1 DAMOCLES DEBRISFALL ASSESSMENT IN MOUNTAIN CATCHMENTS FOR LOCAL END-USERS Contract No EVG1 - CT COMPARING DEBRIS FLOW RELATIONSHIPS IN THE ALPS AND IN THE PYRENEES José M. García-Ruiz, Santiago Beguería, Adrián Lorente & Carlos Martí Instituto Pirenaico de Ecología, CSIC, Campus de Aula Dei, Apartado 202, Zaragoza, Spain.
2 Within the DAMOCLES Project, two reports have been produced on debris flow relationships. One has been made by Crosta et al. (2001) using information from the Italian Alps. The other is the result of field and statistical work using information from the Central Spanish Pyrenees (Lorente et al., 2001). Neverthelss, their contents are extremely different due to differences in the study area, types of debris flows and statistical approaches. In spite of that, this report will try to compare the main characteristics and relationships in two mountain environments, very much affected by the occurrence of debris flows. Both in the Italian and Spanish mountains, debris flows are one of the most powerful mechanisms for transporting material downslope, as it has been reported by, for instance, Deganutti et al. (2000), Calcaterra et al. (2000), Baroni et al. (2000) and Guzzetti et al. (1999) in the Italian Alps, and by García-Ruiz & Puigdefábregas (1982), García-Ruiz et al. (1988) and Martínez-Castroviejo & García-Ruiz (1990). This is especially true in the Alps and in the Pyrenees, due above all to the steep slopes, the high production of debris accumulated in the hillslopes as colluvium or in the channels, the characteristics of some lithological outcrops and, finally, to the relatively frequent occurrence of high intensity rainstorms. Debris flows are a well known geomorphic process all over the World, as can be seen in the map presented by Innes (1983). In fact, many authors consider that debris flows are the most active geomorphic hazard in mountain areas, affecting human settlements, infrastructures and touristic resorts (Takahashi et al., 1981). Many papers even report the loss of lives, both in developed and in developing countries. This is the reason why many studies have been devoted to identify the factors that trigger debris flows and to understand the relationships between these factors. There is a general agreement in the definition of two essential parameters in order to establish debris flow hazards: first of all, the volume of material carried out by debris flows, and, secondly, the distance travelled by debris flows (especially the runout distance). As it was pointed out in other report within the DAMOCLES Project (Lorente et al., 2001), this information is especially relevant for debris flow modelling and to predict which areas will most probably be affected in the future. Blijenberg (1998) also stresses the crucial importance of displacement, runout and volume. The comparison of the Italian and Spanish reports on debris flow relationships reveals the existence of few points in common. It is important to take into account
3 that the studied Alpine and Pyrenean debris flows are quite different. The differences can be summarized in i) The characteristics of the materials involved, ii) The topographic, climatic and land use characteristics of the study areas, iii) The types of debris flows studied, iv) The type of analysis of the information recorded The materials involved are quite different in the Alps and in the Pyrenees. The study area in the Alps corresponds to the eastern side of the Lario Lake (Lombardy Region, Northern Italy), composed above all by massive limestones, covered and mantled in the gentler sloping areas with thick glacial deposits. Occasionally, there are outcrops of conglomerates and quartzites. In the case of the Central Pyrenees the study area corresponds especially to the Flysch Sector, with thin layers of alternating sandstones and marls. Debris flows are also possible in other lithologies (calcareous screes), but their density is much higher in the Flysch, where most of analysis have been made. The main difference with the Alps consists in the presence of a higher proportion of fine material within the debris in the Flysch Sector. The rest of environmental characteristics are also different. For instance, (i) slopes are steeper in the Alpine study area than in the Pyrenean Flysch; (ii) the range of altitudes is much higher in the Alps, where the study area ranges between 200 and 1830 m; (iii) mean annual precipitation is much higher in the lower part of the Alpine study area (1450 vs 800 mm), while is higher in the upper part of the Pyrenean study area (2000 vs 1650 mm). (iv) Land uses are also quite different: The Lario Lake area in the Alps is mainly covered by dense forests, with discontinuous meadows and terraced fields. In the Flysch Sector the sunny aspect is occupied by old abandoned fields subject to a process of plant recolonisation with dense shrubs, and the shady aspect is occupied by forests. Most of debris flows occur in the sunny aspect. The debris flows studied in both areas represent two patterns of massive displacement of debris. Those studied in the Alps correspond to valley-confined debris flows, that originate in scars at the head of a torrent and circulate along the torrent channel as different surges. They very much depend on the availability of debris in the channel, so they are not easily related to the rainfall features (Zimmermann et al., 1997). Thus, in the Alps they occur mainly in summer (between June and September; in autumn they do not occur surely because of the unavailability of sediment after the summer debris flows (Deganutti et al., 2000; see also Zimmermann et a., 1997). In general, they arrive to an alluvial fan or a debris fan,
4 where they develop the runout distance. According to Hungr et al. (1984) one of the problems detected in debris flow relationships is that many predictions of the debris flow magnitude (or volume) are based on the runoff volume or peak discharge. However, it would be more logical to base the prediction on the availability of debris. In the Pyrenees, the Flysch Sector is affected by both valley-confined and unconfined debris flows. The study has been focused on unconfined debris flows, though examples of valley confined debris flows were studied previously to the approval of the DAMOCLES Project (Martínez-Castroviejo & García-Ruiz, 1990), due to their large influence on the dynamics of braided rivers. Unconfined debris flows start as shallow landslides and occur in previously non incised hillslopes, triggered in slopes with abundant non-consolidated sediments, steep gradients and scarce plant cover (Brunsden, 1979). Scars develop at the rupture area, producing a shallow landslide that immediately evolves into a debris flow (Bathurst et al., 1997). Lateral levees (accompanying or not an incised channel developed during the scouring of the debris) occur in the middle and lower part, that ends in a frontal lobe with imbricated, non-sorted clasts (Varnes, 1978; Johnson & Rodine, 1984). Obviously, volume, velocity and behaviour of the debris mass are so different that one could expect that the main relationships obtained in valley-confined and unconfined debris flows would be almost impossible to compare. Furthermore, there is another problem: the parameters that can be measured in both types of debris flows are very different and so the available information (in the form of tables) can not produce, sauf exceptions, comparable equations. For example, in valley-confined debris flows the source of sediment (i.e., the scar) is more disperse than in unconfined debris flows, since in the former ones sediment can arrive to the channel from small instable areas in the talus itself or from a series of scars located at different altitudes in a torrential basin. On the contrary, in the case of unconfined debris flows the source area of sediment is clearly localised, in general, in a unique scar. Nevertheless, there are some points of accordance: - The volume of the debris flow is a relatively important characteristic in determining the length and runout of the debris flow, especially in the Alps. - The size (or volume) of any future debris flow is extremely difficult to assess, and then a very high uncertainty is always present in any predictive study. In fact, Rickenmann (1999) points out that debris flows are a too much complex
5 geomorphologic (and hydrological) process, and for this reason numerical simulation is still very difficult to use for practical applications. - Different environmental features are favouring both in the Alps and in the Pyrenees, as everywhere in the World. This is the case for the gradient and the volume and intensity of rainfall. On the opposite, there are no coincidence in the role of the forest cover. For example, in the Pyrenees almost no debris flows occur under forest cover (and many in shrub and old, already abandoned farmed areas, wheras in the Alps they occur frequently in forest areas. - Both reports agree in the importance of modelization to predict the spatial hazard of debris flows. One simple possibility to model parameterisation is to establish relationships between the most important and significant debris flow parameters, in order to determine the beginning of sedimentation, the runout distance and the volume.
6 1000 Total d.f. length (m) M*H (t m) Observed d.f. Adjusted power function: L = 7.13 (M H) L = 30 (M H) 1/4 (Rickenmann, 1999) Figure 1. Plot of the total length of debris flow vs. the available potential energy (represented by the M H factor). The adjusted power function is also represented, along with the Rickenmann (1999) relationship. In general, there are many difficulties to compare valley-confined and unconfined debris flows. Fig. 1, for example, plots the total length of debris flows vs. potential energy (M H factor) including the results from the Spanish Pyrenees and the Rickenmann's (1999) relationship. The differences are obvious because the adjusted power function from Rickenmann is clearly over that from the Pyrenean debris flows. That means that, according to the Rickenmann's equation, with the same volume of debris the valley-confined debris flows undergo a larger displacement than unconfined, Pyrenean debris flows. This is probably a logical or expectable result, since the displacement of a debris flow (and its runout) is highly sensible to the water content (Chau et al., 2000), and it is obvious that, in general, the valley-confined debris flows are likely to have higher water discharges than the hillslope debris flows.
7 The Rickenmann's relationship between the debris flow length and the available potential energy is L = 30 (M H) 1/4 where L is the total length of the debris flow (m), M is the debris flow mass and H is the difference in height between the highest point of the debris flow (the scar) and the lowest end at the debris fan (m). For the Pyrenean debris flows this relationship is expressed by L = 7.13 (M H) Nevertheless, when the debris flow deposit length (runout distance) is plotted vs the total volume, no especial differences can be found between the Alpine (Crosta, 2001) and the Pyrenean debris flows (Lorente et al., 2001). Fig. 2 shows that the Rickenmann's (1999) adjusted theoretical function is again over the empirical functions, and that the Alpine and Pyrenean debris flows are relatively close one to the other. The Rickenmann's function is expressed as L f = 15 V 1/3 where L f is the runout distance (m) and V is the debris flow volume (m 3 ). Nevertheless, Rickenmann (1999) do not recommend the use of this equation for practical applications, given the great differences between the predicted and observed values.
8 100 Length of deposit (m) Volume (m 3 ) Observed d.f. Adjusted power function: Lf = 4.98 V Lf = 15 V 1/3 (Rickenmann, 1999) Lf = 7 V (Crosta et al, 2001) Figure 2. Plot of the debris flow deposit length vs. the total volume, along with the adjusted power function and the relationships by Rickenmann (1999) and Crosta et al. (2002). In the case of the Alps (Crosta et al., 2001) all the measured debris flows plot below the relationship proposed by Rickenmann and are fitted by the equation: L f = 7 V And for the Pyrenean debris flows the adjusted power curve has the form: L f = 4.98 V This expression is relatively similar to that of Crosta et al. (2001), also shown in Fig. 2. It is interesting, however, to note that the Pyrenean debris flows produce an adjusted power function located slightly below than that from the Alpine debris flows, confirming that confined debris flows are able to travel further than unconfined debris flows.
9 Other parameters are very difficult to compare, given the characteristics of each type of debris flows. This is the case for the relationships trying to explain the gradient at which deposition starts (around 17º in the debris flows developed in the Pyrenean Flysch Sector; 10º according to Hungr et al., 1984), or those that try to predict the runout distance. Probably, most of the debris flow parameters are more likely to be measured in unconfined debris flows. On the other hand, in valleyconfined debris flows most of the relationships have been established between characteristics of the whole catchment (i.e., area, plant cover, lithology) and debris flow parameters, what increases uncertainty, due to the heterogeneity of many mountain catchments, even if they are of small size. According to Rickenmann (1999), The evaluation of, for instance, the debris flow volume using the morphometric features of a catchment as predicting factors is very limited since the equations tend to overestimate the debris flow volume, even by a factor of 100. References Baroni, C., Bruschi, G. & Ribolini, A. (2000): Human-induced hazardous debris flows in Carrara marble basins (Tuscany, Italy). Earth Surface Processes & Landforms, 25: Bathurst, J.C., Burton, A, & Ward, T.J. (1997): Debris flow run-out and landslide sediment delivery model tests. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 123: Blijenberg, H. (1998): Rolling stones? Triggering and frequency of hillslope debris flows in the Bachelard Valley, Southern French Alps. Universiteit Utrecht, 223 pp., Utrecht. Brunsden, D. (1979): Mass movements. In Process in Geomorphology (C. Embleton & J. Thornes, eds.). E. Arnold, pp , London. Calcaterra, D., Parise, M., Palma, B. & Pelella, L. (2000): Multiple debris flows in volcaniclastic materials mantling carbonate slopes. In Debris flow hazards mitigation: Mechanics, prediction and assessment (G.F. Wieczorek and N.D. Naeser, eds.), Balkema, pp , Rotterdam. Chau, K.T., Chan, L.C.P., Luk, S.T. & Wai, W.H. (2000): Shape of deposition fan and runout distance of debris flow: Effects of granular and water contents. In Debris-flow hazard mitigation: Mechanics, prediction and assessment (G.F. Wieczorek & N.D. Naeser, eds.), Balkema, pp , Rotterdam. Deganutti, A.M., Marchi, L. & Arattano, M. (2000): Rainfall and debris flow occurrence in the Moscardo basin (Italian Alps). In Debris-flow hazard mitigation: Mechanics, prediction and assessment (G.F. Wieczorek & N.D. Naeser, eds.), Balkema, pp , Rotterdam.
10 García-Ruiz, J.M. & Puigdefábregas, J. (1982): Formas de erosión en el flysch eoceno surpirenaico. Cuadernos de Investigación Geográfica, 8: García-Ruiz, J.M., Arnáez, J., Ortigosa, L. & Gómez Villar, A. (1988). Debris flows subsequent to a forest fire in the Najerilla River Valley (Iberian System, Spain). Pirineos, 131:3-24. Guzzetti, F., Carrara, A., Cardinali, M. & Reichenbach, P. (1999): Landslide hazard evaluation: A review of current techniques and their application in a multi-scale study, Central Italy. Geomorphology, 31: Hungr, O., Morgan, G.C. & Kellerhalls, R. (1984): Quantitative analysis of debris torrent hazards for design of remedial measures. Can. Geotech. J., 21: Innes, J.L. (1983): Febris flows. Progress in Physical Geography, 7 (4): Johnson, A.M. & Rodine, J.R. (1984): Debris flow. In Slope instability (D. Brunsden & D.B. Prior, eds.). Wiley, pp , Chichester. Lorente, A., Beguería, S & García-Ruiz, J.M. (2001): Debris flow characteristics and relationshisps in the Central Spanish Pyrenees. Report for DAMOCLES Project, 14 pp., Zaragoza. Martínez-Castroviejo, R. & García-Ruiz, J.M. (1990): Coladas de piedras (debris flows) y dinámica fluvial en ríos torrenciales del pirineo Central: El caso del río Ijuez. Cuadernos de Investigación Geográfica, 16: Rickenmann, D. (1999): Empirical relationships for debris flows. Natural Hazards, 19: Takahashi, T. (1981): Estimation of potential debris flows and their hazardous zones; soft counrtermeasures for a disaster. J. Nat. Disaster Sci., 3 (1): Varnes, D.J. (1978): Slope movements, type and processes. In Landslide analysis and control (R.L. Schuster & R.J. Krizec, eds.), Transportation Research Board, National Academy of Sciences, Special Report 176, pp , Washington D.C. Zimmermann, N., Mani, P. & Romang, H. (1997): Magnitude-frequency aspects of Alpine debris flows. Eclogae Geologicae Helvetiae, 90 (3):
Chapter 2 Flash Flood Science A flash flood is generally defined as a rapid onset flood of short duration with a relatively high peak discharge (World Meteorological Organization). The American Meteorological
Sediment Supply and the Upland-Stream Connection Brian Bledsoe Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Colorado State University Overview The sediment system (with an eye towards hillslope processes
Catchment Scale Processes and River Restoration Dr Jenny Mant Jenny@therrc.co.uk The River Restoration Centre therrc.co.uk 3 Main Catchment Elements Hydrology Energy associated with the flow of water affects
Disaster Mitigation of Debris Flows, Slope Failures and Landslides 639 Anthropogenic Caused Mass Movements and their Impact on Railway Lines in Austria Christian Rachoy 1) and Manfred Scheikl 2) 1) Dept.
WILLOCHRA BASIN GROUNDWATER STATUS REPORT 2009-10 SUMMARY 2009-10 The Willochra Basin is situated in the southern Flinders Ranges in the Mid-North of South Australia, approximately 50 km east of Port Augusta
4 DELINEATION OF SPATIAL UNITS. 4.1 Regional Context: At this scale, no delineation is strictly necessary, since most catchments will fall within a single biogeographic region (various regionalisations
Applying MIKE SHE to define the influence of rewetting on floods in Flanders MARK HENRY RUBARENZYA 1, PATRICK WILLEMS 2, JEAN BERLAMONT 3, & JAN FEYEN 4 1,2,3 Hydraulics Laboratory, Department of Civil
Course Plan Day 1: Introduction and Overview Hydrology & Fluvial Geomorphology Alan Jones E:mail: Alan.Jones@ed.ac.uk Water cycle Globally & Locally River shapes and forms River behaviour Closer look at
Deserts, Wind Erosion and Deposition By definition, a desert has less than 10 in (25 cm) of precipitation per year. Deserts occur at 30 o and 60 o in regions of descending air. Deserts can be hot or cold.
1 2 A very short description of the functional center network: regarding the Hydraulic and Hydrogeological risk, the national alert system is ensured by the National Civil Protection Department (DPCN),
NAME DATE WEATHERING, EROSION, AND DEPOSITION PRACTICE TEST 1. The diagram below shows a meandering stream. Measurements of stream velocity were taken along straight line AB. Which graph best shows the
Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences (24) 4: 13 116 SRef-ID: 1684-9981/nhess/24-4-13 European Geosciences Union 24 Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences Hazard assessment of debris flows for Leung
Erosion, Debris Flows and Environment in Mountain Regions (Proceedings of Ihc Chengdu Symposium, July 1992). IAHS Publ. no. 209, 1992. j4 / Major landslides and associated rehabilitation measures in urban
Evaluation of Open Channel Flow Equations Introduction : Most common hydraulic equations for open channels relate the section averaged mean velocity (V) to hydraulic radius (R) and hydraulic gradient (S).
Floodplain Connectivity in Restoration Design 2015 Symposium on Restoration in a Contaminated Environment: Lessons Learned and Challenges in Moving Forward Part II April 2015 Karin Boyd Applied Geomorphology,
26th Session of the EFC Working Party on the Impact of Climate Change on Natural Hazards in Austria NATIONAL REPORT AUSTRIA Seite 1 16.04.2009 Global increase of temperatures: between 1.8 C and 4.0 C (IPCC
Sediment Dynamics and Channel Adjustments Following Torrential Floods in an Upper Alpine Valley (Guil River, Southern French Alps) 65 Fort Monique, Arnaud-Fassetta Gilles, Bétard François, Cossart Etienne,
Keynote 2: What is Landslide Hazard? Inventory Maps, Uncertainty, and an Approach to Meeting Insurance Industry Needs Jeffrey R Keaton Richard J Roth, Jr Amec Foster Wheeler Los Angeles, USA Consulting
Impacts of Climate Change on Urban Infrastructure & the Built Environment A Toolbox Tool 2.3.1: General information on the causes of rainfall-induced landslides Author G. Dellow Affiliation GNS Science,
IIASA-DPRI 2008 Operational methodology to assess flood damages in Europe Contributors: Nicola Lugeri, Carlo Lavalle, Elisabetta Genovese 1 Focus of ADAM work on extremes Types Floods, Heat-wave, Drought
5. IDENTIFICATION OF AREAS OF POTENTIAL SOIL INSTABILITY AND/OR FAULT RUPTURE THROUGH AERIAL PHOTOS AND GEOMORPHOLOGICAL STUDIES 5.1 INTRODUCTION The geomorphologic investigation yields information about
Figure 1.1 The Sandveld area and the Verlorenvlei Catchment - 2 - Figure 1.2 Homogenous farming areas in the Verlorenvlei catchment - 3 - - 18 - CHAPTER 3: METHODS 3.1. STUDY AREA The study area, namely
The 8th International Conference on Geo-information for Disaster Management Intelligent Systems for Crisis Management METHODOLOGY FOR LANDSLIDE SUSCEPTIBILITY AND HAZARD MAPPING USING GIS AND SDI T. Fernández
Geological Maps 1: Horizontal and Inclined Strata A well-rounded geologist must be familiar with the processes that shape the Earth as well as the rocks and minerals that comprise it. These processes cover
Kamla-Raj 2008 J. Hum. Ecol., 23(4): 325-329 (2008) Drainage Problems in a Tropical Environment: Perspectives on Urban Quality Management H. I. Jimoh Department of Geography, University of Ilorin, Ilorin,
ADVANCES IN RIVER SCIENCE CONFERENCE Swansea, 18-21 April 2011 A new methodological framework for stream hydromorphological assessment, analysis and monitoring (IDRAIM) Massimo Rinaldi 1, Nicola Surian
ROSE CREEK WATERSHED HYDROLOGIC, HYDRAULIC, SEDIMENT TRANSPORT, AND GEOMORPHIC ANALYSES TASK 1 EXISTING DATA AND INFORMATION SUMMARY REPORT BACKGROUND The Rose Creek Watershed (RCW) consists of three planning
Geographical Studies 宇 宙 から 見 た 中 央 アジア,パミールのフェドチェンコ 氷 河 の 特 徴 * 岩 田 修 二 キーワード 要 旨 Shan, where precipitation is greatest in summer. 3 General conﬁguration of Fedchenko Glacier (1) Plan form of the glacial
7. Runoff Processes 7-1 Rain and snowmelt water take various paths to streams. Each path contributes differently to; - peak and timing of storm runoff - erosion - transport of chemicals into streams Planners
Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences (23) 3: 31 42 c European Geosciences Union 23 Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences Soil slips and debris flows on terraced slopes G. B. Crosta, P. Dal Negro,
Bulletin of Environment, Pharmacology and Life Sciences Bull. Env. Pharmacol. Life Sci., Vol 4  December 2014: 67-72 2014 Academy for Environment and Life Sciences, India Online ISSN 2277-1808 Journal
THE INFLUENCE OF FORM ROUGHNESS ON MODELLING OF SEDIMENT TRANSPORT AT STEEP SLOPES Michael CHIARI 1, Dieter RICKENMANN 1, 2 1 Institute of Mountain Risk Engineering, University of Natural Resources and
REPUBLIC OF SIERRA LEONE MINISTRY OF ENERGY AND WATER RESOURCES FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR MANUAL DRILLING MAPPING OF FAVOURABLE ZONES Page 2 of 22 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 4 General context 5 Geography
RIVER SYSTEMS AND LANDFORMS (2) RIVER EROSION, DEPOSITION AND LANDFORMS 1. Introduction 2. River energy 3. River erosion and deposition 4. Landforms: upper, middle and lower reaches RIVER ENERGY 1. Kinetic
VENERO CLARO TEST SITE (SPAIN) Location The Arroyo Cabrera is a torrential stream, tributary of the Alberche River in the Tagus Basin (Central Iberian Peninsula). It is formed from the confluence of several
WEPP MODEL APPLICATIONS FOR EVALUATIONS OF BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES D.C. FLANAGAN 1, W.J. ELLIOT 2, J.R. FRANKENBERGER 3, C. HUANG 4 1 USDA-Agricultural Research Service, National Soil Erosion Research
Sedimentary Rocks, Processes, and Environments Sediments are loose grains and chemical residues of earth materials, which include things such as rock fragments, mineral grains, part of plants or animals,
SESSION 5: RIVER SYSTEMS KEY CONCEPTS: In this session we will focus on the following aspects: - Where the water in rivers come from. - Factors influencing run-off, infiltration (and rate of erosion) -
Five Themes of Geography Geographic Concepts and Themes The five themes were written in 1984 by the Joint Committee on Geographic Education of the National Council for Geographic Education (NCGE) and the
Drought in the Czech Republic in 2015 A preliminary summary October 2015, Prague DISCLAIMER All data used in this preliminary report are operational and might be a subject of change during quality control.
FLOODPLAIN DELINEATION IN MUGLA-DALAMAN PLAIN USING GIS BASED RIVER ANALYSIS SYSTEM Dr. Murat Ali HATİPOĞLU Fatih KESKİN Kemal SEYREK State Hydraulics Works (DSI), Investigation and Planning Department
overflow can lead into a permeable conveyance system to increase further the benefit and reduce the need for pipe systems. Pollutant removal rates have been shown to be high, with some pollutants being
Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences (24) 4: 117 131 SRef-ID: 1684-9981/nhess/24-4-117 European Geosciences Union 24 Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences Quantitative risk analysis for landslides
Neversink River East Branch Management Unit 10 Summary of Post-Flood Recommendations Intervention Level Full restoration of the stream reach including the eroding bank site between Station 38380 and Station
616 Sediment Dynamics in Changing Environments (Proceedings of a symposium held in Christchurch, New Zealand, December 2008). IAHS Publ. 325, 2008. Modelling hillslope soil erosion at ANZAC Cove, Turkey
Introduction Running water is by far the most important erosional agent on Earth. Even in arid climates, it is the primary agent of erosion. This is evident from the abundance of stream beds found throughout
Seattle: Using vegetation to limit the hazard of landslides Climate change impacts addressed Spatial scale Response type Themes driving the initiative Factors of success Ground instability Town or city
Module 2 The Science of Surface and Ground Water Lesson 2 Runoff and Infiltration Instructional Objectives At the end of this lesson, the student shall be able to learn: 1. The importance of runoff and
RESTORING ALLUVIAL FAN CONNECTIVITY FOR POST-FIRE FLOOD ALLEVIATION AND SEDIMENT REDUCTION Dave Rosgen, Ph.D., Professional Hydrologist, Wildland Hydrology, Fort Collins, CO, Dave@wildlandhydrology.com;
Belmont Forum Collaborative Research Action on Mountains as Sentinels of Change 1. Background and rationale Mountains exist in many regions of the world and are home to a significant fraction of the world
SKY BASIN (UPPER CA 1 WATERSHED) EROSION ASSESSMENT Prepared by Kevin Drake, CPESC Integrated Environmental Restoration Services, Inc. August 2014 COMMON GROUND UNCOMMON SOLUTIONS P.O. BOX 7559 2780 LAKE
Arctic Observing Summit 2013 Statement Glacier-fed rivers GLACier-fed rivers, HYDRoECOlogy and climate change; NETwork of monitoring sites (GLAC-HYDRECO-NET). Alexander Milner, School of Geography, Earth
Rainfall Thresholds for Forecasting Landslides in the Seattle, Washington, Area Exceedance and Probability By Alan F. Chleborad, Rex L. Baum, and Jonathan W. Godt U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report
Gr 10 to Gr 12 From Grade 10 to Grade 12 the subject of is offered in The NSC stream at the DSJ. In this regard the school has to follow the requirements and syllabii of the CAPS document for as set out
Ground-Water Flooding in Glacial Terrain of Southern Puget Sound, Washington and drumlins. The last extensive glaciation of the southern Puget Sound was the Vashon Stade of the Fraser Glaciation. The glacier
DRAFT SOUTH FORK SKYKOMISH RIVER 9 levees and revetments / Approximately 1.1 miles of river bank are armored Revetments provide limited, localized erosion protection, but impact habitat Frequent and costly
UNIT #5 EXAM -- SURFACE PROCESSES AND LANDSCAPES NAME: BLOCK DATE 1. Which set of surface soil conditions on a hillside would result in the most infiltration of rainfall? 4. Which surface soil type has
local scale landscape scale forest stand/ site level (management unit) Multi-scale upscaling approaches of soil properties from soil monitoring data sampling plot level Motivation: The Need for Regionalization
Landslide hazard zonation using MR and AHP methods and GIS techniques in Langan watershed, Ardabil, Iran A. Esmali Ouri 1* S. Amirian 2 1 Assistant Professor, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Mohaghegh
Understanding Complex Models using Visualization: San Bernardino Valley Ground-water Basin, Southern California Zhen Li and Wesley R. Danskin U.S. Geological Survey, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org,
SOIL EROSION FROM MODELLING TO MITIGATION: CAN CONSERVATION AGRICULTURE BE A SOLUTION? Giampaolo Sarno - Regione Emilia-Romagna D.G. Agriculture Francesca Staffilani - Regione Emilia-Romagna D.G. Environment
US Army Corps of Engineers Hydrologic Engineering Center Methods for Determination of Safe Yield and Compensation Water from Storage Reservoirs October 1966 Approved for Public Release. Distribution Unlimited.
1 Weerasinghe K. M. 1 Landslide Hazard Zonation Mapping Using GIS Abstract: The central highlands of Sri Lanka comprising 20% of the total land area of the country is often threatened by landslides. The
Experiences with Lake Sedimentation in Assabol Reservoir Three Years after Completion of Dam This document shall help to share our experiences in struggling for an optimised water management and sediment
06 - NATIONAL PLUVIAL FLOOD MAPPING FOR ALL IRELAND THE MODELLING APPROACH Richard Kellagher 1, Mike Panzeri 1, Julien L Homme 1, Yannick Cesses 1, Ben Gouldby 1 John Martin 2, Oliver Nicholson 2, Mark
SPECIAL PROJECT PP5 HAMMER RelationsHips between meteo-climatic parameters and ground surface deformation time series in mountain environments F. Ardizzone, P. Allasia, M. Cignetti, D. Giordan, A. Manconi,
GEOLOGY 306 Laboratory Instructor: TERRY J. BOROUGHS NAME: Examining the Terrestrial Planets (Chapter 20) For this assignment you will require: a calculator, colored pencils, a metric ruler, and your geology
Basic Hydrology Time of Concentration Methodology By: Paul Schiariti, P.E., CPESC Mercer County Soil Conservation District What is the Time of Concentration? The time it takes for runoff to travel from
6. NATURAL AREAS FIRE MANAGEMENT 6-1 Wildfire management is an important component of managing and maintaining County natural areas. The natural areas are woven into the community fabric and are a part
CHAPTER 11 GLOSSARY OF TERMS Active Channel The channel that contains the discharge Leopold where channel maintenance is most effective, sediment are actively transported and deposited, and that are capable
The generation of a tsunami from the impact of a massive comet in the Indian Ocean (U) Bob Weaver Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87 Galen Gisler Physics of Geological Processes, University
New Brunswick s Flood Risk Reduction Strategy i New Brunswick s Flood Risk Reduction Strategy Province of New Brunswick PO 6000, Fredericton NB E3B 5H1 2014 www.gnb.ca ISBN 978-1-4605-0533-5 (print edition)
Plan Plus Volume 1 No 1 2002 (117-123) APPLICATION OF GIS (GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM) FOR LANDSLIDE HAZARD ZONATION AND MAPPING DISASTER PRONE AREA: A STUDY OF KULEKHANI WATERSHED, NEPAL Purna Chandra
The Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan Ministry of Water & Irrigation Extreme Flood Events & their Prevention in Jordan Eng. Abeer Nassar Eng. Mohammed Bany-Mustafa 2nd Regional Workshop on Dams in the Mediterranean:
Class: Date: Glaciers and Mass Movements Study Guide Modified True/False Indicate whether the sentence or statement is true or false. If false, change the identified word or phrase to make the sentence
CHAPTER 2 HYDRAULICS OF SEWERS SANITARY SEWERS The hydraulic design procedure for sewers requires: 1. Determination of Sewer System Type 2. Determination of Design Flow 3. Selection of Pipe Size 4. Determination
Urban run-off volumes dependency on rainfall measurement method - Scaling properties of precipitation within a 2x2 km radar pixel L. Pedersen 1 *, N. E. Jensen 2, M. R. Rasmussen 3 and M. G. Nicolajsen
Chapter Overview CHAPTER 6 Air-Sea Interaction The atmosphere and the ocean are one independent system. Earth has seasons because of the tilt on its axis. There are three major wind belts in each hemisphere.