California for the County of Los Angeles, Case No. BC583875) with respect to the settlement of

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "California for the County of Los Angeles, Case No. BC583875) with respect to the settlement of"

Transcription

1 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT This Settlement Agreement is made by and between the undersigned parties on behalf of CROCS RETAIL, LLC (formerly known as CROCS RETAIL, INC. and improperly sued as CROCS RETAIL, INC. and CROCS, INC.) ("Defendant") and the individual named Plaintiffs, ILYA ZAYDENBERG, CHRISTOPHER S. DUREE AND RICHARD MORELY, and the proposed classes and each of their members (collectively "Plaintiffs") in Zaydenberg v. Crocs Retail, Inc., et. al, (Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Los Angeles, Case No. BC554214) and DuRee, et. al. v. Crocs, Inc., et. al. (Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Los Angeles, Case No. BC583875) with respect to the settlement of all claims pled in the currently operative complaints filed in the cases referenced above. I. NATURE OF THE CASE AND THE PARTIES' SETTLEMENT 1. The Parties and Class Counsel. The Plaintiffs and the Defendant are collectively referred to as "the Parties". "Class Counsel" refers to the law firms of Lawyers for Justice, PC, Justice Law Coiporation and RGLawyers, LLP. 2. The Class Action. On April 8, 2014, Zaydenberg filed a Class Action Complaint in the Los Angeles County Superior Court, on behalf of persons who have been or currently are employed by Defendant within the State of California as hourly employees during the Class Period. On May 20, 2015, Zaydenberg filed a Joint Stipulation and Second Amended Class Action Complaint on behalf of all current and fonner hourly employees of Defendant and all current and fonner salaried employees of Defendant during the Class Period. On June 3, 2015 DuRee and Morely filed a Class Action Complaint in the Los Angeles Superior Court on behalf of all current and fonner exempt and nonexempt employees of Defendant during the Class Period. On June 29, 2015, the Honorable John Wiley Jr. entered Orders in both cases (Case No. BC and Case No. BC583875) acknowledging that the cases are related under Local Rule 3.3(f). For purposes of this Settlement Agreement both cases and all related complaints filed in each case will be collectively refened to as the "Class Action." 3. Plaintiffs and Their Claims. Plaintiffs worked as hourly and/or salaried employees at various of Defendants' locations in California. The Class Action alleges that Defendant: did not properly pay overtime, meal period premiums, rest period premiums, business expenses or minimum wage; did not pay wages or final wages in a timely manner; did not provide compliant wage statements or keep required payroll records; did not pay wages set by a statute or contract; and engaged in unfair business practices. The Class Action also includes a claim for remedies under the California Private Attorneys General Act of The Mediation. The Parties attended a mediation on June 26, The mediation was conducted by Attorney David Rotman, a highly experienced professional mediator, and resulted in a settlement of this case. The terms of the Parties' agreement are set forth herein and this Settlement Agreement is a result of the Parties' arms-length negotiations. 5. The Settlement Class and Class Activities. The persons covered under this Settlement Agreement ("the Settlement Class" or "Class Members") include: {00I35075.DOCX/ / } Page 1

2 All California employees of Defendant employed during the time frame from August 8, 2010 until the date the Court grants preliminary approval of this settlement (the "Class Period"), who Defendants classified as exempt or nonexempt. In the event either preliminary or final approval of the settlement memorialized by this Settlement Agreement is not obtained or, if obtained, is reversed upon appeal, the Parties shall be returned to their respective positions in the Class Action as they existed immediately prior to the execution of this Settlement Agreement. Furthermore, nothing said or represented in connection with obtaining approval of the Court with respect to this settlement, either on a preliminary or final basis, shall be admissible for any purpose other than to obtain approval by the Court of this settlement. 6. Non-admissions. Defendant denies any liability or wrongdoing of any kind associated with the claims alleged in the Class Action, and further contend that, for any purpose other than settlement, this action is not appropriate for class treatment. Defendant contends, among other things, that it complied at all times with the California Labor Code. Plaintiffs believe they filed a meritorious action based on alleged violations of California's wage and hour laws and believe that class certification is appropriate because the requisites for class certification can be satisfied in this case. 7. Investigation. Class Counsel have investigated the facts of the Class Action, including an extensive review of voluminous documents and the deposition of Defendants' Person Most Qualified on the issues and claims asserted in the Class Action, and have diligently pursued an investigation of the claims against Defendant. Based on their own independent investigation and evaluation, the individually named Plaintiffs and Class Counsel believe that this Settlement Agreement is fair, reasonable, and adequate and is in the best interests of the Settlement Class in light of all known facts and circumstances, including the risk of significant delay, failure of a motion for class certification, decertification, defenses asserted by Defendant, and potential appellate issues. 8. Cooperation. The Parties agree to cooperate and take all steps necessary and appropriate to effectuate the terms of this Settlement Agreement. 9. Class Certification. For purposes of the settlement set forth herein only, Plaintiffs contend and Defendant will not dispute the elements for certifying the Settlement Class. In the event the settlement is not approved by the Court this Settlement Agreement, inclusive of this Paragraph, shall be rendered null and void. II. TERMS OF SETTLEMENT 10. Purpose of the Parties. The Parties agree that the Class Action and any claims arising out of the dispute described in this Settlement Agreement be settled on the terms described herein as between the Settlement Class and Defendant, subject to the approval of the Court. 11. Certification of a Settlement Class. For the purpose of effectuating the settlement memorialized by this Settlement Agreement, the parties agree to stipulate, as part of /oo dock/ i } Page 2

3 the settlement and in connection with a motion for preliminary approval of a class settlement, to the certification of a Settlement Class as defined above in Paragraph 1(5). In the event either preliminary or final approval of the settlement memorialized by this Settlement Agreement is not obtained or, if obtained, is reversed upon appeal, the Parties shall be returned to their respective positions in the Class Action as they existed immediately prior to the execution of this Agreement. Furthennore, nothing said or represented in connection with obtaining approval of the Court with respect to this settlement, either on a preliminary or final basis, shall be admissible for any purpose other than to obtain approval by the Court of this settlement. 12. Settlement "Effective Date." The settlement embodied in this Settlement Agreement shall become effective on the earlier of: a. the Court's final approval of settlement if no objections have been filed by members of the Settlement Class, or upon final approval and any objection has been withdrawn; b. if an objection has been filed and not withdrawn, the time to appeal a ruling on the objection has expired and no appeal has been filed; or c. the final resolution of any appeal that has been filed. 13. Gross Settlement Fund. In consideration for release of the claims of the Settlement Class against Defendant (as described more fully in Section V, below), Defendant agrees to create a "Gross Settlement Fund" of ONE MILLION FIVE HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS ($1,500,000). The Gross Settlement Fund shall be comprised of the amount to be paid for approved claims, attorneys' fees, costs and expenses awarded by the Court, incentive payments to the class representatives awarded by the Court, and the costs of notice and administration of the settlement. a. Members of the Settlement Class shall not be required to present a claim in order to share in the settlement. Each member of the Settlement Class will be provided with a court approved Notice of Class Action Settlement describing the terms of the settlement, and a Notice of Anticipated Settlement Share Amount, setting forth the Settlement Administrator's best estimate of the amount to be awarded to each individual member of the Settlement Class. b. Subject to court approval, Class Counsel shall move the Court that the named Plaintiffs in the Class Action (Zaydenberg, DuRee and Morely) shall be paid a reasonable incentive compensation of up to $5, each. Such incentive compensation shall be paid out of the Gross Settlement Fund. c. Class Counsel shall apply to the Court for an award of attorneys' fees and costs. Defendant will not oppose an application for a reasonable combined award of attorneys' fees up to THIRTY-FIVE PERCENT (35%) and costs not to exceed $30, of the Gross Settlement Fund. Amounts awarded by the Court for attorneys' fees and costs shall be paid from the Gross Settlement Fund dock/ I } Page 3

4 14. Net Settlement Fund. The "Net Settlement Fund" is the balance of the Gross Settlement Fund after payments have been made from the Gross Settlement Fund for attorneys' fees, costs, the named Plaintiffs' incentive compensation, the Private Attorneys General Act payment, and costs of notice and administration of the settlement. 15. Payment to Class Members from Net Settlement Fund. Each member of the Settlement Class who does not opt out ("Qualified Claimant") will receive a Settlement Share. Settlement Shares will be determined as follows: a. Qualified Claimants will receive a share of the Net Settlement Fund with the numerator being the Qualified Claimant's Total Gross Wages earned during the Class Period as a Class Member and the denominator being all Qualified Claimants' Total Gross Wages during the Class Period. The resulting fraction will be multiplied by the Net Settlement Fund to detennine the Qualified Claimant's individual settlement share. These calculations shall be constructed from Defendant's records. 16. Uncashed Checks. All settlement checks shall expire after 180 days of initial issuance. If any checks remain uncashed or not deposited by the expiration of the 180 days, the Settlement Administrator will pay the funds represented by such un-redeemed checks to the California Department of Industrial Relations Unclaimed Wages Fund, with an identification of the Qualified Claimant to whom the funds belong. 17. PAGA Payment. Pursuant to the Private Attorneys General Act of 2004, a payment in the amount of $5,000 for alleged Labor Code violations shall be paid out of the Gross Settlement Fund, 75% or $3,750 of which shall be paid to the California Labor and Workforce Development Agency ("LWDA") and 25% or $1,250 to Settlement Class members, on a pro rata basis. 18. Taxes. The Settlement Administrator will make wage deductions and report payments on IRS Forms W-2 and 1099 as appropriate. The Parties allocate the Net Settlement Fund as follows: 30% to wages, 35% to interest, and 35% to penalties. Members of the Settlement Class shall be responsible for the payment of any taxes attributable to such payments and hereby agree to indemnify and hold Defendants harmless for tax liability, any failure to withhold, and interest or penalties imposed thereon. in. SETTLEMENT ADMINISTRATOR 19. Appointment. The Parties have agreed to the appointment of ILYM Group, Inc. to perform the duties of a Settlement Administrator for the purpose of coordinating notice, issuing and mailing settlement checks and reporting payments to the IRS and to members of the Settlement Class. 20. Administration Fees. The Parties have agreed that costs of providing notice to the Settlement Class and otherwise administering this settlement will not exceed $13, If the Settlement Administrator's fees and costs are less than that amount, then the residual shall be {00I35075.DOCX/ 1 } Page 4

5 added to the Net Settlement Fund for distribution to the participating Settlement Class members on a pro rata basis. 21. Resolution Of Disputes. All disputes relating to the Settlement Administrator's ability and need to perform duties shall be referred to the Court, if necessary, which will have continuing jurisdiction over this Settlement Agreement until all obligations contemplated by the Settlement Agreement have been fully earned out. IV. NOTICE TO THE SETTLEMENT CLASS 22. Notice of Settlement. Within 15 calendar days after preliminary approval of this Agreement by the Court, Defendant will provide to the Settlement Administrator all of the following information about each Class Member who meets the class definition during the Class Period in a format requested by the Settlement Administrator: (1) name, (2) last known mailing address and telephone number(s), (3) social security number, (4) dates of employment as a Class Member; and (5) total gross wages paid during the Class Period as a Settlement Class Member. The Settlement Administrator will perform address updates and verifications as necessary prior to the first mailing. Within 10 calendar days after receipt of the Class List from Defendant, and subject to the approval of the Court, the Claims Administrator will send a Notice of Class Action Settlement ("Notice"), attached as Exhibit 1, to each Settlement Class Member by first class mail. The Notice of Class Action Settlement shall be available for viewing on the Settlement Administrator's Website in the form attached hereto as Exhibit 1. The Notice of Class Action Settlement will instruct members of the Settlement Class as to the methods by which they may obtain additional infonnation regarding this settlement. For members of the Settlement Class whose notice is returned to the Settlement Administrator undelivered there will be an additional attempt to secure a correct address using "skip tracing" and, if such "skip tracing" is successful, a subsequent notice shall be sent to the new address within seven calendar days of receipt of the returned mail. The Settlement Administrator shall post on their website from which the Settlement Class can access the settlement documents and infonnation including the final judgment in satisfaction with California Rules of Court, Rule 3.771(b) 23. Notice of Settlement Share. The Notice of Class Action Settlement shall include a Notice of Anticipated Settlement Share which will provide Class Members with the Administrator's best estimate of the settlement proceeds each individual will receive if all requested amounts are awarded by the Court. 24. Opt Out Procedure. Members of the Settlement Class shall have 30 days from the distribution of the Notice to Opt Out of the Settlement. To be valid, a written request to opt out must: (1) state the Class Member's name, address and telephone number; (2) that the Class Member wishes to opt out from the Settlement; (3) be signed by the Class Member; and (4) be mailed first-class postage pre-paid by [date] to the Settlement Administrator. The date of the post-mark will detennine if it was timely mailed. 25. Objections. The Notice of Class Action Settlement shall provide that any member of the Settlement Class who objects to the settlement must serve on the Settlement Administrator { DOCX/ 1 } Page 5

6 a written statement objecting to the settlement or a written notice of intention to appear at the Final Approval hearing and object at that time. Such written statement or notice must be served on the Settlement Administrator within 30 calendar days following the date of the Notice (and in the case of a r ed Notice, the date of the r ed Notice). Members of the Settlement Class who fail to serve timely written objections or notice of intention to appear and object in the maimer specified above shall be deemed to have waived any objections and shall be foreclosed from making any objection (whether by appeal or otherwise) to the settlement. 26. Resolution of Claim Disputes. Class Members who dispute their Anticipated Settlement Share may do so by initially contacting the Settlement Administrator by telephone. The Settlement Administrator shall have two (2) business days from receipt of such dispute within which to notify Class Counsel and Defendant's Counsel. The Parties' Counsel will make a good faith effort to resolve the dispute informally. If they camiot agree within 10 calendar days' time, the dispute shall be submitted to the Settlement Administrator, who shall examine Defendant's records and any submission by the Class Member in an attempt to resolve the dispute. In making this decision, in the absence of contrary evidence (contrary evidence may solely be based on the declaration under penalty of perjury of a disputing Class Member), Defendant's records shall be dispositive. No claimant may increase the size of his or her claim by arguing that the Defendant's records are incorrect without providing documentation corroborating his or her position. The decision of the Settlement Administrator shall be final and non-appealable. 27. Funding of Settlement. Within 10 business days of the Settlement Effective Date, Defendant shall complete transfer of the Gross Settlement Fund to the Settlement Administrator. 28. Distribution of Settlement Funds. Funds shall be distributed to the Settlement Class, Class Counsel and the named Plaintiffs within 10 business days after the funding of the settlement as set forth in paragraph 27. V. RELEASE BY THE NAMED PLAINTIFFS AND THE SETTLEMENT CLASS 29. Scope of Release. Upon the final approval by the Court of this Settlement Agreement, and except as to such rights or claims as may be created by this Settlement Agreement, each member of the Settlement Class fully releases and discharges Defendant and all of its past, present, and future parent companies, subsidiaries, affiliates, divisions, and agents, and all of their respective employees, members, officers, directors, partners, legal representatives, accountants, trustees, executors, administrators, real or alleged alter egos, predecessors, successors, transferees, assigns and insurers (the "Released Parties"), from liability for the claims that were asserted in the Class Action, and arising out of the acts, facts, transactions, occurrences, representations, or omissions set forth in the Class Action, for the time frame from August 8, 2010 until the date the Court grants final approval of this settlement. Claims that shall not be released include claims for unemployment compensation, workers' compensation, employment discrimination, and retaliation, except that all claims are being released by the named Plaintiffs (Zaydenberg, DuRee and Merely) to the fullest extent permitted by law. { docx/ / / Page 6

7 30. Named Plaintiffs Release. In addition to the releases made by the members of the Settlement Class, Ilya Zaydenberg, Christopher DuRee and Richard Morely make the additional following general release of all claims, known or unknown, in exchange and consideration of the payments set forth above. These named Plaintiffs agree to a general release of the Released Parties from all claims, demands, rights, liabilities, grievances, demands for arbitration, and causes of action of every nature and description whatsoever, known or unknown, pending or threatened, asserted or that might have been asserted, whether brought in tort or in contract, whether under state or federal or local law. This general release includes all employment-related and non-employment-related claims, whether known or unknown, arising during the Class Period. Except as otherwise specifically provided under this Settlement Agreement, the named Plaintiffs expressly waive and relinquish all rights and benefits afforded by Section 1542 of the Civil Code of the State of California, which states: "A GENERAL RELEASE DOES NOT EXTEND TO CLAIMS WHICH THE CREDITOR DOES NOT KNOW OR SUSPECT TO EXIST IN HIS OR HER FAVOR AT THE TIME OF EXECUTING THE RELEASE, WHICH IF KNOWN BY HIM OR HER MUST HAVE MATERIALLY AFFECTED HIS OR HER SETTLEMENT WITH THE DEBTOR." VL MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 31. Cooperation and Approvals. The Parties and their counsel will cooperate in obtaining the Court's approval of the settlement and in preparing and executing all documents relating thereto. 32. Confidentiality. The negotiations, terms and existence of this Settlement Agreement will remain strictly confidential and shall not be discussed with anyone other than the parties of record, counsel of record, their retained consultants, and the mediator. Any confidentiality associated with the tenns of this settlement shall expire upon the filing of a motion for preliminary approval of the settlement, except: (i) the negotiations and discussions preceding submission of the settlement to the Court for approval, and any negotiations and discussions between the time of preliminary approval and final approval, shall remain strictly confidential (unless otherwise ordered by the Court); and (ii) Defendant may disclose the settlement in filings that it is required to make with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including 10-Q and 10-K filings. 33. Press Contact. Prior to final approval by the Court, neither side shall make any public statements in any format or to any media whatsoever (including the internet) concerning the settlement, and all Parties and counsel shall decline to respond to media inquiries concerning the settlement. 34. Notice to Court and Status Quo. The Parties shall notify the Court of their intent to resolve the Class Action and request that all pending motions, deadlines, and {00I35075.DOCX/ 1 } Page 7

8 proceedings be stayed. In the event that no final, non-appealable order approving the settlement is entered, this Settlement Agreement shall be deemed null, void, and unenforceable and the Parties shall be returned to their status quo as of the date notice of the settlement was provided to the Court. 35. Resolution of Disputes. The Parties agree that this Settlement Agreement shall be binding and enforceable pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure section 664.6, with any disputes reviewable by the Court in which the Class Action was brought. 36. Venue. The Parties agree that venue for purposes of obtaining preliminary and final Court approval shall be with the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Las Angeles, the Honorable John Wiley Jr., presiding. {00I35075.DOCX/ 1 } Page 8

9 Dated: /W;r sporf u On behalf of Named Plaintiffs and the Settlement Class: Counsel for Named Plaintiffs and The Settlement Class Ilya Z^dcnbcrg Plaintiff and Cjdss Representative Edwin Aiwazian Lawyers for Justice, PC Christopher DuRec Plaintiff and Class Representative Douglas Han Justice Law Corporation Richard Merely Plaintiff and Class Representative Solomon Gresen RGLawyers, LLP On behalf of Defendant: Counsel for Defendants CROCS By:, Its:i \J P ^ a L * A O Charles W. Wecse Lewis, Bess, Williams & Wecse P.C. 10UIJ5075 DOCX 1/ Pages

10 Dated: On behalf of Named Plaintiffs and the Settlement Class: Counsel for Named Plaintiffs and The Settlement Class Ilya Zaydenberg Plaintiff and Class Representative Edwin Aiwazian Lawyers for Justice, PC Christopher DuRee Plaintiff and Class Representative Douglas Han Justice Law Corporation C Richam Morel y Plaintiff and Class Representative Soloijj RGMi\ltye /re en rs,! XP On behalf of Defendant: Counsel for Defendants CROCS RETAIL, LLC By:. Its: Charles W. Weese Lewis, Bess, Williams & Weese P.C. { DOCK/ I } Page 8

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES Ilya Zaydenberg v. Crocs Retail, Inc., et al. Los Angeles County Superior Court Case No. BC554214; Christopher S. DuRee, et al. v.

More information

As a current or former non-exempt PPG employee, you may be entitled to receive money from a class action settlement.

As a current or former non-exempt PPG employee, you may be entitled to receive money from a class action settlement. NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND HEARING DATE FOR COURT APPROVAL Penaloza, et al., v. PPG Industries, Inc., Case No. BC471369 As a current or former non-exempt PPG employee, you may be entitled

More information

Case 3:06-cv-00701-MJR-DGW Document 526 Filed 07/20/15 Page 1 of 8 Page ID #13631 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Case 3:06-cv-00701-MJR-DGW Document 526 Filed 07/20/15 Page 1 of 8 Page ID #13631 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS Case 3:06-cv-00701-MJR-DGW Document 526 Filed 07/20/15 Page 1 of 8 Page ID #13631 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS ANTHONY ABBOTT, et al., ) ) No: 06-701-MJR-DGW Plaintiffs,

More information

SUMMARY OF SETTLEMENT. This notice explains the lawsuit, the settlement, your rights and the potential distribution of settlement funds.

SUMMARY OF SETTLEMENT. This notice explains the lawsuit, the settlement, your rights and the potential distribution of settlement funds. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SOLANO Lori Davis, Michelle Smith and Paul Stockman, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and on behalf of the general public,

More information

YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that a proposed class settlement (the Class Settlement ) of the above entitled purported

YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that a proposed class settlement (the Class Settlement ) of the above entitled purported LEGAL NOTICE: If you worked for PLS Financial Solutions of California, Inc. (formerly Payday Loan Store of California, Inc.) or PLS Check Cashers of California, Inc. as an hourly paid or non exempt employee

More information

Case3:12-cv-05980-CRB Document265 Filed07/20/15 Page2 of 12

Case3:12-cv-05980-CRB Document265 Filed07/20/15 Page2 of 12 Case:-cv-00-CRB Document Filed0// Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 0 IN RE HP SECURITIES LITIGATION, This Document Relates To: All Actions MASTER

More information

Courtroom: 19 FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Courtroom: 19 FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE DISTRICT COURT, CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, COLORADO City and County Building, Room 256 1437 Bannock Street Denver, CO 80202 Plaintiff: RAYMOND AND SALLY MILLER, ET AL., on behalf of themselves and all

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS PEORIA DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS PEORIA DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS PEORIA DIVISION JONATHAN DANIEL, ) ) Plaintiff, ) No. 14 CV 01232 ) vs. ) ) Honorable Michael M. Mihm THE CITY OF PEORIA, et al.,

More information

FINAL JUDGMENT BY CONSENT

FINAL JUDGMENT BY CONSENT COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS SUFFOLK, SS. SUPERIOR COURT DEPARTMENT OF THE TRIAL COURT ) COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, ) Plaintiff, ) CIVIL ACTION NO. /3-6) 7W--1-1- 2-- ) TRANSAMERICA LIFE INSURANCE

More information

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE This Settlement Agreement and Release ( Agreement ) is made and entered into by and between Cheryl Coryea ( Coryea or Plaintiff ), and Rochester Independent School District

More information

VERENGO, INC., WAGE AND HOUR CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE OF CLAIMS

VERENGO, INC., WAGE AND HOUR CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE OF CLAIMS VERENGO, INC., WAGE AND HOUR CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE OF CLAIMS This Settlement Agreement and Release of Claims ( Settlement Agreement ) is entered into by and between Defendant Verengo,

More information

~INAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

~INAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE Case 1:12-cv-06677-JSR Document 110 Filed 06/29/15 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK EDWARD ZYBURO, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, NCSPLUS

More information

Case 3:11-cv-00545-RCJ-WGC Document 96 Filed 12/18/14 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Case 3:11-cv-00545-RCJ-WGC Document 96 Filed 12/18/14 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA Case 3:11-cv-00545-RCJ-WGC Document 96 Filed 12/18/14 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA HOWARD L. HOWELL, Lead Plaintiff, ELLISA PANCOE, Individually and on Behalf of All Others

More information

Case 1:12-cv-01203-VEC Document 206 Filed 10/15/15 Page 1 of 10 USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #:

Case 1:12-cv-01203-VEC Document 206 Filed 10/15/15 Page 1 of 10 USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: Case 1:12-cv-01203-VEC Document 206 Filed 10/15/15 Page 1 of 10 USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: DATE FILED: 10/15/2015 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK CITY OF

More information

AGREEMENT WITH FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT SERVICES FOR

AGREEMENT WITH FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT SERVICES FOR AGREEMENT WITH FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT SERVICES FOR This Agreement, made and entered into this day of,, by and between the CITY OF SAN MATEO, a municipal corporation existing under the laws of the

More information

United States District Court for the Southern District of California Case No. 11-md-2286 MMA (MDD)

United States District Court for the Southern District of California Case No. 11-md-2286 MMA (MDD) NOTICE AND FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ( FAQ ) NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT IN RE: MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC., TELEPHONE CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT LITIGATION United States District Court

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA VERA WILLNER, ET AL. V. MANPOWER INC., CASE NO. 3:11-CV-02846-JST (MEJ)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA VERA WILLNER, ET AL. V. MANPOWER INC., CASE NO. 3:11-CV-02846-JST (MEJ) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA VERA WILLNER, ET AL. V. MANPOWER INC., CASE NO. 3:11-CV-02846-JST (MEJ) IMPORTANT: You are not being sued. Please read this Notice carefully.

More information

Case 2:10-cv-02847-IPJ Document 292 Filed 05/27/15 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case 2:10-cv-02847-IPJ Document 292 Filed 05/27/15 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION Case 2:10-cv-02847-IPJ Document 292 Filed 05/27/15 Page 1 of 12 FILED 2015 May-27 AM 10:35 U.S. DISTRICT COURT N.D. OF ALABAMA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION

More information

OFFICIAL COURT NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT

OFFICIAL COURT NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT OFFICIAL COURT NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT KELLY MINICH AND DEBBIE MINICH, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Superior Court of California, County of San Diego v. Plaintiffs, Case No.

More information

Sample Settlement Agreement and Release for an Employment Law Claim

Sample Settlement Agreement and Release for an Employment Law Claim Sample Settlement Agreement and Release for an Employment Law Claim As submitted to the Missouri Bar Association Labor and Employment Law Committee October 2004 Drafted by a Committee working group comprised

More information

, and which are the basis for an action

, and which are the basis for an action SAMPLE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE FOR AN Eh4PLOYMENT LAW CLAIM This Settlement Agreement and Release ("Agreement") is made and entered into by and between (hereinafter referred to as "Claimant")

More information

Interactive Brokers Hong Kong Agreement for Advisors Providing Services to Interactive Brokers Clients

Interactive Brokers Hong Kong Agreement for Advisors Providing Services to Interactive Brokers Clients Interactive Brokers Hong Kong Agreement for Advisors Providing Services to Interactive Brokers Clients This Agreement is entered into between Interactive Brokers Hong Kong Ltd ("IB") and the undersigned

More information

PRODUCT SALES AGREEMENT

PRODUCT SALES AGREEMENT PRODUCT SALES AGREEMENT This Product Sales Agreement (this Agreement ) is made as of the day of, 201, by and between Georgia Tech Applied Research Corporation, a Georgia non-profit corporation ( Seller

More information

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE Must Be Postmarked No Later Than November 6, 2015 In re Delcath Systems, Inc Securities Litigation c/o Garden City Group, LLC PO Box 10189 Dublin, OH 43017-3189 1-888-470-0243 wwwdelcathsecuritieslitigationcom

More information

Case 8:13-cv-00662-GJH Document 71 Filed 12/02/14 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MARYLAND

Case 8:13-cv-00662-GJH Document 71 Filed 12/02/14 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MARYLAND Case 8:13-cv-00662-GJH Document 71 Filed 12/02/14 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MARYLAND JAY CLOGG REALTY GROUP, INC., Plaintiff vs. BURGER KING CORPORATION CIVIL ACTION NO. 13-cv-00662

More information

QUESTIONS? CALL 1 (844) 322-8152 OR VISIT WWW.SPARKEMAILSETTLEMENT.COM 1

QUESTIONS? CALL 1 (844) 322-8152 OR VISIT WWW.SPARKEMAILSETTLEMENT.COM 1 Notice of Settlement And Hearing Date for Court Approval Kristina Kirby, et al. v. Spark Networks, Inc., et al., Civil Case No. BC493892 Superior Court of the State of California, County of Los Angeles

More information

LEGAL NOTICE BY ORDER OF THE COURT

LEGAL NOTICE BY ORDER OF THE COURT LEGAL NOTICE BY ORDER OF THE COURT IF YOU USED A CHECK PROVIDED BY CAPITAL ONE TO TRANSFER A BALANCE ON YOUR CAPITAL ONE CREDIT CARD ACCOUNT IN APRIL OR MAY 2009, YOU MAY BE ENTITLED TO BENEFITS UNDER

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA BEHZAD MOUSAI, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, vs. Plaintiffs, CLASS/COLLECTIVE ACTION Case No. C 06-01993 SI NOTICE

More information

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. This settlement agreement and the annexed exhibits (the Settlement Agreement ) is

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. This settlement agreement and the annexed exhibits (the Settlement Agreement ) is SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF WESTCHESTER ------------------------------------------------------------------------X VINCENT J. EMILIO, on behalf of himself : and all others similarly

More information

CLASS SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. action brought under California Business and Professions Code section 17200 against Apollo

CLASS SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. action brought under California Business and Professions Code section 17200 against Apollo CLASS SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT This is an agreement to settle portions of a class action lawsuit and a representative group action brought under California Business and Professions Code section 17200 against

More information

NEW YORK NY GENERAL OBLIGATIONS LAW 5-1701 5-1709 TITLE 17 STRUCTURED SETTLEMENT PROTECTION ACT

NEW YORK NY GENERAL OBLIGATIONS LAW 5-1701 5-1709 TITLE 17 STRUCTURED SETTLEMENT PROTECTION ACT NEW YORK NY GENERAL OBLIGATIONS LAW 5-1701 5-1709 TITLE 17 STRUCTURED SETTLEMENT PROTECTION ACT 5-1701. Definitions. For purposes of this title: a. "Annuity issuer" means an insurer that has issued an

More information

Case 3:06-cv-00701-MJR-DGW Document 500 Filed 04/30/15 Page 1 of 15 Page ID #13368

Case 3:06-cv-00701-MJR-DGW Document 500 Filed 04/30/15 Page 1 of 15 Page ID #13368 Case 3:06-cv-00701-MJR-DGW Document 500 Filed 04/30/15 Page 1 of 15 Page ID #13368 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS ANTHONY ABBOTT, et al., ) ) No: 06-701-MJR-DGW

More information

NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION, FAIRNESS HEARING, AND RIGHT TO APPEAR IMPORTANT NEW INFORMATION READ CAREFULLY AND DO NOT DISCARD

NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION, FAIRNESS HEARING, AND RIGHT TO APPEAR IMPORTANT NEW INFORMATION READ CAREFULLY AND DO NOT DISCARD UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION, FAIRNESS HEARING, AND RIGHT TO APPEAR IMPORTANT NEW INFORMATION READ CAREFULLY AND DO

More information

U.S. BANK CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT

U.S. BANK CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT U.S. BANK CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT If you are or were employed by U.S. BANK, N.A. as an In-Store Banker 1, In-Store Banker 2, Senior In-Store Banker 1, and/or Senior In-Store Banker 2 at In-Store

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case 2:03-cv-01500-KOB -TMP Document 1718 Filed 07/26/10 Page 1 of 9 FILED 2010 Jul-26 PM 02:01 U.S. DISTRICT COURT N.D. OF ALABAMA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION

More information

ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE Case 3:07-cv-01886-JAG-SCC Document 473 Filed 06/10/13 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO SAMUEL HILDENBRAND, On Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly

More information

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM. Blitz v. AgFeed Industries, Inc. c/o Claims Administrator PO Box 3207 Portland, OR 97208-3207 Tel: 800-625-7675

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM. Blitz v. AgFeed Industries, Inc. c/o Claims Administrator PO Box 3207 Portland, OR 97208-3207 Tel: 800-625-7675 Blitz v. AgFeed Industries, Inc. c/o Claims Administrator PO Box 3207 Portland, OR 97208-3207 A. GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS & INFORMATION PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM 1. You are urged to read carefully the

More information

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF PHYSICS AND JEFF SCHMIDT

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF PHYSICS AND JEFF SCHMIDT SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF PHYSICS AND JEFF SCHMIDT THIS SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT ( Agreement ) is made and entered into as of February 20, 2006, by and between the American Institute

More information

NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, PROPOSED PARTIAL SETTLEMENT, AND HEARING DATE FOR COURT APPROVAL

NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, PROPOSED PARTIAL SETTLEMENT, AND HEARING DATE FOR COURT APPROVAL IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR FLAGLER COUNTY, FLORIDA WILLIAM G. MAYFIELD, on behalf of himself and all other persons similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. CASE NO. 2009-CA-002245

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION DR. WILLIAM P. GRESS and AL AND PO ) CORPORATION, on behalf of plaintiffs and ) the class members defined herein,

More information

How To Settle A Lawsuit Against The City Of Naperville

How To Settle A Lawsuit Against The City Of Naperville SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE THIS SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE is hereby entered into as of the 3 rd day of September 2015, by and between MALIA KIM BENDIS ( PLAINTIFF ) and SERGEANT NICK LIBERIO,

More information

Case: 1:12-cv-10064 Document #: 137 Filed: 07/29/14 Page 1 of 11 PageID #:1365

Case: 1:12-cv-10064 Document #: 137 Filed: 07/29/14 Page 1 of 11 PageID #:1365 Case: 1:12-cv-10064 Document #: 137 Filed: 07/29/14 Page 1 of 11 PageID #:1365 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION IN RE CAPITAL ONE TELEPHONE CONSUMER

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA 1 1 In re LONGS DRUG STORES CORP. SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION This Document Relates To: ALL ACTIONS. Lead Case No. C-0-0 CLASS ACTION FINAL JUDGMENT

More information

State of California Department of Corporations

State of California Department of Corporations STATE OF CALIFORNIA BUSINESS, TRANSPORTATION AND HOUSING AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF CORPORATIONS Allied Cash Advance California, LLC dba Allied Cash Advance File # 0- and 0 locations NW th Street, Suite 00 Doral,

More information

STATE OF NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND INDUSTRY DIVISION OF MORTGAGE LENDING * * * STIPULATED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

STATE OF NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND INDUSTRY DIVISION OF MORTGAGE LENDING * * * STIPULATED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT STATE OF NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND INDUSTRY DIVISION OF MORTGAGE LENDING In re: J.H.S. Moxie Corp., and Jacqueline O Shaughnessy, Respondent. * * * STIPULATED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT 1 STIPULATED

More information

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT Mirkarimi v. Nevada Property 1 LLC dba The Cosmopolitan of Las Vegas S.D. Cal. Case No. 12-cv-02160-BTM (DHB)

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT Mirkarimi v. Nevada Property 1 LLC dba The Cosmopolitan of Las Vegas S.D. Cal. Case No. 12-cv-02160-BTM (DHB) NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT Mirkarimi v. Nevada Property 1 LLC dba The Cosmopolitan of Las Vegas S.D. Cal. Case No. 12-cv-02160-BTM (DHB) PLEASE READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY. THIS NOTICE CONTAINS IMPORTANT

More information

Case 4:08-cv-00507-RP-CFB Document 245 Filed 09/02/15 Page 1 of 10

Case 4:08-cv-00507-RP-CFB Document 245 Filed 09/02/15 Page 1 of 10 Case 4:08-cv-00507-RP-CFB Document 245 Filed 09/02/15 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA CENTRAL DIVISION,etal., Plaintiffs, v. WELLSFARGO&CO.,and WELLSFARGOBANK,N.A.,

More information

Employee Settlement and Release Agreement.

Employee Settlement and Release Agreement. Form: Description: Release: No Disparagement: References: Review by Counsel: Employee Settlement and Release Agreement. This is a sample form agreement for the settlement of any claims by an employee against

More information

PLAN OF ALLOCATION. 1. The definitions set out in the Settlement Agreement, except as modified or defined

PLAN OF ALLOCATION. 1. The definitions set out in the Settlement Agreement, except as modified or defined PLAN OF ALLOCATION THE DEFINED TERMS 1. The definitions set out in the Settlement Agreement, except as modified or defined herein, apply to and are incorporated into this Plan of Allocation: Acquisition

More information

GOODS AND SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PUBLIC POWER AUTHORITY AND COMPANY/CONTRACTOR NAME

GOODS AND SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PUBLIC POWER AUTHORITY AND COMPANY/CONTRACTOR NAME GOODS AND SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PUBLIC POWER AUTHORITY AND COMPANY/CONTRACTOR NAME This GOODS AND SERVICES AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is entered into and effective [DATE], by and

More information

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT November 1, 2010 United States District Court for the Central District of California Krummell, et al. v. North American Company for Life and Health Insurance Case No. CV-08-1509 NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION

More information

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE This Settlement Agreement and Release (the "Settlement Agreement") is made and entered into this day of, 2015, by and between: "Claimant" "Defendant" "Insurer" Recitals

More information

SAMPLE VENDOR AGREEMENT VENDOR # 00000. Sample Vendor, Vendor Title Sample Vendor Company. Evelyn V. Martinez, Executive Director

SAMPLE VENDOR AGREEMENT VENDOR # 00000. Sample Vendor, Vendor Title Sample Vendor Company. Evelyn V. Martinez, Executive Director VENDOR AGREEMENT VENDOR # 00000 TO: FROM: Sample Vendor, Vendor Title Sample Vendor Company Evelyn V. Martinez, Executive Director DATE: SUBJECT: Sample Vendor Project This Agreement, by and between the

More information

Settlement Agreement & Mutual Release

Settlement Agreement & Mutual Release Settlement Agreement & Mutual Release This agreement is useful for completing the renegotiation of a deal perhaps you offer to pay a reduced amount of a long-standing invoice perhaps you have a complex

More information

California Solar Initiative (CSI) Program 2007 Reservation Request Form and Program Contract [follows the second page Reservation Request form]

California Solar Initiative (CSI) Program 2007 Reservation Request Form and Program Contract [follows the second page Reservation Request form] California Solar Initiative (CSI) Program 2007 Reservation Request Form and Program Contract [follows the second page Reservation Request form] CSI CONTRACT TERMS AND CONDITIONS This California Solar Initiative

More information

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM In re Merck & Co., Inc. Vioxx Securities Litigation c/o Epiq Systems P.O. Box 6659 Portland, OR 97228-6659 Toll Free Number: (866) 752-0067 Settlement Website: www.merckvioxxsecuritieslitigation.com Email:

More information

Submit a Valid Claim Form Deadline: February 12, 2016 Ask to be excluded Deadline: November 24, 2015. Object Deadline: November 24, 2015

Submit a Valid Claim Form Deadline: February 12, 2016 Ask to be excluded Deadline: November 24, 2015. Object Deadline: November 24, 2015 NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT California Superior Court, County of Los Angeles IF FIRE INSURANCE EXCHANGE APPLIED DEPRECIATION WHEN CALCULATING A PAYMENT MADE TO YOU ON A PROPERTY LOSS INSURANCE CLAIM,

More information

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND MUTUAL RELEASE RECITALS

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND MUTUAL RELEASE RECITALS SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND MUTUAL RELEASE This Settlement Agreement and Mutual Release (the "Agreement") is made as of December 5, 2007 (the "Effective Date"), by and between RELIABLE HEALTH CARE SERVICES,

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA SETTLEMENT OFFICER INFORMATION: _ Telephone: 1 1 1 1 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA Case No: RELEASE AND SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT Date: Time: :0 a.m. Case Assigned

More information

REQUEST FOR EXCLUSION FROM SETTLEMENT. JENKINS V. GOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF THE GREATER EAST BAY, INC., Alameda County Superior Court Case No.

REQUEST FOR EXCLUSION FROM SETTLEMENT. JENKINS V. GOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF THE GREATER EAST BAY, INC., Alameda County Superior Court Case No. JENKINS V GOODWILL SETTLEMENT ADMINISTRATOR C/O RUST CONSULTING, INC. - 4347 PO BOX 2396 FARIBAULT, MN 55021-9096 IMPORTANT LEGAL MATERIALS *Barcode39* -

More information

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND MUTUAL GENERAL RELEASE. This Settlement Agreement and Mutual General Release ( Agreement ) is entered into

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND MUTUAL GENERAL RELEASE. This Settlement Agreement and Mutual General Release ( Agreement ) is entered into SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND MUTUAL GENERAL RELEASE This Settlement Agreement and Mutual General Release ( Agreement ) is entered into by and between George Liberman Enterprises, Inc. ( Liberman ), on one

More information

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM S-8 REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933. Delaware 61-1521161

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM S-8 REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933. Delaware 61-1521161 As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 22, 2008 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 Registration No. 333- FORM S-8 REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE SECURITIES

More information

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT GRECO V. SELECTION MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, INC. San Diego Superior Court Case No. 37-2014-00085074-CU-BT-CTL

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT GRECO V. SELECTION MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, INC. San Diego Superior Court Case No. 37-2014-00085074-CU-BT-CTL NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT GRECO V. SELECTION MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, INC. San Diego Superior Court Case No. 37-2014-00085074-CU-BT-CTL The Superior Court has authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation

More information

HOURLY CONSULTING AGREEMENT

HOURLY CONSULTING AGREEMENT 4245 Kemp Blvd., Suite 1007 Wichita Falls, Texas 76308 HOURLY CONSULTING AGREEMENT This is an agreement between Personal Money Planning ( Advisor ), and ( Client ). By this agreement, Client retains Advisor

More information

In the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia Atlanta Division

In the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia Atlanta Division Case 1:14-cv-02211-AT Document 61-1 Filed 12/28/15 Page 1 of 20 In the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia Atlanta Division Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, Plaintiff,

More information

Terms and Conditions for Tax Services

Terms and Conditions for Tax Services Terms and Conditions for Tax Services In the course of delivering services relating to tax return preparation, tax advisory, and assistance in tax controversy matters, Brady, Martz & Associates, P.C. (we

More information

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT Subject to final approval by the Court, this Settlement Agreement ( Agreement ) is between Araceli Negrete and Carol Phillips ( Plaintiffs ) on the one hand, and Big Heart Pet Brands

More information

MORTGAGE BROKER AGREEMENT

MORTGAGE BROKER AGREEMENT MORTGAGE BROKER AGREEMENT This Mortgage Broker Agreement (the "Agreement") is entered into by and between: ST. CLOUD MORTGAGE, a California Corporation (the "Lender"), and (the "Mortgage Broker") as of

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA CASE 0:11-cv-02781-SRN-JSM Document 604 Filed 04/06/15 Page 1 of 15 ROGER KRUEGER, et al., UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA v. Plaintiffs, No. 11-CV-02781 (SRN/JSM) AMERIPRISE FINANCIAL,

More information

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND GENERAL RELEASE. There is no one size fits all. However, there are some general terms that are usually in the agreement.

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND GENERAL RELEASE. There is no one size fits all. However, there are some general terms that are usually in the agreement. SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND GENERAL RELEASE There is no one size fits all. However, there are some general terms that are usually in the agreement. Payment Terms. Parties should agree on the amount if money

More information

Payroll Services Agreement

Payroll Services Agreement Payroll Services Agreement THIS PAYROLL SERVICES AGREEMENT (the Agreement ) is made and entered into this day of, 20, by and between Susan Arnoldussen, of Accounting Unlimited, LLC (the Payroll Service

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE CHRISTOPHER LEVANOFF; ALISON DIAZ; ANDREW GAXIOLA; JENNA STEED; ROES 1 through 25, inclusive, as individuals and on behalf of all similarly situated

More information

Secretary of the Senate. Chief Clerk of the Assembly. Private Secretary of the Governor

Secretary of the Senate. Chief Clerk of the Assembly. Private Secretary of the Governor Senate Bill No. 510 Passed the Senate September 9, 2009 Secretary of the Senate Passed the Assembly August 24, 2009 Chief Clerk of the Assembly This bill was received by the Governor this day of, 2009,

More information

Case 1:11-md-02290-RGS Document 396 Filed 12/06/13 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:11-md-02290-RGS Document 396 Filed 12/06/13 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS ) ) ) ) ) ) Case 1:11-md-02290-RGS Document 396 Filed 12/06/13 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS IN RE JPMORGAN CHASE MORTGAGE MODIFICATION LITIGATION THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: All

More information

United States District Court, District of Minnesota. Rasschaert v. Frontier Communications Corp. Case No. 11-cv-02963 DWF/JSM

United States District Court, District of Minnesota. Rasschaert v. Frontier Communications Corp. Case No. 11-cv-02963 DWF/JSM United States District Court, District of Minnesota Rasschaert v. Frontier Communications Corp. Case No. 11-cv-02963 DWF/JSM NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, PROPOSED SETTLEMENT, AND HEARING A court

More information

SENATE BILL No. 510 AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY JULY 14, 2009 AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY JUNE 24, 2009 AMENDED IN SENATE MAY 5, 2009 AMENDED IN SENATE APRIL 13, 2009

SENATE BILL No. 510 AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY JULY 14, 2009 AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY JUNE 24, 2009 AMENDED IN SENATE MAY 5, 2009 AMENDED IN SENATE APRIL 13, 2009 AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY JULY, 00 AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY JUNE, 00 AMENDED IN SENATE MAY, 00 AMENDED IN SENATE APRIL, 00 SENATE BILL No. Introduced by Senator Corbett (Coauthor: Assembly Member Tran) February,

More information

COLLABORATION AGREEMENT

COLLABORATION AGREEMENT COLLABORATION AGREEMENT This Collaboration Agreement ( Agreement ) is made by and between Microryza Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company ) and, a Delaware Corporation (the University ) (together with

More information

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM MUST BE POSTMARKED NO LATER THAN DECEMBER 28, 2015 In re Tower Group International, Ltd. Securities Litigation c/o A.B. Data, Ltd. P.O. Box 170500 Milwaukee, WI 53217-8091 1-800-328-6074 www.towersecuritiessettlement.com

More information

SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES If You Bought Mario Badescu Healing Cream or Control Cream At Any Time Since February 15, 2009 You Could Get One or Two $45 Certificates

More information

The two sides disagree on how much money, if any, could have been awarded if Plaintiffs, on behalf of the class, were to prevail at trial.

The two sides disagree on how much money, if any, could have been awarded if Plaintiffs, on behalf of the class, were to prevail at trial. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES If you are a subscriber of Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc. and you, or your dependent, have been diagnosed with an autism spectrum disorder, you could receive

More information

A State Court authorized this Notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer.

A State Court authorized this Notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT Mount v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. d/b/a America s Servicing Company Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles Case No. BC395959 A State Court authorized

More information

NEW YORK, NEW YORK. EXCESS SIPC SURETY BOND (the "Surety Bond")

NEW YORK, NEW YORK. EXCESS SIPC SURETY BOND (the Surety Bond) NEW YORK, NEW YORK Bond No. EXCESS SIPC SURETY BOND (the "Surety Bond") WHEREAS Securities Investor Protection Corporation (hereinafter referred to as "SIPC") has been established pursuant to the Securities

More information

Case 1:09-cv-03701-JPO-JCF Document 362 Filed 08/04/15 Page 1 of 8 : : : : : : EXHIBIT A

Case 1:09-cv-03701-JPO-JCF Document 362 Filed 08/04/15 Page 1 of 8 : : : : : : EXHIBIT A Case 109-cv-03701-JPO-JCF Document 362 Filed 08/04/15 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x FORT WORTH EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT FUND, On Behalf of Itself and All Others Similarly

More information

INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR AGREEMENT

INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR AGREEMENT INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR AGREEMENT This Agreement is hereby entered into between the ESCONDIDO UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT, hereinafter referred to as District, and hereinafter referred to as Contractor.

More information

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS OF THE TRIAL COURT CIVIL ACTION NO. 07-1083-C

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS OF THE TRIAL COURT CIVIL ACTION NO. 07-1083-C COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS WORCESTER, SS. SUPERIOR COURT DEPARTMENT OF THE TRIAL COURT CIVIL ACTION NO. 07-1083-C ) PHILIPPE E. GUT AND GWEN PRATT GUT, ) on behalf of themselves and all ) others similarly

More information

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM A. GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS & INFORMATION PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM 1. You are urged to read carefully the accompanying Notice of Pendency of Class Action and Proposed Settlement, Settlement Fairness

More information

2 of 8 10/18/2012 1:12 PM

2 of 8 10/18/2012 1:12 PM 2 of 8 10/18/2012 1:12 PM Exhibit 10.11 EXECUTION COPY SALARIED EMPLOYEE LIABILITIES ASSUMPTION AGREEMENT This SALARIED EMPLOYEE LIABILITIES ASSUMPTION AGREEMENT ( Agreement ) is made on the 22nd day of

More information

INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR AGREEMENT (ICA)

INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR AGREEMENT (ICA) INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR AGREEMENT (ICA) (This agreement is not a construction contract within the meaning of Civil Code section 2783, and is not an agreement for the provision of construction services within

More information

FINANCIAL RESCUERS, LLC

FINANCIAL RESCUERS, LLC DEBT SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT Financial Rescuers, LLC (hereinafter the Company ), whose address is noted above, and (hereinafter Client ), residing at hereby agree as follows: 1. Client is retaining the Company

More information

09-50026-reg Doc 11627 Filed 04/23/12 Entered 04/23/12 15:12:23 Main Document Pg 1 of 6

09-50026-reg Doc 11627 Filed 04/23/12 Entered 04/23/12 15:12:23 Main Document Pg 1 of 6 09-50026-reg Doc 11627 Filed 04/23/12 Entered 04/23/12 151223 Main Document Pg 1 of 6 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------------x

More information

RULES OF THE TAX APPEAL COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I

RULES OF THE TAX APPEAL COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I RULES OF THE TAX APPEAL COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I (SCRU-13-0005988) Adopted and Promulgated by the Supreme Court of the State of Hawai i As amended March 6, 1981 Effective March 6, 1981 With Further

More information

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE This Settlement Agreement and Release ("Settlement Agreement") is made and entered into as of and on the last date set forth herein below by and between/among: "Plaintiff":

More information

Superior Court of California, County of San Diego Webb v. Allstate Insurance Company Case No. 37-2013-00077708

Superior Court of California, County of San Diego Webb v. Allstate Insurance Company Case No. 37-2013-00077708 Superior Court of California, County of San Diego Webb v. Allstate Insurance Company Case No. 37-2013-00077708 A court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation. This is not a lawsuit against

More information

ATLANTA COMMERCIAL BOARD OF REALTORS, INC. EXCLUSIVE LISTING AGREEMENT FOR SALE OF REAL PROPERTY

ATLANTA COMMERCIAL BOARD OF REALTORS, INC. EXCLUSIVE LISTING AGREEMENT FOR SALE OF REAL PROPERTY ATLANTA COMMERCIAL BOARD OF REALTORS, INC. EXCLUSIVE LISTING AGREEMENT FOR SALE OF REAL PROPERTY THIS EXCLUSIVE LISTING AGREEMENT (this Agreement ), dated, is made and entered into by and between as owner

More information

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE OF CLAIMS

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE OF CLAIMS NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE OF CLAIMS If you are a current or former installation technician of Cable Communications, Inc. and worked in Oregon, please read this Notice carefully.

More information

LEGAL NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

LEGAL NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT LEGAL NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT The Records of Trina Turk reflect that you may be part of the proposed FACTA and/or Song Beverly Settlement Classes described as follows: All individuals

More information

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND FAIRNESS HEARING

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND FAIRNESS HEARING IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF FAYETTE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA X EUGENIA REBAR-TRICH and MICHAEL TRICH, and DAVID PENICH, Plaintiffs, vs. NATIONWIDE AFFINITY INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, NATIONWIDE MUTUAL

More information

Case 1:11-cv-01918-LGS Document 151 Filed 06/08/15 Page 1 of 7 : : : : :

Case 1:11-cv-01918-LGS Document 151 Filed 06/08/15 Page 1 of 7 : : : : : Case 111-cv-01918-LGS Document 151 Filed 06/08/15 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------------- 6/8/15 X In re SHENGDATECH,

More information

The St. Paul Companies, Inc. Securities Litigation. c/o The Garden City Group, Inc.

The St. Paul Companies, Inc. Securities Litigation. c/o The Garden City Group, Inc. Must be Postmarked No Later Than September 12, 2004 PART I: CLAIMANT IDENTIFICATION Claim Number: Control Number: The St. Paul Companies, Inc. Securities Litigation c/o The Garden City Group, Inc. Claims

More information

Author may incur additional charges if the Work is not submitted in a format acceptable to the Publisher.

Author may incur additional charges if the Work is not submitted in a format acceptable to the Publisher. This PUBLISHING AGREEMENT (Agreement) between The Educational Publisher Inc., with offices at 1313 Chesapeake Ave., Columbus, Ohio 43212 (Publisher), and the author (Author) whose name and signature appear

More information