 12864 Regulatory Docket No. FAA 2015 2162 Mr. David B. Churchill Professional Claims Services, Inc. 1235 Holmgrove Drive San Marcos, CA 92078 Dear Mr. Churchill: This letter
See Appendix A for the petition submitted to the FAA describing the proposed operations and the regulations that the petitioner seeks an exemption.
September 2, 2015 Exemption No. 12732 Regulatory Docket No. FAA 2015 1831 Mr. Ed Wilke Lockheed Martin 16020 Empire Grade Road Santa Cruz, CA 95060 Dear Mr. Wilke: This letter is to inform you that we
AIRSPACE EXPLAINED. Separation of Traffic
AIRSPACE EXPLAINED Airspace is an area of aeronautical knowledge that is commonly poorly demonstrated on airman practical tests. Even when airman applicants demonstrate knowledge of the airspace system
See Appendix A for the petition submitted to the FAA describing the proposed operations and the regulations that the petitioner seeks an exemption.
June 8, 2015 Exemption No. 11776 Regulatory Docket No. FAA 2015 0928 Mr. Gregory S. Winton, Esq. Counsel for Cardno Limited The Aviation Law Firm 1997 Annapolis Exchange Parkway Suite 300 Annapolis, MD
See Appendix A for the petition submitted to the FAA describing the proposed operations and the regulations that the petitioner seeks an exemption.
August 27, 2015 Exemption No. 12640 Regulatory Docket No. FAA 2015 2422 Mr. Doug Andriuk Revolution UAS, LLC 14812 North 60th Street Scottsdale, AZ 85254 Dear Mr. Andriuk: This letter is to inform you
Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION 2 2. DEFINITION 4 3. UAS CLASSIFICATION 6 4. REGULATORY PRINCIPLES 16 5. INTERACTION WITH AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL 16
FOREWORD Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION 2 2. DEFINITION 4 3. UAS CLASSIFICATION 6 4. REGULATORY PRINCIPLES 16 5. INTERACTION WITH AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL 16 6. SENSE AND AVOID ( required for applicants
How To Discuss Unmanned Aircraft System (Uas)
Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) for American Association of Port Authorities Administration and Legal Issues Seminar New Orleans, LA April 9, 2015 Briefly about Flight Guardian Our Services: Educating public
See Appendix A for the petition submitted to the FAA describing the proposed operations and the regulations that the petitioner seeks an exemption.
August 11, 2015 Exemption No. 12436 Regulatory Docket No. FAA 2015 1405 Mr. Terry Lankford Skeye I LLC 4537 513th Avenue Ames, IA 50014 Dear Mr. Lankford: This letter is to inform you that we have granted
See Appendix A for the petition submitted to the FAA describing the proposed operations and the regulations that the petitioner seeks an exemption.
September 2, 2015 Exemption No. 12729 Regulatory Docket No. FAA 2015 1052 Mr. Dan Skaggs Principal HSEarchitects 914 North Broadway Avenue, Suite 200 Oklahoma City, OK 73102 Dear Mr. Skaggs: This letter
Oral Preparation Questions
Oral Preparation Questions The oral section of the practical test is the time when you need to demonstrate your understanding of the various tasks listed in the practical test standards and the factors
Re: Petition for Exemption Under Section 333 of the FAA Reform Act and Part 11 of the Federal Aviation Regulations
U.S. Department of Transportation Docket Management System 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE Washington, DC 20590 Filed with www.regulations.gov January 2, 2015 Re: Petition for Exemption Under Section 333 of the
See Appendix A for the petition submitted to the FAA describing the proposed operations and the regulations that the petitioner seeks an exemption.
September 11, 2015 Exemption No. 12824 Regulatory Docket No. FAA 2015 2577 Mr. Marc Ceres 1397 West Phillips Boulevard Pomona, CA 92021 Dear Mr. Ceres: This letter is to inform you that we have granted
See Appendix A for the petition submitted to the FAA describing the proposed operations and the regulations that the petitioner seeks an exemption.
September 2, 2015 Exemption No. 12717 Regulatory Docket No. FAA 2015 2512 Mr. Russell A. Graves P.O. Box 68 Childress, TX 79201 Dear Mr. Graves: This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request
See Appendix A for the petition submitted to the FAA describing the proposed operations and the regulations that the petitioner seeks an exemption.
August 24, 2015 Exemption No. 12564 Regulatory Docket No. FAA 2015 2390 Mr. J. August Shoemaker, Esq. Counsel for Pinpoint Services, Inc. 100 North 12th Street, Suite 605 Lincoln, NE 68508 Dear Mr. Shoemaker:
Use of RPAS/Drones in Norway
Use of RPAS/Drones in Norway Publisert: 23 mai 2016 13:05 CEST Oppdatert: 08 jun 2016 09:56 CEST Send på epost About Drones Drones Use of drones, or RPAS (Remotely piloted aircraft system) is regulated
FAA Familiarization Briefing
FAA Familiarization Briefing Presented by: Kathryn Vernon Presented to: Regional Administrator Northwest Mountain Region Oregon Congressional Staff Presented on: March 13, 2015 FAA Statistics National
See Appendix A for the petition submitted to the FAA describing the proposed operations and the regulations that the petitioner seeks an exemption.
] September 10, 2015 Exemption No. 12819 Regulatory Docket No. FAA 2015 2595 Mr. Jimmy Clark JimmyC LTD 176 Trails End Ranch Cedar Creek, TX 78612 Dear Mr. Clark: This letter is to inform you that we have
UK AIRSPACE Introduction
UK AIRSPACE Introduction The UK has now adopted the ICAO system for naming of airspace types from A to G. However in the UK there is at present no Class C airspace. Classes A to E are called Controlled
The UAS proposed by the petitioner are the DJI Phantom 3 Professional and DJI Inspire 1.
October 1, 2015 Exemption No. 13050 Regulatory Docket No. FAA 2015 2786 Mr. Bruce Rowley CEO/Principal RSA Marketing 400 South Commerce Wichita, KA 67202 Dear Mr. Rowley: This letter is to inform you that
RE: Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, Request for Comments: Operation and Certification of Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems [Docket No.
April 24, 2015 Docket Management Facility (M-30) U. S. Department of Transportation West Building Ground Floor Room W12-140 1200 New Jersey Ave. Washington, DC 20590-0001 RE: Notice of Proposed Rulemaking,
Inoperative Equipment
Inoperative Equipment Reference Sources Advisory Circular AC91-67 Minimum Equipment Requirements for General Aviation Operations under FAR Part 91 ( Definitions section at minimum) Title 14 Code of Federal
Exemption No. 11485 Regulatory Docket No. FAA 2015 0313
May 5, 2015 Exemption No. 11485 Regulatory Docket No. FAA 2015 0313 Mr. Matthew Kenney Technical Program Manager Donan Solutions, LLC 2101 Production Drive Louisville, KY 40299 Dear Mr. Kenney: This letter
See Appendix A for the petition submitted to the FAA describing the proposed operations and the regulations that the petitioner seeks an exemption.
August 27, 2015 Exemption No. 12628 Regulatory Docket No. FAA 2015 1447 Mr. Michael R. Monar Monar Aero 3250 West Crystal Street Unit 3 Chicago, IL 60651 Dear Mr. Monar: This letter is to inform you that
Private Pilot Checkride Checklist
Private Pilot Checkride Checklist From the PPSEL/CPSEL Flight Instructor Notebook Bridgette Doremire Gene Hudson PRIVATE PILOT CHECKRIDE CHECKLIST Private Pilot Checkride Checklist Part 61 Student Pilot
Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) Integration in the National Airspace System (NAS) Project
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) Integration in the National Airspace System (NAS) Project Presented by: Mr. John Walker on behalf of Mr. Chuck Johnson Manager,
See Appendix A for the petition submitted to the FAA describing the proposed operations and the regulations that the petitioner seeks an exemption.
July 17, 2015 Exemption No. 12070 Regulatory Docket No. FAA 2015 1339 Mr. Drew Schulte SDHS, Inc. dba San Diego Home Sales 2683 Via De La Valle, G-227 Del Mar, CA 92014 Dear Mr. Schulte: This letter is
CHAPTER 2 AIR TRAFFIC CONTROLLER (AC) NAVPERS 18068-2F CH-64
CHAPTER 2 AIR TRAFFIC CONTROLLER (AC) NAVPERS 18068-2F CH-64 Updated: October 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS AIR TRAFFIC CONTROLLER (AC) SCOPE OF RATING GENERAL INFORMATION AIR TRAFFIC CONTROLLER CONTROL TOWER
Drones: All Abuzz with Privacy & Security Issues
SESSION ID: LAW-R01 Drones: All Abuzz with Privacy & Security Issues Dr. Christopher T. Pierson, J.D. EVP, General Counsel & Chief Security Officer Viewpost James T. Shreve, J.D. Attorney BuckleySandler
See Appendix A for the petition submitted to the FAA describing the proposed operations and the regulations that the petitioner seeks an exemption.
August 20, 2015 Exemption No. 12534 Regulatory Docket No. FAA 2015 1364 Mr. John W. Gunnett, P.G. Skelly and Loy, Inc. 449 Eisenhower Boulevard Suite 300 Harrisburg, PA 17111-2302 Dear Mr. Gunnett: This
Airworthiness Certification
October 1, 2015 Exemption No. 13054 Regulatory Docket No. FAA 2015 2874 Mr. Edford A. Coffey 1211 Long Branch Road Louisa, KY 41230 Dear Mr. Coffey: This letter is to inform you that we have granted your
See Appendix A for the petition submitted to the FAA describing the proposed operations and the regulations that the petitioner seeks an exemption.
June 16, 2015 Exemption No. 11810 Regulatory Docket No. FAA 2015 1082 Ryan P. Corey Vertical Imagery LLC P.O. Box 1345 2275 Dead Indian Memorial Road Ashland, OR 97520 Dear Mr. Corey: This letter is to
Advisory Circular. U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration
U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Subject: Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems (suas) Advisory Circular Date: 6/21/16 AC No: 107-2 Initiated by: AFS-800 Change: The Federal
TFR AUTHORITY. Ready Reference
TFR AUTHORITY Ready Reference Valid August 20, 2010 This document contains excerpts from the Code of Federal Regulations covering the various Temporary Flight Restrictions (TFR) issued by the Federal Aviation
See Appendix A for the petition submitted to the FAA describing the proposed operations and the regulations that the petitioner seeks an exemption.
June 29, 2015 Exemption No. 11937 Regulatory Docket No. FAA 2015 1363 Mr. John L. Wright The Law Office of John L. Wright, PC Counsel for Xizmo Media Productions, LLC 11705 Airport Way, Suite 307 Broomfield,
See Appendix A for the petition submitted to the FAA describing the proposed operations and the regulations that the petitioner seeks an exemption.
August 20, 2015 Exemption No. 12536 Regulatory Docket No. FAA 2015 1500 Mr. Marcel Piet 16701 SE. McGillivray, Suite 210 Dear Mr. Piet: This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for
2. APPLICABILITY. This AC provides information for any person who engages in public aircraft operations (PAO) as defined by the statute.
U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Advisory Circular Subject: Public Aircraft Operations Date: 2/12/14 Initiated by: AFS-800 AC No: 00-1.1A Change: 1. PURPOSE. This advisory
Ministry of Civil Aviation ECAR Part 103 Egyptian Civil Aviation Authority. Part 103 ULTRALIGHT VEHICLES. Issue 5, Rev. 0 Dated May, 2012 Page 1
Ministry of Civil Aviation ECAR Part 103 Part 103 ULTRALIGHT VEHICLES Issue 5, Rev. 0 Dated May, 2012 Page 1 U U ECAR Part 103 Ministry of Civil Aviation UTABLE OF CONTENTS 0BITEM SUBPART 4B A: 103.1U
For Flight Simulation purposes only on the VATSIM Network.
Compiled by Daniel A. Hawton, ZDC Training Administrator For Flight Simulation purposes only on the VATSIM Network. Introduction The goal of the document is to introduce you, the controller, to the appropriate
CHAPTER 6 AIRSPACE OPERATIONS. 6.1.1. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Coordination.
CHAPTER 6 6.1. Pre-mission Coordination. AIRSPACE OPERATIONS 6.1.1. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Coordination. 6.1.1.1. Responsibilities. The Air Traffic Control System Command Center (ATCSCC)
Operational Risk Analysis of Predator/Reaper Flight Operations in a Corridor between Cannon AFB and Melrose Range (R-5104A)
Operational Risk Analysis of Predator/Reaper Flight Operations in a Corridor between Cannon AFB and Melrose Range (R-5104A) Executive Summary This assessment was prepared to support the 27 th Operations
The UAS proposed by the petitioner are the Aerialtronics Altura Zenith ATX8, DJI Phantom 2, Parrot Bebop.
October 1, 2015 Exemption No. 13057 Regulatory Docket No. FAA 2015 2881 Mr. Jeff Taylor VP of Property InSight Xactware Solutions, Inc. 1100 West Traverse Parkway Lehi, UT 84043 Dear Mr. Taylor: This letter
AIRCRAFT NOISE ABATEMENT OPERATING PROCEDURES AND RESTRICTIONS
AIRCRAFT NOISE ABATEMENT OPERATING PROCEDURES AND RESTRICTIONS This section sets forth the Los Angeles World Airports (LAWA s) informal noise abatement traffic; flight and runway use procedures and includes
The UAS proposed by the petitioner are the DJI Phantom 2 Vision +, DJI Inspire 1, and DJI S1000.
August 27, 2015 Exemption No. 12639 Regulatory Docket No. FAA 2015 2426 Ms. Carmen P. Gackstetter CEO Raven Executive & Security Services, Inc. 7111 Dixie Highway, #149 Clarkston, MI 48346 Dear Ms. Gackstetter:
C.W. Johnson, Ph.D.; Department of Computing Science, University of Glasgow, Scotland.
Insights from the Nogales Predator Crash for the Integration of UAV s into the US National Airspace System under FAA Interim Operational Approval Guidance 08-01 C.W. Johnson, Ph.D.; Department of Computing
Application for Special Flight Operations Certificate Standing Restricted Operator - Complex Application Process File # AA-01012015-01
Application for Special Flight Operations Certificate Standing Restricted Operator - Complex Application Process File # AA-01012015-01 Operator Name Address City, Province Postal Code P 902 555-1212 E
FedEx, Rolls Royce and UPS know And so do Google, Facebook, Amazon and Intel
FedEx, Rolls Royce and UPS know And so do Google, Facebook, Amazon and Intel The next great U.S. industrial cycle AUVSI s 2013 Economic Report: www.auvsi.org/econreport The UAS global market is currently
Lessons Learned: Application of Small UAV for Urban Highway Traffic Monitoring
45th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit 8-11 January 2007, Reno, Nevada AIAA 2007-596 Lessons Learned: Application of Small UAV for Urban Highway Traffic Monitoring Kapseong Ro *, Jun-Seok Oh
Department of Defense Final Report to Congress on Access to National Airspace for Unmanned Aircraft Systems
Department of Defense Final Report to Congress on Access to National Airspace for Unmanned Aircraft Systems Under Secretary of Defense (Acquisition, Technology and Logistics) October 2010 2 Department
AIR TRAFFIC INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
AIR TRAFFIC INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Operational Test Period #2 to Evaluate the Feasibility of Changing Runway Configurations at Two Times during the Day at Boston-Logan Airport FAA Order 7400.2 Appendix
Memorandum Date: February 5, 2014
Federal Aviation Administration Memorandum Date: February 5, 2014 To: From: Subject: Memo No.: See Distribution List David W. Hempe, Manager, Aircraft Engineering Division, AIR-100 James D. Seipel, Manager,
See Appendix A for the petition submitted to the FAA describing the proposed operations and the regulations that the petitioner seeks an exemption.
September 2, 2015 Exemption No. 12710 Regulatory Docket No. FAA 2015 1141 Mr. Jason W. Lines Aerovista, LLC 7440 South Juniper Street Tempe, AZ 85283 Dear Mr. Lines: This letter is to inform you that we
FLIGHT ADVISORY NATIONAL SPECIAL SECURITY EVENT Nuclear Security Summit
FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION FLIGHT ADVISORY NATIONAL SPECIAL SECURITY EVENT Nuclear Security Summit The United States Government will host a Nuclear Security Summit in Washington, DC on April 12 and
National Transportation Safety Board Washington, DC 20594
National Transportation Safety Board Washington, DC 20594 Safety Recommendation The Honorable Michael P. Huerta Administrator Federal Aviation Administration Washington, DC 20590 Date: May 4, 2015 In reply
www.ibac.org IBAC Bulletin B00-2 Pacific Implementation of RVSM and RNP 10/50NM Lateral
www.ibac.org IBAC Bulletin B00-2 Subject: Pacific Implementation of RVSM and RNP 10/50NM Lateral Previous notification had been made regarding implementation of RVSM and RNP in the Pacific Region. This
LONDON SOUTHEND AIRPORT CLASS D CONTROLLED AIRSPACE GUIDE
CLASS D CONTROLLED AIRSPACE GUIDE Introduction From the 2 nd of April 2015 London Southend Airport (LSA) will be implementing Class D (CAS). This airspace is made up of a Control Zone (CTR) and Control
AIRSPACE WAIVERS AND FLIGHT AUTHORIZATIONS FOR CERTAIN AVIATION OPERATIONS (INCLUDING DCA) (Amended)
for the AIRSPACE WAIVERS AND FLIGHT AUTHORIZATIONS FOR CERTAIN AVIATION OPERATIONS (INCLUDING DCA) (Amended) Contact Point Lisa S. Dean Privacy Officer Transportation Security Administration (571) 227-3947
Springdale Fire Department Policy & Procedures Manual Volume 2 Operations Section 203 Fire Operations 203.20 City Airport Emergency Plan
Springdale Fire Department Policy & Procedures Manual Volume 2 Operations Section 203 Fire Operations 203.20 City Airport Emergency Plan In order to better protect the lives and property on and around
RECURRENT FLIGHT SCHOOL SECURITY AWARENESS (FSSA) TRAINING
U.S. Department of Homeland Security Arlington, VA 22202 RECURRENT FLIGHT SCHOOL SECURITY AWARENESS (FSSA) TRAINING Recurrent FSSA Training for Flight School Employees and independent Certified Flight
Security-related procedures and requirements are a fact of life for today's pilots, especially those who operate in the Washington, DC metropolitan
Security-related procedures and requirements are a fact of life for today's pilots, especially those who operate in the Washington, DC metropolitan area Special Flight Rules Area (SFRA) and the DC Flight
Operation and Certification of Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
Billing Code 4910-13-P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Parts 21, 43, 45, 47, 61, 91, 101, 107, and 183 [Docket No.: FAA-2015-0150; Notice No. 15-01] RIN 2120 AJ60 Operation
Background on Airspace
Background on Airspace There are six classifications of airspace in the United States; A, B, C, D, E, and G. Class A is the most restrictive and Class G the least restrictive. They can be categorized as:
FAR/AIM Sport Pilot Study Guide
This FAR/AIM Study Guide is meant to be used with Sport Pilot Checkride by Paul Hamilton (#ASA-F2F-CKRIDE) to help sport pilot license candidates understand regulations affecting pilots flying LSA. Specific
Department of Transportation
Vol. 80 Monday, No. 35 February 23, 2015 Part III Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Parts 21, 43, 45, et al. Operation and Certification of Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems;
Henry H. Perritt, Jr. Attorney at Law 1131 Carol Lane Glencoe, IL 60022 hperritt@gmail.com (312) 504-5001 12 August 2014
Henry H. Perritt, Jr. Attorney at Law 1131 Carol Lane Glencoe, IL 60022 hperritt@gmail.com (312) 504-5001 12 August 2014 Hon. Michael Huerta Administrator Federal Aviation Administration U. S. Department
See Appendix A for the petition submitted to the FAA describing the proposed operations and the regulations that the petitioner seeks an exemption.
September 11, 2015 Exemption No. 12829 Regulatory Docket No. FAA 2015 1974 Mr. Mark C. Pope Site Safety Solutions LLC P.O. Box 1367 Hayesville, NC.28904 Dear Mr. Pope: This letter is to inform you that
Space Applications and Technologies Expo Rome, Italy February 4 6, 2010
Space Applications and Technologies Expo Rome, Italy February 4 6, 2010 Overview of the EUROCONTROL UAS Integration Activity Anders Hallgren EUROCONTROL Manager ATM Procedures 1 European Organisation for
See Appendix A for the petition submitted to the FAA describing the proposed operations and the regulations that the petitioner seeks an exemption.
September 24, 2015 Exemption No. 12969 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2014-1094 Mr. Dan Smith Stark Aerospace, Inc. 319 Charleigh D. Ford, Jr. Drive Columbus, MS 39701 Dear Mr. Smith: This letter is to inform
North Dakota Legislative Council Briefing On UASs January 23, 2014. Dr. Bruce A. Smith Dean
APPENDIX D North Dakota Legislative Council Briefing On UASs January 23, 2014 Dr. Bruce A. Smith Dean UND s Odegard School UAS Evolution 2005: Convinced the BRAC to keep the GFAFB open and Realign to UAS
DEVELOPING THE EMERGENCY PLAN By: Robert Sheffield INTRODUCTION. Overview
DEVELOPING THE EMERGENCY PLAN By: Robert Sheffield INTRODUCTION Overview The Emergency Plan can never be tested until there an emergency occurs. The incident range can extend from a minor or simple impairment
Flight Review. The flight review is required by Federal Aviation Regulations for all pilots who intend to act as pilot in command of an aircraft.
S A F E T Y A D V I S O R Regulations No. 2 Pilot s Guide to the Flight Review This Safety Advisor provides guidance to pilots and flight instructors for the conduct of flight reviews and to convey current
See Appendix A for the petition submitted to the FAA describing the proposed operations and the regulations that the petitioner seeks an exemption.
July 28, 2015 Exemption No. 12179 Regulatory Docket No. FAA 2015 1718 Mr. Jeremy Shick Owner Shick Web Design, LLC 230 East Park Avenue, Suite 31 Lake Wales, FL 33853 Dear Mr. Shick: This letter is to
Bridging Document - 14 CFR Part 91 (up to Amd. 91-336) to the GACAR
Bridging Document - 14 CR Part 91 (up to Amd. 91-336) to the ACAR 14 CR Part 91 A eneral 91.1 Applicability. 91.1 A eneral 91.3 Responsibility and authority of the pilot in command. 91.3 A eneral 91.5
WHICH AIR TRAFFIC CONTROLLER TO CONTACT
WHICH AIR TRAFFIC CONTROLLER TO CONTACT 1. Introduction This article is written in order to explain to all beginners in the IVAO network the basics for any pilot to contact the correct air traffic controller.