Offenders on Indeterminate Sentences
|
|
|
- Dayna Woods
- 9 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Offenders on Indeterminate Sentences Introduction Prisoners serving sentences of Life Imprisonment and Preventive Detention form a distinct sub-set of the prisoner population. The following pages provide information about recent trends involving these offenders. As will become apparent, numbers of prisoners serving indeterminate sentences have been growing steadily for several decades. It is hoped that this analysis will improve understanding of this sub-group, and potentially stimulate improvements in the management of such offenders, both while in prison, and after their eventual release. Life sentences and Preventive Detention Life Imprisonment and Preventive Detention are described as indeterminate sentences because, when imposed by a sentencing judge, no fixed expiry date applies. Instead, a minimum non-parole period is specified, constituting the length of time that the offender must remain in prison before parole can be considered. However, as the following analysis will show, prisoners subject to indeterminate sentences can serve many years beyond the non-parole date before eventual release. Once released, indeterminately sentenced offenders are subject to recall to prison at any time, and may as a result of recall spend many more years in custody. Prior to implementation of the Sentencing Act 2002 and the Parole Act 2002, most offenders sentenced to Life Imprisonment were subject to minimum non parole periods of 10 years. Offenders sentenced to Preventive Detention were subject to minimum non parole periods of 7 years. The 2002 legislation specified that the minimum non-parole period for life imprisonment should remain at 10 years, with periods longer than 10 years possible in cases involving aggravating factors. For cases involving one or more serious aggravating factors, a non-parole period of at least 17 years must be imposed, unless the court was satisfied that it would be manifestly unjust to do so. Under section 89 of the Sentencing Act 2002, offenders sentenced to Preventive Detention must serve a minimum period of imprisonment of at least five years, although longer non-parole periods are also frequently imposed. Parameters of this analysis All offenders sentenced to Life Imprisonment and/or Preventive Detention since 1945 have been included in this analysis. However, it is acknowledged that official records of offenders prior to 1980 are not always complete. Where an indeterminately sentenced offender is recorded as having been released prior to 1990, and no further records relating to the person can be found (including parole orders), he or she is recorded here as discharged. Offenders In total, 1,299 1 offenders have been sentenced to an indeterminate sentence since the Department s records began. Figure 1 Indeterminate sentenced offenders by current status 1 To date there are 20 offenders who have been sentenced to both Life Imprisonment and Preventive Detention. In these cases, the offender has been counted only as a Life Imprisonment. On 31 December 2013, 776 of this number were in prison (including 4 waiting for a recall hearing), 28 had been deported, and 99 are deceased. The remaining 265 are being managed in the community on life-long parole. STATUS ALL LIFE PD In Prison, Sentenced In Prison, Recall Outstanding Community, Parole Deceased Discharged Deported Grand Total Figure 2 Indeterminate offenders by current status 2 Offenders who are counted as In Prison, Recall Outstanding have been released on parole, and have been recalled to prison and are awaiting a recall hearing to confirm if the NZPB will approve the recall order. 3 Under the Criminal Justice Act 1985, offenders could be discharged from life parole by the National Parole Board. This was repealed with the introduction of the Parole Act 2002 S29(3). 1 Offenders on Indeterminate sentences
2 Snapshot of indeterminate offenders in prison Although typically fewer than 50 offenders start indeterminate sentences each year, they remain in prison for lengthy periods and are becoming an increasingly significant subset of the prisoner population. Indeterminate offenders now make up 11 percent of the sentenced population. In 1990, 85 percent of indeterminate sentenced offenders in prison were serving Life sentences. Since then, this proportion has reduced significantly, to 66 percent, with a greater proportion now on Preventive Detention. Figure 3 Number of indeterminate sentenced offenders in prison New indeterminate sentence starts Figure 4 Number of new indeterminate sentence starts each calendar year Approximately twice as many offenders are sentenced to Life Imprisonment than receive Preventive Detention. Unusually, in 2004 the number of starts on Preventive Detention was more than the number of Life Imprisonment starts. Since 1985 the number of offenders sentenced to an indeterminate sentence has generally been increasing. Spikes in the number of offenders sentenced to Life Imprisonment appear to have occurred in each of the last three decades. For example, against an average of around 25 Life sentence starts per year, in 2010, 48 offenders were sentenced to Life Imprisonment. Age at sentencing Two thirds of offenders sentenced to Life Imprisonment were between 20 and 39 years old when their sentence started. The remaining third can roughly be halved into two equal age groups, under 20 and 40 and over. Figure 5 Indeterminate sentenced offenders by age at sentencing Figure 5 shows the proportion of indeterminate offenders according to the age at which they were first sentenced to the indeterminate sentence. More younger offenders are sentenced to Life Imprisonment than those sentenced to Preventive Detention. This is due to the nature of the offences associated with each sentence type (see Figure 11). The median age of offenders sentenced to Life Imprisonment is 27 years. This is significantly lower than the median age of offenders sentenced to Preventive Detention, which is 38. Figure 6 Indeterminate sentenced offenders by age group Offenders sentenced to Preventive Detention present a different profile. About half of the offenders sentenced to Preventive Detention were aged 40 years or over when they commenced the sentence. Offenders between 20 and 39 account for over half of all offenders sentenced to Preventive Detention. Only one offender under the age of 20 has been sentenced to Preventive Detention. 2 Offenders on Indeterminate sentences
3 Gender Figure 7 Indeterminate sentenced offenders by gender Of the 1299 offenders sentenced to an indeterminate sentence, 62 (five percent) are female. When split by sentence type a clear difference emerges. Only one female offender has ever been sentenced to Preventive Detention and, unlike the majority of male Preventive Detention offenders, the offences involved were violent rather than sexual in nature. Of all offenders sentenced to Life Imprisonment, seven percent are female. This is still below the proportion of females sentenced to imprisonment on determinate sentences (10 percent). Ethnicity The ethnicity of offenders serving indeterminate sentences is very similar proportionally for both Maori and European, around 45 percent. Pacific peoples generally account for just over 10 percent, and all other ethnicities about four percent. Maori make up the same proportion of offenders sentenced to Life Imprisonment and Preventive Detention (42 percent). A higher proportion of European offenders however are sentenced to Preventive Detention (51 percent) compared to Life Imprisonment (40 percent). Figure 8 Indeterminate sentenced offenders by ethnicity 4 4 Ethnicity of 12 percent of all indeterminate offenders is not recorded. These offenders, most of whom were sentenced prior to 1990, have been excluded from the above figures. Gangs Figure 9 Indeterminate sentenced offenders who are active gang members Twelve percent of all indeterminate sentenced offenders are gang members. Fourteen percent of all Life Imprisonment prisoners and eight percent of all Preventive Detention offenders are gang members. The finding that offenders on Life Imprisonment sentences have a higher rate of gang members than Preventive Detention sentences is to be expected for two reasons: the majority of Life Imprisonment offenders are sentenced for homicide or violent offences, as are over half of gang members. the majority of Preventive Detention offenders are sex offenders, and sex offences constitute the offences of only 10 percent of all gang members in prison. 3 Offenders on Indeterminate sentences
4 Offence type Life Imprisonment sentences are predominantly imposed for murder (over 99 percent), although a small number have been imposed for less serious violent offences such as manslaughter. A very small group of Life-sentenced prisoners received this penalty for drug importation or manufacturing offences. Preventive Detention sentences are mainly imposed for sexual offences, although 17 percent of offenders sentenced to Preventive Detention were sentenced for non-sexual offences. Most of these however were sentenced under old legislation that has since been repealed. Figure 10 shows the first indeterminate sentence of each sentence type and the offence type for that sentence. Figure 10 Indeterminate sentenced offenders by offence type Indeterminate sentences as proportion of all prison sentences 5 Figure 11 shows that only 0.4 percent of all prison sentences are indeterminate in length. Only one percent of imprisoned violent offenders receive an indeterminate sentence. However, the sentences of four percent of all sexual offenders who were imprisoned were Preventive Detention. 5 Only prison sentences started within the last 30 years have been included in the analysis of this rate (sentence commence date >= 01/01/1984). Figure 11 Offence type by prison sentence type Indeterminate sentenced offenders place of b irth Over 90 percent (1167) of offenders sentenced to an indeterminate sentence were born in New Zealand. Offenders born in the Pacific Islands (5 percent) are the largest group of offenders with non-new Zealand places of birth. These percentages are not dissimilar to proportions found the wider prison population. Figure 12 Number of indeterminate offenders and location of birth 6 6 Where an offender has no specified birthplace, the assumption has been made that they were born in New Zealand. Figure 13 Life offenders by birthplace 4 Offenders on Indeterminate sentences
5 Imposed minimum non-parole period Figure 14 shows the spread of imposed non-parole periods. Minimum non-parole periods for Life Imprisonment and Preventive Detention have changed a number of times as relevant legislation has been revised. Almost half of all Life Imprisonment sentences were imposed with 10 years non-parole periods. With sentences of Preventive Detention, 38 percent had a 10 years nonparole period, with the majority (57 percent) having minimum periods below 10 years. This difference reflects the provisions of the Sentencing Act Figure 14 Minimum non-parole periods of indeterminate sentences The mean imposed non-parole period for a Life Imprisonment sentence is 10 years 2 months, compared with 7 years 7 months for Preventive Detention. To date, the longest imposed non-parole period for a Life Imprisonment sentence is 30 years, imposed in The longest imposed non-parole period for a Preventive Detention sentence is 28 years, imposed in Seriousness Index Not surprisingly perhaps, amongst all offenders on whom an indeterminate sentence has been imposed, those released from prison and currently on parole were originally convicted of offences lower in seriousness than the offences of those who currently remain in prison (see Figure 15). This difference is particularly pronounced amongst Preventive Detainees. The seriousness of the offences for which the sentence was imposed is influential in determining longterm risks to public safety posed by any individual offender. Figure 15 Average Seriousness Index Ever released on parole Figure 16 Indeterminate sentenced offenders who have been released on parole at least once 7 Figure 16 shows the proportion of indeterminate sentenced offenders who have been released on parole (at least once), by sentence type. Of the 1299 offenders sentenced to an indeterminate sentence, 589 (45%) have been released on parole at least once. Over half (52 percent) of offenders who have been sentenced to Life Imprisonment have been given parole at least once, compared with only 28 percent of offenders sentenced to Preventive Detention. Of the 265 indeterminate sentenced offenders who are currently released on parole, only 23 (9%) were Preventive Detainees. These differences reflect the fact that a significant number of offenders sentenced to Life Imprisonment are assessed as having low risks of reoffending. However, Preventive Detention is imposed only on offenders who are assessed at the time of sentencing as having a very high risk of future offending. 7 Releases on parole here include those released by the NZ Parole Board and its predecessor, the National Parole Board. 5 Offenders on Indeterminate sentences
6 Time served before first release Figure 17 Average number of years served before first release, counted at year of first release The average time served by those released from a Life Imprisonment sentence has increased steadily since the early 1990s. Time served amongst those released from Preventive Detention increased significantly between 1990 and in the early 2000s, peaking at 14.4 years. Since 2010, the average number of years served before being released from Preventive Detention has decreased to just over 11 years. It should be stressed however that these figures relate only to indeterminate sentenced offenders who have been released: they do not reflect the lengths of time served by those who have passed their parole eligibility date but have not been released. Time served for those not yet released Figure 18 shows all indeterminate sentenced offenders who have passed their parole eligibility date, but have not yet been released. Most of these offenders have spent five years beyond their parole eligibility date. Preventive Detention offenders are found to have served slightly longer (2-3 months) on average since passing their parole eligibility date than have Life Imprisonment offenders. Figure 18 Number of years since Parole Eligibility Date 8 8 These figures relate only to indeterminate sentenced offenders who have passed their parole eligibility date and have not yet been released. They do not include indeterminate sentenced offenders who have been released but then recalled to prison. Recalls to prison 9 Figure 19 relates only to indeterminate offenders who have been released on parole. It reveals the proportion of these who have been recalled to prison to resume serving the indeterminate sentence at least once. Just over a quarter of indeterminate offenders who have been released have subsequently been recalled. This proportion is significantly higher for Life Imprisonment offenders than for Preventive Detention offenders. Figure 19 Indeterminate sentenced offenders who have been released on parole at least once and proportion recalled Offenders recalled following release from an indeterminate sentence included here may or may not still be in prison. 9 Releases and recalls referred to in this document relate to decisions made by both the New Zealand Parole Board, and its predecessor, the National Parole Board 6 Offenders on Indeterminate sentences
7 Sub-types of indeterminately sentenced offenders Offenders sentenced to Life Imprisonment or Preventive Detention vary significantly in terms of prior offending history. A graphical representation developed by the Department the Offender Timeline depicts individual criminal histories in a simplified visual format. Each offender s timeline starts at left as the offender s date of birth, and continues until very recently (December 2013). Longer timelines represent older offenders and shorter timelines, younger. Interspersed along each timeline are markers representing elements of a unique offending history: Markers above the timeline represent individual offences; the colour of each marker depicts the nature of the offence (see Legend opposite). Slight differences in height of each marker above the line depict the seriousness score for each offence. The colour of each bar below the timeline depicts the nature of the most serious offence for which a sentence was imposed The depth of each bar below the line depicts the nature of the imposed sentence or order (see Legend). The length of each bar depicts the length of the sentence or order. Line colour = offence type Homicide Sexual Offences.. Volence related.. Burglary.. Drugs. Robbery.. Good order etc.... Traffic LEGEND Figure 20 Legend for offender timeline Line thickness (above line) = seriousness score Score <= 40 Score <= 100. Score <= Score > Line thickness (below line )= sentence type Community sentenced Parole or ROC Remanded in custody Prison sentenced Timelines for offenders sentenced to Life Imprisonment Offenders sentenced to Life Imprisonment appear to divide equally into two categories: those with a significant history of offending prior to the Life sentence, and those who had little or no prior history of offending 11. A sample of offender timeless for Life-sentenced prisoners with significant previous offending histories appears immediately below. Violent and dishonesty offences predominate in these prior offences, with convictions and sentences for burglary being particularly common. 0 Age in years 80 0 Age in years 80 Figure 22 Sample of offenders with no history of offending Just over half (53 percent) of all offenders sentenced to Life Imprisonment have little or no prior history of offending 12. Offenders in this category are probably more likely to be released shortly after their parole eligibility date. 12 Note that this form of analysis counts only Corrections-administered sentences, and thus does not show convictions resulting in fines, discharges, and other lower-level sentencing outcomes. Figure 21 Sample of offenders with a strong history of offending 11 Offenders are counted as having a significant history of offending if there is at least one prison sentence, or five community sentences prior Life Imprisonment. 7 Offenders on Indeterminate sentences
8 Preventive Detention Offenders sentenced to Preventive Detention fall into one of three somewhat distinct categories. These include offenders with a significant history of offending of various types 13, those with multiple prior convictions and sentences but for sexual offending only 14, and those with only minor, or no prior convictions of any type. As with many chronic offenders who eventually receive Life Imprisonment, Preventive Detention offenders in the first group are revealed as having significant quantities of convictions for violent and dishonesty offences (including burglary), as indicated in the graphic below. Over 75 percent of offenders sentenced to Preventive Detention are found also to have significant histories of non-sexual offending. 0 Age in years 80 0 Age in years 80 Figure 24 Sample of offenders with a significant history of sexual offending Less common again are instances of Preventive Detention being imposed on offenders who present with no prior convictions or sentences for any type of offence, including sexual. Around ten percent of offenders sentenced to Preventive Detention are in this category the Preventive Detention sentence is the first time that they have been subjected to a prison term, and without any prior record of offending. However, as appears in the timelines examples given below, when Preventive Detention is the first prison term ever imposed on an individual there has been proven a long and serious history of sexual offending that may have spanned many years. Imposition of the sentence also signifies an assessed high risk of future re-offending. 0 Age in years 80 Figure 23 Sample of offenders with a significant history of offending Fourteen percent of offenders sentenced to Preventive Detention have significant offending histories which is exclusively, or very largely, sexual in nature. Example timelines are given in the following graphic (Figure 24). 13 An offender is counted as having a significant history of offending if he or she has at least one prison sentence or five community sentences prior to receiving Preventive Detention. 14 An offender is counted as having a significant history of sexual offending if he or she has at least one prison sentence or five prior community sentences for sexual offences prior to receiving Preventive Detention. Figure 25 Sample of PD offenders with little or no official record of previous sentencing 8 Offenders on Indeterminate sentences
9 Conclusion Indeterminate sentences are the most severe penalty that can be handed down by a court in New Zealand, and almost always reflect offending of the most serious type. At the end of 2013 there were 776 prisoners serving indeterminate sentences in New Zealand prisons. These offenders comprise 11% of the sentenced prison population. An additional 265 have completed their prison term and were being managed on parole in the community. These latter offenders are subject to recall to prison at any time, and will remain so for the rest of their lives. Based on trend of the last 20 years it appears likely that the number of prisoners on indeterminate sentences will continue to increase. This group of offenders will therefore continue to be an important focus for correctional policy and practice, both to ensure sound and humane management of these offenders while in prison, and to promote effective rehabilitation so that as many as realistically possible can eventually be released, without creating undue risks to public safety. 9 Offenders on Indeterminate sentences
10 Relevant source documents Conviction and Sentencing of Offenders in New Zealand: 1995 to (2006, Feb). Retrieved from Ministry of Justice: to-2004/4-custodial-sentences-and-remands Capital punishment in New Zealand. (2013, Aug 1). Retrieved from New Zealand History Online: List of executions. (2013, Aug 1). Retrieved from New Zealand History Online: Criminal Justice Act Section 32(2)(c), Section 75(1). (n.d.). Retrieved from New Zealand Legal Information Institute: Criminal Justice Act Section 93. (n.d.). Retrieved from New Zealand Legal Information Institute: Criminal Justice Amendment Act (No 3) (1987 No 168) - Section 9(2)(c). (n.d.). Retrieved from New Zealand Legal Information Institute: Criminal Justice Amendment Act Section 26(2)(c). (n.d.). Retrieved from New Zealand Legal Information Institute: Criminal Justice Amendment Act Section 7(1)(c). (n.d.). Retrieved from New Zealand Legal Information Institute: Criminal Justice Amendment Act Section 15(2). (n.d.). Retrieved from New Zealand Legal Information Institute: Parole Act 2002 (2002 No 10) - Section 29(3). (n.d.). Retrieved from New Zealand Acts As Enacted: Sentencing Act Section 87(2)(b). (n.d.). Retrieved from New Zealand Legislation: edreg_sentencing+_resel_25_a&p=1 Sentencing Act 2002 (2002 No 9) - Section 89(1), Section 103(1). (n.d.). Retrieved from New Zealand Legal Information Institute: 10 Offenders on Indeterminate sentences
11 Appendix 1 The following table shows the changes to the minimum non-parole periods for each indeterminate sentence type. Non parole periods for Life Imprisonment Criminal Justice Act 1954 Criminal Justice Amendment Act 1962 Criminal Justice Amendment Act 1967 Criminal Justice Amendment Act 1975 Criminal Justice Act 1985 Criminal Justice Amendment Act 1987 Sentencing Act years 10 years 6 years 7 years 7 years 10 years 10 years Non-parole periods for Preventive Detention Criminal Justice Act 1954 Criminal Justice Act 1985 Sentencing Act years 7 years 5 years 11 Offenders on Indeterminate sentences
Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Amendment (Provisional Sentencing for Children) Act 2013 No 7
New South Wales Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Amendment (Provisional Sentencing for Contents Page 1 Name of Act 2 2 Commencement 2 Schedule 1 Amendment of Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 No 92 3
Sentencing Snapshot. Introduction. People sentenced. Causing serious injury recklessly
Sentencing Snapshot Sentencing trends in the higher courts of Victoria 28 9 to 22 June 24 No. 57 Causing serious injury recklessly Introduction This Sentencing Snapshot describes sentencing outcomes for
A public protection order is a court order that will allow the detention of very high risk individuals at a secure facility within prison precincts.
Q+A - Public Safety (Public Protection Orders) Bill What are public protection orders (PPO)? A public protection order is a court order that will allow the detention of very high risk individuals at a
Public perceptions of crime and the criminal justice system survey 2014 results
Public perceptions of crime and the criminal justice system survey 2014 results Report prepared for: Ministry of Justice Date: December 2014 Level 1, 6-10 The Strand PO Box 33690 Takapuna, Auckland Ph:
Sentencing outcomes for trafficking drugs in the Magistrates Court of Victoria
February 2009 Barry Woodhouse Sentencing outcomes for trafficking drugs in the Magistrates Court of Victoria Summary Contents Summary 1 Introduction 2 Trends 2 People sentenced 3 Overview of sentencing
Defendants charged with serious violent and sexual offences (including murder)
Bail Amendment Bill Q+A Defendants charged with serious violent and sexual offences (including murder) How is the Government changing bail rules for defendants charged murder? The Government thinks that
Men and Women. and the. Criminal Justice System
, Men and Women and the Criminal Justice System Appraisal of published Statistics PARITY Briefing Paper September 213 Foreword Are men and women treated equally by the Criminal Justice System in England
Drug Court Legislation Amendment Act 2014 No 45
New South Wales Drug Court Legislation Amendment Act 2014 No 45 Contents Page 1 Name of Act 2 2 Commencement 2 Schedule 1 Amendment of Drug Court Act 1998 No 150 3 Schedule 2 Amendment of other legislation
Criminal Justice Statistics Quarterly Update to March 2013
/ Criminal Justice Statistics Quarterly Update to 2013 England and Wales Ministry of Justice Statistics bulletin Published 22 August 2013 Contents Contents... 1 Introduction... 2 Executive summary... 4
2009 Florida Prison Recidivism Study Releases From 2001 to 2008
2009 Florida Prison Recidivism Study Releases From 2001 to 2008 May 2010 Florida Department of Corrections Walter A. McNeil, Secretary Bureau of Research and Data Analysis [email protected]
STATES OF JERSEY. DRAFT CRIMINAL JUSTICE (YOUNG OFFENDERS) (No. 2) (JERSEY) LAW 201-
STATES OF JERSEY r DRAFT CRIMINAL JUSTICE (YOUNG OFFENDERS) (No. 2) (JERSEY) LAW 201- Lodged au Greffe on 6th April 2016 by the Minister for Home Affairs STATES GREFFE 2016 P.33 DRAFT CRIMINAL JUSTICE
Historical Data. Historical Data 33
Historical Data Historical Data 33 Introduction to Historical Data The arrival of the new millennium provides an opportunity to reflect on the past and consider the challenges of the future. The 2 th century
Have New South Wales criminal courts become more lenient in the past 20 years?
NSW Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research Bureau Brief Have New South Wales criminal courts become more lenient in the past 20 years? Karen Freeman Issue paper no. 101 March 2015 Aim: To investigate
Standing Committee on Justice, Human Rights, Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness. Ottawa, November 24, 2005. Speaking Notes
Standing Committee on Justice, Human Rights, Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness Ottawa, November 24, 2005 Speaking Notes Bill C-215: An Act to amend the Criminal Code (consecutive sentence for use
HANDOUT 1: Purpose and Principles of Sentencing in Canada
HANDOUT 1: Purpose and Principles of Sentencing in Canada Principles of Sentencing The Criminal Code of Canada outlines the principles and purpose of sentencing in s. 718. These principles are placed in
Overview of Federal Criminal Cases
Overview of Federal Criminal Cases Fiscal Year 2012 Glenn R. Schmitt Jennifer Dukes Office of Research and Data The United States Sentencing Commission 1 received information on 84,360 federal criminal
The Start of a Criminal Career: Does the Type of Debut Offence Predict Future Offending? Research Report 77. Natalie Owen & Christine Cooper
The Start of a Criminal Career: Does the Type of Debut Offence Predict Future Offending? Research Report 77 Natalie Owen & Christine Cooper November 2013 Contents Executive Summary... 3 Introduction...
Employment Manual REHABILITATION OF OFFENDERS AND SELF DISCLOSURE POLICY
Employment Manual REHABILITATION OF OFFENDERS AND SELF DISCLOSURE POLICY CONTENTS INTRODUCTION TO REHABILITATION OF OFFENDERS ACT 1974... 1 EXCEPTIONS TO THE ACT... 1 MODIFICATIONS TO THE ACT... 1 POLICY...
CAYMAN ISLANDS. Supplement No. 9 published with Extraordinary Gazette No. 53 of 17th July, 2015. DRUG REHABILITATION COURT LAW.
CAYMAN ISLANDS Supplement No. 9 published with Extraordinary Gazette No. 53 of 17th July, 2015. DRUG REHABILITATION COURT LAW (2015 Revision) Law 26 of 2006 consolidated with 19 of 2012. Revised under
State of New York DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND COMMUNITY SUPERVISION
State of New York DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND COMMUNITY SUPERVISION Building Number 2 Harriman Office Campus Albany, New York 12226 UNDER CUSTODY REPORT: Profile of Incarcerated Offender Population Under
Lifetime Likelihood of Going to State or Federal Prison
U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Bureau of Justice Statistics Special Report March 1997, NCJ-160092 Lifetime Likelihood of Going to State or Federal Prison By Thomas P. Bonczar and
Title 17-A: MAINE CRIMINAL CODE
Title 17-A: MAINE CRIMINAL CODE Chapter 51: SENTENCES OF IMPRISONMENT Table of Contents Part 3.... Section 1251. IMPRISONMENT FOR MURDER... 3 Section 1252. IMPRISONMENT FOR CRIMES OTHER THAN MURDER...
Development of Forensic Nursing in Australia: Associate Professor Linda Saunders 4 th December 2008
Development of Forensic Nursing in Australia: Associate Professor Linda Saunders 4 th December 2008 Working with Offenders Country Total Criminal Population Population Australia 20,090,437 22,458 Canada
In 2013, U.S. residents age 12 or older experienced
U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Bureau of Justice Statistics Revised 9/19/2014 Criminal Victimization, 2013 Jennifer L. Truman, Ph.D., and Lynn Langton, Ph.D., BJS Statisticians In
S G C Sentencing Guidelines Council New Sentences: Criminal Justice Act 2003 Guideline
S G C Sentencing Guidelines Council New Sentences: Criminal Justice Act 2003 Guideline FOREWORD In accordance with the provisions of section 170(9) Criminal Justice Act 2003, the Sentencing Guidelines
2010 CRIMINAL CODE SENTENCING PROVISIONS. Effective July 29, 2010
010 CRIMINAL CODE SENTENCING PROVISIONS Effective July 9, 010-0- GENERAL CRIMES SENTENCING RANGES Class NON-DANGEROUS OFFENSES ( 13-70) First Offense ( 13-70(D)) MIT* MIN P MAX AGG* 3 4 5 10 1.5 3.5 3.5
Information for completing: Form D: Application for transfer to Australia prisoner not on parole and not serving suspended sentence
Information for completing: Form D: Application for transfer to Australia prisoner not on parole and not serving suspended sentence When to use this form Use this form if you are applying for transfer
Statistics on Women and the Criminal Justice System 2013. A Ministry of Justice publication under Section 95 of the Criminal Justice Act 1991
Statistics on Women and the Criminal Justice System 2013 A Ministry of Justice publication under Section 95 of the Criminal Justice Act 1991 November 2014 1 2 Contents Acknowledgments... 4 List of tables
CRIMINAL CODE REVISION BILL H.B. 1006, 2013
CRIMINAL CODE REVISION BILL H.B. 1006, 2013 Background: Criminal Code Evaluation Commission (CCEC) established by HEA 1001, 2009 Purpose: evaluating the criminal laws of Indiana Final Report: November
DRIVER LICENCE DISQUALIFICATION REFORM
Submission No 23 DRIVER LICENCE DISQUALIFICATION REFORM Organisation: Legal Aid NSW Name: Ms Pilar Lopez Position: Solicitor Date Received: 26/07/2013 INQUIRY INTO DRIVER LICENCE DISQUALIFICATION REFORM
Literature review: UK veterans and the criminal justice system
Literature review: UK veterans and the criminal justice system Executive Summary In comparison to the United States (US) there has been a lack of reliable research on the subject of the United Kingdom
Amendments to the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders (LASPO) Bill Equality Impact Assessment
Amendments to the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders (LASPO) Bill Equality Impact Assessment Introduction This Equality Impact Assessment (EIA) relates to amendments to the Legal Aid, Sentencing
Model Spent Convictions Bill - Consultation paper
Model Spent Convictions Bill - Consultation paper Background The Standing Committee of Attorneys-General is working on a project to design a national model Bill for a spent-convictions scheme. A spentconvictions
Proven Re-offending Statistics Quarterly Bulletin July 2010 to June 2011, England and Wales
Proven Re-offending Statistics Quarterly Bulletin July 2010 to June 2011, England and Wales Ministry of Justice Statistics Bulletin 25 April 2013 Contents Contents...2 Introduction...3 Executive summary...7
Overall, 67.8% of the 404,638 state
U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Bureau of Justice Statistics Special Report April 2014 ncj 244205 Recidivism of Prisoners Released in 30 States in 2005: Patterns from 2005 to 2010
GUIDELINES TO THE RELEVANCE OF CONVICTIONS FOR HACKNEY CARRIAGE / PRIVATE HIRE DRIVER LICENCE APPLICANTS
Introduction GUIDELINES TO THE RELEVANCE OF CONVICTIONS FOR HACKNEY CARRIAGE / PRIVATE HIRE DRIVER LICENCE APPLICANTS It is an absolute requirement for any person completing an application to disclose
National Objectives for Social Work Services in the Criminal Justice System: Standards - Throughcare
National Objectives for Social Work Services in the Criminal Justice System: Standards - Throughcare CHAPTER 3: SOCIAL SERVICES IN PRISONS INTRODUCTION 34.Social work in prisons is part of the provision
Speaker Sheldon Silver. Breaking New York s Addiction to Prison: Reforming New York s Rockefeller Drug Laws
Speaker Sheldon Silver Breaking New York s Addiction to Prison: Reforming New York s Rockefeller Drug Laws In 1973 New York enacted, what were considered at the time, the harshest drug laws in the nation.
LUTON BOROUGH COUNCIL. Taxi and Private Hire Licensing. Convictions and Fitness Policy
1 Introduction LUTON BOROUGH COUNCIL Taxi and Private Hire Licensing Convictions and Fitness Policy 1.1. The purpose of this Policy is to provide guidance on the criteria used by the Council when determining
Alternative Sentencing in the Federal Criminal Justice System
Alternative Sentencing in the Federal Criminal Justice System UNITED STATES SENTENCING COMMISSION United States Sentencing Commission One Columbus Circle, N.E. Washington, DC 20002 www.ussc.gov Patti B.
Compulsory Drug Treatment Correctional Centre Act 2004 No 42
New South Wales Compulsory Drug Treatment Correctional Centre Act 2004 No 42 Contents Page 1 Name of Act 2 2 Commencement 2 3 Amendment of Drug Court Act 1998 No 150 2 4 Amendment of Crimes (Sentencing
Offender Rehabilitation Act 2014
Offender Rehabilitation Act 2014 CHAPTER 11 Explanatory Notes have been produced to assist in the understanding of this Act and are available separately 9. 75 Offender Rehabilitation Act 2014 CHAPTER 11
Adult Plea Negotiation Guidelines
From the office of the Rice County Attorney: Adult Plea Negotiation Guidelines Revision June, 2004 1. These guidelines apply to any adult felony defendant case prosecuted by this office, which is not disposed
Increasing the Magistrates Court fine limit Equality Impact Assessment
Increasing the Magistrates Court fine limit Equality Impact Assessment Introduction The Ministry of Justice tabled Government amendments at the Commons Report stage of the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment
Crimes (Serious Sex Offenders) Act 2006 No 7
New South Wales Crimes (Serious Sex Offenders) Act 2006 No 7 Contents Part 1 Part 2 Preliminary Page 1 Name of Act 2 2 Commencement 2 3 Objects of Act 2 4 Definitions 2 5 Definitions of serious sex offence
PROPOSAL. Expansion of Drug Treatment Diversion Programs. December 18, 2007
December 18, 2007 Hon. Edmund G. Brown Jr. Attorney General 1300 I Street, 17 th Floor Sacramento, California 95814 Attention: Ms. Krystal Paris Initiative Coordinator Dear Attorney General Brown: Pursuant
Who benefits from the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act and how?
What is the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act 1974? The Rehabilitation of Offenders Act 1974 exists to support the rehabilitation into employment of reformed offenders who have stayed on the right side of
Rehabilitation of Offenders Act. Page 1 of 13 Rehabilitation of Offenders Act version 2.0 Valid from 9 December 2013
Page 1 of 13 Rehabilitation of Offenders Act version 2.0 Valid from 9 December 2013 About this guidance This guidance explains how the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act 1974 applies to immigration and nationality
Colorado Legislative Council Staff
Colorado Legislative Council Staff Room 029 State Capitol, Denver, CO 80203-1784 (303) 866-3521 FAX: 866-3855 TDD: 866-3472 MEMORANDUM October 9, 2012 TO: Interested Persons FROM: Hillary Smith, Research
Queensland CORRECTIVE SERVICES AMENDMENT ACT 2003
Queensland CORRECTIVE SERVICES AMENDMENT ACT 2003 Act No. 48 of 2003 Queensland CORRECTIVE SERVICES AMENDMENT ACT 2003 TABLE OF PROVISIONS Section Page PART 1 PRELIMINARY 1 Short title....................................................
A Decade of Truth-In- Sentencing in Virginia
A Decade of Truth-In- Sentencing in Virginia A decade ago, Virginia abolished parole and adopted truth-in-sentencing for convicted felons. Over 200,000 criminals have been punished under noparole laws.
Consequences of Convictions for Sex Crimes
Consequences of Convictions for Sex Crimes Sex Offender Registration Act, Sex Offender Commitment Act, Lifetime Supervision for Sex Offenders SORA 29 Chapter 40 1 Sex Offender Registration Act (SORA):
Criminal Justice and Immigration Act 2008
Criminal Justice and Immigration Act 2008 CHAPTER 4 Explanatory Notes have been produced to assist in the understanding of this Act and are available separately Criminal Justice and Immigration Act 2008
How To Save Money On Drug Sentencing In Michigan
Drug Policies in the State of Michigan Economic Effects Executive Summary News Walker: Keep reforming drug laws Home» Publications» Drug Policies in the State of Michigan Economic Effects» Drug Policies
The Code. for Crown Prosecutors
The Code for Crown Prosecutors January 2013 Table of Contents Introduction... 2 General Principles... 3 The Decision Whether to Prosecute... 4 The Full Code Test... 6 The Evidential Stage... 6 The Public
California s Criminal Justice System. A Primer
California s Criminal Justice System A Primer January 2013 Legislative Analyst s Office California s Criminal Justice System A Primer Mac Taylor, Legislative Analyst January 2013 Contents Introduction...3
COMPARISON OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE STATISTICS
TRAVIS COUNTY COMPARISON OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE STATISTICS OF THE SIX LARGEST URBAN COUNTIES IN TEXAS CRIMINAL JUSTICE PLANNING P.O. BOX 1748, AUSTIN, TX 78767 PHONE: (512) 854-4415 FAX: (512) 854-4417 Comparison
FINAL BILL REPORT HB 1544
FINAL BILL REPORT HB 1544 C 352 L 99 Synopsis as Enacted Brief Description: Making corrections to sentencing laws. Sponsors: Representatives O Brien, Ballasiotes, Kastama, Cairnes and Keiser; by request
2012 Party Platforms On Criminal Justice Policy
2012 Party Platforms On Criminal Justice Policy September 2012 1 2012 PARTY PLATFORMS ON CRIMINAL JUSTICE POLICY THE SENTENCING PROJECT The Washington Post recently reported that the gulf between Republicans
BERMUDA REHABILITATION OF OFFENDERS ACT 1977 1977 : 6
QUO FA T A F U E R N T BERMUDA REHABILITATION OF OFFENDERS ACT 1977 1977 : 6 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 3 4 5 6 Entitlement to rehabilitation Sentences that are excluded from rehabilitation Effect of rehabilitation
Sexual Offences Definitive Guideline DEFINITIVE GUIDELINE
Sexual Offences Definitive Guideline DEFINITIVE GUIDELINE Contents Applicability of guideline 7 Rape and assault offences 9 Rape 9 Sexual Offences Act 2003 (section 1) Assault by penetration 13 Sexual
Questionnaire on principles of public prosecution as regards juvenile justice for Consultative Council of European Prosecutors (CCPE)
THE REPUBLIC OF CROATIA THE OFFICE OF THE STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE REPUBLIC OF CROATIA No: A-14/10 Zagreb, 11th January 2010 MK/SP SUBJECT: Questionnaire on principles of public prosecution as regards
A. APPLICABILITY OF GUIDELINE
1 Reduction in Sentence for a Guilty Plea Draft Guideline A. APPLICABILITY OF GUIDELINE The Sentencing Council issues this guideline as a draft guideline in accordance with section 120 of the Coroners
Security Classification Using the Custody Rating Scale
Security Classification Using the Custody Rating Scale Brian A. Grant and Fred Luciani Research Branch Correctional Service of Canada February, 1998 This report is part of a series of 24 research/evaluation
Peering Into the Black Box: The Criminal Justice System s Response to Gun- Related Felonies in St. Louis. Richard Rosenfeld Joshua Williams
Peering Into the Black Box: The Criminal Justice System s Response to Gun- Related Felonies in St. Louis Richard Rosenfeld Joshua Williams University of Missouri St. Louis St. Louis Public Safety Partnership
REPORT TO CRIME & DISORDER OVERVIEW & SCRUTINY PANEL. Title: OVERVIEW OF THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM. Date: 27 th October 2009
REPORT TO CRIME & DISORDER OVERVIEW & SCRUTINY PANEL Title: OVERVIEW OF THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM Date: 27 th October 2009 Officer Reporting: Brian Martin, Community Safety Manager Contact Officer(s):
REHABILITATION OF OFFENDERS (Criminal Procedure and Evidence Act 2011) GUIDANCE NOTE
REHABILITATION OF OFFENDERS (Criminal Procedure and Evidence Act 2011) GUIDANCE NOTE This guidance note provides background information on Part 25 of the Criminal Procedure and Evidence Act 2011 which
Sentencing for Impaired Driving
Sentencing for Impaired Driving 1. Sentencing on Impaired Driving Causing Death or Bodily Harm Introduction The principles governing Canadian sentencing law are convoluted. It is often difficult to understand
Domestic Violence Offenders in Missouri
MISSOURI STATE HIGHWAY PATROL Domestic Violence Offenders in Missouri A Study on Recidivism Eric Chambers & Mark Krispin March 2011 Contents I. BACKGROUND... 5 II. METHODOLOGY... 5 III. ANALYSIS OF ARRESTS
PUBLIC OPINION ON THE MANDATORY DEATH PENALTY IN TRINIDAD A SUMMARY OF THE MAIN FINDINGS OF A SURVEY. Roger Hood and Florence Seemungal
PUBLIC OPINION ON THE MANDATORY DEATH PENALTY IN TRINIDAD A SUMMARY OF THE MAIN FINDINGS OF A SURVEY Roger Hood and Florence Seemungal A Report for the Death Penalty Project and the Rights Advocacy Project
Proposition 5. Nonviolent Offenders. Sentencing, Parole and Rehabilitation. Statute.
Proposition 5 Nonviolent Offenders. Sentencing, Parole and Rehabilitation. Statute. SUMMARY This measure (1) expands drug treatment diversion programs for criminal offenders, (2) modifies parole supervision
Chapter 938 of the Wisconsin statutes is entitled the Juvenile Justice Code.
Juvenile Justice in Wisconsin by Christina Carmichael Fiscal Analyst Wisconsin Chapter 938 of the Wisconsin statutes is entitled the Juvenile Justice Code. Statute 938.1 of the chapter states that it is
Crime Rates and Youth Incarceration in Texas and California Compared: Public Safety or Public Waste?
CENTER ON JUVENILE AND CRIMINAL JUSTICE JUNE 2007 www.cjcj.org Crime Rates and Youth Incarceration in Texas and California Compared: Public Safety or Public Waste? By Mike Males PhD, Christina Stahlkopf
CRIMINAL JUSTICE (COMPENSATION ORDERS) (JERSEY) LAW 1994
CRIMINAL JUSTICE (COMPENSATION ORDERS) (JERSEY) LAW 1994 Revised Edition Showing the law as at 1 January 2006 This is a revised edition of the law Criminal Justice (Compensation Orders) (Jersey) Law 1994
CHAPTER 93. BE IT ENACTED by the Senate and General Assembly of the State of New Jersey: 1. N.J.S.2C:35-14 is amended to read as follows:
CHAPTER 93 AN ACT concerning medication-assisted treatment for certain persons, amending N.J.S.2C:35-14, and supplementing Title 2C of the New Jersey Statutes. BE IT ENACTED by the Senate and General Assembly
Burglary Offences Definitive Guideline DEFINITIVE GUIDELINE
Burglary Offences Definitive Guideline DEFINITIVE GUIDELINE Burglary Offences Definitive Guideline 1 Contents Applicability of guideline 2 Aggravated burglary (Theft Act 1968, section 10) 3 Domestic burglary
Queensland DRUG REHABILITATION (COURT DIVERSION) ACT 2000
Queensland DRUG REHABILITATION (COURT DIVERSION) ACT 2000 Act No. 3 of 2000 Queensland DRUG REHABILITATION (COURT DIVERSION) ACT 2000 Section TABLE OF PROVISIONS PART 1 PRELIMINARY Page 1 Short title.....................................................
ENHANCEMENTS IN CALIFORNIA CRIMINAL LAW: Making sense of tacking on more time.
Prisoner Rights Attorney Justice for the Incarcerated Charles F.A. Carbone, Esq. Attorney ENHANCEMENTS IN CALIFORNIA CRIMINAL LAW: Making sense of tacking on more time. In this article, California prisoners
The Criminal Justice Diversion Program in Victoria
A statistical profile October 28 Geoff Fisher The Criminal Justice Diversion Program in Victoria Contents Abstract 1 Introduction 2 The Criminal Justice Diversion Program (CJDP) 2 Diversion and Sentencing
Indecent photographs of children
Sexual Offences Guideline Consultation 251 Possession of indecent photograph of child Criminal Justice Act 1988 (section 160) Triable either way Maximum: 5 years custody Offence range: Community order
Alcohol and Re-offending Who Cares?
January 2004 Alcohol and Re-offending Who Cares? This briefing paper focuses on the high level of alcohol misuse and dependence within the prison population. In recent years a great deal of time and money
Women, Punishment and Human Rights
Women, Punishment and Human Rights Prison is often a very expensive way of making vulnerable women s life situations much worse. Women In Prison A Discussion Paper Background Increasing numbers of women
PARTICIPANTS PAPERS THE MALDIVES CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM AN ALTERNATIVE METHOD FOR PUNISHMENT. Haleem Mohamed*
PARTICIPANTS PAPERS THE MALDIVES CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM AN ALTERNATIVE METHOD FOR PUNISHMENT Haleem Mohamed* I. INTRODUCTION The Maldives legal system is based on the principles of shariah and other legislation,
THE CIVIL RIGHTS RESTORATION PROCESS
THE CIVIL RIGHTS RESTORATION PROCESS INTRODUCTION If you have been convicted of a felony, you have lost your civil rights, which includes the right to vote, serve on a jury, hold public office, and obtain
TITLE 6: CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE DIVISION 1: CRIMES AGAINST THE PERSON
1302. Sexual Assault in the Second Degree. (a) An offender commits the crime of sexual assault in the second degree if (1) the offender engages in sexual contact with another person without consent of
Practioner Guide to HB 585. Mississippi Corrections and Criminal Justice Task Force
Practioner Guide to HB 585 Mississippi Corrections and Criminal Justice Task Force 0 An Introduction to House Bill 585 Seeking to repair the long-standing disconnect between the corrections and criminal
Safer Streets Crime Action Plan Youth Justice. Have Your Say
Safer Streets Crime Action Plan Youth Justice Have Your Say 1 Foreword Through its Safer Streets Crime Action Plan, the Newman Government made a commitment to crack down on crime. As part of this plan,
Information Bulletin AN INCREASING INDIGENOUS POPULATION? IMPLICATIONS FOR THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM. Justine Doherty
Information Bulletin OFFICE OF CRIME STATISTICS No 32 April 2002 AN INCREASING INDIGENOUS POPULATION? IMPLICATIONS FOR THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM Justine Doherty ATTORNEY-GENERAL S DEPARTMENT Introduction
THIS GUIDANCE APPLIES FROM 10 MARCH 2014
THIS GUIDANCE APPLIES FROM 10 MARCH 2014 Guidance on the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act 1974 Contents: (1) INTRODUCTION: What is the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act 1974? Who benefits from the 1974 Act
The Criminal Procedure Rules October 2015 PART 9 ALLOCATION AND SENDING FOR TRIAL
Contents of this Part PART 9 ALLOCATION AND SENDING FOR TRIAL General rules When this Part applies rule 9.1 Exercise of magistrates court s powers rule 9.2 Matters to be specified on sending for trial
