Department of the Air Force

Transcription

1 Department of the Air Force Base Realignment and Closure Part II (BRAC 91) FY 22 Amended Budget Submission Justification Data Submitted to OSD: June 21 (For Display Purposes Only)

2 FY 22 BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE DATA 1991 COMMISSION FOR DISPLAY PURPOSES ONLY

3 1991 Commission I. Base Closure and Realignment II. Financial Summary III. Base Closure and Realignment Detail - By Package 1. Bergstrom AFB, Texas Carswell AFB, Texas Castle AFB, California Eaker AFB, Arkansas England AFB, Louisiana Grissom AFB, Indiana Loring AFB, Maine Lowry AFB, Colorado MacDill AFB, Florida Myrtle Beach AFB, South Carolina Richards-Gebaur AFB, Missouri Rickenbacker AGB, Ohio Williams AFB, Arizona Wurtsmith AFB, Michigan Chanute AFB, Illinois George AFB, California Mather AFB, California Norton AFB, California Pease AFB, New Hampshire Program Management

4 FY 22 BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE DATA 1991 COMMISSION U.S. Air Force Overview Schedule: FY 1992: Base Closure Account requirement: $24.5 Million. Air Force requirements for FY 1992 consisted of planning, designing and initiating military construction projects to accommodate the movement of units into gaining locations. Funding was also necessary for operation and maintenance, procurement, and environmental compliance and restoration actions, and compliance with the National Policy Act at each closure/realignment location. Bergstrom AFB, TX: Base Closure Account requirement: $16.3 Million The funding supported to environmental and restoration requirements. Carswell AFB, TX: Base Closure Account requirement: $4.7 Million The funding supported to environmental and restorations requirements. Castle AFB, CA: Base Closure Account requirement: $24.7 Million The funding supported to environmental and restoration actions, and operation and maintenance requirements. Eaker AFB, AR: Base Closure Account requirement: $8.1 Million The funding supported to environmental and restoration requirements. England AFB, LA: Base Closure Account requirement: $6.8 Million The funding supported to environmental and restoration requirements. Grissom AFB, IN: Base Closure Account requirement: $1.3 Million The funding supported to environmental and restoration requirements. Loring AFB, ME: Base Closure Account requirement: $26.6 Million The funding supported to environmental and restoration requirements. Lowry AFB, CO: Base Closure Account requirement: $8.2 Million The funding supported to environmental and restoration requirements. MacDill AFB, FL: Base Closure Account requirement: $13.1 Million The funding supported to environmental and restoration requirements. Myrtle Beach AFB, SC: Base Closure Account requirement: $13.8 Million The funding supported to environmental and restoration requirements. Richards-Gebaur ARS, MO: Base Closure Account requirement: $2.1 Million The funding supported to environmental and restoration requirements. Rickenbacker AGB, OH: Base Closure Account requirement: $12.4 Million The funding was required to modify on-going construction projects at gaining locations in order to take advantage of reduced design and construction costs. requirements were also included. EXHIBIT BC- 1

5 Williams AFB,AZ: Base Closure Account requirement: $15.8 Million The funding supported to environmental and restoration actions, operation and maintenance and military construction requirements. Wurtsmith AFB, Ml: Base Closure Account requirement: $1.1 Million The funding supported to environmental and restoration requirements. Chanute AFB, IL: Base Closure Account requirement: $. Million George AFB, CA: Base Closure Account requirement: $. Million Mather AFB, CA: Base Closure Account requirement: $4.lMillion The funding supported to environmental and restoration requirements. Norton AFB, CA: Base Closure Account requirement: $.3 Million The funding supported to environmental and restoration requirements. Pease AFB, NH: Base Closure Account requirement: $.5 Million The funding supported to environmental and restoration requirements. Program Management: Base Closure Account requirement: $35.6 Million Funding was primarily required for planning and design costs for military construction at gaining locations and cantonment areas, additional manpower authorizations to administer the program, caretaker contracts, other procurement and environmental costs. FY 1993: Base Closure Account requirement: $63.6 Million. Eaker and England AFBs closed 15 December Myrtle Beach AFB closed 3 1 March Bergstrom AFB and Cat-swell AFB realigned on 3 September Williams AFB closed 3 September Wurtsmith AFB closed 3 June Additionally, Chanute, George, and Mather AFBs closed as recommended by the 1988 Base Closure Commission. All active duty force structure at these bases relocated or retired, and all active military and civilian personnel relocated or were eliminated from Air Force end strength. Numerous units relocated or inactivated. Funding was primarily related to operations and maintenance, procurement, construction projects and environmental requirements. Funds were required to pay both military and civilian moving costs and civilian severance costs. Additionally, to facilitate the closure of bases, as well as the transition of land and facilities to community use, Base Transition Coordinator (BTC) positions were established in FY 1993 by the Department of Defense (DOD). Bergstrom AFB, TX: Base Closure Account requirement: $46.5 Million The base closed 3 September The funding was related to construction for the units moving to Davis-Monthan AFB, AZ, and Fort Hood, TX, operations and maintenance, other procurement and environmental requirements. Carswell AFB, TX: Base Closure Account requirement: $18.5 Million The base realigned 3 September The funding was required for construction at gaining locations and for the AF Reserve cantonment area at Carswell AFB. All active force structure relocated. Funding was also required for personnel moves, severance, operations and maintenance and environmental cleanup. and Castle AFB, CA: Base Closure Account requirement: $2.2 Million The base closed 3 September The funding was primarily related to environmental, construction, operations and maintenance. Eaker AFB, AR: Base Closure Account requirement: $14.4 Million EXHIBIT BC- 1 2

6 The base closed 15 December Funding was required for environmental and operations and maintenance requirements. England AFB, LA: Base Closure Account requirement: $3 1.4 Million The base closed 15 December Funding supported for military construction, environmental, and operation and maintenance. Grissom AFB, IN: Base Closure Account requirement: $8.9 Million Funding supported military construction, operation and maintenance, and environmental requirements. Loring AFB, ME: Base Closure Account requirement: $35.1 Million The funding was required primarily for environmental compliance and restoration costs, operation and maintenance, and military construction. Lowry AFB, CO: Base Closure Account requirement: $117.2 Million Funding was primarily related to construction at gaining locations, moving training courses and equipment, procurement of equipment for the electronics training course, and environmental cleanup requirements. MacDill AFB, FL: Base Closure Account requirement: $3. Million Funding was required for construction to support units moving to Luke AFB, AZ, and Seymour Johnson AFB, NC. Funds were also required for operation and maintenance and environmental actions. Myrtle Beach AFB, SC: Base Closure Account requirement: $14.6 Million The base closed 3 1 March Funding was primarily related to construction for units moving to Luke AFB, AZ, Pope AFB, NC, and Seymour Johnson AFB, NC, such as the 73rd Air Tactical Control Squadron. Funding was required for caretaker costs, environmental costs, and relocation of personnel. Richards-Gebaur ARS, MO: Base Closure Account requirement: $35.9 Million Funding was required for construction supporting units moving to Whiteman AFB, MO, as well as operation and maintenance, and environmental costs. Rickenbacker AGB, OH: Base Closure Account requirement: $46.8 Million Funding supported for military construction, procurement, operation and maintenance, and environmental compliance and restoration operations. Williams AFB, AZ: Base Closure Account requirement: $17. Million The base closed 3 September Funding supported operation and maintenance costs and environmental. Wurtsmith AFB, MI: Base Closure Account requirement: $16. Million The base closed 3 June Funding primarily related to operation and maintenance, and environmental compliance and restoration requirements. Chanute AFB, IL: Base Closure Account requirement: $41.1 Million The base closed 3 June Funding required for construction for redirected activities, environmental compliance and restoration, communications installation at gaining locations and operation and maintenance. George AFB, CA: Base Closure Account requirement: $5 1.3 Million The base closed 15 December Most of the funding consisted of military construction. Also included was operation and maintenance and environmental compliance and restoration requirements. EXHIBIT BC- 1 3

7 Mather AFB, CA: Base Closure Account requirement: $46.4 Million The base closed 3 September Construction was required at Randolph AFB, TX, and at the Mather hospital which became an annex to McClellan AFB, CA. Communications equipment was installed in the new facilities. Funds were required for environmental compliance and restoration, as well as procurement. Norton AFB, CA: Base Closure Account requirement: $.3 Million The funding supported operation and maintenance and environmental and restoration requirements. Pease AFB, NH: Base Closure Account requirement: $.3 Million The funding supported operation and maintenance and environmental and restoration requirements. Program Management: Base Closure Account requirement: $65.7 Million Funding was required for planning and design costs for military construction at gaining locations and cantonment areas, additional manpower authorizations to administer the program, caretaker contracts, and disposal environmental studies. FY 1994: Base Closure Account requirement: $ Million. Loring, Lowry and Richards-Gebaur AFBs closed and Rickenbacker AFB realigned on 3 September All active duty force structure at these bases relocated or retired, and all active military and civilian personnel relocated or were eliminated from Air Force end strength. In addition, the active flying mission assigned to MacDill AFB was terminated, and the remainder of the base was converted to an administrative base. The Air Force continued funding the operation of the airfield until October 1995, with the largest requirements for environmental and operation and maintenance. Funds were required to pay both military and civilian PCS and civilian severance costs, procurement, family housing construction, and military construction. studies are completed or will be continued as necessary and environmental restoration initiated. Numerous units relocated or deactivated. Bergstrom AFB, TX: Base Closure Account requirement: $.6 Million Funding supported military construction costs and environmental requirements. Carswell AFB, TX: Base Closure Account requirement: $3.8 Million Funding supported environmental, caretaker and disposal management team requirements and military construction requirements. Castle AFB, CA: Base Closure Account requirement: $29.5 Million Funding supported environmental and operation and maintenance requirements. Also included was military construction, family housing and procurement funds. Eaker AFB, AR: Base Closure Account requirement: $2.1 Million Funding supported caretaker and environmental requirements. England AFB, LA: Base Closure Account requirement: $2. Million Funding supported caretaker requirements. Grissom AFB, IN: Base Closure Account requirement: $8.4 Million The base realigned 3 September Funding supported operation and maintenance, construction of the AF Reserve cantonment area, PCS of military personnel, procurement and environmental compliance and restoration costs. EXHIBIT BC- 1

8 Loring AFB, ME: Base Closure Account requirement: $42.7 Million The funding supported operation and maintenance, environmental compliance and restoration costs and PCS of military personnel. The base closed 3 September Lowry AFB, CO: Base Closure Account requirement: $24.2 Million The base realigned 3 September The Air Reserve Personnel Center, Defense Finance and Accounting Service, and the 3567 USAF Recruiting Squadron remained in a cantonment area. The 11 Space Systems Squadron remains in a separate cantonment area. Funding supported military personnel PCS, procurement, military construction, environmental cleanup, and caretaker requirements. MacDill AFB, FL: Base Closure Account requirement: $1.7 Million The base was realigned 3 1 March Funding supported procurement and operation and maintenance requirements. Myrtle Beach AFB, SC: Base Closure Account requirement: $4.8 Million Funding supported environmental cleanup and caretaker requirements. Richards-Gebaur ARS, MO: Base Closure Account requirement: $5.4 Million The base closed 3 September Funding supported environmental and caretaker requirements. Rickenbacker AGB, OH: Base Closure Account requirement: $18.8 Million The base realigned 3 September Funding supported military construction, environmental, and operation and maintenance requirements. Williams AFB, AZ: Base Closure Account requirement: $4.3 Million Funding supported environmental cleanup, caretaker and disposal management team requirements. Wurtsmith AFB, MI: Base Closure Account requirement: $1.4 Million Funding supported environmental, caretaker and disposal management team requirements. Chanute AFB, IL: Base Closure Account requirement: $14.1 Million Funding supported environmental and the completion of construction at Vandenberg AFB, CA for transferring units. George AFB, CA: Base Closure Account requirement: $1.9 Million Funding supported caretaker and military construction requirements. Mather AFB, CA: Base Closure Account requirement: $1.2 Million Funding supported caretaker and environmental requirements. Norton AFB, CA: Base Closure Account requirement: $.1 Million The funding supported caretaker requirements. Pease AFB, NH: Base Closure Account requirement: $.1 Million The funding supported environmental and restoration requirements. Program Management: Base Closure Account requirement: $15. Million Funding supported planning and design, environmental cleanup and operation and maintenance costs. EXHIBIT BC-1

9 FY 1995: Base Closure Account requirement: $132.4 Million. Castle AFB, CA closed 3 September All other bases will continue in caretaker status until property ownership is transferred. Funds were required for military construction, environmental, and operation and maintenance costs. Bergstrom AFB, TX: Base Closure Account requirement: $2.6 Million Funding was required primarily for environmental cleanup requirements. Carswell AFB, TX: Base Closure Account requirement: $.8 Million Funding supported caretaker requirements. Castle AFB, CA: Base Closure Account requirement: $4.7 Million The base closed on 3 September Funding supported construction, operation and maintenance costs and environmental cleanup requirements. Eaker AFB, AR: Base Closure Account requirement: $4.9 Million Funding supported construction, environmental cleanup and caretaker requirements. England AFB, LA: Base Closure Account requirement: $3.8 Million Funding supported environmental cleanup and caretaker requirements. Grissom AFB, IN: Base Closure Account requirement: $1.O Million Funding supported environmental cleanup and caretaker requirements. Loring AFB, ME: Base Closure Account requirement: $2.8 Million Funding supported environmental cleanup, caretaker and disposal management team requirements. Lowry AFB, CO: Base Closure Account requirement: $12.5 Million Funding supported caretaker and environmental cleanup requirements. MacDill AFB, FL: Base Closure Account requirement: $1. Million Funding supported military construction and environmental cleanup requirements. Myrtle Beach AFB, SC: Base Closure Account requirement: $1.8 Million Funding supported environmental cleanup, caretaker requirements and construction. Richards-Gebaur ARS, MO: Base Closure Account requirement: $.4 Million Funding supported environmental compliance and restoration requirements. Rickenbacker AGB, OH: Base Closure Account requirement: $.5 Million Funding supported caretaker requirements. Williams AFB, AZ: Base Closure Account requirement: $1.O Million Funding supported caretaker and environmental cleanup requirements. Wurtsmith AFB, MI: Base Closure Account requirement: $4.9 Million Funding supported operation and maintenance and caretaker requirements. Chanute AFB, IL: Base Closure Account requirement: $9.1 Million Funding supported military construction, operation and maintenance, and environmental cleanup requirements. George AFB, CA: Base Closure Account requirement: $.6 Million EXHIBIT BC- 1

10 Funding supported military construction requirements. Mather AFB,CA: Base Closure Account requirement: $.5 Million Funding supported operation and maintenance, and environmental cleanup requirements. Norton AFB, CA: Base Closure Account requirement: $. Million Pease AFB, NH: Base Closure Account requirement: $.1 Million The funding supported environmental and restoration requirements. Program Management: Base Closure Account requirement: $16.4 Million Funding supported the environmental program, the Air Force Base Conversion Agency and military construction planning and design requirements. FY 1996: Base Closure Account requirement. $194.3 Million which includes $54.5 Million for BRAC 88 requirements. All bases recommended for closure were closed by the end of FY 1995 and will continue in caretaker status until property ownership is transferred. Funds were required for military construction, environmental, and operation and maintenance costs. Bergstrom AFB, TX: Base Closure Account requirement: $2.1 Million Funding supported environmental cleanup and caretaker requirements. Carswell AFB, TX: Base Closure Account requirement: $5.1 Million Funding supported environmental cleanup and caretaker requirements. Castle AFB, CA: Base Closure Account requirement: $32. Million Funding supported military construction, environmental cleanup, and operation and maintenance requirements. Eaker AFB, AR: Base Closure Account requirement: $.2 Million Funding supported environmental cleanup and caretaker requirements. England AFB, LA: Base Closure Account requirement: $6.2 Million Funding supported environmental cleanup and caretaker requirements. Grissom AFB, IN: Base Closure Account requirement: $5.4 Million Funding supported military construction, environmental cleanup and caretaker requirements. Loring AFB, ME: Base Closure Account requirement: $1.4 Million Funding supported operation and maintenance and environmental cleanup requirements. Lowry AFB, CO:. Base Closure Account requirement: $9.5 Million Funding supported military construction, operation and maintenance and environmental requirements. MacDill AFB, FL: Base Closure Account requirement: $.2 Million Funding supported operation and maintenance requirements. Myrtle Beach AFB, SC: Base Closure Account requirement: $11.3 Million Funding supported military construction, caretaker requirements, operation and maintenance, and environmental requirements. EXHIBIT BC-1

11 Richards-Gebaur ARS, MO: Base Closure Account requirement: $1.4 Million Funding supported military construction and environmental requirements. Rickenbacker AGB, OH: Base Closure Account requirement: $15.3 Million Funding supported military construction, caretaker and operation and maintenance and environmental requirements. Williams AFB, AZ: Base Closure Account requirement: $2.9 Million Funding supported caretaker and environmental requirements. Wurtsmith AFB, MI: Base Closure Account requirement: $4.3 Million Funding supported caretaker and environmental requirements. Chanute AFB, IL: Base Closure Account requirement: $. Million George AFB, CA: Base Closure Account requirement: $. Million Mather AFB, CA: Base Closure Account requirement: $7.3 Million Funding supported military construction and operation and maintenance requirements. Norton AFB, CA: Base Closure Account requirement: $. Million Pease AFB, NH: Base Closure Account requirement: $. Million Program Management: Base Closure Account requirement: $26.2 Million Funding supported operation and maintenance and environmental requirements. FY 1997: Base Closure Account requirement: $221.7 Million which includes $45.4 Million for BRAC 88 requirements. All bases were closed or realigned by the end of FY 1995 and will continue in caretaker status until property ownership is transferred. restoration will continue until completion. Funds were required for military construction, family housing, environmental, and operation and maintenance costs. Bergstrom AFB, TX: Base Closure Account requirement: $5.5 Million Funding supported environmental and operation and maintenance requirements. Carswell AFB, TX: Base Closure Account requirement: $1.O Million Funding supported environmental, operation and maintenance and construction requirements. Castle AFB, CA: Base Closure Account requirement: $44.9 Million Funding supported family housing construction, operation and maintenance and environmental requirements. Eaker AFB, AR: Base Closure Account requirement: $.7 Million Funding supported operation and maintenance and environmental requirements. England AFB, LA: Base Closure Account requirement: $.9 Million Funding supported operation and maintenance and environmental requirements. Grissom AFB, IN: Base Closure Account requirement: $12. Million EXHIBIT BC- 1

12 Funding supported military construction, operation and maintenance and environmental requirements. Loring AFB, ME: Base Closure Account requirement: $25.5 Million Funding supported operation and maintenance and environmental requirements. Lowry AFB, CO: Base Closure Account requirement: $16.1 Million Funding supported military construction, operation and maintenance and environmental requirements. MacDill AFB, FL: Base Closure Account requirement: $. Million Myrtle Beach AFB, SC: Base Closure Account requirement: $5.2 Million Funding supported operation and maintenance and environmental requirements. Richards-Gebaur ARS, MO: Base Closure Account requirement: $1.1 Million Funding supported operation and maintenance and environmental requirements. Rickenbacker AGB, OH: Base Closure Account requirement: $15.1 Million Funding supported military construction, operation and maintenance and environmental requirements. Williams AFB, AZ: Base Closure Account requirement: $5.6 Million Funding supported operation and maintenance and environmental requirements. Wurtsmith AFB, MI: Base Closure Account requirement: $3.6 Million Funding supported operation and maintenance and environmental requirements. Chanute AFB,IL: Base Closure Account requirement: $1.5 Million Funding supported military construction. George AFB, CA: Base Closure Account requirement: $. Million Mather AFB, CA: Base Closure Account requirement: $4. Million Funding supported military construction and operation and maintenance requirements. Norton AFB, CA: Base Closure Account requirement: $. Million Pease AFB, NH: Base Closure Account requirement: $. Million Program Management: Base Closure Account requirement: $33.6 Million Funding supported military construction, operation and maintenance and environmental requirements. Mission Impact: The preceding schedule was developed to minimize the impact on Air Force mission capability while placing priority on closing eight bases and realigning six bases, as recommended by the Base Closure Commission and directed by the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 199, P.L. 1 l-5 1, as amended. It is the Air Force s objective to close eight bases and realign six bases at the earliest opportunity to take advantage of savings provided by reductions to Air Force end strength, reductions to base operating support costs, and anticipated proceeds from sale of real and personal property at the closure bases. Considerations: By the end of FY 22, ten BRAC 91 installations will have remedial actions installed in accordance with the Comprehensive Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA). These actions (which include: landfill closures, groundwater treatments, bioventing, air sparging, underground storage tank removals and free product removal) comply with the requirements of CERCLA 12(3) which governs deed transfers of property, and protects human health and the environment. By FY 22, it is EXHIBIT BC- 1

13 anticipated that two of the three National Priority List (Loring AFB, ME and Williams AFB, AZ) will have all remedies in place and operational. Three bases are on the NPL, two others are proposed for NPL and one has a Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) administrative order. Installations on the NPL or with RCRA orders have cleanup schedules that are legally binding with stipulated penalties and fines for failure to comply. There are currently 4 1,539 acres to be transferred at BRAC 9 1 installations; 26,119 acres are now environmentally ready for transfer. Through long term leases and deed transfers, 37,646 acres are now in reuse. Nine installations (Bergstrom AFB, TX, Castle AFB, CA, England AFB, LA, Eaker AFB, AR, Grissom AFB, IN, Myrtle Beach AFB, SC, Richards-Gebaur ARS, MO, Rickenbacker ANGS, OH and Williams AFB, AZ) have greater than 9% of the available acres in reuse. Completion of the environmental actions are crucial for the reuse and economic development of the affected communities. : Included in this submit are those requirements generated by the 1991 Base Closure Commission which changes the 1988 Base Closure Commission recommendations. Additionally, the defense base closure account, which funds the bases recommended for closure by the 1988 Commission, expired on September 3, Therefore, the defense base closure account of 199 has been used to fund ongoing environmental restoration and property disposal actions for the BRAC 88 closures and realignments since that date. These costs are included in the 199 account, and are separately identified in this portion of the budget submission. The savings associated with these closure actions are for display purposes only and will accrue in other Air Force appropriations. The funding profiles associated with the schedule have been programmed to accomplish this objective. EXHIBIT BC-1

14 ONE TIME IMPLEMENTATION COSTS: BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE ACCOUNT COMMISSION USAF FINANCIAL SUMMARY (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) TOTAL FY 1992 FY 1993 FY 1994 FY 1995 FY 1996 FY 1997 FY ,191 3, , , , ,324 79, I 12, ,42 28,947 37,75 2 4, ,179 3,43 Paid With Later Appropriations TOTAL ONE-TIME COSTS , ,88 176,296 Revenues porn Land Sales (-) BRAC 88 kequirements s4soo 45,384 BUDGET AUTHORITY REQUEST 24,478 63, , , , ,68 533,281 23,173 61, ,15 4,56 4,72 I,88,341 I,474,627 3J I I Family Housing 9,156 9, , 56,617 4,493 23,38 2.5,286 1,64, ,493 23,38 33, ,46 TOTAL SAVINGS 114,528 12, ,487 22,225 22,985 21,851 31,294 42,372 43,8 I2 45, , , ,18 152, II 45 1, ,243 (1.361) (2,595) (2,818) (2.818) (2,818) (7,565) (1,692) (11.881) (11.881) (11,881) , , ,98 715,79 743, ,645 19, ,868 1,958,614 (2,818) 3, I 13,26 NET IMPLEMENTATION COSTS d, - (82.81) 34 1,383 Il (21.851) (37,294) 181, ,37 49, ,94 (27,991) ( ) (3.55,353) 12 1,179 3,43 4,493 23, ,539 (318,872) 19, ,437 22,973 (42,372) (43.812) (45,29) ,324 79,826 (114,376) (133,11) (131,33) ( ) ( ) (57,243) (51,337) (57S.982) (567,33) EXHIBIT BC-2 33,392 23,173-19,619 61, I.236 I,954,54 4,72 89, ,659

15 BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE ACCOUNT COMMISSION USAF FINANCIAL SUMMARY (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) ONE TIME IMPLEMENTATION COSTS: FY 1996 FY ,788 42,15 1,712 3,234 TOTAL ONE -TIME COSTS 54,5 45,384 BUDGET AUTHORITY REQUEST 54,5 45,384. EXHIBIT BC-2

16 Bergstrom AFB, Texas Package Base Realignment and Closure Detail 13

17 BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE ACCOUNT COMMISSION USAF/BERGSTROM AFB, TX (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) ONE TIME IMPLEMENTATION COSTS: TOTAL ONE-TIME COSTS BUDGET REQUEST Family Housing FY 1992 FY 1993 FY 1994 FY 1995 FY 19% FY , ,263 27, ,628 2,46 5,519 3, ,263 46, ,628 2,123 5,536 16,263 46, ,628 2,123 5,536 28! ,867 1,933 2,1 2,69 2,139-4,48-1,187-1,236-1,285-1,336 2,554 39, ,246 42,886 44,596 (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (1,43) (1,43) (1,43) (1,43) (1,43) TOTAL SAVINGS 18,373 4,387 42,11 43,67 45,399 14, ,867-1,933-2,1-2,69-2,139 16,263 27, ,628 2,46 5,519 7,941 1,187 1,444 1,362 1,353-2,554-39, ,246-42,886-44, NET IMPLEMENTATION COSTS ,799-39,175-41,547-39,863 EXHIBIT BC-2 14

18 BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE ACCOUNT - USAF/BERGSTROM AFB. TX (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) TOTAL FY ONE TIME IMPLEMENTATION COSTS: TOTAL ONE-TIME COSTS 15,142 54,349 3, ,762 BUDGET REQUEST 86, COMMISSION Family Housing ,9-9,92 188,923 (3) (1,43) TOTAL SAVINGS 189,84 15,142-1,9 54,349 13, , NET IMPLEMENTATION COSTS -115,933 EXHiBlT BC-2

19 Carswell AFB, Texas Package Base Realignment and Closure Detail 76

20 BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE ACCOUNT COMMISSION USAFKARSWELL AFB, TX (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) ONE TIME IMPLEMENTATION COSTS: TOTAL ONE-TIME COSTS FY 1992 FY 1993 FY 1994 FY 1995 FY 1996 FY ,74 4,74 5, , , ,584 3, ,447 3, , BUDGET REQUEST Family Housing TOTAL SAVINGS NET IMPLEMENTATION COSTS 4,74 4,74 4,74 18,447 3, , ,333 7,8 2,3 1 6,333 7,8 2,223 3,294 3,411 3,531 3,651 3,774-24,725-17,685-18,3-18,911-19,546 35,842 66,3 68,985 71,728 74,588 (26) (26) (26) GW (26) (1,648) (1,648) (1,648) (1,648) (1,648) 14,411 52,26 54,216 56,468 58,816 5, ,294-3,411-3,53 1-3,65 1-3,774 6, , ,39 2,694 19,36 19,318 19,793-35,842-66,3-68, ,728-74,588 6,333 7,8 2,3 1 1,369-41,19-51,179-51,362-57,825 EXHIBIT BC-2

21 BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE ACCOUNT COMMISSION USAFKARSWELL AFB, TX (DOLLARS IN TH@JSfJfS) ONE TIME IMPLEMENTATION COSTS: TOTAL ONE-TIME COSTS FY ,37 16,495 11,61 4,97 BUDGET REQUEST 4,97 Family Housing ,372 15,564 17,661-99, ,443 (26) (1,648) TOTAL SAVINGS 235,937 6,37-17,661 16,495 11,42-317,443 15,372 NET IMPLEMENTATION COSTS - 186,447 EXHIBIT BC-2 18

22 Castle AFB, California Package Base Realignment and Closure Detail

23 BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE ACCOUNT COMMISSION USAF/CASTLE AFB, CA (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) ONE TIME IMPLEMENTATION COSTS: TOTAL ONE-TIME COSTS BUDGET REQUEST Family Housing FY 1992 FY 1993 FY 1994 FY 1995 FY 1996 FY , , ,973 24,481 16,464 2,57 8,783 1,11 21, ,293 6,843 4,428 2, ,73 1 2,177 29,467 4, ,33 44,915 24,73 1 2,177 29,467 4, ,33 44,915 1,969 7,828 7,762 12,461 7,828 7,762 14,43 3,766 3,894 4,26 9,686 14,57 15,57 27, ,838 48,76 (223) (223) (223) (1,189) (1,189) (1,189) TOTAL SAVINGS 4,683 65,239 67, ,421 27,38 19, ,973-3,766-3,894-4,26 24, ,464 2,57 8,783 1,11 21, ,293 6,843-3,289-12,481-14,444-27, ,838-48, ,828 7,762 12,461 NET IMPLEMENTATION COSTS 24, ,5 37, ,874 EXHIBIT BC-2 2

24 ONE TIME IMPLEMENTATION COSTS: BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE ACCOUNT COMMISSION USAF/CASTLE AFB, CA (DOLLARS IN TH@jZ@$S) TOTAL ONE-TIME COSTS FY ,127 23,173 11,728 17, ,867 BUDGET REQUEST 282,867 Family Housing 1,969 28,51 3,2 11,686 39,25 122,775 (223) (1,189) TOTAL SAVINGS 173,711 49,127 23,173-11,686 11,728-19, , ,5 1 NET IMPLEMENTATION COSTS 48,223 EXHIBIT BC-2

25 Eaker AFB, Arkansas Package Base Realignment and Closure Detail

26 BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE ACCOUNT COMMISSION USAF/EAKER AFB, AR (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) FY 1992 FY 1993 FY 1994 FY 1995 FY 1996 FY 1997 ONE TIME IMPLEMENTATION COSTS: 4,236 8,57 8, ,248 1, TOTAL ONE-TIME COSTS 8,57 14,384 2,119 4, BUDGET REQUEST 8,57 14,384 2,119 4, Family Housing 5 4, , ,965 3,7 3,178 3,286 3,397 6,826 17,114 17,777 18,432 19,118 19,338 4,59 41,681 43,338 45,66 (234) (234) (234) (234) (234) (1,31) (1,31) (1,31) (1,31) (1,31) TOTAL SAVINGS 29,129 6,243 62,636 65,56 67,58 1-2,965 8,57 8, ,338 4,719-3, ,19-4, ,236-3,178-3,286-3, ,88-18,322-18,928-41,681-43,338-45,66 14 NET IMPLEMENTATION COSTS 8,57-1,26-57,171-57,146-64,894-66,885 EXHIBIT BC-2 23

27 BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE ACCOUNT COMMISSION USAF/EAKER AFB, AR (DOLLARS IN TH@zjS#&S) ONE TIME IMPLEMENTATION COSTS: TOTAL ONE-TIME COSTS BUDGET REQUEST Family Housing FY ,236 17,127 8,941 42,474 42, ,776 6,276 15,896 79, ,482 (234) (1,31) TOTAL SAVINGS 284,645 4,236-15,896 17,127-69, ,482 5,776 NET IMPLEMENTATION COSTS -248,65 EXHIBIT BC-2 2 4

28 England AFB, Louisiana Package Base Realignment and Closure Detail 25

29 BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE ACCOUNT COMMISSION USAF/ENGLAND AFB, LA (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) ONE TIME IMPLEMENTATION COSTS: TOTAL ONE-TIME COSTS FY 1992 FY 1993 FY 1994 FY 1995 FY 1996 FY ,659 6,775 15,212 2,892 6, ,527 1, ,775 31,398 1,96 3,85 6, BUDGET REQUEST 6,775 31,398 1,96 3,85 6, Family Housing 1,527 1, , ,618 1,867 1,933 2,1 2,69 2,139 2, ,762 22,586 23,43 24,253 17,444 32,4 1 33,338 34,664 36,46 (219) (219) (219) (219) (219) (85% (859) (85% (85% (85% TOTAL SAVINGS 22,247 55,736 57,925 6,136 62,438 9,659-1,867-1,933-2,1-2,69-2,139 6,775 15,212 2,892 6, ,591-19,82-2,146-23,4-24,218-17,444-32,41-33,338-34,664-36,46 1, NET IMPLEMENTATION COSTS 6,775 11,71-52,871-52,52-53,981-61,585 EXHIBIT BC-2 26

30 BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE ACCOUNT COMMISSION USAF/ENGLAND AFB, LA (DOLLARS IN THqdmS) ONE TIME IMPLEMENTATION COSTS: TOTAL ONE-TIME COSTS FY ,659 31,849 9,438 62,493 BUDGET REQUEST 62,493 Family Housing 1,527 2,916 4,443 1,9 94,94 153,533 (219) (85% TOTAL SAVINGS 258,482 9,659-1,9 31,849-83, ,533 2,916 NET IMPLEMENTATION COSTS -23,93 EXHIBIT BC-2 27

31 Grissom AFB, Indiana Package Base Realignment and Closure Detail 28

32 BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE ACCOUNT COMMISSION USAF/GRISSOM AFB, IN (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) ONE TIME IMPLEMENTATION COSTS: TOTAL ONE-TIME COSTS BUDGET REQUEST FY 1992 FY 1993 FY 1994 FY 1995 FY 1996 FY ,49 3,485 6,19 1,278 4, ,157 1,327 3,26 3, ,57 1, ,278 8,886 8, ,371 12,24 1,278 8,886 8, ,371 12,24 Family Housing ,799 6,3 6,27 6,416 6,194 6,761 6,994 7,235 21,523 44,472 46,24 48,83 (18) (18) (18) (18) (1,162) (1,162) (1,162) (1,162) TOTAL SAVINGS 33,516 57,236 59,441 61, ,49 3,485 6,19-5,799-6,3-6,27-6,416 1,278 4, ,157 1,327 3,26-2,345-5,61-6,265-2,728-2,442-44,472-46,24-48, NET IMPLEMENTATION COSTS 1,278 8,93-25,144-55,939-54,7-49,71 EXHIBIT BC-2 29

33 . BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE ACCOUNT COMMISSION USAF/GRISSOM AFB, IN (DOLLARS IN THI;)bwS) ONE TIME IMPLEMENTATION COSTS: TOTAL ONE-TIME COSTS FY ,445 9,111 13,151 1, ,719 BUDGET REQUEST 64,719 Family Housing ,425 27,184 16,318 (18) (1,162) TOTAL SAVINGS 211,927 13,445-24,425 9,111-13, , NET IMPLEMENTATION COSTS -174,682 EXHIBIT BC-2 3

34 Loring AFB, Maine Package Base Realignment and Closure Detail 3t

35 BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE ACCOUNT COMMISSION USAF/LORING AFB. ME (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) FY 1992 FY 1993 FY 1994 FY 1995 FY 1996 FY 1997 ONE TIME IMPLEMENTATION COSTS: ,613 29,268 28,95 17,634 5,196 19,971 5,267 11,998 3,125 5,213 5,565 1,82 TOTAL ONE-TIME COSTS 26,613 35,146 42,723 2,759 1,49 25,536 BUDGET BEQUEST 26,613 35,146 42,723 2,759 1,49 25,536 Family Housing 1, 4,219 4,12 7,919 4,219 4,12 8,919 Operatton &r Mamtenance 5,912 6,12 6,328 6,542 u 22, ,958 33, I3 17,78 34,9 36,287 37,734 (42% (42% (42% (42% (1,19) (1,19) (1,19) (1,19) TOTAL SAVINGS 46,453 72,978 75,753 78,649 NET IMPLEMENTATION COSTS 26, ,912-6,12-6,328-6,542 26,613 29,268 28,95 17,634 5,196 19,971 5,267-1,835-27,833-27,925-28,88-15,888-34,9-36,287-37,734 4,219 4,12 7,919 39, ,3-65,344-53,113 EXHIBIT BC-2 32

36 BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE ACCOUNT COMMISSION USAF/LORING AFB, ME (DOLLARS IN TH@jmS) FY ONE TIME IMPLEMENTATION COSTS: ,587 31,168 1,82 TOTAL ONE-TIME COSTS 23 1,443 BUDGET REQUEST 23 1,443 Family Housing Uperatton & Mamtenance 1, 16,258 17,258 24,92 122,32 126,629 (42% (1,19) TOTAL SAVINGS 273, ,92 127,587-9, ,89 16,258 NET IMPLEMENTATION COSTS -95,389 EXHIBIT BC-2

37 Lowry AFB, Colorado Package Base Realignment and Closure Detail 34

38 BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE ACCOUNT COMMISSION USAF/LOWRY AFB, CO (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) ONE TIME IMPLEMENTATION COSTS: TOTAL ONE-TIME COSTS FY 1992 FY 1993 FY 1994 FY 1995 FY 1996 FY ,21 9,639 1,46 12,582 8,183 6, ,424 6,92 1 2,614 16,l 14 9,94 2,49 1, , ,79 8, ,227 24,2 I 12,473 9, BUDGET REQUEST 8, ,227 24,21 12,473 9, ,115 Family Housing ,956 3,6 3,164 3,271 14,692 22,391 23,233 24,118 12,446 2,872 21,72 22,567 (378) (378) (378) (378) (522) (522) (522) (522) TOTAL SAVINGS 3,94 46,323 48,99 49,956 94,2 1 9,639 1,46 12,582-2,956-3,6-3,164-3,271 8,183 6, ,424 6,921 2,614 16,114-4,752-19,842-22,66-23,199-1,789-2,872-21,72-22, ,79 16 NET IMPLEMENTATION COSTS 8, ,243-5,893-33,35-38,65-33,841 EXHIBIT BC-2 35

39 ONE TIME IMPLEMENTATION COSTS: BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE ACCOUNT COMMISSION USAF/LOWRY AFB, CO (DOLLARS IN TH@$$@S) TOTAL ONE-TIME COSTS FY ,828 34,898 3,189 1,657 3, ,63 1 BUDGET REQUEST 227,63 1 Family Housing , ,434 77,587 (378) (522) TOTAL SAVINGS 174,472 Revenues from Land Sales (-> 117,828-12,451 34,898-53,745-75,93 3, NET IMPLEMENTATION COSTS 13,737 EXHIBIT BC-2

40 MacDill AFB, Florida Package Base Realignment and Closure Detail 37

41 BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE ACCOUNT COMMISSION USAF/MACDILL AFB, FL (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) ONE TIME IMPLEMENTATION COSTS: TOTAL ONE-TIME COSTS BUDGET REQUEST FY 1992 FY 1993 FY 1994 FY 1995 FY 1996 FY ,139 13,139 13,139 2,53 3, , , , , ,968!,721 9, Family Housing TOTAL SAVINGS NET IMPLEMENTATION COSTS 13,139 13, , ,563 3,628 5,16 5,351 5,551 13,1 16,765 17,432 18,127 6) (76) (76) (76) (424) (424) (424) (424) 16,728 21,925 22,783 23,678 2,53 3, , ,992-5,16-5,193-5,532-13,1-16,765-17,432-18, ,563 3,25-14,972-9,384-22,625-23,659 EXHIBIT BC-2 38

42 BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE ACCOUNT COMMISSION USAF/MACDILL AFB, FL (DOLLARS IN TH@xjwS) FY ONE TIME IMPLEMENTATION COSTS.: 6,152 19,566 2,18 85 TOTAL ONE-TIME COSTS 28,2 BUDGET REQUEST Family Housing 28,2 2,655 2,655 19,69 65,424 (76) (424) TOTAL SAVINGS 85,114 6,152 19,566-17,51-65, ,655 NET IMPLEMENTATION COSTS -54,476 EXHIBIT BC-2 39

43 Myrtle Beach AFB, South Carolina Package Base Realignment and Closure Detail

44 BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE ACCOUNT COMMISSION USAF/MYRTLE BEACH AFB, SC (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) ONE TIME IMPLEMENTATION COSTS: TOTAL ONE-TIME COSTS BUDGET REQUEST FY 1992 FY 1993 FY 1994 FY 1995 FY 1996 FY ,799 13,799 13,799 8, , ,482 1,459 4,985 4,815 5,445 2, , ,632 4, ,312 5,161 14,632 4,827 1,89 11,312 5,161 Family Housing 7,914 7,914 1,4 1, ,196 2,274 2,354 2,434 2,516 2,17 8,159 8,496 8,828 9,178 18,55 32,75 33, ,84 (219) (21% (219) (21% (219) (932) (932) (932) 6 32) (932) TOTAL SAVINGS 22,268 42,58 44,224 45,963 47,778 13,799 8, ,169-2,196-2,274-2,354-2,434-2, ,482 1,459 4,985 4,815 3,428-5,814-8,178-7,67-8,832-18,55-32,75-33,374-34,71-36,84 7,914 1,4 115 NET IMPLEMENTATION COSTS 13, ,641-42,3-34, ,6 17 EXHIBIT BC-2 41

45 BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE ACCOUNT COMMISSION USAF/MYRTLE BEACH AFB. SC (DOLLARS IN THqbwS) ONE TIME IMPLEMENTATION COSTS: TOTAL ONE-TIME COSTS BUDGET REQUEST Family Housing FY ,846 28,82 9,612 71,523 71,523 9,61) Y,O , ,289 (219) (932) TOTAL SAVINGS 22,741 13,846-11,774 28,82-27,66-154,289 9,69 NET IMPLEMENTATION COSTS -142,132 EXHIBIT BC-2 42

46 Richards-Gebaur ARS, Missouri Package Base Realignment and Closure Detail 43

47 BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE ACCOUNT COMMISSION USAF/RICHARDS-GEBAUR AFB, MO (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) WTiiiE IMPLEMENTATION COSTS: TOTAL ONE-TIME COSTS FY 1992 FY 1993 FY 1994 FY 1995 FY 1996 FY , , ,53 5, ,75 35,934 5, ,373 1,43 BUDGET REQUEST 2,75 35,934 5, ,373 1,43 Family Housing Homeowner5 Assistance Program ,433 4,799 4,99 5,192 (18) (18) (18) (18) TOTAL SAVINGS 1,433 4,799 4,99 5,192 33, , ,53 3,783-4,549-4,99-5, NET IMPLEMENTATION COSTS 2,75 35,934 3,974-4, ,149 EXHIBIT BC-2 44

48 BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE ACCOUNT COMMISSION USAF/RICHARDS-GEBAUR AFB, MO (DOLLARS IN TH@jS#fS) ONE TIME IMPLEMENTATION COSTS: TOTAL ONE-TIME COSTS FY ,491 4,99 6,827 55,363 BUDGET REQUEST 55,363 Family Housing ,414 (18) TOTAL SAVINGS 16,414 34,491 4,99-9,337 3 NET IMPLEMENTATION COSTS 3,66 EXHIBIT BC-2 45

49 Rickenbacker AGB, Ohio Package Base Realignment and Closure Detail 46

50 BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE ACCOUNT COMMISSION USAi=/RICKENBACKER AGB, OH (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) ONE TIME IMPLEMENTATION COSTS: TOTAL ONE-TIME COSTS FY 1992 FY 1993 FY 1994 FY 1995 FY 1996 FY ,839 29, ,5 13,64 7,587 3,576 2,777 3,2 1,147 13,569 15, ,426 46,762 18, ,31 15,68 BUDGET REQUEST 12,426 46,762 18, ,31 15,68 Family Housing I,25 1 1,31 1,351 1, (225) (225) (22% (225) TOTAL SAVINGS 1,478 1,537 1,597 1,659 4,839 29, ,5 13,64 7,587 3,576 2,777 3,2 1,147 13,569 14, ,111-1, NET IMPLEMENTATION COSTS 12,426 46,768 17, ,49 EXHIBIT BC-2 47

51 BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE ACCOUNT COMMISSION USAF/RICKENBACKER AGB. OH (DOLLARS IN TH@jwS) ONE TIME IMPLEMENTATION COSTS: TOTAL ONE-TIME COSTS FY ,824 18,17 3, ,3 BUDGET REQUEST 133,3 Family Housing , (225) TOTAL SAVINGS 6,271 6,824 18,17 25, NET IMPLEMENTATION COSTS 13, EXHIBIT BC-2

52 Williams AFB, Arizona Package Base Realignment and Closure Detail

53 BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE ACCOUNT COMMISSION USAF/WILLIAMS AFB, AZ (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) ONE TIME IMPLEMENTATION COSTS: TOTAL ONE-TIME COSTS Revenues from Land Sales (-j FY 1992 FY 1993 FY 1994 FY 1995 FY 1996 FY ,2 14,462 9, ,151 3, ,795 4, ,774 2,26 15,762 16, ,1 2,925 5,622 BUDGET REQUEST 15,762 16,96 4,254 1,1 2,925 5,622 Family Housing 3,623 3,752 3,884 4,16 4,151 3,581 16,56 17,224 17,877 18,564 2,257 41,475 33,155 44, ,66 (316) (316) (316) (316) (316) (935) (935) (935) (935) (935) TOTAL SAVINGS 27,461 61,787 64,263 66,764 69,375 1,2 14, ,623 9,165 4,214-2, , ,46-41,475-3, ,533-43,155-4,16 1,151-16,13-44,87 1-4,151 3,362 16,34-46,66 NET IMPLEMENTATION COSTS 15,762-1,499-57,533-63,253-63,839-63,753 EXHIBIT BC-2 5

54 BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE ACCOUNT COMMISSION USAF/WILLIAMS AFB, AZ (DOLLARS IN TH@JwS) ONE TIME IMPLEMENTATION COSTS: TOTAL ONE-TIME COSTS FY ,2 28,559 16,774 6,287 BUDGET REQUEST 6,287 Family Housing 19,426 73,86 196,418 (316) (935) TOTAL SAVINGS 289,65 1,2-19,426 28,559-57,32-196,418 2 NET IMPLEMENTATION COSTS -243,115 EXHIBIT BC-2 51

55 Wurtsmith AFB, Michigan Package Base Realignment and Closure Detail 52

56 BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE ACCOUNT COMMISSION USAF/WURTSMITH AFB, Ml (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) FY 1992 FY 1993 FY 1994 FY 1995 FY 1996 FY 1997 ONE TIME IMPLEMENTATION COSTS: 1,64 8,261 5,194 2,182 3,59 1,725 5,23 4,924 2,1 13 TOTAL ONE-TIME COSTS 1,64 15,986 1,424 4,924 4,282 3,639 BUDGET REQUEST 1,64 15,986 1,424 4,924 4,282 3,639 Family Housing Homeowners.4ssistance Program 893 7,447 :,484 7,447 1, ,39 6,254 6,474 6,694 6,919 1,34 22,325 23,193 24,5 24,948 2,85 43,316 45,7 46,862 48,73 3 (317) (317) (317) (317) (317) (1,117) (1,117) (1,117) (1,117) Cl,1 17) TOTAL SAVINGS 37,229 71,895 74,737 77,66 8,597-6,39-6,254-6,474-6,694-6,919 1,64 8,261 5,194 2,182 3,59-2,615-17,95-17, ,95-24,818-2,85-43,316-45,7-46,862-48,73 7,447 1,484 NET IMPLEMENTATION COSTS 1,64-13,796-59,987-68,92-73,324-76,958 EXHIBIT BC-Or 53

57 BASE REALIGNMENT.AND CLOSURE ACCOUNT - USAF/WURTSMITH AFB, MI (DOLLARS IN TH@$Zf&IS) FY ONE TIME IMPLEMENTATION COSTS: 29,21 2,19 TOTAL ONE-TIME COSTS 7,428 BUDGET REQUEST 7, COMMISSION Family Housing 893 8,93 1 9,824 32,38 14,856 24,828 (317) (1,117) TOTAL SAVINGS 342,64-32,38 29,21-83,854-24,828 8,931 NET IMPLEMENTATION COSTS -282,921 txhlblt BC-2 54

58 Chanute AFB, Illinois Package Base Realignment and Closure Detail 55

59 BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE ACCOUNT COMMISSION USAFKHANUTE AFB, IL (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) ONE TIME IMPLEMENTATION COSTS: TOTAL ONE-TIME COSTS BUDGET BEQUEST FY 1992 FY 1993 FY 1994 FY 1995 FY 1996 FY ,832 14,58 4, ,693 3, ,84 14,62 9,124 41,84 14,62 9,124 1,543 1,543 1,543 Family Housing TOTAL SAVINGS 36,832 14,58 4, ,693 3, ,543 NET IMPLEMENTATION COSTS 57 41,84 14,62 9,124 1,543 EXHIBIT BC-2

60 BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE ACCOUNT COMMISSION USAFKHANUTE AFB, IL (DOLLARS IN TH@jZf#S) ONE TIME IMPLEMENTATION COSTS: TOTAL ONE-TIME COSTS BUDGET REQUEST FY ,826 5,47 3,997 67,413 67,413 Family Housing TOTAL SAVINGS 56,826 5,47 3,997 NET IMPLEMENTATION COSTS EXHIBIT BC-2 57

61 George AFB, California Package Base Realignment and Closure Detail 58

62 BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE ACCOUNT COMMISSION USAF/GEORGE AFB, CA (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) ONE TIME IMPLEMENTATION COSTS: TOTAL ONE-TIME COSTS BUDGET REQUEST FY 1992 FY 1993 FY 1994 FY 1995 FY 1996 FY ,654 1, ,287 1, ,287 1,895 6 Family Housing TOTAL SAVINGS 5,654 1, NET IMPLEMENTATION COSTS 51,287 1,895 6 EXHIBIT BC-2 59

63 BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE ACCOUNT COMMISSION USAF/GEORGE AFB. CA (DOLLARS IN TH@jZf#S) ONE TIME IMPLEMENTATION COSTS: TOTAL ONE-TIME COSTS FY , ,134 53,782 BUDGET REQUEST 53,782 Family Housing TOTAL SAVINGS 52, ,134 NET IMPLEMENTATION COSTS 53,782 EXHIBIT BC-2

64 Mather AFB, California Package Base Realignment and Closure Detail 61

65 BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE ACCOUNT COMMISSION USAF/MATHER AFB, CA (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) FY 1992 FY 1993 FY 1994 FY 1995 FY 1996 FY 1997 ONE TIME IMPLEMENTATION COSTS: 39,456 6,698 2,274 4,85 1,35 1, , , TOTAL ONE-TIME COSTS 4,85 46,435 1, ,348 3,997 Revenues from Land Sales c-j BUDGET REQUEST 4,85 46,435 1, ,348 3,997 Family Housing Operation d Maintenance TOTAL FIJNDED OUTSIDE THE ACCOUNT Military Personnei TOTAL SAVINGS 39,456 6,698 2,274 4,85 1,35 1, , , NET IMPLEMENTATION COSTS 4,85 46,435 1, ,348 3,997 EXHIBIT BC-2 62

66 BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE ACCOUNT COMMISSION USAF/MATHER AFB, CA (DOLLARS IN THt#f&%) FY ONE TIME IMPLEMENTATION COSTS: 48,428 6,748 7, TOTAL ONE-TIME COSTS 67,66 BUDGET REQUEST Family Housing TOTAL SAVINGS 48,428 6,748 7, NET IMPLEMENTATION COSTS 63,69 EXHIBIT BC-2 63

67 Norton AFB, California Package Base Realignment and Closure Detail 64

68 BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE ACCOUNT COMMISSION USAF/NORTON AFB, CA (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) ONE TIME IMPLEMENTATION COSTS: TOTAL ONE-TIME COSTS FY 1992 FY 1993 FY 1994 FY 1995 FY 1996 FY BUDGET REQUEST Family Housing TOTAL SAVINGS NET IMPLEMENTATION COSTS EXHIBIT BC-2

69 BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE ACCOUNT COMMISSION USAF/NORTON AFB, CA (DOLLARS IN TH@zjwS) FY ONE TIME IMPLEMENTATION COSTS: TOTAL ONE-TIME COSTS 715 BUDGET REQUEST 715 Family Housing TOTAL SAVINGS NET IMPLEMENTATION COSTS EXHIBIT BC-2

70 Pease AFB, New Hampshire Package Base Realignment and Closure Detail 67

71 BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE ACCOUNT COMMISSION USAF/PEASE AFB, NH (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) ONE TIME IMPLEMENTATION COSTS: TOTAL ONE-TIME COSTS BUDGET REQUEST FY 1992 FY 1993 FY 1994 FY 1995 FY 1996 FY Family Housing TOTAL SAVINGS NET IMPLEMENTATION COSTS % EXHIBIT BC-2

72 BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE ACCOUNT COMMISSION USAF/PEASE AFB, NH (DOLLARS IN TH@jmS) ONE TIME IMPLEMENTATION COSTS: TOTAL ONE-TIME COSTS BUDGET REQUEST Family Housing Operation B Maintenance FY TOTAL SAVINGS NET IMPLEMENTATION COSTS 959 EXHIBIT BC-2