9.1 (a) The standard deviation of the four sample differences is given as.68. The standard error is SE (ȳ1  ȳ 2 ) = SE d  = s d n d


 Calvin Lynch
 10 months ago
 Views:
Transcription
1 CHAPTER 9 Comparison of Paired Samples 9.1 (a) The standard deviation of the four sample differences is given as.68. The standard error is SE (ȳ1  ȳ 2 ) = SE d  = s d n d =.68 4 =.34. (b) H 0 : The mean yields of the two varieties are the same (µ 1 = µ 2 ) H A : The mean yields of the two varieties are different (µ 1 µ 2 ) t s = 1.65/.34 = With df = 3, Table 4 gives t.01 = and t.005 = 5.841; thus,.01 < P <.02. At significance level α =.05, we reject H 0 if P <.05. Since.01 < P <.02, we reject H 0. There is sufficient evidence (.01 < P <.02) to conclude that Variety 2 has a higher mean yield than Variety 1. (c) H 0 : The mean yields of the two varieties are the same (µ 1 = µ 2 ) H A : The mean yields of the two varieties are different (µ 1 µ 2 ) SE (ȳ1  ȳ 2 ) = = t s = 1.65/1.230 = With df = 6, Table 4 gives t.20 =.906 and t.10 = Thus,.20 < P <.40 and we do not reject H 0. There is insufficient evidence (.20 < P <.40) to conclude that the mean yields of the two varieties are different. (By contrast, the correct test, in part (b), resulted in rejection of H 0.) 9.2 (a) The standard deviation of the nine sample differences is given as The standard error is SE d = s d = 59.3 n d 9 = (b) H 0 : The mean weight gains on the two diets are the same (µ 1 = µ 2 ) H A : The mean weight gains on the two diets are different (µ 1 µ 2 ) t s = 22.9/19.77 = With df = 8, Table 4 gives t.20 =.889 and t.10 = Thus,.20 < P <.40 and we do not reject H 0. There is insufficient evidence (.20 < P <.40) to conclude that the mean weight gains on the two diets are different. (c) 22.9 ± (1.860)(19.77) (13.9,59.7) or < µ d < 59.7 lb. (d) We are 90% confident that the average steer gains somewhere between 59.7 pounds more and 13.9 pounds less when on Diet 1 than when on Diet 2 (in a 140day period).
2 Let 1 denote control and let 2 denote progesterone. H 0 : Progesterone has no effect on camp (µ 1 = µ 2 ) H A : Progesterone has some effect on camp (µ 1 µ 2 ) The standard error is SE (ȳ1  ȳ 2 ) = SE d  = s d n d =.40 4 =.20. The test statistic is t s = ȳ 1  ȳ 2 SE (ȳ1  ȳ 2 ) = d  SE d  = = 3.4. To bracket the Pvalue, we consult Table 4 with df = 41 = 3. Table 4 gives t.025 = and t.02 = Thus, the Pvalue is bracketed as.04 < P <.05. At significance level α =.10, we reject H 0 if P <.10. Since.04 < P <.05, we reject H 0. There is sufficient evidence (.04 < P <.05) to conclude that progesterone decreases camp under these conditions. 9.4 (a) Let 1 denote treated side and 2 denote control side. The standard error is SE (ȳ1  ȳ 2 ) = s d = n d 15 = The critical value t.025 is found from Student's t distribution with df = n d  1 = 151 = 14. From Table 4 we find that t(14).025 = The 95% confidence interval is d  ± t.025 SE d.117 ± (2.145)(.2887) (.50,.74) or .50 < µ 1  µ 2 <.74 C. (b) SE (ȳ1  ȳ 2 ) = = ± (2.048)(.460) (using df = 28) (.83,1.06) or .83 < µ 1  µ 2 < 1.06 C. This interval is wider than the one obtained in part (a). 9.5 Let 1 denote treated side and 2 denote control side. H 0 : The electrical treatment has no effect on collagen shrinkage temperature (µ 1 = µ 2 ) H A : The electrical treatment tends to reduce collagen shrinkage temperature (µ 1 < µ 2 ) We note that ȳ 1 > ȳ 2, so the data do not deviate from H 0 in the direction specified by H A. Thus, P >.50 and we do not reject H 0. There is no evidence (P >.50) that the electrical treatment tends to reduce collagen shrinkage temperature under these conditions. 9.6 The data provide fairly strong evidence (P =.03) that desipramine is more effective than clomipramine in reducing the compulsion to pull one's hair.
3 9.7 SE d  = s d n d = 3 =.57. The confidence interval is 10.9 ± (2.052)(.57) or (9.7,12.1) With the outliers deleted, the mean of the remaining 26 differences is 11.0 and the standard deviation is 2.1. SE d = s d 2.1 = =.41. The confidence interval is 11.0 ± (2.060)(.41) or (10.1,11.8). This interval is n d 26 more narrow than the previous interval that was based on all of the data, including the outliers, but the difference is not great. 9.9 There is no single correct answer. Any data set with Y 1 and Y 2 varying, but d not varying, is correct; for example: Y 1 Y 2 d See Section III of this Manual (a) 34 Yield, Variety Yield, Variety 1 Yes, the upward trend indicates that the pairing was effective.
4 132 (b) Weight gain, Diet Weight gain, Diet 1 The upward trend here is rather weak, which indicates that the pairing was not especially effective. (c) Shrinkage Temp, Control Shrinkage Temp, Treated Yes, the upward trend indicates that the pairing was effective (a) B s = 6. Looking under n d = 9 in Table 7, we see that there is no entry less than or equal to 6. Therefore, P >.20. (b) B s = 7. Looking under n d = 9 in Table 7, we see that the only column with a critical value less than or equal to 7 is the column headed.20 (for a nondirectional alternative), and the next column is headed.10. Therefore,.10 < P <.20. (c) B s = 8. Looking under n d = 9 in Table 7, we see that the rightmost column with a critical value less than or equal to 8 is the column headed.05 (for a nondirectional alternative), and the next column is headed.02. Therefore,.02 < P <.05. (d) B s = 9. Looking under n d = 9 in Table 7, we see that the rightmost column with a critical value less than or equal to 9 is the column headed.01 (for a nondirectional alternative), and the next column is headed.002. Therefore,.002 < P <.01.
5 9.15 (a) P >.20 (b).10 < P <.20 (c).02 < P <.05 (d).002 < P <.01 (e) P <.001 (f) P < Let p denote the probability that oral conjugated estrogen will decrease PAI1 level. H 0 : Oral conjugated estrogen has no effect on PAI1 level (p =.5) H A : Oral conjugated estrogen has an effect on PAI1 level (p.5) N + = 8, N  = 22, B s = 22. With n d = 30, 22 falls under the.02 heading (for a nondirectional alternative) in Table 7. Thus,.01 < P <.02 and we reject H 0. There is sufficient evidence (.01 < P <.02) to conclude that oral conjugated estrogen tends to decrease PAI1 level For the sign test, the hypotheses can be stated as H 0 : p=.5 H A : p>.5 where p denotes the probability that the rat in the enriched environment will have the larger cortex. The hypotheses may be stated informally as H 0 : Weight of the cerebral cortex is not affected by environment H A : Environmental enrichment increases cortex weight There were 12 pairs. Of these, there were 10 pairs in which the relative cortex weight was greater for the "enriched" rat than for his "impoverished" littermate; thus N + = 10 and N  = 2. To check the directionality of the data, we note that N + > N  Thus, the data so deviate from H 0 in the direction specified by H A. The value of the test statistic is B s = larger of N + and N  = 10. Looking in Table 7, under n d = 12 for a directional alternative, we see that the rightmost column with a critical value less than or equal to 10 is the column headed.025 and the next column is headed.01. Therefore,.01 < P <.025. At significance level α =.05, we reject H 0 if P <.05. Since P <.025, we reject H 0. There is sufficient evidence (.01 < P <.025) to conclude that environmental enrichment increases cortex weight.
6 We have n d = 12. The null distribution is a binomial distribution with n = 12 and p =.5. Since B s = 10 and H A is directional, we need to calculate the probability of 10, 11, or 12 plus (+) signs. We apply the binomial formula n C j p j (1  p) nj, as follows: j = 10, n  j = 2: j = 11, n  j = 1: j = 12, n  j = 0: (66)(.5 10 )(.5 2 ) = (12)(.5 11 )(.5 1 ) = (1)(.5 12 )(.5 0 ) = The Pvalue is the sum of these probabilities: P = = Let p denote the probability that a patient will have fewer minor seizures with valproate then with placebo. H 0 : Valproate is not effective against minor seizures (p =.5) H A : Valproate is effective against minor seizures (p >.5) N + = 14, N  = 5, B s = 14; the data deviate from H 0 in the direction specified by H A. Eliminating the pair with d = 0, we refer to Table 7 with n d = 19. The only entry of 14 falls under the.05 heading (for a directional alternative). Thus,.025 < P <.05 and we reject H 0. There is sufficient evidence (.025 < P <.05) to conclude that valproate is effective against minor seizures We need to find the probability of 14 or more successes for a binomial distribution with n = 19 and p =.5. For the normal approximation to the binomial, the mean is np = (19)(.5) = 9.5 and the SD is z = np(1  p) = (19)(.5)(.5) = P = = = 1.84; Table 3 gives We need to find the probability of 22 or more successes, or of 8 or fewer successes, for a binomial distribution with n = 30 and p =.5. For the normal approximation to the binomial, the mean is np = (30)(.5) = 15 and the SD is np(1  p) = (30)(.5)(.5) = We find the probability of 22 or more successes and double this probability (since the normal curve is symmetric). z = = 2.37; Table 3 gives P = 2( ) = Let p denote the probability that the Northern member of a pair will dominate in more episodes than the Carolina.
7 H 0 : Dominance is balanced between the subspecies (p =.5) H A : One of the subspecies tends to dominate the other (p.5) N + = 8, N  = 0, B s = 8. Looking under n d = 8 in Table 7, we see that the rightmost column with a critical value less than or equal to 8 is the column headed.01 (for a nondirectional alternative), and the next column is headed.002. Therefore,.002 < P <.01. There is sufficient evidence (.002 < P <.01) to conclude the Carolina subspecies tends to dominate the Northern P = 2(.5 8 ) = (a) The null distribution is a binomial distribution with n = 7 and p =.5. Since B s =7 and H A is nondirectional, we need to calculate the probability of 7 successes or of 0 successes. The probability of 7 successes is.5 7 = Likewise, the probability of 0 successes is.5 7 = Thus, P = 2( ) = (b) With n d = 7, the smallest possible pvalue is ; thus P cannot be less than (a) (i) P = (2)[(105)(.5 13 )(.5 2 ) + (15)(.5 14 )(.5) + (1)(.5 15 )] = (ii) P = (2)[(15)(.5 14 )(.5) + (1)(.5 15 )] = (iii) P = (2)(.5 15 ) = (b) If B s = 14, then P = <.002; if B s = 13, then P = >.002. Thus, the critical value 14 corresponds to a Pvalue that is as close to.002 as possible without exceeding it. (c) The entry for.005 would be 14, because <.005 but > Let p denote the probability that hunger rating is higher when taking mcpp than when taking the placebo. H 0 : p =.5 H A : p.5 N + = 3, N  = 5, B s = 5. Looking under n d = 8 in Table 7, we see that the leftmost column has an entry of 7, so the Pvalue is greater than.20. There is insufficient evidence (P >.20) to conclude that hunger ratings differ on the two treatments P = (2)[(56)(.5 5 )(. 5 3 ) + (28)(.5 6 )(. 5 2 ) + (8)(.5 7 )(. 5 1 ) + (1)(.5 8 )] = (a) P >.20 (b).10 < P <.20 (c).02 < P <.05 (d).01 < P < (a) P >.20 (b).05 < P <.10 (c).002 < P <.01 (d).002 < P < H 0 : Hunger rating is not affected by treatment (mcpp vs. placebo) H A : Treatment does affect hunger rating 135
8 136 The absolute values of the differences are 5, 7, 28, 47, 80, 7, 8, and 20. The ranks of the absolute differences are 1, 2.5, 6, 7, 8, 2.5, 4, and 5. The signed ranks are 1, 2.5, 6, 7, 8, 2.5, 4, and 5. Thus, W+ = = 9 and W = = 27. W s = 27 and n d = 8; reading Table 8 we find Pvalue >.20 and H 0 is not rejected. There is insufficient evidence (P >.20) to conclude that treatment has an effect H 0 : Weight change is not affected by treatment (mcpp vs. placebo) H A : Treatment does affect weight change The absolute values of the differences are 1.1, 1.6, 2.1, 0.3, 0.6, 2.2, 0.9, 0.7, and 0.4. The ranks of the absolute differences are 6, 7, 8, 1, 3, 9, 5, 4, and 2. The signed ranks are 6, 7, 8, 1, 3, 9, 5, 4, and 2. Thus, W+ = = 15 and W = = 30. W s = 30 and n d = 9; reading Table 8 we find Pvalue >.20 and H 0 is not rejected. There is insufficient evidence (P >.20) to conclude that treatment has an effect H 0 : HLA compatibility has no effect on graft survival time H A : Survival time tends to be greater when compatibility score is close The differences tend to be positive, which is consistent with H A. The absolute values of the differences are 12, 6, 42+, 67, 5, 5, 6, 20, 11, 18+, and 1. The ranks of the absolute differences are 7, 4.5, 10, 11, 2.5, 2.5, 4.5, 9, 6, 8, and 1. The signed ranks are 7, 4.5, 10, 11, 2.5, 2.5, 4.5, 9, 6, 8, and 1. Thus, W+ = = 60.5 and W = = 5.5. W s = 60.5 and n d = 11; reading Table 8 we find.005 < Pvalue <.01 and H 0 is rejected. There is strong evidence (.005 < Pvalue <.01) to conclude that survival time tends to be greater when compatibility score is close H 0 : Alcoholism has no effect on brain density H A : Alcoholism reduces brain density The differences tend to be negative, which is consistent with H A. The absolute values of the differences are 1.2, 1.7,.5, 4.7, 3.3,.4, 2.7, 1.8,.1,.3, and 1.4. The ranks of the absolute differences are 5, 7, 4, 11, 10, 3, 9, 8, 1, 2, and 6. The signed ranks are 5, 7, 4, 11, 10, 3, 9, 8, 1, 2, and 6. Thus, W+ = = 5 and W = = 61. W s = 61 and n d = 11; reading Table 8 we find.001 < Pvalue <.005 and H 0 is rejected. There is strong evidence (.001 < Pvalue <.005) to conclude that alcoholism is associated with reduced brain density. This was an observational study, so drawing a causeeffect inference is risky. We should stop short of saying that alcoholism reduces brain density.
9 9.34 Let 1 denote 5 weeks and 2 denote baseline. (a) Let N denote no coffee. H 0 : Mean cholesterol does not change in the "no coffee" condition (µ N,1 = µ N,2 ) H A : Mean cholesterol does change in the "no coffee" condition (µ N,1 µ N,2 ) 137 SE = 27/ 25 = t s = 35/5.40 = With df = 24, Table 4 gives t.0005 = We reject H 0. There is sufficient evidence (P <.001) to conclude that mean cholesterol is reduced in the "no coffee" condition. (b) Let U denote usual coffee. H 0 : Mean cholesterol does not change in the "usual coffee" condition (µ U,1 = µ U,2 ) H A : Mean cholesterol does change in the "usual coffee" condition (µ U,1 µ U,2 ) SE = 56/ 8 = t s = 26/19.8 = With df = 7, Table 4 gives t.20 = and t.10 = We do not reject H 0. There is insufficient evidence (.20 < P <.40) to conclude that mean cholesterol is changed in the "usual coffee" condition. (c) Let N denote no coffee, U denote usual coffee, and d denote the change from baseline. H 0 : Mean cholesterol is not affected by discontinuing coffee (µ N,d = µ U,d ) H A : Mean cholesterol is affected by discontinuing coffee (µ N,d µ U,d ) SE = = t s = (3526)/20.52 = Formal (7.1) gives df = 8.1 and the conservative df value is min{24,7} = 7, whereas the liberal df value is n 1 + n 22 = 31. Using df = 8, Table 4 gives t.01 = and t.005 = 3.355, which implies that.01 < P <.02. (Using df = 30, the closest value to 31 in Table 4, we get t.005 = and t.0005 = 3.646, which implies that.001 < P <.01.) We reject H 0. (d) There is sufficient evidence (.01 < P <.02) to conclude that mean cholesterol is reduced by discontinuing coffee Food Intake (cal) Premenstrual Postmenstrual
10 No. This result suggests that the population mean difference between the right eye and the left eye is less than 1.1 mg/dl, but positive and negative differences cancel each other out when such a mean is calculated. The result says nothing at all about the typical or average magnitude of the difference between the two eyes No. "Accurate" prediction would mean that the individual differences (d's) are small. To judge whether this is the case, one would need the individual values of the d's; using these, one could see whether most of the magnitudes ( d 's) are small (a) ȳ 1  ȳ 2 = d  = 1, s d = 1.2. SE (ȳ1  ȳ 2 ) = 1.2/ 15 = ± (2.145)(.3098) (df = 14) (1.66,.34) or < µ 1  µ 2 < (b) SE (ȳ1  ȳ 2 ) = = ± (2.145)(.8595) (using df = 14) (2.84,0.84) or < µ 1  µ 2 < This interval is much wider than the one constructed in part (a) H 0 : The before and after means are the same (µ 1 = µ 2 ) H A : The before and after means are different (µ 1 µ 2 ) SE (ȳ1  ȳ 2 ) = 1.2/ 15 = t s = 1/.3098 = With df = 14, Table 4 gives t.005 = and t.0005 = 4.140; thus,.001 < P <.01. We reject H 0 ; there is strong evidence (.001 < P <.01) of a before and after difference (a) Let p denote the probability that a before count is higher than the corresponding after count. H 0 : p =.5 H A : p.5 N + = 2, N  = 10, B s = 10. Looking under n d = 12 in Table 7, we see that.02 < P <.05. There is sufficient evidence (.02 < P <.05) to conclude that the after count tends to be higher than the before count. (b) P = (2)[(66)(.5 10 )( 5 2 ) + (12)(.5 11 )( 5 1 ) + (1)(.5 12 )] =.0386.
11 The scatterplot shows a positive relationship between before and after counts. The pairing removes the variability between cats from the analysis and is, therefore, effective. After (Y ) Before (Y ) Let 1 denote central and 2 denote top. ȳ 1  ȳ 2 = d  = 2.533, s d = SE (ȳ1  ȳ 2 ) =.41312/ 6 = ± (2.015)(.1687) (df = 5) (2.19,2.87) or 2.19 < µ 1  µ 2 < 2.87 percent The standard error is SE (ȳ1  ȳ 2 ) = 1.86/ 15 = ± (1.761)(.48) (df = 14) (1.35,3.05) or 1.35 < µ 1  µ 2 < 3.05 species It must be reasonable to regard the 15 differences as a random sample from a normal population. We must trust the researchers that their sampling method was random. The normality condition can be verified with a normal probability plot. The plot below is fairly linear (although the plateaus show that there are several differences that have the same value), which supports the normality condition Difference nscores
12 The null and alternative hypotheses are H 0 : The average number of species is the same in pools as in riffles (µ 1 =µ 2 ) H A : The average numbers of species in pools and in riffles differ (µ 1 µ 2 ) The standard error is SE (ȳ1  ȳ 2 ) = SE d  = s d n d = =.48. The test statistic is t s = ȳ 1  ȳ 2 SE (ȳ1  ȳ 2 ) = d  SE d  = = To bracket the Pvalue, we consult Table 4 with df = 151 = 14. Table 4 gives t.0005 = Thus, the Pvalue for the nondirectional test is bracketed as P <.001. At significance level α =.10, we reject H 0 if P <.10. Since P <.001, we reject H 0. There is sufficient evidence (P <.001) to conclude that the average number of species in pools is greater than in riffles (a) Let p denote the probability that there are more species in a pool than in its adjacent riffle. H 0 : The two habitats support equal levels of diversity (p =.5) H A : The two habitats do not support equal levels of diversity (p.5) N + = 12, N  = 1, B s = 12. Eliminating the two pairs with d = 0, we refer to Table 7 with n d = 13. The rightmost column with a critical value of 12 is the column headed.01 for a nondirectional alternative (i.e., for a twotailed test), and the next column is headed.002. Therefore,.002 < P <.01. There is sufficient evidence (.002 < P <.01) to conclude that species diversity is greater in pools than in riffles. (b) P = (2)[(13)(.5 12 )(.5 1 ) ] = H 0 : Pools and riffles support equal levels of diversity H A : Pools and riffles support different levels of diversity The absolute values of the differences are 3, 3, 4, 3, 4, 5, 1, 1, 1, 4, 1, 4, and 1. The ranks of the absolute differences are 7, 7, 10.5, 7, 10.5, 13, 3, 3, 3, 10.5, 3, 10.5 and 3. The signed ranks are 7, 7, 10.5, 7, 10.5, 13, 3, 3, 3, 10.5, 3, 10.5 and 3. Thus, W+ = = 88 and W = 3. W s = 88 and n d = 13; reading Table 8 we find.001 < Pvalue <.002 and H 0 is rejected. There is strong evidence (.001 < Pvalue <.002) to conclude that the diversity levels differ between pools and riffles There are several ties in the data, which means that the Pvalue from the Wilcoxon test is only approximate.
13 9.49 The null and alternative hypotheses are H 0 : Caffeine has no effect on RER (µ 1 =µ 2 ) H A : Caffeine has some effect on RER (µ 1 µ 2 ) We proceed to calculate the differences, the standard error of the mean difference, and the test statistic. Subject Placebo Caffeine Difference Mean 7.33 SD 5.59 The standard error is SE (ȳ1  ȳ 2 ) = SE d  = s d n d = = The test statistic is t s = ȳ 1  ȳ 2 SE (ȳ1  ȳ 2 ) = d  SE d  = = To bracket the Pvalue, we consult Table 4 with df = 91 = 8. Table 4 gives t.005 = and t.0005 = Thus, the Pvalue for the nondirectional test is bracketed as.001 < P <.01. At significance level α =.05, we reject H 0 if P <.05. Since P <.01, we reject H 0. To determine the directionality of departure from H 0, we note that d  > 0; that is, ȳ 1 > ȳ 2. There is sufficient evidence (.001 < P <.01) to conclude that caffeine tends to decrease RER under these conditions. 141
14 RER (%) Placebo Caffeine 9.51 Let p denote the probability that RER for a subject is higher after taking placebo than after taking caffeine. H 0 : RER is not affected by caffeine (p =.5) H A : RER is affected by caffeine (p.5) N + = 9, N  = 0, B s = 9. Looking under n d = 9 in Table 7, we see that the rightmost column with a critical value less than or equal to 9 is the column headed.01 (for a nondirectional alternative), and the next column is headed.002. Therefore,.002 < P <.01. There is sufficient evidence (.002 < P <.01) to conclude that caffeine tends to decrease RER under these conditions H 0 : Mean CP is the same in regenerating and in normal tissue (µ 1 = µ 2 ) H A : Mean CP is different in regenerating and in normal tissue (µ 1 µ 2 ) SE (ȳ1  ȳ 2 ) = 4.89/ 8 = t s = 4.64/1.727 = With df = 7, Table 4 gives t.02 = and t.01 = Thus,.02 < P <.04 and we reject H 0. There is sufficient evidence (.02 < P <.04) to conclude that mean CP is different in regenerating and in normal tissue (a) Let 1 denote control and 2 denote benzamil. H 0 : Benzamil does not impair healing (µ 1 = µ 2 ) H A : Benzamil impairs healing (µ 1 > µ 2 ) ȳ 1  ȳ 2 = d  =.09706; s d = SE (ȳ1  ȳ 2 ) =.14768/ 17 = t s =.09706/ = P =.0077, so we reject H 0. There is sufficient evidence (P =.0077) to conclude that benzamil impairs healing.
15 (b) Let p denote the probability that the control limb heals more than the benzamil limb. H 0 : Benzamil does not impair healing (p =.5) H A : Benzamil impairs healing (p >.5) N + = 11, N  = 4, B s = 1. The two animals with d = 0 are eliminated. P =.059, so we do not reject H 0. There is insufficient evidence (P =.059) to conclude that benzamil impairs healing. [Remark: Unlike the t test in part (a), the sign test does not take account of the fact that the negative d's are smaller in magnitude than the positive d's. This illustrates the inferior power of the sign test.] (c) (.021,.173) or.021 < µ 1  µ 2 <.173 mm 2. (d) Benzamil Control Yes, the upward trend indicates that the pairing was effective Summary statistics are as follows: Experimental group Control group Rest (1) Work (2) Difference (3) Rest (4) Work (5) Difference (6) Mean SD (a) Column (1) versus column (4) H 0 : Mean ventilation at rest is the same in the two conditions (µ 1 = µ 4 ) H A : Mean ventilation at rest is different in the two conditions (µ 1 µ 4 ) t s = 2.757, df = 13.97, P =.015. We reject H 0. There is sufficient evidence (P =.015) to conclude that mean ventilation at rest is higher in the "to be hypnotized" condition than in the "control" condition. (b) (i) Column (1) versus column (2): H 0 : Hypnotic suggestion does not change mean ventilation (µ 1 = µ 2 ) H A : Hypnotic suggestion increases mean ventilation (µ 1 < µ 2 ) t s = , df = 7, P = We reject H 0. There is sufficient evidence (P =.0087) to conclude that hypnotic suggestion increases mean ventilation.
16 144 (ii) Column (4) versus column (5): H 0 : Waking suggestion does not change mean ventilation (µ 4 = µ 5 ) H A : Waking suggestion increases mean ventilation (µ 4 < µ 5 ) Because ȳ 4 > ȳ 5, the data do not deviate from H 0 in the direction specified by H A. Thus, P >.50 and we do not reject H 0. There is no evidence that waking suggestion increases mean ventilation. (iii) Column (3) versus column (6): H 0 : Hypnotic and waking suggestion produce the same mean change in ventilation (µ 3 = µ 6 ) H A : Hypnotic suggestion increases mean ventilation more than does waking suggestion (µ 3 < µ 6 ) t s = , df = 7.5, P = We reject H 0. There is sufficient evidence (P =.0055) to conclude that hypnotic suggestion increases mean ventilation more than does waking suggestion. (c) (i) Sign test for column (1) versus column (2). Let p 1 denote the probability that a person's ventilation after hypnotic suggestion will be higher than that at rest. H 0 : Hypnotic suggestion does not change mean ventilation (p 1 =.5) H A : Hypnotic suggestion increases mean ventilation (p 1 >.5) B s = 8, P = We reject H 0. There is sufficient evidence (P =.0039) to conclude that hypnotic suggestion increases mean ventilation. (ii) Sign test for column (4) versus column (5). Let p 2 denote the probability that a person's ventilation after waking suggestion will be higher than that at rest. H 0 : Waking suggestion does not change mean ventilation (p 2 =.5) H A : Waking suggestion increases mean ventilation (p 2 >.5) N + = 6, N  = 2. Thus, the data do not deviate from H 0 in the direction specified by H A, so P >.50 and we do not reject H 0. There is no evidence that waking suggestion increases mean ventilation. (iii) WilcoxonMannWhitney test for column (3) versus column (6): H 0 : Hypnotic and waking suggestion produce the same mean change in ventilation H A : Hypnotic suggestion increases mean ventilation more than does waking suggestion U s = 63, P = We reject H 0. There is sufficient evidence (P = ) to conclude that hypnotic suggestion increases mean ventilation more than does waking suggestion.
17 145 (d) A normal probability plot of column (3) shows that the data are quite skewed. This could account for two discrepancies: First, to compare column (1) to column (2), we used the differences in column (3); the t test gave P =.0087 whereas the sign test gave P = Second, to compare column (3) to column (6), the t test gave P =.0055 whereas the WilcoxonMannWhitney test gave P = Both of the t tests rest on the questionable condition that the population distribution corresponding to column (3) is normal. The failure of this condition inflates the standard deviation and robs the t test of power, so that the nonparametric tests give stronger conclusions (smaller Pvalues) Ventillation nscores A normal probability plot of column (6) shows that the normality condition appears to be met for these data. 5.5 Ventillation nscores 9.55 (a) By using matched pairs we eliminate the variability that is associated with the variables used to create the pairs (age, sex, etc.). This provides for greater precision and more power in the test. (b) It may be that the pairing variables (age, sex, etc.) are unrelated to blood pressure. If this is the case, then the pairing accomplishes nothing, but it reduces the number of degrees of freedom, and therefore the power, of the test N + = 10, N  = 10, B s = 10. In this case, the data are as evenly balanced as possible, so P = 1. (Table 7 indicates that P >.20.) Thus, we do not reject H 0. There is no evidence that transdermal estradiol has an effect on PAI1 level.
18 A normal probability plot of the data shows that the normality condition is not met. However, a sign test can be conducted. Let p denote the probability that urinary protein excretion will go down after plasmapheresis. H 0 : Plasmapheresis affects urinary protein excretion (p =.5) H A : Plasmapheresis does not affect urinary protein excretion (p.5) N + = 6, N  = 0, B s = 6. From Table 7,.02 < P <.05 (for a twosided test). The exact Pvalue is (2)(.5 6 ) = Thus, there is evidence (P =.03125) to conclude that urinary protein excretion tends to go down after plasmapheresis. Note: Another approach would be to transform the data and then conduct a t test in the transformed scale. For example, taking the reciprocal of each difference yields a fairly symmetric distribution; a t test then gives t s = 5.4 and P =.003.
Structure of the Data. Paired Samples. Overview. The data from a paired design can be tabulated in this form. Individual Y 1 Y 2 d i = Y 1 Y
Structure of the Data Paired Samples Bret Larget Departments of Botany and of Statistics University of Wisconsin Madison Statistics 371 11th November 2005 The data from a paired design can be tabulated
More informationStat 371, Cecile Ane Practice problems Midterm #2, Spring 2012
Stat 371, Cecile Ane Practice problems Midterm #2, Spring 2012 The first 3 problems are taken from previous semesters exams, with solutions at the end of this document. The other problems are suggested
More informationCHAPTER 7 Comparison of Two Independent Samples 7.1 We first find the standard error of each mean. SE 1 = SE ȳ1 = s 1 n 1 = 4.3 6 = 1.755. SE 2 = SE ȳ2 = s 2 n 2 = 5.7 12 = 1.645. SE (ȳ1  ȳ 2 ) = SE 1
More informationUCLA STAT 13 Statistical Methods  Final Exam Review Solutions Chapter 7 Sampling Distributions of Estimates
UCLA STAT 13 Statistical Methods  Final Exam Review Solutions Chapter 7 Sampling Distributions of Estimates 1. (a) (i) µ µ (ii) σ σ n is exactly Normally distributed. (c) (i) is approximately Normally
More informationThe calculations lead to the following values: d 2 = 46, n = 8, s d 2 = 4, s d = 2, SEof d = s d n s d n
EXAMPLE 1: Paired ttest and tinterval DBP Readings by Two Devices The diastolic blood pressures (DBP) of 8 patients were determined using two techniques: the standard method used by medical personnel
More informationHYPOTHESIS TESTING (TWO SAMPLE)  CHAPTER 8 1. how can a sample be used to estimate the unknown parameters of a population
HYPOTHESIS TESTING (TWO SAMPLE)  CHAPTER 8 1 PREVIOUSLY estimation how can a sample be used to estimate the unknown parameters of a population use confidence intervals around point estimates of central
More informationStatistical Inference and ttests
1 Statistical Inference and ttests Objectives Evaluate the difference between a sample mean and a target value using a onesample ttest. Evaluate the difference between a sample mean and a target value
More informationPower and Sample Size Determination
Power and Sample Size Determination Bret Hanlon and Bret Larget Department of Statistics University of Wisconsin Madison November 3 8, 2011 Power 1 / 31 Experimental Design To this point in the semester,
More informationChapter 9: Comparison of Paired Samples
STAT503 Lecture Notes: Chapter 9 1 Chapter 9: Comparison of Paired Samples November 2, 2009 9.1 Introduction Observations occur in pairs such as: as identical twins, two observations on the same individual
More informationExample for testing one population mean:
Today: Sections 13.1 to 13.3 ANNOUNCEMENTS: We will finish hypothesis testing for the 5 situations today. See pages 586587 (end of Chapter 13) for a summary table. Quiz for week 8 starts Wed, ends Monday
More informationT adult = 96 T child = 114.
Homework Solutions Do all tests at the 5% level and quote pvalues when possible. When answering each question uses sentences and include the relevant JMP output and plots (do not include the data in your
More informationStatistiek I. ttests. John Nerbonne. CLCG, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen. John Nerbonne 1/35
Statistiek I ttests John Nerbonne CLCG, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen http://wwwletrugnl/nerbonne/teach/statistieki/ John Nerbonne 1/35 ttests To test an average or pair of averages when σ is known, we
More information1. Rejecting a true null hypothesis is classified as a error. 2. Failing to reject a false null hypothesis is classified as a error.
1. Rejecting a true null hypothesis is classified as a error. 2. Failing to reject a false null hypothesis is classified as a error. 8.5 Goodness of Fit Test Suppose we want to make an inference about
More informationUnit 24 Hypothesis Tests about Means
Unit 24 Hypothesis Tests about Means Objectives: To recognize the difference between a paired t test and a twosample t test To perform a paired t test To perform a twosample t test A measure of the amount
More informationStatistics 104: Section 7
Statistics 104: Section 7 Section Overview Reminders Comments on Midterm Common Mistakes on Problem Set 6 Statistical Week in Review Comments on Midterm Overall, the midterms were good with one notable
More informationInferential Statistics
Inferential Statistics Sampling and the normal distribution Zscores Confidence levels and intervals Hypothesis testing Commonly used statistical methods Inferential Statistics Descriptive statistics are
More informationSimple Linear Regression Chapter 11
Simple Linear Regression Chapter 11 Rationale Frequently decisionmaking situations require modeling of relationships among business variables. For instance, the amount of sale of a product may be related
More informationChi Square for Contingency Tables
2 x 2 Case Chi Square for Contingency Tables A test for p 1 = p 2 We have learned a confidence interval for p 1 p 2, the difference in the population proportions. We want a hypothesis testing procedure
More informationWording of Final Conclusion. Slide 1
Wording of Final Conclusion Slide 1 8.3: Assumptions for Testing Slide 2 Claims About Population Means 1) The sample is a simple random sample. 2) The value of the population standard deviation σ is known
More informationConfidence level. Most common choices are 90%, 95%, or 99%. (α = 10%), (α = 5%), (α = 1%)
Confidence Interval A confidence interval (or interval estimate) is a range (or an interval) of values used to estimate the true value of a population parameter. A confidence interval is sometimes abbreviated
More informationTesting: is my coin fair?
Testing: is my coin fair? Formally: we want to make some inference about P(head) Try it: toss coin several times (say 7 times) Assume that it is fair ( P(head)= ), and see if this assumption is compatible
More informationSociology 6Z03 Topic 15: Statistical Inference for Means
Sociology 6Z03 Topic 15: Statistical Inference for Means John Fox McMaster University Fall 2016 John Fox (McMaster University) Soc 6Z03: Statistical Inference for Means Fall 2016 1 / 41 Outline: Statistical
More informationLAB 4 INSTRUCTIONS CONFIDENCE INTERVALS AND HYPOTHESIS TESTING
LAB 4 INSTRUCTIONS CONFIDENCE INTERVALS AND HYPOTHESIS TESTING In this lab you will explore the concept of a confidence interval and hypothesis testing through a simulation problem in engineering setting.
More informationAP Statistics 2000 Scoring Guidelines
AP Statistics 000 Scoring Guidelines The materials included in these files are intended for noncommercial use by AP teachers for course and exam preparation; permission for any other use must be sought
More informationModule 5 Hypotheses Tests: Comparing Two Groups
Module 5 Hypotheses Tests: Comparing Two Groups Objective: In medical research, we often compare the outcomes between two groups of patients, namely exposed and unexposed groups. At the completion of this
More informationLecture Topic 6: Chapter 9 Hypothesis Testing
Lecture Topic 6: Chapter 9 Hypothesis Testing 9.1 Developing Null and Alternative Hypotheses Hypothesis testing can be used to determine whether a statement about the value of a population parameter should
More informationAP Statistics 2007 Scoring Guidelines
AP Statistics 2007 Scoring Guidelines The College Board: Connecting Students to College Success The College Board is a notforprofit membership association whose mission is to connect students to college
More informationAP Statistics 2004 Scoring Guidelines
AP Statistics 2004 Scoring Guidelines The materials included in these files are intended for noncommercial use by AP teachers for course and exam preparation; permission for any other use must be sought
More informationHypothesis tests, confidence intervals, and bootstrapping
Hypothesis tests, confidence intervals, and bootstrapping Business Statistics 41000 Fall 2015 1 Topics 1. Hypothesis tests Testing a mean: H0 : µ = µ 0 Testing a proportion: H0 : p = p 0 Testing a difference
More informationName: Date: Use the following to answer questions 34:
Name: Date: 1. Determine whether each of the following statements is true or false. A) The margin of error for a 95% confidence interval for the mean increases as the sample size increases. B) The margin
More informationAn example ANOVA situation. 1Way ANOVA. Some notation for ANOVA. Are these differences significant? Example (Treating Blisters)
An example ANOVA situation Example (Treating Blisters) 1Way ANOVA MATH 143 Department of Mathematics and Statistics Calvin College Subjects: 25 patients with blisters Treatments: Treatment A, Treatment
More informationHypothesis testing S2
Basic medical statistics for clinical and experimental research Hypothesis testing S2 Katarzyna Jóźwiak k.jozwiak@nki.nl 2nd November 2015 1/43 Introduction Point estimation: use a sample statistic to
More informationSTT 430/630/ES 760 Lecture Notes: Chapter 6: Hypothesis Testing 1. February 23, 2009 Chapter 6: Introduction to Hypothesis Testing
STT 430/630/ES 760 Lecture Notes: Chapter 6: Hypothesis Testing 1 February 23, 2009 Chapter 6: Introduction to Hypothesis Testing One of the primary uses of statistics is to use data to infer something
More informationStatistical Significance and Bivariate Tests
Statistical Significance and Bivariate Tests BUS 735: Business Decision Making and Research 1 1.1 Goals Goals Specific goals: Refamiliarize ourselves with basic statistics ideas: sampling distributions,
More informationA) to D) to B) to E) to C) to Rate of hay fever per 1000 population for people under 25
Unit 0 Review #3 Name: Date:. Suppose a random sample of 380 married couples found that 54 had two or more personality preferences in common. In another random sample of 573 married couples, it was found
More informationHypothesis Testing: Two Means, Paired Data, Two Proportions
Chapter 10 Hypothesis Testing: Two Means, Paired Data, Two Proportions 10.1 Hypothesis Testing: Two Population Means and Two Population Proportions 1 10.1.1 Student Learning Objectives By the end of this
More information1 Confidence intervals
Math 143 Inference for Means 1 Statistical inference is inferring information about the distribution of a population from information about a sample. We re generally talking about one of two things: 1.
More informationSTAT 145 (Notes) Al Nosedal anosedal@unm.edu Department of Mathematics and Statistics University of New Mexico. Fall 2013
STAT 145 (Notes) Al Nosedal anosedal@unm.edu Department of Mathematics and Statistics University of New Mexico Fall 2013 CHAPTER 18 INFERENCE ABOUT A POPULATION MEAN. Conditions for Inference about mean
More informationMAT X Hypothesis Testing  Part I
MAT 2379 3X Hypothesis Testing  Part I Definition : A hypothesis is a conjecture concerning a value of a population parameter (or the shape of the population). The hypothesis will be tested by evaluating
More informationCHAPTER 14 NONPARAMETRIC TESTS
CHAPTER 14 NONPARAMETRIC TESTS Everything that we have done up until now in statistics has relied heavily on one major fact: that our data is normally distributed. We have been able to make inferences
More informationChapter 8 Hypothesis Testing
Chapter 8 Hypothesis Testing Chapter problem: Does the MicroSort method of gender selection increase the likelihood that a baby will be girl? MicroSort: a genderselection method developed by Genetics
More informationAP Statistics 2006 Scoring Guidelines
AP Statistics 2006 Scoring Guidelines The College Board: Connecting Students to College Success The College Board is a notforprofit membership association whose mission is to connect students to college
More informationInference for two Population Means
Inference for two Population Means Bret Hanlon and Bret Larget Department of Statistics University of Wisconsin Madison October 27 November 1, 2011 Two Population Means 1 / 65 Case Study Case Study Example
More informationNonparametric Statistics
1 14.1 Using the Binomial Table Nonparametric Statistics In this chapter, we will survey several methods of inference from Nonparametric Statistics. These methods will introduce us to several new tables
More informationOneSample ttest. Example 1: Mortgage Process Time. Problem. Data set. Data collection. Tools
OneSample ttest Example 1: Mortgage Process Time Problem A faster loan processing time produces higher productivity and greater customer satisfaction. A financial services institution wants to establish
More informationHypothesis Testing. Lecture 10
Lecture 10 Hypothesis Testing A hypothesis is a conjecture about the distribution of some random variables. For example, a claim about the value of a parameter of the statistical model. There are two types
More informationSection 9.3B Inference for Means: Paired Data
Section 9.3B Inference for Means: Paired Data 1 Objective PERFORM significance tests for paired data are called: paired t procedures. Comparative studies (i.e. 2 observations on 1 individual or 1 observation
More informationE205 Final: Version B
Name: Class: Date: E205 Final: Version B Multiple Choice Identify the choice that best completes the statement or answers the question. 1. The owner of a local nightclub has recently surveyed a random
More informationInferences About Differences Between Means Edpsy 580
Inferences About Differences Between Means Edpsy 580 Carolyn J. Anderson Department of Educational Psychology University of Illinois at UrbanaChampaign Inferences About Differences Between Means Slide
More informationChapter 3: Nonparametric Tests
B. Weaver (15Feb00) Nonparametric Tests... 1 Chapter 3: Nonparametric Tests 3.1 Introduction Nonparametric, or distribution free tests are socalled because the assumptions underlying their use are fewer
More informationChapter Five: Paired Samples Methods 1/38
Chapter Five: Paired Samples Methods 1/38 5.1 Introduction 2/38 Introduction Paired data arise with some frequency in a variety of research contexts. Patients might have a particular type of laser surgery
More informationP(every one of the seven intervals covers the true mean yield at its location) = 3.
1 Let = number of locations at which the computed confidence interval for that location hits the true value of the mean yield at its location has a binomial(7,095) (a) P(every one of the seven intervals
More informationSection 3 Part 1. Relationships between two numerical variables
Section 3 Part 1 Relationships between two numerical variables 1 Relationship between two variables The summary statistics covered in the previous lessons are appropriate for describing a single variable.
More informationAnalysis of Variance ANOVA
Analysis of Variance ANOVA Overview We ve used the t test to compare the means from two independent groups. Now we ve come to the final topic of the course: how to compare means from more than two populations.
More information7. Tests of association and Linear Regression
7. Tests of association and Linear Regression In this chapter we consider 1. Tests of Association for 2 qualitative variables. 2. Measures of the strength of linear association between 2 quantitative variables.
More informationChapter 8. Hypothesis Testing
Chapter 8 Hypothesis Testing Hypothesis In statistics, a hypothesis is a claim or statement about a property of a population. A hypothesis test (or test of significance) is a standard procedure for testing
More informationSTA218 Introduction to Hypothesis Testing
STA218 Introduction to Hypothesis Testing Al Nosedal. University of Toronto. Fall 2015 October 29, 2015 Who wants to be a millionaire? Let s say that one of you is invited to this popular show. As you
More informationExperimental Design. Power and Sample Size Determination. Proportions. Proportions. Confidence Interval for p. The Binomial Test
Experimental Design Power and Sample Size Determination Bret Hanlon and Bret Larget Department of Statistics University of Wisconsin Madison November 3 8, 2011 To this point in the semester, we have largely
More informationGeneral Method: Difference of Means. 3. Calculate df: either WelchSatterthwaite formula or simpler df = min(n 1, n 2 ) 1.
General Method: Difference of Means 1. Calculate x 1, x 2, SE 1, SE 2. 2. Combined SE = SE1 2 + SE2 2. ASSUMES INDEPENDENT SAMPLES. 3. Calculate df: either WelchSatterthwaite formula or simpler df = min(n
More information1 Nonparametric Statistics
1 Nonparametric Statistics When finding confidence intervals or conducting tests so far, we always described the population with a model, which includes a set of parameters. Then we could make decisions
More informationComparing Two Groups. Standard Error of ȳ 1 ȳ 2. Setting. Two Independent Samples
Comparing Two Groups Chapter 7 describes two ways to compare two populations on the basis of independent samples: a confidence interval for the difference in population means and a hypothesis test. The
More informationHypothesis testing: Examples. AMS7, Spring 2012
Hypothesis testing: Examples AMS7, Spring 2012 Example 1: Testing a Claim about a Proportion Sect. 7.3, # 2: Survey of Drinking: In a Gallup survey, 1087 randomly selected adults were asked whether they
More informationSTATISTICS 151 SECTION 1 FINAL EXAM MAY
STATISTICS 151 SECTION 1 FINAL EXAM MAY 2 2009 This is an open book exam. Course text, personal notes and calculator are permitted. You have 3 hours to complete the test. Personal computers and cellphones
More informationAP Statistics 2010 Scoring Guidelines
AP Statistics 2010 Scoring Guidelines The College Board The College Board is a notforprofit membership association whose mission is to connect students to college success and opportunity. Founded in
More information12.8 Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test: Nonparametric Analysis for
M12_BERE8380_12_SE_C12.8.qxd 2/21/11 3:5 PM Page 1 12.8 Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test: Nonparametric Analysis for Two Related Populations 1 12.8 Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test: Nonparametric Analysis for Two
More informationPROBLEM SET 1. For the first three answer true or false and explain your answer. A picture is often helpful.
PROBLEM SET 1 For the first three answer true or false and explain your answer. A picture is often helpful. 1. Suppose the significance level of a hypothesis test is α=0.05. If the pvalue of the test
More informationAP Statistics 2008 Scoring Guidelines Form B
AP Statistics 2008 Scoring Guidelines Form B The College Board: Connecting Students to College Success The College Board is a notforprofit membership association whose mission is to connect students
More informationChapter 11: Linear Regression  Inference in Regression Analysis  Part 2
Chapter 11: Linear Regression  Inference in Regression Analysis  Part 2 Note: Whether we calculate confidence intervals or perform hypothesis tests we need the distribution of the statistic we will use.
More information7.1 Inference for comparing means of two populations
Objectives 7.1 Inference for comparing means of two populations Matched pair t confidence interval Matched pair t hypothesis test http://onlinestatbook.com/2/tests_of_means/correlated.html Overview of
More informationAP Statistics Solutions to Packet 14
AP Statistics Solutions to Packet 4 Inference for Regression Inference about the Model Predictions and Conditions HW #,, 6, 7 4. AN ETINCT BEAST, I Archaeopteryx is an extinct beast having feathers like
More informationUnit 21 Student s t Distribution in Hypotheses Testing
Unit 21 Student s t Distribution in Hypotheses Testing Objectives: To understand the difference between the standard normal distribution and the Student's t distributions To understand the difference between
More informationObjectives. 9.1, 9.2 Inference for twoway tables. The hypothesis: no association. Expected cell counts. The chisquare test.
Objectives 9.1, 9.2 Inference for twoway tables The hypothesis: no association Expected cell counts The chisquare test Using software Further reading: http://onlinestatbook.com/2/chi_square/contingency.html
More informationNonParametric Tests (I)
Lecture 5: NonParametric Tests (I) KimHuat LIM lim@stats.ox.ac.uk http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~lim/teaching.html Slide 1 5.1 Outline (i) Overview of DistributionFree Tests (ii) Median Test for Two Independent
More informationHypothesis Testing. Bluman Chapter 8
CHAPTER 8 Learning Objectives C H A P T E R E I G H T Hypothesis Testing 1 Outline 81 Steps in Traditional Method 82 z Test for a Mean 83 t Test for a Mean 84 z Test for a Proportion 85 2 Test for
More informationHypothesis Testing and Confidence Interval Estimation
Biostatistics for Health Care Researchers: A Short Course Hypothesis Testing and Confidence Interval Estimation Presented ed by: Susan M. Perkins, Ph.D. Division of Biostatistics Indiana University School
More informationComparing Means in Two Populations
Comparing Means in Two Populations Overview The previous section discussed hypothesis testing when sampling from a single population (either a single mean or two means from the same population). Now we
More information6.1 The Elements of a Test of Hypothesis
University of California, Davis Department of Statistics Summer Session II Statistics 13 August 22, 2012 Date of latest update: August 20 Lecture 6: Tests of Hypothesis Suppose you wanted to determine
More informationChapter 7. Estimates and Sample Size
Chapter 7. Estimates and Sample Size Chapter Problem: How do we interpret a poll about global warming? Pew Research Center Poll: From what you ve read and heard, is there a solid evidence that the average
More informationACTM State ExamStatistics
ACTM State ExamStatistics For the 25 multiplechoice questions, make your answer choice and record it on the answer sheet provided. Once you have completed that section of the test, proceed to the tiebreaker
More information3. Nonparametric methods
3. Nonparametric methods If the probability distributions of the statistical variables are unknown or are not as required (e.g. normality assumption violated), then we may still apply nonparametric tests
More informationSTA 2023H Solutions for Practice Test 4
1. Which statement is not true about confidence intervals? A. A confidence interval is an interval of values computed from sample data that is likely to include the true population value. B. An approximate
More information3.4 Statistical inference for 2 populations based on two samples
3.4 Statistical inference for 2 populations based on two samples Tests for a difference between two population means The first sample will be denoted as X 1, X 2,..., X m. The second sample will be denoted
More informationStatistics II Final Exam  January Use the University stationery to give your answers to the following questions.
Statistics II Final Exam  January 2012 Use the University stationery to give your answers to the following questions. Do not forget to write down your name and class group in each page. Indicate clearly
More informationI. Basics of Hypothesis Testing
Introduction to Hypothesis Testing This deals with an issue highly similar to what we did in the previous chapter. In that chapter we used sample information to make inferences about the range of possibilities
More informationConstruct a scatterplot for the given data. 2) x Answer:
Review for Test 5 STA 2023 spr 2014 Name Given the linear correlation coefficient r and the sample size n, determine the critical values of r and use your finding to state whether or not the given r represents
More information0.1 Estimating and Testing Differences in the Treatment means
0. Estimating and Testing Differences in the Treatment means Is the Ftest significant, we only learn that not all population means are the same, but through this test we can not determine where the differences
More informationStatistics for Management IISTAT 362Final Review
Statistics for Management IISTAT 362Final Review Multiple Choice Identify the letter of the choice that best completes the statement or answers the question. 1. The ability of an interval estimate to
More informationThe Paired ttest and Hypothesis Testing. John McGready Johns Hopkins University
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons AttributionNonCommercialShareAlike License. Your use of this material constitutes acceptance of that license and the conditions of use of materials on this
More informationStatistics 2014 Scoring Guidelines
AP Statistics 2014 Scoring Guidelines College Board, Advanced Placement Program, AP, AP Central, and the acorn logo are registered trademarks of the College Board. AP Central is the official online home
More information1 Hypotheses test about µ if σ is not known
1 Hypotheses test about µ if σ is not known In this section we will introduce how to make decisions about a population mean, µ, when the standard deviation is not known. In order to develop a confidence
More informationMath 62 Statistics Sample Exam Questions
Math 62 Statistics Sample Exam Questions 1. (10) Explain the difference between the distribution of a population and the sampling distribution of a statistic, such as the mean, of a sample randomly selected
More informationHypothesis testing for µ:
University of California, Los Angeles Department of Statistics Statistics 13 Elements of a hypothesis test: Hypothesis testing Instructor: Nicolas Christou 1. Null hypothesis, H 0 (always =). 2. Alternative
More informationSHORT ANSWER. Write the word or phrase that best completes each statement or answers the question.
Practice for Chapter 9 and 10 The acutal exam differs. SHORT ANSWER. Write the word or phrase that best completes each statement or answers the question. Find the number of successes x suggested by the
More informationCALCULATIONS & STATISTICS
CALCULATIONS & STATISTICS CALCULATION OF SCORES Conversion of 15 scale to 0100 scores When you look at your report, you will notice that the scores are reported on a 0100 scale, even though respondents
More informationOnesample normal hypothesis Testing, paired ttest, twosample normal inference, normal probability plots
1 / 27 Onesample normal hypothesis Testing, paired ttest, twosample normal inference, normal probability plots Timothy Hanson Department of Statistics, University of South Carolina Stat 704: Data Analysis
More informationAnalysis of numerical data S4
Basic medical statistics for clinical and experimental research Analysis of numerical data S4 Katarzyna Jóźwiak k.jozwiak@nki.nl 3rd November 2015 1/42 Hypothesis tests: numerical and ordinal data 1 group:
More informationA POPULATION MEAN, CONFIDENCE INTERVALS AND HYPOTHESIS TESTING
CHAPTER 5. A POPULATION MEAN, CONFIDENCE INTERVALS AND HYPOTHESIS TESTING 5.1 Concepts When a number of animals or plots are exposed to a certain treatment, we usually estimate the effect of the treatment
More informationMULTIPLE CHOICE. Choose the one alternative that best completes the statement or answers the question.
STATISTICS/GRACEY EXAM 3 PRACTICE/CH. 89 MULTIPLE CHOICE. Choose the one alternative that best completes the statement or answers the question. Find the Pvalue for the indicated hypothesis test. 1) A
More informationPage 548, Exercise 13
Millersville University Name Answer Key Department of Mathematics MATH 130, Elements of Statistics I, Homework 4 April 29, 2008 Page 548, Exercise 13 Height versus Arm Span A statistics student believes
More informationHypothesis testing. c 2014, Jeffrey S. Simonoff 1
Hypothesis testing So far, we ve talked about inference from the point of estimation. We ve tried to answer questions like What is a good estimate for a typical value? or How much variability is there
More information