Administrative Rules GOVERNOR S OFFICE PRECLEARANCE FORM

Transcription

1 Administrative Rules GOVERNOR S OFFICE PRECLEARANCE FORM Agency: Environmental Protection Commission / Department of Natural Resources (DNR) IAC Citation: 567 IAC 100, 567 IAC 101, 567 IAC 111 Agency Contact: Leslie Goldsmith (515) Statutory Authority: Iowa Code sections 455B.304 and 455D.7 Preclearance Requested Review Deadline: May 6, 2016 Purpose of Proposed Rule: DNR proposes the following changes in 567 IAC chapters 100, 101 and 111 in order to make the administrative rules consistent with Iowa Code: Rescind the statewide waste management hierarchy enumerated in 567 IAC and replace all references to 567 IAC with a reference to the waste management hierarchy enumerated in Iowa Code section 455B.301A; Remove certain waste management technique implementation requirements for planning areas that fail to meet the 25% waste reduction goal because the enabling legislation establishing these requirements was rescinded during the 2013 legislative session; Remove the availability of a waiver to exempt waste generated during a declared disaster from the state s tonnage fee requirements because the legislation establishing the tonnage fee does not allow for this exemption by waiver. DNR is also proposing changes to reduce planning area reporting requirements by: 1) removing the Municipal Solid Waste and Recycling Survey submission requirement; and 2) recognizing submittal of the annual reports required for planning areas designated as Environmental Management Systems (EMS) as satisfying comprehensive plan update requirements. Additionally, DNR is proposing to remove unused definitions from 567 IAC 101, move the remaining definitions to 567 IAC 100 and update as necessary, revise a definition in 567 IAC 111 to make it consistent with these revisions, and to correct outdated references to the Iowa Code. Need for Proposed Rule: This rulemaking is the result of two recent legislative changes that affect 567 IAC 100, as well as the comprehensive five year rule review that the DNR is currently undertaking pursuant to Iowa Code section 17A.7(2). The two legislative changes: The first was enacted in House File 225 (2013), signed by Governor Branstad on March 28, This legislation removes certain requirements applicable to planning areas that fail to meet the 25% waste reduction goal established in Iowa Code section 455D.3. The proposed rule is necessary to align the current administrative rule with the revised Iowa Code. The second was enacted in House File 544 (2015), signed by Governor Branstad on June 18, This 1

2 legislation revised the waste management hierarchy enumerated in Iowa Code section 455B.301A. This proposed rule is necessary in order to amend the corresponding administrative rule to simply refer to Iowa Code 455B.301A so the rule remains consistent with Iowa Code. The results of the DNR s five year rule review: DNR s 5 year regulatory review includes a review of the statutory authority for each regulatory provision. 567 IAC 101.7(3) authorizes the DNR to grant tonnage fee payment waivers for waste generated during a declared disaster. However, there is no legislative authority authorizing the DNR to issue such a waiver. As such, this waiver/exemption provision is rescinded to make the administrative rule consistent with Iowa Code. Also, the Municipal Solid Waste and Recycling Survey required by 567 IAC is no longer necessary because the same information is being compiled and made available to the public through the Iowa Green List (IAGREENLIST.com). Further, to reduce redundant paperwork, the DNR proposes to remove the requirement for submittal of a comprehensive plan update in certain instances, instead recognizing that an EMS annual report satisfies this requirement. Additionally, the definition of comprehensive plan update has been revised to reflect the 2009 amendments to 567 IAC 101 in which the definition of planning cycle was extended from three to five years. The current definition of comprehensive plan update requires planning agencies to incorporate a proposed course of action for the next two planning cycles (10 years), which has proven to be too long a time period to allow for accurate planning. As such, the revision requires the comprehensive plan update to address the next planning cycle (5 years). Additional revisions meeting this objective have been incorporated throughout the proposed rule. Finally, the Solid Waste section of the DNR s Land Quality Bureau is methodically working to move all definitions into one section of the Iowa Administrative Code so there is consistency across applicable chapters. DNR is proposing to move certain existing definitions into 567 IAC 100. Having a single chapter for all definitions will improve consistency. Summary of Informal Rulemaking Activities related to the Proposed Rule (e.g., stakeholder input): Documents associated with this rule review were posted on the DNR website on November 9, 2015: Protection/Land Quality/Solid Waste/Solid Waste Policy Rules/Rulemaking Actions DNR staff ed stakeholders on November 9, 2015 to notify them of the rulemaking action being considered. The list was made up of all solid waste planning area and facility contacts along with other contacts such as the Iowa Farm Bureau Federation, the Iowa League of Cities, the Iowa State Association of Counties, and the Iowa Association of Business and Industry. DNR staff requested that anyone with comments or questions about the proposed rule contact Leslie Goldsmith by November 30, No comments were received during the original comment period, 2

3 therefore an extension was allowed until December 14, One comment/question was received on December 10, 2015 from Shannon Meister, Education Coordinator at the Council Bluffs Recycling Center in the Iowa Waste Systems Planning Area (Planning Area). The comment/question concerned the purpose and benefit of the following proposed rule: Reduce planning area reporting requirements by removing the Municipal Solid Waste and Recycling Survey and Online Survey. Ms. Meister stated that removal of the survey requirement might significantly reduce communication throughout the Planning Area. The response by DNR staff on December 14, 2015 included the following background explanation for the proposed rule: The Municipal Survey occurs every five years as the timing is coordinated with the Comprehensive Plan Update. Some of the information reported changes as frequently as annually which causes the database to become outdated. It can be costly for planning areas to gather and input data, especially if an outside consultant is utilized. DNR already has facility permit information online available for the public to view. There is no need to collect this information as part of the Comprehensive Plan Update. DNR does not use information such as the names of board members. This information could continue to be collected locally and would have more value posted on local websites. The current database is outdated and may be replaced with a system that is compatible with the Iowa Green List, a directory that allows users to find local contractors and vendors who offer recycling, reuse, and disposal services. Leslie Goldsmith followed up the with a phone call to Shannon Meister on December 29, 2015 to discuss her communication concerns. Ms. Goldsmith explained that the Planning Area could still require members to complete a Planning Area Survey in preparation for the Plan Update. A locallyprepared survey could better serve Planning Area needs by gathering the data and information necessary to benefit local cities and to improve integrated solid waste management in the area. If the proposed rule is implemented, Planning Area staff would no longer need to take time to input data into the DNR database. Additionally, Ms. Goldsmith noted that DNR staff is available to assist the Planning Area in the preparation of such a survey. Ms. Meister had no further questions after the phone call and . DNR posted a summary of its communication with Ms. Meister on the DNR website, and extended the comment period on the proposed rule to January 20, On December 17, 2015, another was sent to all stakeholders notifying them of the availability of this new information and the comment extension. In addition to the DNR s to stakeholders about the proposed rule change, one major stakeholder organization, the Iowa Society of Solid Waste Operations (ISOSWO), ed the webpage link in an E Blast three times to its membership during the comment period. ISOSWO represents individuals working at solid waste facilities and planning areas. These are the stakeholders most affected by this proposed rule. Ms. Goldsmith contacted the organization about additional opportunities for input and 3

4 discussion and was invited to present information about the proposed rule at the January 8, 2016 ISOSWO board meeting. At this meeting there was a discussion about the proposed rule. No concerns were noted during the meeting. Ms. Goldsmith was instructed to the rule update webpage link to the ISOSWO Technical Advisory Committee chair for further review. This was done January 11, No further comments were received from the committee chair or others by January 20, On April 27, 2016, DNR Director Chuck Gipp discussed the proposed rule with the Director of Iowa Homeland Security & Emergency Management, Mark Schouten, and Mr. Schouten expressed no concerns with the rule. 4

5 JOBS IMPACT STATEMENT 1. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Agency: Environmental Protection Commission / Department of Natural Agency: Resources (DNR) IAC Citations: 567 IAC 100, 567 IAC 101, 567 IAC 111 Agency Contact: Leslie Goldsmith (515) Statutory Authority: Iowa Code sections 455B.304 and 455D.7 Objective: Purpose of Proposed Rule: DNR proposes the following changes in 567 IAC chapters 100 and 101 in order to make the administrative rules consistent with Iowa Code: Rescind the statewide waste management hierarchy enumerated in 567 IAC and replace all references to 567 IAC with a reference to the waste management hierarchy enumerated in Iowa Code section 455B.301A; Remove certain waste management technique implementation requirements for planning areas that fail to meet the 25% waste reduction goal because the enabling legislation establishing these requirements was rescinded during the 2013 legislative session; Remove the availability of a waiver to exempt waste generated during a declared disaster from the state s tonnage fee requirements because the legislation establishing the tonnage fee does not allow for this exemption by waiver. Summary: DNR is also proposing changes to reduce planning area reporting requirements by: 1) removing the Municipal Solid Waste and Recycling Survey submission requirement; and 2) recognizing submittal of the annual reports required for planning areas designated as Environmental Management Systems (EMS) as satisfying comprehensive plan update requirements. Additionally, DNR is proposing to remove unused definitions from 567 IAC 101, move the remaining definitions to 567 IAC 100 and update as necessary, revise a definition in 567 IAC 111 to make it consistent with these revisions, and to correct outdated references to the Iowa Code. This rulemaking is the result of two recent legislative changes that affect 567 IAC 100, as well as the comprehensive five year rule review that the DNR is currently undertaking pursuant to Iowa Code section 17A.7(2). The two legislative changes: The first was enacted in House File 225 (2013), signed by Governor Branstad on March 28, This legislation removes certain requirements applicable to planning areas that fail to meet the 25% waste 5

6 reduction goal established in Iowa Code section 455D.3. The proposed rule is necessary to align the current administrative rule with the revised Iowa Code. The second was enacted in House File 544 (2015), signed by Governor Branstad on June 18, This legislation revised the waste management hierarchy enumerated in Iowa Code section 455B.301A. This proposed rule is necessary in order to amend the corresponding administrative rule to simply refer to Iowa Code 455B.301A so the rule remains consistent with Iowa Code. The results of the DNR s five year rule review: DNR s 5 year regulatory review includes a review of the statutory authority for each regulatory provision. 567 IAC 101.7(3) authorizes the DNR to grant tonnage fee payment waivers for waste generated during a declared disaster. However, there is no legislative authority authorizing the DNR to issue such a waiver. As such, this waiver/exemption provision is rescinded to make the administrative rule consistent with Iowa Code. Also, the Municipal Solid Waste and Recycling Survey required by 567 IAC is no longer necessary because the same information is being compiled and made available to the public through the Iowa Green List (IAGREENLIST.com). Further, to reduce redundant paperwork, the DNR proposes to remove the requirement for submittal of a comprehensive plan update in certain instances, instead recognizing that an EMS annual report satisfies this requirement. Additionally, the definition of comprehensive plan update has been revised to reflect the 2009 amendments to 567 IAC 101 in which the definition of planning cycle was extended from three to five years. The current definition of comprehensive plan update requires planning agencies to incorporate a proposed course of action for the next two planning cycles (10 years), which has proven to be too long a time period to allow for accurate planning. As such, the revision requires the comprehensive plan update to address the next planning cycle (5 years). Additional revisions meeting this objective have been incorporated throughout the proposed rule. Finally, the Solid Waste section of the DNR s Land Quality Bureau is methodically working to move all definitions into one section of the Iowa Administrative Code so there is consistency across applicable chapters. DNR is proposing to move certain existing definitions into 567 IAC 100. Having a single chapter for all definitions will improve consistency. 6

7 2. JOB IMPACT ANALYSIS Fill in this box if impact meets these criteria: No Job Impact on private sector jobs and employment opportunities in the State. (If you make this determination, you must include the following statement in the preamble to the rule: After analysis and review of this rulemaking, no impact on jobs has been found. ) Explanation: The proposed rule will bring the administrative rules into conformance with the Iowa Code and will reduce paperwork. There are no new costs or requirements for businesses and the proposed rule will have no impact on job opportunities in Iowa. Fill in this box if impact meets either of these criteria: Positive Job Impact on private sector jobs and employment opportunities in the State. Negative Job Impact on private sector jobs and employment opportunities in the State. Description and quantification of the nature of the impact the proposed rule will have on private sector jobs and employment opportunities: Categories of jobs and employment opportunities that are affected by the proposed rule: Number of jobs or potential job opportunities: Regions of the state affected: Additional costs to the employer per employee due to the proposed rule: (if not possible to determine, write Not Possible to Determine. ) 3. COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS The Agency has taken steps to minimize the adverse impact on jobs and the development of new employment opportunities before proposing a rule. See the following Cost Benefit Analysis: The DNR has determined that the proposed rule will have no impact on employment opportunities in the State. There are also no costs to the State or to regulated entities, and there will be an immediate benefit for planning areas as duplicative paperwork obligations are rescinded resulting in decreased costs. 7

8 4. FISCAL IMPACT Please see the Fiscal Impact Statement for an identification and description of costs the DNR anticipates state agencies, local governments, the public, and the regulated entities, including regulated businesses and self employed individuals, will incur from implementing and complying with the proposed rule. 5. PREAMBLE The information collected and included in this Jobs Impact Statement must be included in the preamble of the proposed rule, written in paragraph form. For rules that have no impact on jobs (see the first box in number 2 above), the following statement must be included in the preamble: After analysis and review of this rulemaking, no impact on jobs has been found. 8

9 FISCAL IMPACT STATEMENT Agency: Environmental Protection Commission / Department of Natural Resources (DNR) IAC Citations: 567 IAC 100, 567 IAC 101, 567 IAC 111 Agency Contact: Leslie Goldsmith, phone: (515) Summary of the Rule: DNR proposes the following changes in 567 IAC chapters 100, 101 and 111 in order to make the administrative rules consistent with Iowa Code: Rescind the statewide waste management hierarchy enumerated in 567 IAC and replace all references to 567 IAC with a reference to the waste management hierarchy enumerated in Iowa Code section 455B.301A; Remove certain waste management technique implementation requirements for planning areas that fail to meet the 25% waste reduction goal because the enabling legislation establishing these requirements was rescinded during the 2013 legislative session; Remove the availability of a waiver to exempt waste generated during a declared disaster from the state s tonnage fee requirements because the legislation establishing the tonnage fee does not allow for this exemption by waiver. DNR is also proposing changes to reduce planning area reporting requirements by: 1) removing the Municipal Solid Waste and Recycling Survey submission requirement; and 2) recognizing submittal of the annual reports required for planning areas designated as Environmental Management Systems (EMS) as satisfying comprehensive plan update requirements. Additionally, DNR is proposing to remove unused definitions from 567 IAC 101, move the remaining definitions to 567 IAC 100 and update as necessary, revise a definition in 567 IAC 111 to make it consistent with these revisions, and to correct outdated references to the Iowa Code. Fill in this box if the impact meets any of these criteria: No Fiscal Impact to the State. Fiscal Impact of less than $100,000 annually or $500,000 over 5 years. _ Fiscal Impact cannot be determined. Brief Explanation: Striking the DNR s waiver authority in 567 IAC 101.7(3) may have fiscal implications due to the potential for increased tipping fee receipts resulting from the disposal of wastes generated during disaster events. However, it is impossible to predict the tonnage of solid waste that might be generated as a result of declared disasters in the next five years. Therefore the fiscal impact cannot be determined. 9

10 Fill in this box if the impact meets this criteria: Fiscal Impact of $100,000 annually or $500,000 over 5 years. Brief Explanation: 10

11 Assumptions: Describe how estimates were derived: Not Applicable Estimated Impact to the State by Fiscal Year Year 1 (FY16 ) Year 2 (FY17 ) Revenue by Each Source: GENERAL FUND $0 $0 FEDERAL FUNDS $0 $0 OTHER (Specify) $0 $0 TOTAL REVENUE $0 $0 Expenditures: GENERAL FUND $0 $0 FEDERAL FUNDS $0 $0 OTHER (Specify) $0 $0 TOTAL EXPENDITURES NET IMPACT $0 $0 x This rule is required by State law or Federal mandate. Please identify the state or federal law: House File 225 (2013) House File 544 (2015) Funding has been provided for the rule change. Please identify the amount provided and the funding source: X Funding has not been provided for the rule. Please explain how the agency will pay for the rule change: The DNR will use existing staff to implement the proposed rule. Fiscal impact to persons affected by the rule: This chapter affects planning areas, which are made up of local governments. description of how local governments may be impacted by the proposed rule. See below for a 11

12 Fiscal impact to Counties or other Local Governments (required by Iowa Code 25B.6): The proposed rule will result in a cost savings for local governments due to a reduction in reporting requirements. Presently, planning areas (made up of local governments) spend staff time or hire consultants to collect and input data required for the Municipal Solid Waste and Recycling Survey and online database. Removing the requirements for this survey will result in a savings of $1,000 $2,000 per planning area every five years, primarily due to a decrease in the need for data entry. There are forty four planning areas. Total savings would range from $44,000 to $88,000 every five years. There will also be potential savings for planning areas falling below the 25% waste diversion rate for the first time, as the areas will no longer be required to implement prescribed waste management techniques such as: Printing an advertisement in the paper stating failure to reach the 25% goal, and Holding a waste reduction seminar for the commercial sector. Further, the nine planning areas that are presently voluntary participants in the EMS program will no longer need to prepare comprehensive plan updates. This will result in cost savings of approximately $4,000 in either consultant fees or staff time per participant every five years. 12

13 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION COMMISSION[567] Notice of Intended Action Pursuant to the authority of Iowa Code sections 455B.304(1) and 455D.7, the Environmental Protection Commission (Commission) hereby gives Notice of Intended Action to amend Chapter 100, Scope of Title Definitions Forms Rules of Practice, Chapter 101, Solid Waste Comprehensive Planning Requirements, and Chapter 111, Annual Reports of Solid Waste Environmental Management Systems, Iowa Administrative Code. This rule making results from legislative changes to the Iowa Code that must be reflected in the Iowa Administrative Code and the comprehensive five-year rule review that the Department of Natural Resources (Department) is currently undertaking pursuant to Iowa Code section 17A.7(2). This proposed rule making will eliminate inconsistencies with Iowa Code, remove redundant reporting requirements, eliminate unnecessary and unused verbiage and make corrections to Iowa Code references, thus simplifying the rules of the Commission and making them easier to use and understand. The proposed changes will: Move certain definitions from 567 Chapter 101 to 567 Chapter 100 and make minor corrections to Chapter 101 for consistency with the applicable state statutes. Rescind rule 101.3(455B,455D) pertaining to the State s Waste Management Hierarchy and replace all references to rule 101.3(455B,455D) with a reference to Iowa Code section 455B.301A. Amend rules 101.6(455B,455D) and 101.7(455B,455D) and rescind subrule (8) to align language with recent legislative changes to Iowa Code section 455D.3, regarding required solid waste management techniques for planning areas falling below the 25 percent waste 13

14 volume reduction goal. See House File 225 (2013), signed by Governor Branstad on March 28, Remove the waiver in subrule 101.7(3) exempting waste generated during a declared disaster from the state tonnage fee. Iowa Code does not give the Department the authority to issue this waiver. Rescind the requirement for local governments to complete the Municipal Solid Waste and Recycling Survey and accompanying forms in rules (455B,455D) and (455B,455D). Recognize the annual reporting efforts of planning areas and service areas that are designated as Environmental Management Systems (EMS) under Iowa Code chapter 455J as meeting the comprehensive plan update requirements in subrule (2). Revise the definition of comprehensive plan update to reflect the 2009 amendments to 567 IAC 101 in which the definition of planning cycle was extended from three to five years. The current definition of comprehensive plan update requires planning agencies to incorporate a proposed course of action for the next two planning cycles (10 years), which has proven to be too long a time period to allow for accurate planning. As such, the revision requires the comprehensive plan update to address the next planning cycle (5 years). Additional revisions meeting this objective have been incorporated throughout the proposed rule. Any interested person may make written suggestions or comments on the proposed amendments on or before 4:30 p.m. on. Such written materials should be directed to Leslie Goldsmith, Iowa Department of Natural Resources, 502 East 9th Street, Wallace State Office Building, Des Moines, Iowa , fax (515) ; or by to 14

15 Persons who have questions may contact Leslie Goldsmith by or at (515) A public hearing will be held on, at in the Conference Room of the Wallace State Office Building, 502 East Ninth Street, Des Moines, Iowa. Persons attending the public hearing may present their views either orally or in writing. At the hearing, persons will be asked to give their names and addresses for the record and to confine their remarks to the proposed rule making. Any persons who plan to attend a public hearing and have special requirements, such as those related to hearing or mobility impairments, should contact the Department and advise of specific needs. After analysis and review of this rule making, no impact on jobs has been found. The proposed amendments are expected to result in cost-savings for local governments due to decreasing redundant reporting obligations, decreasing requirements for duplicating comprehensive plan revisions, and by potentially decreasing certain prescriptive waste management practices for certain planning areas. These amendments are intended to implement Iowa Code sections 455B.301A, 455B.302, 455B.306, 455B.310 and 455D.3. The following amendments are proposed. ITEM 1. Amend rule (455B,455D) by adopting the following new definitions of Comprehensive plan, Comprehensive plan amendment, Comprehensive plan update, Consumer price index, Contaminated soil, Fiscal year, Initial comprehensive plan, 15

16 Integrated solid waste management, Municipal solid waste sanitary disposal project, Planning agency, Planning cycle, Plan participants and Service area: Comprehensive plan means a course of action developed and established cooperatively between cities, counties and municipal solid waste sanitary disposal projects regarding their chosen integrated solid waste management system, its participants, waste reduction strategies, and disposal methods. Comprehensive plan amendment means a notification, filed between comprehensive plan updates, that the planning agency seeks to change the participation or change the designated disposal project(s) as set out in the most recent approved comprehensive plan submittal. Comprehensive plan update means a planning document that provides status reports on the integrated solid waste management system and that describes revisions to the information and evaluation of the integrated solid waste management system and the proposed course of action for the next planning cycle. Consumer price index means the measure of the average change over time in the prices paid by urban consumers for a market basket of consumer goods and services. For the purpose of this chapter, consumer price index refers to All Urban Consumers (CPI-U), All Items, as published by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Contaminated soil means soil that contains any harmful constituent in a concentration that may harm human health. Fiscal year means the state fiscal year from July 1 through June 30. Initial comprehensive plan means a first or new comprehensive plan filed with the department of natural resources pursuant to the provisions of Iowa Code section 455B

17 Integrated solid waste management means any solid waste management system which is focused on planned development of programs and facilities that reduce waste volume and toxicity, recycle marketable materials and provide for safe disposal of any residuals. Municipal solid waste sanitary disposal project means all facilities and appurtenances, including all real and personal property connected with such facilities, which are acquired, purchased, constructed, reconstructed, equipped, improved, extended, maintained, or operated to facilitate the final disposition of household waste without creating a significant hazard to the public health or safety. A municipal solid waste sanitary disposal project also may receive other types of RCRA Subtitle D wastes, such as construction and demolition debris and commercial and industrial solid waste. Planning agency means the designated contact agency on file with the department. Planning cycle means the length of time between the due date for each comprehensive plan update submittal as approved by the department, which shall be five years effective March 1, Plan participants means any individual, group, government or private entity that has direct involvement in an integrated solid waste management system. Service area means an area served by a specific municipal solid waste sanitary disposal project defined in terms of the jurisdictions of the local governments using the facility. A planning area may include more than one service area. This definition does not apply to Chapter 111. Further amend rule (455B,455D), definitions of Planning area and Solid waste, as follows: 17

18 Planning area means the localities and facilities involved in any aspect of the sanitary disposal project(s) management of waste, including out-of-state localities and facilities, if applicable the combined jurisdiction of the local governments and the designated municipal solid waste sanitary disposal project(s) involved in a comprehensive plan. A planning area may include one or more municipal solid waste sanitary disposal projects. Solid waste is defined has the same meaning as found in Iowa Code section 455B.301. Pursuant to Iowa Code section 455B.301 subsection 23, paragraph b, the commission has determined that solid waste includes those wastes exempted from federal hazardous waste regulation pursuant to 40 CFR 261.4(b), as amended through [code editor enter the effective date of this rule], except to the extent that any such exempted substances are liquid wastes or wastewater. This definition applies to all chapters within Title VIII. To the extent there is a conflict, this definition controls. ITEM 2. Rescind rule (455B,455D) and adopt the following new rule in lieu thereof: (455B,455D) Definitions. For the purposes of this chapter, the definitions found in (455B,455D) shall apply. ITEM 3. Rescind and reserve rule (455B,455D). ITEM 4. Amend rule (455B,455D) as follows: (455B,455D) Duties of cities and counties. Every city and county of this state shall, for the solid waste generated within the jurisdiction of its political subdivision, provide for the 18

19 establishment and operation of an integrated solid waste management system consistent with the waste management hierarchy under rule (455B,455D) Iowa Code section 455B.301A and designed to meet the state s waste reduction and recycling goals. Integrated systems and municipal solid waste sanitary disposal projects may be established separately or through cooperative efforts, including Iowa Code chapter 28E agreements as provided by law. To meet these responsibilities, cities and counties may execute, with public and private agencies, contracts, leases, or other necessary instruments, purchase land and do all things necessary not prohibited by law for the implementation of waste management programs, collection of solid waste, establishment and operation of municipal solid waste sanitary disposal projects, and general administration of the same. If a city or county facility planning agency refuses any particular solid waste type for management or disposal, the city or county facility planning agency must identify another waste management facility municipal solid waste sanitary disposal project for that waste within the planning area. In the case of special waste, if If no other waste management facility for that waste type municipal solid waste sanitary disposal project exists within the planning area, the city or county planning agency must, in cooperation with the waste generator, establish or arrange for access to another waste management facility municipal solid waste sanitary disposal project. Municipal solid waste sanitary disposal projects are required to maintain written approval from both the department and the planning agency in the planning area of origin in order to accept any Iowa-generated waste from outside the planning area. All cities and counties or Iowa Code chapter 28E agencies established for the purpose of managing solid waste or implementing integrated solid waste management systems, or both, on behalf of cities and counties shall demonstrate compliance with the provisions of this chapter by 19

20 their participation in a comprehensive plan approved by the department. ITEM 5. Amend rule (455B,455D) as follows: (455B,455D) State volume reduction and recycling goals. The goal of the state is to reduce the amount of materials in the waste stream existing as of the July 1, 1988, baseline, 25 percent by July1, 1994, and 50 percent by July 1, 2000, by an intermediate goal of 25 percent, and by a final goal of at least 50 percent, through the practice of waste volume reduction at the source and through recycling. The updated goal progress calculations provided by the department for each planning area shall be used by the department in reporting to the general assembly on the state s progress toward meeting the 25 and 50 percent goals. If at any time the department notifies the planning agency in writing that the planning area has failed to meet the 25 percent waste volume reduction and recycling goal, at a minimum, the solid waste management techniques listed in Iowa Code section 455D.3(4) and subrule (8) must be implemented throughout the planning area. The specific methodology for determining goal progress is outlined in rule (455B,455D). ITEM 6. Amend subrule 101.7(3) as follows: 101.7(3) Waste generated as part of an exceptional event or contaminated soils removed as part of a brownfield or contaminated site cleanup should not negatively affect a planning area s goal progress calculation. a. Exceptional events include, but are not limited to, such unforeseen disasters as storms, fires, floods, tornadoes, or train wrecks. Exceptional events do not include economic development, derelict housing removal, or other planned activities/demolitions. Written requests 20

21 to exempt exceptional event debris from goal progress calculations shall be made to the department on the required Quarterly Solid Waste Fee Schedule and Retained Fees Report, DNR Form Requests for goal progress calculation exemptions must be made within six months after initial disposal of the debris. The determination to exempt exceptional event debris from goal progress calculations shall be made solely by the department and shall not be made independently by individual municipal solid waste sanitary disposal projects or planning agencies. Municipal solid waste sanitary disposal projects required to remit tonnage fees shall continue to pay solid waste tonnage fees until written notification of fee exemption is received, at which time any applicable fee credit shall be granted by the department. Upon review of the request, the department will notify the municipal solid waste sanitary disposal project and planning agency of the determination in writing or request further documentation. (1) Exemption requests shall, at a minimum, include: 1. Date(s) of duration of the exceptional event. 2. Type of event (i.e., flood, tornado, combination thereof). 3. Description of affected area(s), including approximate number of buildings and addresses, if available. 4. Type(s) of waste to be exempted. 5. Actual tonnage of debris disposed of during the quarter. 6. Preliminary estimate of the total tonnage to be exempted (i.e., tons already disposed of and potential tons to be disposed of in future quarters). (2) Additional documentation to verify the exceptional event and the debris it generated may be requested by the department. Failure to submit requested documentation may result in 21

22 denial of the goal progress calculation or solid waste tonnage fee exemption request(s), including any fee credits authorized by the department. Documentation may include: 1. Protocol used by the municipal solid waste sanitary disposal project staff for determining which waste(s) coming into the facility was attributed to the exceptional event. 2. Summary of existing policies to divert storm debris from disposal, as well as the amount of waste(s) diverted. 3. Copies of scale tickets and summary report of scale tickets. 4. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) reports, if any. 5. Newspaper articles or pictures of affected areas. 6. Supporting documentation indicating estimated remaining tonnage expected as a result of the exceptional event (i.e., supporting documentation from local insurance companies or municipal building inspectors). 7. Contact information for the person(s) responsible for compiling the exceptional event report(s). b. If the governor of the state of Iowa declares a city or county a disaster area as a result of an exceptional event, the municipal solid waste sanitary disposal project or planning agency may request that the debris be exempt from solid waste tonnage fees. A request to waive tonnage fees must be submitted in writing on the facility s or planning agency s letterhead prior to or in the same submittal as the Quarterly Solid Waste Fee Schedule and Retained Fees Report, DNR Form Requests to waive tonnage fees, as provided for in this rule, must be made within 6 months after the initial disposal of the debris. A copy of the proclamation of disaster emergency declared by the governor of the state of Iowa is required in order for approval of tonnage fee exemptions. Any continuing documentation shall be submitted with each Quarterly 22

23 Solid Waste Fee Schedule and Retained Fees Report, DNR Form , within the length of time authorized by the department. Solid waste disposed of outside the window of time authorized by the department shall not be eligible for exemption. To be eligible for an exemption, all exceptional event waste must be disposed of within the following time lines: (1) For debris clearance and emergency protective measures, as defined by FEMA guidelines, 6 months from the end of the exceptional event. (2) For permanent repair work, as defined by FEMA guidelines, 18 months from the end of the exceptional event. Upon written request, with supporting rationale, extensions to these time lines may be granted solely by the department on a case-by-case basis. c. b. Contaminated soils removed as part of a brownfield or contaminated site cleanup should not negatively affect a planning area s goal progress calculation. If the contaminated soil is to be disposed of in a municipal solid waste sanitary disposal project, the municipal solid waste sanitary disposal project or planning agency must request the goal progress exemption in writing, in accordance with the procedures outlined in this rule. Written requests to exempt contaminated soil from goal progress calculations shall be made to the department on the Quarterly Solid Waste Fee Schedule and Retained Fees Report, DNR Form Requests for goal progress exemptions must be made within 6 months after initial disposal of the contaminated soil. The determination to exempt contaminated soil from goal progress calculations shall be made solely by the department and shall not be made independently by individual municipal solid waste sanitary disposal projects or planning agencies. The department shall notify the municipal solid waste sanitary disposal project or planning agency in writing of the 23

24 determination or shall request further clarification to make an exemption decision. Failure to submit additional information requested by the department regarding the request to exempt contaminated soil may result in a denial of the goal progress calculation exemption request. Contaminated soil occurrences not eligible for goal progress exemption include, but are not limited to, illegal municipal solid waste disposal sites and contaminated soils formed for the sole purpose of requesting goal progress exemption. Exemption requests shall include, at a minimum, the following: (1) Contact information of the primary and any other government agency overseeing or involved with site cleanup. (2) Address of the brownfield or contaminated site. (3) Date(s) when the site was believed to have been contaminated, if known. (4) Type of operation and owners of the operation that led to the contamination, if known. (5) Constituents of concern present in the soil. (6) Types of miscellaneous waste mixed with the soil, if any. (7) Appropriate testing for identified contaminants of the contaminated soil. (8) Actual tonnage of contaminated soil disposed of during the quarter. (9) Preliminary estimate of the total tonnage to be exempted (i.e., tons of contaminated soil already disposed of and potential tons to be disposed of in future quarters). (10) Narrative justification to explain why disposal in a municipal solid waste sanitary disposal project is the best site cleanup methodology. ITEM 7. Amend rule (455B,455D) as follows: 24

25 (455B,455D) Submittal of initial comprehensive plans and comprehensive plan updates. Initial comprehensive plans and comprehensive plan updates filed with the department must include a signed electronic submission certificate, which can be printed when all online forms have been submitted to the department for review. When hard-copy portions of the initial comprehensive plan or comprehensive plan update are submitted to the department, only one original copy is necessary. Initial comprehensive plans and comprehensive plan updates are required to be double-sided and cannot be submitted in three-ring binders. Comprehensive plan updates shall be submitted in accordance with the schedule, as and instructions provided by the department 12 months prior to the due date of the first comprehensive plan update for each planning cycle. Planning agencies are not required to submit hard copies of the online forms for comprehensive plan updates. ITEM 8. Rescind and reserve rule (455B,455D). ITEM 9. Rescind and reserve rule (455B,455D). ITEM 10. Amend paragraph (1) g as follows: g. A description of the current waste composition and waste generation rates and a projection of waste composition and waste generation spanning two planning cycles the next planning cycle. This description should include the effects of anticipated planning area modifications on waste generation and composition in the future. These factors may include economic changes, population changes, loss or addition of communities to the planning area, and any other modification expected to affect the amount of waste generated. 25

26 ITEM 11. Amend subparagraph (1) h (3) numbered item 6 as follows: 6. The anticipated impact on the waste stream and diversion over at least two planning cycles the next planning cycle. ITEM 12. Amend paragraph (1) k, introductory paragraph, as follows: k. A specific plan and schedule spanning two planning cycles for implementing the initial comprehensive plan during the next planning cycle. Items that shall be addressed include: ITEM 13. Amend subparagraph (2) g (3), numbered item 5, as follows: 5. The anticipated impact on the waste stream and diversion over at least two the next planning cycles cycle. ITEM 14. Amend paragraph (2) h, introductory paragraph, as follows: h. An evaluation of progress toward meeting the state s waste volume reduction and recycling goals using the goal progress calculation provided by the department 12 months prior to the due date of the comprehensive plan update, if requested by the planning agency. This analysis may use any combination of the following methodologies: ITEM 15. Amend paragraph (2) j, introductory paragraph, as follows: j. A specific plan and schedule spanning two planning cycles for implementing the comprehensive plan during the next planning cycle. Items that shall be addressed include: ITEM 16. Adopt the following new paragraph (2) k as follows: 26

27 k. Annual reports submitted by planning agencies designated as Environmental Management Systems, pursuant to Iowa Code section 455J.7, satisfy the comprehensive plan update submittal requirements of this subrule. Item 17. Rescind and reserve subrule (8). ITEM 18. Amend the implementation clause as follows: These rules are intended to implement Iowa Code sections 455B.301A, 455B.302, 455B.306, 455B.310 and 455D.3. ITEM 19. Amend rule (455J), definition of Planning area, as follows: Planning area means the same as defined in rule (455B,455D) (455B,455D). Date Chuck Gipp, Director 27