Carbon Disclosure Project

Transcription

1 Carbon Disclosure Project CDP 2012 Investor CDP 2012 Information Request Iren SpA Module: Introduction Page: Introduction 0.1 Introduction Please give a general description and introduction to your organization IREN was set up on 1st July 2010 through the merger of Enìa and Iride and is at the top in the Italian multiutilities sector occupying a leading position in its business areas, a balanced mix of regulated activities and free activities and a close integration bteween upstream and downstream activities. Due to its production assets, its past and present investments, its position in all business areas, in all phases in the energy chain, and its roots within the country, IREN is now one of the main Multi-utiliies Groups on the Italian scene. The IREN Group operates in the following sectors: electricity, gas, district heating, integrated water service and waste, and it also provides other public utility services (telecommunications, public lighting, traffic light services, facility management). A diversified business model, characterized by a mix of profits between free activities (35%) and regulated activities (65%), which guarantees solidity, development prospects and reduced risk levels. IREN is one of the main examples in Italy of multiutilities oriented towards the provision of services and creation of infrastructure for enriching and enhancing the country, in respect of the environment and the customers. The Group serves a multiregional area with over 7,200,000 inhabitants, with its 4,560 employees, a Gross Operating Margin of 592 million euros in 2011, a portfolio of more than 1.4 million customers in the energy sector and over 2.4 million inhabitants served in the water service and waste management. 0.2 Reporting Year Please state the start and end date of the year for which you are reporting data. The current reporting year is the latest/most recent 12-month period for which data is reported. Enter the dates of this year first. We request data for more than one reporting period for some emission accounting questions. Please provide data for the three years prior to the current reporting year if you have not provided this information before, or if this is the first time you have answered a CDP information request. (This does not apply if you have been offered and selected the option of answering the shorter questionnaire). If you are going to provide additional years of data, please give the dates of those reporting periods here. Work backwards from the most recent reporting year. Please enter dates in following format: day(dd)/month(mm)/year(yyyy) (i.e. 31/01/2001). Enter Periods that will be disclosed Sat 01 Jan Sat 31 Dec Country list configuration Please select the countries for which you will be supplying data. This selection will be carried forward to assist you in completing your response Select country Italy 0.4 Currency selection

2 Please select the currency in which you would like to submit your response. All financial information contained in the response should be in this currency. EUR( ) 0.5 Please select if you wish to complete a shorter information request 0.6 Modules As part of the Investor CDP information request, electric utilities, companies with electric utility activities or assets, companies in the automobile or auto component manufacture sectors and companies in the oil and gas industry should complete supplementary questions in addition to the main questionnaire. If you are in these sectors (according to the Global Industry Classification Standard (GICS)), the corresponding sector modules will be marked as default options to your information request. If you want to query your classification, please respond@cdproject.net. If you have not been presented with a sector module that you consider would be appropriate for your company to answer, please select the module below. If you wish to view the questions first, please see Attachments Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2012/Introduction/Board of directors_2010.pdf Module: Management [Investor] Page: 1. Governance 1.1 Where is the highest level of direct responsibility for climate change within your company? Individual/Sub-set of the Board or other committee appointed by the Board 1.1a Please identify the position of the individual or name of the committee with this responsibility Climate change issues are strategic for Group businesses and therefore related topics are discussed at the highest levels of the organization within the Executive Committee (composed by the Chairman, the Deputy Chairman, the Chief Executive Officer and the General Manager) and the Board of Directors. These bodies control Environmental policies, update strategic plans connected with sustainable development and climate change. 1.2 Do you provide incentives for the management of climate change issues, including the attainment of targets? Yes 1.2a Please complete the table

3 Who is entitled to benefit from these incentives? Business unit managers Energy managers Public affairs managers Other: Legal managers Other: Procurement managers The type of incentives Monetary reward Monetary reward Monetary reward Monetary reward Monetary reward Incentivised performance indicator Incentives of many Iren Group employees (from different departments/units and different level) are linked to projects with significant environmental and GHG emissions benefits (e.g. district heating). Incentives of many Iren Group employees (from different departments/units and different level) are linked to projects with significant environmental and GHG emissions benefits (e.g. district heating). Incentives of many Iren Group employees (from different departments/units and different level) are linked to projects with significant environmental and GHG emissions benefits (e.g. district heating). Incentives of many Iren Group employees (from different departments/units and different level) are linked to projects with significant environmental and GHG emissions benefits (e.g. district heating). Incentives of many Iren Group employees (from different departments/units and different level) are linked to projects with significant environmental and GHG emissions benefits (e.g. district heating). Page: 2. Strategy 2.1 Please select the option that best describes your risk management procedures with regard to climate change risks and opportunities Integrated into multi-disciplinary company wide risk management processes 2.1a Please provide further details (see guidance) i. the scope of the process, i.e. the type of risks and opportunities considered by the process such as regulatory, customer behaviour changes, reputational and weather-related. In the ERM model of Iren Group, the most relevant financial, commodity, operational and reputational risks are managed: in particular, the risks linked to natural catastrophes, pollution and droughts are among our top 20 risks. ii. how risks/opportunities are assessed at a company level (e.g. reputational risk can impact on the full corporation). An assessment process is active, in which owners are required to map and evaluate their inherent risks, controls and residual risks, in according to the company standards/policies. All the risks are merged and integrated for the whole Group. iii. how risks/opportunities are assessed at an asset level (e.g. physical impacts can affect individual facilities). Asset level is defined as anything below company level such as individual sites and subsidiaries. Risk assessment is made for the main Group facilities, for plant damage and business interruption, and it is updated once a year. The information is also used to aid Risk Management for customizing insurance program. iv. the frequency of monitoring in terms of weeks/months/years. Levels of risks and risk map are reviewed at least every three months for internal reporting, but most of these are monitored more often. Risk policies are revised at least yearly. v. criteria for determining materiality/priorities. Materiality/priorities of the risks mapped are determined on base of risk value (frequency*severity) in terms of enterprise value. Financial, operational and reputational impacts are taken in account within this evaluation.

4 vi. to whom are the results reported. Board of Directors, Internal Auditing Committee, Executive Committee. 2.2 Is climate change integrated into your business strategy? Yes 2.2a Please describe the process and outcomes (see guidance) i. How the business strategy has been influenced, i.e. the internal communication/reporting processes that achieve this. Climate changes have been taken in account for the specific issues related to the Group production system. The main process involved in achieving the goal of considering climate changes in the company strategies in the Strategic Plan definition. ii. What climate change aspects have influenced the strategy, e.g. how the strategy is linked to the risks and opportunities and emissions reduction targets (requested in subsequent sections of the information request). Climate change directly influences energy business. The main climate changes aspects influencing Iren Group strategy are: average and extreme temperatures and the level of precipitations. Another aspect relevant for Iren business is emissions reduction targets, mainly linked to mandatory requirements issued by regulators. Iren Group strategy therefore considers not only risks linked to climate change but also the related opportunities (e.g. energy efficiency services, renewable energy, etc.) iii. The most important components of the short term strategy that have been influenced by climate change (e.g. changes in operational practices, changing the way business is communicated, etc.). If climate change has only affected the long term strategy, this should be stated. The most important component of short term strategy that has been influenced by climate change is thermoelectric plant operation, which is strictly related to energy needs from consumers and incentive and emission trading systems. iv. The most important components of the long term strategy that have been influenced by the climate change (e.g. changing core business focus, development and incorporation of new technologies, etc.). In the less likely event that climate change has only affected the short term strategy, this should be stated. The most important component of long term strategy that as been influenced by climate change is the structure of production mix of the Group (CHP, hydro with pumping plants,...). v. How this is gaining you strategic advantage over your competitors. Production mix of the Group can be better exploited than competitors' (higher level of operation hours), because the main plants are low CO2 emitting. vi. What have been the most substantial business decisions made during the reporting year that have been influenced by the climate change driven aspects of the strategy (e.g. investment, location, procurement, M&A, R&D). Both the business decision and the aspect of climate change that has influenced the business decision must be made clear in the answer. If there are none to report, this should be stated. During the year Iren invested in CHP plants and district heating network (Torino Nord) and WTE (Polo Ambientale Integrato in Parma), which allow GHG emissions reduction (compared to traditional heating system). Additionally, in the Environmental authorization for the WTE (Polo Ambientale Integrato in Parma) facility, the GHG emissions have been set at lower level than those required by current National and European regulations. 2.3 Do you engage with policy makers to encourage further action on mitigation and/or adaptation? Yes 2.3a Please explain (i) the engagement process and (ii) actions you are advocating

5 Iren Group is member of several associations of the environmental, energy and hydro sectors at national and international level. The aim of these memberships is to stimulate the regulations/technical update and review the research activities in cooperation with other companies and public bodies. Main associations in which Iren Group is member are: Federutility (the Italian industry association for companies operating in the energy, gas and water sectors. The Chairman of Federutility is Iren Group Chairman), Federambiente (the Italian industry association for companies operating in the waste management sector), Confservizi (Italian industry association for the utility sector), Confindustria (main Italian organization representing Italian manufacturing and services companies), Airu (Italian Association for urban heating), Anfida (the Italian industry association for companies operating in the water management sector), IWC (Italian Water Convention), International Gas Union, Eurelectric. The Group has also constant relationships with local and national public entities (e.g. Municipalities, Districts, Regions, etc.) taking part to the main working groups. Finally the Group has relationships with Universities and Research Institutes, where in some cases it participates (e.g. Leap, Enìa Altervis, etc.). Main topics covered by associations and working groups where Iren partecipates are: energy policies, water conservation and saving, renewable energy production, waste management, local policies linked to climate change (e.g. energy plans of Municipalities, local waste management policies, etc.), research and development programs, technology and process innovation. Iren is active in the promotion of emission reduction actions, in cooperation with local and national entities, also developing specific initiatives for citizens. The Group has an open dialogue with stakeholders (either directly or through the association where it has a membership). Finally, the Committee on combined heat and power and on district heating, is composed by Managers of the sector, including Iren Managers, as well as by exponents from the two main universities of Turin (Politecnico of Torino and University of Torino). The Committee is a think tank on energy that aims to share information from the different members. Discussions are currently in progress with the Minister of Economic Development and Environment in support of the drafting of the Ministerial Enactement decrees envisaged in legislative decree 28/2011, which are expective to define the methods and extent of the incentives system both for electrical energy and heat energy, and the distribution methods to support the development of district heating network. Page: 3. Targets and Initiatives 3.1 Did you have an emissions reduction target that was active (ongoing or reached completion) in the reporting year? No 3.1e Please explain (i) why not; and (ii) forecast how your emissions will change over the next five years (i) The CO2 emissions of Iren Group are significantly lower than those allowed on ETS scheme. In fact Iren production is mainly based on hydroelectric and CHP plants. Additionally Iren is committed in the development of several project/initiatives resulting in CO2 emissions reduction (e.g. Installation of photovoltaic plants) and in the provision of products/services enabling third parties (e.g. clients) to avoid GHG emissions. Generally renewable energy plants are connected to the energy grid, therefore the related emissions reductions are considered in the answer 3.2 ( please see below). Currently the Group doesn't have specific emissions reduction targets, but it's considering to set such targets as part of its sustainable approach. (ii) Also considering the operativeness of new energy plants and the related significant increase of energy production (please consider that the new Torino Nord plant is replacing a previous plant with lower energy capacity and higher environmental impacts), Iren emissions are projected to increase in the near future. By the way the intention of Iren is to continue to comply with the quotas allocated on the basis of ETS scheme. 3.2 Does the use of your goods and/or services directly enable GHG emissions to be avoided by a third party?

6 Yes 3.2a Please provide details (see guidance) i. How the emissions are/were avoided; Main emissions reduction avoided by third parties (i.e. clients) is linked to Iren hydroelectric energy production and distric heating, representing the most part of Iren Group energy production. Additionally the Group provides other products and services that enable third parties to avoid GHG emissions, such as: services related to heating plants efficiencies; substitution of heating generators with condensation generators with higher efficiency. Other services provided, mainly for the public sector, enabling third parties involved to avoid/reduce the GHG emissions are: smart cities project: optimization of the accumulation systems, increase of the distric heating system and innovations in terms of technologies and materials; street lighting: substitution of existing lights with those with lower power (-100W each); traffic lights management: substitution of existing traffic lights with LED ones; management of heating plants in buildings owned by Municipalities: accurate management of heating plants; global management of public buildings: implementation of the district heating system in the Court House of Tourin. Additionally, since 2009 Iren developed the project "A scuola con il sole" ("At school with the sun"), installing solar panels for the school's energy consumptions. Iren is responsible for the development, installation and maintenance of the panels. ii. An estimate of the amount of emission that are/were avoided over time, e.g. x metric tonnes CO2e per year with a 2007 baseline; x metric tonnes per year aver a period of 10 years ( ); In 2011 the Group obtained the CO2 emissions of 890,512 tons CO2 through distric heating and 474,317 tons CO2 through hydroelectric plants. In addition, thanks to the installation of photovoltaic plants, in 2011 it has been possible to avoid the total CO2 emissionof 2137 tons. Thanks to the energy requalification, in 2011 it has been possible to avoid the emissions of about 630 tons of CO2 (as well as almost 1,000 tons of NOx) compared to Additionally the following emissions were avoided/are planned to be avoided: smart cities project: whenall the systems will be implemented, they should allows the decrease of around 680 tonnes CO2/year; street lighting: substitution of existing bulbs with those with lower energy consumption has permitted the CO2 emissions reduction of 1444 tonnes; traffic lights management: substitution of existing traffic lights with LED ones has permitted the CO2 emissions reduction of 29 tonnes; management of thermal plants in buildings owned by Municipalities: accurate management of thermal plants has permitted the CO2 emissions reduction of 3028 tonnes; global management of public buildings: implementation of the district heating system in the Court House of Tourin has made possible to avoid the production of 1032 tons of CO2. Relating to the project "A scuola con il sole", in 2011 it permitted to avoid the production of about 60 tons of CO2. iii. The methodology, assumptions, emission factors and global warming potentials (if you have expressed your carbon saving figure in CO2e) used for your estimations; The emission factors used for the calculation of the C02 emission reductions are: smart cities project: 0,227 tonnes CO2/MWh; for district heating, hydroelectric plants and photovoltaic plants: 0,482 tonnes CO2/MWh. In particular, to calculate the CO2 emission factor, we used the latest available data from Terna (updates as of 2010). We considered the gross electricity production of the Italian thermoelectric system (236,624 GWh) and the amount of power produced by each source. We then multiplied the energy productionof each source with the related specific emission factors indicated in the CO2 National Allocation Plan In this way we determined the total amount of CO2 emitted for gross electrical production in the national system ( t CO2). We then calculated the average emission factor for the national system (total CO2 emissions/total thermoelectric production = 0,482 tonnes CO2/MWh). for all the other initiatives reported in ii point: 2626 kg CO2/Tep. iv. Whether you are considering generating CERs or ERUs within the framework of CDM or JI (UNFCCC). NO. 3.3

7 Did you have emissions reduction initiatives that were active within the reporting year (this can include those in the planning and/or implementation phases) Yes 3.3a Please identify the total number of projects at each stage of development, and for those in the implementation stages, estimated CO2e savings Stage of development Number of projects Under investigation To be implemented* Implementation commenced* Implemented* Not to be implemented Total estimated annual CO2e savings (only for rows marked *) 3.3b For those initiatives implemented in the reporting year, please provide details in the table below Activity type Low carbon energy installation Description of activity Installation of photovoltaic plant on a building owned by Iren. This is a voluntary activities, with an impact on scope 2 emissions. Estimated annual CO2e savings Annual monetary savings (unit currency) Investment required (unit currency) Payback period >3 years 3.3c What methods do you use to drive investment in emissions reduction activities? Method Compliance with regulatory requirements/standards Dedicated budget for energy efficiency Financial optimization calculations Internal finance mechanisms Comment Further Information 3.3a - Data inserted in the table refers to the number of types of initiatives. Each initiative can include more than one project. Page: 4. Communication 4.1 Have you published information about your company s response to climate change and GHG emissions performance for this reporting year in other places than in your CDP response? If so, please attach the publication(s)

8 Publication Page/Section Reference Identify the attachment In annual reports (complete) 14 / / Iren_BILANCIO_2010_UK_interattivo In voluntary communications (underway) previous year attached Further Information As soon as the 2011 Sustainability Report will be published (around end of July) we will provide you with a copy. Attachments Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2012/4.Communication/Iren_BILANCIO_2010_UK_interattivo.pdf Module: Risks and Opportunities [Investor] Page: 2012-Investor-Risks&Opps-ClimateChangeRisks 5.1 Have you identified any climate change risks (current or future) that have potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure? Tick all that apply Risks driven by changes in regulation Risks driven by changes in physical climate parameters Risks driven by changes in other climate-related developments 5.1a Please describe your risks driven by changes in regulation I D 1 Risk driver Description Potential impact International agreements Italy is involved in Kyoto International Climate Agreement and, consequently, in the 2009/28 UE Directive. The actual targets in carbon emission reduction are 20%, subject to further increase up to 25%. These targets should impact on gasfired production units of Iren Group. Furthermore, the cost associated with ETS could vary. Increased operational cost Timefram e Direct/ Indirec t 1-5 years Direct Likelihoo d More likely than not Magnitud e of impact Medium 2 General Piemonte Reduced demand 1-5 years Direct Very likely Medium-

9 I D Risk driver Description Potential impact environmenta l regulations, including planning Uncertainty surrounding new regulation Uncertainty surrounding new regulation Product efficiency regulations and standards mandatory laws on individual metering and controlling of buildings heating could lead to a significant reduction in heat consumption in the medium term (from 2014). For Iren Group, largely operating in district heating, the impact could be relevant. Uncertainty about new regulations for plant operations. Uncertainty about new regulations for plant operations. Changes/reductio n in incentives system for production with renewables and CHP. for goods/services Increased operational cost Reduction/disruptio n in production capacity Reduction in capital availability Timefram e Direct/ Indirec t Likelihoo d 1-5 years Direct Unlikely 1-5 years Direct Unlikely Magnitud e of impact high Mediumhigh Mediumhigh 1-5 years Direct Likely Medium 5.1b Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the risk before taking action; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this risk; and (iii) the costs associated with these actions 1 - International agreements. i. In the short term the financial impact should not be material, because all gas-fired units are operating in high efficiency combined heat and power production and therefore chianges should not affect those units before conventional units of national production mix. ii. Combined plants high efficiency heat, power plants and district heating. iii. There are no extra costs associated. 2. General environmental regulations, including planning. i. Reduction in revenues related to heating. ii. Evaluation of acceptable increasing in heated volumetry in order to compensate shorter consumption. iii. Investments in district heating networks. 3. Uncertainty surrounding new regulation. i. The risk could impact Iren Group with increased needs for investments in new environmental technologies. ii. Plant projects always compliant with new environmental regulation. iii. Costs related to environmental investments. 4. Uncertainty surrounding new regulation. i. Reduction in revenues in case of business interrumption due to plants non compliant. ii. Plant projects always compliant with new environmental regulation. iii. Costs related to environmental investments. 5. Product efficiency regulations and standards. i. Reduction in planned revenues from Green and White Certificates. ii. Promotion of incentives for green energy production.

10 iii. Around 4 FTE in charge of managing interactions with regulators. 5.1c Please describe your risks that are driven by change in physical climate parameters ID Risk driver Description Potential impact Timeframe Change in mean (average) temperature Change in temperature extremes Change in precipitation extremes and droughts Changes in average temperature mainly affect the Group in heat production for district heating, i.e. higher mean temperatures require less heat and vice-versa. Fast changes in energy demand for air conditioning due to summer high temperatures may lead to overloads on distribution network: this event may require emergency management to assure safety operations on the national electrical system (PESSE). Changes in yearly level of precipitation for the Group may determine: a) lower hydroelectric production; b) droghts in water distribution system. Reduced demand for goods/services Inability to do business Reduction/disruption in production capacity Direct/ Indirect Likelihood Magnitude of impact Current Direct Likely Medium Current Direct Unlikely Current Direct Likely Lowmedium Mediumhigh 5.1d Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the risk before taking action; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this risk; and (iii) the costs associated with these actions 6. Change in mean (average) temperature. (i) Less revenues from district heating and lower margins from CHP. (ii) None: the risk is accepted. (iii) None 7. Change in temperature extremes. (i) Low impacts due to business interrumptions needed to preserve the integrity of assets. (ii) Compliance with regulatory procedures. (iii) Investments for compliance.

11 8. Change in precipitation extremes and droughts. (i) Lower revenues from hydroelectric production. (ii) Constant managing of reservoirs levels. Pumping hydroelectric plants. (iii) IT costs. Investment and O&M costs related to pumping system. 5.1e Please describe your risks that are driven by changes in other climate-related developments ID Risk driver Description 9 10 Changing consumer behaviour Uncertainty in social drivers Italian consumers are taking more care on climate changes in their consumption behaviours: consequently, energy wastes are reducing and green energy demand is increasing. For cetain categories of assects, e.g. WTE plants, "nimnby" syndrome mai lead to hostility from people living in the nearbies. Potential impact Reduced demand for goods/services Inability to do business Timeframe Direct/ Indirect Likelihood Magnitude of impact 1-5 years Direct Likely Medium Current Direct Likely Mediumhigh 5.1f Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the risk before taking action; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this risk; (iii) the costs associated with these actions 9. Changing consumer behaviour. (i) Reduced revenues from power. (ii) Investments in renewal (hydroelectric) plants. (iii) Investments costs. 10. Uncertainty in social drivers. (i) Reduced investments and revenues (ii) Communication initiatives. (iii) Advertising costs. Page: 2012-Investor-Risks&Opps-ClimateChangeOpp 6.1 Have you identified any climate change opportunities (current or future) that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure? Tick all that apply Opportunities driven by changes in regulation Opportunities driven by changes in physical climate parameters Opportunities driven by changes in other climate-related developments 6.1a Please describe your opportunities that are driven by changes in regulation ID Opportunit y driver Description Potential impact Timefram e Direct/Indirec t Likelihoo d Magnitud e of impact

12 ID Opportunit y driver Description Potential impact Timefram e Direct/Indirec t Likelihoo d Magnitud e of impact 1 International agreements International/E U agreements pursuit energy efficient solutions coherent with green houses gas reduction goals. In this context, Iren Group may have development opportunities with new technologies and exploit the actual production mix. Investment opportunities 1-5 years Direct Very likely Mediumhigh 2 Air pollution limits Production plants of Iren Group are all based on low (or zero) CO2 technologies; air pollution limits can improve the opportunities of exploiting those assets. Increased demand for existing products/service s 1-5 years Direct Likely Medium 6.1b Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the opportunity; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this opportunity; (iii) the costs associated with these actions 1. International agreements. (i) EU regulations can accelerate new projects in the field of renewable or low CO2 technologies and waste to energy, where the Group is already active. (ii) Diversified presence in power production, environmental services, regassification. (iii) Investment/R&D costs. 2. Air pollution limits. (i) Improving in exploiting power production capacity due to the increased demand of low CO2 technologies may lead to increasing revenues and margins. (ii) Low (or zero) CO2 assets. (iii) Investment costs. 6.1c Please describe the opportunities that are driven by changes in physical climate parameters ID Opportunity driver Description Potential impact Timeframe Direct/ Indirect Likelihood Magnitude of impact 3 Change in temperature extremes Changes in temperature extremes during summer periods may increase Increased demand for existing products/services Current Direct Likely Lowmedium

13 ID 4 5 Opportunity driver Change in mean (average) precipitation Change in temperature extremes Description Potential impact Timeframe power consumption for air conditioning needs, with higher energy prices. Higher mean precipitation levels may determine a better exploting of hydroelectric plants capacity. Lower temperatures in winter periods may increase the demand of heat for district heating and the operation of CHP plants may be improved. Increased production capacity Increased demand for existing products/services Unknown Unknown Direct/ Indirect Direct Direct Likelihood More likely than not More likely than not Magnitude of impact Medium Medium 6.1d Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the opportunity; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this opportunity; (iii) the costs associated with these actions 3. Changes in temperature extremes. (i) Higher prices and revenues. (ii) Availability of plant production capacity during summer periods. (iii) None. 4. Change in mean (average) precipitation. (i) Higher revenues and margins from hydroelectric production. (ii) Investments in hydroelectric business. (iii) Investment costs. 5. Changes in temperature extremes. (i) Higher revenues. (ii) Investments in CHP and district heating. (iii) Investment costs. 6.1e Please describe the opportunities that are driven by changes in other climate-related developments ID 6 Opportunity driver Changing consumer behaviour Description Changes in consumer behaviour can determine these opportunities: a) shifting of power consumption towards less expensive hours in the day reduces volatility of energy prices; b) waste separate collection is increasing and this trend may determine lower costs and higher efficiency in waste management. Potential impact Reduced operational costs Timeframe Direct/ Indirect Likelihood Current Direct Very likely Magnitude of impact Mediumhigh

14 6.1f Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the opportunity; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this opportunity; (iii) the costs associated with these actions 6. Changing consumer behaviour. (i) Power and environmental lines of business may become more efficient. (ii) Specific advertising campaigns; specific tariff structures. (iii) Advertising costs. Module: GHG Emissions Accounting, Energy and Fuel Use, and Trading [Investor] Page: 7. Emissions Methodology 7.1 Please provide your base year and base year emissions (Scopes 1 and 2) Base year Fri 01 Jan Fri 31 Dec 2010 Scope 1 Base year emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) Scope 2 Base year emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) 7.2 Please give the name of the standard, protocol or methodology you have used to collect activity data and calculate Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions Please select the published methodologies that you use The Greenhouse Gas Protocol: A Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard (Revised Edition) 7.2a If you have selected "Other", please provide details below 7.3 Please give the source for the global warming potentials you have used Gas Reference CO2 IPCC Fourth Assessment Report (AR4-100 year) 7.4 Please give the emissions factors you have applied and their origin; alternatively, please attach an Excel spreadsheet with this data Fuel/Material/Energy Natural gas 1.9 Diesel/Gas oil 3.1 Emission Factor Unit Other: Metric tonnes CO2 per 1000 Stdm3 metric tonnes Reference Factors used for the CO2 emissions inventory in the national UNFCCC (average of values of the years ). These data can be used for the calculation of emissions from 1 January 2011 to 31 December Factors used for the CO2 emissions inventory in the national UNFCCC (average of values of the years ). These

15 Fuel/Material/Energy Crude oil 3.1 Electricity 0.5 Biogas 1.2 Other: Waste to Energy Plants Emission Factor 1.6 Unit CO2 per metric tonne metric tonnes CO2 per metric tonne metric tonnes CO2 per MWh Other: kg CO2 per Nmc metric tonnes CO2 per MWh Reference data can be used for the calculation of emissions from 1 January 2011 to 31 December 2012 Factors used for the CO2 emissions inventory in the national UNFCCC (average of values of the years ). These data can be used for the calculation of emissions from 1 January 2011 to 31 December 2012 To calculate the CO2 emission factor, we used the latest available data from Terna (updated as of 2010). We considered the gross electricity production of the Italian thermoelectric system (236,624 GWh) and the amount of power produced by each source. We then multiplied the energy production of each source with the related specific emission factors indicated in the CO2 National Allocation Plan In this way we determined the total amount of CO2 emitted for gross electrical production in the national system ( t CO2). We then calculated the average emission factor for the national system (total CO2 emissions/total thermoelectric production = 0,482 tonnes CO2/MWh). The emission factor used refers to landfills. The calculation is based on internal plants data. The emission factor used refers to waste to energy plants. The calculation is based on internal plants data. Further Information For the calculation of CO2 emissions from transportation we used emission factors taking into account the vehicles category (Euro 1, 2, etc.) and fuel used. The factors are those provided by Arpa Regione Lombardia the regional environmental agency (please, see the attachment) Attachments Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2012/7.EmissionsMethodology/Emission Factors_Trasport_ARPA Lombardia.pdf Page: 8. Emissions Data - (1 Jan Dec 2011) 8.1 Please select the boundary you are using for your Scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas inventory Operational control 8.2a Please provide your gross global Scope 1 emissions figure in metric tonnes CO2e a

16 Please provide your gross global Scope 2 emissions figure in metric tonnes CO2e Are there are any sources (e.g. facilities, specific GHGs, activities, geographies, etc.) of Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions which are not included in your disclosure? No 8.5 Please estimate the level of uncertainty of the total gross global Scope 1 and Scope 2 figures that you have supplied and specify the sources of uncertainty in your data gathering, handling, and calculations Scope 1 emissions: Uncertainty range More than 5% but less than or equal to 10% Scope 1 emissions: Main sources of uncertainty Data Gaps Assumptions Scope 1 emissions: Please expand on the uncertainty in your data Some kilometers traveled by Company cars are estimated. Additionally, considering the large number of sites and facilities managed by the Group, some not material energy consumptions are not included. Please consider that assumptions and data gaps refer to not material consumptions compared to total Scope 1 emissions. Scope 2 emissions: Uncertainty range More than 5% but less than or equal to 10% Scope 2 emissions: Main sources of uncertainty Data Gaps Scope 2 emissions: Please expand on the uncertainty in your data Considering the large number of sites and facilities managed by the Group, some not material energy consumptions are not included. 8.6 Please indicate the verification/assurance status that applies to your Scope 1 emissions Verification or assurance underway but not yet complete - last year s statement available 8.6a Please indicate the proportion of your Scope 1 emissions that are verified/assured More than 90% but less than or equal to 100% 8.6b Please provide further details of the verification/assurance undertaken, and attach the relevant statements Level of verification or assurance Limited assurance ISAE 3000 Relevant verification standard Relevant statement attached Please find attached the KPMG limited assurance report on the Sustainability Report.

17 Level of verification or assurance Reasonable assurance Relevant verification standard EC Directive 2003/87/EC Annex V and 2007/589/EC as amended (EU ETS compliance) Relevant statement attached Please find attached the third party verification statements for 2011 related to plants under ETS Scheme 8.7 Please indicate the verification/assurance status that applies to your Scope 2 emissions Verification or assurance underway but not yet complete - last year s statement available 8.7a Please indicate the proportion of your Scope 2 emissions that are verified/assured More than 90% but less than or equal to 100% 8.7b Please provide further details of the verification/assurance undertaken, and attach the relevant statements Level of verification or assurance Limited assurance ISAE 3000 Relevant verification standard Relevant statement attached Please find attached the KPMG limited assurance report on the Sustainability Report. 8.8 Are carbon dioxide emissions from the combustion of biologically sequestered carbon (i.e. carbon dioxide emissions from burning biomass/biofuels) relevant to your company? Yes 8.8a Please provide the emissions in metric tonnes CO2e Further Information Data refers to CO2 emissions from biogas burned in landfills. Attachments Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2012/8.EmissionsData(1Jan Dec2011)/IrenEnergia_POLITECNICO_120307_Attestato_finale_647F.pdf Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2012/8.EmissionsData(1Jan Dec2011)/IrenEnergia_Parma Via Lazio_120315_Attestato_finale_647F.pdf Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2012/8.EmissionsData(1Jan Dec2011)/IrenEnergia_Torino

18 Nord_120201_Attestato_finale_647F.pdf Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2012/8.EmissionsData(1Jan Dec2011)/IrenEnergia_LE VALLETTE_ _Attestato_finale_647F.pdf Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2012/8.EmissionsData(1Jan Dec2011)/Iren Energia_BIT_120308_Attestato_finale_647F.pdf Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2012/8.EmissionsData(1Jan Dec2011)/IrenEnergia_Pappagnocca_120302_Attestato_finale_647F.pdf Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2012/8.EmissionsData(1Jan Dec2011)/IrenEnergia_MIRAFIORI NORD_120308_Attestato_finale_647F.pdf Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2012/8.EmissionsData(1Jan Dec2011)/IrenEnergia_ParmaSMargherita_120315_Attestato_finale_647F.pdf Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2012/8.EmissionsData(1Jan Dec2011)/IrenEnergia_iren via sardegna_120302_attestato_finale_647f.pdf Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2012/8.EmissionsData(1Jan Dec2011)/IrideEnergia_SAMPIERDARENA_120309_Attestato_finale_647F.pdf Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2012/8.EmissionsData(1Jan Dec2011)/IrenEnergia_polo energetico_120302_attestato_finale_647f.pdf Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2012/8.EmissionsData(1Jan Dec2011)/IrenEnergia_MONCALIERI_120306_Attestato_finale_647F.pdf Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2012/8.EmissionsData(1Jan Dec2011)/IrenEnergia_rete 1_120302_Attestato_finale_647F.pdf Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2012/8.EmissionsData(1Jan Dec2011)/IrenEnergia_Piacenza_120315_Attestato_finale_647F.pdf Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2012/8.EmissionsData(1Jan Dec2011)/KPMG_LETTERA_Iren_BILANCIO_2010_UK_interattivo.pdf Page: 9. Scope 1 Emissions Breakdown - (1 Jan Dec 2011) 9.1 Do you have Scope 1 emissions sources in more than one country or region (if covered by emissions regulation at a regional level)? No 9.2 Please indicate which other Scope 1 emissions breakdowns you are able to provide (tick all that apply) By activity 9.2d Please break down your total gross global Scope 1 emissions by activity Activity Scope 1 metric tonnes CO2e Combined heat and power Waste to Energy Plants Landfills 28362

19 Activity Scope 1 metric tonnes CO2e Offices activities 6888 Transports (Company cars) 9892 Page: 10. Scope 2 Emissions Breakdown - (1 Jan Dec 2011) 10.1 Do you have Scope 2 emissions sources in more than one country or region (if covered by emissions regulation at a regional level)? No 10.2 Please indicate which other Scope 2 emissions breakdowns you are able to provide (tick all that apply) By activity 10.2c Please break down your total gross global Scope 2 emissions by activity Activity Scope 2 metric tonnes CO2e Processes activities 7635 Offices activities Page: 11. Emissions Scope 2 Contractual 11.1 Do you consider that the grid average factors used to report Scope 2 emissions in Question 8.3 reflect the contractual arrangements you have with electricity suppliers? Yes 11.2 Has your organization retired any certificates, e.g. Renewable Energy Certificates, associated with zero or low carbon electricity within the reporting year or has this been done on your behalf? Yes 11.2a Please provide details including the number and type of certificates Type of certificate European Energy Certificate Scheme European Energy Certificate Scheme Number of certificates Comments The reported number refers to green certificates obtained from hydroelectric plants activities. The reported number refers to green certificates obtained from cogeneration plants connected to district heating grid. Page: 12. Energy

20 12.1 What percentage of your total operational spend in the reporting year was on energy? More than 50% but less than or equal to 55% 12.2 Please state how much fuel, electricity, heat, steam, and cooling in MWh your organization has consumed during the reporting year Energy type MWh Fuel Electricity Heat Steam Cooling 12.3 Please complete the table by breaking down the total "Fuel" figure entered above by fuel type Fuels MWh Natural gas Diesel/Gas oil Crude oil Motor gasoline 3674 Liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) 47 Biogas Methane 2 Page: 13. Emissions Performance 13.1 How do your absolute emissions (Scope 1 and 2 combined) for the reporting year compare to the previous year? Increased 13.1a Please complete the table Reason Change in boundary Emissions value (percentage) Direction of change 11 Increase Comment The emissions increase is mainly due to an increase of energy production and the consideration of consumptions not tracked in 2010 (e.g. heating consumption in some of Iren buildings) Please describe your gross combined Scope 1 and 2 emissions for the reporting year in metric tonnes CO2e per unit currency total revenue

21 Intensity figure Metric numerator Metric denominator % change from previous year Direction of change from previous year Reason for Change metric tonnes CO2e unit total revenue 11 Decrease The revenues have been increased more than CO2 emissions compared to Please describe your gross combined Scope 1 and 2 emissions for the reporting year in metric tonnes CO2e per full time equivalent (FTE) employee Intensity figure Metric numerator Metric denominator % change from previous year Direction of change from previous year Reason for Change 553 metric tonnes CO2e FTE Employee 13 Increase The number of employees is decreased while the CO2 emissions are increased compared to Please provide an additional intensity (normalized) metric that is appropriate to your business operations Intensity figure Metric numerator Metric denominator % change from previous year Direction of change from previous year Reason for Change metric tonnes CO2e megawatt hour (MWh) 3 Increase The CO2 emissions have been slightly increased more than energy production compare to The intensity figure is calculated considering only CO2 emissions due to energy production (part of scope 1) to be consistent with denominator unit (MWh). Page: 14. Emissions Trading 14.1 Do you participate in any emission trading schemes? Yes 14.1a Please complete the following table for each of the emission trading schemes in which you participate Scheme name Period for which data is supplied Allowances allocated Allowances purchased Verified emissions in metric tonnes CO2e Details of ownership European Union ETS Sat 01 Jan Sat 31 Dec Facilities we own and operate 14.1b

22 What is your strategy for complying with the schemes in which you participate or anticipate participating? Iren Group approach on complying with the schemes, part of the wider approach to sustainability, is to continue respecting the allowances allocated based on ETS scheme, also considering the operativeness of new energy plants (Torino Nord) Has your company originated any project-based carbon credits or purchased any within the reporting period? Yes 14.2a Please complete the following table Credit origination or credit purchase Credit Origination Credit Origination Credit Origination Credit Origination Credit Origination Credit Origination Credit Origination Credit Origination Project type Other: HFC23 Other: HFC23 Other: Gas Recovery Project identification Verified to which standard Number of credits (metric tonnes of CO2e) Number of credits (metric tonnes CO2e): Risk adjusted volume Credits retired Purpose e.g. compliance 011 CDM Yes Compliance 0306 CDM Yes Compliance 2469 CDM No Compliance Hydro 0841 CDM Yes Compliance Hydro 0862 CDM No Compliance Other: Landfills Other: Landfills Other: Gas Recovery 0586 CDM No Compliance 0487 CDM No Compliance RU JI No Compliance Page: 2012-Investor-Scope 3 Emissions 15.1 Please provide data on sources of Scope 3 emissions that are relevant to your organization Sources of Scope 3 emissions Other (downstream) metric tonnes CO2e 423 Methodology The Greenhouse Gas Protocol: a Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard (Revised Edition). Data refers to emissions generated by the transportation of waste generated by the Group and reused/recycled. If you cannot provide a figure for emissions, please describe them

23 15.2 Please indicate the verification/assurance status that applies to your Scope 3 emissions Verification or assurance underway but not yet complete - last year s statement available 15.2a Please indicate the proportion of your Scope 3 emissions that are verified/assured More than 90% but less than or equal to 100% 15.2b Please provide further details of the verification/assurance undertaken, and attach the relevant statements Level of verification or assurance Limited assurance ISAE 3000 Relevant verification standard Relevant statement attached Please find attached the KPMG limited assurance report on the Sustainability Report Are you able to compare your Scope 3 emissions for the reporting year with those for the previous year for any sources? No, this is our first year of estimation Attachments Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2012/15.Scope3Emissions/KPMG_LETTERA_Iren_BILANCIO_2010_UK_i nterattivo.pdf Module: Electric utilities Page: 2012-Investor-EU0ReferenceDates EU0.1 Reference dates EU0.1: Please enter the dates for the periods for which you will be providing data. The years given as column headings in subsequent tables correspond to the "year ending" dates selected below. It is requested that you report emissions for: (i) the current reporting year; (ii) one other year of historical data (i.e. before the current reporting year); and, (iii) one year of forecasted data (beyond 2016 if possible). Year ending Date range 2010 Fri 01 Jan Fri 31 Dec Sat 01 Jan Sat 31 Dec Wed 01 Jan Wed 31 Dec 2014