LESSON 3 Fact vs. Opinion

Transcription

1 LESSON 3 Fact vs. Opinion Objectives: Students will: distinguish between beliefs or opinions, values, attitudes, and facts. develop criteria for evaluating the quality, balance and fairness of information. evaluate the balance and fairness of information designed to represent points of view about Wilderness and land ethics. Background: People have many different points of view, particularly concerning issues like Wilderness. It is difficult at times to discern fact from opinion, objectivity from subjectivity, and accuracy from exaggeration. Sometimes people are knowingly selective in what information they present about a topic. Other times they do not realize that they are presenting only a narrow view of the topic. Individuals in a community may hold differing beliefs or opinions, attitudes and values toward Wilderness and land ethics. There are many different reasons for the beliefs, values and attitudes people hold. Whatever the reasons or sources, the result may be strongly held differences of opinion related to the same issue in the same community. Sometimes the best solution to a local issue may seem obvious. More often, there are no clear right or wrong answers, yet emotions may be aroused and different solutions may have dramatically differing impacts on all involved, including Wilderness. When people disagree, it s hard to figure out who is right. You may decide one person is right just because the person is your friend or relative. But this is not a very good reason to agree or disagree with someone. It is better if you try to understand why these people disagree. On what main points do they disagree? Read or listen to each person s argument carefully. Separate the facts and opinions that each person presents. Finally, decide which argument best matches what you think about this process. Examining an argument without emotion is part of what critical thinking is all about. This is not easy. Many things make it hard to understand and form opinions. People s values, ages and experiences all influence the way they think. This is why learning to read and think critically is an invaluable skill. In these activities students will acquire skills to analyze beliefs or opinions, facts, values and attitudes related to Wilderness and land ethics. For the purposes of this activity, the following definitions are given: Belief or opinion: An information-based assumption. It may be right or wrong. Example: The more Wilderness we have, the more predators there will be. Value: A worth attached to some event, place, idea, etc. Example: It is important to preserve Wilderness. Page 109

2 Â Background continued: Attitude: Based on an implied belief system, an implied value system, with a predicted behavior. Example: We need to protect all remaining roadless lands in Montana as Wilderness. This statement implied a belief that it is more important to leave roadless lands undeveloped than to open them up to multiple-use development. Or: We have enough land set aside as Wilderness, and we should open all remaining roadless lands in Montana to multiple-uses such as mining, road building, logging, and motorized recreation. This statement implies a belief that natural resource development in roadless lands will provide economic benefits in the form of jobs and fewer restrictions on the types of recreation opportunities allowed. Fact: A piece of information presented as having objective reality, something that has actual existence. Example: Four percent of the land mass of the United States is congressionally designated as Wilderness. Interest Groups: Those individuals or groups who have an interest in an issue for personal, ecological, or economic reasons. They may or may not have much information, and may or may not have a strong opinion. Wilderness: an area where the Earth and its community of life are not controlled by people, where natural forces prevail, and people may visit but not live permanently. Land ethic: A value position originally developed by Aldo Leopold. This view depends upon an understanding of the science of ecology and the relationships among the parts of ecosystems. It also incorporates the belief that human beings are just one part of a larger Earth community of plants, animals, water, soils, collectively called the land. Living things are viewed from the perspective of populations rather than individual things and about maintaining it in good health. Leopold believed that responsible actions would result if a person loved and respected the land. Page 110

3 Activity 1: Opposing Viewpoints Duration: 1 class period Location: indoors Materials: student/teacher handout: Discussion Guidelines, page student handout: Opposing Wilderness Views, page Procedure: 1. Review definitions of beliefs or opinions, values, attitudes, and facts. Discuss the differences between an argument and a discussion. Refer to Discussion Guidelines student information pages. You may also want to establish clear rules for behavior during class. 2. Have students read and discuss the Opposing Wilderness Views handout. Ask students to think about these things: How do they agree? How do you think they disagree? Distinguish between the facts and the beliefs or opinions they state. What is your opinion? Put the following continuum on the board: More Wilderness Enough Wilderness Explain the differing viewpoints. Ask, If you were to show your position on the Wilderness issue, where would you be? Decide where you would be on this line and come to the board and place your name there. Ask students why they placed their names where they did. Discuss the differing viewpoints in the class and why students hold these views. 3. Give students four index cards each. Ask them to write down one sentence for each card. These sentences should consist of: one fact supporting the preservation of Wilderness one opinion supporting the preservation of Wilderness one fact in opposition one opinion in opposition Page 111

4 Â Procedure continued: 4. Bring exercise to closure by discussing both positions, and solicit other ideas or alternatives. Perhaps some of the remaining 6.2 acres of roadless lands can be set aside as Wilderness and some can be opened for multiple use management. Encourage students to see that there are no cut and dry decisions, that a solution to a controversy may be somewhere in the middle. No one will be completely satisfied with this compromise but each interest group will give and take of their positions. Review the definition of a land ethic and ask the students how they would apply a land ethic to the arguments for and against additional Wilderness. Evaluation / Follow-up / Extension Evaluate students ability to respect differing viewpoints after presenting discussion guidelines and completing the activity. Grade class participation, ability to discern differences between facts and opinions, and completion of index card assignment. If there is a particular Wilderness near your school or community, it can be used to explore the different values that people place on the land. If you don t have a Wilderness or forest area, choose one in your state or region that is either already designated or is proposed for Wilderness designation. Divide students into groups and ask each group to research the value of that particular Wilderness or forest area in terms of the following perspectives: - timber value - watershed value (the amount of rainfall and drinking water produced by the area) - wildlife value (what animals live there, how much money is spent on hunting, management, etc.) - recreational values (What is the visitation, how much money is spent in the local community by recreationist) - forage value (amount of grazing of cattle or sheep that could be done) After this research is done, have the class discuss the impacts on these values when one or another use is made of the forested area. What trade-offs are involved? How does society determine which value is the highest? Credit: CLEARING magazine, Wilderness Issue, Summer Career Options: Wilderness manager, natural resource professional, mediator, logger, miner, rancher, farmer, environmental activist References: Decision Making in a Nuclear Age, Chris Austill, ed. What Do You Think?: Teaching Critical Thinking on Critical Issues, Susan Williams Project WILD, Wildlife Issues: A Community Attitude Survey Page 112

5 Activity 1: Opposing Viewpoints STUDENT HANDOUT Discussion Guidelines The following chart, taken from Decision Making in a Nuclear Age, Chris Austill, ed., could be given to students to set guidelines for the discussion: Argument loud, angry, harsh tone interrupting changing the subject, using phony issues insults, put-downs, sarcasm exaggeration (terrible, evil, everybody, always) pushy or threatening body language talking fast, rushing thinking only of your next point instead of listening to the other person s idea faking it if you don t know something, never admitting the other person has a good point the goal is to win playing the victim to make the other person feel guilty mind reading, telling the other person what he/she thinks or feels Discussion quiet, calm, even tone of voice letting the other person finish a point before you start to speak sticking to each point until you ve worked through it treating the other person with respect using careful, exact words using calm face and hand motions taking time listening carefully and seriously considering the other s views saying I don t know if you don t, agreeing with the other person s good points the goal is to find the truth being clear and assertive about the situation asking the other person how he/she feels Page 113

6 Â Activity 1: Opposing Viewpoints STUDENT HANDOUT Discussion Guidelines 1. Try to ask open-ended questions with no right answers; accept opinions, analysis of facts and arguments. 2. Allow time for students to think before they answer, suggested time is 3 minutes. 3. Teacher should paraphrase, clarify, summarize points periodically, make it clear to the class where the discussion has been and can go. 4. Encourage student-student discussion by asking rebound questions, sending paraphrased answers back to students or to another student. Use questions like: Is that what you mean? (to first student) What do you think? Do you care to respond? (to new student) Who agrees? Disagrees? Wants to rebut? (to class) Who can explain why he/she might think that way? Rebound questions require good listening skills on the part of the students. 5. Stay with a student long enough for him/her to develop a point. Redirect statements back to the same student for clarification, defense, explanation, etc. Try to guide that student further along in his or her thinking, rather than jumping immediately to next student. 6. Ask forced-choice-decisions questions where students must take a position. 7. When necessary play devil s advocate in discussions to force students to support their own views. Be outrageous sometimes. That usually gets a response. 8. When students ask questions of the teacher, ask if other students want to respond before responding yourself. 9. Bring up value questions and/or moral choice questions in order to learn where your students stand on these. Explore these important issues with your students to find out where they are coming from, not to preach your point of view. 10. Accept all responses, correct them if facts are wrong, point out irrelevant or illogical information (or let other students do this). Credit: What Do You Think?: Teaching Critical Thinking on Critical Issues by Susan Williams. Page 114

7 Activity 1: Opposing Viewpoints STUDENT HANDOUT Opposing Wilderness Views We Need More Wilderness Just 4 percent of the land base of the United States is protected as congressionally designated Wilderness. That represents roughly 104 million acres. Currently there are 6.2 million acres of wild, roadless lands left in Montana that are up for grabs. The multiple-use people want to open it all to resource development and multiple-use management which will ruin pristine lands and watersheds. The result will be a loss of plant and wildlife species. The wild animals that live in Wilderness will all perish because their critical habitat will be destroyed forever! It is important to save the last wild country from development. I ve heard that one plant or animal species becomes extinct each day and that about one-third of the Earth s plant species are believed to be edible or medicinal. What if the plant that holds the cure for AIDS only grows in Wilderness? If we release the remaining wildlands to developers we may never have the chance to find the cure to AIDS. Let s not take a chance. We need to protect all remaining roadless lands as Wilderness to protect critical habitat for wildlife species and ensure genetic diversity of all living creatures. Page 115

8 Â Activity 1: Opposing Viewpoints STUDENT HANDOUT Opposing Wilderness Views We Have Enough Wilderness I like Wilderness. I use the Wilderness for hunting, fishing, trapping, hiking and camping. Every summer I take my family camping to the Wilderness where we look forward to relaxing, catching lots of fish and cooking them over the campfire. Even so, we have enough Wilderness. All our natural resources on forest lands are being locked up. America has a proud history of wisely using our natural resources. I am a fifth-generation logger who makes a living harvesting trees. If the remaining acres of roadless lands are designated as Wilderness, I will become the next endangered species. I m going to lose my job and I won t be able to feed my family. You know, you can t eat the scenery! If these lands are released for multiple-use, there will be plenty of jobs for everybody. Everybody will benefit immediately the loggers, the mill operators, the building industry, the businesses that provide services in the communities where we live, and the people who need homes. I just can t understand these preservationists who think Wilderness is more important than people trying to make a living. Page 116

9 Activity 2: We Can t Always Believe What We Read! Background: Everything we read, see, and hear is somewhat subjective. Everything is subject to an individual s personal filters and perspective. Objectivity is one goal of science. Even in the precise world of scientific measure, pure objectivity without some influence on the part of the observer may be beyond reach. So objectivity is a goal that is difficult, if not impossible, to achieve in a pure and technical sense. If objectivity is so hard to achieve, what can we do to develop our own skills of objectivity? One way is to become more discerning about balance and fairness. When you hear a speaker presenting information on a controversial topic like Wilderness, is that person making an effort to describe the topic as a whole? Or is the speaker selectively describing only his or her view? Does the speaker acknowledge there are any other differing points of view? Is the speaker presenting accurate information or opinion as if it were factually based? Sometimes the distortion of information, or at least its lack of completeness, may be intentional. At other times the limitations are a reflection of emerging and conflicting perspectives about what is accurate information concerning the topic. These are some of the questions this activity is designed to address. The purpose of this activity is for students to develop and use their own set of criteria for evaluating the quality, balance and fairness of information presentations. Materials: Í sample brochures collections of sample print informational brochures and publications sample advertisements and articles from newspapers and magazines student handout: Facts and Falsehoods, page Duration: two or three 45-minute periods Location: indoors Procedure: 1. Put together a file of sample informational brochures from various public or private agencies and organizations and articles from the local news media. Make sure some address Wilderness topics or issues. Examples are found in the Wilderness box, or collect your own set concerning local wildlands issues. 2. Assign students to collect articles from different media sources. They might read newspapers and magazines, or watch television newscasts on a regular basis for one or two weeks. Provide them with a Facts and Falsehoods student handout to evaluate the messages they see. Page 117

10 Â Procedure continued: 3. Divide the class into small groups. Give each group samples of informational brochures, handouts, or pamphlets that were collected. Ask students to analyze and evaluate these materials. 4. Ask each group to report on their findings. They can summarize their findings by giving the brochure an overall rating, using the five categories from exceptionally accurate to exceptionally inaccurate. Ask them to support their evaluation with some evidence and response for their view. 5. As a large group, ask them to develop a Checklist they can use to evaluate informational materials, exhibits or presentations. What should be the characteristics of an informational presentation on quality? Of balance? Of fairness? Encourage further discussion on these questions: Is it possible to be forceful and effective in expressing one s view without becoming unfair or biased? Is it possible to separate one s own viewpoint from a publicly held neutral position? To what extent do government agencies, citizen s groups, businesses, interest groups, and individual citizens have a responsibility to acknowledge other points of view concerning their policies and practices? Add further ideas to the checklist. Post the final checklist in a visible place and provide each student with a copy of the final checklist for personal use. Evaluation / Follow-up / Extension: Evaluate Facts and Falsehoods handout and group presentation. Visit a site where information is provided that is related to Wilderness or some other environmental issue or topic. Using your checklist, evaluate whether the programs, exhibits and printed materials appear to be balanced and fair. Students can contact organizations and groups from state and federal agencies involved with Wilderness; representatives of private environmental and conservation organizations; and, business and industry interests (like mining, ranching, farming, logging, tourism) in natural resource development for information. Information can be collected through written letters asking the organization s point of view (policy or position statement), the reasons the organization is taking that point of view, and a general statement of goals of the organization. Students can make predictions of the points of view and compare them with the responses they receive. Invite local members or representatives of the various groups to present their points of view in person. Think of five things you could do to enhance the public s understanding of Wilderness and land ethics in your own community without using propaganda. Career Options: Wilderness manager, natural resource professional, journalist, mediator, logger, miner, rancher, farmer, environmental activist References: Project Aquatic WILD, Facts and Falsehoods and Philosophical Differences Page 118

11 Activity 2: We Can t Always Believe What We Read! STUDENT HANDOUT Facts and Falsehoods 1. Does the article or advertisement cite or list facts? What are they? 2. Does the item make a claim? Is the claim based on or supported by facts or by some sort of evidence? Describe the claims and the supporting facts and evidence. 3. Does the item or article base its claim or story on some part of science or technology? Is a scientific law or principle used to support the claims? If yes, what are they? Is a scientist or engineer cited as an authority? Who is he or she and how is his or her expertise established? What is the occupation of the writer? 4. Is there any indication that the writer of the article stands behind its accuracy or validity? Will the publishers or editors of the brochure, newspaper or magazine support their claims? 5. How could you go about checking or verifying the claims and facts in the article? 6. What is your overall assessment of the accuracy of the article or advertisement? Exceptionally accurate? Generally accurate? Somewhat accurate? Generally inaccurate? Exceptionally inaccurate? 7. Does the publication acknowledge different points of view or opinions about Wilderness? Where are they? 8. Have the information or facts been selected in order to support a particular view or perspective? Does the material try to persuade you in some way or are you invited to make up your own mind? What evidence can you find to support your viewpoint? Page 119